[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access October 9, 2014

Chemical reactivity of quinclorac employing the HSAB local principle - Fukui function

  • Luis H. Mendoza Huizar EMAIL logo , Clara H. Rios-Reyes , Nubia J. Olvera-Maturano , Juvencio Robles and Jose A. Rodriguez
From the journal Open Chemistry

Abstract

In the present work we have calculated several DFT reactivity descriptors for quinclorac at the B3LYP/6- 311++G(2d,2p) and MP2/6-311++G(2d,2p) levels of theory in order to analyze its reactivity. Reactivity descriptors such as ionization energy, molecular hardness, electrophilicity, condensed Fukui function and total energies were determined to predict the reactivity of quinclorac. The influence of the solvent was taken into account employing the PCM model. The results indicate that the solvation modifies the values of quinclorac reactivity descriptors. The Fukui function values predict that an electrophilic attack on quinclorac might cause a dechlorination, while a nucleophilic attack might lead to a decarboxylation and a free radical attack would cause a hydrogen substitution on the quinoline ring. Quinclorac in deprotonated form would be susceptible to decarboxylation through an electrophilic attack while nucleophilic and free radical attacks would cause an attack on the hydrogens of the ring.

Graphical Abstract

References

[1]Grossmann K., Kwiatkowski J., Tresch S., J. Exp. Bot., 2001, 52, 1811 10.1093/jexbot/52.362.1811Search in Google Scholar

[2]Zheng R, Hall J.C., Weed Sa., 2001,49,276 10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0276:UAHRIW]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[3]Eastin E.F., Proc. South. Weed Sel. Soc., 1989,42,7010.1017/S0308229600010357Search in Google Scholar

[4] Martinez N.L., De Prado R., Rademacher W., Walter H., Marshall G., Schmidt 0., Differential response of Echinochloa species and biot>pes to quinclorac, Abstracts of the International Conference at IACR-Rothamsted (17-20 November, 1997, Harpenden, UK) BCPC, Herts 1997,1 Search in Google Scholar

[5] Schmidt 0., Aunch 0., Martinez N.L., De Prado R., Walter H., In: Maillet J. (Ed.), 6th EWRS Mediterranean Symposium (13-15 May 1998, Montpellier, France) ENSA, France 8,1Search in Google Scholar

[6]Lee S.Y., Kim Y.K., Eom S.H., Park W.T., Uddin M.R., Park N., Kim S.G., Park S.U., POJ, 2011,4(2), 91Search in Google Scholar

[7]Reimche G.B., Machado S.L.O., Golombieski J.I., Baumart J.S., Braun N., Marchesan E., Zanella R., Cmec Rural, 2008, 38(1), 710.1590/S0103-84782008000100002Search in Google Scholar

[8]Marchesan E., Zanella R, Avila L.A., Camargo E.R., Machado SLQ, Macedo V.R.M., Sd. Agr, 2003,64(2), 13110.1590/S0103-90162007000200005Search in Google Scholar

[9]2005 Evaluation of the new active quinclorac in the product Drive Herbicide Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority, National Registration Authority for Agricultural and Vetennary Chemicals, Canberra, Australia, 2005 Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-12-12
Accepted: 2014-4-23
Published Online: 2014-10-9

© 2015 Luis H. Mendoza Huizar et al.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 17.10.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/chem-2015-0008/html
Scroll to top button