My thesis discusses the style subject according to Gadamer’s approach via clarifying questions. The clarification presents possible statements regarding the components and mechanisms of style. The thesis assumes that style is anchored in...
moreMy thesis discusses the style subject according to Gadamer’s approach via clarifying questions. The clarification presents possible statements regarding the components and mechanisms of style. The thesis assumes that style is anchored in the themes of truth and method, and that these subjects are founded upon an array of concepts divided into categories beneath them; at the same time, style is anchored in an array of basic consciousness mechanisms that enables the formation of understanding and motivates its development. In these respects, the thesis reveals that according to Gadamer, the mode of understanding is characterized as a dynamic understanding circle founded upon the categories of truth, accuracy, absoluteness, correspondence, representation, understanding, temporality, irony, application, and personality; additionally, the thesis demonstrates that the motion of thinking in the circular understanding mode, identifying A as if it were B, is enabled due to two basic consciousness mechanisms: the first is characterized as lack of knowledge that assumes perfection, and is termed the absence structure; the second is characterized by attentive intent toward the datum, as active and acted intention, and is termed intentionality function
Cite this poster as: Hovav Rashelbach, "Style: The Garden of Forking Paths" in: a Poster at The 7th International Conference on Teacher Education:The Story on Innovation in Teacher Education, at: Tel Aviv, Affiliation: The MOFET Institute, 2019