[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (1,184)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = zircon

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
30 pages, 12450 KiB  
Article
The Early Neoproterozoic Andean-Type Orogenic and Within-Plate Magmatic Events in the Northern Margin of the Yangtze Craton during the Convergence of the Rodinia Supercontinent
by Yunxu Wei, Haiquan Li, Wenxiao Zhou, Changqian Ma, Ernest Chi Fru, Daliang Xu, Xin Deng, Mantang Tan, Xiaoming Zhao, Yang Xu and Hao Liu
Minerals 2024, 14(8), 820; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080820 (registering DOI) - 13 Aug 2024
Abstract
Although considered a crucial component of the Rodinia supercontinent, it remains uncertain how the Yangtze craton relates to the accretion and breakup of Rodinia. Here, the Huanglingmiao granitic complex (HGC), an intermediate-acid rock series that intruded on the southern Kongling terrane of the [...] Read more.
Although considered a crucial component of the Rodinia supercontinent, it remains uncertain how the Yangtze craton relates to the accretion and breakup of Rodinia. Here, the Huanglingmiao granitic complex (HGC), an intermediate-acid rock series that intruded on the southern Kongling terrane of the northern Yangtze craton margin, is investigated to help resolve this conundrum. Our analysis indicates that these rocks consist of tonalite, trondhjemite, granodiorite, oligoporphyritic granodiorite, porphyric biotite granodiorite, and fine- to medium-grained granodiorite dyke compositions. Collectively, this assemblage is further subdivided into two categories by their temporal, spatial, and geochemical features into early TTG-like and later granitic–dioritic units, which are composed of tonalite, trondhjemite, granodiorite, porphyritic granodiorite, and the fine- to medium-grained granodiorite dykes, respectively. Zircon U-Pb dating yields ages of 865~850 Ma for the TTG-like rocks, 844~825 Ma for the porphyritic granodiorites, and ~800 Ma for the granodiorite dykes. Combined with geochemical evidence, the data suggest that the early- and late-series rocks were formed by a partial melting of Mesoproterozoic and Paleoproterozoic crustal materials, respectively, suggesting that the vertical layering of the crust controlled the composition of the independent units. In addition, isotopic evidence points to different sources for the various rocks in the Kongling terrane and that mantle-derived materials influenced the early-series lithologies. Combined with previous studies on the northern margin of the Yangtze craton, it is inferred that the early-series rocks formed in an active continental margin environment, while the late-series rocks display within-plate boundary formation characteristics. The multiple magmatic activities revealed by this study record sequential partial melting with tectonic transition characteristics from an Andean-type to within-plate magmatism in the northern margin of the Yangtze craton. Taken together, these observations point to a strong association between these rocks, convergence, and incorporation of the northern Yangtze craton margin into the Rodinia supercontinent during the Tonian Period. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) A remote-sensing image of the South China craton and adjacent areas; (<b>b</b>) the distribution of Precambrian rocks in the Yangtze craton and Neoproterozoic tectonic framework. Modified after Zhao and Cawood [<a href="#B11-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">11</a>] and Peng and Kusky [<a href="#B23-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">23</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geological map of the Huanglingmiao granitic complex and the distribution of related rocks in southern Kongling [<a href="#B27-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B47-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">47</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Field photographs and photomicrographs of the units that make up the Huanglingmiao granitic complex. (<b>a</b>) The Luxiping trondhjemite; (<b>b</b>) the Yingzizui granodiorite intruding into the Luxiping trondhjemite; (<b>c</b>) the Maopingtuo oligoporphyritic granodiorite intruding into the Yingzizui granodiorite; (<b>d</b>) the Neikou porphyric granodiorite intruding into the Maopingtuo oligoporphyritic granodiorite; (<b>e</b>) a few quartz phenocrysts in the Maopingtuo oligoporphyritic granodiorite; (<b>f</b>) the zonal K-feldspar phenocryst in the Neikou porphyric granodiorite; (<b>g</b>–<b>l</b>) photomicrographs for panel’s a-f, respectively. Qtz = quartzite; Bt = biotite; Kfs = K-feldspar; and Pl = plagioclase.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>CL images of the representative zircon grains and zircon U-Pb-associated age diagrams (small spots represent the locations of U-Pb analyses, and large spots represent locations of the Lu-Hf analyses).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Harker diagrams of the selected major elements (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) and Mg<sup>#</sup> (<b>f</b>) vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> contents for the Neoproterozoic Huanglingmiao granitic complex. The red lines display the relations of the early series for the Huanglingmiao granitic complex.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Geochemical discriminations for the Hbl-rich diorite and monzogranite. (<b>a</b>) Q A-P (after Streckeisen [<a href="#B71-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">71</a>]), (<b>b</b>) Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O-SiO<sub>2</sub> (after Le Maitre, Streckeisen [<a href="#B72-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">72</a>]), (<b>c</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O-SiO<sub>2</sub> (after Peccerillo and Taylor [<a href="#B73-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">73</a>]), (<b>d</b>) A/NK-A/CNK (after Maniar and Piccoli [<a href="#B74-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">74</a>]). A/NK = Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O) (mol), A/CNK = Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(CaO + Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O) (mol). The red lines display the relations of the early series for the Huanglingmiao granitic complex.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE distribution patterns for the Huanglingmiao granitic complex and (<b>b</b>) primitive mantle-normalized trace elements for the Huanglingmiao granitic complex. The chondrite-normalized values and mantle values are from Sun and McDonough [<a href="#B75-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">75</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The Lu-Hf isotope data plotted on a histogram. (<b>a</b>) Histogram for ε<sub>Hf</sub>(t), (<b>b</b>) histogram for T<sub>DM1</sub>, and (<b>c</b>) histogram for T<sub>DM2</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Hf isotope evolution diagram. (<b>a</b>) ε<sub>Hf</sub>(t)-zircon age and (<b>b</b>)<sup>176</sup>Hf/<sup>176</sup>Hf-zircon age. Data sources: Peng, Wu [<a href="#B22-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">22</a>], Zhao, Zhou [<a href="#B26-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">26</a>], Zhao, Zhou [<a href="#B27-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">27</a>], Gao, Ling [<a href="#B35-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">35</a>], Gao, Yang [<a href="#B36-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">36</a>], Guo, Gao [<a href="#B37-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">37</a>], Li, Zhou [<a href="#B39-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">39</a>], Qiu, Ling [<a href="#B58-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">58</a>], Xiong, Zheng [<a href="#B92-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">92</a>], Chen, Gao [<a href="#B93-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">93</a>], Guo, Zheng [<a href="#B94-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">94</a>], Guo, Zheng [<a href="#B95-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">95</a>], Wei, Zhou [<a href="#B96-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">96</a>], Zhang, Zheng [<a href="#B97-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">97</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Sr-Nd isotopic Harker diagrams of the HGC. (<b>a</b>) <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup> Sr-zircon age, (<b>b</b>) <sup>143</sup>Nd/<sup>144</sup>Nd-<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup> Sr, and (<b>c</b>) ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t)-ε<sub>Sr</sub>(t).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Discrimination diagrams for granite rock types. (<b>a</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O + Na<sub>2</sub>O/CaO-Zr + Nb + Ce + Y (after Whalen, Currie [<a href="#B31-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">31</a>]); (<b>b</b>) Na<sub>2</sub>O-K<sub>2</sub>O; (<b>c</b>) Q-A-P diagram (after Lameyre and Bowden [<a href="#B98-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">98</a>]); (<b>d</b>) Zr-SiO<sub>2</sub>; (<b>e</b>) Zr-SiO<sub>2</sub>; and (<b>f</b>) Ce-SiO<sub>2</sub> (<b>b</b>, <b>e</b>, and <b>f</b> after Collins, Beams [<a href="#B99-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">99</a>]). The red lines display the relations of the early series for the Huanglingmiao granitic complex.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The genetic types and evolution relationships of the Huanglingmiao granitic complex. (<b>a</b>) Zr/Sm-Th/La. (<b>b</b>) La/Sm-La. (<b>c</b>) Th/La-SiO<sub>2</sub>. High Th/La ratios in the magmatic rocks indicate relatively large contributions from sedimentary source rocks. ‘A’ indicates a partial melting of sediment-dominated crustal sources and ‘B’ indicates a partial melting of mafic crustal sources. (<b>d</b>) Sr/Y-La/Yb. F1 indicates the adakitic melts derived from eclogitic rocks in the garnet stability field with little or no plagioclase. F2 indicates the crustal melts in the stability field for both plagioclase and garnet. F3 indicates the crustal melts in the stability field for plagioclase with little or no garnet present. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) After Du, Long [<a href="#B105-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">105</a>]; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) after Wang, Xue [<a href="#B106-minerals-14-00820" class="html-bibr">106</a>]. The red (later series) and blue (early series) lines display the evolution relations of the different series for the Huanglingmiao granitic complex.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Schematic diagrams showing the tectonic processes of the Kongling terrane (no scale). (<b>a</b>) Early stage involving a partial melting of the lower crust. (<b>b</b>) Late stage involving a partial melting of the upper crust.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 9251 KiB  
Article
Petrogenesis of Carboniferous-Permian Granitoids in the Kumishi Area of Tianshan, China: Insights into the Geodynamic Evolution Triggered by Subduction and Closure of the South Tianshan Ocean
by Wenbin Kang, Kai Weng, Kai Cao, Xiaojian Zhao and Yongwei Gao
Minerals 2024, 14(8), 811; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080811 (registering DOI) - 11 Aug 2024
Viewed by 246
Abstract
Late Carboniferous–Early Permian granitoids are widespread in the Tianshan area and their tectonic setting is controversially discussed. Our research presents fresh whole-rock geochemical and Pb isotopic data, along with zircon U-Pb ages and Hf isotopic data for representative monzonitic and granitic intrusions in [...] Read more.
Late Carboniferous–Early Permian granitoids are widespread in the Tianshan area and their tectonic setting is controversially discussed. Our research presents fresh whole-rock geochemical and Pb isotopic data, along with zircon U-Pb ages and Hf isotopic data for representative monzonitic and granitic intrusions in the Kumishi area. The aim is to decipher their magma sources and illuminate their geodynamic evolution. Zircon U-Pb dating results reveal that biotite monzonites in the Central Tianshan Belt were emplaced at 312.7 ± 2.9 Ma, while the quartz-monzonites and syenogranites in the South Tianshan Belt were formed at 284.5 ± 2.4 Ma and 283.4 ± 3.9 Ma, respectively. The biotite monzonites generally exhibit metaluminous and high-K calc-alkaline characteristics. They have a positive εHf(t) value (+4.9–+14.1), and are enriched in LREEs and LILEs but depleted in HREEs and HFSEs. These characteristics indicate that they were derived from a mixed magma source of the lower crust and the input of components derived from the mantle wedge above the subduction zone. The quartz-monzonites and syenogranites are high-K calc-alkaline to shoshonitic I-type granites, with εHf(t) values of +14.9–+15.5 and +6.6–+14.9, respectively. They are enriched in LREEs but depleted in HFSEs (e.g., Nb, Ta, and Ti), displaying relatively flat HREE patterns and negative Eu anomalies. The genesis of these rocks is attributed to a partial melting of the lower crust in which mantle-derived magmas participated, which was triggered by an upwelling asthenosphere in a post-collisional extensional geodynamic setting. These granitoids, together with regional analysis of other magmatism in the study area, suggest that the Kumishi area has experienced an evolution from subduction to post-collision from the Late Carboniferous to the Early Permian, which constrains the local closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metallogenesis of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Simplified tectonic map of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (modified after Wang [<a href="#B34-minerals-14-00811" class="html-bibr">34</a>]). (<b>b</b>) Tectonic sketch map of the North Xinjiang (after Xiao [<a href="#B26-minerals-14-00811" class="html-bibr">26</a>]). (<b>c</b>) Geological map of the Kumishi area with the sampling locations and distribution of Carboniferous–Permian magmatic rocks, see <a href="#app1-minerals-14-00811" class="html-app">Table S1</a> for details (modified after Dong [<a href="#B29-minerals-14-00811" class="html-bibr">29</a>]). AQK Fm.—Lower Permian Aqikebulake Formation, DKE Fm.—Middle Carboniferous Dikaner Formation, YMS Fm.—Lower Carboniferous Yamansu Formation, MAQ Fm.—Lowermost Carboniferous Maanqiao Formation, AEB Fm.—Lower Devonian Arbishimibulake Formation, MSG Fm.—Silurian Mishigou Formation, AHB Fm.—Silurian Ahabulake Formation, KKN Fm.—Ordovician Kekenaike Formation, BLT Gr.—Proterozoic Baluntai Group.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) Field and microscopic photos of the monzonitic and granitic intrusions in the Kumishi area. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) The biotite monzonite; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) the quartz-monzonitic pluton; (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) the syenogranitic pluton. Mineral abbreviations: Qtz = quartz, Pl = plagioclase, Bt = biotite, Kfs = K-feldspar. Cross-polarized light.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>U-Pb concordia diagrams and CL images of zircon grains for the granitoids in the Kumishi area. (<b>a</b>)18ZB–44 for biotite monzonite; (<b>b</b>) 18ZB–35 for quartz-monzonite; (<b>c</b>) 18ZB–24 for syenogranite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Major element diagrams for the granitoids in the Kumishi area. (<b>a</b>) Total alkali (wt.%) vs. silica diagram (wt.%) [<a href="#B63-minerals-14-00811" class="html-bibr">63</a>]; the alkaline and sub-alkaline division is after Irvine and Baragar [<a href="#B64-minerals-14-00811" class="html-bibr">64</a>]. (<b>b</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O (wt.%) vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> (wt.%) (after Peccerillo and Taylor [<a href="#B65-minerals-14-00811" class="html-bibr">65</a>] and Calanchi [<a href="#B66-minerals-14-00811" class="html-bibr">66</a>]). (<b>c</b>) ANK vs. ACNK diagram [<a href="#B67-minerals-14-00811" class="html-bibr">67</a>] (data for compiled magmatic rocks are listed in <a href="#app1-minerals-14-00811" class="html-app">Table S2</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) Chondrite-normalized rare earth element (REE) patterns and (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) primitive mantle-normalized multielement variation diagrams for the granitoids in the Kumishi area. The chondrite values and primitive mantle values are after Taylor and McLennan [<a href="#B68-minerals-14-00811" class="html-bibr">68</a>] and Sun and McDonough [<a href="#B62-minerals-14-00811" class="html-bibr">62</a>], respectively (data for compiled magmatic rocks are listed in <a href="#app1-minerals-14-00811" class="html-app">Table S2</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Harker diagrams of selected elements vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> for granitic rocks in the Kumishi area. (<b>a</b>) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, (<b>b</b>) CaO, (<b>c</b>) FeOt, (<b>d</b>) MgO, (<b>e</b>) MnO, (<b>f</b>) TiO<sub>2</sub>, (<b>g</b>) P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, (<b>h</b>) Rb, and (<b>i</b>) Sr.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Age versus ε<sub>Hf</sub>(<span class="html-italic">t</span>) diagram (data for compiled magmatic rocks are listed in <a href="#app1-minerals-14-00811" class="html-app">Table S3</a>), and (<b>b</b>) <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb versus <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Discrimination diagrams of A-type granites from I- and S-type granites (data for compiled magmatic rocks are listed in <a href="#app1-minerals-14-00811" class="html-app">Table S2</a>) [<a href="#B79-minerals-14-00811" class="html-bibr">79</a>]. FG, fractionated granites; OGT, unfractionated granites. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) FeO<sup>T</sup>/MgO, Zr, Ce and Y vs. 10,000*Ga/Al; (<b>e</b>–<b>f</b>) FeO<sup>T</sup>/MgO and (Na<sub>2</sub>O+K<sub>2</sub>O)/CaO vs. Zr+Nb+Ce+Y.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Trace element variation diagrams for the granitic rocks in the Kumishi area. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Variations of Th and Y vs. Rb, respectively, from Chappell and White [<a href="#B84-minerals-14-00811" class="html-bibr">84</a>], (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) variations of Sr vs. Ba and Rb, respectively, (<b>e</b>) variations of La vs. (La/Yb)<sub>N</sub> (modified after Wu [<a href="#B85-minerals-14-00811" class="html-bibr">85</a>]), and (<b>f</b>) variations of Th vs. V.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Tectonic discrimination diagrams of the igneous rocks in the Kumishi area of (<b>a</b>) Y v. Nb, (<b>b</b>) Y + Nb v. Rb, (c) Yb v. Ta, and (<b>d</b>) Yb + Ta v. Rb [<a href="#B98-minerals-14-00811" class="html-bibr">98</a>] (data for compiled magmatic rocks are listed in <a href="#app1-minerals-14-00811" class="html-app">Table S2</a>). syn-COLG, syn-collisional granites; ORG, ocean ridge granites; VAG, volcanic arc granite; WPG, within-plate granite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Schematic tectonic evolution of subduction of the South Tianshan Ocean beneath the CTB.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 3559 KiB  
Article
Encoding CO2 Adsorption in Sodium Zirconate by Neutron Diffraction
by Connor Gammie, Fabian Hesse, Blair Kennedy, Jan-Willem G. Bos and Aimaro Sanna
Molecules 2024, 29(16), 3798; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29163798 - 10 Aug 2024
Viewed by 183
Abstract
Recent research into sodium zirconate as a high-temperature CO2 sorbent has been extensive, but detailed knowledge of the material’s crystal structure during synthesis and carbon dioxide uptake remains limited. This study employs neutron diffraction (ND), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) [...] Read more.
Recent research into sodium zirconate as a high-temperature CO2 sorbent has been extensive, but detailed knowledge of the material’s crystal structure during synthesis and carbon dioxide uptake remains limited. This study employs neutron diffraction (ND), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) to explore these aspects. An improved synthesis method, involving the pre-drying and ball milling of raw materials, produced pure samples with average crystal sizes of 37–48 nm in the monoclinic phase. However, using a slower heating rate (1 °C/min) decreased the purity. Despite this, the 1 °C/min rate resulted in the highest CO2 uptake capacity (4.32 mmol CO2/g Na2ZrO3) and CO2 sorption rate (0.0017 mmol CO2/g) after 5 min at 700 °C. This was attributed to a larger presence of microstructure defects that facilitate Na diffusion from the core to the shell of the particles. An ND analysis showed that the conversion of Na2ZrO3 was complete under the studied conditions and that CO2 concentration significantly impacts the rate of CO2 absorption. The TGA results indicated that the reaction rate during CO2 sorption remained steady until full conversion due to the absorptive nature of the chemisorption process. During the sorbent reforming step, ND revealed the disappearance of Na2O and ZrO2 as the zirconate phase reformed. However, trace amounts of Na2CO3 and ZrO2 remained after the cycles. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>XRD results for original and improved synthesis methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>TEM of ISM—1 °C/min.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>ISM—1 °C/min—neutron diffraction results from exposure to different gases. Readings taken each 5 min in presence of pure CO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Sodium zirconate—10 °C/min—neutron diffraction results from heating from room temperature to 900 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Unit cell volume change with temperature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Sodium zirconate—10 °C/min—ND in presence of 10% CO<sub>2</sub> (balance with N<sub>2</sub>). Readings each 20 min.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Sodium zirconate—10 °C/min—ND in presence of 50% CO<sub>2</sub> (balance with N<sub>2</sub>). Readings taken each 5 min.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of sodium zirconate (1) before carbonation and (2) after reformation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>TGA and DTG Analysis of the ISM samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Synthesised sodium zirconate from original (<b>left</b>) [<a href="#B17-molecules-29-03798" class="html-bibr">17</a>] and improved (<b>right</b>) methods at 10 °C/min.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 31392 KiB  
Article
Involvement of the Northeastern Margin of South China Block in Rodinia Supercontinent Evolution: A Case Study of Neoproterozoic Granitic Gneiss in Rizhao Area, Shandong Province
by Xiaolong He, Zeyu Yang, Kai Liu, Wei Zhu, Honglei Zhan, Peng Yang, Tongzheng Wei, Shuxun Wang and Yaoyao Zhang
Minerals 2024, 14(8), 807; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080807 (registering DOI) - 9 Aug 2024
Viewed by 290
Abstract
The South China Plate is an important part of the Rodinia supercontinent in the Neoproterozoic. The Rizhao area, located on the northeastern margin of the South China Plate, records multiple periods of magmatism, among which Neoproterozoic granitic gneiss is of great significance to [...] Read more.
The South China Plate is an important part of the Rodinia supercontinent in the Neoproterozoic. The Rizhao area, located on the northeastern margin of the South China Plate, records multiple periods of magmatism, among which Neoproterozoic granitic gneiss is of great significance to the tectonic evolution of the South China Block. In this study, systematic petrology, geochemistry, isotopic chronology, and zircon Hf isotopic analyses were carried out on gneisses samples of biotite alkali feldspar granitic and biotite monzogranitic compositions in the Rizhao area. Geochemical analyses suggest that these granitic rocks belong to the sub-alkaline series and have high potassium contents. They are enriched in large-ion lithophile elements K, Rb, and Ba; depleted in high field strength elements P, Nb, and Ti; enriched in light rare earth elements and moderately depleted in heavy rare earth elements; and have weak to moderate negative Eu anomalies and weak negative Ce anomalies. These rocks are post-orogenic A-type granites. LA-MC-ICP-MS U-Pb dating of zircons from two biotite alkali-feldspar granitic gneiss samples yielded weighted mean ages of 785 ± 8 Ma (MSWD = 3.0) and 784 ± 6Ma (MSWD = 1.5), respectively, and a biotite monzogranitic gneiss sample yielded a weighted mean age of 789 ± 6 Ma (MSWD = 2.3). Lu-Hf isotopic analyses on zircon grains from the two types of Neoproterozoic-aged gneisses yielded negative εHf(t) values ranging from −19.3 to −8.8 and from −18.3 to −10.4, respectively, and the corresponding two-stage Hf model age ranges are 2848–3776 Ma and 2983–3682 Ma, respectively. These granites are the product of Neoproterozoic magmatic activity and are mainly derived from the partial melting of Archean continental crust. Combining the geochemical characteristics and zircon U-Pb-Lu-Hf isotopic analyses, these A-type granitic gneisses appear to have formed in an intracontinental rift extension environment during the initial break-up of the Rodinia supercontinent, as part of the supercontinent break-up process at the northeastern margin of the South China Block. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geological map of the Rizhao area of the South China Block. (<b>a</b>) The inset modified from [<a href="#B15-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">15</a>] shows the location of the South China Block. (<b>b</b>) Tectonic sketch map of the Rizhao and adjacent areas, modified from [<a href="#B16-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">16</a>]. Abbreviations: UHP = ultra-high-pressure; HP = high-pressure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simplified geological map of the Rizhao area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Field photographs and photomicrographs of the Rizhao granitic gneisses: (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) porphyritic biotite alkali feldspar granitic gneiss; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) porphyritic biotite alkali feldspar granitic gneiss; (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) porphyritic biotite monzogranitic gneiss; (<b>j</b>–<b>l</b>) medium-fine-grained biotite monzogranitic gneiss. Abbreviations: Qtz = quartz; Bt = biotite; Pl = plagioclase; Kfs = K-feldspar; Amp = amphibolite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Total-alkali-silica (TAS) diagram [<a href="#B22-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">22</a>]; (<b>b</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O–SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram ([<a href="#B23-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">23</a>] for the Rizhao granitic gneisses).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE and (<b>b</b>) N-MORB-normalized trace element patterns of the Rizhao granitic gneisses (normalizing factors are from [<a href="#B24-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">24</a>]; N-MORB compositions are from [<a href="#B24-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">24</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Zircon cathodoluminescence (CL) images and U–Pb concordia diagrams of the Rizhao granitic gneisses: (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) RZ07, (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) RZ30, and (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) RZ47.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Plots of zircon <span class="html-italic">ε</span>Hf<sub>(<span class="html-italic">t</span>)</sub> values versus U-Pb ages of the Rizhao granitic gneisses (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), and (<b>a</b>) is modified after [<a href="#B29-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Discrimination plots for magmatic, metamorphic, and hydrothermal zircon according to [<a href="#B30-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B51-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">51</a>]. (<b>a</b>) zircon Th–U plot; (<b>b</b>) zircon LREE–REE plot; (<b>c</b>) zircon (Sm/La)<sub>N</sub>–La plot; (<b>d</b>) zircon (Ce/Ce*)<sub>N</sub>–(Sm/La)<sub>N</sub> plot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Genetic discrimination diagrams for the Rizhao granitic gneisses according to [<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">48</a>,<a href="#B50-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">50</a>,<a href="#B52-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">52</a>]. (<b>a</b>) Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O–10,000 Ga/Al discrimination diagram; (<b>b</b>) TiO<sub>2</sub>–SiO<sub>2</sub> discrimination diagram; (<b>c</b>) Nb–Y–3Ga triangular discrimination diagram; (<b>d</b>) Nb–Y–Ce triangular discrimination diagram. Abbreviation: RRG = rift-related granites; CEUG = continental uplift-related granites; A1 = A1-type granites; A2 = A2-type granites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Tectonic discrimination diagrams [<a href="#B52-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">52</a>] for the Rizhao granitic gneisses. (<b>a</b>) Rb–Y+Nb diagram; (<b>b</b>) Nb–Y discrimination diagram. Abbreviation: Syn-COLG = syn-collision granite; VAG = volcanic arc granite; WPG = within plate granite; ORG = ocean ridge granite; Post-COLG = post-collision granite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Simplified genetic model showing the Neoproterozoic tectonic–magmatic evolution in the northeastern margin of Yangtze Plate.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 29396 KiB  
Article
Geochemistry, Mineralogy, and Geochronology of the NYF Pegmatites, Jiaolesayi, Northern Qaidam Basin, China
by Long Zhang, Xianzhi Pei, Yongbao Gao, Zuochen Li, Ming Liu, Yongkang Jing, Yuanwei Wang, Kang Chen, Nan Deng, Yi Zhang and Junwei Wu
Minerals 2024, 14(8), 805; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080805 - 9 Aug 2024
Viewed by 233
Abstract
A significant amount of pegmatite has been discovered on the northwest margin of the Qaidam basin. Among this, the Jiaolesayi pegmatite, located in the northwestern margin of the Quanji Massif (Oulongbuluke micro-continent), shows rare element mineralization potential. Detailed field investigations, along with mineralogical, [...] Read more.
A significant amount of pegmatite has been discovered on the northwest margin of the Qaidam basin. Among this, the Jiaolesayi pegmatite, located in the northwestern margin of the Quanji Massif (Oulongbuluke micro-continent), shows rare element mineralization potential. Detailed field investigations, along with mineralogical, geochemical, and zircon U-Pb geochronological studies, were carried out on the pegmatite. The results show that the Jiaolesayi pegmatite is syenite, without obvious compositional zoning in the outcrop. It exhibits a peraluminous, high-K calc-alkaline nature with strong depletions in Eu, Sr, Ba, Ti, and P, and high contents of Nb, Ta, Y, Ti, U, Th, and heavy rare earth elements (HREEs), which are primarily concentrated in allanite-(Ce), euxenite-(Y), limonite, thorite, and zircon. The geochemical and mineralogical features of the syenite pegmatite indicate it belongs to the euxenite-type in the rare element class (REE) of the NYF family, with the characteristic accessory mineral being euxenite-(Y). Its 10,000 Ga/Al ratios (2.46 to 2.96), Zr + Nb + Ce + Y contents (998 to 6202 ppm), Y/Nb ratios (0.62 to 0.75), and Yb/Ta ratios (0.80 to 1.49) show an affinity with A1-type granite. Zircons from the syenite sample yielded a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 413.6 ± 1.4 Ma, while the elevated U and Th concentrations in the zircons and Th/U ratios (0.04 to 0.16) suggest the possible influence of hydrothermal processes in the late-stage fractional crystallization. In the context of the regional tectonic evolution, the syenite pegmatite may have formed from a basic alkaline magma derived from an OIB-like melt with minor crustal contamination, under the post-collisional extension setting. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>) Location of the study area (based on Google Earth image). (<b>B</b>) Geological map of the northwest margin of Quanji Massif. <a href="#minerals-14-00805-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a> is shown as red rectangle. (<b>C</b>–<b>E</b>) Remote sensing images of pegmatites in Niubiziliang, Dachaigou, and Jiaolesayi (unpublished images from Xi’an Center of China Geological Survey, 2020).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simplified geological map of Jiaolesayi.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Photographs and photomicrographs of pegmatite outcrops and rock samples from Jiaolesayi. (<b>A</b>) Previous reported Nb-Ta deposit, represented by the blue star in <a href="#minerals-14-00805-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>. (<b>B</b>) Newly discovered pegmatite, represented by the green star in <a href="#minerals-14-00805-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>, a person in the yellow circle as a scale. (<b>C</b>) Conjugated joints and brittle fractures developed in the flesh-red pegmatite. (<b>D</b>) Graphic structure and magnetite aggregates in the pegmatite. (<b>E</b>) Quartz veins intruded into the brecciated pegmatite. (<b>F</b>) Perthitic texture of perthite under a polarizing microscope. (<b>G</b>,<b>H</b>) Photomicrographs of graphic structure under a polarizing microscope. (<b>I</b>) Pegmatite with sericitization under a polarizing microscope. Abbreviations: Afs—alkali feldspar; Mc—mica; Or—orthoclase; Pl—plagioclase; Pth—perthite; Qz—quartz; Ser—sericite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Classification diagrams for the Jiaolesayi pegmatite. (<b>A</b>) Total alkalis (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O) vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> (TAS) diagram after Middlemost [<a href="#B47-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">47</a>]; (<b>B</b>) (A/NK) vs. (A/CNK) diagram, solid lines are after Peccerillo [<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">48</a>]; (<b>C</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram after Rickwood [<a href="#B49-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">49</a>], and (<b>D</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns. (<b>E</b>) Primitive mantle-normalized trace element spider diagrams for the Jiaolesayi pegmatite samples. Normalizing data for the chondrite and primitive mantle are from Sun and McDonough [<a href="#B50-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">50</a>]. Symbols: green diamond—syenite pegmatite samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>A</b>) Photomicrographs (cross-polarized light) and cathodoluminescence images of all tested zircons from Jiaolesayi pegmatite. (<b>B</b>) U-Pb Concordia diagram of sample D3301-1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Photomicrographs under a reflecting microscope. (<b>A</b>) Typical subhedral euxenite-(Y) grain. (<b>B</b>) Short columnar euxenite-(Y) aggregates. (<b>C</b>) Thorite and anhedral euxenite-(Y). (<b>D</b>) Zircon, euxenite-(Y), and later-formed limonite in between. (<b>E</b>) A partial enlargement of Figure (<b>D</b>). (<b>F</b>) Image (<b>E</b>) in plane-polarized light. (<b>G</b>) An allanite-(Ce) grain. (<b>H</b>,<b>I</b>) Euhedral euxenite-(Y) grains and the EPMA test locations. (<b>J</b>) Limonite pseudomorph with residual pyrite in the core. (<b>K</b>,<b>L</b>) BSE images of euhedral euxenite-(Y) grains. Abbreviations: Aln-(Ce)—allanite-(Ce); Eux—euxenite-(Y); Lm—limonite; Py—pyrite; Thr—thorite; Zr—zircon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>A</b>) Canonical discrimination analysis of AGM and EGM and (<b>B</b>) triangular discriminant graph after Škoda [<a href="#B55-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">55</a>]; (<b>C</b>) FeO*/MgO vs. Zr + Nb + Ce + Y; (<b>D</b>) ternary plot of Nb-Y-Ce after Eby [<a href="#B57-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">57</a>] and (<b>E</b>) Zr vs. 10,000 Ga/Al, A-type granite discrimination diagrams after Whalen [<a href="#B58-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">58</a>]. Symbols: pink squares—AGM, grey squares—EGM from Škoda [<a href="#B55-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">55</a>], orange crosses—EPMA data in this study (<a href="#app1-minerals-14-00805" class="html-app">Supplementary Table S3</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>A</b>) Plots of Nb/Yb vs. Th/Yb, after Wang [<a href="#B78-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">78</a>], and (<b>B</b>) plots of Y/Nb vs. Yb/Ta, after Eby [<a href="#B56-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">56</a>]. Black squares represent the three end-members in the MORB-OIB array. Abbreviations: OIB, oceanic island basalt; IAB, island arc basalt; N-MORB, normal middle oceanic ridge basalt; E-MORB, enriched middle oceanic ridge basalt; A1, A<sub>1</sub> type granite; A2, A<sub>2</sub> type granite.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 7789 KiB  
Article
Geochronology, Petrogenesis, and Metallogenic Implications of Quartz Monzonite Porphyry in the Shanlixu Copper–Gold Deposit in the Lujiang–Chuzhou Area, Middle–Lower Yangtze River Valley Metallogenic Belt, China
by Yang Cai, Cheng Tang, Tao Ma, Ke Shi, Ziteng Li and Siwen Fan
Minerals 2024, 14(8), 798; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080798 - 5 Aug 2024
Viewed by 272
Abstract
The Lujiang–Chuzhou Metallogenic Area is an important component of the Middle–Lower Yangtze River Valley Metallogenic Belt. Despite being an important copper–gold deposit in this area, the Shanlixu skarn Cu-Au deposit has not yet been systematically studied. According to LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating, the [...] Read more.
The Lujiang–Chuzhou Metallogenic Area is an important component of the Middle–Lower Yangtze River Valley Metallogenic Belt. Despite being an important copper–gold deposit in this area, the Shanlixu skarn Cu-Au deposit has not yet been systematically studied. According to LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating, the quartz monzonite porphyry from the Shanlixu deposit is aged 137.5 ± 1.7 Ma: while it differs from the timing of the magmatism and related mineralization in the Lujiang–Chuzhou Area, it is consistent with magmatic activity elsewhere in the Middle–Lower Yangtze River Valley Metallogenic Belt. The Ce4+/Ce3+ values of zircon in the quartz monzonite porphyry vary from 204.5 to 886.5, indicating that the intrusion might have formed in an environment with high oxygen fugacity. Additionally, the quartz monzonite porphyry exhibits high contents of Al2O3, Sr, Ba, and Mg# (Mg# = Mg2+/(Mg2+ + Fe2+)) and low ratios of Y, Nb, Ta, and K2O/Na2O, showing geochemical characteristics similar to those of adakitic rocks. Based on these characteristics, it is suggested that the intrusion might have been derived from the partial melting of subducted oceanic crust under a continental arc margin setting. Furthermore, it is strongly indicated that the quartz monzonite porphyry from the Shanlixu deposit, in the Lujiang–Chuzhou Area, is closely related to Cu-Au mineralization, as suggested by the age of the intrusion, which is approximately 137 Ma. These findings provide a new direction for research and exploration in this region. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geological maps of igneous rock and deposits in the MLYB, the inset refers to <a href="#minerals-14-00798-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geological maps of the Shanlixu Cu-Au deposit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Geological cross-section of the Shanlixu Cu-Au deposit’s No. 10 exploration line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Hand specimen (<b>a</b>) and microphotographs (<b>b</b>) of Shanlixu quartz monzonite porphyry. Bt = biotite; Pl = plagioclase.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Zircon CL images (<b>a</b>), U-Pb concordia (<b>b</b>) and weighted mean ages (<b>c</b>) of quartz monzonite porphyry in the Shanlixu Cu-Au deposit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Q-A-P diagram (<b>a</b>), TAS diagram (<b>b</b>), K<sub>2</sub>O versus SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram (<b>c</b>), and ACNK versus ANK diagram (<b>d</b>) of quartz monzonite porphyry in the Shanlixu Cu-Au deposit (after Middlemost, 1994 [<a href="#B38-minerals-14-00798" class="html-bibr">38</a>]; Peccerillo and Taylor, 1976 [<a href="#B39-minerals-14-00798" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; and Maniar and Piccoli, 1989 [<a href="#B40-minerals-14-00798" class="html-bibr">40</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE (<b>a</b>) and primitive mantle-normalized trace element (<b>b</b>) patterns for quartz monzonite porphyry in the Shanlixu Cu-Au deposit (the normalized values for chondrite and the primitive mantle are from Sun and McDonough, 1989 [<a href="#B41-minerals-14-00798" class="html-bibr">41</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE patterns of zircon for sample ZK2-16 from Shanlixu quartz monzonite porphyry.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The Ce<sup>4+</sup>/Ce<sup>3+</sup> versus Eu/Eu* (<b>a</b>), log<span class="html-italic">f</span>O<sub>2</sub> versus T (<b>b</b>), and Ce<sup>4+</sup>/Ce<sup>3+</sup> versus 10<sup>4</sup>/T (<b>c</b>) diagrams of Shanlixu quartz monzonite porphyry. HOF = high oxygen fugacity; LOF = low oxygen fugacity; MH = magnetite–hematite buffer; FMQ = fayalite–magnetite–quartz buffer; IW = iron–wustite buffer; and NNO = nickel–nickel oxide buffer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Geochemical discrimination diagrams for Shanlixu quartz monzonite porphyry. Mg<sup>#</sup> versus SiO<sub>2</sub> (<b>a</b>) and MgO versus SiO<sub>2</sub> (<b>b</b>) diagrams for adakite discrimination. K<sub>2</sub>O/Na<sub>2</sub>O versus Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<b>c</b>) and Sr/Y versus (La/Yb)<sub>N</sub> (<b>d</b>) diagrams to distinguish lower crust-derived adakitic rocks from slab-derived adakites (after Stern and Kilian, 1996 [<a href="#B80-minerals-14-00798" class="html-bibr">80</a>]; data for LCC melting in Dabie and STLF are from Wang et al., 2007 [<a href="#B79-minerals-14-00798" class="html-bibr">79</a>], Huang et al., 2008 [<a href="#B77-minerals-14-00798" class="html-bibr">77</a>], and Perford and Atherton, 1996 [<a href="#B74-minerals-14-00798" class="html-bibr">74</a>]; data for oceanic slab melting are from Kamei et al., 2009 [<a href="#B81-minerals-14-00798" class="html-bibr">81</a>]; data for subducting oceanic crust are from Defant and Drummond, 1990 [<a href="#B70-minerals-14-00798" class="html-bibr">70</a>], Stern and Kilian, 1996 [<a href="#B80-minerals-14-00798" class="html-bibr">80</a>], and Aguillon-Robles et al., 2001 [<a href="#B82-minerals-14-00798" class="html-bibr">82</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Histogram of zircon ε<sub>Hf</sub>(<span class="html-italic">t</span>) values (<b>a</b>) and ε<sub>Hf</sub>(<span class="html-italic">t</span>) versus age (<b>b</b>) diagram of Shanlixu quartz monzonite porphyry. (Data of continental lower crustal rocks at 2.55 Ga are from Vervoort and Patchett, 1996 [<a href="#B85-minerals-14-00798" class="html-bibr">85</a>], while data of Early Cretaceous volcanic rocks in the Ningwu Area are from Hou and Yuan, 2010 [<a href="#B86-minerals-14-00798" class="html-bibr">86</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Geotectonic trace element discrimination diagrams for Shanlixu quartz monzonite porphyry. Ta versus Y (<b>a</b>), Rb-Yb + Nb (<b>b</b>), Th/Ta versus Yb (<b>c</b>), and La/Yb versus Th/Yb diagrams (<b>d</b>) (after Pearce et al., 1984 [<a href="#B93-minerals-14-00798" class="html-bibr">93</a>]; Gorton and Schandl, 2000 [<a href="#B94-minerals-14-00798" class="html-bibr">94</a>]; and Condie, 1989 [<a href="#B98-minerals-14-00798" class="html-bibr">98</a>]).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 4575 KiB  
Article
Zircons from Eclogite-Associated Rocks of the Marun–Keu Complex, the Polar Urals: Trace Elements and U–Pb Dating
by Laysan Salimgaraeva, Aleksey Berezin, Sergey Sergeev, Nikolai Gubanov, Ekaterina Stetskaya and Sergey Skublov
Geosciences 2024, 14(8), 206; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14080206 - 2 Aug 2024
Viewed by 288
Abstract
The Marun–Keu complex plays a significant role in our understanding of the geological evolution of the Ural orogen; however, it remains poorly understood. This study aims to provide insights into the complex’s age, protolith composition, rock formation conditions, and its position in the [...] Read more.
The Marun–Keu complex plays a significant role in our understanding of the geological evolution of the Ural orogen; however, it remains poorly understood. This study aims to provide insights into the complex’s age, protolith composition, rock formation conditions, and its position in the geological history. The zircons from the host granitic gneiss are characterized by magmatic cores with an age of 473 Ma and metamorphic rims with an age of approximately 370 Ma. We suggest that the metamorphic rims were formed during eclogite metamorphism and that the metagranitoids hosting the eclogites experienced eclogite metamorphism simultaneously with the basic and ultrabasic rocks that are common in this area. Heterogeneous zircons were also isolated from the selvage of a pegmatite vein, in which four domains are distinguished, two to three of which can be identified within single grains, as follows: (1) igneous cores with an age of approximately 470 Ma and the geochemical characteristics of zircon crystallized in basic rocks; (2) zircons recrystallized during eclogite metamorphism with geochemical characteristics intermediate between those of the magmatic cores and true eclogitic zircon; (3) pegmatitic zircon, exhibiting the most sharply differentiated REE spectra of all four domains, characterized by a prominent positive Ce anomaly and a weakly expressed negative Eu anomaly; and (4) eclogitic zircon, observed in the form of veins and rims, superimposed in relation to the other three domains. The age of the latter three domains is within the error range and is estimated to be approximately 370 Ma. This indicates that the processes of eclogite metamorphism and the formation of pegmatites occurred at approximately the same time in the studied area. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Geochemistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Simplified tectonic scheme of the Urals after [<a href="#B3-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-bibr">3</a>]. MUF—Main Uralian Fault. 1—the Cis-Ural foredeep; 2—the Central Ural megazone; 3—the East Ural megazone; 4—the West Ural megazone; 5—the Tagil–Magnitogorsk megazone; 6—the Trans-Ural megazone. (<b>b</b>) The inset shows the overall geographic location of the Marun–Keu complex. (<b>c</b>) Geological map of the Marun–Keu complex [<a href="#B5-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-bibr">5</a>]. Key: 1—Quaternary; 2—Ordovician (?); 3—greenschists of the Nyarovey formation; 4—Marun–Keu series: gneisses, eclogites; 5—gneisses, granite gneisses; 6—granites with fluorite; 7—meta-rhyolites; 8—diorites, 9—gabbroids; 10—ultramafic rocks (Syum–Keu complex); 11—predominately eclogites; 12—glaucophane-hosted rocks; 13—quartz–graphite schists; 14—faults.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic sampling map. (<b>b</b>) General view of the peak 1040 area. (<b>c</b>) Selvage of a pegmatite vein at the contact with its host peridotites; white circle with sample number indicates the location from which sample 2209 was collected. (<b>d</b>) Contact between granitic gneisses and peridotites, cross-cut by a 1.5 m-wide pegmatite vein; white circle with sample number indicates the location from which sample 2218 was collected. The pegmatite vein was previously excavated for exploration purposes. (<b>e</b>) Migmatization zone in granitic gneisses indicated by a blue dashed line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Microphotographs of thin section of granitic gneiss (sample 2218): (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) transmitted polarized light; (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) birefringence.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) CL images of zircons from granitic gneiss (sample 2218). Colored circles indicate the SIMS analytical spots, the numbers of which correspond to those in <a href="#app1-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-app">Table S2</a> and <a href="#geosciences-14-00206-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>. Blue circles indicate magmatic cores, while green circles indicate metamorphic rims. (<b>b</b>) BSE images of zircons from granitic gneiss (sample 2218) with labeled mineral inclusions. <span class="html-italic">Png</span>—<span class="html-italic">phengite</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) CL images of zircons from the selvage of a pegmatite vein (sample 2209). The colored circles indicate the SIMS analytical spots, the numbers of which correspond to those in <a href="#app1-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-app">Table S3</a> and <a href="#geosciences-14-00206-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>. Blue circles indicate magmatic cores (first domain), green circles indicate recrystallized cores (second domain), navy blue circles indicate pegmatite zircon (third domain), and yellow circles indicate eclogite rims and veinlets (fourth domain). (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) BSE images of zircons from the selvage of a pegmatite vein (sample 2209) with labeled mineral inclusions. <span class="html-italic">Png</span>—<span class="html-italic">phengite</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Trace element compositions of zircons from granitic gneiss (sample 2218). (<b>a</b>) REE distribution patterns normalized to CI chondrite [<a href="#B33-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-bibr">33</a>]. (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) Co-variation diagrams of element pairs. The position of the analytical spots in different zircon domains is shown in <a href="#geosciences-14-00206-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a> by circles of the corresponding colors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Trace element compositions of zircons from the selvage of a pegmatite vein (sample 2209). (<b>a</b>) REE distribution patterns normalized to CI chondrite [<a href="#B33-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-bibr">33</a>]. (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) Co-variation diagrams of element pairs. The position of the analytical spots in different zircon domains is shown in <a href="#geosciences-14-00206-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a> by circles of the corresponding colors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Geochemical discriminant diagrams for zircon after [<a href="#B35-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-bibr">35</a>]. Blue markers indicate the positions of zircon cores from the selvage of the pegmatite vein (sample 2209).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Concordia plot for zircons (<b>a</b>) from granitic gneiss (sample 2218) and (<b>b</b>) from the selvage of a pegmatite vein (sample 2209). Error ellipses are at 2σ confidence. The blue ellipses represent the concordia age and error. Decay constant errors are included.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 5171 KiB  
Article
Heavy Mineral and Zircon Age Constraints on Provenance of Cenozoic Sandstones in the Gulf of Mexico Subsurface
by Andrew C. Morton, Michael E. Strickler and C. Mark Fanning
Minerals 2024, 14(8), 779; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080779 - 30 Jul 2024
Viewed by 412
Abstract
Combined heavy mineral analysis and detrital zircon geochronology have enabled us to track detritus supplied by the ancestral river systems draining the North American continent into the deep subsurface of the Gulf of Mexico, in both the coastal plain and the offshore deep [...] Read more.
Combined heavy mineral analysis and detrital zircon geochronology have enabled us to track detritus supplied by the ancestral river systems draining the North American continent into the deep subsurface of the Gulf of Mexico, in both the coastal plain and the offshore deep water areas. During deposition of the Paleocene–Eocene Wilcox Group, sandstones in the western part of the area are interpreted as the products of the Rosita system derived via paleo-Rio Grande material, with a large component of sediment shed from the Western Cordillera. By contrast, samples from wells further east have high proportions of zircons derived from the Yavapai-Mazatzal Province and are attributed to the Rockdale system with sediment fed predominantly by the paleo-Colorado or paleo-Colorado-Brazos. There is evidence that sediment from the Rosita system occasionally extended into the central Gulf of Mexico, and, likewise, data indicate that the Rockdale system sporadically supplied sediment to the western part of the basin. During the Late Eocene of the central Gulf of Mexico (Yegua Formation) there was a distinct shift in provenance. The earlier Yegua sandstones have a large Grenville zircon component and are most likely to have had a paleo-Mississippi origin, whereas the later Yegua sandstones are dominated by zircons of Western Cordilleran origin, similar to Wilcox sandstones fed by the Rosita system via the paleo-Rio Grande. The switch from paleo-Mississippi to paleo-Rio Grande sourcing implies there was a major reorganisation of drainage patterns during the Late Eocene. Miocene sandstones in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico were principally sourced from the paleo-Mississippi, although the paleo-Red River is inferred to have contributed to the more westerly-located wells. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the wells discussed in this paper.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Relationships between burial depth and GZi and between ATi and RuZi in Wilcox Group sandstones from the GoM basin. Square symbols are samples with U-Pb zircon chronology data. Data from Allan Kovar #1, Urban #2 and Weatherby Gas Unit #2 are from core, whereas Shenzi Deep, Chinook Deep and Diamond Back are from ditch cuttings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Stratigraphic variations in ATi, GZi and chloritoid content in Wilcox Group sandstones in Chinook Deep. The square symbol shows the sample with U-Pb zircon chronology data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Wilcox Group zircon age spectra displayed as combined histogram-probability density plots. Dark grey = zircons with &lt;10% discordance, pale grey = zircons with &gt;10% discordance. ‘n’ = number of zircons with &lt;10% discordance in the total zircon population. Data from Allan Kovar #1, Urban #2 and Weatherby Gas Unit #2 are from core, whereas Shenzi Deep, Chinook Deep and Diamond Back are from ditch cuttings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Zircon age distributions in the 0–300 Ma range in samples from the Wilcox Group in the western GoM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Paleodrainage reconstruction for the Wilcox Group in the GoM adapted from Galloway et al. [<a href="#B2-minerals-14-00779" class="html-bibr">2</a>] and Blum et al. [<a href="#B20-minerals-14-00779" class="html-bibr">20</a>], showing locations of the wells discussed in this paper. Terrane base map is from Blum et al. [<a href="#B20-minerals-14-00779" class="html-bibr">20</a>]. The yellow line is the Paleocene shelf margin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Zircon populations in Wilcox, Yegua and Miocene sandstones broken down into the specific age groups defined by Mackey et al. [<a href="#B17-minerals-14-00779" class="html-bibr">17</a>]. *—data from Xu et al. [<a href="#B23-minerals-14-00779" class="html-bibr">23</a>]; Rio Grande Embayment is compiled from samples GOM2–7; Houston Embayment is compiled from samples GOM8–13; Mississippi Embayment is compiled from samples GOM14–15; Eastern Gulf of Mexico is compiled from samples GOM16–19. **—data from Craddock and Kylander-Clark [<a href="#B4-minerals-14-00779" class="html-bibr">4</a>]. ***—data from Mackey et al. [<a href="#B17-minerals-14-00779" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>ATi-RuZi plot of Yegua sandstones in Mid-Val #2 and #4 showing the presence of two distinct provenance types. Square symbols are samples with U-Pb zircon chronology data. All data are from core.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Yegua and Miocene age zircon spectra displayed as combined histogram-probability density plots. Dark grey = zircons with &lt;10% discordance, pale grey = zircons with &gt;10% discordance. ‘n’ = number of zircons with &lt;10% discordance in the total zircon population. Data from Mid-Val #4 are from core, whereas Jedi, Shenzi Deep and Stampede are from ditch cuttings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Heavy mineral parameters in Miocene sandstones from Jedi, Myrtle Beach, Shenzi, Stampede and Tubular Bells. Square symbols are samples with U-Pb zircon chronology data. All data are from ditch cuttings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Miocene paleodrainage into the GoM, adapted from Galloway et al. [<a href="#B2-minerals-14-00779" class="html-bibr">2</a>] and Xu et al. [<a href="#B23-minerals-14-00779" class="html-bibr">23</a>], showing the locations of wells discussed in this paper. Terrane base map is from Blum et al. [<a href="#B20-minerals-14-00779" class="html-bibr">20</a>].</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 5679 KiB  
Article
Mineralogical and Geochemical Response to Fluid Infiltration into Cambrian Orthopyroxene-Bearing Granitoids and Gneisses, Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica
by Ane K. Engvik, Fernando Corfu, Ilka C. Kleinhanns, Heinrich Taubald and Synnøve Elvevold
Minerals 2024, 14(8), 772; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080772 - 29 Jul 2024
Viewed by 348
Abstract
Fluid infiltration into Proterozoic and Early Palaeozoic dry, orthopyroxene-bearing granitoids and gneisses in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica, has caused changes to rock appearance, mineralogy, and rock chemistry. The main mineralogical changes are the replacement of orthopyroxene by hornblende and biotite, ilmenite by titanite, [...] Read more.
Fluid infiltration into Proterozoic and Early Palaeozoic dry, orthopyroxene-bearing granitoids and gneisses in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica, has caused changes to rock appearance, mineralogy, and rock chemistry. The main mineralogical changes are the replacement of orthopyroxene by hornblende and biotite, ilmenite by titanite, and various changes in feldspar structure and composition. Geochemically, these processes resulted in general gains of Si, mostly of Al, and marginally of K and Na but losses of Fe, Mg, Ti, Ca, and P. The isotopic oxygen composition (δ18OSMOW = 6.0‰–9.9‰) is in accordance with that of the magmatic precursor, both for the host rock and infiltrating fluid. U-Pb isotopes in zircon of the altered and unaltered syenite to quartz-monzonite indicate a primary crystallization age of 520.2 ± 1.0 Ma, while titanite defines alteration at 485.5 ± 1.4 Ma. Two sets of gneiss samples yield a Rb-Sr age of 517 ± 6 Ma and a Sm-Nd age of 536 ± 23 Ma. The initial Sr and Nd isotopic ratios suggest derivation of the gneisses from a relatively juvenile source but with a very strong metasomatic effect that introduced radiogenic Sr into the system. The granitoid data indicate instead a derivation from Mid-Proterozoic crust, probably with additions of mantle components. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Geographical situation map of central Dronning Maud Land. (<b>b</b>) Geological map of the studied part of Mühlig–Hofmannfjella and Orvinfjella. The numbers indicate the sampled localities (Table 1) (modified from [<a href="#B16-minerals-14-00772" class="html-bibr">16</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Field photos. (<b>a</b>) Nunatak of orthopyroxene-bearing granitoid with the characteristic dark brownish outcrop color (Håhelleregga). (<b>b</b>) Alteration halo around discordant aplitic vein crosscutting migmatitc gneiss (locality 7, Kubusfjellet). The vein (arrow) is about 5 cm thick with an alteration halo extending 0.5 m into the host rock. The field of view is 1.5 m. (<b>c</b>) Alteration halo around the pegmatitic vein cutting dark brownish-colored orthopyroxene-bearing syenite (locality 5, Trollslottet). The field of view is about 1 m. (<b>d</b>) A high density of crisscrossing veins causes heavy alteration of the dark orthopyroxene-bearing syenite of the Trollslottet nunatak (Locality 5, the cliff face is about 70 m high).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Micrographs of pristine orthopyroxene-bearing gneiss and granitoid intrusions (mineral abbreviations following Whitney and Evans [<a href="#B38-minerals-14-00772" class="html-bibr">38</a>]. (<b>a</b>) Garnet-orthopyroxene gneiss with major quartz, perthitic K-feldspar, and plagioclase occur equigranular with embayed and triple-point grain boundaries (sample AHA193A, plane light). (<b>b</b>) Euhedral orthopyroxene in the quartz and feldspar matrix (sample AHA217, orthopyroxene granite, plane light). (<b>c</b>) Coarse subhedral amphibole with medium-grained biotite and orthopyroxene (sample AHA144, orthopyroxene-bearing quartz-monzonite, plane light). (<b>d</b>) Amphibole and biotite in the matrix of quartz and perthitic K-feldspar; note the coarse crystals of biotite (sample AHA197, orthopyroxene-bearing granite, plane light). (<b>e</b>) Amphibole and biotite in the matrix of perthite, plagioclase, and quartz; note the well-developed coarse crystals of amphibole and biotite (sample AHA197, orthopyroxene-bearing granite, plane light). (<b>f</b>) Fine-grained quartz and feldspars of aplite but with a strong heterogeneity including some coarse grains. Remark dusty appearance of quartz and feldspar (sample AHA200II, crossed polarizers).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Replacement of mafic minerals in alteration zones (micrographs, plane light). (<b>a</b>) Biotite + quartz fine-grained symplectites (sample AHA107, altered quartz-monzonite). (<b>b</b>) Amphibole + quartz fine-grained symplectites (sample AHA107, altered quartz-monzonite). (<b>c</b>) Replacement of amphibole along cleavage planes and microfractures to biotite (white arrows) and Fe-oxide (black arrow; sample AHA145 altered quartz-monzonite). (<b>d</b>) Replacement of amphibole to biotite along cleavage planes, micro-cracks, and sub-grain boundaries (sample AHA145, altered quartz-monzonite). (<b>e</b>) Replacement of coarse biotite to finer biotite grains and of ilmenite to titanite (sample AHA199, altered quartz monzonite).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Feldspars in alteration zones. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Replacement of original feldspar to subgrains and production of a high density of micropores, fluid inclusions, and tiny grains of sericite and biotite. Plane light (<b>a</b>) and crossed polarizers (<b>b</b>) (sample AHA145, altered quartz-monzonite). (<b>c</b>) Replacement of perthitic K-feldspar to microcline (crossed polarizers, sample AHA 193C, altered gneiss). (<b>d</b>) Alteration of perthitic K-feldspar along microfractures (arrows) and replacement to microcline (crossed polarizers, sample AHA199, altered syenite). (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) Sericitization (arrows) and growth of biotite (brown phase) and titanite along microfractures in plagioclase. Plane light (<b>e</b>) and crossed polarizers (<b>f</b>) (sample AHA145, altered quartz-monzonite).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>TAS-plot. Arrows link the unaltered and altered samples with their direction pointing to the alteration. Symbols are the same as in Figure 8 and Figure 9.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>U-Pb analyses of zircon and titanite in orthopyroxene-bearing granite (sample AHA197) and alteration zone (sample AHA199). Ellipses (full lines for zircon and dashed lines for titanite) indicate 2 sigma uncertainty.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Radiogenic isotopic plot. Arrows link the unaltered to the altered sample and their direction points to the alteration. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) <sup>87</sup>Rb/<sup>86</sup>Sr vs. <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr. (<b>c</b>) <sup>147</sup>Sm/<sup>144</sup>Nd vs. <sup>143</sup>Nd/<sup>144</sup>Nd. See <a href="#sec5-minerals-14-00772" class="html-sec">Section 5</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Geochemical variation crossing alteration zones from unaltered rock (<b>left</b>) to altered rock (<b>right</b>). Symbols are the same as in <a href="#minerals-14-00772-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 8347 KiB  
Article
Geochronology, Geochemistry, and In Situ Sr-Nd-Hf Isotopic Compositions of a Tourmaline-Bearing Leucogranite in Eastern Tethyan Himalaya: Implications for Tectonic Setting and Rare Metal Mineralization
by Yangchen Drolma, Kaijun Li, Yubin Li, Jinshu Zhang, Chengye Yang, Gen Zhang, Ruoming Li and Duo Liu
Minerals 2024, 14(8), 755; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080755 - 26 Jul 2024
Viewed by 369
Abstract
Himalayan leucogranite is an excellent target for understanding the orogenic process of the India–Asia collision, but its origin and tectonic significance are still under debate. An integrated study of geochronology, geochemistry, and in situ Sr-Nd-Hf isotopes was conducted for a tourmaline-bearing leucogranite in [...] Read more.
Himalayan leucogranite is an excellent target for understanding the orogenic process of the India–Asia collision, but its origin and tectonic significance are still under debate. An integrated study of geochronology, geochemistry, and in situ Sr-Nd-Hf isotopes was conducted for a tourmaline-bearing leucogranite in the eastern Tethyan Himalaya using LA-ICP-MS, X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, and ICP-MS and LA-MC-ICP-MS, respectively. LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating of zircon and monazite showed that it was emplaced at ~19 Ma. The leucogranite had high SiO2 and Al2O3 contents ranging from 73.16 to 73.99 wt.% and 15.05 to 15.24 wt.%, respectively. It was characterized by a high aluminum saturation index (1.14–1.19) and Rb/Sr ratio (3.58–6.35), which is characteristic of S-type granite. The leucogranite was enriched in light rare-earth elements (LREEs; e.g., La and Ce) and large ion lithophile elements (LILEs; e.g., Rb, K, and Pb) and depleted in heavy rare-earth elements (e.g., Tm, Yb, and Lu) and high field strength elements (HFSEs; e.g., Nb, Zr, and Ti). It was characterized by high I Sr (t) (0.7268–0.7281) and low ε Nd (t) (−14.6 to −13.2) and ε Hf (t) (−12.6 to −9.47), which was consistent with the isotopic characteristics of the Higher Himalayan Sequence. Petrogenetically, the origin of the leucogranite is best explained by the decompression-induced muscovite dehydration melting of an ancient metapelitic source within the Higher Himalayan Sequence during regional extension due to the movement of the South Tibetan Detachment System (STDS). The significantly high lithium and beryllium contents of the leucogranite and associated pegmatite suggest that Himalayan leucogranites possess huge potential for lithium and beryllium exploration. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geological sketch map of the Himalayas showing the distribution of Himalayan leucogranites (after [<a href="#B5-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">5</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simplified geological map of the Luozha tourmaline-bearing leucogranite (after [<a href="#B25-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">25</a>]). Mineral abbreviations [<a href="#B26-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">26</a>]: And, andalusite; Grt, garnet; St, staurolite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Representative field photographs and photomicrographs of the LTLG and spodumene-bearing pegmatites. (<b>a</b>) Field photograph showing oriented tourmalines of the LTLG; (<b>b</b>) Photomicrograph of the LTLG; (<b>c</b>) Field photograph of the spodumene-bearing pegmatite and (<b>d</b>) Photomicrograph of the spodumene-bearing pegmatite. Mineral abbreviations [<a href="#B26-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">26</a>]: Bt, biotite; Kfs, K-feldspar; Ms, muscovite; Pl, plagioclase; Qz, quartz; Spd, Spodumene; Tur, tourmaline.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>U-Pb dating results of the LTLG. (<b>a</b>) Cathodoluminescence images for representative zircons from the LTLG; (<b>b</b>) U-Pb zircon concordia diagram of the LTLG; Tera–Wasserburg concordia diagram for zircons (<b>c</b>) and monazites (<b>d</b>) of the LTLG. The red circle indicate the location of U-Pb dating analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. (Na<sub>2</sub>O+K<sub>2</sub>O) (after [<a href="#B39-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">39</a>]), (<b>b</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. (Na<sub>2</sub>O+K<sub>2</sub>O-CaO) (after [<a href="#B40-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">40</a>]), (<b>c</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. K<sub>2</sub>O (after [<a href="#B41-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">41</a>]); and (<b>d</b>) A/CNK vs. A/NK (after [<a href="#B42-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">42</a>]) for the LTLG.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) REE patterns and (<b>b</b>) Spidergrams of the LTLG. The values of chondrite and primitive mantle are from McDonough and Sun [<a href="#B43-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">43</a>]. The data of S-type (blue field) and highly fractional (green field) leucogranites from the Ramba area are from Liu et al. [<a href="#B12-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">12</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) in situ and whole rock Sr-Nd isotopic data and (<b>b</b>) Zircon Hf isotopic data of the LTLG.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Diagrams of (<b>a</b>) (Zr + Nb + Ce + Y) vs. FeO*/MgO (after [<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">48</a>]); (<b>b</b>) (Zr + Nb + Ce + Y) vs. (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O)/CaO (after [<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">48</a>]); (<b>c</b>) Rb vs. Th and (<b>d</b>) Rb vs. Y (after [<a href="#B50-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">50</a>]) for the LTLG. The data of S-type granites from the Interview River Suite are from Chappell [<a href="#B45-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">45</a>]. The data of S-type leucogranites from the Ramba area are from Liu et al. [<a href="#B12-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">12</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Diagrams of (<b>a</b>) Nb/Ta vs. Zr/Hf and (<b>b</b>) Rb/Sr vs. (La/Yb)<sub>N</sub> for the LTLG. The data of S-type and highly fractional leucogranites from the Ramba area are from Liu et al. [<a href="#B12-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">12</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O + TiO<sub>2</sub> + TFeO + MgO) vs. (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O)/(TiO<sub>2</sub> + TFeO + MgO) (after [<a href="#B60-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">60</a>]), (<b>b</b>) (CaO + TiO<sub>2</sub> + TFeO + MgO) vs. CaO/(TiO<sub>2</sub> + TFeO + MgO) (after [<a href="#B60-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">60</a>]), (<b>c</b>) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub> vs. CaO/TiO<sub>2</sub> (after [<a href="#B61-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">61</a>]); and (<b>d</b>) Rb/Sr vs. Rb/Ba (after [<a href="#B61-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">61</a>]) for the LTLG. MP, metapelites; MGW, metagreywackes; AMP, amphibolites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) Ba vs. Rb/Sr and (<b>b</b>) Sr vs. Rb/Sr (after [<a href="#B62-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">62</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Plots of <b>ε<sub>Nd</sub></b>(t) vs. <b>I<sub>Sr</sub></b>(t) for the LTLG. Fields of Gangdese batholith, Higher Himalayan Sequence, and Lesser Himalayan Sequence are from Wu et al. [<a href="#B5-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">5</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) Rb/Sr vs. Li; (<b>b</b>) Rb/Sr vs. Be; (<b>c</b>) Zr/Hf vs. Li; (<b>d</b>) Zr/Hf vs. Be; (<b>e</b>) Nb/Ta vs. Li; and (<b>f</b>) Nb/Ta vs. Be for the LTLG.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 4734 KiB  
Article
Zircon Internal Deformation and Its Effect on U-Pb Geochronology: A Case Study from the Himalayan High-Pressure Eclogites
by Hafiz U. Rehman
Minerals 2024, 14(8), 742; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080742 - 24 Jul 2024
Viewed by 375
Abstract
Zircon, with a chemical formula of ZrSiO4, is a widely used mineral for determining the crystallization age of igneous rocks. It is also used to constrain the timing of metamorphic events from its overgrowth or recrystallized domains. Furthermore, detrital zircon grains [...] Read more.
Zircon, with a chemical formula of ZrSiO4, is a widely used mineral for determining the crystallization age of igneous rocks. It is also used to constrain the timing of metamorphic events from its overgrowth or recrystallized domains. Furthermore, detrital zircon grains can provide information on the sedimentary provenance. Due to the trace amounts of uranium (parent) which decays into its daughter element (Pb), it is a prime geochronometer for the majority of magmatic and metamorphic rocks. With high-precision analytical instruments, such as TIMS, SIMS, and LA-ICP-MS, huge amounts of geochronological and trace element data from zircon have been generated around the globe to date. Target domains within zircon grains are analyzed to extract geochemical and geochronological records using spatially resolved techniques such as ion probes or laser ablation coupled with mass spectrometry. Before any such analysis, the zircon grains are examined for internal structures, growth zoning, and the presence of tiny inclusions. However, many researchers analyze multiple domains within single zircon grains for U-Pb isotope analysis with little regard for their internal structures, particularly crystallographic orientations. Hence, they may obtain mixed ages with variable discordance, leading to imprecise interpretation especially when the growth domains are not well-identified. Particularly, zircon grains that contain multi-growth domains or have local internal deformations within a single grain may not produce geologically meaningful age results if the analyses are conducted on mixed domains. This study presents a brief review on zircon geochronology, how to identify and visualize micro-deformations in metamorphic zircons through the EBSD analysis, and the effects of micro-deformation on age results. Examples from a case study conducted on zircons hosted in the Himalayan high-pressure eclogites are presented that show intra-grain plastically deformed domains and their effects on the corresponding age results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Simplified geological map (modified from [<a href="#B33-minerals-14-00742" class="html-bibr">33</a>]) of the study area showing a sketch of the Himalaya (<b>a</b>), a simplified geological map of the Indian and Asian plates with the Kohistan-Ladakh Island arc (<b>b</b>), and a geological map showing the occurrence of Himalayan high-pressure (HP) and ultrahigh-pressure (UHP) eclogites, Kaghan Valley, north Pakistan (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Four examples showing a deviation of U-Pb age data from the Concordia lines reported from magmatic and metamorphic zircon grains. The plots shown in (<b>a</b>) and (<b>b</b>) display Wetherill Concordia plots and those shown in (<b>c</b>) and (<b>d</b>) display Terra-Wasserburg plots. In all the four examples, the U-Pb isotope analyses show large scatter and numerous analyses plot away from the Concordia lines, indicating Pb-loss, analyses conducted on mixed or complex domains, or ages reset due to secondary events. Data source for plot (<b>a</b>) is from Figure 7 in [<a href="#B34-minerals-14-00742" class="html-bibr">34</a>], for plot (<b>b</b>) from Figure 3 in [<a href="#B35-minerals-14-00742" class="html-bibr">35</a>], for plot (<b>c</b>) from Figure 5 in [<a href="#B36-minerals-14-00742" class="html-bibr">36</a>], and for plot (<b>d</b>) from Figure 3.3 in [<a href="#B37-minerals-14-00742" class="html-bibr">37</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Cathodoluminescence images of representative zircon grains from the Himalayan Group I eclogites displaying irregular morphologies, healed cracks, and diffused boundaries. These grains were analyzed by LA-ICP-MS [<a href="#B31-minerals-14-00742" class="html-bibr">31</a>] and the age data for each analyzed spot is shown. The majority of the analysis displays Permian (260~270 Ma) protolith ages; however, the relatively younger age values likely resulted due to Pb-loss or internal deformation. The scale bar under each grain is 50 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Cathodoluminescence images of representative zircon grains from the Himalayan Group II eclogites displaying metamorphic features (fir tree zoning). These grains were analyzed with HR-SIMS [<a href="#B30-minerals-14-00742" class="html-bibr">30</a>] and a few grains with lower contents of U and Pb were additionally analyzed with LA-ICP-MS [<a href="#B31-minerals-14-00742" class="html-bibr">31</a>]. Two zircon grains from this group were analyzed using EBSD but there was no internal deformation. Age-data represents the Eocene eclogite facies event in the Himalayan region. The scale bar under each grain is 50 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Representative zircon grains from the Himalayan Group I eclogites that show internal deformation and its effect on age data. Gray-scale images (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and EBSD phase maps with crystallographic misorientations (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) of the same grains are shown. Gray-scale images are generated from the band contrast map data acquired at the time of EBSD analysis using MTEX (v.5.7.0.), a MATLAB toolbox. Scale bars along the vertical axes in (<b>a</b>) and (<b>c</b>) represent the degree of black and white tone on a scale of 20 to 200. The relatively larger holes in the gray-scale images display the pits formed due to HR-SIMS U-Pb analysis. Small circles on grains in (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) with digits are the NanoSIMS analysis. Domains displaying color variation (from blue to green to yellow) in the zircon grains indicate local deformation at the grain scale, evidenced from the difference in their crystallographic orientation with respect to the undeformed domain (blue). The U-Pb age values from the deformed domains were likely affected by deformation. The scale bars along the vertical axes (in (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>)) show misorientation in degrees within the grain and with the surrounding phases. The investigated zircon grains showed internal misorientation up to 3 degrees. Age values for the analyzed spots are: Spot#7: 50 ± 21 Ma, 8: 182 ± 45 Ma, 9: 113 ± 28 Ma, 10: 95 ± 24 Ma, 35: 138 ± 25 Ma, 36: 145 ± 31 Ma, 37: 96 ± 35 Ma, 38: 61 ± 21 Ma, 39: 113 ± 30 Ma, 40: 94 ± 18 Ma, 41: 47 ± 27 Ma. For the second grain the age data for the analyzed spots are: 11: 120 ± 35 Ma, 12: 162 ± 46 Ma, 13: 180 ± 44 Ma. Age data are the same as reported in [<a href="#B32-minerals-14-00742" class="html-bibr">32</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Cathodoluminescence image (<b>a</b>), gray-scale image obtained from FE-SEM attached to the EBSD instrument (<b>b</b>), the EBSD orientation map (<b>c</b>), and image quality map displayed on the gray-scale image, displaying the internal misorientation (<b>d</b>). The color difference shows internal misorientation within the grain. The white line across the grain is for reference to draw the misorientation histogram shown in <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f010" class="html-fig">Figure 10</a>a. The legend on the right side shows the details of analyzed points in the zircon grain and boundary rotation angles. The scale bar under the zircon grain is 100 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Cathodoluminescence image (<b>a</b>), gray-scale image obtained from FE-SEM attached to the EBSD instrument (<b>b</b>), the EBSD orientation map (<b>c</b>), and image quality map displayed on the gray-scale image, displaying the internal misorientation (<b>d</b>). The white line across the grain is used for the misorientation histogram in <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f010" class="html-fig">Figure 10</a>b. Other details are the same as given in the caption of <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>. The scale bar under the zircon grain is 100 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Cathodoluminescence image (<b>a</b>), gray-scale image obtained from FE-SEM attached to the EBSD instrument (<b>b</b>), the EBSD orientation map (<b>c</b>), and image quality map displayed on the gray-scale image, displaying the internal misorientation (<b>d</b>). The white line across the grain is used for the misorientation histogram in <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f010" class="html-fig">Figure 10</a>c. Other details are the same as given in the caption of <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>. The scale bar under the zircon grain is 100 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Cathodoluminescence image (<b>a</b>), gray-scale image (<b>b</b>), the crystallographic orientation map (<b>c</b>), and image quality map displayed on the gray-scale image (<b>d</b>). The white line across the grain is used for the misorientation histogram in <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f010" class="html-fig">Figure 10</a>d. Other details are the same as given in the caption of <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>. The scale bar under the zircon grain is 100 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Histograms displaying the misorientation angles in degrees (horizontal axes) against the number fractions (vertical axes) in the studied zircon grains (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>). The histograms in (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) are plotted along the line shown on the zircon grains presented in <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>, <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>, <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f008" class="html-fig">Figure 8</a> and <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>, respectively. Scale bars under the zircon grains shown in (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) are 100 μm whereas in (<b>c</b>) it is 90 μm.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 6293 KiB  
Article
The Formation Age and Magma Source of the Xiaonanshan–Tunaobao Cu-Ni-PGE Deposit in the Northern Margin of the North China Craton
by Guanlin Bai, Jiangang Jiao, Xiaotong Zheng, Yunfei Ma and Chao Gao
Minerals 2024, 14(7), 733; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070733 - 22 Jul 2024
Viewed by 415
Abstract
The Xiaonanshan–Tunaobao Cu-Ni-PGE deposit is located in the northern margin of the North China Craton (N-NCC) in central Inner Mongolia. However, the age, magma source, petrogenesis, and sulfide mineralization mechanism of the ore-related Xiaonanshan-Tunaobao pluton remain unclear. Zircon U-Pb dating indicates the Tunaobao [...] Read more.
The Xiaonanshan–Tunaobao Cu-Ni-PGE deposit is located in the northern margin of the North China Craton (N-NCC) in central Inner Mongolia. However, the age, magma source, petrogenesis, and sulfide mineralization mechanism of the ore-related Xiaonanshan-Tunaobao pluton remain unclear. Zircon U-Pb dating indicates the Tunaobao pluton formed at 275.9 ± 2.8 Ma (Early Permian), similar to the Xiaonanshan pluton (272.7 ± 2.9 Ma). The ore-related gabbro is enriched in LREE and LILE (e.g., Rb) and depleted in HREE and HFSE (e.g., Nb and Ti). It likely originated from enriched mantle metasomatized by subduction fluids, supported by enriched Hf-Nd isotopes (–34.34 to –6.16 for zircon εHf(t) and –7.24 to –5.92 for whole-rock εNd(t) values) and high Ba/La but low Rb/Y ratios. The δ34S values of the Xiaonanshan sulfides range from 4.5‰ to 11.4‰, indicating a mantle origin with contribution from surrounding rocks. Combining previous recognition with this study, we propose that the Xiaonanshan–Tunaobao pluton formed in a post-collision extensional setting. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mineral Resources in North China Craton)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Division of geological tectonic units in the central part of Inner Mongolia [<a href="#B10-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B11-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B13-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">13</a>,<a href="#B15-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B17-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">17</a>] (<b>a</b>) [<a href="#B13-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">13</a>] and geological sketch map for the XNS-TNB area (<b>b</b>) [<a href="#B18-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">18</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geological exploration line for the Xiaonanshan–Tunaobao deposit [<a href="#B18-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">18</a>]. (<b>a</b>) Geological sketch map of the Xiaonanshan deposit; (<b>b</b>) geological sketch map of the Tunaobao deposit; (<b>c</b>) exploration line for the Xiaonanshan deposit; (<b>d</b>) exploration line for the Tunaobao deposit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Representative photographs and photomicrographs showing major mineral assemblages and sulfide mineralization in the Xiaonanshan (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) and Tunaobao gabbro (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>). Abbreviations: Ccp—chalcopyrite; Cpx—clinopyroxene; Ilm—ilmenite; Opx—orthopyroxene; Pn—pentlandite; Po—pyrrhotite; Py—pyrite; Srp—serpentine.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Cathode luminescence photos of zircon grains from the Tunaobao pluton.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Concordia (<b>a</b>) and weighted mean (<b>b</b>) diagrams of zircon U-Pb dating of the Tunaobao pluton.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE patterns (<b>a</b>) and primitive mantle-normalized trace elements spider diagrams (<b>b</b>) of XNS-TNB gabbro. The data of chondrite and primitive mantle are from [<a href="#B44-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">44</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram (<b>a</b>) [<a href="#B46-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">46</a>] and SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. K<sub>2</sub>O diagram (<b>b</b>) [<a href="#B47-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">47</a>] of the XNS-TNB gabbro.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Heatmap of immobile elements and geochemical data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Harker diagrams for the Xiaonanshan–Tunaobao plutons.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(Th/Ta)<sub>PM</sub> vs. (La/Nb)<sub>PM</sub> diagram (<b>a</b>) and (Ta/Th)<sub>PM</sub> vs. (Th/Yb)<sub>PM</sub> diagram (<b>b</b>) of the Xiaonanshan–Tunaobao pluton [<a href="#B15-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B54-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">54</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>ε<sub>Hf</sub>(t) vs. <span class="html-italic">t</span> diagram of Tunaobao pluton (<b>a</b>) and ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t) vs. (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>i</sub> diagram of the Xiaonanshan–Tunaobao pluton (<b>b</b>) [<a href="#B57-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">57</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Nb/Y vs. La/Yb diagram (<b>a</b>) and Ba/La vs. Th/Yb diagram (<b>b</b>) of the Xiaonanshan–Tunaobao pluton [<a href="#B60-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">60</a>,<a href="#B62-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">62</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>δ<sup>34</sup>S of sulfides from the Xiaonanshan Cu-Ni-PGE deposit. δ<sup>34</sup>S of sulfides of other deposits are from the data published in previous studies [<a href="#B35-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">35</a>,<a href="#B72-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">72</a>,<a href="#B73-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">73</a>,<a href="#B74-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">74</a>,<a href="#B75-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">75</a>,<a href="#B76-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">76</a>,<a href="#B77-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">77</a>,<a href="#B78-minerals-14-00733" class="html-bibr">78</a>].</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 24038 KiB  
Article
Petrogenesis of the Early Jurassic–Early Cretaceous Adakite-like Rocks in the Erguna Block, NE China: Implications for the Tectonic Evolution of the Mongol–Okhotsk Ocean
by Yuanchao Wang, Yuanyi Zhao, Xinfang Shui and Zaili Tao
Minerals 2024, 14(7), 725; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070725 - 19 Jul 2024
Viewed by 450
Abstract
The petrogenesis and geodynamic setting of the Mesozoic magmatic rocks in the Erguna Block, NE China remains controversial, especially the relationship between magmatism and the subduction history of the Mongol–Okhotsk oceanic plate. Here we present data for the Early Jurassic–Early Cretaceous adakite-like magmatic [...] Read more.
The petrogenesis and geodynamic setting of the Mesozoic magmatic rocks in the Erguna Block, NE China remains controversial, especially the relationship between magmatism and the subduction history of the Mongol–Okhotsk oceanic plate. Here we present data for the Early Jurassic–Early Cretaceous adakite-like magmatic rocks from Chaoman Farm in the northeastern part of the Erguna Block. Zircon U-Pb dating reveals that the syenogranites crystallized at around 190–180 Ma, while the monzonites, quartz diorite porphyries, and quartz monzonite porphyries were emplaced at around 147–143 Ma. The syenogranites, monzonites, quartz diorite porphyries, and quartz monzonite porphyries are adakite-like rocks. The syenogranites and quartz monzonite porphyries were produced by the partial melting of a thickened ancient mafic lower continental crust and a thickened juvenile lower crust, respectively. Meanwhile, the monzonites and quartz diorite porphyries were formed as a result of partial melting of the oceanic crust. In conclusion, the occurrence of these Early Jurassic magmatic rocks was closely linked to the process of southward subduction of the Mongol–Okhotsk oceanic plate. On the contrary, the Late Jurassic to early Early Cretaceous magmatism (147–143 Ma) occurred in an extensional environment, and was probably triggered by upwelling of the asthenosphere. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Simplified geological sketch map of the CAOB (the Central Asian Orogenic Belt) showing the main tectonic subdivisions [<a href="#B28-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">28</a>]. (<b>b</b>) Tectonic sketch map of NE China [<a href="#B29-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geological map of the Chaoman Forest Farm polymetallic exploration area in the northeastern part of the Erguna Block.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Representative photomicrographs of the Chaoman Forest Farm Mesozoic magmatic rocks in the Erguna Block; (<b>a</b>) ZK21001-55 Syenogranite; (<b>b</b>) ZK21001-59 Syenogranite; (<b>c</b>) ZK0401-9 Monzonite; (<b>d</b>) ZK0401-1 Quartz diorite porphyry; (<b>e</b>) ZK0401-3 Quartz diorite porphyry; (<b>f</b>) ZK21001-43 Quartz monzonite porphyry; Bi = biotite; Amp = amphibole; Kfs = K-feldspar; Pl = pla-gioclase; Qtz = quartz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>CL images of zircon grains of the Chaoman Forest Farm Mesozoic magmatic rocks. Solid and dashed circles indicate the locations of U–Pb dating and Hf isotope analyses, respectively (<b>a</b>–<b>h</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>U–Pb concordia diagrams of the Chaoman Forest Farm Mesozoic magmatic rocks. 190 ± 1.4 Ma (MSWD = 0.03) (<b>a</b>); 190 ± 1.2 Ma (MSWD = 0.28) (<b>b</b>); 189 ± 0.94 Ma (MSWD = 0.2) (<b>c</b>); 146 ± 1.5 Ma (MSWD = 0.08) (<b>d</b>); 144 ± 1.2 Ma (MSWD = 0.08) (<b>e</b>); 150 ± 1.5 Ma (MSWD = 0.02) (<b>f</b>); 143 ± 0.9 Ma (MSWD = 0.1) (<b>g</b>); 190 ± 3.7 Ma (MSWD = 1.3) (<b>h</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Total alkalis vs. silica diagram [<a href="#B63-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">63</a>]; (<b>b</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram [<a href="#B64-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">64</a>]; (<b>c</b>) A/NK vs. A/CNK diagram [<a href="#B65-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">65</a>]; (<b>d</b>) Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O vs. 10,000 Ga/Al discrimination diagram [<a href="#B68-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">68</a>]. Data sources: Lower crust-derived adakites in the Lhasa terrane and Subducted oceanic crust-derived adakites in the Lhasa terrane [<a href="#B69-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">69</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Sr/Y vs. Y diagrams [<a href="#B66-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">66</a>] and (<b>b</b>) diagram of batch-melting modeling of chondrite-normalized (La/Yb)<sub>N</sub> ratios vs. (Yb)<sub>N</sub> [<a href="#B70-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">70</a>], where N means normalized to chondrite [<a href="#B71-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">71</a>]. An Eastern Pontides gabbro (G518) [<a href="#B72-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">72</a>] is used as the source rock for the REE modeling under amphibolite and eclogite conditions, with varying garnet contents and respective partition coefficients (I–VI).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE pattern (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) [<a href="#B73-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">73</a>] and spider diagrams (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) [<a href="#B71-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">71</a>] for the Chaoman Forest Farm Mesozoic magmatic rocks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Plot of zircon ε<sub>Hf</sub>(<span class="html-italic">t</span>) values vs. U–Pb ages, (<b>b</b>) diagrams of ε<sub>Nd</sub>(<span class="html-italic">t</span>) vs. (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>i</sub> for the Chaoman Forest Farm Mesozoic magmatic rocks. Data sources: Taipingchuan igneous rocks [<a href="#B74-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">74</a>]; Fukeshan igneous rocks [<a href="#B8-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">8</a>]; Wunugetushan igneous rocks [<a href="#B19-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">19</a>,<a href="#B75-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">75</a>]; Badaguan igneous rocks [<a href="#B15-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">15</a>]. The fields for the Erguna Block are from Deng et al., (2019a) [<a href="#B8-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">8</a>]. The fields for MORB (Mid-Oceanic Ridge Basalt), OIB (Ocean Island Basalt) and IAB (Island Arc Basalt) are from Vervoort et al., (1999) [<a href="#B76-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">76</a>]. EMI and EMII represent two types of mantle end-members [<a href="#B77-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">77</a>]. The new continental crust (island arc) evolutionary line is defined by isotopic growth from <sup>176</sup>Hf/<sup>177</sup>Hf = 0.279703 at 4.55 Ga to 0.283145 at present, with <sup>176</sup>Lu/<sup>177</sup>Hf = 0.0375 [<a href="#B78-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">78</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) (<sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb)<sub>i</sub> vs. (<sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb)<sub>i</sub> and (<b>b</b>) (<sup>208</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb)<sub>i</sub> vs. (<sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb)<sub>i</sub> for the Chaoman Forest Farm Mesozoic magmatic rocks. Data sources: subducted oceanic slab-derived adakites and MORB [<a href="#B80-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">80</a>]; Northern Hemisphere Reference Line (NHRL) [<a href="#B79-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">79</a>]; mantle source reservoirs BSE, DMM, EM I and EM II [<a href="#B81-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">81</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Discrimination diagrams for the Chaoman Forest Farm Mesozoic magmatic rocks. (<b>a</b>) MgO vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram [<a href="#B98-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">98</a>]. Data for metabasaltic and eclogite experimental melts (1–4 GPa) are from Rapp et al., (1999) and references therein [<a href="#B96-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">96</a>]; (<b>b</b>) Mg<sup>#</sup> vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram [<a href="#B84-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">84</a>]. Mantle AFC curves are after Rapp et al., (1999) (Curve 1); the proportion of assimilated peridotite is also shown. The crustal AFC curve is after Stern and Kilian (1996) (Curve 2) [<a href="#B95-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">95</a>]; (<b>c</b>) Ni vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram [<a href="#B98-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">98</a>]; (<b>d</b>) Cr vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram [<a href="#B98-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">98</a>]; (<b>e</b>) Ni versus Cr diagram [<a href="#B69-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">69</a>]; (<b>f</b>) Th/La versus Th diagram. The data for upper continental crust are from Plank (2005) and references therein [<a href="#B99-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">99</a>]. The data for marine sediments are from Plank and Langmuir (1998) and for MORB are from Niu and Batiza (1997) [<a href="#B100-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">100</a>,<a href="#B101-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">101</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Diagrams of whole-rock ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t) (<b>a</b>) and zircon ε<sub>Hf</sub>(t) (<b>b</b>) against U–Pb ages of the Chaoman Forest Farm Mesozoic magmatic rocks. Data sources: Mesozoic mafic rocks in the Erguna Block [<a href="#B5-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">5</a>,<a href="#B19-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">19</a>,<a href="#B111-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">111</a>]; Mesozoic intermediate–felsic rocks in the Erguna Block [<a href="#B2-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">2</a>,<a href="#B4-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">4</a>,<a href="#B5-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">5</a>,<a href="#B8-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">8</a>,<a href="#B10-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B13-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">13</a>,<a href="#B15-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B16-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">16</a>,<a href="#B17-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">17</a>,<a href="#B74-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">74</a>,<a href="#B75-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">75</a>,<a href="#B117-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">117</a>,<a href="#B118-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">118</a>,<a href="#B119-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">119</a>,<a href="#B120-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">120</a>,<a href="#B121-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">121</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>) Nb vs. Y and (<b>b</b>) Rb vs. (Y + Nb) diagrams [<a href="#B127-minerals-14-00725" class="html-bibr">127</a>]. Abbreviations: WPG: Within-plate granitoid; VAG: volcanic arc granitoid; Syn-COLG: syn-collision granitoid; ORG: ocean ridge granitoid.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Conceptual diagram illustrating the proposed tectonic model and magma genesis of the Εarly Jurassic–late Early Cretaceous Mesozoic magmatic rocks in the Erguna Block. (<b>a</b>) Εarly Jurassic, (<b>b</b>) Middle Jurassic–early Cretaceous.</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 5946 KiB  
Article
Geochronology, Geochemical Characterization and Tectonic Background of Volcanic Rocks of the Longjiang Formation in the Lengjimanda Plate Area, Middle Da Hinggan Mountains
by Shi-Chang Wang, Yu-Jie Hao, Lu Shi, Zhen Tang and Shuang Zhu
Minerals 2024, 14(7), 719; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070719 - 16 Jul 2024
Viewed by 392
Abstract
The Lengjimanda plate is situated in the middle section of the Da Hinggan mountains, in the eastern section of the Tianshan Xingmeng orogenic belt. To determine the formation age of the volcanic rocks in the Longjiang formation in this area, to explore their [...] Read more.
The Lengjimanda plate is situated in the middle section of the Da Hinggan mountains, in the eastern section of the Tianshan Xingmeng orogenic belt. To determine the formation age of the volcanic rocks in the Longjiang formation in this area, to explore their origin and tectonic background, and to reconstruct the geodynamic evolution of the region, this study conducted petrological, zircon U–Pb geochronological, geochemical, and isotopic analyses of the volcanic rocks in the Longjiang formation. The Longjiang formation’s volcanic rocks are primarily composed of trachyandesite, trachyte trachydacite, and andesite, which are intermediate basic volcanic rocks. They are enriched in large-ion lithophile elements, are depleted in high-field-strength elements, are significantly fractionated between light and heavy rare earth elements, and exhibit a moderate negative Eu anomaly in most samples. The results of the LA–ICP–MS zircon U–Pb dating indicate that the volcanic rocks in this group were formed in the Early Cretaceous period at 129.1 ± 0.82 Ma. The zircon εHf(t) ranges from +1.13 to +43.77, the tDM2 ranges from +655 to +1427 Ma, the initial Sr ratio (87Sr/86Sr)i ranges from 0.7030 to 0.7036, and the εNd(t) ranges from +2.1 to +6.6. Based on the geochemical compositions and isotopic characteristics of the rocks, the initial magma of the volcanic rocks in the Longjiang formation originated from the partial melting of basaltic crustal materials, with a source material inferred to be depleted mantle-derived young crustal. These rocks were formed in a superimposed post-collisional and continental arc environment, possibly associated with the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean closure and the oblique subduction of the Pacific plate. This study addresses a research gap regarding the volcanic rocks of the Longjiang formation in this area. Its findings can be applied to exploration and prospecting in the region. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) The sample structural map in the Northeast region [<a href="#B40-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">40</a>]; (<b>b</b>) plate geological map of LingjiManda plate, Da Hinggan Mountains [<a href="#B41-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">41</a>]; and (<b>c</b>) geological cross-section view of Lengjimanda plate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Hand specimen photo (<b>a</b>) and microscope photos (<b>b</b>–<b>f</b>) of the Lengjimanda plate. (<b>a</b>) TWG05; (<b>b</b>) TWG01; (<b>c</b>) TWG02; (<b>d</b>) TWG04; (<b>e</b>) TWG05; (<b>f</b>) TWG06, Sa: sanidine; Pl: plagioclase; Mag: magnetite; Afs: alkalifeldspar; Bt: biotite; Qtz: quartz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>U–Pb zircons cathodoluminescence images from the volcanic rocks of the Longjiang formation at Lengjimanda plate. Circles indicate the locations of U–Pb analysis on zircons, along with their respective zircon numbers, and age information listed below. (<b>a</b>) TWG01, (<b>b</b>) TWG04, (<b>c</b>) TWG05, (<b>d</b>) TWG06.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Diagram of (N<sub>2</sub>O+K<sub>2</sub>O) vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> of volcanic rocks of Longjiang formation [<a href="#B49-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">49</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Major elements classification diagrams of Longjiang formation volcanic rocks, Lengjimanda plate. (<b>a</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram [<a href="#B50-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">50</a>]; (<b>b</b>) A/NK vs. A/CNK diagram [<a href="#B50-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">50</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE distribution patterns [<a href="#B51-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">51</a>] and (<b>b</b>) primitive mantle-normalized spider diagrams [<a href="#B52-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">52</a>] of the Longjiang formation volcanic rocks, Lengjimanda plate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Concordant and weighted diagrams of the zircon U–Pb age of the Longjiang formation volcanic rocks, Lengjimanda plate. Error ellipses are shown for 1-sigma level of uncertainty. (<b>a</b>) TWG01, (<b>b</b>) TWG04, (<b>c</b>) TWG05, (<b>d</b>) TWG06, (<b>e</b>) Longjiang formation volcanic rocks, (<b>f</b>) weighted diagrams of the Longjiang formation volcanic rocks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Illustration of magmatic evolution of volcanic rocks in the Longjiang formation of Lengjimanda plate [<a href="#B65-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">65</a>]. (<b>a</b>) La/Yb vs. La and (<b>b</b>) La/Sm vs. La.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Adakite discrimination diagram of Longjiang formation volcanic rocks, Lengjimanda plate. (<b>a</b>) Sr/Y vs. Y diagram; (<b>b</b>) (La/Yb) <sub>N</sub> vs. (Yb) n diagram [<a href="#B71-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">71</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p><span class="html-italic">ε</span><sub>Hf</sub> (<span class="html-italic">t</span>) vs. age diagram of Longjiang formation volcanic rocks, Lengjimanda plate. East CAOB: East Asian Orogenic Belt Eastern part [<a href="#B21-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">21</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p><span class="html-italic">ε</span><sub>Nd</sub>(t) vs. <span class="html-italic">ε</span><sub>Sr</sub>(t) diagram of volcanic rocks in the Longjiang formation of Lengjimanda plate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Pb isotope composition diagram of Longjiang formation volcanic rocks, Lengjimanda plate. Orogene: Orogenic belt. ((<b>a</b>), [<a href="#B83-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">83</a>]; (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>), [<a href="#B84-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">84</a>]; (<b>d</b>), [<a href="#B80-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">80</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Structural identification diagram of volcanic rocks in Longjiang formation, Lengjimanda plate [<a href="#B107-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">107</a>]. (<b>a</b>) Intraplate environment (WIP), (<b>b</b>) continental arc environment (CAP), post-collision environment (PAP), initial ocean arc environment (IOP), late ocean arc environment (LOP).</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 15297 KiB  
Article
Geochronology and Geochemistry of Paleoproterozoic Mafic Rocks in Northern Liaoning and Their Geological Significance
by Jingsheng Chen, Yi Tian, Zhonghui Gao, Bin Li, Chen Zhao, Weiwei Li, Chao Zhang and Yan Wang
Minerals 2024, 14(7), 717; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070717 - 16 Jul 2024
Viewed by 469
Abstract
Petrological, geochronological, and geochemical analyses of mafic rocks in northern Liaoning were conducted to constrain the formation age of the Proterozoic strata, and to further study the source characteristics, genesis, and tectonic setting. The mafic rocks in northern Liaoning primarily consist of basalt, [...] Read more.
Petrological, geochronological, and geochemical analyses of mafic rocks in northern Liaoning were conducted to constrain the formation age of the Proterozoic strata, and to further study the source characteristics, genesis, and tectonic setting. The mafic rocks in northern Liaoning primarily consist of basalt, diabase, gabbro, and amphibolite. Results of zircon U-Pb chronology reveal four stages of mafic magma activities in northern Liaoning: the first stage of basalt (2209 ± 12 Ma), the second stage of diabase (2154 ± 15 Ma), the third stage of gabbro (2063 ± 7 Ma), and the fourth stage of magmatic protolith of amphibolite (2018 ± 13 Ma). Combined with the unconformity overlying Neoproterozoic granite, the formation age of the Proterozoic strata in northern Liaoning was found to be Paleoproterozoic rather than Middle Neoproterozoic by the geochronology of these mafic rocks. A chronological framework of mafic magmatic activities in the eastern segment of the North China Craton (NCC) is proposed. The mafic rocks in northern Liaoning exhibit compositional ranges of 46.39–50.33 wt% for SiO2, 2.95–5.08 wt% for total alkalis (K2O + Na2O), 6.17–7.50 wt% for MgO, and 43.32–52.02 for the Mg number. TiO2 contents lie between 1.61 and 2.39 wt%, and those of MnO between 0.17 and 0.21 wt%. The first basalt and the fourth amphibolite show low total rare earth element contents. Normalized against primitive mantle, they are enriched in large ion lithophile elements (Rb, Ba, K), depleted in high field strength elements (Th, U, Nb, Ta, Zr, Ti), and exhibit negative anomalies in Sr and P, as well as slight positive anomalies in Zr and Hf. The second diabase and the third gabbro have similar average total rare earth element contents. The diabase shows slight negative Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* = 0.72–0.88), enrichment in large ion lithophile elements (Ba), depletion in Rb, and slight positive anomalies in high field strength elements (Th, U, Nb, Ta, Zr, Hf, Ti), with negative anomalies in K, Sr, and P. The gabbro is enriched in large ion lithophile elements (Rb, Ba, K), depleted in high field strength elements (Th, U, Nb, Ta, Zr, Hf), and exhibits positive anomalies in Eu (Eu/Eu* = 1.31–1.37). The contents of Cr, Co, and Ni of these four stages of mafic rocks are higher than those of N-MORB. The characteristics of trace element ratios indicate that the mafic rocks belong to the calc-alkaline series and originate from the transitional mantle. During the process of magma ascent and emplacement, it is contaminated by continental crustal materials. There are residual hornblende and spinel in the magma source of the first basalt. The other three magma sources contain residual garnet and spinel. The third gabbro was formed in an island arc environment, and the other three stages of mafic rocks originated from the Dupal OIB and were formed in an oceanic island environment. The discovery of mafic rocks in northern Liaoning suggests that the Longgang Block underwent oceanic subduction and extinction in both the north and south in the Paleoproterozoic, indicating the possibility of being in two different tectonic domains. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The tectonic location (<b>a</b>) (modified after Zhao, 2005 [<a href="#B1-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">1</a>]); simplified geological map and sample location (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Occurrence and micro-pictures of mafic rocks from northern Liaoning. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>): D1917 basalt; (<b>a</b>): pillow-shaped basalt; (<b>b</b>): edge and center phases of pillow-shaped basalt; (<b>c</b>): microscopic characteristics of basalt; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>): D1918 diabase; (<b>d</b>): field occurrence of diabase dyke; (<b>e</b>): specimen of diabase; (<b>f</b>): microscopic characteristics of diabase; (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>): D1919 gabbro; (<b>g</b>): gabbro intruded into marble; (<b>h</b>): spherical weathering of gabbro; (<b>i</b>): microscopic characteristics of gabbro; (<b>j</b>–<b>l</b>): D2012 amphibolite; (<b>j</b>): field occurrence of amphibolite; (<b>k</b>): amphibolite wrapped in marble in a pillow shape; (<b>l</b>): microscopic characteristics of amphibolite; Pl: plagioclase; Px: pyroxene; Ol: olivine; Hbl: hornblende; Spn: sphene; Ep: epidote.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Micro-pictures of zircons in the mafic rocks from northern Liaoning. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>): D1917 zircon in pillow-shaped basalt; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>): D1918 zircon in diabase; (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>): D1919 zircon in gabbro; (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>): D2012 zircon in amphibolite; Zr: zircon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of the selected zircons from the mafic rocks in northern Liaoning. The circles on zircons represent analyzed spots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE distribution diagrams for different zircons from mafic rocks in northern Liaoning.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Concordia diagrams for zircons analysed from mafic rocks in the northern Liaoning.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. total alkali (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O) ((<b>a</b>), after [<a href="#B51-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">51</a>]), R1 vs. R2 ((<b>b</b>), after [<a href="#B52-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">52</a>]), SiO<sub>2</sub>-K<sub>2</sub>O ((<b>c</b>), after [<a href="#B53-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">53</a>]) and Ta/Yb vs. Ce/Yb ((<b>d</b>), after [<a href="#B54-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">54</a>]) diagrams for mafic rocks from northern Liaoning. (<b>b</b>): 1—alkaline gabbro (alkaline basalt); 2—olivine gabbro (olivine basalt); 3—gabbro norite (tholeiite); 4—syenite gabbro (trachyte basalt); 5—monzonite gabbro (andesite coarse basalt); 6—gabbro (basalt); 7—trachyandesite (syenite); 8—monzonite (andesite); 9—monzodiorite (trachyte); 10—diorite (andesite); 11—nepheline syenite (trachyte phonolite); 12—syenite (trachyte); 13—quartz syenite (quartz trachyte); 14—quartz monzonite (quartz andesite); 15—tonalite (dacite); 16—alkaline granite (alkaline rhyolite); 17—syenogranite (rhyolite); 18—monzogranite (dacite rhyolite); 19—granodiorite (rhyolite dacite); 20—essenite aegirine gabbro; 21—peridotite (picrite); 22—nepheline (picrite nepheline); 23—qilieyan (basanite); 24—neonite (nepheline); 25—essenite; 26—nepheline syenite (phonolite).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Chondrite-normalized rare earth element patterns (<b>a</b>) and primitive mantle-normalized trace element spider diagram (<b>b</b>) for the mafic rocks from northern Liaoning. (The values of chondrite and primitive mantle are from [<a href="#B55-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">55</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Age histogram of mafic rocks from the eastern segment of the NCC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Source characteristics of the Triassic gabbro from the Kaiyuan Area. (<b>a</b>) After [<a href="#B69-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">69</a>], DEP—depleted mantle, EN—enriched mantle, N-MORB—normal mid-ocean ridge basalt, PM—primitive mantle, REC—recycled plate, UC—upper crust. (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) After [<a href="#B70-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">70</a>], Grt—garnet, SP—spinel. (<b>c</b>) Cpx—clinopyroxene. (<b>d</b>) After [<a href="#B71-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">71</a>]. (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) After [<a href="#B72-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">72</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Identification diagram of tectonic setting for the mafic rocks from northern Liaoning. (<b>a</b>) Hf/3 versus Th versus Nb/16 (after [<a href="#B83-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">83</a>]); (<b>b</b>) Nb/Yb versus Th/Yb diagram (after [<a href="#B83-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">83</a>]).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop