[go: up one dir, main page]

Explore 1.5M+ audiobooks & ebooks free for days

From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Breakfast of Champions: A Novel
Breakfast of Champions: A Novel
Breakfast of Champions: A Novel
Ebook347 pages3 hours

Breakfast of Champions: A Novel

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

“Marvelous . . . [Vonnegut] wheels out all the complaints about America and makes them seem fresh, funny, outrageous, hateful and lovable.”—The New York Times

In Breakfast of Champions, one of Kurt Vonnegut’s most beloved characters, the aging writer Kilgore Trout, finds to his horror that a Midwest car dealer is taking his fiction as truth. What follows is murderously funny satire, as Vonnegut looks at war, sex, racism, success, politics, and pollution in America and reminds us how to see the truth.

“Free-wheeling, wild and great . . . uniquely Vonnegut.”—Publishers Weekly
LanguageEnglish
PublisherRandom House Publishing Group
Release dateSep 23, 2009
ISBN9780307567239
Breakfast of Champions: A Novel
Author

Kurt Vonnegut

Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. (1922-2007) is the author of the novels Cat's Cradle (1963), Slaughterhouse-Five (1969), and Breakfast of Champions (1973).

Read more from Kurt Vonnegut

Related to Breakfast of Champions

Related ebooks

Literary Fiction For You

View More

Related categories

Reviews for Breakfast of Champions

Rating: 3.9933138918303386 out of 5 stars
4/5

4,786 ratings97 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5

    Jun 5, 2025

    Perhaps Vonnegut's single funniest book, although far from profound. This one features his simple illustrations, which perfectly suit the text. It's the story of a car salesman going insane--and a lot of other stuff, including a few summaries of Kilgore Trout novels. I think this is the last 5-star book Vonnegut wrote.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5

    Dec 31, 2024

    I can see why it's a successful book and I can understand why people would have eaten it up in the same way Robert Crumb captured minds. Despite this I felt a great distance from it. The humor and absurdities didn't break the shell of society to reveal cracks of honest truth, they felt like a cartoonist's caricature work. The themes were explored, but without heart.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5

    Jul 28, 2025

    I read nearly every Vonnegut book in the mid-1980s (every book he had written up until then), but now thought I'd do some re-reads, as I really loved him back then and didn't remember the books well. I found Breakfast of Champions in my basement, so it's first.

    I still love much about his writing style- Vonnegut is very funny, and weird in the best way. There's something profoundly depressing about all his books, a reflection (one assumes) of his mother's suicide in 1944 and his POW experience in WW II, during which he survived the bombing of Dresden. This book has that uncanny ability to be sad and funny at the same time.

    The plot: Kilgore Trout is an unknown writer of science fiction stories, invited to an arts festival in Midland Ohio by the patron of the festival, who is basically his only fan. Dwayne Hoover is a wealthy car dealer in Midland, whose wife died by suicide. The narrator explains that Dwayne Hoover is going to go crazy and hurt lots of people at the end of the book, and then spends the whole novel leading both key characters to that point. Strangely, the second half of the book brings in a third character, the narrator/author, who becomes more and more prominent at the end.

    So why the low rating? The book really wanders, with many other characters (which is one of the points I guess, that every character is important and has a parenthetical back story, most of them tragic). What reads poorly now is voluminous use of the N-word describing Black characters and communities. I think he's using the term ironically, and trying to say something cynical about race relations and injustice, but the point is never really made and I think that could have been a focus in a different book.

    And he has a running gag about penis size that isn't very funny- the humor can be juvenile at times.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Nov 25, 2024

    Not one of my favorites. Superbly written but depressing as hell. And so on. Seriously, thinking of the "Creator" as an asshole puppeteer going around ruining people's lives probably wasn't what I needed In November 2024.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5

    Oct 10, 2023

    I absolutely loved his unconventional writing style.
    Nothing was told in the same order in which the events occurred and the drawings were elementary at best but added to the hilarity.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5

    Sep 25, 2023

    I probably would have liked this better had I read it when I was 13 or 14, but now, while I can spot much that is clever in it, this book feels dated and too geared towards adolescent boys. I will still try Cat's Cradle, though not for awhile.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Jul 31, 2023

    When I looked up this book to provide a review, I found I had already given it five stars. I must have got it confused with something else when I first created a Goodreads account (possibly Bluebeard?) because I had never read this before in my life.

    It rollicks along at a good pace, but I wonder if Vonnegut has lost some of his shine for me. Once upon a time I thought his capacity to tell the truth and to make sense of things by defiantly not making sense of them was groundbreaking, but I think now it's infiltrated our culture so far that this book seems a little bit...dated. He's no longer saying what no one else is brave enough to say, he's just saying stuff that comes up on Twitter all the time. Even the very sweet stuff about the human condition is pretty widely understood by politically, intellectually and socially engaged folks.

    The book still stands, though, on the quality of its characters - Kilgore Trout is so sympathetic - its situations and its sense of fun.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5

    Jul 29, 2023

    Can you believe.... this is 50 years old this year?  I just happened to notice.  And what an influence I'm sure it has been on so many writers. Also, I believe Vonnegut was 50 years old when he wrote this.  I love the nuggets of story ideas from Kilgore Trout.  It especially brings to mind the genius of Douglas Adams.  I bet he loved Kurt Vonnegut.  But this book is meta!  It's hilarious!  I love meta hilariousness!  I love that Vonnegut seems to tie himself to his own books, gets so personal (even if he is using the name Philboyd Studge.)  The only thing I didn't love was his use of stereotypes, especially regarding race, regardless if it is "satire" or not.  If Flannery O'Connor is considered racist for writing racist characters (though to be honest, I know nothing about O'Connor's personal life), then Vonnegut would definitely be considered racist here.  Certain racist words just grated after so many times, and I didn't see the point of it within the book.  I also love his drawings.  Especially the animals.  I'm not a tattoo person, but I bet all of these drawings have existed as tattoos at some point.  But also wish he had included a drawing of the 1962 Cadillac limo with a truckbed that was mentioned.  I mean... this needs illustration.   This is the seventh Vonnegut I have read annnnddd....
    *Book #132 I have read of the '1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die'
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Jul 11, 2023

    In the midwestern town of Midland City, Indiana, wealthy car dealer and widower Dwayne Hoover exists on the rim of insanity—but it will take an obscure and impoverished science fiction writer named Kilgore Trout to push Dwayne over the edge. 

    After being invited to the Midland City Arts Festival as their guest of honor, Trout debates whether to accept. Once he decides to go, he first hitchhikes to New York City to find copies of his novels. Trout hates his own books to much that he keeps none at home. He intends to embarrass the organizers and attendees of the festival by reading his lowbrow stories. 

    After being abducted, beaten, and robbed in New York, Trout hitchhikes his way to Midland City. All the while, Hoover grows more unstable. He becomes argumentative, insulting, and isolated. Filthy and haggard, Trout arrives at the Midland City Holiday Inn—also owned by Hoover—and takes a seat in the lounge where pretentious guests of the festival clash with a few of the locals. Ignoring all of this, Hoover sits alone in a corner lost in his own deranged thoughts and ignoring his estranged homosexual son, Bunny, the lounge piano player.

    When the bartender turns on the black lights in the lounge, his jacket glows a brilliant white, as does the waitress’s outfit—and Kilgore Trout’s shirt. Beguiled by this, Hoover approaches Trout, resting his chin on the writer’s shoulder and demanding the answer to life. He snatches up a copy of Trout’s novel, Now It Can Be Told, and speed reads it on the spot. After which, all hell breaks loose. 

    Throughout the story, told in third-person omniscient, Vonnegut observes the events with his trademark razor wit and dry humor, reminding the reader that he is the creator of this story, explaining some of his decisions, and veering off on hilarious tangents.

    The above summary is about one-fifth of what happens in this surreal satire that addresses themes of sex, pollution, racism, mental health, desperation, success, and hypocrisy complete with illustrations drawn by Vonnegut. 
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Jun 19, 2023

    Kilgore Trout, an obscure science fiction writer, is invited to an Arts Festival in a Midwest city where Dwayne Hoover, a successful business man and owner of many local institutions, is having a mental breakdown.

    This book is very quintessential Vonnegut, with tons of absurd, dark humor and pessimistic views of the world around him (and rightly so in many cases). He even populates it with characters from his other books, such as the aforementioned Kilgore Trout as well as Eliot Rosewater.

    Despite being published in 1973 and in some places showing its age (e.g., certain language used), this books feels surprisingly and perhaps disappointingly fresh as Vonnegut addresses the very same social and environmental issues that we are still grappling with today, from racism to pollution to gender identity to the way American history is taught and more. It's definitely a thought-provoking book. As the plot progresses, tension builds as Vonnegut clues you in to what will happen when Dwayne and Kilgore meet.

    Unfortunately, towards the end of the book, Vonnegut goes from an omniscient narrator to actually inserting himself as a flesh-and-blood person in the book, walking around with his characters while acknowledging that they are fictional. I felt that the book lost some steam for me there. The big climactic scenes were a bit less climactic than they could have been, and the meta-ness was maybe a little too much. So, I was not thrilled with the ending and found it a little flat, although I thought the beginning and middle parts of the book were compelling.

    Overall, I still recommend this book for raising lots of serious issues but in a way that is very readable with its biting satire. It's a classic for a reason and fans of Vonnegut will not be disappointed to come back to the world of characters he created. This book also includes some drawings from the author, which add to the story and its dark humor.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Apr 16, 2023

    Another one I remember reading some years ago, without now recalling its details.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5

    Mar 30, 2023

    I had a hard time getting into the book. The book explains why is is written with so many useless tangents that eventually reach some consistency although I found the resolution underwhelming.

    There is a point where I was genuinely interested in the book although it was brief and too far in the book to make a difference for me. Other people may enjoy it but it was definitely not to my tastes.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5

    Oct 3, 2022

    I’ve come to the conclusion that a Kurt Vonnegut novel is like a music album from an artist that never changes their formula e.g. AC/DC or Red Hot Chili Peppers. You know what an AC/DC album is going to sound like. You know what RHCP’s next single is going to sound like (and it’s probably going to involve California). That’s not a bad thing — if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

    Kurt Vonnegut is like that, like a music album more than a story. There are other authors like that too, but Vonnegut is so embossed that his style outshines any other part of the book. He’s not necessarily a storymaker, so much as a style. You’ve read one Kurt Vonnegut story, you know what the others are going to offer. There won’t necessarily be a linear plot or characters you like, but there will be a technique, a voice. Something that’s got a form that can’t really be described. And it’s popular because it’s something different. This is not a slight against Vonnegut, just a description.

    It’s so stream-of-consciousness that I wasn’t sure where the story actually started. The plot meanders all over the place so that you’re not so much reading a story as you’re reading Kurt Vonnegut’s brain. Dwayne was a car dealer. Car dealers sell Corvettes. I once had a Corvette. I drove the Corvette up a mountain. The mountain did not like this. “Ouch,” said the mountain. It’s like a four-year-old telling you his dream, but amped up to the composure of an adult.

    As far as I can tell, it’s a satirical indictment of capitalism. But with a non-linear story sustained long enough, it all becomes a mess, and I found myself getting distracted while reading because there was nothing to hang onto. It was like a painting that’s a swirl of colors that might seem pretty, but there’s nothing for my eye to rest on.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    May 24, 2022

    An absurdist, rambling satire on America, madness, and writing.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    May 1, 2022

    The story Vonnegut tells in Breakfast of Champions isn’t the most compelling, but his commentary on America is blistering, and just as dead-on in 2022 as it was in 1973.

    First and foremost, he is upfront about the two monstrous sins in America’s past, genocide and slavery, and the hypocrisy of the country never fully owning up them, yet passing itself off as a virtuous beacon of freedom. How fantastic is it that nearly 50 years ago he was casting the “discovery” of America in 1492 in a very different light, calling it “the year in which sea pirates began to cheat and rob and kill them [other human beings].” “Color was everything,” in America, he says, meaning including the present day, and “The chief weapon of the sea pirates was their capacity to astonish. Nobody else could believe, until it was much too late, how heartless and greedy they were.”

    Vonnegut also comments on capitalistic greed and the country’s “every man for himself” attitude, resulting in extreme cruelty to other people and a destruction of the environment. There is a fossil fuel company called Rosewater in the book that strips the land and treats workers like animals, which reminded me of the real-world Duke Power. He points out the unfairness in the distribution of wealth, including those like Nelson Rockefeller who “owned or controlled more of the planet than many nations…his destiny since infancy.” On these points and others (racism, the patriarchy, commercialism) the book is still incredibly relevant today, which is as depressing as it is impressive.

    Vonnegut also reveals a fair amount of pessimism about humanity as a whole, through his character Kilgore Trout believing that “humanity deserved to die horribly, since it had behaved so cruelly and wastefully on a planet so sweet.” He points out mankind’s inherent and dangerous tribalism when he says “Ideas on Earth were badges of friendship or enmity. Their content did not matter. Friends agreed with friends, on order to express friendliness. Enemies disagreed with friends, in order to express enmity.” He was 51 when he wrote the book, in the period of life when it does get difficult to remain sanguine about the human race.

    The book starts incredibly strong, but it meanders as it plays out, and Vonnegut inserting his own illustrations often didn’t add much. However, the references to his personal life, including his mother’s suicide and his own struggles with mental health, were touching though. All in all, definitely a good read.

    Just one more quote, on America:
    “The undippable [American] flag was a beauty, and the anthem and the vacant motto [E pluribus unum] might not have mattered much, if it weren’t for this: a lot of citizens were so ignored and cheated and insulted that they thought they might be in the wrong country, or even on the wrong planet, that some terrible mistake had been made. It might have comforted them some if their anthem and their motto had mentioned fairness or brotherhood or hope or happiness, had somehow welcomed them to the society and its real estate.”
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Feb 17, 2021

    This book is a crazy, seeming to head in all different directions. It covers a lot of social issues and much is about free will. It kind of makes fun of everything and is pretty 'out there' a lot. The way it is highlights how ridiculous things are in real life.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5

    Mar 26, 2021

    A masterpiece

    Before talking about the plot, the things that fascinated me:
    - the sharp and current critiques of consumer society, discrimination, gender violence, and a very humanistic view of all kinds of groups
    - calling alcohol "fermented poop"
    - the arguments in Trout's novels
    - the biting humor
    - the winks from the narrator

    Plot

    An omniscient narrator, Philboyd Studge, tells us the story of a writer as prolific as he is failed, Kilgore Trout, and a millionaire who goes insane: Dwayne Hoover. In between, a portrayal of society made in 1973 that has an alarming relevance today. (Translated from Spanish)
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5

    Mar 15, 2021

    Unclassifiable like everything of yours. (Translated from Spanish)
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5

    Jun 12, 2020

    Breakfast of Champions went places that impressed me and sorta made me squirm as Vonnegut humorously and deftly described the history of the United States and present social conditions like race and class distinctions that, for how much he criticized them, he did little to disrupt in the narrative itself. BoC was as fun, and zany, as I remember although I could've done without so much of the meta-narrative that at times felt extraordinarily intriguing but the encounter with Kilgore Trout at the end made me feel a bit deflated, as if Vonnegut dipped out when he had worked himself into a tangle instead of working to unravel, at least a tid-bit.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5

    May 28, 2020

    There's usually a comforting kind of consistency with Kurt Vonnegut's books – they're never my favourites, with the characterisation being too shallow for that – but they're witty, left-wing, and usually just kinda fun.

    Unfortunately, I didn't find this one as fun. I kept getting the characters mixed up and then it all got a bit silly at the end.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Oct 3, 2019

    Kurt Vonnegut wrote some of the best and most depressing books of the Twentieth Century. I've read three Vonnegut books now and I've needed to go on suicide watch after each one.

    "Breakfast of Champions" covers a rich white man and his descent into madness and annihilation, and other fun topics. Kilgore Trout makes a welcome appearance and things turn out for him not as horrible as one fears. Some great storytelling but remember to have the anti-depressants on hand.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Feb 17, 2019

    I've only read two Vonnegut books, and as this one is a bit of a 50th birthday exercise for KV to say goodbye to his characters (as Jefferson freed his slaves at age 50, apparently), my impression may not be an altogether true one. But it is this: Kurt Vonnegut only really writes one book, it gets new chapters from time to time, it is brilliantly different in that the perspective is a special sort of 4th wall meets omniscient narration.
    I thought sections of BoC were beautifully mind-expanding. I became aware of how his work had influenced other writers I like (Phillip K Dick and Grant Morrison). If not everyone else... seriously - is any writer not a fan of KV? Probably, I'm just too lazy to google it.

    The pacing, and variance of theme, are beautiful in Breakfast of Champions. Also, a little personally therapeutic, on the author's part (I assume - along with his suggestion) riffing on the subjects of emotion, depression, suicide, and paternal legacy.

    The actual climax was dull compared to the build-up, I'm afraid. Otherwise I may have gone to 5 stars. Also, the idea that reading one KV book is such a similar experience to reading another is something that costs it a little charm for me. I like when an artist gives a different sort of picture, or variation enough to provoke you to keep walking in the gallery.

    Fully enjoyable. Happy to have chosen it as my vacation read. Goes well with sand and waves and mostly naked people walking around like that's perfectly normal.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Dec 5, 2018

    The time jumps that the author is known for make a somewhat bland plot bearable, but it is very well told for the most part. Some sections are truly unmissable. Inconstant but good. (Translated from Spanish)
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5

    Nov 17, 2018

    maybe my steady diet of Vonnegut has raised my expectations ? so far Bluebeard and Player Piano are my favorites !
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5

    Sep 20, 2018

    It is a book that has great value for me. The way the characters interact and the settings that the story itself presents create an unimaginable atmosphere. It is striking and captivating. (Translated from Spanish)
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Jun 28, 2018

    This was my first Vonnegut novel (I previously had only read some of his short fiction) and I really enjoyed it. His writing style is unlike anyone else's in a delightful -- though perhaps "acquired taste" -- sort of way. This book satirizes American culture and makes some vitally important statements about racism and other social ills that feel timely today, decades after its publication.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Apr 17, 2018

    Kilgore Trout is a novelist who is not at all known. Dwayne Hoover is an obnoxiously “charming” and wealthy auto salesman who is going nuts. He eventually believes from Kilgore Trout (when he meets Trout at a fine arts festival) that everyone but himself is a robot. Vonnegut writes himself into this novel and has himself meeting Trout near the end of the book! Ha! Some of the lines of this book are outrageously funny. Vonnegut does a great job of satirizing those things in our world that needs to be criticized. How did I ever miss this author back in the 70’s? I’m going to catch up on some of his writing now!
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5

    Nov 3, 2017

    Technically I had finished this just before going out with Sara and then over to Pizza Boy; but I'm only now getting to put it up as finished.

    Breakfast of Champions has always been one of my favorite Vonnegut reads. The 'attacks' heaved against America by Vonnegut were spot on then.... and (sadly) still spot on. His comments and views on the race issues of then and (still) today are just as true and just as poignant.

    His other statements against commercialism, the rich vs. the poor, how our minds work, etc, are all still very strong, true, and resonate greatly. This is Vonnegut in ultra-cynic mode too, maybe not as much as when he wrote 'A Man Without a Country' but still very cynical of the US, of people, and of our philosophies and ideas.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Sep 24, 2017

    My fourth Vonnegut read this year, and fifth overall. I'm not tiring of him yet. While not everyone loves him, he has quite a devoted following and I can see why -- I love his brand of humor and keen observations.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5

    Apr 20, 2017

    At a time when a dominant trend in fiction seems to be to express familiar things in a complex way, it's refreshing to return to a writer who so obviously attempts the opposite. From the outset, the narrative is pitched in a matter-of-fact manner that enhances rather than diminishes the content, and the inclusion of the author's illustrations adds to the diarist/textbook style. With this being Vonnegut, plenty of satirical punches arise using these devices, and these literary blows are placed with effective precision. With a postmodern flourish, the narrative also moves on to include scenes featuring the narrator/author (but, despite the cameo appearances of characters from other Vonnegut novels, I wouldn't rush to the conclusion that the authored author is Vonnegut himself). 'Breakfast of Champions' is a little zany, and a little bit of its own time, but still sufficiently fresh to make it a worthwhile read more than 40 years after first being published.

Book preview

Breakfast of Champions - Kurt Vonnegut

    PREFACE

The expression Breakfast of Champions is a registered trademark of General Mills, Inc., for use on a breakfast cereal product. The use of the identical expression as the title for this book is not intended to indicate an association with or sponsorship by General Mills, nor is it intended to disparage their fine products.

• • •

The person to whom this book is dedicated, Phoebe Hurty, is no longer among the living, as they say. She was an Indianapolis widow when I met her late in the Great Depression. I was sixteen or so. She was about forty.

She was rich, but she had gone to work every weekday of her adult life, so she went on doing that. She wrote a sane and funny advice-to-the-lovelorn column for the Indianapolis Times, a good paper which is now defunct.

Defunct.

She wrote ads for the William H. Block Company, a department store which still flourishes in a building my father designed. She wrote this ad for an end-of-the-summer sale on straw hats: For prices like this, you can run them through your horse and put them on your roses.

• • •

Phoebe Hurty hired me to write copy for ads about teenage clothes. I had to wear the clothes I praised. That was part of the job. And I became friends with her two sons, who were my age. I was over at their house all the time.

She would talk bawdily to me and her sons, and to our girlfriends when we brought them around. She was funny. She was liberating. She taught us to be impolite in conversation not only about sexual matters, but about American history and famous heroes, about the distribution of wealth, about school, about everything.

I now make my living by being impolite. I am clumsy at it. I keep trying to imitate the impoliteness which was so graceful in Phoebe Hurty. I think now that grace was easier for her than it is for me because of the mood of the Great Depression. She believed what so many Americans believed then: that the nation would be happy and just and rational when prosperity came.

I never hear that word anymore: Prosperity. It used to be a synonym for Paradise. And Phoebe Hurty was able to believe that the impoliteness she recommended would give shape to an American paradise.

Now her sort of impoliteness is fashionable. But nobody believes anymore in a new American paradise. I sure miss Phoebe Hurty.

• • •

As for the suspicion I express in this book, that human beings are robots, are machines: It should be noted that people, mostly men, suffering from the last stages of syphilis, from locomotor ataxia, were common spectacles in downtown Indianapolis and in circus crowds when I was a boy.

Those people were infested with carnivorous little corkscrews which could be seen only with a microscope. The victims’ vertebrae were welded together after the corkscrews got through with the meat between. The syphilitics seemed tremendously dignified—erect, eyes straight ahead.

I saw one stand on a curb at the corner of Meridian and Washington streets one time, underneath an overhanging clock which my father designed. The intersection was known locally as "The Crossroads of America."

This syphilitic man was thinking hard there, at the Crossroads of America, about how to get his legs to step off the curb and carry him across Washington Street. He shuddered gently, as though he had a small motor which was idling inside. Here was his problem: his brains, where the instructions to his legs originated, were being eaten alive by corkscrews. The wires which had to carry the instructions weren’t insulated anymore, or were eaten clear through. Switches along the way were welded open or shut.

This man looked like an old, old man, although he might have been only thirty years old. He thought and thought. And then he kicked two times like a chorus girl.

He certainly looked like a machine to me when I was a boy.

• • •

I tend to think of human beings as huge, rubbery test tubes, too, with chemical reactions seething inside. When I was a boy, I saw a lot of people with goiters. So did Dwayne Hoover, the Pontiac dealer who is the hero of this book. Those unhappy Earthlings had such swollen thyroid glands that they seemed to have zucchini squash growing from their throats.

All they had to do in order to have ordinary lives, it turned out, was to consume less than one-millionth of an ounce of iodine every day.

My own mother wrecked her brains with chemicals, which were supposed to make her sleep.

When I get depressed, I take a little pill, and I cheer up again.

And so on.

So it is a big temptation to me, when I create a character for a novel, to say that he is what he is because of faulty wiring, or because of microscopic amounts of chemicals which he ate or failed to eat on that particular day.

• • •

What do I myself think of this particular book? I feel lousy about it, but I always feel lousy about my books. My friend Knox Burger said one time that a certain cumbersome novel … read as though it had been written by Philboyd Studge. That’s who I think I am when I write what I am seemingly programmed to write.

• • •

This book is my fiftieth-birthday present to myself. I feel as though I am crossing the spine of a roof—having ascended one slope.

I am programmed at fifty to perform childishly—to insult The Star-Spangled Banner, to scrawl pictures of a Nazi flag and an asshole and a lot of other things with a felt-tipped pen. To give an idea of the maturity of my illustrations for this book, here is my picture of an asshole:

• • •

I think I am trying to clear my head of all the junk in there—the assholes, the flags, the underpants. Yes—there is a picture in this book of underpants. I’m throwing out characters from my other books, too. I’m not going to put on any more puppet shows.

I think I am trying to make my head as empty as it was when I was born onto this damaged planet fifty years ago.

I suspect that this is something most white Americans, and nonwhite Americans who imitate white Americans, should do. The things other people have put into my head, at any rate, do not fit together nicely, are often useless and ugly, are out of proportion with one another, are out of proportion with life as it really is outside my head.

I have no culture, no humane harmony in my brains. I can’t live without a culture anymore.

• • •

So this book is a sidewalk strewn with junk, trash which I throw over my shoulders as I travel in time back to November eleventh, nineteen hundred and twenty-two.

I will come to a time in my backwards trip when November eleventh, accidentally my birthday, was a sacred day called Armistice Day. When I was a boy, and when Dwayne Hoover was a boy, all the people of all the nations which had fought in the First World War were silent during the eleventh minute of the eleventh hour of Armistice Day, which was the eleventh day of the eleventh month.

It was during that minute in nineteen hundred and eighteen, that millions upon millions of human beings stopped butchering one another. I have talked to old men who were on battlefields during that minute. They have told me in one way or another that the sudden silence was the Voice of God. So we still have among us some men who can remember when God spoke clearly to mankind.

• • •

Armistice Day has become Veterans’ Day. Armistice Day was sacred. Veterans’ Day is not.

So I will throw Veterans’ Day over my shoulder. Armistice Day I will keep. I don’t want to throw away any sacred things.

What else is sacred? Oh, Romeo and Juliet, for instance.

And all music is.

—PHILBOYD STUDGE

   1

This is a tale of a meeting of two lonesome, skinny, fairly old white men on a planet which was dying fast.

One of them was a science-fiction writer named Kilgore Trout. He was a nobody at the time, and he supposed his life was over. He was mistaken. As a consequence of the meeting, he became one of the most beloved and respected human beings in history.

The man he met was an automobile dealer, a Pontiac dealer named Dwayne Hoover. Dwayne Hoover was on the brink of going insane.

• • •

Listen:

Trout and Hoover were citizens of the United States of America, a country which was called America for short. This was their national anthem, which was pure balderdash, like so much they were expected to take seriously:

O, say can you see by the dawn’s early light

What so proudly we hailed at the twilight’s last gleaming,

Whose broad stripes and bright stars, thru the perilous fight

O’er the ramparts we watched were so gallantly streaming?

And the rockets’ red glare, the bombs bursting in air,

Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there.

O, say does that star-spangled banner yet wave

O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave?

There were one quadrillion nations in the Universe, but the nation Dwayne Hoover and Kilgore Trout belonged to was the only one with a national anthem which was gibberish sprinkled with question marks.

Here is what their flag looked like:

It was the law of their nation, a law no other nation on the planet had about its flag, which said this: "The flag shall not be dipped to any person or thing."

Flag-dipping was a form of friendly and respectful salute, which consisted of bringing the flag on a stick closer to the ground, then raising it up again.

• • •

The motto of Dwayne Hoover’s and Kilgore Trout’s nation was this, which meant in a language nobody spoke anymore, Out of Many, One: "E pluribus unum."

The undippable flag was a beauty, and the anthem and the vacant motto might not have mattered much, if it weren’t for this: a lot of citizens were so ignored and cheated and insulted that they thought they might be in the wrong country, or even on the wrong planet, that some terrible mistake had been made. It might have comforted them some if their anthem and their motto had mentioned fairness or brotherhood or hope or happiness, had somehow welcomed them to the society and its real estate.

If they studied their paper money for clues as to what their country was all about, they found, among a lot of other baroque trash, a picture of a truncated pyramid with a radiant eye on top of it, like this:

Not even the President of the United States knew what that was all about. It was as though the country were saying to its citizens, "In nonsense is strength."

• • •

A lot of the nonsense was the innocent result of playfulness on the part of the founding fathers of the nation of Dwayne Hoover and Kilgore Trout. The founders were aristocrats, and they wished to show off their useless education, which consisted of the study of hocus-pocus from ancient times. They were bum poets as well.

But some of the nonsense was evil, since it concealed great crimes. For example, teachers of children in the United States of America wrote this date on blackboards again and again, and asked the children to memorize it with pride and joy:

The teachers told the children that this was when their continent was discovered by human beings. Actually, millions of human beings were already living full and imaginative lives on the continent in 1492. That was simply the year in which sea pirates began to cheat and rob and kill them.

Here was another piece of evil nonsense which children were taught: that the sea pirates eventually created a government which became a beacon of freedom to human beings everywhere else. There were pictures and statues of this supposed imaginary beacon for children to see. It was sort of an ice-cream cone on fire. It looked like this:

Actually, the sea pirates who had the most to do with the creation of the new government owned human slaves. They used human beings for machinery, and, even after slavery was eliminated, because it was so embarrassing, they and their descendants continued to think of ordinary human beings as machines.

• • •

The sea pirates were white. The people who were already on the continent when the pirates arrived were copper-colored. When slavery was introduced onto the continent, the slaves were black.

Color was everything.

• • •

Here is how the pirates were able to take whatever they wanted from anybody else: they had the best boats in the world, and they were meaner than anybody else, and they had gunpowder, which was a mixture of potassium nitrate, charcoal, and sulphur. They touched this seemingly listless powder with fire, and it turned violently into gas. This gas blew projectiles out of metal tubes at terrific velocities. The projectiles cut through meat and bone very easily; so the pirates could wreck the wiring or the bellows or the plumbing of a stubborn human being, even when he was far, far away.

The chief weapon of the sea pirates, however, was their capacity to astonish. Nobody else could believe, until it was much too late, how heartless and greedy they were.

• • •

When Dwayne Hoover and Kilgore Trout met each other, their country was by far the richest and most powerful country on the planet. It had most of the food and minerals and machinery, and it disciplined other countries by threatening to shoot big rockets at them or to drop things on them from airplanes.

Most other countries didn’t have doodley-squat. Many of them weren’t even inhabitable anymore. They had too many people and not enough space. They had sold everything that was any good, and there wasn’t anything to eat anymore, and still the people went on fucking all the time.

Fucking was how babies were made.

• • •

A lot of the people on the wrecked planet were Communists. They had a theory that what was left of the planet should be shared more or less equally among all the people, who hadn’t asked to come to a wrecked planet in the first place. Meanwhile, more babies were arriving all the time—kicking and screaming, yelling for milk.

In some places people would actually try to eat mud or such on gravel while babies were being born just a few feet away.

And so on.

• • •

Dwayne Hoover’s and Kilgore Trout’s country, where there was still plenty of everything, was opposed to Communism. It didn’t think that Earthlings who had a lot should share it with others unless they really wanted to, and most of them didn’t want to.

So they didn’t have to.

• • •

Everybody in America was supposed to grab whatever he could and hold on to it. Some Americans were very good at grabbing and holding, were fabulously well-to-do. Others couldn’t get their hands on doodley-squat.

Dwayne Hoover was fabulously well-to-do when he met Kilgore Trout. A man whispered those exact words to a friend one morning as Dwayne walked by: Fabulously well-to-do.

And here’s how much of the planet Kilgore Trout owned in those days: doodley-squat.

And Kilgore Trout and Dwayne Hoover met in Midland City, which was Dwayne’s home town, during an Arts Festival there in autumn of 1972.

As has already been said: Dwayne was a Pontiac dealer who was going insane.

Dwayne’s incipient insanity was mainly a matter of chemicals, of course. Dwayne Hoover’s body was manufacturing certain chemicals which unbalanced his mind. But Dwayne, like all novice lunatics, needed some bad ideas, too, so that his craziness could have shape and direction.

Bad chemicals and bad ideas were the Yin and Yang of madness. Yin and Yang were Chinese symbols of harmony. They looked like this:

The bad ideas were delivered to Dwayne by Kilgore Trout. Trout considered himself not only harmless but invisible. The world had paid so little attention to him that he supposed he was dead.

He hoped he was dead.

But he learned from his encounter with Dwayne that he was alive enough to give a fellow human being ideas which would turn him into a monster.

Here was the core of the bad ideas which Trout gave to Dwayne: Everybody on Earth was a robot, with one exception—Dwayne Hoover.

Of all the creatures in the Universe, only Dwayne was thinking and feeling and worrying and planning and so on. Nobody else knew what pain was. Nobody else had any choices to make. Everybody else was a fully automatic machine, whose purpose was to stimulate Dwayne. Dwayne was a new type of creature being tested by the Creator of the Universe.

Only Dwayne Hoover had free will.

• • •

Trout did not expect to be believed. He put the bad ideas into a science-fiction novel, and that was where Dwayne found them. The book wasn’t addressed to Dwayne alone. Trout had never heard of Dwayne when he wrote it. It was addressed to anybody who happened to open it up. It said to simply anybody, in effect, Hey—guess what: You’re the only creature with free will. How does that make you feel? And so on.

It was a tour de force. It was a jeu d’esprit.

But it was mind poison to Dwayne.

• • •

It shook up Trout to realize that even he could bring evil into the world—in the form of

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1