[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (49)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = U-Pb chronology

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 6020 KiB  
Article
Magmatic Evolution and Nb-Ta Enrichment of Early Jurassic Granitic Porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta Deposit of the Nanling Range
by Hongling Liu, Jinrong Wang, Qin Chen, Yanna Huang, Xin Li, Wei Liu, Bin Chen and Fan Xiao
Minerals 2024, 14(10), 1005; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14101005 - 3 Oct 2024
Viewed by 363
Abstract
The Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit is located in the Yongding region of Fujian Province, the south-eastern section of the Nanling Range, South China. A series of Nb-Ta deposits, associated with granitic porphyries, are present in the Yongding region. Nevertheless, the genesis of the Nb-Ta [...] Read more.
The Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit is located in the Yongding region of Fujian Province, the south-eastern section of the Nanling Range, South China. A series of Nb-Ta deposits, associated with granitic porphyries, are present in the Yongding region. Nevertheless, the genesis of the Nb-Ta mineralisation remains practically ambiguous, and further study of the latest Nb-Ta granitic porphyries in the Nanling Range may prove beneficial in understanding the mineralisation mechanism. This paper presents a detailed analysis of the petrographic, geochemical, chronological and isotopic characteristics of the Shangxiahu granite porphyry. Shangxiahu granite porphyry is high-potassium subalkaline granite. The Rittman index (δ) is < 3.3, indicating a calc-alkaline signature. The aluminium saturation index (A/CNK) is >1.1, indicating a strong peraluminous nature. Furthermore, the rare earth elements diagram exhibits Eu-negative anomalies and an M-type ‘tetrad effect’, while the multi-element distribution patterns diagram shows an overall right-leaning trend. The SIMS zircon U-Pb age of the Shangxiahu granite porphyry is 183.2 ± 3.2 Ma, revealing the emplacement of the granite porphyry in the Early Jurassic. The high Zr + Nb + Ce + Y content and Ga/Al ratios, along with the zircon saturation temperature TZr value of 1033 °C, indicate that the Shangxiahu granite porphyry exhibits the characteristics of a highly differentiated A-type granite. The Sr-Nd isotope signatures indicate that the Nb-Ta-bearing magma was formed by the mixing of crust–mantle material. The evolution and mineralisation process of granite porphyry in the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit can be divided into four principal stages: (1) the upwelling of Asthenosphere material due to the extensional background induced partial melting of the crust; (2) the mixing of mantle-derived magma and crustal-derived magma; (3) magmatic fractional crystallisation and (4) magma–hydrothermal interaction. Combined with the reported data of Yongding Daping niobium-tantalum mining area, it can be postulated that the enrichment of Nb-Ta ores in Shangxiahu is primarily the result of the upwelling of Asthenosphere material, which caused the partial melting of the niobium-rich Mesoproterozoic crust with high Nb/Ta value. The enrichment of Nb-Ta ore bodies in Daping is primarily attributed to the fractional crystallisation of the magma and the hydrothermal alteration, which is postulated to be associated with the presence of a crust exhibiting elevated Nb/Ta ratios in Yongding. Additionally, it is postulated that ore may be found in area with high crustal source components in the crust–mantle mixed zone. There may be high volatile-rich Nb-Ta orebodies and Sn-rich and W-rich orebodies at depth or in the surrounding area. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Deposits)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The tectonic location of the study area (<b>a</b>); simplified regional geological map of the Shangxiahu in Yongding region, Fujian Province, Southern China (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Photographs of hand specimens (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and microscopic features (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit. The mineral abbreviations are as follows: Kfs (potassium feldspar), Qtz (quartz), Ms (muscovite) and Zrn (zircon).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O-SiO<sub>2</sub> (<b>a</b>) (after Peccerillo and Taylor, 1976 [<a href="#B29-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">29</a>]) and A/NK-A/CNK (<b>b</b>) (after Maniar and Piccoli, 1989 [<a href="#B30-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">30</a>]) diagrams of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit. The data of granite porphyry in the Daping Nb-Ta deposit are obtained from Wang et al., 2020 [<a href="#B13-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">13</a>] and are the same below.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Normalised rare earth elements (<b>a</b>) and multi-element distribution patterns (<b>b</b>) of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit (normalisation values after Sun and McDonough, 1989 [<a href="#B31-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">31</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Zircon CL images (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and U-Pb concordia diagrams (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(K<sub>2</sub>O + Na<sub>2</sub>O)/CaO-Zr + Nb + Ce + Y (<b>a</b>) and Zr-10,000 × Ga/Al (<b>b</b>) diagrams of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t)-Age (Ma) diagram of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit and Early Jurassic A-type granite in South China. The Early Jurassic A-type granite data in South China were obtained from Zhou et al., 2018 [<a href="#B71-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">71</a>], including the Yuanshishan data from Jia et al., 2014 [<a href="#B72-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">72</a>]; the Beitou data from He et al., 2010 [<a href="#B73-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">73</a>] and the Wengong data from Zhu et al., 2010 [<a href="#B74-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">74</a>]; the same are below.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t)-(<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>i</sub> (<b>a</b>) and ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t)-estimated proportions of the mantle component (<b>b</b>) diagrams of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit and Early Jurassic A-type granite in South China. Mantle component (%) = (Nd<sub>c</sub>/Nd<sub>m</sub>)/((Nd<sub>c</sub>/Nd<sub>m</sub>) + (ε<sub>m</sub>−ε<sub>s</sub>)/(ε<sub>s</sub>−ε<sub>c</sub>)) [<a href="#B75-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">75</a>] in (<b>b</b>). The results of the data are detailed in <a href="#minerals-14-01005-t003" class="html-table">Table 3</a>, where Nd<sub>c</sub> and Nd<sub>m</sub> denote the Nd concentration in the crustal and mantle compositions, respectively. ε<sub>m</sub>, ε<sub>s</sub> and ε<sub>c</sub> denote Nd isotopic compositions for the juvenile crust, the test sample and the crust, respectively. Parameters used as follows: ε<sub>m</sub> = +8, ε<sub>c</sub> = −15, Nd<sub>c</sub> = 25 ppm and Nd<sub>m</sub> = 15 ppm. Nd isotope data for the end members are from Wu et al., 2003 [<a href="#B76-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">76</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Y-Nb-Ce (<b>a</b>) and Y-Nb-3 × Ga (<b>b</b>) triangular diagrams of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit (modified from Eby (1992) [<a href="#B77-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">77</a>]). Where A1 represents non-orogenic A-type granite, A2 represents orogenic A-type granite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Rb-Y + Nb (<b>a</b>) and Nb-Y (<b>b</b>) diagrams of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Zr/Nb-Zr diagram (<b>a</b>); Nb-La/Yb diagram (<b>b</b>); Sr-Eu diagram (<b>c</b>); Ba-Rb diagram (<b>d</b>) of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Rb/Sr-K/Rb diagram (<b>a</b>); Nb/Ta-TE<sub>1,3</sub> diagram (<b>b</b>); Nb/Ta-K/Rb diagram (<b>c</b>); Nb/Ta-Zr/Hf diagram (<b>d</b>) of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit. Calculation of tetrad effect is TE<sub>1,3</sub> = (t1 × t3)<sup>0.5</sup>, t1 = (Ce/Ce<sup>t</sup> × Pr/Pr<sup>t</sup>)<sup>0.5</sup>, t3 = (Tb/Tb<sup>t</sup> × Dy/Dy<sup>t</sup>)<sup>0.5</sup>, Ce/Ce<sup>t</sup> = Ce<sub>cn</sub>/(La<sub>cn</sub><sup>2/3</sup> × Nd<sub>cn</sub><sup>1/3</sup>), Pr/Pr<sup>t</sup> = Pr<sub>cn</sub>/(La<sub>cn</sub><sup>1/3</sup> × Nd<sub>cn</sub><sup>2/3</sup>), Tb/Tb<sup>t</sup> = Tb<sub>cn</sub>/(Gd<sub>cn</sub><sup>2/3</sup> × Ho<sub>cn</sub><sup>1/3</sup>), Dy/Dy<sup>t</sup> = Dy<sub>cn</sub>/(Gd<sub>cn</sub><sup>1/3</sup> × Ho<sub>cn</sub><sup>2/3</sup>), which is derived from Irber (1999) [<a href="#B99-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">99</a>]. The data ranges of Sn-, W-, Nb- and Ta-rich granites and Sn- and W-rich granites in Nanling Range are from Xiang et al. 2020 [<a href="#B100-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">100</a>]; the data ranges of barren granites, rare metal granites and Sn-W-(U)-related granites are from Ballouard et al. 2016 [<a href="#B98-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">98</a>].</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 5625 KiB  
Article
Pan-African and Early Paleozoic Orogenic Events in Southern Tibet: Evidence from Geochronology and Geochemistry of the Kangbuzhenri Gneissic Granite in the Zhegu Area
by Ming Cheng, Xuming Hu, Yao Tang, Zhao Deng, Yingzi Min, Shiyi Chen, Saijun Sun and Huanzhan Zhou
Minerals 2024, 14(8), 845; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080845 - 22 Aug 2024
Viewed by 458
Abstract
The Zhegu area in southern Tibet is situated in the central and eastern part of the Tethys Himalayan tectonic belt, with the Kangbuzhenri area being abundant in gneissic granites. This study examines the petrology, chronology, and geochemistry of the Kangbuzhenri gneissic granite, providing [...] Read more.
The Zhegu area in southern Tibet is situated in the central and eastern part of the Tethys Himalayan tectonic belt, with the Kangbuzhenri area being abundant in gneissic granites. This study examines the petrology, chronology, and geochemistry of the Kangbuzhenri gneissic granite, providing insights into its Pan-African and Early Paleozoic geological evolution. The zircon U-Pb chronology indicates an upper intercept age of ~539 Ma, reflecting Pan-African orogenic events in the eastern part of the Tethys Himalayan tectonic belt, and a lower intercept age of ~144 Ma, representing a late tectonic–thermal event. Geochemically, the gneissic granites are calc-alkaline peraluminous rocks with high SiO2 and Al2O3 contents and low TiO2, P2O5, MgO, and FeOT contents. The gneissic granites are enriched in LREE and LILEs (Rb, Pb, Th, U, etc.), but relatively depleted in HREE and HFSEs (Nb, Ti, P, etc.). Most of them show a weak negative δEu anomaly, except for two samples which show a significant negative δEu anomaly due to the crystallization of plagioclase. Based on the above study, most of the gneissic granites exhibited the characteristics of an I-type granite, while two of the samples were a highly differentiated I-type granite with S-type affinities. All the above characteristics indicate that the gneissic granite likely originated from the partial melting of crustal materials and sediments with a minor involvement of mantle-derived materials. Combined with the previous chronological studies, the Kangbuzhenri gneissic granites were formed in an extensional tectonic environment during post-collision orogeny and then they were influenced by the Kerguelen mantle plume tectonic–thermal event around ~144 Ma and the subsequent Southern Tibet Detachment System (STDS). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Geotectonic map of southern Tibet (revised by [<a href="#B18-minerals-14-00845" class="html-bibr">18</a>,<a href="#B19-minerals-14-00845" class="html-bibr">19</a>]); (<b>b</b>) Geological map of the Zhegu area. 1—Indian plate; 2—Northern Lhasa Massif; 3—Gangdisê island arc; 4—Tethys Himalayas; 5—High Himalayas; 6—Low Himalayas; 7—Sub-Himalayan; 8—Yarlung Tsangpo river ophiolite belt; 9—thrust fault; 10—slip fault; YLZBS—Yalung Zangbo suture; STD—South Tibet detachment; MCT—Main central thrust; MBT—Main boundary thrust; MFT—Main front thrust.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Field contacts of gneissic granites from the Zhegu area in southern Tibet; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Photomicrographs of gneissic granites from the Zhegu area. Qzt—quartz; Pl—plagioclase; Kfs—K-feldspar; Ms—muscovite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Zircon U-Pb concordia diagrams of the Kangbuzhenri gneissic granitoids; Zircon cathodoluminescence image of the Kangbuzhenri gneissic granitoids.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> versus K<sub>2</sub>O + Na<sub>2</sub>O diagram for the Kangbuzhenri gneissic granitoids; (<b>b</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> versus K<sub>2</sub>O diagram for the Kangbuzhenri gneissic granitoids [<a href="#B42-minerals-14-00845" class="html-bibr">42</a>]. (<b>c</b>) A/NK versus A/CNK diagram for the Kangbuzhenri gneissic granitoids [<a href="#B43-minerals-14-00845" class="html-bibr">43</a>]. Reference data from Yalashangbo granite gneiss [<a href="#B15-minerals-14-00845" class="html-bibr">15</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Harker diagrams for the Kangbuzhenri gneissic granitoids. Reference data from Yalashangbo granite gneiss [<a href="#B15-minerals-14-00845" class="html-bibr">15</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns of the Kangbuzhenri gneissic granitoids; (<b>b</b>) Primitive mantle-normalized trace elements spider diagrams of the Kangbuzhenri gneissic granitoids. Normalizing values are from [<a href="#B44-minerals-14-00845" class="html-bibr">44</a>]. Reference data from Yalashangbo granite gneiss [<a href="#B15-minerals-14-00845" class="html-bibr">15</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Na<sub>2</sub>O versus K<sub>2</sub>O diagram, (<b>b</b>) P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> versus SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram [<a href="#B68-minerals-14-00845" class="html-bibr">68</a>], (<b>c</b>) Fe*O/MgO versus (Zr + Nb + Ce + Y) diagram [<a href="#B69-minerals-14-00845" class="html-bibr">69</a>], (<b>d</b>) (La/Yb)<sub>N</sub> versus δEu diagram for the Kangbuzhenri gneissic granites. Reference data from Yalashangbo granite gneiss [<a href="#B15-minerals-14-00845" class="html-bibr">15</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Ba/Th versus (La/Sm)<sub>N</sub> diagram (<b>b</b>) Th/Yb versus Ba/La diagram for the Kangbuzhenri gneissic granitoids. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Plots of Rb/Sr ratios versus Sr (ppm) and Ba (ppm), respectively (after Inger and Harris, 1993 [<a href="#B76-minerals-14-00845" class="html-bibr">76</a>]). Reference data from Yalashangbo granite gneiss [<a href="#B15-minerals-14-00845" class="html-bibr">15</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(Y + Nb) versus Rb diagram for the Kangbuzhenri gneissic granitoids [<a href="#B85-minerals-14-00845" class="html-bibr">85</a>]. Rb-Hf-Ta triangular plot for the Kangbuzhenri gneissic granitoids [<a href="#B86-minerals-14-00845" class="html-bibr">86</a>]. Reference data from Yalashangbo granite gneiss [<a href="#B15-minerals-14-00845" class="html-bibr">15</a>]. ORG-Ocean Ridge granites; WPG-Within Plate Granites; VAG-Volcanic Arc Granites; Syn/Post-COLG (Syn- and Post-collision Granites).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 31392 KiB  
Article
Involvement of the Northeastern Margin of South China Block in Rodinia Supercontinent Evolution: A Case Study of Neoproterozoic Granitic Gneiss in Rizhao Area, Shandong Province
by Xiaolong He, Zeyu Yang, Kai Liu, Wei Zhu, Honglei Zhan, Peng Yang, Tongzheng Wei, Shuxun Wang and Yaoyao Zhang
Minerals 2024, 14(8), 807; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080807 - 9 Aug 2024
Viewed by 638
Abstract
The South China Plate is an important part of the Rodinia supercontinent in the Neoproterozoic. The Rizhao area, located on the northeastern margin of the South China Plate, records multiple periods of magmatism, among which Neoproterozoic granitic gneiss is of great significance to [...] Read more.
The South China Plate is an important part of the Rodinia supercontinent in the Neoproterozoic. The Rizhao area, located on the northeastern margin of the South China Plate, records multiple periods of magmatism, among which Neoproterozoic granitic gneiss is of great significance to the tectonic evolution of the South China Block. In this study, systematic petrology, geochemistry, isotopic chronology, and zircon Hf isotopic analyses were carried out on gneisses samples of biotite alkali feldspar granitic and biotite monzogranitic compositions in the Rizhao area. Geochemical analyses suggest that these granitic rocks belong to the sub-alkaline series and have high potassium contents. They are enriched in large-ion lithophile elements K, Rb, and Ba; depleted in high field strength elements P, Nb, and Ti; enriched in light rare earth elements and moderately depleted in heavy rare earth elements; and have weak to moderate negative Eu anomalies and weak negative Ce anomalies. These rocks are post-orogenic A-type granites. LA-MC-ICP-MS U-Pb dating of zircons from two biotite alkali-feldspar granitic gneiss samples yielded weighted mean ages of 785 ± 8 Ma (MSWD = 3.0) and 784 ± 6Ma (MSWD = 1.5), respectively, and a biotite monzogranitic gneiss sample yielded a weighted mean age of 789 ± 6 Ma (MSWD = 2.3). Lu-Hf isotopic analyses on zircon grains from the two types of Neoproterozoic-aged gneisses yielded negative εHf(t) values ranging from −19.3 to −8.8 and from −18.3 to −10.4, respectively, and the corresponding two-stage Hf model age ranges are 2848–3776 Ma and 2983–3682 Ma, respectively. These granites are the product of Neoproterozoic magmatic activity and are mainly derived from the partial melting of Archean continental crust. Combining the geochemical characteristics and zircon U-Pb-Lu-Hf isotopic analyses, these A-type granitic gneisses appear to have formed in an intracontinental rift extension environment during the initial break-up of the Rodinia supercontinent, as part of the supercontinent break-up process at the northeastern margin of the South China Block. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geological map of the Rizhao area of the South China Block. (<b>a</b>) The inset modified from [<a href="#B15-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">15</a>] shows the location of the South China Block. (<b>b</b>) Tectonic sketch map of the Rizhao and adjacent areas, modified from [<a href="#B16-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">16</a>]. Abbreviations: UHP = ultra-high-pressure; HP = high-pressure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simplified geological map of the Rizhao area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Field photographs and photomicrographs of the Rizhao granitic gneisses: (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) porphyritic biotite alkali feldspar granitic gneiss; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) porphyritic biotite alkali feldspar granitic gneiss; (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) porphyritic biotite monzogranitic gneiss; (<b>j</b>–<b>l</b>) medium-fine-grained biotite monzogranitic gneiss. Abbreviations: Qtz = quartz; Bt = biotite; Pl = plagioclase; Kfs = K-feldspar; Amp = amphibolite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Total-alkali-silica (TAS) diagram [<a href="#B22-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">22</a>]; (<b>b</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O–SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram ([<a href="#B23-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">23</a>] for the Rizhao granitic gneisses).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE and (<b>b</b>) N-MORB-normalized trace element patterns of the Rizhao granitic gneisses (normalizing factors are from [<a href="#B24-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">24</a>]; N-MORB compositions are from [<a href="#B24-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">24</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Zircon cathodoluminescence (CL) images and U–Pb concordia diagrams of the Rizhao granitic gneisses: (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) RZ07, (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) RZ30, and (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) RZ47.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Plots of zircon <span class="html-italic">ε</span>Hf<sub>(<span class="html-italic">t</span>)</sub> values versus U-Pb ages of the Rizhao granitic gneisses (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), and (<b>a</b>) is modified after [<a href="#B29-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Discrimination plots for magmatic, metamorphic, and hydrothermal zircon according to [<a href="#B30-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B51-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">51</a>]. (<b>a</b>) zircon Th–U plot; (<b>b</b>) zircon LREE–REE plot; (<b>c</b>) zircon (Sm/La)<sub>N</sub>–La plot; (<b>d</b>) zircon (Ce/Ce*)<sub>N</sub>–(Sm/La)<sub>N</sub> plot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Genetic discrimination diagrams for the Rizhao granitic gneisses according to [<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">48</a>,<a href="#B50-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">50</a>,<a href="#B52-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">52</a>]. (<b>a</b>) Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O–10,000 Ga/Al discrimination diagram; (<b>b</b>) TiO<sub>2</sub>–SiO<sub>2</sub> discrimination diagram; (<b>c</b>) Nb–Y–3Ga triangular discrimination diagram; (<b>d</b>) Nb–Y–Ce triangular discrimination diagram. Abbreviation: RRG = rift-related granites; CEUG = continental uplift-related granites; A1 = A1-type granites; A2 = A2-type granites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Tectonic discrimination diagrams [<a href="#B52-minerals-14-00807" class="html-bibr">52</a>] for the Rizhao granitic gneisses. (<b>a</b>) Rb–Y+Nb diagram; (<b>b</b>) Nb–Y discrimination diagram. Abbreviation: Syn-COLG = syn-collision granite; VAG = volcanic arc granite; WPG = within plate granite; ORG = ocean ridge granite; Post-COLG = post-collision granite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Simplified genetic model showing the Neoproterozoic tectonic–magmatic evolution in the northeastern margin of Yangtze Plate.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 6719 KiB  
Article
Source and U-Pb Chronology of Diagenetic Fluids in the Permian Maokou Formation Dolomite Reservoir, Eastern Sichuan Basin, China
by Shuangjian Li, Jian Gao, Tianbo Yang, Tianyi Li, Tianjia Liu, Yunqing Hao, Zhiliang He and Entao Liu
Minerals 2024, 14(8), 803; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080803 - 7 Aug 2024
Viewed by 776
Abstract
The hydrothermal dolomitization, facilitated by basement fault activities, had an important impact on the Permian Maokou Formation dolomite in the Sichuan Basin, which experienced complex diagenesis and presented strong reservoir heterogeneity. The source and age of diagenetic fluids in this succession remain controversial. [...] Read more.
The hydrothermal dolomitization, facilitated by basement fault activities, had an important impact on the Permian Maokou Formation dolomite in the Sichuan Basin, which experienced complex diagenesis and presented strong reservoir heterogeneity. The source and age of diagenetic fluids in this succession remain controversial. In this study, various analyses were implemented on samples collected from outcrops and wells near the No. 15 fault in the eastern Sichuan Basin to reconstruct the multi-stage fluid activity and analyze the impact on reservoir development, including petrology, micro-domain isotopes, rare earth elements, homogenization temperature of fluid inclusions, and Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) U-Pb dating. The homogenization temperature of primary brine inclusions in fine-grained matrix dolomite and saddle dolomite is concentrated between 100 and 150 °C, which indicates that the impacts of abnormally high temperatures of other geological bodies. The δ13C and δ18O value and low 87Sr/86Sr value indicate that the diagenetic fluid of fine-grained matrix dolomite is mainly Permian seawater. The U-Pb ages of fine-grained matrix dolomite are ~260 Ma, which coincides with the age of the main magmatism of Emeishan Large Igneous Province (ELIP), and hydrothermal fluid provided a favorable high-temperature environment in the penecontemporaneous stage. While highly radiogenic 87Sr/86Sr compositions suggests those of saddle dolomite, the high-temperature Sr-rich formation fluid. The U-Pb ages of saddle dolomite are 245–250 Ma, which coincides with the age of the 255~251 Ma magmatism of ELIP. This indicates that those should be the diagenetic products of the ELIP hydrothermal fluid in the shallow burial stage. The U-Pb age of coarse-grained calcite is 190–220 Ma, and it should be the diagenetic product of the deep burial stage. Brine inclusions associated with primary methane inclusions were developed in coarse-grained calcite, with a homogenization temperature range of 140.8–199.8 °C, which indicates that the formation fluid activities were related to hydrocarbon charging. The Permian Maokou Formation dolomite was firstly formed in the penecontemporaneous shallow burial stage, and then it was subjected to further hydrothermal dolomitization due to the basement faulting and the abnormally high heat flow during the active period of ELIP. Hydrothermal dolomitization contributed to the formation and maintenance of intercrystalline and dissolution pores, whereas it also formed saddle dolomite to fill the pores, and reduce the pore space. The influence of deep fluid activities on reservoir evolution is further distinguished. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Tectonic sketch map of China and location of the Sichuan Basin. (<b>b</b>) Distributions and thickness of the Maokou Formation dolomite and basement faults. (<b>c</b>) Stratigraphy of the Maokou Formation in the Sichuan Basin. The yellow colour is dolomite reservoir, GR = natural gamma-ray logging.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Correlation between wells drilled around the No. 15 basement fault in the eastern Sichuan Basin and outcropped Maokou Formation. The yellow colour is the reservoir, and the five-pointed star is the samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Field photographs showing the Permian Maokou Formation dolomite reservoirs in the eastern Sichuan Basin. (<b>a</b>) Maokou Formation dolomite is macroscopically layered and patchy in Tuotuoba section ((<b>a<sub>1</sub></b>) zebra-like structures, caves, and chert nodule (Cht) in the dolomite; (<b>a<sub>2</sub></b>) Fissures are filled with dolomite content (CD); (<b>a<sub>3</sub></b>) Caves are filled with dolomite and calcite content (CC). (<b>b</b>) Maokou Formation dolomite is macroscopically either layered or patchy in Fangniuba section ((<b>b<sub>1</sub></b>) CD is parallel distributed in the dolomite; (<b>b<sub>2</sub></b>,<b>b<sub>3</sub></b>) CD is in the crumby and zebra-like structures).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Core characteristics of Permian Maokou Formation dolomite reservoirs in the eastern Sichuan Basin. (<b>a</b>) Micro-cracks developed in dense limestone (Lime) and were filled with CD, TL7, 5106.6 m; (<b>b</b>) Karst caves associated with cracks were both developed in gray MD; the caves were filled with CD and CC in sequence, TL601, 5534.1 m; (<b>c</b>) Cracks were developed in gray MD and filled with CD, TL601, 5530.3 m; (<b>d</b>) Cht were developed in gray MD, and floating MD, chert breccia, and CD are seen in veins. TL601, 5528.4 m; (<b>e</b>) Cht were cut by network cracks, and the cracks were filled with CD. TL601, 5528.4 m; (<b>f</b>) Echelon fractures are developed in gray MD and partially filled with CD, with a small number of residual pores developed. TL6, 5490.3 m; (<b>g</b>) The cross-section of the rock core of d, floating matrix dolomite, and chert breccia can be seen in the network cracks; (<b>h</b>) The cross-section of the rock core of e, MD, was associated with flint nodules; (<b>i</b>) In the cross-section of the rock core of f, the pyrite crystals (Py) precipitate in the MD, and a small amount of sphalerite (Sph) and CD were developed in the fracture veins.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Cathodoluminescence characteristics of the Permian Maokou Formation dolomite in the eastern Sichuan Basin. (<b>a</b>) fine-grained matrix dolomite (MD) exhibits dull red luminescence; (<b>b</b>) Cave is filled with calcite (CC) and saddle dolomite (SD), surrounding rock is limestone (Lime), and the CC is cut through by later SD, TL7; (<b>c</b>) Cathode luminescence of (<b>b</b>), the CC is dark red and dolomite content (CD) is shiny red; (<b>d</b>) Cave is filled with CD, barite (Brt), fluorite (Fl), and CC in sequence, TL601; (<b>e</b>) Cave is sequentially filled with sphalerite (Sph) SD, the surrounding rock is MD, TL6; (<b>f</b>) Cathode luminescence of (<b>e</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Pore space characteristics of the Permian Maokou Formation dolomite in the eastern Sichuan Basin. (<b>a</b>) Caves associated with fractures are developed in dolomite, filled with Qt, CD, and CC, with a small number of residual caves and pores which have not been fully filled (blue arrow), Tuotuoba section; (<b>b</b>) Zebra-like structures and residual caves and pores (blue arrow), Tuotuoba section; (<b>c</b>) Karst caves associated with fractures were developed in dolomite, with a cemented dolomite rim and coarse calcite visible. Most of the space in the caves is not filled; TL6, 5503.8 m [<a href="#B5-minerals-14-00803" class="html-bibr">5</a>]; (<b>d</b>) A small number of intergranular pores were developed in the MD; TL6, 5510.0 m [<a href="#B5-minerals-14-00803" class="html-bibr">5</a>]; (<b>e</b>) The karst caves in the MD were mainly filled with SD, with a small amount of residual karst pores developed. TL6, 5490.3 m; (<b>f</b>) Multiple sets of fractures are developed within the MD, which have not been fully filled by the SD, and a small number of residual pores are also developed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>C and O isotopes of different diagenetic phases and limestone in the Permian Maokou Formation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p><sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr values of different diagenetic phases and limestone in the Permian Maokou Formation (the <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr ratios of Permian seawater (0.70662–0.70774, [<a href="#B40-minerals-14-00803" class="html-bibr">40</a>]) were marked for comparison).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>REEs in different diagenetic phases and limestone of the Permian Maokou Formation. (<b>a</b>) LM (<b>b</b>) MD (<b>c</b>) SD (<b>d</b>) CC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>In situ U-Pb ages of different diagenetic phases in the Permian Maokou Formation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Photographs of fluid inclusions within different diagenetic phases in the Permian Maokou Formation. (<b>a</b>) Matrix dolomite (<b>b</b>) Saddle dolomite (<b>c</b>) Calcite 1 (<b>d</b>) Calcite 2 (<b>e</b>) Quartz 1 (<b>f</b>) Quartz 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Homogenization temperature (<b>a</b>) and salinity of fluid inclusions (<b>b</b>) in different diagenetic phases and limestone of the Permian Maokou Formation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Relationship between burial history and diagenetic events of Permian strata in Fangniuba area, eastern Sichuan Basin [<a href="#B44-minerals-14-00803" class="html-bibr">44</a>] and the U-Pb ages of the MD, SD, and CC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Schematic model illustrating hydrothermal dolomitization in the Permian Maokou Formation [<a href="#B32-minerals-14-00803" class="html-bibr">32</a>]. Dolomitization of the Permian Maokou Formation can be divided into three stages: micritic limestone and micritic bioclastic limestone were developed in an open platform during the sedimentary period; high heat flow facilitated the long-lasting dolomitization, which resulted to the formation of fine-grained dolomite in the penecontemporaneous stage. The magnesium-rich fluid from the deep source rose along the fault and entered the gractures and vugs, forming asddle dolomite.</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 15297 KiB  
Article
Geochronology and Geochemistry of Paleoproterozoic Mafic Rocks in Northern Liaoning and Their Geological Significance
by Jingsheng Chen, Yi Tian, Zhonghui Gao, Bin Li, Chen Zhao, Weiwei Li, Chao Zhang and Yan Wang
Minerals 2024, 14(7), 717; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070717 - 16 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 746
Abstract
Petrological, geochronological, and geochemical analyses of mafic rocks in northern Liaoning were conducted to constrain the formation age of the Proterozoic strata, and to further study the source characteristics, genesis, and tectonic setting. The mafic rocks in northern Liaoning primarily consist of basalt, [...] Read more.
Petrological, geochronological, and geochemical analyses of mafic rocks in northern Liaoning were conducted to constrain the formation age of the Proterozoic strata, and to further study the source characteristics, genesis, and tectonic setting. The mafic rocks in northern Liaoning primarily consist of basalt, diabase, gabbro, and amphibolite. Results of zircon U-Pb chronology reveal four stages of mafic magma activities in northern Liaoning: the first stage of basalt (2209 ± 12 Ma), the second stage of diabase (2154 ± 15 Ma), the third stage of gabbro (2063 ± 7 Ma), and the fourth stage of magmatic protolith of amphibolite (2018 ± 13 Ma). Combined with the unconformity overlying Neoproterozoic granite, the formation age of the Proterozoic strata in northern Liaoning was found to be Paleoproterozoic rather than Middle Neoproterozoic by the geochronology of these mafic rocks. A chronological framework of mafic magmatic activities in the eastern segment of the North China Craton (NCC) is proposed. The mafic rocks in northern Liaoning exhibit compositional ranges of 46.39–50.33 wt% for SiO2, 2.95–5.08 wt% for total alkalis (K2O + Na2O), 6.17–7.50 wt% for MgO, and 43.32–52.02 for the Mg number. TiO2 contents lie between 1.61 and 2.39 wt%, and those of MnO between 0.17 and 0.21 wt%. The first basalt and the fourth amphibolite show low total rare earth element contents. Normalized against primitive mantle, they are enriched in large ion lithophile elements (Rb, Ba, K), depleted in high field strength elements (Th, U, Nb, Ta, Zr, Ti), and exhibit negative anomalies in Sr and P, as well as slight positive anomalies in Zr and Hf. The second diabase and the third gabbro have similar average total rare earth element contents. The diabase shows slight negative Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* = 0.72–0.88), enrichment in large ion lithophile elements (Ba), depletion in Rb, and slight positive anomalies in high field strength elements (Th, U, Nb, Ta, Zr, Hf, Ti), with negative anomalies in K, Sr, and P. The gabbro is enriched in large ion lithophile elements (Rb, Ba, K), depleted in high field strength elements (Th, U, Nb, Ta, Zr, Hf), and exhibits positive anomalies in Eu (Eu/Eu* = 1.31–1.37). The contents of Cr, Co, and Ni of these four stages of mafic rocks are higher than those of N-MORB. The characteristics of trace element ratios indicate that the mafic rocks belong to the calc-alkaline series and originate from the transitional mantle. During the process of magma ascent and emplacement, it is contaminated by continental crustal materials. There are residual hornblende and spinel in the magma source of the first basalt. The other three magma sources contain residual garnet and spinel. The third gabbro was formed in an island arc environment, and the other three stages of mafic rocks originated from the Dupal OIB and were formed in an oceanic island environment. The discovery of mafic rocks in northern Liaoning suggests that the Longgang Block underwent oceanic subduction and extinction in both the north and south in the Paleoproterozoic, indicating the possibility of being in two different tectonic domains. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The tectonic location (<b>a</b>) (modified after Zhao, 2005 [<a href="#B1-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">1</a>]); simplified geological map and sample location (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Occurrence and micro-pictures of mafic rocks from northern Liaoning. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>): D1917 basalt; (<b>a</b>): pillow-shaped basalt; (<b>b</b>): edge and center phases of pillow-shaped basalt; (<b>c</b>): microscopic characteristics of basalt; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>): D1918 diabase; (<b>d</b>): field occurrence of diabase dyke; (<b>e</b>): specimen of diabase; (<b>f</b>): microscopic characteristics of diabase; (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>): D1919 gabbro; (<b>g</b>): gabbro intruded into marble; (<b>h</b>): spherical weathering of gabbro; (<b>i</b>): microscopic characteristics of gabbro; (<b>j</b>–<b>l</b>): D2012 amphibolite; (<b>j</b>): field occurrence of amphibolite; (<b>k</b>): amphibolite wrapped in marble in a pillow shape; (<b>l</b>): microscopic characteristics of amphibolite; Pl: plagioclase; Px: pyroxene; Ol: olivine; Hbl: hornblende; Spn: sphene; Ep: epidote.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Micro-pictures of zircons in the mafic rocks from northern Liaoning. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>): D1917 zircon in pillow-shaped basalt; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>): D1918 zircon in diabase; (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>): D1919 zircon in gabbro; (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>): D2012 zircon in amphibolite; Zr: zircon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of the selected zircons from the mafic rocks in northern Liaoning. The circles on zircons represent analyzed spots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE distribution diagrams for different zircons from mafic rocks in northern Liaoning.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Concordia diagrams for zircons analysed from mafic rocks in the northern Liaoning.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. total alkali (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O) ((<b>a</b>), after [<a href="#B51-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">51</a>]), R1 vs. R2 ((<b>b</b>), after [<a href="#B52-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">52</a>]), SiO<sub>2</sub>-K<sub>2</sub>O ((<b>c</b>), after [<a href="#B53-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">53</a>]) and Ta/Yb vs. Ce/Yb ((<b>d</b>), after [<a href="#B54-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">54</a>]) diagrams for mafic rocks from northern Liaoning. (<b>b</b>): 1—alkaline gabbro (alkaline basalt); 2—olivine gabbro (olivine basalt); 3—gabbro norite (tholeiite); 4—syenite gabbro (trachyte basalt); 5—monzonite gabbro (andesite coarse basalt); 6—gabbro (basalt); 7—trachyandesite (syenite); 8—monzonite (andesite); 9—monzodiorite (trachyte); 10—diorite (andesite); 11—nepheline syenite (trachyte phonolite); 12—syenite (trachyte); 13—quartz syenite (quartz trachyte); 14—quartz monzonite (quartz andesite); 15—tonalite (dacite); 16—alkaline granite (alkaline rhyolite); 17—syenogranite (rhyolite); 18—monzogranite (dacite rhyolite); 19—granodiorite (rhyolite dacite); 20—essenite aegirine gabbro; 21—peridotite (picrite); 22—nepheline (picrite nepheline); 23—qilieyan (basanite); 24—neonite (nepheline); 25—essenite; 26—nepheline syenite (phonolite).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Chondrite-normalized rare earth element patterns (<b>a</b>) and primitive mantle-normalized trace element spider diagram (<b>b</b>) for the mafic rocks from northern Liaoning. (The values of chondrite and primitive mantle are from [<a href="#B55-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">55</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Age histogram of mafic rocks from the eastern segment of the NCC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Source characteristics of the Triassic gabbro from the Kaiyuan Area. (<b>a</b>) After [<a href="#B69-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">69</a>], DEP—depleted mantle, EN—enriched mantle, N-MORB—normal mid-ocean ridge basalt, PM—primitive mantle, REC—recycled plate, UC—upper crust. (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) After [<a href="#B70-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">70</a>], Grt—garnet, SP—spinel. (<b>c</b>) Cpx—clinopyroxene. (<b>d</b>) After [<a href="#B71-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">71</a>]. (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) After [<a href="#B72-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">72</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Identification diagram of tectonic setting for the mafic rocks from northern Liaoning. (<b>a</b>) Hf/3 versus Th versus Nb/16 (after [<a href="#B83-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">83</a>]); (<b>b</b>) Nb/Yb versus Th/Yb diagram (after [<a href="#B83-minerals-14-00717" class="html-bibr">83</a>]).</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 12357 KiB  
Article
Zircon U-Pb and Fission-Track Chronology of the Kaiyang Phosphate Deposit in the Yangtze Block: Implications for the Rodinia Supercontinent Splitting and Subsequent Thermal Events
by Yina Song, Tianqi Li, Jiayi Zhou, Debin Zhu and Lingling Xiao
Minerals 2024, 14(6), 585; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14060585 - 31 May 2024
Viewed by 511
Abstract
The Kaiyang phosphate mining area in Guizhou, which is located in the central–southern part of the Yangtze Block, hosts one of China’s more significant phosphate-enriched strata within the Doushantuo Formation. This formation is essential for phosphate mining and also preserves multiple magmatic events, [...] Read more.
The Kaiyang phosphate mining area in Guizhou, which is located in the central–southern part of the Yangtze Block, hosts one of China’s more significant phosphate-enriched strata within the Doushantuo Formation. This formation is essential for phosphate mining and also preserves multiple magmatic events, which are closely linked to the assembly and breakup of the Rodinia supercontinent. Our comprehensive studies in petrology, geochemistry, zircon U-Pb geochronology, and fission-track dating reveal that the primary ore mineral in phosphorite is collophane, which is accompanied by dolomite, quartz, pyrite, and zircon. The majority of detrital zircons in the phosphorite, as well as the overlying dolostone and underlying sandstone, are of magmatic origin, with a record of multiple stages of magmatic ages. Among these, the older age groups of ~2500 Ma and ~2000–1800 Ma represent the ancient crystalline basement of the Yangtze Block from the Paleoproterozoic era. The three main age peaks at ~880 Ma, ~820 Ma, and ~780 Ma indicate that the magmatic event at ~880 Ma was related to the assembly of the Rodinia supercontinent during the Grenvillian period. The most prominent age peak at ~820 Ma marks a critical time point for the transition from assembly to the breakup of the Rodinia supercontinent, with the Yangtze Block’s response to the supercontinent breakup events lasting at least until ~780 Ma. The youngest group of zircon ages from the phosphorite (~594 Ma), and the underlying sandstone (~529 Ma) establishes the minimum age for the phosphorite formation, indicating that the Doushantuo phosphorite layer in the Kaiyang area was formed after 594 Ma, i.e., even later than 529 Ma. The zircon fission-track ages in the three rock types of the phosphorite-bearing rocks can be divided into three groups: 501–489 Ma, ~366 Ma, and 53–39 Ma. All of these groups are presumed to be associated with the tectonic uplift events that follow mineralization. The first two age groups correspond to the two major tectonic uplift events during the Caledonian period, which resulted in the formation of the Qianzhong Uplift. The ages of 53–39 Ma are related to the late uplift of the Himalayan orogeny, and they represent its response in the Kaiyang area of Guizhou. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geochemistry and Metallogenesis of REE-Rich Phosphorite Deposits)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Simplified geological map of South China Craton and the distribution of Proterozoic–Paleozoic thermal events. (<b>b</b>) Simplified map of the tectonic plate divisions of China. Both (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) are modified after being obtained from [<a href="#B5-minerals-14-00585" class="html-bibr">5</a>]. Reprinted from Precambrian Research, 2020, 337, Wang, L.J.; Zhang, K.X.; Lin, S.F.; He, W.H.; Kou, X.H.; and Xiao, H.Z. Turbidite record of a Neoproterozoic active continental margin in the West Cathaysia terrane, South China: implications for the relationships between the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks and their positions in Rodinia, no. 105457, Copyright (2024), with permission from Elsevier.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simplified geological map of the Yangshui anticline area in the Kaiyang area (modified after [<a href="#B18-minerals-14-00585" class="html-bibr">18</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Stratigraphic column diagram illustrating the phosphorite-bearing rocks in the Kaiyang area of Guizhou, from the Doushantuo Formation to the overlying Dengying Formation. The yellow asterisks denote the following sampled intervals: PA797-2 for top dolostone, PA770-4 and MNW283-6 for phosphorite rock, and MNW283-10 and PA770-7 for basal sandstone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Underground (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) and surface outcrop (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) photos of the phosphorite-bearing rocks of the Doushantuo Formation in the Kaiyang area. (<b>a</b>) Top dolostone overlying phosphorite; (<b>b</b>) phosphorite overlying basal sandstone; (<b>c</b>) pyrite-containing top dolostone; (<b>d</b>) pyrite in dolostone; (<b>e</b>) weathered surface showing greenish-gray, banded phosphorite; and (<b>f</b>) fresh surface showing grayish-white, banded phosphorite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Specimen photographs (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) and petrographic photomicrographs (<b>d</b>–<b>l</b>) of phosphorite-bearing rocks. (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>j</b>) Pyrite-banded dolomitic phosphorite; (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>k</b>) striped phosphorite; (<b>h</b>,<b>i</b>) siliceous phosphorite; and (<b>c</b>,<b>g</b>,<b>l</b>) basal sandstone. Abbreviations: Py = pyrite; Dol = dolomite; Qtz = quartz; Clh = collophane; Mus = muscovite; and Cln = chalcedony. The mineral names and abbreviations are referenced from [<a href="#B20-minerals-14-00585" class="html-bibr">20</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Diagrams illustrating the whole-rock geochemical compositions for the Kaiyang phosphorite-bearing rocks. (<b>a</b>) A trace element spider diagram normalized to the upper continental crust values (data referenced from [<a href="#B25-minerals-14-00585" class="html-bibr">25</a>]); (<b>b</b>) rare earth element normalized distribution pattern diagram (PAAS-normalized data from [<a href="#B26-minerals-14-00585" class="html-bibr">26</a>]); (<b>c</b>) correlation chart of the P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and total REE content; (<b>d</b>) correlation chart of the P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and Y content; and (<b>e</b>) correlation chart of the P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> content and La<sub>N</sub>/Yb<sub>N</sub> ratio.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) Representative CL images of the zircon grains from the Kaiyang phosphorite-bearing rocks (red circles indicate analysis locations).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Phosphorite sample MNW283-6 zircon U-Pb age-analysis-related diagrams. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Concordia diagrams; (<b>c</b>) chondrite-normalized REE distribution pattern diagram (C1 chondrite normalization data from [<a href="#B27-minerals-14-00585" class="html-bibr">27</a>]); (<b>d</b>) U-Pb age histograms and the relative probability plots; and (<b>e</b>) correlation diagrams of the zircon ages and Th/U ratio diagram. The <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U ages were selected for zircons younger than 1000 Ma, while <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>206</sup>Pb ages were used for zircons older than 1000 Ma.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Sandstone sample MNW283-10 zircon U-Pb age analysis-related diagrams. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Zircon concordia diagrams; (<b>c</b>) zircon chondrite-normalized REE distribution pattern diagram (C1 chondrite normalization data from [<a href="#B27-minerals-14-00585" class="html-bibr">27</a>]); (<b>d</b>) U-Pb age histograms and the relative probability plots; and (<b>e</b>) correlation diagrams of the zircon ages and Th/U ratio diagram. <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U ages were selected for zircons younger than 1000 Ma, while <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>206</sup>Pb ages were used for zircons older than 1000 Ma.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Sandstone sample PA770-7 zircon U-Pb age analysis-related diagrams. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Zircon concordia diagrams; (<b>c</b>) zircon chondrite-normalized REE distribution pattern diagram (C1 chondrite normalization data from [<a href="#B27-minerals-14-00585" class="html-bibr">27</a>]); (<b>d</b>) U-Pb age histograms and the relative probability plots; and (<b>e</b>) correlation diagrams of the zircon ages and Th/U ratio diagram. <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U ages were selected for zircons younger than 1000 Ma, while <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>206</sup>Pb ages were used for zircons older than 1000 Ma.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Dolostone sample PA797-2 zircon U-Pb age analysis-related diagrams. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Zircon concordia diagrams; (<b>c</b>) zircon chondrite-normalized REE distribution pattern diagram (C1 chondrite normalization data from [<a href="#B27-minerals-14-00585" class="html-bibr">27</a>]); (<b>d</b>) U-Pb age histograms and the relative probability plots; and (<b>e</b>) correlation diagrams of the zircon ages and Th/U ratio diagram. <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U ages were selected for zircons younger than 1000 Ma, while <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>206</sup>Pb ages were used for zircons older than 1000 Ma.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(Sm/La)<sub>N</sub> – ω(La) (<b>a</b>) and Ce/Ce* – (Sm/La)<sub>N</sub> (<b>b</b>) zircon genesis discrimination diagram. Both (<b>a</b>) and (<b>b</b>) are based on [<a href="#B60-minerals-14-00585" class="html-bibr">60</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Kaiyang phosphorite-bearing rock single grain standard deviation and age variance radiograph: (<b>a</b>) Basal sandstone, PA770-7; (<b>b</b>) Basal sandstone, MNW283-10; (<b>c</b>) Phosphorite, PA770-4; (<b>d</b>) Top dolostone, PA797-2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Kaiyang phosphorite sample PA770-4 zircon fission-track decomposition age chart.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 11673 KiB  
Article
Geochemistry, Sr-Nd Isotope Compositions, and U-Pb Chronology of Apatite from Kimberlite in Wafangdian, North China Craton: Constraints on the Late Magmatic Processes
by Sishun Ma, Ende Wang, Haitao Fu, Jianfei Fu, Yekai Men, Xinwei You, Kun Song, Fanglai Wan and Liguang Liu
Minerals 2024, 14(3), 284; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14030284 - 8 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1259
Abstract
Diamondiferous kimberlites occur in the Wafangdian area in the eastern part of the North China Craton (NCC). In order to better constrain their magmatic source and emplacement time, we have investigated apatite from two kimberlites, i.e., the #110 dike kimberlite and the #50 [...] Read more.
Diamondiferous kimberlites occur in the Wafangdian area in the eastern part of the North China Craton (NCC). In order to better constrain their magmatic source and emplacement time, we have investigated apatite from two kimberlites, i.e., the #110 dike kimberlite and the #50 root-zone kimberlite by measuring in situ their U–Pb and Sr–Nd isotopic compositions. The crystallization ages of the #110 and #50 apatites are 460.9 ± 16.8 Ma and 455.4 ± 19.3 Ma, respectively. For the #50 apatite, 87Sr/86Sr = 0.70453–0.70613 and εNd(t) = −2.74 to −4.52. For the #110 apatite, 87Sr/86Sr = 0.70394–0.70478 and εNd(t) = −3.46 to −5.65. Based on the similar distribution patterns of the rare earth elements (REEs) and the similar Sr-Nd isotope compositions of the apatite, it is believed that the #110 and #50 kimberlites have the same source region and the kimberlite magmas in Wafangdian were derived from an enriched mantle source (EMI). The primary magmatic composition has little effect on the emplacement pattern. It is more likely that the geological environment played an important role in controlling the retention and removal of volatile components (H2O and CO2). This led to the different evolutionary paths of the kimberlite magma in the later period, resulting in differences in the major element compositions of the apatite. High Sr concentrations may be associated with hydrothermal (H2O-rich fluid) overprinting events in the later magmatic period; the higher light rare earth element (LREE) concentration of the #50 apatite reflects the involvement of the REE3+ + SiO44− ⇔ Ca2+ + PO43− replacement mechanism. Two emplacement patterns of the #110 dike kimberlite (#110 apatite, low Sr, and high Si) and the #50 root-zone (#50 apatite, high Sr, and low Si) kimberlites were identified via major element analysis of the #110 apatite and #50 apatite. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Simplified geologic map showing the cratons in China (<b>A</b>), a simplified geologic map of the diamondiferous Wafangdian region (<b>B</b>), and a field map of #110 dike kimberlite and #50 pipe kimberlite (<b>C</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Representative images showing the different petrographic features of (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>,<b>F</b>), the #110 dike kimberlites, and (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>,<b>E</b>) the #50 root-zone kimberlites. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) show the rock samples from the #50 root-zone kimberlite and #110 dike kimberlite, respectively. (<b>D</b>,<b>F</b>) present plane-polarized transmitted light photomicrographs. C and E present cross-polarized transmitted light photomicrographs. Carb: carbonate, Serp: serpentine, Ol: olivine, Phl: phlogopite, and Sp: spinel. The Fe-Ti oxides are spinel and magnetite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Backscattered electron images of the types of apatite (Ap) in the kimberlites. Ol: olivine, Phl: phlogopite, and Sp: spinel (<b>A</b>–<b>F</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Backscattered electron (BSE) images and X-ray element maps of #110 apatite crystals from the #110 dike kimberlites and the #50 apatite from the #50 root-zone kimberlites. The color scale to the right of each panel indicates the relative concentration of each element, i.e., cool colors (blue, black) denote low concentrations, and warm colors (red, orange) denote high concentrations. The warmness or coolness of the colors is only relative, reflecting the difference in concentration between apatite and its surrounding matrix (<b>A</b>–<b>J</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Oxide–oxide variation diagrams for apatite grains from the #110 dike kimberlites and #50 root-zone kimberlites analyzed in this study. The circles denote samples of the #110 apatite (dike kimberlites), and the square symbols denote samples of the #50 apatite (root-zone kimberlites).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>A</b>) Plot of S + LREE (La + Ce) vs. Si (atoms per formula unit, a.p.f.u) showing the compositions of the apatite from the dike kimberlites (pipe No. 110) and root-zone kimberlites (pipe No. 50) analyzed in this study. (<b>B</b>) Chondrite normalized REE patterns of the apatite from the dike kimberlites (pipe No. 110) and root-zone kimberlites (pipe No. 50). The Type 3 apatites are prismatic euhedral apatites from the phlogopite-rich Ekati Mine kimberlites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>ICP–MS U–Pb geochronological data for apatite from Wafangdian Province, China. (<b>A</b>) #50 apatite; (<b>B</b>) #110 apatite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>A</b>) Initial <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr vs. εNd variations of the Wafangdian apatite. The dashed-line fields denote Kuruman whole-rock kimberlite data from Donnelly et al. (2011) [<a href="#B60-minerals-14-00284" class="html-bibr">60</a>,<a href="#B61-minerals-14-00284" class="html-bibr">61</a>]. The kimberlite, orangeite, and transitional kimberlite fields are from Yang et al. (2009) [<a href="#B33-minerals-14-00284" class="html-bibr">33</a>] and the references therein. The initial Sr isotope compositions of the groundmass apatite and carbonate from the Kuruman kimberlites are indicated by thick lines parallel to the <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis; no corresponding Nd data are available for these samples. (<b>B</b>) DM-depleted mantle, BSE-bulk silicate earth, EMI- and EMII-enriched mantle, HIMU-mantle with a high U/Pb ratio, PREMA-prevalent mantle [<a href="#B62-minerals-14-00284" class="html-bibr">62</a>].</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 20044 KiB  
Article
New Age Constraints of the Bilong Co Oil Shale in the Qiangtang Basin, Northern Tibet: Evidence from In Situ U–Pb Dating and Palaeontology
by Haowei Zhang, Jian Wang, Ahmed Mansour, Jianyong Zhang, Hengye Wei, Xiugen Fu, Lijun Shen, Shaoyun Xiong, Mohamed S. Ahmed and Thomas Gentzis
Minerals 2024, 14(3), 246; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14030246 - 28 Feb 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1285
Abstract
The Bilong Co oil shale is one of the most significant source rocks in the Mesozoic Qiangtang Basin (Northern Tibet); however, its absolute chronology remains controversial. In this study, in situ carbonate U–Pb isotope dating analysis was carried out for the first time. [...] Read more.
The Bilong Co oil shale is one of the most significant source rocks in the Mesozoic Qiangtang Basin (Northern Tibet); however, its absolute chronology remains controversial. In this study, in situ carbonate U–Pb isotope dating analysis was carried out for the first time. Detailed field geological investigations yielded some age-diagnostic ammonites, enabling a re-evaluation of the stratigraphic age of the Bilong Co oil shale. A total of 61 spots of U–Pb isotope dating from the middle part of the Bilong Co oil shale section suggests an average age of 181 ± 13 Ma. Elemental geochemistry and diagenetic analysis indicate that the proposed age represents the early deposition of the calcite, and the oil shale was deposited during the Early Jurassic time. This estimated age is further supported by the newly discovered ammonite assemblage of HildoceratidaeTiltoniceras sp. at the top part of the oil shale section, which confirms the deposition of the oil shale during the Toarcian age of the late Early Jurassic. Consequently, the Bilong Co oil shale can be assigned to the Quse Formation, which is attributed to the Lower Jurassic rather than the Middle Jurassic. The re-assessment of the stratigraphic age of the Bilong Co oil shale is of great significance for regional evaluation and exploration activities of hydrocarbon source rock layers in the Qiangtang Basin as well as for global stratigraphic correlation of the late Early Jurassic Toarcian oceanic anoxic event. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Petroleum Geology and Geochemistry of Sedimentary Basins)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>) Simplified topographic map of the Tibetan Plateau (modified from Google Earth Pro). (<b>B</b>) Geological map showing the major structural features and the location of the Bilong Co section (solid red star). (<b>C</b>) Field photograph of surface outcrop strata dominated by oil shale with limestone interbeds from the Bilong Co section. Note: 1-Quaternary, 2-Neogene, 3-Lower Jurassic Quse Formation, 4-Middle Jurassic Sewa, Buqu, and Xiali Formation, 5-Upper Jurassic Suowa Formation, 6-Fault, 7-Unconformity, 8-Study section in this study, NQD-North Qiangtang Depression, SQD-South Qiangtang Depression.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram showing the major lithostratigraphic units and lithofacies composition of the Upper Triassic–Jurassic in the South Qiangtang Depression [<a href="#B50-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">50</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Vertical variations of diagenesis proxies (MgO, Ca, Mn, and Sr) and micrographs of limestone sample BJ4-2. (<b>A</b>) Geochemical data measured by Hand-Held X-ray fluorescence (HH-XRF). Blue circles are data in this study. Black circles refer to data measured by Fu et al. [<a href="#B6-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">6</a>]. (<b>B</b>,<b>C</b>) Reflected light (LIBS) and CL images showing weak diagenesis and highlighting the regions analyzed for U–Pb. CL images are almost dark to the naked eye, and thus the brightness is turned up by a fixed amount to show the textural detail. The white dotted lines highlight the cracks caused during sample preparation, and thus the spots in white circles were excluded from the calculation of calcite U–Pb ages. (<b>D</b>) Limestone interbed mainly consists of microspar showing weak diagenesis under the plane polarized light.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>In situ calcite U–Pb isotopic analysis of the limestone sample BJ4-2. (<b>A</b>): Shows a cross-plot of <sup>238</sup>U/<sup>206</sup>Pb versus <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>206</sup>Pb Tera–Wasserburg Concordia diagrams. Gray dashed line represents the isochrons. Ellipses represent the ‘n’ spot analyses and corresponding isotope ratios obtained. Solid black line represents the Concordia curves. All ages are reported with 2σ confidence. (<b>B</b>): Cross-plot of Uranium (U) versus Lead (Pb) concentrations expressed in parts per million (ppm). (<b>C</b>): Cross-plot of <sup>238</sup>U/<sup>206</sup>Pb versus <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>206</sup>Pb ratios showing a wide range in sample BJ4-2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Photographs of ammonites recovered from the Bilong Co section. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>,<b>E</b>): <span class="html-italic">Tiltoniceras</span> sp., late Pliensbachian–early Toarcian recovered from samples JJ-01, JJ-02, and JJ-05, respectively. (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>,<b>F</b>): <span class="html-italic">Hildoceratidae</span> sp., Early Jurassic, taken from samples JJ-03, JJ-04, and JJ-06, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Regional ammonite biostratigraphic correlation from Western North America, Northwest Europe, Andes, and Mediterranean [<a href="#B62-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">62</a>,<a href="#B63-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">63</a>], and absolute U–Pb age data [<a href="#B64-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">64</a>,<a href="#B65-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">65</a>] during the early Toarcian.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comprehensive regional biostratigraphic and lithostratigraphic correlation of the Bilong Co oil shale, showing that no calcareous nannofossils and ammonoid constraints occur in the lower Quse Formation [<a href="#B53-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">53</a>]. Proposed ages and data source are from (<b>a</b>)-[<a href="#B26-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">26</a>], (<b>b</b>)-[<a href="#B25-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B66-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">66</a>], (<b>c</b>)-[<a href="#B9-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">9</a>], (<b>d</b>)-[<a href="#B6-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">6</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Regional correlation of carbon isotope profiles of kerogen [<a href="#B54-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">54</a>], organic matter [<a href="#B6-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">6</a>,<a href="#B9-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">9</a>], and bulk carbonate [<a href="#B6-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">6</a>], showing the negative excursion that characterizes the Toarcian oceanic anoxic event from the eastern Tethys (southern Tibet and Tibetan Himalaya in southern hemisphere) [<a href="#B86-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">86</a>], Panthalassa Ocean (southwest Japan) [<a href="#B89-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">89</a>], and northwestern Tethys (the UK [<a href="#B4-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">4</a>,<a href="#B88-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">88</a>] and northern Switzerland [<a href="#B5-minerals-14-00246" class="html-bibr">5</a>]).</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 9744 KiB  
Article
Zircon U-Pb-Hf Isotopes and Whole-Rock Geochemistry of the “Kulumudi Formation” from the Laofengkou Area (West Junggar): Implications of the Construction of a Juvenile Arc in the Junggar–Balkhash Ocean
by Bo Liu, Lin-Xiao Hou, Yan Xu, Nan Ju, Jing-Xuan Ma, Zhi-Hao Xie and Yang-Bai-He Hong
Minerals 2024, 14(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14010014 - 21 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1212
Abstract
The properties of ancient magmatic arcs are crucial for understanding the tectonic evolution of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. The Middle Devonian Kulumudi Formation in the Laofengkou area of West Junggar lacks accurate chronological data constraints, which hampers the knowledge of the nature [...] Read more.
The properties of ancient magmatic arcs are crucial for understanding the tectonic evolution of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. The Middle Devonian Kulumudi Formation in the Laofengkou area of West Junggar lacks accurate chronological data constraints, which hampers the knowledge of the nature of the Late Paleozoic magmatic arcs in the West Junggar and circum-Balkhash areas. In this contribution, samples of pyroclastic rocks and sedimentary rocks were collected from the volcano–sedimentary strata of the Kulumudi Formation. Petrography, zircon U-Pb-Hf isotopic analysis and whole-rock geochemistry were carried out to constrain the age and the tectonic setting of the Kulumudi Formation. The zircon U-Pb age of the lithic crystal tuff from the Kulumudi Formation on the northeast side of the Alemale Mountains was 386 ± 2 Ma, accurately indicating that this rock unit formed during the Middle Devonian. However, the fine sandstone near the Huojierte Mongolian Township, originally assigned as the “Kulumudi Formation”, yielded a maximum depositional age of 341 ± 3 Ma. Combined with the stratigraphic contact, this rock unit was redefined to belong to the Lower Carboniferous Jiangbasitao Formation. According to the whole-rock geochemistry study, the lithic crystal tuff of the Kulumudi Formation was characterized as medium potassium–calc–alkaline series rock, which is relatively enriched in light rare earth elements and large ion lithophile elements (i.e., Rb, Ba, K) and depleted in high-field-strength elements (i.e., Nb, Ta, Ti), showing similar geochemical characteristics to the volcanic arc rocks. By contrast, the fine sandstone from the Jiangbasitao Formation had Al2O3/SiO2 (0.25–0.29) and K2O/Na2O (1.29–1.72) ratios close to those derived from the continental arc and active continental margin and was characterized as part of the continental arc field in the La-Th-Sc and Th-Sc-Zr/10 tectonic discrimination diagrams. Zircon Hf isotope analysis showed that the εHf(t) values of the Kulumudi Formation were +5.6–+12.8, and those of the Jiangbasitao Formation were +11.43–+15.48, both of which show highly positive juvenile characteristics. The above data indicate that the Kulumudi Formation and Jiangbasitao Formation both formed in a juvenile arc setting with ocean–continent subduction. Combined with the previous work, it was concluded that the southward subduction of the ocean basin represented by the Darbut–Karamay ophiolitic mélanges beneath the newly accreted arc crustal segments produced a juvenile arc with positive Hf isotope characteristics. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Simplified tectonic map of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (modified after [<a href="#B14-minerals-14-00014" class="html-bibr">14</a>]). (<b>b</b>) Geological map of the West Junggar terrane (modified after [<a href="#B15-minerals-14-00014" class="html-bibr">15</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geological map of the Laofengkou area (modified after [<a href="#B31-minerals-14-00014" class="html-bibr">31</a>]). Published age data are from [<a href="#B22-minerals-14-00014" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B32-minerals-14-00014" class="html-bibr">32</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Photomicrographs and field photographs of the dark green lithic crystal tuff (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) and gray-green fine sandstone (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>). Pl—plagioclase; Cpx—clinopyroxene; Deb—debris.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of representative zircons of the lithic crystal tuff (<b>a</b>) and fine sandstone (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE patterns of the zircons of the lithic crystal tuff (<b>a</b>) and fine sandstone (<b>b</b>). Chondrite normalization values are from [<a href="#B67-minerals-14-00014" class="html-bibr">67</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Zircon U-Pb concordia diagrams and weighted average age diagrams of the lithic crystal tuff (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and fine sandstone (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>). The red solid circles represent valid zircon ages that were used for further discussion, wheras the black dotted ones were not considered during the calculation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The ε<sub>Hf</sub>(t) vs. T/(Ma) diagrams of the lithic crystal tuff (<b>a</b>) and fine sandstone (<b>b</b>). Data for the Early Carboniferous sedimentary rocks are from [<a href="#B68-minerals-14-00014" class="html-bibr">68</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>TAS classification diagram ((<b>a</b>), from [<a href="#B69-minerals-14-00014" class="html-bibr">69</a>]), SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. K<sub>2</sub>O diagram of the lithic crystal tuff ((<b>b</b>), from [<a href="#B70-minerals-14-00014" class="html-bibr">70</a>]); lg[w(Na<sub>2</sub>O)/(K<sub>2</sub>O)] vs. lg[w(SiO<sub>2</sub>)/w(Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>)] diagram ((<b>c</b>), from [<a href="#B71-minerals-14-00014" class="html-bibr">71</a>]) of the fine sandstone. Data for the Late Devonian volcanic rocks and the Early Carboniferous clastic rocks are from [<a href="#B50-minerals-14-00014" class="html-bibr">50</a>] and [<a href="#B68-minerals-14-00014" class="html-bibr">68</a>,<a href="#B72-minerals-14-00014" class="html-bibr">72</a>], respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE patterns (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and primitive-mantle-normalized spidergrams (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) of the lithic crystal tuff and fine sandstone. Data for Later Devonian volcanic rocks and Early Carboniferous sedimentary rocks are from [<a href="#B50-minerals-14-00014" class="html-bibr">50</a>] and [<a href="#B68-minerals-14-00014" class="html-bibr">68</a>,<a href="#B72-minerals-14-00014" class="html-bibr">72</a>], respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Discrimination diagrams of the La-Th-Sc (<b>a</b>) and Th-Sc-Zr/10 (<b>b</b>) (from [<a href="#B80-minerals-14-00014" class="html-bibr">80</a>]). A—oceanic arc; B—continental arc; C—active continental margin; D—passive continental margin. Data for Early Carboniferous sedimentary rocks are from [<a href="#B68-minerals-14-00014" class="html-bibr">68</a>,<a href="#B72-minerals-14-00014" class="html-bibr">72</a>].</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 15311 KiB  
Article
Permian Granitic Plutons from the Northern Margin of the North China Craton: Implications for the Tectonic Evolution of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt
by Jingsheng Chen, Dexin Tian, Bin Li, Yi Shi, Zhonghui Gao, Yi Tian, Weiwei Li, Chao Zhang and Yan Wang
Minerals 2023, 13(12), 1554; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13121554 - 17 Dec 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1354
Abstract
As the world’s largest accretionary orogen, the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) underwent continuous juvenile crustal growth in the Phanerozoic. The northern margin of the North China Craton (NCC) and its adjacent area form the eastern segment of the CAOB, which is a [...] Read more.
As the world’s largest accretionary orogen, the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) underwent continuous juvenile crustal growth in the Phanerozoic. The northern margin of the North China Craton (NCC) and its adjacent area form the eastern segment of the CAOB, which is a key area for learning about the geological evolution of the Paleo-Asian Ocean (PAO). In the Permian, the west of the northern margin of the NCC was a post-collision extensional environment, while the east was in a subduction stage. As a connecting area, the Permian evolution of the PAO in the middle of the northern margin of the NCC has not been systematically studied. In order to fill the gap and understand the continuous temporal and spatial evolutionary process of the PAO, this paper focuses on the Permian granitic rocks in the Chifeng area. Zircon U-Pb dating and the geochemical analysis of whole-rock major and trace elements were conducted to build a granite chronological framework, and to discuss the genesis and tectonic background of the granitic rocks, along with tectono-magmatic evolutionary history in the Chifeng area. The respective LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating results from eight samples are 269 ± 1, 268 ± 3, 260 ± 4, 260 ± 1, 260 ± 1, 255 ± 2, 254 ± 2 and 256 ± 1 Ma, respectively. These results, combined with previous data, revealed that the Permian granitic rocks had undergone three events of magmatism: (1) monzogranitic-syenitic phase (294–284 Ma; Cisuralian); (2) monzogranitic phase (269–260 Ma; Guadalupian) and (3) late monzogranitic-syenitic phase (256–254 Ma; Lopingian). From the Early Permian (294–284 Ma) to the Middle Permian (269–260 Ma), granites with fine-medium-grained locally porphyritic texture and massive structure showed a high-potassium calc-alkaline series formed in a compressional setting, indicating a continuous collision between the Xing’an-Mongolian Orogenic Belt (XMOB) and the NCC. During the Late Permian-Early Triassic (256–248 Ma), granites with massive structure and medium-grained texture in the Chifeng area were magmatism dominated by A- and I-type granites of high-potassium calc-alkaline series, combined with the coeval basic rocks, which constituted a typical “bimodal” rock assemblage. This suggests that the Chifeng area was located in an extensional setting where the subducting slab broke off during the collision between the XMOB and NCC. These granitic plutons from the Permian are believed to have been generated by the subduction-collision of the Paleo-Asian oceanic crust beneath the NCC, according to emplacement time and occurrence location. Our findings provide strong evidence for Permian continuous temporal and spatial tectonic evolution and the characterization of the eventual closure of the PAO in Chifeng area at the northern margin of the NCC. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic tectonic map showing main tectonic subdivisions of central and eastern Asia and location of northeast China (modified from Li, 2006) [<a href="#B4-minerals-13-01554" class="html-bibr">4</a>]; (<b>b</b>) simplified geological map of central Inner Mongolia of the CAOB showing different tectonic units (modified from [<a href="#B7-minerals-13-01554" class="html-bibr">7</a>,<a href="#B8-minerals-13-01554" class="html-bibr">8</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simplified geological map of the study area in the north margin of the North China Craton showing sample locations, modified after [<a href="#B8-minerals-13-01554" class="html-bibr">8</a>]. AH–Aohan Banner, DLBG–Daluobogou, XDH–Xiaodonghuang, BZF–Beizifu, SCYG–Shangchaoyanggou, QXYZ–Qixieyingzi, EDG–Erdaogou.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Outcrop pictures and microphotographs (cross-polarized light) of magmatic rocks from the Chifeng Area showing rock textures. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Aohan Banner pluton (fine-grained monzogranite); (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Daluobogou pluton (fine-grained monzogranite); (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) Daluobogou pluton (medium-grained monzogranite) (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>) Xiaodonghuang pluton (porphyritic biotite monzogranite); (<b>i</b>,<b>j</b>) Beizifu pluton (medium-grained monzogranite); (<b>k</b>,<b>l</b>) Shangchaoyanggou pluton(medium-grained monzogranite); (<b>m</b>,<b>n</b>) Qixieyingzi pluton (medium-grained syenogranite) and (<b>o</b>,<b>p</b>) Erdaogou pluton (medium-grained monzogranite); Qtz: quartz; Pl: plagioclase; Mic: microcline; Or: orthoclase; Bt: biotite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of selected zircon grains from the Permian granites in this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Zircon <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>235</sup>U-<sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U concordia diagrams of the Permian granites samples from this study. The dashed ellipse represents the discordant age. (<b>a</b>): PM210-12-1; (<b>b</b>): PM105-2-2); (<b>c</b>): D3038; (<b>d</b>): PM302-7-1; (<b>e</b>): D5695; (<b>f</b>): PM401-17-1; (<b>g</b>): T310; (<b>h</b>): PM305-21-1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>K<sub>2</sub>O versus SiO<sub>2</sub> (<b>a</b>) and A/NK (molar/molar) versus A/CNK (molar/molar) (<b>b</b>) diagrams for Permian granitic rocks. Normalization values are from [<a href="#B50-minerals-13-01554" class="html-bibr">50</a>] and [<a href="#B51-minerals-13-01554" class="html-bibr">51</a>], respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE patterns (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and primitive mantle-normalized trace element spider diagrams (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) for these Permian granitic rocks in the Chifeng area. The values of chondrite and primitive mantle are from [<a href="#B52-minerals-13-01554" class="html-bibr">52</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) La<sub>N</sub>/Yb<sub>N</sub> versus Yb<sub>N</sub>; (<b>b</b>) Sr/Y versus Y diagram of the Middle Permian granites in Aohan area, modified after [<a href="#B56-minerals-13-01554" class="html-bibr">56</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Diagram of 10,000 Ga/Al vs. Zr, Nb, Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>), and (Zr + Nb + Ce + Y) vs. (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O/CaO) (<b>d</b>) for the Late Permian granitic intrusions [<a href="#B56-minerals-13-01554" class="html-bibr">56</a>]. A, A-type granite; FG, highly fractionated I-type granite; I, S&amp;M, OGT, unfractionated I, S, and M-type granite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) Y versus Nb; (<b>b</b>) Yb + Ta versus Rb diagrams of the Middle Permian granites in Chifeng area (after [<a href="#B78-minerals-13-01554" class="html-bibr">78</a>]). The fields are ORG—oceanic ridge granites; syn-COLG—syn-collisional granites; VAG—volcanic arc granites; WPG—within-plate granites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Diagram of R2 versus R1 for the Middle-Late Permian granites in the Chifeng area. ①—plagiogranite; ②—active continental margin granite; ③—collisional–orogenic granite; ④—late orogenic granite; ⑤—unorogenic A-type granite; ⑥—collisional granite (S-type); ⑦—post-orogenic granite (after [<a href="#B79-minerals-13-01554" class="html-bibr">79</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Identification diagram of tectonic setting for the Late Permian granites in the Chifeng area. (<b>a</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> (wt%) versus TFeO/(TFeO + MgO); (<b>b</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> (wt%) versus Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (wt%); (<b>c</b>) MgO (wt%) versus TFeO (wt%), IAG—island arc granite; CAG—continental arc granite; CCG—continental collision granite; POG—post-orogenic granite; RRG—rift related granite; CEUG—continental epeirogenic uplift granite (after [<a href="#B51-minerals-13-01554" class="html-bibr">51</a>]). (<b>d</b>) Yb + Nb versus Rb, (<b>e</b>) Yb + Ta versus Rb (after [<a href="#B78-minerals-13-01554" class="html-bibr">78</a>]), VAG—volcanic arc granites; syn-COLG—syn-collisional granites; WPG—within-plate granites; ORG—oceanic ridge granites; post-COLG—post-collisional granites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>A tectonic evolution model from Carboniferous to Permian in the north margin of the NCC in the Chifeng-Aohan area. NCC, North China Craton; XMOB, Xing’an-Mongolian Orogenic Belt. (<b>a</b>): Subduction, Continental Margin Arc Environment; (<b>b</b>): Syn–collisional Environment; (<b>c</b>): Extensional Environment.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 9727 KiB  
Article
Chronological and Mineralogical Records of the Langqi Pluton, Fuzhou: Constraints on the Magma Mixing Process
by Zhouxin Chen, Liyuan Wang and Xue Yan
Minerals 2023, 13(12), 1538; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13121538 - 11 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1100
Abstract
The mafic microgranular enclaves (MMEs) from Mesozoic intermediate-acid magmatic rocks, widely developed along the Fujian coast, are considered to be the results of large-scale crust–mantle interaction by magma mixing. This paper is based on zircon U-Pb chronology, along with zircon Hf isotope and [...] Read more.
The mafic microgranular enclaves (MMEs) from Mesozoic intermediate-acid magmatic rocks, widely developed along the Fujian coast, are considered to be the results of large-scale crust–mantle interaction by magma mixing. This paper is based on zircon U-Pb chronology, along with zircon Hf isotope and mineral analyses for the host granite and MMEs from Langqi Island, in order to investigate the magma mixing mechanism of the Langqi pluton in Fuzhou, Southeast China. The results indicate that the MMEs were emplaced during the late Early Cretaceous (98.9 ± 2.2 Ma), identical to the age of the granite (100.1 ± 1.1 Ma) within the error range. The zircon εHf(t) values for the granite and MMEs are in the ranges of −2.1~0.0 and −1.7~+1.1. The zircon Hf isotope data indicate that both the granite and MMEs were predominantly derived from the ancient crustal basement of Cathaysia, with a partial mantle-derived contribution. The An values of plagioclase phenocrysts with oscillatory zoning patterns in the MMEs show oscillatory changes from the core to the rim, indicating multiple mixing events between the two magmas with different compositions. Amphiboles in the MMEs show characteristics of crust–mantle contamination, and the Ti migrated from the mafic magma with high concentration to the felsic magma with low concentration during the magma mixing process. Biotites in the host rock and MMEs belong to primary biotite, and they have relatively high MgO contents (ave. 12.78 wt.%) and relatively low FeOT/(MgO + FeOT) ratios (ave. 0.56), showing characteristics of crust–mantle contamination. The crust–mantle magma interaction in a crystal, mushy state played a significant role in controlling the formation and evolution of the Langqi pluton. The magmatism was predominantly sourced from mixing between the mantle-derived mafic magma and the crust-derived felsic magma during the subduction of the Paleo-Pacific Plate, resulting in the formation of the Langqi doleritic veins, granites, and MMEs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Sketch map of Fujian Province ((<b>a</b>), after Wang et al., 2020) [<a href="#B18-minerals-13-01538" class="html-bibr">18</a>] and geological map of the Langqi region ((<b>b</b>), after Huang et al., 2020) [<a href="#B10-minerals-13-01538" class="html-bibr">10</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Field characteristics of Langqi pluton: (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) Plagioclase phenocrysts in the MMEs exhibit shapes and sizes comparable to those present in the host rock. (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) Smaller MMEs are enveloped by larger MMEs. (<b>e</b>) The MMEs are widely developed in granite, mainly lenticular and ellipsoidal. (<b>f</b>) The contact between the MMEs and the host granite is sharp. (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) The doleritic veins developed in the granite on both sides are greyish-green in color.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Microscopic photos of the Langqi pluton: (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) Granite has a porphyritic texture. (<b>d</b>) Microstructures of the MMEs, the poikilitic inclusions of amphibole within the plagioclase with a chaotic texture. (<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>) Microstructures of the MMEs, the poikilitic inclusions of plagioclase within the amphibole with a long column shape. (<b>f</b>,<b>h</b>) Microstructures of the MMEs, the poikilitic inclusions of amphibole within the plagioclase with an oscillatory zoning pattern. (<b>i</b>) The needle-shaped apatite in the MMEs (Pl—plagioclase; Qz—quartz; Kfs—K-feldspar; Amp—amphibole; Bi—biotite; Ap—apatite).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of representative zircon grains from (<b>a</b>) MME (BT-1) and (<b>b</b>) host granite (LQ-5) analyzed for U-Pb and Hf isotope ratios. Circles represent the U-Pb and Hf isotope analyses. (<b>c</b>) U-Pb concordia diagram of the MMEs; the inset in the figure shows the average mean age. (<b>d</b>) U-Pb concordia diagram of the host granite; the inset in the figure shows the average mean age (after Huang et al., 2020) [<a href="#B10-minerals-13-01538" class="html-bibr">10</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Compositions of minerals of the host rock and MMEs from Langqi pluton: (<b>a</b>) Feldspar ternary diagram showing the chemical composition of the studied plagioclase from the host rock and MMEs. (<b>b</b>) Mg/(Mg + Fe<sup>2+</sup>) versus Si diagram of the studied amphibole from the MMEs (after Leake et al., 1997) [<a href="#B21-minerals-13-01538" class="html-bibr">21</a>]. (<b>c</b>) Classification diagram of biotites from the host rock and MMEs (after Forster, 1960) [<a href="#B22-minerals-13-01538" class="html-bibr">22</a>]. (<b>d</b>) Genetic diagram of biotites from the host rock and MMEs (after Nachit et al., 2005) [<a href="#B23-minerals-13-01538" class="html-bibr">23</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Representative transmitted light microphotographs, (<b>b</b>) BSE images and (<b>c</b>) profile An (mol%) variations along traverses of the plagioclase from the MMEs. The red dots are the spots of the electron microprobe analyses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Backscattered electron image characteristics (<b>a</b>) and electron probe analysis results (<b>b</b>) of the amphibole from the MMEs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Origin diagram of amphiboles from the MMEs ((<b>a</b>), after Jiang and An, 1984) [<a href="#B40-minerals-13-01538" class="html-bibr">40</a>] and origin diagram of biotites from the host granite and MMEs ((<b>b</b>), after Guo et al., 2017) [<a href="#B41-minerals-13-01538" class="html-bibr">41</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Discriminant diagram of the tectonic environment for biotites from the host granite and MMEs (after Abdel-Rahman, 1994) [<a href="#B43-minerals-13-01538" class="html-bibr">43</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>U−Pb ages versus εHf(t) diagram of zircons from the host granite and MMEs: The Hf isotope evolution of the Cathaysia crustal basement (after He and Xu, 2012) [<a href="#B16-minerals-13-01538" class="html-bibr">16</a>], A-type granitoids, and Pingtan granite data are cited from Zhao et al. (2015) [<a href="#B54-minerals-13-01538" class="html-bibr">54</a>], Chen et al. (2019) [<a href="#B17-minerals-13-01538" class="html-bibr">17</a>] and Zhang et al. (2020) [<a href="#B55-minerals-13-01538" class="html-bibr">55</a>].</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 8131 KiB  
Article
Early Permian Post-Collision Extensional Setting in the Southern Beishan Orogenic Belt: Evidence from the Zhangfangshan Granodiorite and the Baishantang Bimodal Volcanic Rocks
by Lei Wu, Xinwei Zhai, Erteng Wang, Wanfeng Chen, Gaorui Song, Feifei Zheng, Jiaolong Zhao, Jinrong Wang and Haidong Wang
Minerals 2023, 13(12), 1468; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13121468 - 22 Nov 2023
Viewed by 1140
Abstract
Outcrops of late Paleozoic magmatic rocks are common in the Southern Beishan Orogenic Belt (SBOB), Southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB), which is a key object for the understanding of regional tectonism and defining the final closure time of the Paleo-Asian Ocean (PAO). [...] Read more.
Outcrops of late Paleozoic magmatic rocks are common in the Southern Beishan Orogenic Belt (SBOB), Southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB), which is a key object for the understanding of regional tectonism and defining the final closure time of the Paleo-Asian Ocean (PAO). We present zircon U-Pb chronology and whole-rock geochemistry data for late Paleozoic granodiorites and bimodal volcanic rocks from the Shuangyingshan-Huaniushan unit in the north Huitongshan-Zhangfangshan ophiolitic belt in the SBOB. The Zhangfangshan granodiorites (LA-ICP-MS, Ca. 288 Ma) are A2-type granite enriched in Rb, Th, Pb and LREEs and depleted in Nb, Ta, Ti, Sr, Ba and HREEs. They have varying MgO and TFe2O3 contents with high Mg# (38.56~48.97) values; the Lu/Yb ratios (0.14~0.15) of these granodiorites are similar to mantle-derived magma. A clear plagioclase zoning structure and acicular apatite occur in mineral assemblages derived from magma mixing between mafic and felsic magmas. The Baishantang bimodal volcanic rocks (272 Ma) consist of rhyolite and basaltic andesite. Baishantang rhyolites are A2-type felsic rock enriched in Rb, Th, Pb and LREEs and depleted in Nb, Ta, Ti, Sr, Ba and HREEs, with negative εNd(t) and εHf(t) (−5.2~−4.8 and −2.2~−1.9, respectively). Rhyolites originated from the partial melting of the crust, influenced by mantle material. Basaltic andesites belong to calc-alkaline series and have an enrichment of Rb, Ba, Th, U, Pb and LREEs, are weakly enriched in Zr-Hf, and are depleted in Nb, Ta, Ti and HREEs. The Nd-Hf isotopes of these basaltic andesites are not coupled with negative εNd(t) (−2.8~−0.4) and positive εHf(t) (1.8~5.5) values. These characteristics indicate that they originated from the partial melting of the mantle mixed with sediment-derived melts. In combination with previous studies, our findings show that the early Permian Zhangfangshan granodiorites and Baishantang bimodal volcanic rocks formed in a post-collision extensional setting, and the Huitongshan-Zhangfangshan ocean had been closed before early Permian. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Simplified tectonic map of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt showing the location of the Beishan Orogenic Belt (BOB) (modified after [<a href="#B31-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">31</a>]). (<b>b</b>) Simplified geological map of the BOB (modified after [<a href="#B17-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">17</a>]). (<b>b</b>) Early Permian magmatism in the SBOB (age data are taken from [<a href="#B13-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">13</a>,<a href="#B26-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B32-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">32</a>,<a href="#B33-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">33</a>,<a href="#B34-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">34</a>,<a href="#B35-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">35</a>,<a href="#B36-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">36</a>,<a href="#B37-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">37</a>]). (1): Hongshishan ophiolitic belt; (2): Jijitaizi-Xiaohuangshan ophiolitic belt; (3): Hongliuhe-Niujuanzi-Yueyashan ophiolitic belt; (4): Huitongshan-Zhangfangshan ophiolitic belt; Unit 1: Queershan unit; Unit 2: Heiyingshan-Hanshan unit; Unit 3: Mazongshan unit; Unit 4: Shuangyingshan-Huaniushan unit; Unit 5: Shibanshan unit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geological maps of (<b>a</b>) the Zhangfangshan granodiorite and (<b>b</b>) the Baishantang bimodal volcanic rocks (after [<a href="#B45-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B46-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">46</a>]); (<b>c</b>) profile of the Baishantang bimodal volcanic rocks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Field photos and photomicrographs of the Zhangfangshan granodiorite and Baishantang bimodal volcanic rocks. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Zhangfangshan granodiorite intruded into Zhangfangshan ophiolitic mélange (ZOM); (<b>c</b>) Photo of the Zhangfangshan granodiorite sample. Hornblende can be clearly seen in the rock; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) Photomicrographs of the Zhangfangshan granodiorite. Tiny acicular apartite and zonal structure of plagioclase are detected (<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>). The mineral assemblages of granodiorite (<b>e</b>). Quartz crystal as inclusions occur in plagioclase (<b>f</b>); (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>) Field photos of the Baishantang bimodal volcanic rocks. Rhyolite and basaltic andesite are interbedded (<b>g</b>), and the distribution area of rhyolite is larger than that of basaltic andesite (<b>h</b>); (<b>i</b>) Plane-polarized photograph of basaltic andesite; (<b>j</b>) Cross-polarized photograph of basaltic andesite, where epidotization occurs in plagioclase; (<b>k</b>) Plane-polarized photograph of rhyolite; (<b>l</b>) Cross-polarized photograph of rhyolite, where epidotization occurs in plagioclase. Ap: apatite; Hbl: hornblende; Bt: biotite; Pl: plagioclase; Qtz: quartz; Chl: chlorite; Ep: Epidote.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Representative zircons cathodoluminescence images for zircons in the Zhangfangshan granodiorite (<b>a</b>) and the Baishantang rhyolite (<b>b</b>). Yellow and red numbers represent the U-Pb analytical sites of the Zhangfangshan granodiorite and the Baishantang rhyolite, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>U-Pb dating results of zircons for the Zhangfangshan granodiorite (<b>a</b>) and the Baishantang rhyolilte (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Geochemical classification diagrams for the Zhangfangshan granodiorites and Baishantang bimodal volcanic rocks. (<b>a</b>) TAS diagram [<a href="#B57-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">57</a>], (<b>b</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O versus SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram [<a href="#B58-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">58</a>], (<b>c</b>) A/NK versus A/CNK diagram [<a href="#B59-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">59</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Chondrite (C1)-normalized REE patterns (<b>a</b>) and Primitive Mantle (PM)-normalized multielement diagrams (<b>b</b>) for the Zhangfangshan granodiorites and Baishantang bimodal volcanic rocks. C1 and PM values are from Sun and McDonough [<a href="#B60-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">60</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t) values of the Baishantang bimodal volcanic rocks; (<b>b</b>) ε<sub>Hf</sub>(t) values of the Baishantang bimodal volcanic rocks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O)/CaO and (<b>b</b>) Zr vs. 10,000*Ga/Al diagram [<a href="#B79-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">79</a>]; (<b>c</b>) T<sub>Zr</sub> (°C) vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram; (<b>d</b>) Nb-Y-Ce diagram [<a href="#B77-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">77</a>]. I: I-type felsic rock; S: S-type felsic rock; A: A-type felsic rock; A1: A1-type felsic rock; A2: A2-type felsic rock; T<sub>Zr</sub> (°C): zircon saturation temperature; average temperature of A and I- type granite after [<a href="#B84-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">84</a>,<a href="#B73-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">73</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) TiO<sub>2</sub> vs. FeO<sub>t</sub> + MgO diagram [<a href="#B82-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">82</a>]; (<b>b</b>) 1/V vs. Rb/V diagram [<a href="#B85-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">85</a>]; (<b>c</b>) (Th/Nb)<sub>PM</sub> vs. (La/Nb)<sub>PM</sub> diagram [<a href="#B86-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">86</a>]; (<b>d</b>) Rb/Sr vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram [<a href="#B87-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">87</a>]; (<b>e</b>) Ba/Th vs. (La/Sm)<sub>N</sub> diagram [<a href="#B88-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">88</a>]; (<b>f</b>) <sup>144</sup>Nd/<sup>143</sup>Nd(i) vs. Hf/Nd diagram [<a href="#B88-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">88</a>]. C: crust; M: mantle; Cm: crust-mantle mixed; LC: lower crust; MC: middle crust; AOB: altered oceanic basalt; SM: sediment metasomatism.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Tectonic setting discrimination diagrams for the Zhangfangshan granodiorite and the Baishantang bimodal volcanic rocks: (<b>a</b>) Nb vs. Y diagram [<a href="#B116-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">116</a>]; (<b>b</b>) Ta vs. Yb diagram [<a href="#B116-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">116</a>]; (<b>c</b>) Zr/Y vs. Zr diagram [<a href="#B117-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">117</a>]; (<b>d</b>) Ti vs. Zr diagram [<a href="#B117-minerals-13-01468" class="html-bibr">117</a>]. MORB: mid-ocean ridge basalt; IAB: island-arc basalt; WPB: within-plate basalt; VAG: volcanic arc granite; POG: post-orogenic granite; ORG: ocean ridge granite; WPG: within-plate granite; syn-COLG: syn-collisional granite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Schematic illustration of the proposed genetic model for the early Permian in the Southern Beishan Orogenic Belt.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 15379 KiB  
Article
Geochemistry and Zircon U–Pb Geochronology of the Wugongshan Granites in the Northwestern Jiangxi Area, China: Implications for the Paleozoic Tectonic Development of South China
by Guangqin Yang, Yaoyao Zhang, Kai Liu, Yi Zhou, Shuxun Wang and Hailong Huo
Minerals 2023, 13(11), 1427; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13111427 - 9 Nov 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1411
Abstract
The properties of the Caledonian orogeny along the transition belt of the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks have received much attention in recent years. The widespread Early Paleozoic granites provide critical geological clues for unraveling the tectonic evolution and geodynamic processes of the South [...] Read more.
The properties of the Caledonian orogeny along the transition belt of the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks have received much attention in recent years. The widespread Early Paleozoic granites provide critical geological clues for unraveling the tectonic evolution and geodynamic processes of the South China Continent (SCC). Here we present new zircon U–Pb chronology, whole-rock major and trace elements, in situ Hf isotopes for Paleozoic granites, i.e., the Wugongshan granites in the northwest Jiangxi province, and aim to explore the magmatism and properties of the Caledonian orogeny involved in their formation. Our new data show that the Wugongshan granites were emplaced during the Early Silurian Period (442–438 Ma). The Paleozoic Wugongshan granites belong to S-type muscovite-bearing peraluminous granites (MPG) and show a single origin. The Wugongshan granites exhibit negative εHf(t) values (−11.56 to −6.19) and TDM2 model ages of 2148–1809 Ma, indicating their derivation from an ancient crustal source, through partial melting of ancient crustal material. The Wugongshan granitic magmatism is probably being generated in an extensional environment related to an intracontinental orogeny setting. It is inferred that the Paleozoic tectonic–magmatic event in the Wugongshan area was associated with the oceanic–continental convergence of the Paleo-Tethys Ocean. The Wugongshan granites highlight the intracontinental magmatism in the Early Paleozoic orogeny in the SCC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Petrogenesis, Magmatism and Geodynamics of Orogenic Belts)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geological map of Wugongshan area of the SCC. (<b>a</b>) The inset shows the location of the SCC, modified from [<a href="#B22-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">22</a>]. (<b>b</b>) Sketch tectonic map of the Wugongshan and adjacent areas, modified from [<a href="#B31-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">31</a>]. (<b>c</b>) Intracontinental orogenic model, modified from [<a href="#B14-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">14</a>]. (<b>d</b>) Continental collision orogenic model, modified from [<a href="#B10-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">10</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simplified structural map of the Wugongshan area (modified from [<a href="#B3-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">3</a>,<a href="#B32-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">32</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Field photographs and photomicrographs (crossed polar) of granites in the Wugongshan area: (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) biotite monzonitic granite; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) two-mica monzonite granite; (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) porphyritic two-mica monzonite granite. Abbreviations: Q—quartz; Bt—biotite; Pl—plagioclase; Kfs—K-feldspar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>U–Pb concordia diagram for Wugongshan granites: (<b>a</b>) CJZK06–2, (<b>b</b>) WGS06022, and (<b>c</b>) WGS06028.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Total-alkali-silica (TAS) diagram; (<b>b</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O–SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram (after [<a href="#B55-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">55</a>,<a href="#B56-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">56</a>]); (<b>c</b>) the A/NK–A/CNK diagram (from [<a href="#B57-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">57</a>]); and (<b>d</b>) AFM diagram (from [<a href="#B58-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">58</a>,<a href="#B59-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">59</a>]) for the Wugongshan granites. The triangle denotes published data for the Wugongshan granites ([<a href="#B24-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">24</a>]; and reference data; the same below).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE and (<b>b</b>) N-MORB-normalized spider patterns of the Wugongshan granites (normalizing factors are from [<a href="#B60-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">60</a>,<a href="#B61-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">61</a>]; N-MORB compositions are from [<a href="#B60-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">60</a>]). The black lines indicate published data for the Wugongshan granites ([<a href="#B24-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">24</a>]; and reference data).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The data of zircon εHf(t) vs. <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U ages for Wugongshan granites (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), indicating that the magma was formed by the reworking of the upper-middle crust. The corresponding lines are from [<a href="#B49-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">49</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Rb/Ba–Rb/Sr (after [<a href="#B73-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">73</a>]) (<b>a</b>) and CaO/Na<sub>2</sub>O–Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub> (<b>b</b>) (from [<a href="#B73-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">73</a>]) diagrams for the Wugongshan granites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Tectonic discrimination diagrams for Wugongshan granites. (<b>a</b>) Rb/10–Hf–(3Ta); (<b>b</b>) Rb/30–Hf–(3Ta) (after [<a href="#B82-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">82</a>]). COLG—collisional granite; VAG—volcanic arc granite; WPG—within–plate granite; S-COLG—syn–collisional granite; ORG—oceanic ridge granite; P-COLG—post–collisional granite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Tectonic discrimination diagrams for Wugongshan granites: (<b>a</b>) Rb–(Yb+Ta) diagrams; (<b>b</b>) Rb–(Y+Nb) diagrams; (<b>c</b>) Nb–Y diagrams; (<b>d</b>) Ta–Yb diagrams (from [<a href="#B83-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">83</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The dynamic model of the Neoproterozoic to the Paleozoic tectonic evolution of South China (non-scale for crust and lithosphere) (modified from [<a href="#B14-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">14</a>,<a href="#B28-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">28</a>,<a href="#B62-minerals-13-01427" class="html-bibr">62</a>].</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 9070 KiB  
Review
Precambrian Tectonic Affinity of Hainan and Its Evolution from Columbia to Rodinia
by Limin Zhang, Xiang Cui, Yong Yang, Si Chen, Bin Zhao and Xiguang Deng
Minerals 2023, 13(10), 1237; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13101237 - 22 Sep 2023
Viewed by 983
Abstract
The assembly and break-up of supercontinents have been hot research topics in international earth sciences because they represent a breakthrough in reconstructing the history of continental evolution and deepening the theory of plate tectonics, which is of indispensable importance to the development of [...] Read more.
The assembly and break-up of supercontinents have been hot research topics in international earth sciences because they represent a breakthrough in reconstructing the history of continental evolution and deepening the theory of plate tectonics, which is of indispensable importance to the development of earth sciences. With the continuous enrichment of paleomagnetic, paleontological, chronological, and geochemical data in the last two decades, the evolution of the supercontinent from Columbia to Rodinia has gradually gained unified understanding, and the reconstruction of the major plates within the supercontinent has basically been constrained. In contrast, the reconstruction of microplates, such as South China, Tarim, and Kabul, is controversial and has now become a popular topic and frontier area of supercontinent reconstruction. Hainan lies at the southern tip of South China, and a few Proterozoic units are exposed on the island. At present, Hainan is often taken as a part of the Cathaysia Block. However, due to the lack of exposed Mesoproterozoic igneous and supercrustal rocks in Cathaysia, the reconstruction model of the Cathaysia Block and even the South China Craton based solely on Mesoproterozoic units in Hainan are distinct from those based on units in the Yangtze Block and younger Proterozoic units within the Cathaysia Block, which makes the paleoposition of the South China Craton controversial. In this paper, we provide new detrital zircon U–Pb age data for the Baoban Complex, Hainan, together with the available data to comment on the affinities between Hainan and the Yangtze and Cathaysia Blocks in the Proterozoic, and on this basis, we can reconstruct the South China Craton within the Proterozoic supercontinents. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Tectonic outline of the South China Craton (after [<a href="#B49-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">49</a>]), (<b>b</b>) simplified geological map of Hainan Island showing the distribution of Mesoproterozoic rocks (revised after [<a href="#B50-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">50</a>]), and (<b>c</b>) simplified stratigraphic column of the Mesoproterozoic Baoban Complex (revised after [<a href="#B50-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">50</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Representative models showing the location of the South China block in Rodinia (after [<a href="#B8-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">8</a>,<a href="#B31-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">31</a>]). Panel (<b>a</b>) shows internal locations and panel (<b>b</b>) shows external locations of the South China block in Rodinia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Relative probability density plots (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) and Th/U characteristics (<b>g</b>–<b>l</b>) for Proterozoic unit detrital zircons from Hainan (data from [<a href="#B37-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">37</a>,<a href="#B39-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">39</a>,<a href="#B41-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">41</a>,<a href="#B60-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">60</a>,<a href="#B71-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">71</a>] and this study).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Simplified stratigraphic columns and relative probability density plots for the representative samples from the (<b>a</b>) Shilu Group in Hainan and (<b>b</b>) Kunyang and Huili groups in the Yangtze Block. Simplified stratigraphic column is modified after [<a href="#B13-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">13</a>,<a href="#B69-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">69</a>,<a href="#B71-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">71</a>,<a href="#B93-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">93</a>,<a href="#B94-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">94</a>,<a href="#B95-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">95</a>]. Data for the Shilu Group are from [<a href="#B37-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">37</a>,<a href="#B60-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">60</a>,<a href="#B71-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">71</a>] and the Kunyang and Huili groups are from [<a href="#B23-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B91-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">91</a>,<a href="#B92-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">92</a>,<a href="#B93-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">93</a>,<a href="#B94-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">94</a>,<a href="#B95-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">95</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Hf isotopic composition of detrital zircon from the Shilu Group in Hainan and Kunyang and Huili groups in the Yangtze Block. Data for the Shilu Group are from [<a href="#B37-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">37</a>,<a href="#B68-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">68</a>,<a href="#B70-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">70</a>] and the Kunyang and Huili groups are from [<a href="#B23-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B86-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">86</a>,<a href="#B88-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">88</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparisons of Mesoproterozoic sequences in west Hainan and Laurentia. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) show age distribution and (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) show Hf isotopic composition of detrital zircon. Data for Hainan are from [<a href="#B37-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">37</a>,<a href="#B39-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">39</a>], West Laurent are from [<a href="#B103-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">103</a>,<a href="#B106-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">106</a>,<a href="#B108-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">108</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Relative probability plots for zircon ages for late Mesoproterozoic sequence in west Hainan (<b>a</b>), southwest Yangtze (<b>b</b>), northwest India (<b>c</b>), and Antarctica (<b>d</b>). Data in west Hainan are from [<a href="#B37-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">37</a>,<a href="#B41-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">41</a>] and this study; west Laurentia are from [<a href="#B104-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">104</a>,<a href="#B106-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">106</a>,<a href="#B108-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">108</a>]; northwest India are from [<a href="#B129-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">129</a>,<a href="#B130-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">130</a>,<a href="#B131-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">131</a>,<a href="#B132-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">132</a>]; East Antarctica are from [<a href="#B117-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">117</a>,<a href="#B119-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">119</a>,<a href="#B137-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">137</a>,<a href="#B141-minerals-13-01237" class="html-bibr">141</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Proposed configuration of west Hainan, Yangtze, India, Mawson continent (South Australia Gawler Craton and Antarctica) and Laurentia during extension of supercontinent Columbia ca. 1450 Ma and (<b>a</b>) assembly of supercontinent Rodinia ~1000 Ma (<b>b</b>). Y-Yangtze Block, C-Cathaysia Block, H-Hainan, NAC-North Australian Craton, SAC-South Australia Craton, KY-Kunyang Group, HL-Huili Group, JL-Julin Group. Inferred extraneous sedimentary provenance links are shown by magenta arrows. Red ellipses circled with dashed line on Mawson continent depict point sources in East Antarctica and Terre Adélie of unknown extent (for interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 8925 KiB  
Article
Petrogenesis and Geochronology of the Shazuoquan Ophiolite, Beishan Orogenic Belt: Constraints on the Evolution of the Beishan Ocean
by Yong Meng, Xin Zhang, Jianke Bai, Kai Wang, Yaogang Qi, Haibo Zhao and Yuan Han
Minerals 2023, 13(8), 1067; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13081067 - 11 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1216
Abstract
The ophiolites in the Beishan Orogenic Belt provide important information about the evolution of the Beishan Ocean in the Paleozoic Era. We studied ophiolite petrology, geochemistry and isotopic chronology. The Shazouquan ophiolites consist of dunites, wehrlites, gabbros and anorthosites. Ophiolitic mélange belts are [...] Read more.
The ophiolites in the Beishan Orogenic Belt provide important information about the evolution of the Beishan Ocean in the Paleozoic Era. We studied ophiolite petrology, geochemistry and isotopic chronology. The Shazouquan ophiolites consist of dunites, wehrlites, gabbros and anorthosites. Ophiolitic mélange belts are composed of matrixes and blocks, and different rocks are fault-bounded. Dunites and wehrlites are high in Mg#, Cr# and MgO, low in TiO2, relatively depleted in large-ion lithophile elements (Ti and P) and enriched in high-strength elements (U, Zr and Hf). They have a total REE of 1.25 × 10–6−5.39 × 10−6 and δEu of 1.12–3.54, which are similar to those of SSZ-type ophiolites, indicating that their parent magma source region may be a weakly depleted mantle source region. The anorthosite and gabbro are high in Al2O3, MgO and Mg#, low in TiO2, enriched in large-ion lithophile elements (Rb and Sr), and depleted in high-strength elements (Nb, Ta and Ti), but enriched in Zr and Hf. They have similar geochemical signatures to those of arc magmatic rocks. They are derived from the mantle peridotite formed against the tectonic background of subduction and modified by the fluid materials in the subduction zone. We collected anorthosite and gabbro, which were produced as ophiolite for U-Pb dating. The anorthosite yields a zircon U-Pb, aged 394 ± 11 Ma (MSWD = 0.84), and a gabbro zircon U-Pb, aged 466 ± 12 Ma (MSWD = 3.2), indicating that the Shazouquan ophiolite was formed in the Middle Ordovician–Early Devonian eras. Combining the above evidence, we conclude that the Beishan Ocean was in a subduction tectonic background from the Middle Ordovician to Early Devonian periods. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Deposits)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Simplified tectonic map showing the location of the Central Asia orogenic belt [<a href="#B10-minerals-13-01067" class="html-bibr">10</a>] (<b>a</b>); sketch map showing the tectonic units of the Beishan orogenic belt [<a href="#B21-minerals-13-01067" class="html-bibr">21</a>] (<b>b</b>); simplified geological map of the regions in Shazouquan [<a href="#B37-minerals-13-01067" class="html-bibr">37</a>] (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Cross-section of the ophiolitic tectonic mélange belt in the BOB (<b>d</b>). (<b>a</b>) Peridotite; (<b>b</b>) Gabbro; (<b>c</b>) Anorthosite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Microscopic images of the ophiolitic mélange. (<b>a</b>) Dunite orthogonal photomicrograph. (<b>b</b>) Wehrlite orthogonal photomicrograph. (<b>c</b>) Anorthosite orthogonal photomicrograph. (<b>d</b>) Gabbro orthogonal photomicrograph. Ol = olivine; Serp = serpentine; Px = pyroxene; Pl = plagioclase.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Zircon CL images of Shazouquan mafic rocks in the BOB. (<b>a</b>) CL images of anorthosite zircon (sample BS01). (<b>b</b>) CL images of gabbro zircon (sample BS07).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Concordance and weighted mean age plots (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) of LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb ages for Shazouquan mafic rocks in the BOB. (<b>a</b>) Anorthosite (BS01). (<b>b</b>) Gabbro (BS07).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Plots of GaO-MgO-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> in Shazouquan ultramafic rocks in the BOB. MAR for average composition of oceanic ridge basalt [<a href="#B53-minerals-13-01067" class="html-bibr">53</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns. (<b>b</b>) Primitive mantle-normalized incompatible element distribution patterns for Shazouquan ultramafic rocks in the BOB (chondrite data and primitive mantle data for normalization taken from Sun et al. [<a href="#B54-minerals-13-01067" class="html-bibr">54</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Covariation diagram of Cr (<b>a</b>) and Ni- (<b>b</b>) vs. MgO for Shazouquan ultramafic rocks in the BOB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns. (<b>b</b>) Primitive mantle-normalized incompatible element distribution patterns for Shazouquan mafic rocks in the BOB (chondrite data and primitive mantle data for normalization taken from Sun et al. [<a href="#B54-minerals-13-01067" class="html-bibr">54</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Plots of Nb/Yb-Th/Yb (<b>a</b>) and Nb/Yb-TiO<sub>2</sub>/Yb (<b>b</b>) in Shazouquan mafic rocks in the BOB [<a href="#B54-minerals-13-01067" class="html-bibr">54</a>]. MORB stands for mid-ocean ridge basalts; N-MORB stands for normal MORB; E-MORB stands for enriched MORB; OIB stands for ocean island basalts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Plots of Shazouquan anorthosite and gabbro Nb × 2-Zr/4-Y (<b>a</b>) [<a href="#B70-minerals-13-01067" class="html-bibr">70</a>], TiO<sub>2</sub>-MnO × 10-P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> × 10 (<b>b</b>) [<a href="#B71-minerals-13-01067" class="html-bibr">71</a>], and Hf/3-Th-Nb/16 (<b>c</b>) [<a href="#B72-minerals-13-01067" class="html-bibr">72</a>] in the BOB. Nb × 2-Zr/4-Y diagram: AI stands for within-plate alkaline basalts, AII stands for within-plate alkaline basalts and within-plate tholeiitic, B stands for E-MORB, C stands for within-plate tholeiitic and volcanic-arc basalts, and D stands for depleted MORB and volcanic-arc basalts. TiO<sub>2</sub>-MnO × 10-P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> × 10 diagram: OIT stands for ocean island tholeiitic, MORB stands for mid-ocean ridge basalts, IAT stands for island-arc tholeiitic, OIA stands for ocean island alkaline, and CAB stands for calc-alkaline basalts. Hf/3-Th-Nb/16 diagram: A stands for depleted MORB, B stands for E-MORB and within-plate tholeiitic, C stands for within-plate tholeiitic, and D stands for volcanic-arc basalts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The geological section of Dundunshan formation and Sangejing formation in the BOB.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop