Efka's Reviews > Broken Angels
Broken Angels (Takeshi Kovacs, #2)
by
by
I'm not really sure if this book can really be called "a second part of trilogy". I mean, a trilogy, how I perceive it, is three books, three parts of a single story, unified by one or more main characters, usually plus some secondary characters and a consistant plotline, which, more or less, starts at the first book, later evolves and the final part brings a closure. I might be jumping ahead too much, as I'm already reading the third book, though my review is only about the second one but still. There's nothing in this book, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING AND NO-ONE, that has at least remote connection to the "Altered Carbon", except Takeshi Covacs. And even he is a middle aged afroamerican/caribbean dude in this book. It's a perfect stand-alone novel, this one, and the third book is a pre-history. So, as far as the story goes, it is quite safe to say that the story starts and finishes with Altered Carbon. Sort of.
Now a few words about the book itself. It's a slower read than the first one, it gets too concentrated on minor details at one point around the middle, and the story is much, much less noir detective. Actually, it's more alike to a military sci-fi than a noir detective, but the plot is decent enough to tag along for a ride and in the end it grips you quite well. I might have enjoyed more answers/explanations, but they weren't necessary and not getting them served on a plate doesn't actually matter.
Takeshi is still Takeshi, but what I really liked is the fun feeling, that Richard Morgan is a pacifist. I've got a few drops of this feeling while reading Altered Carbon, but as this book is much more concentrated on military, rebellions and war in general, no wonder that I've felt it much more in this book. So yeah, the dude who writes all that gory murder and torture sequences is a pacifist. Quite an oxymoron, wouldn't you agree?
"Broken Angels" might not have that glitter and appeal of its predecessor, but it is a solid book nevertheles, and if you enjoyed the first book of the series, this one should definitely be on you list too. A solid 4*.
Now a few words about the book itself. It's a slower read than the first one, it gets too concentrated on minor details at one point around the middle, and the story is much, much less noir detective. Actually, it's more alike to a military sci-fi than a noir detective, but the plot is decent enough to tag along for a ride and in the end it grips you quite well. I might have enjoyed more answers/explanations, but they weren't necessary and not getting them served on a plate doesn't actually matter.
Takeshi is still Takeshi, but what I really liked is the fun feeling, that Richard Morgan is a pacifist. I've got a few drops of this feeling while reading Altered Carbon, but as this book is much more concentrated on military, rebellions and war in general, no wonder that I've felt it much more in this book. So yeah, the dude who writes all that gory murder and torture sequences is a pacifist. Quite an oxymoron, wouldn't you agree?
"Broken Angels" might not have that glitter and appeal of its predecessor, but it is a solid book nevertheles, and if you enjoyed the first book of the series, this one should definitely be on you list too. A solid 4*.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Broken Angels.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
April 17, 2018
–
Started Reading
April 17, 2018
– Shelved
April 18, 2018
–
26.0%
April 24, 2018
–
45.0%
April 29, 2018
–
63.0%
May 2, 2018
–
100.0%
May 2, 2018
–
Finished Reading
May 7, 2018
– Shelved as:
knygos-paverstos-filmais
May 7, 2018
– Shelved as:
sci-fi
May 7, 2018
– Shelved as:
war
July 31, 2019
– Shelved as:
cyberpunk
Comments Showing 1-26 of 26 (26 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Caro
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
May 07, 2018 10:11AM
Gal jau siunciau, tai dovanok :) https://www.theguardian.com/books/201...
reply
|
flag
Nesiuntei, labai cool interviu. Everything I write is interrogating that paradox. A lot of my writing comes from rage. It’s all been vomited out on to the page. I’m incensed by how badly humans behave. I guess what it’s about is wasted potential. We could be so much better. We always trip up, always manage to fuck it up. We seem to have a will to do that.
Vat sakau, nu jaučiasi. Carbone dar ne taip, bet angeluose tai žodis žodin galiu pasirašyt po visa šita citata.
Bet still:On screen, though, no gender switch is made. It is the actor Joel Kinnaman, playing Kovacs, whom we see tortured. Kalogridis made the change, says Morgan, feeling that torturing a woman would “come across as exploitative, a sick thrill for misogynists”.
Tegyvuoja politkorektiškumas! Hoorah, hoorah, hoorah!
B**t.
Tai jo, man irgi patiko. Bet tas pavadinimas... :))O dėl politkorektiškumo - na, žinojau kad šiais laikais neleis tos scenos ekrane rodyt, čia tiesiog buvo kaip 2+2 lygu 4. Net stebiuosi, kad apskritai main villain vaidmenyje moterį paliko, nors ir pakeitė motyvaciją ir pačią veikėją. Kas man žiauriai nepatiko, nesąmonė tiesiog.
And btw - We could be so much better Tai va, kol netapsime, jokių kontaktų, jokių ateivių, niekas nenori turėti reikalų su pasiutusiais šunimis. ;)
Nu gal nėra blogai tas "jokių kontaktų". Kaip Hawkingas sakė, actekams kontaktas su pranašesne civilizacija nekaip baigėsi.
Nu true, bet ir kitos pasaulio dalys nuo jų labai neatsiliko. Kai kur iki šiol ritualinis kanibalizmas klestėte klesti... Pvz., Lietuvoj. ;D
Na gal, bet tai yra mūsų kulinarinis paveldas, mes negalime jo tiesiog va taip imti ir atsisakyti! :P
Nu ne, aš rimtai kalbėjau. :) Prisimink mišias. Ką sako kunigas bobutei išsižiojusiai, įdėdamas tą blyną? "Kristaus kūnas". Ką kvasina taurę pakėlės? "Kristaus kraujas". O kristus taigi žmogus buvo, kas, kad dievo sūnus. Vat prašom, ritualinis kanibalizmas visu grožiu. :)
O, giliai kasat, kolega, giliai kasat... Paklauskit, kada aš paskutinį kartą bažnyčioje buvau, kad man tai iškart į galvą ateitų. :DBet šiaip sutinku, įdomi ta krikščionybė. :)
Smagu kad patiko, ir ziuriu vertinimas musu sutampa :)Vienas dalykas though: the third book is a pre-history. So, as far as the story goes, it is quite safe to say that the story starts and finishes with Altered Carbon. - cia ne visai taip. Gal pacioj pradzioj trecios knygos taip atrodo - bet tai nera pre-history. ;)
Milda wrote: "Gal pacioj pradzioj trecios knygos taip atrodo - bet tai nera pre-history. ;)"Jau jaučiu kažkokį Morganišką plottwistą. :D Ok, jei ne pre-history, tai jau dar labiau įdomu. :D
Efka wrote: "Jau jaučiu kažkokį Morganišką plottwistą. :D Ok, jei ne pre-history, tai jau dar labiau įdomu. :D"tyliu
:D
Your review captures my sentiments about the book perfectly. This is more of a military sci-fi set in the same universe as the first book; it works pretty much as a standalone rather then the continuation of book 1.
They skipped 2nd book all together, didn't they? Second season seemed to be based on the last book (and unfortunately missing all the best bits from it.)
Ahh, that makes sense. So they skipped the alien ship? Dang it, they managed to skip all the best bits from both books!

