Anti evolution

In this article it is proved that the Origin of Species means/represents the Survival of the Fittest, natural selection, the Darwin’s
theory (Darwinian evolution) and vice-versa but the Descent Man (human evolution) means the Survival of the Fittest with the
Lamarck’s theory. So, if it is proved that the Survival of the Fittest and Lamarck’s theory is not valid, the Origin of
Species, natural selection, the Darwin’s theory (Darwinian evolution) and the Descent Man would be invalid. However, it is
known from the several observations that many unfit animal may survives; whereas the really the fittest are died out due to
various hazards. So, there is no chance for the Survival of the Fittest. Again, the Survival of the Fittest’ indicates that living
organisms are selfish and struggle for their existence like battle in battle. But symbiosis, obligate symbiosis, cooperation etc.
are widely spread in nature from microorganisms to vertebrate; even altruism (self sacrifice) also. Again, no fittest organism
developed by the slight variation/gradualism. Darwin’s theory cannot explain the presence of vestigial organ. The reproductive
success organisms evolved during millions and millions of years ago and still existing in their own form. How extinct
organisms are fittest and produce new species? The Mendel’s laws, the Hardy-Weinberg’s law, the laws of thermodynamics
and teleology oppose Darwinian evolution. Even all the evidences of Darwin’s theory are opposites of evolution. Hence, seven
theories of evolution are formulated without the effects of the Survival of the Fittest. Consequently, the Survival of the Fittest
is wrong, invalidated and also meaningless. Again, Lamarck’s theory s is wrong. Hence, the Survival of the Fittest is not
valid: Darwin’s theory of natural selection, the Origin of Species and the Descent Man opposite to Evolution; many literatures
support it. Additionally, the Survival of the Fittest played a nasty role of political idealism and it removes the religion
(atheistic). But all religions take note of the major events of a lifetime: birth, youth, marriage and death; bind society together
through ceremony of worships and to control social deviance.
Keywords: the survival of the fittest, Darwin’s theory, origin of species

There is in no doubt whatsoever that evolution theory has transformed our rational and understanding of the origin of life, the Earth and the finite cosmos. Charles Darwin, the father of evolution, is attributed to the founding of the original concept in his 1859 handiwork, The Origin of Species. This theory has played a fundamental role in our developing society, and has ‘evolved’ our very perception of science, religion and politics, all in the space of a hundred and fifty years. And that is the question; how has this theory influenced our society? How did certain figures of evolution theory (such as; Darwin, Haeckel) influence the beliefs and decisions of the individual (such as; Hitler) and the multitude (such as; Germany)? What science does this theory use to devalue human life? Does evolution promote ultra-genocide? What is ‘Entwicklung’? If evolution is true, and there is an Omega man; who is it? If nature chooses, then how is eugenics survival of the fittest? Who defines ‘fittest’; nature or intelligence? Can there ever be a concept of morality in evolution? Granted, rhetorical questions are ill-advised, I only state them to stimulate the mind; these are the questions one should ask when considering the eventual effects of evolution on societal vision. It would be absurd to state that Darwinian evolution was responsible for the creation of Nazism and Communism, but one cannot deny the influence Darwinian philosophies have had on these movements, and their leaders. Dr. Ruse is correct, evolution is a religion and he being a passionate adherent is proud to announce it.