[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 

Molecular Research of Neurodegenerative and Psychiatric Diseases, 2nd Edition

A special issue of Biomedicines (ISSN 2227-9059). This special issue belongs to the section "Neurobiology and Clinical Neuroscience".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2025 | Viewed by 1896

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Laboratory for Molecular Neuropsychiatry, Division of Molecular Medicine, Rudjer Boskovic Institute, Bijenicka cesta 54, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia
Interests: molecular basis; genetics; psychiatric disorders; neurodegenerative diseases; pharmacogenetics; neurobiology; neuropharmacology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Huntington’s disease, as well as psychiatric diseases, such as schizophrenia, anxiety, depression and addictions, are multifactorial and heterogeneous disorders, which pose significant health, social and economic problems. Despite many studies, their complex etiology is still poorly understood, and therapeutic strategies are often limited to relieving their symptoms. The elucidation of their molecular background may contain keys for identifying risk factors, offering novel diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers, as well as providing novel and specific targets for their prevention and treatment. This Special Issue aims to present the most up-to-date findings regarding research targeting molecular mechanisms underlying different neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases. It aims to provide a broad overview of novel advances in the field, including studies at the molecular, epi/genetic and cellular levels, but will also cover integrative, imaging and psychopharmacology research areas, as well as comprehensive omics approaches. We welcome the submission of studies using various preclinical in vitro and in vivo models, as well as clinical studies involving human subjects.

Dr. Dubravka Švob Štrac
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Biomedicines is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • neurodegenerative disorders
  • psychiatric diseases
  • biomarkers
  • therapeutic targets
  • omics approaches
  • molecular pathways
  • cell biology
  • animal models
  • clinical studies

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

25 pages, 2329 KiB  
Article
Genomic Characterisation of the Relationship and Causal Links Between Vascular Calcification, Alzheimer’s Disease, and Cognitive Traits
by Emmanuel O. Adewuyi and Simon M. Laws
Biomedicines 2025, 13(3), 618; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13030618 - 3 Mar 2025
Viewed by 205
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Observational studies suggest a link between vascular calcification and dementia or cognitive decline, but the evidence is conflicting, and the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Here, we investigate the shared genetic and causal relationships of vascular calcification—coronary artery calcification (CAC) and abdominal aortic [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Observational studies suggest a link between vascular calcification and dementia or cognitive decline, but the evidence is conflicting, and the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Here, we investigate the shared genetic and causal relationships of vascular calcification—coronary artery calcification (CAC) and abdominal aortic calcification (AAC)—with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and five cognitive traits. Methods: We analyse large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary statistics, using well-regarded methods, including linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC), Mendelian randomisation (MR), pairwise GWAS (GWAS-PW), and gene-based association analysis. Results: Our findings reveal a nominally significant positive genome-wide genetic correlation between CAC and AD, which becomes non-significant after excluding the APOE region. CAC and AAC demonstrate significant negative correlations with cognitive performance and educational attainment. MR found no causal association between CAC or AAC and AD or cognitive traits, except for a bidirectional borderline-significant association between AAC and fluid intelligence scores. Pairwise-GWAS analysis identifies no shared causal SNPs (posterior probability of association [PPA]3 < 0.5). However, we find pleiotropic loci (PPA4 > 0.9), particularly on chromosome 19, with gene association analyses revealing significant genes in shared regions, including APOE, TOMM40, NECTIN2, and APOC1. Moreover, we identify suggestively significant loci (PPA4 > 0.5) on chromosomes 1, 6, 7, 9 and 19, implicating pleiotropic genes, including NAV1, IPO9, PHACTR1, UFL1, FHL5, and FOCAD. Conclusions: Current findings reveal limited genetic correlation and no significant causal associations of CAC and AAC with AD or cognitive traits. However, significant pleiotropic loci, particularly at the APOE region, highlight the complex interplay between vascular calcification and neurodegenerative processes. Given APOE’s roles in lipid metabolism, neuroinflammation, and vascular integrity, its involvement may link vascular and neurodegenerative disorders, pointing to potential targets for further investigation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic representation of MR assumptions and study design. The figure provides an overview of the MR analysis approach, emphasising its application and core assumptions in examining the potential causal relationship between exposure and outcome variables [<a href="#B28-biomedicines-13-00618" class="html-bibr">28</a>,<a href="#B29-biomedicines-13-00618" class="html-bibr">29</a>,<a href="#B30-biomedicines-13-00618" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B31-biomedicines-13-00618" class="html-bibr">31</a>]. It highlights the three fundamental assumptions of MR: (1) the genetic variants (SNPs) used as instrumental variables must be robustly associated with the exposure, (2) these SNPs should not be associated with confounding factors (we note the direction of the arrow as recently illustrated [<a href="#B47-biomedicines-13-00618" class="html-bibr">47</a>]), and (3) they must influence the outcome exclusively through the exposure [<a href="#B28-biomedicines-13-00618" class="html-bibr">28</a>,<a href="#B29-biomedicines-13-00618" class="html-bibr">29</a>,<a href="#B30-biomedicines-13-00618" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B31-biomedicines-13-00618" class="html-bibr">31</a>]. The figure also details the clumping parameters employed to ensure the independence and relevance of the genetic instruments. The analysis involves two rounds: first using CAC and AAC as exposures against AD and cognitive traits as outcomes, and the reverse analysis where AD and cognitive traits serve as exposures, with CAC and AAC as the outcome variables. AAC: abdominal aortic calcification, AD: Alzheimer’s disease, CAC: coronary artery calcification, EA: effect allele, IVW: inverse variance weighted, MR: Mendelian randomisation, MR-PRESSO: Mendelian randomization pleiotropy residual sum and outlier, NEA: non-effect allele, SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Causal effect of CAC on AD and cognitive traits. CAC: coronary artery calcification, CI: confidence interval, IVW: inverse variance weighted, nIV: number of instrumental variables, OR: odds ratio, <span class="html-italic">p</span>: <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value, cExecutive function: common executive function.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Causal effect of AAC onAD and cognitive traits. AAC: abdominal aortic calcification, CI: confidence interval, IVW: inverse variance weighted, nIV: number of instrumental variables, OR: odds ratio, <span class="html-italic">p</span>: <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value, cExecutive function: common executive function.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Causal effect of AD on cognitive traits against CAC. CAC: coronary artery calcification, CI: confidence interval, IVW: inverse variance weighted, nIV: number of instrumental variables, OR: odds ratio, <span class="html-italic">p</span>: <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value, cExecutive function: common executive function.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Causal effect of AD and cognitive traits on AAC. AAC: abdominal aortic calcification, CI: confidence interval, IVW: inverse variance weighted, nIV: number of instrumental variables, OR: odds ratio, <span class="html-italic">p</span>: <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value, cExecutive function: common executive function.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3121 KiB  
Article
Neuroprotective Effects of Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulphate Against Aβ Toxicity and Accumulation in Cellular and Animal Model of Alzheimer’s Disease
by Barbara Vuic, Tina Milos, Erika Kvak, Marcela Konjevod, Lucija Tudor, Szidónia Farkas, Gordana Nedic Erjavec, Matea Nikolac Perkovic, Dora Zelena and Dubravka Svob Strac
Biomedicines 2025, 13(2), 432; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13020432 - 11 Feb 2025
Viewed by 533
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Beneficial effects of neurosteroid dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS) on cognition, emotions and behavior have been previously reported, suggesting its potential in the prevention and treatment of various neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This study aimed to investigate the potential neuroprotective [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Beneficial effects of neurosteroid dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS) on cognition, emotions and behavior have been previously reported, suggesting its potential in the prevention and treatment of various neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This study aimed to investigate the potential neuroprotective actions of DHEAS against Aβ toxicity in both cellular and animal models of AD. Methods: After optimizing the AD model in vitro, we investigated the DHEAS effects on the viability and death of primary mouse neurons exposed to toxic Aβ42 oligomers for 24 h. In order to extend our research to an in vivo study, we further tested the acute effects of intraperitoneal DHEAS administration on the Aβ plaque density in different brain regions of 3xTg-AD mice, an animal model of AD. Results: In cell culture, DHEAS hampered the decrease in the neuronal viability caused by toxic Aβ oligomers, primarily by influencing mitochondrial function and apoptosis. DHEAS also counteracted the increase in the mRNA expression of selected genes (PI3K, Akt, Bcl2, Bax), induced in neuronal culture by treatment with Aβ42 oligomers. Obtained data suggested the involvement of mitochondria, caspases 3 and 7, as well as the PI3K/Akt and Bcl2 signaling network in the antiapoptotic properties of DHEAS in neurons. Forty-eight hours after DHEAS treatment, a significantly lower number of Aβ plaques was observed in the motor cortex but not in other brain areas of 3xTg-AD mice. Conclusions: Results indicated potential neuroprotective effects of DHEAS against Aβ toxicity and accumulation, suggesting that DHEAS supplementation should be further studied as a novel option for AD prevention and/or treatment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Treatment with various concentrations (0.1–10 μM) of Aβ<sub>42</sub> monomers, oligomers and polymers for 24 h affected the viability of primary mouse neurons determined by (<b>A</b>) MTT Assay: * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.005, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 vs. control; (<b>B</b>) RealTime-Glo™ MT Assay: * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.002, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 vs. control; and demonstrated that 10 μM Aβ<sub>42</sub> oligomers were most toxic, as confirmed with (<b>C</b>) MUSE Count and Viability reagent using MUSE™ cell analyzer: ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 vs. control. Results are expressed as means ± SD from 3 experiments and analyzed by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Dots represent individual values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Treatment with various (0.1–10 μM) concentrations of Aβ<sub>42</sub> oligomers for (<b>A</b>) 24 h (<b>B</b>) 48 h and (<b>C</b>) 72 h, affected the viability of primary mouse neurons determined by MTT assay: * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001 vs. control, and demonstrated significant neurotoxicity already after 24 h treatment with Aβ<sub>42</sub> oligomers. Results are expressed as means ± SD from 4 to 6 experiments and analyzed by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Dots represent individual values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Treatment of primary mouse neurons with various (0.1–10 μM) concentrations of Aβ<sub>42</sub> oligomers for 24 h affected (<b>A</b>) ATP levels: * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 vs. control; (<b>B</b>) cell membrane integrity: ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001 vs. control; (<b>C</b>) caspase 3/7 activity: * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.02 vs. control; determined by Mitochondrial ToxGlo™ Assay and Caspase-Glo<sup>®</sup> 3/7 Assay™. Results are expressed as means ± SD from 3 experiments and analyzed by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Dots represent individual values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>A representative sample of the cell Bcl-2 activation profile in primary mouse neurons treated for 24 h with (<b>A</b>) vehicle (control) (<b>B</b>) 10 μM Aβ<sub>42</sub> oligomers, obtained by using MUSE Bcl-2 activation reagent and the MUSE™ cell analyzer, and (<b>C</b>) Bcl-2 activation levels expressed as means ± SD from 3 experiments and analyzed by the Student <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test: ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001 vs. control. Dots represent individual values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effects of various DHEAS concentrations on the viability of primary mouse neurons treated with 10 μM Aβ<sub>42</sub> oligomers for 24 h determined by (<b>A</b>) MTT Assay: ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 vs. control, <sup>φ</sup> <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 vs. Aβ<sub>42</sub> oligomers; (<b>B</b>) RealTime-Glo MT Assay: * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.02 vs. control, <sup>φ</sup> <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 or <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 vs. Aβ<sub>42</sub> oligomers. Results are expressed as means ± SD from 3 experiments and analyzed by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Dots represent individual values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Effects of 10<sup>−7</sup> M DHEAS on mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis and necrosis of primary mouse neurons treated with 10 μM Aβ<sub>42</sub> oligomers for 24 h, determined by (<b>A</b>) Hoechst 33342 (blue) and propidium iodide (red) staining and EVOS system, Scale bar 100 μm; (<b>B</b>) ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.005 vs. Aβ<sub>42</sub> oligomers, analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test; and determined by Mitochondrial ToxGlo™ measuring (<b>C</b>) ATP levels: ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.003 vs. Aβ<sub>42</sub> oligomers, analyzed by Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test and (<b>D</b>) cell membrane integrity. Results are expressed as means ± SD from 3 experiments. Dots represent individual values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effects of 10<sup>−7</sup> M DHEAS administration in the primary mouse neuronal culture treated with 10 μM Aβ<sub>42</sub> oligomers for 24 h on (<b>A</b>) caspase 3/7 activity determined with Caspase-Glo<sup>®</sup> 3/7 Assay. *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0005 vs. control, <sup>φ</sup> <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.004 vs. Aβ<sub>42</sub> oligomers; (<b>B</b>) mRNA expression of selected genes (<span class="html-italic">PI3K, Akt, Bcl2, Bax, Bax/Bcl2</span> ratio) determined by qPCR and normalized to <span class="html-italic">GAPDH</span> expression. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.02, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001, **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 vs. control; <sup>φ</sup> <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.002, <sup>φφ</sup> <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 vs. Aβ<sub>42</sub> oligomers. Results are expressed as means ± SD from 3–4 experiments and analyzed by one or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The effects of 10 mg/kg DHEAS on Aβ plaque density in the mouse motor cortex (MC) of 3xTg-AD mice 24 and 48 h after i.p. administration. (<b>A</b>) MC representative immunohistochemistry staining against Aβ, Scale bar 100 μm; (<b>B</b>) analyzed brain slices from MC; (<b>C</b>) relative number of Aβ plaques in the MC of 3xTg-AD mice 24 h and 48 h following vehicle (Control) or 10 mg/kg DHEAS i.p. administration: ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.002 vs. control, <sup>φ</sup> <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.03 vs. DHEAS 24 h group. Results are expressed as means ± SD from 6 mice per group and analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Dots represent individual values.</p>
Full article ">

Other

Jump to: Research

14 pages, 692 KiB  
Systematic Review
Fibromyalgia, Depression, and Autoimmune Disorders: An Interconnected Web of Inflammation
by Stefania Sedda, Maria Piera L. Cadoni, Serenella Medici, Elena Aiello, Gian Luca Erre, Alessandra Matilde Nivoli, Ciriaco Carru and Donatella Coradduzza
Biomedicines 2025, 13(2), 503; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13020503 - 18 Feb 2025
Viewed by 527
Abstract
Background: Fibromyalgia, depression, and autoimmune diseases represent a triad of interconnected conditions characterized by overlapping biological pathways, including chronic inflammation, immune dysregulation, and neurochemical imbalances. Understanding their shared mechanisms offers opportunities for innovative therapeutic approaches. Objective: This systematic review explores the common inflammatory- [...] Read more.
Background: Fibromyalgia, depression, and autoimmune diseases represent a triad of interconnected conditions characterized by overlapping biological pathways, including chronic inflammation, immune dysregulation, and neurochemical imbalances. Understanding their shared mechanisms offers opportunities for innovative therapeutic approaches. Objective: This systematic review explores the common inflammatory- and immune-related pathways among these conditions, emphasizing their implications for biomarker development and novel therapeutic strategies. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Studies examining the relationship between fibromyalgia, depression, and autoimmune diseases with a focus on immune responses, inflammatory biomarkers, and therapeutic interventions were included. The quality of the selected studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results: From the 255 identified studies, 12 met the inclusion criteria. Evidence supports the role of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-6, TNF-α) and neurochemical dysregulation (e.g., serotonin, dopamine) as key factors in the pathophysiology of these conditions. Pilot studies highlight the potential of immune-modulating therapies, including low-dose IL-2 and anti-inflammatory agents such as N-acetylcysteine and minocycline, in alleviating both physical and psychological symptoms. Emerging biomarkers, including cytokine profiles and platelet serotonin activity, show promise for personalized treatment approaches. Conclusions: The shared inflammatory pathways linking fibromyalgia, depression, and autoimmune diseases underscore the need for integrated therapeutic strategies. Although pilot studies provide preliminary insights, validation through large-scale, multicenter trials is essential. Future research should focus on standardizing methodologies and leveraging biomarker-driven precision medicine to improve outcomes for patients with these complex, multifactorial conditions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>PRISMA flow diagram representing the literature search and study selection process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Neuroinflammation, HPA axis dysregulation, and oxidative stress in fibromyalgia, depression, and autoimmune diseases.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop