Nataliya's Reviews > The Invisible Life of Addie LaRue
The Invisible Life of Addie LaRue
by
by
To be honest, this felt a bit … well… twee.
Now, I was actually captivated by the beginning. Adeline LaRue makes an ill-considered Faustian bargain in 1714 with a sinisterly handsome devil/darkness god - trading her soul for the life of freedom and immortality, with a caveat that hits her like a ton of bricks rather quickly - the price of freedom is forgettability. Everyone forgets her the moment she is out of sight, and she is doomed to wander the world without ever leaving a mark on it, not even a memory, until she’s so tired for it that she would beg for her life to end and her soul to be taken. Because living an invisible, immaterial life forever is a curse rather than a blessing, especially when the dark and handsome entity you made that bargain with seems *very* interested in you and your misery.
And then one day, three centuries later Addie meets a man (or a boy, as she insists of thinking of him despite him pushing thirty) who remembers her despite her curse. And there may be a good reason for that.
Sounds good, right? And for a bit it was. I kinda loved it for about a 100 pages or so.
And then my brain started getting peskily restless, and started asking all kinds of questions and pointing out all kinds of annoyances.
Let’s list some, shall we?
- Why is Addie unable to say any variation of her name - until she suddenly can to Henry?
- How is Addie unable to leave her mark on the world (can’t even set an abandoned hut on fire) until she is able to transplant a tree sapling that grows into a full-size tree?
- So if everyone immediately forgets her the moment she’s out of sight, have none of her lovers ever needed a bathroom break in the course of the evenings they spent with her? Either she accompanied them to the toilet or else there was quite a bit of full-bladder lovemaking.
- Was there a point to the constant mentioning of her seven freckles (apparently shaped like a constellation) besides making her recognizable in the works of art? Because they are mentioned quite a bit, without much payoff. And everyone is mesmerized by them for some reason. Seven freckles. Over and over again. Freckles do not replace personality.
- Is there a reason Henry looks so much like Luc/ Adeline’s love fantasy from before her curse? Wouldn’t it be more interesting (especially (view spoiler) and the nature of his relationship with Addie) for him to be unremarkable-looking, plain, ordinary?
- How the hell is Henry able to afford his own apartment in New York without roommates on what is likely to be minimum wage even before (view spoiler)? Plus him being able to afford a diamond ring on what I presume are measly paycheck leftovers from New York rent? What odd magic is at work here? Or are his parents still paying for him, therefore providing a decent reason for why people are not too impressed with him?
- Why do we not get to actually see the progression of much more interesting relationship between Addie and Luc?
- Why did it take a whole decade for Addie to become a fluent reader? I mean, seriously?
- And what exactly is so inspirational about Addie for her to impress all those artists and writers? There must be something, but we are not actually shown any of that. It can’t be just these FRECKLES, right?
- And why is Addie more interesting to the darkness/old god/Luc than, for instance, Beethoven or Shakespeare or Sinatra? Is that because of those freckles? They must be there for a reason, right?
- And does Schwab have a thing for curls or what?
- And don’t even get me started on insta-love that happens because plot needs it to, but with no chemistry between the leads whatsoever.
This book retains a very young feel to it, despite Addie being 300+ years old. She never seems to progress beyond her physical age of 23 despite centuries of experience, her thinking never seems to change, and her personality never develops. It’s just so young. And everything feels sweet and safe and twee, even when she is supposed to be in danger. Other than her selling her body in the beginning of her story, it seems that Luc is there to rescue her out of genuinely sticky situations, and New York is a shiny sparkly wide-eyed sanitized world of art and secret lively art and music venues and Pac-Man “speakeasies” and rooftop parties and never ever shows any genuinely unpleasant side. And deals with the gods who answer after dark are immutable and final and unchangeable - unless Addie needs them not to be. And adults being constantly referred to as boys and girls instead of men and women, adding to the very young adult feel in a book that really should not be young adult.
For a book that is so long, it manages to leave the characters quite underdeveloped. Half of it consists of flashbacks to Addie’s 300 years of existence, but after a few they all assume the familiar repetitive feel - which may fit Addie’s repetitive “invisible” life but does not add that much to the story. In the meantime, there are tantalizing references to interesting things happening - French Revolution, World War II, transatlantic voyage - but all we get to see are mundane snippets with questionable love story, most of the development of which is just hinted at and then barely shown in the very end. “Show not tell” does not really happen much here.
And of course, everything is filled with angst. Oh, the angsty angst.
Yet I did not hate it. It was an easy read, done in competent, although at times much too flowery writing. The strength of the beginning carried me through at least half of it easily, so there’s that. It’s not bad; it’s just nothing as special as one would expect from all the buildup.
2.5 stars.["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>
“[…] It is sad, of course, to forget.
But it is a lonely thing, to be forgotten.
To remember when no one else does.”
Now, I was actually captivated by the beginning. Adeline LaRue makes an ill-considered Faustian bargain in 1714 with a sinisterly handsome devil/darkness god - trading her soul for the life of freedom and immortality, with a caveat that hits her like a ton of bricks rather quickly - the price of freedom is forgettability. Everyone forgets her the moment she is out of sight, and she is doomed to wander the world without ever leaving a mark on it, not even a memory, until she’s so tired for it that she would beg for her life to end and her soul to be taken. Because living an invisible, immaterial life forever is a curse rather than a blessing, especially when the dark and handsome entity you made that bargain with seems *very* interested in you and your misery.
And then one day, three centuries later Addie meets a man (or a boy, as she insists of thinking of him despite him pushing thirty) who remembers her despite her curse. And there may be a good reason for that.
Sounds good, right? And for a bit it was. I kinda loved it for about a 100 pages or so.
“I gave you what you asked for, Adeline. Time, without constraint. Life without restriction.”
“You cursed me to be forgotten.”
“You asked for freedom. There is no greater freedom than that. You can move through the world unhindered. Untethered. Unbound.”
And then my brain started getting peskily restless, and started asking all kinds of questions and pointing out all kinds of annoyances.
Let’s list some, shall we?
- Why is Addie unable to say any variation of her name - until she suddenly can to Henry?
- How is Addie unable to leave her mark on the world (can’t even set an abandoned hut on fire) until she is able to transplant a tree sapling that grows into a full-size tree?
- So if everyone immediately forgets her the moment she’s out of sight, have none of her lovers ever needed a bathroom break in the course of the evenings they spent with her? Either she accompanied them to the toilet or else there was quite a bit of full-bladder lovemaking.
- Was there a point to the constant mentioning of her seven freckles (apparently shaped like a constellation) besides making her recognizable in the works of art? Because they are mentioned quite a bit, without much payoff. And everyone is mesmerized by them for some reason. Seven freckles. Over and over again. Freckles do not replace personality.
- Is there a reason Henry looks so much like Luc/ Adeline’s love fantasy from before her curse? Wouldn’t it be more interesting (especially (view spoiler) and the nature of his relationship with Addie) for him to be unremarkable-looking, plain, ordinary?
- How the hell is Henry able to afford his own apartment in New York without roommates on what is likely to be minimum wage even before (view spoiler)? Plus him being able to afford a diamond ring on what I presume are measly paycheck leftovers from New York rent? What odd magic is at work here? Or are his parents still paying for him, therefore providing a decent reason for why people are not too impressed with him?
- Why do we not get to actually see the progression of much more interesting relationship between Addie and Luc?
- Why did it take a whole decade for Addie to become a fluent reader? I mean, seriously?
- And what exactly is so inspirational about Addie for her to impress all those artists and writers? There must be something, but we are not actually shown any of that. It can’t be just these FRECKLES, right?
- And why is Addie more interesting to the darkness/old god/Luc than, for instance, Beethoven or Shakespeare or Sinatra? Is that because of those freckles? They must be there for a reason, right?
- And does Schwab have a thing for curls or what?
- And don’t even get me started on insta-love that happens because plot needs it to, but with no chemistry between the leads whatsoever.
“Henry is an impossible thing, her strange and beautiful oasis. But he is also human, and humans have friends, have families, have a thousand strands tying them to other people. Unlike her, he has never been untethered, never existed in a void.”
This book retains a very young feel to it, despite Addie being 300+ years old. She never seems to progress beyond her physical age of 23 despite centuries of experience, her thinking never seems to change, and her personality never develops. It’s just so young. And everything feels sweet and safe and twee, even when she is supposed to be in danger. Other than her selling her body in the beginning of her story, it seems that Luc is there to rescue her out of genuinely sticky situations, and New York is a shiny sparkly wide-eyed sanitized world of art and secret lively art and music venues and Pac-Man “speakeasies” and rooftop parties and never ever shows any genuinely unpleasant side. And deals with the gods who answer after dark are immutable and final and unchangeable - unless Addie needs them not to be. And adults being constantly referred to as boys and girls instead of men and women, adding to the very young adult feel in a book that really should not be young adult.
For a book that is so long, it manages to leave the characters quite underdeveloped. Half of it consists of flashbacks to Addie’s 300 years of existence, but after a few they all assume the familiar repetitive feel - which may fit Addie’s repetitive “invisible” life but does not add that much to the story. In the meantime, there are tantalizing references to interesting things happening - French Revolution, World War II, transatlantic voyage - but all we get to see are mundane snippets with questionable love story, most of the development of which is just hinted at and then barely shown in the very end. “Show not tell” does not really happen much here.
And of course, everything is filled with angst. Oh, the angsty angst.
“[…] She wonders about Henry. Wonders at the loneliness she sees behind his eyes. Wonders at the way the waiters and the bartenders and the other patrons look at him, the warmth he doesn’t seem to notice.”
Yet I did not hate it. It was an easy read, done in competent, although at times much too flowery writing. The strength of the beginning carried me through at least half of it easily, so there’s that. It’s not bad; it’s just nothing as special as one would expect from all the buildup.
2.5 stars.["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>
1038 likes · Like
∙
flag
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Invisible Life of Addie LaRue.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
October 13, 2020
–
Started Reading
October 13, 2020
– Shelved
October 13, 2020
–
20.0%
"Pretty good so far. But the romantic interest just showed up, so I’m a bit wary."
October 17, 2020
–
36.0%
"I don’t care that you are a 300+ year old woman. A man should not be referred to as “a boy” after his mid-twenties. That’s icky."
October 18, 2020
–
99.0%
October 18, 2020
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 226 (226 new)
message 1:
by
nastya
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Oct 19, 2020 10:35PM
high five! 😀
reply
|
flag
nastyako wrote: "high five! 😀"🙌 great minds think alike and all that jazz. But yeah, your review was spot on.
Stephanie wrote: "Freckles?! Freckles. Now the word sounds funny. Freckles. 😂"Freckles and curls. That would be a great title for the spinoff or a sequel to this one.
Marc *Dark Reader of the Woods* wrote: "Fiction means never having to pee."I know, right? Bladder and bowel function is optional in fiction.
Nataliya wrote: I know, right? Bladder and bowel function is optional in fiction."never pee and never have a 9 hour day at work :)
you see that's why we need ya characters in this ya book. so brooding angsty henry can go to his room to sleep in his parent's house and eat the meal mom cooked him and also ask for pocket money from his parents to go to the starbucks with Addie!
i can clearly see henry lying on his bed, listening to My Chemical Romance. and his walls have all these posters from Requiem for a dream, Fight club, maybe "why so serious" poster from The Dark Knight... perfection...
The questions about having to go to the bathroom and pee, LOL. I wondered why she couldn't have taken part in much more than (repeated?) one-night stands and posing for portraits given all her years, but to be fair, she deliberately couldn't leave proper marks on history. I wouldn't want to change the stars in my review, but I do agree with the flaws you point out haha. Similar to what you mentioned, I was very propelled in the beginning, and I maintained a lot of that same momentum whilst binge-reading. I never had a chance to properly step away from it, so I was very much along for her ride to see how the whole Henry situation would resolve. Fabulous deconstruction, Nataliya!
Either she accompanied them to the toilet or else there was quite a bit of full-bladder lovemaking.Swoon......Nataliya, you are soooooo romantic!
nastyako wrote: "i can clearly see henry lying on his bed, listening to My Chemical Romance. and his walls have all these posters from Requiem for a dream, Fight club, maybe "why so serious" poster from The Dark Kn..."Hahahaha, that image suits Henry so well! He certainly did not appear mature enough at the age 28-29; he could have easily been 16 the way he was portrayed. And he probably lives off his parents anyway, given his job and New York rent and no roommates; no way should he be able to afford that.
Elizabeth wrote: "The questions about having to go to the bathroom and pee, LOL. I wondered why she couldn't have taken part in much more than (repeated?) one-night stands and posing for portraits given all her year..."Thanks, Elizabeth! The flaws got to me eventually. Had this book been half of its length, I think I would have enjoyed it more because it is insanely readable, but the substantial length gave me time to shake off my initial starry-eyed fascination with it and see the annoying bits. Brevity would have served a Schwab well with this story, perhaps as a novella it would have been more poignant. But when I reread your wonderful review of this book just now, I agreed with the positives that you discuss; for me the criticality prevailed but I completely understand how it can completely charm the reader.
I wish we got more depth and page time for Luc. He had the most potential - I just wish it was realized more.
carol. wrote: "I just can't take "twee" seriously. Including the word. Tweeeeeeeeeee...."That’s exactly why I love that word,! It’s so silly and full of “twee-ness” that it makes me actually giggle when I write it.
Tweeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!
Nataliya wrote: "nastyako wrote: "i can clearly see henry lying on his bed, listening to My Chemical Romance. and his walls have all these posters from Requiem for a dream, Fight club, maybe "why so serious" poster..."Schwab already sold rights for adaptation! please somebody give me production design!! :D
Left Coast Justin wrote: "Either she accompanied them to the toilet or else there was quite a bit of full-bladder lovemaking.Swoon......Nataliya, you are soooooo romantic!"
I know, right? I think my romance gene is defective. But seriously - logical bathroom habits for fictional characters are important, no?
You gotta think of the consequences of poor toilet hygiene. The consequences may be if note dire then at least unpleasant ;)
nastyako wrote: "Schwab already sold rights for adaptation! please somebody give me production design!! :D"That was fast! I can see how this movie will end up popular, with the right conventionally attractive actors and lack of all the curls and freckles mentions.
And yeah, they should put you in charge of production design. Your vision of a Henry is perfect and very realistic - although probably not something they have in mind.
Nataliya wrote: I wish we got more depth and page time for Luc. He had the most potential - I just wish it was realized more.he would've been interesting if he was not super hot and had this inexplicable boner for Addie almost from the beginning .and maybe had interesting personality. i just cannot believe from the whole wide world and all the times bland Addie was THE ONE! he should've seduced charlotte bronte or mary shelley for crying out loud. or even brad pitt! :D
I was interested in this one, but in the last VE Schwab book I read, the main character's coat was more interesting than he was. I think I might pass on this for similar reasons.
Absolutely. All the choices he could have had, and he settled for a bland but pretty woman. Maybe it’s the magical number of freckles that did it for him. Because Addie did not seem to be anything special except for the immortality part, but that should have not been impressive to the god of darkness!Instead of making him interesting, Schwab turned him into a point in the silly love triangle and made him blandly conventional. Ugh.
Jennifer wrote: "I was interested in this one, but in the last VE Schwab book I read, the main character's coat was more interesting than he was. I think I might pass on this for similar reasons."Was that A Darker Shade of Magic? I recall there was quite a bit of description of Kell’s super-useful coat.
This one is not terrible, but to me it completely failed to live up to its hype. It’s quite ordinary, and could have been so much better had Schwab made a few less conventional and braver choices.
Yeah, that was it. I seem to like Schwab's ideas more than her execution of them. I don't really need more books to be meh about these days!
Nataliya wrote: "Absolutely. All the choices he could have had, and he settled for a bland but pretty woman. Maybe it’s the magical number of freckles that did it for him. Because Addie did not seem to be anything ..."i think she and the devil should have kids and henry can imprint on one of them. and the love triangle is solved! Voila!
Jennifer wrote: "Yeah, that was it. I seem to like Schwab's ideas more than her execution of them. I don't really need more books to be meh about these days!"I have had a pretty bad book streak lately, and The Once and Future Witches - for which I had such hopes - is failing to engage me, and I’m worried about my reading sanity. I think I’ll binge some Terry Pratchett just to remind me that there are strong and masterfully crafted stories. Cleanse the palate.
Scwab’s Shades of Magic series was at least entertaining, but that Lila character was beyond awful. I hated every page she was on, which did not make for a very enjoyable experience.
nastyako wrote: "i think she and the devil should have kids and henry can imprint on one of them. and the love triangle is solved! Voila!"Now why does this (a) sound familiar and (b) bring some uncomfortable flashbacks to a very poorly done book series?
So if it goes that way, then it would mean that Henry does not remember Addie as much as he remembers her ovaries?
haha. also dnf everything your heart is not in. don’t push through. and there is always kj charles 🙂
nastyako wrote: "haha. also dnf everything your heart is not in. don’t push through. and there is always kj charles 🙂"I try but I find it so hard to dnf a book, even when it’s awful. My inner completist gets all uncomfortable about not finishing the story (although I don’t the the same issue with abandoning series I don’t care much for). The only book I can actually say for certain that I was able to put aside and never come back to was Eat, Pray, Love.
And yes, there’s always K.J. Charles! I hope she never stops writing.
think of it this way: there are so many great books and so little time on this earth... dnf this sucker! 😊
nastyako wrote: "think of it this way: there are so many great books and so little time on this earth... dnf this sucker! 😊"One of these days I’ll succeed in doing that, I promise! I’ll try this with the next clunker that comes along.
Ha, this book was so twee that we both used the word twee in our reviews! It was just trying so hard. I actually semi dnfed it once Henry got introduced, I basically skipped around and then just read the end.
Sophie wrote: "Ha, this book was so twee that we both used the word twee in our reviews! It was just trying so hard. I actually semi dnfed it once Henry got introduced, I basically skipped around and then just re..."Twee was honestly the first word that came to mind when I was thinking of a good description of this book. At least it was a very easy read.
Left Coast Justin wrote: "Are the freckles at least in the shape of the Pleiadies or something?"The constellation is left for you to imagine; we are just told ad nauseam that they are in the shape of a constellation. I assumed Ursa Minor since I’m not that well-versed in constellations.
You made so many amazing points here. 500+ pages and barely any character devalopment or plot. One character I found interesting was Luc and we see so little of him. And as you said, why did the devil find Addie interesting, she does nothing in the 300 yrs but travel around and Schwab is trying to convince us she is more interesting then Beethoven? I expected so much more of this premise alas...
Amila wrote: "You made so many amazing points here. 500+ pages and barely any character devalopment or plot. One character I found interesting was Luc and we see so little of him. And as you said, why did the de..."Exactly. It’s too bad it hasn’t been able to standout among similar YA-type books with a very special heroine and a hot, attractive and quite needless love triangle, and focus on otherwise unimportant physical attributes, with stakes going as high as “loves me loves me not”.
I just jumped off 108 in. Probably didn’t do it any favours to be hyped up to me as much as it was. It’s just not working for me at all.
Fraser wrote: "I just jumped off 108 in. Probably didn’t do it any favours to be hyped up to me as much as it was. It’s just not working for me at all."I do agree that the hype worked against this book, making you expect something more that what it actually is.
Well, mine tends to skip over such things as logic. But you're certainly making some valid points there. Except for the bathroom break. It's common knowledge that no one ever needs to pee in a book, right?
It's common knowledge that no one ever needs to pee in a book, right?Well, the pages tend to stick together if you do. < /snark>
Left Coast Justin wrote: "It's common knowledge that no one ever needs to pee in a book, right?Well, the pages tend to stick together if you do. "
Hahahaha, Justin! Love it. Yes, peeing in the book would be very inconvenient.








