Sauropoda

The Lower Cretaceous of the Algarve Basin (South Portugal) consists mainly of carbonate and mixed facies from inner shelf and transitional environments, sometimes with excellent conditions for the occurrence of dinosaur tracks. This is the case of the shoreline exposures located between Ponta da Baleeira and Praia dos Arrifes, near Albufeira, where cliffs are cut in vertical sandstone, claystone, marl and limestone beds of Valanginian age (Manuppella, 1992). The high potential of this area to find palaeontological evidences was revealed during fieldwork in Praia dos Arrifes, when several dinosaur tracks preserved as natural casts were found. On the lower surface of a sandstone bed, at least two sauropod trackways and tridactyl footprints were recognized. They became exposed due to erosion of the underneath greyish mudstone layer that left a space between levels. These tracks were produced when the dinosaurs crossed sandy and chalky sediments highly bioturbated, and sunk in the underneath muddy layer. They testify the existence of sauropods and biped dinosaurs, possibly theropods, living near a shallow and restricted inner shelf palaeoenvironment of a littoral plain. Previously, Early Cretaceous dinosaur tracksites in the Algarve Basin were recognized only near Vila do Bispo, 17 km to the west of Lagos, where iguanodontian footprints were described for the first time in Portugal, showing that this group was well-represented in the Iberian Peninsula and Southwestern Europe (Santos et al., 2000, 2013). This new tracksite yields the first evidence of Early Cretaceous sauropods in the Algarve Basin and the ongoing study will provide more information to increase the palaeobiogeographical data available for this group in the Iberian Peninsula.

Several types of pathological bony overgrowth are known from various dinosaur taxa but, except for stress fractures, are rarely reported from appendicular elements. Herein we describe pathological manual and pedal phalanges of a camarasaurid sauropod (SMA 0002), which show features rarely recognised in non-avian dinosaurs. They include lateral osteophytes and smoothing of phalangeal articular surfaces, a deep pit, proximal enthesophytes in pedal unguals, distal overgrowth associated with a fracture, and a knob-like overgrowth lateral to the distal condyles of a pedal phalanx. Their causes were assessed by means of visual examination, CT scans, and bone histology, where possible. The lateral osteophytes are interpreted as symptoms of osteoarthritis. The ossified tendon insertions in the unguals are most probably the result of prolonged, heavy use of the pedal claws, possibly for scratchdigging. The distal overgrowth is interpreted to have developed due to changed stress regimes, and to be the cause for the fracture. The deep pit represents most likely a case of osteochondrosis, whereas the knob-like overgrowth likely represents a post-traumatic phenomenon not previously reported in dinosaurs. The study confirms that a rigorous assessment of pathologies can yield information about behaviour in long-extinct animals.

Rhoetosaurus brownei is the only known named pre-Cretaceous sauropod from Australia. It is therefore a potentially important taxon for understanding global paleobiogeographic and phylogenetic patterns among early sauropods. Despite its obvious significance, Rhoetosaurus has been too poorly understood to be included in most recent analyses of early sauropod evolution. With this in mind, we evaluated the osteology and phylogeny of undescribed materials of Rhoetosaurus, in order to attempt to close the gap in this understanding. The lower hind limb of Rhoetosaurus highlights a plethora of differences from other sauropods, supporting the distinctiveness of Rhoetosaurus even in the absence of other materials. Some unique traits include prominent crests and sulci on the tibia medially, a narrow metatarsal articular bridge, and pedal claws with an accessory groove or fossa. The pes plesiomorphically retains four claws where most sauropods have three, and bears superficial similarity to that of Shunosaurus. Preliminary cladistic analysis confirms that Rhoetosaurus is a non-neosauropod gravisaurian, although weak support for the most parsimonious topology suggests further findings are required to improve upon incompleteness in the character data. Examination of alternative phylogenetic hypotheses rules out a close relationship between Rhoetosaurus and East Asian Jurassic sauropods, and indicates a closer examination of the potential relationships between Rhoetosaurus and other contemporaneous Middle Jurassic Gondwanan sauropods is necessary.

Sauropod dinosaurs compose a diversified, well known, and worldwide distributed clade, with a stereotyped body plan: deep trunk, elongated neck and tail, columnar limbs and very small skull. In Brazil, the group is represented by ten formally described Cretaceous species, mostly titanosaurs. This is the case of Maxakalisaurus topai, known based on an incomplete and disarticulated skeleton, unearthed from deposits of the Adamantina Formation in Minas Gerais. Here, we report a partial right dentary, including five isolated teeth, collected from the same site as the type-series of M. topai and tentatively referred to that taxon. The bone is gently curved medially, the functional teeth are set on an anterolingual position, and two replacement teeth are seen per alveoli. New morphological data gathered from that specimen was employed to conduct a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of Titanosauria (with 42 taxa and 253 characters), based on previous studies. The Aeolosaurini clade was recovered, with Gondwanatitan and Aelosaurus as sister taxa, and Maxakalisaurus, Panamericansaurus, and Rinconsaurus forming a basal polytomy.

The relationships among basal sauropodomorphs are controversial. Results of cladistic analyses vary from a fully paraphyletic assemblage to a monophyletic core-prosauropod. We apply the comparative cladistics method to three published cladistic analyses of sauropodomorph dinosaurs, in order to identify root causes for differences between phylogenetic results. Except for three taxa (Saturnalia, Thecodontosaurus, and Efraasia) and one clade (Gravisauria), the remaining genera are recovered with conflicting positions. The comparative method is based on indices that allow for the quantification of the degree of similarity in characters and character states among analyses. A comparison of primary data, character selection, and scoring highlights significant discrepancies in data sets. Our results suggest that one character out of two varies from one analysis to the other. These are the root causes for the phylogenetic incongruence observed. The hurdle of the phylogenetic definition of the clade Sauropoda, which has been defined in four different ways, is also treated. We concur with several recent papers following the first node-based definition of Sauropoda.