[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
entropy-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Complexity in Financial Networks

A special issue of Entropy (ISSN 1099-4300). This special issue belongs to the section "Complexity".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 27 March 2025 | Viewed by 6535

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
Interests: financial complexity; mining finance; resource and environmental economics and management; managing scientific complexity

grade E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Trinity Business School, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Interests: applied finance; behavioral finance; corporate finance derivatives; finance theory; financial management; integrative cases in finance; introduction to finance; introduction to organizations and management investments port

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Management and Engineering, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China
Interests: energy economics; time series analysis; Chinese economic studies; energy investment; energy policy; networks; econophysics; complex systems

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China
Interests: financial market; financial network; financial complexity; financial risk

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

A financial system is a type of nonlinear dynamic system, but it is much more complex since human behavior is involved. One significant and effective way to explore and understand nonlinear dynamic systems is through complex network theory. By considering the financial system as a multilayer network with heterogeneous entities, including various financial markets, institutions, and stakeholders from different countries and regions, all these entities interact with each other through financial activities determined mainly by the available information. This network understanding of the financial system sheds light on the complexity of the financial system following the 2008 global financial crisis.

Information theory is a branch of applied mathematics that involves the quantification of information, while financial complexity is closely related to information. Specifically, key concepts from information theory involving entropy and mutual information offer effective tools for measuring uncertainties associated with a random variable and how knowledge about one random variable reduces uncertainty about another. All these contents are well aligned with the uncertainty and complex nature of the financial network.

Currently, the entire financial system is accelerating to face the occurrence of various uncertainties, such as geopolitical tensions (Israel and Iran in 2023), the Russian–Ukrainian crisis (since February 2022), and long COVID-19 (since 2020), leading to the highest degrees of complexity and uncertainties observed so far in the financial system. Therefore, it is necessary to further develop tools based on complexity, network, and information theory that could work well to complement existing economic modeling approaches.

Here, we collect various theoretical, modeling, and empirical contributions from the field of financial network. In particular, as we aim to align with the scope of the Entropy journal, manuscripts that integrate information theory are welcome.

Dr. Shupei Huang
Prof. Dr. Brian Lucey
Dr. Xueyong Liu
Dr. Xinya Wang
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Entropy is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • financial network analysis
  • information spillover in financial systems
  • multilayer networks in finance
  • uncertainties in financial network

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 744 KiB  
Article
Causal Hierarchy in the Financial Market Network—Uncovered by the Helmholtz–Hodge–Kodaira Decomposition
by Tobias Wand, Oliver Kamps and Hiroshi Iyetomi
Entropy 2024, 26(10), 858; https://doi.org/10.3390/e26100858 - 11 Oct 2024
Viewed by 350
Abstract
Granger causality can uncover the cause-and-effect relationships in financial networks. However, such networks can be convoluted and difficult to interpret, but the Helmholtz–Hodge–Kodaira decomposition can split them into rotational and gradient components which reveal the hierarchy of the Granger causality flow. Using Kenneth [...] Read more.
Granger causality can uncover the cause-and-effect relationships in financial networks. However, such networks can be convoluted and difficult to interpret, but the Helmholtz–Hodge–Kodaira decomposition can split them into rotational and gradient components which reveal the hierarchy of the Granger causality flow. Using Kenneth French’s business sector return time series, it is revealed that during the COVID crisis, precious metals and pharmaceutical products were causal drivers of the financial network. Moreover, the estimated Granger causality network shows a high connectivity during the crisis, which means that the research presented here can be especially useful for understanding crises in the market better by revealing the dominant drivers of crisis dynamics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Complexity in Financial Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Example of the Helmholtz–Hodge–Kodaira decomposition for a single graph into a gradient-based graph (g) and a circular graph (c). Note that direction of the flux between A and C is different in (g) and (c), which is the same as changing the sign <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>J</mi> <mrow> <mi>A</mi> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>g</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <msubsup> <mi>J</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mi>A</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>g</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and hence, their sum is given by <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>J</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mi>A</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>g</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>+</mo> <msubsup> <mi>J</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mi>A</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>c</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>0.6</mn> <mo>+</mo> <mn>0.7</mn> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and the original flux <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>J</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mi>A</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> is reconstructed. Also, note that the total flux between two nodes is path-independent for (g) as <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>J</mi> <mrow> <mi>A</mi> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>g</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>=</mo> <msubsup> <mi>J</mi> <mrow> <mi>A</mi> <mi>B</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>g</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>+</mo> <msubsup> <mi>J</mi> <mrow> <mi>B</mi> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>g</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The network structure used for the vector autoregression which generates synthetic time series. One node is at the top of the hierarchy without any causal parent, whereas eight nodes are in the second layer and forty are in the final layer. Each node in the second layer is the parent node of 5 nodes in the final layer and has the node in the first layer as their parent node. Sketched via the software [<a href="#B35-entropy-26-00858" class="html-bibr">35</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Results of the RCGCI-HHKD analysis for annual data from [<a href="#B22-entropy-26-00858" class="html-bibr">22</a>]. The gray shaded area is the CI for the network connectivity of random data without any causal coupling. Note that the lines that connect the dots are only a visual aid, and no linear interpolation between the periods is assumed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>For the analysis of annual data from 2004 to 2023, KDE of the sum of all influx and outflux of Granger causality and the total number of years with at least one inward or outward link in the RCGCI network. Values on the x-axis have been normalized to the same scale.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>For time periods of 12 months, two network measures are depicted here: the network connectivity and the gradient contribution <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math>. The network connectivity is the percentage of sectors connected to the network and is displayed here against the random connectivity expected for independent time series. If the network is complete and has a connectivity of 1, the gradient contribution <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math> is also calculated according to Equation (<a href="#FD10-entropy-26-00858" class="html-disp-formula">10</a>). Note that the time on the x-axis is the midpoint of the 12-month intervals of data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>For the same time intervals as in <a href="#entropy-26-00858-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>, the potentials <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> of each sector are shown as dots. Note that for each time interval, the potentials have been centered via <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mo>∑</mo> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <msub> <mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. Some selected sectors are shown in color, and the gray area shows the spread between the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>25</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>75</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> quantiles for each time period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The estimated Granger causality influence network ordered by the HHKD potentials for the periods from January 2007 to December 2007 (the sector FabPr is not shown because it has no link to any other sector) and from October 2019 to September 2020. The width of the arrows reflects the strength of the Granger causality, and selected sectors are highlighted with the same color coding as in <a href="#entropy-26-00858-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a> whereas all other sectors are shown in blue.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 2616 KiB  
Article
Wandering Drunkards Walk after Fibonacci Rabbits: How the Presence of Shared Market Opinions Modifies the Outcome of Uncertainty
by Nicolas Maloumian
Entropy 2024, 26(8), 686; https://doi.org/10.3390/e26080686 - 13 Aug 2024
Viewed by 623
Abstract
Shared market opinions and beliefs by market participants generate a set of constraints that mediate information through a not-so-unstable system of expected target prices. Price trajectories, within these sets of constraints, confirm or disprove the likelihood of participant expectations and cannot, de facto, [...] Read more.
Shared market opinions and beliefs by market participants generate a set of constraints that mediate information through a not-so-unstable system of expected target prices. Price trajectories, within these sets of constraints, confirm or disprove the likelihood of participant expectations and cannot, de facto, be considered permutable, as literature has shown, since their inner structure is dynamically affected by their own progress, suggesting per se the presence of both heat and cycles. This study described and discussed how trajectories are built using different alphabets and suggests that prices follow an ergodic course within structurally similar tessellation classes. It is reported that the courses of price moves are self-similar due to their a priori structure, and they do not need to be complete in order to create the conditions, in resembling conditions, for the appearance of the well-known and commonly used Fibonacci ratios between price trajectories. To date, financial models and engineering are mostly based on the mathematics of randomness. If these theoretical findings need empirical validation, such a potential infrastructure of ratios would suggest the possibility for a superstructure to exist, in other words, the emergence of exploitable patterns. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Complexity in Financial Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Different possible combinations after six trades, ‘a’ marking any price change, ‘H’ marking no change.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Different possible combinations posting a six-letter chain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Different ways to see the same rise in price from a bottom to a top as depicted in ‘a’, with ‘b’ presenting an l-composition (l standing for left) of ‘a’, and with ‘c’ presenting an r-composition (r standing for right) of ‘a’. On both ‘b’ and ‘c’, each horizontal line is an ‘H’.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Grouping different ‘tiles’ of an eight-letter chain composed with ‘1’s’ (one tick up or down) and ‘0’s’ (no change). (<b>A</b>) shows the set of tiles for moves going up, and (<b>B</b>) shows the set of tiles for moves going down.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Probability structure of Fibonacci <span class="html-italic">n</span>-letter chains, or classes, probability levels on the y-axis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Showing how the tile sets T{9} T{8} T{7} are related. Black squares indicate no price changes (‘H’ or ‘0’), and all other squares indicate a price change of one unit of price (‘1’).</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 2886 KiB  
Article
Study on the Stability of Complex Networks in the Stock Markets of Key Industries in China
by Zinuoqi Wang, Guofeng Zhang, Xiaojing Ma and Ruixian Wang
Entropy 2024, 26(7), 569; https://doi.org/10.3390/e26070569 - 30 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 966
Abstract
Investigating the significant “roles” within financial complex networks and their stability is of great importance for preventing financial risks. On one hand, this paper initially constructs a complex network model of the stock market based on mutual information theory and threshold methods, combined [...] Read more.
Investigating the significant “roles” within financial complex networks and their stability is of great importance for preventing financial risks. On one hand, this paper initially constructs a complex network model of the stock market based on mutual information theory and threshold methods, combined with the closing price returns of stocks. It then analyzes the basic topological characteristics of this network and examines its stability under random and targeted attacks by varying the threshold values. On the other hand, using systemic risk entropy as a metric to quantify the stability of the stock market, this paper validates the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic as a widespread, unexpected event on network stability. The research results indicate that this complex network exhibits small-world characteristics but cannot be strictly classified as a scale-free network. In this network, key roles are played by the industrial sector, media and information services, pharmaceuticals and healthcare, transportation, and utilities. Upon reducing the threshold, the network’s resilience to random attacks is correspondingly strengthened. Dynamically, from 2000 to 2022, systemic risk in significant industrial share markets significantly increased. From a static perspective, the period around 2019, affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, experienced the most drastic fluctuations. Compared to the year 2000, systemic risk entropy in 2022 increased nearly sixtyfold, further indicating an increasing instability within this complex network. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Complexity in Financial Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Probability density distribution of mutual information among stocks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Changes in the number of nodes in the largest connected subgraph based on mutual information.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The complex network of the equity market based on mutual information.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Degree distribution of the points in the complex network of the financial share marketplace; (<b>a</b>) shows that when the threshold is 0.198, the degree distribution of nodes in the complex network of financial stocks follows the long tail distribution, and (<b>b</b>) further investigates whether the network satisfies the power law distribution by using the log-log coordinates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The trend of change in the proportion of nodes in the largest connected subgraph under intentional attack and random attacks; (<b>a</b>) shows a deliberate attack on critical nodes. When F approaches 1, the network connectivity decreases sharply. (<b>b</b>) represents the random selection of nodes for attack and observes the changes in connectivity. Deliberate attacks are more destructive to the largest connected subgraph.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>High-threshold complex web of the financial stock market.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Attack scenarios on the high-threshold stock market complex network; (<b>a</b>) shows that after strengthening the standards for node importance or connectivity, under deliberate attack, S will obviously break and jump. The largest connected subgraph will suddenly split into several small subgraphs, which will lead to a sharp decline in network connectivity. (<b>b</b>) shows no obvious fracture phenomenon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Low-threshold intricate system of the stock market.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Attack scenarios on the low-threshold stock market complex network; (<b>a</b>) shows that under a low threshold, the network connectivity remains relatively stable despite the deliberate removal of nodes, and only collapses when most of the nodes are removed. The inset magnifies the details when F approaches 1, showing the final fracture. (<b>b</b>) shows the impact of random attacks on the network, where the network connectivity gradually decreases without a sudden structural change.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Systemic risk entropy and its variations from 2000 to 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Complex networks before and after 2019 under high and low thresholds compared to the original state. (<b>a</b>) High-Threshold Network (before 2019); (<b>b</b>) Low-Threshold Network (before 2019); (<b>c</b>) Original Network (before 2019); (<b>d</b>) High-Threshold Network (after 2019); (<b>e</b>) Low-Threshold Network (after 2019); (<b>f</b>) Original Network (after 2019).</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 1744 KiB  
Article
SF-Transformer: A Mutual Information-Enhanced Transformer Model with Spot-Forward Parity for Forecasting Long-Term Chinese Stock Index Futures Prices
by Weifang Mao, Pin Liu and Jixian Huang
Entropy 2024, 26(6), 478; https://doi.org/10.3390/e26060478 - 30 May 2024
Viewed by 707
Abstract
The complexity in stock index futures markets, influenced by the intricate interplay of human behavior, is characterized as nonlinearity and dynamism, contributing to significant uncertainty in long-term price forecasting. While machine learning models have demonstrated their efficacy in stock price forecasting, they rely [...] Read more.
The complexity in stock index futures markets, influenced by the intricate interplay of human behavior, is characterized as nonlinearity and dynamism, contributing to significant uncertainty in long-term price forecasting. While machine learning models have demonstrated their efficacy in stock price forecasting, they rely solely on historical price data, which, given the inherent volatility and dynamic nature of financial markets, are insufficient to address the complexity and uncertainty in long-term forecasting due to the limited connection between historical and forecasting prices. This paper introduces a pioneering approach that integrates financial theory with advanced deep learning methods to enhance predictive accuracy and risk management in China’s stock index futures market. The SF-Transformer model, combining spot-forward parity and the Transformer model, is proposed to improve forecasting accuracy across short and long-term horizons. Formulated upon the arbitrage-free futures pricing model, the spot-forward parity model offers variables such as stock index price, risk-free rate, and stock index dividend yield for forecasting. Our insight is that the mutual information generated by these variables has the potential to significantly reduce uncertainty in long-term forecasting. A case study on predicting major stock index futures prices in China demonstrates the superiority of the SF-Transformer model over models based on LSTM, MLP, and the stock index futures arbitrage-free pricing model, covering both short and long-term forecasting up to 28 days. Unlike existing machine learning models, the Transformer processes entire time series concurrently, leveraging its attention mechanism to discern intricate dependencies and capture long-range relationships, thereby offering a holistic understanding of time series data. An enhancement of mutual information is observed after introducing spot-forward parity in the forecasting. The variation of mutual information and ablation study results highlights the significant contributions of spot-forward parity, particularly to the long-term forecasting. Overall, these findings highlight the SF-Transformer model’s efficacy in leveraging spot-forward parity for reducing uncertainty and advancing robust and comprehensive approaches in long-term stock index futures price forecasting. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Complexity in Financial Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Transformer model for stock index futures price forecasting. The time series data are input into the encoder, which employs multiple attention layers to extract features for forecasting. Simultaneously, the forecasting horizons, marked as zeros and accompanied by the previous historical time series data, are fed into the decoder. The decoder, integrating features from the encoder, predicts the values of forecasting horizons using multiple attention layers and a fully connected layer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Architecture of SF-Transformer. (<b>a</b>) Sequential spot-forward (SF) parity values, stock index futures values, and global time constitute the input representation to the SF-Transformer. This input generates embeddings for SF via value/position/time embedding. (<b>b</b>) The SF-Transformer utilizes the embeddings of the encoder and decoder inputs to generate forecasts of stock index futures prices in a generative manner. Model training involves the use of mean squared error (MSE) to measure the difference between forecasted values and ground-truth values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>1-day- to 28-days-ahead out-of-sample forecasting errors of SF-Transformer, SF-LSTM, and SF-MLP for (<b>a</b>) IF, (<b>b</b>) IH, and (<b>c</b>) IC Stock Index Futures measured by MAPE. Note that arbitrage-free is not illustrated here due to its significantly higher and even inapplicable MAPEs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>1-day- to 28-days-ahead out-of-sample forecasting errors of Transformer, LSTM, and MLP for (<b>a</b>) IF, (<b>b</b>) IH, and (<b>c</b>) IC Stock Index Futures measured by MAPE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variation of mutual information (VarMI) with and without spot-forward parity across forecasting horizons from 1 to 28 days for (<b>a</b>) IF, (<b>b</b>) IH, and (<b>c</b>) IC Stock Index Futures.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 887 KiB  
Article
Underwriter Discourse, IPO Profit Distribution, and Audit Quality: An Entropy Study from the Perspective of an Underwriter–Auditor Network
by Songling Yang, Yafei Tai, Yu Cao, Yunzhu Chen and Qiuyue Zhang
Entropy 2024, 26(5), 393; https://doi.org/10.3390/e26050393 - 30 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1031
Abstract
Underwriters play a pivotal role in the IPO process. Information entropy, a tool for measuring the uncertainty and complexity of information, has been widely applied to various issues in complex networks. Information entropy can quantify the uncertainty and complexity of nodes in the [...] Read more.
Underwriters play a pivotal role in the IPO process. Information entropy, a tool for measuring the uncertainty and complexity of information, has been widely applied to various issues in complex networks. Information entropy can quantify the uncertainty and complexity of nodes in the network, providing a unique analytical perspective and methodological support for this study. This paper employs a bipartite network analysis method to construct the relationship network between underwriters and accounting firms, using the centrality of underwriters in the network as a measure of their influence to explore the impact of underwriters’ influence on the distribution of interests and audit outcomes. The findings indicate that a more pronounced influence of underwriters significantly increases the ratio of underwriting fees to audit fees. Higher influence often accompanies an increase in abnormal underwriting fees. Further research reveals that companies underwritten by more influential underwriters experience a decline in audit quality. Finally, the study reveals that a well-structured audit committee governance and the rationalization of market sentiments can mitigate the negative impacts of underwriters’ influence. The innovation of this paper is that it enriches the content related to underwriters by constructing the relationship network between underwriters and accounting firms for the first time using a bipartite network through the lens of information entropy. This conclusion provides new directions for thinking about the motives and possibilities behind financial institutions’ cooperation, offering insights for market regulation and policy formulation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Complexity in Financial Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Underwriter–accounting firm network visualization.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 3707 KiB  
Article
Systemic Importance and Risk Characteristics of Banks Based on a Multi-Layer Financial Network Analysis
by Qianqian Gao, Hong Fan and Chengyang Yu
Entropy 2024, 26(5), 378; https://doi.org/10.3390/e26050378 - 29 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1158
Abstract
Domestic and international risk shocks have greatly increased the demand for systemic risk management in China. This paper estimates China’s multi-layer financial network based on multiple financial relationships among banks, assets, and firms, using China’s banking system data in 2021. An improved PageRank [...] Read more.
Domestic and international risk shocks have greatly increased the demand for systemic risk management in China. This paper estimates China’s multi-layer financial network based on multiple financial relationships among banks, assets, and firms, using China’s banking system data in 2021. An improved PageRank algorithm is proposed to identify systemically important banks and other economic sectors, and a stress test is conducted. This study finds that China’s multi-layer financial network is sparse, and the distribution of transactions across financial markets is uneven. Regulatory authorities should support economic recovery and adjust the money supply, while banks should differentiate competition and manage risks better. Based on the PageRank index, this paper assesses the systemic importance of large commercial banks from the perspective of network structure, emphasizing the role of banks’ transaction behavior and market participation. Different industries and asset classes are also assessed, suggesting that increased attention should be paid to industry risks and regulatory oversight of bank investments. Finally, stress tests confirm that the improved PageRank algorithm is applicable within the multi-layer financial network, reinforcing the need for prudential supervision of the banking system and revealing that the degree of transaction concentration will affect the systemic importance of financial institutions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Complexity in Financial Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Multi-layer financial network of the Chinese banking system. (Red: banks; green: financial assets; blue: firms).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Distribution of degree and total loan amount of banks in the bank–firm credit network. (BOC: Bank of China; CMB: China Merchants Bank; ICBC: Industrial and Commercial Bank of China; CCB: China Construction Bank; CIB: Industrial Bank; SPDB: Shanghai Pudong Development Bank; BCM: Bank of Communications; CMBC: China Minsheng Bank; ABC: Agricultural Bank of China; CITIC: China CITIC Bank; CDB: China Development Bank; ADBC: Agricultural Development Bank of China; PSBC: Postal Savings Bank of China).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Distribution of the degree of asset classes and the total amount of assets in the bank–asset portfolio network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Degree of banks and total lending amount in the interbank lending network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Degree, the amount of transactions and the PageRank index of the bank in each financial market.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The proportion of each asset in total assets and the average degree in various networks of different types of banks in various networks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Counterparties of the six largest state-owned banks across trading markets. (ICBC: Industrial and Commercial Bank of China; ABC: Agricultural Bank of China; CCB: China Construction Bank; BOC: Bank of China; PSBC: Postal Savings Bank of China; BCM: Bank of Communications).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop