World Geomorphological Landscapes
Mauro Soldati
Mauro Marchetti Editors
Landscapes and
Landforms of
Italy
World Geomorphological Landscapes
Series editor
Piotr Migoń, Wroclaw, Poland
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/10852
Mauro Soldati Mauro Marchetti
•
Editors
Landscapes and Landforms
of Italy
Under the auspices of
123
Editors
Mauro Soldati
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e
Geologiche
Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia
Modena
Italy
Mauro Marchetti
Dipartimento di Educazione e Scienze
Umane
Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia
Reggio Emilia
Italy
ISSN 2213-2090
ISSN 2213-2104 (electronic)
World Geomorphological Landscapes
ISBN 978-3-319-26192-8
ISBN 978-3-319-26194-2 (eBook)
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2
Library of Congress Control Number: 2017930793
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is
concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction
on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic
adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not
imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and
regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed
to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty,
express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been
made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional
affiliations.
Printed on acid-free paper
This Springer imprint is published by Springer Nature
The registered company is Springer International Publishing AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Series Editors’ Preface
Landforms and landscapes vary enormously across the Earth, from high mountains to endless
plains. At a smaller scale, Nature often surprises us creating shapes which look improbable.
Many physical landscapes are so immensely beautiful that they received the highest possible
recognition—they hold the status of World Heritage properties. Apart from often being
immensely scenic, landscapes tell stories which not uncommonly can be traced back in time
for tens of million years and include unique events. In addition, many landscapes owe their
appearance and harmony not solely to the natural forces. Since centuries, or even millennia,
they have been shaped by humans who modified hillslopes, river courses, and coastlines, and
erected structures which often blend with the natural landforms to form inseparable entities.
These landscapes are studied by Geomorphology—‘the Science of Scenery’—a part of
Earth Sciences that focuses on landforms, their assemblages, surface and subsurface processes
that moulded them in the past and that change them today. Shapes of landforms and regularities of their spatial distribution, their origin, evolution, and ages are the subject of research.
Geomorphology is also a science of considerable practical importance since many geomorphic
processes occur so suddenly and unexpectedly, and with such a force that they pose significant
hazards to human populations and not uncommonly result in considerable damage or even
casualties.
To show the importance of geomorphology in understanding the landscape, and to present
the beauty and diversity of the geomorphological sceneries across the world, we have launched a new book series World Geomorphological Landscapes. It aims to be a scientific library
of monographs that present and explain physical landscapes, focusing on both representative
and uniquely spectacular examples. Each book will contain details on geomorphology of a
particular country or a geographically coherent region. This volume presents geomorphology
of Italy—a country with highly diverse landscapes, from lowlands crossed by big rivers to
active volcanoes and very high mountains. It is also very dynamic geomorphology, continuously shaped by earthquakes, eruptions, landslides, floods and vigorous erosion in clayey
materials producing spectacular badlands. Each of these aspects of Italian geomorphology has
received its due coverage. More than thirty selected examples from mainland Italy and its
islands are presented, along with fascinating stories behind the marvellous sceneries, including
long-term interactions between physical landscapes and people. Thus, the book is not only
suitable for scientists and students of Geography and Earth Science, but can also provide
guidance to holidaymaking geoscientists as to where to go to enjoy the very best scenery.
The World Geomorphological Landscapes series is produced under the scientific patronage
of the International Association of Geomorphologists—a society that brings together geomorphologists from all around the world. The IAG was established in 1989 and is an independent scientific association affiliated with the International Geographical Union and the
International Union of Geological Sciences. Among its main aims are to promote geomorphology and to foster dissemination of geomorphological knowledge. I believe that this lavishly illustrated series, which sticks to the scientific rigour, is the most appropriate means to
v
vi
Series Editors’ Preface
fulfil these aims and to serve the geoscientific community. To this end, my great thanks go to
Profs. Mauro Soldati and Mauro Marchetti for coordinating the efforts of Italian geomorphological community and expertly editing the book, as well as to all individual contributors
who worked together to show us the Italian landscape at its best.
Piotr Migoń
Foreword
The great variety of landscapes makes Italy a very significant country from the geomorphological point of view. The geological history has given fundamental imprint to the morphology
of the country, building two large chains, the Alps and the Apennines, still evolving. To the
north, the Po Valley, between these chains, completes the continental portion of the territory.
The Italian peninsular area has its main framework in the Apennine ridge that, starting from
the mainland, wedges powerfully into the Mediterranean and launches poetically its string of
islands as a safe harbour to the Mediterranean populations. The peninsular Italy, together with
the main islands reaches to the south latitudes comparable to those of the northern coast of the
African continent. This large latitudinal extension, from north to south, makes Italy a country
with extreme climate and, consequently, landscape variability. Climate variability and tectonic
events are the foundation of current and past geomorphological evolution. During the Pleistocene the latter created most of the landforms currently observed at different scales and that
mainly derive from glacial, fluvial, coastal, volcanic, karst, gravitational and aeolian morphogenetic processes. As in other parts of the world, in Italy the natural geomorphological
processes have created beautiful and highly scenic landscapes; next to these, anthropic
landscapes of great cultural value are overlapped. A wide range of these landscapes is
described in this volume that contains more than thirty cases, representative of all morphogenetic environments, both natural and human. About the cultural value of the Italian landscape, I like to point out that, among the cultural and natural properties recognized by
UNESCO as heritage of humanity, Italy is the country that has the largest number of sites
included in the World Heritage List. Not by chance, the Italian territory has been a crossroads
of peoples and cultures unique in the world where man, over the centuries, has changed river
courses, swamps, coasts, slopes, forests, creating sites and morphologies that have been
integrated into the natural landscape forming a unique and harmonious entity.
In the European Landscape Convention (ELC), landscape is considered as common heritage of individuals and active subject for the construction of a national and European identity,
that people cannot ignore. In this context, the Italian landscape is, in my opinion, the cradle
and the laboratory of multi-ethnic cultural and technological identities that go beyond the
European context and that are made through the centuries with the participation of many
peoples such as Greeks, Phoenicians, Gauls, Romans, Byzantines, Goths, Lombards,
Carolingian, Arabs, Normans and, finally, Spanish and French. These peoples, together with
the Italians, overlapped their cultures and their way of operating into the landscape, making
Italy the largest historical artistic and environmental library. The European Convention defines
the landscape as “a certain part of the territory, as perceived by people, whose character
derives from natural and/or human factors and their interrelationships.” Including all the
territory in the concept of active landscape is crucial because each location or natural space is
related to other places; all together they establish complex interconnections between them and
the urban and rural areas. Therefore, three typologies of landscapes are considered: the
exceptional landscapes, the daily-life landscapes and the degraded landscapes. In this context,
Geomorphology plays a major role (at different scales): interprets the relations among the great
morphodynamic systems (hills, valleys, coasts); identifies the supporting skeleton and that of
vii
viii
Foreword
greater visual impact among different types of landscape; identifies forces and pressures
(natural and anthropic) that can transform them; presents protection and enhancement solutions, in a sustainable perspective. The study of the landscape is characterized by a clear
diversity of disciplinary approaches and the consequent relational processes are the main
theme of the Convention, which then takes a great effect of stimulation and dialogue between
various disciplines. The approaches of each individual discipline to the landscape in many
cases lead to consider only some components. However, in my opinion, the issues of “Geomorphology” are the “substrate” of the landscape and contribute significantly to a holistic
vision of the same, having the intrinsic ability to relate all the system components (abiotic,
biotic and cultural). Fundamental is the contribution of geomorphology to the identification of
macro and micro landforms and exploitation of their origin (natural or human), as well as their
evolution over time. The contribution of geomorphological methods to the implementation
of the Convention guiding philosophy is, in my opinion, considerable and may even result as a
good base for dialogue between the various disciplines involved.
Gilberto Pambianchi
Contents
1
Introduction to the Landscapes and Landforms of Italy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mauro Soldati and Mauro Marchetti
Part I
2
1
Physical Environment
The Great Diversity of Italian Landscapes and Landforms: Their Origin
and Human Imprint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mauro Marchetti, Mauro Soldati, and Vittoria Vandelli
7
3
Outline of the Geology of Italy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Alfonso Bosellini
21
4
The Climate of Italy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Simona Fratianni and Fiorella Acquaotta
29
5
Morphological Regions of Italy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Paola Fredi and Elvidio Lupia Palmieri
39
Part II
6
7
Landscapes and Landforms
The Glaciers of the Valle d’Aosta and Piemonte Regions: Records
of Present and Past Environmental and Climate Changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Marco Giardino, Giovanni Mortara, and Marta Chiarle
Landscapes of Northern Lombardy: From the Glacial Scenery
of Upper Valtellina to the Prealpine Lacustrine Environment
of Lake Como . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Irene Bollati, Manuela Pelfini, and Claudio Smiraglia
77
89
8
The Adamello-Presanella and Brenta Massifs, Central Alps:
Contrasting High-Mountain Landscapes and Landforms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
Alberto Carton and Carlo Baroni
9
Large Ancient Landslides in Trentino, Northeastern Alps, as Evidence
of Postglacial Dynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
Alberto Carton
10 The Dolomite Landscape of the Alta Badia (Northeastern Alps):
A Remarkable Record of Geological and Geomorphological History . . . . . . . 123
Mauro Marchetti, Alessandro Ghinoi, and Mauro Soldati
11 The Vajont Valley (Eastern Alps): A Complex Landscape
Deeply Marked by Landsliding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
Alessandro Pasuto
12 Karst Landforms in Friuli Venezia Giulia: From Alpine
to Coastal Karst . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
Franco Cucchi and Furio Finocchiaro
ix
x
13 The Tagliamento River: The Fluvial Landscape and Long-Term
Evolution of a Large Alpine Braided River . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
Nicola Surian and Alessandro Fontana
14 Lake Garda: An Outstanding Archive of Quaternary Geomorphological
Evolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
Carlo Baroni
15 Geomorphological Processes and Landscape Evolution
of the Lagoon of Venice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181
Aldino Bondesan
16 The Po Delta Region: Depositional Evolution, Climate Change
and Human Intervention Through the Last 5000 Years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193
Marco Stefani
17 Landscapes and Landforms Driven by Geological Structures
in the Northwestern Apennines. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203
Luisa Pellegrini and Pier Luigi Vercesi
18 Fingerprints of Large-Scale Landslides in the Landscape
of the Emilia Apennines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215
Giovanni Bertolini, Alessandro Corsini, and Claudio Tellini
19 Mud Volcanoes in the Emilia-Romagna Apennines: Small Landforms
of Outstanding Scenic and Scientific Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225
Doriano Castaldini and Paola Coratza
20 The Outstanding Terraced Landscape of the Cinque Terre Coastal
Slopes (Eastern Liguria) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235
Pierluigi Brandolini
21 Tuscany Hills and Valleys: Uplift, Exhumation, Valley Downcutting
and Relict Landforms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245
Mauro Coltorti, Pier Lorenzo Fantozzi, and Pierluigi Pieruccini
22 Landscapes and Landforms of the Duchy of Urbino in Italian
Renaissance Paintings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257
Olivia Nesci and Rosetta Borchia
23 Rocky Cliffs Joining Velvet Beaches: The Northern Marche Coast . . . . . . . . . 271
Daniele Savelli, Francesco Troiani, Paolo Cavitolo, and Olivia Nesci
24 The Typical Badlands Landscapes Between the Tyrrhenian Sea
and the Tiber River . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281
Maurizio Del Monte
25 The Tuff Cities: A ‘Living Landscape’ at the Border of Volcanoes
in Central Italy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293
Claudio Margottini, Laura Melelli, and Daniele Spizzichino
26 A Route of Fire in Central Italy: The Latium Ancient Volcanoes . . . . . . . . . . 303
Paola Fredi and Sirio Ciccacci
27 Relief, Intermontane Basins and Civilization in the Umbria-Marche
Apennines: Origin and Life by Geological Consent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
Marta Della Seta, Laura Melelli, and Gilberto Pambianchi
28 The Terminillo, Gran Sasso and Majella Mountains: The ‘Old
Guardians’ of the Tyrrhenian and Adriatic Seas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327
Tommaso Piacentini, Marcello Buccolini, and Enrico Miccadei
Contents
Contents
xi
29 Aeternae Urbis Geomorphologia—Geomorphology of Rome,
Aeterna Urbs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339
Maurizio Del Monte
30 Granite Landscapes of Sardinia: Long-Term Evolution of Scenic
Landforms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351
Rita T. Melis, Felice Di Gregorio, and Valeria Panizza
31 The Coastal Dunes of Sardinia: Landscape Response to Climate
and Sea Level Changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365
Rita T. Melis, Felice Di Gregorio, and Valeria Panizza
32 The Terrestrial and Submarine Landscape of the Tremiti
Archipelago, Adriatic Sea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377
Enrico Miccadei, Tommaso Piacentini, and Francesco Mascioli
33 Vesuvius and Campi Flegrei: Volcanic History, Landforms
and Impact on Settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 389
Pietro P.C. Aucelli, Ludovico Brancaccio, and Aldo Cinque
34 Sorrento Peninsula and Amalfi Coast: The Long-Term History
of an Enchanting Promontory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 399
Aldo Cinque
35 The Coastal Landscape of Cilento (Southern Italy): A Challenge
for Protection and Tourism Valorisation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 409
Alessio Valente, Paolo Magliulo, and Filippo Russo
36 The Salento Peninsula (Apulia, Southern Italy): A Water-Shaped
Landscape Without Rivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 421
Giuseppe Mastronuzzi and Paolo Sansò
37 The Landscape of the Aspromonte Massif: A Geomorphological
Open-Air Laboratory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 431
Gaetano Robustelli and Marino Sorriso-Valvo
38 Volcanic Landforms and Landscapes of the Aeolian Islands
(Southern Tyrrhenian Sea, Sicily): Implications for Hazard Evaluation . . . . . 443
Federico Lucchi, Claudia Romagnoli, and Claudio Antonio Tranne
39 Geomorphology of the Capo San Vito Peninsula (NW Sicily):
An Example of Tectonically and Climatically Controlled Landscape . . . . . . . 455
Valerio Agnesi, Christian Conoscenti, Cipriano
Di Maggio, and Edoardo Rotigliano
40 Landforms and Landscapes of Mount Etna (Sicily): Relationships
Between a Volcano, Its Environment and Human Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 467
Stefano Branca, David Chester, Emanuela De Beni, and Angus Duncan
41 Pantelleria Island (Strait of Sicily): Volcanic History
and Geomorphological Landscape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 479
Silvio G. Rotolo, Valerio Agnesi, Christian Conoscenti, and Giovanni Lanzo
Part III
Geoheritage
42 Geoheritage in Italy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 491
Maria Cristina Giovagnoli
43 Geomorphodiversity in Italy: Examples from the Dolomites,
Northern Apennines and Vesuvius . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 501
Mario Panizza and Sandra Piacente
xii
44 Goethe’s Italian Journey and the Geological Landscape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 511
Paola Coratza and Mario Panizza
45 Wine Landscapes of Italy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 523
Vincenzo Amato and Mario Valletta
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 537
Contents
Editors and Contributors
About the Editors
Mauro Soldati is Associate Professor of Geomorphology at the Department of Chemical and Geological
Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy. His research deals with geomorphology and slope
instability, with special emphasis on landslides and climatic change. He is Vice-President of the International
Association of Geomorphologists (IAG) for the period 2013–2017. He is a member of the Editorial Board
of the Geomorphology, as well as of other international journals, and has been guest-editor of special issues
of the journal dealing with landslides. He is author or co-author of about 160 papers.
Mauro Marchetti is Associate Professor of Geography at the Department of Education and Human Sciences,
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. His research is mainly focused on geomorphological and applied
geomorphological topics, with particular attention to fluvial morphogenesis and geomorphological mapping.
He was a member of the Directive Council of the Italian Association of Physical Geography and Geomorphology (AIGeo). Author of more than 100 scientific papers and of geomorphological maps.
Contributors
Fiorella Acquaotta is research fellow at the Earth Sciences Department of the University of
Torino. She has a rather wide range of interests in the fields of meteorology and climatology.
She is focusing her activity on the data analysis, with a specific interest towards the reconstruction, quality-check and homogenization of the meteorological stations data. She is
exploring the difficult relationship between climate and human health. She is member of the
international World Meteorological Organization project MEDARE (MEditerranean DAta
REscue) and of the Action COST-ES0601.
Valerio Agnesi is Full Professor of Geomorphology at the Dipartimento di Scienze della
Terra e del Mare, University of Palermo. His research interests are focused on slope processes,
karst phenomena and geosites. He is Dean of the Base and Applied Science School and
Director of Geological Museum of Palermo University.
Vincenzo Amato is currently a research grant holder in the GeoGisLab of Bioscience and
Territory Department, Molise University; PhD in Earth Science (Federico II University of
Naples). The main scientific research regards the Quaternary geomorphological and environmental evolution of the southern Apennines. Co-author of 30 peer-review research articles,
many of them presented at international and national congresses and meetings.
Pietro P.C. Aucelli is Associate Professor of Physical Geography and Geomorphology at the
University of Napoli “Parthenope” where he has taught since 2008. He graduated in Geological science and obtained the PhD in Environmental Geology at Molise University. He is
specialized in applied geomorphology, Quaternary geology and GIS analysis.
Carlo Baroni is Full Professor of Geomorphology at the University of Pisa and Coordinator
of the regional Ph.D. programme, School of Earth Sciences. Past President of the Italian
Glaciological Committee, he co-ordinates annual glacier monitoring in the Central Italian
Alps, acting as National correspondent of WGMS. He is National focal point for the Global
Cryosphere Watch (GCW-WMO) and Italian delegate in the SCAR—Standing Committee on
xiii
xiv
Antarctic Geographic Information. He took part in 15 Antarctic expeditions. He conducts
research on Glacial Geology, Glaciology, Geomorphology, Quaternary Geology and
Geoarchaeology.
Giovanni Bertolini is Senior Geologist at the Regione Emilia-Romagna authority. His professional activities and research interests deal with large landslides and, specifically, mapping,
dating, hazard evaluation and consolidation works. He is author of more than 30 publications.
Irene Bollati is post-doctoral scientist at the Earth Science Department “A. Desio”,
University of Milano. She works on geoheritage and geomorphological processes affecting
active geomorphosites through the integration of geomorphological and dendrogeomorphological techniques and on the dissemination of Earth Sciences. Her main study areas are
located in the Western and Central Italian Alps, the Northern Apennines and the Swiss Alps.
Aldino Bondesan is Associate Professor in Geomorphology at the Dipartimento di Geoscienze, University of Padova. He has conducted research in various fields of physical
geography (fluvial and glacial geomorphology, glaciology, karstology, geoarchaeology and
military geosciences) and has participated in scientific expeditions in Antarctica, Asia
and Africa. He has been in charge of numerous national and international research projects and
holds positions in academic and scientific associations. He is the author and editor of 15 books
and more than 150 academic papers and book chapters.
Rosetta Borchia holds a degree from the Academy of Fine Arts of Urbino and is a painter
and photographer of the landscapes of the Montefeltro region. Following her discovery of the
real landscape portrayed on a Piero della Francesca diptych she has published extensively on
the landscapes of Renaissance paintings. She is also an avid naturalist, a collector of ancient
roses and rare wildflowers, and a garden designer.
Alfonso Bosellini is Professor Emeritus of the University of Ferrara, Honorary Member of the
Geological Society of America, Member of Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, past-President
of the International Association of Sedimentologists.
Stefano Branca is Senior Researcher at Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia—
Osservatorio Etneo. His research is focused on geological, structural and geomorphological
investigations of Etna and Stromboli volcanoes and on the reconstruction of historical and
prehistorical eruptive activity of Etna. He has published over 60 papers and book chapters and
was an author of the 2011 Geological Map of Etna Volcano.
Ludovico Brancaccio is retired Full Professor of Physical Geography and Geomorphology.
He has taught at University of Napoli “Federico II” and then at University of Molise where he
was Dean of the Science Faculty. He was President, from 1993 to 1997, of the Italian
Association of Geomorphologists. He worked among other topics on neotectonic analysis of
southern Apennines and on ancient sea level traces reconstruction.
Pierluigi Brandolini is Associate Professor of Physical Geography and Geomorphology at
the University of Genova. Ph.D. in Geographical and Cartographical Sciences. His research
interests are mainly focused on geomorphological evolution of coastal areas, landslides and
their relationship with settlements, geo-hydrological hazards, land-use changes and their
relationship with erosion and slope stability, geomorphological heritage and geotourism,
large-scale geomorphological and environmental mapping.
Marcello Buccolini is Full Professor of Physical Geography and Geomorphology at the
Department of Engineering and Geology, “G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara. Head
of the Degree Course of Geological Sciences. Main research interests are on general geomorphology, landslides investigation, soil erosion and badland analysis, quantitative and
dynamic geomorphology and geomorphological hazard in Central and Southern Italy.
Editors and Contributors
Editors and Contributors
xv
Geomorphology expert and responsible of several projects on geomorphology (PRIN and
projects in collaboration with governmental institutions).
Alberto Carton is Full Professor of Physical Geography and Geomorphology at the
Department of Geosciences, University of Padova. He has always carried out basic and
applied geomorphological investigations, with particular attention to geomorphological surveying and mapping, glacial and periglacial morphogenesis, applications of geomorphology to
slope stability investigations and hazard and risk processes in high-mountain domains. His
research has also been finalised to the reconstruction of glacialism in the Little Ice Age and
permafrost distribution.
Doriano Castaldini is Full Professor of Physical Geography and Geomorphology at the
Department of Chemical and Geological Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia.
He also taught at the University of Pisa. He received the Degree “Honoris Causa” by Cluj
Napoca and Oradea Universities (Romania). He is a member of national and international
associations, and an expert in Geomorphological mapping, Environmental Impact Assessment,
Geotourism, Geomorphological and Seismic hazards. He is the author of about 160 papers
published in national and international journals.
Paolo Cavitolo earned his Ph.D. in Earth Sciences at the University of Urbino. His study
focused on multi-temporal hydrological analyses and on channel-metrics for 2D and 3D fluvial
modelling. His present research also includes applied geomorphology and physical geography.
David Chester is Professor of Environmental Sciences at Liverpool Hope University, UK.
He has studied volcanic and earthquake related hazards and their impacts in Southern Italy and
Portugal (including the Azores) for more than 35 years.
Marta Chiarle is Researcher at the CNR-IRPI Torino. She has been a visiting scientist at the
USGS of Golden, Colorado and at the CNHR of Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
She participated in several national and international research projects on natural hazards, with
a focus on glacial and periglacial mountain areas and on the impacts of climate change. She
has authored many journal papers, given public lectures and trained graduate students and
young scientists.
Sirio Ciccacci is Associate Professor of Physical Geography and Geomorphology at the
Department of Earth Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome. His scientific activity is testified
by more than 80 publications on themes of Quantitative Geomorphology, focusing in particular on the evaluation of erosion entity in drainage basins, of Volcanic Geomorphology and
of Morphotectonics. He is Author of several Geomorphology books and of the volume ‘Le
Forme del Rilievo - Atlante illustrato di Geomorfologia’.
Aldo Cinque has been Full Professor of Physical Geography, Geomorphology and Quaternary Geology at the Federico II University of Naples. He has also been teaching for some
academic years at the Universities of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Luanda, Angola. He has a
profound knowledge of the area between Amalfi and Sorrento, whose geology and landscape
he has been studying since the time of his graduation thesis. In the last years his main field of
research has been Geoarchaeology, with investigations in Helea, Paestum, Pompeii, Herculaneum and Naples.
Mauro Coltorti is Full Professor of Geomorphology at the Department of Physics, Earth and
Environmental Science, University of Siena. He taught at the University of Luanda and Addis
Ababa. His research has been carried out on present and ancient fluvial, coastal, aeolian and
slope deposits and dynamics including landslides, neotectonics, climatic and human induced
changes. He is a specialist for Quaternary sediments, facies analysis, stratigraphy, geoarcheology and geomorphological mapping. Research activities have been carried out in Italy,
Ethiopia, Ecuador, Bolivia, Oman, Sudan and Vietnam.
xvi
Christian Conoscenti is Associate Professor of Geomorphology at the Dipartimento di
Scienze della Terra e del Mare, University of Palermo. His research activity focuses on GIS
and statistical analysis of landslide and water erosion processes.
Paola Coratza is Researcher in Physical Geography and Geomorphology at the Department
of Chemical and Geological Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. Her research
activity is mainly focused on assessment, mapping and enhancement of geomorphological
heritage. Since 2013, she is Chairman of the Working Group on Geomorphosites of the
International Association of Geomorphologists (IAG).
Alessandro Corsini is Associate Professor of Engineering Geology at the Department of
Chemical and Geological Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. His research is
mostly focused on mapping, monitoring and modelling of landslides in the Apennines and the
Dolomites. He is author of more than 80 publications.
Franco Cucchi is former Full Professor in Physical Geography at the Dipartimento di
Matematica e Geoscienze, University of Trieste. In recent years he has been working in
geology and geomorphology linked with Karst (lithology, tectonics, hydrogeology, speleology), in hydrogeology (groundwaters, water supply and use, waters vulnerability), in landscapes evolution and protection (landslides, seismic risk, geosites). He is author or co-author
of more than 250 academic papers and of numerous public educational articles.
Emanuela De Beni is researcher fellow at Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia—
Osservatorio Etneo. Her research concentrates on geochronological and stratigraphical studies
of Etna and Stromboli volcanoes and is particularly concerned with the monitoring of Etna by
means of GIS techniques. She has published over 30 papers and was a contributor to the 2011
Geological Map of Etna Volcano.
Maurizio Del Monte is Associate Professor of Geomorphology at the Department of Earth
Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome. In 2012, he was deemed qualified as Full Professor by
the Ministry of University and Scientific Research. He is a member of the Editorial Board of
Sapienza University Press. His scientific activity covers different fields of Physical Geography,
Geomorphology and Environmental Geology. The main researches concern Quantitative
Geomorphology of drainage basins, Geomorphological Hazards, Volcanic Geomorphology
and Erosion evaluation methods.
Marta Della Seta is Researcher in Geomorphology at the Department of Earth Sciences,
Sapienza University of Rome. Her research focuses on computation of geomorphic parameters
and analysis of geomorphic markers aimed at morpho-evolutionary modelling in studies on
neotectonics and large slope instabilities, geomorphological hazard analysis associated to
gravitational and water erosion processes. She is a professor in Geomorphological Survey and
Mapping. She is a member of the Executive Committee of the International Association of
Geomorphologists.
Felice Di Gregorio is Associate Professor of Environmental Geology at the University of
Cagliari and Coordinator of the PhD Doctorate in Defense and Soil Conservation, Environmental Vulnerability and Hydrogeological Protection at the same University. He has published
over 200 papers and book chapters in national and international journals of geomorphology.
He has central interests in coastal zone management and geosite, geomorphosites and geoheritage in Sardinia, Tunisia and Morocco.
Cipriano Di Maggio is Associate Professor of Geomorphology at the Dipartimento di
Scienze della Terra e del Mare, University of Palermo. He completed his PhD at the University
of Palermo where he studied the morphotectonic setting and the geomorphological evolution
of the Palermo Mountains. His research deals with geomorphology and includes studies about
deep-seated gravitational slope deformations, surficial landslides, morphotectonics, karst
processes and geomorphological mapping.
Editors and Contributors
Editors and Contributors
xvii
Angus Duncan was formerly Professor of Volcanology at the University of Bedfordshire and
is now an Honorary Research Fellow at the University of Liverpool, UK. He has undertaken
volcanological research on volcanoes in Southern Italy, the Azores and Costa Rica. He has
been an author on more than 30 papers and two books on Etna and was a contributor to the
1979 Geological Map of Mount Etna.
Pier Lorenzo Fantozzi is Associated Professor of Geomorphology at the Department of
Physics, Earth and Environmental Science, University of Siena. He taught at the University of
Addis Ababa, Cardiff and Iringa. His research has been carried out on structural setting of the
northeastern coastal sector of the Gulf of Aden (Yemen and Somali) and in the structural
evolution of Northern Apennines (Italy). He is an expert in GIS and thematic cartography, and
in applied geology for cooperation project with African countries. Research activities have
been carried out in Italy, Somali, Tanzania and Yemen.
Furio Finocchiaro is Researcher in Sedimentology at the Dipartimento di Matematica e
Geoscienze, University of Trieste. The research activities have been directed to the study of
recent sediments in various environments (lakes, lagoons, continental shelf). He has taken part
in five scientific expeditions in the Ross Sea (Antarctica). He is also involved in a project on
geosites of Friuli Venezia Giulia region and in other projects dedicated to disseminating the
geology of the region.
Alessandro Fontana is Assistant Professor at the Department of Geosciences, University of
Padua. He is a geomorphologist and Quaternary geologist with interest in the geomorphology
of the alluvial and coastal environments and in the geoarchaeological aspects. He mainly
studied the Late Pleistocene and Holocene evolution of the Venetian−Friulian Plain and of the
Adriatic Sea. His research focused on the interplay between fluvial systems, sea−level variations and ancient human settlements.
Simona Fratianni is Researcher and Adjunct Professor at the Earth Sciences Department,
University of Torino. Her research interests are climate data analysis, climate change and
extreme events detection. She is member of the international project MEDARE and of the
Actions COST-ES0601 and ES1106. She is scientific responsible of the NextSnow and
EU-INTERREG STRADA projects, and of the international cooperation (University of Turin
and San Paulo, Brazil) where she has been visiting professor. She is designated member for the
Administrator Council of the Association Internationale de Climatologie.
Paola Fredi is Full Professor of Physical Geography and Geomorphology at the Department
of Earth Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome. She has been the President of the Italian
Association of Physical Geography and Geomorphology (AIGeo) for six years. At present she
is the Italian Delegate at the International Association of Geomorphologists (IAG) and chair
of the IAG Working Group “Tectonic Geomorphology”. Her scientific activity is testified by
about 150 publications on themes of Morphotectonics, Volcanic Geomorphology and Quantitative Geomorphology, focussing in particular on the evaluation of erosion entity in drainage
basins.
Alessandro Ghinoi is part-time lecturer and contract researcher at the Department of
Chemical and Geological Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. He achieved a
Ph.D. in Natural Sciences and a Ph.D. in Geology for the Environment and the Territory. He is
expert in snow-avalanche susceptibility assessment. He has carried out geomorphological
research in Alpine and Apennine areas, focusing on slope instability processes and
paleo-environmental reconstructions. His current main occupation is as professional geologist.
Marco Giardino is Associate Professor of Physical Geography and Geomorphology at the
Earth Sciences Department, University of Torino. His research interests are morphodynamics
of alpine relief, geomorphological hazards and risks, and particularly landforms geodiversity
and geoheritage. He applies innovative technologies for the collection and dissemination of
xviii
scientific data. He is a member of the Italian Glaciological Committee and co-chair of the
IAG/AIG Working Group on Geodiversity. He coordinates the “geoNatHaz” EU-Canada
university exchange on Earth Sciences and Natural Hazards.
Maria Cristina Giovagnoli is a geologist at ISPRA, Italian Institute for Environmental
Protection and Research, which includes the Italian Geological Survey since 2008. Her first
years in the Geological Survey were dedicated to field work for the Geological Map of Italy
Project, scale 1:50,000. After some years she chose to dedicate herself to biostratigraphy, first
with regard to Mesozoic benthos then specializing in plankton forms, but she has never
entirely abandoned field work. Since 2007 she has been involved in geoheritage activities and
coordinates the Italian Geosites Project and the ISPRA initiatives for Geoparks.
Giovanni Lanzo PhD in Petrology of volcanic rocks at the University of Palermo. He collaborates with the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Section of Palermo. His
research interests regard melt inclusion and experimental petrology.
Federico Lucchi is Researcher of Volcanology in the Geological Division of the Department
of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences of the University of Bologna. He is
author of several papers in international journals concerning the stratigraphy of volcanic areas,
volcanology and hazard evaluation, together with geological maps and guides on the emerged
portions of the Aeolian Islands volcanoes.
Elvidio Lupia Palmieri is Senior Full Professor of Physical Geography and Geomorphology
at the Sapienza University of Rome where he has also been Director of the Department of
Earth Sciences, Dean of the Faculty of Sciences and Pro-Chancellor. He is Worthy Fellow
of the Italian Geological Society, Honorary member of the Italian Geographical Society
and of the Italian Association of Physical Geography and Geomorphology. He is also
member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts. He presided over the Scientific
Committee of the Ministry of the Environment of Italy. He was awarded with the Gold Medal
of the Republic of Italy devoted to “Well-deserving citizens for culture”. More than 250
publications testify to his scientific and educational activities in different fields of Physical
Geography, Geomorphology and Environmental Geology.
Paolo Magliulo is Researcher of Physical Geography and Geomorphology at the Department
of Sciences and Technologies of the Sannio University, Benevento. He is Adjunct Professor of
“Geomorphology Applied to the Soil Conservation” and “Environmental Geology”, member
of the Italian Association of Physical Geography and Geomorphology and referee for several
international, peer-reviewed journals. Research interests include soil geomorphology, fluvial
geomorphology, long-term geomorphological evolution and geomorphosites.
Mauro Marchetti is Associate Professor of Geography at the Department of Education and
Human Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. His research is mainly focused on
geomorphological and applied geomorphological topics, with particular attention to fluvial
morphogenesis and geomorphological mapping. He was a member of the Directive Council
of the Italian Association of Physical Geography and Geomorphology (AIGeo). Author of
more than 100 scientific papers and of geomorphological maps.
Claudio Margottini is senior scientist at the Geological Survey of Italy (ISPRA), Vice
President of the International Consortium on Landslides at the University of Kyoto (Japan)
and adjunct professor at the Huangzou University (Wuhan, China). His major research topic is
the development of engineering geological techniques for the conservation and protection of
cultural and natural heritages. Most relevant projects include many UNESCO sites world wide,
such as Machu Picchu, Buddha’s statues of Bamiyan (Afghanistan), Aksum, Easter Island and
Petra. He is author of more than 300 publications and books.
Editors and Contributors
Editors and Contributors
xix
Francesco Mascioli achieved a Ph.D. in “Earth Science for the Earth dynamic, geological
hazard and natural resources” at “G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara. At present, he
is researcher at Niedersächsischer Landesbetrieb für Wasserwirtschaft, Küsten- und Naturschutz (Germany). His scientific interests are focused on seabed habitat mapping and
monitoring, with skills on hydroacoustical survey, bathymetrical and backscatter data processing, supervised classification methods including ground-truthing.
Giuseppe Mastronuzzi is Associate Professor of Physical Geography and Geomorphology at
Department of Earth and Geoenvironmental Sciences, University of Bari. His research focuses
mainly on the reconstruction of Late Quaternary relative sea-level change along the coast of
southern Italy, France, Albania and Greece. The morphological effects of the impact of historical tsunamis have been also investigated along Mediterranean and Caribbean coasts;
methods for tsunami hazard assessment have been developed as well.
Laura Melelli is Researcher in Geomorphology at Department of Physics and Geology,
University of Perugia and professor in GIS and Geomorphology. The major research topics are
the integration of conventional geomorphological approaches with GIS and Remote Sensing
capability, to develop a quantitative study of landscape evolution. She was principal
investigator and coordinator of several research projects focused on applied geomorphology,
cultural heritage preservation and promotion and digital cartography.
Rita T. Melis is Associate Professor of Physical Geography and Geomorphology at the
University of Cagliari. Her research topics are geoarchaeology and paleoenvironmental
reconstructions and Quaternary geomorphology. Her principal present-day field interest is
Pleistocene and Holocene landscape evolution and the way former civilizations interacted with
their environment, especially in Italy and Ethiopia.
Enrico Miccadei is Associate Professor of Physical Geography and Geomorphology at the
Department of Engineering and Geology, “G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara.
Responsible of research projects in Central Italy, Adriatic Sea, Alps, Mauritius, Ethiopia and
Svalbard Islands, concerning geological and geomorphological mapping, landscape evolution,
natural hazard Scientific Coordinator and Director of CARG Project, Geological Mapping of
Italy (Geological Survey of Italy). Landslide analysis expert and coordinator of IFFI Project
Landslide inventory (Geological Survey of Italy) and PAI Project (Abruzzo Region).
Giovanni Mortara is Associate Researcher of CNR-IRPI Torino. He carries out research in
the field of natural instability in Italian and Himalayan glacial environment. He coordinates the
glaciological campaigns in the Italian Western Alps on behalf of the Italian Glaciology
Committee. He ensures the dissemination of geological culture and promotes projects of
valorization of geomorphological sites. He participates in international cooperation projects,
developing environmental awareness programmes in Sahelian countries.
Olivia Nesci is Associate Professor of Physical Geography at the Department of Pure and
Applied Sciences, University of Urbino. Her scientific activity has been conducted in the field
of geomorphology. Her best-known works concern the genesis and evolution of the physical
landscape of central-northern Italy and cultural geomorphology. She has published four books
on the landscape of central Italy.
Gilberto Pambianchi is Full Professor of Physical Geography and Geomorphology at the
School of Science and Technologies, University of Camerino. He is the author of more than
100 scientific papers (publications and thematic books), regarding to Environmental Geology,
Geomorphology and Applied Geomorphology. The scientific activity concerns mainly tectonic
and fluvial geomorphology, large-scale gravitational phenomena, geomorphological mapping.
He is President of the Italian Association of Physical Geography and Geomorphology (AIGeo)
since 2012.
xx
Mario Panizza is Emeritus Professor of Geomorphology at the University of Modena and
Reggio Emilia. He was Delegate for International Relationships, Head of the Earth Sciences
Department, Member of the Academic Senate and President and founder of the Degree on
Cultural Heritage. Degrees “honoris causa” in Geomorphology and in Geography. Former
President and Honorary Fellow of International Association of Geomorphologists, Italian
Association of Physical Geography and Geomorphology, Italian Association Geology &
Tourism and European Center for Geomorphological Hazards. He is IUCN and UNESCO
scientific advisor. Scientific activity in many countries around the world with more than 300
publications.
Valeria Panizza is Associate Professor of Geography at the University of Sassari, where she
teaches Geography of Landscape and Environment and also Geography of Coastal Landscapes. Her research focuses mainly on geomorphosite assessment in Sardinia, on the promotion of natura land-scape through geotourism and on geomorphological risk assessment
related to the tourist use of the mountain environment.
Alessandro Pasuto is Research Director at the Italian National Research Council (CNR). He
is responsible of the Padova Branch of the Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection
(IRPI). His research activity is mainly focused on applied geology and geomorphology with
particular interest in landslide hazard and risk assessment and management. He is involved in
research activities in several foreign countries such as Japan, Taiwan, China, Malta, Argentina
and manages research groups in Italy and abroad. He is author of more than 160 scientific
papers and book chapters.
Manuela Pelfini is Full Professor of Physical Geography and Geomorphology at the Earth
Science Department “A. Desio”, University of Milano. She works on the spatio-temporal
evolution of landscapes as a response to climate change, especially in the high mountain
environment. Her research includes landscape valorisation, geomorphological hazards related
to mountain tourism and dendrogeomorphology. Her study areas are located in the Italian Alps
and Apennines.
Luisa Pellegrini is Associate Professor of Geomorphology at the Department of Earth and
Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia. Her research is mainly focused on geomorphological and applied geomorphological topics, with particular attention to fluvial morphogenesis and oro-hydrographic evolution, geomorphological mapping and the application of
geomorphology in studies concerning hydrogeological instability and related hazards and
risks. She is a Member of the Directive Council and Vice-President of the Italian Association
of Physical Geography and Geomorphology (AIGeo).
Sandra Piacente is former Associate Professor of Geography, Environmental Geology and
Cultural Geomorphology at the Earth Sciences Department, University of Modena and Reggio
Emilia. She carried out research and teaching activities at the Universities of Bari, Ferrara and
Modena with over 100 papers concerning Climatology, Geomorphology, Resources and
Natural Risks, Environmental Education, Didactics of Sciences and Appraisal of Geological
Heritage, with particular attention to problems of Cultural Landscape and Philosophy of
Science. She is member of the Italian Commission on Geoethics within the Italian Federation
of Earth Sciences.
Tommaso Piacentini is Associate Professor of Physical Geography and Geomorphology at
“G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, Department of Engineering and Geology. His
research interests are broadly focused on geological and geomorphological mapping, tectonic
geomorphology and landscape evolution, natural hazard analysis, in Central Italy, Adriatic
Sea, Mauritius Island, Ethiopia and Svalbard Islands. He has published several papers in
international journals and several geological and geomorphological maps in scientific journals
and for the Geological Survey of Italy.
Editors and Contributors
Editors and Contributors
xxi
Pierluigi Pieruccini is Researcher of Geomorphology at the Department of Physics, Earth
and Environmental Science, University of Siena. His main research fields include Geomorphological and Quaternary Geology Mapping, Quaternary Stratigraphy, Applied Geomorphology, Neotectonics, Geoarchaeology and Soil Micromorphology. Research activities were
carried on in Italy (Alps, Apennines, Islands), Ecuador, Bolivia and Ethiopia.
Gaetano Robustelli is Associate Professor of Geomorphology at the Department of Biology,
Ecology and Earth Sciences (DiBEST), University of Calabria, where he has been teaching
Geomorphology and Geomorphological Mapping. His research interests cover a number of
topics, including slope and alluvial processes and landforms. He is the author of geological
and geomorphological maps and guides of southern Italy, and has published over 60
peer-reviewed scientific publications in national and international journals of geology and
geomorphology.
Claudia Romagnoli is Associate Professor of Stratigraphy and Sedimentology in the Geological Division of the Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences,
University of Bologna. Her interests mainly deal with marine and coastal geology, she is also
involved in researches on risks assessment and mitigation. She is author of several papers and
maps on the submarine portions of the Aeolian volcanoes.
Edoardo Rotigliano is Associate Professor of Applied Geomorphology at the Dipartimento
di Scienze della Terra e del Mare, University of Palermo. His research activity mainly deals
with landslide and water erosion susceptibility assessment by means of stochastic approaches
and the study of the “calanchi” landforms.
Silvio G. Rotolo is Associate Professor of Petrology at the Dipartimento di Scienze della
Terra e del Mare, University of Palermo. His research interests are focused on the petrology of
volcanism, experimental petrology and tephrostratigraphy.
Filippo Russo is Full Professor of Geomorphology at the University of Sannio, Benevento.
He is member Executive Board of the Italian Association of Physical Geography and Geomorphology (AIGeo), affiliated to IAG (International Association of Geomorphologists). He
was CNR visiting researcher to the University of Glasgow (Scotland). In addition, he was
President of the Geological Sciences Degree and Head of the Department of Geological and
Environmental Studies at the University of Sannio. Finally, he is the author of more than one
hundred scientific papers, maps and divulgative books.
Paolo Sansò is Associate Professor of Physical Geography and Geomorphology at the
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies (Di.S.Te.B.A.),
University of Salento. His research focuses mainly on the reconstruction of Apulia landscape
evolution in response to tectonics, sea-level oscillations and climate change during the Quaternary. Moreover, he investigated the morphogenetic effects of historical tsunamis along the
Apulian coast and the present evolution of Apulian landscape due to karst processes.
Daniele Savelli is Associate Professor at the Department of Pure and Applied Sciences,
University of Urbino. He authored more than 100 articles in the fields of geomorphology and
Quaternary geology. His research mainly focused of the central-northern Apennines, with
concerns on late Quaternary terraces, geoarchaeology and natural heritage.
Claudio Smiraglia is Full Professor of Physical Geography and Geomorphology at the Earth
Science Department “A. Desio”, University of Milano. He works in the field of glacial and
periglacial geomorphology, glaciology and climatology, rock glaciers and the recent dynamics
of high mountain environments. In addition to study sites located mainly in the Central and
Western Italian Alps, he has taken part in scientific expeditions to glaciers on different continents (Africa, Asia, South America and Antarctica).
xxii
Mauro Soldati is Associate Professor of Geomorphology at the Department of Chemical and
Geological Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy. His research deals with
geomorphology and slope instability, with special emphasis on landslides and climatic change.
He is Vice-President of the International Association of Geomorphologists (IAG) for the
period 2013–2017. He is a member of the Editorial Board of the Geomorphology, as well as of
other international journals, and has been guest-editor of special issues of the journal dealing
with landslides. He is author or co-author of about 160 papers.
Marino Sorriso-Valvo has been Researcher at CNR-IRPI of Cosenza from 1972 to 2010. He
achieved the positions of First Researcher (1988), Director of Research (1990), Director of
Institute (Cosenza IRPI, 1996–2002), Director of National Institute (Perugia IRPI, 2008–
2009). He is presently CNR Associate Researcher. He has been teaching Engineering Geology
at Universities of Calabria and Reggio Calabria. His research interests are mainly geomorphology and geology applied to mass movement and erosion. He published more than 150
papers, many of which in international journals.
Daniele Spizzichino is engineer at the Geological Survey of Italy (ISPRA) with an extensive
experience in IT applied in different sectors of civil and environmental engineering. He has a
Ph.D. on Earth System Sciences. His work is focuses on natural hazard risk assessment and
numerical modelling; environmental impact assessment; elaboration of conservation plan for
Cultural Heritage preservation; monitoring system design and management, executive design
of mitigation works. He has published many articles in scientific journal papers.
Marco Stefani is Associate Professor of Geology at the University of Ferrara. His work
mainly deals with the stratigraphy of sedimentary rocks, ranging from Triassic carbonate
platforms and basins to late Quaternary deposits of Italian alluvial plains, the Po Delta area and
the Adriatic Sea. He also works on the interaction between the fluvial evolution and the urban
history and the modulating effect of the subsurface stratigraphy architecture on the seismic
danger.
Nicola Surian is Associate Professor at the Department of Geosciences at the University of
Padova. His research interests are primarily focused on fluvial processes (e.g. channel
adjustments, sediment transport) and on the application of geomorphological approaches in
river management and restoration. He has studied different fluvial environments, but a large
part of his research has dealt with large gravel-bed rivers. He is author of several papers and
book chapters in international journals and monographs.
Claudio Tellini is Full Professor of Geomorphology at the University of Parma. His research
is mostly directed to the Emilia Apennines, Alps and the Po Plain and regards topics such as
morpho-tectonics, morphodynamic evolution of landscape, slope instability, geological and
geomorphological mapping, fluvial processes. He is author of more than 100 publications.
Claudio Antonio Tranne is Researcher of Volcanology in the Geological Division of the
Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna.
His scientific researches have been focused on different aspects of volcanic areas. He is author
of several scientific papers, published on international and Italian journals, together with
geological maps and guides.
Francesco Troiani is Researcher of Geomorphology at the Department of Earth Sciences,
Sapienza University of Rome. His research focuses on tectonic geomorphology, physical
geography and applied geomorphology. He completed geomorphological research in
central-northern Apennines of Italy, south-eastern Alps, Spanish Pyrenees and central
America.
Alessio Valente is Researcher and Adjunct Professor of Physical Geography at the Sannio
University, Benevento. He is a member of the AIGeo (Italian Association of Physical
Geography and Geomorphology), affiliated to the IAG (International Association of
Editors and Contributors
Editors and Contributors
xxiii
Geomorphologists). He is a member of Scientific Committee of the Geopark of Cilento, Vallo
di Diano and Alburni. His principal scientific interests, documented by more than 60 scientific
papers and collaboration in research programs, are about coastal and fluvial geomorphology,
environmental geology and geological heritage valorisation.
Mario Valletta was chief geologist of Italian Geological Survey and professor at the
Universities of Benevento and Viterbo. Nowadays he is member of the technical and scientific
council of Rocca di Cerere Geopark, consultant of Section of Environmental Geology,
Geotourism and Geosite of IEMEST (Euro-Mediterranean Institute of Science and Technology) and past vice-president of Italian Association Geologia & Turismo. He is co-author of
more than 30 contributions on geological mapping, geological-applied mapping and environmental–geological mapping and more than 100 publications.
Vittoria Vandelli is Ph.D. student in Geomorphology at the Department of Chemical and
Geological Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. Her research activity focuses
on glacial geomorphology in the Italian Dolomites. She also deals with coastal geomorphology within a project of the EUR-OPA Major Hazard Agreement, Council of Europe, on
the integration of coastal and marine datasets, including issues related to the protection and
appraisal of sites of geological and natural interest.
Pier Luigi Vercesi is Professor of Geology at the Department of Earth and Environmental
Sciences, University of Pavia. His scientific works are focused especially on geological,
neotectonic and geomorphological topics. He wrote a high number of papers about sedimentology, stratigraphy, structural geology, geomorphology, neotectonics and he is author of
several geological maps of Alpine and Apennine areas.
1
Introduction to the Landscapes and Landforms
of Italy
Mauro Soldati and Mauro Marchetti
Alle bellezze ed alle ricchezze scientifiche delle Alpi, noi aggiungiamo quelle così diverse dell’Appennino; e
quando avremo descritto i nostri ghiacciai, le nostre rupi e le gole delle Alpi e delle Prealpi, troveremo altri
nuovi mondi da descrivere; le emanazioni gazose, le fontane ardenti, le salse e i vulcani di fango, i veri
vulcani o vivi o spenti, il Vesuvio, l’Etna, poi ancora il mare e le sue isole, i climi diversi, le diverse zone di
vegetazione dalla subtropicale alla glaciale, e così discorrendo, chè l’Italia è quasi (non balbetto nel dirlo)
la sintesi del mondo fisico.
To the beauty and scientific richness of the Alps, we add those so diverse of the Apennines; and when we
have described our glaciers, our cliffs and gorges of the Alps and Prealps, we will find other new worlds to
describe; the gaseous emissions, the fiery fountains, the mud volcanoes, the true volcanoes either alive or
extinguished, the Vesuvius, the Etna, and again the sea and its islands, the different climates, the different
vegetation zones from subtropical to glacial, and so on, because Italy is almost (I do not mumble in saying
it) the synthesis of the physical world.
Antonio Stoppani 1876
II Bel Paese (The Beautiful Country)
Italian landscapes and landforms show an outstanding variety due to long-term geological processes and climate
changes. Landscape diversity in many regions of the country
is also deeply connected with human presence since ancient
times, cultural and political diversity as well as highly varied
customs and traditions. Also for these reasons, Italy has been
a privileged destination for generations of travellers, intellectuals and artists attracted by fascinating landscapes which
perfectly frame architecture and art masterpieces. Nowadays
Italy is one of the most important tourist destinations in the
world, with more than 50 million international visitors every
year.
The first comprehensive essay on the landscape of Italy, II
Bel Paese (‘The Beautiful Country’), was written by Abbot
Antonio Stoppani in 1876. The ‘natural beauties, geology and
physical geography of Italy’ are marvellously described in the
original form of conversations to be held on 29 different
evenings. Noteworthy is also the first compendium of Italian
topographic maps produced in the form of an ‘Atlas of Geographic Types’ by the Florentine professor Olinto Marinelli—
M. Soldati (&)
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Università di
Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 103, 41125 Modena, Italy
e-mail: mauro.soldati@unimore.it
M. Marchetti
Dipartimento di Educazione e Scienze Umane, Università di
Modena e Reggio Emilia, Viale Allegri 9, 42100 Reggio Emilia,
Italy
admirer and friend of William Morris Davis—which was
published by the Istituto Geografico Militare in 1922. Further
and more traditional treatises on the landscape of Italy came a
few years after the Second World War as a witness of the
increasing interest for landscape appraisal. Roberto Almagià
in 1959 provided an outstanding overview of the geography of
Italy, included in two weighty volumes (entitled Italia) published by UTET publishing house. The first illustrates in detail
the physical aspects of the country with the aid of remarkable
photographs and a series of valuable historic and topographic
maps, whilst the second takes into account economic and
human-related aspects. Aldo Sestini in another milestone on
the physical geography of Italy, the book entitled Il Paesaggio
(‘The Landscape’) and published in 1963 by Touring Club
Italiano, stated that the Italian ‘landscape acquires higher
interest and offers more spiritual pleasure when it is observed
by those who are able to recognise the compositional elements, the peculiar variety and the natural and human factors
that contributed to form it’. This is a key issue for those who
wish to approach and get to know the Italian territory.
A strong input to the study of physical landscape of Italy
was made in 1980s by the National Group ‘Geografia Fisica
e Geomorfologia’ (founded in 1982) of the National
Research Council (CNR) which in the year 2000 turned into
the Associazione Italiana di Geografia Fisica e Geomorfologia (AIGeo) currently representing Italy as National
Scientific Member of the International Association of Geomorphologists (IAG). Within this frame, noteworthy is the
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_1
1
2
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti
Fig. 1.1 Location of landscapes and landforms described in Part II of
the book (in brackets are the numbers of respective chapters). 1
Glaciers of Piedmont and Valle d’Aosta (Chap. 6); 2 Valtellina and
Como Lake (Chap. 7); 3 Adamello-Presanella massifs (Chap. 8); 4
Trentino ancient landslides (Chap. 9); 5 Dolomites of Alta Badia
(Chap. 10); 6 Vajont Valley (Chap. 11); 7 Karst in Friuli Venezia
Giulia (Chap. 12); 8 Tagliamento River (Chap. 13); 9 Garda Lake
(Chap. 14); 10 Venice Lagoon (Chap. 15); 11 Po Delta (Chap. 16); 12
Northwestern Apennines’ structural landscape (Chap. 17); 13 Emilia
large-scale landslides (Chap. 18); 14 Emilia-Romagna mud volcanoes
(Chap. 19); 15 Cinque Terre terraced landscape (Chap. 20); 16 Tuscany
hills and valleys (Chap. 21); 17 Urbino Apennine landscape (Chap. 22);
18 Northern Marche coasts (Chap. 23); 19 Central Italy badlands
(Chap. 24); 20 Central Italy tuff cities (Chap. 25); 21 Latium ancient c
volcanoes (Chap. 26); 22 Umbria-Marche intermontane basins
(Chap. 27); 23 Abruzzo mountains (Chap. 28); 24 Rome urban
landscape (Chap. 29); 25 Sardinia granites (Chap. 30); 26 Sardinia
coastal dunes (Chap. 31); 27 Tremiti Islands (Chap. 32); 28 Vesuvius
and Campi Flegrei (Chap. 33); 29 Sorrento peninsula and Amalfi coast
(Chap. 34); 30 Cilento coasts (Chap. 35); 31 Salento peninsula
(Chap. 36); 32 Aspromonte Massif (Chap. 37); 33 Aeolian Islands
(Chap. 38); 34 Capo San Vito Peninsula (Chap. 39); 35 Etna Volcano
(Chap. 40); 36 Pantelleria Island (Chap. 41). The blue rectangle
includes the Lampedusa and Linosa islands which are located
southward, outside the frame (base map courtesy of Litografia Artistica
Cartografica S.r.l., Firenze)
journal Geografia Fisica e Dinamica Quaternaria which has
been an important recipient of studies on the Italian landscapes and landforms since 1978; the journal is managed by
the Comitato Glaciologico Italiano and supported by the
AIGeo.
The book Landscapes and Landforms of Italy, which
comes under the auspices of both the IAG and AIGeo, aims
at providing a synoptic overview of the most spectacular
landscapes of Italy and at showing outstanding landforms
from both a scientific and scenic viewpoint. The volume is
divided into three parts. Part I introduces the great variety of
landscapes and landforms of Italy, providing a background
on geological, geomorphological and climatic aspects. Part
II includes 36 chapters (Fig. 1.1) illustrating different landscapes in a sequence ranging from the high mountains of
Northern Italy (the Alps) to the coastal areas of Southern
Italy and the islands, passing through hilly and mountain
areas of Central Italy (the Apennines). Outstanding landscapes of different origin are described, showing the high
geodiversity of the country which includes glacial, fluvial,
lacustrine,
karst,
volcanic,
coastal,
structural,
gravity-induced and aeolian landscapes. Cultural implications on landscapes are also taken into account by two
specific chapters devoted to the capital city of Rome and its
urban geomorphology, and to landscapes of Central Italy as
depicted in Italian Renaissance paintings by famous artists
such as Leonardo da Vinci. Part III is concerned with
peculiar aspects of the country and collects thematic chapters
on geoheritage, geomorphodiversity and wine landscapes.
Attention is also given to the famous travel of Johann
Wolfgang von Goethe and its appraisal of Italian geological
landscapes in the eighteenth century.
This book is the result of an exciting joint venture
established among Italian geomorphologists, which has also
included the participation of valuable experts from other
disciplines. More than 80 authors from 29 universities as
well as eight research centres and public agencies have
contributed to the book.
Every chapter has undergone a thorough peer-review by a
team Italian and foreign experts who acted as reviewers,
providing precious contribution to the enhancement of the
quality of the manuscripts. In this respect, we would like to
thank Pierluigi Brandolini, John J. Clague, Doriano Castaldini, Sirio Ciccacci, Paola Coratza, Sunil Kumar De, Maurizio Del Monte, Marta Della Seta, Monique Fort, Paola
Fredi, Christian Giusti, Giuseppe Mastronuzzi, Piotr Migon,
Gilberto Pambianchi, Mario Panizza, Alessandro Pasuto,
Manuela Pelfini, Luisa Pellegrini, Emmanuel Reynard,
Daniele Savelli, John A. Schembri and Claudio Tellini.
We are also very grateful to Piotr Migon, Series Editor,
for having invited us to join the amazing editorial project of
the ‘World Geomorphological Landscapes’, and for his
continuous support. We would also like to acknowledge the
precious suggestions and constant availability of Robert K.
Doe, Springer Senior Publisher, and the assistance by the
Springer book Project Coordinators who took care of this
book with remarkable dedication and patience, in particular
Manjula Saravanan and Mohammed Ali who finalised the
volume production. Finally, we are indebted to Andrew
Goudie for his valuable advice.
Last but not least, our special thanks go to the individual
authors for the enthusiasm with which they responded to our
invitation, and for the outstanding efforts made for the success of this important editorial initiative.
1
Introduction to the Landscapes and Landforms of Italy
3
4
References
Almagià R (1959) L’Italia. UTET, Torino, 1320 pp
Marinelli O (1922) Atlante dei Tipi Geografici. Istituto Geografico
Militare, Firenze, 78 sketches
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti
Sestini A (1963) Il Paesaggio. Touring Club Italiano, Milano, 232 pp
Stoppani A (1876) Il Bel Paese. Conversazioni sulle bellezze naturali.
La Geologia e la Geografia fisica d’Italia. Barbera Ed, Milano,
682 pp
Part I
Physical Environment
2
The Great Diversity of Italian Landscapes
and Landforms: Their Origin and Human
Imprint
Mauro Marchetti, Mauro Soldati, and Vittoria Vandelli
Abstract
An outstanding variety of landscapes and landforms are present in Italy due to its complex
geological history, repeated climate changes and increasing human impact through time.
This chapter highlights the reasons for the geological and geomorphological diversity of the
country by illustrating its geological evolution since the Mesozoic, outlining the
paleogeographic changes that occurred as a consequence of Quaternary climate variations,
and tracing the unique human civilization history that has so strongly influenced landscape
evolution since the Neolithic. Special attention is devoted to the complex history of the
country, where peoples coming from different geographical areas met each other
contributing to make Italy a compendium of cultural diversity capable of attracting
travellers from all over the world. Landscape conservation and protection are finally taken
into account.
Keywords
Landscape
2.1
Climatic change
Introduction
Italy is characterized by extraordinary diversity of landscapes due to its complex long-term geological and climatic
evolution, and its unique human civilization history.
From a geological viewpoint, the shape and physical
configuration of Italy originates from the collision between
the African and Eurasian plates that occurred during the
Cenozoic. This geological event caused the closure of the
Tethys Sea, and was accompanied by the compression and
piling up of its sediments which determined the formation of
the two mountain chains that now characterize the Italian
territory: the Alps and the Apennines. This tectonic
M. Marchetti
Dipartimento di Educazione e Scienze Umane, Università di
Modena e Reggio Emilia, Viale Allegri 9, Reggio Emilia, 42100,
Italy
M. Soldati V. Vandelli (&)
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Università di
Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 103, Modena, 41125, Italy
e-mail: vittoria.vandelli@unimore.it
Paleogeography
History
Italy
evolution is still ongoing, causing remarkable seismic and
volcanic activity, which threaten human settlements and
activities. The diversity of Italian landscapes is also due to
the wide variety of lithotypes, including the pre-orogenic
basement and the successive sedimentary cover.
Dramatic climate changes affected Italy in the last
25,000 years leading to relevant geographical and morphoclimatic changes, including remarkable coastline variations.
At present, diverse climatic conditions characterize the
country influencing landform evolution. This is principally
due to the wide latitudinal extent of Italy, and to the altitudinal range from over 4800 m to sea level, and locally
below. In addition, the presence of the Alps and Apennines
significantly influences the general air circulation; the fact
that the country is enveloped by the sea along ca. 7500 km
determines also a significant variety of regional and local
morphoclimatic conditions.
The human presence since prehistoric times has itself
profoundly contributed to the shaping of Italian landscapes.
Numerous and different communities who alternatively ruled
and lived in the Italian territory have left a clear imprint in
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_2
7
8
M. Marchetti et al.
the land use and management (such as terracing, land
reclamation, management of water courses, land division,
farming), providing the means to make Italy a compendium
of environmental diversity where, through time, a
melting-pot of different cultures developed thanks to
Mediterranean, Slavic and German influxes. This has also
provided the ground for the development of Italian “cultural
landscape” which has attracted travellers and visitors for a
long time.
2.2
Physiography of Italy
Italy consists of a peninsula elongated in a N–S direction
into the central Mediterranean Sea and of two major islands,
Sardinia and Sicily (Fig. 2.1). The peninsula and Sicily show
a peculiar boot shape delimited in the north by the Alps. The
Mediterranean Sea enveloping Italy locally takes different
names, such as the Tyrrhenian Sea to the west, the Adriatic
Sea to the east, and the Ionian Sea to the southeast of the
mainland.
From an administrative viewpoint, Italy borders France to
the west, Switzerland and Austria to the north and Slovenia
to the east. It is worth noting that within the Italian peninsula
two foreign states are included: San Marino (61.2 km2) and
Vatican City (0.44 km2).
Coasts represent an important geographic feature of Italy,
since they extend for 7375 km (ISTAT 2015) offering a
great diversity of coastal landscapes and landforms (Fredi
and Lupia Palmieri 2017). Mountainous and hilly areas
prevail over lowlands (Table 2.1) due to the presence of the
Alps and the Apennines which dominate the country from a
physiographic viewpoint due to their continuity and significant average altitude (Federici 2000). The Alps, as well as
the seas encircling the peninsula, protected Italy from
invasions; in historic times, the Apennines constituted the
backbone of the country and also a geographical and cultural
divide.
The two mountain chains heavily influence the climate of
the country since they control wind circulation and precipitation patterns. The Alps protect the Po Plain from the cold
currents from Central Europe, while the Apennines restrain
the influence of maritime humid air to the west-facing
Tyrrhenian side (Fratianni and Acquaotta 2017). The Alps
also host a number of glaciers, especially in its western side
(Giardino et al. 2017).
The distribution and regime of rivers are strongly influenced by the presence of the Alps and Apennines, with the
Fig. 2.1 Italy: physical and political setting. The latter displays the 20 administrative regions. The blue rectangles include the Lampedusa and
Linosa islands which are located southward, outside the frame (base maps courtesy of Litografia Artistica Cartografica S.r.l., Firenze)
2
The Great Diversity of Italian Landscapes and Landforms: Their Origin and Human Imprint
9
Table 2.1 Numbers of Italy
Schematic description of main physiographic features of Italy according to: (1) ISTAT (2015); (2) Marchetti (2008); (3) Fredi and Pelfini (2008);
(4) De Pippo and Valente (2008); (5) Smiraglia and Diolaiuti (2015); (6) Fratianni and Acquaotta (2017)
10
M. Marchetti et al.
rivers flowing from the Alps being longer and having higher
discharge. Plain areas are not frequent in Italy though the
northern part of the country is dominated by the Po Plain
(constituting 70% of level areas of Italy) which results from
the accumulation of fluvial sediments deposited by the main
Italian river during the last one million years. Lakes of different origin are present throughout Italy. The main lakes
located at the southern margin of the Alps are related to both
structural causes and action of ancient glaciers (Table 2.1).
Central Italy is instead characterized by a series of volcanic
lakes (Fredi and Ciccacci 2017).
The main geographic features of the country are reported
in Table 2.1.
2.3
Long-Term Geological History
and Paleogeography of Italy
Italy is characterized by considerable geological diversity
which is largely related to its long-term geological history
(Bosellini 2005, 2017). The topical geological events which
have made Italy such a complex land from a tectonic and
lithologic viewpoint will be briefly described below, as well
as the main climatic phases which profoundly changed the
geography of Italy through time due to remarkable sea-level
variations.
At the beginning of the Mesozoic (ca. 250 Ma BP), when
all continents were joined into one (Pangea supercontinent)
and surrounded by a single ocean (Panthalassa) most of the
Italian peninsula was submerged by the relatively shallow
and warm waters of the Tethys Gulf (Fig. 2.2). The Triassic
Italian landscape was substantially different from the
present-day one: most of the contemporary lands were
covered by a shallow, epi-continental sea. Locally there were
groups of white sandy atolls surrounded by deep sea branches and protected by huge coral reefs. The latter, due to
mountain building processes, have been uplifted more than
3000 m and nowadays constitute some of the most spectacular landforms of the Dolomites (Soldati 2010). Coastal
areas hosted tidal flats, lagoons and small evaporitic basins
where fine calcareous sediments were rhythmically deposited constituting today’s thick layered dolomitic rocks. At
that time only part of Sardinia and Tuscany were emerged
within the arid paleo-European continent. The Triassic
landscape did not last more than ca. 50 Ma years; in fact,
with the Jurassic opening of the Piedmont-Liguria Ocean all
previous emerged lands were covered by an extensive
oceanic basin.
In the Paleogene (from ca. 66 to 23 Ma BP), in effect of
Piedmont-Liguria Ocean closure and the consequent continental collision, uplift of the Alpine and Apennine chains
occurred. During the Tortonian (from 11.6 to 7.2 Ma BP)
most of the Italian peninsula was still under the sea level:
Fig. 2.2 Southern Europe at the beginning of Mesozoic (ca. 250 Ma
BP)
Apulia, most of the Alps and Apennines, Corsica and Sardinia were the only emerged areas. Between the
Corsica-Sardinia block and the Apennine chain, the youngest of the Italian seas was born: the Tyrrhenian Sea. The
latter at present reaches depths of 3800 m and is characterized by a series of volcanic islands and submerged volcanoes; among the latter noteworthy is Marsili which is
considered the largest European volcano. Thanks to the
opening of the Tyrrhenian Sea the Apennine chain migrated
towards the east and progressively emerged above sea level.
During the Messinian (from 7.2 to 5.3 Ma BP), evaporation was dominant in the Mediterranean Sea and, like
today, the inflows coming from the Atlantic Ocean played a
fundamental role in sustaining the sea level. At that time the
communication with the Atlantic Ocean was drastically
interrupted—the reasons for which are still debated—leading to almost complete desiccation of the Mediterranean
basin and to huge precipitation of evaporites (e.g. gypsum
and halite). At the same time, during the drying up of the
Mediterranean Sea, the Apennine uplift continued. As a
consequence, today it is possible to find outcrops of evaporites along the entire Apennine chain, from Piedmont to
Sicily, such as the spectacular Vein of Gypsum of Romagna
Apennines. At the time of the Messinian salinity crisis, the
Tyrrhenian Sea was reduced to a brackish basin delimited by
a steep arid slope, the Messina Strait was an emerged plateau
and all along the peninsula spectacular canyon systems
developed in correspondence with former rivers.
Once the communication with the Atlantic Ocean was
re-established (early Pliocene; about 5 Ma BP), the sea quite
rapidly invaded the Mediterranean basin reaching a level
higher than today. At the same time the Apennines almost
reached their present position and the Tyrrhenian Sea
increased in its depth. Next to the Apennine chain new volcanic centres were formed such as Colli Albani and Campi
Flegrei (Aucelli et al. 2017; Fredi and Ciccacci 2017).
2
The Great Diversity of Italian Landscapes and Landforms: Their Origin and Human Imprint
During the Pliocene (from 5.3 to 2.5 Ma BP), Italy still
showed landscape configuration very different from that of
today. The sea enveloped the Alps and the Apennines, the
latter displaying a multitude of archipelagos (Fig. 2.3). The
11
Po Plain did not exist yet and the coastline was shifted up to a
few hundred kilometres inland. Many species characteristic
of tropical seas such as sharks, marine mammals, shells of
different shape and colours—of which outstanding remnants
Fig. 2.3 Italy during the Pliocene (from 5.3 to 2.5 Ma BP) (base map courtesy of Litografia Artistica Cartografica S.r.l., Firenze)
12
are preserved as fossil records—populated the Pliocene sea
which was much warmer than today. In correspondence to
the present Po Plain there was a wide and deep gulf where
Pliocene rivers flowed into and built fan-deltas. At that time
the shoreline was adjacent to the foothills of the Apennines
(Pede-Apennines). This gulf would have been filled by debris
if it had not been for the contemporary basin subsidence. The
transition from marine to continental environments was due
to the prevailing sediment supply outpacing subsidence, and
also to incipient glacial phases during which a considerable
increase in sediment production took place in mountain areas.
In fact, during the glaciation a great quantity of water was
stored within continental glaciers and thus the sea level was
lower than today and large amounts of sediment reached the
plain (Marchetti 2002; Fontana et al. 2014).
During the Quaternary, that is during the last 2.5 Ma, the
Italian peninsula experienced well-documented cyclic alternations of sea-level highstands and lowstands. The three
principal contributions to sea-level changes along the Italian
coasts are eustatic variation, glacio-hydro isostasy and vertical tectonic movements, such as the uplift of Calabria and
Sicily and subsidence of the northern Adriatic area (Lambeck et al. 2011).
The last glaciation, which commenced ca. 110,000 years
BP, has profoundly influenced landscape evolution and its
traces are still clearly visible, especially in northern Italy.
The shift of morphoclimatic belts determined different distribution of flora and fauna, the latter being drastically
reduced and forced to migrate southward. During the Last
Glacial Maximum (LGM, 24,000–18,000 years BP) the
Alps were almost completely covered by glaciers as a nearly
continuous thick ice sheet (it is estimated that in some areas
the ice sheet reached 1800 m in thickness) that extended
over an area of about 30,000 km2 (Fig. 2.4) while the present glaciers’ area is only of 500 km2 (Antonioli and Vai
2004). Glaciers occupied large tracts of the Alpine foothills
in northern Italy, since they expanded along the valleys and
merged with each other to form typical piedmont glaciers.
Glaciers also developed in some Apennine valleys, especially in those with northern aspect. During the LGM sea
level was 130 m lower than today and a widespread alluvial
plain developed over the entire northern Adriatic basin. The
Po River Delta was located between Ancona and Pescara, in
correspondence of the northern scarp of the Meso-Adriatic
depression, and the Po River flowed in a slightly southern
position from its present path. The Maltese archipelago and
Sicily were linked by a bridge 105 km long and 38 km wide
(Furlani et al. 2013) and Corsica and Sardinia were joined
together, too. The landscape during the LGM was typically
glacial and arid, with arctic tundra and grassy steppe covering the foothills of the Alps and Apennines and irregular
deciduous and coniferous forest along the Mediterranean
coast. Present-day Alpine glacial lakes and valleys testify to
M. Marchetti et al.
the erosive power of LGM glaciers whose maximum
extension is revealed by majestic moraine amphitheatres.
After the LGM the global climate shifted towards warmer
and wetter conditions through alternation between cool and
mild periods. It is during the transition from glacial to interglacial conditions that Italy, as well as many parts of the Earth,
underwent the most outstanding climatic and environmental
changes during the last 20,000 years (Orombelli and Ravazzi
1996). Finally, during the early Holocene post-glacial Climatic Optimum—the warmest climate of the post-glacial
period—the average surface temperature was ca. 2 °C higher
than today (Vai and Cantelli 2004). Alpine and Apennine
glaciers progressively diminished in size or even disappeared,
whilst flora and fauna gradually recolonized mountain areas.
The Adriatic Sea inundated once more the Po Plain and the
Italian shoreline approached in stages its present arrangement.
Minor climate changes occurred in historical times,
among which noteworthy are the warmer climate phase in
correspondence of the Roman period and the so-called
Medieval Climatic Optimum (between 800 and 1150 AD).
The coldest period of the Holocene was the Little Ice Age
that occurred between ca. 1550 and 1850 and has left
remarkable traces within many Alpine valleys. During this
period the Italian glaciers advanced significantly; for
example the Rutor Glacier (Valle d’Aosta) was 1 km longer
than now.
2.4
History and Civilization
Until the early Holocene the shaping of Italian landscape
was exclusively driven by natural processes. Starting from
about 7000 years ago—in correspondence with the spreading of agriculture in Italy—Man has progressively become
the principal actor of landscape modelling in many regions
of the country.
The first hominin traces discovered in the Italian peninsula date back to 850,000 years ago thanks to the dating of
layers including lithic tools at Mt. Poggiolo, in the
Pede-Apennines of Emilia-Romagna (Muttoni et al. 2011).
However, the most ancient human remains found so far is a
child’s tooth collected at the Palaeolithic archaeological site
of La Pineta, near Isernia (Molise, Central Italy), which is
ca. 600,000 years old (Peretto et al. 2015).
In the second millennium BC, an Indo-European population moved towards the Po Plain and the Terramara culture
developed in correspondence to a climatic period characterized by a decrease in temperature and by an increase of
rainfall (Pinna 1996). These climate conditions could have
forced the Terramara civilization to live in stilt houses to
protect themselves from recurring floods; in this context they
tried to modify the landscape to manage water resources
through canalizations, deforestation for building, agricultural
2
The Great Diversity of Italian Landscapes and Landforms: Their Origin and Human Imprint
and grazing purposes. The deforestation of the Po Plain,
which already started during the Neolithic period, dramatically increased during the Terramara civilization. At the start
13
of the Iron Age, between ninth and eighth century BC, the
Villanovan civilization characterized a large area between
Emilia-Romagna and Campania.
Fig. 2.4 Italy during the LGM, 24,000–18,000 years BP; Alpine and Apennine glaciers are outlined in turquoise; red dots indicate glaciers of
limited extension (base map courtesy of Litografia Artistica Cartografica S.r.l., Firenze)
14
In the eighth century BC, the Etruscan civilization developed first on hilly, fertile and water rich areas of Central Italy,
the so-called Etruria region (mainly corresponding to the present Tuscany Region) and later they reached the Po Plain in the
north, and Campania in the south. The Etruscans were expert
farmers: they performed water canalizations for irrigation and
modified river courses profoundly shaping the landscape. In the
same period, Greek colonies widely developed in southern
Italy. The Greeks also left a clear imprint on the landscape
through the building of world famous cities and temples, such
as at Agrigento and Siracusa (Sicily)—which implied the
extraction of limestone from local quarries—and through the
practice of intensive cultivations, especially of cereals, olive
trees and grapevines.
However the most influential civilization which developed
on the Italian territory in ancient times was the Roman one.
Traditionally, the foundation of Rome is dated to 753 BC when
the Etruscans in the north and the Greeks in the south were
dominating over most of Italy. In 509 BC Rome became a
republic. Starting from a small settlement of farmers and
shepherds along the Tiber River (Del Monte 2017), the
Romans soon conquered the whole Italian peninsula. As a
result of the victory in the Punic Wars, fought against the
Phoenicians between 244 and 146 BC, the Romans started their
expansion and domination on the Mediterranean regions which
in the following centuries resulted in a large empire (established
by Emperor Augustus in 27 BC) stretching from northern
Europe to the Middle East.
The Romans were responsible for a profound landscape
transformation, whose traces remain visible nowadays in
many parts of Italy. They created a dense, but extremely
well organized network of urban centres characterized by
extraordinary buildings and infrastructures, such as roads,
bridges and aqueducts. Extraordinary roads were built to
facilitate commercial activities and military actions (e.g.
Via Appia from Rome to Apulia; Via Aurelia from Rome
to France; Via Cassia from Rome to Tuscany). They all
preserve their original path and are still in use. The most
striking imprint on plain rural areas left by the Romans
was the Centuriation, a regular square grid subdivision of
cultivated lands outlined by orthogonal crossing roads and
canals (Fig. 2.5). This practice started with its classical
features in the third century BC and developed for about
four centuries. The Po Plain was largely affected by this
type of land management which followed intense deforestation (up to 60% of the Po Plain was deforested during
Roman times). Deforestation caused a general increase in
soil erosion which resulted in gully development in the
hilly areas of the Northern Apennines and fluvial aggradation in the Emilia-Romagna plain due to the high
availability of sediment. At that time there was also a
M. Marchetti et al.
substantial progradation of the Po Delta into the Adriatic
Sea (Stefani 2017).
Since the Bronze Age attempts of land reclamation and
drainage of marshy areas were several but almost all of them
failed. The most famous land reclamation attempts during
Roman times were the works on Pontine marshes ordered by
Emperor Augustus and the implementation of a gallery
(longer than 5 km) that linked the Fucino Lake to Liri Valley
(Latium) by Emperor Claudius in the first century AD, to
avoid the frequent lake floods.
After a period of prosperity (first and second century
AD), characterized by warm climate conditions, starting
from third century AD the Roman Empire fell into economic
and political crises; in the fifth century AD repeated barbaric
invasions—possibly related also to the search for more
favourable quality of life during a cold and humid climate
phase—progressively reduced the influence of the Western
Roman Empire to Italy only (Fig. 2.6). Among those invasions, the most striking was probably that of Attila the king
of the Huns (people coming from North Central Asia) which
occurred in 452 AD. It seems that the birth of the city of
Venice is related to these attacks when the inhabitants of
villages of northeastern Italy moved to the Venetian Lagoon
to protect themselves. In 476 AD Odoacre, coming from
Pannonia (present western Hungary), deposed the last
Roman Emperor of the Western Empire, Romulus Augustulus. The year 476 AD is conventionally attributed to the
beginning of the Middle Ages.
During the Early Middle Ages, neglect in water and
land management, accompanied by climate deterioration,
resulted in frequent floods which periodically submerged
plain areas causing the spread of malaria in former salubrious and dry areas. A famous catastrophic event is represented by the breach of Adige near Verona on 17
October 589 AD. As reported by Paul the Deacon, this
flooding event partially destroyed the walls of the city of
Verona. This period is characterized by economic and
demographic crisis: barbaric invasions and epidemics,
among which the terrible bubonic plague, reduced the
Italian population to less than a half. As a consequence of
the demographic crisis, agriculture activity drastically
decreased; only some vegetable gardens and orchards
remained around villages for local supply, and the forest
expanded. Locally, clearings occurred carried out by
monks and nobles devoted to agricultural practices.
During the Middle Ages attempts to restore the former
Roman Empire failed under the advance of the Longobards, a people of Germanic origin that was ruling Italy
between 568 and 774 AD. Only in the ninth century,
Charles the Great (Charlemagne) once defeated the Longobards and added northern Italy to the Holy Roman
2
The Great Diversity of Italian Landscapes and Landforms: Their Origin and Human Imprint
15
Fig. 2.5 Evidence of Roman
Centuriation in the Emilia plain
between Modena and Bologna
(Northern Italy). Red lines outline
the traces of the original land
subdivision on satellite image (©
2016 Google) and topographic map
(Source C.T.R. Emilia-Romagna,
scale 1:25,000— licence at http://
geoportale.regione.emiliaromagna.it/Projects/geoportale/
get_license_view?tipo_licenza=
CC-BY%202.5)
Empire of which he became the first Emperor on 25
December 800 AD. At the same time, central Italy was part
of the Papal States and southern Italy and Sicily were
contended by the Byzantine Empire and Arabs, until the
progressive conquest (eleventh and twelfth century) by the
Normans who were descendants of the Vikings. After the
death of Charles the Great, the Holy Roman Empire progressively lost its original integrity due to power struggles
and repeated invasions.
A generalized climate warming and consequent partial
ice-melting happened between 800 and 1150 AD—the
so-called Medieval Climatic Optimum—causing sea-level
rise, altering river dynamics and favouring wide development of marshes in plain areas. The spreading of forests and
marshes together with Arab and Norman invasions forced
populations to move from the coast to the hinterland and
settle in fortified villages on hills. The Mesola Forest represents a remaining patch of the ancient planitial and thermophile forest that once ran along the Adriatic shoreline
toward the north. It grows on sandbars probably formed
between twelfth and fifteenth century AD.
The expansion of Medieval Communes which turned into
powerful City States during the eleventh century, together
with commercial activities, determined the modification of
rural landscape, especially in northern and central Italy, by
means of deforestation, quarrying and road building. The
most influent City States evolved in several kingdoms and
dukedoms.
The Italian Renaissance (fifteenth–sixteenth century)
saw the flowering of arts and culture; the rural transformation left the most widespread imprint on the territory:
plain areas underwent canalization, wide fields were used
for farming and for sheep’s grazing purposes, hillslopes
were extensively terraced for olive tree and grapevine
cultivation, deforestation and tillage were extended up to
mountain areas. Towers and fortifications rose in strategic
sites and around cities. During this period the belief that
nature had to be under man’s control developed, for both
productive and aesthetic needs. However, between 1494
and 1559, Italy repeatedly became the battleground in a
dispute mainly between France and Spain for the hegemony on Europe. The Peace of Cateau-Cambrésis (1559)
ratified the supremacy of Spain on half of the Italian
peninsula including the Dukedom of Milan, the Kingdom
of Naples and the Kingdom of Sicily, which lasted until
the beginning of the eighteenth century.
16
M. Marchetti et al.
Fig. 2.6 Invasions of the Roman Empire between 100 and 500 AD.
Legend: 1 Ostrogoths, 2 Goths, 3 Vandals, 4 Visigoths, 5 Huns, 6
Franks, 7 Jutes, Angles and Saxons, 8 Domain of Western Roman
Empire, 9 Domain of Eastern Roman Empire, 10 Land outside the
Roman empires
As a consequence of the War of the Spanish Succession
(1701–1714), the Spanish domain on the peninsula was
replaced by Austrian Habsburgs domain with the Treaty of
Utrecht (1713) according to which the Kingdom of Naples,
the Kingdom of Sardinia and the Dukedom of Milan passed
under Austria. Sicily instead became part of the Savoy
domain.
Between 1802 and 1815, Napoleon Bonaparte conquered
the peninsula: the northern part was named as the Reign of
Italy and the southern as the Reign of Naples. After the
Congress of Vienna (1814–1815), which was aimed at
resetting the geography of Europe after the turbulent period
of the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars, northern
Italy came under the Habsburg control, southern Italy under
the Bourbons and the Reign of Sardinia (including Piedmont) under Savoy. A large part of Italy was under the Papal
States, while minor dukedoms survived (Fig. 2.7).
The nineteenth century was a period of further landscape
changes due to urban development and the beginning of
industrialization. In northern Italy, innovative cultivation
techniques and irrigation works developed, and a new railway system was emplaced that increased deforestation rate.
It is estimated that between the end of the nineteenth century
and the beginning of the twentieth, forested areas diminished
by 30% (Corona 2015).
The generalized discontent, provoked by the provisions
established by the Congress of Vienna, animated new
nationalistic inspirations that led to popular rebellion against
foreign powers. In this context, the movement of Italian
“Risorgimento” (literally Resurgence)—a period which
Fig. 2.7 Italy after the Vienna Congress (1815). Legend: 1 Reign of
Sardinia; 2 Duchy of Parma, Piacenza and Guastalla; 3 Duchy of
Modena and Reggio; 4 Duchy of Massa and Carrara; 5 Duchy of
Lucca; 6 Grand Duchy of Tuscany; 7 Most Serene Republic of San
Marino; 8 Papal States; 9 Reign of the Two Sicilies; 10 Reign of
France; 11 Swiss Confederation; 12 Austrian Empire; 13 Ottoman
Empire; 14 Other African States
eventually resulted in the unification of the Italian peninsula
under a unique national state—developed. Initially, revolutionary popular uprising developed, successively after the
First (1848–49) and the Second (1859) War of Independence
and the crucial expedition of Giuseppe Garibaldi in the
southern part of the peninsula, Italy was almost completely
unified under a unique reign governed by King Vittorio
Emanuele II (1861). After the Third Independence War
(1866) Veneto was annexed to Italy while Rome—after the
defeat of Papal States and the so-called Capture of Rome (20
September 1870)—became the capital city. Trentino and
Alto Adige (South Tyrol) became however part of the Italian
Reign only after the First World War (1915–1918, in Italy).
During the latter, several areas of the present northeastern
Italy were sites of hard battles which left evident traces.
Noteworthy are mountain areas at the former boundary
between the present regions of Trentino-Alto Adige to the
north and Lombardy, Veneto and Friuli Venezia Giulia to
the south.
A few years after the First World War, which determined
severe social-economic conditions in Italy, Fascism (1922–
1943) developed and lasted until the Second World War
(1940–1945, in Italy). Beyond any political judgment, it
must be emphasized that during this period the Italian urban
2
The Great Diversity of Italian Landscapes and Landforms: Their Origin and Human Imprint
landscape in particular underwent important transformations,
including the emergence of considerable architectural works
and redesign of many Italian cities. However, some rural
landscapes still show the effects of relevant works carried
out especially in suburban areas and in marshy and insalubrious lands (e.g. Agro Pontino) which were reclaimed.
Noteworthy are the extensive works carried out in the Agro
Pontino (Latium), Campidano (Sardinia), and coastal areas
of Emilia-Romagna and Veneto (Federici 2008). It should be
noted that 40% of the present agricultural areas consist of
reclaimed lands which need constant maintenance.
During the Second World War the whole Italian territory was a battleground and as a result it was severely
impacted and suffered from deep economic crisis for some
years. However, on 2 June 1946 a referendum sanctioned
the end of the monarchy and the birth of the Italian
Republic, and two years later the Italian Constitution was
proclaimed. Since then the present partition of Italy in 20
regions (and further subdivisions) was effective (Fig. 2.1).
Since the Second World War the population increased by
more than 30% from 45,910,000 (1946) up to 60,795,600
(2015) inhabitants following a constant growth trend which
determined an increase of almost 300% since 1861
(Fig. 2.8). At present the population is mainly concentrated
in urban and plain areas, also as a result of quite recent
progressive migrations of people, especially from mountain
areas to productive and urbanized areas. The most densely
inhabited regions are Campania, Lombardy and Latium
(Table 2.2). The abandonment of rural areas in the last
decades locally resulted in enhanced slope instability and
land degradation, as happened in some formerly cultivated
terraced areas in Liguria (Brandolini 2017). Nevertheless,
reforestation took place both naturally, on abandoned
lands, and artificially. At present, forested areas more than
double those present at the beginning of the twentieth
century (Corona 2015).
Fig. 2.8 Italian population
growth from 1861 to 2015
(source: ISTAT database)
2.5
17
Landscape Conservation and Protection
The reconstruction following the Second World War progressively led to an inexorable, widespread and sometimes
disordered overbuilding of the territory. Starting from the
end of the 1950s, the years of the second industrial revolution, in correspondence of the so-called Italian economic
miracle, there was an over-exploitation of rural and coastal
areas which implied disruption of pristine landscapes
through deforestation, development of industrial settlements,
enlargement of urban areas, colonization of coastal areas for
tourism purposes, quarrying activities also within riverbeds
(gravel and sand extraction) and so on.
The twentieth century is definitely the period during
which human impact had the greatest influence on the Italian
landscape. During the first half of the twentieth century, only
cultural and political aristocracies and upper classes were
well aware of the value of landscape, but the latter was
appreciated and started to be protected mainly due to its
aesthetic quality. However, during this period landscape
protection issues were recognized also at the central governmental level. In this context, one of the first actions was
the promulgation of law n. 1497 in 1939 which introduced
land planning and restrictions as landscape protection tools.
Subsequently, article 9 of the Italian Constitution (1948)
included landscape as a matter under State protection.
A turning point in landscape protection is related to law n.
431 of 1985 (the so-called Galasso Law) according to which
landscape assets had to be protected not only for their aesthetic and cultural significance but also for their physical
features, both natural or human-related ones. This has led to
the perception of landscape as part of cultural heritage.
Currently, landscape protection is regulated by the Legislative Decree n. 42 promulgated in 2004 known as the “Code
of Cultural Heritage and Landscape” which has collected
and expanded the previously mentioned rules.
18
M. Marchetti et al.
Table 2.2 Regional population density and percentage of inhabitants
Region
PopulaƟon density
(inhabitants/km²)
Inhabitants
(%)
Lombardy
LaƟum
Campania
Sicily
Veneto
Emilia-Romagna
Piedmont
Apulia
Tuscany
Calabria
Sardinia
Liguria
Marche
Abruzzo
Friuli Venezia Giulia
TrenƟno-Alto Adige
Umbria
Basilicata
Molise
Valle d’Aosta
ITALY
419
341
429
197
267
198
174
209
163
130
69
292
165
123
156
77
105
57
70
39
201
16.45
9.69
9.65
8.37
8.11
7.32
7.28
6.72
6.17
3.25
2.73
2.61
2.55
2.19
2.02
1.74
1.47
0.95
0.52
0.21
100
The first protected areas established in Italy—Abruzzo
National Park and Gran Paradiso National Park—date back
to the early 1920s. Many more have been added even
recently; this underlines the growing awareness of landscape
importance and the need of land conservation and protection. Toward a wider protection of the environment stands
the framework law n. 394 of 1991 which ratifies the main
principles for the institution and management of protected
areas at different spatial scales. As a result, the Italian territory is now including nearly 3 million hectares of terrestrial
and marine protected areas constituting almost 10% of the
country. At present 24 national parks, 140 regional parks, 27
marine protected areas, two submarine parks, one sanctuary
of marine mammals plus a large number of natural reserves
are listed by the Italian Ministry of Environment.
With special reference to geological and geomorphological
landscapes, although the concept of geological heritage has
only recently found a proper legislative definition in Italy, the
development of conservation awareness regarding the physical
elements and non-renewable landforms had already been
growing among scientists since the nineteenth century. The
first Italian scientist who recognized the indispensable aid
given by physical elements in understanding the history of the
Earth and mankind was Antonio Stoppani (1824–1891). In
1875 he wrote the famous and conceptually modern book “Il
Bel Paese” (The Beautiful Country) which makes him—thanks
to the valuable overview of the Italian landscapes—a forerunner and appraiser of those features that would have been
later on defined as Geosites. Apart from the work carried out
by a few authors, only in the 1990s a scientific approach to
geoconservation started to develop (e.g. Panizza and Piacente
1993). The recognition and assessment of geosites was functional to protection and conservation actions as well as to
educational activities and tourist promotion (Miccadei et al.
2011; Bollati et al. 2012; Reynard and Coratza 2013; Pica et al.
2016).
The first systematic census of geosites at regional level in
Italy was carried out in Lombardy between the end of the
1970s and the early 1980s, and at present most of the Italian
regions have geosite inventories. At the national level, the
“National Inventory Geosite” project was launched in 2002.
The Inventory contains information on sites of geological,
pedological and geoarchaeological interest, which have been
collected by the Italian National Institute for Environmental
Protection and Research (ISPRA).
Research activity in this field has produced a vast amount
of literature and is being carried on by the co-ordinated
collaboration between research boards, universities and
public administrations, witnessing the increasing awareness
for preservation of geological and geomorphological
2
The Great Diversity of Italian Landscapes and Landforms: Their Origin and Human Imprint
features, as fundamental landscape components. The outstanding value of the Italian physical landscape favoured the
inscription of a number of Italian areas within UNESCO
natural World Heritage Sites (4) and the recognition of
others as Geoparks (9). At present, the Italian natural World
Heritage Sites are the Aeolian Islands, Monte San Giorgio,
Dolomites and Mount Etna (Giovagnoli 2017).
2.6
19
Nowadays Italy is a popular tourist destination. More
than 50 million foreigners visited the country in 2015,
making it the fifth in the world in terms of international
visitations. The Italian tourist economy amounts to more
than 10% of the national GDP and still with a large unexploited potential. Among the reasons to visit Italy is definitely the willingness to see extraordinary, often spectacular
mountainous, volcanic and coastal landforms which make
Italian landscape unique.
Conclusions
The Italian territory is varied and fragmented into a multitude of regions having their own physical and cultural
identity. This is also due to the rise of majestic mountain
chains, locally covered by sparkling ice sheets, to massifs
and sharp peaks located not far away from wide and populous plains crossed by a dense network of rivers, to limestone plateaus characterized by sinkholes, to gentle hills
covered by vineyards and olive groves, to fertile volcanic
areas, and to spectacular but desolate clayey slopes. To this
variety of landscape features have contributed a long-term
geological history, climate changes—which repeatedly
modified the paleogeography of Italy—human activities
since the Neolithic, and a complex history related to the
strategic position of Italy in the Mediterranean region. Since
ancient times, the elongated outline of Italy has favoured
connections and exchanges with surrounding regions, but
mountain chains have tended to separate and isolate people
within specific geographic areas. This has led to an even
higher variety of landscapes and landforms which are in
many areas deeply connected with the human presence and
different types of land use due to cultural and political
diversity as well as to highly varied customs and traditions.
This is still reflected in the extraordinary and valuable cultural heritage that characterizes and differentiates most of the
Italian regions: architecture, literature, cultivation type and
pattern, dialects, food, etc. Evidence of the complex evolution of Italian landscapes and landforms, which can be
themselves considered as part of the national cultural heritage, is well preserved in many parts of the country despite
the high density of population and industrial development
that occurred in the last decades.
For the reasons mentioned above Italy has been a privileged destination for generations of well-educated travellers,
intellectuals, poets and painters, for a long time attracted by
the fascinating “Garden of Europe” where outstanding
landscapes perfectly framed architecture and art masterpieces. Antonio Paolucci, art historian and the former Minister for Cultural and Environmental Heritage in the 1990s,
stated that in the past “The Italian landscape was considered
the emotional multiplier of the historic-artistic suggestion,
meaning that the latter received from the landscape frame a
sort of heroic and romantic amplification” (Paolucci 2000).
References
Antonioli F, Vai GB (eds) (2004) Climex Maps Italy—explanatory
notes. Museo Geologico Giovanni Capellini, Bologna, 80 pp
Aucelli PPC, Brancaccio L, Cinque A (2017) Vesuvius and Campi
Flegrei: Volcanic History, Landforms and Impact on Settlements.
In: Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and Landforms of
Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 389–398
Bollati I, Pelfini M, Pellegrini L (2012) A geomorphosites selection
method for educational purposes: a case study in Trebbia valley
(Emilia Romagna, Italy). Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 35(1):23–35
Bosellini A (2005) Storia geologica d’Italia. Gli ultimi 200 milioni di
anni. Zanichelli, Bologna, 183 pp
Bosellini A (2017) Outline of the geology of Italy. In: Soldati M,
Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer,
Cham, pp 21–27
Brandolini P (2017) The outstanding terraced landscape of the Cinque
Terre coastal slopes (Eastern Liguria). In: Soldati M, Marchetti M
(eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 235–
244
Corona G (2015) Breve storia dell’ambiente in Italia. Il Mulino,
Bologna, 140 pp
Del Monte M (2017) Aeternae Urbis Geomorphologia—Geomorphology of Rome, Aeterna Urbs. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 339–350
De Pippo T, Valente A (2008) Lagune e stagni costieri. In: Grillotti Di
Giacomo MG (ed) Atlante Tematico delle Acque d’Italia. Brigati,
Genova: 71–74
Federici PR (2000) La varietà dei paesaggi naturali. In: Touring Club
Italiano (ed) Il Paesaggio Italiano. Touring Editore, Milano: 11–26
Federici PR (2008) Le bonifiche. In: Grillotti Di Giacomo MG
(ed) Atlante Tematico delle Acque d’Italia. Brigati, Genova: 103–
108
Fontana A, Mozzi P, Marchetti M (2014) Alluvial fans and megafans
along the southern side of the Alps. Sed Geol 301:150–171
Fratianni S, Acquaotta F (2017) The climate of Italy. In: Soldati M,
Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer,
Cham, pp 29–38
Fredi P, Ciccacci S (2017) A route of fire in central Italy: the Latium
ancient volcanoes. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and
landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 303–315
Fredi P, Lupia Palmieri E (2017) Morphological regions of Italy. In:
Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy.
Springer, Cham, pp 39–74
Fredi P, Pelfini M (2008) I laghi d’Italia. In: Grillotti Di Giacomo MG
(ed) Atlante Tematico delle Acque d’Italia. Brigati, Genova: 59–64
Furlani S, Antonioli F, Biolchi S, Gambin T, Gauci R, Presti VL,
Anzidei M, Devoto S, Palombo M, Sulli A (2013) Holocene sea
level change in Malta. Quatern Int 288:146–157
Giardino M, Mortara G, Chiarle M (2017) The glaciers of the Valle
d’Aosta and Piemonte regions: records of present and past
20
environmental and climate changes. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M
(eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 77–88
Giovagnoli MC (2017) Geoheritage in Italy. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M
(eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 491–500
ISTAT—Italian National Institute of Statistics (2015) Italy in Figures.
Dissemination and Communication of Statistical Information
Directorate, Rome, 33 pp
Lambeck K, Antonioli F, Anzidei M, Ferranti L, Leoni G, Scicchitano G, Silenzi S (2011) Sea level change along the Italian coast
during the Holocene and projections for the future. Quatern Int 232
(1):250–257
Marchetti M (2008) Corsi d’acqua e bacini idrografici. In: Grillotti Di
Giacomo MG (ed) Atlante Tematico delle Acque d’Italia. Brigati,
Genova: 47–58
Marchetti M (2002) Environmental changes in the central Po Plain
(Northern Italy) due to fluvial modifications and man’s activities.
Geomorphology 44(3–4):361–373
Miccadei E, Piacentini T, Esposito G (2011) Geomorphosites and
geotourism in the parks of Abruzzo region (Central Italy).
Geoheritage 3(3):233–251
Muttoni G, Scardia G, Kent DV, Morsiani E, Tremolada F, Cremaschi M, Peretto C (2011) First dated human occupation of Italy
at*0.85 Ma during the late Early Pleistocene climate transition.
Earth and Planetary Science Letters 307(3):241–252
Orombelli G, Ravazzi C (1996) The Late Glacial and Early Holocene:
chronology and paleoclimate. Il Quaternario – Italian Journal of
Quaternary Sciences 9(2):439–444
Panizza M, Piacente S (1993) Geomorphological Assets Evaluation.
Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie NF, Suppl Bd 87:13–18
M. Marchetti et al.
Paolucci A (2000) Il paesaggio come ritratto dell’Italia antica. Il
Paesaggio Italiano. Touring Club Italiano, Milano, 147–158 pp
Peretto C, Arnaud J, Moggi-Cecchi J, Manzi G, Nomade S, Pereira A,
Falguères C, Bahain JJ, Grimaud-Hervé D, Berto C, Sala B,
Lembo G, Muttillo B, Gallotti R, Thun Hohenstein U, Vaccaro C,
Coltorti M, Arzarello M (2015) A human deciduous tooth and new
40Ar/39Ar dating results from the middle Pleistocene archaeological site of Isernia La Pineta southern Italy. PLoS ONE 10(10):
e0140091
Pica A, Vergari F, Del Monte M (2016) The Aeterna Urbs geomorphological heritage (Rome, Italy). Geoheritage 8(1):31–42
Pinna M (1996) Le Variazioni del Clima. FrancoAngeli s.r.l, Milano,
214 pp
Reynard E, Coratza P (2013) Scientific research on geomorphosites. a
review of the activities of the IAG working group on geomorphosites over the last twelve years. Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 36:159–
168
Smiraglia C, Diolaiuti G (eds) (2015) The new Italian glacier inventory.
Ev-K2-CNR, Bergamo, 400 pp
Soldati M (2010) Dolomites: The spectacular landscape of the “Pale
Mountains”. In: Migon P (ed) Geomorphological landscapes of the
world. Springer Science + Business Media BV: 191–199
Stefani M (2017) The Po Delta region: depositional evolution, climate
change and human intervention through the last 5000 years. In:
Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy.
Springer, Cham, pp 193–202
Vai GB, Cantelli L (eds) (2004) Litho-palaeoenvironmental maps of
Italy during the last two climatic extremes. Litografia Artistica
Cartografica, Firenze
3
Outline of the Geology of Italy
Alfonso Bosellini
Abstract
The Italian peninsula is an extremely active region from the geodynamic point of view as
witnessed by the presence of active volcanoes (Vesuvius, Campi Flegrei, Stromboli,
Vulcano, Etna) and by frequent earthquakes. Italian geology, however, is dominated by two
different mountain chains, the Alps to the north and the Apennines to the south, along the
peninsula. Geologically speaking, the Italian territory can be subdivided into seven specific
sectors, i.e. The Alpine chain proper, the Po Plain, the Apennines, the Apulia foreland, the
Calabrian-Peloritan arc, Sicily and Sardinia.
Keywords
Italian geology
3.1
Alps
Apennines
General Overview
Geologically speaking, Italy is in a quite active geodynamic
evolution: volcanoes, earthquakes, land and coasts instability
are a clear evidence. As a matter of fact, Italy, being situated
in the middle of the Mediterranean, is subject to the same
geological evolution which characterizes this entire region,
controlled by the progressive approaching of two megaplates, Eurasia to the north and Africa to the south (Bosellini
2005). The present geology of Italy, including the two major
islands, Sicily and Sardinia, is remarkably varied and contains rock series from all eras and periods (Fig. 3.1). The
Italian territory can be subdivided into seven specific sectors,
which will be schematically described in the following
pages.
A. Bosellini (&)
Dipartimento di Fisica e Scienze della Terra, Università di Ferrara,
Via Saragat 1, 44122 Ferrara, Italy
e-mail: bos@unife.it
3.2
Mediterranean geodynamics
The Alps
The Alpine chain, which extends from Provence and Ligurian coasts to Vienna and to the Hungarian Pannonian basin
(Fig. 3.2), is the result of the convergence and collision of
the European and African (Adria) continental margins,
which took place between the Middle Cretaceous and the
Late Eocene.
The Alps are a thrust belt with a double vergence. In other
words, they are constituted by two different mountain chains
which developed in opposite directions. In the north is the
Alpine chain proper with European vergence, a pile of
crustal nappes, overlapped northward since the
mid-Cretaceous, whilst to the south a much younger tectonic
system occurs, the so-called Southern Alps, similar to the
Apennines, which since the Miocene has developed a
southern vergence, i.e. toward the Po Plain. The boundary
between these two large tectonic systems, with opposite
vergence and different ages, is a series of faults, commonly
and collectively identified as Insubric Line (Fig. 3.2), which
from Turin and Canavese, through Valtellina and Tonale
Pass, reaches Meran and more eastward Pusteria Valley,
Gail Valley (Austria) and the Hungarian Pannonian basin.
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_3
21
22
Fig. 3.1 Simplified geological map of Italy (modified after APAT 2005)
A. Bosellini
3
Outline of the Geology of Italy
23
Fig. 3.2 Geological–structural map of the Alpine chain. Arrows indicate the opposite vergence of two sectors of the edifice: the Alps proper to the
north, the Southern Alps to the south, separated by the Insubric Line (red line). Legend: (1) Plains bordering the alpine chain; (2) Rocks of the
African south-vergent continental margin (Southern Alps and Dinarides); (3) Rocks of the African north-vergent continental margin
(Austroalpines); (4) Rocks of the Penninic Ocean (Pennides): (a) sediments; (b) oceanic crust (ophiolites); (5) Rocks of the European continental
margin (Helvetides)
The Alps proper, i.e. the north-verging sector, are constituted by three groups of nappes, the Helvetides, the Pennides and the Austroalpines (Argand 1924). These three
groups of nappes consist of rocks belonging to the European
continental margin, the former Penninic Ocean, and the
African (Adria) continental margin, respectively. The Austroalpine nappes are the highest (structurally) in the Alps
edifice, whereas the Helvetides lie along the frontal sector.
The Pennides, which bear metamorphic ophiolites, crop out
mainly in the Western Alps and within two large tectonic
windows, the Hohe (High) Tauern to the east and the
Engadin in the Swiss sector.
To the south, the Southern Alps consist mainly of
Mesozoic sedimentary rocks deposited on the ancient Adria
continental margin (Winterer and Bosellini 1981). Here
spectacular carbonate sceneries include the Garda Lake area
and the well-known Dolomite region.
3.3
The Po Plain
The Po Plain is an alluvial, relatively flat region, the result of
an earlier marine and more recent fluvial sedimentation,
mainly by the Po River and its tributaries. From the geological point of view, the Po Plain can be considered the
foreland trough both of the Northern Apennines and the
Southern Alps (Fig. 3.3). Large part of the Po Plain has a
substratum of “buried mountains” (Fig. 3.4) which are the
front of both the Apennine system and of the Southern Alps
(Ghielmi et al. 2010; Fantoni and Franciosi 2010). This
Apennine front is still active, and thus responsible for the
earthquakes occurring so frequently in the Emilia region.
During the Pleistocene glacial periods, the future Po Plain
was involved in repeated transgressions and regressions. In
particular, during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), the
shoreline was between Ancona and Pescara.
24
A. Bosellini
Fig. 3.3 Structural elements characterizing the central Po Plain in the Lombardy area. Legend: (1) Plutonic rocks; (2) Alluvial deposits of the Po
Plain; (3) Sedimentary cover of the Southern Alps; (4) Crystalline basement; (5) Overthrusts; (6) Faults; (7) Section depicted in Fig. 3.4
Fig. 3.4 Cross section of the Po Plain showing its deep complex structure (Lombardy area). Legend: (1) Plio-Quaternary; (2) Miocene; (3)
Paleogene; (4) Jurassic–Cretaceous; (5) Triassic (modified from Bosellini 2005)
3.4
The Apennines
Geologically speaking, the Apennine chain extends from
Genoa to the Sibari plain in Calabria. It can be subdivided
into two principal sectors, the Northern Apennines and the
Central-Southern Apennines (Fig. 3.5). These two sectors
are bounded by regional transcurrent faults. To the north the
Apennines are separated from the Alps by the so-called
Sestri–Voltaggio Line, whereas the boundary between the
Northern and Southern Apennines is marked by a series of
faults collectively called Ancona–Anzio Line.
The Apennines are the result of the collision of the
western continental margin of Adria (the African Promontory) with the Sardinia–Corsica block, which happened
mainly during Miocene–Pliocene time (Castellarin and
Cantelli 2010). The structural edifice of the Apennines
consists of a series of east-verging nappes. The Ligurides,
structurally the highest, include ophiolites and oceanic
3
Outline of the Geology of Italy
25
Fig. 3.5 General outline of the
Apennine chain. The red line is
the active front of the chain.
Legend: (SV) Sestri–Voltaggio
Line; (AA) Ancona–Anzio Line;
(LS) Sangineto Line
sedimentary rocks like radiolarites. The Ligurides originated
from an ocean that has disappeared since, the so-called
Ligure-Piemontese Ocean.
The Northern Apennines are characterized by the abundance of flysch formations ranging in age from Cretaceous to
Miocene. There is also a large tectonic window (the Apuanian Alps), where the famous Carrara marbles are exposed.
Many grabens (tectonic valleys) occur in the western (internal) part of the chain (mainly in Tuscany); they are the
result of the collapse of the western part of the chain caused
by the opening of the Tyrrhenian Sea.
The Southern Apennines are instead characterized by the
presence of large carbonate platforms of Jurassic–Cretaceous
age, which constitute the highest mountain of the Abruzzi
region (Gran Sasso, Maiella). This southern sector of the
chain has a tectonic boundary, the so-called Sangineto Line,
with the adjacent Calabrian-Peloritan arc (Fig. 3.5).
3.5
The Apulia Foreland
The Apulia region consists of two geologically distinct
zones, the foreland trough and the foreland bulge (Fig. 3.6).
Mainly constituted of Cretaceous carbonate rocks, the region
is totally outside of the Apennine mountain system and only
mildly deformed by recent tectonics. Except the Gargano
promontory, where the transition from the Jurassic–Cretaceous shallow-water platform to the Adriatic deep-water
basin is exposed, the entire region is a sub-horizontal carbonate plateau.
26
A. Bosellini
Fig. 3.6 Geological sketch of the Apulia region, showing the foreland
trough (yellow) and the foreland bulge (green)
Fig. 3.7 The Calabrian-Peloritan arc (brown colour) and its regional
geological framework
During the last fifteen years, several dinosaur footprints
have been discovered in the Cretaceous shallow-water carbonates of Apulia (Bosellini 2002). These findings document the Mesozoic connection of Apulia with the African
Continent.
The Apulia carbonates are deeply affected by karst as
documented by the numerous dolines and caves (for example the famous Castellana caves).
3.7
3.6
The Calabrian-Peloritan Arc
This peculiar geological province extends from the Sibari
Plain to the Messina Strait and beyond to the northeast
corner of Sicily, where the Peloritan mountains are present
(Fig. 3.7). The Calabrian-Peloritan block is an “exotic terrain” and a segment of the Alpine chain. Before the opening
of the Tyrrhenian basin it was posted close to Sardinia. The
arc includes metamorphic basement and granites of Paleozoic age and, moreover, it consists of a pile of east-verging
nappes. In conclusion, the Calabrian-Peloritan arc must be
considered a fragment of European crust, a terrain totally
different from the remainder of Italy, which pertains to the
African plate. Naturally, underneath the “exotic Alpine
chain” the Apennine chain is present. It crops out in several
tectonic windows.
At the margin of the mountains, near the sea, relatively
undeformed Miocene–Pliocene terrains suture the front of
the various nappes.
Sicily
The island of Sicily (except the Peloritani mountains) is the
easternmost tract of the Maghrebian chain of north Africa
(Fig. 3.8) and belongs to the northern continental margin of
this continent. It consists of several south-verging nappes
and a foreland area in the southeast corner (Iblei Mts.)
(Abate et al. 1978). The Panormide carbonate platform of
northwestern Sicily is considered to act, during the Jurassic–
Cretaceous interval, as a temporary continental bridge
between Africa and Adria (Zarcone et al. 2010). Moreover,
the highest volcano of Europe, Mount Etna, is present along
the eastern coast.
3.8
Sardinia
Geologically speaking, the island of Sardinia is not part of
Italy. It is a fragment of the European continent, together
with the island Corsica (France). It separated from Catalunia
(Spain) about 30 Ma ago and reached the present position
about 18 Ma ago. Large part of the eastern side of the island
consists of granites and Paleozoic rocks formed during the
Hercynian orogenesis. The most complete Paleozoic sedimentary succession of Italy is present in the island, where
several Hercynian tectonic nappes have been discovered
(Carmignani et al. 1992). The eastern side of the island is
characterized by the presence of widespread volcanics,
mainly of Tertiary age.
3
Outline of the Geology of Italy
27
Fig. 3.8 The Maghrebian chain
and its eastern Sicilian tract
3.9
Conclusions
Concluding this brief geological description of Italy, it
should be emphasized that the Italian peninsula is an
extremely active region from the geodynamic point of view,
as witnessed by the presence of active volcanoes (Vesuvius,
Campi Flegrei, Stromboli, Vulcano, Etna) and by frequent
earthquakes.
Due to its geological complexity, the Italian territory
shows extremely varied and spectacular landscapes which
are of great interest from the geomorphological viewpoint.
On the other hand, its intense geodynamic activity locally
favours highly hazardous contemporary geological and
geomorphological processes.
References
Abate B, Catalano R, Renda P (1978) Schema geologico dei Monti di
Palermo. Bollettino Società Geologica Italiana 97:807–819
APAT (2005) Carta Geologica d’Italia – Scala 1:250.000. S.E.L.C.A.,
Firenze
Argand E (1924) La tectonique de l’Asie. Proc Int Geol Congr 13:171–372
Bosellini A (2002) Dinosaurs “re-write” the geodynamics of the eastern
Mediterranean and the paleogeography of the Apulia Platform.
Earth Sci Rev 59:211–234
Bosellini A (2005) Storia geologica d’Italia. Gli ultimi 200 milioni di
anni. Zanichelli, Bologna, p 183
Carmignani L, Pertusati PC, Barca S, Carosi R, Di Pisa A, Gattaglio M,
Musumeci G, Oggiano G (1992) Struttura della catena ercinica in
Sardegna. Gruppo Informale di Geologia Strutturale. Centrooffset,
Siena, p 177
Castellarin A, Cantelli L (2010) Geology and evolution of the Northern
Adriatic structural triangle between Alps and Apennine. Rendiconti
Lincei – Scienze Fisiche e Naturali 21(Suppl 1):3–14
Fantoni R, Franciosi R (2010) Tectono-sedimentary setting of the Po
Plain and Adriatic Foreland. Rendiconti Lincei – Scienze Fisiche e
Naturali 21(Suppl 1):197–209
Ghielmi M, Minervini M, Nini C, Rogledi S, Rossi M, Vignolo A
(2010) Sedimentary and tectonic evolution in the eastern Po Plain
and northern Adriatic Sea area from Messinian to Middle
Pleistocene (Italy). Rendiconti Lincei – Scienze Fisiche e Naturali
21(Suppl 1):131–166
Winterer EL, Bosellini A (1981) Subsidence and sedimentation on
Jurassic passive continental margin, southern Alps Italy. AAPG
Bull 65:394–421
Zarcone G, Petti FM, Cillari A, Di Stefano P (2010) A possible bridge
between Africa and Adria: New palaeobiogeographic and stratigraphic constraints on the Mesozoic palaeogeography of the Central
Mediterranean area. Earth Sci Rev 103:154–162
4
The Climate of Italy
Simona Fratianni and Fiorella Acquaotta
Abstract
The chapter highlights the main features of the climate of Italy. In particular, it identifies
and defines the main climatic regions and the local factors that control the type of climate
according to the Köppen classification. Furthermore, it shows the distribution of the main
meteorological variables, temperature and precipitation, and the climatic variations that
affected Italy in the last decades. The Italian climate displays remarkably varied features
due to the complexity of its territory. Climatic variations recently observed show some
common elements throughout the country, i.e. a gradual increase in temperature and a
change in the annual distribution of precipitation. These changes are more remarkable in
the Alpine region.
Keywords
Italian climate
4.1
Climate regions
Introduction
Italy stretches across the centre of the Mediterranean, from a
latitude of 36°N to a latitude of 47°N. This remarkable
extension makes the climatic conditions very variable.
Moreover, the orography is very complex due to the presence of mountain chains of the Apennines and the Alps.
They influence the pathway of weather fronts and interact
with the dominant winds, thus exposing different areas of
Italy to specific types of circulation. The Alps and the
Apennines in fact have a barrier effect: the former protect the
Po Plain and the Venetian Plain from the cold northerly
currents, while the latter, developing along the entire
peninsula, limit the influence of the moist westerly air to the
Tyrrhenian side, which is in turn protected from the cold
S. Fratianni F. Acquaotta
Centro interdipartimentale sui rischi naturali in ambiente montano
e collinare, NatRisk, Via Leonardo da Vinci 44, 10095
Grugliasco, TO, Italy
Temperature
Precipitation
Climate variations
easterly winds that hit the Adriatic side during the winter
season. Winter is in fact colder on the Adriatic coast than on
the Tyrrhenian coast at the same latitude (Mennella 1967;
Pinna 1977).
It is also necessary to point out the mitigating effect of the
Mediterranean Sea, which generally has a destabilizing
effect on the air masses that flow there, favouring the
development of depressurizing systems (cyclogenesis) close
to the Italian peninsula. The distribution of atmospheric
pressure over the Peninsula and over the surrounding seas
(Adriatic, Ligurian, Tyrrhenian, Ionian seas) during different
seasons is one of the fundamental factors that condition the
trend and regime of meteorological elements.
4.2
S. Fratianni (&) F. Acquaotta
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Torino, Via
Valperga Caluso 35, 10125 Turin, Italy
e-mail: simona.fratianni@unito.it
Local Factors and Climatic Regions
The concurrent influence of various geographic factors (including different altitudes, different distances from the sea,
different morphological characteristics of marine basins,
presence of particular coastal currents, exposition to dominant winds etc.) determines the existence of different climatic regions, whose borders can be represented as shown in
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_4
29
30
S. Fratianni and F. Acquaotta
Fig. 4.1 The climatic regions of
Italy: (1) Alpine Region, (2) Po
Plain and Upper Adriatic Region,
(3) Central-Southern Adriatic
Region, (4) Ligurian and
Tyrrhenian Region, (5) Apennine
Region, (6) Mediterranean
Region (scheme proposed by
Cantù 1977, redrawn by D.
Garzena)
Fig. 4.1, on the basis of the scheme proposed by Cantù
(1977), which gives particular prominence to weather types
that occur over the regions. These regions have to be considered as macro-sections; it is obvious that sub-units exist
within these portions, each with its own particular climatic
conditions. The main climatic regions are: (i) the Alpine
Region, (ii) the Po Plain and Upper Adriatic Region, (iii) the
Central-Southern
Adriatic
Region,
(iv)
the
Ligurian-Tyrrhenian Region, (v) the Apennine Region and
(vi) the Mediterranean Region.
The Alpine Region includes the Aosta Valley,
Trentino-Alto Adige and the mountain sectors of Piedmont,
Veneto, Lombardy and Friuli Venezia Giulia. This climatic
region is all above 1000 m a.s.l. and—in autumn, winter and
spring—is affected by a series of low pressure zones arriving
from the Atlantic, the Gulf of Genoa and the Mediterranean
Sea. The Alpine climate is conditioned by the altitude, and it
can be considered as a cold temperate type, which becomes
of a nival type at altitudes above 2700–2800 m. The Alps
and the pre-Alps receive high amount of rainfall, with peaks
of 3000 mm per year in the sectors which are more exposed
to the cold air masses coming from the Pole and the hot air
coming from Africa.
The Po Plain and Upper Adriatic Regions are made up of
an extensive basin that is surrounded by mountain chains to
the north, west and south, with no relief on the east side.
Considering the orography, this climatic region is limited by
the 1000 m contour line on the Alpine side and by the
watershed line on the Apennine side. During winter, the
entire region is covered by a layer of cold and stagnant air
that is several thousands metres thick. The outstanding feature of this climatic zone is its accentuated seasonal excursion with maximum temperatures in summer that often
exceed 30 °C and winter minimums that often fall below
zero. Rainfall is not very abundant, between 600 and
800 mm per year, with a higher frequency in autumn and
4
The Climate of Italy
spring. During summer, stormy events are also quite
frequent.
The Central-Southern Adriatic Region includes the eastern peninsular part of the Apennine watershed, between the
43° and 39° parallels. This region has thermal and rainfall
behaviour of a Mediterranean type, but also shows continental characteristics that are dictated by the mitigating
influence of the Adriatic Sea and the favourable exposition
to currents flowing from the north and from the east. Rainfall
is not abundant, between 600 and 700 mm per year. Rains
are more frequent in spring and autumn, and the latter is the
rainiest period of the year. When the synoptic situation is
such that it favours currents from west to southwest,
anomalous torrid hot or warm waves can also occur in the
middle of winter. In the cold season, the minimum temperatures drop to values of around 0 °C, and in high summer
they exceed 30 °C.
The Ligurian and Tyrrhenian Region includes Liguria,
the coastal sectors and the bordering hinterland of Latium,
Tuscany and Campania. Even the western part of Umbria,
although it shows some continental aspects, is affected by
the mitigating action of the Tyrrhenian Sea. The climate in
these regions, which can be defined as Mediterranean, is
milder and wetter than the Adriatic sector at the same latitude, because of the presence of the Apennines. On average,
rainfall is between 800 and 1000 mm per year, but there are
important differences in relation to the closeness of the
Apennines to the coast. Summers are hot and dry, with
maximum temperatures that often exceed 30 °C. Windward
low pressure areas can be observed during autumn, causing
flash floods and devastating effects in the provinces of
Genoa and La Spezia, especially in recent years.
The Apennine Region includes the mountainous sectors
of Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Latium, Marche, Campania,
Abruzzo, Molise, eastern Umbria and most of Basilicata.
The characteristics of this climatic area are determined by
altitude, and are comparable with those of the cool continental temperate zones, with lower thermal values as the
altitude increases. Rainfall reaches values of more than
1500 mm per year on the slopes that are more exposed to the
dominant western winds.
The Mediterranean Region includes Calabria, Sardinia,
Sicily, the coastal areas of Basilicata and south Apulia. These
zones have a similar climate to that of the Tyrrhenian Region,
but with a marked intensification of the Mediterranean
characteristics, and the appearance of some subtropical sections in the internal parts of Sicily and Sardinia. The sea
markedly influences climatic parameters. Summers are dry
and hot, with temperatures that can even exceed 40 °C, when
the African cyclone is developing, while winters are very wet
with rainfall that is prevalently of a downpour or stormy type.
31
The occurrence of different baric situations and specific
local conditions determines the frequency, intensity and
direction of winds in Italy. Anemometric observations show
that only generally moderate variable winds (with the
exception of local breezes), which precede, accompany or
follow atmospheric low pressure areas, are present
throughout Italy.
In general, the areas which overlook the Ligurian Sea and
Tyrrhenian Sea suffer above all from winter westerly winds.
These winds have northwest direction over Sardinia (Mistral),
southwest direction over the eastern Ligurian coasts and over
the upper part of the Tyrrhenian Sea (Libeccio), and western
direction over the central part of the Tyrrhenian Sea (Ponente).
The directions of the winds are reversed on the Adriatic side.
The winds in the northern and central parts prevalently arrive
from the north and northeast, while those in the southern part
are from the south and southeast. Winds from the south and
southeast are frequent in the southern parts of the peninsula.
The Ionic coasts are hit by lukewarm and moist Scirocco
winds, while the extremely hot and moist African Scirocco
wind blows from southeast and reaches Sicily.
4.3
Climate Classification
Classifying climate means defining its characteristics in
different places, considering the most important climatic
elements.
The most famous climate classification and to which
reference is made regularly in climate descriptions is that
proposed by W. Köppen (Pinna 1978). It is based on the
distribution of mean annual and monthly temperature and
rainfall, and distinguishes five main climate groups in the
world.
The Italian peninsula falls completely within the
Mediterranean climate area, which is part of the
meso-thermal type climates and, to be more precise, of
subtropical climates with dry summers. In reality, besides
the typical Mediterranean climate, there are also areas with
other meso-thermal climates, or areas with situations of
micro-thermal or altitude climates. A climatic classification
based on the Köppen–Geiger scheme (Fig. 4.2) and only
referring to thermal aspects is outlined below.
1. The Ligurian-Tyrrhenian, Middle Adriatic, Ionic and
Mediterranean coastal regions (Cs). Two types of climates can be found within this group:
(a) Subtropical temperate. This climate is marked by
limited (almost non-existent in summer) and very
irregular rainfall. It affects the hottest areas along a
narrow strip of the southern Italian coast and that of
the islands. Mean annual temperature >17 °C; mean
32
S. Fratianni and F. Acquaotta
Fig. 4.2 Map of climatic
classification by Köppen and
Geiger (after Pinna 1978, redrawn
by D. Garzena)
temperature of the coldest month >10 °C; five
months with a mean temperature >20 °C; annual
temperature from 15 to 17 °C.
(b) Hot temperate. This climate is usually characterized
by summer droughts (Csa), and it affects the
Tyrrhenian coastal area from Liguria down to
Calabria, the southern part of the Adriatic coast and
the Ionic zone. Mean annual temperature from 14.5
to 16.9 °C; mean temperature of the coldest month
from 6 to 9.9 °C; four months with a mean temperature >20°C; annual temperature from 15 to 17 °C.
2. The internal sub-coastal region (Cs) includes the hilly
zones of the Tuscan-Umbrian-Marche pre-Apennines and
the lower slopes of the southern Apennines. Mean annual
temperature from 10 to 14.4 °C; mean temperature of the
coldest month from 4 to 5.9 °C; three months with a
mean temperature >20 °C; annual temperature from 16 to
19 °C.
3. Po and Venetian plains, Upper Adriatic and internal
peninsular regions. Two types and two sub-types can be
identified in this climatic region:
(a) Sub-continental temperate (Cf), which affects part of
the Venetian Plain, the Friulian Plain, the coastal area
of the Upper Adriatic Sea and the internal peninsular
region. Mean annual temperature from 10 to 14 °C;
mean temperature of the coldest month from −1 to
3.9 °C; two months with temperature >20 °C; annual
temperature from 16 to 19 °C.
(b) Continental temperate (Cf), which affects all of the
Po Plain and part of the Venetian Plain. Mean annual
temperature from 9.5 to 25 °C; mean temperature of
the coldest month from −1.5 to 3 °C; three months
with a mean temperature >20 °C; mean annual
temperature >19 °C.
Two sub-types that show a remarkable extension can
be identified within the temperate type of climate: the
hot summer temperate climate (Cfa) and lukewarm
summer temperate climate (Cfb).
4. Pre-Alpine and Middle Apennine region. A Cool temperate (Cf) climate can be identified. This affects the
pre-Alps and the axial zone of the Apennines, which
sometimes presents sub-continental characteristics. Mean
annual temperature of 6 to 9.9 °C; mean temperature of
the coldest month from 0 to −3 °C; mean temperature of
the hottest month from 15 to 19.9 °C; annual temperature
from 18 to 20 °C.
5. Alpine and Upper Apennine region. A Cold temperate
(Dw) climate can be identified. This affects an area of the
Alps and the summit areas of the higher Apennine
groups. Mean annual temperature from 3 to 5.9 °C; mean
4
The Climate of Italy
temperature of the coldest month >−3 °C; mean temperature of the hottest month from 10 to 14.9 °C; annual
temperature from 16 to 19 °C.
6. Alpine region. Two types of climate can be recognized
(a) Cold due to altitude (H) which affects the highest
sectors of the Alps and the summit areas of the
higher Apennine groups.
(b) Nival (EF), which affects the Alpine zone above
3500 m, with the presence of perennial snow.
4.4
Temperature Distribution
In general, the mean temperature throughout Italy decreases
in winter as the latitude, altitude and distance from the sea
increase. However, this trend shows significant exceptions,
above all as a result of the barrier effect of the main
mountain chains (Rapetti and Vittorini 1989). It has already
been mentioned how, at the same latitude, the Adriatic coast,
which is open to winds from the north, is relatively colder
than the Tyrrhenian coast in winter. The thermal contrast
between the Po Plain (which is covered by a layer of cold air
in winter) and the Ligurian Riviera, which is sheltered from
the arrival of cold air from the north by the Marittime Alps in
the west, is even more accentuated. The annual thermal
excursion fluctuates, over most of the Italian territory,
between 14 and 25 °C; in general, temperature increases
when moving from the coast towards the internal part, and
then diminishes passing from the plain to mountains. The
lowest values of thermal excursion are recorded over some
parts of the western part of Liguria and over some sections
of the western coast of Sardinia as well as the southern
sections of Sicily. The highest values are instead found in the
southwestern sector of the Po Plain (Pinna 1978).
On the basis of the map of mean annual temperatures that
are recorded in Italy (Fig. 4.3), mean values of more than
16 °C can be observed over the western part of Liguria,
along the Tuscan coastline, along the coast between Abruzzo
and Apulia, along the Ionian coast of Basilicata and
Calabria, and along all the coastal sections and internal flat
areas of Sicily and Sardinia. In the peninsular areas, the
isotherm passes locally in a more or less decisive way
towards the corresponding hinterland. Most of the Apennine
range, the Sardinian mountains, the pre-Alps and the Alpine
valleys record mean values ranging between 10 and 12 °C;
mean annual temperatures ranging between 5 and 10 °C are
instead recorded on the top of Mt. Etna, on the highest
summits of the Apennines and on most of the Alpine range,
where mean annual values below 5 °C can even be recorded
on the highest peaks.
33
The absolute mean extreme values of the temperature
fluctuate between 44 and 45 °C—recorded in July over
some locations in southern Italy—and −30 °C, recorded at
some locations in the Alps in January.
The highest temperature in Italy, since 1951, was recorded by the Air Force Military meteorological network,
which is affiliated with the World Meteorological Organization, and was equal to 47 °C; it was measured by the
Foggia Amendola station on 25 June 2007 (Fig. 4.3). The
lowest temperature was measured in February 1929, at 4554
metres, at the Regina Margherita hut on Monte Rosa. On that
occasion, the temperature dropped as low as −41 °C.
Always in the Italian Alps, the −34.6 °C measured at Plateau
Rosa on the 6 March 1971 stands out, and this was followed
by the −30 °C that was measured at Dobbiaco on 1 January
1953. Whilst for the cities on the plain, the lowest temperatures were recorded in Florence (12 January 1985) and
Tarvisio (7 January 1985) with −23 °C.
4.5
Precipitation Distribution
The mean annual rainfall distribution, though generally
depending on the latitude, is also influenced by altitude and
aspect. The mountainous zones in Italy in fact receive a
greater quantity of water than the plains and the coasts,
especially when they are exposed to moist currents from the
sea. The rainiest areas in Italy (mean annual rainfall between
2500 and 3500 mm) are located in the Carnian and Julian
Alps, in the pre-Alpine section between Lake Maggiore and
Lake Como, in the eastern Ligurian Apennines, in the
Apuane Alps and in the highest sectors of the
Tuscan-Emilian Apennines (Fig. 4.4). In general, rainfall is
more plentiful along the Ligurian-Tyrrhenian side (which is
open to currents from the west and to the perturbations that
accompany these currents) than on the Adriatic-Ionian side
(see Rapetti and Vittorini 1989). Less abundant rainfall is
generally recorded on the plains and along the coasts.
Rainfall is particularly scarce (below 500 mm/year) along
the coast in some parts of Apulia, Sicily and Sardinia. Low
values are also found in the bottom of some Alpine (Aosta
Valley, Susa Valley, Valtellina, Pusteria Valley) and some
Apennine valleys, which are protected by elevated mountainous ramparts. In the Po Plain, rainfall diminishes from
east to west, as it does from the high altitudes to the low
plain. The mean annual number of rainy days is higher on
the western sides of the peninsula (110–120 days in the
Alps, pre-Alps) and in the most elevated areas of the Alps
and Apennines. It is lower in the western Po Plain, and along
the coastal plains of Southern Italy and the islands. The
pluviometric regime presents a remarkable variability
34
S. Fratianni and F. Acquaotta
Fig. 4.3 Map of mean annual
temperatures from 1961 to 1990 in
Italy. Source SCIA system by
ISPRA (www.scia.isprambiente.it)
(Pinna and Vittorini 1985) and the following main types can
be distinguished:
– Continental regime is characterized by an accentuated
maximum summer rainfall and an accentuated minimum
winter rainfall: it affects some Alpine and pre-Alpine
areas.
– Pre-Alpine regime affects almost all of northern Italy and
the upper part of Tuscany, with two maximum rain
periods in spring and in autumn, and two minimum
periods in summer and winter. In some zones, such as in
Piedmont, the spring maximum is prevalent, while the
autumn one is prevalent in other zones.
– Apennine regime presents a main maximum rainfall
period at the end of autumn and a main minimum period
in summer; a minor minimum occurs at the end of winter.
– Sub-coastal regime is rather similar to the previous one,
with less accentuated minor minimums and maximums
which, going towards the south, almost level out.
– Mediterranean regime: this type presents a maximum
winter rainfall and a minimum summer rainfall: it affects
Sicily, Calabria and parts of Apulia.
The location that shows the highest rainfall in Italy is
Musi (633 m) in Friuli Venezia Giulia exposed to the moist
and rainy Scirocco and Libeccio winds, thanks to which it
4
The Climate of Italy
35
Fig. 4.4 Annual mean
precipitation from 1961 to 1990 in
Italy. Source SCIA system by
ISPRA (www.scia.isprambiente.it)
manages to accumulate a total mean annual rainfall of
3300 mm. In this area, the maximum quantity of rain
cumulated in a year was recorded at Uccea in 1960 with
6012.9 mm.
The location with the lowest precipitation throughout the
entire Italian territory is that of Capo Carbonara, in the
municipality of Villasimius, in Sardinia, with a mean yearly
rainfall of 237.8 mm in the 1971–2000 30-year period.
As far as snowfall in Italy is concerned, unlike what can
be observed for rainfall, precipitation events are particularly
abundant on the most internal elevations, and also on the
slopes that back on to the sea. This shows that altitude and
continental nature of weather are the main factors that
determine the rather low temperatures that occur during the
winter period.
These events increase over the Po Plain, from east to
west. They are somewhat modest at the bottom of the alpine
valleys, but increase rapidly towards the top of the valleys,
above all in the Western Alps—which are more internal and
therefore subject to more continental weather.
Mean annual snowfall between 20 and 50 cm occur on
the plains of northwest Italy, in the Alpine valleys, in the
plain areas of Emilia-Romagna close to the Apennines,
along the coastal section in the first part of the hinterland in
the Marche region, and along the whole Apennine ridge at
the altitude of transition between the high hills and the
36
S. Fratianni and F. Acquaotta
mountains; the high hills and low mountain areas of Sardinia
also fall into this category. As far as the mountainous areas
are concerned, snowfall increases with altitude, and above
all with exposition to the moist currents from the Mediterranean and Balkan seas. As far as the Apennines are concerned, the snowiest areas are generally those of the
Tuscan-Emilian regions and that of the Adriatic side—in
particular between Sibillini and Matese mounts—as well as
the areas closest to the sea of Mt. Pollino, Mt. Etna and Mt.
Gennargentu.
4.6
Climatic Variations
The analysis of the temperature series gathered throughout
the Italian territory makes it possible to point out two
sub-periods, since 1961 until 2010, which are characterized
by opposite trends. A decreasing trend can be identified from
1961 until the end of the 1970s, while a sudden increase in
temperature can be observed from the eighties onwards.
A decrease in the mean temperature of 0.3 °C/10 years
has been estimated from 1961 until the end of the seventies
Fig. 4.5 a Mean temperature of
Italy in 1978; b Mean temperature
of Italy in 2011; c Mean
temperature in three different
30 years periods. Source SCIA
system by ISPRA (www.scia.
isprambiente.it) (Desiato et al.
2015)
(Fig. 4.5a). The most noticeable decreases are calculated on
the series of the minimum temperature, where a decrease of
−0.84 °C has been identified for the twenty-year period,
while a decrease equal to −0.51 °C has been found for the
maximum temperatures (Toreti and Desiato 2007). A sudden
change in the temperature trend has been observed from the
1980s until today (Fig. 4.5b, c). The maximum and minimum temperatures have begun to increase. The most notable
increase, that is of 0.6 °C/10 years, has been calculated on a
series of maximum temperatures, and this is followed by the
minimum ones with 0.5 °C/10 years. An increasing trend
has also been calculated for the temperature range, the
summer days and the tropical nights.
A relevant increase of temperature was calculated in
particular in the Alps, for locations above 2000 m. For these
areas the maximum increase was estimated for minimum
temperature of up to 2.8 °C in the last 50 years (Acquaotta
et al. 2015).
A stationary trend has been observed in Italy in the period
1961–2010, as far as rainfall is concerned. The cumulated
annual rainfall has neither increased not decreased in the
north, in the centre or in the south of Italy. A decreasing
4
The Climate of Italy
winter trend has been observed at a seasonal level in the
north and centre of Italy. In the north, a decrease of
−1.5 mm/year has been recorded, while in central Italy the
decrease, which is equal to −7.7 mm/year, has been calculated starting from 1988. More consistent variations have
been found for the number of rainy days. The overall
number of rainy days throughout the entire national territory
has diminished by about 14%, without any significant differences between the northern and central-southern regions
(Brunetti et al. 2006). The greatest contribution to the
decrease has been calculated for the winter season. This
behaviour points out a variation in the occurrence of rainfall
events. Heavy rains have increased over the 1961–2010
period and 2011 was characterized by extreme events
37
(Fig. 4.6). The recent flash floods that hit the Liguria
(Genoa, Cinque Terre) and North Tuscany (Aulla and Massa
Carrara) regions between the end of October and beginning
of November 2011 are examples of this behaviour. In fact,
on 25 October 2011 nearly 542 mm of rain, a third of the
average annual rainfall, fell in six hours. The city of Genoa
was rocked by severe flash floods on 4 November 2011,
when nearly 500 mm of rain fell in six hours. Six people
perished and millions of Euros in damages occurred. The
next event occurred in Genoa on 9–10 October 2014, with
188 mm in 24 h, causing one fatality.
A decreasing trend in snowfall has been pointed out in
Italy over the Alps from 1961 until the 1970s. An inversion
in tendency has been registered from the 1970s onwards,
Fig. 4.6 Distribution of heavy precipitation (a) and distribution of dry periods in Italy in 2011 (b). Source SCIA system by ISPRA (www.scia.
isprambiente.it)
Fig. 4.7 Snowfall Standardized
Anomaly Index (SAI) of
Piedmont highlighting the greater
variations of the variable from his
mean value. The snowfall data are
calculated using the dataset from
all of Piedmont high altitude
stations from 1961 to 2010. The
red line shows the moving mean
value for 5 years (reference
period from 1971 to 2000)
38
until and including all the 1980s. Abundant snowfall has
been recorded over the entire Alpine range (Fig. 4.7).
However, in the last few decades, a decrease has continued
to be recorded, although this decrease is more moderate than
in the previous years (Auer et al. 2007).
The reduction in the snow cover is more remarkable at
lower altitudes, between 800 m and 1500 m, and in the
spring season, from March till April. The maximum decrease
was recorded in the nineties, with −14 days/10 years, while
the decrease over the last decade has been more moderate,
−8 days/10 years (Terzago et al. 2013).
As far as snowfall in the winter season is concerned,
decreasing trends of between −44 cm/10 years and
−4 cm/10 years have been calculated from December to
April. The most important decrease has been identified at the
end of the 1970s and during the 1990s. Two contrasting
trends have been also observed over the Apennines from
1987 until today. In the northern Apennines, both snowfall
and snow cover have shown decreasing trends, which are
comparable with those of the Alpine chain. The maximum
decrease has been recorded for stations located at altitudes
below 1300 m. Instead, increasing trends have been calculated for the central part of the Apennines.
Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Diego Garzena,
PhD candidate of the 28th cycle, Earth Science, Doctoral School of
Sciences and Innovative Technologies, University of Turin, for the
image editing.
S. Fratianni and F. Acquaotta
References
Acquaotta F, Fratianni S, Garzena D (2015) Temperature changes in the
North-Western Italian Alps from 1961 to 2010. Theor Appl
Climatol 122:619–634
Auer I, Bohm R, Jurkovic A, Lipa W, Orlik A, Potzmann R, Schoner W,
Ungersbock M, Matulla C, Briffa K, Jones P, Efthymiadis D,
Brunetti M, Nanni T, Maugeri M, Mercalli L, Mestre O, Moisselin JM, Begert M, Westermeier G, Kveton V, Bochnicek O,
Stastny P, Lapin M, Szalai S, Szentimrey T, Cegnar T, Dolinar M,
Gajic-Capka M, Zaninovic K, Majstorovicp Z, Nieplovaq E (2007)
HISTALP—Historical Instrumental Climatological Surface Time
series of the Greater Alpine Region. Int J Clim 27:17–46
Brunetti M, Maugeri M, Monti F, Nanni T (2006) Temperature and
precipitation variability in Italy in the last two centuries from
homogenized instrumental time series. Int J Clim 26:345–381
Cantù V (1977) The climate of Italy. In: Wallén CC (ed) Climate of
central and southern Europe. Elsevier, Amsterdam, vol 6, pp 127–184
Desiato F, Fioravanti G, Fraschetti P, Perconti W, Piervitali E (2015)
Valori climatici normali di temperatura e precipitazione in Italia.
ISPRA, Stato dell’Ambiente 55/2014, Roma, 63 pp
Mennella C (1967) Il clima d’Italia nelle sue caratteristiche e varietà e quale
fattore dinamico del paesaggio. Editrice E.D.A.R.T, Napoli, 718 pp
Pinna M (1977) Climatologia. UTET, Torino, 442 pp
Pinna M (1978) L’atmosfera e il clima. UTET, Torino, 478 pp
Pinna M, Vittorini S (1985) Contributo alla determinazione dei regimi
pluviometrici in Italia. Mem Soc Geogr It 39:147–168
Rapetti F, Vittorini S (1989) Aspetti del clima nei versanti tirrenico e
adriatico lungo l’allineamento Livorno – M. Cimone – Modena. Atti
Soc Tosc Sci Nat Mem, Serie A 96:159–192
Terzago S, Fratianni S, Cremonini R (2013) Winter precipitation in
Western Italian Alps (1926–2010): Trends and connections with the
North Atlantic/Arctic Oscillation. Meteorol Atmos Phys 119:125–136
Toreti A, Desiato F (2007) Temperature trend over Italy from 1961 to
2004. Theor Appl Climatol 91:51–58
5
Morphological Regions of Italy
Paola Fredi and Elvidio Lupia Palmieri
Abstract
This chapter presents a synthesis of the wide variety of landscapes that makes Italy a very
interesting country from a geomorphological point of view. The complex and lively
geological history, responsible for the peculiar tectonic arrangement of Italy, the high
heterogeneity of outcropping rocks and the distinct distribution of altitudes, together with
the different types of climates are the main causes of the landscape varieties. The main
natural aspects of the “Morphological Regions” of Italy are described; that is to say those
areas of the Italian territory marked by a dominant type of landscape—even though often
strongly diversified within themselves—which resulted from both the conditioning of the
geological structure and the predominance of given exogenous processes, in relation to
climatic conditions.
Keywords
Morphological regions
Morphogenetic processes
Landforms
Landscape
Italy
… il bel paese
ch’Appennin parte, e ‘l mar circonda e l’Alpe
(Sonetto XCVI in vita di M.L.)
Petrarca (1304–1374)
5.1
Introduction
“… our world (i.e. Italy) is … immensely rich in natural
phenomena and beauties. The beauties and the scientific
treasures of the Alps go along with the dissimilar beauties
and treasures of the Apennines; and after having described
our glaciers, the castle rises and the gorges of the Alps and
Prealps, we shall have new worlds to describe: gas emissions, nuée ardente, mud volcanoes, still active or extinct
volcanoes, Vesuvio, Etna; and further on, the sea and its
islands, different climates and vegetation, from subtropical to
P. Fredi (&) E. Lupia Palmieri
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Sapienza Università di Roma,
Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
e-mail: paola.fredi@uniroma1.it
glacial, and so on, so that Italy (and I do not stammer saying
it) is the synthesis of the physical world.”
This is the translation of a text from the essay “Il Bel
Paese. Conversazioni sulle Bellezze Naturali, La Geologia e
la Geografia fisica d’Italia” (The Beautiful Country. Conversations on Natural Beauties, Geology and Physical
Geography of Italy) written in 1876 by Antonio Stoppani, a
man of letters and sciences, who had been teacher of
Geology for a long period. He derived the title of his book
from a sonnet by Petrarca, where the poet defines Italy as the
“Beautiful Country that the Apennine divides and the Sea
and the Alps encircle”. The Stoppani’s statements clearly
underline the wide variety of landscapes that makes Italy a
very interesting country from a geomorphological point of
view. Many different causes contribute to the diversity of the
landscapes of Italy. The geological background plays
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_5
39
40
P. Fredi and E. Lupia Palmieri
obviously a decisive role. The complex and lively geological
history is responsible for the peculiar tectonic arrangement
of Italy, with the Alps and the Apennines, two young and
still rising mountain chains that make up the general
framework of the peninsula. The different orientations of the
two chains—roughly west–east of the Alps, and NW–SE of
the Apennines—are the main cause for Italy’s geodiversity,
as they are a crucial factor of climate variability. Furthermore, the same dramatic geological events have also produced the high heterogeneity of outcropping rocks, often
changing on small distances, and the distinct distribution of
altitudes (Figs. 5.1 and 5.2). All these peculiarities are sound
basis for the development of differentiated landforms.
If we add the varied types of climates occurring in the
peninsula extended for about 12° in latitude, we can easily
understand the multiplicity of natural landforms of the Italian landscapes. All the following chapters of this volume are
by themselves a tribute to the richness of the geomorphological features of Italy.
Indeed, speaking about the causes of diversity of the
Italian landscape, to remind the human presence since the
most ancient times is also obligatory. In fact, human activities have had and still have an increasingly important role in
the modification of natural landscapes, which at present
occur only over very restricted areas of the Italian territory.
Anyway, it is impossible to go over all the detailed aspects
of the Italian landscapes in a single, overview book chapter.
Some simplifications and generalizations are unavoidable,
which imply, first of all, to neglect the human role in shaping
the land.
Therefore, geomorphological descriptions in the next
paragraphs will be devoted to the general, main natural
aspects of the “Morphological Regions” of Italy. That is to
say those areas of the Italian territory marked by a dominant
type of landscape—even though often strongly diversified
within themselves—which resulted from both the influence
of geological structure and the predominance of certain
exogenous processes, in relation to climatic conditions. On
these bases, and substantially in accordance with previous
works (Almagià 1959; Sestini 1963; Franceschetti 1974;
Federici 2000), we will describe the overall features of the
following morphological regions: Alps, Padano-Veneta
Plain, Apennines, Volcanoes, Major Islands and Coasts of
the Italian Peninsula.
5.2
The Alps
Alpi nevose, che le corna al cielo
e quinci e quindi oltre misura alzate,
e ne l’algente verno e calda estate
orride sète di perpetuo gelo…
(Il Canzoniere)
Matteo Bandello (1485–1561)
Snowy Alps, that everywhere lift up your horns
beyond measure
and in the freezing winter as in the warm summer
are wild and icy…
(Translation by G. Luciani)
The Alps are the widest and highest mountain chain of
Europe. They extend for about 12° in longitude and 5° in
latitude, over an area of 250,000 km2 approximately, and
constitute an imposing rocky rampart that separates ancient,
mostly levelled massifs of Central and Northern Europe,
from the southern and geologically younger Mediterranean
domain. The alpine reliefs are the result of complex and
long-lasting events started in the Cretaceous (Coward and
Dietrich 1989; Bosellini 2005) that produced a complex
chain with double vergence: a N-vergence, towards the
European foreland (the Alps s.s.), and a S-vergence towards
the Africa-Adriatic foreland (Southern Alps). The two relief
systems are linked up with the Insubric Line system
(Fig. 5.3).
The Europe-vergence chain is present in the Italian
territory with its inner slope that includes the crystalline
uplifted basement massifs of the Western Alps, the Pennine nappes (the Alps s.s. which make the arch of Western Alps and its prolongation towards the Carpathians)
and the Austro-Alpine nappes (most of the reliefs of
Central and Eastern Alps, to the north of the Insubric Line
system). The S-vergence chain is represented by the
Sudalpine nappes, to the south of the Insubric Line
system.
The Italian Alps (about 27% of the entire alpine area)
form a wide arch extending for approximately 1200 km
from Liguria in the west, to the Dinarids in the east. Orientation of the chain varies along its length: in the westernmost sector it roughly follows the parallels direction
(Alpi Liguri and Alpi Marittime); then the meridians direction (Alpi Cozie and Alpi Graie); finally the parallels
direction again (Alpi Pennine, Alpi Lepontine, Alpi Retiche,
Alpi Carniche and Prealps chain), vanishing with decreasing
altitude into the Dinaride arch.
The complex sequence of tectonic events reflects itself in
the overall morphological aspect. First of all, it is responsible
for dissimilar altitudes, but also for the sharper and narrower
landscapes of the western sector and the progressively more
rounded and spacious landscapes that prevail moving
towards the eastern sector.
Generally speaking, the alpine landscape has very distinctive characters, typified by high and steep-sided reliefs,
wide and deep valleys, vegetation cover that changes from
woods to grassland with altitude, human settlements on the
valley floors or on the gentler sun facing slopes. The landscape changes with seasons: the snow cover dominates
during winter partially hiding landforms that become more
evident during spring and summer. All these features are
5
Morphological Regions of Italy
Fig. 5.1 Orographic map of Italy (after Insolera and Musiani Zaniboni 1979)
41
42
P. Fredi and E. Lupia Palmieri
Fig. 5.2 Lithological map of
Italy (after Lupia Palmieri and
Parotto 2009)
strictly tied to the high difference in elevation between the
valley floors and the summits that is responsible, in its turn,
for marked climatic and vegetation diversity (Sestini 1963).
The Italian Alps share these peculiarities with other geologically young mountain chains, in which tectonic deformations and uplift are still active.
Given the young age of the chain, the alpine landscape
clearly shows the dominant effects of endogenous
morphogenetic agents; indeed, the constructive activity of
such processes still overcome that of the destructive
exogenous processes. However, varying morphosculptures,
mainly produced by glaciers, surface running waters and
gravity, occur on the large morphostructures. The tectonic
conditioning goes along with the lithological control that is
particularly evident where sedimentary rocks alternate with
igneous and metamorphic rocks.
5
Morphological Regions of Italy
43
Fig. 5.3 Main structural units of
Italy and its surrounding areas.
Arrows indicate direction and age
of large movements connected to
the last orogenetic phases, the
Sardo-Corso massif rotation, and
the Tyrrhenian Abyssal Plain
formation (after Lupia Palmieri
and Parotto 2009)
5.2.1 The Landscapes of the Italian Slope
of the Europe-Vergence Chain
(Alps S.S.)
A very distinctive character of this chain is the presence of
the imposing “crystalline massifs”.
They are essentially intrusive bodies coupled with belts of
metamorphic terrains (para- and orto-schists and gneiss),
which represent the highest relief of the alpine system,
mostly at the border of Italy. Starting from the western
section of the Alps, the most important massifs are the following: Argentera (Alpi Marittime, 3297 m a.s.l.), Gran
Paradiso (Alpi Graie, 4061 m), Monte Bianco (Alpi Graie,
4810 m), Cervino (Alpi Pennine, 4165 m), Monte Rosa
(Alpi Pennine, 4634 m), Monte Disgrazia (Alpi Retiche,
3678 m), Monte Bernina (Alpi Retiche, 4049 m),
Ortles-Cevedale (Alpi Retiche, 3902 m) and Monte Adamello (Alpi Retiche, 3539 m). Monte Bianco and Monte
Adamello (actually a post collision intrusive body) are
mainly granitic in composition; schistose and gneissic rocks
make up the almost continuous massifs in Western and
Central Alps and the highest relief of Lombardy. Their
landscape is mostly shaped by ice, even if surface waters and
gravity have played an important role.
The highest portions of the crystalline massifs—too steep
to host glaciers—show the effects of physical weathering
clearly. It is mainly due to the repeated freeze-thaw cycles,
also favoured by the existence of frequent and differently
oriented fractures. Very sharp, irregular and discontinuous
crests result from the frost action and gravity; they are often
interrupted by saddles from which very narrow, steep-sided
canyons originate (Carton 2004).
44
The summits of Argentera and Monte Bianco are the
sharpest and most indented because of their peculiar geological history. These external massifs, in fact, represent the
remains of an ancient levelled Hercynian chain that was
involved again in the more recent alpine orogenesis.
Showing brittle behaviour towards the alpine thrusting, these
“nuclei” of the old chain were strongly uplifted and extensively fractured (Franceschetti 1974). Nearly vertical,
heavily tectonized rocky slopes were transformed into
spectacular notched pinnacles because of physical weathering and gravity processes (Fig. 5.4).
The altitude of the crystalline massifs is above the contemporary snow line of the Italian slopes of the Alps (2850–
2950 m); therefore glaciers are often present. Their size is
much smaller in comparison with the huge Pleistocene glaciers, and they have receded drastically since the end of the
Little Ice Age (1550–1850). In spite of reduction of their
size, glaciers can still be considered among the main erosional agents (Fig. 5.5). The shapes of present-day glaciers
are markedly varying as a consequence of general morphological arrangement of the massif. Larger glaciers are classified as valley glaciers; but smaller glaciers are often
present, generally lacking a well-developed ablation area.
The largest glacier (18 km2) of the Italian Alps occurs in the
Adamello massif (see Carton and Baroni 2017). The latter
shows a very peculiar morphology resembling a large Norwegian plateau, with glaciers feeding radial valleys. The
Forni glacier, in the Ortles-Cevedale massif, is the second
larger glacier in the Italian Alps and the largest among valley
glaciers. It is an example of a valley glacier with a complex
accumulation area, followed down valley by an undersized
ablation area which is an evidence of its marked retreat.
Miage glacier on Monte Bianco is perhaps the most famous
and spectacular glacier of the Italian Alps. Its accumulation
area is not a single well-defined depression; steep and narrow lateral valley glaciers feed the main valley where the ice
flows are constrained between vertical walls. It is a
P. Fredi and E. Lupia Palmieri
debris-covered glacier that resembles the Himalayan glaciers
(Smiraglia 2004).
On the whole, both weathering and glacial processes are
strongly influenced by geological structure that is particularly evident and complex in metamorphic massifs; as a
result their landscapes are much more uneven than the
landscape of granitic massifs.
As consequence of severe frost and gravity action, wide
talus slopes occur at the foot of steep rocky walls of the
crystalline massifs. More frost susceptible metamorphic,
schistose rocks produce a larger quantity of debris of various
sizes in comparison with granitic rocks. The higher volume
of debris influence, in its turn, the volumes of talus slopes at
the foot of the metamorphic reliefs and the moraine rampart
size as well.
The landscapes of the crystalline massifs and their active
glaciers are surely the most spectacular and known of the
whole Alpine chain. Nevertheless, other landscapes offer
equally striking views. This is the case, for instance, of areas
where selective erosion acts upon different lithologies of
outcropping rocks. In the Western Alps, for example, where
variously resistant lithologies of the Mesozoic and
Permo-Triassic sedimentary cover crop out, the landscape is
quite smooth and relief does not exceed 2500–2600 m in
elevation. Moreover, as result of morphoselection, rocky
landforms built of Triassic dolomites or high ophiolitic
massifs, like the beautiful Monviso (3841 m), rise above the
generally mild landscapes shaped on calcareous schists. In
the northern-central sector of the Italian Alps (corresponding
to the Australpine domain), the crystalline and metamorphic
massifs go along with extensive outcrops of Mesozoic
limestones and flysch; as a consequence, the landscape
shows great variety of landforms.
At the margin of glaciated areas, periglacial landforms are
common. Rock glaciers are perhaps the most striking. They
consist of detrital bodies, produced by creeping phenomena,
and resemble true glaciers (Fig. 5.6). Outside of the areas
Fig. 5.4 Panoramic view of the Italian slope of the Monte Bianco, in the Valle d’Aosta (photo M. Giardino)
5
Morphological Regions of Italy
45
Fig. 5.5 View of the Forni
valley glacier, in the
Ortles-Cevedale massif (photo
C. Smiraglia)
presently shaped by glacial processes, the most striking
landscapes occur where still recognizable inactive landforms, produced by the large Pleistocene glaciers, were
deeply modified by the recent erosional processes due to
running waters. Single or coalescent cirques are present at
the higher altitudes of deglaciated relief. The sharp crests of
arête dominate the landscape of the summits; by contrast,
glacial striations, grooves and polished surfaces are dominant features of smoothed bedrock below the trimline,
marking the maximum upper level of the Pleistocene
glaciers.
Valley morphology is very complex, as it is conditioned
by landforms shaped by the Pleistocene glaciers that, in their
turn, occupied more ancient fluvial incisions. The same
drainage network geometry is often influenced by the presence of complex flow directions tied to the frequent glacial
transfluences and diffluences. Although often deeply modified, the cross profiles of the present valleys still preserve the
U-shape of the glacial troughs (Fig. 5.7). Their longitudinal
profiles are irregular and at places contain thresholds (riegel)
and overdeepened depressions now occupied by series of
small lakes (Paternoster lakes) or aggrading streams. High
steep steps (hanging valleys) are particularly evident where a
secondary stream joins the main valley (Baroni 2004).
The valley arrangement is quite different in the different
sectors of the chain. In the western arc they have a radial
centripetal pattern verging towards the River Po plain. The
Val di Susa (drained by the River Dora Riparia), the Valle
d’Aosta, the Val Sesia and the Val d’Ossola are the most
important valleys that come from the Pennidic domain. They
were once occupied by the Pleistocene glaciers and are now
drained by streams that reach the Padano-Veneta Plain,
crossing the moraine amphitheatres.
The major valleys of the Central alpine arc end within
depressions that host large southern alpine lakes. The tectonic control on the valley arrangement is easy discernible.
Long rectilinear stretches of the main valleys follow tectonic
directions that are parallel to the chain axes. The Valtellina is
the most impressive one; this E–W oriented valley is
strongly conditioned by a segment of the Insubric Line
system that can be considered as a geological scar at the
border between the north-verging chain of the
Pennidic/Australpine domain and the south-verging chain of
the Southalpine domain. Valleys transversal to the chain are
also present; they often follow tectonic lineaments too and
make the connection between longitudinal valley stretches
possible, thus allowing direct link between the inner part of
the chain and the external ones. The northeastern arch is
characterized by wide valleys that reflect the highly evolved
glacial morphology of this area. The huge glaciers joining
the present River Adige valley, in fact, had a higher volume
than the glaciers in the Valle d’Aosta.
Active tectonics, as well as the variety of rocks, the
morphology of slopes and the climatic characteristics are all
factors that make the Alpine arc prone to mass movements,
responsible for profound and fast morphological changes.
46
Fig. 5.6 Intact debris-tongue shaped rock glacier with the rooting
zone formerly occupied by the Camosci glacier until 1996 (Central
Alps, Lombardy) (photo R. Scotti)
5.2.2 The Landscape of the South-Verging
Chain (Southern Alps)
The Southern Alps are located to the south of the Insubric
Line system and represent the Africa verging chain that
belongs to the Southalpine domain. They extend eastward
for about 700 km from the area to the south of Gran Paradiso
and form a wide arc that borders the Padano-Veneta Plain to
the north. The relief consists mainly of Mesozoic sedimentary rocks and only subordinately of metamorphic rocks. By
contrast with the Alps s.s., the Southern Alps were affected
by folds and overthrusting, generally E–W oriented.
The ridges of this chain do not attain high altitudes. Their
contact with the Padano-Veneta Plain is generally abrupt
because a hilly intermediate belt is often lacking. The
landscape of the western portion of Southern Alps, where
metamorphic rocks dominate, resembles that of the Alpine
chain s.s. Due to lower elevation, glacial erosion was
obviously less intense; with the exception of large valleys
P. Fredi and E. Lupia Palmieri
shaped by glaciers fed by higher altitudes. At present, glacial
landforms are more or less modified by stream erosion,
depending on different rock erodibility. In the central part of
Southern Alps metamorphic rocks give place to the calcareous and dolomitic lithologies. The landscape is dominated by the beautiful Southern alpine lakes and it is one of
the most known and celebrated. The lakes Maggiore, Como,
Iseo, Idro and Garda occupy the southern stretches of wide
valleys that extend up to about 100 km. The lake depressions are the result of a complex geological and geomorphological history in which tectonic events, fluvial erosion
and glacial erosion played an important role. The rocky
substratum of the depressions is up to 600–700 m below the
present sea level and it is overlain by sediments hundreds of
metres thick. Cross profiles of the buried rocky substratum
suggest that the depressions were initially shaped by streams
during the Messinian (late Miocene), when the sea level was
far below the present one due to the Mediterranean salinity
crisis (Orombelli 2004). These valleys changed into rias
during the Pliocene marine ingression. Successively they
became preferential ways for Pleistocene glaciers that
reached the Po Plain and shaped further the morphology of
lacustrine basins through erosional overdeepening and
damming of the valleys by moraines.
The eastern portion of Southern Alps is characterized by
calcareous relief and plateaux that rarely exceed 2000 m in
height and show evidence of karst erosion. The correspondence between geological structure and morphology is evident. The landscape is typical of the Jurassic relief, deeply
dissected due to action of important rivers such as Brenta,
Piave and Tagliamento.
Northward, the Dolomiti, recently declared by UNESCO
a World Heritage site, offer one of the most famous and
breathtaking landscapes in the world (Panizza 2004; Soldati
2010). Towers, steeples, ramparts and pinnacles of white and
pink rocks dominate over gentle and green valley slopes
where pastures, woodlands and small towns are present. The
Dolomiti landscape tells the fascinating history of this part of
the Southern Alps which started about 200 million years ago
in the warm tropical waters of the ancient Tethys, where
corals and algae (and other organisms) proliferated. Helped
by the subsidence of the sea bottom, these organisms raised
their buildings up to hundreds of metres, thus originating
imposing calcareous and dolomitic reefs. In the meantime,
different kinds of sediments, then transformed into marls and
sandstone, accumulated progressively in the sea among the
reefs. Successively the Alpine orogeny caused emersion of
all these rocks that fell a prey to erosional processes. Thick,
horizontally layered and fractured dolomite rocks alternate
with arenaceous, argillaceous and marly lithologies, and
pyroclastics; moreover important tectonic dislocations affect
the outcropping rocks. As a consequence, selective weathering and erosion processes (due to glaciers, surface running
5
Morphological Regions of Italy
47
Fig. 5.7 This area of the
Western Alps (Bousson,
Piedmont) is presently shaped by
weathering and surface runoff.
Nevertheless, the relief shows
evidence of processes
accomplished by glaciers during
the last cold climatic phases. The
wide valley that is now drained
by a river still preserves the
U-shaped cross profile that is
typical for the valleys remodelled
by glacial tongues (after Lupia
Palmieri and Parotto 2009)
Fig. 5.8 The southern slope of
Monte Cristallo; this type of relief
dominates the landscape of the
Dolomiti, close to Cortina
d’Ampezzo (Veneto) (photo
Zavijavah, Wikimedia Commons
under CC BY-SA 3.0)
waters and gravity) dismembered the original relief into
isolated uneven or massive compartments with low summit
relief. Differential weathering resulted in the origin of ledges
and steps that interrupt the almost vertical cliffs. Thaw and
freeze cycles produced large quantities of loose rock fragments that accumulated in talus cones and talus slopes at the
base of the cliffs. Alluvial, lacustrine and moraine deposits
filled the valley floors and gave rise to wide flat surfaces
(Fig. 5.8).
The Alpi Carniche and the Alpi Giulie close the arc of the
Southern Alps to the east. The landscape of the
calcareous-dolomitic Alpi Carniche is sharp and limitedly
smoothed by glacial processes. However, the presence of
frontal moraines at the outlet of the River Tagliamento into
the Veneto Plain testifies to glacier action during the Last
Glacial Maximum (LGM) Fluvial processes are clearly
dominant both in the Alpi Carniche and Alpi Giulie, also
helped by abundant rainfall. Finally, the Alpi Giulie slope
48
P. Fredi and E. Lupia Palmieri
… rivers fill the valleys and push away the sea as the Po
does with its tributaries, which once flowed into the sea, that
was closed between the Apennines and the German Alps
(Translation by G. Luciani)
The Padano-Veneta Plain is the largest alluvial plain of
Italy. It is roughly triangularly shaped and extends for about
46,000 km2 between the Alps to the north and the Apennines
to the south. The plain gently slopes to the east towards the
Adriatic Sea and is crossed by the River Po, the major river in
Italy. The altitude of the Padano-Veneta area, which contains
the wide plain s.s., ranges from 650 m a.s.l. in the highest
western portion to 5 m b.s.l. in the Po Delta (Fig. 5.9).
The coastal belt of the plain stretches for about 330 km.
Its central part is dominated by the River Po delta; lagoons
prevail in the northeastern reach, the Lagoon of Venice
being the most important.
N
Bre
nta
Como
Lake
As
Garda
Lake
tic
o
Riv
er
e
av
Pi
Ri
r
ve
R iv
er
TRIESTE
Adi
g
Maggiore
Lake
zo
Riv
er
… i fiumi colmano le valli e discostano il mare come far si
vede al Po colli aderenti sua, li quali prima versavan nel
mare, che infra l’Appennino e le Germaniche Alpi si serrava
(Codice di Leicester, f. 10r and 27v)
Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519)
Ison
The Padano-Veneta Plain
e R
ive
r
5.3
The drainage network of the River Po basin is asymmetric; in fact, the tributaries coming from the Alps and
flowing southeastward are systematically longer than the
tributaries coming from the Apennine northern slopes that
flow north-eastward.
The eastern portion of the plain is drained by large rivers
that at present do not belong to the Po drainage basin but
were part of it during the LGM, when the plain occupied
large part of the contemporary northern Adriatic Sea. The
most important are the rivers Adige, Brenta, Piave and
Tagliamento (see Surian and Fontana 2017), from the
Veneto and Friuli regions to the north, and Reno from
Emilia-Romagna to the south.
The Padano-Veneta Plain attained the present configuration in middle Holocene (Gasperi 2001), after a very
complex geological and geomorphological history that
is strictly connected to the birth of the Alps and Apennines.
During the Mesozoic, the Padano-Veneta Plain area was
the foreland for both the chains; starting from the
Oligocene it evolved into a strongly subsiding foredeep
basin for the Sudalpine nappes first, and then, starting from
the Messinian, for the Apennine structures. As a result, the
foredeep basin underwent compression from both
chains verging in the opposite directions (Gasperi 2001).
During and after the birth of the Alps and the Apennines,
and still during the Quaternary, the area now occupied by the
plain was a marine basin that extended as a wide gulf as far
Tagliam
ento R
iver
down seaward in the Carso region, where the landscape is
characterized by karst processes that derive their name from
this calcareous area (see Cucchi and Finocchiaro 2017).
MILANO
VENEZIA
Po
Rive
r
TORINO
ADRIATIC SEA
BOLOGNA
GENOVA
0
50 km
LIGURE SEA
Substratum
Morainal hills
<0m
0-10 m
10-20 m
Fig. 5.9 Altimetric map of the Padano-Veneta Plain (drawing M. Albano)
20-50 m
50-100 m
100-250 m
250-500 m
> 500 m
5
Morphological Regions of Italy
as the present Piedmont region. The gulf became gradually
smaller due to both compressional forces and thick clastic
sedimentation nourished by the abundant solid load that was
delivered to the sea by streams coming from both the
southern slopes of the Alps and the northern slopes of the
Apennines. Wide deltas were built up and the depression
progressively changed into a huge valley floor, after complex alternate events differentiated in space and time. In the
Lower-Middle Pleistocene continental sedimentation is
likely to have prevailed; at that time the area of the present
plain, although punctuated by swamps and ponds, was
dominated by river dynamics. Streams coming from mountain valleys produced large alluvial fans on the newborn
valley floor. Growing in thickness and size, juxtaposing and
superimposing each other, the alluvial fans gave rise to an
irregular sloping plane.
This apparently simple evolution was strongly complicated by climate changes that allowed the development of
glaciers, affected river dynamics, and caused repeated
changes of the sea level. The alpine Quaternary glaciers
deposited large moraines at the plain borders that were then
reworked by the water courses after the end of glaciations.
Fluvial depositional phases alternated with erosional phases
responsible for the origin of different orders of fluvial terraces and terraced alluvial fans.
Glacial and fluvioglacial deposition led to the formation
of two different belts of plain. These are the “high plain”
characterized by permeable coarse-grained deposits and the
“low plain” where finer-grained and less permeable deposits
prevail. The transition zone between the two belts is the line
of resurgences locally named “fontanili”. They underline the
limits between the high plain and the low plain on the Alpine
side and, although discontinuously, also on the Apennine
side. The large availability of water and soil fertility is the
reason for the successful development of agriculture all over
the plain.
The Padano-Veneta Plain evolution was further complicated by intense subsidence phenomena. The weight and
consolidation of the sedimentary deposits themselves, as
well as tectonics, caused the lowering of the plain up to
hundreds of metres. Subsidence was increasing southward,
thus explaining the shift of the River Po towards the
Apennine chain and the asymmetry of its drainage network.
Subsidence in the plain is still active and nowadays natural
causes go along with causes due to human activity, consisting mainly in underground water pumping and natural
gas extraction.
Many interesting landforms occur at the boundary
between the plain and the surrounding higher grounds. In
reality, the orographic limits of the present Padano-Veneta
Plain do not correspond to the structural boundaries of the
Alps and the Northern Apennines that are buried under the
thick detrital cover. The plain limit is clearly discernible all
49
along the border of the Alpine chain, where differences in
elevation are strong and erosional and depositional processes
are very intense. In some other cases transitional, usually
hilly, landforms are present that make the boundary of the
plain less evident (Tellini and Pellegrini 2001).
Fault scarps and steps, often deeply modified by
denudational processes, are among the most widespread
types of the margin, especially along the Alps. Sometimes
they occur in connection with flexure zones and uplifted or
folded areas. The distribution of these tectonic landforms is
quite heterogeneous within the plain; nevertheless, they are
more frequent at the Apennine and Veneto-Friuli margins,
thus testifying to lively tectonic activity witnessed by frequent earthquakes.
In the westernmost sector the limit of the alluvial plain
is characterized by planation landforms on bedrock (erosional glacis). In particular, they occur where severe
neotectonic uplift prevented the plain margin from being
buried under fluvial deposits. Along the Alpine margin
alluvial glacis are also found, resulting from the coalescence of complex alluvial fans. These fans extend well
downstream and often show evidence of ancient stream
courses that are oversized with respect to the present ones,
in accordance with high solid and water discharge of
glacially fed streams. Their evolution was influenced by
Quaternary climatic changes and as a consequence, they
usually underwent alternate phases of aggradation during
glaciations, and erosion during the postglacial periods.
Holocene alluvial fans are also present. They are more
frequent at the Northern Apennine border, but they occur
also along the Alpine margin. In both cases they do not
show clear evidence of dissection.
Moraine hills, sometimes a few hundred metres high, are
other typical transitional landforms between the plain and
the Alps. In most cases the moraine hills are in morphological connection with the downstream outwash plain and
represent the remnants of ancient and wide moraine
amphitheatres that testify to the frequent extensions of
glacial tongues into the plain marginal areas (Biancotti
2001). The Rivoli and Serra d’Ivrea moraine amphitheatres,
at the Dora Riparia and Dora Baltea outlets in the Po Plain
respectively, stand out at the western limit of the plain.
Moving to the east, the gentle hills of Brianza, to the south
of Como Lake, represent an amphitheatre built up by the
glacier that was responsible for overdeepening of the
depression where the lake is hosted. However, the amphitheatre of Garda Lake, that covers an area of about
760 km2, is the most impressive. These are only some of
the most significant examples, but many other moraine
amphitheatres of varying size are spread along the
Alps/plain margin.
Other hilly landforms interrupt the apparent flatness of
the plain. They are made of pre-Quaternary rocks and rise
50
from the surrounding fluvial, fluvioglacial, lacustrine and
moraine deposits. The Colli Berici (made of Mesozoic carbonatic rocks of marine environment) and the Colli Euganei
(extinct sub-volcanic reliefs, then exhumed by erosion;
Pellegrini 2004), that rise to heights of 300–600 m above the
plain are perhaps the most important examples. Both of them
are the result of processes that took place well before the
origin of the plain.
As a consequence of the alternate depositional and erosional processes, alluvial glacis, single alluvial fans and
outwash plain deposits are incised by different orders of
terraces that are wider on the Alpine side than on the
Apennine one, where they show evidence of neotectonic
deformations. Terraces are mainly convergent and they
characterize the portions of the plain hanging above the
present lower plain level, where the River Po and its tributary flow. The most ancient and highest terraces are connected to the so called “plain main level” through more or
less sharp scarps. This level is thought to be the product of
fluvioglacial and fluvial aggradational phases that affected
the foothill plain in relation with the last glaciation. In turn,
this old plain—well extended on the Alpine side from
Piedmont to Lombardy—joins the Holocene alluvial plain
through a step that resulted from downcutting of the main
stream (Franceschetti 1974; Castiglioni and Pellegrini 2001).
Fig. 5.10 The Padano-Veneta
Plain in the Cremona District. The
meandering bed of the River Po is
evident as well as the presence of
abandoned meanders (Google
Earth—Image © 2016
DigitalGlobe)
P. Fredi and E. Lupia Palmieri
The present drainage networks have different characteristics that correspond to the portions of the plain where they
are emplaced. The existence of hanging river beds in the low
plain is strictly tied to the Holocene prevalence of aggradation over erosion. The result is the origin of typical
ribbon-shaped fluvial ridges that extend for tens of kilometres, rising from the plain up to about 2 m. Their persistence
is also helped by building of artificial levees which started in
the Roman times. The presence of hanging river beds is a
crucial factor in flooding events, like the destructive historical one that struck the Polesine area in 1951.
Traces of abandoned river beds are also widespread. In
particular, ancient braided patterns are found over the high
plain. Old inactive meandering channels occur practically all
over the plain (Fig. 5.10). They often consist of single meander, but evidence of shifting of long trunks of streams to
other positions (avulsion) are also present. Actually, the
present drainage network geometry is greatly influenced by
human activities. The high density networks of artificial
channels, mainly related to land reclamation and agricultural
practices, substantially modify the previous trends of river
courses. Close to the coastal belt stream bed patterns are
very irregular, also due to the influence of coastal dynamics
in the development of river mouth deposits (Bondesan
2001).
5
Morphological Regions of Italy
The morphological aspects of the coastal belt of the
Padano-Veneta Plain allow the identification of three sectors: the southern sector, where wetlands do not exist anymore; the central sector, dominated by the River Po delta;
and the northern sector, characterized by a series of lagoons
among which the Venezia Lagoon is the most famous. The
Holocene evolution of the three sectors was controlled by
different factors: subsidence, neotectonic movements,
erosional/depositional processes and sea-level changes,
together with the very important role of human activities.
The River Po delta history is very long and complex (see
Stefani 2017). The most ancient prograding beach ridges are
located about 20 km inland in respect to the present shoreline and were built 5000–4500 years ago. Since that time the
River Po delta history is a history of progradation that
continued until the birth of the modern delta, although with
varying entity. The modern delta was established at the
beginning of the seventeenth century, after Venetian people
shifted the River Po main course to the southeast. Since then,
delta development was very fast until the middle of the
nineteenth century; progradation in this period has been
estimated for 140 ha/year. In more recent times, progradation slowed down and eventually the shoreline retreated,
mainly because of anthropic enhancement of subsidence and
reduction of solid load in the streams (Bondesan et al. 2001).
5.4
The Apennines
Non sono essi (gli Appennini) così belli come le Alpi? …
C’è una gran cosa che manca alle Alpi e alle Prealpi, per
la quale invece gli Appennini sembrano fatti apposta…la
vista del mare.
(Il Bel Paese)
Antonio Stoppani (1824–1891)
Aren’t they (i.e. the Apennines) as beautiful as the Alps
are? … There is something very important that the Alps
and Prealps are missing, which instead the Apennines seem
to have been made for … the view of the sea.
The landscapes of the Apennines are not as imposing as
the Alpine landscapes. Nevertheless they show very attractive and charming sceneries. They offer perhaps a greater
variety of landforms, mainly due to the different outcropping
lithologies and climatic variability that affect this long chain
stretching for about 6° in latitude.
The Apennine chain, in fact, extends for about 1500 km
across the whole Italian Peninsula and along northern Sicily,
where it joins the Maghrebides chain of North Africa. Going
from the north, it draws initially a southward concave arc
that separates the slope facing the Ligurian Sea in the south,
from the one sloping toward the western portion of
Padano-Veneta Plain in the north. Southeastwards, the
51
Apennine chain becomes concave westward and show its
typical NW–SE orientation; it separates the western slope,
facing the Tyrrhenian Sea, from the eastern slope facing the
Adriatic Sea. Finally, the Apennines are practically E–W
oriented on the northern side of Sicily. The highest relief is
Corno Grande (2912 m) in the Gran Sasso Massif, Abruzzo
Apennines (Central Italy).
The distance of the Apennines’ axis from the sea varies.
The chain seems to rise directly from the sea in its westernmost stretch (Appennino Ligure). Moving to the
south-east it progressively approaches the Adriatic Sea
(Appennino Tosco-Emiliano; Appennino Umbro-Marchigiano and Appennino Abruzzese) allowing the existence of a
wide Pre-apenninic area on the Tyrrhenian side. Further
southward the chain axis moves again towards the Tyrrhenian Sea (Appennino Campano, Appennino Lucano and
Appennino Calabro) while an external Pre-appenine area
characterizes the Adriatic side.
Sedimentary rocks are dominant along the whole chain
and carbonate rocks of the thrust sheets go along with
syn-orogenetic terrigenous deposits. Metamorphic rocks of
different grade outcropping in the Liguria and Tuscany
Apennines are an exception. Finally, crystalline rocks crop
out in the Sila and Aspromonte massifs of Calabria and at
the Monti Peloritani (Sicily); these terrains, although
belonging to the Apennines from a geographical point of
view, underwent a different and more complex geological
history (see Bosellini 2017).
The topography of the Apennines is characterized by a
long-wavelength topographic bulge *200 km wide, with
superimposed ranges *30 km spaced (Molin and Fubelli
2005). The first one has been interpreted as an effect of deep
endogenous processes (D’Agostino et al. 2001). The second
ones are made of Mesozoic limestones deformed by Neogene thrusting and bounded by Quaternary normal faults on
their southwestern side that show, in some cases, evidence of
Holocene activity (Galadini and Galli 2000).
The general morphological setting of the opposite slopes
of the Apennines is strongly influenced by the varying tectonic style. The eastern (external) slope has the character of a
thrust-and-fold chain that is the result of the northeastward
migrating compressive tectonics. The western (internal)
slope shows a characteristic horst and graben structure due to
the extensional tectonics—northeastward migrating as well
—that accompanied the compressive phase starting from the
late Pliocene. The origin of the peri-Tyrrhenian depressions
and intermontane basins also along the chain axis can be
mostly related to this tectonic phase.
Although with different intensity along the chain, both
compressional and extensional tectonics is still active; in
particular, compression seems to be active in the external
part of the northern sectors of the Apennines, while crustal
52
extension dominates in central and southern ones (Frepoli
and Amato 1997), which obviously influences their geomorphological evolution.
As a result of the eastward-migrating extensional and
compressional deformation belts, the Apennine chain is
asymmetrical: the Tyrrhenian slope is generally shorter and
steeper in comparison to the longer and gently dipping
slopes facing the Padano-Veneta Plain and the Adriatic Sea.
These tectonic styles strongly conditioned the general
landscape evolution as well as the arrangement of the present drainage networks that differs greatly on the two sides
of the Apennines. In particular, the drainage network pattern
in the western portion of the folded chain was influenced by
the existence of intermontane basins. These closed tectonic
depressions were flooded by the sea and once definitively
emerged (Early Pleistocene), they experienced continental,
mainly fluvio-lacustrine deposition. Subsequent erosional
processes, also driven by intense tectonic uplift, caused the
incision of the continental deposits and destruction of
thresholds which closed the basins. In this way the intermontane depressions became part of the drainage systems.
As a result of this evolution, some trunks of present major
rivers joining the Tyrrhenian Sea, as for instance rivers
Arno and Tevere, flow longitudinally to the chain and are
connected with each other by trunk streams that cut the
relief orthogonally, thus depicting a rectangular drainage
pattern.
Stream valleys on the Adriatic side show different
arrangements: in the Northern Apennines they are usually
transversal to the folds originated by compressional tectonics, and join the River Po or the Adriatic Sea being almost
one parallel to one another; in the south drainage patterns are
much more complex. In fact, the presence of intermontane
basins in the chain axial zones favoured the development of
longitudinal trunk streams also on the Adriatic side.
Among the main geomorphological features of the
Apennines is the existence of low relief palaeosurfaces that
are often found along the ridges, but also at lower altitudes
within the slopes. They represent very old elements of the
Apennines landscape and have been interpreted by many
authors (Bartolini 1980; Ciccacci et al. 1985; Boenzi et al.
2004; Della Seta et al. 2008; Schiattarella et al. 2013) as
remnants of ancient landscapes that were probably shaped in
morphoclimatic systems different from the present one, at
the Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary. The subsequent fluvial
incision tied to Pleistocene regional uplift processes transformed these old planation surfaces into landscapes hanging
high above the present-day lines of erosional incisions. In
other words, the geomorphological evolution of most of the
Apennine chains can be divided into two phases. The first
one dates back to the Pliocene and was characterized by
erosional processes that interacted with the chain build-up.
The second, Pleistocene phase was dominated by renewal of
P. Fredi and E. Lupia Palmieri
erosion processes tied to the strong regional uplift and to the
complex climatic changes that occurred before the establishment of the present morphoclimatic system (Bosi 2002).
5.4.1 The Landscape of the Northern Apennines
This sector of the chain extends from the Passo di Cadibona
(the limit between the Alps and the Apennines) as far as the
Val Tiberina, corresponding to the headwater of River
Tevere. It attains moderate height, Monte Cimone in the
Appennino Tosco-Emiliano (2165 m) being the highest.
The westernmost stretch of the Northern Apennines
(Appennino Ligure) can be considered the link between the
Alps and the Apennines from both the geographical and
geological point of view.
To some extent its tectonic arrangement can be compared
to one present in the Alps; relief consists mainly of metamorphic rocks and is not very high (the highest peak is Monte
Beigua, 1287 m). Given the short distance from the Ligurian
Sea, the southern slopes of this part of the Apennines constitute the steep and beautiful coastal area of Liguria.
Going eastward, the Apennines (Appennino ToscoEmiliano-Romagnolo) show their typical roughly NW–SE
orientation. Nevertheless, the effects of transversal tectonics
are evident; as a result the chain is characterized by oriented
ridges that on the whole are arranged like a series of theatre
wings. The correspondence among drainage divides, highest
elevations and the eastern front of normal faulting suggests
that the general topographic arrangement is controlled by the
eastward migration of normal faulting that lowered the west
side of the orogenic belt (Mazzanti and Trevisan 1978;
Bartolini et al. 2003).
Streams draining towards the Padano-Veneta Plain are
transversal to the chain; however their trending often shows
evidence of tectonic controls, tied to the presence of the
Apennine Frontal Lineament (a high angle reverse fault
system that separates the rising Apennines from the subsiding plain) and tectonic discontinuities (strike-slip faults)
that intersect the Lineament itself. On the Tyrrhenian side
rectangular drainage pattern prevails (Tellini and Pellegrini
2001).
Generally speaking, the landscape of the Northern
Apennines is rather squat and smooth, mainly because of the
low resistance of the most widespread outcropping rocks to
erosion. The youngest landforms are mainly due to slope
processes and to running water, also being favoured by the
presence of intensely fractured clayey, marly and arenaceous
rocks (Cretaceous–Miocene in age).
Many landslides of different kinds dot the slopes, making
this part of the Apennines one of the most hazardous (Bertolini et al. 2017). The most widespread landslides often
have complex genesis, as they frequently involve different
5
Morphological Regions of Italy
lithologies. Where clays prevail, flows occur, that are locally
named “lame”. In the hill and middle mountain belts, where
clays crop out, slope wash gives rise to bare rock surfaces on
which badlands and “biancane” easily develop (Vergari et al.
2013a, b; Del Monte 2017).
Given bedrock diversity, selective erosion produced some
of the most suggestive landscapes. This is the case of the
so-called Pietra di Bismantova (Fig. 5.11) in the northern
slope of the Emilia Apennines. Higher erodibility of the
underlying marls in respect to the above sub-horizontal
calcarenites allowed the formation of a very peculiar relief
(1047 m) that rises from the surrounding gentle landscape.
This relief was celebrated by Dante in his Divina Commedia
and it is thought to have inspired the Poet’s description of
Purgatorio.
Landforms due to fluvial processes are also common.
Stream valleys are differently shaped due to varied intensity
of fluvial deepening and slope processes that are both controlled by geological structure. The landscapes of the intermontane basins that are now drained by the longitudinal
reaches of the main rivers are particularly charming. Considerable stream incision tied to Pleistocene uplift led to the
origin of terraces comprising Plio-Quaternary fluviolacustrine deposits. The coupled action of streams and
slope wash originated the odd “Balze” landscape that is
typical of almost all the intermontane basins. In the “Balze”
areas rounded clayey hills and steep cliffs shaped on sands
and gravel, up to 100 m high, alternate with deep gorges
(Fig. 5.12). The beauty of this landscape inspired Leonardo
da Vinci who immortalized it in one of his learned sketches
and described it in this way: “…in fra essa terra si vede le
profonde segature dei fiumi” (literally: …within this land it
is seen the deep sawing of rivers).
53
Even if gravity and surface running waters are the
dominant morphogenetic agents, other formative processes
have also played their role in the origin of the contemporary landscape. On the northern slope of the Emilia
Apennines, where Triassic and Messinian evaporites crop
out, wonderful and unusual karst landscapes are found.
Quaternary glaciers have left their imprint in the
highest slope reaches (Fig. 5.13). During the LGM the
headwaters of streams flowing towards the Padano-Veneta
Plain were progressively occupied by valley glaciers
coming from wide cirques. The southerly unfavourable
exposure of the Tyrrhenian slopes, instead, allowed the
development of small “vedrette” restricted to the divide
areas. In these cases, the presence of glacial landforms has
obviously conditioned the postglacial streams. In fact, they
show irregular longitudinal profiles, in which steeper
stretches alternate with flatter ones, thus revealing the
previous morphology of cirques and glacial valleys
(Tellini 1994).
The northwestern sector of Tuscany, between the
Tyrrhenian coastal plain and the main divide of the
Apennines, hosts an amazing, sharp landscape that strongly
contrasts with the generally smooth landscape of Northern
Apennines. It is the landscape of Alpi Apuane, a mountain
chain that is quite distinct from the Apennines s.s. The
landscape is characterized by a series of rugged and barred
ridges that dominate the surrounding areas. The relief
consists mainly of metamorphic rocks among which marbles dominate. Quarry activities, starting about 2000 years
ago, are so intense to become the main morphogenetic
process. It is to remember that the marbles coming from
these areas have been the raw material for Michelangelo’s
masterpieces.
Fig. 5.11 The mesa of Pietra di Bismantova in the Emiliano-Romagnolo Apennine. It is a wonderful example of landforms resulting from
selective erosion (photo P. Picciati, Wikimedia Commons under CC BY-SA 3.0)
54
P. Fredi and E. Lupia Palmieri
Fig. 5.12 The “Balze del Valdarno” (photo S. Fabrizi) show the typical landscape of many intermontane basins. Plio-Quaternary fluvio-lacustrine
deposits filling these basins were successively incised by stream action, favoured by Pleistocene uplift (see also www.lamiabellatoscana.com)
Fig. 5.13 The Sillara lakes in
the Appennino Tosco-Emiliano
occupy cirques shaped by glaciers
during the LGM (photo M.
Mendi)
5.4.2 The Landscape of Central Apennines
Geographically speaking, the central sector of the Apennine
chain includes the Umbria-Marche Apennines and the
Abruzzo Apennines. The highest peaks are in the Abruzzo
Apennines (Piacentini et al. 2017) (Fig. 5.14). Given the
shift of the chain axis towards the Adriatic Sea, the
Tyrrhenian side is much wider and hosts ancient extinct
volcanoes of Latium in its westernmost portion, that extend
as far as the coastal zone (Fredi and Ciccacci 2017).
The asymmetry of the two slopes of the chain is still
evident; furthermore the drainage divide does not correspond
5
Morphological Regions of Italy
55
Fig. 5.14 View of the Gran
Sasso massif. To the left the
“Paretone” of the eastern peak of
Corno Grande; to the right the
Corno Piccolo peak (photo E.
Iannetti)
to the highest peaks that are localized on the Adriatic side.
Thus, some of the fluvial systems draining to the Adriatic
Sea have their headwaters in the western area subject to
ongoing extension. Whether this pattern is caused by stream
antecedence on the highest elevations or from regressive
erosion by the Adriatic rivers is a matter of a long-standing
debate in the geomorphological literature (Demangeot 1965;
Mazzanti and Trevisan 1978; D’Agostino et al. 2001).
The presence of Mesozoic calcareous relief along the
chain axis, roughly NNW–SSE oriented, is a dominant
character that makes the overall geomorphological aspect of
this portion of the chain markedly different from that of the
Northern Apennines. Given the contrast between the calcareous rocks and the surrounding terrigenous lithologies,
the highest peaks of the Central Apennines (Gran Sasso,
2912 m; Maiella, 2793 m; Velino-Sirente, 2486 m) rise
abruptly from a generally hilly and smooth landscape.
The development of rivers on the Tyrrhenian slope was
strongly influenced by the presence of the intermontane
basins that border the chain’s western slopes, and by their
filling. Most of them were successively integrated in the
present drainage patterns and they presently host the longitudinal reaches of the main rivers that are connected through
gorges deeply cut into the chain structure. The River Tevere
drainage network followed this evolutionary scheme and
attained its present pattern only in historical time, when the
last swamps were completely dried up. The Trasimeno Lake
is an exception: it still exists, although its size has been
constantly reduced in time. Some closed basins still survive,
as in the cases of Piani di Castelluccio, Colfiorito and Piana
del Fucino (Della Seta et al. 2017). They are close to the
watershed and their capture by external drainage networks
has been probably delayed by both their distance from the
sea and active local tectonic subsidence (D’Agostino et al.
2001).
Also favoured by tectonic uplift, the valleys of the
Adriatic slope of the Marche Apennines deeply cut the fold–
thrust chain through transversal gorges, affording spectacular
and wild landscapes (Fig. 5.15). The same arrangement of
valleys is found also in the Abruzzo Apennines; however,
the presence of intermontane basins at the chain axis makes
drainage patterns more complex because of the presence of
stream sections that flow parallel to the Apennine structure
(Bisci et al. 1994).
Finally, the Adriatic foothills are characterized by parallel
drainage pattern that is perpendicular to the NW–SE
Apennine trend. This hilly area is characterized by low relief
and sub-horizontal plains that slope gently towards the
Adriatic Sea. It is shaped on Plio-Pleistocene marine
deposits that are strongly affected by gravity-driven processes and erosion due to running water. Striking badland
landscapes dominate where argillaceous rocks prevail
(Fig. 5.16).
The wide spreading of strongly fractured and tectonized
calcareous and dolomite rocks allowed the development of
karst processes that affect both the Umbria-Marche and
Abruzzo Apennines. In some cases such processes contributed to surface lowering of the intermontane basins,
helping the preservation of closed depressions. Karst landforms are present also in the Apennine foothills on the
Tyrrhenian side; the landscape of Altopiani di Arcinazzo is a
wonderful example (Lupia Palmieri and Zuppi 1977).
56
P. Fredi and E. Lupia Palmieri
Fig. 5.15 The River Furlo gorge
cuts transversally the Marche
ridge of the Apennines (photo
Alicudi, Wikimedia Commons
under CC BY-SA 3.0)
Fig. 5.16 The suggestive
landscape of badlands shaped on
the argillaceous hills of Abruzzo,
on the Adriatic side of Central
Apennines (photo Dodo87,
Wikimedia Commons under CC
BY-SA 3.0)
Besides tectonics and lithological variety, Quaternary
climatic changes also had an important role in shaping
the Central Apennine landscapes. During the LGM, the
snowline in Central Apennines was at altitudes ranging
between 1550 and 1900 m (Federici 2004). Therefore,
ancient, inactive glacial landforms are present at higher
elevations (Fig. 5.17). At present the only existing glacier, named Il Calderone, occurs on the northern slope
of the Gran Sasso Massif and extend for about 4.5 ha
(Pecci et al. 2000). Some snow fields are present on the
Maiella massif, the second highest peak of the
Apennines.
5
Morphological Regions of Italy
57
Fig. 5.17 Landscape of Monti
Sibillini, with traces of past
glacial shaping clearly evident
(photo G. Tassi, Archivio
fotografico del Parco Nazionale
dei Monti Sibillini)
5.4.3 The Landscape of Southern Apennines
Southern Apennines include the Campania Apennines and
the Lucania-Calabria Apennines which have their prolongation in the relief of northern Sicily (Monti Peloritani).
However, the Calabrian landscape belongs to the Apennines
only from a geographical point of view, as it underwent a
markedly different geological history (Bosellini 2005). The
chain axis is shifted towards the Tyrrhenian Sea; as a consequence, high relief often hangs over the coastal belt. The
celebrated Costiera Amalfitana in the Penisola Sorrentina is
a wonderful example (Cinque 2017).
Unlike the Northern and Central Apennines, the typical
longitudinal arrangement of the relief is hardly discernible
and the mountain chain lacks an overall unity; as a result the
divide between the Tyrrhenian and the Adriatic slopes shows
a very irregular trend. Furthermore, considering the peculiar
outline of the Italian Peninsula, the trend of the divide and
streams patterns are made more complex by the presence of
the slopes facing the Ionian Sea.
Calcareous and dolomite terrains, often affected by
intense and advanced karst processes, predominate. In the
inner zones, the carbonatic rocks are often flanked by sandy,
marly and clayey rocks, thus favouring processes of selective erosion. The Matese massif, Monte Taburno, Monti
Picentini, Monti Alburni, Monte Sirino and Monte Pollino
(that includes the highest relief of the Southern Apennines:
Serra Dolcedorme, 2267 m) afford some among the most
typical landscapes of this part of the Southern Apennines
(Fig. 5.18).
The effects of horst and graben tectonics, guided by both
NW–SE and NE–SW oriented faults, are clearly evident on
the Tyrrhenian side. The coastline of the Campania Apennines, for example, is very irregular because of the presence
of bays and headlands which are the consequence of the
activity of the differently oriented fault systems. The NE–
SW oriented Penisola Sorrentina, with its exiting landscape
and the enchanting towns like Amalfi, is a structural high,
connected with Plio-Quaternary tectonics that closes to the
south the well-known Gulf of Naples. The coastal flat areas
of Piana Campana and Piana del Sele (which faces the Gulf
of Salerno) have an analogous meaning: they are structural
lows deriving from this very same tectonics. The volcanic
activity of Monte Vesuvio and Campi Flegrei (Aucelli et al.
2017), that characterizes the landscape of the Piana Campana, is tied to this same tectonic phase.
As in the case of Northern and Central Apennines,
extensional tectonics produced also NW–SE and NE–SW
trending intermontane basins that influenced the evolution of
drainage networks. The largest among these depressions are
some tens of kilometres wide and represent morphological
elements that separate the carbonatic massifs. Some of these
basins hosted tectonic lakes for a long time, as in the cases of
the Vallo di Diano, now drained from south to north by the
River Tanagro before joining the River Sele, or of the
mountain valley of the River Mercure, that drains the eastern
slope of the Pollino massif (Gioia and Schiattarella 2006).
Some others evolved into poljes and they still host small or
temporary lakes (Matese Lake). Generally, the evolution of
these depressions was characterized by phases of lacustrine
58
P. Fredi and E. Lupia Palmieri
Fig. 5.18 The landscape of the
calcareous monoclinal relief of
Monti Alburni. The massif is
strongly affected by karst
processes (photo M. Schiattarella)
and fluvial deposition that alternated with erosional phases;
as a result fluvial terraces are common in these areas.
The overall aspect of the carbonatic massifs is by itself
evidence of the complex tectonics that affected this sector of
the Apennines. The same discontinuous trend of the chain
and the usually polygonal shapes of the elevated tracts of
terrain are derived from the Plio-Quaternary activity of
normal or strike-slip faults. The landscape is generally sharp,
due to the low erodibility of the outcropping rocks and karst
landscape is dominant. Mountain slopes are generally steep
and they often correspond to fault scarps or fault-line scarps.
By contrast, flat erosional surfaces are repetitive and easily
discernible features of the mountain summits; they represent
the remnants of a wide palaeosurface shaped by long lasting
karst and fluviokarst processes active at the late
Pliocene/Quaternary boundary (Cinque and Romano 2001).
Fluvial landscapes are strongly influenced by the tectonic
history and the variety of outcropping rocks. The Pleistocene
uplift, together with variations of the sea level due to climatic changes, favoured stream incision. The effects of both
past and present fluvial erosion are much more evident
where less resistant, marly and clayey rocks crop out. Carbonatic massifs have poorly developed drainage networks
and the origin of stream valleys is also affected by karst
dissolution. The rare deep gorges that cut these elevations
are the result of antecedence or superimposition.
Although it does not belong properly to the Apennine
chain, the promontory of Cilento, recently declared
UNESCO World Heritage site, is worth mentioning for the
beauty of its landscapes (Valente et al. 2017). It separates
the Gulf of Salerno from the Gulf of Policastro and has been
the object of mythological tales some of which are told by
Homer in his Odyssey and in Vergil’s Aeneid.
Sandstone and conglomerates laying above less resistant
rocks are dominant and the landscape is generally
sharp. Streams flowing in very steep, narrow and short
valleys deeply cut down the relief that attains maximum
altitude of 1898 m at a short distance from the Tyrrhenian
Sea (Cinque and Romano 2001). The promontory’s coasts
are wonderful: sandy beaches alternate with high cliffs that
show surprising inlets and caves.
Given their remarkable altitude, also the highest elevations of this sector of the Apennine chain experienced glacial
shaping during the climatic cold phases. To the east, the
calcareous relief of Campania and Lucania Apennines gently
slopes towards a low mountain and hilly area. This area, in
turn, gradually declines towards the alluvial plain of Tavoliere, facing the Adriatic Sea, and the Fossa Bradanica (i.e.
the more recent foredeep of Southern Apennines) drained by
rivers Bradano, Basento and Agri that join the Ionian Sea.
Marly, arenaceous and clayey rocks prevail and the landscape is everywhere rather monotonous and smooth. Highest
elevations do not exceed 1000 m and are replaced seawards
by a large expanse of hills. Ubiquitous spreading of clayey
rocks favours the development of badlands and mass
movements, thus reminding of the Emilia Apennines.
5
Morphological Regions of Italy
The extinct volcano of Monte Vulture and the Monte
Volturino—the easternmost among calcareous elevations—
rise up from these gently rolling areas.
Although they do not belong to the Apennine chain, it is
worth mentioning the karst uplands of Gargano promontory
(600–1000 m) and Le Murge (400–600 m) where Cretaceous limestones crop out. The landscape is obviously
characterized by karst landforms that are much more
developed on the Gargano upland. These flat topped plateaux are bordered by steep scarps that in Le Murge are cut
by characteristic deep gorges, locally named “gravine”.
From a geomorphological point of view, the Pollino
massif—at the border between Basilicata and Calabria—
represents the southernmost limit of the peninsular Apennines. In fact the Calabrian uplands, to the south, are made
of pre-Triassic crystalline rocks that differ greatly from the
rocks of the Apennines but show strong analogies with the
Alpine rocks. Thus the Calabria Apennines, together with
the Monti Peloritani in Sicily, would represent a fragment of
the European crust that was pushed and rotated up to get
stuck into the Apennine chain (see Bosellini 2017).
The most important elevations making the Calabria
Apennines are the Catena Costiera, running close to the
Tyrrhenian coast, the Sila and the Aspromonte (Fig. 5.19),
where the highest altitude occurs (Montalto, 1956 m). The
landscape is quite unlike those of the other sectors of the
Apennines. Dissimilarities are mainly due to marked lithological differences but also to the higher uplift rates, as well
as to different climatic conditions. All of them influenced
Fig. 5.19 The Fiumara La
Verde deeply cut the southeastern
slope of the Aspromonte massif.
The gently waving summit
surface is a frequent feature of the
Calabrian relief. The typical bed
of “fiumare” is also evident
(photo E. Galluccio)
59
past morphological evolution and still guide the present
morphogenesis.
The rocks making the Calabrian relief are densely fractured and deeply weathered, also because of the Quaternary
hot-wet climatic phases. As a result, a thick debris cover is
present that mantles bedrock surfaces and reduces their
sharpness. The resulting thick debris cover is often involved
in mass movements or removed by the action of running
waters.
Although they show their own peculiarities, the general
aspect of the Calabria relief is characterized by flattened or
gently rolling summits bordered by steep convex slopes.
Because of this particular geomorphological arrangement,
the steepness of stream valleys increases from the upper to
the middle stretches. In the lower reaches—and before
reaching the coastal plain—valleys are generally deep and
wide and they host the typical “fiumare”: streams with high
discharge in the rainy periods alternated with long droughts,
which derive from the typical distribution of the precipitation in the Mediterranean climate (Robustelli and
Sorriso-Valvo 2017). The abundant solid load by some of
these particular streams was responsible for the origin of
wide coastal plains, like, for example, the fertile and pleasant
plains of Sibari (along the Gulf of Squillace) and Santa
Eufemia (along the homonymous gulf).
The structural analogies between Aspromonte and Monti
Peloritani testify to the continuity between the Italian
peninsula and Sicily. In spite of the geological similarities,
however, the Monti Peloritani has a more uneven landscape.
60
5.5
P. Fredi and E. Lupia Palmieri
The Volcanoes
Questi campi cosparsi
di ceneri infeconde, e ricoperti
dell’impietrata lava
… fûr liete ville e cólti
e biondeggiâr di spiche…
e fûr cittá famose
che coi torrenti suoi l’altèro monte
dall’ignea bocca fulminando oppresse
con gli abitanti insieme. Or tutto intorno
una ruina involve
(La Ginestra Canto XXXIV, 1836)
Giacomo Leopardi (1798–1837)
These fields with barren ashes strown
And lava hardened into stone,
... Were cheerful villages
With waving fields of golden grain…
Were famous cities, which the mountain fierce
Forth-darting torrents from his mouth of flame
Destroyed, with their inhabitans
Now all around, one ruins lies
(Translation by Frederick Townsend)
Considering the geodynamic framework in which the
Italian Peninsula evolved and is still evolving, the presence
of both active and inactive volcanoes is not surprising. They
are mainly located on the dry land along the Tyrrhenian
coast from Tuscany to Sicily; others are completely submerged or partially emerged as islands.
Most of them were imposing volcanic complexes that
died out some tens of thousands years ago, like Monte
Amiata, the Volcanic Complexes of Latium, the Ponziane
Islands, the volcano of Roccamonfina (to the southwest of
Monti del Matese) and the Monte Vulture (the only one on
the Adriatic side). Others are still persistently active, like
Monte Etna, the biggest active volcano in Europe, and
Stromboli volcano, in the Aeolian Islands, to the north of
Sicily. Their existence is related to the basaltic volcanism of
southern part of the Tyrrhenian Sea. Finally, some volcanoes, although active, are only temporarily quiescent, like
the Campi Flegrei, Ischia and the Vesuvio; all of them
belong to the explosive volcanic province of Campania.
The landscapes of active volcanoes are doubtless the most
representative for volcanic geomorphology, as the effects of
exogenous morphogenetic processes are obliterated by the
powerful action of volcanism. Landforms of inactive volcanoes are obviously strongly reshaped and even completely
erased by the subsequent erosional processes, but they can
tell a lot about the geological evolutionary history of Italy.
Considering the persistently active volcanoes, it is
appropriate to start with the geomorphological characteristics of Monte Etna volcano (3340 m), that covers an area of
about 1250 km2 on the eastern coast of Sicily, where it faces
the Ionian Sea (Fig. 5.20) (Branca et al. 2017). From a
geodynamic point of view, it is located in the collision zone
between the Euro-Asiatic plate to the north and the African
plate to the south. The basaltic volcanism of Monte Etna is
tied to the existence of an important normal fault system that
intersects the eastern Sicily crust, thus allowing magma
uprising from the mantle. It is a complex volcano edifice that
has the character of a shield volcano in the lower part and of
a strato-volcano in the upper one (corresponding to a change
in magma chemistry). Monte Etna is an imposing, individual
feature of the eastern Sicily landscape. On the whole it does
not have steep relief. The foothill area, where the most
ancient volcanic products crop out, is very gently sloping.
Different orders of fluvial terraces are present in its southwestern sector, where the River Simeto is incised into the
lava flows that repeatedly dammed its valley. Marine terraces, instead, characterize the southeastern sector of the
volcano, facing the Ionian Sea (Agnesi 2004).
The Etna morphological evolution is a very fast one,
especially at its summit, where eruptions following one
another cause repeated changes of crater shape and location,
so that also the mount altitude is continuously changing.
About 100 years ago there was only one crater at the summit, while today they are as many as four. A peculiar morphological element of Monte Etna is the Valle del Bove: a
wide depression on the eastern slope of the volcano that
originated about 10 ka ago as a result of a huge gravitational
collapse (Calvari et al. 2004), which followed repeated caldera collapses. It is likely that the huge slope failure produced devastating tsunami that affected all the eastern
Mediterranean area (Pareschi et al. 2006).
High permeability of volcanic rocks, helped by intense
fracturing, favours water infiltration, thus reducing surface
runoff. As a result, Etna slopes are mainly drained by rills
and gullies that fill with water after intense rainfall. Fluvial
landscapes are particularly impressive at the volcano foothills. Rivers coming from the Monti Nebrodi to the
northeast lap on the volcano relief and run towards the
Ionian Sea in very deep and spectacular canyons that cross
the lava flows.
Stromboli volcano, on one of the island of the Aeolian
magmatic arc to the north of Sicily, is persistently active too.
The morphology of this sub-conical volcano that covers an
area of about 12 km2 and rises up to 924 m is rather simple
as it is the result of different activity cycles of the same
central edifice. However, the relief relative continuity is
visibly interrupted on the northwestern slope, where the
large depression of Sciara del Fuoco dominates the landscape; it is the result of a gravitational collapse which
occurred about 6 ka ago, recognizable up to a depth of about
750 m below the sea level. Gravity-driven processes related
to the instability of the volcanic flanks are widespread. One
of the most recent examples is the landslide that affected the
northeastern slope of the Sciara del Fuoco during the
5
Morphological Regions of Italy
61
Fig. 5.20 Southern flank of
Monte Etna showing lateral cones
and flow from the 2001 eruption
(photo Wikimedia Commons
under CC0 1.0)
eruptive events of 2002–2003, causing tsunami waves high
up to 10 m (Calanchi et al. 2007). Marine processes are
responsible for some of the most exciting landforms: beaches with black sands and steep cliffs alternate and testify to
the struggle between the constructive action of volcanism
and the destructive and reworking action of sea waves.
Alicudi, Filicudi, Salina, Panarea, Lipari and Vulcano are
the other volcanic islands of the Aeolian Archipelago. Lipari
and Vulcano (the eponym of all volcanoes) can be considered active, even if their last eruptions date back respectively
to the seventh century BC and to 1890. Their morphology is
much more complex as they are the result of a very complex
volcanological history that determined the superimposition
in time and space of different eruptive centres (Lucchi et al.
2017). A constant geomorphological feature of all the volcanic Aeolian Islands is the presence of marine terraces.
Their sub-horizontal surfaces are the result of sea wave
erosion which acted during periods of sea still stand and
volcanic inactivity; sea-level low stand or crustal uplift were
then responsible for the terrace emersion.
In spite of its 70 years of inactivity (the last eruption dates
back to 1944), Vesuvio is perhaps the most famous volcano in
Italy (Fig. 5.21). It is also one of the most studied because the
consequence of a possible future eruption would be devastating for the about 800,000 people living on its slopes. The
Giacomo Leopardi’s poetry at the beginning of this paragraph
clearly evidences the high risks of Vesuvio’s eruptions.
Vesuvio, more properly named Somma-Vesuvio, can be
considered the symbol of the Gulf of Naples (Campania
region) of which it is surely the most outstanding morphological feature (Aucelli et al. 2017).
The Somma-Vesuvio has developed since about the end
of late Pleistocene into an extensional basin that originated
in relation to the Tyrrhenian Sea formation (Cinque et al.
1987; Santacroce 1987). It is a double peaked stratovolcano
made by an ancient edifice, the Monte Somma, and by the
more recent Vesuvio that has developed inside the caldera
depression produced by the collapse of Monte Somma
summit (about 3.6 ka ago; Rolandi et al. 2004). In spite of
more recent modifications, the present overall morphological
aspect of the volcano was determined by the very
well-known destructive eruption of 79 BC that destroyed the
towns of Pompei and Ercolano.
The most impressive volcanic landform of the Somma is
the roughly circular caldera (15 km in diameter). Its rim is
very asymmetric, with a very steep inner slope. The outer
slopes are moulded by well-developed drainage networks.
Stream valleys do not show a simple centrifugal pattern;
stream piracies and headward erosion, in fact, allowed the
development of amphitheatre valleys (Ollier and Brown
1971; Davoli et al. 1999). At elevation lower than 200 m the
low slope gradient (about 10°) on lahar deposits allows the
development of large flat floored valleys, with gentle slopes,
locally known as “Lagni”. In the past the Lagni were
responsible for repeated floods that contribute to the geomorphological hazards and risks of the Somma-Vesuvio area
(Davoli et al. 2001).
The younger Vesuvio is a cone-shaped stratovolcano,
with an elliptical summit crater. Streams generally flow
following the maximum slope without joining in a more
complex network. Gullies are widespread; they often join
into “parasol ribbing” networks.
62
P. Fredi and E. Lupia Palmieri
Fig. 5.21 The Vesuvio volcano. The volcanic edifice impends over the city of Naples (Google Earth—Image © 2016 TerraMetrics)
Not far from Somma-Vesuvio, other active volcanic areas
exist. The most important is the Campi Flegrei, to the
west of the city of Naples, and the Ischia Island, at the
northwestern margin of the Gulf of Naples. Both of them
belong to the same volcanic district that has been active
since about one million years ago.
The volcanic landforms of Campi Flegrei, that also
extend below the sea level, characterize the northern sector
of the Gulf of Naples. The whole area consists of a volcano–
tectonic depression, inside which numerous monogenetic,
mainly explosive, eruptive centres have developed chaotically (Russo 2004). The volcanic elevations have gentle
slopes and often show wide central depressions of crateric or
calderic origins; the scoriae cone of Monte Nuovo—born in
the sixteenth century—with its rather steep flanks is an
exception. Less important volcano–tectonic collapses
affected the area in recent times, too; the resulting depressions, together with the remnants of cones and domes contribute to the typical uneven morphology of the area. The
coastal belt too shows evidence of volcanic activity: various
promontories and semicircular bays, although deeply
demolished by marine erosion, clearly denote their crateric
origin.
Even if volcanic landforms are widespread, the landscape
of the Ischia Island (in the Campano Archipelago) is dominated by the effects of exogenous processes and by tectonic
landforms. The resurgent block of Monte Epomeo (Acocella
and Funiciello 1999; Della Seta et al. 2012) is one of the
most impressive landforms of the island. Its slopes are
drained by dense stream networks that originated steep and
deep incisions, whose unstable slopes are affected by frequent mass movements. The northern and western very steep
5
Morphological Regions of Italy
63
Fig. 5.22 Outline of the extinct
volcano of Monte Vulture (photo
Generale Lee, Wikimedia
Commons under CC BY-SA 3.0)
flanks of Epomeo are, in fact, fault slopes often affected by
rock falls and earth flows. The coastline is generally
indented; cliffs are prevailing, while beaches are few and
instable (Russo 2004).
Striking landscapes characterize also the areas were volcanism extinguished long times ago (Fredi and Ciccacci
2017; Margottini et al. 2017). Monte Amiata, an isolated
gently sloping elevation in southern Tuscany (Central Italy),
the volcanic Complexes of Latium, the stratovolcano of
Roccamonfina (active in Campania from 650 to 50 ka BP;
Davoli et al. 1999), the Monte Vulture (active in Basilicata
since 730–132 ka BP; Ciccacci et al. 1999) are among the
most important examples. With the only exception of Monte
Vulture (Fig. 5.22) that developed in a horst and graben
structure on the compressive front of the Apennine chain,
they owe their origin to the extension along the margin of the
Tyrrhenian Sea which followed the compressive tectonics
responsible for the formation of the Apennine orogen. The
morphology of these areas still reflects their volcanic origin,
even if volcanic landforms are more or less modified by the
subsequent action of exogenous processes, depending on the
time elapsed since the end of the volcanic activity, and
masked by the often thick vegetation cover.
It is noteworthy mentioning also the volcanic landforms
of Sardinia. They are connected with Oligo-Miocene
explosive volcanic events and to the more recent emplacement of basaltic lava flows, Pliocene-Quaternary in age.
Basaltic plateaux (locally named “giare”) were successively
disarticulated into mesas by fluvial erosion; these mesa
landforms are a main morphological characteristic in the
landscape of the western-central sector of Sardinia. Lava
flows often reached the sea, thus contributing to the wonderful coastal landforms of the island.
5.6
The Major Islands
Giusto è che questa terra, di tante bellezze superba, alle
genti si additi e tanto si ammiri…
(De rerum natura)
Tito Lucrezio Caro (* 98–55 BC)
It is only too fair that this land (i.e. Sicily), splendid for so
many beauties, is glorified to all the people in the world
and deeply admired…
(Translation by G. Luciani)
… io percorsi, o Sardegna, le tue strade
saline di Gallura,
la terra d’Orosei bianca, africana,
la Barbagia granitica e selvosa,
l’Ogliastra rossa…
(Sardegna)
Vincenzo Cardarelli (1887–1959)
I travelled, oh Sardinia, along your routes
saline of Gallura,
the Orosei’s white African land,
the woody and granite Barbagia,
the red Ogliastra…
(Translation by G. Luciani)
Offshore the Italian coasts, many archipelagos exist.
Some of the islands are made of sedimentary rocks, some of
64
magmatic rocks, but all of them afford wonderful landscapes
that are strictly tied to the different origins of the islands, as
well as to climatic conditions and local factors.
The most important group of islands in the Tyrrhenian Sea
is the Tuscan Archipelago, located in front of the homonymous region; the granitic Elba Island is the largest (about
234 km2). To the south the Campano Archipelago includes
volcanic islands (Ischia, for example) but also islands made
of sedimentary rocks. The wonderful calcareous Capri Island
that faces the Penisola Sorrentina and shares with it its geological origin is well known all over the world for its landscape, dominated by “Faraglioni”, and its sea caves. The
already mentioned volcanic Aeolian Islands, as well as the
sedimentary Tremiti Islands (in the Adriatic Sea), the astonishing pink granitic islands of the Maddalena Archipelago, to
the north of Sardinia, and the calcareous Lampedusa Island in
the Pelagie Archipelago, close to the Tunisian coasts, are
other examples of the numerous islands of Italy.
The two major islands of Italy, Sicily and Sardinia,
deserve a short, specific description because of the multitude
of landscapes they afford.
The statement of Tacito, a famous historian, orator and
senator of Ancient Rome, stressed the beauty of Sicily, the
widest region of Italy and the largest island of the
Mediterranean Sea with a coastline stretching along
1623 km, including its minor islands. The high variety of
landscapes, changing from the dreadfulness of Monte Etna
to attractive coastal areas, together with the historical and
cultural treasures, make Sicily one of the most beautiful
regions of Italy. The orography of Sicily shows strong
contrasts between high relief of the coastal chain in the
northern sector, hilly areas of the southern-central and
southwestern sectors, uplands of the southeastern sector and
the eastern sector dominated by Monte Etna. Drainage systems reflect this peculiar arrangement of the relief. Streams
draining northward flow in short and steep valleys; the
longest and more important ones flow southward and
southeastward and join the Sicily Channel and the Ionian
Sea, respectively. Some of them can be classified as typical
“fiumare”. Exogenous processes are mainly due to gravity
and running waters, and by sea waves in the coastal zones.
The result is a great variety of landscapes, in which evidence
of past climatic changes is also present.
The relief of the coastal chain that faces the Tyrrhenian
Sea is the main morphological feature of the Sicily landscape. From a geological point of view (see Bosellini 2017)
they belong to the Calabro-Peloritano arc (Monti Peloritani)
and to the Maghrebian chain of North Africa (Monti Nebrodi, Madonie, Monti di Palermo, Sicani and Egadi Islands).
As a whole, the coastal chain is the result of compressive
tectonics that caused folding and emersion of the area during
Early and Middle Pliocene; successively, extensional tectonics and uplift played a key role in relief evolution.
P. Fredi and E. Lupia Palmieri
The Monti Peloritani, the easternmost elevations, are
made of metamorphic rocks, often affected by intense
weathering. Their tops are generally sharp, even if the
presence of deeply weathered rocks allows at places the
development of rounded summits. The steep slopes, especially those facing the Tyrrhenian Sea, are drained by impetuous “fiumare”. To the west, the landscape of Monti
Nebrodi (1847 m) is gentler as a whole. The relief is made of
pelitic-arenaceous flysch. Their summits are often rounded
off; by contrast, slopes are generally abrupt and cut by
narrow valleys that become wider towards the Tyrrhenian
Sea. Landforms due to selective erosion are widespread
(Regione Sicilia 1996).
Further to the west, the landscape is dominated by the
massif of Madonie (Fig. 5.23), the highest (Pizzo Carbonara,
1979 m) and largest relief after the volcanic complex of
Monte Etna. The summit area of the Madonie is a wide
karstic plateau underlain by carbonatic rocks. The detrital
sedimentary piedmont belts of the massif and the surrounding argillaceous hilly areas are mainly affected by
gravity and surface erosion processes. Rill and gully erosion
are common and badlands are widespread (Agnesi et al.
2004).
Moving westward the coastal chain loses its identity and
vanishes into the Monti di Palermo and Monti di Trapani to
the north, and the Monti Sicani to the south. They are
generally characterized by abrupt slopes and narrow and
steep valleys due to elevated resistance of the outcropping
rocks to erosional processes.
To the south of the coastal chain the landscape changes
definitely. The southern central sector, to the south of the
Madonie massif and to the west of Monti Erei, is characterized by a continuous succession of hills that gently
slope toward the Mediterranean Sea. Plio-Quaternary
clays, marls and sands prevail. Outcrops of evaporitic
rocks, chiefly gypsum, are affected by karst erosion and
provide very peculiar landscapes. The smooth and sometime tabular relief of Monti Erei connects the northern
coastal chain to the Monti Iblei. These mounts constitute
the southeastern portion of Sicily that corresponds to the
northernmost sector of the Maghrebian chain foreland.
They constitute tabular unfolded plateaux, mainly calcareous in composition, that are deeply cut by
fluvio-karstic gorges, locally named “cave” (Regione
Sicilia 1996).
The most important alluvial plains are located in the
southeastern coastal areas; the Catania Plain and the Gela
Plain are the widest. The coastal landscapes of Sicily differ
greatly from one another. The presence of the coastal chain
along the Tyrrhenian side determines the prevailing steepness of the northern coasts. High and rocky cliffs alternate
with sandy beaches that represent the edge of the “fiumare”
alluvial plains. In the sharpest coastal landscape of the
5
Morphological Regions of Italy
65
Fig. 5.23 View of the Madonie
massif (photo MoritzP,
Wikimedia Commons under CC
BY-SA 2.0)
western sector, high rocky cliffs alternating with wide gulfs
prevail (Amore and Giuffrida 2011).
The northern sector of the Ionian coasts is dominated by
the Monti Peloritani and Monte Etna reliefs. Narrow pebbly
beaches grade into the jagged coast at the Monte Etna feet,
where inlets in the lava flows alternate with basaltic cliffs.
By contrast, low sandy and calcareous beaches exist in the
southern sector, where Monti Iblei faces the sea.
The coasts along the southern Mediterranean Sea are a
belt of wild, wide sandy beaches, bordered at places by low
white cliffs and interrupted by rocky promontories. In the
northwestern stretch, wet coastal flats are the site for the
development of salines. They represent a very characteristic
landscape where natural and human aspects merge into a
harmonious unity.
Sardinia is a world apart. From a geological point of
view, it deeply differs from the rest of Italy, so that it can
be considered as a fragment of the European continent
(see Bosellini 2017). Its Palaeozoic rocks, the oldest
found in Italy, outcrop mainly in the eastern, Tyrrhenian
sector of the island and, subordinately, in the southwestern corner. They are highly deformed granitic,
metamorphic and sedimentary rocks that show evidence
of the Hercynian orogenesis and even of the Caledonian
one. In other words, they represent the remains of an old
Hercynian chain, successively levelled into a peneplain by
erosional processes. This erosional surface is still well
recognizable in the landscape of the central eastern sector
of the island (Federici 2000), where it constitutes a wide
plateau deeply cut by streams. Mesozoic and Cenozoic
sedimentary rocks overlay the Palaeozoic basement; their
outcrops are dominant on the western side of the island.
Since Sardinia was not involved in the Alpine orogenesis,
the post-Palaeozoic rocks are sub-horizontal, although
they are displaced by fault systems. Moreover, volcanic
rocks are present. They are related to three subsequent
Cenozoic explosive and effusive volcanic cycles, each of
them referred to different phases of the island geological
history (Bosellini 2005).
Since the orogenic processes ceased long time ago,
exogenous morphogenetic agents could easily reduce the
resultant relief. The Gennargentu massif (1834 m), in
the central eastern part of Sardinia, is the highest relief of the
island, with a mean elevation of about 400 m.
It is self-evident that the variety of rock types, their
different grades of tectonic deformation and their peculiar
distribution, are important factors that influenced the
exogenous morphogenetic processes shaping the Sardinia
landscapes. Granitic rocks crop out mainly in the
northeastern sector and especially in the Gallura area, where
they support the wonderful and indented coast that contains
the very famous Costa Smeralda (Emerald Coast) and the
striking islands of the Maddalena Archipelago. The landscape is rather wild and sharp. Tower shaped hills, pinnacles
and uneven mountain crests are frequent even if they alternate at places with dome-like elevations that were rounded
by exfoliation, also favoured by intense fracturing of the
rock (Melis et al. 2017). Rocks with unusual cavernous
66
P. Fredi and E. Lupia Palmieri
Fig. 5.24 This granitic rock of
the Spargi Island (Maddalena
Archipelago, Sardinia) has been
shaped by exogenous processes
into a surprising “Witch head”
(photo Mattia.dipaolo, Wikimedia
Commons under CC BY-SA 3.0)
Fig. 5.25 The “tacco” Texile, in
the Barbagia region (central
Sardinia), has been officially
recognized as Natural Monument
(photo Mario 1952, Wikimedia
Commons under CC BY-SA 3.0)
landforms (tafoni) often result from weathering and erosional processes (Fig. 5.24).
The landscape is less sharp where metamorphic rocks
prevail. In fact, the lower resistance to erosion of these
rocks has allowed the development of generally smooth
reliefs. One of the most peculiar landscapes of the whole
island is present where Mesozoic sedimentary rocks crop
out. The different erodibility of the strongly deformed
Palaeozoic formations and the overlying horizontal sedimentary rocks is a key factor for the development of some
peculiar landforms, locally named “tacchi” (Federici 2000).
They are Jurassic sub-horizontal summit calcareous slabs
that were isolated by erosional processes; they are typically
bordered by steep scarps that contrast strongly with the
gentler slopes, shaped on the more ancient underlying
rocks (Fig. 5.25).
5
Morphological Regions of Italy
The Hercynian peneplain, the characteristic “tacchi” and
the already described basaltic “giare” are not the only flat
horizontal surfaces of the Sardinia landscape. In fact, one of
the main characteristics of the landscape is the low land of
Campidano that extends from NW to SE in the southwestern
corner of the island. It is a narrow-graben depression, about
30 km wide and 100 km long, that originated as consequence of extensional tectonics, tied to the opening of the
Tyrrhenian Sea, and was successively filled with Quaternary
alluvial deposits.
The coasts of Sardinia are certainly among the most
scenic of Italy, so that they attract a high number of tourists
during summer. They extend for 1879 km, including the
minor islands, and consist mainly of gently sloping rocky
sections or steep cliffs, at places interrupted by small beaches; large beaches are few. Altogether, rocky coasts and
sandy-pebbly beaches represent, respectively, about 76 and
24% of the entire coastal perimeter.
The scenery varies greatly, depending on the type of
outcropping rocks. The landscape of the granitic coasts in
the northeastern sector is surely one of the most spectacular.
Numerous promontories alternate with many small sandy
inlets and rare cliffs that face the sea dotted by many islands
and stacks. The peculiar morphology of this rias coast
resulted from drowning of previous fluvial valleys, as a
consequence of sea-level rise that followed the end of the
LGM (Ginesu 1999).
The landscape of the coasts where sedimentary rocky
cliffs dominate is as much attractive as that of the rias coast.
On the eastern Tyrrhenian side, the Orosei Gulf is practically
a continuous cliff, shaped in the Jurassic limestones, interrupted by isolated small beaches (Marini 2011). The type of
outcropping rocks favours the development of karst. Caves
often open at the base of the cliffs, thus contributing to the
spectacularity of the landscape.
The western coast shows different morphological characteristics, also depending on the variety of rocks. Cliffs
shaped in the Cambrian limestones, Mesozoic ones, or in
volcanic rocks represent a true heritage not only from the
aesthetical point of view, but also from the geological one,
as they show the complex history of Sardinia (Marini 2011).
High steep cliffs are poorly represented in the southern coast,
where low gently sloping rocky cliffs or beaches prevail.
Long beaches are rare in Sardinia. In the lack of important streams capable of delivering abundant load, the existence of these beaches is tied to tectonic and glacio-eustatic
events. They are located in areas affected by Miocene horst
and graben tectonics and by Plio-Pleistocene uplift, that
allowed the emersion of abundant sands from the before sea
bottom. Climate changes also played an important role. The
low sea-level stands of the cold periods, in fact, helped the
emersion of these sands that were blown inland, giving rise
67
to wide dune fields, especially along the western coasts
(Marini 2011).
The same causes were also responsible for the formation
of beach ridges and lagoons lying behind them, still present
at the back of the present shoreline. These wet areas represent true heritage from naturalistic point of view, as they are
important resources for scientific and tourist reasons, as well
as precious reservoirs of biodiversity.
5.7
The Coasts of the Italian Peninsula
In tutto il mondo, per quando si estende la volta celeste,
la regione fra tutte più bella è l’Italia… per le coste ricche
di porti, il soffio benigno dei venti…
(Naturalis Historia)
Plinio il Vecchio (79–23 BC)
All over the world, as far as the vault of the heaven
extends, the most beautiful country is Italy… for its coasts
rich of inlets, the mild breath of winds…
The coasts of Italy stretch for about 7500 km, including
the islands, and constitute the majority of the country’s
boundaries. Considering only the peninsula, the length of the
coastal belt of the Tyrrhenian, Ionian and Adriatic sides is
about 4000 km. Coasts are a very important feature of the
landscape and have played a primary role in the development of human activities.
The present morphological aspect of the Italian shores is
the result of a long evolution in which variable geological
histories of the various slopes facing the Italian seas shared a
fundamental role with alternating climatic phases and the
following sea-level changes. The evidence of this complex
evolution is recorded in the frequent presence of marine
terraces and notches on the rocky cliffs. The shore aspects
greatly differ: sandy beaches alternate with rocky cliffs,
deltas, swamps, pools and lagoons; large gulfs and small
inlets alternate with more or less projecting promontories
(Morandini 1957; CNR-MURST 1997). Either the Ligurian
or the Tyrrhenian, or the Ionian or the Adriatic coasts offer
great varieties of landscapes, even if each of them has its
own peculiarities. As a whole, the Ligurian and Tyrrhenian
sea coasts are more irregular that the Adriatic and Ionian sea
ones.
Starting from the Ligurian Sea slope and going along the
peninsula counterclockwise, the coast of Liguria is found.
The Ligurian coasts extend for 350 km and show high
variety of landscapes. They are traditionally divided into two
sectors: the “Riviera di Ponente” (Western Riviera) and the
“Riviera di Levante” (Eastern Riviera) related to the geological evolution of the Alps and the Apennine chain. They
correspond, respectively, to the seaward slopes of the Alpi
Marittime and the Appennino Ligure. As a result the landscape is characterized by the dominance of rocky cliffs that
68
P. Fredi and E. Lupia Palmieri
Fig. 5.26 The wonderful coastal
landscape of Cinque Terre, on the
Tyrrhenian side, at the boundary
between Liguria and Tuscany
(photo M. Firpo)
are particularly steep and continuous in the Riviera di
Levante. Cliffs often host small sandy or gravelly pocket
beaches at their foot, fed by mass movements from the cliffs
and marine depositional processes. Only in rare cases larger
beaches represent the boundaries of alluvial plains built by
the sedimentary load delivered by short and steep streams
(Corradi 2011). It is a very striking landscape: the mountain
slopes jut out over the deep sea and are refined by the
blooming Mediterranean woodlands, also favoured by a
particularly mild climate (Fig. 5.26).
Given the shifting of the Central Apennine chain towards
the Adriatic Sea, it is easy to understand why the Tyrrhenian
coasts of Tuscany (442 km) and Latium (290 km) show
wider beaches with shallower sea bottoms. These beaches
constitute the seaward edge of the alluvial plains of rivers
like Arno, Ombrone and Tevere which have large drainage
basins and carry sediment load abundant enough to replenish
the shore. The Versilia beaches in Tuscany, with the wonderful Alpi Apuane in the background, are among the most
known for their tourist value. Dune ridges are often present
landward of the shoreline and they allow the existence of
coastal ponds and lakes. The lakes of southern Latium
(Fig. 5.27), limited to the south by the Circeo promontory,
are an interesting example. The shape of these lakes and the
sea bottom morphology suggest that a rias coast has originated because of the sea-level rise since the end of the LGM.
Successively, the formation of the beach and dune ridges
(locally called “tumuleti”) cut off a sea sound and caused
lake formation (Caputo 2011). These widespread coastal
ponds and lakes represent the remains of wider and
reclaimed old swamp areas; the Tuscan Maremma and the
Latial Piana Pontina, between Monti Lepini-Ausoni and the
sea, are the largest and perhaps the best known.
The continuity of the mainly sandy Tyrrhenian shoreline
is interrupted by the presence of projecting landforms: they
are the rivers Arno, Ombrone and Tevere cuspate deltas and
some rocky promontories with rather high cliffs. Monte
Argentario, that limits to the south the Tuscan Maremma,
and Monte Circeo are the most evident promontories. They
share a common origin in that both of them were islands
subsequently connected to the mainland by more or less
developed “tomboli” and “tumuleti”. At present, Monte
Circeo is completely linked up with the Pianura Pontina,
while a wide lagoon still exists between Monte Argentario
and the main shoreline.
Rocky cliffs generally made also the coasts of the islands
of Tuscan Archipelago. Elba and Giglio islands are the most
known because of the beauty of their cliffs alternated with
small and wonderful sandy beaches that are a preferred
destination for bathing tourism (De Pippo 2011).
Moving southward along the Tyrrhenian coast, the three
wide gulfs of Gaeta, Napoli and Salerno and the Cilento
promontory draw the general outline of the Campania
shoreline that stretches for about 480 km, containing also the
northern portion of the Gulf of Policastro. The Apennine
chain is again close to the sea, even if not so markedly as
along the Ligurian coast. Sandy shores alternate with inaccessible high rocky cliffs, shaped in calcareous, terrigenous
5
Morphological Regions of Italy
69
Fig. 5.27 The coastal lakes of
southern Latium. In the
foreground the calcareous
promontory of Circeo (photo
Parco Nazionale del Circeo)
and volcanic rocks. This is the case of the Capri and Ischia
islands in the Gulf of Napoli, or of both the beautiful
“Costiera Amalfitana” that limits the Gulf of Salerno
northward and the rugged shores of Cilento (Cinque 2017;
Valente et al. 2017). The aspect of the coastal belt clearly
reflects the structural arrangement of this area. The presence
of rocky cliffs of the promontories, in correspondence with
structural highs, reveals the control exerted by the Apennine
tectonics. Sandy shores are located mainly at the edges of the
fluvial plains built by rivers like Garigliano, Volturno and
Sele inside the coastal tectonic depressions that were originated by the Plio-Quaternary extensional tectonics affecting
the Tyrrhenian slope of the Apennines (GNRAC 2006).
The coast of Gulf of Policastro, to the south, belongs to
three different Italian regions: Campania, Basilicata and
Calabria. The shoreline is strongly indented and characterized by a succession of promontories and inlets. Gravitational, fluvial and marine processes favoured local
deposition of coarse-grained sediments, thus favouring the
formation of small and mainly pebbly pocket beaches. The
prevailingly calcareous outcropping rocks allowed the
development of karst caves that have been flooded by the sea
and reworked by marine processes after the end of the LGM
(Schiattarella 2011).
Southward, the arrangement of the Tyrrhenian shore of
Calabria is influenced by the proximity of the Apennines to
the sea. The coastal belt is rather narrow and bordered by
sandy-pebbly beaches that are limited inland by poorly
developed dune ridges and locally interrupted by more or
less projecting promontories. Delta plains occur at the
mouths of major streams. However, the main features of the
Calabria Tyrrhenian coast are the wide gulfs of Sant’Eufemia and Gioia Tauro, divided by the striking rocky
promontory of Capo Vaticano. The two gulfs correspond to
wide alluvial plains that are bordered landward by a ring of
mountains and hills. The existence of many orders of marine
terraces is clearly evident along the coast of Calabria
(Fig. 5.28). Their origin is mainly tied to the episodes of
strong uplift that has affected this region, and its southern
sector in particular, in very recent times. The presence of
fossil beaches at different elevations is a further evidence of
these marked vertical movements. High cliffs and small
beaches dominate the southernmost coasts as far as the
opening of the Messina Strait, that represents the limit of the
Tyrrhenian shore.
The Ionian shore of the Italian peninsula is marked by the
large gulfs of Squillace and Taranto, divided by the large
promontory corresponding to the Sila massif and its eastern
foothills.
The Gulf of Squillace and the shore to its south, entirely
belonging to Calabria, are lined by beaches that show rectilinear trend. Deltaic coastal plains are lacking, in spite of
the presence of locally wide drainage basins along this
coastal stretch. The main reason to explain this peculiarity is
scarce solid load delivered to the coast by streams, as a
consequence of their intense embanking and damming.
However, the sea bottom configuration has an important role
too; in fact the rather narrow continental shelf is incised by
70
P. Fredi and E. Lupia Palmieri
Fig. 5.28 Marine terraces along
the Tyrrhenian coast of Calabria
(photo Bultro, Wikimedia
Commons under CC BY-SA 3.0)
deep submarine canyons that carry the detrital load far offshore (Pugliese 2011).
The wide Gulf of Taranto shows a great variety of
landscapes. Along this gulf, in fact, different geological
arrangements follow one another: the Apennine chains, the
foredeep and the foreland. Complex deltas are important
elements that stretch out into the sea along sandy shores of
the southern side of the gulf. They are the result of depositional processes driven by streams coming from the eastern
slopes of the Apennines. Alluvial plains are present only in
some cases; in others the typical braided channels of “fiumare” flow directly into the sea giving rise to fan-shaped
delta flanked by low rocky cliffs (Schiattarella 2011).
The landscape changes on the northern side, along the
calcareous Penisola Salentina that represents the foreland of
the Apennine chain (Mastronuzzi and Sansò 2017). Rocky
coasts are dominant. High steep cliffs shaped on fault surfaces or gently seaward sloping rocky beaches, in places
corresponding to bedding surfaces, are the most common
morphological features. Sandy beaches are less widespread;
they are usually rather narrow and their landward edges are
often bordered by belts of dunes that dam back swampy
areas.
The Canale d’Otranto marks the beginning of the Adriatic
Sea. The height of the shoreline is generally low; flat or
gentle surfaces slope towards the sea that has very shallow
bottom. Straight stretches of sand extend for many kilometres forming an almost continuous beach that can be considered the longest in Europe (Pennetta 2011). Moving
northward from the Canale d’Otranto, the continuity of the
Adriatic sandy shore is interrupted by the jagged headland of
Gargano (built of Mesozoic limestones) that shows bluffs
and cliffs on its southern side and sandy-clayey beaches on
the northern one, where the coastal lakes Lesina and Varano
are present.
A practically uninterrupted succession of sandy or pebbly
beaches extends northward along the Abruzzo (Fig. 5.29)
and Marche shore. Their width becomes narrower where the
eastern, and often terraced foothills of the Apennines
approach the coastline and reach it at the Conero promontory. Its cliffs are shaped on mainly calcareous substratum
and are the highest of the Adriatic Italian coast.
Long sandy beaches, also fed by important rivers coming
from the Northern Apennines, characterize the landscape of
the Emilia-Romagna shores. Tourism along these beaches is
so developed that it has become a first rank economic
activity in Europe. Towns, like the well-known Rimini and
Riccione, extended in time and eventually coalesced into a
single seaside resort stretching for more than 50 km
(Simeoni and Corbau 2011).
To the north, the Adriatic shore is dominated by the Po
Delta that covers an area of about 400 km2 and is bordered
by a wide submerged prodelta (Stefani 2017). The delta
shore is characterized by systems of beach ridges and bars
that enclose wide and densely inhabited lagoon areas (Corbau and Simeoni 2011).
The northernmost Italian shores of the Adriatic Sea
(belonging to Veneto and Friuli Venezia Giulia) are
5
Morphological Regions of Italy
71
Fig. 5.29 The beach of Cerrano
(Pineto) along the Abruzzo coast
(photo C. Bosica)
essentially sandy and clayey and represent the seaward
edge of the wide alluvial plains of rivers Adige, Brenta,
Piave, Tagliamento and Isonzo. Really the entire shore is a
complex system of deltas and lagoons, among which the
Venice Lagoon stands out. This lagoon has originated since
the end of the LGM and was due to the parallel progradation of the shoreline caused by deposition of clays and
muds delivered by the rivers Po, Brenta, Sile, Piave and
Tagliamento. Nowadays the lagoon extends for about
550 km2 and is characterized by a thick channel network of
different depth. It hosts the worldwide famous city of
Venice (Corbau and Simeoni 2011; Bondesan 2017).
Moving northeastward of the Venice Lagoon the landscape
does not change. The shore is still a system of deltas (of
rivers Piave, Tagliamento and Isonzo) and lagoons (Marano
and Grado) that strongly contrast with the rocky and steep
coast of the Gulf of Trieste dominated by the Carso Massif
(Brambati 2011).
5.8
Final Remarks
The physical landscapes of Italy have a great variety of
landforms, hardly found in other countries with a similar
small size of about 301,000 km2. Well-developed landforms
that derive their origin from the processes accomplished by
glaciers, slope wash, streams, sea and wind, or more strictly
tied to weathering and gravitational processes, occur in a
very limited space. And they are paralleled by landforms
produced by tectonic movements and volcanism. Furthermore, everything is framed into a territory that is geologically young and very active, rather heterogeneous from a
lithological point of view, and with climatic conditions that
change in time and in the different geographical zones. Italy,
in fact, is not only one of the regions of the world characterized by the typical Mediterranean climate, as it is frequently thought, but it is also affected by other climatic types
and each of them comprehends different varieties, like, for
example, the Mediterranean sub-arid climate of the southernmost areas of Sicily or the cold climate of the Alps
(Fratianni and Acquaotta 2017).
The evolution of the geomorphological regions of Italy is
made still more complex by human communities that have
been present in this country since the most ancient times.
Nowadays the presence of people and their activities is
widespread over most of the territory, excluding the most
internal and highest areas. This human presence deeply
modified the natural equilibrium, enhancing the probability
for hazardous geomorphological processes to happen or
triggering new ones, thus also causing an increase of risks.
One of the most impressive examples in Italy is provided by
widespread erosion that has affected the Italian beaches in
the last decades (Caputo et al. 1991; Table 5.1). The erosional processes can be related not only to natural causes
(sea-level rise, subsidence of sedimentary basins, climate
change etc.) but also, and perhaps chiefly, to human interventions (inland stream damming, harbour structures, quarrying, dune levelling etc.).
In the light of the above considerations, the Italian territory appears like an extraordinary “geomorphological laboratory”, where it is possible to study the complex
relationships between the endogenous and exogenous geodynamic forces, including the increasingly powerful human
action in the latter.
72
P. Fredi and E. Lupia Palmieri
Table 5.1 Types of coasts and beach erosion in Italy (modified after GNRAC 2006)
Italian regions
Shore total length (km)
Cliffs (km)
Beaches (km)
Retreating beaches
(km)
(%)
Veneto
140
0
140
25
17.9
Friuli Venezia Giulia
111
35
76
10
13.2
Liguria
350
256
94
31
33.0
Emilia-Romagna
130
0
130
32
24.6
Tuscany
442
243
199
77
38.7
Marche
172
28
144
78
54.2
Latium
290
74
216
117
54.2
Abruzzo
125
26
99
60
60.6
Molise
36
14
22
20
90.9
Campania
480
256
224
95
42.4
Puglia
865
563
302
195
64.6
68
32
36
28
77.8
Basilicata
Calabria
736
44
692
300
43.4
Sicily
1623
506
1117
438
39.2
Sardinia
1897
1438
459
165
35.9
Italy
7465
3515
3950
1671
42.3
References
Acocella V, Funiciello R (1999) The interaction between regional and
local tectonics during resurgent doming: the case of the island of
Ischia, Italy. J Volcanol Geoth Res 88(1–2):109–123
Agnesi V (2004) Vulcani attivi: l’Etna. Tav. 65. In: Italia—Atlante dei
tipi geografici. Istituto Geografico Militare, Firenze, pp 325–326
Agnesi V, Di Maggio C, Madonia G (2004) La Geomorfologia. In:
Ente Parco delle Madonie—Dipartimento di Geologia e Geodesia
dell’Università di Palermo (eds) Guida geologica del Parco delle
Madonie. Priulla Ed, Palermo, 215 pp
Almagià R (1959) L’Italia. UTET, Torino, p 1320
Amore C, Giuffrida E (2011) La costa della Sicilia. In: Ginesu S (ed) La
costa d’Italia. Carlo Delfino, Sassari, pp 291–304
Aucelli PPC, Brancaccio L, Cinque A (2017) Vesuvius and Campi
Flegrei: volcanic history, landforms and impact on settlements. In:
Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and Landforms of Italy.
Springer, Cham, pp 389–398
Baroni C (2004) Valli glaciali. Tav. 39. In: Italia-Atlante dei tipi
geografici. Istituto Geografico Militare, Firenze, pp 227–231
Bartolini C (1980) Su alcune superfici sommitali dell’Appennino
settentrionale (prov. di Lucca e di Pistoia). Geogr Fis Dinam Quat
3:42–60
Bartolini C, D’Agostino N, Dramis F (2003) Topography, Exumation
and drainage network evolution of the Apennines. Episodes 26
(3):212–216
Bertolini G, Corsini A, Tellini C (2017) Fingerprints of large-scale
landslides in the landscape of the Emilia Apennines. In: Soldati M,
Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer,
Cham, pp 215–224
Biancotti A (2001) Limiti dell’area di pianura. In: Castiglioni GB,
Pellegrini GB (eds) Note illustrative alla Carta Geomorfologica
della Pianura Padana. Suppl Geogr Fis Dinam Quat IV:17–19
Bisci C, Coltorti M, Dramis F, Gentili B, Pambianchi G (1994)
Evoluzione idrografica e strutturale. In: Passeri L (ed) L’Appennino
umbro-marchigiano. Guide Regionali, Società Geologica Italiana,
BE-MA editrice, Lodi, pp 70–78
Boenzi F, Capolongo D, Cecaro G, D’Andrea E, Giano SI, Lazzari M,
Schiattarella M (2004) Evoluzione geomorfologica polifasica e tassi
di sollevamento del bordo sud-occidentale dell’alta Val d’Agri
(Appennino meridionale). Boll Soc Geol It 123:357–372
Bondesan A (2017) Geomorphological processes and landscape evolution of the Lagoon of Venice. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 181–191
Bondesan M (2001) Idrografia. In: Castiglioni GB, Pellegrini GB
(eds) Note illustrative alla Carta Geomorfologica della Pianura
Padana. Suppl Geogr Fis Dinam Quat IV:33–44
Bondesan M, Elmi C, Marocco R (2001) Forme e depositi di origine
litoranea e lagunare. In: Castiglioni GB, Pellegrini GB (eds) Note
illustrative alla Carta Geomorfologica della Pianura Padana. Suppl
Geogr Fis Dinam Quat IV:105–118
Bosellini A (2005) Storia geologica d’Italia. Zanichelli, Bologna, 183 pp
Bosellini A (2017) Outline of the geology of Italy. In: Soldati M,
Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer,
Cham, pp 21–27
Bosi C (2002) L’interpretazione delle superfici relitte nell’Appennino
centrale: il caso della zona di Colfiorito, prov. Perugia e Macerata. Il
Quaternario 15:69–82
Brambati A (2011) La costa del Friuli Venezia Giulia. In: Ginesu S
(ed) La costa d’Italia. Carlo Delfino, Sassari, pp 431–446
Branca S, Chester D, De Beni E, Duncan A (2017) Landforms and
landscapes of Mount Etna (Sicily): relationships between a volcano, its
environment and human activity. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M
(eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 467–478
Calanchi N, Lo Cascio P, Lucchi F, Rossi PL, Tranne CA (2007) Guida
ai vulcani e alla natura delle Isole Eolie. Stabilimento Poligrafico
Fiorentino, Calenzano (Firenze), 385 pp
Calvari S, Tanner LH, Groppelli G, Norini G (2004) Valle Del Bove,
eastern flank of Etna Volcano: a comprehensive model for the
opening of the depression and implications for future hazards. In:
Bonaccorso A, Calvari S, Coltelli M, Del Negro C, Falsaperla S
5
Morphological Regions of Italy
(eds) Mt. Etna: Volcano Laboratory. AGU Geophysical Monograph
Series, vol 143, pp 65–75
Caputo C (2011) La costa del Lazio. In: Ginesu S (ed) La costa d’Italia.
Carlo Delfino, Sassari, pp 217–228
Caputo C, D’Alessandro L, Landini B, Lupia Palmieri E (1991) Present
erosion and dynamics of Italian beaches. Z Geomorphol Supp
81:31–39
Carton A (2004) Paesaggi di alta montagna: rocce cristalline. Tav. 4. In:
Italia - Atlante dei tipi geografici. Istituto Geografico Militare,
Firenze, pp 106–111
Carton A, Baroni C (2017) The Adamello-Presanella and Brenta
Massifs, Central Alps: contrasting high-mountain landscapes and
landforms. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and
landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 101–112
Castiglioni GB, Pellegrini GB (eds) (2001) Note illustrative alla Carta
Geomorfologica della Pianura Padana. Suppl Geogr Fis Dinam
Quat IV, 207 pp
Ciccacci S, D’Alessandro L, Dramis F, Fredi P, Pambianchi G (1985)
Geomorphological and neotectonic evolution of the Umbria-Marche
ridge northern sector. Stud Geol Camerti 10:7–15
Ciccacci S, Del Gaudio V, La Volpe L, Sansò P (1999) Geomorphological features of Monte Vulture Pleistocene Volcano (Basilicata,
Southern Italy). Z Geomorphol Supp 114:29–48
Cinque A (2017) Sorrento Peninsula and Amalfi Coast: the long-term
history of an enchanting promontory. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M
(eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 399–408
Cinque A, Romano P (2001) Evoluzione geomorfologica della regione.
In: Vallario A (ed) L’ambiente geologico della Campania. CUEN,
Napoli, pp 59–90
Cinque A, Hossein HH, Laureti L, Russo F (1987) Osservazioni
preliminari sull’evoluzione geomorfologica della Piana del Sarno
(Campania, Appennino meridionale). Geogr Fis Dinam Quat
10:161–174
CNR-MURST (1997) Atlante delle spiagge italiane. Selca, Firenze
Corbau C, Simeoni U (2011) La costa del Veneto. In: Ginesu S (ed) La
costa d’Italia. Carlo Delfino, Sassari, pp 411–430
Corradi N (2011) La costa della Liguria. In: Ginesu S (ed) La costa
d’Italia. Carlo Delfino, Sassari, pp 185–200
Coward M, Dietrich D (1989) Alpine tectonics—an overview. In:
Coward MP, Dietrich D, Park RG (eds) Alpine tectonics. Geological Society Special Publication, vol 45, pp 1–29
Cucchi F, Finocchiaro F (2017) Karst landforms in Friuli Venezia Giulia:
from Alpine to Coastal Karst. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 147–156
D’Agostino N, Jackson JA, Dramis F, Funiciello R (2001) Interaction
between mantle upwelling, drainage evolution and active normal
faulting: an example from the central Apennines (Italy). Geophys J
Int 147:475–497
Davoli L, Del Monte M, De Rita D, Fredi P (1999) Geomorphology
and tectonics in the Roccamonfina Volcano (Campania, Central
Italy). Z Geomorphol Supp 114:11–28
Davoli L, Fredi P, Russo F, Troccoli A (2001) Natural and
anthropogenic factors of flood hazard in the Somma-Vesuvio area
(Italy). Géomorphologie Relief Processus Environ 3:195–208
Della Seta M, Del Monte M, Fredi P, Miccadei E, Nesci O,
Pambianchi G, Piacentini T, Troiani F (2008) Morphotectonic
evolution of the Adriatic piedmont of the Apennines: an advancement in the knowledge of the Marche-Abruzzo border area.
Geomorphology 102:119–129
Della Seta M, Marotta E, Orsi G, de Vita S, Sansivero F, Fredi P (2012)
Slope instability induced by volcano-tectonics as an additional
source of hazard in active volcanic areas: the case of Ischia island
(Italy). Bull Volcanol 74(1):79–106
Della Seta M, Melelli L, Pambianchi G (2017) Reliefs, intermontane
basins and civilization in the Umbria-Marche Apennines: origin and
73
life by geological consent. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 317–326
Del Monte M (2017) The typical badlands landscapes between the
Tyrrhenian Sea and the Tiber River. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M
(eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 281–291
Demangeot J (1965) Geomorphologie des Abruzzes Adriatiques.
Centre Recherche et Documentation Cartographique, Memoires et
Documents. CNRS, Paris, 403 pp
De Pippo T (2011) Il Mar Tirreno e il Mar Ligure. In: Ginesu S (ed) La
costa d’Italia. Carlo Delfino, Sassari, pp 61–70
Federici PR (2000) La varietà dei paesaggi naturali. Il Paesaggio
italiano. Touring Club Italiano, Milano, pp 11–26
Federici PR (2004) Forme di glacialismo appenninico. Tav. 44. In:
Italia - Atlante dei tipi geografici. Istituto Geografico Militare,
Firenze, pp 250–253
Franceschetti B (1974) I lineamenti morfologici. L’Italia. Istituto
Geografico De Agostini, Novara, pp 22–37
Fratianni S, Acquaotta F (2017) The climate of Italy. In: Soldati M,
Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer,
Cham, pp 29–38
Fredi P, Ciccacci S (2017) A route of fire in Central Italy: the Latium
ancient Volcanoes. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes
and landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 303–315
Frepoli A, Amato A (1997) Contemporaneous extension and compression in the Northern Apennines from earthquake fault plane
solution. Geophys J Int 129:368–388
Galadini F, Galli P (2000) Active tectonics in the central Apennines
(Italy)—input data for seismic hazard assessment. Nat Hazards
22:225–270
Gasperi G (2001) Schema strutturale dell’area. In: Castiglioni GB,
Pellegrini GB (eds) Note illustrative alla Carta Geomorfologica
della Pianura Padana. Suppl Geogr Fis Dinam Quat IV:45–54
Ginesu S (1999) Sardegna, aspetti del paesaggio fisico in un micro
continente. Ed. Poddighe, Sassari, 186 pp
Gioia D, Schiattarella M (2006) Caratteri morfotettonici dell’area del
valico di Prestieri e dei Monti di Lauria (Appennino Meridionale). Il
Quaternario 19(1):129–142
GNRAC—Gruppo Nazionale per la Ricerca sull’Ambiente Costiero
(2006) Lo stato dei litorali italiani. Studi costieri 10:1–174
Insolera D, Musiani Zaniboni G (eds) (1979) Atlante Generale
Illustrato. Zanichelli, Bologna, 178 pp
Lucchi F, Romagnoli C, Tranne CA (2017) Volcanic landforms and
landscapes of the Aeolian Islands (Southern Tyrrhenian Sea, Sicily):
implications for hazard evaluation. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M
(eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 443–453
Lupia Palmieri E, Parotto M (2009) Il globo terrestre e la sua
evoluzione. V and VI editions. Zanichelli, Bologna, 580 pp
Lupia Palmieri E, Zuppi GM (1977) Il carsismo degli Altopiani di
Arcinazzo (Lazio). Geol Romana 16:309–390
Margottini C, Melelli L, Spizzichino D (2017) The Tuff Cities: A
‘Living Landscape’ at the border of volcanoes in Central Italy. In:
Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy.
Springer, Cham, pp 293–301
Marini A (2011) La costa della Sardegna. In: Ginesu S (ed) La costa
d’Italia. Carlo Delfino, Sassari, pp 305–326
Mastronuzzi G, Sansò P (2017) The Salento Peninsula (Apulia,
Southern Italy): a water-shaped landscape without rivers. In:
Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy.
Springer, Cham, pp 421–430
Mazzanti R, Trevisan L (1978) Evoluzione della rete idrografica
nell’Appennino centro-settentrionale. Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 1:55–62
Melis RT, Di Gregorio F, Panizza V (2017) Granite landscapes of
Sardinia: long-term evolution of scenic landforms. In: Soldati M,
Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer,
Cham, pp 351–363
74
Molin P, Fubelli G (2005) Morphometric evidence of the topographic
growth of the central Apennines. Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 28:47–61
Morandini G (1957) I mari, le coste, le isole. L’Italia fisica: Conosci
l’Italia, vol 1. Touring Club Italiano, Milano, pp 135–168
Ollier CD, Brown MJF (1971) Erosion of a young volcano in New
Guinea. Z Geomorphol Supp 15:12–28
Orombelli G (2004) Laghi prealpini. Tav. 42. In: Italia - Atlante dei tipi
geografici. Istituto Geografico Militare, Firenze, pp 242–244
Panizza M (2004) Paesaggi di alta montagna: dolomie. Tav. 3. In: Italia Atlante dei tipi geografici. Istituto Geografico Militare, Firenze,
pp 104–105
Pareschi MT, Boschi E, Mazzarini F, Favalli M (2006) Large
submarine landslides offshore Mt. Etna. Geophys Res Lett 33
(L13302):5
Pecci M, De Sisti G, Marino A, Smiraglia C (2000) New radar survey
in monitoring the evolution of the Calderone Glacier. Artic Antartic
and Alpine Res 32(2):197–201
Pellegrini GB (2004) Edifici vulcanici estinti: Colli Euganei. Tav. 69.
In: Italia - Atlante dei tipi geografici. Istituto Geografico Militare,
Firenze, pp 338–339
Pennetta L (2011) Il Mare Adriatico. In: Ginesu S (ed) La costa d’Italia.
Carlo Delfino, Sassari, pp 39–48
Piacentini T, Buccolini M, Miccadei E (2017) The Terminillo, Gran
Sasso and Majella Mountains: The ‘OldGuardians’ of the Tyrrhenian and Adriatic Seas. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes
and landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 327–337
Pugliese F (2011) La costa della Calabria. In: Ginesu S (ed) La costa
d’Italia. Carlo Delfino, Sassari, pp 269–290
Regione Sicilia (1996) Linee guida del piano territoriale paesistico
regionale. Assessorato dei beni culturali, ambientali e della pubblica
istruzione, www.regionesicilia.it
Robustelli G, Sorriso Valvo M (2017) The landscape of the
Aspromonte Massif: a geomorphological open-air laboratory. In:
Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy.
Springer, Cham, pp 431–441
Rolandi G, Bellucci F, Cortini M (2004) A new model for the formation
of the Somma Caldera. Mineral Petrol 80(1–2):27–44
Russo F (2004) I Campi Flegrei e Ischia. Tav. 67. In Italia - Atlante dei
tipi geografici. Istituto Geografico Militare, Firenze, pp 330–335
Santacroce R (1987) Somma-Vesuvius. CNR Quad Ric Sci 8:1–243
Schiattarella M (2011) Il Mar Ionio. In: Ginesu S (ed) La costa d’Italia.
Carlo Delfino, Sassari, pp 49–60
P. Fredi and E. Lupia Palmieri
Schiattarella M, Giano SI, Gioia D, Martino C, Nico G (2013) Age and
statistical properties of the summit palesurfaces of southern Italy.
Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 36:289–302
Sestini A (1963) Il Paesaggio. Conosci l’Italia, Vol. VII. Touring Club
Italiano, Milano, 232 pp
Simeoni U, Corbau C (2011) La costa dell’Emilia Romagna. In:
Ginesu S (ed) La costa d’Italia. Carlo Delfino, Sassari, pp 393–410
Smiraglia C (2004) Ghiacciai vallivi alpini. Tav. 36. In: Italia - Atlante
dei tipi geografici. Istituto Geografico Militare, Firenze, pp 214–217
Soldati M (2010) Dolomites: The spectacular landscape of the “Pale
Mountains”. In: Migon P (ed) Geomorphological landscapes of the
World. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., pp 191–199
Stoppani (1876) Il Bel Paese. Barbera Ed, Milano, 682 pp
Stefani M (2017) The Po Delta region: depositional evolution, climate
change and human intervention through the last 5000 years. In:
Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy.
Springer, Cham, pp 193–202
Surian N, Fontana A (2017) The Tagliamento River: the fluvial
landscape and long-term evolution of a large alpine braided river.
In: Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy.
Springer, Cham, pp 157–167
Tellini C (1994) Aspetti geomorfologici. In: Zanzucchi G (ed) L’Appennino ligure-emiliano. Guide Regionali, Società Geologica Italiana,
BE-MA editrice, Lodi, pp 75–80
Tellini C, Pellegrini L (2001) Forme di origine tettonica. In:
Castiglioni GB, Pellegrini GB (eds) Note illustrative alla Carta
Geomorfologica della Pianura Padana. Suppl Geogr Fis Dinam
Quat IV:55–68
Valente A, Magliulo P, Russo F (2017) The Coastal Landscape of
Cilento (Southern Italy): A Challengefor Protection and Tourism
Valorisation. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and
landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 409–419
Vergari F, Della Seta M, Del Monte M, Barbieri M (2013a) Badlands
denudation “hot spots”. The role of parent material properties on
geomorphic processes in 20-years monitored sites of Southern
Tuscany (Italy). Catena 106:31–41
Vergari F, Della Seta M, Del Monte M, Fredi P, Lupia Palmieri E
(2013b) Long- and short-term evolution of some Mediterranean
denudation hot spots: the role of rainfall variations and human
impact. Geomorphology 183:14–27
Part II
Landscapes and Landforms
6
The Glaciers of the Valle d’Aosta and Piemonte
Regions: Records of Present and Past
Environmental and Climate Changes
Marco Giardino, Giovanni Mortara, and Marta Chiarle
Abstract
Glaciated mountains of the Valle d’Aosta and Piemonte regions are described in relation to
the geological, geomorphological and climatic settings of the Western Alps. A comprehensive view of the present-day Alpine regional cryosphere is offered, and links to regional
and local examples of its evolution through the Quaternary are provided. Pleistocene
moraine amphitheatres (Ivrea and Rivoli-Avigliana) of the piedmont area recall the
development stages of Alpine glaciology. Major glaciers (Lys, Miage, Belvedere, Rutor
and Sabbione) of the highest peaks of the Western Alps (Mt. Bianco, Mt. Rosa) are
analysed for their specific scientific, environmental, cultural and economic importance. The
distinctive dynamic nature of the glacial landscape is illustrated by examples of active
glacial landforms and related slope instability, whose sensitivity to climate changes can
increase hazards and risks.
Keywords
Glacier
6.1
Moraine amphitheatre
Introduction
The Valle d’Aosta and Piemonte regions are geologically
diverse and include a great number of landforms and
deposits related to glaciation and deglaciation processes. In
this chapter, we first outline the physical setting and the
present-day cryosphere of these regions; then we offer a
virtual geomorphological journey through the glaciated
Western Alps through time and space, from southeast to
northwest.
In order to reach the present-day glaciers from the Po
Plain, one has first to cross the piedmont area, onto which
M. Giardino (&)
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Torino, Via
Valperga Caluso 35, 10125 Turin, Italy
e-mail: marco.giardino@unito.it
G. Mortara
Comitato Glaciologico Italiano, Corso Massimo d’Azeglio 42,
10125 Turin, Italy
M. Chiarle
CNR-IRPI, Strada delle Cacce 73, 10135 Turin, Italy
Quaternary
Glacial risk
Western Alps
glaciers spread out during Pleistocene glaciations. Here, the
moraine amphitheatres are the first stop on our journey.
Then, as we travel along the major Alpine valleys, we can
“feel” the extent of glacial erosion marked by trimlines and
steep valley sides. After that, as we approach present-day
Alpine glaciers we encounter
• glacial and paraglacial landforms and deposits, and
postglacial slope instabilities;
• panoramic views of active glaciers and trails crossing
recent moraines and glaciers themselves, for a living
illustration of glacial processes and their historical
fluctuations.
In relation to the present-day glaciation, our journey
includes also a selection of “iconic glaciers”, i.e. glaciers of
particular relevance for their scientific, environmental, cultural or economic value, with some insights into the rapid
loss of ice, related risks and possible future scenarios. We
conclude with some remarks on interactions between people
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_6
77
78
M. Giardino et al.
of the Valle d’Aosta and Piemonte regions and on future
adaptation strategies to climate change.
6.2
Physical Setting of the Western Alps
Mountains of the Valle d’Aosta and Piemonte regions are
located in the core of the Western Alps (Fig. 6.1) along the
boundaries between Italy, France and Switzerland. According to the new classification system of the Alps (Marazzi
2005), the Western Alps extend from the Savona-Bocchetta
di Altare-Montezemolo-Mondovì line to the Rhine—Splügen Pass—Como Lake—Lecco Lake line; they are divided
in 14 sections and include some of the highest peaks in
Europe. From north to south, the most noteworthy are: Mt.
Leone, 3552 m a.s.l. (Lepontine Alps); Mt. Rosa, 4634 m
(Pennine Alps); Mt. Bianco (Mont Blanc), 4810 m, Gran
Paradiso, 4061 m and Uja di Ciamarella, 3676 m (Graian
Alps); Pierre Menue, 3506 m and Monviso, 3841 m (Cottian
Alps); Argentera, 3297 m (Maritime Alps) (Fig. 6.1a).
From the geological and geomorphological points of
view, the Western Alps are an arc-shaped, double-verging
orogenic belt composed of diverse lithological, structural
and tectonic units. They include three main structural sectors
(Fig. 6.1b), partly corresponding to paleogeographic realms
(Dal Piaz et al. 2003):
(A) An internal sector belonging to the upper (“African”)
plate of the collisional system comprising Hercynian and
pre-Hercynian basement rocks with lower continental
crust, upper mantle rocks and inner molasse units.
(B) An axial composite sector (the orogenic prism with the
metamorphic collisional belt), which includes Hercynian and pre-Hercynian continental crustal rocks,
metasedimentary cover rocks, oceanic lithosphere and
flysch. This sector is bounded by two crustal discontinuities: the external Penninic frontal thrust and the
internal Insubric Line.
(C) An external sector belonging to the lower plate of the
collisional system (“European” plate) consisting of
intrusive rocks of Hercynian massifs (e.g. Mt. Bianco),
Mesozoic sedimentary cover and flysch. This sector is
bordered outward by the Jura frontal thrust and contains Prealps and outer molasse units.
The tectonic framework of the Western Alps is complex.
Extensional, contractional and strike-slip tectonics dominate the internal sector, whereas coeval contractional
kinematics has affected the external zone. The Western
Alps have an asymmetric cross-profile: the internal (Eastern, “Italian”) flank is shorter and steeper than the external
one. The internal front range shows a marked step from the
Po Plain (elevation 200–300 m a.s.l.) into the mountains
(elevation 1000–4800 m, rising from the piedmont to the
crest of the range).
Alpine valleys of northwest Italy spread radially around the
Western Po Plain. Major valleys (Susa, Lanzo, Aosta, Sesia,
Ossola) are deeply incised in bedrock, their slopes being
marked by up to 3000 m of relief. Valley incision dates back
to the Messinian (late Miocene), according to Bini et al.
(1978). Pliocene marine deposits and a regressive continental
sequence of Middle Pliocene to Lower Pleistocene age fill the
terminal parts of the valleys. During the Pleistocene, large
glaciers repeatedly sculpted the Western Alps, producing the
present landscape with U-shaped valleys, moraine
amphitheatres and lakes at their mouths (Carraro and Giardino
2004) (Fig. 6.2; locations 2 and 5 in Fig. 6.1a). Locally,
Holocene gravitational and fluvial processes have modified
glacial landforms and deposits (Soldati et al. 2006).
6.3
Contemporary Glaciers
The climate of the Western Alps is conditioned by moderate to
low oceanic moisture supply; mean annual precipitation is
about 900 mm, a value lower than that of northern and eastern
Alpine regions (Biancotti et al. 1998). In fact, the Alpine chain
is a barrier to the Atlantic storms that bring heavy precipitation
in winter; the Italian side of the Alps can thus only partially
benefit from them, with the exception of northern Piemonte.
Due to limited moisture and the exposure to solar radiation, the glaciers of the Italian Western Alps are smaller than
those in the rest of the Alps (Williams and Ferrigno 1993).
The heads of the valleys are preferentially oriented towards
the NE, E and SE (Fig. 6.3; see also location 3 in Fig. 6.1).
As a result, more than 80% of *300 present-day glaciers
in the Western Italian Alps have areas of less than 1 km2
(Smiraglia and Diolaiuti 2015). They are unevenly distributed in the Alpine sectors (Table 6.1). The Graian Alps
host 60% of the glaciers and the same percentage of the
overall glaciated area. About 35% of the glaciers are in the
Pennine Alps and the other 5% are in the Lepontine, Cottian
and Maritime Alps (Salvatore et al. 2015). The largest and
most numerous glaciers are located in the Valle d’Aosta,
which also hosts the highest massifs of the Italian Alps. The
glaciers of the Valle d’Aosta account for two-thirds of the
Western Italian glaciers and for 80% of the overall glaciated
area (about 166 km2). The two largest glaciers of the Valle
d’Aosta are Miage Glacier (10.6 km2) and Lys Glacier
(9.5 km2). Glaciers cover 4% of the Valle d’Aosta, but only
0.1% of Piemonte. The contemporary ice cover is less than
half of the glaciated area during the Little Ice Age (LIA; see
Table 6.1). Glacier shrinkage since the end of the LIA in the
Western Italian Alps has been more evident in the south
rather than in the north, due to a combination of climatic and
topographic factors and latitude. The striking loss of
6
The Glaciers of the Valle d’Aosta and Piemonte Regions …
Fig. 6.1 Orography (a) and
geology (b) of the Western Alps
a The Italian side of the
arc-shaped Western Alps with
locations of the places and
features described in this chapter.
Dashed lines separate sections of
the Alpine subdivision, from NE
to SW: Lugano Prealps (Lu),
Lepontine Alps (Le), Pennine
Alps (Pe), Graian Alps (Gr),
Cottian Alps (Co), Maritime Alps
(Ma) and Ligurian Alps (Li). Ba–
SA is the Savona-Bocchetta di
Altare-Montezemolo-Mondovì
line, separating the Western Alps
from the Apennines. IMA: Ivrea
Moraine Amphitheatre; RAMA:
Rivoli-Avigliana Moraine
Amphitheatre. Black triangles
indicate major glacierized
massifs; blue circles are some
“glacier icons” (A Sabbione;
B Belvedere; C Lys; D Miage;
E Rutor); red squares and black
dots are locations, maps and
numbered photographs. Box at
the bottom left borders of the
Piemonte (P) and Valle d’Aosta
(A) regions (graphics S.
Lucchesi). b Block diagram of an
ideal geological NW–SE
cross-section of the Western Alps,
including three main structural
sectors (and related plate tectonics
features): A internal (“African”
upper plate); B axial composite
sector (orogenic prism with
metamorphic collisional belt);
C external (European, Lower
plate). See text for explanations
(modified after Polino et al 2002)
79
80
M. Giardino et al.
Fig. 6.2 The internal depression of the Ivrea moraine amphitheatre (SW to NE view), at the mouth of the Aosta Valley (left) with the 20 km long
“Serra d’Ivrea” moraine; the Pennine Alps are in the background (photo F. Gianotti)
Fig. 6.3 The much larger extent
of glaciers on the northern
(French) flank of the Mt. Bianco
than on the southern (Italian)
flank. This difference clearly
illustrates the unfavourable
conditions for the development of
glaciers on the Italian side. Data
source Glariskalp Project, Alcotra
Program 2007–2013, www.
glariskalp.eu
6
The Glaciers of the Valle d’Aosta and Piemonte Regions …
Table 6.1 Number of glaciers
and extent of glaciated areas in
the alpine sectors of the Western
Italian Alps at different times
Alpine sector
2006–2007 (1)
Area (km2)
N.
Lepontine
Alps
81
22
LIA (2)
Area (%)
6.95
4.2
N.
Area (km2)
1958 (1)
1989 (3)
Area (km2)
n.
26
14.36
Area (km2)
N.
26
10.72
Pennine Alps
91
57.31
34.5
93
83.92
77
66.22
Graian Alps
198
101.73
61.2
180
136.65
198
123.83
Cottian Alps
5
0.22
0.1
20
6.13
14
3.39
12
0.87
Maritime
Alps
1
0.04
0.0
20
3.27
7
1.05
5
0.19
318
166.25
100.0
320
239.37
318
201.83
Total
Data sources (1) Salvatore et al. (2015), (2) Lucchesi et al. (2014a), (3) Ajassa et al. (1997)
glaciated areas is evident in the Monviso Massif, where
glaciers almost disappeared in the last 150 years (Fig. 6.4).
Glacier shrinkage is usually quantified in terms of areal
loss, as this is the easiest parameter to measure. In reality, the
volume loss of the glaciers, in percentage, has been much
larger than the areal loss because of glacier down-wasting
(Paul et al. 2004). Many glaciers now have flat surfaces and
few crevasses, which are indicators of low activity. In
addition, the surfaces of glaciers are becoming more and
more dark due to the release of debris from melting ice and
rock falls and rock slides onto ice surfaces. In the Western
Italian Alps, only the highest glaciers (i.e. above 3500 m a.s.l.)
are at the moment escaping this trend.
6.4
Moraine Amphitheatres of the Po Plain
Our geomorphological journey of the glaciated mountains of
the Piemonte and Valle d’Aosta regions starts from the Po
Plain, by approaching the piedmont area of the Western Alps
from southeast. Here, the moraine amphitheatres are the
main geomorphic evidence of Alpine glaciers spreading out
in the plains from major valleys during the Pleistocene
glacial periods (Fig. 6.2).
During the 1800s, before the glacial theory was proposed
in the Alpine region, the origin of moraine amphitheatres
and related deposits was debated by the scientific community. Disputes among Catastrophists and Uniformitarians
arose over relict glacial features of the Piemonte Region,
culminating in the definitive studies of the Serra d’Ivrea
moraines (Studer 1844) and the Ivrea and the
Rivoli-Avigliana moraine amphitheatres (Martins and Gastaldi 1850; Figs. 6.2 and 6.5).
The major moraine amphitheatres of the Piemonte Region
are among the most spectacular examples of Pleistocene end
moraine systems in the entire Alps (Lucchesi et al. 2014b):
• The Ivrea Moraine Amphitheatre, 500 km2 in area, at the
outlet of Aosta Valley, is a spectacular landscape with a
marked contrast between the internal subglacially
moulded rocky hills of Ivrea, and the outer surrounding
moraines with relief of up to 700 m. It is a product of
repeated glaciations ranging from about 900 to 20 ka old.
• The Rivoli-Avigliana Moraine Amphitheatre, 100 km2 in
area, at the outlet of Susa Valley, is today part of the
intensively urbanized area of Turin, but still it contains
well-preserved Pleistocene glacial landforms, including
moraines, spill-way channels, roches moutonnées and
erratic boulders.
After the development of Alpine glaciology at the great
peri-alpine moraine amphitheatres, the interest of naturalists,
geologists and topographers shifted towards the heads of the
valleys, driven by the emergence of mountaineering. The
Italian Alpine Club, founded in Turin in 1863, understood
the importance of studying glaciers and in 1895 established a
special commission, which in 1914 became the Italian Glaciology Committee (CGI). A century of uninterrupted study
of hundreds of glaciers and participation in numerous projects (International Geophysical Year, International Hydrological Decade, World Glacier Inventory and the Global
Land Ice Measurements from Space) have provided an
extraordinary body of historical scientific data. This body of
data now serves as a valuable reference for understanding
the current marked transformation of glacial and periglacial
environments. The drastic reduction in the volume of glacier
ice is also stimulating additional and more detailed studies,
thanks also to the availability of modern investigation tools
(Ajassa et al. 1997).
6.5
Pleistocene Glacial Phases
and the Evolution of Major Valleys
at the Transition to Holocene
The onset of Pleistocene glaciation in the Western Alps led
to the formation of a large ice sheet, nunataks and major
valley glaciers. Sequences of erosional and depositional
landforms, trimlines and steep valley sides witness the extent
of glacial phases along the Aosta and Susa valleys.
82
M. Giardino et al.
Fig. 6.4 Glacier shrinkage in the
Monviso massif (Cottian Alps)
since the end of the Little Ice Age
(LIA), where glaciers have almost
disappeared in the past 150 years.
The maximum extent of LIA
glaciers is indicated by the purple
colour (dark purple lines are LIA
moraines; lines with triangles are
glacial cirques); present glacier
outlines are in blue. Numbers
correspond to the glaciers as
catalogued by Lucchesi et al.
2014a, from which the present
figure has been derived
A distinctive geomorphological feature at the mouth of
Susa Valley is Mt. Musinè (Fig. 6.6; see location 6 in
Fig. 6.1, close to the Rivoli-Avigliana Moraine Amphitheatre). Here the traces of two distinct glacial phases can be
easily recognized along the southern slope on Mt. Musinè: a
more recent one (MIS4) is represented by a well-preserved
moraine ridge (bold white arrows in Fig. 6.6), whilst an
older one (MIS6) is recorded by isolated erratic boulders
higher up the slope (Carraro and Giardino 2004).
The evolutionary stages in the development of a major
Alpine valley are well documented in the higher part of
Valle d’Aosta Region, along the tributary Veny Valley,
bordering the southern slope of the Mt. Bianco massif
(Fig. 6.7; see location 7 in Fig. 6.1). Here, the U-shaped
cross profile of the valley sculpted by Pleistocene glaciers
shows distinct geomorphological discontinuities. On the Mt.
Bianco side, (right in Fig. 6.7), an upper trimline separates
the steep, glacially sculpted slopes from craggy
non-glaciated areas above. The terminal moraines (early
Holocene to LIA) of the Brenva and Miage glaciers block
the mouths of tributary valleys and the lower slopes of the
valley are mantled by imposing talus, landslide and avalanche deposits.
Other significant landforms related to the interaction
between glacial and gravitational processes are found on the
vegetated southern slope of Veny Valley (left in Fig. 6.7).
They relate to a complex setting of post-glacial deep-seated
gravitational slope deformations and other shallow slope
6
The Glaciers of the Valle d’Aosta and Piemonte Regions …
83
remodelling
either
by
slow/gradual
and/or
by
rapid/impulsive processes, often related to permafrost
degradation.
6.6
Fig. 6.5 The Rivoli-Avigliana moraine amphitheatre at the Susa
Valley mouth: a digital elevation model showing major physiographic
features and b the historical cross-section interpreting the glacial origin
of the Rivoli hills (Martins and Gastaldi 1850)
instabilities, which originated as paraglacial landforms and
deposits (i.e. produced by geomorphic processes acting
during the transition from glacial to postglacial conditions).
Similar phenomena occurred all over the Western Alps at
the transition to Holocene. Major Alpine valleys underwent
Iconic Italian Glaciers and Glacial
Dynamic Landscapes
The geomorphological, structural, lithological and climatic
diversity of the Western Alps gives each glacier its own
individuality. Some glaciers, however, have characteristics
of particular relevance and therefore can be taken as “glacial
icons”. Among them are four major glaciers of Valle
d’Aosta and Piemonte regions that have specific scientific
(Lys Glacier), environmental (Belvedere Glacier), cultural
(Rutor Glacier) and economic (Sabbione Glacier) importance. The Miage Glacier and the Veny Valley are also
included here as symbols of the glacial dynamic landscapes,
which contain significant examples of ephemeral landforms,
such as glacial lakes, particularly sensitive to climate
changes.
Glaciers are extremely dynamic bodies, which can generate ephemeral landscapes not only in response to climate
variations, but also in consequence of slope instabilities,
which may cause rock and debris accumulation onto glacier
ice, affecting its dynamics (Fig. 6.8). Landscape changes can
occur on a time scale of years (glacier fluctuation due to
climate variations, see Fig. 6.9c, d), weeks (growth of a
supraglacial lake, see Fig. 6.8a), or minutes (collapse of a
rock spur or an ice front, or moraine breaching and debris
accumulation due to a glacial outburst flood, see Fig. 6.8b–
f). Whenever ice and/or water are the main component, these
morphological features are transient and will change or
disappear rapidly (in years or even in hours).
Fig. 6.6 North flank of the Susa Valley. Traces of two separate glacial phases (MIS4 below white arrows; MIS6 upslope) are recognized at the
foot of the Mt. Musinè (photo F. Carraro, 2004)
84
M. Giardino et al.
Fig. 6.7 3D model (DEM and
orthophoto) of Veny Valley at the
margin of the Mt. Bianco. The
Brenva Glacier (foreground)
reaches the valley bottom at the
Mt. Bianco tunnel entrance
(Courmayeur). Debris-covered
Miage Glacier (trilobate terminal
moraines in the background) is
the longest glacier in the Italian
Alps (11 km; Fig. 6.3)
6.6.1
Sabbione (Hohsand) Glacier (Ossola
Valley, Lepontine Alps)
Alpine glaciers are considered a reservoir for European
countries because they are an important reserve of fresh water
in the solid state (“white gold”: “oro bianco” in the Italian
language, “houille blanche” in French). For this reason, many
dams have been built in the main glacierized drainage basins
for hydropower, irrigation and flood control. In the Italian
Western Alps, most dams are located in the Piemonte Region,
in particular in the Orco Valley on the southern flank of the
Gran Paradiso massif (Graian Alps) and in the Ossola Valley
(Lepontine Alps). Dams in the Ossola Valley have a combined
capacity of more than 170 106 m3.
The glacier–dam coupling is well represented by Sabbione glaciers (south and north), which coalesce at the front
and terminate in a proglacial lake (A in Fig. 6.1; Fig. 6.9a).
The lake formed in 1952 when a dam was constructed a
short distance from the glacier front. The artificial lake is still
a valuable source of hydropower, but has also had an effect
on the dynamics of the two glacier tongues. The glacier
fronts have been subjected to intense calving, which accelerated glacier retreat and forced the separation of the two
tongues (1850 m of retreat from 1940 to 2009).
6.6.2
Belvedere Glacier (Mt. Rosa, Anzasca
Valley, Pennine Alps)
Belvedere Glacier is the largest glacier in Piemonte (4.5 km2).
It flows from the foot of the magnificent northeast face of Mt.
Rosa (B in Fig. 6.1; Fig. 6.9b). The glacier is debris-covered
and has been admired and studied since the end of the eighteenth century. At the beginning of the present millennium, it
gained notoriety following an exceptional surge that greatly
changed its morphology. The formation of a large supraglacial
lake (3 106 m3) led to an emergency response to mitigate
the risk of a destructive outburst flood (Tamburini and Mortara
2005). The surge ended in 2005, however the entire basin is
still experiencing geomorphic activity that is unparalleled in
the Alps. It includes ice and rock avalanches, collapse of LIA
moraines and debris flows (Tamburini et al. 2013). Belvedere
Glacier can be considered a geosite of international
importance.
6.6.3
Lys Glacier (Mt. Rosa, Aosta Valley,
Pennine Alps)
Lys Glacier (C in Fig. 6.1; Fig. 6.9c, d) is one of the largest
glaciers in Italy (about 10 km2) and one of the most studied.
Historical observatories at high elevation (Capanna
Margherita, 4554 m and Institute “Angelo Mosso”, 2901 m)
gave impetus to much research in the field of glaciology,
geomorphology, climatology, topography, atmospheric
physics, environmental sciences, physiology and medicine.
The glacier was visited by H.B. de Saussure in 1789 and J.D.
Forbes in 1840 and measurements of its frontal variations
span two centuries, starting in 1812. Retreat of its front since
the end of the LIA is estimated to be over 1700 m. Important
stratigraphic, climatological and environmental information
have been provided by deep ice drilling campaigns by Italian
and Swiss researchers since 1976 at Colle Gnifetti (4452 m)
and at Col du Lys (4248 m) (Smiraglia et al. 2000).
6
The Glaciers of the Valle d’Aosta and Piemonte Regions …
85
Fig. 6.8 Example of “dynamic landscapes” and related glacial risk
case studies of the Western Italian Alps: a Effimero Lake at Belvedere
Glacier (2002; aerial view, IRPI archive); b rock-ice avalanche from the
Mt. Rosa NE face (2007; photo F. Bettoli); c Grandes Jorasses hanging
glacier, subject to periodic detachments of its frontal seracs (1996;
RAVA archive); d “Live” rock falland landslide scarps at the Aiguille
Rouge de Peteurey (2009, Aug. 13; photo A. Franchino); e moraine
collapse (photo G. Mortara) and f depositional area of a debris flow at
the Mulinet Glacier proglacial area (1993; photo G. Mortara)
6.6.4
fed by four tributary glaciers and snow avalanches (D in
Fig. 6.1; Fig. 6.9e). From historical data we know that the
surface of Miage Glacier was free of debris until the end of
nineteenth century. Nowadays almost all the ablation tongue
shows a cm- to m-thick debris cover, originated mostly from
rock falls. Mass movements are very active in the area
(Fig. 6.8d): distribution of rock fall events in the Veny
Miage Glacier and the Veny Valley (Mt.
Bianco, Graian Alps)
Two main geomorphological features dominate the ephemeral landscape of the Veny Valley: the Miage debris-covered
glacier and steep rock slopes of the Mt. Bianco. The Miage
Glacier is the third largest Italian glacier and the longest one,
86
M. Giardino et al.
Fig. 6.9 “Glacier icons” of the Western Italian Alps: a Sabbione
Glacier and its proglacial lake and reservoir (2006; photo G.
Kappenberger); b Belvedere Glacier and the Mt. Rosa NE face
(1999; photo G. Gnemmi); c Lys Glacier (1868; CGI archive); d Lys
Glacier (2007; photo D. Cat Berro); e debris-covered Miage Glacier,
snow avalanches in the Miage Valley and Miage glacial lake in the
Veny Valley (2010; photo M. Bacenetti); f Rutor Glacier and its
proglacial lakes (2012; photo L. Mercalli)
Valley is influenced by local geological and geomorphological conditions (such as lithological and structural setting,
and related weathering and previous morphogenetic processes producing variable topographic environments) and/or
by permafrost degradation induced by climate change
(Bertotto et al. 2015).
6.6.5
Rutor Glacier (Rutor Massif, Aosta Valley,
Graian Alps)
Rutor Glacier (8.3 km2) occupies a large basin with a low
gradient and has a complex snout bordered by numerous
proglacial lakes (E in Fig. 6.1; Fig. 6.9f). One of the lakes
6
The Glaciers of the Valle d’Aosta and Piemonte Regions …
(Santa Margherita Lake) is infamous for its numerous,
devastating glacial outburst floods during the LIA. Since
1596, Italian, French and Swiss technicians planned and
executed complex and daring interventions (Sacco 1917).
This historic cross-border collaboration dealt with an issue—
glacial hazards—that the international scientific community
became aware of only near the end of the twentieth century
(Villa et al. 2008).
6.7
Concluding Remarks
The geomorphological journey through time and space in the
Western Alps showcased in this chapter is not intended to be
simply a geo-touristic field trip. The glaciers of the Piemonte
and Valle d’Aosta regions are impressive indicators of present and past environmental changes in the Alps. We
selected some glacial iconic landforms (glaciers, moraines,
slopes) and related geomorphological features of the Alpine
dynamic landscape (glacial lakes, unstable deglaciated
slopes) to illustrate their importance from scientific, environmental, historical, social and economic perspectives.
During their advances and regressions, glaciers explicate
an intense morphogenetic action, which is often associated
with instability processes like ice falls/avalanches, glacial
outburst floods, rock falls/avalanches, moraine collapse and
debris flows. These processes can sometimes be extremely
hazardous, because of the magnitude they can achieve, the
distances that they can travel and, in some cases, because of
their unpredictability. The risk is especially high in densely
populated mountain areas like the Western Alps and is
expected to rise in the future, both because deglacierization
and expected climate warming have destabilized steep
slopes, as well as due to growth of anthropic pressure.
Societal awareness of past and ongoing glacial processes
is the key to developing proper strategies to minimize the
impacts of climate change and help decision makers,
stakeholders and citizens in mountain communities to make
wise land-use decisions.
References
Ajassa R, Biancotti A, Biasini A, Brancucci G, Carton A, Salvatore MC
(1997) Changes in the number and area of Italian alpine glaciers
between 1958 and 1989. Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 20:293–297
Bertotto S, Perotti L, Bacenetti M, Damiano E, Chiarle M, Giardino M
(2015) Integrated geomatic techniques for assessing morphodynamic processes and related hazards in glacial and periglacial areas
(Western Italian Alps) in a context of climate change. In: Lollino G,
Manconi A, Clague J, Shan W, Chiarle M (eds) Engineering
geology for society and territory, vol 1. Springer, International
Publishing Switzerland, pp 173–176
87
Biancotti A, Bellardone G, Bovo S, Cagnazzi B, Giacomelli L,
Marchisio C (1998) Distribuzione regionale di piogge e temperature. Studi climatologici in Piemonte, vol 1, Regione Piemonte &
Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino, 80 pp
Bini A, Cita MB, Gaetani M (1978) Southern Alpine lakes-hypothesis
of an erosional origin related to the Messinian entrenchment. Mar
Geol 27:271–288
Carraro F, Giardino M (2004) Quaternary glaciations in the western
Italian Alps—a review. In: Ehlers J, Gibbard PL (eds) Quaternary
glaciations—extent and chronology, part I. Europe, Elsevier,
Amsterdam, pp 201–209
Dal Piaz GV, Bistacchi A, Massironi M (2003) Geological outline of
the Alps. Episodes 26(3):175–180
Lucchesi S, Fioraso G, Bertotto S, Chiarle M (2014a) Little Ice Age and
contemporary glacier extent in the Western and south-Western
Piedmont Alps (North-Western Italy). J Maps 10(3):409–423
Lucchesi S, Gianotti F, Giardino M (2014b) The morainic amphitheater
environment: a geosite to rediscover the geological and cultural
heritage in the examples of the Ivrea and Rivoli-Avigliana morainic
amphitheaters (NW Italy). In: Lollino G, Giordan D, Marunteanu C,
Christaras B, Yoshinori I, Margottini C (eds) Engineering geology
for society and territory, vol 8. Springer, International Publishing
Switzerland, pp 245–248
Marazzi S (2005) Atlante orografico delle Alpi. SOIUSA, Priuli and
Verlucca, Torino, 416 pp
Martins C, Gastaldi B (1850) Essai sur les terrains superficiels de la
vallée du Pô, aux environs de Turin, comparés a ceux de la plaine
suisse. Bull Soc Géol France, Ser 2(7):554–605
Paul F, Kääb A, Maisch M, Kellenberger T, Haeberli W (2004) Rapid
disintegration of Alpine glaciers observed with satellite data.
Geophys Res Lett 31:L21402
Polino R, Balestro G, Boano P, Bicchi E, Cadoppi P, Cavagna S,
Clari P, d’Atri A, Dela Pierre F, Ferrero E, Festa A, Fioraso G,
Forno MG, Gelati R, Giardino M, Gnaccolini M, Irace A, Malusà
M, Martin S, Morelli M, Mosca P, Perello P, Philippot P, Piana F,
Ruffini R, Tallone S (2002) Il sistema alpino-appenninico nel
Cenozoico. 81° Riunione estiva Società Geologica Italiana,
Litografia Geda, Torino, 218 pp
Sacco F (1917) Il ghiacciaio ed i laghi del Rutor. Boll Soc Geol
It 36:1–36
Salvatore MC, Zanoner T, Baroni C, Carton A, Banchieri F, Viani C,
Giardino M, Perotti L (2015) The state of Italian glaciers: a snapshot
of 2006–2007 hydrological period. Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 38
(2):175–198
Smiraglia C, Diolaiuti G (eds) (2015) The New Italian glacier
inventory. EvK2CNR, Bergamo, 400 pp
Smiraglia C, Maggi V, Novo A, Rossi G, Johnston P (2000)
Preliminary results of two ice core drilling on Monte Rosa (Colle
Gnifetti and Colle del Lys), Italian Alps. Geogr Fis Dinam Quat
23:165–172
Soldati M, Borgatti L, Cavallin A, De Amicis M, Frigerio S,
Giardino M, Mortara G, Pellegrini GB, Ravazzi C, Tellini C,
Zanchi A in collaboration with Alberto W, Albanese D, Chelli A,
Corsini A, Marchetti M, Palomba M, Panizza M (2006) Geomorphological evolution of slopes and climate changes in northern Italy
during the Late Quaternary: spatial and temporal distribution of
landslides and landscape sensitivity implications. Geogr Fis Dinam
Quat 29:165–183
Studer B (1844) Lehrbuch der physikalischen geographie und geologie,
vol 1. Chur und Leipzig, Bern, 398 pp
Tamburini A, Mortara G (2005) The case of the “Effimero” lake at Monte
Rosa (Italian Western Alps): studies, field surveys, monitoring. In:
Proceedings 10th ERB conference (Turin, 13–17 Oct 2004), vol 77.
Unesco, IHP-VI Technical Documents in Hydrology, pp 179–184
88
Tamburini A, Villa F, Fischer L, Hungr O, Chiarle M, Mortara G
(2013) Slope instabilities in high-mountain rock walls. Recent
events on the Monte Rosa East Face (Macugnaga, NW Italy). In:
Margottini C, Canuti P, Sassa K (eds) Landslide science and
practice, vol 3. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp 327–332
Villa F, Tamburini A, De Amicis M, Sironi S, Maggi V, Rossi G
(2008) Volume decrease of Rutor Glacier (Western Italian Alps)
M. Giardino et al.
since Little Ice Age: a quantitative approach combining GPR, GPS
and cartography. Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 31:63–70
Williams RS Jr, Ferrigno JG (eds) (1993) Satellite image atlas of
glaciers of the world: EUROPE. US Geological Survey Professional
Paper 1386-E-1, 48 pp
7
Landscapes of Northern Lombardy: From
the Glacial Scenery of Upper Valtellina
to the Prealpine Lacustrine Environment
of Lake Como
Irene Bollati, Manuela Pelfini, and Claudio Smiraglia
Abstract
In the region between Valtellina and Lake Como in the Central Italian Alps, one can visit, in a
relatively small area, some of the best examples of mountain geomorphological landscapes of
Italy. Eight specific sites—showing peculiar glacial, periglacial, structural, gravity-induced
and erosional landforms—have been selected to illustrate how different landscapes may
originate from geomorphological modelling of different lithotypes in different morphogenetic systems. These eight sites are exemplary cases in which significant evidence of past
and current climatic and structural conditions characterising this region is exhibited.
Keywords
Glacial landscape
7.1
Periglacial landscape
Introduction
The Central Italian Alps and the related Prealpine areas are
characterised by different structural domains of the Alpine
range and by different climatic conditions. As a consequence, a succession of various landscapes and landforms
related to the lithological and structural complexity of the
Alpine region characterises this territory. Changes in landforms modelled under different geological and climatic
conditions are observable within a region spanning just a
few kilometres.
The outcropping lithotypes behave differently with
respect to chemical and mechanical weathering and, especially in the Alpine high mountain environment, surface
processes are subject to variations in intensity as a consequence of climate change. In this sense, the high mountain
environment allows us to directly observe landscape
responses to the current climatic trend. The upper sector of
Valtellina is characterised by the presence of the most sensitive indicators of climate change—glaciers, some of which
are among the most important in the Alps, such as the Forni
I. Bollati (&) M. Pelfini C. Smiraglia
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Milano,
Via Mangiagalli 34, 20133 Milan, Italy
e-mail: irene.bollati@unimi.it
Structural landscape
Valtellina
Lake Como
Glacier, which is the widest valley glacier of the southern
side of the Alps. At higher altitudes, the temporal and spatial
transition from a glacial to a paraglacial system is documented by glacier shrinkage and widening of proglacial
areas. In the meantime, gravity-driven processes, water
runoff and periglacial processes are intensifying in the
Alpine environment. These changing dynamics are also a
crucial for hazard and risk assessment, and for promotion
and conservation of geomorphological heritage, especially
concerning glaciers and depositional landforms such as
moraines (Pelfini and Bollati 2014).
Moreover, in Valtellina the rock–landform relationships
are various and peculiar. For example, the Oligocene
calc-alkaline rocks of the Masino and Mello Valleys and the
ophiolitic rocks outcropping in Valmalenco are modelled to
produce relief in significant contrast to each other.
Last but not least, the presence of important structural
lineaments (i.e. the Insubric Line) has significantly influenced the trend of the valleys, in particular the main valley,
Valtellina, which has a clear E–W trend from Tirano to
Colico.
Within the Central Italian Alps, from Upper Valtellina
to the Lake Como area, eight sites/landscapes were selected. Some of them are included in the National and/or
Regional Database of Geosites and other host cultural,
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_7
89
90
Table 7.1 Summary table of the
described sites and landscapes.
The reference code and the
scientific interest are from
Geoportale Regione
Lombardia (http://www.
geoportale.regione.lombardia.it/)
I. Bollati et al.
Site
Landscape
Regional Geosites list
Code
Type of interest
1
Forni glacier
Glacial
SO0034
Geomorphology
2
Foscagno rock glacier
Periglacial
SO0022
Structural
geology
3
Val Pola landslide
Rock avalanche
SO0020
Geomorphology
4
Postalesio earth pyramids
Erosional
landforms
SO0010
Structural
geology
5A
Val Masino-Bregaglia granitic
pluton
Lithological
SO0009
Geomorphology
5B
Malenco-Forno ophiolitic unit
Lithological
SO0016
Petrography
6
Lake Como and Pian di Spagna
Lacustrine
CO0015
SO0030
Geomorphology
7
Karst of the Grigne Massif
Lithological
LC0008
Geomorphology
Fig. 7.1 Geographical setting of the Valtellina and Lake Como area and location of the geomorphological sites described
nature or thematic trails. In Table 7.1, codes used in the
Geosites list of the Geoportale Regione Lombardia are
reported. The sites are numbered following a geographical
order from the Upper Valtellina as far as Lake Como and
they are presented in the text following a set of geological–
geomorphological criteria.
7.2
Geographical Setting
The area is located in the Central Italian Alps (Fig. 7.1), in the
Rhaetian sector, principally along the Adda Basin and Valtellina valley, within the provinces of Sondrio, Lecco and
Como, generally following National Roads 36 and 38.
7
Landscapes of Northern Lombardy …
The area includes several elevated peaks of the Central Italian
Alps, among which are the Disgrazia (3678 m a.s.l.) and the
Bernina (4049 m) in the Bernina Group, and the peaks of Gran
Zebrù (3857 m), Cevedale (3679 m) and San Matteo
(3678 m) in the Ortles-Cevedale Group. In the Upper Valtellina, the inter-regional Stelvio National Park was instituted
in 1935, and its Lombardy sector covers a surface area of
593 km2. It includes one of the most important glaciers of the
Italian Alps: the Forni Glacier (Fig. 7.1). Lake Como, which
runs along the area between the Alps and the Brianza region,
has a surface of 144 km2. It splits halfway into two branches,
the Como and Lecco branches, in the middle of which the
Triangolo Lariano region is located (Fig. 7.1).
7.3
Geological and Geomorphological
Landscapes
The Valtellina and Lake Como areas belong to various
Alpine structural domains: Austroalpine, Pennidic and
Southern Alps (Fig. 7.2a). The Upper Valtellina, in the
northeastern part, is characterised by outcrops of different
nappes of the Austroalpine Domain that represent the remnants of the paleo-African continent. The bedrock of the
Valmalenco area, located north of Sondrio, is constituted by
rocks belonging to the paleo-African Austroalpine Nappes
and to the oceanic and paleo-European Pennidic Nappes.
A portion of Sissone and of the nearby Masino and Mello
valleys is also characterised by outcrops of the Oligocene
91
pluton of Masino-Bregaglia (Bergell), the emplacement of
which is linked to Tertiary magmatic activity, and which
developed during the late Alpine orogenesis stages.
The Periadriatic Fault System (i.e. the Insubric Line),
with a local E–W trend, marks the contact of the Austroalpine and Pennidic Domains with the Southern Alps
Domain, and represents the separation mark between the
Alps sensu strictu and the Southern Alps region.
Part of the Southern Alps Domain in the area consists of
sedimentary rocks such as Triassic limestones and siliciclastic deposits of sedimentary cover that lie above the
paleo-African basement. A complete section of this succession is visible along the eastern side of Lake Como, where
National Road 36 runs.
The different lithologies have been moulded by different
physical agents (e.g. gravity, water, glacial ice, wind) for
thousands of years, and structural landscapes are evident in
the region. Glaciers are among the most active landscape
modelling factors from the highest peak regions as far as
Lake Como. During the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM;
30,000–15,000 years BP), the main glaciers flowing from
Valtellina and Chiavenna Valley split into different lateral
glaciers and reached the Brianza region (Fig. 7.2b), as evidenced by the presence of huge moraine amphitheatres (Bini
and Zuccoli 2004). Recent glacial landforms characterise the
higher altitudes in the region. The periglacial landscape,
symbolised by rock glaciers, is widespread over the Upper
Valtellina, and active and well-preserved landforms are
common in the Livigno and Foscagno areas.
Fig. 7.2 a Geological setting and principal structural features of the described area (modified after Montrasio et al. 2012). b Reconstruction of
glacier extent in the Central Alps during the LGM and the present day (modified after Cavallin et al. 1997)
92
7.3.1
I. Bollati et al.
The Glacial Landscapes of the Forni Valley
In the Upper Valtellina, the most important Italian valley
glacier is present: the Forni Glacier (Figs. 7.1 and 7.3), with
a surface area, in 2007, of 11.36 km2 (D’Agata et al. 2014)
and an elevation range today between 3670 and 2500 m. It is
located in the Ortles-Cevedale Group, within the Stelvio
National Park. The area is characterised by an outcrop of
low-grade metamorphic basement of the Bormio Phyllades
of the Austroalpine Nappe. They are in contact, in the head
of the northeastern tributary valley, with limestones and
dolomites of the sedimentary cover that forms the pyramid
of Gran Zebrù, which stands out prominently.
The Forni Glacier has undergone visible shrinkage, as
evidenced by comparison of glacier front positions between
the nineteenth and the twenty-first centuries (Fig. 7.3a, b).
As quantified recently by D’Agata et al. (2014), the whole
glacial surface area of the Ortles-Cevedale Group has
undergone surface area changes of −19.43 km2 ± 1.2%, or
approximately −40%, in the interval from 1954 to 2007,
with an accelerated surface reduction of approximately 8.7%
between 2003 and 2007. This equates to an area loss of
approximately 0.693 km2/year. The glacier thickness,
locally covered by debris, is higher as a result of differential
ablation. On the glacial surface there are spectacular active
medial moraines and active bédières that are streamflows
draining the surface of the glacier.
The Forni Valley represents a typical glacial U-shaped
valley (Fig. 7.3a, b) with huge and abundant roche moutonnée and active or relict giant kettles (Fig. 7.3e). The
records of several fluctuations are well documented and
preserved by the numerous moraine ridges characterising the
valley floor and slopes. Along the S and SW facing slopes,
the Late Glacial lateral moraines (locally dated 11,000–
10,000 years BP; Cavallin et al. 1997) are well developed
and conserved, with thick soil coverage. The Holocene and
historical moraines are well expressed and are characterised
by different levels of development of soil, vegetation coverage and lichen colonisation in relation to their exposure
age, and they are easily observable all along the glaciological trails (Fig. 7.3c, d) (Orombelli and Pelfini 1985).
The maximum advance of the Forni Glacier during the
Holocene is evidenced by remnants of a terminal moraine
that has an age close to that of the Little Ice Age (LIA,
1850). It dams a small peat bog radiocarbon dated to
2670 ± 130 years BP 14C (830–710 cal years BC), which
represents the minimum age for the glacier’s advance
(Orombelli and Pelfini 1985). The main advance and retreat
phases of the Forni Glacier tongue after the LIA, evidenced
by moraine ridges, happened at the beginning of the twentieth century: 1904 or 1913–1914, 1926. During the next
retreat phase, the Forni glacial basin underwent separation
into different minor glaciers. The neo-formational moraines
resulting from the most recent 1974–1981 advance phase are
unconsolidated, dissected by the action of the proglacial
stream and largely affected by weathering processes and
physical degradation due especially to the melting of their
ice core (Pelfini and Bollati 2014).
7.3.2
Periglacial Landscape: The Rock Glaciers
of Foscagno Pass
Periglacial features (i.e. rock glaciers, protalus ramparts,
polygonal and striated soils) are quite widespread, especially
in the Upper Valtellina area, and several examples of these
landforms have been studied since the 1980s. In the Foscagno area (Fig. 7.1), periglacial landforms and especially
rock glaciers are dominant, providing one of the best
expressions of periglacial landscapes. In this climate, the
presence of deformed and fractured schist and paragneiss
allow for the formation of a great quantity of debris indispensable for the genesis of rock glaciers. The rock glaciers
are both active and inactive: in the first case the fronts are
generally located at an elevation of 2600 m; in the second
case they are located below 2500 m altitude. The quantification of permafrost in the Foscagno area also allowed for
recognition of its patchy distribution within the rock glaciers; the active layers range from 1.2 to 1.5 m (N-facing
slopes) to almost 10 m (SE-facing slopes) (Guglielmin et al.
1994).
The Forcellina cirque and the below area of Vallaccia are
occupied by the Foscagno rock glacier (Fig. 7.4), which is
the most important and the most-studied rock glacier of the
Italian Alps. It can be approached from National Road 38
(Fig. 7.1). It has a multi-lobed structure and exhibits typical
rock–glacier debris zoning. It develops for approximately
1 km and the active zone front is located at a lower altitude
than others in this area (2500 m). The ice is considered a
relic of glacier ice preserved within a permafrost body that
flowed down to the current position from the Forcellina
cirque area (Guglielmin et al. 2004).
7.3.3
The Val Pola Rock Avalanche: A Dramatic
Change in the Landscape
Gravity-induced processes are very frequent in the upper
Valtellina. The most catastrophic event occurred on 27th
July 1987 and radically changed the local landscape by
burying a small village and damming the Adda River’s
course.
7
Landscapes of Northern Lombardy …
93
Fig. 7.3 Glacial landscape of the Forni Valley. Comparison of the
Forni Glacier during: a Little Ice Age (LIA) (photo from Stoppani
1876) and b summer 2012 (photo I. Bollati 2012). c View of the glacial
terminus and of the LIA moraine from the left hydrographic valley side
(photo I. Bollati 2012). d View of the vegetation recolonisation process
along the proglacial area from the left hydrographic valley side (photo
I. Bollati 2012). e Subglacial giant potholes on the left side of the
valley at 2500 m a.s.l. along the upper glaciological trail (photo I.
Bollati 2012)
During the months of July and August 1987, a serious
flood emergency developed, due mainly to intensification of
heavy rain. Between 15th and 22nd July 1987 exceptionally
warm temperatures and rainfall exceeding half of the mean
annual precipitation for this area (i.e. 1200 mm) were
recorded (Crosta et al. 2004). Numerous landslides and
94
I. Bollati et al.
Fig. 7.4 a The Foscagno rock
glacier. Panoramic view of the
northeastern side of Monte
Foscagno (photo G. Scherini
2010). b Aerial photo of 2007
(courtesy of Geoportale
Nazionale—Ministero
dell’Ambiente) in which the
Foscagno rock glacier perimeter
is shown. The white line delimits
the active portion of the rock
glacier, and the white dashed line
borders the inactive portion, as
identified by Guglielmin et al.
(2004)
debris flows occurred during this period in the Upper Valtellina; among these the most dangerous was the Val Pola
rock avalanche which is still observable from the older road
built to cross the landslide (Figs. 7.1 and 7.5). The landslide
deposit has been progressively modified by both natural
surface processes and human activities undertaken for risk
management and for restoration of safe access.
The Val Pola landslide detached from the eastern slope of
Mount Zandila, which consists of Austroalpine Domain
rocks such as gneisses intruded by diorite and gabbros, and
which was characterised by a prehistoric landslide located at
the intersection of two major joint sets. Between 18 and 19
July 1987 debris flows moved down the slope, damming the
Adda River and causing the formation of a lake with an
estimated volume of 50,000 m3 and a depth of 1–5 m. In the
following days, several fractures along the prehistoric scarp
were observed, and on the 27 July, the Val Pola rock avalanche occurred. The landslide volume was estimated at
approximately 40 Mm3. The debris reached as far as 1200 m
below the landslide scarp, running 300 m up on the opposite
side of the valley, and material was distributed both up- and
down-stream along the Adda River (Fig. 7.5). This landslide
is considered to be among the most rapid mass movements
ever documented (76–108 m/s) (Crosta et al. 2004), and the
rock avalanche, entering the debris-dam lake that had
formed in the previous days, produced an anomalous water
wave. Significant topographic changes occurred, numerous
buildings were destroyed and 27 people were killed. The
modelling of the Val Pola landslide based on run-out extent,
debris profiles, velocities and deposition distributions
7
Landscapes of Northern Lombardy …
95
Fig. 7.5 The Val Pola landslide
viewed from the opposite side of
the main valley (photo V.
Garavaglia 2009)
(see Crosta et al. 2004) provides us with the opportunity to
better understand this type of hazard which may significantly
affect alpine valleys.
by sediment transported during heavy rainfall that occurred
during the autumn of 2013.
7.3.5
7.3.4
Postalesio Earth Pyramids: The Modelling
of Glacial Deposits by Runoff
Coming from the Upper Valtellina, the landscape shows a
transition from landforms shaped mainly by glaciers to
polygenic landforms generated by mass wasting and fluvial
action.
The Postalesio earth pyramids, located a few kilometres
west of Sondrio (Figs. 7.1 and 7.6), are famous landforms in
Upper Pleistocene glacial deposits, where gneiss and
micaschist boulders of the Tonale Units are incorporated and
protect the finer portion of the deposit from runoff. Water
runoff action is the main process which shapes the deposits
of different grain size into spectacular forms. The pyramids
have been evolving, and both the formation of new pyramids
and the dismantling of old ones are deduced by the presence
of fallen blocks at the base of the slopes. In Fig. 7.6, a shot
of the pyramids in 1931, as included in the monograph “The
Alps” by Federico Sacco (1934), is compared with the
current situation, and at least seven pyramids are easily
distinguishable. The path that allows a visit along the
perimeter of this Natural Reserve has recently been buried
The Lithological Landscapes
of Valmalenco and Masino Valleys
During the Oligocene, a regional tensional regime led to the
emplacement of several wide plutons distributed mainly
along the Insubric Line. One of the most important plutons is
located on the northern side of Valtellina and is known as
Masino-Bregaglia or Bergell Pluton (Fig. 7.1). It develops in
the area between Valmalenco (Sissone Valley, in the western
part) and Chiavenna Valley, with a tail that reaches the
Bellinzona area, and covers an area of approximately
280 km2. The pluton is characterised by elongation along the
Insubric Line. The calk-alkaline lithotypes, that characterise
the pluton, are of two types, on the southern and southeastern edges of the pluton, fine grained tonalite is present
(locally named “Serizzo”), while the core and the eastern
portion of the pluton consist of a large-feldspar granodiorite
that, because of the presence of porphyroclasts of potassium
feldspar, is known locally as “Ghiandone”. These rock types
are largely used for buildings in the Milan area.
Morphology of the granitic pluton has been shaped by
advancing glaciers and by their recent retreat, and also by
gravity-driven processes, particularly after the LGM which
96
I. Bollati et al.
Fig. 7.6 Postalesio earth pyramids. a Image extracted from Sacco (1934). b View of the pyramids from the lower portion of the tourism path
(photo I. Bollati 2013)
have produced voluminous rock fall deposits. Running water
and fluvial action have been playing an important role in
modelling this landscape to a considerable extent as a typical
example of a lithological landscape. The Masino and Mello
Valley sides are famous for the awe-inspiring rock walls. In
the Masino Valley near San Martino, one of the most
impressive and famous mega-boulders, the Sasso Remenno,
which has a volume of several hundred cubic metres, is
present as the result of a huge rock fall (Crosta 1994).
Due to the valley shape and the quality of the granite
lithotype, large numbers of tourists and climbers visit the
area, especially during summer. Climbing on the rock walls
of Mello Valley or on the Sasso Remenno is an appreciated
activity, and the granodioritic walls of the Masino and Mello
valleys are famous all over Europe as “the little Yosemite”.
One of the most important mountains in the Masino Valley
area, approachable from both the Swiss and Italian sides, is
the Badile Peak, a beautiful example of modelling on
granitic substrate.
From a geological point of view, the area near Valmalenco is significant because along the valley it is possible to
cross the different tectonic units of the paleo-African Austroalpine Nappes and oceanic and paleo-European rocks of
the Pennidic Nappes. The importance of Valmalenco is also
attributable to mining activity, deriving from the presence of
many types of minerals such as chromite, asbestos and
manganese nodules that are exported all over the world.
In the mountainsides surrounding Chiareggio village
(Fig. 7.1) in the Sissone Valley, the panoramic view of
contrasting lithological landscapes is meaningful (Fig. 7.7):
the contact is evident between the Oligocene intrusive rocks
and the ultramafic rocks of the ophiolitic Malenco-Forno
Nappe that makes up the Disgrazia Peak and others. The
names of the peaks in the area (i.e. Sasso Nero and Sasso
Moro) reflect the dark colour of the unweathered ultramafic
lithotypes, and the same naming pattern is evident where the
weathering of the ferric serpentinite rocks gives them a very
red aspect (i.e. Preda Rossa, Corna Rossa and Corni
Bruciati).
Many itineraries and hiking trails allow enjoyment of
these spectacular landscapes, which range from lithological
to glacial.
7.3.6
The Lacustrine Landscape of Lake Como
Lake Como collects, in the northern sector, the waters of the
Mera River flowing from the Chiavenna Valley and of the
Adda River flowing from Valtellina (Figs. 7.1 and 7.8). In
this region, a wide plain area, the Pian di Spagna, gradually
develops and consists of alluvial deposits of both rivers,
though the Adda River sedimentation rate has been the most
influential one. In fact the advance of sedimentation towards
the west led to the progressive separation of Lake Como, in
historical times (around the sixteenth century), from the
Mezzola Lake located to the north in the Chiavenna Valley.
The Pian di Spagna, an internationally recognised wetland,
derives its name from Spanish rule during the seventeenth
century.
From National Road 36, it is possible to appreciate the
Lake Como landscape. The current Lake Como basin shape
is an inverted “Y” where the towns of Como and Lecco are
7
Landscapes of Northern Lombardy …
97
Fig. 7.7 Geological landscape of granites and ophiolitic rocks in the
Sissone Valley. The contact between oceanic rocks of the Valmalenco
Nappe (serpentinites and amphibolites) and granites of the Val
Masino-Bregaglia pluton is very evident, enhanced by the contrasting
colours: the red of oxidised serpentinites stands out clearly (photo M.
Lucini 2009)
Fig. 7.8 Panoramic view of Lake Como. The Lecco branch of the lake
is visible with the peaks of the Grigna Massif in the background: the
Northern Grigna (2399 m) and the Southern Grigna (2181 m),
respectively known as “Grignone” and “Grignetta”. The photo was
taken from the Barni village (635 m) located between the two branches
of Lake Como (photo I. Bollati 2011)
located on the two southern tails (Figs. 7.1 and 7.8). Along
the lake sides, from north to south, the change from metamorphic basement to the Permo-Mesozoic sedimentary
cover of the Southern Alps is visible.
During the period between the Oligocene and the Middle
Miocene, renewed tectonic activity, accompanied by a rapid
orogenic uplift, activated the Alps, and in the final phase of
the Miocene, during the Messinian (7.2–5.3 Ma BP), the
closure of the connection between the Atlantic Ocean and
the Mediterranean Sea led to the complete desiccation of the
Mediterranean Sea, with the consequent deposition of hundreds of kilometres of evaporite deposits. This episode
played a fundamental role in the formation of Lake Como
and of the other large Prealpine lakes such as Lake Maggiore
and Lake Iseo, for example. This event led to an irregular
increase of the incision level of the rivers, mainly N–S oriented such as the Adda River, that tended to reach the
new base elevation. The most important consequence of this
incision was the formation of deep canyons along the
Mediterranean margins. Southern Alpine lakes generally
have common features such as N–S orientation, steep lateral
slopes and lakebeds that lie below sea level (i.e. cryptodepressions), confirmed by geophysical investigations conducted in both the Po Plain and Lake Como. According to
98
I. Bollati et al.
these studies a possible link between lake formation, intensification of erosion and the formation of canyons has been
proposed (Bini et al. 1978).
At the end of the Pleistocene, in the LGM phase, the glaciers present in the area were locally up to 2 km thick, leaving
only the higher peaks exposed above the ice (Cavallin et al.
1997). These constituted a complex system of valley glaciers
continuing south from the main glaciers coming out of the
Valtellina and Chiavenna valleys, and forming the piedmont
glaciers of Como, Brianza and Lecco (Fig. 7.2b). The glaciers
left, as a record of their maximum expansion, a series of
concentric moraine ridges referred to as the moraine
amphitheatres of Brianza and Lecco. The characteristics of
medial and end moraines, together with the positions of erratic
boulders and glacial deposits in caves, permitted the reconstruction of thirteen glacial episodes in the Prealpine area
since the Late Pliocene (Bini et al. 1996). The erratic boulders
dispersed in the area down valley of Lake Como are representative of the outcropping lithotypes in the broad provenance basin of the Adda River, among which the previously
described granitic and ultramafic rocks of the Valmalenco and
Masino Valley are widely represented. Some of these erratic
boulders, which have names linked with local traditions (e.g.
Sass Negher, Pietra Luna and Pietra Pendula), are now protected as natural monuments.
Hence, the glacial modelling of the prior canyons, previously proposed as the primary agent for the formation of
the U-shaped steep flanks of Lake Como’s profile, might
have acted only successively, remodelling the canyons and
partially re-eroding the sediments pertinent to the Messinian
desiccation events and to the successive Pliocene transgression phase.
7.3.7
The Karst Landscape of the Grigne Massif
Approaching the Lake Como area, where calcareous lithotypes become dominant, karst landforms are widespread.
One of the most representative and well-known karst landscapes of the Central Italian Alps develops in the Grigne
Massif, located on the eastern side of Lake Como (Figs. 7.1
and 7.8). The area is characterised by the sedimentary cover
of the Southern Alps which lies above the metamorphic
basement outcropping towards the north. The Triassic
limestones of the Grigne Massif belong mainly to the Esino
dolomitic limestone Platform (Upper Anisian—Ladinian),
which forms the two most important peaks: the Northern
Grigna (2399 m) and the Southern Grigna (2181 m). The
landscape is typically characterised by karst landforms,
especially along the Bregai edge: dolines, shafts, hills, flat
rock surfaces and karren (micro-karsts) are represented.
Snow is present in the area for some months during the year.
In the past, the soil coverage must have been very thick, as
covered karst landforms are widespread (Santilli et al. 2005).
Different paleo-karst stages led to the formation of a
broad and deep karst system that has been successively cut
by Quaternary glacial erosion. In fact, the area is renowned
from a speleological point of view, and in some of these
caves ice is still present, as reported by Leonardo Da Vinci,
who was among the first to note this feature. Among the
deepest and most famous caverns there is the “Abisso W le
Donne” (1160 m deep). The ice from one of these caves
(“Abisso sul Margine dell’Alto Bregai”, 192 m deep) has
been analysed for d18O and ionic content relative to depth;
the ice is considered to be derived from the crystallisation,
from the top to the bottom, of lake water, with partial
opening of the system and entry of different sources of water
(Citterio et al. 2004).
Also around the Grigna Massif are interesting hiking
trails; the one that reaches the Northern Grigna peak from
Esino Lario and that crosses the most important cave areas
allow observation of the geomorphological features of the
area.
7.4
Conclusions
The Central Italian Alps, and in particular the region
between Upper Valtellina and Lake Como, permit observation of a varied series of landforms and landscapes by following the retreat path of the glaciers since the LGM. The
different structural domains of the Alps are reflected in the
various lithological patterns, and the differentiation of geomorphological processes acting through time and space
allows us to make inferences regarding the influence of
climate change on the intensity and frequency of
climate-related processes. The records of the most important
evolutionary phases of the Alpine range are present and
comprehensible within the current landscapes, as is the
glacial evolution from the maximum extent during the Upper
Pleistocene until the Little Ice Age, and the current shrinkage
phase.
References
Bini A, Zuccoli L (2004) Glacial history of the southern side of the
central Alps, Italy. In: Ehlers J, Gibbard PL, Hughes PD (eds) Quaternary glaciations. Extent and chronology. Elsevier, London,
pp 195–200
Bini A, Cita MB, Gaetani M (1978) Southern Alpine lakes—hypothesis
of an erosional origin related to the Messinian entrenchment. Mar
Geol 27(3):271–288
7
Landscapes of Northern Lombardy …
Bini A, Felber M, Pomicino N, Zuccoli L (1996) Maximum extension
of the glaciers (MEG) in the area comprised between Lago di
Como, Lago Maggiore and their respective end-moraine system.
Geol Insubrica 1(1):65–78
Cavallin A, Baroni C, Bini A, Carton A, Marchetti M, Orombelli G,
Pelfini M, Zanchi A (1997) Geomorphology of the central and
southern Alps. Suppl Geogr Fis Dinam Quat III(2):13–47
Citterio M, Turri S, Bini A, Maggi V (2004) Observed trends in the
chemical composition, d18O and crystal sizes vs. depth in the first
ice core from the “LoLc 1650 Abisso sul Margine dell’Alto Bregai”
ice cave (Lecco, Italy). Theor Appl Karstology 17:27–44
Crosta G (1994) An example of unusual complex landslide: from a
rockfall to a dry granular flow. Geol Romana 30:175–184
Crosta GB, Chen H, Lee CF (2004) Replay of the 1987 Val Pola
landslide, Italian Alps. Geomorphology 60(1–2):127–146
D’Agata C, Bocchiola D, Maragno D, Smiraglia C, Diolaiuti G (2014)
Glacier shrinkage driven by climate change during half a century
(1954–2007) in the Ortles-Cevedale group (Stelvio National Park,
Lombardy, Italian Alps). Theor Appl Karstology 116:169–190
Guglielmin M, Lozej A, Tellini C (1994) Permafrost distribution and
rock glaciers in the Livigno area (Northern Italy). Permafrost
Periglac Process 5(1):25–36
99
Guglielmin M, Camusso M, Polesello S, Valsecchi S (2004) An old
relict glacier body preserved in permafrost environment: the
Foscagno rock glacier ice core (Upper Valtellina, Italian Central
Alps). Arct Antarct Alp Res 36(1):108–116
Montrasio A, Bini A, Berra F, Cariboni M, Ceriani M, Deichmann N,
Ferliga C, Gregnanin A, Guerra S, Gugliemin M, Jadoul F,
Longhin M, Mair V, Mazzoccola D, Sciesa E, Zappone A (2012)
Carta geologica d’Italia 1:50,000. Foglio 024—Bormio, Note
illustrative. S.E.L.C.A., Firenze, 17 pp
Orombelli G, Pelfini M (1985) Una fase di avanzata glaciale
nell’Olocene superiore, precedente alla Piccola Glaciazione, nelle
Alpi Centrali. Rend Soc Geol It 8:17–20
Pelfini M, Bollati I (2014) Landforms and geomorphosites ongoing
changes: concepts and implications for geoheritage promotion.
Quaes Geograph 33(1):131–143
Sacco F (1934) Le Alpi. Touring Club Italiano Ed., Milano, 736 pp
Santilli M, Pelfini M, Citterio M, Turri S (2005) Landscape history in
the subalpine karst region of Moncodeno (Lombardy Prealps,
Northern Italy). Dendrochronologia 23:19–27
Stoppani A (1876) Il Bel Paese. Barbera Ed., Milano, 682 pp
8
The Adamello-Presanella and Brenta Massifs,
Central Alps: Contrasting High-Mountain
Landscapes and Landforms
Alberto Carton and Carlo Baroni
Abstract
Adamello-Presanella and Brenta massifs are two distinct and adjacent mountain groups
divided by an Alpine structural alignment which separates the Southern Alps into two
distinct blocks characterized by different rock types. The Adamello-Presanella Massif is
made up of intrusive igneous rocks and shows typical landscapes of high-mountain
environments modelled prevalently by the action of glaciers. In the Brenta Massif
limestones and dolostones crop out extensively which have been shaped into steeples,
pinnacles, vertical rock faces and ledges by selective erosion. In this mountain group
subsurface and surface karst landscapes have also developed. Owing to its extraordinary
interest and geological-geomorphological value, these massifs are included in the European
Geoparks Network and in the World Global UNESCO Network of Geoparks.
Keywords
Alpine landscape
Glacial geomorphology
Karst geomorphology
heritage Adamello-Presanella and Brenta massifs
8.1
Introduction
The massifs of Adamello-Presanella and Brenta, located at the
easternmost extremity of the Rhaetian Alps, are two mountain
groups which differ considerably one from the other, from
both geological and geomorphological viewpoint.
The former is mostly made up of igneous rocks of a large
batholith formed by several tonalite plutons, granodiorites
and gabbros. It is the largest and most spectacular intrusive
body of Alpine Tertiary magmatism. Morphology of this
area clearly shows typical features of a high-mountain
landscape which has been intensely modelled by glaciers,
with deep glacial U-shaped trough valleys, laterally flanked
by sheer rock slopes and long glacial terraces.
Nature world
In the Brenta Massif the oldest rocks are Permian
volcano-sedimentary deposits but the most widespread formation is Dolomia Principale, a typical carbonate shelf formation made up of a monotonous sequence of typically
laminated dolostone layers. The most famous peaks of this
group are modelled in this formation which, in its central
sector, makes up a majestic landscape dominated by steeples, pinnacles and sheer rock faces. The Brenta Massif is
also characterized by glacial landforms, mainly cirques,
although karst landscape is the most dominant in this massif.
The widespread presence of rocks subject to karst processes
makes the Brenta Massif one of the most important karst
areas in the Dolomites, with an extremely well-articulated
subsurface drainage network.
A. Carton (&)
Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università di Padova, Via Gradenigo
6, 35131 Padua, Italy
e-mail: alberto.carton@unipd.it
8.2
C. Baroni
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Pisa, Via S.
Maria 53, 56126 Pisa, Italy
The Adamello-Presanella Massif lies in the southern sector
of the Central Alps (Rhaetian Alps), and covers an area of
more than 1100 km2 (Fig. 8.1). The eastern sector is
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_8
Geographical Setting
101
102
A. Carton and C. Baroni
included in the Trentino region, the western one belongs to
Lombardy. It is the southernmost massif in this sector of the
Alps, with peaks exceeding 3500 m in elevation. Adamello
hosts the largest plateau glacier of the Italian Alps: the
Adamello or Pian di Neve Glacier. To the north, it borders
the Ortles-Cevedale Group, from which it is separated by
Val di Sole and the upper Val Camonica. The Brenta Massif
bounds it to the east along the Rendena, Campiglio and
Meledrio valleys, whereas to the west, beyond Val
Camonica, it borders the Orobian Alps. The southern
boundary is less marked and the massif gradually gives way
to the Lombardy pre-Alps between the Camonica and Giudicarie valleys. The major peaks of the group are Cima
Presanella (3557 m), Mt. Adamello (3538 m) and Mt. Caré
Alto (3463 m); the southern peaks are no more than 3000 m
high.
The Brenta Massif is located some kilometres east of the
Adamello-Presanella Group; it stretches entirely within
the Trentino territory, between the lower Val di Sole to the
northwest, the Meledrio, Campiglio and Rendena valleys to
the west, the upper Val Giudicarie to the south, the Val di
Non and the Molveno Lake and Banale area to the east (De
Battaglia et al. 2013), covering a surface of roughly 400 km2
(Fig. 8.1). The highest peaks are Cima Tosa (3173 m), Cima
Brenta (3150 m) and Pietra Grande (2937 m).
The entire hydrographic network of the Adamello Massif
and a great portion of the Brenta flow into Garda Lake and
Iseo Lake, therefore within the basin of the Po River, whereas
Fig. 8.1 Geographical setting of the Adamello-Presanella and Brenta
massifs. The Adamello-Presanella is a rather compact mountain range
which stretches nearly symmetrically around the two main peaks (Mt.
Adamello and Mt. Presanella). The Brenta massif is instead arranged as
a long, narrow ridge with an articulated but practically single N-S
oriented water divide in the axis of the group
8
The Adamello-Presanella and Brenta Massifs, Central Alps …
the northern slope of Presanella and the northeastern ridges of
Brenta belong to the Adige River basin.
From the climatic standpoint the Adamello-Presanella
and Brenta groups are located at the transition between the
southern Alps—characterized by high precipitation (1800–
2500 mm/year) concentrated in spring and autumn—and the
innermost portion of the Alps, characterized by a more
continental climate, with precipitation (including snowfall)
mainly occurring during winter and generally not exceeding
1000–1200 mm/year. At higher altitudes, in snowy years,
the snow cover remains on the ground until May–June.
These two massifs stretch along an altitude range of over
3000 m; for this reason various vegetation belts are present.
There are meadows and pastures, vast extensions of rocky
species, sub-alpine shrubs and alpine prairies and sub-nival
vegetation. At the highest altitudes vast areas are completely
devoid of vegetation and cryonival processes are particularly
active.
No carriage road runs completely across these two
mountain groups, except a forest road which penetrates for
about 20 km into the Adamello-Presanella Massif along the
Val Genova.
103
On the other hand, the geological history of the Brenta
Massif is quite different since this massif is made up entirely
of sedimentary rocks (Fig. 8.2). The series range from early
Palaeozoic to Cretaceous. The volcano-sedimentary succession of the lower Permian shows a very interesting intercalation of volcanic products and fluvial-lacustrine deposits. In
the eastern sector of the Brenta Dolomites the higher part of
the Dolomia Principale crops out in the central body of this
rocky massif and shows spectacular morphostructural (rock
towers, steeples, ledges etc.) and morphoclimatic landforms
(glacial cirques, roches moutonnées, cryogenic landforms
etc.). The back-stepping trend follows with the subtidal
limestone of the Calcari Grigi Group. Moving westward all
these units are replaced by the Rhaethian basinal deposits.
The condensed units of the Rosso Ammonitico Formation
and Selcifero Lombardo lie on both the Trento shelf and on
the Lombardy basinal facies, witnessing that all the area
started developing in a homogeneous way from the late
Jurassic onwards (Dal Piaz et al. 2007).
8.3.2
Tectonics
The Adamello-Presanella and Brenta Massifs cover a key
area of the Alps, characterized by the presence of the tectonic border between the Austroalpine and Southern Alps,
and by the union of three segments of the Periadriatic
Alignment (Bosellini 2017).
From the structural standpoint, besides the two great regional features which bound it to NNW (Tonale Line) and to the
east (Giudicarie Line), the Adamello batholith is affected by
the Gole larghe—Val Genova Alignment, which makes up
its main tectonic discontinuity. This is a great
right-transcurrent E–W trending fault with a throw of about
1 km (Di Toro and Pennacchioni 2004, 2005). On the contrary, the Brenta Massif is affected by a dense network of
sub-parallel N-S trending overthrusts (Fig. 8.2).
8.3.1
8.3.3
8.3
Geology and Its Influence
on Geomorphology
Lithology
The Adamello-Presanella intrusive massif is the largest
(670 km2) and the oldest (42–31 Ma) of the intrusive bodies
of Oligocene age widespread in the Alps (Brack et al. 2008).
Given the great extent of the outcrops of its magmatic rocks
(Callegari and Brack 2002), it is considered to be a batholith. The magmatic mass is enclosed in a crustal structural
wedge bounded to the north by the Tonale Line, the local
name for the Insubric Line, which separates the Austroalpine Domain from the Southern Alps and to the west by
the Giudicarie Line (Fig. 8.2). Different rock types can be
distinguished (Callegari and Dal Piaz 1973), as the Adamello batholith is made up of many plutons that are more or
less differentiated (Fig. 8.2). The main outcropping rocks
are tonalite, quartz diorite, granodiorite etc. (Callegari and
Dal Piaz 1973). Aplitic and pegmatitic dykes and sills are
widespread all over the massif where they cut across the
“hosting” rocks.
Geological Control on Landforms
The striking difference between the Adamello-Presanella and
Brenta massifs is evident from any aerial view. The first is a
rather compact mountain group which stretches nearly
symmetrically around the two main peaks (Mt. Adamello
and Cima Presanella). On the contrary, the Brenta Massif is
arranged as a long, narrow ridge, with an articulated but
practically single N–S oriented watershed running on
top. These diverse arrangements are perfectly reflected in the
hydrographic network which shows different patterns in the
two massifs (Fig. 8.1). In the Adamello-Presanella Massif
extensive systems of regional faults (Tonale and Giudicarie
Lines) have strongly influenced the trend of the peripheral
hydrographic network, generating the upper Val Camonica
and the Vermiglio, Sole, Rendena and Giudicarie valleys,
which may be interpreted as subsequent valleys. On the
contrary, the hydrographic pattern developed by Fumo,
Adamè, Salarno, Miller, Baitone and Avio valleys assumes a
104
A. Carton and C. Baroni
Fig. 8.2 Geological sketch map
of the Adamello-Presanella and
Brenta massifs. Legend: 1
Sedimentary cover (Upper
Permian-Neogene); 2 Re di
Castello Tonalite Unit (Middle
Eocene); 3 Western Adamello
Tonalite Unit (Late Eocene); 4
Avio and Central Adamello
Tonalite Unit (Late
Eocene-Oligocene); 5 Presanella
Tonalite Unit (Oligocene); 6
metamorphic basement rocks; 7
main anticline; 8 main syncline; 9
main fault; 10 main thrust; 11
klippe and summit overthrust; 12
tectonic window (modified after
Baroni et al. 2014)
centrifugal arrangement, diverging radially from the top
areas of the massif; this is due to the uplift of the Tertiary
batholith which has reached its most elevated and eroded
point in this area.
In the Brenta Massif the development of valleys is less
pronounced and less geometrical. The various geological
structures cut across the mountain chain with a dense
series of N–S trending faults and thrusts. Along or in
proximity of these tectonic features, the main valleys are
found, e.g. the Val di Tovel. Structural controls are also
found in correspondence with valleys developed along a
great normal and trascurrent fault. A set of vertical or
sub-vertical faults and joints, which generally cut across
the dolostones, usually with sub-horizontal or slightly
inclined attitudes, generates a series of pinnacles and rock
towers of various sizes (Fig. 8.3) recorded in the local
toponymy, as in the case of Campanil Basso and Campanil Alto, and Torre di Vallesinella. These spectacular
forms have been shaped in a thick dolostone mass, in
particular, the Dolomia Principale Formation which in the
Brenta massif forms a single rock body with the underlying Carnian and Ladinian dolostones. In some places the
considerable thickness of these rocks is caused also by
overthrusts occurring within the dolostones which increase
their total thickness. For this reason, the perpendicular
faces of many rock towers and monoliths are about a
hundred metres high and offer long, vertical rock faces to
climbers. Other rock towers are the result of morphoselection processes on rocks of different nature. Spectacular
forms of this type are the Turrion Basso and Turrion Alto
in the upper Val di Tovel (Fig. 8.4). Selective erosion has
also occurred in correspondence with lithological changes
or where there are variations of thickness and compactness within the same geological formation. This phenomenon is well represented by narrow ledges sculpted
within the Dolomia Principale, which host various alpine
itineraries, the most famous of which is the “delle
Bocchette” way.
8
The Adamello-Presanella and Brenta Massifs, Central Alps …
105
Fig. 8.3 Typical saw-shaped
profile of the Brenta Massif
caused by a series of faults and
sub-vertical joints which cut
through the dolostone layers
giving origin to pinnacles and
towers. Central Brenta: Busa dei
Sfulmini. From left to right Cima
Tosa (in the background), Cima
Brenta Alta, Campanil Basso,
Campanil Alto, Cima dei
Sfulmini, Torre di Brenta and
Cima d’Armi (photo P. Calzà)
Fig. 8.4 Spectacular example of
morphoselection: Turrion Basso
and Turrion Alto. The two towers
are interpreted as a klippen
(overthrust peak) that duplicates
the Rethian succession. The basin
(valley) in which they are located
is laterally bounded by two faults.
The areas near the two faults have
suffered more intense erosion
than the towers due to a greater
jointing of the bedrock (photo M.
Visintainer)
In the Adamello-Presanella Massif the wide and monotonous outcrops of crystalline rocks lack a network of faults
or joints on a regional scale and therefore do not allow the
formation of articulated landforms. The slopes are constantly
characterized by steep inclinations, sometimes interrupted by
glacial shoulders. The rock types found in this group are less
subject to frost shattering and, as a consequence, have better
preserved the erosional traces of glaciers. For this reason
well preserved trimlines can frequently be observed on the
slopes, dating back to both the Last Glacial Maximum
106
A. Carton and C. Baroni
Fig. 8.5 Long sharp crests
(arêtes) characterize the whole
Adamello-Presanella Massif
originated due to intersection of
retreating rock slopes in the
glacial valley heads. To the left
Crozzon di Lares stands above
Vedretta di Folgorida, in the
middle Crozzon di Folgorida with
a set of well-preserved Late
Glacial moraine ridges at its foot
(photo A. Carton)
(LGM) and the Little Ice Age (LIA). The flat open spaces
found in the central Brenta Massif do not have their counterparts in Adamello, where they are constantly substituted
by sharp crests (arête), resulting from glacial undercutting of
rock slopes and cryogenic processes (Fig. 8.5).
8.4
The Glacial Inprint
The second major control on landforms is ice action. The
Adamello-Presanella and Brenta massifs were affected by
the great Pleistocene glacial expansions. In particular, they
were affected by the LGM expansion, by the subsequent
Late Glacial phase and, finally, by the LIA. During the LGM
the Adamello-Presanella and Brenta massifs were almost
completely covered by an ice sheet from which only the
highest peaks emerged. It is estimated that, in the area where
the village of Madonna di Campiglio lies (1527 m), the ice
sheet surface might have reached an altitude of 2150–
2200 m. On the Adamello-Presanella massif the lobes of
some of the largest glaciers of the Southern Alps branched
out towards the south, such as the Chiese and Oglio glaciers
located in Val Camonica. A remarkable lobe came down
from Val di Sole to the east. This impressive ice-mass surrounded even the Brenta Dolomites on the east side, along
the alignment Val di Non—Molveno—Banale. To the west,
a large tongue between the Brenta and Adamello-Presanella
massifs was generated along the Meledrio, Campiglio and
Rendena valleys.
In subsequent phases of climate warming this “sea of ice”
was disrupted. Already in the Late Glacial (Gschnitz stage
Auct.) numerous valley glaciers, isolated one from the other,
were present in the two mountain groups within a network of
secondary valleys (Dal Piaz et al. 2007; Brack et al. 2008).
However, their successive development and evolution was
different, owing to the different orographic conditions of the
two massifs. Up to a few decades ago, in the
Adamello-Presanella Massif there were well developed
valley glaciers. On the other hand, in the Brenta Massif the
small Late Glacial valley glaciers soon gave way to a series
of cirque glaciers. Even at present this diversity is very
evident.
Today the Adamello-Presanella Massif glaciers, including the largest glacier of the Italian Alps, the Adamello
Glacier (Fig. 8.6), have an extension of some 53 km2. More
than 140 glaciers developed during the LIA, stretching over
an area almost double their present surface; about 90 of the
LIA glaciers (extending over some 8 km2) are at present
extinct. The considerable regression of the glacier fronts is
marked by withdrawals ranging from several hundred metres
to more than 1800 m (Mandrone Glacier) and 2000 m
(Lobbia Glacier) (Baroni and Carton 1992, 1996). At present, apart from the Adamello Glacier which is considered a
plateau glacier, most glaciers belong to the category of cirque glaciers; only a few of them maintain the characteristics
of valley glaciers.
In the Brenta Massif, towards the end of the nineteenth
century there were 16 glaciers covering a total area of
4.64 km2. Now there are about 15 hanging glaciers
stretching over an area of less than 1 km2. They were all
cirque glaciers but now they are turning into glacio-nival or
debris-covered glaciers. The LIA moraines markedly
8
The Adamello-Presanella and Brenta Massifs, Central Alps …
107
Fig. 8.6 The Lobbia Glacier to
the left and the Mandrone Glacier
(Pian di Neve) to the right within
the Adamello Massif. In the
1960s they were joined
in-between Lobbia alta and Cresta
Croce. On the right flank of the
Mandrone glacier are evident
some glacial cirques (photo A.
Carton, 12 September 2013)
Fig. 8.7 Val di Fumo with
characteristic U-shaped section
laterally surmounted by glacial
shoulders (photo M. Visintainer)
characterize the heads and slopes of the valleys (Fig. 8.7).
From a glaciological viewpoint, it should be emphasised that
in the Brenta Massif glaciers are nearly exclusively fed by
avalanches while in the Adamello-Presanella mainly by
snow precipitation.
8.5
Landforms
In the Adamello-Presanella Massif the alpine morphology is
well-defined, with deep glacial troughs characterized by
successions of basins and steps, well-developed glacial
108
A. Carton and C. Baroni
shoulders, cirques, arêtes and horns. Glacial deposits of the
major Late Glacial phases and of the LIA characterize all
valleys. The more recent lateral and terminal moraines are
found in the vicinity of existing or only recently extinct
glaciers. Mass wasting and periglacial landforms are present
throughout the massif. This morphogenesis is witnessed by
the presence of rock glaciers and by a fair amount of patterned grounds.
On the contrary, the Brenta Massif shows the typical
Dolomite landscape, magnificent and unique the world over,
which is even more unusual in this area of the Rhaetian Alps
dominated by the crystalline massifs of the Central Alps.
Intense erosional processes on lithological discontinuities
and carbonate and dolomite rocks has generated a landscape
rich in rock towers, steeples, ramparts and furrows. In this
group glaciation traces are present, although not as widespread as in the Adamello-Presanella Massif, since the
materials produced by weathering on the steep
calcareous-dolomite slopes have partially hidden the traces
of the more ancient morphogenesis. A series of splendid
karst and glacio-karst landscapes characterizing the wide
upper plateaus compensate this apparent shortcoming. They
also show a well-developed subsurface karst pattern. When
this pattern emerges in correspondence of the vertical walls,
spectacular waterfalls are formed.
There are also numerous glacial cirques (Fig. 8.6),
varying in size and shape but nearly always wide, only
partially hidden by debris. In many cases, segments of
trimlines—often ascribable to the LGM—are observable in
the cirques’ inner parts or along the rocky slopes.
Roches moutonnées are just as frequent on the step sills
and in the flat areas. They emphasize the joint network in a
spectacular manner since they are oriented along these discontinuities. In particular, the roches moutonnées ascribable
to the Late Glacial stadial phases are well preserved,
although widely covered by lichens.
On the contrary, traces of glacial erosion present in the
Brenta Massif are quite different since orographic features of
this massif have not allowed the formation of long valleys
(the longest one, attaining nearly 12 km in length, is Val di
Tovel). All the other valleys are much shorter, orthogonal to
the massif extension, and with steeper slopes. The trough
morphology can be made out only in a few cases as in Val
Gelada since it is devoid of debris and hence its profile
appears to be rather distinct. In all other cases abundant
ice-shattered material, accumulating from the densely layered calcareous and dolomite slopes, hide the trough profile
often buried by debris and talus fans.
8.5.2
8.5.1
Glacial Landforms
The main features characterizing the Adamello-Presanella
Massif are glacial valleys. They have been entirely sculpted
in the Adamello plutons and have perfectly preserved their
typical trough shape. They can attain considerable lengths
(up to 20 km) as in the case of Val Genova. The Avio,
Miller, Salarno, Adamè and Fumo valleys are shorter but just
as spectacular. They preserve the typical U-shape of polycyclic glacial valleys (Fig. 8.8), laterally surmounted by
glacial shoulders.
Another common and interesting feature is offered by the
steps at the outlet into lateral valleys cutting across the
glacial trough (the righel of German authors). An example of
this type is observed in the upper Val Genova, in proximity
of the front of the Mandrone Glacier. Even more spectacular
is the series of righels found in Val d’Avio, which was
already described by Salomon (1908–1910), and in the
1950s was exploited for the construction of a series of
artificial reservoirs. A continuous set of outlet steps is
recognised in Val Genova in correspondence with the lateral
Láres, Seniciaga and Nardis valleys. From this latter step, the
melting waters of the glacier bearing the same name create a
spectacular waterfall, which is listed among the geosites of
the Adamello Brenta Geopark and considered one of the
main tourist attractions of the area.
Periglacial Landforms
The different susceptibility to frost shattering of the rocks
cropping out in the two mountain groups produces larger
amounts of ice-shattered material in the Brenta Massif giving origin to voluminous talus, fans and detrital covers.
Furthermore, the two mountain groups differ also in terms of
the number of rock glaciers. In the Adamello-Presanella
Massif a total of 216 rock glaciers have been identified
(Baroni et al. 2004). Out of these, 88 are active/inactive and
the rest are relict ones. In the group of active/inactive rock
glaciers, 59 are considered active and some of these are
certainly in motion, as confirmed by two recent topographic
surveys (Seppi et al. 2012). At least 30 rock glaciers have
been formed since the LIA. The mean elevation of the fronts
of active rock glaciers (2527 m) lies well below the estimated altitude of the −1 °C (2740 m) and −2 °C (2910 m)
isotherms, suggesting that the reconstructed mean annual air
temperature (MAAT) of −1/−2 °C does not coincide with
the local MAAT in the entire group or that the rock glaciers
studied are in disequilibrium with respect to the current
climate conditions of this area.
On the other hand, in the Brenta Massif only seven rock
glaciers are found, all of which are relict. The large difference
in rock glacier density seems to be related to the different rocks
outcropping in the two mountain groups. The most suitable
rock types for rock glacier development are, in fact, crystalline
rocks; the less suitable ones are carbonate rocks.
8
The Adamello-Presanella and Brenta Massifs, Central Alps …
Fig. 8.8 Little Ice Age deposits (LIA) in the Adamello-Presanella
massif (a) and in the Brenta massif (b). They appear as long and
imposing ridges with sharp crests and steep slopes (a, Nardis hanging
Glacier; photo A. Carton). In the Brenta massif the LIA moraines show
modest size, as seen in correspondence of the Sfulmini northern
109
Glacier (b; photo P. Calzà). a Clearly shows the top portion of the left
lateral moraine of the hanging Nardis Glacier on the lower right of the
picture, externally to the sharp LIA moraines. This moraine (Lg) is
widely covered by vegetation and can be ascribed to the Late-glacial
stadial phases
110
8.5.3
A. Carton and C. Baroni
Karst Landforms
Another feature which radically differentiates the landscape
of the Brenta Massif from the one of Adamello-Presanella is
karst morphology (Fig. 8.9). The surface hydrographic network consists only of a few streams located at the margins of
the area (Ambiez, Seghe, Tovel, Brenta valleys).
There are numerous surface karst and glacio-karst landforms, such as in the top of the Grostedi plateau and in the
Lastei depression (Nicod 1976). There are also perched
blocks, grikes, dolines, gikes, bogaz, rohrenkarren, staircase
karts (schichttreppenkarst), rinnenkarren and rundkarren.
These spectacular landscapes occupy vast sub-horizontal
areas or glacio-karst depressions in correspondence with the
outcrops of Dolomia Principale and Calcari Grigi of the
Liassic. Other noticeable examples are found near Bocca
della Vallazza and at Pian della Nana (Fig. 8.10). In some
sectors there are also wide endorheic depressions, with
diameters up to 800 m. The most typical one is Pozza Tramontana, a 130 m deep huge ellipsoidal doline-like cavity
with a flat bottom. Other examples of karst landscape are
found in the area, where structural surfaces subject to intense
karst processes in the Dolomia Principale are cut across by
slightly open sub-vertical joints, along which grikes and
rohrenkarren were formed. The intense karst processes
make this massif the largest underground hydro-structure in
Trentino, with a hydrological karst difference in elevation
between 3173 m at Cima Tosa and 260 m in the lower Val
di Non (the highest in Italy) (Borsato 2007). In the whole
Brenta Massif there are over 500 cavities made up of karst
pits, many of which are up to 200 m deep. In the
Fig. 8.9 Thick series of karren
at the foot of Castelletto inferiore
of Vallesinella in the Brenta
Massif. They are a spectacular
example of high-altitude karst
forms which were shaped on
carbonate rocks originally
smoothed by glaciers (photo
P. Calzà)
central-southern sector of this group several caves are also
present, some of which attain a length of several kilometres.
8.6
Protection and Appraisal
Owing to their particular natural characteristics, the
Adamello-Presanella and Brenta massifs are included within
two regional parks: the Natural Adamello-Brenta Park
(PNAB) and the Lombardy Adamello Park. The former,
officially established in 1967, includes the entire Brenta
Massif, the Presanella Massif and the eastern part of the
Adamello Massif. The latter, established in 1993, includes
the remaining part of the Adamello Massif. Initiatives to
establish institutions for protection of these territories,
however, date back to the 1920s. In 2011 the management
boards of these two parks signed an agreement protocol
establishing common initiatives and collaboration activities.
As for the Adamello-Brenta Natural Park, already at the date
of its foundation a modern and precursory provincial law
had been enacted whose principles were later ratified by
national laws. This law defined the purposes of these two
natural parks as “the conservation of environmental and
natural characteristics, the promotion of scientific and social
use of environmental assets” and established administrative
organization and general management guidelines of the
protected area.
Due to extraordinary interest and geological and geomorphological values, in 2008 the Adamello-Brenta Natural
Park has obtained the acknowledgement of Adamello Brenta
Geopark. In this way it became part of the European and
8
The Adamello-Presanella and Brenta Massifs, Central Alps …
111
Fig. 8.10 Pian della Nana, Brenta Massif. Wide glacio-karst trough completely devoid of surface hydrography, shaped in-between the Jurassic
limestone, on the left, and the softer marly limestone of the Cretaceous Scaglia Rossa, on the right (photo M. Visintainer)
Global Network of Geoparks, a network of protected areas
which work together in order to preserve and appraise the
Earth’s geological heritage under the auspices of UNESCO.
In the Adamello Brenta Geopark 61 sites of high geological
value (geosites) have been identified. They are now being
protected by means of adequate and sustainable forms of
geotourism. Nevertheless, the maximum acknowledgement
achieved, dated 26 June 2009, was the insertion of the
Brenta Dolomites in the UNESCO World Heritage list
together with another eight Italian Dolomite areas (serial
asset no. 9; Gianolla et al. 2008). This recognition pinpoints
even more the geological spectacularity of these territories.
The motivation for this acknowledgement is as follows: “It
features some of the most beautiful mountain landscapes
anywhere, with vertical walls, sheer cliffs and a high density
of narrow, deep and long valleys. A serial property of nine
areas that present a diversity of spectacular landscapes of
international significance for geomorphology marked by
steeples, pinnacles and rock walls; the site also contains
glacial landforms and karst systems”.
8.7
Conclusions
Peaks born from the sea and rocks formed in the depths of
the Earth; glaciers which shape the mountains and waters
which dissolve carbonate rocks. All this is offered by the
landscapes of the Adamello-Presanella and Brenta massifs.
The variety of landforms which nature has placed in a circumscribed space in the heart of the Alps is really extraordinary. Besides telling the geological history of each relief,
the landscapes found in these mountain groups are educational examples, in some cases spectacular ones, which show
the evolution of several geological and geomorphological
processes on different type of bedrock. The determination to
establish a Nature Park, which was subsequently included in
the European and Global Network of Geoparks, has made
the conservation, fruition and, most of all, appraisal of the
geological heritage of this territory possible, thanks also to
the patronage by UNESCO and the resulting dense network
of scientific and cultural exchanges. Additionally, these
parks provide excellent visitor centres and accompanying
explanations on landform and landscape evolution.
References
Baroni C, Carton A (1992) Variazioni glaciali oloceniche nel Gruppo
del Monte Adamello (Alpi Centrali). Mem Soc Geol It 45:877–882
Baroni C, Carton A (1996) Geomorfologia dell’alta Val di Genova
(Gruppo dell’Adamello, Alpi Centrali). Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 19(1):
3–17
Baroni C, Carton A, Seppi R (2004) Distribution and behaviour of rock
glaciers in the Adamello-Presanella Massif (Italian Alps). Permafrost Periglac Process 15:243–259
Baroni C, Martino S, Salvatore MC, Scarascia Mugnozza G, Schilirò L
(2014) Thermomechanical stress-strain numerical modelling of
deglaciation since the Last Glacial Maximum in the Adamello
group (Rhaetian Alps, Italy). Geomorphology 226:278–299
Borsato A (2007) Gli acquiferi carsici delle Dolomiti di Brenta: risorse
idriche e funzionamento idrogeologico. In: Cucchi F, Forti P,
Sauro U (eds) L’acqua nelle aree carsiche in Italia. Mem Ist It
Speleologia, II serie, vol 19, pp 49–56
Bosellini A (2017) Outline of the geology of Italy. In: Soldati M,
Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer,
Cham, pp 21–27
Brack P, Dal Piaz GV, Baroni C, Carton A, Nardin M, Pellegrini GB,
Pennacchioni G (2008) Note illustrative della carta d’Italia alla scala
1:50.000 Foglio 58 M. Adamello. Agenzia per la Protezione
dell’Ambiente e per i Servizi Tecnici. Dipartimento Difesa del
Suolo. Servizio Geologico d’Italia. Provincia Autonoma di Trento,
140 pp
112
Callegari E, Brack P (2002) Geological map of the tertiary Adamello
batholiths (Northern Italy). Explanatory notes and legend. Mem Sci
Geol Padova 54:19–49
Callegari E, Dal Piaz GB (1973) Field relationships between the main
igneous masses of the Adamello intrusive massif (Northern Italy).
Mem Ist Geol Miner Univ Padova 29:3–39
Dal Piaz GV, Castellarin A, Martin S, Selli L, Carton A, Pellegrini GB,
Casolari E, Daminato F, Montresor L, Picotti V, Prosser G,
Santuliana E, Cantelli L (2007) Note illustrative della carta
geologica d’Italia alla scala 1:50.000 Foglio 42 Malè. Agenzia per
la Protezione dell’Ambiente e per i Servizi Tecnici. Dipartimento
Difesa del Suolo. Servizio Geologico d’Italia—Provincia Autonoma
di Trento, Firenze, 143 pp
De Battaglia F, Carton A, Pistoia U (eds) (2013) Dolomiti di Brenta.
Cierre edizioni, Società Alpinisti Tridentini, Verona, 394 pp
Di Toro G, Pennacchioni G (2004) Superheated friction-induced melts
in zoned pseudotachylytes within the Adamello tonalites (Italian
Southern Alps). J Struct Geol 26:1783–1801
Di Toro G, Pennacchioni G (2005) Fault plane processes and
mesoscopic structure of a strong-type seismogenic fault in
A. Carton and C. Baroni
tonalites (Adamello batholith, Southern Alps). Tectonophysics
402:55–80
Gianolla P, Micheletti C, Panizza M, Viola F (eds) (2008) Nomination
of the Dolomites for inscription on the world natural heritage list
UNESCO—nomination document. Provincia di Belluno, Provincia
Autonoma di Bolzano—Bozen, Provincia di Pordenone, Provincia
Autonoma di Trento, Provincia di Udine, 363 pp
Nicod J (1976) Les Dolomites de la Brenta (Italie), Karst hautalpin
typique et le problème des cuvettes glacio-karstiques. Z Geomorph
Supp 26:35–57
Salomon W. (1908–1910) Die Adamellogruppe. Ein alpines Zentralmassiv und seine Bedeutung für die Gebirgsbildung und unsere
Kenntnis von dem Mechanismus der Intrusionen. Abh KK Geol
Reichsanst Wien, 21:1–433, 22:435–603
Seppi R, Carton A, Zumiani M, Dall’Amico M, Zampedri G, Rigon R
(2012) Inventory, distribution, and topographic features of rock
glaciers in the southern region of the Eastern Italian Alps (Trentino).
Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 35(2):185–197
9
Large Ancient Landslides in Trentino,
Northeastern Alps, as Evidence of Postglacial
Dynamics
Alberto Carton
Abstract
The mountain landscape of Trentino (northeastern Italy) is characterized by the presence of
a series of large-scale landslides locally known as marocche. Remarkable examples are
represented by the so-called Lavini di Marco, Marocche di Dro and Marocche di Molveno.
Various hypotheses have been suggested regarding the origin of these landslides. Some
authors have proposed a glacial rather than a gravitational origin. Other authors maintained
that marocche should be referred to rock avalanches which occurred in glacial conditions
and whose accumulations must have been distributed by glacial processes. The latter
interpretation cannot be accepted since the largest landslide is far more recent than
Late-Glacial Age. Many concordant chronological data tend to ascribe them to the
Holocene, between 3000 and 1000 years BP.
Keywords
Rock avalanche
9.1
Rock slide
Introduction
Throughout the Holocene, valley slopes in the Alps have
been in an adjustment stage after extensive reshaping by
Pleistocene glaciers. The dominant response to ice decay can
be observed in numerous slope instability processes, both in
the bedrock and cover sediments of varying size and type,
such as rock fall, rock slide and rock avalanche (Soldati et al.
2006; Prager et al. 2008; Borgatti and Soldati 2010). In
Trento Province, along the southern side of the Eastern Alps,
many rock slides have been documented, particularly in the
lower valleys of the Adige and Sarca rivers. The most
famous landslides are Lavini di Marco, Marocche di Dro,
Marocche di Pietramurata, Marocche di Masi di Lasino,
Marocche del Monte Palon, Marocche di Castelpietra,
Marocche di Molveno and Marocche di Tovel (Fig. 9.1). In
particular, the Lavini di Marco was first mentioned early in
A. Carton (&)
Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università di Padova, Via Gradenigo
6, 35131 Padua, Italy
e-mail: alberto.carton@unipd.it
Marocche
Holocene
Trentino
Eastern Alps
1300 by Dante Alighieri in his Divine Comedy (Inferno, XII,
4–9).
Two large tongues of the Atesino Glacier once stretched
along the Adige and Sarca valleys, reaching as far as the
northern Po Plain. In several points, the two ice flows were
connected by a series of transfluence saddles. Their thickness was such that the valley flanks were covered by ice
nearly up to the top. The slopes now bear the marks of
considerable landslides: at their foot, vast debris accumulations are scattered, often consisting of large rock blocks.
These landslides are locally known with the term marocche.
The term marocca is a dialect entry deriving from mar
which means “stone”. In the Adige Valley, around Rovereto,
also the term lavini (or slavini) is used. Mass movement of
this type, with transport of huge amounts of rock debris for
distances up to thousands of metres, are classified in the
literature as debris avalanches and rock avalanches (Angeli
et al. 1996).
From the end of the nineteenth century onwards, they
have been described by several authors (see Venzo 2000 for
a review). The use of traditional radiometric dating by means
of 14C (Orombelli and Sauro 1988; Bassetti and Borsato
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_9
113
114
A. Carton
Fig. 9.1 Geological sketch map of the Trento Province with location and size of landslides (modified after Martin et al. 2014)
2007) and more recent ones based on 36Cl decay rate, which
allow the calculation of the exposure period (Martin et al.
2014), have opened new opportunities to date these important landslide bodies and to provide a detailed evolutional
and chronological framework of the Lavini di Marco.
In the past, these large landslides were associated with the
withdrawal of Pleistocene glaciers. Following the thinning
up of glacial tongues, the surrounding steep slopes were no
longer supported, thus leading to the detachment of large
rock masses and their accumulation and limited transport on
the glaciers’ tongues (moraine landslides). According to this
hypothesis, these landslides would be Late-glacial in age.
Other researchers have interpreted them as moraines disguised as landslides. Nowadays, the hypothesis of valley
deglaciation can no longer be justified since the most
important landslides are definitely more recent than
Late-glacial. On the basis of most chronological clues, they
have been ascribed to the Late Holocene, to have occurred
within an interval of 3000–1000 years BP. On the whole, the
data available today testify to the activity of tectonic
structures with which the landslides are associated. For some
of them, a seismo-tectonic origin is assumed, since this is
compatible with the seismic history of the territory.
Because of their genesis, patterns of movement and
chronological plurality of the events, the complexity of these
landslides still arouses great interest from both scientific and
scenic point of view.
9.2
Geological Control on Landform
Development
In the region north of Garda Lake and in the southern Adige
Valley, geomorphological elements such as valleys and
ridges are controlled by and parallel to the NNE–SSW
trending tectonic lines of the Giudicarie System. The geological structures are characterized by west-dipping monocline ridges which are bordered to the east by tectonic scarps
forming the right-hand side slopes of large asymmetrical
valleys, sometimes split up by dip-upstream shear surfaces.
9
Large Ancient Landslides …
The geological structure of the southern sector of the Giudicarie System is overlain by a Triassic-Eocene carbonate
succession divided into NNE–SSW elongated blocks. These
blocks dip toward WNW and overlap the main lines of the
Giudicarie System (Fig. 9.1). They give rise to monocline
morphostructures marked by asymmetric ridges, the western
slopes of which correspond to bedding surfaces, while the
eastern ones are tectonic scarps. Therefore, the valleys
between ridges correspond to depressions between tectonic
scarps and dip slopes. This general morphological situation
is very prone to vast mass movements which affect the
slopes of the asymmetrical valleys, in correspondence with
the monocline structures and tectonic scarps (Cavallin et al.
1997).
In this area, the Jurassic series typical of the Trento shelf
crops out (Castellarin et al. 2005a, b). It is made up of
limestones such as Calcari Grigi, San Vigilio Oolite, Rosso
Ammonitico and Biancone. Nearly all the main scarps and
slide surfaces of the large landslides originate within the
Calcari Grigi.
Along the Adige River valley and other minor valleys,
there are numerous landslide accumulations distributed over
a relatively small area (Fig. 9.1). Exemplary case are the
Lavini di Marco, the Marocche NNE of Dro and the
Marocche di Molveno.
The large landslides are clearly linked to the marked
asymmetry of the valleys, where western slopes are characterized by tectonic scarps as long as 20 km and there are
differences in height of up to 500–1000 m, with slope gradients of 30–50°. Morphological and structural characteristics allow two main types of slope movement to be
recognized: (i) rock falls from tectonic scarps which correspond to ESE facing slopes; (ii) translational slides along
bedding surfaces on WNW facing slopes (Fig. 9.2).
115
The surface of the landslide deposits is irregular and
undulated, with confined depressions and long, narrow rises.
In places, arcuate, sometimes concentric structures can be
recognized. They are derived from both modest bank-like
rises, small, narrow valleys and alignments of large boulders
or fine-textured belts, which are often revealed by vegetation. These landslide accumulation features are generally
interpreted as flow structures.
Studies on neotectonics carried out in Italy in the 1980s
showed that these large landslides were induced by tectonic
activity. Some of the landslide scarps are, in fact, connected
with presumably active structures, i.e. fault scarp-walls
connected with the neotectonic evolution of the Giudicarie
System (Cavallin et al. 1997).
9.3
9.3.1
Landforms and Landscapes
Lavini di Marco
Along the left side of the mid-Adige Valley, south of the
town of Rovereto, on the western slope of Mt. Zugna there
are at least seven large to medium-sized landslide bodies
(Orombelli and Sauro 1988). From north to south they are:
the Corna Calda landslide, the Dosso Gardene landslide, the
772 m elevation landslide SSE of Grotta Damiano Chiesa,
the Lavini di Marco landslide, the Costa Stenda landslide,
the Marco landslide and the Varini landslide (Fig. 9.3). Out
of these landslide bodies, the largest is the Lavini di Marco.
It is also considered as one of the largest rock avalanches on
the southern flank of the Eastern Alps (Martin et al. 2014).
This landslide or Slavini were mentioned by Dante
Alighieri, the well-known Italian poet, who interpreted the
Lavini di Marco deposits as the result of missing support
(sostegno manco), perhaps related to an earthquake (tremoto).
Qual’è quella ruina che nel fianco
di qua da Trento l’Adice percosse,
o per tremoto o per sostegno manco,
che da cima del monte, onde si mosse,
al piano è sì la roccia discoscesa,
ch’alcuna via darebbe a chi sù fosse
Just like that rockslide on this side of Trent
That struck the flank of the Adige River
Either by an earthquake or erosion
Where, from the mountaintop it started down
To the plain below, the boulders shattered so,
For anyone above they formed a path
Inferno, XII, 4–9
Fig. 9.2 Lavini di Marco. Stratum surfaces, usually WNW trending,
along which translational slides were generated; in the background the
Adige Valley (photo R. Tomasoni)
Towards the end of the 1980s, the Lavini di Marco
became important also from the palaeontological viewpoint
since numerous tracks of dinosaur footprints were found on
the bedding surfaces (Fig. 9.4). Most of the footprints,
116
A. Carton
Fig. 9.3 Lidar image of the
left-hand side of the Adige Valley
south of Rovereto. The largest
landslide deposit, known as
Lavini di Marco, seems to have
modified the river’s course.
Landslides: CC Corna Calda;
DG Dosso Gardene; CS Costa
Stenda; M Marco; V Varini
(elaboration F. Ferrarese)
imprinted in the ancient beach mud, were left by carnivorous
and herbivorous dinosaurs of very variable size. This ichnofauna is principally represented by Grallator, Kayentapus,
Anomoepus and some Parabrontopodus-like ichnotaxa
(Venzo 2000).
At Mt. Zugna Torta, the Calcari Grigi form a massif
elongated in a N–S direction, with WNW dipping slopes, cut
by several NW-trending faults belonging to the
Schio-Vicenza system, one of the most active seismogenetic
systems in Trento Province (Sauro and Zampieri 2001). The
Fig. 9.4 Lavini di Marco: tracks of dinosaur footprints. Ichnofauna is
principally represented by Grallator, Kayentapus, Anomoepus and
some Parabrontopodus-like ichnotaxa (photo R. Tomasoni)
activity and deformation along the Schio-Vicenza fault
system contributed to slope instabilities at Mt. Zugna Torta.
Historical earthquakes are known in SW Trentino, in the
Adige Valley, in Verona, in the adjacent Sarca Valley, Garda
Lake area, and in the Venetian region (Martin et al. 2014).
The Lavini di Marco comprises Jurassic carbonate rocks
of the Calcari Grigi that slid along a dip slope out onto the
plain of the Adige River (Fig. 9.2). The whole complex can
be subdivided into three, not everywhere well-defined parts:
(i) a system of detachment scarps (ii) a series of slide planes
and (iii) landslide deposits. The landslide is made up of a
series of translational slides favoured by bed inclination,
showing monocline 20–25° dip-downstream attitude. The
detachment and slide surface correspond to wide bedding
planes in several points (Fig. 9.5). They are slightly degraded, lacking soil cover, and sometimes covered by thin,
discontinuous debris deposits. The extremely coherent dip of
the bedding planes and the presence of numerous fractures,
perpendicular to the bedding, caused sliding along clay-rich
levels (Tommasi et al. 2009).
The deposit has a volume of *2 108 m3 and covers an
area of about 6.8 km2. It is approximately 5 km long and
1.8 km wide, with a difference of elevation of 1030 m
(Orombelli and Sauro 1988). The landslide deposits cover a
wide area on the valley floor, as far as the Adige River. It has
a defined contour, nearly always semicircular, with some
minor lobes. At the surface it is made up of sharp coarse
clasts and sometimes by large blocks up to tens or even
hundreds of m3. Flow and accumulation directions can be
recognized thanks to the presence of ridges and depressions,
9
Large Ancient Landslides …
117
Fig. 9.5 Lavini di Marco
landslide. The stratum surfaces
along which sliding occurred are
clearly visible. The landslide
body is recognizable in the slope
lower part (photo G. Carton)
ground undulations and radially, fan-arranged, discontinuous
small swells, though these are not always evident.
In particular, the Lavini di Marco is composed of at least
two different rock avalanche bodies; the main deposit known
as Lavini di Marco (the principal) and the much smaller
Costa Stenda deposit (Fig. 9.5). The latter overlies the
Lavini di Marco deposits. According to Orombelli and Sauro
(1988), these two lobes could have been generated at different times or be the result of a single event during which a
rock spur within the landslide channel (Costa Stenda) might
have divided the sliding material.
The age and origin of the Lavini di Marco deposits have
been the focus of controversy for centuries, with age estimates ranging from the Last Interglacial to historic times.
Over 20 years ago some buried soil levels in Lavini di
Marco were dated and the different degree of development of
karst corrosion forms was analyzed. Out of more than seven
recognized landslide bodies, only the Dosso Gardene and
Varini have radiocarbon dates. Orombelli and Sauro (1988)
report a date of 5630 ± 80 14C years (6630–6290 cal years
BP) from a soil buried by the Dosso Gardene rockslide,
which is located just north of the Lavini di Marco deposits.
Radiocarbon dates give a minimum age for the Dosso Gardene rock slide. Orombelli and Sauro (1988) report also an
age of 1300 ± 100 14C years (1385–980 cal years BP) for a
soil buried by the Varini slide, which is located just south of
Lavini di Marco.
Recently many boulders in both the main Lavini di Marco
and Costa Stenda deposits were sampled for 36Cl surface
exposure dating (Martin et al. 2014). Exposure ages range
from 800 ± 210 to 21,310 ± 1000 years. The latter age
stands as a notable outlier, suggesting that the Costa Stenda
boulders were exposed for a considerable amount of time in
the pre-slide bedrock.
The Lavini di Marco and Costa Stenda boulders’ mean
ages are 3000 ± 400 years. Although data are uncertain, the
two slides seem to have been simultaneous. Significantly
younger ages were obtained for the bedrock slide plane:
1600 ± 100 and 1400 ± 100 years, and for the head scarp:
800 ± 200 years (Martin et al. 2014).
9.3.2
Marocche di Dro
In the lower Sarca Valley, between Toblino Lake and Dro,
there are numerous landslides of various sizes, known as the
Marocche di Dro, which make up a complex rock and debris
accumulation. Some make up small isolated ridges emerging
from alluvial deposits. The largest one, the Marocca di Dro
s.s. (also named as Marocca di Pietramurata) occupies the
entire valley floor between Pietramurata and Trebi (Fig. 9.6).
Trener (1924) found a dozen diachronic landslides and
mapped them as seven units in his geological map. In later
studies, the various deposits identified by Trener were
interpreted in different ways: as four morphological units
were identified by Chinaglia (1992) and six units were recognized by Bassetti (1997). The reconstruction of the
boundaries of the various landslide bodies is more evident
for the more recent episodes, whereas it is more approximate
for the older ones. In the valley stretch comprised between
Dro and Pietramurata one of the main mass wasting events
(Marocca di Dro s.s.) took place following the detachment of
a huge slope portion from the Mt. Casale–Mt. Granzoline
area. The deposits of this slope movement dammed most of
118
A. Carton
Fig. 9.6 Lidar image of the
Sarca Valley, between Toblino
Lake and Dro. On the right-hand
side, between Mt. Brento and Mt.
Casale, well-preserved large
niches are present from which
several landslide bodies have
detached. Landslides: M Marocca
di Dro s.s. (also named as
Marocca di Pietramurata); K Kas;
LS Laghisoli; ML Masi di Lasino
(elaboration F. Ferrarese)
the valley floor, forced the Sarca River to shift its channel to
the east, as far as the foot of the left-side slope, in correspondence with the present position of Cavedine Lake.
Another mass wasting event, known as Kas landslide,
occurred later on just downstream of the previous landslide
body which was partially buried. A popular legend states
that this landslide buried a village named Kas. The deposits
coming from the area of Mt. Brento dammed the old channel
of Sarca River for a long distance, among the hamlets of
Laghisoli, Trebi and Pozze. Following the landslide, a large
impoundment was formed which today corresponds to
Cavedine Lake (Figs. 9.6 and 9.7). The Kas landslide, in
turn, overlapped an older landslide body which now crops
out discontinuously. Its original accumulation area is now
mostly covered by the Sarca River alluvial deposits. It seems
therefore plausible that this is the oldest landslide deposit
concealing a valley floor at an altitude lower than the present
one (Chinaglia 1992). The Marocche di Dro stretch over an
area exceeding 13 km2, with maximum length of about
5 km between the main scarp and the toe, width of 3.5 km
and a difference in elevation of 1250 m (Fig. 9.8). The
estimated volume is over 109 m3 (Bassetti 1997). The clasts
are all carbonate, large to medium in size, attaining in some
cases even 500 m3 (Kas landslide). The huge crown area
from which the rock mass detached (Mt. Casale–Mt. Brento)
is set along a tectonic scarp associated with a reverse fault. It
appears controlled by discontinuity surfaces often corresponding to sub-vertical fault planes. On most of the landslide body there are structures which seem to point to a
single provenance from the main scarp, with material
deposited also on the opposite slope up to 200 m from the
valley floor. Chronological information can provide this set
of landslides with a temporal framework. Trener (1924)
reported that during the excavation of an offtake tunnel near
Laghisoli a Roman artefact was found. The datum was
confirmed by a subsequent finding of Roman artefacts made
up of brick fragments associated with an alluvial soil which
was involved in the landslide and was rich in coal fragments
(Bassetti 1997). These fragments were later subject to two
radiocarbon dating analyses which produced ages of 14C
2248 ± 42 years BP (2152–2344 cal years BP) and 14C
2249 ± 39 years BP (2153–2344 cal years BP), respectively. The most ancient landslide accumulation material was
identified in the Marocca di Dro s.s. thanks to 14C dating of
charcoal fragments found at the top of a buried soil level
(Bassetti and Borsato 2007). It produced an age of 14C
4171 ± 41 years BP (4576–4836 cal years BP). Near
Pietramurata, lamellibranchiate shells were found. They
produced a 14C age of 3081–2998 cal years BP (Castellarin
et al. 2005b).
In addition, morphological investigations were carried out
concerning the effects of karst corrosion on the block surfaces and the formation of soil. The development of karst
microforms is substantially homogeneous and does not
appear significant for a definition of the relative age of the
various landslide deposits. This seems to indicate a rather
recent, maximum proto-historic age to this landslide. Similar
conclusions are reached by examining the development of
soils.
In the light of knowledge acquired so far, a chronological
reconstruction of the most evident and most important events
which took place in the lower Sarca Valley can be synthesized as follows. The Marocca di Dro s.s. seems to predate
the deposition of other landslides and chronologically follows the last Ice Age since it involved late glacial deposits in
its movement. The deposition of the Kas landslide—the
most recent one—barred the Sarca River and formed a large
lake stretching to the north over the present Toblino Lake.
9
Large Ancient Landslides …
119
Fig. 9.7 The Sarca Valley from
north to south. In the foreground
the Toblino Lake. The completely
vegetated ridge at the centre of
the photograph belongs to the
landslide deposits of Marocche di
Dro and generated the Cavedine
barrier lake. On the right the long
scarp between Mt. Casale and Mt.
Brento, from which rock falls and
slides originated, is visible (photo
R. Tomasoni)
Fig. 9.8 The complex wide
landslide body of Marocche di
Dro. The landslide huge
detachment zone is set along a
tectonic scarp controlled by
discontinuity surfaces often
corresponding to sub-vertical
fault planes (photo R. Tomasoni)
9.3.3
Marocche di Molveno
The Marocche di Molveno are located south of the lake
bearing the same name, which formed due to the damming
of the valley. The valley hosting the Marocche di Molveno
has an asymmetrical profile, with an extremely steep western
slope affected by scarp-fault-surfaces and an eastern one
descending gradually along a structural slope, with slope
120
gradient corresponding to the attitude of the stratified
formations.
The landslide deposits occupy a total surface of about
6 km2, stretching for a maximum length of about 4 km, a
width of 2.7 km and a difference of altitude of about
1000 m, between 1600 and 550 m (Fuganti 1968–1969).
They are made up of blocks overlying massive diamicton
deposits within a finer matrix. It is possible to observe
arcuate concentric features within the deposit showing different orientations. They seem to be related to different areas
of provenance or could be from complex movements of the
displaced materials during deposition.
The collapsed material detached from the right-hand side
of the valley which corresponds to a tectonic scarp made up
of the Mesozoic carbonate sequence overlying Eocene
limestone. Some hundreds of metres upstream of the landslide crown, the slope is displaced by reverse slope scarp a
few metres high and 1 km long. Landslide crowns are present also on the left-hand side of the valley within a monocline structure. Nevertheless, their smaller dimensions
make them much less evident from the geomorphological
standpoint. For this reason, it is not sure whether the landslide body is made up of a single unit of material coming
from the same detachment scarp or not. In the recent Geological Map of Italy at the 1:50,000 scale (Castellarin et al.
2005a), the Marocche di Molveno are still interpreted as a
single landslide body. The recognition of different landslide
bodies is rather problematic owing to the homogeneity of the
rock types involved, since the rock falls were developed
within the same Jurassic stratigraphic units. A possible distinction of various landslide bodies must therefore be based
upon morphological considerations, since no absolute dating
is available.
Fig. 9.9 Lidar image of the
Molveno Lake area. The left-hand
slope shows numerous
detachment niches with their
relative landslide bodies at the
foot. Landslides: PG Pian delle
Graone; M Moline; N Nembia;
DC Dosso della Croce
(elaboration F. Ferrarese)
A. Carton
On the basis of these remarks, Chinaglia (1992) proposed a subdivision of the Marocche di Molveno into four
separate units. The Marocca di Pian delle Graone seems to
have originated from a head scarp on the left-hand side of
the valley, NW of Mt. Ranzo (Fig. 9.9). It seems to have
been formed by a translational slide on a W-dipping bedding surface of 30°. The largest accumulation (350 million
m3) is found at Marocca delle Moline. This landslide
deposit is overlapped by Marocca di Nembia, which
occupies the central part of the valley (Fig. 9.9). These two
latest landslide events originated within the great head
scarps present on the western side of the valley and have
developed in correspondence with two families of NW–SE
and NE–SW oriented vertical tectonic discontinuities.
Finally, the Marocca di Doss della Croce is found at the
southernmost end of the area, still on the left-hand side of
the valley, in correspondence with the ridge bearing the
same name.
This set of landslides was investigated following the
introduction of hydroelectric power generated from Molveno
Lake. In the autumn of 1951, the reservoir was almost
completely depleted, and its original surface reduced from
3.27 km2 to just 0.138 km2 (Marchesoni 1958). This intervention revealed the remains of a forest on the lake bottom.
The state of preservation of the remains of the ancient forest
was identical, confirming that the lake had been created by a
single landslide. Nevertheless, this does not exclude that
Marocche di Molveno might have been formed by several
events, even subsequent to lake formation.
If we admit that Marocche di Molveno was produced by
the overlapping of several landslides, then the oldest one
should be Marocca del Pian delle Graone (Fig. 9.10).
The presence of superficial karst forms found on the
9
Large Ancient Landslides …
121
Fig. 9.10 Molveno Lake and the
host valley. Some frontal
damming is evident in the
background. In the foreground,
the village of Molveno.
Landslides: PG Pian delle
Graone; M Moline (photo A.
Carton)
boulders below the lake level indicates that this episode was
not responsible for the formation of Molveno Lake (Chinaglia 1992) or, at least, that it was responsible only partially. Subsequently, Marocca delle Moline dammed the
valley floor completely, leading to the formation of Molveno
Lake. Marocca di Nembia and Marocca del Dosso della
Croce seem to represent the last mass wasting episodes.
From the chronological viewpoint, the first information
came as early as the 1950s from the study of a buried forest. The
dominant presence of beech (Fagus sylvatica) in the ancient
Molveno forest excluded any dating preceding the second
millennium BC. In fact, the numerous peat deposits studied in
Trentino showed that beech was the last tree species to colonize
this area. A definitely more significant chronological datum for
Marocche di Molveno is given by the 14C dating carried out on
a tree trunk found at a depth of 32 m in the landslide (Marocca
delle Moline or Marocca di Nembia?). The 14C radiometric
dating obtained is 2908 ± 153 years BP. That means that the
landslide which created the lake took place some 1000–
800 years BC (Marchesoni 1958). According to the same
author, this date would also be confirmed by findings of charcoal and artefacts compatible with the Iron Age. Therefore,
these finds show the existence of a human settlement which was
abandoned once the lake formed.
9.4
Conclusions
Landslide accumulation features known as Marocche are a
typical morphological unit of the Alps and, in particular, of
western Trentino where a large number of them can be
observed. Today the old interpretations implying their
origin associated with glacier decay cannot be accepted
because the largest landslides are far more recent than the
Late-glacial.
Studies on neotectonics showed that these large landslides were induced by tectonic activity. Some of the landslide scarps follow presumably active structures. Among the
tectonic scarps found in this area, it is possible to identify
“fault scarp-walls” connected to the neotectonic evolution of
the Schio-Vicenza fault system and Giudicarie System.
Besides the complex geological and geomorphological
vicissitudes which have generated these vast landslides, the
marocche of Trentino make up typical and unique landscapes. The Marocche di Dro, for example, are one of the
largest landslide deposits of the Italian Alps. The landslide
features have not been obliterated by subsequent degradation
processes and vegetation has colonized them only in part, so
that they are still perfectly visible. Owing to their educational value as models of landslide evolution, palaeogeographical evidence, scientific and ecological importance, the
three sites described here have been placed among the
Trentino geomorphosites (Carton et al. 2005). As such, they
are protected and listed in the inventory of unchangeable
assets of the Town Planning Scheme of the Trento Province.
Thanks to this conservation bill, the Province’s Councillorship for Urban Planning and the Environment can preserve
and enrich the distinctive features of these permanent and
irreplaceable elements, which are strictly and durably linked
with their own environment and territory, as well as with the
community living in this area. In addition, the Lavini di
Marco and Marocche di Dro are two biotopes whose value,
122
thanks also to the presence of dinosaur footprints, has been
further enhanced through the setting of nature trails, production of illustration pamphlets and guided tours.
References
Angeli MG, Gasparetto P, Menotti RM, Pasuto A, Silvano S, Soldati M
(1996) Rock Avalanche. In: Dikau R, Brunsden D, Schrott L,
Ibsen ML (eds) Landslide recognition. Wiley & Sons, Chichester,
pp 190–201
Bassetti M (1997) Studio geomorfologico sulle “Marocche” di Dro
(Trentino occidentale). Studi Trentini Scienze Naturali, Acta
Geologica 72:5–30
Bassetti M, Borsato A (2007) Evoluzione geomorfologica della Bassa
Valle dell’Adige dall’Ultimo Massimo Glaciale: sintesi delle
conoscenze e riferimenti ad aree limitrofe. Studi Trentini Scienze
Naturali, Acta Geologica 82:31–42
Borgatti L, Soldati M (2010) Landslides as a geomorphological proxy
for climate change: a record from the Dolomites (northern Italy).
Geomorphology 120:56–64
Carton A, Avanzini M, Seppi R, Tomasoni R (2005) Geomorphosites
in Trentino: a first census. Il Quaternario 18(1):63–78
Castellarin A, Dal Piaz GV, Picotti V, Selli L, Cantelli L, Martin S,
Montresor L, Rigatti G, Prosser G, Bollettinari G, Pellegrini GB,
Carton A, Nardin M (2005a) Note illustrative della carta geologica
d’Italia alla scala 1:50.000, foglio 059 Tione di Trento. Provincia
Autonoma di Trento, L.A.C., Firenze, 158 pp
Castellarin A, Picotti V, Cantelli L, Claps M, Trombetta L, Selli L,
Carton A, Borsato A, Daminato F, Nardin M, Santuliana E,
Veronese L, Bollettinari G (2005b) Note illustrative della carta
geologica d’Italia alla scala 1:50.000, foglio 080 Riva del Garda.
Provincia Autonoma di Trento, L.A.C., Firenze, 145 pp
Cavallin A, Baroni C, Bini A, Carton A, Marchetti M, Orombelli G,
Pelfini M, Zanchi A (1997) Geomorphology of the central and
southern Alps. Guide for the excursion. Fourth International
Conference on Geomorphology—Italy, 1997. Suppl Geogr Fis
Dinam Quat III(2):13–47
Chinaglia N (1992) Le marocche della Bassa Valle del Sarca:
scivolamenti planari in unità calcaree stratificate. Atti I° Convegno
A. Carton
Nazionale Giovani Ricercatori in Geologia Applicata, Gargnano.
CUEM, Milano, pp 47–56
Fuganti A (1968–69) Studio geologico di sei grandi frane nella regione
Trentino Alto Adige (Marco, Molveno, Prà del Finocchio, Malgrè,
Sasso Englar, Rasciera). Mem Museo Trid Sci Nat 17(3):5–69
Marchesoni V (1958) La datazione col metodo del carbonio 14 del lago
di Molveno e dei resti vegetali riemersi in seguito allo svaso. Studi
Trentini di Scienze Naturali 35(2–3):95–98
Martin S, Campedel P, Ivy-Ochs S, Viganò A, Alfomov V, Vockenhuber C, Andreotti E, Carugati G, Pasqual D, Rigo M (2014) Lavini
di Marco (Trentino, Italy): 36Cl exposure dating of a polyphase
rock avalanche. Quat Geochronol 19:106–116
Orombelli G, Sauro U (1988) I Lavini di Marco: un gruppo di frane
oloceniche nel contesto morfoneotettonico dell’Alta val Lagarina
(Trentino). Suppl Geogr Fis Dinam Quat I:107–116
Prager C, Zangerl C, Patzelt G, Brandner R (2008) Age distribution of
fossil landslides in the Tyrol (Austria) and its surrounding areas. Nat
Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8(2):377–407
Sauro U, Zampieri D (2001) Evidence of recent surface faulting and
surface rupture in the Fore-Alps of Veneto and Trentino (NE Italy).
Geomorphology 40:169–184
Soldati M, Borgatti L, Cavallin A, De Amicis M, Frigerio S,
Giardino M, Mortara G, Pellegrini GB, Ravazzi C, Tellini C,
Zanchi A in collaboration with Alberto W, Albanese D, Chelli A,
Corsini A, Marchetti M, Palomba M, Panizza M (2006) Geomorphological evolution of slopes and climate changes in northern Italy
during the Late Quaternary: spatial and temporal distribution of
landslides and landscape sensitivity implications. Geogr Fis Dinam
Quat 29(2):165–183
Tommasi P, Verrucci L, Campedel P, Veronese L, Pettinelli E,
Ribacchi R (2009) Buckling of high natural slopes: the case of
Lavini di Marco (Trento-Italy). Eng Geol 109(1–2):93–108
Trener GB (1924) Geologia delle marocche. In: Gli impianti idroelettrici della città di Trento. Parte seconda. Tip. Scotoni, Trento,
pp 25–33
Venzo GA (2000) Inquadramento geografico-geologico e cronistoria
degli studi e ricerche geologiche sui Lavini di Marco. In:
Leonardi G, Mietto P (eds) Dinosauri in Italia. Le orme giurassiche
dei Lavini di Marco (Trentino) e gli altri resti fossili italiani.
Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Museo Tridentino di Scienze
Naturali, Museo Civico di Rovereto—Accademia Editoriale
Pisa-Roma, Rovereto, pp 21–31
10
The Dolomite Landscape of the Alta Badia
(Northeastern Alps): A Remarkable Record
of Geological and Geomorphological History
Mauro Marchetti, Alessandro Ghinoi, and Mauro Soldati
Abstract
The Alta Badia (Eastern Dolomites) well synthetizes the remarkable geological and
geomorphological features that enabled the Dolomites to be inscribed in the UNESCO
World Heritage List. Spectacular dolomite mountain groups, built up during the Triassic in
coral-reef and tidal-plain environments, stand out of mild slopes made up of clayey terrains
deposited in deep inter-reef basins. The landscape is characterized by pale-coloured
dolomite cliffs, towers and pinnacles rising above wide talus deposits and gentle grassy
foothills witnessing a complex geomorphological long-term evolution. Pleistocene glaciers
profoundly shaped the valleys and, at their retreat, periglacial and gravity-induced
processes had a major role in slope modelling. Landslides have affected the valleys since
the Lateglacial leaving a clear inprint on the landscape, as well as Man in recent times.
Keywords
Alpine landscape
10.1
Structural landforms
Introduction
The Italian Dolomites are universally known for their scenic
beauty and scientific interest. They are the quintessence of
the ‘dolomite landscape’ worldwide and make up a unique
geomorphological environment on Earth which was recognized by UNESCO as a World Heritage Site in 2009 (Gianolla et al. 2009; Soldati 2010).
Long-term complex geological events and Quaternary
glacial advances have deeply influenced the modelling of the
spectacular landscapes and landforms of this region.
Majestic mountains separated by deep valleys are the
remains of an ancient seabed and of reefs formed in a
tropical sea due to the activity of algae, sponges and corals
M. Marchetti (&)
Dipartimento di Educazione e Scienze Umane, Università di
Modena e Reggio Emilia, Viale Allegri 9, 42100 Reggio Emilia,
Italy
e-mail: mauro.marchetti@unimore.it
A. Ghinoi M. Soldati
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Università di
Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 103, 41125 Modena, Italy
Glacial landforms
Landslides
Dolomites
about 200 millions years ago. These structures were born
due to long-term sedimentation associated to alternating
sinking and rising of the seabed, which determined the
development of very thick sequences of dolomites, finally
lifted up to over 3000 m by tectonic forces.
Travellers and artists have visited the Dolomites since the
eighteenth century, and described the landscape as the ‘Pale
Mountains’ or ‘Reign of Titans’, which has been highly
appreciated since then for its aesthetic value. The Dolomites
are actually named after Déodat de Dolomieu (1750–1801),
a French nobleman and scientist who discovered during his
travel to Italy a ‘strange calcareous stone’ that did not react
with acids. Thanks to the help of Nicolas de Saussure, a
Swiss chemist, he realized that the rock consisted of a yet
unknown mineral, which was then named ‘dolomite’ in
honour of de Dolomieu himself.
The Alta Badia (Upper Badia Valley, Eastern Dolomites)
represents an outstanding example of this dolomite landscape
being characterized by high dolomite cliffs, pale-coloured
rocky towers and pinnacles which rise from green gentle
slopes made up of softer rocks, testifying to long-term and
fascinating geomorphological evolution (Fig. 10.1).
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_10
123
124
M. Marchetti et al.
Fig. 10.1 Panoramic view of the Alta Badia from the Conturines
group. In the background the Sella (left) and Gardenaccia (right)
dolomite mountain groups are visible. In the foreground stands the
Pralongià plateau at the bottom of which the villages of San Cassiano
(left) and La Villa (right) are located (photo F. Planinschek, courtesy of
Tourist Board Alta Badia)
A distinctive, spectacular geomorphological feature, common
to many parts of the Dolomites, is the intersection of horizontal layers formed on the paleo-Thetys seabed and vertical
fissures related to the endogenous forces which uplifted these
mountains due to the collision between the Eurasian and
African plates. Differential erosion has shaped the bedrock,
producing a peculiar landscape, where high vertical dolomite
cliffs that linked to gentle terrain underlain by clayey bedrock
via ample cone and festoon-shaped debris deposits
(Fig. 10.2). An added quality to the scenic value of the
Dolomite cliffs is the famous phenomenon of intense
colouring assumed by the rocky cliffs at sunrise and dusk
(‘Enrosadira’ in the local Ladinian language, literally ‘becoming pink’).
representing major stages of Earth’s history, including the
record of life, significant on-going geological processes in
the development of landforms, or significant geomorphic or
physiographic feature’ (Criterion viii) (Gianolla et al. 2009).
The Alta Badia is a privileged destination for winter and
summer tourism. Beside the pristine areas of the mountain
groups, which are part of the UNESCO property, a dense
and interconnected network of ski-runs and rope ways has
been developed thanks to the pioneering vision of Franz
Kostner, who first opened the valley to the winter sports in
1930. He built the first sledge-track in Italy near the village
of Corvara. During summer, visitors can take advantage of
the numerous hiking paths and biking routes to reach any
part of the valley and experience its unique landscapes.
The mountains of Alta Badia are included in two of the
nine systems making up the UNESCO World Heritage
Property (no. 5 Northern Dolomites, Sett Sass; no.
6 Puez-Odle). It should be emphasized that the inscription of
the Dolomites on the World Heritage List is based on the
recognition that the Dolomites show ‘superlative natural
phenomena or areas of exceptional natural beauty and aesthetic importance’ (Criterion vii) and ‘outstanding examples
10.2
Geographic Setting
Entirely within the Adige River basin, the Alta Badia lies in
the Southeastern Alps, mainly within the Autonomous Province of Bolzano (South Tyrol) and only in a small sector in
the Veneto Region (Fig. 10.3).
10
The Dolomite Landscape of the Alta Badia …
125
Fig. 10.2 The spectacular dolomite cliffs of the western side of the Conturines mountain group (photo C. Soldati)
Fig. 10.3 Geographic and geological setting of the Alta Badia.
Colours correspond to those used in the stratigraphic scheme of
Fig. 10.4. Red marks refer to the landslides shown in Fig. 10.10.
LiDAR data courtesy of Servizio cartografia provinciale e coordinamento geodati, Autonomous Province of Bolzano
126
M. Marchetti et al.
The Badia Valley is part of the land of the Ladinians, a
people that shares very old culture with roots back to almost
2000 years ago when the Rhaetians intermingled with the
Roman conquerors. The latter had a strong influence on the
Rhaetian language and, consequently, on the birth of the
Ladinian language. After the collapse of the Roman Empire,
the valley was subject to the ever growing political and
cultural influence of the Germans that created a common
sense of identity, even reinforced during and after the
Napoleon’s invasion. After the peace treaty of Vienna
(1809), the Ladinian region was separated between the
Napoleonic reigns of Bavaria (Gardena and Badia valleys)
and Italy (Ampezzo, Fassa and Livinallongo valleys). After
the Vienna Congress (1815), the Ladinian valleys and the
whole South Tyrol became part of the Austrian-Hungarian
Empire. At the end of the First World War (1918), the Badia
Valley became part of the Italian Kingdom along with the
whole South Tyrol.
Alta Badia can be reached through the Gardena Pass
(2121 m a.s.l.) from the west, the Campolongo Pass
(1679 m) from the southwest, the Valparola Pass (2168 m)
from the southeast and from Brunico in the north, along the
Rio Gadera. It is surrounded by spectacular dolomite
mountain groups, such as Sella (reaching the highest elevation of the valley at Piz Boè, 3152 m), Puez (3025 m) and
Conturines (3064 m). Along the three main water courses
(Rio Torto, Rio San Cassiano and Rio Gadera), which trace a
distinctive upside-down ‘Y’, the main villages are located,
namely Colfosco (1640 m), Corvara (1560 m), San Cassiano (1540 m), La Villa (1420 m) and Pedraces (1325 m).
These villages relied on a subsistence economy based on
pasture, agriculture and handicraft until the 1950s, and only
since then have undergone a continuous and well-governed
urban expansion, thanks to the exploitation of the surrounding landscape especially for winter tourism.
Climate is typically alpine; it shows a mean annual precipitation of some 950 mm, with peaks in the summer
months. The mean annual air temperature is around 5 °C
with a mean monthly minimum in January (−4.9 °C) and a
mean monthly maximum in July (15 °C).
10.3
Geological History
The Dolomites are a key area worldwide for the study of the
Triassic history. In fact, the geological record from the
Triassic is outstanding for the high sedimentation rates,
remarkable variety of depositional environments and rich
fossiliferous heritage. Subsidence and uplift events controlled the development of a series of carbonate platforms,
surrounded by deep water basins, which from time to time
were filled by volcanic, volcaniclastic and terrigenous sediments (Gianolla et al. 2009).
The geological record of the Alta Badia mainly includes
the Triassic, though older rocks outcropping in the area
testify to geological processes occurring back in the Upper
Permian when the sea occupied this region for the first time
after the Hercynian orogeny (Figs. 10.3 and 10.4; Bosellini
et al. 2003; Brandner et al. 2007).
The Triassic sequence started with the growth of the first
calcareous platforms in the area (Contrin Formation, Upper
Anisian) around which basin sediments were deposited. The
volcanic activity which occurred during the Upper Ladinian,
when the Dolomites were part of the major volcanic district
of Europe, produced pillow lavas and tuffs belonging to the
so-called Fernazza Group, whose outcrops can be observed
between Colfosco and La Villa. Contemporaneous with the
volcanic activity, a highly subsiding area developed, creating
a deep basin where thick sediment sequences made up of
silty-arenaceous and claystone alternations deposited
(Wengen Formation, Upper Ladinian); these mainly derived
from the erosion of volcanic edifices located to the west. In
the Alta Badia, these terrains crop out in the middle and
lower parts of the slopes. From the end of the Ladinian to the
Lower Carnian subsidence almost stopped, volcanic activity
ended and a tropical shallow-sea environment allowed the
growth of fringing reefs. The carbonate platforms representing this depositional environment refer to the so-called
Sciliar Group (including Dolomia Cassiana, Lower Carnian)
which makes up the basal portion of the Sella and Gardenaccia mountain groups and entirely composes the Setsas
and Lagazuoi mounts. The surrounding basins were simultaneously filled by mainly fine sediments, giving origin to
alternation of marls, marly limestones and calcareous marls
(San Cassiano Formation, Upper Ladinian–Lower Carnian).
These form the medium parts of most slopes and the upper
part of the Pralongià plateau.
During the Carnian, the sea level dropped and the evolution of the carbonate platforms stopped, allowing for the
deposition of carbonate and terrigenous sediments of the
so-called Raibl Group, characterized by a typical alternation
of colourful marls and argillaceous schists (Pordoi, Heiligkreuz and Travenanzes formations, Carnian) which often
morphologically mark the transition between the cliffs of the
Dolomia Cassiana and Dolomia Principale. The latter was
formed during the Upper Carnian and Norian in a tidal flat
environment; thanks to the continuous subsidence it reached
remarkable thickness, up to 500 m in Alta Badia as seen in
the Sella, Gardenaccia and Conturines mountain groups. At
the end of the Triassic there was a remarkable change of the
geological environment due to the deepening of the sea, and
deposition of limestones took place during the Jurassic. The
10
The Dolomite Landscape of the Alta Badia …
127
Fig. 10.4 Stratigraphic scheme
of the geological sequence
characterizing the Alta Badia and
surrounding areas (Triassic—
Lower Cretaceous). The dolomite
formations are rose-coloured. The
formations depicted in white are
not outcropping in the Alta Badia
larger outcrops of this upper part of the sequence occur on
the top of the Conturines mountain group (Dachstein
Limestone and Calcari Grigi, Rhaetian-Pliensbachian),
whilst more restricted outcrops can be found in the Sella and
Gardenaccia mountain groups (Gardenaccia Formation,
Ammonitico Rosso, Pliensbachian-Tithonian), together with
the terrigenous sediments of the Lower Cretaceous (Puez
Formation, Valanginian-Aptian) which close the depositional sequence of the area, preluding the onset of the Alpine
orogeny.
From the tectonic viewpoint, the Dolomite region derived
from the Tertiary shortening of a Mesozoic passive continental margin of the Tethys Ocean (Doglioni 1987; Doglioni
and Carminati 2008). The Triassic and Jurassic periods were
characterized by extensive tectonics that produced a
horst-graben morphology with strong control on sedimentation.
The
Mesoalpine
compressive
phase
(Eocene-Oligocene) was responsible for the origin of W- and
SSW-verging thrusts which determined the overlapping of
Upper Triassic to Cretaceous rocks on Cretaceous marls
witnessed by isolated summits known as Gipfelfaltungen
(summit overthrusts). Spectacular evidence of this tectonic
process is the peaks of Piz Boè on the Sella group, and Col
de Puez and Col de la Sonea on the Gardenaccia plateau.
However, only 20 million years ago (early Miocene) the
Dolomite region started emerging from the sea, during the
Neoalpine compressive phase that caused a S-verging
thrusting and folding of the region. During this phase a
doubling of the stratigraphic sequence took place, giving
origin to impressive dolomite massifs and cliffs such as those
making the south-facing slopes of the Conturines group
(Fig. 10.2). Since the emersion from the sea, the continuous
and still ongoing uplift has raised the former coral reefs up to
more than 3000 m.
10.4
Landscape and Landforms
Since the Upper Miocene, when the Dolomites emerged
from the sea, terrestrial processes started shaping the
uplifting rock masses which were at the same time subject to
compressive tectonic forces responsible for their intense
folding, thrusting and cracking. Meteoric water, weathering,
gravity-induced processes and, during the Quaternary,
128
M. Marchetti et al.
repeated glaciations contributed to model the outstanding
landscape that we can observe today. Valleys formed in
weak rocks or along the major tectonic lines. In contrast,
imposing mountain groups bounded by vertical cliffs correspond to the former coral reefs and massive calcareous
platforms. This landscape was formed through different
processes and following different rhythms, in connection
with differential erosion, tectonics and climate changes.
The resulting intense contrast between the light-coloured
dolomite cliffs and the dark basin sediments enhances both
the aesthetic appeal and scientific relevance of the Alta
Badia landscape.
10.4.1
equal to the slope and the south-facing slope being
sub-vertical. These crossing lines provide the Alta Badia
mountains with infinite shapes that are the true secret of the
appeal of this region (Fig. 10.5).
Where ductile rocks are intercalated with the brittle ones,
differential erosion has produced typical belts named cengie
(ledges) that represent evident breaks in the vertical profile of
dolomite cliffs and distinctive traits of mountain massifs such
as the Sella group (Fig. 10.6). From a morphological viewpoint, the cengia is a lower inclined surface developed where
the pelitic rocks of the Raibl Group are interposed between the
vertical cliffs of Dolomia Cassiana and Dolomia Principale.
The cengia is normally covered by scree deposits.
Structural Landforms
10.4.2
Tectonics repeatedly deformed and dismembered the original geological sequence and provided remarkable structural
landforms.
Tectonic elements such as thrusts, faults and folds control
the direction of valleys—as is the case of the northern Alta
Badia N-S-oriented valley stretch, the San Cassiano valley
and the Val di Mesdì—and have favoured the formation of
saddles such as at Gardena Pass and Valparola Pass. Where
tectonic elements are closely spaced, the cracking of the
dolomite rocks favoured increased erosion giving rise to
spectacular vertical features such as towers, pinnacles, spires
and jagged crest lines which contrast with the sub-horizontal
dolomite plateaus mentioned above. Inclined structural
slopes can also be found, such as at Setsas mountain, where
the north-facing slope shows a mild inclination with an angle
Fig. 10.5 A close up of the
Gardenaccia mountain group
from the Pralongià plateau. In the
centre the Sassongher tower
which dominates the village of
Corvara
Glacial Landforms
During the Pleistocene, the Alta Badia was repeatedly
occupied by glaciers that left a clear imprint in the area. The
glacial heritage is related to the Alpine Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, 27,000–18,000 years BP; Monegato et al.
2007; Ravazzi et al. 2014) and to the subsequent Lateglacial
phases. During the major glacial advances, including the
LGM, ice masses reached the valley from the north, moving
upstream from the Pusteria Valley. This is proved by
allochtonous metamorphic and granitic clasts found within
glacial deposits in the Alta Badia. Small metamorphic clasts
recently found at the Gardena Pass (Fig. 10.7) lead to
hypothesize also a secondary ice contribution from the west,
that is from the Adige basin, through the Gardena Valley
(Panizza et al. 2011).
10
The Dolomite Landscape of the Alta Badia …
Fig. 10.6 The typical ‘cengia’ (ledge) on the Sella group located
between Dolomia Principale (above) and Dolomia Cassiana (below) in
correspondence to the softer Pordoi Formation
Glaciers during the LGM were covering the whole Alta
Badia up to some 2300 m a.s.l., with a maximum thickness
of 900–1000 m. Therefore, only the highest peaks were
jutting out of this sea of ice, though local high-altitude
glaciers occurred at the top of the mountain groups
(Fig. 10.8a).
The ice masses coming from the Pusteria Valley are
likely to have overflowed the Valparola Pass in the eastern
sector of the Alta Badia and the Campolongo Pass to the
129
south. It should be emphasized that the whole Pralongià
plateau was covered by ice during the LGM. Scattered
dolomite erratic blocks can be found on its top, witnessing
glacial transport since no dolomite rocks crop out there.
Among LGM landforms, worth of notice are two parallel
moraine ridges located at an altitude between 2000 and
2200 m on the right hand-side of the valley at the base of the
dolomite cliffs overhanging the village of San Leonardo.
During the Lateglacial (18,000–11,600 years BP), once
disappeared the LGM ice cap, the ice flow started its
northward movement in the form of valley glaciers whose
source areas were in correspondence of the Lagazuoi, Setsas
and Sella groups. During this period, the Pralongià plateau
was progressively left free of ice as witnessed by the dating
of a charcoal sample found near Piz de Sorega, at an altitude
of 1937 m. This sample was dated back to 16,610 BP
(Panizza et al. 2011).
During the Lateglacial, the valley glaciers were responsible for the deposition of frontal and lateral moraines of
limited height which can still be identified, especially in the
southeastern sector of the Alta Badia, e.g. in the San Cassiano valley, though they were also here largely erased by
subsequent erosional processes and landslides (Fig. 10.8b).
Nevertheless, remnants of Lateglacial lateral moraines can
be found at Pedraces and upstream La Villa, whilst quite
well preserved frontal moraines can be observed in the San
Cassiano valley, at Armentarola, as well as in Valparola and
in the Setsas and Lagazuoi groups. These landforms testify
Fig. 10.7 The Gardena Pass seen from the Pralongià plateau. On the left the northern cliffs of the Sella group and on the right the southern cliffs
of the Gardenaccia group. During the LGM, glaciers were flowing over the pass from the Gardena valley toward the Alta Badia
130
Fig. 10.8 Glacial features in the Alta Badia. a Ice cover during the
Lastglacial Maximum; b moraines and glacial deposits in the area: 1
LGM deposits; 2 Lateglacial deposits; 3 Moraine ridges. LiDAR data
M. Marchetti et al.
courtesy of Servizio cartografia provinciale e coordinamento geodati,
Autonomous Province of Bolzano
Alta Badia. They were shaped both during the LGM, when the
highest parts of the main groups were emerging from the ice
cap, and later on, during the Lateglacial, when they corresponded to source areas of valley or local glaciers. Spectacular
examples can be found on the main mountain groups, such as
on the western and southeastern margins of Gardenaccia
(Chedul, Ciampei, Juel cirques), at Conturines (e.g. Val
Medesc cirque), on the north facing side of Lagazuoi (e.g.
Lagazuoi cirque), and on Sella (e.g. Vallon cirque).
Nowadays no glaciers are present in the Alta Badia.
Nevertheless, from many parts of the area the largest glacier
of the Eastern Italian Alps can be admired, that is the
Marmolada Glacier (Fig. 10.9), which is located ca 12.5 km
south of Corvara.
Fig. 10.9 The Marmolada glacier seen from Lagazuoi. In the
foreground Col di Lana whose concave shape is related to a blasting
occurred during the First World War. The dark crests consist of
volcanic rocks, whilst Mt. Marmolada is made up of limestones
to glacial advances which are likely to have occurred during
a general period of glacier withdrawal within the Oldest
Dryas (namely, the Gschnitz and the Clavadel/Sanders stadials, ca. between 17,000 and 16,000 years BP), as per
comparison with other Alpine valleys (cf. Ivy-Ochs et al.
2008). Moraines ascribable to younger Lateglacial stadials
were not found in the Alta Badia, therefore it is possible that,
after the Bølling-Allerød warmer phase, ice accumulation in
the area in the Younger Dryas (12,900–11,600 years BP)
was not sufficient to build new glacier tongues.
Glacial erosional landforms, in particular glacial cirques,
are well preserved within the main mountain groups of the
10.4.3
Periglacial Landforms
During the Lateglacial, periglacial processes became
increasingly important and led to the origin of evident landforms, especially in the upper parts of the valley, at the base of
the dolomite cliffs and on the top of the mountain groups.
Frost shattering processes caused detachment of debris
from the dolomite cliffs, which contributed to the
building-up of remarkable scree slopes and talus cones
(Fig. 10.5). The size and distribution of the latter vary,
depending principally on the jointing of the rock masses and
secondarily on slope aspect.
At the base of the dolomite cliffs protalus ramparts can be
found, mainly within the glacial cirques described above.
Protalus ramparts in the Alta Badia are generally inactive,
except for that of Piz Boè (2900 m). This demonstrates that
10
The Dolomite Landscape of the Alta Badia …
at present snow and ice tend to have a lower persistence on
the ground than in the past.
Two rock glaciers can be found in Alta Badia. An active
one is located northwest of Piz Boè at an elevation of 2900–
3000 m, showing high slope angles of frontal and lateral
flanks. In turn, an inactive tongue-like shape rock glacier can
be observed in the vicinity of the Valparola Pass at an elevation of 2100–2250 m; it consists of large dolomite blocks
which are likely to have been detached from the southwestern side of Lagazuoi and accumulated on an ancient
glacier or ice field.
10.4.4
Landslides
Landslides of different type and size characterize the landscape of the Alta Badia and make up the most common and
Fig. 10.10 Landslides in the Alta Badia: a Passo Gardena landslide, a
rock slide which affected the dolomite cliffs of the northernmost part of
the Gardenaccia mountain group in the early post-glacial; b Corvara
landslide, an active earth slide/earth flow which reaches the homonymous village determining damages to the winding road leading to
Campolongo Pass; c Sottrù landslide, a sudden reactivation of a
131
widespread Quaternary deposits in the area. Slope instability
processes, developed soon after the retreat of glaciers from
the valleys, are responsible also for erosion, remobilization
and burying of glacial landforms and deposits (Soldati et al.
2004; Borgatti et al. 2006; Borgatti and Soldati 2010). The
first phase of marked slope instability occurred in the Preboreal and Boreal (about 11,500–8500 years BP) which was
characterized by large-scale translational rock slides affecting the dolomite rock masses (e.g. Passo Gardena landslide;
Fig. 10.10a) and earth slides and flows affecting the underlying pelitic formations (e.g. Corvara landslide; Fig. 10.10
b). The latter are likely to have been favoured by high
groundwater levels due to an increase in precipitation and/or
permafrost melting. A second cluster of landslide events has
been recognized during the Sub-Boreal (about 5800–
2000 years BP), when mainly rotational slides and/or flows
occurred. Many of the events dated can be considered as
historical earth slide/earth flow occurred in December 2012 on the right
flank of Rio Gadera at the foot of the Conturines group (photo January
2012); d Crep de Sela landslide, a rock/debris slide evolving into a
muddy debris flow detached in April 2014 from the lower slopes of the
Sella group in the vicinity of Corvara (photo June 2014)
132
reactivations of older movements as a consequence of
increased precipitation as in other Alpine regions.
Beside the indirect effect of glacier retreat on slope stability during the Lateglacial and early Holocene, the occurrence of landslides has always been strictly linked to
lithological, stratigraphic and tectonic conditions. In particular, landslides have been favoured by (i) the presence of
brittle rocks, such as the dolomites, which have been affected
by rock slides and rock falls, especially along the highly
jointed cliffs of the main mountain groups, and (ii) the
widespread outcropping of formations with a ductile behaviour, such as the San Cassiano and Wengen formations,
which has favoured the development of a series of earth
slides and flows on the middle and lower parts of the slopes.
Often, different types of movement combine, giving origin to
landslides with a complex style. This is the case of the major
landslides which have affected the Alta Badia since the
Lateglacial.
The oldest dated landslide in the Alta Badia is the Passo
Gardena landslide (11,500–8500 years BP), an impressive
mass movement extending over an area of about 1.4 km2
which detached from the southern slope of the Gardenaccia
mountain group near the homonymous pass (Fig. 10.10a).
This is a complex landslide consisting of a rock slide
affecting the dolomite rock cliff which induced a earth slide
—earth flow affecting the underlying clayey rocks of the
Wengen and San Cassiano formations.
Following the retreat of the ice cap which covered the
entire Pralongià plateau, earth slides and flows developed on
the slopes of the plateau, giving origin to multiple landslide
bodies that often joined together into some of the largest
landslide deposits of the valley. The most spectacular is the
Corvara landslide, a complex landform characterized by
movement from multiple source areas, where rotational earth
slides have detached, joining valleyward and giving origin to
an imposing accumulation which reaches the upper part of
the Corvara village (Fig. 10.10b). The landslide has been
active since 10,000 years BP showing an intermittent
activity throughout the Holocene, with periods of increased
instability related to climate changes, such as between ca
5000 and 2500 years BP (Corsini et al. 2001). The landslide
is still active today, with major sliding surfaces at depth from
48 to about 10 m. The rate of movement varies in different
sectors of the landslide (from centimetres to a few metres per
year), with the track area being the fastest (Corsini et al.
2005; Panizza et al. 2011).
Recent reactivations of older landslides have left
impressive scars within the grassy and woody slopes, visible
from very long distances. This is the case of the Sottrù
landslide that occurred in December 2012, after almost
200 years of dormancy (Fig. 10.10c) (Ghinoi et al. 2014).
A huge earth slide—earth flow destroyed a few houses and
M. Marchetti et al.
almost dammed the Rio Gadera, assuming a shape strikingly
similar to that of its first documented activation of 1821.
The Crep de Sela landslide is the most recent slope
instability event occurred in the Alta Badia. It dates back to
April 2014 when a rock/debris slide evolving into an earth
flow was reactivated at the outer limit of the Corvara village,
creating a deep cut in the slope and a two-branch mass
movement which almost affected newly built houses and a
base camp of the Italian Army (Fig. 10.10d).
10.5
The First World War and Related
Heritage
During the First World War (1915–1918 in Italy), a part of
the alpine front line between the Italian and the
Austrian-Hungarian armies crossed the Alta Badia in the
vicinity of the Setsas and Lagazuoi mountain groups. The
fights not only caused great human losses on both sides but
also changed the morphology of some mountain crests and
slopes due to massive bomb attacks. One of the most
impressive examples is the crest line of Col di Lana (ca
2.5 km south of the Setsas), whose shape was strongly
modified after the explosion of an Italian bomb that removed
ca 10,000 tons of rock creating shell craters and huge
troughs that are still visible on the summit (Angetter and
Hubmann 2015; Fig. 10.9). Another huge blasting was
carried out by the Austrians targeting an Italian outpost on
the ‘Cengia Martini’ ledge on the Lagazuoi, close to the
Falzarego Pass, removing ca 200,000 m3 of dolomite rocks.
Both armies dug tunnels within the Lagazuoi, which have
been recently opened to the public, representing an open-air
museum of the First World War (Fig. 10.11).
Though outside the Alta Badia, it is worth mentioning the
‘Ice city’ of the Marmolada glacier as a valuable heritage of
Fig. 10.11 Entrance to a First World War tunnel on the top of the
Laguzuoi mountain group, at an elevation of ca 2600 m
10
The Dolomite Landscape of the Alta Badia …
the First World War. It was a 12 km-long network of tunnels
and caves dug by hand into the glacier ice (up to 50 m-thick)
by the soldiers of the Austrian-Hungarian army to protect
themselves from the Italian bombing attacks. The ice retreat
of 3.4 km2 in the last 100 years has brought to light interesting remains of that life beneath the ice, including bodies
of soldiers.
10.6
Conclusions
Besides its outstanding aesthetic value which has been
appreciated since a long time ago, the Alta Badia is a site of
exceptional scientific and educational value. The dolomite
plateaus and cliffs—defined by the Swiss architect Le Corbusier ‘the most impressive buildings in the world’—as well
as the slopes beneath them, are a remarkable record of
geological and geomorphological history, making them an
open-air laboratory for Earth scientists and destination not to
be missed by visitors interested in natural and environmental
sciences. Research activity carried out within this ‘laboratory’ dates back to 1841 when Wissmann and Münster
described in detail the famous fossil fauna of the San Cassiano Formation, named after the village of the Alta Badia,
soon followed by the first geological map of the valley
performed by Fuchs (1844). Since then, the valley has
attracted natural scientists, at first, and later on specialized
geologists and geomorphologists, who provided extensive
literature on the area.
The dense network of rope ways and hiking paths
developed in recent years favours the reachability of a series
of geoheritage sites and observation points, even at the
highest elevations, which enables visitors to take full
advantage of different landscape components. It should be
emphasized that an exemplary range of diverse landforms—
resulting from the complex geological structure of these
mountains and from climatic changes through time—provides the background of high geomorphodiversity both at a
global and regional scale (Panizza 2009).
The conservation and protection of geological and natural
heritage of the Alta Badia is guaranteed not only by
UNESCO rules, but also by the long-standing existence of
two Natural Parks in the area, Puez-Odle and
Fanes-Senes-Braies established by the Autonomous Province of Bolzano, respectively in 1978 and 1980. Furthermore, it should be noted that the inhabitants of the Badia
Valley have always been deeply tied to their land which has
enabled harmonious development of villages and tourist
infrastructures, and profoundly respectful of natural assets,
133
even in recent times when tourist activities have largely
become the main source of income.
References
Angetter D, Hubmann B (2015) The front in high alpine rock and ice
regions. World War I from an engineering geological point of view.
Rendiconti Online della Società Geologica Italiana 36:10–13
Borgatti L, Soldati M (2010) Landslides as a geomorphological proxy
for climate change: a record from the Dolomites (northern Italy).
Geomorphology 120(1–2):56–64
Borgatti L, Ravazzi C, Donegana M, Corsini A, Marchetti M, Soldati M
(2006) A lacustrine record of early Holocene watershed events and
vegetation history, Corvara in Badia, Dolomites, Italy. J Quat Sci 22
(2):173–189
Bosellini A, Gianolla P, Stefani M (2003) Geology of the Dolomites.
Episodes 26(3):181–185
Brandner R, Keim L, Gruber A, Gruber J (2007) Carta Geologica delle
Dolomiti Occidentali - Tavola Est – Scala 1:25.000. Ufficio
Geologia e prove materiali, Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano - Alto
Adige, Bolzano
Corsini A, Marchetti M, Soldati M (2001) Holocene slope dynamics in
the area of Corvara in Badia (Dolomites, Italy): chronology and
paleoclimatic significance of some landslides. Geogr Fis Dinam
Quat 24(2):127–139
Corsini A, Pasuto A, Soldati M, Zannoni A (2005) Field monitoring of
the Corvara landslide (Dolomites, Italy) and its relevance for hazard
assessment. Geomorphology 66(1–4):149–165
Doglioni C (1987) Tectonics of the Dolomites (Southern Alps,
Northern Italy). J Struct Geol 9:181–193
Doglioni C, Carminati E (2008) Structural styles and Dolomites Field
Trip. Memorie Descrittive della Carta Geologica d’Italia 82:1–295
Fuchs W (1844) Die Venezianer Alpen. Verlag von Jent & Gassmann,
Solothurn/Bei P. Rohrmann, Wien
Ghinoi A, Freddi R, Pasuto A, Soldati M (2014) Geomorphological
analysis of the historic landslide of Sottrù (Badia Valley, Italy)
reactivated on December 12, 2012. In: Proceedings international
conference “Analysis and management of changing risks for natural
hazards”, Padua, Italy, AP19 1–8, 18–19 November 2014
Gianolla P, Micheletti C, Panizza M (2009) Nomination of the
Dolomites for inscription on the World Natural Heritage
List UNESCO. Provincia di Belluno, Provincia Autonoma di
Bolzano-Bozen, Provincia di Pordenone, Provincia Autonoma di
Trento, Provincia di Udine, 4 volumes
Ivy-Ochs S, Kerschner H, Reuther A, Preusser F, Heine K, Maisch M,
Kubik PW, Schlüchter C (2008) Chronology of the last glacial cycle
in the European Alps. J Quat Sci 23(6–7):559–573
Monegato G, Ravazzi C, Donegana M, Pini R, Calderoni G, Wick L
(2007) Evidence of a two-fold glacial advance during the last glacial
maximum in the Tagliamento end moraine system (eastern Alps).
Quatern Res 68:284–302
Panizza M (2009) The geomorphodiversity of the Dolomites (Italy): a
key of geoheritage assessment. Geoheritage 1(1):33–42
Panizza M, Corsini A, Ghinoi A, Marchetti M, Pasuto A, Soldati M
(2011) Explanatory notes of the geomorphological map of the Alta
Badia valley (Dolomites, Italy). Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 34(1):105–
126
Ravazzi C, Pini R, Badino F, De Amicis M, Londeix L, Reimer PJ
(2014) The latest LGM culmination of the Garda Glacier (Italian
134
Alps) and the onset of glacial termination. Age of glacial collapse
and vegetation chronosequence. Quatern Sci Rev 105:26–47
Soldati M (2010) Dolomites: the spectacular landscape of the “Pale
Mountains”. In: Migon P (ed), «Geomorphological Landscapes of
the World». Springer Science+Business Media B.V., pp 191–199
M. Marchetti et al.
Soldati M, Corsini A, Pasuto A (2004) Landslides and climate change
in the Italian Dolomites since the Lateglacial. Catena 55(2):141–161
Wissman HL, Münster G (1841) Beiträge zur Geognosie und
Petrefactenkunde des südöstlichen Tirols vorzüglich der Schichten
von St. Cassian. Beiträge zur Petrefactenkd. IV, 1–152
The Vajont Valley (Eastern Alps): A Complex
Landscape Deeply Marked by Landsliding
11
Alessandro Pasuto
Abstract
On 9th October 1963 the Vajont Valley was strongly modified due to a world known
landslide, which claimed the lives of almost 2000 people. At that time a huge amount of
material collapsed into an artificial reservoir generating a water wave, which overtopped the
dam destroying seven villages in the Piave River Valley. The landslide accumulation filled
the valley blocking its drainage that is now guaranteed by a by-pass built soon after a
previous smaller landslide occurred on 4th November 1960. However, the whole valley has
been affected by a series of landslides, which buried ancient glacial and fluvial landforms
sealing and preserving them. The chapter is therefore not only focusing on the Vajont
Landslide, but also on other gravitational, glacial and fluvial landforms, which are crucial
for the reconstruction of the post-glacial geomorphological evolution.
Keywords
Landslides
11.1
Glacial morphology
Introduction
On 22:39 9th October 1963, some 270 106 cubic metres
of rock slid down from the northern slope of Mt. Toc into the
Vajont reservoir generating a huge wave propagating both
upstream and downstream. The wave overtopped the dam
and plunged into the Piave River Valley. It swept away
seven villages killing 1917 persons. It was the largest
catastrophe occurred in Italy since the end of World War II.
The Vajont Valley has always been prone to landslides
due to its geological, geomorphological and tectonic setting
upstream the deep gorge cut into Jurassic limestones which
was considered as a suitable place to build a
double-curvature concrete arch dam 261.60 m high (the
highest dam in the world at that time).
The lower part of Mt. Toc north slope consisted of an
ancient landslide deposit and not of bedrock, as initially
A. Pasuto (&)
Istituto di Ricerca per la Protezione Idrogeologica, Consiglio
Nazionale delle Ricerche (IRPI-CNR), Corso Stati Uniti 4, 35127
Padua, Italy
e-mail: alessandro.pasuto@irpi.cnr.it
Vajont
Eastern Alps
inferred. After the Vajont slide, many scientists (e.g. Carloni
and Mazzanti 1964; Chowdhury 1978; Müller 1964, 1987;
Nonveiller 1987; Kilburn and Petley 2003) dealt with many
different aspects of the landslide (e.g. rheology of material,
kinematics, wave propagation), but a specific study worth to
be mentioned is that of Hendron and Patton (1985). This is a
very comprehensive study that takes into account different
issues related to the landslide event: tectonics, geotechnics,
rheology, etc. analysing the wide literature produced until
then. Moreover, various review papers summarizing the
events preceding the catastrophe and highlighting the valuable contributions to the comprehension of the triggering
factors were published by scientists directly involved in
researching the landslide event (Müller 1964; Selli and
Trevisan 1964; Semenza 1965; Müller 1987; Semenza 2010)
and by some of their collaborators (Semenza and Ghirotti
2000; Genevois and Ghirotti 2005; Ghirotti 2012; Genevois
and Prestininzi 2013). Somehow paradoxically, due to such
a wide scientific interest in the Vajont Landslide (cf. Genevois and Tecca 2013) and to the great emphasis given to
this event by national and international media, the striking
geomorphological features of the valley related to its
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_11
135
136
A. Pasuto
The Vajont Valley is located in the Eastern Italian Alps—in
the buffer zone of the Dolomites UNESCO World Heritage
Site—some 100 km north of Venice (Fig. 11.1). It can be
considered a typical Alpine valley with a superimposition of
forms and deposits of different origins. The valley has been
dammed several times after the Last Glacial Maximum
(LGM) by landslides and the Vajont Torrent was diverted
probably cutting an epigenetic gorge more than once. The
Vajont Valley is a left-hand tributary of Piave Valley, one of
the main access routes to Dolomites. Despite its wild landscape, it is easily reachable by motorway from the Veneto
plain area.
The Vajont Torrent has two main tributaries: the Mesazzo
Torrent on the left and the Zemola Torrent on the right,
originating from Col Nudo Group on the south and Mt.
Duranno on the north, respectively. They are more or less
aligned along a N-S oriented structural discontinuity and this
has an impact on the great amount of available debris on the
valley bottom.
The higher peaks bordering the drainage basin generally
exceed 2000 m a.s.l. (Mt. Borgà, 2228 m; Mt. Duranno,
2652 m; Col Nudo, 2439 m; Mt. Toc, 1921 m), and the
confluence with the Piave River is located at an elevation of
Fig. 11.1 Geomorphological sketch map of the Vajont Valley.
Legend: A Vajont Landslide; B La Pineda Landslide; C Salta rock
fall; D landslide scarp; 1 slope deposits; 2 fluvial deposits; 3 marls,
marly limestones and flysch (Marne di Erto and Flysch Formation,
Palaeocene p.p.—Eocene); 4 reddish and nodular limestones, white
micritic limestones (Ammonitico Rosso, Biancone, Scaglia Rossa,
Lower Cretaceous–Lower Palaeocene p.p.); 5 white oolithic and
bioclastic calcarenites, grey dolomitized micrites and limestones with
alternanace of thin clayey layers (Soverzene Formation, Igne Formation, Vajont Limestones and Fonzaso Formation, Jurassic); 6 white or
grey massive dolomite (Dolomia Principale, Upper Triassic); a fault;
b uncertain fault; c overthrust
Quaternary evolution were almost neglected and underestimated. Consequently, there has been an evident paucity of
geomorphological investigations and landscape evaluations,
contrasting with clear evidence of glacial, gravitational and
fluvial processes co-existing in a unique environment
strongly affected by human action, but still preserving
ancestral characteristics.
11.2
Geographical and Geological Setting
11
The Vajont Valley (Eastern Alps): A Complex …
430 m. It follows that the area is characterized by considerable differences in elevation and a deeply incised fluvial
network. This results in a significant landslide susceptibility,
enhanced by poor geomechanical characteristics of some of
the outcropping geological formations.
In the Vajont Valley and adjacent mountain groups,
geological formations range in age from the Upper Triassic
(Dolomia Principale) to the Middle Eocene (Flysch). They
are mainly represented by limestones and dolomites occasionally interbedded by thin layers of clays and marls that
represented a predisposing factor for the sliding process of
the Vajont landslide (Hendron and Patton 1985).
The E-W trend of the valley is related to the presence of
the south-verging asymmetric Erto Syncline, which is part of
a greater regional tectonic structure, namely the Belluno
Line. N-S minor folds and faults that further complicated the
geological setting of the area affect the Erto syncline.
Climate of the valley is characterized by heavy rainfall
generally concentrated in late spring and autumn. The
average annual cumulative precipitation is about 1800 mm;
the maximum daily rainfall at the Cimolais Station (some
5 km eastward) in the period 1944–2000 has been recorded
on 25 November 1987 (175.9 mm), whereas the highest
cumulative values for 3, 5, 10 and 15 days have been
recorded in September 1965 with 342.4, 369.0, 377.8 and
379.4 mm, respectively. Permanent snow cover remains on
the ground normally from December until March, and
locally (e.g. north slope of Mt. Toc) until May.
11.3
Landscape and Landforms
Generally speaking, the Vajont Valley shows rugged morphology with deep gorges and steep slopes. The landscape
retained an ancestral character and only two small villages
with few hundreds of inhabitants are now present. Before
1963, the people living in the valley were many more, but
most of them emigrated soon after the catastrophe.
The main geomorphological feature of the valley is the
presence of several huge landslide accumulations of different
age and size. The most impressive one is certainly that related
to the October 1963 catastrophic landslide and consequent
wave. However, besides landslides, the valley is rich in glacial and fluvial landforms and deposits, somewhere buried
and sealed by gravitational ones that allowed them to be
preserved. Actually, during the LGM the Vajont Valley was
occupied by a local glacier merging into the Piave Valley
which hosted the main glacial tongue in the surrounding area
with a thickness of more than a thousand metres.
137
11.3.1
Glacial Landforms
Due to the above-mentioned Quaternary setting, a wide
range of glacial landforms and deposits are still present in
the valley. The special character and the high value of these
traces are mainly related to their clearness and degree of
preservation as well as to the broad variety of forms and
sediments representing a comprehensive picture of the valley
glacial evolution.
One of the clearest evidence of glacial erosion processes
in the valley is the sidewall recently exhumed some tens of
metres above the village of Casso (Fig. 11.2). Thanks to the
protective action of a thick scree slope that covered the wall
since thousands of years ago, it is well preserved and
exhibits a textbook example of glacial grooves and
striations.
Exhumation of this erosional landform was due to the
excavation of a deep trench to protect the houses of the village from rock falls that have periodically affected the above
hanging cliff. The erosive surface involving the limestones
belonging to the Scaglia Rossa formation (Upper Cretaceous–Lower Paleocene) is smooth, undulated and deeply
striated due to the abrasion action of the clasts incorporated in
the ice mass. Considering the elevation and orientation of the
sidewall as well as the micromorphology of the striations, we
can infer that this landform is related to the erosional action of
the Piave glacier which probably branched out into the
Vajont Valley during the LGM.
Noteworthy are also the glaciolacustrine deposits
outcropping along the Vajont riverbed represented by a thick
rhythmic sequence of silt and clay interbedded by sandy
layers somewhere affected by glaciotectonic deformation
and including exceptional examples of dropstones
(Fig. 11.3).
Deep boreholes drilled in the area of La Pineda showed
the existence of a well-preserved layer of glacial deposit,
namely bottom moraines, beneath a 90 m thick layer of
gravitational deposits related to the La Pineda Landslide (cf.
Sect. 11.3.2). A sequence of such glacial deposits can be also
observed within an erosional scarp located along the
Mesazzo Valley (Fig. 11.4). This outcrop clearly illustrates
the role of post-glacial gravitational deposits, namely La
Pineda Landslide, in protecting and preserving the glacial
ones. In particular, it shows a typical delta sedimentary
sequence, probably related to the presence of a proglacial
lake, represented by bottom-sets, foresets and topsets covered by moraine and landslide deposits. The uniqueness of
this stratigraphic sequence is evident and certainly rare in the
Eastern Alps.
138
A. Pasuto
Fig. 11.2 Glacial sidewall located on the right side of the Vajont Valley above of the village of Casso characterized by evident grooves and deep
striations (photo A. Pasuto)
Fig. 11.3 Remarkable example of dropstone in a rhythmic sequence
of fine glaciolacustrine deposits (photo Dolomiti Project)
11.3.2
Gravitational Landforms
As stated above, the landscape is dominated by gravitational
landforms and deposits, and the landslide of 1963 is only the
last of a series of events that shaped the morphology of the
valley. This is mainly due to the complex tectonic setting of
the area that makes it prone to gravity-induced processes.
The effects of tectonic activity, which is still active (Mantovani and Vita-Finzi 2003), consist of steep slopes, deep
valleys and intense jointing and fracturing of the
outcropping rocks. This has favoured the presence of thick
and widespread layers of loose debris that can be mobilized
not only by gravity, but also by water and snow avalanches.
It should be also emphasized that the Vajont Valley is
located very close to one of the most active seismic zone of
Italy (namely Friuli Venezia Giulia), which experienced a
strong earthquake (M 6.4) in 1976 causing almost 1000
victims some 60 km eastward.
Among the widespread active and dormant slope instability phenomena, the most relevant in terms of geomorphological risk, long-lasting evidence in the landscape and
damage caused are Salta rock fall, La Pineda Landslide and
Vajont Landslide, respectively. The main geomorphological
features of these landslides are described below.
The Salta rock fall area is located on the northern slope of
the Vajont Valley and severely threats the small village of
Casso in which some tens of people live (Fig. 11.5). Rock
falls can be considered the most hazardous process still
active in the valley. Falling debris originates from the
uppermost part of the southern slope of Mt. Salta, at an
elevation of about 1500 m. The footslope deposit is the
result of multiple events; the first known rock fall event in
the area occurred in 1674. In the 1960s, large boulders
reached the secondary road connecting the village of Casso
to Regional Road no. 251. Since 1990, minor rock falls have
been repeatedly reported on the same slope in the vicinity of
the village. The rock fall deposit covers an area of about
11
The Vajont Valley (Eastern Alps): A Complex …
Fig. 11.4 Stratigraphic sequence outcropping on the eastern side of La
Pineda Landslide along the Mesazzo Valley. The top layer is composed
by landslide deposits; just below there is a layer of glacial till overlying
Fig. 11.5 The Village of Casso at the base of Mt. Salta. On the right
large rock fall deposit is visible (photo Dolomiti Project)
139
glaciodeltaic cemented deposits characterized by well recognisable
topset and foreset beds (photo Dolomiti Project)
5 105 m2 between 1250 and 850 m a.s.l. and has an
estimated total volume of 2.5 106 m3. A quarry was
opened east of Casso to exploit the rock fall materials for
construction purposes and to obtain a retaining zone to
protect the village and trap the falling boulders. The geomorphological evolution of the slopes is mostly conditioned
by the tectonic setting. In particular, the Mt. Borgà thrust is
certainly the main conditioning structural element that led to
the weakening of the rock mass and the subsequent slope
failures. Emplacement of the thrust sheared the rock and
produced intensive and pervasive fracturing processes.
Above the thrust zone, folded and faulted bedding planes dip
steeply toward the slope free face, producing instability
conditions predisposing to rock falls. The source area is
characterized by the presence of different scarps, distributed
along tectonic discontinuities. Field surveys revealed
unstable rock blocks with individual volumes exceeding
1 103 m3. These blocks are separated by fractures up to
2 m wide and 15 m deep. The scarp and the accumulation
zone of the 1674 event are still evident. The main scarp has a
semicircular shape, delimited by steep walls, several metres
high, carved in the Vajont Limestone formation. The deposit
is arranged at an inclination up to 50° because of the presence of abundant huge blocks, which can reach a volume of
some hundreds of cubic metres. Some of them got close to
the houses in the past forcing the people to move away.
La Pineda Landslide, similarly to the Vajont landslide,
permanently changed the morphology of the valley due to its
140
huge volume and fast dynamics. Since no organic matter has
been collected in the accumulation area it has not been
possible to establish the timing of this event, but it can be
approximately dated back to the post-LGM period. The
event can be defined as a translational landslide which
turned into a rock avalanche, as suggested by the stratigraphic sequence of Fig. 11.4. The main landslide features
are represented by the sliding surface visible on the right side
of the valley along a footpath that connect the villages of
Casso and Erto, and the large accumulation located at the
base of the opposite slope (Fig. 11.6). This means that the
landslide dammed both the Mesazzo and Vajont valleys. The
source area is currently characterized by great amount of
loose debris often involved in debris flow phenomena, and
slabs of displaced rock clearly showing the bedding planes
and other structural features; these rock portions have been
considered remnants of the unstable mass still in place or
slightly shifted and potentially prone to sliding. This is why
a tunnel protecting the Regional Road no. 251 running at the
base of the slope had to be built. The landslide accumulation
zone has been deeply reworked by human activities since it
represented a favourable location for agriculture and settlements. The geometry of the body clearly reflects past, buried
valley morphology and a deep borehole drilled in the area
A. Pasuto
revealed a 94 m thick layer of landslide material overlying a
4 m layer of alluvial deposits of the Mesazzo Torrent and at
least 20 m of glacial deposits. Edges of the landslide accumulation zone have been found on the right side of Mesazzo
Valley, confirming the damming of this valley. A part of
landslide deposit rested at the base of the easternmost slope
of Mt. Toc and therefore this could have favoured the stability of this sector, acting as a supporting wedge.
The Vajont Landslide is a worldwide known mass
movement due to both its catastrophic effects and peculiar
dynamics. Many scientists visited the site and studied the
phenomenon and a huge literature has been produced about
this event and its implications. Nevertheless some aspects,
mainly related to the high speed reached by the landslide
during its collapse, still remain unsolved. However, the
Vajont event represents a clear example of man-induced
disaster, which marked an indelible scar both in the landscape and in the consciousness of the population.
Despite different interpretations on the dynamics of the
initial stages of movement and of the final collapse, it seems
evident that the most important triggering factor would have
been groundwater level variations related to the reservoir
filling operations. Therefore, the dam construction—aimed
at the exploitation of the Vajont Torrent and the creation of a
Fig. 11.6 A panoramic view of the Vajont Valley from east to west. In the foreground La Pineda Landslide and the large debris plain caused by
the depositional activity of Mesazzo Torrent. In the background the 1963 landslide and its scar on the left side of the valley (photo Virtualgeo)
11
The Vajont Valley (Eastern Alps): A Complex …
141
Fig. 11.7 Mt. Toc and Vajont Landslide and dam. The central part of the accumulation zone is characterized by the abandoned valley of
Massalezza Stream backtilted toward the sliding surfaces. On the right the Piave River Valley is visible (photo Virtualgeo)
reservoir with huge water storage capacity—can be considered as the starting point of a predictable disaster.
The reservoir was created artificially in 1960 after the
Vajont Torrent was dammed as part of regional expansion in
hydroelectric-power generation. The dam is 261.60 m high
and 190 m wide across the top and, at the time of construction, was the highest and one of the most advanced
double-arched dams in the world. Nowadays it is part of the
landscape of the valley and, in recent years, has become a
tourist attraction.
After the reservoir level had been raised and lowered
several times, the southern margin of Mt. Toc became
eventually destabilised and, after nearly three years of
intermittent creeping, it catastrophically collapsed at 22:39
on 9th October 1963. Within 30–40 s, some 270 million m3
of rock crashed into the reservoir, causing a water wave,
which overtopped the dam. The vast slope movement,
ascribable to a rock slide, started to move along a surface
corresponding to one or more downstream-dipping clayey
interbeds having the same angle as the slope surface. The
slide displaced a 250–300 m thick mass of rock for 300–
400 m horizontally. The mass reached a velocity of over
20 m/s before running up and stopping against the opposite
slope of the valley (Fig. 11.7). The slide filled the valley and
the reservoir in a few tens of seconds and the water wave
propagated both upstream and downstream. This wave
reached a maximum elevation of 935 m a.s.l. (235 m above
the reservoir level) (Ghirotti 2012). It swept across the dam
and the Vajont gorge and eventually fell onto the Piave
Valley floor, where it destroyed the town of Longarone and
neighbouring villages, claiming 1917 lives.
The topographic features of the valley changed enormously following this event, especially with the infilling of
the gorge with landslide material consisting of fractured
rocks, moraine deposits, ancient alluvial deposits (fluvial and
torrential), sometimes cemented, and slope debris, all Quaternary in age. Nevertheless, the impressive limestone layers
representing the sliding surface of the 1963 landslide mostly
characterize the landscape. They are somewhere quite clean
and smooth but, since the scarp is still active, thick scree
deposits are present at the toe of the slope.
Along the sliding surfaces peculiar landforms are present
which could be interpreted at a first view as badlands
affecting scree slopes. However, a closer analysis highlights
142
A. Pasuto
Fig. 11.8 Schematic
interpretation of
geomorphological features and
landslide subunits (compare with
Fig. 11.7)
that they are slabs of rock deeply fragmented and partially
metamorphosed due to friction, mainly formed by clasts
regularly shaped and arranged in a sort of brick walls and
representing source areas for debris feeding the scree cones
at the base of the sliding surfaces.
The landslide accumulation zone can be roughly divided
into three subunits, which can be interpreted as the result of
different and partially successive sliding phases (Fig. 11.8).
Subunit A includes the northernmost part of the landslide
which now fills the valley. Before the collapse, this portion
was located at the toe of the unstable slope of Mt. Toc and
represents the sliding front, which pushed out the water of
the Vajont reservoir causing the huge wave. It consists of a
single mass in which the original layering, even if strongly
deformed during collapse, is still clearly visible. All
pre-failure vegetation was removed by the return water wave
after the event. Some morphological features of the north
slope of Mt. Toc are still preserved in different locations and
with different settings. This is the case of Massalezza Valley
which drained the unstable slope before 1963 and is now
shifted of about 400 m northward in a sub-horizontal position. It can be observed driving over the landslide accumulation on the road to La Pineda and splits the unit in two
main parts (Figs. 11.7 and 11.8). This incision is now
draining the landslide accumulation zone to the south, into a
large closed depression at the base of the outcropping sliding
surface. Soon after the event, this depression was occupied
by a lake, which is now completely filled by debris and only
during snow melting period or heavy rainfall still contains a
small pound. Close to the dam, on the western margin of this
unit, some small depressions are also visible, probably
related to a subsidence phenomenon caused by the settling
and reworking of the moving materials.
Subunit B consists of two different parts located in the
easternmost and westernmost sectors of the accumulation
zone respectively, in an intermediate position between the
sliding surface (at a higher elevation) and Subunit A. An
analysis of the vegetation age demonstrated that most trees are
older than 50 years thus confirming that this unit was not
affected by the water waves produced by the collapse and this
seems to be consistent with the hypothesis of a second-stage
collapse, shortly after the displacement of Subunit A.
Finally, Subunit C is represented by the small portion of
the landslide deposit located directly against the dam, south
of Regional Road no. 251. It is topographically in a lower
position with respect to Subunit A and is mainly composed
by sand, gravel and other loose material derived from
fragments washed back onto the landslide by the return wave
immediately after the collapse and covering the originally
displaced slope. Similarly to what happened at the base of
the sliding surface, after the 1963 landslide this depression
was occupied by a small lake, which rapidly disappeared
probably due to sufficient permeability of the highly
fractured and deformed rock.
11
The Vajont Valley (Eastern Alps): A Complex …
143
Fig. 11.9 The deep narrow
gorge of the Vajont Valley seen
from the top of the dam. On the
right hand side a water cascade
flowing from the by-pass which
allows the drainage of the Vajont
Valley toward the Piave River
(photo A. Pasuto)
11.3.3
Fluvial Landforms
The action of fluvial erosion is clearly visible in the valley
and the most remarkable landform is the deep gorge carved
in the limestone outcropping close to the outlet to the Piave
River Valley west of the dam (Fig. 11.9). It is more than
200 m deep and some tens of metres wide and is easily
observable along the road running on the left side of the
Piave River bed. However, both the tributaries of the Vajont
Torrent are characterized by deeply incised V-shaped valleys
and narrow gorges; noteworthy is the view of the Zemola
gorge from the bridge along the Regional Road no. 251 immediately eastward of the village of Erto. It is quite
impressive and significant examples of potholes can be
observed along the sidewalls. During the Holocene, the
Vajont Valley has been repeatedly dammed by landslides,
causing base-level changes and a succession of incision and
aggradation phases. This evolutionary behaviour is evident
upstream of the 1963 landslide accumulation zone which is
now representing the new base level for the upper catchment. Soon after the landslide, a residual lake draining the
upper catchment was present eastward. This lake was connected to the valley outlet by means of a by-pass built after
the 800,000 m3 landslide which detached from the Mt. Toc
slope at the beginning of November 1960 and fell into the
reservoir. Now the residual lake is being progressively filled
by sediment discharged by the tributaries and a large flat area
characterizes this sector (see Fig. 11.6), thus determining an
increase in the elevation of the local base level.
Therefore the past dynamics of the river network, and in
particular base-level changes of the main stream through
time, have strongly conditioned the development of the
fluvial landforms allowing some of them to be preserved and
even rejuvenated. This situation is also typical of the Zemola
and Mesazzo valleys where several remarkable erosional
forms (Fig. 11.10) can be observed at different elevation on
the slopes, confirming water level changes during the
Holocene.
11.4
Conclusions
The Vajont Valley represents an almost unique case in the
Eastern Alps in which glacial landscape (including landforms and deposits) has been protected and preserved by an
intense landsliding activity which occurred after the retreat
of the LGM glaciers. The largest mass movement, whose
evidence is still clear and easily recognisable, took place in
1963. The Vajont Landslide has completely twisted the
valley and now the landscape is composed by natural and
anthropic elements, such as the impressive dam, which
represent an admonition for future generations to avoid
waste of natural resources and improper land use, and to
consider the land as an asset to be protected and preserved.
144
A. Pasuto
scientific and social, such as student workshops, conferences, guided tours, etc., involving national and international
universities and research centres as well as local associations
and institutions have been established and promoted, thus
favouring the influx of many visitors to this site.
Even if the area is easy to reach by motorway, it nevertheless still does not offer adequate tourist infrastructures.
However, since 2009, when the Dolomites became a
UNESCO World Heritage Site, things have been changing
and improving. This is certainly a right step towards more
sustainable and environmentally aware tourist approach and
an effective landscape conservation.
Acknowledgements Special thanks to Emiliano Oddone and Fabrizio
Tagliavini for their valuable activity in field surveying, and for useful
discussion and essential contribution in defining the geomorphological
evolution of the valley.
References
Fig. 11.10 Pothole cut into the conglomerate in the Zemola Valley
(photo Dolomiti Project)
In recent years, many initiatives have been carried out in
order to preserve the memory and transfer the lesson learnt
as well as to solve some of the problems not yet tackled
since 1963. In-depth investigations were promoted by the
regional government for assessing the residual geological
risk in the landslide area and removing the heavy restrictions
regarding land use. This activity was also targeted towards
favouring the homecoming of the population moved away
soon after the catastrophe.
Besides that many other events have been sponsored and
organized especially on the occasion of anniversaries (in
2013, the year of the 50th anniversary, important scientific
conferences were held to discuss unsolved questions) and
other celebrations. A couple of museums collecting historical images, films, finds and other materials may be visited in
Longarone and Erto-Casso. Moreover, many projects, both
Carloni GC, Mazzanti R (1964) Rilevamento geologico della frana del
Vaiont. Giorn Geol 32:105–138
Chowdhury R (1978) Analysis of the Vaiont slide: new approach. Rock
Mech 11:29–38
Genevois R, Ghirotti M (2005) The 1963 Vaiont landslide. Giornale di
Geologia Applicata 1:41–52
Genevois R, Prestininzi A (eds) (2013) Proceedings of the “International Conference on Vajont—1963–2013. Thoughts and analyses
after 50 years since the catastrophic landslide. Italian Journal of
Engineering Geology and Environment—Book Series 6, 651 pp
Genevois R, Tecca, PR (2013) The Vajont Landslide: state-of-the-art.
In: Genevois R, Prestininzi A (eds) Proceedings of the “International Conference on Vajont—1963–2013. Thoughts and analyses
after 50 years since the catastrophic landslide. Italian Journal of
Engineering geology and Environment—Book Series 6:15–39
Ghirotti M (2012) The 1963 Vaiont landslide, Italy. In: Clague JJ,
Stead D (eds) Landslides types, mechanisms and modeling.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 359–372
Hendron AJ, Patton FD (1985) The Vaiont slide: A geotechnical
analysis based on new geologic observations of the failure surface.
US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station,
Technical Report GL-85-5, 2 volumes
Kilburn CRJ, Petley DN (2003) Forecasting giant, catastrophic slope
collapse: lessons from Vajont, northern Italy. In: Pasuto A,
Kilburn CRJ (eds) Studies on large volume landslides. Geomorphology 54:21–32
Mantovani F, Vita-Finzi C (2003) Neotectonics of the Vajont dam site.
In: Pasuto A, Kilburn CRJ (eds) Studies on large volume landslides.
Geomorphology 54:33–37
Müller L (1964) The rock slide in the Vaiont valley. Rock Mech Eng
Geol 2:148–212
Müller L (1987) The Vaiont slide. Eng Geol 24:513–523
Nonveiller E (1987) The Vaiont reservoir slope failure. In:
Leonards GA (ed) Dam failures. Eng Geol 24(1–4):493–512
Selli R, Trevisan L (1964) Caratteri e interpretazione della Frana del
Vajont. Giorn Geol 32(1):8–104
11
The Vajont Valley (Eastern Alps): A Complex …
Semenza E (1965) Sintesi degli studi geologici sulla frana del Vaiont
dal 1959 al 1964. Mem Museo Trid Sc Nat 16:1–52
Semenza E (2010) The Story of Vaiont told by the geologist who discovered
the landslide. Published posthumously. K-flash, Ferrara, 208 pp
145
Semenza E, Ghirotti M (2000) History of 1963 Vaiont Slide. The
importance of the geological factors to recognise the ancient
landslide. Bull Eng Geol Environ 59:87–97
Karst Landforms in Friuli Venezia Giulia: From
Alpine to Coastal Karst
12
Franco Cucchi and Furio Finocchiaro
Abstract
Around 20–25% of the Friuli Venezia Giulia region consists of karstified rocks. The
geological, geographical and climatic conditions have given rise to a whole series of karst
landscapes which have developed in different ways on limestone of different ages, located
at different altitudes. One encounters splendid examples of alpine karst (Mt. Canin and
Cansiglio–Cavallo Massif), mountain-hill karst (Mt. Ciaurlec, Julian Prealps) and
marine-coastal karst. In the Classical Karst near Trieste, the worldwide symbol of karst
phenomena, over 3000 caves are known while half a dozen are over 1000 m in length.
There are about 80 solution and collapse dolines with a diameter greater than 100 m.
Keywords
Karst landscapes
12.1
Alpine karst
Introduction
Carbonate rocks make up about a quarter of the Friuli
Venezia Giulia area and almost 40% of the mountainous and
hilly territories. It is not therefore surprising that there is a
high presence of strongly karstified areas, among which the
Classical Karst (hereinafter: Karst) and Mt. Canin are
famous for their surface and subsurface karst landforms
(Cucchi et al. 2009). The intensity of karst processes is
illustrated by the more than 7000 caves explored to date,
with densities of up to 70 caves/km2 in the Karst and 264
caves/km2 on the plateau of Mt. Canin. Surface karst forms
are just as many: there are dolines, karren and limestone
pavements, often of remarkable dimensions and types
(Cucchi et al. 2010).
Carbonate rocks of different ages and in different structural settings outcrop at variable altitudes, between 2500 and
1200 m above sea level in the Alps, and between 900 and
700 m in large part of the plateau in the Prealps, and from
300 m in the classic karst region that overlooks the Adriatic
F. Cucchi (&) F. Finocchiaro
Dipartimento di Matematica e Geoscienze, Università di Trieste,
Via E. Weiss 2, 34127 Trieste, Italy
e-mail: cucchi@units.it
Classical Karst
Friuli Venezia Giulia
Sea (Fig. 12.1). The Mts. Creta di Timau and Canin are the
most representative areas of the alpine karst. In the prealpine
zone karst features are most extensive in terms of area.
Cansiglio–Cavallo Massif, Mt. Ciaurlec and Julian Prealps
between Torre River and Cornappo Torrent present characteristic karst landscapes (Cucchi and Zini 2009).
Karst processes have been acting over several millions of
years and therefore in this area karst landscapes best represent various stages of the development of karst, not only due
to different altitudes and hydrological gradient, but also to
the changing climatic conditions during the late Cenozoic.
12.2
Geological and Geomorphological
Setting
Friuli Venezia Giulia’s mountainous terrain can be divided
into orographic units with geographic characteristics
strongly influenced by geological features. In structural
terms, three geological chains meet in this area: the Paleocarnic and Sudalpine Chains and the Dinaric Alps. The
stratigraphic sequence (Fig. 12.2), which is entirely sedimentary, has a thickness of 30,000 m and represents
450 million years of geological history (Carulli 2006).
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_12
147
148
F. Cucchi and F. Finocchiaro
Fig. 12.1 Karst areas in the Friuli Venezia Giulia region
To the north, the Paleocarnic Chain, between 10 and
20 km wide, consists almost exclusively of Paleozoic rocks
spreading from the Gail fault, in Austria, in the north to the
Fella-Sava line to the south. Both the Hercynian and Carboniferous–Permian sequences outcrop here, whilst they are
hidden below the Mesozoic successions to the south. In the
Hercynian sequence, the stratified limestone at Orthoceras of
the Mt. Lodin Formation, Silurian in age, and the massive
reef limestone of the Devonian lie on siltstones and marls of
the Val Visdende and Uqua formations. The Devonian
limestone, between 200 and 300 m thick, is often intensely
karstified. In the successive Carboniferous–Permian
sequences, it is possible to distinguish many formations that
consist of alternating continental, deltaic and shelf deposits
in terrigenous or carbonate facies with a total thickness of up
to 3000 m, but without significant karst landscapes.
In the Carnic Alps and the Julian Alps, the Mesozoic
shelf sequence, which contains many limestone formations,
including thick ones, is today intensely karstified. However,
it is pointed out that on the Monticello Formation (dark
marly limestone with siliceous rocks) there is the Dolomia
Principale Formation (Norian) composed by massive dolomite and stratified dolomitic limestone with a maximum
thickness of 2000 m, which in some cases present limited
karst phenomena. On the other hand, in the highly stratified
grey limestone of the Dachstein Limestone Formation
(Rhaetian), that reaches a thickness of 800 m, and in the
overlying grey oolitic limestone, of the Calcari Grigi Formation (Lias), about 200 m thick, intense and widespread
karstification occurs. Karst landforms can be found also in
siliceous limestone with oolites and crinoids (Vajont and
Cellina formations) and in the highly stratified limestone
12
Karst Landforms in Friuli Venezia Giulia: From Alpine to Coastal Karst
149
Fig. 12.2 Geological sketch map of Friuli Venezia Giulia region (modified after Carulli 2006)
with a thickness of about 360 m of the Soccher Formation
(Dogger-Malm).
Further south, the high ground of the Carnian Prealps
rises above the Friuli Plain forming an arch, where Mesozoic
and Cenozoic rocks prevail. Further east, the Julian Prealps
have developed an interesting active cave network, even
where facies of Cenozoic flysch outcrop.
The Classical Karst, the northern tip of the Dinaric Chain,
is the most typical karstified area, where heavy karstification
of limestone outcrops has created all possible surface and
subsurface features in such numbers, dimensions and types
to render the area the universal symbol of karst phenomenon.
This is why the Timavo springs, already mentioned by
ancient Latin authors, universally represent the impetuous
outflow of waters from the underground caves of the Karst.
The plateau is underlain by a thick succession of mostly
carbonate rocks, from the Triassic to the Eocene, covered by
flysch. In the Trieste Karst, in particular, carbonate lithotypes (limestones and, subordinately, dolomites) from the
upper Cretaceous to lower Eocene crop out.
12.3
Alpine Karst Landscapes
The karst epigean forms are not very common on the Paleocarnic Chain, with the exception of some areas along the
southern slope of the range across the border with Austria,
from Mt. Coglians (2780 m) to Mt. Avostanis (2207 m).
The most characteristic form is limestone pavement, furrowed by grikes a few decimetres wide, up to a metre deep,
and also more than ten metres long (Fig. 12.3). Through this
mountain range, about 12 km long, a well developed and
150
Fig. 12.3 Large grikes and grooves in the Carnian Alps (photo G.D.
Cella)
deep karst drainage is active mainly from west to east.
During 2012, the link between a shaft on the Mt. Coglians
and the Fontanon di Timau, an important spring that feeds
the But Torrent and is located ten kilometres apart, has been
established by chemical tracing test.
Mt. Canin (2587 m) straddles the Italian–Slovenian border, in the heart of the western Julian Alps. It can be easily
seen from the Friuli Plain, as well as from many parts of the
coast and from the Karst, due to its size and the vast plateau
on its southern side. The entire massif is the most spectacular
example of alpine karst in Italy, due to the richness and
variety of its surface forms, its morphological features and
the size of deep caves which occur within it. Covering
180 km2 and split between Italy and Slovenia, it contains
thousands of caves (2031 in Italy alone): these are significant
numbers, especially when compared with other karst regions
in the world. What makes it unique is its network of
approximately 130 km of caves explored to date, a number
of which reach depths of over 1000 m. The distinctive
appearance of the landscape is due to the vast exposure of
limestone outcrops on the plateaus, a continuous display of
alternating micro- and macro-karst forms. In this moonscape, with its sparse vegetation, it is possible to find caves,
shafts and dolines of various dimensions, as well as countless karren grooves and grikes.
Mt. Canin is principally composed by Triassic carbonate
rocks, such as Dolomia Principale and Dachstein Limestone,
where karst features occur. The massif is divided into two
distinct structural subunits which form two monocline folds
with opposite attitudes: the northern one (lower Italian slope)
dips northwards, while the southern (higher Italian slope and
the Slovenian slope) dips southwards. The occurrence of
minor faults, fractures and stratification have favoured the
development of karst networks within the individual blocks
which, from a hydrogeological point of view, constitute
F. Cucchi and F. Finocchiaro
semi-independent units. There are no passageways connecting the voids in the different blocks, which are also
characterised by the presence of levels of phreatic galleries at
different altitudes. In most cases, the blocks are hydrogeologically limited at their base by the Dolomia Principale,
which contributes to the formation of an undefined permeability threshold of the karst aquifer.
The regional landscape is characterised by surfaces shaped
by glacial erosion and exposed to intense karstification. We
can find glaciokarst forms, such as glaciokarst depressions,
the largest of which is represented by the Conca del Prevala,
roches moutonnées and narrow ridges elongated in shape in
the direction of the steepest slope of the surfaces with
smoothed sides, called “skedenj” in Slovenian language. The
latter are products of lateral movement of ancient glaciers,
which only partially covered the original structural peaks.
Among epigean macro-karst forms, the snow shafts and
dolines give the local landscape a characteristic appearance.
Their density makes travelling over the plateaus difficult,
especially off the paths. Snow shafts have the peculiar
characteristic of being circular, a few metres in diameter and
about a dozen of metres deep. The dolines often have very
steep or subvertical slopes, generated at the intersection of
major tectonic discontinuities. Snow deposits often remain
all summer in the larger, deeper dolines.
The high degree of karstification of the Dachstein
Limestone and of the Jurassic carbonate series, combined
with the favourable structural setting, has produced a multitude of twisting micro-forms. Solution grooves and holes
(pits and grikes and kamenitzas) characterise the whole
plateau. Meandering karren, rarely found in other karst areas,
are common. Solution grooves dominate along the steepest
slope of the bedding planes, where the strata are thicker and
slightly fractured. Deep grikes occur where fracturing has
favoured water penetration (Fig. 12.4).
Hypogean karst is characterised by shafts forming some
of the deepest abysses in the world. Mt. Canin caves have
typical high mountain abyss morphologies, characterised
mainly by the presence of vadose forms (waterfalls and
structural shafts) which intercept active and inactive
sub-horizontal systems (syngenetic phreatic galleries, with
circular or elliptical sections). Underground drainage is
directed (as in the past) towards four distinct valley systems,
with different base levels, spring areas and evolution.
All around the massif there are nine permanent springs and
other temporary springs that have an overflow function. Some
have been identified in specific caves while others are not so
clearly definable as they constitute true springs only during
the heavy rain season, with water pouring from karstified
fractures or interstrata. On the Italian side the most important
is the Fontanon di Goriuda, a spectacular mouth suspended
over the bottom of the valley from which the waters flow in a
series of cascades with a drop of approximately 100 m,
12
Karst Landforms in Friuli Venezia Giulia: From Alpine to Coastal Karst
151
Fig. 12.4 Glaciokarstic alpine
landscape of northern slope of
Mt. Canin, Julian Alps
reaching Raccolana Torrent, an affluent of Fella River. Other
important springs of the Italian slopes are situated to the east
of the small village of Sella Nevea and are used for drinking
water. These waters feed the Predil Lake and the Slizza
Torrent, flowing towards the Danubian basin.
12.4
Cansiglio–Cavallo Plateau
The Cansiglio–Cavallo is a plateau area bounded by higher
ground and rising above the plain which extends along the
western zone of the Carnian Prealps. Its western side is
partially shared with the nearby Veneto Region. It rises
steeply from the Friuli Plain and includes two large basins of
karstic origin, the Pian del Cansiglio and the Piancavallo.
These two depressions entrap cold air, thus the plateau is
characterised by a continental climate with higher than
normal humidity and average annual temperatures 2 °C
below normal values based on the altitude alone.
The mountain range is a relatively homogeneous tectonic
unit enclosed within major regional tectonic lines (Aviano
fault and Barcis-Staro Selo line). It consists of limestone
formed in the interval from the Triassic to the Cretaceous,
topped by Eocene and Miocene siliciclastic rocks. It has
huge limestone outcrops which are karstified to variable
degree with large, diverse and diffuse surface forms, the
predominant ones being dolines which bound the plateau to
the east: symmetrical, closely spaced, deep, with sides
sometimes marked by splendid karren.
In strictly morphological terms, the massif can be divided
into three altitudinal zones, consisting of ridges at higher
altitudes (>1800–2000 m), plateaus at intermediate altitudes
and escarpments at the foot of the plateaus. Obviously the
three zones are characterised by distinct landscapes. The
intermediate altitudinal zone is made up of a system of more
or less rectangular plateaus, with surface areas of approximately 450 km2, and altitudes between 1000 and 1500 m. It
has a more gentle relief towards the western region and
steeper slope towards the plain. Piancavallo is a structural
polje and is carved entirely within the limestones; Pian del
Cansiglio is a border polje which has also evolved as a result
of marginal corrosion (Fig. 12.5).
The surface of the Cansiglio–Cavallo sometimes features
limestone pavements, while sometimes it is interrupted by
fields of large- and medium-sized dolines separated by
conical residual hills. Elsewhere the karst is characterised by
rounded ridges and wide valleys with well-formed dolines.
The occurrence of massive, resistant rock leads to a landscape dominated by blocks, often aligned along preferential
directions, with rounded surface, interrupted by holes and
narrow grikes. As a result of the outcropping of marly
limestone of the Scaglia Formation in the western part of the
Pian del Cansiglio subsidence dolines with sub-circular
perimeters and flat bottoms predominate.
Over 250 caves are known today in the Cansiglio–
Cavallo area. The deep karst is primarily vertical in structure,
including a lot of small shafts. The most famous caves are
the Bus de la Lum and the Abisso del Col della Rizza in the
Friuli Venezia Giulia region, and the Bus de la Genziana
located in the Veneto region. The latter opens out into the
Scaglia, but extends for over 580 m deep into the underlying
limestone of the Monte Cavallo Formation. Almost devoid
152
F. Cucchi and F. Finocchiaro
Fig. 12.5 Pian del Cansiglio
plateau from Mt. Cavallo,
Carnian Prealps. In the
foreground an outcrop of
Cretaceous limestone with a little
kamenitza (photo B. Grillo)
of speleothems, it is characterised by alternating shafts and
galleries and rises for almost 5 km of total length. It is one
of Italy’s two subterranean nature reserves.
The escarpment varies in width according to lithology
and is crossed by torrential grooves and landslide scars.
A polje opens out at the base of the southeast escarpment in
which several springs emerge, their waters supplying a
marsh from which a number of river branches originate,
flowing into the Livenza River.
The largest spring is the Gorgazzo that owes its origin to
the barrier caused by a system of thrust faults of a regional
nature. The Gorgazzo is a vauclusian spring which feeds a
pond, the outflow from which occurs only during high-water
episodes (altitude 52 m a.s.l.). Still a destination for extreme
cave diving explorations, the Gorgazzo is the deepest karst
spring in Italy, as it has been explored down to a depth of
212 m below ground level (it goes down to at least 160 m
below sea level!). The spring is characterised by a highly
irregular regime, with high peak flow rates which return to
normal within a few hours. The other perennial springs (at
altitudes approximately 30 m a.s.l.) have average discharge
rates of over 16 m3/s and are characterised by a low degree
of flow variation and extremely long depletion times. All
these springs are source for Livenza River.
12.5
Carnian Prealps
The Carnian Prealps extend from Mt. Resettum (2067 m)
to the Tagliamento River, thus covering an area of
approximately 1000 km2, with several karst areas.
Geologically speaking, the area is composed primarily of
karstified limestones of Jurassic and Cretaceous age.
Structurally, the area forms part of an imbricated structure
as a result of the presence of several overthrusts of regional
significance.
The most highly karstified zones are Mt. Ciaurlec
(1148 m) and the nearby Gerchia Plateau. The structure of
the area is characterised by folds, the most important of
which is Mt. Ciaurlec anticline. Surface karst features are
represented in particular on Mt. Ciaurlec by small but
numerous dolines and infrequent karren. Of particular note is
the deep doline of Valmaggiore on its southwest slope.
There is a high degree of karstification on the Gerchia
Plateau (500–700 m), mainly in the southern part, where
numerous dolines are found, usually elongated and
non-symmetrical in form, some with coalescent edges. Large
areas with frequent, intensely karstified outcrops like hums,
pillars, karren and large grikes give rise to a ruiniform karst
(Fig. 12.6), similar to a “città di roccia” (rock town) landscape (Perna and Sauro 1978). There are over a hundred
caves in this area of approximately 3 km2, many of which
are characterised by a complex pattern with speleogenetically different voids, although they extend mainly
horizontally. They are often hydrogeologically active springs
or sinkholes at the end of small blind valleys. The plateau is
dissected by a deep gorge about 1 km long, delimited by
walls 250–300 m high. This active fluviokarstic canyon is
rich in waterfalls, rapids, potholes and incised meanders and
has intercepted a system of tunnels and caves. One of the
caves—the Grotte Verdi di Pradis—and the entire gorge are
easily accessible.
12
Karst Landforms in Friuli Venezia Giulia: From Alpine to Coastal Karst
153
Fig. 12.6 Ruinform karstic hum
emerges in the wood near Gerchia
Plateau, Carnian Prealps
12.6
Julian Prealps
In the Julian Prealps, where the Eocene Flysch Formation
outcrops, the landscape is predominantly fluvial but between
marls and siliciclastic sandstones one finds several megabanks of calcarenites and carbonatic conglomerates and two
tectonic wedges of Cretaceous (Mt. Bernadia, 878 m) and
Jurassic (Mt. Matajur, 1641 m) limestones.
Some of the carbonatic banks outcrop as a result of differential erosion. Sinkholes or cave springs open out, creating the classical landscape of a marginal karst. Sometimes,
limited thickness of the siliciclastic cover has allowed small
suffosion dolines to originate, created by the collapse of
caves in the underlying carbonatic conglomerate megabeds.
As a result of coarse texture, which does not allow for the
formation of karren or kamenitzas, there are limited grikes or
hums (toothed karren), surrounded by high vegetation.
Carbonatic intercalations have led to the genesis of several
active cave systems composed of blind valleys, sinkholes,
cave networks and resurgence (Fig. 12.7). Close to the
northern side of Mt. Bernadia there is a show cave (Villanova Cave) where erosion morphologies in the Flysch
Formation and corrosion morphologies in calcarenitic banks
occur side by side. A few kilometres away, at the end of a
blind valley in the Flysch Formation, the impressive Viganti
sinkhole opens up. This abyss is linked by a 40 m long
siphon to the Pre Oreak cave, a horizontal gallery 400 m
long, that opens near the Cornappo riverbed, 270 m below.
The contrast between the characteristic fluvial landscape and
karst features is striking.
12.7
Classical Karst
Classical Karst is a vast morphological unit that ranges from
the southeast of the Isonzo River to Postojna (Slovenia). It
forms a rectangular plateau with an area of 600 km2,
extending along a SE–NW axis for about 50 km and about
15 km wide, from sea level to about 600 m in altitude. The
plateau is created by a thick succession of mostly carbonate
rocks, from the Triassic to the Eocene, covered by flysch.
The large-scale landscape of the plateau is closely related
to the petrographic characteristics of carbonate rocks. Along
the Italian–Slovenian border we find a broad band of Lower
Cretaceous limestone in which dolomitic levels are frequent,
reducing the extent of karstification. At the centre of the
plateau, where the most extensive karren and deepest dolines
are located, very pure, highly stratified limestone of Upper
Cretaceous age outcrop. On the edge of the plateau, sloping
downwards towards the sea, slightly marly limestones dating
to the Paleocene, often impure, outcrop. The various degrees
of karstification naturally imply variable rates of corrosion. It
is for this reason that the karst surfaces over time have
evolved in such a way as to lead to a greater depression of
the central part of the Trieste Karst, where limestone rocks
dated to the Upper Cretaceous crop out. The effect on the
landscape is a wide valley bounded to the northeast by
elevations which follow the line of the border and to the
southwest by smaller elevations which separate the plateau
from the sea. This specific landform led a number of authors
during the last century to suppose the action of a paleoriver
during the Miocene in the initial stages of emergence of the
154
Fig. 12.7 A passage in Villanova Cave, Julian Prealps. The gorge is
carved in marls and sandstones of Eocene Flysch Formation, on the
ceiling a bank of calcarenite occurs (photo A. D’Andrea)
plateau when the subterranean hydrological network was
still undeveloped.
The Karst plateau is the product of relatively advanced
karst processes that have acted for almost 10 million years.
Although the rate of surface dissolution is extremely low
(0.02 mm/year, Furlani et al. 2009), time has rendered the
original landforms almost unrecognisable. In the limited
Trieste Karst sector (a surface area of less than 300 km2)
over 3000 caves are known; approximately 150 reach a
depth of over 100 m, while half a dozen are over 1000 m in
length. Several surface karst forms are worthy of note, giving the landscape its highly distinctive appearance (Cucchi
2009). There are about 80 solution and collapse dolines with
a diameter greater than 100 m, and limestone pavements and
karren cover a total area of some tens of km2. The most
representative surface forms are undoubtedly the polje
hosting the Doberdò Lake, the Duino cliff, the Riselce doline, Borgo Grotta Gigante and San Pelagio karren fields
(Figs. 12.8 and 12.9).
F. Cucchi and F. Finocchiaro
The hydrogeological model roughly distinguishes
between three significant sectors: one in which waters flow
from above ground (as they are flowing down non-karst
valleys) to below ground (when they disappear into the
depths) and flow into the karst-level waters (Cucchi and Zini
2002). The Timavo River (Reka River in Slovenian) disappears into the extraordinary sinkhole of the Skocjanske Jame
(Slovenia), and then, after 40 km of a subterranean passage
of which only a few parts are known, it re-emerges at full
strength in San Giovanni di Duino (Italy). Another sector is
the Karst Plateau in which waters flow at depth within a
complex network of underground drainage systems and are
also increased by surface infiltration of rainwater. The third
sector, where karst waters emerge and flow into the sea,
hosts a couple of temporary lakes covering the bottom of
base-level poljes and a large number of springs, such as the
Timavo springs. The spring system has an area of about
20 km2. It consists of a series of modest, blunt elevations,
including the Doberdò and Pietrarossa lakes, the Timavo
springs, the minor springs that feed the Lisert and Moschenizze canals and the marine-coastal springs spread along
the almost 7 km of high coastline—the Gulf of Trieste cliffs.
It is difficult to recommend the most interesting caves in
the area, given their large number. The Grotta Gigante has
been a show cave since 1908 and was included in the
Guinness World Records in 1995 as the largest natural show
cave in the world, whilst the Abisso di Trebiciano is the
most famous vertical shaft, in which a branch of the Timavo
River flows at the bottom. The caves conserve rare primary
morphology, modified by filling deposits, collapses and all
types of speleothems. The present morphology is related to
polycyclic climate and base level changes. In this regard,
two other caves are of great interest: the Skilan cave, near
Rosandra Valley, which extends for over 6 km to a depth of
380 m (approximately the sea level!), and Savi cave, with its
4 km of galleries and beautiful rooms to the right of the
Rosandra River. Only the Abisso di Trebiciano and the
nearby of Lazzaro Jerko cave reach the branches of the
underground Timavo River, and only a few others are
reached by groundwaters during the biggest floods.
In the southeast area of the Karst, Val Rosandra stands
alone: a valley deeply excavated or engraved in Tertiary
limestones, marls and sandstones, with a morphology controlled by lithology and tectonics.
The Rosandra River is the morphological type representing a typical fluviokarstic valley, having carved out
white limestone canyons, ingrown meanders, escarpments
and created waterfalls, potholes and rapids.
Along the slopes marls and sandstones tectonically
interbedded with limestones outcrop. The different erodibility has created a stepped slope. There are many caves
inside the limestone of the side valleys: wide galleries and
tight passages, large rooms highly covered by speleothems
12
Karst Landforms in Friuli Venezia Giulia: From Alpine to Coastal Karst
155
Fig. 12.8 Karstified vertical
strata of Cretaceous limestone in
the cliff near Duino Castle, few
kilometres from Timavo Springs,
Classical Karst
Fig. 12.9 Limestone pavement
of Cretaceous limestone with
large kamenitzas near Borgo
Grotta Gigante, Classical Karst
or by ceiling breakdowns and tiny spaces in smoothed rock.
Speleothems of every type and thick filling fluvial and
pre-historical deposits with traces of recent history, are a
testimony to majestic flows and geological changes.
The interaction between physical features, vegetation and
geographical location all go towards making Val Rosandra a
geosite of global significance. The Karst is situated in a
geographically strategic position and is marked by traces of
human presence dating back to prehistoric times and
intensified over recent centuries which have contributed to
landscape modifications. Yet it was over the course of the
past century, in particular during the First World War, that
the landscape has been intensively and dramatically modified by human activities and needs, although these have had
to adapt to the peculiarities of karst features. For example,
people had to respect dolines in the planning of road and
transport systems, and were guided in selecting the location
for crops where the soil was more fertile and productive.
156
F. Cucchi and F. Finocchiaro
They avoided karren and grikes in grazing activities and
sealed the bottom of a number of dolines, thus creating small
artificial watering troughs.
The area characterised by Classical Karst landscape,
which is extremely homogeneous in geological terms, has
been and continues to be administered by two different
States. This has led, since the end of the Second World War,
to different kinds of anthropogenic modifications in terms of
both type and intensity. We need only consider the presence
of a large city such as Trieste, the suburbs of which have
encroached over karst areas, and the constantly expanding
population of small towns and villages built on the karst
terrain. The Province of Trieste has a population density of
over 1000 people per km2 because of its provincial capital
and also because the population of some of the municipalities located exclusively on the plateau has increased by 25%
over the last 50 years, reaching densities of around 70
people per km2. For comparison purposes, Slovenia’s coastal
region, which takes in the city of Koper, has a population
density of 106 people per km2, falling to just 36 people per
km2 in the inland karst regions.
All of this, in Italy, has resulted in an extremely dense
road and transport system and fairly extensive and widespread civil and industrial urbanisation, which have fragmented the natural karst landscape. Slovenia, in contrast,
despite undergoing considerable economic development
over the last twenty years, has seen much less invasive
modifications to the landscape.
12.8
Conclusions
Around 25% of the Friuli Venezia Giulia region consists of
more or less karstified carbonate rocks. Moreover, in Friuli
Venezia Giulia the specific geological, geographical and
climatic conditions have given rise to a whole series of karst
landscapes which have developed in different ways on
limestone rocks of variable ages, located at different altitudes
and exposed to karst processes for periods of time which
vary but which nonetheless can be measured in millions of
years.
Thus, from north to south one encounters splendid
examples of alpine karst, mountain-hill karst and coastal
karst. Alpine karst has developed on Palaeozoic and
Triassic-Jurassic rocks; the mountain-hill karst is supported
by Triassic, Jurassic, Cretaceous and Eocene rocks, and
coastal karst is associated with Cretaceous and Paleocene
rocks. Dolines, poljes, fluvio-glacial-karst valleys, blind
valleys, karren, hums, caverns, shafts and caves, sinkholes
and springs occur in a range of morphological variants.
The result is an extremely wide, complex variety of karst
landforms, which take on different appearance and form
according to altitude, exposure times, rock type and structure
and overburden. Their exploration, both for scientific and
excursion/tourism purposes, enables a comprehensive interpretation of the power of karstification.
The importance of Classical Karst as a model of karst
landscape is highlighted in Slovenia by the inclusion of
Skocjianske Jame in the list of UNESCO World Heritage
Sites. Environmental protection and the management of
protected areas in Slovenia value karst landscape greatly.
Unfortunately, not the same is the case in Italy, but we hope
that in the future the whole Classical Karst will be managed
according to common protection rules and joint initiatives
for promoting and enhancing geomorphological features of
karst landscape will be implemented.
References
Carulli GB (2006) Carta geologica del Friuli Venezia Giulia & Note
illustrative. Ed. Regione Autonoma Friuli Venezia Giulia,
Università di Trieste, map 1:150,000 scale. S.E.L.C.A., Firenze,
44 pp
Cucchi F (2009) Kamenitzas. In: Ginés A, Knez M, Slabe T,
Dreybrodt W (eds) Karst Rock Features—Karren Sculpturing.
Carsologica 9, ZRC Publishing, Ljubljana: 139–150
Cucchi F, Zini L (2002) Underground Timavo River monitoring
(Classical Karst). Acta Carsologica 31(1):75–84
Cucchi F, Zini L (eds) (2009) Paesaggi carsici nel Friuli Venezia
Giulia. Ed. Università di Trieste, Regione Friuli Venezia Giulia,
Trieste, 112 pp
Cucchi F, Finocchiaro F, Muscio G (eds)(2009) Geositi del Friuli
Venezia Giulia. Ed. Servizio geologico della Regione Autonoma
Friuli Venezia Giulia, Udine, 283 pp
Cucchi F, Finocchiaro F, Zini L (2010) Karst geosites in NE Italy. In:
Carrasco F, Durán JJ, LaMoreaux JW (eds) Andreo B. Advances in
Research Karst Media, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 393–
398
Furlani S, Cucchi F, Forti F, Rossi A (2009) Comparison between
coastal and inland Karst limestone lowering rates in the northeastern
Adriatic Region (Italy and Croatia). Geomorphology 104:73–81
Perna G, Sauro U (1978) Atlante delle microforme di dissoluzione
carsica superficiale del Trentino e del Veneto. Memorie Museo
Tridentino Scienze Naturali 22:1–176
The Tagliamento River: The Fluvial Landscape
and Long-Term Evolution of a Large Alpine
Braided River
13
Nicola Surian and Alessandro Fontana
Abstract
The Tagliamento River represents a reference system to observe natural, or semi-natural,
forms and processes in the Alpine environment. In this chapter, the morphology of the
Tagliamento in its lower sector (i.e. in the Friulian Plain) and the medium-long-term
evolution of the river are described. The river is very wide and has a spectacular braided
pattern. Its morphology undergoes rapid and abrupt changes, such as channel avulsion and
bar formation or destruction. Islands are a distinct feature in this river and they are
characterized by a rapid turnover. Besides recent channel adjustments due to some human
interventions, the Tagliamento has undergone a complex evolution in the last 30,000 years
and formed an alluvial megafan. Since the Last Glacial Maximum the downstream limit of
gravel transport and channel typology have changed dramatically in response to climate
change and sea-level variations.
Keywords
Braided river morphology
Friulian Plain
13.1
Introduction
Most Italian rivers have been subject to remarkable human
impact over time, leading to significant alteration of river
forms and processes (Surian and Rinaldi 2003). The
Tagliamento River is one of the few large rivers draining the
Alps where human impact has been relatively low, representing a reference system to observe and understand natural, or semi-natural, forms and processes. For this reason
several geomorphologists and ecologists have widely studied
this river over the last 15 years (e.g. Ward et al. 1999;
Gurnell et al. 2000; Tockner et al. 2003; Gurnell and Petts
2006; Surian et al. 2009; Bertoldi et al. 2011; Ziliani and
Surian 2012). Nowadays, the Tagliamento is well known
within the scientific community but there is also a greater
awareness among local population and different stakeholders
N. Surian (&) A. Fontana
Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università di Padova,
Via Gradenigo 6, 35131 Padua, Italy
e-mail: nicola.surian@unipd.it
Channel adjustments
Last Glacial Maximum
Holocene
(from water agencies to environmental organizations) of the
major value of this river (Bianco et al. 2006).
Besides being a reference fluvial system, the Tagliamento
displays a spectacular braided morphology along most of its
course. The river channel is very wide, up to 1 km, and
dynamic. Channels, bars and islands shift in position and
change their form frequently. This implies that the overall
morphology of the river is renewed year after year. In this
chapter the morphology of the Tagliamento in its lower
sector (i.e. in the Friulian Plain) and the medium-long-term
evolution of the river are described. Over the last
30,000 years the Tagliamento formed an alluvial megafan
and terraces, paleochannels and abandoned fluvial ridges are
generally well preserved in the alluvial landscape. These
landforms have a fairly higher visibility than in the other
large Alpine alluvial systems of northeastern Italy (e.g.
Piave, Brenta and Adige rivers) and their study has allowed
to reconstruct the different phases of deposition and erosion
that occurred in this fluvial system since the Last Glacial
Maximum (LGM).
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_13
157
158
13.2
N. Surian and A. Fontana
Geographical Setting
The Tagliamento River is located in northeastern Italy, in the
Friuli Venezia Giulia Region. It drains a 2580 km2 basin and
has a length of 178 km. The river flows from the eastern
Alps and pre-Alps and has its source at 1195 m a.s.l. in the
Dolomites and its mouth in the Adriatic Sea.
Mean annual precipitation is about 2000 mm/year, but
there is significant variation within the basin, ranging from
1500 mm/year in some small portions of the upper and
lower parts of the drainage basin up to 3100 mm/year in
some central parts of the basin. Seasonal maxima and minima occur, respectively, in the autumn and spring and in the
winter. Daily precipitation can exceed 400 mm. The
Tagliamento River is characterized by a flashy pluvio-nival
flow regime, which results from both alpine and Mediterranean, snowmelt and precipitation regimes. At the Venzone
gauging station (located 22 km upstream of Pinzano gorge,
Fig. 13.1) the maximum and the mean discharges in the
period 1932–1973, were 4050 and 81 m3/s, respectively
(Surian et al. 2009). We refer to that period because there are
some gaps in recent discharge measurements and significant
changes of flow regime have not occurred over the last
decades, except for low flows.
The Tagliamento catchment belongs to the eastern
South-Alpine Chain, which is a SE-verging thrust-fold belt
dominated by limestones and dolostones of Paleozoic and
Mesozoic age. Several tectonic structures are still active and
an earthquake with Magnitude 6.4 occurred in 1976 (the
earthquake epicentre was in the pre-Alps, near Venzone).
Besides the structural constraints, Quaternary glaciations
played a key role in the morphological evolution of this
region. During the LGM, which took place between 29,000
and 19,000 years ago, a large end-moraine system was built
at the outlet of the Tagliamento catchment (Monegato et al.
2007) and fluvioglacial systems developed and shaped the
Friulian Plain (Fontana et al. 2014b).
The Friuli Venezia Giulia Region is less populated than
other regions in northern Italy (e.g. in comparison to Veneto
and Lombardia). This fact explains why the Tagliamento
River has undergone relatively lower human impact than
other Italian rivers, and why recent and ancient fluvial features are often well preserved in the Friulian landscape.
13.3
Present Landforms and Recent
Evolution
13.3.1 Channel Morphology in the Friulian Plain
The morphology of the Tagliamento River in the Friulian
Plain (i.e. downstream of Pinzano gorge) varies in relation to
bed material, channel slope, and human structures for flood
control (Fig. 13.1). The river displays braided morphology
from Pinzano (130 m a.s.l.) to Belgrado (15 m a.s.l.), where
the channel bed and banks are mainly made of gravels, the
channel slope is relatively high (i.e. 0.2–0.5%), and levees
for flood control are far apart, having little influence on
lateral channel mobility. Because the slope decreases notably
downstream of Belgrado, the river becomes single thread.
The river retains essentially natural features and dynamics
up to Latisana (1 m a.s.l.), while in the lower course, the
river has few natural characteristics because artificial levees
constrict it in a relatively narrow channel. From Ronchis to
the mouth, the river displays a sinuous or meandering pattern
and flows along a fluvial ridge that is about 1000–2000 m
wide and elevated up to 2–4 m over the adjacent floodplain
(Fig. 13.1). The influence of the Adriatic Sea is felt up to
Latisana, where the tide amplitude is 60 cm. Gravels are
found almost up to that town, while downstream the bed is
made of fine and medium sands. In the single-thread reach
the depth of the channel is 2–3 m, but it can be up to 8 m in
the outer side of the bends. Tagliamento mouth is a typical
wave-dominated delta, characterized by a cuspate morphology with two wings occupied by the touristic beaches of
Lignano Sabbiadoro and Bibione (Fig. 13.2).
13.3.2 Braided Morphology and Processes
The following part will focus on the braided reach because
this is the dominant morphology of the Tagliamento.
Braiding is a distinctive alluvial river morphology characterized by multiple intersecting channels (“anabranches”)
separated by exposed bars, commonly unvegetated (Ashmore 2009) (Fig. 13.3). Braiding occurs in noncohesive
sand and gravel and is common in mountain and piedmont
environments, alluvial plains and glaciated regions with high
rates of sediment supply. The channel morphology is
extremely unstable and characterized by rapid and abrupt
changes, such as channel avulsion and bar formation or
destruction. Such changes take place only during periods of
high flow, therefore dynamics is intermittent in these rivers.
This means that channel morphology may remain stable for
some months and then change notably in response to a single
flood.
Between Pinzano and Belgrado, the Tagliamento displays
a spectacular braided configuration. The channel is very
wide, being 1850, 760 and 140 m at maximum, average and
minimum width in this reach, respectively. As shown in
Fig. 13.3, the flow is divided in two or more anabranches:
commonly, there are 3 or 4 anabranches in this reach of the
Tagliamento. Anabranches are separated by bars or, in some
cases, by islands. The bars are completely unvegetated if
their formation has recently occurred, while they can be
covered by some herbaceous vegetation if sufficient time is
13
The Tagliamento River: The Fluvial Landscape and Long-Term Evolution of a Large Alpine Braided River
159
Fig. 13.1 Digital Elevation
Model of the Friulian Plain
showing the present course of the
Tagliamento River and main
landforms (e.g. paleochannels,
scarps, fluvial ridges) related to its
late Quaternary evolution (DEM
obtained from reprocessing
topographic data after Tarquini
et al. 2007)
given to vegetation to develop. In some cases, a bar can be
colonized and stabilized by more mature vegetation (i.e. high
shrubs and trees), becoming an island. This implies that
the overall braided morphology of this river is determined by
the interplay between water, sediments, and vegetation. The
Tagliamento is one of the most famous “natural laboratories”
in the world, where the role of vegetation on channel morphology and processes has been investigated (e.g. Gurnell
et al. 2000; Gurnell and Petts 2006; Bertoldi et al. 2011).
A large portion of the channel (i.e. bars and islands) is dry
for most of the years when the flow is low and occupies only
the anabranches. During summer, or other periods with very
low flow, the channel can be completely dry in some sections, in particular near Casarsa. This is due to the efficient
infiltration that takes places between Pinzano and Casarsa.
Commonly, the river becomes “active” only some days in a
year, when high flows or floods occur. When the flow
exceeds a given threshold, gravels start to move in the
channel bed and, then, on bars (Mao and Surian 2010).
Besides gravel transport, bank erosion is another important
process that contributes to the dynamics of this river. Banks
can retreat several tens of metres up to more than 100 m
during a single flood event (Surian et al. 2009). It is worth
noting that not only very large floods but also frequent
160
N. Surian and A. Fontana
Fig. 13.2 The mouth of Tagliamento separates the tourist beaches of
Lignano Sabbiadoro and Bibione. In the foreground the wave crests
evidence the present-day mouth bar, while in the left part of the photo
(middle), the remnants of past sand ridges covered by woods can be
seen. Between the river mouth and the lighthouse (white building on
the left), jetties and other protective structures have been built in the last
decades to reduce coastal erosion (photo A. De Rovere)
floods (e.g. with recurrence interval of 1.5–2 years) are able
to produce remarkable changes of channel morphology (i.e.
shifting of anabranches, bar migration, bank erosion).
As mentioned above, islands are distinctive features of
the Tagliamento River. Islands are not homogeneously distributed between Pinzano and Belgrado because conditions
for their formation (e.g. stream power, driftwood supply,
moisture availability) vary along the reach. Vegetative
regeneration from uprooted trees (i.e. large wood) deposited
on gravel bars during floods is an important process in the
development of islands (Gurnell and Petts 2006). Occasionally, islands are entirely generated by growth of riparian
tree seedlings, but this is unusual on the Tagliamento
because of the frequent flow disturbances. Vegetation turnover (i.e. the time that vegetation persists within the channel)
is remarkably rapid in the Tagliamento. Comparing aerial
photos of different dates, it was observed that about 50% of
vegetation persists for less than 5–6 years and only 10% for
more than 18-19 years. Besides, significant erosion of vegetation does occur with relatively frequent floods, i.e. floods
with a recurrence interval of 1–2 years.
A fluvial landscape such that found along the Tagliamento in the Friulian Plain is rare in Italy, as well as in
Europe. Besides the channel features and processes described above, it is worth noting that the whole fluvial corridor
still remains in good environmental conditions (Fig. 13.3).
First, the presence of artificial levees and bank protection
structures (e.g. groynes) has limited effects on channel
dynamics. In particular, such structures do not prevent lateral
mobility, except in specific sections (e.g. bridge crossings).
This is very important because lateral mobility is a key
process in a braided river. Second, riparian forests are still
widely present within the fluvial corridor. Besides their
ecological values, riparian forests are important for the
morphology of this river because large wood has a role in
channel processes.
13.3.3 Channel Adjustment Over the Last
200 Years
Historical analyses have shown that the Tagliamento has
notably changed its morphology over the last 200 years, and
particularly over the last 40–50 years (Ziliani and Surian
2012). The river was wider in the past: channel width at the
beginning of the nineteenth century was about twice the
present width (Figs. 13.4 and 13.5). The river channel
underwent three main phases of adjustment over the last
200 years. The first two phases, from the end of the nineteenth century to the early 1990s, were characterized by
narrowing (very intense during the 1970s and the 1980s) and
incision (i.e. bed level lowering of about 1 m). Widening
13
The Tagliamento River: The Fluvial Landscape and Long-Term Evolution of a Large Alpine Braided River
161
Fig. 13.3 Aerial photo of the Tagliamento River near Dignano, with Pinzano gorge in the background (photo R. Pizzutti). Yellow arrows mark
the scarps limiting the post-LGM terrace
and slight aggradation have taken place in the third phase,
from the 1990s to present-day. This evolution of the
Tagliamento was driven primarily by human intervention at
reach scale (i.e. sediment mining and channelization) (Ziliani
and Surian 2012). The very recent channel changes (i.e.
channel widening and aggradation), connected to a
remarkable decrease of mining activity, were interpreted as
part of a new phase of adjustment that is likely to continue
for several decades.
In addition to channel width and bed-elevation, other
morphological changes are worth to be described. In the
reach from Pinzano to Belgrado, the river has maintained a
braided configuration over the last 200 years, but braiding
intensity has changed notably. The braiding index (BI),
which gives a measurement of the number of anabranches in
a river reach, decreased moderately from the nineteenth
century (BI = 5.9 in 1833) to 1954 (BI = 4.9) and then more
intensely in the following decades (BI = 2.8 in 2007). On
the other hand, changes in channel configuration took place
downstream of Belgrado (Fig. 13.1). First, it worth noting
that there used to be a braided morphology also 4–5 km
downstream of Belgrado. For instance, this was the river
condition at the end of the nineteenth century. Second,
starting from the 1970s, there has been a reduction in the
number of reaches with transitional (i.e. wandering) and
meandering morphology and an increase of those with sinuous or straight configuration.
13.4
Long-Term Evolution
The recent morphological changes documented along the
Tagliamento River have been mainly controlled by the
variations in sediment flux and flow regime. From a general
viewpoint, these factors are the same that have driven the
long-term evolution of the Tagliamento megafan. But, considering the Quaternary evolution, the magnitude of the
variations in sediment flux and flows were higher because of
the dramatic climate changes and sea-level fluctuations that
have occurred since the Late Pleistocene.
162
13.4.1 River and Floodplain Dynamics During
Last Glacial Maximum
At the peak of the last glaciation, when the Adriatic shoreline
was south of Ancona and the Tagliamento glacier reached the
Friulian Plain, the Tagliamento River was one of its main
outwash rivers together with Corno, Cormor and Torre rivers.
It formed an alluvial megafan of 1200 km2, with a typical
divergent shape, extending from Pinzano to the present
Adriatic shelf (Fontana et al. 2014a). The glacial front supported the fluvial system with an enormous quantity of sediment and allowed a widespread aggradation of the whole
plain, with deposition of 20–30 m of sediments between
29,000–19,000 cal. years BP (A in Fig. 13.6). Channel
shifting was very frequent, especially during summer meltwater, and avulsions at the apex of the fan was the main
process leading to alluvial deposition over the entire megafan
surface. The river channels were unconfined and transport
capacity was lost within the proximal portion of the plain.
Thus, gravels travelled only up to 10–20 km from the apex of
the megafan (see dotted line in Fig. 13.1 and #3a in
Fig. 13.7), while medium and fine sands were the only coarse
material reaching the distal plain. This strong grain-size
sorting led to the differentiation between the proximal gravelly plain and the distal fine-dominated sector: the so-called
alta (high) and bassa pianura (low plain) in Italian, that are
divided by the spring belt, where groundwater crops out and
feeds a dense network of minor streams. During LGM peak,
Fig. 13.4 The castle of Spilimbergo is built on the LGM terrace and
faces the western scarp limiting fluvial incision of the Tagliamento. The
river was flowing below the castle until the beginning of twentieth
century and moved toward the eastern scarp due to the progressive
N. Surian and A. Fontana
before 22,000 years BP, even in the distal plain the channel
belts of the Tagliamento were braided, but sandy, while meandering pattern was present only in the very terminal sector
of the megafan, now submerged by the Adriatic Sea. Geophysical soundings carried out in the Adriatic platform
allowed to recognize the Tagliamento megafan up to 15 km
from the present coast, while downstream a floodplain environment was present.
The retreat of the Tagliamento glacier started around
22,000 years BP, but ice mass occupied part of the moraine
amphitheatre until 18,600 years BP, when it definitively
abandoned the plain (Fontana et al. 2014b). During the onset
of glacial withdrawal (B in Fig. 13.6), in the apical sector of
its megafan, the Tagliamento River entrenched for about 15–
20 m from the top of the surface of LGM peak (Fig. 13.4).
But, at the same time, deposition still occurred in the distal
plain, where narrow and low fluvial ridges formed downstream of the spring belt (#4 in Fig. 13.6). These are characterized by single channels with low sinuosity, consisting
of gravelly sands as far downstream as the present lagoon
area, with a maximum grain size of 1 cm. Channel deposits
have a mean depth of 2–4 m and a width of 40–250 m.
Because of the entrenchment in the apical sector, the sedimentary flux became confined and the funnelling effect led
to transport of gravels even in the distal sector. It is likely
that a large part of the gravels forming the channel infill was
cannibalized from the tract upstream of Codroipo, where the
Tagliamento was eroding the deposits of LGM peak.
narrowing related to construction of groynes and gravel mining activity.
In the background, the light stripe of gravels coincides with the active
channel (photo S. De Toni)
13
The Tagliamento River: The Fluvial Landscape and Long-Term Evolution of a Large Alpine Braided River
13.4.2 Lateglacial and Early Holocene Fluvial
Incisions
Since about 18,500 years BP, when the glacier finally contracted in the inner mountain valley, the Tagliamento River
persisted as the only stream fed by the mountainous drainage
basin. On the contrary, the other former glacial outwashes
(i.e. Cormor, Corno) became minor streams with small
catchments. Because of the concentration of water discharge
along a single river and vanishing of the important sedimentary input represented by the glacial front, the Tagliamento megafan experienced a phase of severe erosion (C in
Fig. 13.6). During Lateglacial the river strongly incised into
the LGM gravelly deposits of the piedmont sector along a
valley and the resultant incision has a width between 1 and
3 km and it still confines the present-day river channel up to
Rivis (Figs. 13.1 and 13.4). The scarps have a maximum
height of 70 m near Pinzano and they progressively diminish
downstream, until they disappear near Casarsa. On the
contrary, in the distal sector of the plain, the Tagliamento
formed several different valleys, but they have been filled
and reworked by the deposition of the post-LGM lobe of the
megafan (D in Fig. 13.6). The different channel belts
forming this lobe (Fig. 13.7) show a divergent pattern from
an avulsive node situated at the limit of the spring belt,
where the gradient abruptly changes from 3 to 1‰. The
oldest channel belts, dated between the Lateglacial and early
Holocene, are deeply incised into the LGM deposits, while
the late Holocene channel belts aggraded on the LGM surface and formed fluvial ridges.
Some valleys are still partly visible in the present
landscape or through the analysis of topographic
163
microrelief (Fig. 13.1). In particular, the Lemene,
Reghena, Arcon, Sile and Fiume rivers, which are fed by
groundwater, flow along depressions previously formed by
the Tagliamento during Lateglacial (#14 and 15 in
Fig. 13.7). Other fluvial incisions or parts of them have
been buried by younger depositional units of the Tagliamento that re-used its older valleys; this fact is documented for the directions of Portogruaro—Concordia
Sagittaria, Cordovado−Lugugnana and Latisana (#5, 6,
and 7 in Fig. 13.7) (Fontana 2006). The valleys formed by
the Tagliamento in the distal sector of its megafan had
widths spanning between 500 and 2000 m; their depths
reached 2–4 m near the spring belt, but it increased
downstream to 15–20 m over a distance of 20 km. This
area corresponds to the present coastal sector, where these
fluvial incisions have been later completely filled by
Holocene lagoon and alluvial deposits. Thus, now these
valleys can be detected in this sector only through
examination of stratigraphic record from boreholes, as in
the case of Concordia Sagittaria (Fig. 13.8). The continuation of some of these fluvial incisions has also been
documented in the Adriatic seafloor by cores and geophysical soundings.
Some metres of gravels are documented at the base of the
valleys up to the present lagoon and, thus, they arrived some
tens of kilometres downstream than during the LGM peak.
These coarse sediments reached the distal sector of the
megafan because of the funnelling effect related to the
concentration of the sediment flux along the incised channels. Large part of the gravels found in the distal part of the
megafan had been cannibalized by the Tagliamento River
from the deep incision of the apical portion.
Fig. 13.5 Comparison of channel morphology in 1805 (a) and 1999 (b) in a reach few kilometres downstream of Spilimbergo
164
N. Surian and A. Fontana
Fig. 13.6 Scheme of the geomorphological evolution of the Tagliamento alluvial megafan since Last Glacial Maximum (modified after Fontana
2006, 2014a)
13.4.3 Interaction with Marine Transgression
and Late Holocene Evolution
As documented in the section of Concordia Sagittaria, the
valley was already partly filled by gravels at 14,000 years
BP and was subsequently abandoned by the Tagliamento at
8500 years BP; a comparable chronology was recognized in
the valley now occupied by the Reghena River and in the
fluvial incision underlying the channel belt of Roman time
(Fontana 2006). The fluvial system incised during Lateglacial and early Holocene, thus concurrently with sea-level
rise due to postglacial climate warming. But gravel transport
in the distal plain lasted until about 8500 years BP, when
the sea reached a relative level of about 10 m below the
present one. Since that period the coastline achieved a setting that was already fairly comparable to the present one
and the base of Caorle and Marano lagoons is dated at
7500 years BP.
Sea-level highstand strongly lowered the channel slope in
the distal plain and, therefore, the stream power of the
Tagliamento. In the last millennia, the limit of gravel
transport has progressively migrated upstream, following the
relative sea-level rise. Along the present-day Tagliamento
channel the gravels come to rest slightly north of Latisana,
that is 10 km upstream than the most distant position
reached during Lateglacial. Since 8000 years BP, in the
distal plain, the valleys started to be mainly filled by fine
alluvial deposits.
During post-LGM the Tagliamento followed different
directions that diverged from the avulsion area located
between Valvasone and S. Vito. In response to flood periods
or severe events, the river shifted position quite frequently in
the last 17,000 years. Because of the topographic depression
represented by the Lateglacial fluvial incisions, these valleys
were re-used several times by the river. In the time elapsed
between one phase of activity and another, the valleys were
13
The Tagliamento River: The Fluvial Landscape and Long-Term Evolution of a Large Alpine Braided River
165
Fig. 13.7 Simplified scheme of the Tagliamento River evolution
during post-LGM (last 17,000 years) (modified after Fontana 2006).
Legend 1 channel belt, with indication of the period of activity, 1a
buried channel belt, 2 trace of stratigraphic section in Fig. 13.8, 3
isoline 0 m a.s.l., 3a upper limit of the spring belt, 4 fluvial scarp, 5
present Tagliamento unit <sixth century AD, 6 Concordia Sagittaria
unit sixth-eight century AD, 7 unit of Tiliaventum Maius active in
Roman period 1st millennium BC—eight century AD, 8 Alvisopoli
unit, >3300 BP, 9 Glaunicco-Varmo unit, >3500 BP, 10 Rividischia
unit, >3500 BP, 11 San Vidotto unit, >3500 BP, 12 Iutizzo unit, >3500
BP, 13 Campomolle and Pocenia units, >4500 BP, 14 Lateglacial units,
15 Lateglacial valleys now reoccupied by groundwater-fed streams, 16
undifferentiated post-LGM deposits, 17 LGM deposits, 18 deposits of
other fluvial systems, 19 incision of Stella River, remodeled by
Tagliamento in 4500–2800 BP, 19a deposits of Stella River with input
from Tagliamento River, <4500 BP, 20 Holocene lagoon deposits, 21
pre-Roman coastal sand ridges, 22 swamp of Loncon
temporarily occupied by the groundwater-fed rivers that
created a swampy environment and favoured accumulation
of peaty and organic layers (#5 in Fig. 13.8). Due to the
post-LGM marine transgression, around 7000 years BP the
relative sea level was at about −10 m. Since that time the
coastline reached a position comparable to the present one,
but brackish waters expanded further inland along the
pre-existing depressions connected to the sea. This dramatic
environmental change occurred also along the fluvial incision of Concordia Sagittaria that had been already abandoned by the Tagliamento at that time, and led to the
sedimentation of lagoon deposits until the city of Portogruaro (#4 in Fig. 13.8). This setting lasted for several millennia, but the Tagliamento temporarily re-used the valley of
166
N. Surian and A. Fontana
Fig. 13.8 Concordia Sagittaria, stratigraphic section of the fluvial incision formed by the Tagliamento River during Lateglacial and filled in the
middle-late Holocene (modified after Fontana 2006)
Concordia Sagittaria around 4,500 years BP and completely
filled it with silty sands between the sixth and eight centuries, sealing large sectors of the Roman city of Concordia
(Fontana 2006). The alluvial cover preserved the archaeological remains that, after the stratigraphic excavation of the
nineteenth–twentieth centuries, are widely exposed and
available for tourist visits, in particular, the mosaics of the
early Christian Basilica.
Except the deltaic area, alluvial deposition was confined
within the fluvial incisions until about 3500–3000 years
BP. At that moment, probably in response to sea-level
position and sediment supply, the active channel belt of the
Tagliamento started to flood over the LGM surface and a
new phase of widespread deposition has begun. Wide and
high fluvial ridges have developed along the meandering
channels and the related floodplain extends for 1–2 km far
from the river. This situation characterizes the channel belts
numbered as #5, 6, and 7 in Fig. 13.7. The first corresponds
to the so-called Tiliaventum Maius, cited by Plinius the
Elder, and was active from the 1st millennium BC to early
Middle Age. Between the sixth and ninth centuries AD
several floods led the Tagliamento to flow along the
directions of Concordia Sagittaria and Latisana and to progressively abandon the Tiliaventum Maius. Since the tenth
century AD the present course has been the only active
channel belt and minor variations occurred to this path.
The present cuspate delta started to form in the sixth
century AD and experienced an almost continuous progradation between the Middle Ages and the beginning of the
twentieth century, but a clear erosional trend has been noted
since 1960s. In the last 50 years, the area of the mouth
retreated by about 400 m and sediment loss occurred in
many tracts of the beaches of Lignano and Bibione, leading
to management problems of touristic activity (Fig. 13.2).
This process is probably related to the sediment mining
activity that took place upstream from Latisana, which could
have had effects on the quantity of sand reaching the mouth.
13.5
Final Remarks on River Management
This chapter illustrates the fluvial landscape of the Tagliamento River, pointing out that both its present river corridor
and the whole alluvial plain are peculiar in comparison to
13
The Tagliamento River: The Fluvial Landscape and Long-Term Evolution of a Large Alpine Braided River
those of other large Alpine rivers. The fact that the Friuli
Venezia Giulia Region has undergone a lower human impact
compared to other alpine regions helps to explain why the
river can be still considered semi-natural and why ancient
fluvial features are often well preserved in the Tagliamento
riverine landscape. That said, river management—which has
to take into account several issues (e.g. different water needs,
flood risk, ecological aspect)—is very challenging in the
Tagliamento. For instance, a strong debate has been going
on about how to reduce flood risk at Latisana (the town was
heavily affected by the 1966 flood), without affecting the
great ecological value of the river. It may be concluded that
this river represents a good opportunity to reconcile the aims
of the two European Directives that are driving river management at present, the Water Framework Directive
(2000/60/CE) and the Flood Directive (2007/60/CE) whose
goals are to improve the ecological quality of rivers and to
reduce flood risk, respectively.
References
Ashmore P (2009) Intensity and characteristic length of braided channel
patterns. Can J Civ Eng 36:1656–1666
Bertoldi W, Drake NA, Gurnell AM (2011) Interactions between river
flows and colonizing vegetation on a braided river: exploring spatial
and temporal dynamics in riparian vegetation cover using satellite
data. Earth Surf Proc Land 36:1474–1486
Bianco F, Bondesan A, Paronuzzi P, Zanetti M, Zanferrari A
(eds) (2006) Il Tagliamento. Cierre Edizioni, Verona 507 pp
Fontana A (2006) Evoluzione geomorfologica della bassa pianura
friulana e sue relazioni con le dinamiche insediative antiche.
Monografie del Museo Friulano di Storia Naturale, vol. 47, Udine,
167
288 pp. With enclosed the Geomorphological Map of the Friulian
Low Plain, scale 1:50,000
Fontana A, Monegato G, Zavagno E, Devoto S, Burla I, Cucchi F
(2014a) Evolution of an Alpine fluvioglacial system at the LGM
glacial decay: the Cormor allluvial megafan (NE Italy). Geomorphology 204:136–155
Fontana A, Mozzi P, Marchetti M (2014b) Alluvial fans and megafans
along the southern side of the Alps. Sed Geol 307:1–22
Gurnell AM, Petts G (2006) Trees as riparian engineers: the Tagliamento River, Italy. Earth Surf Proc Land 31:1558–1574
Gurnell AM, Petts GE, Harris N, Ward JV, Tockner K, Edwards PJ,
Kollmann J (2000) Large wood retention in river channels: the case
of the Fiume Tagliamento, Italy. Earth Surf Proc Land 25:255–275
Mao L, Surian N (2010) Observations on sediment mobility in a large
gravel-bed river. Geomorphology 114:326–337
Monegato G, Ravazzi C, Donegana M, Pini R, Calderoni G, Wick L
(2007) Evidence of a two-fold glacial advance duringthe last glacial
maximum in the Tagliamento end moraine system (eastern Alps).
Quatern Res 68:284–302
Surian N, Rinaldi M (2003) Morphological response to river
engineering and management in alluvial channels in Italy. Geomorphology 50:307–326
Surian N, Mao L, Giacomin M, Ziliani L (2009) Morphological effects
of different channel-forming discharges in a gravel-bed river. Earth
Surf Proc Land 34:1093–1107
Tarquini S, Isola I, Favalli M, Mazzarini F, Bisson M, Pareschi MT,
Boschi E (2007) TINITALY/01: a new Triangular Irregular
Network of Italy. Ann Geophys 50:407–425
Tockner K, Ward JV, Arscott DB, Edwards PJ, Kollmann J, Gurnell AM, Petts GE, Maiolini B (2003) The Tagliamento River: a
model ecosystem of European importance. Aquat Sci 65:239–253
Ward JV, Tockner K, Edwards PJ, Kollmann J, Bretschko G,
Gurnell AM, Petts GE, Rossaro B (1999) A reference river system
for the Alps: the Fiume Tagliamento. Regulated Rivers: Research
and Management 15:63–75
Ziliani L, Surian N (2012) Evolutionary trajectory of channel
morphology and controlling factors in a large gravel-bed river.
Geomorphology 173–174:104–117
14
Lake Garda: An Outstanding Archive
of Quaternary Geomorphological Evolution
Carlo Baroni
Abstract
Pleistocene glaciers repeatedly filled the elongated crypto-depression presently hosting
Lake Garda, building a complex suite of end moraines at the Alpine foothills and looping
out onto the Po Plain. The moraine amphitheatre impounded Lake Garda, the widest Italian
lake, and offers a well famous example of glacially originated landscape. The mountain
sector of the lake depression deeply enters the alpine border and the complex geological
structure strongly conditioned the geomorphological setting of the area. A suite of
well-preserved lacustrine relict landforms document the articulated history of the
paleo-Lake Garda that developed after the withdrawal of Pleistocene glaciers. Relevant
is the connection of landscape features and Quaternary sediments with the archaeological
heritage of human frequentation of the area, furnishing a very helpful tool for investigating
the paleoclimatic evolution of this region as well as for investigating neotectonic activity.
Keywords
Glacial geomorphology
14.1
Relict shorelines
Introduction
Pleistocene glaciers repeatedly filled the valley depression
hosting the Lake Garda in Northern Italy, similarly to most
of the Alpine valleys reaching the Po Plain. The spectacular
relict glacial landforms and the impressive moraine
amphitheatre abandoned at the alpine foothills preserve an
outstanding geological and geomorphological archive of the
Pleistocene paleoclimatic and paleoenvironmental evolution
of the entire Alpine Chain. The Garda region is representative of an archetypal landscape that characterizes the
C. Baroni (&)
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Pisa, Via Santa
Maria 53, 56126 Pisa, Italy
e-mail: carlo.baroni@unipi.it
C. Baroni
CNR, Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse, Via G. Moruzzi 1,
56124 Pisa, Italy
Pleistocene
Holocene
Lake Garda
southern margin of the Alps. The lake is nestled between the
dominating mountain ridge of Mt. Baldo to the east and the
articulated relief of Lombardian Prealps to the west
(Fig. 14.1). These mountains surround the lake today but
they also hung over the glacier filling the lake depression
during the repeated Pleistocene glacial advances. Even
during glacial periods these mountain terrains offered an
ice-free environment, suitable for human settling in the
surrounding of the glaciated world since the Early
Paleolithic.
Following the complete deglaciation of the region, the
lacustrine landscape features and their surroundings attracted
human occupation since at least 15 ka BP, essentially
without interruption. In particular, as it concerns the nearshore belt, modern humans first settled during the Neolithic
at the margin of the paleo-Lake Garda and since then
interacted more and more intensely with the evolution of the
landscape of this region. As a result, the present-day landscape is deeply anthropized and very rich in human settlements and other remains of considerable archaeological
interest.
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_14
169
170
C. Baroni
Fig. 14.1 Lake Garda and location of sites geomorphological interest. The white line indicates the limit of the Garda Glacier during the LGM
14
Lake Garda: An Outstanding Archive of Quaternary …
The marine appearance of the southern portion of the lake
expanding on the high Po Plain is a significant feature of the
landscape, unique in all the Po Plain; this characteristic of
the lake contributed to the fame of Lake Garda (also known
as Benàco) since the Roman Period. At that time, Virgilio
(Georgiche, II, 158–160) underlined the marine nature of the
lacustrine waves under storm condition (…fluctibus et fremitu adsurgens Benace marino) and Catullo celebrated the
beauty of the peninsula of Sirmione. For thousands of years,
the mild sub-Mediterranean climate regulated by the lake
water and the ‘Mediterranean’ landscape of the Benàco have
assumed an enduring, strong, cultural and aesthetic attraction, inspiring many poetries and artists (e.g. J.W. Goethe
and G. D’Annunzio).
14.2
171
regulated the Garda basin. The maximum springtime limit is
at present 140 cm in April, while the autumn limit is around
80 cm; the minimum absolute limit is set at 15 cm over
hydrometric zero (Baroni 2010).
14.3
The Origin of Lake Garda Depression:
The Morphostructural Setting
The Garda depression divides two different geological
domains of the Southern Alps, the Lombardy basin to the
west and the Venetian Platform and Trento high ridge to the
east (Fig. 14.2). This depression is located to the south of the
Adamello-Presanella composite batholith, the largest Cainozoic plutonic body in the Alps (Late Eocene to Late
Geographic Setting
Lake Garda is the largest Italian lake, covering a surface of
368 km2 (Fig. 14.1). Its maximum length and width are
51.9 km and 16.7 km respectively, while the perimeter
extends for 155 km. Lake Garda occupies a depression
transversally oriented with respect to the Alpine chain.
Actually, the Garda basin develops in a deep
crypto-depression (−346 m below the present lake level and
−281 m below the mean sea level) roughly oriented NNE–
SSW, stretching from the margin of the Po Plain into the
Southern Alps. The characteristic shape of the lake defines,
along the major axis, two main portions: (i) an inner valley
segment entering the Southern Alps (about 35 km long and
from 3 to 6 km wide); and (ii) a larger portion of the lake
expanding in the foothills up to the maximum width of
16.7 km, bordered by a complex moraine amphitheatre. The
peninsula of Sirmione and the line joining Sirmione—Garda
separate the foothill portion of the lake in two main portions:
the western portion consists of large bays, from Salò to
Desenzano, with depths between 100 m and 200 arranged in
continuity with the maximum depths that characterize the
intermountain valley. The most eastern portion of the piedmont basin, instead, is characterized by relatively low depth,
largely lower than 50 m, anyway not greater than 80 m.
The catchment area covers 2260 km2 and deeply enters in
the Southern Alps, reaching the maximum elevation of
3558 m a.s.l. at Mt. Presanella (Fig. 14.1). The ratio between
the area of the lake and the area of the basin (1:6) is much
greater than that of all other pre-alpine lakes (always less
than 1:30). The total volume of water stored in the lake is
about 50 km3, with an average residence-time of about
28 years. The average lake level is about 0.9 m over
hydrometric zero set at 64.027 m a.s.l. at Peschiera del
Garda. The seasonal fluctuation is around 1 m and maximum values do not exceed 2 m. Since the nineteenth century, a dam across the River Mincio at Peschiera has
Fig. 14.2 Geological sketch map of the Adamello-Presanella Group
area. Legend: 1 Sedimentary cover (upper Permian-Neogene); 2
Paleogene Adamello-Presanella granitoids; 3 Middle Triassic effusive
and intrusive rocks; 4 lower Permian volcanic plateau (mainly rhyolitic
rocks); 5 post-Hercynian granitoids; 6 metamorphic basement rocks; 7
anticline (selected); 8 syncline (selected); 9 main thrust; 10 klippe and
summit overthrust; 11 tectonic window. Redrawn and modified after
Castellarin et al. (1992, 2005) and Baroni (2010)
172
Oligocene in age), intruded in a structural wedge bordered
by the Periadriatic fault system (Insubric Line) and by the
Giudicarie Line (Castellarin et al. 1992; Callegari and Brack
2002; Castellarin et al. 2005). The Garda depression,
developed during the Mesozoic, was successively reactivated on several occasions during the alpine compression,
and still separates structural sectors with different kinematic
behaviour and is still considered as seismogenic.
The complex geological structure of the region strongly
conditioned the geomorphological setting of the area. The
mountain sector of the lake depression deeply enters the
alpine border (Fig. 14.3) and, to the north of Riva del Garda,
is connected with the Sarca River valley (the main tributary
of the Benàco). Further north, the elongated Garda Lake—
Sarca Valley depression extends to a segment of a dead
valley, known as Valle dei Laghi, whose head is suspended
above the Adige Valley and which drained a significant
transfluence of the Adige Glacier toward the Garda Lake
depression during Pleistocene glaciations. In this area, the
geological structure is characterized by a complex sequence
of asymmetric folds conditioned by the activity of the Giudicarie System. In extreme synthesis, the Triassic-Eocene
carbonate succession is divided in NNE–SSW elongated
blocks dipping toward WNW and separated by several tectonic lineaments. The folded-faulted complex system gives
rise to a sequence of monocline morphostructures defining
asymmetric ridges with western structural slopes and eastern
tectonic scarps with dip slopes. Therefore, the resulting
valleys correspond to depressions between tectonic scarps
and dip slopes (Cavallin et al. 1997). This morphostructural
setting is very prone to the development of deep-seated
gravitational slope deformations (DGSDs) along the
C. Baroni
asymmetrical valleys, particularly in correspondence with
the tectonic scarps (Carton 2017). Landslides which originate in this environment are both rock falls detaching from
tectonic scarps and translational landslides along bedding
surfaces on the opposite side of the valleys. Such landslides
are locally known as ‘marocche’ and have been recently
recognized as rock avalanches, able to move for kilometres,
to cross the valley bottom and go up on the opposite slopes
(Cavallin et al. 1997; Castellarin et al. 2005).
The complex geological structure of the area gives rise to
several morphostructures, well identifiable as distinct landscape features, worthy of being considered as geomorphosites. Relevant is the asymmetric syncline hosting the
northern portion of the lake, that gives rise at Mt. Brione, in
the Riva del Garda area, to a cuesta-like structure with
Calcarenite of Middle–Late Oligocene to Early Miocene age
dipping toward WNW (Fig. 14.4).
A sequence of impressive flatirons occurs on the western
slope of the Mt. Baldo ridge. They have developed on the
western side of a faulted anticline structure bordering the
eastern side of the syncline described above (Fig. 14.5).
These morphostructures are elements that give identity to the
landscape of the northern sector of the Lake Garda, being
visible from any observation point.
On the opposite side of the lake, on the western coastal
margin, cliffs due to differential erosion roughly oriented
NNE–SSW represent outstanding landscape features. They
underline the overthrusts developing along the western coast
of the Lake Garda and verging towards ESE and SE
(Tremosine-Tignale thrust and associated folds; Fig. 14.2).
According to Bini et al. (1978) and Finckh (1978), the
Lake Garda crypto-depression (like the crypto-depressions
Fig. 14.3 Panoramic view from N (Mt. Altissimo) of Mt. Baldo ridge on the left, the Lake Garda and on the right the articulated relief of the
western coast (photo G. Carton)
14
Lake Garda: An Outstanding Archive of Quaternary …
173
Fig. 14.4 The northern margin of the Lake Garda with Mt. Brione cuesta-like structure near Riva del Garda (photo G. Carton)
Fig. 14.5 The western slope of
Mt. Baldo with the well
developed flatirons (photo
G. Zordan)
presently hosting the other Pre-Alpine southern lakes)
originated from canyons deeply eroded by rivers during the
Messinian evaporitic drawdown (Late Miocene), when the
Mediterranean basin was isolated from the Atlantic Ocean.
At the beginning of Pliocene, with the opening of Gibraltar
Strait and the filling of the Mediterranean, the sea
transgressed onto the lower part of the Southern Alps foothills, entering the Messinian canyons (Corselli et al. 1985).
The continuous uplift of the region caused a definitive
regression of the sea from the Lombardian plain, which was
then successively filled by continental fluvial and fluvioglacial deposits. In fact, deltaic to continental sediments,
174
C. Baroni
late Miocene to late Pliocene (?) in age, uplifted to elevation
exceeding 500 m at Mt. S. Bartolomeo (Salò), document the
continuous uplift of the western coast of the lake. Neotectonic activity occurred also during the middle and late
Pleistocene, as evidenced by the anticlockwise rotation (toward east) of the moraines of the different phases, and during
the Holocene, as documented by the displacement of
Holocene lake levels (Baroni 1985, 2010).
Neotectonic activity is well documented also in the
southern sector of Mt. Baldo (Forcella and Sauro 1988)
where evident scarps cut and displace dolines and other
karstic features. Furthermore, in the same area a ribbon-like
scarplet documents a recent (Holocene) episode of seismogenic surface faulting, probably originated due to a
destructive earthquake.
14.4
Pleistocene Glaciations
and the Moraine Amphitheatre
The Pleistocene glaciations profoundly re-shaped the main
alpine valleys that reach the Po Plain and repeatedly determined also glacial re-modelling of the Lake Garda depression.
Alpine glaciers infilled the Prealps margin along the Garda
trough several times since at least the late Early Pleistocene.
There is a lively discussion concerning the evidence of Pliocene glaciations in the southern alpine margin. Stoppani in the
nineteenth century hypothesized that glaciers entered into
fjords at the alpine foothills, whilst Corselli et al. (1985) documented a sequence of glaciomarine sediments with striated
pebbles, Pliocene in age, in western Lombardy (Varese). In the
Garda area, evidence of Pliocene glaciation of the southern
alpine margin has not yet found. Quaternary glaciers were
responsible for the deposition of several arcuate ridges that
constitute the moraine amphitheatre of the Lake Garda, edging
the Southern Alps foothills, and advancing on the Po Plain for
tens of kilometres. At least five glacial stages can be recognized
in the moraine amphitheatre, as evidenced by moraine ridges
and related outwash plains, and loess deposits (Penck and
Brückner 1909; Cremaschi 1987). Glacial tills, fluvioglacial
deposits and loess deposits of different age retain several
well-developed paleosoils, which allowed to recognize and
differentiate glacial stages on the basis of their thickness,
rubefaction, clay content and other pedologic characteristics.
These deposits, together with the intercalated paleosoils provide a valuable archive of information for reconstructing and
characterizing paleoclimatic conditions of the entire region.
Aeolian sedimentation typically accompanied glacial periods
and loesses have accumulated since the beginning of the
Middle Pleistocene. On the other hand, three main articulated
phases of large-scale loess sedimentation have been recognized, the oldest pertaining to the late Middle Pleistocene, the
second and the third being attributed to the Late Pleistocene.
These loess deposits are widely distributed along the alpine
margin and on isolated hills of the Po Plain. It is worthy to note
that several archaeological findings allow attributing these two
main phases of aeolian sedimentation to the Mousterian and to
the Upper Paleolithic (Cremaschi 1987).
The oldest glacial deposits of the moraine amphitheatre
are exposed on the western margin of the Ciliverghe hill, a
minor relief feature 1.5 km long and 0.5 km wide, emerging
a dozen of metres above the surrounding fluvioglacial
deposits (sandur). The Ciliverge Hill defines the western
limit of the moraine amphitheatre and lies in between the
continental Garda system and the Pleistocene marine sediments outcropping on the nearby Castenedolo Hill (Cremaschi 1987). Glacial till and related fluvioglacial deposits
are to be found at the base of continental deposits (late Early
Pleistocene in age, Günz Auct.; dated to late Matuyama
paleomagnetic Epoch, presumably postdating the Jaramillo
event; possibly MIS 22).
According to Cremaschi (1987), three glacial phases
recognizable in the Garda amphitheatric system date to the
Middle Pleistocene (Mt. Faita, Carpenedolo and Sedena
Stages. The oldest one, linked to the early Middle Pleistocene (possibly MIS 16), is well recognizable at Mt. Faita,
near Gavardo, at the western margin of the Garda region. On
the other hand, this stage is not really well evidenced further
to the south in the amphitheatre.
Among the other two glacial phases dated to the Middle
Pleistocene, the oldest one (Carpenedolo) is well documented by a series of isolated hills depicting an arcuated and
well identifiable moraine ridge. On the basis of the well
rubified paleosol developed on glacial deposits of this stage
in the Carpenedolo area, covered by loess deposits containing Early Paleolithic artifacts (that supply a minimum
age for the moraine), this stage is possibly linked with MIS
12 (Mindel Auct., or perhaps to MIS 10).
The Sedena stage represents the last glacial phase dated to
Middle Pleistocene and most probably is ascribable to MIS 6
(Riss Auct.). This stage is testified by deeply eroded hills that
represent the remains of a moraine ridge covered by the Late
Pleistocene moraine complex (well evident at the western
margin of the amphitheatre). The Val Sorda section (to the
ESE of Garda, at the LGM border of the moraine
amphitheatre), where two loesses bracket fluvioglacial
deposits, gives the date of this stage. Late Pleistocene glacial
till covers the youngest loess that, in turn, supports a
chernosem-type soil and is most probably datable to a glacial
phase pre-dating the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) (Cremaschi 1987). Loess deposits of this stage in the vicinity of
the section described in Val Sorda supplied Mousterian
artifacts (Middle Paleolithic).
The last recognized stage of the moraine amphitheatre
(Solferino Stage) is dated to the Late Pleistocene and it can
be subdivided in two sub-stages, presumably linkable to
14
Lake Garda: An Outstanding Archive of Quaternary …
MIS 4 and MIS 2, respectively. Moraines from this glacial
stage are widespread and associated with evident outwash
plains that characterize a very wide portion of the Garda
moraine amphitheatre and its surroundings.
The progressive eastward rotation of the glacial tongues
since the Early Pleistocene caused by more pronounced
uplift of the western coast of Lake Garda with respect to the
eastern one explains why the oldest moraines of the
amphitheatre are preserved to the west of the lake and lack in
the eastern side.
14.5
Last Glacial Maximum and Glacial
Retreat
During the last great glacial expansion (LGM, MIS 2)
bracketed between 26–25 and 19 ka, the Alps were almost
completely mantled by a glacial cover, which was characterized by ice caps and ice fields feeding an interconnected
system of valley glaciers (Ehlers and Gibbard 2004; Vai and
Cantelli 2004; Bini et al. 2009). The ice cover reached in the
main valley troughs maximum thickness that in places
exceeded 2000 m. Only the most elevated alpine sharp crests
(arêtes) and pyramidal peaks emerged above the ice.
Powerful ice tongues descending from the Adamello,
Presanella, Ortles-Cevedale and Brenta groups filled the
main and secondary valleys descending to the Po Plain.
These huge valley glaciers reached the Alpine forelands
infilling the depressions in the foothills, which presently host
lakes at the border of the Southern Alps.
Fig. 14.6 Late Pleistocene
moraine of the Garda system in
the vicinity of Salò (photo C.
Baroni)
175
The huge glacier filling the Lake Garda reached the
thickness of about 1000 m near Tremosine and expanded on
the Po Plain to form a flat piedmont glacier (ca. 50 km wide).
The tongue was fed by transfluences from the Adige Valley
(i.e. from the Valle dei Laghi and from the Loppio saddle).
The ablation tongue also insinuated into confluent valleys
locally damming glacio-lacustrine basins. Relict moraines,
together with the ridges of the piedmont moraine amphitheatre depict the elevation reached by the glacier along the lake
trough (Fig. 14.6). Elevation of relict moraines decreases
from the internal portion of the valley toward the southern
border of the former glacier. In the upper lake area elevation
of moraine crests exceeds 1000 m a.s.l., while descending to
the lower lake area elevation is about 650 m at Tremosine,
400 m at Gardone Riviera, 300 m at Manerba del Garda, and
less than 200 m at Solferino, where the minimum elevation is
reached at the southernmost boundary of the amphitheatre.
During the LGM, valley glaciers descending to the Po
Plain also isolated intervening mountain blocks and wide
ridges with secondary valleys, which remained completely
ice free. In fact, the Equilibrium Line Altitude (ELA) reconstructed on the basis of LGM drop in temperature is
estimated to have been located at 1300–1500 m at the
southern margin of the Alps (Kuhlemann et al. 2008). This
means that wide portions of the Prealps located on mountain
blocks delimited by valley tongues were lacking ice cover.
In the Garda region, the glacierization level of the intervening blocks was located at 1600–1700 m, a couple of
hundred metres above the reconstructed ELA for alpine
glaciers. Therefore, wide portion of the Prealps to the west of
176
the Lake Garda were completely deglaciated and only the
highest portions of mountain groups and ridges exceeding
about 1600 m hosted local glaciers.
Very peculiar is the case of the Mt. Baldo, embraced by
the huge Garda valley and piedmont glacier to the west and
by the glacier tongue of the Adige Valley, feeding the small
Rivoli Amphitheatre, to the east. The summit backbone of
the Mt. Baldo (2218 m) was still above the snowline and,
therefore, allowed the development of local cirques glaciers.
On the other hand, a wide deglaciated belt surrounded the
mountain ridge, bounded at the bottom by the Garda glacier
and on top by local cirque glaciers. Only a narrow passage
located in between the Garda and Rivoli amphitheatres
margins allowed the connection of the Mt. Baldo with the Po
Plain.
Elongated valley troughs with very peculiar parabolic
profiles and a number of confluent valleys hanging above the
main valleys emerged as a consequence of the glacial retreat
that followed the LGM. In the paraglacial environment left
by glacial retreat, numerous small and shallow lakes formed
in the intermoraine plains. Sediments from these lakes represent natural archives to investigate paleoenvironmental
evolution of the region, particularly because small lakes are
extremely sensitive to change in precipitation and local
temperature. At Lake Frassino (Peschiera), for example,
lithological, malacological and stable isotope composition of
freshwater shells allowed to recognize lateglacial conditions
as drier than during the Holocene, although a wetter period
was inferred before about 14 ka (Baroni et al. 2006). Data
Fig. 14.7 The Holocene delta of
Toscolano Maderno (view is from
ENE, photo G. Zordan)
C. Baroni
from the Frassino and other localities suggest that the glacial
retreat after the LGM was underway in the Garda Lake area
by 18–19 ka cal BP. Glacier collapse likely started at ca.
16 ka BP and most probably at 15 ka the Garda region was
completely deglaciated. In particular, during Late Glacial
stadiums (since the Gschnitz and later on) glaciers were
confined to the interior of the Adamello-Presanella and
Ortles-Cevedale massifs. At that time, the main troughs and
several confluent valleys were completely deglaciated
(Cavallin et al. 1997; Baroni et al. 2014).
14.6
The Paleo-Lake Garda
and the Holocene
Following the collapse of Late Pleistocene glaciers, the
moraine amphitheatre impounded the elongated valley
crypto-depression and paleo-Lake Garda was established at
elevations higher than those reached at present (65 m a.s.l.;
Baroni 1985, 2010; Cavallin et al. 1997; Castellarin et al.
2005). In fact, LGM moraines produced a damming effect
for the huge amount of water released by melting glaciers.
The not-yet effective erosion of the threshold by the Mincio
River, dammed the paleo-lake at elevation exceeding 30 m
above the present level. The main streams feeding the newly
formed lake started to build deltaic deposits made of sandy
gravels. The apices of lacustrine deltas in correspondence of
the main watercourses witness the existence of very high
lake levels during the Late Glacial. To the north of Salò, on
14
Lake Garda: An Outstanding Archive of Quaternary …
the western coast, streams cut into deep and spectacular
gorges of suspended valleys and fed these deltas (Fig. 14.7).
On the other hand, along the lake’s lower sector the dismantling of the innermost deposits of the moraine
amphitheatre generated several small deltas. The oldest and
highest deltas were terraced as a consequence of the progressive lowering of the lake level during the Late Glacial
and the Early Holocene. The resulting converging scarps
underline the relict suspended deltas, as also clearly evidenced by foreset and topset beds, recognizable up to their
apices, at elevation as high as 100–120 m a.s.l.
Along the rocky shores, large stretches of relict cliffs retain
traces of ancient lake levels such as relict wave-cut notches,
suspended abrasion platform (rocky lacustrine terraces),
paleo-beaches, and calcareous rims. The best-preserved evidences are wave-cut notches and abrasion platforms, these
latter being mainly preserved in the lake’s southwestern sector, swept by dominant winds. The contemporary abrasion
platform emerges at present on the occasion of seasonal
low-standing level of the lake. The most outstanding features
develop at the border of main islands and peninsulas (Sirmione, S. Fermo, Punta Belvedere, Manerba Sasso, Isola S.
Biagio and Isola del Garda).
The highest evidence of paleo-lake levels is preserved in
the Manerba area where wave-cut notches are visible up to
several dozens of metres above the present lake level
(Figs. 14.8 and 14.9). Consistent records of paleo-lake levels
are identifiable at various elevations between 80 m a.s.l. and
the present lake level (65 m a.s.l.). Raised abrasion platforms
in the SW portion of the lake represent the best-preserved
landscape features that testify to high-standing lake levels, the
Fig. 14.8 The high cliff at the
northern margin of Manerba
Sasso with evidence of wave-cut
notches in background, abrasion
platform and erosional caves in
foreground (photo C. Baroni)
177
most spectacular being eroded at about 3.5 m above the present lake level.
Relict beaches made up of rounded and imbricated pebbles also evidence paleo-shorelines of the Lake Garda. They
may be found at several sites and elevations ranging from 1
to ca. 15 m, resting on lacustrine terraces, relict abrasion
platforms, or cemented as gravel patches on rocky cliffs. Of
particular significance is a beach deposit found at about 3 m
above the lake level at Riparo Valtenesi (Sasso di Manerba
del Garda), on top of which a settlement of fishermen, Early
Neolithic in age, was found (Barfield 2007). The lacustrine
gravels supporting the Neolithic settlement and also found in
the surroundings were dated to 9730 ± 70 14C yr BP
(TO-4767) and 10,290 ± 80 14C yr BP (TO-4902) on the
basis of single shells of freshwater gastropods (Bithynia
tentaculata) (Fig. 10), corresponding to 11.0–12.4 ka
calibrated age (Baroni in Barfield 2007; Baroni 2010).
Calcareous rims made up by algal stromatoliths and other
organisms including freshwater gastropods are among the
best indicators of lacustrine relict levels on the rocky coasts
of the upper lake, where they developed from 1 to 5.7 m
above the present lake level. These horizontally arranged
concretion levels overhang the lake and depict the upper
limit of the wet zone along the rocky coast (Cavallin et al.
1997; Baroni 2010). AMS dates of single shells from
freshwater gastropods (Bithynia tentaculata and Theodoxus
fluviatilis) found in the calcareous rims furnished ages
ranging from 10,070 ± 70 (TO-4136) to 6140 ± 60
(TO-4766) 14C yr BP (Cavallin et al. 1997), corresponding
to calibrated ages ranging from 11.3–11.8 ka and
6.9–7.2 cal yr BP.
178
C. Baroni
Fig. 14.9 a Section of the high cliff at the northern margin of Manerba
Sasso with relict wave-cut notches and rock fall at the cliff toe.
b Section through the paleo-beach at Manerba Sasso; radiocarbon date
obtained from freshwater shell (Bithynia tentaculata) collected in the
beach pebbles (modified after Baroni 2010)
Since at least the Early Neolithic the lake level has
never exceeded the height of 68 m (ca. +3 m above the
present lake) as documented by several archaeological
settlements in the perilacustrine area (Aspes et al. 1998;
Barfield 2007). Nevertheless, fluctuations of the Lake
Garda level from some decimetres to not more than 1 m
are documented during the ancient and middle to recent
Bronze Age (4.1–3.5 ka BP, calibrated age) as registered in
different settlement stages of pile-dwellings (Lazise, San
Felice, Gabbiano di Manerba, Moniga, Cisano, etc.).
Stratigraphic evidence of settlement stages are recognizable
below the present lake level and witness lower than present
levels as well documented at Lazise ‘la Quercia’
pile-dwelling. At this site, underwater excavation conducted by the Museum of Verona revealed various phases
of occupation and abandonment of the pile-dwellings,
which are clearly related to lowering and subsequent risings of the lake level (Aspes et al. 1998).
Along the western coast of the Lake Garda, shorelines of
the same age may be found at different elevations and relative uplift of about 1 m of the shore to the north of Salò in
respect to the Manerba-Sirmione area took place between ca.
12–10 ka and the present (with a mean estimated rate of ca.
10 cm/1000 years) as inferred by 14C dates obtained from
relict shorelines and beaches along the coastal margin of
Lake Garda respect to their elevation (Cavallin et al. 1997;
Baroni 2010).
References
Aspes A, Baroni C, Fasani L (1998) Umweltveränderungen und ihre
Folgen für die Bevölkerung der Bronzezeit in Norditalien. Mensch
und Umvelt in der Bronzezeit Europas. Seminar für Ur-und
Frühgeschichte der Freien Universität, Berlin, pp 419–426
Barfield LH (ed) (2007) Excavations in the Riparo Valtenesi, Manerba,
1976–1994. ORIGINES, Studi e materiali pubblicati a cura
dell’Istituto Italiano di Preistoria e Protostoria, Firenze, 593 pp
Baroni C (1985) Note sulla paleogeografia olocenica della costa
occidentale del Lago di Garda. Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 8:49–61
Baroni C (2010) Paleolivelli tardoglaciali e olocenici del Lago di
Garda. In: Orombelli G, Cassinis G, Gaetani M (eds) Una nuova
geologia per la Lombardia. Convegno in onore di Maria Bianca
Cita, Milano 6–7 Novembre 2008, Istituto Lombardo Accademia di
Scienze e Lettere. Incontri di Studio, 54, LED Edizioni Universitarie, Milano, pp 231–254
Baroni C, Martino S, Salvatore MC, Scarascia Mugnozza G, Schilirò L
(2014) Thermomechanical stress-strain numerical modelling of
deglaciation since the Last Glacial Maximum in the Adamello
Group (Rhaetian Alps, Italy). Geomorphology 226:278–299
Baroni C, Zanchetta G, Fallick AE, Longinelli A (2006) Mollusca
stable isotope record of a core from Lake Frassino, northern Italy:
hydrological and climatic changes during the last 14 ka. The
Holocene 16:827–837
Bini A, Cita MB, Gaetani M (1978) Southern Alpine lakes. Hypothesis
of an erosional origin related to the Messinian entrenchment. Mar
Geol 27(3–4):271–288
Bini A, Buoncristiani F, Couterrand S, Ellwanger D, Felber M,
Florineth D, Graf HR, Keller O, Kelly M, Schlüchter C, Schöneich
P (2009) Die Schweiz Während des Letzteiszeitlichen Maximums
(LGM) 1:500,000. Bundesamt für Landestopografie Swisstopo,
Wabern, Switzerland
14
Lake Garda: An Outstanding Archive of Quaternary …
Callegari E, Brack P (2002) Geological map of the Tertiary Adamello
batholith (Northern Italy). Explanatory notes and legend. Mem Sci
Geol 54:19–49
Carton A (2017) Large ancient landslides in Trentino, northeastern
Alps, as evidence of post-glacial dynamics. In: Soldati M,
Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and Landforms of Italy. Springer,
Cham, pp 113–122
Castellarin A, Cantelli L, Fesce AM, Mercier JL, Picotti V, Pini GA,
Prosser G, Selli L (1992) Alpine compressional tectonics in the
Southern Alps: Relationships with the N-Apennines. Annales
Tectonicae 6(1):62–94
Castellarin A, Picotti V, Cantelli L, Claps M, Trombetta L, Selli L,
Carton A, Borsato A, Daminato F, Nardin M, Santuliana E,
Veronese L, Bollettinari G (2005) Foglio 080—Riva del Garda.
Note illustrative della Carta Geologica d’Italia, APAT, Provincia
Autonoma di Trento, 145 pp
Cavallin A, Baroni C, Bini A, Carton A, Marchetti M, Orombelli G,
Pelfini M, Zanchi A (1997) Geomorphology of the Central and Southern
Alps. In: Fourth International Conference on Geomorphology, Guide
for the Excursion. Suppl Geogr Fis Dinam Quat III(2):13–47
Corselli C, Cremaschi M, Violanti D (1985) The Messinian canyon
near Malnate (Varese); late Miocene pedogensis and Pliocene
marine transgression of the southern margin of the Alps. Riv Ital
Paleontol Stratigr 91(2):259–286
179
Cremaschi M (1987) Paleosols and vetusols in the central Po Plain
(Northern Italy). A study in Quaternary Geology and Soil Development, Edizioni Unicopli, Milano, 307 pp
Ehlers J, Gibbard PL (2004) Quaternary Glaciations—Extent and
Chronology. Part I: Europe. Development in Quaternary Science 2.
Elsevier, Amsterdam, 475 pp
Finckh PC (1978) Are southern alpine lakes former messinian canyons?
Geophysical evidence for preglacial erosion in the southern alpine
lakes. Mar Geol 27:289–302
Forcella F, Sauro U (1988) Morphotectonic evolution of the southern
sector of the Mt. Baldo (Prealpi Venete). Suppl Geogr Fis Dinam
Quat I:83–87
Kuhlemann J, Rohling EJ, Krumrei I, Kubik P, Ivy-Ochs S, Kucera M
(2008) Regional synthesis of mediterranean atmospheric circulation
during the Last Glacial Maximum. Science 321(5894):1338–1440
Penck A, Brückner E (1909) Die Alpen im Eiszeitalter, vol. 2, Die
Eiszeiten in den Südalpen und im Bereich der Ostabdachung der
Alpen. Tauchnitz, Leipzig, pp 717–1197
Vai GB, Cantelli L (eds) (2004) Litho-Palaeoenvironmental maps of
Italy during the last two climatic extremes. Map 1—Last Glacial
Maximum. 32nd International Geological Congress Publications,
Litografia Artistica Cartografica S.r.l., Firenze
Geomorphological Processes and Landscape
Evolution of the Lagoon of Venice
15
Aldino Bondesan
Abstract
The Lagoon of Venice, extending along the northern Adriatic coast in northeastern Italy, is
the most important Italian lagoon. The delta systems of the Po, Adige and Brenta rivers
delineate the lagoon from the south, whilst the Sile and Piave rivers border the lagoon in the
north. The lagoon is closed by the barrier islands of Lido and Pellestrina and the spit of
Cavallino. Inside the lagoon, several landforms typical of this peculiar environment are
present: islands, salt marshes, tidal flats, fluvial deltas, tidal channels, sand dunes, ancient
coastlines and man-made forms such as landfills, fish farms, coastal defences and artificial
channels. Due to protracted human interference with natural processes, the Lagoon of
Venice may be considered today as an artificial environment.
Keywords
Lagoon
15.1
Salt marshes
Venice
Introduction
The Lagoon of Venice is the largest Italian lagoon and the
most important heritage of the system of estuarine lagoons
that for thousands of years and until the last century extended along the coast of the Adriatic Sea between Trieste and
Ravenna, in northeastern Italy. The term “lagoon” is derived
from the Italian laguna, which refers specifically to the
Lagoon of Venice.
The lagoons are subjected to highly dynamic coastal
processes, responsible for a fragile balance between terrestrial and marine processes, where, very often, an important
role is played by humans. In fact, despite the history of
significant environmental changes that occurred during the
middle and late Holocene, the current setting of the Lagoon
of Venice is mainly the result of a series of human interventions, especially those implemented in the last five
centuries.
A. Bondesan (&)
Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università di Padova, Via Gradenigo
6, 35131 Padua, Italy
e-mail: aldino.bondesan@unipd.it
15.2
Adriatic Sea
Geographical Setting
The Lagoon of Venice is located in the Gulf of Venice
(northern Adriatic Sea), along the coastal fringe of the
Venetian–Friulian Plain. The lagoon basin forms an arc
about 55 km long and 8–13 km wide. It is separated from
the open sea by a narrow coastal strip consisting of a series
of barrier islands (Fig. 15.1). From the ENE, the spit of
Cavallino is the largest one, which in the past was nourished
by the mouth of the Piave River. It is followed by the two
barrier islands of Lido and Pellestrina, while further south
the lagoon is separated from the sea by the left wing of the
fluvial delta of the Brenta River (Fig. 15.1).
The inner boundary that separates the lagoon from the
mainland is in most cases marked by artificial hydraulic
works. Figure 15.2 shows the lagoon boundary, the
so-called Conterminazione lagunare, which is more an
administrative border than a geographical one. It was fixed
with 99 stones in 1791 by the Venetian Republic and was
updated by the Magistrato alle Acque (Water Authority) at
the end of the 1990s.
On both sides of the lagoon, a system of river mouths
debouch into the Adriatic Sea. To the south, the large Po
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_15
181
182
A. Bondesan
Fig. 15.1 Location
map. Satellite image of the
Lagoon of Venice and its
mainland (Aster Image, 9
December 2001)
delta juts out into the sea; between the delta and the lagoon,
the Adige and Brenta rivers (which also receive the waters of
the Bacchiglione River) bring sediments to the southern part
of the lagoon. To the north, the Sile, which occupied an old
riverbed of the Piave in 1683, and the Piave rivers are
delineating the lagoon, the latter with clearly identified fluvial ridges and deltas. Even in historical times, the Brenta
and Sile poured their waters into the lagoon, but they have
gradually been diverted outside it over the last five centuries.
Inside the lagoon basin, in addition to Venice and
Chioggia, which are the two major groups of islands, there
are other inhabited islands of appreciable size, such as
Murano, Burano, Torcello and Sant’Erasmo. The others are
smaller and almost all uninhabited.
The periodic ebb and flow of the sea water in connection
with the cycle of the tides occurs via three tidal inlets at
Chioggia, Malamocco and Lido.
15.3
Geomorphological Evolution
The Lagoon of Venice is part of the Venetian–Friulian plain
formed by deposition by large river systems alternating with
marine transgression. This sequence was mainly driven by
the glacial and interglacial phases related to global climate
cycles that occurred during the late Pleistocene and
Holocene.
The central stretch of the Veneto plain consists of three
alluvial megafans. The westernmost megafan was built by
the Brenta River and stretches roughly in the NW–SE
direction from the Brenta valley to the Venetian mainland.
To the east, it borders the megafan of the Piave of Montebelluna, formed when the river was entering the plain west
of Montello hill. Montello is located at the eastern end of the
apex of the current Piave alluvial fan (megafan of the Piave
of Nervesa).
15
Geomorphological Processes and Landscape Evolution of the Lagoon of Venice
183
Fig. 15.2 Geomorphological sketch map of the Lagoon of Venice.
Legend: 1 lagoonal inlet pool; 2 ancient lagoon inlet; 3 ancient
coastline (5 ka BP); 4 ancient administrative lagoon boundary (Conterminazione lagunare); 5 depression in lagoon floor; 6 embankments;
7 tidal flat; 8 salt marsh; 9 artificial salt marsh; 10 sand dune; 11 relict
of ancient barrier island; 12 lagoon tidal delta; 13 fish farm; 14 lagoon
channel; 15 fluvial delta inside the lagoon; 16 reclaimed lagoon surface
(Delta Brenta, 1840–1896); 17 landfill; 18 urbanized area
The plain to the west of the central and southern part of
the Lagoon of Venice represents the terminus of the Holocene depositional system of the Brenta. This system is bordered to the north by the late Pleistocene deposits of the
Brenta and to the south by the Holocene deposit of the
Adige, with smaller contribution from the Po. The morphogenetic activity of the Bacchiglione is forced inside the
large hollow formed by the juxtaposition of the Brenta
system with the Adige system (Fontana et al. 2008, 2010;
Carton et al. 2009).
The top of the Pleistocene deposits is marked by a
paleosol—locally known as caranto—that contains carbonate concretions that are centimetres thick. This separates the
Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) alluvial deposits from the
overlying back barrier ones. Its top is an unconformity surface marking the Holocene–Pleistocene boundary between 4
and 7 m below mean sea level within the Lagoon of Venice
(Donnici et al. 2011).
The formation of the lagoon took place after the marine
transgression started at the end of the last glacial period,
184
which reached its maximum in the Upper Atlantic (5–6 ka
BP). In the Lagoon of Venice, the coastal wedge is quite thin
and short, while most of the post-LGM deposits are lagoonal. Radiocarbon dating has shown that the paralic sediments
along the margins of the lagoon are 1–2 thousands of years
older than in Venice itself, where a structural high is present
and lagoonal deposits range in age from 5.5 to 4.7 ka BP
(Ammerman et al. 1995; Serandrei-Barbero et al. 2001,
2002). Alluvial and swamp deposits were buried by the
marine ingression around 6.8 ka BP in the northern basin
(Canali et al. 2007) and around 6 ka BP in the southern one
(Favero and Serandrei-Barbero 1980).
After the maximum marine transgression, which went
beyond the present coastline (Fig. 15.3, line A), a regression
phase began, probably helped by the contribution of sediments from the Brenta in the southern sector of the lagoon
and more to the south by the Adige and the Po. In the areas
behind the line of maximum ingression, swamps and bogs
A. Bondesan
formed as an effect of flooding and stagnation of fresh water
(5–6 ka BP). In a relatively short period, the coastline
moved forwards about 5 ka BP, towards the alignment of
Motte Cucco–Peta de Bo–Val Grande (Fig. 15.3, line B).
Upstream of this ancient shoreline, the first lagoons formed;
from about 5 ka BP to mediaeval times we saw gradual
development of the lagoon basins, fostered mainly by the
stability of the coastline and the fact that the areas behind the
barrier islands were not directly affected by the clastic
contributions of rivers.
Between 2.8 and 2.5 ka BP the coastline rapidly moved
forward along the Cavanella d’Adige–Sant’Anna–Chioggia
line (Fig. 15.3, line C), where it remained until mediaeval
times. Subsequent advancement of the coastline was probably caused by the Po River, but it was the Adige River
which played a major role in sedimentation along the
southern margin of the Lagoon. Also the Brenta River
markedly contributed to coastal progradation, especially
after an artificial fluvial diversion occurred at the end of the
nineteenth century.
On the northern side of the lagoon, shoreline position was
more stable and shoreline progradation started around 3 ka
BP, induced by the action of the Piave River mouth
(Amorosi et al. 2008). A marked advance was driven by the
construction of the jetties at San Nicolò Port when, starting
from 1872, a 2 km wide beach formed in about 80 years.
15.4
Landforms
The landforms inside the Lagoon of Venice can be classified
according to the morphogenetic processes that have shaped
them. Hence, alluvial, lagoonal and coastal features may be
distinguished. These forms can be further classified
according to bathymetry as subtidal zones located below the
level of the average low tides; intertidal zones, alternately
submerged and emerged; and supratidal zones (high tide
platforms), submerged only by the highest tides (Fig. 15.2).
15.4.1
Fig. 15.3 The variations of the coastline in the southern part of the
Lagoon of Venice. Legend: Line A limit of the maximum Holocenic
ingression, after Favero and Serandrei-Barbero 1980; line B coastline of
San Pietro di Cavarzere–Motte Cucco–Motta Palazzetto–Peta de Bo;
line C: coastline Cavanella d’Adige–Sant’Anna–Chioggia; line D:
present coastline; inner margin of the lagoon and coastline derived from
historical cartography: 1 sixteenth century; 2 seventeenth century; 3
barrier island and complex of dunes, levelled or in elevation; ancient
barrier island derived from: 4 historical cartography; 5 satellite images
(modified after Bondesan and Meneghel 2004)
Alluvial Landforms
Within the Lagoon of Venice, alluvial and relict landforms
inherited from continental environments are found. Among
these, fluvial ridges, which are partially or completely submerged, form positive features inside the lagoon. These
landforms are related to fluvial sedimentation due to repeated overbanking during floods. They can be relict forms
determined by a natural or artificial withdrawal of the lagoon
rim (which led to a partial submergence of the ridge) or they
may have been generated by the advance of continental
fluvial ridges in the lagoon environment. They are present in
15
Geomorphological Processes and Landscape Evolution of the Lagoon of Venice
parts of the coastal plain invaded by the waters that now
form the lagoon bottom, where there has been no subsequent
sedimentation.
The fluvial deltas inside the lagoon are built of deltaic
deposits formed along the lagoon’s inner margin. The rivers,
which at various times have poured their waters into the
lagoon, created inner deltas with their sediments, consequently reducing the water surface area. The sediments are
poorly reworked and deposits are generally thin, in a fan
shape along the delta channels.
Some of the islands closest to the inner lagoonal margin
arose on the fluvial deposits of rivers entering the lagoon.
15.4.2
Lagoon Landforms
Lagoonal landforms are widespread, and some have local
names that have sometimes been proposed as scientific terms
in Italian scientific literature.
The salt marshes (It.: barene) are among the most characteristic morphological elements of the lagoon. They are
loamy, sandy flats situated a few centimetres above the sea
level, dominated by dense stands of salt-tolerant plants such
as herbs, grasses or low shrubs that contribute to their conservation. Currently, the lower limit of survival of halophilic
vegetation coincides with the average sea level. They match,
though not always perfectly, the forms defined by the
Fig. 15.4 Salt marshes, tidal
flats and tidal creeks during low
tide (photo A. Bondesan)
185
international terms of haute slikke or schorre. They are
characterized by a somewhat varying size and shape, but
often in the vicinity of the channels they have a raised edge
and a more depressed central part, similar to a “bowl”
morphology. In other contexts, their form is tabular, with
depressed edges or edges inclined towards the ponds where
they link up with the intertidal flat. Various types of salt
marshes
were
distinguished
by
Favero
and
Serandrei-Barbero (1983), depending on their continental
(morphological relicts of the alluvial paleoplain inundated
by marine transgression and subsequently emerged) or
lagoonal origin (deposits that have developed as a result of
natural lagoonal processes) and on the evolutionary behaviour that characterizes them.
Salt marshes of lagoon channel (It.: barene di canale) are
very peculiar and largely present in the northern basin of the
Lagoon of Venice. They are part of the natural levées located
on the edge of the lagoon channels whose morphology is
characterized by the presence of a raised edge at the feeder
and a surface that slopes towards the side away from the
channel (Fig. 15.4). The term “gengiva” (gum) has been
proposed for submerged channel levées.
The mud flats (It.: velme) are barren silty intertidal flats
located just below the sea level and extending from the
lowest portion of the intertidal zone to the marsh areas. They
usually show a low slope inclination. They are indicated in
the international scientific literature by the terms tidal flats,
186
marsh flats or slikke. These flat plains are limited by the
network of lagoon channels that starts from the inlets and
branch off into smaller courses.
For the subtidal forms, the term “swamp” (It.: palude) is
locally used to indicate the portions of the lagoon bottom
that are located below the average low tide level. Based on
the morphology of the lagoon, other forms have also been
identified, including depressions in the lagoon floor (generally less than 1–1.5 m) on which there is little deposition of
lagoon sediments.
Water interchange occurs through three tidal inlets (It.:
bocca di porto or porto), which identify three lagoon basins
separated by underwater watershed lines, each of which has
a dendritic network of lagoon channels that converges to
each inlet. In former times, there were up to eight ancient
tidal inlets, but these are now silted up.
The widest basin is that of the Port of Lido, which
includes about 50% of the surface of the lagoon. The
Malamocco basin includes about 30% of the lagoon and the
Chioggia basin includes about 20%. At the inlets, also as a
result of the construction of jetties, the ebb and flow creates
strong currents that have dug lagoonal inlet pools. These are
the deepest areas of the lagoon (approximately 50 m deep at
Malamocco, 38 m deep at Chioggia, and 30 m deep at
Lido).
The entire lagoon, including the subtidal zone, is crossed
by a dense network of tidal channels representing the circulatory system of water coming into the lagoon from the
tidal inlets and reducing their section inwards. The natural
hydrographic network is defined by at least three orders of
channels: (1) main channels that convey the fluvial or
lagoonal water to the sea; (2) secondary channels that flow
from the main channels draining or dispersing water within
Fig. 15.5 Salt marshes next to
the lagoon channel along the
Cenesa Canal in the northern
Lagoon of Venice (photo A.
Bondesan)
A. Bondesan
the lagoon basin; and (3) tertiary channels that depart from
the main channels or, more frequently, from the secondary
ones and meander between mud flats and salt marshes. The
latter (tidal creeks) are usually delimited by smooth levées,
often no more than 20 cm high. The tidal creeks are locally
known as ghebi. They often feed small ponds of brackish
water, indicated by the local term “chiari”.
The main channels have locally been recognized to be the
legacy of an ancient river hydrographic system that existed
before the marine transgression. In places, they are still
linked with the tributaries of the lagoon.
The natural levées of lagoon channels are formed by
sedimentary bodies on the sides of a channel, generated by
the ebb and flow of tidal currents according to a genetic
process similar to the formation of fluvial ridges in a continental environment. The contribution of sediments derived
mainly from the tidal inlets form large salt marshes and tidal
flats (Fig. 15.5).
The dendritic pattern of tidal channels that branch off
from the inlets to the interior of the lagoon shapes a tidal
lagoon delta (“flood delta”), formed by the complex of
islands, salt marshes, mud flats and natural levées of the
lagoon channel. In this sense, the city of Venice and the
large islands on the northern side of the lagoon are considered to be part of the great tidal lagoon delta of the Port of
Lido inlet.
15.4.3
Coastal Landforms
Some islands and old barrier islands, now incorporated
within the lagoon, have marine origin. A typical example is
the island of Sant’Erasmo, a stretch of ancient coastline
15
Geomorphological Processes and Landscape Evolution of the Lagoon of Venice
isolated inside the lagoon that subsequently formed in a
more advanced seawards position, the Cavallino coast (a
large spit protruding from the northeastern coastal plain) and
the barrier island of Lido. Other ancient beach ridges have
been identified on the lagoon floor using remote sensing,
historical maps and underwater surveys.
Seawards, the Lagoon of Venice is bordered by barrier
islands and spits, characterized by variable widths from a
few dozen metres to a few kilometres; these are Pellestrina,
Lido di Venezia and Cavallino. Sottomarina constitutes the
left wing of a protruding fluvial delta of the Brenta River.
Sand dunes have formed along the beaches, especially
close to the inlets and along the river mouths where the
sedimentary load was particularly high. Starting from the
beginning of the nineteenth century, all the beaches have
been subjected to drastic erosion, partially countered by the
construction of dams, jetties, coastal defences and artificial
nourishments.
15.5
An Artificial Landscape:
Human-Induced Transformations
Human intervention in the lagoon environment commenced
with the first human occupation, starting from Roman times
along the lagoonal rim and from the fifth century AD in the
town of Venice (Fig. 15.6), when the islands started to give
refuge to Romanised people fleeing the Hun invasions.
Fig. 15.6 Aerial view of Venice.
San Marco Square on the right
(photo A. Bondesan)
187
The lagoon extent was regulated by the presence of river
deltas and lagoon inlets, being controlled in their evolution
by river sediment loads and tidal dynamics. After the twelfth
century, the lagoon inlets were menaced by the progressive
shallowing of water due to sand deposition caused by sedimentary drift converging in front of the lagoon from the
side fluvial deltas (mostly the Piave and Adige rivers) and by
silting up of the lagoon basin, mostly due to internal sedimentation of the Brenta and Sile rivers. For that reason, the
Republic of Venice undertook an epic struggle against the
rivers, diverting them outside the lagoon or turning them far
aside. The projects were only partially carried out, mostly
during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, changing not
only the morphology of the surrounding alluvial plain and
the coastal margin but also altering water dynamics and the
pace of erosional processes. In order to prevent the lagoon
from turning into a marshland, Venetian hydraulic projects
reversed the natural evolution of the lagoon, in time causing
progressive erosion of the main landforms, the coasts and the
lagoon bottom (Bondesan and Furlanetto 2012).
Anthropogenic forms in the Lagoon of Venice have
important, quite invasive, presence. Most of the islands of
the lagoon are in fact associated with human intervention,
which contributed to their elevation and conservation though
defensive works (Fig. 15.7).
In the last two centuries, many transformations have been
induced by humans. Peculiar features of the lagoon include
the following. Fish farms (It.: valli da pesca) occupy an area
188
equal to 16% of the water surface. They represent large
lagoonal areas surrounded by embankments used for traditional fish farming, where water exchange is artificially
regulated and natural processes are slowed down or halted
(Fig. 15.8). Hydraulic reclamation for agriculture changed
large parts of the inner margin, especially on the southern
side of the lagoon where the Brenta River used to enter into
the lagoon before its final deviation at the end of nineteenth
century. Landfills are largely present in most of the islands
and the industrial site of Porto Marghera. In the twentieth
century, the Marco Polo International Airport was constructed inside the lagoon, occupying large tidal flats.
Among the lagoon islands, the large reclaimed areas
known as casse di colmata have to be mentioned for their
impact on the lagoon environment. Their construction took
place from the 1920s to the 1960s, to accommodate the
expansion of the industrial port and the vast complex of
factories of Porto Marghera facing the lagoon. The industrial
port is today connected to the Malamocco inlet by the
Malamocco-Marghera Canal. This canal has an average
depth of 15 m. Some of the most serious causes of degradation of the lagoon are due to its existence. In fact, it has
increased the volume and speed of tidal inflows and outflows, resulting in the intense and rapid dismantling of the
lagoon bottom.
Materials resulting from the excavation of the channel
were used in the 1960s to create reclaimed areas for the
Third Industrial Zone (never completed). In addition to the
strong impact that the reclaimed areas had and still have on
the lagoon, the fundamental problem is that these extended
“artificial islands” have affected the quantity and quality of
water exchange. In 1986, the first measures were approved
for the hydro-morphological recovery of the site to restore
some of the previously existing channels.
The gradual increase in sea level and the reduced longshore drift caused the pronounced erosion of the Venetian
beaches, which the Republic of Venice has tried to protect
since 1300 AD. The efforts to defend the littoral against the
aggressive action of the sea culminated in the eighteenth
century with the construction of the murazzi (large stone
walls).
The barrier island of Pellestrina is the most slender island
between Malamocco and Chioggia (Fig. 15.7c). In the early
1990s, it was reduced in some places to a width of a few tens
of metres, making the Lagoon of Venice extremely fragile (it
was bypassed by the waves in the surge that occurred in
1966).
In 1994, enormous artificial nourishment consisting of
about 4.6 million cubic metres of sand was accomplished
along approximately 9 km of coastline for an initial width of
A. Bondesan
Fig. 15.7 Islands of the Lagoon of Venice. a Burano Island. The
lagoon border is in the background, and the Alps are in the distance.
b A typical small lagoon island (abandoned by people). They are
usually artificially elevated with sediment accumulation and protected
from erosion by concrete or stone walls. c The barrier island of
Pellestrina is extremely narrow along its southern stretch (photos A.
Bondesan)
15
Geomorphological Processes and Landscape Evolution of the Lagoon of Venice
189
Fig. 15.8 Fish farms in the southern basin of the lagoon (Valle Averto). In the foreground is the system of pools for fish recovery, and in the
background is the network of embankments (photo A. Bondesan)
Fig. 15.9 Exceptional tide peaks are causing increasingly frequent flooding of Venice (photo DeepGreen/www.shutterstock.com)
190
A. Bondesan
about 100 m. This work, unprecedented in Europe, was
completed in March 1999. The sand came from a submarine
quarry located about 20 km off Malamocco in deep water
from 20 to 24 m. This sand consisted of sediments belonging to transgressive coastal deposits. The intervention was
supported by maritime works, such as jetties connected to a
submerged berm, in order to form an organized structure in
cells that can more effectively slow down erosion of sand.
Situated in the enclosed Gulf of Venice, the lagoon is
subject to high variations in water levels due to extreme tides
and low atmospheric pressure. These tides regularly flood
much of Venice (Fig. 15.9). In the last decade, a huge effort
was made to safeguard the Lagoon of Venice through the
MOSE system (MOdulo Sperimentale Elettromeccanico,
Experimental Electromechanical Module), which is an
integrated system consisting of rows of movable gates
installed at the Lido, Malamocco and Chioggia inlets that
can temporarily isolate the Lagoon of Venice from the
Adriatic Sea during high tides. MOSE is designed to protect
Venice and the lagoon from tides of up to 3 m and from sea
storms. The works to realize MOSE changed morphology at
the tidal inlets and the jetties. Other defensive measures
include construction of complex coastal defences, raising of
quaysides and restoration through artificial re-nourishment
of salt marshes and mudflats, subject to pronounced erosion
during the last century, using the sediments excavated from
canals.
15.6
Land Subsidence of Venice
Venice has suffered from both natural subsidence, ranging
between 0.5 (Kent et al. 2002) and 1.3 mm/year (Carbognin
et al. 2010) during the Quaternary period, and anthropogenic
subsidence, particularly as an effect of over-exploitation of
artesian aquifers for industrial water supply beginning in the
1930s and reaching its maximum from the 1950s to 1970s,
when it doubled. The closure of the artesian wells in the
1970s resulted in a slight rebound (2 cm) and slowing down
of anthropogenic subsidence. The subsidence recorded at the
end of the last century was 1–3 mm/year along the coastline
and 2–4 mm/year at the furthermost northern and southern
boundaries (Carbognin et al. 2010). The elevation loss since
1897 is about 26 cm; 3 cm is the result of natural subsidence, 9 cm is the result of anthropogenic land subsidence
and 14 cm is the result of an increase in the eustatic sea
level. The subsidence caused an increase in the frequency
and amount of flooding as well as erosion of the lagoon
intertidal areas and the littoral (Brambati et al. 2003).
15.7
Conclusions
The Lagoon of Venice is characterized by complex morphology, with very different environments from the mainland
and the sea, and contains constantly evolving landforms.
Largely protected from silting by the Venetians in past centuries, it is now threatened by erosion caused by breaking
waves and tidal forces. Man’s interventions have been a
decisive factor in a process that allowed preservation of the
lagoon over the centuries. In this sense, the Lagoon of Venice
is today a sort of open laboratory where human action drives
or counters natural processes that challenge its survival.
References
Ammerman AJ, De Min M, Housley R, McLennen CE (1995) More on
the origins of Venice. Antiquity 69:501–510
Amorosi A, Fontana A, Antonioli F, Primon S, Bondesan A (2008)
Post-LGM sedimentation and Holocene shoreline evolution in the
NW Adriatic coastal area. Geoacta 7:41–67
Bondesan A, Furlanetto P (2012) The artificial fluvial diversions in the
mainland of the Lagoon of Venice during the XVI and XVII
centuries inferred by historical cartography analysis. Géomorphologie 2:175–200
Bondesan A, Meneghel M (2004) Geomorfologia della Provincia di
Venezia. Esedra, Padova 516 pp
Brambati A, Carbognin L, Quaia T, Teatini P, Tosi L (2003) The
lagoon of Venice: geological setting, evolution and land subsidence.
32nd International Geological Congress. Episodes 26(3):264–268
Canali G, Capraro L, Donnici S, Rizzetto F, Serandrei-Barbero R,
Tosi L (2007) Vegetational and environmental changes in the
eastern Venetian coastal plain (northern Italy) over the past 80,000
years. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 253:300–316
Carbognin L, Teatini P, Tomasin A, Tosi L (2010) Global change and
relative sea level rise at Venice: What impact in term of flooding.
Clim Dyn 35:1055–1063
Carton A, Bondesan A, Fontana A, Meneghel M, Miola A, Mozzi P,
Primon S, Surian N (2009) Geomorphological evolution and
sediment transfer in the Piave River system (Northeastern Italy)
since the Last Glacial Maximum. Géomorphologie 3:155–174
Donnici S, Serandrei-Barbero R, Bini C, Bonardi M, Lezziero A (2011)
The caranto paleosol and Its role in the early urbanization of Venice.
Geoarchaeology 26(4):514–543
Favero V, Serandrei-Barbero R (1980) Origine ed evoluzione della
laguna di Venezia-bacino meridionale. Lavori della Società
Veneziana di Scienze Naturali 5:49–71
Favero V, Serandrei-Barbero R (1983) Oscillazioni del livello del mare
ed evoluzione paloambientale della Laguna di Venezia nell’area
compresa tra Torcello e il margine lagunare. Lavori della Società
Veneziana di Scienze Naturali 8:83–102
Fontana A, Mozzi P, Bondesan A (2008) Alluvial megafans in the
Venetian-Friulian Plain (north-eastern Italy): evidence of sedimentary and erosive phases during late Pleistocene and Holocene.
Quatern Int 189:71–90
Fontana A, Mozzi P, Bondesan A (2010) Late Pleistocene evolution of
the Venetian-Friulian Plain Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e
Naturali 21(1) Suppl: 181–196
15
Geomorphological Processes and Landscape Evolution of the Lagoon of Venice
Kent VD, Rio D, Massari F, Kukla G, Lanci L (2002)
Emergence of Venice during the Pleistocene. Quatern Sci
Rev 21:1719–1727
Serandrei-Barbero R, Donnici S, Lezziero A (2002) Contributo alla
conoscenza dell’Area Arsenale a Venezia: L’evoluzione del
191
territorio negli ultimi 25000 anni. Atti dell’Istituto Veneto di
Scienze Lettere ed Arti 160:363–383
Serandrei-Barbero R, Lezziero A, Albani A, Zoppi U (2001) Depositi
tardo-pleistocenici ed olocenici nel sottosuolo veneziano: Paleoambienti e cronologia. Il Quaternario 14:9–22
The Po Delta Region: Depositional Evolution,
Climate Change and Human Intervention
Through the Last 5000 Years
16
Marco Stefani
Abstract
The Holocene depositional evolution and landform development of the Po River delta area
are hereafter illustrated. Eustasy, climate and a growing degree of human intervention
largely influenced the delta history. During late phases of the post-glacial transgression, two
large estuarine bays developed. About 3000 years ago, the growth of a rectilinear coastline,
under high energy meteo-marine conditions, closed the bays. Several generations of
wave-dominated delta lobes then prograded into the sea. The modern delta was induced
400 years ago by the digging of an artificial canal and records very fast environmental
modification. The present-day framework is largely artificial in nature and subject to a
growing degree of environmental dangers, such as river and sea water flooding. Significant
landscape values are nevertheless surviving in the region.
Keywords
Depositional dynamics
Adriatic Sea
16.1
Climate change
Introduction
The Po is the largest river of Italy, forming a wide alluvial
plain (Pianura Padana) and reaching the Adriatic Sea
through a splay of delta distributary channels. The Po River
delta area of northern Italy (Fig. 16.1) records a widespread
transgressive-regressive evolution of Holocene age. Through
the last 5000 years, several generations of delta lobes
advanced for 30–40 km into the northern Adriatic Sea, laterally shifting over 90 km of latitude (Fig. 16.2). Only a
younger portion of the progradational units keeps a geomorphic expression and can be directly examined in outcrop,
since the sediments older than about 4000 years are all
buried. The region records major palaeogeographic change,
from estuarine bays, through rectilinear wave-dominated
coastlines, to jagged delta lobe shapes. The palaeogeographical evolution was largely influenced by the changing
M. Stefani (&)
Dipartimento di Architettura, Università di Ferrara, Via della
Ghiara 36, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
e-mail: stm@unife.it
Human settlement
Holocene
Po Delta
climate framework and by the growing anthropic intervention, an influence well-recorded inland by the Po River
system (Marchetti 2008). This contribution is focused on the
role of climate fluctuations and human activity in the
changing depositional style of the sedimentary units
outcropping in the coastal plain of the Po River. Reconstruction of the evolution is particularly detailed for the
modern delta lobe, grown since the beginning of the seventeenth century AD, because of the wealth of historic
documentation, integrated with the physical evidence.
The delta is developed in a tectonically active depositional basin, at the junction between the buried Apennine
chain and the Venice monocline (Pieri and Groppi 1981).
The structural framework induces tectonic subsidence, largely enhanced by sediment compaction and anthropogenic
alteration (Bondesan et al. 1997). The fast subsidence was
over-compensated, in the past, by the vast sediment input of
the Po River, which is now severely reduced. The northern
tributaries of the Po, deriving from the Alps and often
flowing out of large lakes, provide the largest water contribution, but are comparatively poor in sediment; the streams
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_16
193
194
M. Stefani
magnitude than the modern ones, but nevertheless important,
inducing a punctuated dynamics of sedimentation, well
recorded by the delta sedimentary successions. The Po Delta
lobe protrudes into the semi-enclosed Adriatic Sea, characterized by eutrophic waters, by a maximum tidal range of
about one metre, and by a comparatively reduced wave
activity. The more frequent waves, triggering the northward
long-shore drift of coastal sands, are induced by the SE wind
(Scirocco); the strongest storm waves are generated by the
NE one (Bora). The near shore marine current forms the
western portion of an anticlockwise circulation cell, supporting the southward transport of suspended sediments.
16.2
Fig. 16.1 Geographic location of the Po Delta area. Base satellite
image from 2015 Google, Image Landsat; Data SIO, NOAA, U.S.
Navy, NGA, GEBCO
flowing from the highly erodible Apennines generate the
majority of the sediment input. The Po is about 650 km long
and presently has a catchment surface of about 71,000 km2.
During earlier Holocene times, its drainage basin was much
larger, because former tributaries are now independently
reaching the sea. The Po presently provides a mean water
discharge to the sea of about 1500 m3/s, its flux regime
recording an increasing variation in amplitude. The registered flood maxima exceed 10,000 m3/s (years 1951, 2000)
and the summer minima are lower than 275 m3/s (2012).
Before the human alteration, flux fluctuations were minor in
From the Synglacial Sea-Level
Low-Stand to the Post-glacial
Maximum Transgression
(18,000–3000 Years BC)
During the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), the eustatic sea
level was about 120–130 m lower than the modern one,
large Alpine glaciers reached the plain, and gravel-sand units
accumulated within braided river systems across large portions of the present-day Po Plain and northern Adriatic Sea
(Coreggiari et al. 1996). In the present delta region, coarse
sands accumulated into cold, middle alluvial plain environments, about 300 km upstream from the ancient coast (Stefani and Vincenzi 2005). Climate warming then triggered the
retreat of the Alpine glaciers, well before the major melting
phase of the polar caps. At early stages of glacier retreat, the
development of large Sub-Alpine lakes, followed by
mountain reforestation, sharply decreased the sediment input
into the Po Plain. To the north of the Po, fluvial waters were
abundant, but poor in sediment load, and they were therefore
able to induce widespread terrace erosion and apical incision
of alluvial fans (Fontana et al. 2014). In this phase, fluvial
sedimentation ceased across large areas of the plain in the
modern delta region. Global melting of the continental ice
then induced eustatic rise and worldwide transgression. In
the present-day Po coastal area, renewed sedimentation was
triggered only by the last phases of sea-level increase (8000–
5000 years BC). Sediment accumulation restarted under
continental conditions, soon to shift towards brackish and
estuarine environments.
16.3
Maximum Transgression
and Early Sea-Level Highstand
(3000–1000 Years BC)
The melting speed of continental ice eventually slowed down,
stabilizing the eustatic sea level. In the modern coastal region,
relative sea-level rise and sedimentation compensated each
16
The Po Delta Region: Depositional Evolution, Climate Change …
195
Fig. 16.2 Progradational
evolution of the Po Delta coast in
the last 5000 years, from the
maximum transgression to the
present. Note the considerable
change in the geographic
framework, from early highstand
delta-estuarine bays to rectilinear
coastline, and then from
wave-dominated lobes to the
modern artificial, digitate shape.
Dashed lines indicate
discontinuous delta-front sand
ridges, continuous lines depict
pronounced palaeo-coastlines
other on the maximum transgression line (Fig. 16.2). At the
time, the delta-estuarine gulfs reached the most inland
position, to the north and south of Comacchio, where they
were floored by flat sand beds (Amorosi et al. 2003; Stefani
and Vincenzi 2005), recording both storm waves and tidal
currents. A continuous coastline was lacking and marine
environments graded landward into wide brackish lagoons.
Marine systems reached areas 40 km to the west of the
present-day coastline and brackish waters regions that are
now more than 70 km inland. At about 2000 years BC, two
Po delta-estuarine mouths were active, well to the west of
the present-day coastline (Fig. 16.2). Coastal sands accumulated there, under the combined action of storm waves
and tidal currents. In a slowly subsiding anticline area, these
sediments are still visible at the surface, forming the older
outcropping unit of the coastal region (Fig. 16.3). The vast
majority of the coeval sediments is however buried into the
subsurface.
During the Bronze Age, between 2000 and 1000 years
BC, an increased wind and wave activity supported a major
environmental innovation, generating a new kind of depositional system through the growth of coastal spits and large
barrier islands, which eventually merged together, to form a
continuous coast (Figs. 16.2 and 16.4). The development of
a rectilinear coastline can be traced across the whole of the
northern Adriatic region, from the Apennine rocky coast
196
M. Stefani
Holocene counterpart of the delta area. This palaeogeographic evolution correlates with an active meteorological
and oceanographic framework, well witnessed by the subsurface storm-layers distribution, suggesting a length of sea
waves doubled than the present-day one, and by the accumulation of sand-gravel beds, drifted northward from the
Apennine coast to the Comacchio area, under the action of
strong SE wind (Scirocco). Climate change towards cooler
and dryer conditions is also witnessed by Po and Venetian
plain deposits (Veggiani 1994; Accorsi et al. 1996; Bondesan and Meneghel 2004), where it is associated with fluvial
network reorganisation, lowering of the phreatic water table
and the widespread abandonment of archaeological sites,
marking the termination of the Bronze Age Terramare
Civilisation, dated at between 1200 and 900 years BC. The
dune fields dating back to this late Bronze Age time remain a
striking feature within an otherwise wide, flat landscape of
the delta plain and are therefore known as monti (mountains). These well drained sites provide the core area for the
production of a peculiar sand soil wine (Vino Fortana DOC,
“Vini del Bosco Elìceo”).
16.4
Fig. 16.3 Satellite image acquired in the visible spectrum, depicting
some of the oldest outcropping sand bodies of the Po Delta plain, in the
reclaimed Valle di Mezzano area, southwest of Comacchio. Image
filtered and modified from 2015 Digital Globe
(south of Rimini) to the Friuli region. The active long-shore
sand drift closed the former delta-estuarine bays and generated the barrier islands enclosing the Venice Lagoon
(Bondesan and Meneghel 2004). The largest aeolian dune
field (Figs. 16.4, 16.5, 16.6 and 16.7) of the Adriatic region
(Italba-Massenzatica; Bondesan 1990) dates back to this
time and it is still exceeding 13.5 m in elevation above the
surrounding plain. The dunes are higher than any other
Several Generations
of Wave-Dominated Deltas (1000 BC–
1600 AD)
From about the ninth to eighth century BC onwards, climate
warming occurred in the coastal region (Veggiani 1994),
associated with a sharp reduction in storm activity. The
diminished long-shore drift supported the growth of several
generations of protruding lobes (Figs. 16.2 and 16.4). In this
phase, the massive sediment input filled up the lagoon space
in the Emilia-Romagna area, while the paucity of sediment
has preserved the Venice Lagoon to the present. During the
first half of the first millennium BC, a major delta channel of
the Po flew to a northern position, reaching the ancient port
of Adria (Fig. 16.8).
In the second half of the same millennium, the main
distributary channel (Eridanus) shifted to the south of the
modern Comacchio site, supporting the growth of a very
large delta lobe. The fluvial framework remained comparatively constant between about sixth century BC and fifth
century AD (Fig. 16.8), during a relatively warm and stable
climate phase. Between 350 years BC and 50 AD, the main
Po channel advanced for about 12 km, as suggested also by
the comparison of the Pseudo Sillace’s and Strabo’s geographic descriptions. At the north side of the delta lobe, the
Etruscan port town of Spina developed since the late sixth
century BC, soon reaching major importance, but the fast
delta progradation afterwards made the port activity difficult,
to the point that the port town was almost abandoned by the
second century BC.
16
The Po Delta Region: Depositional Evolution, Climate Change …
Fig. 16.4 LIDAR elevation model of the coastal plain, to the
southwest of the present-day Po Delta lobe. Colours depict topographic
elevation. Several coastal sand ridges, deposited through the last
3000 years, are visible. Data kindly provided by the Geological Service
of the Regione Emilia-Romagna
Through Roman times (second century BC–fifth century
AD), fluvial stability was enhanced by the first massive
phase of artificial intervention. At that time, erosion and
sediment input increased due to widespread deforestation,
agriculture practises and river embankment. Large land
reclamation canals were dug and river segments straightened, such as the Po channel downstream of Voghenza
(Roman name: Vicus Aventiae; Stefani 2006) and the Santerno one (Vatrenus), at Filo d’Argenta (Fig. 16.8). The
197
Reno (Rhenus) and Senio (Sinnius) rivers and all the streams
in between were at the time tributaries of the Po, whereas
they are now reaching the sea independently (Figs. 16.1 and
16.8). The larger fluvial basin and the large sediment input
combined to support the massive growth of a Po (Eridanus)
delta lobe, to the south of Comacchio, for the first time
prograding beyond the modern coastline position. The
ancient names of all the distributary channels of this delta are
known from literary sources (Fig. 16.8).
Between 400 and 600 years AD, the demise of Roman
infrastructures brought back wide areas to almost natural
conditions, during a confuse period of war and invasions,
while a moister and cooler climate developed (Veggiani
1994). Across the alluvial plain, wide swamplands arose and
the Roman occupation surface was often rapidly buried by
sediments (Cremaschi and Gasperi 1989). The whole of the
Apennine tributaries, from the Secchia River to the Adriatic
Sea, were disconnected from the Po and formed inland lake
deltas. The former Po Delta distributaries were deactivated,
and two new channels started to diverge at the future site of
Ferrara, feeding two new delta lobes, to the north (Volano)
and south (Primaro) of the abandoned Roman delta
(Fig. 16.8). At the root of the Volano lobe (Figs. 16.4 and
16.5), the important Benedictine Abbey of Pomposa was
founded near the seashore during early Mediaeval times, but
the adjacent coastline then rapidly prograded for about 8 km,
over a 500 year interval. From the twelfth century AD
onwards, the main channel of the Po shifted northward,
opening the present-day fluvial axis, thus generating a new
lobe (Fig. 16.8). Climate was warmer and coastal progradation rates slower than during the previous early mediaeval
phase. In the coastal area, gravity driven land reclamation
works were performed under supervision of the Pomposa
Abbey.
During the Renaissance, in the sixteenth century, a sharp
increase of human intervention impacted the coastal area. An
attempt to force the Reno River to reach the sea through the
southern distributaries of the Po caused the termination of
these channels (Volano and Primaro), because the large
sediment load of the Reno silted up the confluence area,
interrupting any further water flow (Bondesan et al. 1995).
The two abandoned riverbeds then acted as natural dams,
preventing fresh water and sediments from reaching the
interspaced depression, which progressively became the
salty, deepening lagoon of Valli di Comacchio (Fig. 16.8). It
partially escaped the modern land reclamation works and
presently forms the largest inland brackish water area of
Italy. Meanwhile, the main delta channel supported the
progradation of a large northern lobe (Po delle Fornaci), near
the Adige River mouth (Fig. 16.9). Eventually these two
deltas merged together, supporting fast progradation towards
the Venice Lagoon.
198
M. Stefani
Fig. 16.5 Present-day
geographic configuration of the
Po Delta area, with location of the
place names referred to in the
text. Base satellite image from
2015 Google, Image Landsat;
Data SIO, NOAA, U.S. Navy,
NGA, GEBCO
Fig. 16.6 Aerial view of the delta sand plain in the northeastern
portion of the Ferrara Province, acquired by a R.A.F. reconnaissance
plane during the late 1944, prior to the widespread anthropic alteration
of the area. In the box, the LIDAR elevation model of the dunes,
acquired in the year 2008, shows some sand excavation damage. The
white dot visible in the elevation model indicates the location of
Fig. 16.7
Between 1564 and 1580, an imposing land reclamation
work was attempted in the coastal area, by order of the Duke
of Ferrara (Alfonso II d’Este), drying about 400 km2, to the
south of the main Po fluvial channel. A 330 km long network of canals was dug and the inland waters were induced
to reach the sea through two terminal mouths, under
16
The Po Delta Region: Depositional Evolution, Climate Change …
199
Fig. 16.7 Field view of the
southwestern portion of the
Italba-Massenzatica dune field,
partially covered by a recently
grown poplar wood. Dunes reach
13.5 m of elevation above the
adjacent delta plain. See white dot
in Fig. 16.6 for location. Note
man for scale (circled)
gravitational forcing. However, compaction of dried peats
and organic clays induced fast subsidence across the
reclaimed area, reversing the topographic gradients of the
canals and eventually frustrating any effort to keep the area
dry. The long canals and the spectacular ancient sluice
buildings are however still well visible in the Po Delta area
(Torre Abà and Agrifoglio, Fig. 16.5), providing important
historic landmarks.
16.5
The Fast Growth of the Man-Induced
Modern Delta Lobe (1600-1900 AD)
The evolution of the modern delta is hereafter for the first
time reconstructed in detail (Fig. 16.9). The growth of the
present-day lobe was induced, at the very beginning of the
seventeenth century, by an artificial canalisation, triggering
fast progradation. The modern delta rapidly evolved from a
cuspidate lobe to articulated, poly-lobe deltas, rich in a large
number of rapidly shifting distributary channels and lacking
aeolian dunes and continuous beach systems.
At the end of the sixteenth century, the delta was fast
prograding northward, approaching the inlets of the Venice
Lagoon. At the time, the Republic of Venice was performing
major hydraulic works, aimed at preserving the navigation,
fishery and military-protection functions of the lagoon by
preventing the sedimentary infilling of the area. The rivers of
the Venice region were forced to directly reach the sea,
bypassing the lagoon. Meanwhile, immediately to the south
of the Po Delta lobe, the Estense government of the Ferrara
State was planning a port at Mesola, potentially threatening
the Venice interests. The Estense power was however soon
to be forced out from the Ferrara Duchy, in 1598, relinquishing the region to the State of the Church. The resulting
power vacuum allowed the Venetian government to artificially force the Po Delta channels southward. The diversion
was planned to prevent the sedimentary closure of the
southern tidal inlets of the Venice Lagoon, but also to
smother with sediment the Mesola Port and the reclamation
canals of a potentially hostile neighbour. The diversion was
very successful in triggering the fast progradation of the
modern delta lobe.
At about the year 1600 (Gabbianelli et al. 2000), the Po
Delta almost reached the southern inlet of the Venice
Lagoon (Bocca di Chioggia), and a narrow interdistributary
bay separated the main northern lobe (Po delle Fornaci) from
the smaller southern one (Po dell’Abate). Between May the
5th 1600 and September the 16th 1604, a large canal was
dug at Porto Viro, to connect the main Po channel with the
interdistributary bay. The canal was about 4500 m long,
600 m wide and 10 m deep. An attempt was also performed
to close down the northbound channel by building a dam. In
the year 1612, the main distributary channel was the
man-induced one, the Po Novo, which had already prograded for more than 15 km, while the underfed northern
lobe started to retreat. In the year 1650, the main Po channel
was the Donzella one, also known as Gnocca, fast prograding southward. At the time, the erosional retrogradation
of the northern lobe had almost reached the present-day
coastline and the adjacent delta plain started to be flooded by
salty waters. During the seventeenth century, the new delta
progradation closed the mouth of the northern canals of the
former Estense land reclamation. By the end of the century,
almost the whole of the reclaimed region was therefore
re-flooded.
A renewed northward progradation trend took place at
about the year 1700 (Po di Grignola), because of the failed
attempts to close the northern distributary channels of the
Po. At the time, the coastline developed a poly-lobe shape,
with well developed interdistributary bays and a poorly
defined coastline. During the early eighteenth century, the
delta growth speeded up because of an augmented sediment
200
M. Stefani
Fig. 16.8 Schematic reconstructions of the drainage evolution in the
Po coastal plain, from Roman to modern times. In the oldest
reconstruction, toponyms known form the ancient Latin literature are
used. Note the impressive magnitude of the paleogeography change
(modified after Bondesan 1990 and Stefani and Vincenzi 2005)
input, supported by climate evolution towards cooler conditions, the retreat of the mountain woods and the advance of
Alpine glaciers. The sea wave activity also probably
increased. Over the short period of a few years, a major
geographic change took place. In the year 1735, a continuous delta front developed, smoothed by the coastal sand
drift, associated with the growth of small aeolian dunes. The
major distributary channels were eastbound (Asenìn and
Tolle channels); to the south, the ancient Po di Volano lobe
was largely flooded, and the former wood and vineyard areas
(Bosco Elìceo) gave way to salty lagoons. In the year 1758,
after a pause in progradation, the advance of the southern
mouths restarted to dominate the delta evolution. In the year
1790, the central channels became the dominant ones, two of
them corresponding to the modern channels of Pila and
Tolle. The fast progradation rapidly recreated a digitate
16
The Po Delta Region: Depositional Evolution, Climate Change …
201
Fig. 16.9 Reconstruction of the modern delta lobe growth, since the beginning of the seventeenth century
shape of the delta, with embryonic interdistributary bays
(Sacca di Scardovari and Sacca di Goro), as visible in the
year 1814. During the second half of the nineteenth century,
the Po di Maistra was for the last time keeping its importance, as visible in the 1876 map. At the time, the Po di Tolle
channel was fast prograding towards the very south. At the
start of the new century, the northern channel was already
confined to a minor role and the major discharge was
through the centrally placed Pila mouth. During the first half
of the twentieth century, the delta was still prograding,
generating a strongly digitate shape, recording a progressive
sediment starvation of the delta system.
16.6
The Present-Day Artificial Framework
During the last 150 years, water scooping supported the
widespread land reclamation of the vast majority of the delta
top region. The landscape of the southern portion of the
modern delta is therefore mainly flat and artificial in nature,
compartmentalized by the high river embankments; in the
northern portion, coastal lagoons and deltaic spits are however preserved, generating a “natural” landscape of high
value (e.g. Boccasette). Some fascinating environments have
survived in partially natural conditions, such as the aeolian
dune field and lagoons in the northern portion of the delta,
202
M. Stefani
his degree thesis work; Luca Minarelli for contributing to the study of
the lower alluvial plain of the Po, Alessandro Fontana and Marco
Bondesan for interesting scientific debate; the Servizio Geologico
Sismico e dei Suoli della Regione Emilia-Romagna is thanked for
providing access to subsurface and elevation modelling data.
References
Fig. 16.10 Former coastal wood at the southern margin of the Bosco
Mesola, progressively covered by the salty waters of the Sacca di Goro
interdistributary bay because of the fast subsidence and sediment
starvation. For location, see Fig. 16.5
near Rosolina, the delta bay of Goro, the coastal wood of
Bosco Mesola, the salty lagoons of Valle Bertuzzi and the
larger lagoon area of the Valli di Comacchio.
The massive anthropogenic alteration is however overwhelming. Continuous river embankments were built, forcing rivers to become suspended over reclaimed areas, which
are well below sea level. Natural subsidence was considerably accelerated, to values even exceeding 3–4 m per century, by the combined effect of land drying and subsurface
water and methane pumping (Bondesan et al. 1997). The
granular sediment input to the coastal environments has
almost stopped over the last 50 years because of the massive
anthropogenic alteration of rivers, such as dam construction
and sand excavation from riverbeds. The combination of
these factors induced erosion and marine transgression to
largely took over progradation, throughout the region
(Fig. 16.10). Only massive coastal protection works and
artificial damming prevent the Po River delta from being
rapidly re-conquered by sea. River and coastline
man-induced rigidity, accelerated subsidence, interruption of
the fluvial sediment input, climate change, river and sea
water pollution and eutrophication combine to make the
environmental management of the fragile coastal area difficult. A retreat of the human activity from large delta top
areas therefore looks unavoidable in any foreseeable future.
Acknowledgements I thank Andrea Pavanati for the valuable contribution to the understanding of the modern delta lobe, provided during
Accorsi CA, Bandini Mazzanti M, Mercuri AM, Rivalenti C, Trevisan
Grandi G (1996) Holocene forest pollen vegetation of the Po Plain,
Northern Italy. Allionia 34:233–276
Amorosi A, Centineo MC, Colalongo ML, Pasini G, Sarti G, Vaiani SC
(2003) Facies architecture and latest Pleistocene-Holocene depositional history of the Po Delta (Comacchio area), Italy. J Geol
111:39–56
Bondesan M (1990) L’area deltizia padana: caratteri geografici e
geomorfologici. Parco del Delta del Po, Volume 1: L’ambiente
come risorsa. Spazio Libri Editore, Ferrara, pp 9–48
Bondesan A, Meneghel M (eds) (2004) Geomorfologia della Provincia
di Venezia: Note Illustrative della Carta geomorfologica della
Provincia di Venezia. Esedra editrice, Padova, 514 pp
Bondesan M, Castiglioni GB, Elmi C, Gabbianelli G, Marocco R,
Pirazzoli P, Tomasin A (1995) Storm surges and sea-level rise:
coastal areas at risk in northeast Italy. J Coast Res 11:1354–1379
Bondesan M, Gatti M, Russo P (1997) Movimenti verticali del suolo
nella Pianura Padana orientale desumibili da dati I.G.M. a tutto il
1990. Bollettino di Geodesia e Scienze Affini 2:141–172
Coreggiari A, Roveri M, Trincardi F (1996) Late Pleistocene and
Holocene evolution of the north Adriatic Sea. Il Quaternario 9
(2):697–704
Cremaschi M, Gasperi G (1989) La “alluvione” alto-medievale di
Mutina (Modena) in rapporto alle variazioni ambientali oloceniche.
Mem Soc Geol It 42:179–190
Fontana A, Mozzi P, Marchetti M (2014) Alluvial fans and megafans
along the southern side of the Alps. Sed Geol 307:1–22
Gabbianelli G, Del Grande C, Simeoni U, Zamariolo Calderoni G
(2000) Evoluzione dell’area di Goro negli ultimi cinque secoli
(Delta del Po). Studi Costieri 2:45–63
Marchetti M (2008) Clima e attività umane come cause dei cambiamenti fluviali—Il caso del Fiume Po. Il Quaternario 21(1B):241–
250
Pieri M, Groppi G (1981) Subsurface geological structure of the Po
Plain, Italy. Progetto Finalizzato Geodinamica, Pub 414, CNR,
Roma, 23 pp
Stefani
M
(2006)
Il
contesto
paleogeografico
e
sedimentologico-stratigrafico della necropoli romana del Verginese.
In: Berti F (ed) Mors Immatura. Quaderni di Archeologia
dell’Emilia-Romagna 16: 41–48
Stefani M, Vincenzi S (2005) The interplay of eustasy, climate and
human activity in the late Quaternary depositional evolution and
sedimentary architecture of the Po Delta system. Mar Geol 222–
223:19–48
Veggiani A (1994) I deterioramenti climatici dell’Età del Ferro e
dell’Alto Medioevo. Bollettino Società Torriceliana di Scienze e
Lettere 45:3–80
17
Landscapes and Landforms Driven
by Geological Structures in the Northwestern
Apennines
Luisa Pellegrini and Pier Luigi Vercesi
Abstract
The northwestern Apennines present a very complex geomorphology, strictly related to the
recent tectonic evolution of the orogenic chain (Upper Oligocene—Lower Miocene to
present). In this chapter, some unique and representative landform assemblages related to
tectonic structures located in the area between the Scrivia and Trebbia valleys are
described. Morphological aspects are also highlighted in relation to lithological/structural
elements of local or regional importance, some of which have driven significant river
diversion. The peculiar features of these landforms hold the pieces of the geological and
geomorphological evolution of the entire area and are spectacularly exposed and clearly
visible along beautiful valleys.
Keywords
Selective erosion
Synclinal mountain
Northern Apennines
17.1
Introduction
The extremely varied landscape of the northwestern Apennines is the result of geomorphological modelling influenced
by the presence of rock types of diverse erodibility in a very
complex tectonic setting. The tectonic evolution of the area
took place in the Neogene and Quaternary, involving alternating phases of intense activity (e.g. the Tortonian,
Intra-Messinian, Mid-Pliocene phases) and phases of relative
quiescence. The effects of these phases are clearly visible in
the contemporary morphology of mountains and valleys,
where a series of different geomorphic features allows for the
reconstruction of a complex landscape evolution, including
the development of a hydrographic network with a very
peculiar pattern. Therefore, fluvial diversions, superimposed
rivers (entrenched meanders), steep escarpments, or gorges
are common in this sector of the Apennines.
L. Pellegrini (&) P.L. Vercesi
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e dell’Ambiente, Università di
Pavia, Via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy
e-mail: luisa.pellegrini@unipv.it
River diversion
Entrenched meanders
There are many locations where landforms, such as
hanging valleys, monadnocks, etc. are strictly related to
regional tectonic structures (anticlines and synclines) and to
their lithology. Obviously, all these structures had clearly
influenced the fluvial morphology, which shows straight
trends, aligned elbows, asymmetrical valleys, erosion steps
with the formation of paleo-surfaces, polygenic landslides,
centrifugal patterns, etc. Selected unique examples will be
described and discussed in this chapter, aiming at highlighting how the geomorphological evolution has been
conditioned through time by various geological settings.
17.2
Geographical Setting
The area is located in the northern portion of the Apennines,
east of the Scrivia Valley, west of the Trebbia Valley and
north of the Po River—Ligurian Sea watershed (Fig. 17.1).
This watershed runs about 10 km away from the Ligurian
coastline and is about 1200 m high (except Mt. Aiona,
1695 m a.s.l.). It should be noted that the highest peaks are
not situated along the watershed itself, but they can be found
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_17
203
204
about 25 km north of it, forming a massif about 1600–
1700 m high (e.g. Mt. Lesima, 1724 m; Mt. Chiappo,
1699 m; Mt. Ebro, 1700 m; Mt. Antola, 1597 m). North of
the massif elevations progressively decrease, the mountains
become hills and finally the Po Plain opens up and the
altitudes drop to 50–70 m.
The area is crossed by many rivers and streams, which
form a kind of radial pattern with the massif formed by Mt.
Antola, Mt. Ebro, Mt. Chiappo and Mt. Lesima in the centre.
This pattern is due to structural setting and differential uplift.
Neotectonic phases, in particular, the uplift of the central
area of the chain, and favourable, very wet climatic conditions have caused intense fluvial erosion, many river diversions and captures.
Rivers on the northern slopes of this massif, which flow
into the Po River, have two preferential directions: northwest
(Staffora, Curone and Scrivia rivers) and northeast (Tidone
and Trebbia rivers). This configuration follows the shape of
Fig. 17.1 Geographical setting
of the northwestern Apennines.
The brown dashed line indicates
the divide between the Po basin
and the Ligurian basins; the green
dotted line shows the Po Plain
boundary; the red lines represent
tectonic lines (lines with triangles
are main post-Tortonian thrusts,
modified after CNR 1991). The
stars indicate: 1 Rocca d’Olgisio
syncline mountain; 2 Pietra
Parcellara ophiolite; 3 Mt.
Barberino ophiolite; 4 Caverzago
slope; 5 Brugnello slope; 6
Castello della Pietra peak; 7
Borbera River diversion; 8
Trebbia River entrenched
meanders and Bobbio windows
L. Pellegrini and P.L. Vercesi
the structural arc in this part of the Apennine area. Only the
first reach of the Staffora River and some minor streams (e.g.
Versa and Scuropasso rivers) flow northward.
Climate shows an average annual temperature of 12 °C in
the less elevated areas and of 8 °C at the highest elevations.
Rainfall is about 675 mm/year on the plain, 785 mm/year in
the hills and 1420 mm/year in the mountains. The monthly
pluviometric regime shows two maxima, in November (absolute maximum) and May, and two minima, in July (absolute minimum) and January (Maggi and Ottone 2003).
17.3
Geology and Structure
The Apennine orogen was generated by the closure of the
Liguria-Piemonte Ocean (Eoalpine phase) and subsequent
continental collision between the European and Adriatic
tectonic plates (Mesoalpine phase). This chain has an
17
Landscapes and Landforms Driven by Geological Structures …
205
eastward vergence (Adriatic vergence) which is due to the
post-Oligo-Miocene tectonic phases, and related to the
westward subduction of the Adriatic plate. According to this
model, the opening of the Ligurian-Provenzal Basin in the
Upper Oligocene—Lower Miocene, and later opening of the
Tyrrhenian Basin (Upper Miocene) can be both explained as
back-arc tectonic extensions, induced by the Apennine
subduction, and as the source of the boudinage structure of
the Alpine prism (Laubscher 1988). Today’s geological
structure of the Apennines, with its northeast-vergent nappes
stacked upon the Adriatic plate, arises from these latest
geodynamic phases, started in the Upper Oligocene—Lower
Miocene and showing landforms very different from one
another.
syncline is built up of turbiditic sediments of the Ranzano
Formation in the upper part, and in the Monte Piano Marls in
the lower part. The conglomeratic sandstones (Ranzano
Formation), highly resistant to erosion, allowed the structure
to stand in a dominant position with respect to the general
landscape, whereas anticlines can be recognized in the more
erodible marls of the Val Luretta Formation to the north, and
in the Palombini Shales and the pelitic-arenaceous succession of the Scabiazza Sandstones to the south (Fig. 17.3),
both subject to considerable erosion.
Also, topographic maps show peculiar erosional features
of the Rocca d’Olgisio syncline, due to central depression of
the WNW–ESE-oriented fold axis and the periclinal closures
of two lateral culminations. These two terminations display
different morphologies: the western one has a very gentle
pitch and the limbs of the folds are almost parallel, while the
eastern one has a steeper pitch and the pattern of the outcrops is almost circular.
Therefore, the area shows all typical conditions for
shaping of a “canoe valley” such as resistant rocks above
weak ones, folded structures (with an Apennine trend of
their axes), folded structures with a WNW–ESE strain trend,
geomorphological evolution that led to the erosion of the
upper parts of the relief (axial culminations) and “relief
inversion”. We can define the elongated shapes as a “canoe
valley” because of the similarity with this type of boat. In the
above-described area, the anticlines, squeezed and faulted,
are more intensely affected by erosion that has reached the
weakest rocks. When this happens, erosion increases its
intensity and speeds up, while the lower parts of the synclines, formed by competent rocks, are still resistant to
erosion. This selective erosion has generated a landscape
where synclines are the most elevated morphological
features.
The evolutionary model of the area has many similarities
with the one proposed in 1965 and taken up in 1985 by
Oberlander to explain the morphology of the Zagros
Mountains. Although the tectonic evolution has been different, the peculiarity of the frequently undulating axes of
the folds (plunging folds), the lithological alternation of
resistant and weak rocks, and the young orogenic developments have led to a similar morphological evolution. The
drainage pattern is discordant with the geological structure
(Chiarone stream) and is comparable to Oberlander’s (1985)
transverse streams with superimposition controlled by
structures such as the “drainage inheritance” of Summerfield
(1991).
In more detail, the canoe valley of the Rocca d’Olgisio is
4.5 km long and 1 km wide in the central part and reaches
the maximum altitude of 610 m in the northwestern periclinal culmination. The effects of selective erosion can be
recognized at different scales, from relief modelling in the
topographic outline to the tiny details of sculpting and
17.4
Landforms
The landscape of the area is very complex, with contrasting
landforms and frequent morphological changes. These
changes are mostly related to different lithology and regional
tectonic structures, heritage of the tectonic setting of the
Apennine chain.
17.4.1
Structural Landforms
In stable tectonic settings, morphology only reflects
erosional/depositional processes, which can be more or less
intense depending on the climatic condition and the initial
topography of the area. By contrast, in the Apennines tectonic evolution is still active and the connection between
landforms and tectonics is the primary element that marks
the landscape. Examples include faults juxtaposing completely different lithologies on the two sides, resulting in
asymmetrical valleys (Staffora Valley); active synclines with
deformed highly resistant sedimentary successions, which
are fractured in the axial zone (Rocca d’Olgisio syncline);
arching and isostatic movements deforming stacked nappes
and taking the same stratigraphic units to different topographic levels (Mt. Barberino ophiolitic group).
An exemplary case of a hanging syncline is the Rocca
d’Olgisio ridge (cf. Pellegrini et al. 2010) which is located
southwest of Piacenza, close to Pianello Val Tidone. It is an
extraordinary site of high geological value, cut in the middle
by the Chiarone stream, with a SSE–NNW direction. At the
western end of the structure, the fortress of Rocca d’Olgisio
stands in a striking position, over a high arenaceous spur
(Fig. 17.2).
The structural and lithological setting played a fundamental role in shaping the Rocca d’Olgisio syncline, where
the “relief inversion” phenomenon is related to the superposition of resistant and weak successions. Therefore, the
206
L. Pellegrini and P.L. Vercesi
Fig. 17.2 View of the structural landform of Rocca d’Olgisio from southeast (photo L. Pellegrini)
Fig. 17.3 The Rocca d’Olgisio
“canoe-shaped” syncline. Three
dimensional sketch of the
structure. RAN Ranzano
Formation; MMP Monte Piano
Marls; VLU Val Luretta
Formation; SCB Scabiazza
Sandstones; APB Palombini
Shales; CC Calpionelle
Limestone (modified after
Pellegrini et al. 2010)
chiselling. The inner side of the “canoe” corresponds to the
pelitic facies of the Ranzano Formation and has gentle
morphology, while the outer rocky faces are steep, with
escarpments
up
to
200 m,
carved
in
the
conglomeratic-arenaceous strata. Lithological features of
these strata, partially lightly diagenized, the exposure of the
face scarp slope, together with the particular microclimate of
the area, have led to the excavation of variously sized hollows, such as tafoni, caves, and alveolar structures with
honeycomb appearance, due to differential weathering.
This area is also of high naturalistic interest, because
some rare and unusual vegetable species, not found elsewhere in the Northern Apennines, grow here spontaneously
thanks to the particular microclimate and soil conditions,
consequence of the southward exposition, and local geometry of the arenaceous slopes. A southward exposition, or a
nook, protected from winter rain, develops a microclimate
that is excellent for these plants, which need warmth and
plenty of sun. Moreover, degradation of the arenaceous
terrain has produced favourable soil (sandy or very well
17
Landscapes and Landforms Driven by Geological Structures …
207
drained, with a pH about 6–7.5) for the growth of some
vegetable species uncommon in this portion of the Apennines. Therefore, it is possible to see the unusual presence of
dwarf Indian figs (Opuntia compressa, Salisb.) of North
American origin, some cork oaks (Quercus pseudosuber,
Santi) and amaryllis, protected by the current laws, the
yellow amaryllis (Sternbergia lutea, L.) very rare in the
Emilian region, some species of wild orchids, like the
“spider flower” (Ophris Sphegodes, Miller) and the “pyramidal orchid” (Anacamptis pyramidalis, L.).
lithological changes and have repercussions in making use of
the soil and in the spontaneous vegetation distribution.
Groundwater reservoir originated in the ophiolitic masses
leaks and soaks the clays underneath. This downgrades the
geotechnical properties of the pelitic rocks, together with
the erosion at the base of the slope, due to lateral erosion of
the Trebbia River. Erosion and degradation of the pelitic
rocks have caused the formation of some huge landslides.
Lithology and structures strongly influence erosional processes that are much faster if the rock is erodible. Resistant
rocks usually emerge as isolated peaks when they are in
contact with weak rocks. The selective erosion of Pietra
Parcellara, Pietra Perduca (very close to Pietra Parcellara),
Mt. Barberino, Caverzago, Brugnello and Castello della
Pietra peak are very significant examples.
17.4.2.2 Mt. Barberino Ophiolitic Relief
Mt. Barberino (Fig. 17.1) ophiolitic relief is also surrounded
by pelitic deposits with gentle and moderately inclined
slopes and is deeply carved by the Trebbia River, which
flows in a gorge. This gorge is the result of a
superimposed/antecedent phenomenon. It was a consequence of the latest phases of rising of the chain that did
increase the stream power enough to deeply erode these
more resistant rocks. Upstream of the obstruction, the valley,
carved in weak rocks, is wide and terraced alluvial deposits
fill its bottom (Bobbio plain). Phases of deposition and
incision of these alluvial deposits were emphasized by the
ophiolitic obstacle and by the phases of its erosion.
17.4.2.1 The Pietra Parcellara Ophiolite
The Pietra Parcellara (Fig. 17.4), Pietra Perduca and Mt.
Barberino elevations in the Trebbia Valley are large fragments
of serpentinized lherzolites (ophiolites) which stand out
against the mild landscape of the Palombini Shales Formation.
Effects of selective erosion are very clear when related to
17.4.2.3 Caverzago Slope
Elevated position, which made the neighbouring areas more
visible, has affected human behaviour in choosing where to
settle since ancient times. In fact, worship or defensive
churches and castles have been built on the top of structural
landforms.
17.4.2
Lithological Control on Erosion: Relief
Due to Selective Erosion
Fig. 17.4 The Pietra Parcellara ophiolitic relief stands out in the background; in the foreground, the foot of a large landslidein clays (photo
P.L. Vercesi)
208
L. Pellegrini and P.L. Vercesi
In the Trebbia Valley, for example, the oratory of Pietra
Perduca is nestled in the fracture of an ophiolitic block, close
to Pietra Parcellara, and the church of Caverzago (Fig. 17.5),
northeast of Barberino, is located on the edge of a steep
scarp. This scarp was shaped in turbiditic successions and,
even if they are relatively easy to crumble, they have relatively endured through time.
17.4.2.4 The Brugnello Slope
Similarly, south of Bobbio, in the Trebbia Valley, the church
of Brugnello (Figs. 17.6 and 17.9a) stands on the edge of a
precipitous scarp, more than 150 m high and shaped in the
erodible Brugnello Shale Member (the arenaceous components prevail against the shales). The position of this church,
and those of Caverzago and the Castello della Pietra,
underlines just how the religious or strategic settlement
choices are linked to specific landforms.
17.4.2.5 Castello Della Pietra Peak
In the Vobbia Valley, a right tributary of the Scrivia River,
there is a spectacular and dramatic peak and on top of it, the
Castello della Pietra towers (Fig. 17.7). The peak is similar
to the Meteora in Thessaly (Central Greece). In this case,
selective erosion focused on planes of weakness, in correspondence to vertical faults. The latter have irregularly cut
the highly resistant rocks belonging to the Savignone Conglomerates Formation, which have been intensely fractured
and are now arranged in bands of variable thickness, from a
few centimetres up to some metres; in some cases, the
Fig. 17.5 The Caverzago
church, dominating the Trebbia
River bed, is set on an ancient
fluvial surface that has been
partially eroded. Beside the
church, the ruins of the castle,
collapsed because of the scarp
retrogression, are still
recognizable (photo P.L. Vercesi)
Fig. 17.6 Church and village of Brugnello built on an ancient fluvial
surface at the edge of a high scarp carved by the Trebbia River (photo
L. Pellegrini)
17
Landscapes and Landforms Driven by Geological Structures …
209
Fig. 17.7 The Castello della Pietra was built on top of the lower of the two rocky peaks. The highest reaches an altitude of 625 m a.s.l. and rises
up 210 m from the valley bottom (photo L. Pellegrini)
formation is shaped in huge isolated spurs. The Castello
della Pietra has been included among the list of Italian
national monuments.
17.4.3
River Diversion
The Villalvernia-Varzi-Ottone-Levanto tectonic lineament
(Fig. 17.1) influences the evolution and the trend of the
Staffora Valley. The influence is very clear in the medium
reach of the Staffora River, where the river suddenly drifts
towards west and then north. From a general point of view,
the river axis shows abrupt drift-diversion, or a fluvial
elbow, mimicking the trends of other rivers of the same
sector (Fig. 17.1). These common features in the river are
visible in the collisional zones of the tectonic arcs, such as
the Emilian tectonic arc and the Monferrato tectonic arc
(CNR 1991).
The Borbera Valley has a very peculiar hydrographic
pattern (Pellegrini et al. 2003). The Borbera River, a right
tributary of the Scrivia River, flows in a SE–NW direction.
Near Pertuso, 1.5 km north of the confluence with the Sisola
River, it twists sharply to the west (Fig. 17.8). Changing its
direction, the stream abandons a zone of weak rocks and
crosses more resistant ones. Moreover, the Borbera Valley
(downstream from the confluence with the Sisola River to
Pertuso) shows a rather wide riverbed (Fig. 17.8a) and very
asymmetric valley slopes. The right side of the valley, carved
in flysch, has a gentle slope; the left one has a much steeper
slope and is developed in more resistant conglomerates.
Along the valley floor, extensive terraced alluvial
deposits stretch out. Where the Borbera River crosses the
conglomerates, in the east-to-west reach, ‘‘young’’ landforms can be seen with entrenched meanders and gorges.
Comparative analysis of the morphological and morphotectonic elements described above allowed to propose a
scheme for the recent evolution of the area. An original river
flowed from SSE towards NNW, going on to the valley of
the present Grue River (Fig. 17.8b). The headward erosion
of a stream flowing to west, and located west of Borbera
Valley, caused capture of the Borbera River. In all likelihood, this capture have been helped by differential tectonic
uplift of Mt. Gavasa area and by a tectonic lineament located
in the present Borbera gorge close to Pertuso. The evidence
of the former Borbera Valley is represented by the scarp
flanking the Merlassino area and which is the continuation of
the scarp south of the Pertuso elbow (Fig. 17.8b, c). Since
the scarp height is generally the same southward and
northward of the elbow, the diversion must have occurred
quite recently. Traces of the bottom of the former Borbera
Valley is no longer visible because of the earth flows
affecting the Merlassino area.
210
Fig. 17.8 a In the foreground, the Borbera River large channel that
carries flows towards the background of the photo (by L. Pellegrini)
and then turns to the left (white arrow). b Lineaments and morphotectonic elements on hillshaded terrain model, related to diversion
(Pertuso area): 1 rectilinear crest or spur; 2 saddle; 3 landslide; 4
asymmetric valley; 5 diversion elbow; 6 triangular facet; 7 centrifugal
L. Pellegrini and P.L. Vercesi
drainage pattern in the uplift area; 8 lineament (modified after Pellegrini
et al. 2003). c Topographic map (after Marinelli 1948) of the area of the
Borbera diversion. The blue arrow indicates the Borbera diversion and
the dashed blue line is its ancient course. The green line highlights the
headward erosion of the captor river
17
Landscapes and Landforms Driven by Geological Structures …
211
Fig. 17.9 a Aerial image of entrenched meanders of the Trebbia
River from Marsaglia to Bobbio (photo G. Bertolini). b terrestrial view
of the San Salvatore meander cut in the San Salvatore Sandstone of the
Lower Miocene (Tuscan nappe) in the heart of the Bobbio tectonic
window (photo L. Pellegrini)
17.4.4
structures to the view, such as the tectonic window of Bobbio, but also shows extraordinary entrenched meanders.
The origin of these meanders is related to the reactivation
of erosional activity of the Trebbia River, after the relief had
Incised Meanders
The deep gorge carved by the Trebbia River (Fig. 17.9a),
south of Bobbio, not only has displayed important geological
212
undergone levelling (pediplanation), likely during the
middle-late Pliocene. This levelling is proven by widespread
ancient surfaces, located on top of the water divides or along
the slopes. The surfaces are now isolated but well recognizable (see, for example in Fig. 17.9a, Moglia, Rossarola,
Brugnello, Telecchio).
Flowing across a gentle and slightly undulated paleolandscape, the Trebbia River channel was a meandering
one, with a very high sinuosity index. When the tectonic
uplift forced the Trebbia River to start downcutting again, the
river did not change its style; it remained meandering highlighting in this way the phenomenon of superimposition.
The magnificent meanders of Confiente, Brugnello and of
San Salvatore (Fig. 17.9b) are carved in highly resistant
lithology, such as siltstone and sandstone, or sandstone and
conglomerate. The high slopes exhibit evidence of several
stages of erosion with stronger gradients towards the valley
floor (rock-cut terraces).
17.4.4.1 The Tectonic Window of Bobbio
The «Bobbio tectonic window» (Ludwig 1929; Elter 1994)
in the Trebbia Valley extends from about Ponte Organasco
(close to Marsaglia) to Bobbio and offers a view of the
Northern Apennine structural frame.
The Northern Apennines developed through successive
tectonic phases and their structure shows various tectonic
units piled upon one another, stacked up and shifted towards
the northeast (from the Lombardy to the Emilia-Romagna
regions), whilst they were originally located in more
southwestern areas. The result of this stacking and migration
was a fold and thrust tectonic style of the chain.
The internal structures, migrated from west to east, now
lie in the western part of the continental margin of the Apula
plate. The allochthonous Ligurian Units of oceanic origin
currently form the uppermost nappe system of the Northern
Apennine stack and have migrated on the Tosco-Umbrian
Unit, which represents the deformed and unstuck foreland of
the Apula plate.
The Ligurian Units nappe is locally incised, giving the
chance to observe the underlying units. This is the case of
the tectonic windows of Bobbio, and the other ones such as
Salsomaggiore, in the Parma Apennines to the east.
Along the valley bottom of the Trebbia River, which is
deeply incised into all the tectonic units, it is possible to see
all lithologies and structures of the tectonic window of
Bobbio along the slopes of the valley, with the younger unit
in the lower part and the progressively oldest lithologies
towards the top, separated from one another by thrusts.
L. Pellegrini and P.L. Vercesi
17.5
Conclusions
An area characterized by very diverse geological and morphological features, which gave birth to a very unusual
landscape, has been described in this chapter. It is interesting
to recognize and understand the connections between landforms and tectonic and lithological setting of the area.
Therefore, an analysis of local landforms inserted and linked
within the regional geological context of the area can be very
helpful in understanding landscape evolution.
Many landforms described here can be considered as
geomorphosites and therefore included in valorisation programmes. Actually, there are two parks in the area: the
Antola Park and the Trebbia Fluvial Regional Park. The
Antola Park was established in 1995, based on regional law.
The protected area includes the high Trebbia Valley and the
Vobbia Valley, with specific reference to the “Castello della
Pietra”. The Trebbia Fluvial Regional Park is located in the
lowest reaches of the valley and is aimed primarily at protecting relict environments in plain and hilly settings, which
are important natural habitats for native flora and fauna.
A project for the establishment of a geotouristic itinerary
in the Trebbia Valley (particularly referred to the middle
section of the valley) is ongoing, aiming at the assessment of
sites with high scientific and aesthetic values such as the
entrenched meanders, the Pietra Parcellara and others,
described in this chapter.
References
CNR (1991) Structural model of Italy, scale 1:1,000,000. S.EL.CA.,
Firenze
Elter P (1994) Introduzione alla geologia dell’Appennino
ligure-emiliano. In: Zanzucchi G (ed) Appennino Ligure Emiliano,
10 itinerari. Guide Geologiche Regionali, Società Geologica
Italiana. BE-MA Editrice, Milano, pp 17–24
Laubscher HP (1988) The arcs of the Western Alps and the Northern
Apennines: an updated view. Tectonophysics 146(1–4):67–78
Ludwig O (1929) Geologische Untersuchungen in der Geden von
Bobbio im Nordapennin. Geol Rundsch 20:36–66
Maggi I, Ottone C (2003) Spatial–temporal precipitation analysis in the
area between Scrivia T. and Nure T. (Northern Italy). Quatern Int
101–102:149–156
Marinelli O (1948) Atlante dei tipi geografici. Istituto Geografico
Militare, 2nd Edition. Firenze, 320 pp
Oberlander TM (1965) The Zagros streams, a new interpretation of
transverse drainage in an Orogenic Zone. Syracuse Geographical
Series No. 1, Syracuse University Press, New York, 168 pp
Oberlander TM (1985) Origin of drainage transverse to structures in
orogens. In: Hack JT, Morisawa M (eds) Tectonic Geomorphology.
Allen & Unwin, Boston, pp 155–182
17
Landscapes and Landforms Driven by Geological Structures …
213
Pellegrini L, Boni P, Carton A (2003) Hydrographic evolution in
relation to neotectonics aided by data processing and assessment:
some examples from the Northern Apennines (Italy). Quatern Int
101–102:211–217
Pellegrini L, Boni P, Vercesi PL (2010) Geotourism and geomorphological hazard: the Rocca d’Olgisio case study (Northern Apennine,
Italy). Geology Adriatic Area GeoActa, Special Publication
3:179–187
Summerfield MA (1991) Global geomorphology. Longman Singapore
Publishers, Singapore, 537 pp
Fingerprints of Large-Scale Landslides
in the Landscape of the Emilia Apennines
18
Giovanni Bertolini, Alessandro Corsini, and Claudio Tellini
Abstract
Impressive depletion and accumulation landforms created by the millennial evolution of
large-scale landslides are distinctive features of the landscape of the Emilia Apennines
(Northern Italy). They are complex earth slides and earth flows that can be tens of hectares
wide and can involve millions of cubic metres of clayey deposits originated by the failure
and weathering of weak rocks such as clayey flysch and mélanges. These landslides have
originated in large number since the upper Pleistocene. It is estimated that they now cover
up to 20% of the mountain areas of the region. They typically alternate periods of
dormancy that can be centuries long, to periods of reactivation that can last for a single
season or several years. Upon reactivation, they rejuvenate landforms that outstand
impressively from the surrounding landscape and cause severe damages to infrastructures.
The chapter presents some relevant examples of these landslides and related hazard and risk
issues.
Keywords
Landslides
18.1
Landslide reactivation
Introduction
In the Late Pleistocene and Holocene, landslides have been a
major geomorphic factor in the development of the landscape of the Emilia Apennines, the sector of the Northern
Apennines of Italy stretching from the Reno to the Trebbia
rivers (Regione Emilia-Romagna) (Fig. 18.1). Impressive
long-term persistent erosional and accumulation features
G. Bertolini
Agenzia Regionale per la sicurezza territoriale e la Protezione
Civile - Servizio Area Affluenti Po, Regione Emilia-Romagna,
Via Emilia Santo Stefano 25, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy
A. Corsini (&)
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Università di
Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 103, 41125 Modena, Italy
e-mail: alessandro.corsini@unimore.it
C. Tellini
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, della Vita e della Sostenibilità
Ambientale, Università di Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 157/A,
43124 Parma, Italy
Hazard and risk
Emilia Apennines
related to large-scale earth slide—earth flow phenomena are
clearly distinguishable in the landscape of Emilia Apennines. The aim of this chapter is to present selected typical
landslide features that mark the landscape of the Emilia
Apennines and to pinpoint how their evolution during the
millennia has left a very distinguishable fingerprint in the
landscape and how their recurrent reactivation influences
troublesome coexistence between socio-economic activities
and natural landscape evolution.
18.2
Geographical Setting
The Emilia Apennines have an area of approximately
9000 km2 from the Reno to the Trebbia river basins in the
northeast-facing slope of the Northern Apennines (Fig. 18.1).
Administratively, they fall within the Regione
Emilia-Romagna, from the Province of Bologna to the Province of Piacenza. The main peaks are located along the
SE–NW watershed of the Apennines (Mt. Corno alle Scale,
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_18
215
216
G. Bertolini et al.
Fig. 18.1 Geographical and geological setting of the Emilia Apennines showing the landslides cited in the text (italic black). The dashed
line outlines areas formed by clayey formations (usually named
“Argille Scagliose” and “Helmintoid Flysch”, Late Cretaceous to
Eocene in age) which are the most landslide-prone units in the Emilia
Apennines
1945 m a.s.l.; Mt. Cimone, 2165 m; Mt. Cusna, 2121 m; Mt.
Sillara, 1867 m; Mt. Penna, 1735 m; Mt. Maggiorasca,
1799 m). Main river valleys and, consequently, secondary
mountain ridges have a NE–SW trend. Average elevation in
secondary mountain ridges is between 1600 and 1000 m and
elevation decreases toward the northeastern boundary of the
mountain chain, which is marked by Quaternary alluvial fans.
Climate is generally “sub-continental” and locally
“cool-temperate”, according to the Köppen classification
system. Rainfall is very variable due to the fact that the
watershed of the Northern Apennines tends to block moist
air masses arriving from the Tyrrhenian Sea. Rainfall varies
from approximately 1800 mm/year along the watershed to
only 800 mm/year at the transition to the Po Plain. It is
mostly concentrated in autumn and spring months, while
during winter a significant snow cover is deposited in the
most elevated sectors of the chain. Wind hits mostly from
the west and south, activated by Atlantic depressions
swapping across the upper Tyrrhenian Sea. During winter,
northeastern currents of artic-continental provenience are
quite common, determining prolonged cold conditions and
significant snowfall even at very low elevations. Average
annual temperature is between 4° and 12 °C, with summer
temperatures around 20 °C or higher and winter temperatures around 5 °C and episodically as low as −20 °C.
18.3
Geological Setting
The Northern Apennines are constituted by allochthonous
stratigraphic sequences superimposed during several tectonic phases in the Cenozoic (Bettelli and De Nardo 2001).
Most of these rock units are made up of arenaceous and
calcareous flysch and of chaotic mélanges (submarine
olistostromes or tectonic mélanges). In both cases, rock
masses have an abundant or prevailing clayey component.
Their degree of tectonization is high, with pervading shear
surfaces observable at any scale. These formations are
usually parts of the Ligurian and Sub-ligurian Domains
(Late Jurassic—Early Eocene in age) and were in the past
also known as “Helmintoid Flysch” and “Argille Scagliose” (Auctt.) (Fig. 18.1). These formations can be
classified as weak rock masses of significant structural and
lithological complexity. Their poor mechanical resistance
and the presence of groundwater makes these rock masses
particularly prone to landslides. The lithological character
of landslide bodies, generally made of thick clayey
deposits with gravels and blocks, is due to the post-failure
weathering of claystone, sandstone and limestone rock
fragments. These deposits are in residual strength conditions and, as such, can be quite easily mobilized by slope
movements.
18
Fingerprints of Large-Scale Landslides in the Landscape …
18.4
Landforms Related to Large-Scale
Landslides
217
Due to geological and paleo-climatic factors, the landscape
in the Emilia Apennines is very diverse. At higher altitudes,
slopes are steep and made of marly and arenaceous flysch
formations. They are characterized by the presence of glacial
landforms and deposits, which formed during the Late
Pleistocene, and by gravitational debris covers deposited
during the Holocene. At intermediate and lower altitudes,
slopes are relatively gentle due to the presence of clayey
flysch and mélanges. Locally, these slopes are characterized
by the presence of plateaux made of sandstones and calcarenites that stand high above the surrounding gentle slopes
made of clayey rocks. Late Pleistocene periglacial conditions
have determined a landscape dominated by alluvial and
gravitational features. Particularly widespread are landforms
associated to complex large-scale earth slides—earth flows
that have developed from the Last Glacial Maximum to date.
The specificity of the “landslide landscape” of the Emilia
Apennines has been acknowledged by the “Geological
Landscape Map of Emilia-Romagna”, published by the
Geological Survey of Emilia-Romagna (Bertolini et al.
2009). It is highlighted that the official landslide inventory
map of the Emilia Apennines includes over 70,000 landslides (Regione Emilia-Romagna 2013). The inventory map
indicates that landslides cover up to 20% of mountain areas
of the region and, in some municipalities, more than 50% of
the territory. In many cases, this is due to the presence of
several large-scale complex earth slides—earth flows, often
adjacent to one another, forming a typical landslide-related
landscape (Fig. 18.2). It is estimated that this type of phenomena makes up for approximately 90% of the recognized
landslides and that at least 1300 of these landslides exceed
one million cubic metres in volume and, often, sliding surfaces are located at depth of tens of metres (Bertolini and
Pellegrini 2001).
Radiocarbon dating of organic matter (principally wood)
trapped in some landslides and lacustrine deposits correlated
to slope movements, indicates that while some phenomena
Fig. 18.2 The Cavola (right) and l’Oca (left) landslides forming a
typical landslide-related landscape in the Emilia Apennines, with
several adjacent large-scale landslides affecting most part of the slopes
(Reggio Emilia Province, photo G. Bertolini, 2014). A detailed analysis
of their internal stratigraphy reveals that the Cavola landslide body was
built up from 4000 to 3000 years ago, showing a mean accumulation
rate of 4.5 cm/year (Bertolini 2007). During the twentieth century, this
landslide was partially reactivated four times
218
can be as old as 30,000 years BP, the majority of landslide
deposits have been accumulated in the last 15,000 years and,
prevalently, in specific periods of the Holocene during which
climatic conditions worsened in terms of precipitation
(Bertolini and Tellini 2001; Soldati et al. 2006; Bertolini
2007). As a consequence, it can be speculated that most of
the large-scale landslides that mark the landscape of the
region are of prehistoric age. Historic records and recent
reports indicate quite clearly that the vast majority of
reported landslide events can be referred to the partial or
total reactivation of pre-existing landslides, while first-time
failure landslides are quite rare. Upon reactivation, velocity
of these landslides can vary from very slow (few cm/day) to
moderate (m/day) according to the scale proposed by Cruden
and Varnes (1996). In dormant conditions, these landslides
can still undergo extremely slow movements (1–2 cm/year)
(Bertolini and Pellegrini 2001).
The causal factors are primarily lithological, structural
and hydrogeological, while topographic gradient and land
use seem to have a more limited influence (most landslides
develop at slope gradients ranging from 8 to 11°—which is
the usual slope angle of clayey and flysch formations—and
densely wooded areas, grassland or cultivated areas are
affected by slope movements in approximately similar
extent). More specifically, reactivation events are caused by
G. Bertolini et al.
hydro-mechanical processes at the slope scale, and involve
groundwater recharge, progressive weathering of the affected fractured bedrock and loss of shear resistance in bedrock
and landslide deposits (Ronchetti et al. 2010). The mechanisms associated with large-scale reactivation of these
landslides include: (i) failure at the crown zone,
(ii) undrained loading of pre-existing landslide deposits,
(iii) downslope failure propagation of the entire landslide
body (Bertolini and Pizziolo 2008).
In a landscape-oriented perspective, it is helpful to distinguish between landslides that have been apparently dormant for long periods of time and landslides that have been
recently reactivated in paroxysmal events. In the first case,
landslide-related landforms are still evident to skilled geologists and geographers, but they might be not so evident to
unexperienced eyes. As an example, the catastrophic Lama
Mocogno landslide of 1579, is now largely covered by
vegetation and partially remodelled by anthropogenic
activity, so that only an experienced eye can recognize and
interpret convex morphology of the source area and lobate
landforms of the main landslide body (Fig. 18.3). The same
applies, for example, to the Tre Rii landslide (Fig. 18.4).
On the other hand, in case of recently reactivated landslides, landforms associated with slope movements can be
rejuvenated by significant retrogression, enlargement and
Fig. 18.3 The Lama Mocogno landslide (Modena Province, photo G. Bertolini, 2014): present state compared with the map of the 1579
reactivation. Map produced by G. Coppi in the nineteenth century
18
Fingerprints of Large-Scale Landslides in the Landscape …
219
Fig. 18.4 The Tre Rii landslide (Parma Province, photo G. Bertolini, 2014) has been dormant for a long period of time and the large fan-shaped
landslide body was built up by pre-historic and historic reactivation events (8665 to 8610 and 1300 to 1520 years BP, Tellini and Chelli 2003)
forward advancement of the landslide. In such cases, the
landslide area outstands impressively from the surrounding
landscape, making it evident even to the eye of
non-specialists. Examples of this kind are the Corniglio
landslide, reactivated in 1994 and 1999 (Larini et al. 2001)
(Fig. 18.5); the Valoria landslide, reactivated in 2001, 2005
and 2009 (Fig. 18.6); the Roncovetro landslide, reactivated
between 1994 and 1999 and ever since active (Fig. 18.7); the
Ca’ Lita landslide, reactivated in 2002 and 2004 (Fig. 18.8);
the Signatico landslide, reactivated in 1977 and frequently
partially active (Fig. 18.9) and, finally, the Capriglio landslide, reactivated in 2013 (Fig. 18.10). These prominent
examples of recently reactivated landslides show features
that might be considered as typical of an “early” or—better
—“rejuvenation” stage of development in the
multi-millennial gravitational evolution of the slopes which
are affected. In some cases, continuous or recurrent activity
is probably co-determined by the inflow of highly mineralized groundwater mixed with methane uprising along
regional fault lines along which the landslides are located
(e.g. Roncovetro landslide in Bertolini 2010 and Ca’ Lita
landslide in Cervi et al. 2012).
18.5
Hazard and Risk Issues
Dealing with the risk associated with large-scale landslides
such as these described above is not an easy task. In prevention, hazard assessment and mapping, one has to address
the problem of estimating return periods of reactivation
events of individual landslides. In some cases, the return
period of reactivation can be roughly assessed on the basis of
available historical archives (Regione Emilia-Romagna
2014). Such archives contain reports about hundreds of
known reactivation events which occurred in the last centuries. Many of the older records refer to events that damaged villages which were built, since the ninth century, on
top of landslide deposits. The awareness of recurrent slope
stability problems, with return periods in the range of centuries or decades, has led decision makers to officially
declare tens of villages to be transferred or to be consolidated. Nonetheless, an objective difficulty in estimating
return periods remains for the majority of landslides, for
which no historical record is available. Therefore, land-use
regulations are based on inventory maps, distinguishing
active and dormant landslides, rather than on hazard maps,
220
Fig. 18.5 The Corniglio landslide (Parma Province, photo G. Bertolini, 2001) was fully reactivated in the 1994–1996 period, after being
historically active in 1740 and 1902 as well as in the sixth, seventh and
sixteenth centuries (Tellini and Chelli 2003). The complete reactivation
Fig. 18.6 The Valoria landslide
reactivated in 2001, 2005 and
2009 (Modena Province, photo A.
Corsini, 2009). Before
reactivation in 2001, the slope
was fully covered by a dense
woodland (Ronchetti et al. 2007).
During the 2001 reactivation, as
well as in 2005 and 2009, clayey
material flowed at velocities up to
10 m/hour. The total
displacement in each single event
was in some sectors even higher
than 100 m (Daenhe and Corsini
2013)
G. Bertolini et al.
of 1996 was initiated by retrogression of the main scarp and landslide
toe advance for about 50 m as a bulk, almost damming the Parma River
(Larini et al. 2001)
18
Fingerprints of Large-Scale Landslides in the Landscape …
Fig. 18.7 The permanently active Roncovetro landslide (Reggio
Emilia Province, photo G. Bertolini, 2012). The activity of the
landslide is probably determined by the inflow of highly mineralized
groundwater mixed with methane, coming from the subsurface
(Bertolini 2010)
indicating intensity and return period of expected phenomena. This makes cost-benefit analysis impossible in land-use
planning and, consequently, land-use regulations do not
generally prohibit new settlements on dormant landslides.
Moving on to the forecast phase, it should be acknowledged
that cumulated rainfall thresholds are presently used for
general wide-area warning purposes in the Emilia Apennines
(Berti et al. 2012). However, it is impossible to know
specifically which landslide, among thousands in the Emilia
Apennines, is actually going to resume activity for a rainfall
event above warning threshold. This makes site-specific
response actions impossible. Ideally, since reactivation of a
landslide proceeds initially at a rather slow rate, site-specific
continuous monitoring systems can be effectively used, in
association with evacuation plans, in order to reduce risk to
people. In practice, early warning systems can be used only
221
Fig. 18.8 The Ca’ Lita landslide, reactivated in 2002 and 2004
(Reggio Emilia Province, photo G. Bertolini, 2012). During the 2004
event the landslide toe advanced for more than 400 m, filling a
previously existing gully (Borgatti et al. 2006; Corsini et al. 2009). The
activity of this landslide is probably co-determined by the inflow of
highly mineralized groundwater mixed with methane uprising along a
regional fault line (Cervi et al. 2012)
in a limited number of cases which generally are restricted to
landslides that have recently resumed activity in paroxysmal
phases. Extending this approach to thousands of landslides
of the Emilia Apennine is utopia. Finally, in the response
phase, structural and deep drainage works aimed at slope
consolidation are possible and, actually, have often been
among the preferred risk mitigation measures. However,
they are extremely costly and technically complex, due to
the huge dimensions of landslides, significant thickness of
landslide bodies, hydro-mechanical complexity of processes
and deposits (Borgatti et al. 2008). Moreover, they require a
proper maintenance programme, an effort that is not generally properly financed.
222
G. Bertolini et al.
Fig. 18.9 The Signatico landslide, reactivated in 1977 (Parma Province, photo G. Bertolini, 2014). There were several previous reactivation
events: ninth century, 1710, nineteenth century and 1906, causing formation of a dammed lake (Tellini and Chelli 2003)
Fig. 18.10 The Capriglio
landslide reactivated in 2013
(Parma Province, photo G.
Bertolini, 2013). Reactivation
caused retrogression of the scarp
by about 300 m and advancement
of the toe for about 1 km, which
filled an existing river gully
18
Fingerprints of Large-Scale Landslides in the Landscape …
18.6
Conclusions
Arcuate scarps, that are hundreds of metres long and accumulation areas that are tens of hectares wide, are the fingerprints of millennial activity and morphological evolution of
large-scale landslides in the Emilia Apennines. Since historic
times, especially from the ninth–eleventh century AD, several
villages in the Emilia Apennines have been built on top of
landslide deposits, mostly because they constitute flatter zones
with a soft clayey substratum that makes cultivation and settlement easier than in the surrounding steep and rocky stable
slopes. Evidently, at the time of village establishment, these
ancient landslides must have been dormant for periods of time
long enough for locals to loose memory of previous catastrophic reactivation events. This recurrent loss of memory
about disastrous landslides has actually continued until the
beginning of the twentieth century, when the first structured
reports of historical landslides were compiled, consisting
mostly of events occurred in post-medieval times during the
so called Little Ice Age (Almagià 1907). Nowadays, the historical archive of landslide events (Regione Emilia-Romagna
2014) contains many hundreds of known reactivation events
which occurred in the last centuries.
As some of these landslides will inevitably reactivate in
the future, as they did in the past centuries, scientists and
decision makers are faced with the difficult task to find a way
to cope with their recurrent activity in terms of prevention,
forecast and response policies. This might involve
improvement of land-use planning by including hazard maps
that account for the relative probability of reactivation of
these phenomena, implementation of monitoring that would
help to assess both triggering conditions and precursory
movements more precisely and, possibly, development of
forecasting event scenarios and improvement of evacuation
and risk management plans. It might also involve application
of new approaches for evaluating or re-evaluating potential
benefits of structural mitigation works and allocation of
resources for their maintenance as well as for the maintenance of a more widespread monitoring network. Finally, it
might also require a more incisive action for effective relocation of some villages and roads that, after all, might be the
most cost-effective measure to undertake. Significant steps
have been made along these lines of actions in the last
decades but other crucial ones are still to be made. Certainly
enough, these landslides will persist in the landscape of the
Emilia Apennine for some millennia ahead and, for the time
being, we should be aware of this type of potentially
destructive processes. Actually, considering the large size
and high thickness of some landslides deposits, it is quite
evident that in some periods in the past these landslides must
have been even much more active than in the last decades.
Therefore it can be concluded that landslides are hazardous,
but they are also part of the natural system and it is up to
223
mankind to find ways to adapt rather than grumble about the
occurrence of landslides. In the meantime, we might also be
allowed to be intellectually fascinated by their features that
witness the impressive magnitude of gravitational slope
processes that, from the Late Pleistocene until today, have
profoundly shaped the landscape of this geologically complex mountain area.
References
Almagià R (1907) Studi geografici sulle frane in Italia. Mem Soc
Geograf 13:1–342
Berti M, Martina MLV, Franceschini S, Pignone S, Simoni A,
Pizziolo M (2012) Probabilistic rainfall thresholds for landslide
occurrence using a Bayesian approach. J Geophys Res 117
(F04006):1–20
Bertolini G (2007) Radiocarbon dating on landslides in the Northern
Apennines (Italy). In: McInnes R, Jakeways J, Fairbank H,
Mathie E (eds) Landslide and Climate Changes: challenges and
solutions. Proceedings of the International Conference on Landslides and Climate Change, Ventnor, Isle of Wight, UK, 21–24 May
2007. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 73–80
Bertolini G (2010) Large earth flows in Emilia-Romagna (Northern
Apennines, Italy): origin, reactivation and possible hazard assessment strategies. Z Deut G Geowiss 161(2):139–162
Bertolini G, Pellegrini M (2001) The landslides of the Emilia
Apennines (Northern Italy) with reference to those which resumed
activity in the 1994–1999 period and required Civil Protection
interventions. Quad Geol Appl 8(1):27–74
Bertolini G, Pizziolo M (2008) Risk assessment strategies for the
reactivation of earth flows in the Northern Apennines (Italy). Eng
Geol 102(3–4):178–192
Bertolini G, Tellini C (2001) New radiocarbon dating for landslide
occurrences in the Emilia Apennines (Northern Italy). Trans Japan
Geom Un 22(4):C-23
Bertolini G, Cazzoli MA, Centineo MC, Cibin U, Martini A
(eds) (2009) Il paesaggio geologico dell’Emilia-Romagna
(1:250,000). Regione Emilia-Romagna, S.EL.CA., Firenze
Bettelli G, De Nardo MT (2001) Geological outlines of the Emilia
Apennines (Northern Italy) and introduction to the formations
surrounding the landslides which resumed activity in the 1994–
1999 period. Quad Geol Appl 8(1):1–26
Borgatti L, Corsini A, Barbieri M, Sartini G, Truffelli G, Caputo G,
Puglisi C (2006) Large reactivated landslides in weak rock masses:
a case study from the Northern Apennines (Italy). Landslides
3:115–124
Borgatti L, Corsini A, Marcato G, Ronchetti F, Zabuski L (2008)
Appraise the structural mitigation of landslide risk via numerical
modelling: a case study from the Northern Apennines (Italy).
Georisk 2:141–160
Cervi F, Ronchetti F, Martinelli G, Bogaard TA, Corsini A (2012)
Origin and assessment of deep groundwater inflow in the Ca’ Lita
landslide using hydrochemistry and in situ monitoring. Hydrol
Earth Syst Sci 16:4205–4221
Corsini A, Borgatti L, Cervi F, Daehne A, Ronchetti F, Sterzai P (2009)
Estimating mass-wasting processes in active earth slides—earthflows with time-series of High-Resolution DEMs from photogrammetry and airborne LiDAR. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:433–439
Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In:
Turner AK, Shuster RL (eds) Landslides: Investigation and
Mitigation. Transportation Research Board, Spec Rep 247,
pp 36–75
224
Daehne A, Corsini A (2013) Kinematics of active earthflows revealed
by Digital Image Correlation and DEM of Difference techniques
applied to multi-temporal LiDAR data. Earth Surf Proc Land 38
(6):640–654
Larini G, Malaguti C, Pellegrini M, Tellini C (2001) La Lama di
Corniglio (Appennino parmense) riattivata negli anni 1994–1999.
Quad Geol Appl 8(1):59–114
Regione Emilia-Romagna (2013) Landslide characteristics in
Emilia-Romagna. Regione Emilia-Romagna. http://ambiente.
regione.emilia-romagna.it/geologia-en/temi/dissesto-idrogeologico/
le-caratteristiche-dei-fenomeni-franosi-in-emilia-romagna
Regione Emilia-Romagna (2014) Historical archive of landslide events.
Regione Emilia-Romagna. http://ambiente.regione.emilia-romagna.
it/geologia-en/temi/dissesto-idrogeologico/larchivio-storico-deimovimenti-franosi
Ronchetti F, Borgatti L, Cervi F, Lucente CC, Veneziano M, Corsini A
(2007) The Valoria landslide reactivation in 2005–2006 (Northern
Apennines, Italy). Landslides 4(2):189–195
G. Bertolini et al.
Ronchetti F, Borgatti L, Cervi F, Corsini A (2010) Hydro-mechanical
features of landslide reactivation in weak clayey rocks. Bull Eng
Geol Environ 69:267–274
Soldati M, Borgatti L, Cavallin A, De Amicis M, Frigerio S,
Giardino M, Mortara G, Pellegrini GB, Ravazzi C, Tellini C,
Zanchi A, Alberto W, Albanese D, Chelli A, Marchetti M,
Palomba M, Panizza M (2006) Geomorphological evolution of
slopes and climate changes in Northern Italy during the Late
Quaternary: spatial and temporal distribution of landslides and
landscape sensitivity implications. Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 29
(2):165–183
Tellini C, Chelli A (2003) Ancient and recent landslide occurrences
in the Emilia Apennines (Northern Apennines, Italy). Proceedings
of Workshop “Geomorphological sensitivity and system
response”, Camerino-Modena Apennines (Italy), July 4th–9th,
2003, pp 104–114
Mud Volcanoes in the Emilia-Romagna
Apennines: Small Landforms of Outstanding
Scenic and Scientific Value
19
Doriano Castaldini and Paola Coratza
Abstract
Mud volcanoes are emissions of cold mud due to the ascent to the surface of salty and
muddy waters mixed with gaseous (methane) and, in minor part, fluid hydrocarbons
(petroleum veils) along faults and fractures. In the Emilia-Romagna Apennines (Northern
Italy) mud volcanoes are closely linked to the active tectonic compression associated with a
thrust of regional importance. They are mostly cone shaped and show variable geometry
and size, ranging from one to few metres, and are located in 19 sites in the northwestern
part of the Apennines. The mud volcanoes of the region have been known since a long time
and have always aroused great interest due to their outstanding scenic value. In the past, the
mud volcano emissions have been used in many ways: the mud was applied for cosmetic
use and the natural oil was much appreciated for its balsamic and purgative properties. In
the last decades, the mud volcanoes have represented relevant tourist attractiveness.
Keywords
Mud volcanoes
19.1
Geotourism
Introduction
Mud volcanoes are usually cone-shaped landforms constructed by the extrusion of mud, rock fragments, fluids
(such as saline water and fluid hydrocarbons) and gases. The
normal activity of mud volcanoes consists of gradual and
progressive outflows of semi-liquid material. Explosive and
paroxysmal activities are responsible for ejecting mud and
decimetric to metric clasts.
The occurrence of mud volcanoes is controlled by several
factors, such as tectonic activity, sedimentary loading due to
rapid sedimentation, the existence of thick, fine-grained
plastic sediments and continuous hydrocarbon accumulation
(cf. Dimitrov 2002). Mud volcanoes have variable geometry
and size, from one to two metres to several hundred metres
in height. These features, expression of a remarkable natural
process initiated deep in the sedimentary succession, are
D. Castaldini P. Coratza (&)
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Università di
Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 103, 41125 Modena, Italy
e-mail: paola.coratza@unimore.it
Emilia-Romagna Apennines
distributed worldwide, both inland and offshore. They can be
found in a wide variety of tectonic settings, including passive continental margins, continental interiors, as well as
transform and convergent plate boundaries. Anyhow they
typically predominate at converging plate boundaries and are
disseminated all along the Alpine-Himalayan, Pacific and
Caribbean mobile belts.
The principal gas emitted by mud volcano eruptions is
thermogenic methane, generated within the sediments at
depths often greater than 10 km. It is commonly accepted
that overpressure generated by methane-rich fluids is one of
the main driving mechanisms triggering mud volcanism
(Dimitrov 2002). Despite their name, morphology and the
resemblance in the activity are the only characteristics of
mud volcanoes that link them with magmatic volcanism.
They generally exhibit a typical cone form, although of
smaller dimension than the magmatic relatives, but other
forms, such as sharp cones, flat and plateau cones, dome
shapes, calderas, can be distinguished. Mud volcanoes
appear to be generally characterised by a gentle activity, but
they may occasionally experience impressive explosive
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_19
225
226
D. Castaldini and P. Coratza
eruptions, with violent ejection of mud and rock blocks often
accompanied by flames produced by self-ignition of the
methane contained in the mud.
Mud volcanoes show a high scenic value and are well
known from many areas of the world such as Azerbaijan,
Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia and Ecuador. In Europe they
can be found in Italy, Albania and Romania. They are quite
common in Italy, with the most spectacular ones located in
Emilia-Romagna and in Sicily. Italian mud volcanoes are
generally characterised by relatively small apparatuses, and
occur along the external compressive margin of the Apennine chain (Martinelli and Judd 2004). They are clustered in
three main geographical groups: northern Apennines
(Pede-Apennines margin of Emilia-Romagna), central
Apennines (eastern Marche and Abruzzo) and Sicily.
Moreover, there are also few mud volcanoes offshore in the
central sector of the Adriatic Sea (Fig. 19.1).
The mud volcanoes of Italy have been known for a long
time and have always aroused great interest. They were first
described by Pliny the Elder, at around 50 AD, in his
monumental “Naturalis Historia”. Others in the following
centuries described the mud volcanoes with fantastic attributes of impressiveness and spectacularity (e.g. the naturalists Spallanzani, at the end of the eighteenth century, and
the Abbot Stoppani at the end of nineteenth century).
19.2
Mud Volcanoes in the Emilia-Romagna
Apennines
Mud volcanoes of relatively small size ( 500 m2), but of
high scientific interest and scenic value, punctuate the
northwestern sector of the Pede-Apennine front of
Emilia-Romagna, between Parma and Bologna, representing
almost 30% of all those present on the Italian territory
(Figs. 19.1 and 19.2). They are genetically linked to the
ascent of salty and muddy waters mixed with gaseous
(methane) to the surface and, in minor part, with circulation
of fluid hydrocarbons (petroleum veils) along tectonic discontinuities produced by the overthrusting of the Apennine
chain front. Their local name “Salse“ results from the high
“salt” content of the muddy waters whose origin is related to
the presence of the sea that occupied the present Po Plain till
about one million years ago and that deposited clays which
nowadays outcrop in the hilly sector of the Apennines.
The shape of the mud ejection apparatuses depends on the
density of the muddy mixture: if it is dense, cones (single,
double or multiple) of height ranging from a few decimetres
to some metres may develop; if the muddy mixture is liquid,
ground level-pool mud volcanoes (diameters ranging from a
few decimetres to some metres) are formed. The cones have
the classic shape of a volcano, occupy roughly circular areas,
and stand up above the general ground level. They
intermittently emit gas bubbles and muddy water from a
crater; these vary from a few centimetres to almost a metre in
diameter (Fig. 19.3).
Mud volcanoes show a rather discontinuous activity;
sometimes old apparatuses become dormant or even extinct
whereas new vents can appear in other spots. Therefore, the
morphology of mud volcano areas is constantly evolving
with the formation of new craters whilst others cease their
activity.
The clayey materials ejected from the craters cover the
surrounding ground with mudflows; owing to their fluidity,
mud flows can cover distances of up to 100 m from the vent.
In the hot season, the shrinking of mud deposits creates
typical polygonal mud cracks (Fig. 19.4).
From a geological point of view the Emilia-Romagna
Apennines are a fold-and-thrust belt, characterised by complex structures and geodynamic evolution. The northern
Apennines originated from the consumption of the LiguriaPiedmont oceanic basin, located in the western Tethys, and
the consequent collision between the Adria plate and the
European plate, which started in the Upper Cretaceous
(Bosellini 2017).
The mud volcanoes occur above the hanging wall of the
active Pede-Apennine thrust, and thus have their origin in
the deformation associated with this regional structure
(Manga and Bonini 2012). In this sector of the Apennines,
the following main structural and stratigraphic units crop out
(Fig. 19.2): (i) Ligurian Units made up of deep-sea sediments, including Jurassic Ophiolites, followed by thick
sequences of Cretaceous to Eocene calcareous or terrigeneous turbidites; (ii) mainly terrigenous Epiligurian Succession of Middle Eocene to late Messinian, uncorformably
resting on the previously deformed Ligurian Units;
(iii) prevalently marly-clayey Late Miocene–Pleistocene
marine rocks.
The morphology of this sector of the Apennines is
strongly influenced by this sequence of lithotypes. In the
surroundings of mud volcanoes, clayey terrains largely
outcrop which are characterised by typical and locally
spectacular “calanchi” landforms (badlands). They are typically shaped in clayey soils due to concentrated gully erosion. The landscape is also characterised by several
landslides of different types, from shallow movements to
large-scale displacements.
19.3
The Landscape of Mud Volcanoes
in the Emilia Pede-Apennines
The mud volcanoes of the Pede-Apennine front of the
Emilia-Romagna Region are mainly located in the Emilia
sector (the northwestern one) and are associated with a
SSW-dipping thrust.
19
Mud Volcanoes in the Emilia-Romagna Apennines …
227
Fig. 19.1 The geographical
distribution of mud volcanoes
inland (red dots) and offshore
(yellow dots) in Italy (data source
Martinelli and Judd 2004). The
box refers to the mud volcanoes
in Emilia-Romagna Apennines
(see Fig. 19.2)
Here below only the mud volcano areas with scenic value
(and easily accessible) are described (Fig. 19.2).
19.3.1
Mud Volcanoes of the Parma Apennines
The mud volcanoes of the Parma Apennines are located in
three sites in which the formations of the Epiligurian Succession outcrop. In detail, in the hills of Parma Apennines
the mud volcanoes of Rivalta, Torre and S. Polo d’Enza (n.
1, 2, 3 in Fig. 19.2) can be found. All these sites are modest
in size and have no volcanoes with height of over 50 cm.
Noteworthy are the first two mud volcano fields which occur
in elliptical depressions (approximately coincident with the
axis of an WNW–ESE trending anticline) interpreted as mud
calderas (Bonini 2012). The Rivalta field is hosted in a
sub-tabular mud-filled depression at an altitude between 320
and 325 m a.s.l.; active vents occur as small cones and
bubbling pools in the depression central sector (Fig. 19.3a).
The Torre field depression exhibits comparatively steeper
scarps that connect to a gentler zone likely to represent the
residual caldera floor. Fluid venting, consisting of bubbling
mud pots, occurs in two zones corresponding to the apical
part of small creeks entering the amphitheatre at about
330 m a.s.l.
In Rivalta and Torre sites, agricultural activity interferes
with muddy emissions, with varying effects in space and
time; in fact owing to their high fluidity, the ejected mud
flows tend to create small swamps, which can disappear as a
result of agricultural activity.
228
D. Castaldini and P. Coratza
Fig. 19.2 Geological sketch map of the Emilia Apennines (modified
after Remitti et al. 2012). Areas of mud volcanism (red dots): 1 Rivalta;
2 Torre; 3 San Polo d’Enza; 4 Casola-Querciola; 5 Regnano; 6
Montegibbio; 7 Nirano; 8 Montebaranzone; 9 Centora; 10 Madonna di
Puianello; 11 Ospitaletto; 12 Canalina; 13 Sassuno; 14 San Martino in
Pedriolo; 15 Bergullo; 16 Sallustra Valley; 17 Pedriaga; 18 Casalfiumanese; 19 Cà Rubano
19.3.2
19.3.3
Mud Volcanoes of the Reggio Emilia
Apennines
The mud volcanoes of the Reggio Emilia Apennines are
located in the Ligurian Units outcropping in the Viano district close to Regnano and Casola-Querciola hamlets (n.
4 and 5 in Fig. 19.2). The Regnano mud volcano is the
second mud volcano field in size, surpassed in all
Emilia-Romagna Apennines only by that of Nirano (Modena
Apennines); it consists of mud breccias and mud flows
spreading over an area of about 1 ha. The Regnano mud
volcano field is found at an altitude between 420 and 430 m
a.s.l., on the top of a slope which faces eastward. The
apparatuses are aligned along normal faults which allow
surface leakage of fluid derived from sources located at a
depth between 3 and 6 km. The fault system associated with
the Regnano mud volcanoes drains a Miocene reservoir
which supplies formation water and thermogenic methane
(Capozzi and Picotti 2002). The activity sometimes is quite
remarkable and occurs in several vents. So much that the
main mud ejection mouths assume a cone trunk shape and
the relative mud flows remain as higher ground than the
surrounding terrain (Figs. 19.3b and 19.4). The
Casola-Querciola mud volcanoes are located in an almost
flat zone (at about 440 m a.s.l.), a few kilometres far to
northwest of Regnano and they are mainly level-pool mud
volcanoes. A new mud ejection point, which was formed in
July 2014, affects a secondary road causing problems to the
local traffic. For both Regnano and Casola-Querciola areas,
educational footpaths with panels were built in July 2015.
Mud Volcanoes of the Modena
Apennines
In the Modena Apennines, mud volcanism occurs in a wide
area (diameter of about 20 km) in which formations
belonging to Ligurian Units, Epiligurian Succession and
Late Miocene–Pleistocene marine deposits outcrop. In
detail, mud volcanoes are found in six areas: Montegibbio,
Nirano, Montebaranzone, Centora, Madonna di Puianello,
Ospitaletto and Canalina (n. 6 to 12 in Fig. 19.2).
The Montegibbio mud volcano field, in the Sassuolo
district (n. 6 in Fig. 19.2), is currently represented by few
small pools of salty waters, with limited gas bubbling, rather
than true mud volcanoes; such pools occur within a moderately elongated depression at an altitude of about 230 m
a.s.l. Historical records report an extremely intense activity,
characterised by emissions accompanied by explosions and
by a large cone approximately 10 m tall, described by several authors. Even the eruption of 91 BC mentioned by Pliny
is believed to have caused extensive damage to historical
Roman settlements. Extensive clay deposits widespread
downstream the Montegibbio mud volcanoes are evidence of
this eruptive event. The decreased activity could be partly
explained by the exploitation of subsurface fluids for supplying the adjacent Salvarola spa (Bonini 2009). The mud
volcano that caused the large 1835 eruption (described in
detail and mapped by nineteenth century authors) is now
extinct and looks like a small hill which has its top at 281 m
a.s.l. The 1835 eruption was accompanied by a seismic
tremor that was perceived by the population up to several
19
Mud Volcanoes in the Emilia-Romagna Apennines …
Fig. 19.3 Mud volcanoes in the Emilia Pede-Apennines: a close-up of
ducted high-velocity flow at Torre mud volcanoes (Parma Apennines)
(photo J. Valdati); b close-up of the main mud ejection mouth of the
Regnano mud volcanism area (Reggio Emilia Apennines) (photo N.
Borghi); c cone of the Nirano Natural Reserve mud volcanoes field at
sunset (Modena Apennines) (photo L. Callegari); d panoramic view
229
over some of the mud cones of Nirano Natural Reserve (Modena
Apennines) (photo L. Callegari); e cone and mudflow in the Madonna
di Puianello area (Modena Apennines) (photo C. Rebecchi);
f level-pool mud volcanoes of Ospitaletto (Modena Apennines) (photo
D. Castaldini)
230
D. Castaldini and P. Coratza
Fig. 19.4 Main mud ejection
mouths of the Regnano mud
volcanism area in the Reggio
Emilia Apennines (photo D.
Castaldini)
kilometres away; the volume of mud emitted was estimated
at 500,000 m3, whereas the spout of ejection reached a
height of 40 m and the eruptive deposit was distributed over
an area of 30,000 m2.
Particularly noteworthy is the Nirano mud volcano field
(n. 7 in Fig. 19.2), located in the Fiorano Modenese district,
which, with a surface area of approximately 75,000 m2, is
one of the best developed and largest mud volcano field of
the entire Italian territory and among the largest in Europe; it
is thus protected as natural reserve (Salse di Nirano) since
1982. The Nirano mud volcanoes are found at the bottom of
an elliptical depression (Fig. 19.5), interpreted as a
collapse-like structure (caldera) that may have developed in
response to the emptying of a shallow mud chamber triggered by several ejections and evacuation of fluid sediments
(Castaldini et al. 2005); the bottom of the depression is at ca.
200 m and the rim at 250 m a.s.l. The Nirano field is
characterised by the presence of two main systems of
faults/fractures, SW–NE and NW–SE oriented, respectively.
They are highlighted by the arrangements of mud volcanoes,
which show clear alignments, and by the elongated shape of
the caldera (Castaldini et al. 2005; Bonini 2008).
There are several individual or multiple cones within the
field of the mud volcanoes of Nirano (Fig. 19.3c, d), but it is
not possible to provide the exact number of mud-ejecting
points, because the morphology of this area is constantly
evolving. In fact, they have a rather discontinuous activity;
apparatuses become dormant or even extinct whereas new
vents can appear in other spots. Nowadays, mud emission
occurs clustered into five main venting areas constituted by
cones as well as level-pool mud volcanoes. A mud chamber
was identified at a depth of 25 m; this mud chamber could
represent the last phase of mud accumulation before the final
emission, not excluding the existence of deeper larger
reservoirs (Accaino et al. 2007).
Other geomorphological features in the Natural Reserve
of Salse di Nirano are badlands which are quite evident on
many slopes (Fig. 19.5). The numerous facilities, excursion
and educational footpaths with panels, equipped trails (one
for people with disabilities), the Cà Tassi visitor centre and
the Cà Rossa eco-museum, make the area accessible to all,
supporting environmental education initiatives.
The Madonna di Puianello vents (n. 10 in Fig. 19.2) occur
in two areas located in the Maranello district. The most
important mud volcanism site is found near Casa Possessione, in a flat depression at the altitude of 440 m a.s.l. that
probably represents a caldera-like feature (Bonini 2012).
Actually, it is characterised by three main cones aligned in a
WNW–ESE direction and three main bubbling mud
level-pools. The mud ejection apparatuses (Fig. 19.3e) are
located in a private property affected by agricultural activity
from which are protected by wire mesh.
The Ospitaletto mud volcanism area (n. 11 in Fig. 19.2) is
located in the Marano sul Panaro district at the bottom of a
south-facing gentle concave depression at an altitude of
about 525 m a.s.l. It is currently constituted by about a
dozen of eruptive apparatuses with moderate activity: most
of them are bubbling mud level-pools with diameter ranging
19
Mud Volcanoes in the Emilia-Romagna Apennines …
231
Fig. 19.5 Aerial view of the mud volcanoes of the Nirano Natural Reserve (Modena Apennines). The mud volcanoes (grey spots) are located at
the bottom of an elliptical depression surrounded by badlands (photo G. Bertolini)
from about 0.1 to 1 m (Fig. 19.3f). The area is easy to reach
by road and is outlined by educational panels.
The Centora, Montebaranzone and Canalina mud volcanoes (n. 8, 9 and 12, respectively, in Fig. 19.2) are nice
examples of mud volcanism. Anyhow, they are difficult to be
reached, and therefore less known and visited than the others
sites.
volcanoes of Bergullo, n. 15 in Fig. 19.2). One of the Bergullo vents is a 3 m diameter bubbling mud level-pools from
which fluid is periodically exploited for supplying the near
Riolo Terme spa.
19.3.4
From a general point of view, earthquakes have been considered to be a potentially important trigger for mud volcano
eruptions (e.g. Martinelli and Panahi 2005; Bonini 2012),
but mud volcanoes also erupt independently of seismicity.
Noteworthy is the occurrence of the above-mentioned
giant mud volcano eruption, associated with the contemporaneous destructive earthquake of 91 BC that struck the
Modena Pede-Apennine margin.
The relationships between seismicity and mud volcano
activity have been testified by the strong seismic events that
occurred in 2012 in northern Italy. In detail, in May 2012 a
seismic sequence struck the lower central part of the Po
Plain, located about 50 km NE of the Modena and Reggio
Emilia Pede-Apennine front. The main shocks occurred on
20 and 29 May, with local magnitude 5.9 and 5.8,
Mud Volcanoes of the Bologna
Apennines
In the Bologna Apennine front, seven mud volcano sites are
located in the Umbria-Romagna Units, in the Epiligurian
Succession and in the Late Miocene–Pleistocene marine
deposits (n. 13 to 19 in Fig. 19.2) at altitudes ranging from
ca. 50–500 m a.s.l. The most part of them have surface
area <5 m2 and are scarcely known. They are level-pool
mud volcanoes with rather discontinuous activity. The only
two Bologna Apennines mud volcanism areas described by
previous authors are currently inaccessible as located in
areas affected by landslides and badlands (mud volcanoes of
Sassuno, n. 13 in Fig. 19.2) or hidden by the dense vegetation which covers the site where they are located (mud
19.4
Mud Volcano Eruptions
and Earthquakes
232
D. Castaldini and P. Coratza
respectively. The seismic sequence, due to buried Apennine
faulted folds, caused a number of fatalities and significant
damage as well as many ground effects such as cracks,
liquefaction-type phenomena and hydrological anomalies
(Emergeo Working Group 2013). A few days before the
onset of the seismic sequence, an anomalous activity was
observed in some mud volcanism areas. In particular in
Nirano,
Ospitaletto,
Puianello,
Regnano
and
Casola-Querciola areas (Modena and Reggio Emilia Apennines), normally inactive or poorly active mud volcanoes
became active or showed increased activity and new small
vents formed (Manga and Bonini 2012).
19.5
Cultural Value and Tourism
Attractiveness
The peculiar geological phenomenon of mud volcanoes
makes this sector of the Emilia-Romagna Apennines a site of
worship and interest since the Roman period. In particular
the field of Nirano has been known since ancient times and
has been studied by historians, scientists and travellers. The
area where the Nirano mud volcanoes are located was called
“the beautiful place”, due to the high aesthetic value of hilly
landscapes forming the foothills of the Apennines. Since the
Roman period, the Nirano area was a dwelling place of
organised groups that worked with ceramics and bricks, as
testified by many historical sources and proved by the discovery of an ancient crockery furnace. Probably, as in other
cults and places, the area of the Nirano mud volcanoes had
Fig. 19.6 The Salse di Nirano as
illustrated in famous book “Il Bel
Paese” by Abbot Antonio
Stoppani (1876)
represented in the past an ideal place where the phenomenon
of leakage of water and mud was interpreted as a prodigy. In
his “Naturalis Historia”, Pliny the Elder, as other scientists
later from the seventeenth century, described the salse with
apocalyptic and spectacular attributes. In particular, he
described the eruption of a mud volcano in the Modena
district, with skyscraping flames and smoke, seen from a
distance of about 10 km, during which the violent ejection of
overpressured mud was accompanied by methane combustion. At the end of the nineteenth century, the abbot Stoppani
compared the salse’s phenomenon to molehills out of which
noises similar to “retching” came out, giving them the epithet of “cesspool volcanoes” (Stoppani 1876) (Fig. 19.6).
Mud volcanoes are interesting owing also to the ecological changes induced by the widespread deposition of
sodium chlorine. Indeed, the herbaceous plants which
colonise the soil around mud volcanoes make up the most
complete example of halophilous vegetation.
In addition to arouse interest and curiosity, the mud
volcanoes between Nirano and Sassuolo (Modena Apennines), were used in many ways in the past. The mud from the
salse was applied for cosmetic use as mud masks and for
mud baths at the ancient Salvarola Spa, near Sassuolo. Also,
natural oil of the salse was much appreciated for its balsamic
and purgative properties and sold by monks of San Pietro in
Modena. Nowadays, the mud is used only in veterinary
science to blaze up articulations of horses.
Besides their cultural value, the Emilia-Romagna mud
volcanoes represent a tourist attraction as testified by an
increasing number of visitors (about 70,000 visitors in 2015
19
Mud Volcanoes in the Emilia-Romagna Apennines …
in the Salse di Nirano Natural Reserve). Numerous initiatives
to improve access and enhance understanding have been
developed in the last decades. In particular, tourist environmental maps, geotourism maps, books in hard copy and
digital format, videos, virtual flights, multimedia and audio
CDs have been implemented (e.g. Castaldini et al. 2011).
These activities are targeted at various potential users, tourists, local residents, young people, schools, etc., and are
aimed at the enhancement of geological and geomorphological aspects of the natural heritage making it available to
the public.
Worthy of note is the 2015 initiative called the “Mud
Volcanoes Route” for the promotion of the environment, art,
wellness, tastes, technology and talent of the territory of
districts of Viano (Reggio Emilia Apennines), Sassuolo,
Fiorano Modenese and Maranello (Modena Apennines), in
which part of the Emilia-Romagna mud volcano fields are
located. The Mud Volcanoes Route is an emotional journey
that connects places and excellences through the geological
phenomenon of mud volcanoes.
19.6
Conclusions
Mud volcanoes are landforms of outstanding scenic value
that are expression of a remarkable natural process initiated
deep in the sedimentary succession. Although these features
have a long history of investigation, in recent years interest
in mud volcanism has increased for several reasons. A considerable impulse to investigations on this topic has been
recorded in part because of petroleum exploration but also
due to the role that mud volcanoes play in the global
methane budget, a potent greenhouse gas.
Moreover, thanks to their scenic value, mud volcanoes
generate tourist attraction; for example, the natural reserves
of Northern Apennines of Nirano or the “vulcanii noroiosi”
of Buzau (Eastern Carpathian foredeep, Romania) are relevant examples in Europe. Recently a growing interest in the
heritage value of mud volcanoes has been observed in
Emilia-Romagna, in relation to geoconservation and geotourism issues. In this context, in 2015 the above-mentioned
Mud Volcanoes Route has been developed. The itinerary is
outlined in a leaflet containing short explanation, photos and
a map in which are located areas with mud volcanoes, castles, archaeological sites, historic and holy buildings and
represents an initiative for the promotion of environment,
art, wellness, tastes, technology and talent of the territory of
these districts. Although the hazard from mud volcanoes is
generally low, sometimes they may lead to sudden and
violent eruptions and isolated casualties have been reported.
Very notable cases in this regard are those of the Offida mud
volcanoes (Ascoli Piceno, Marche Region), which at the end
of 1959 exploded with a deafening roar, associated with a
233
small earthquake and damaging some houses of the areas; or
the most recent event that occurred in September 2014 in the
Natural Reserve of Macalube di Aragona in Sicily where a
mud volcano erupted, with an ejection of mud up to about
20 m above the ground and causing the burial of an adult
and two children killing them. When a given geological site
acquires a tourism value, it is necessary to assess the possible natural hazard processes which might threaten the
safety of visitors (Soldati et al. 2008). In particular,
fast-occurring processes might directly involve tourists in
proximity of the site of interest or along access roads and
footpaths. In this context, interdisciplinary research aiming
at analysing the causes and understanding triggering mechanisms of paroxysmal and dangerous phenomena in the
Natural Reserve of Nirano, are in progress, funded by the
local municipality.
References
Accaino F, Bratus A, Conti S, Fontana D, Tinivella U (2007) Fluid
seepage in mud volcanoes of the northern Apennines: an integrated
geophysical and geological study. J Appl Geophys 63:90–101
Bonini M (2008) Elliptical mud volcano caldera as stress indicator in an
active compressional setting (Nirano, Pede-Apennine margin,
northern Italy). Geology 36:131–134
Bonini M (2009) Mud volcano eruptions and earthquakes in the
Northern Apennines and Sicily, Italy. Tectonophysics 474:723–735
Bonini M (2012) Mud volcanoes: indicators of stress orientation and
tectonic controls. Earth Sci Rev 115:121–152
Bosellini A (2017) Outline of the geology of Italy. In: Soldati M,
Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer,
Cham, pp 21–27
Capozzi R, Picotti V (2002) Fluid migration and origin of a mud
volcano in the Northern Apennines (Italy): the role of deeply rooted
normal faults. Terra Nova 14(5):363–370
Castaldini D, Valdati J, Ilies DC, Chiriac C, Bertogna I (2005)
Geo-Tourist map of the natural Reserve of Salse di Nirano (Modena
Apennines, Northern Italy). Il Quaternario 18:245–255
Castaldini D, Conventi M, Coratza P, Dallai D, Liberatoscioli E,
Sala L, Buldrini F (2011) Carta Turistico- Ambientale della Riserva
Naturale Regionale delle Salse di Nirano—Tourist-Environmental
Map of the Regional Natural Reserve of Salse di Nirano.
Tipolitografia Notizie, Modena. Map at 1:5000 scale
Dimitrov LI (2002) Mud volcanoes: the most important pathway for
degassing deeply buried sediments. Earth-Sci Rev 59:49–76
Emergeo Working Group (2013) Liquefaction phenomena associated
with the Emilia earthquake sequence of May-June 2012 (Northern
Italy). Nat Hazards Earth Sys 13:935–947
Manga M, Bonini M (2012) Large historical eruptions at subaerial mud
volcanoes, Italy. Nat Hazards Earth Sys 12:3377–3386
Martinelli G, Judd A (2004) Mud volcanoes of Italy. Geol J 39:49–61
Martinelli G, Panahi B (eds) (2005) Mud volcanoes, geodynamics and
seismicity. NATO Science Series, IV. Earth and environmental
sciences—vol. 51, Springer, Dordrecht, 288 pp
Remitti F, Bettelli G, Panini F, Carlini M, Vannucchi P (2012)
Deformation, fluid flow, and mass transfer in the forearc of
convergent margins: a two-day field trip in an ancient and exhumed
erosive convergent margin in the Northern Apennines. In: Vannucchi P, Fisher D (eds) Deformation, fluid flow, and mass transfer in
234
the Forearc of Convergent Margins: field guides to the Northern
Apennines in Emilia and in the Apuan Alps (Italy). GSA Field
Guide 28:1–33
Soldati M, Buhagiar S, Coratza P, Magri O, Pasuto A, Schembri JA
(2008) Integration of geomorphology and cultural heritage: a key
D. Castaldini and P. Coratza
issue for present and future times. Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 31(2):95–
96
Stoppani A (1876) Il Bel Paese. Conversazioni sulle bellezze naturali la
geologia e la geografia fisica d’Italia. Tipografia e Libreria Editrice
Ditta Giacomo Agnelli, 488 pp
The Outstanding Terraced Landscape
of the Cinque Terre Coastal Slopes
(Eastern Liguria)
20
Pierluigi Brandolini
Abstract
Due to a century-old agricultural practice, the coastal landscape of Cinque Terre (eastern
Liguria, northwestern Italy) has been almost completely modified by slope terracing via
reworking of millions of cubic metres of debris cover and the construction of thousands of
kilometres of dry stone walls. Given their geomorphological-environmental value, as well
as scenic and historical significance, the Cinque Terre represent one of the most outstanding
examples of human integration with the natural landscape within the Mediterranean region,
and have been recognised since 1997 as a World Heritage Site by UNESCO and included
since 1999 within a National Park. Following the abandonment of farming over the last half
a century, the terraced slopes have been progressively affected by crumbling of the dry
stone walls and mass movements. As dramatically evidenced by the effects of the major
rainstorm of October 2011, the Cinque Terre are currently at very high geomorphological
risk and thus mitigation measures and conservation policies are urgently needed.
Keywords
Terraced slope landscape
Cinque Terre Liguria
20.1
Introduction
Due to its rugged morphology and a general lack of flat areas
suitable for cultivation, the Liguria region in northwestern
Italy is widely characterised, both along the coastal zone and
inland, by slope terracing. Millions of cubic metres of debris
cover have been reworked and thousands of kilometres of
dry stone walls constructed. This impressive work of slope
transformation is the result of a century-old agricultural
practice, representing an outstanding example of human
integration with the natural landscape (Terranova et al. 2002;
Agnoletti 2013).
P. Brandolini (&)
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, dell’Ambiente e della Vita,
Università di Genova, Corso Europa 26, 16132 Genova, Italy
e-mail: brando@unige.it
Dry stone wall
Cultural heritage
Geomorphological risk
Located in easternmost Liguria (Fig. 20.1), the Cinque
Terre are considered one of the most peculiar and dramatic
examples of a terraced coastal landscape within the Mediterranean region. In fact, during the last millennium almost all
the steep slopes of Cinque Terre, from the edge of the sea cliff
and up to 400–500 m in elevation, have been modified by
agricultural terracing, creating a highly unusual, man-made
coastal landscape fully integrated with the geomorphological
environment (Figs. 20.2 and 20.3). In many cases, terraces
have been developed within earlier large coastal landslides
and degradation scarps (Terranova et al. 2006).
Based on their environmental, scenic and historical significance, the Cinque Terre have been recognised since 1997
as a World Heritage Site by UNESCO and since 1999 have
been included within the National Park of Cinque Terre.
Investigation of terraced areas has highlighted their positive role in improving slope stability via the construction of
retaining dry stone masonry and the creation of drainage
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_20
235
236
P. Brandolini
Fig. 20.1 Location of the study
area. a Shaded relief map of the
coastal area of Cinque Terre
(derived from vector topographic
base map 1:5000 scale—Regione
Liguria). b Tectonic sketch map:
(1) Ligurian Unit (Middle
Jurassic–Paleocene); (2)
Sub-Ligurian Unit (Paleocene–
Early-Middle Eocene; (3) Tuscan
Unit (Upper Oligocene); (4) main
faults; (5) main overthrust
(modified after Terranova et al.
2006)
Fig. 20.2 Aerial photo of
Cinque Terre coastal zone
between Volastra and
Riomaggiore, taken in 1973
(modified after Terranova 1984),
showing the slope terracing
developed from the edge of the
sea cliff up to 400–500 m in
elevation. In many cases,
agricultural terracing has been
constructed within earlier large
coastal landslides and degradation
scarps (highlighted in the picture
by the dashed white line)
networks to ensure better control of shallow water erosion
(Terranova 1984; Stanchi et al. 2012). At the same time, a lack
of terrace maintenance due to farm abandonment led in only a
few decades to instability phenomena, characterised by
widespread soil erosion and slope movements. Abandoned
terraced slopes are particularly susceptible to shallow landsliding, usually triggered by heavy rainfall events of short
duration (Cevasco et al. 2013; Brandolini et al. 2016). Moreover, after high intensity precipitation, the materials mobilised
by runoff and landslide phenomena have a considerable
impact on the solid discharge, flow and energy of streams,
causing floods that are increasingly affecting coastal settlements in Liguria (Brandolini et al. 2012; Faccini et al. 2012).
Following the exodus of farmers that has taken place over
the past half century, the terraced slopes of Cinque Terre have
been progressively abandoned and affected by degradation
and crumbling of dry stone walls, with the loss of several
hectares of terracing leading to rising geomorphological risk
20
The Outstanding Terraced Landscape of the Cinque Terre …
Fig. 20.3 Panoramic view of the Cinque Terre from west: in the
foreground the village of Vernazza surrounded by very steep and
cultivated terraced slopes; in the background the ancient Macereto
landslide and the Corniglia village located on a former marine terrace
(photo Cinque Terre National Park Archive)
conditions (Brandolini et al. 2008; Galve et al. 2016). As
dramatically evidenced by the effects of a major rainstorm
event of October 2011, which resulted in hundreds of shallow
landslides as well as a catastrophic flood, the Cinque Terre
are currently ever more sensitive to intense rainfall (Galve
et al. 2015).
Therefore, given the great environmental and historical
value of Cinque Terre, which receive more than one million
tourists every year, geomorphological risk mitigation measures and conservation policies are an urgent issue to preserve this extraordinary coastal landscape.
20.2
Geographical Setting
The toponym “Cinque Terre”, meaning “five lands”, is
derived from the historical villages of Monterosso, Vernazza, Corniglia, Manarola and Riomaggiore, which lie in
easternmost Liguria along a 20-km stretch of rocky coastline
237
between the Mesco and Monesteroli promontories, in the
province of La Spezia (Fig. 20.1).
Despite its seaside location, Cinque Terre exhibit characteristics typical of hilly-mountain areas, with very steep
slopes, deeply cut valleys, and small watersheds with
ephemeral streams. The narrow coastal zone of Cinque Terre
is bounded to the north by a series of peaks ranging in altitude, from west to east, from 400 to around 800 m a.s.l. (Mt.
Negro, 445 m; Mt. Soviore, 620 m; Mt. S. Croce, 621 m; Mt.
Malpertuso, 815 m; Mt. Gaginara, 772 m; Mt. Capri, 786 m;
Mt. Grosso, 655 m; Mt. Verrugoli, 698 m; Mt. Fraschi,
527 m). These mountains form a ridge oriented NW–SE,
parallel and very close (from 1 to 3 km) to the coast, which
represents the divide between Cinque Terre and the Vara
valley. Consequently most of the slopes face southwest.
The villages of Monterosso, Vernazza, Manarola and
Riomaggiore are mainly located along the coast adjacent to
rivers and partly on the top of the sea cliff; only the hamlet of
Corniglia is wholly located on a former marine terrace at an
elevation of 100 m (Fig. 20.3). Scattered settlements are also
present at between 300 and 500 m elevation on slope areas
with favourable aspect.
The climate of the area is typically Mediterranean, characterised by warm and dry summers and mild winters. The
annual mean temperature ranges between 14.5 and 15.5 °C,
reaching a mean peak of 22–24.5 °C in July and August and
a low of 7–8 °C in January. Annual mean rainfall is
1040 mm, with maximum rainfall typically occurring in
December; a mean value of 224 mm has been recorded for
this month at the Levanto gauge station for the period 1932–
2011. Heavy rainfall events of short duration are very frequent in the area, with intensities greater than 150 mm/3 h
and 200 mm/6 h as recorded during the period 1951–2011.
Regarding the flooding event of 25 October 2011, a cumulative rainfall total of 382 mm in 24 h was recorded at the
Monterosso gauge station, the highest levels ever observed
in the entire Cinque Terre region (ARPAL-CFMI-PC 2012).
Thanks to its particular geological, morphological and
climatic conditions, the Cinque Terre area is characterised by
distinctive land-use practices, with almost all slopes terraced
for cultivation of olive groves and especially vineyards.
These practices have led to the development of a unique
coastal landscape and terroir which is internationally
renowned for the production of Vermentino and Sciacchetrà
wines.
Beginning in around 1100 AD, man-made slope terracing
has subsequently spread over an area corresponding to
approximately 60% of the entire territory of the Cinque
Terre (33 km2), within the present day municipalities of
Monterosso, Vernazza and Riomaggiore (Terranova 1984).
The only unterraced areas are the upper slopes in the proximity of the ridge dividing Cinque Terre and the Vara valley,
which are mainly covered by chestnut and holm oak forest.
238
P. Brandolini
Following the exodus of farmers which took place in the
last century, the terraced areas have been progressively
abandoned, causing a general increase in soil erosion and
slope instability. Currently only around 20% of terraces are
still cultivated (Terranova et al. 2002).
20.3
Geological and Geomorphological
Setting
The Cinque Terre area is characterised by the presence of five
tectonic units belonging to the Tuscan, Sub-Ligurian and
Ligurian domains (Giammarino et al. 2002). These units
form part of a wide overturned anti-form SW-verging fold,
and are bounded to the northeast by a major normal fault (La
Spezia fault). Structural and geo-lithological features generated by the emplacement of the Apennines—in particular its
Plio-Quaternary tectonic uplift (Carmignani et al. 1994)—
have directly influenced the geomorphological landscape,
which in turn conditioned current land-use patterns.
The most widespread rock formation is flysch which
comprises sandstones and clayey siltstones locally known as
the Macigno Formation (upper Oligocene). This formation
belongs to the Tuscan Nappe (Tuscan Domain) which crops
out along almost the entire coast between Monterosso and
the eastern border of Cinque Terre represented by the
Monesteroli promontory (Fig. 20.1).
Regarding the Sub-Ligurian Domain, claystones with
limestones and silty sandstone turbidites (Palaeocene), marly
limestones with thin claystone interbeds (early-middle
Eocene) and fine sandstone turbidites (upper Oligocene)
belonging to the Canetolo Unit crop out in the central part of
Cinque Terre, in particular within the Vernazza River
catchment and along the coast between Corniglia and
Manarola.
In the framework of the Ligurian Domain, quartzose and
micaceous-feldspatic
sandstones
(upper
Cretaceous-Palaeocene), claystones, calcarenites and marls
(upper Cretaceous), clayey shales with siliceous micritic
limestones (upper Cretaceous) belonging to the Gottero
Unit, cherts, gabbros and serpentinites (medium Jurassic)
belonging to the Bracco Unit, as well as claystones and
limestones with olistolites of ophiolitic and granitic breccias
(upper Cretaceous) belonging to the Mt. Veri Unit, are
present in the westernmost sector of Cinque Terre between
the Mesco promontory and Monterosso.
From a geomorphological point of view, the orientation
of the coastline and the drainage pattern of the area are
influenced on a large scale by tectonic lineations (fault and
fracture systems), mainly striking NW–SE and NE–SW, but
also N–S and E–W. Catchments in the Cinque Terre region
are very small in extent, ranging from 1–3 km2 (Fegina,
Pastanelli, Groppo and Riomaggiore streams) to around
6 km2 (Vernazza stream). As a consequence, and also due to
the aforementioned proximity of the main divide between
Cinque Terre and the Vara valley to the coast, the rivers are
short with steep profiles and ephemeral hydrological
regimes. Due to considerable erosive and sediment transport
capacity, associated with the high intensity rainfall events
which regularly affect eastern Liguria, many streams are
incising their beds (Cevasco et al. 2012).
Thanks to its high slope steepness, with more than 50%
of terrain characterised by gradients ranging between 30°
and 40°, and its hydrological regime, the geomorphological
landscape of Cinque Terre is dominated by gravity and
running water processes. These terrestrial processes interact
with marine erosion along the coast, resulting in the presence
of several large coastal landslides and an almost continuous
rocky sea cliff (Fig. 20.4).
Dramatic rock falls and degradation scarps are particularly common along the eastern slope of the Mesco
promontory, affecting very thick (up to 15 m) and fractured
sandstone strata of the Gottero Unit. Active large translational rock slides are currently observable along the coast
between Vernazza and Corniglia; the edges of the associated
scarps are located from between 100 m a.s.l. around the
slope and sea cliff just to the east of Vernazza, to 280 m a.s.l.
around the Macereto area (Fig. 20.3). The latter slides
involve highly fractured layers, with the same prevailing bed
attitude as the slope, of sandstones and clayey siltstones of
the Macigno Formation (Tuscan Unit).
A large complex mass wasting process—locally known
as the Guvano landslide and favoured by the tectonic contact
between the Canetolo Unit (claystones with limestones and
silty sandstone turbidites) and the Tuscan Unit (sandstones
and clayey siltstones)—is still active along the coastal slope
between S. Bernardino and Corniglia. The source area is
located at around 350 m a.s.l. just below S. Bernardino,
where rock falls and topples can be observed. This landslide
evolved into a flow, forming a wide downslope accumulation extending to the shoreline (Fig. 20.4a).
An ancient mass movement, locally known as the
Rodalabia landslide, occurred just east of the Corniglia
promontory and involved an entire slope between 275 m
elevation and sea level. This complex landslide resulted in
extensive accumulation that affected around 500 m of
coastline, currently characterised by the presence of agricultural terracing, sparse settlement and the Genoa-La Spezia railway line. Indeed, the latter was only made possible by
the construction of huge retaining walls in 1870, which
protect the landslide area from further sea wave erosion.
Another ancient dormant landslide is present just eastward of
the Manarola village, affecting the slope above the railway
station (Fig. 20.4b).
One of the most hazardous mass movements is the
landslide affecting the sea cliff between Manarola and
20
The Outstanding Terraced Landscape of the Cinque Terre …
Fig. 20.4 Panoramic view of the main landslide areas present in the
Cinque Terre within the terraced coastal slopes landscape: a the large
complex mass movement known as Guvano landslide; b on the right
the dormant landslide of Manarola; on the left shallow landslides and
239
debris flows affecting the slope below Volastra; c on the left the active
landslide of “Via dell’Amore”; on the right the degradation scarp which
affect the slope below the Madonna of Mt. Nero Sanctuary (photos
P. Brandolini)
240
P. Brandolini
Riomaggiore. Frequently reactivated, this landslide has
caused severe damage and interruption to the most famous
and spectacular tourist path in Cinque Terre, the “Via dell’Amore” (Fig. 20.4c). The landslide is complex and affects
slopes up to 200 m a.s.l., mainly in the form of rock falls
from sandstone and clayey siltstone bedrock outcrops
(Tuscan unit) which are strongly tectonised by an articulated
system of folds and joints.
Considering the intense rainfall that regularly affects the
area and the high steepness of the slopes, which are typically
characterised by eluvial-colluvial cover of only 1–2 m in
thickness, shallow landslides and debris flows are widespread throughout Cinque Terre (Fig. 20.4b). Shallow
landslides consisting mainly of earth and debris slides and
often evolving into flows, with a failure surface represented
by the contact between debris cover and bedrock, have
particularly affected mostly abandoned or non-maintained
terraced slopes in the areas of Vernazza, Volastra, Seno di
Canneto, Campi, Fossola and Monesteroli (Terranova 1984;
Cevasco et al. 2013). In the last few decades, these landslides have affected many hectares of vineyards and olive
groves (Fig. 20.5c).
Almost the entire littoral zone of Cinque Terre is characterised by a spectacular rocky coast, cut by the action of
prevailing sea storms from the SW (Libeccio) and SE
(Scirocco). Most of these sea cliffs are active and have an
edge of scarp typically ranging between 5 and 30 m, but
reaching 100 m just along from the Corniglia promontory
(Fig. 20.3).
Beaches in the region are few and small, and are associated with the main rivers (Fegina and Vernazza) or occur at
the foot of some coastal slopes affected by active gravitational processes (Guvano, Campi and Monesteroli). A number of artificial beaches (Corniglia, Vernazza and
Monterosso), currently in retreat, were created in 1870 and
1970 by nourishment with materials derived from the construction of tunnels on the Genova—La Spezia railway line
(Fig. 20.2).
20.4
Landscape of Slope Terracing
and Geomorphological Risk
During the last millennium, the geomorphological landscape
of Cinque Terre has been almost totally modified by human
activity via the construction of agricultural terraces within
the steep slopes, from sea level up to 400–500 m. Early
farmers reworked and retained the shallow colluvial cover
by constructing dry stone walls, selecting the most suitable
bedrock for cultivation. Not coincidentally, the borders of
the terraced areas line up almost exactly with the geological
contacts of the different formations which crop out in the
region. In fact, vineyards and olive groves in Cinque Terre
Fig. 20.5 Example of cultivated terraced vineyards in good state of
conservation on the slope between Corniglia and Volastra (a) (photo R.
Terranova) and in the lower part of Manarola valley (b) (photo
P. Brandolini); abandoned terracing, built just over the top of sea cliff
scarp between Riomaggiore and Monesteroli affected by slope degradation (c) (photo P. Brandolini)
are found only on terraces built on sandstones and clayey
siltstones (Tuscan Unit), claystones with limestones and silty
sandstone turbidites (Canetolo Unit), clayey shales with
siliceous micritic limestones (Gottero Unit) and claystones
20
The Outstanding Terraced Landscape of the Cinque Terre …
241
Fig. 20.6 Evolution of slope
terracing after farming
abandonment: a cultivated
terraces in good state of
conservation; b different types of
dry stone walls crumbling: fall
(1), sliding (2), topple (3),
bulging and sliding (4, 5);
c terrace collapse along a concave
surface (1), dry stone walls
deformations (2, 3). d drystone
walls completely destroyed.
e terraced slope affected by
shallow landsliding (modified
after Terranova 2005)
and limestones with olistolites (Mt. Veri Unit). Significantly,
no terraces have been built on quartzose and
micaceous-feldspatic sandstones (Gottero Unit) or on cherts,
gabbros and serpentinites (Bracco Unit). Cultivation on
terraces has also been favoured by the presence of ancient
landslide deposits such as those associated with the aforementioned large mass movements of Rodalabia, Guvano and
Manarola (Fig. 20.4).
Dry stone wall terracing now covers an area of about
20 km2, representing 60% of the entire Cinque Terre region.
Considering that the width of terraces ranges from 2 to 4 m,
the maximum linear extent of dry stone walls can be estimated to total around 6000 km. Furthermore, considering
that wall height normally ranges between 1.5 and 2.5 m,
depending on slope steepness and terrace width, the total
volume of reworked dry stone is likely to exceed
8,000,000 m3 (Terranova 1984).
This “cyclopean” work of slope terracing is the result of a
centuries-old agricultural practice which over time led to the
local acquisition of unique dry stone construction skills,
adopted in relation to the region’s specific geological and
geomorphological conditions (lithology, steepness, morphology and hydrology). Moreover, important drainage
works have been added, always via the use of dry stone, for
running water control and supply. The varied geometric
features of terraces and working methods therefore mean
they have been integrated almost perfectly within the natural
landscape (Figs. 20.2 and 20.5).
Although the terraces are very effective in ensuring both
the stability of the debris cover and the shallow infiltration
drainage, at the same time they are also fragile because they
were built without the use of any cement mortar and therefore require constant maintenance.
Due to the exodus of farmers which began at the end of
the 1800s and accelerated after the 1950s, a lack of wall
maintenance has resulted in crumbling of many spectacular
areas of terraced slopes, which are now widely affected by
soil erosion and landsliding (Fig. 20.6). In only a few decades, the upper parts of the abandoned terraces became
overgrown with pine trees, and the middle-lower slopes by
Mediterranean scrub (Fig. 20.5c).
The result is that more than 80% of terraces are today
abandoned; olive groves and vineyards now cover less than
250 ha, with only around 150 ha still devoted to the production of Vermentino and Sciacchetrà wines with a
denomination of controlled origin.
In such a complex geological context, with unfavourable
tectonic and structural setting and high energy relief, the
Cinque Terre are strongly prone to landsliding. The terraces,
although fundamental for the preservation of slope stability
in the past, due to their almost complete abandonment today
are an important factor in the geomorphological risk scenario. The terraced slopes must therefore be considered both
an element at risk and simultaneously an element whose
degradation could increase the frequency of gravitational
phenomena and floods.
In the last 50–70 years, a lack of agricultural management
has resulted in many hectares of terraced slopes being
completely lost, included in the areas around Volastra,
Campi and Fossola. In these locations, the progressive collapse of dry stone walls has been rapidly followed by
increasingly extensive erosional processes, shallow
242
P. Brandolini
The rainstorm event also triggered more than 400 shallow
landslides within the catchment, mainly slides and flows,
with individual affected areas ranging in extent from hundreds to thousands of square metres, covered by 1 or 2 m of
debris. These landslides occurred mainly in middle-lower
altitude areas of the catchment, on steeper slopes with gradients greater than 30°. A comparison of landslides and land
use has revealed that landslide source areas are mostly
concentrated near to agricultural terraces, confirming the
high
landslide
susceptibility
of
abandoned
or
non-maintained terraced slopes (Cevasco et al. 2014; Galve
et al. 2015).
20.5
Fig. 20.7 The area around Volastra in 1960 (a, photo R. Terranova)
and in 2011 (b, photo P. Brandolini)
landslides and debris flows, as illustrated by a comparison of
historical photos with the present day situation (Fig. 20.7).
The sensitivity of terraced slopes to intense rainfall, as
well as the correlation of the latter with the occurrence of
landslides and floods, was dramatically confirmed by the
effects of the precipitation event which occurred in Cinque
Terre on 25 October 2011, with the rainstorm affecting the
Vernazza catchment in particular. A cumulative rainfall total
of nearly 400 mm fell in just 6 h, with a peak of around
100 mm in 1 h, causing widespread runoff and erosional
processes and triggering hundreds of shallow landslides,
ultimately leading to a catastrophic debris flood (Cevasco
et al. 2013; Brandolini et al. 2016).
During this event the River Vernazza overflowed its
former talweg, creating an alluvial fan in the marina and
inundating the main street of the village historic centre,
where mud and debris deposits reached an average thickness
of around 4 m, flooding the first floors of buildings. The
flood resulted in three casualties, with the economic damage
to buildings, rail, roads and the tourist trail network estimated at over 130 million euros, without considering the
loss of the agricultural terraces (Fig. 20.8).
Conclusions
In the framework of the high risk scenario currently characterising the outstanding coastal landscape of Cinque Terre,
the choice of appropriate land management strategies and
conservation policies is a very sensitive issue. Any strategy
must consider the urgent need to both counteract long-term
geomorphological hazards and at the same time preserve the
cultural heritage of the man-made terraced landscape.
In fact, the loss of slope terracing not only has a negative
impact on the environment in terms of increasing risk conditions, but also implies the disappearance of agricultural
and societal practices that have formed the basis of the
recognition of the area as a UNESCO World Heritage site
and are today the fundamental factor in attracting tourist
activity.
Until now, intervention has only been carried out in
emergency situations, such as after the rainstorm of 25
October 2011 that affected the Vernazza River catchment.
Although only a short-term solution, very expensive local
structural works to secure exposed buildings and roads have
been primarily undertaken on problematic slopes (flexible
shallow landslide barriers, micropiles, dry stone wall
reconstruction) and stream segments (enlargement of flow
sections, heightening of levees, debris flow barriers).
To drastically reduce the effects of natural disasters and to
ensure long-term effective mitigation of geomorphological
risk, prevention strategies must be planned on a basin-wide
scale, providing widespread restoration of abandoned terraces, recovery of drainage systems and the maintenance and
reforestation of wooded areas in the upper parts of the basins
(Brandolini and Cevasco 2015). To this end, the National
Park of Cinque Terre has recently initiated significant action
towards the recovery of terraced vineyards by supplying
farmers with vine roots and stone material for wall rebuilding free of charge. However, in order to finance interventions
which will successfully mitigate the geo-hydrological risk
and safeguard this dramatic coastal landscape, considerably
greater economic resources are needed.
20
The Outstanding Terraced Landscape of the Cinque Terre …
243
Fig. 20.8 The October 25, 2011 rainstorm caused widespread runoff
erosional processes and triggered hundreds of shallow landslides which
affected the terraced slopes of the Vernazza catchment in particular
(photos a and b Corpo Forestale dello Stato Archive). A catastrophic
debris flood inundated the main street of the village historic centre
(photo c National Park of Cinque Terre Archive) and resulted in fan
accumulation within the marina (photo d National Park of Cinque Terre
Archive)
References
Brandolini P, Cevasco A, Capolongo D, Pepe G, Lovergine F, Del
Monte M (2016) Response of terraced slopes to a very intense
rainfall event and relationships with land abandonment: a case study
from Cinque Terre (Italy). Land Degrad Develop (in press)
Carmignani L, Decandia FA, Fantozzi L, Lazzarotto A, Liotta D,
Meccheri M (1994) Tertiary extensional tectonics in Tuscany
(Northern Apennines, Italy). Tectonophysics 238:295–315
Cevasco A, Pepe G, Brandolini P (2012) Shallow landslides induced by
heavy rainfall on terraced slopes: the case study of the October, 25,
2011 event in the Vernazza catchment (Cinque Terre, NW Italy).
Rendiconti Online della Società Geologica Italiana 21:384–386
Cevasco A, Brandolini P, Scopesi C, Rellini I (2013) Relationships
between geo-hydrological processes induced by heavy rainfall and
land-use: the case of 25 October 2011 in the Vernazza catchment
(Cinque Terre, NW Italy). J Maps 9(2):289–298
Cevasco A, Pepe G, Brandolini P (2014) The influences of geological
and land use settings on shallow landslides triggered by an intense
rainfall event in a coastal terraced environment. Bull Eng Geol
Environ 73:859–875
Faccini F, Robbiano A, Sacchini A (2012) Geomorphic hazards and
intense rainfall: the case study of the Recco Stream catchment
(Eastern Liguria, Italy). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12(4):893–903
Galve JP, Cevasco A, Brandolini P, Soldati M (2015) Assessment of
shallow-landslide risk mitigation measures based on land use
Agnoletti M (ed) (2013) The Italian historical rural landscape. Cultural
values for the environment and rural development. Springer,
Dordrecht, 549 pp
ARPAL-CFMI-PC (Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell’Ambiente Ligure - Centro Funzionale Meteoidrologico - Protezione
Civile della Regione Liguria) (2012) Uno tsunami venuto dai monti
- Provincia della Spezia 25 ottobre 2011 rapporto di evento
meteo-idrologico. Quaderni ARPAL 1:1–96
Brandolini P, Cevasco A (2015) Geo-hydrological risk mitigation
measures and land-management in a highly vulnerable small coastal
catchment. In: Lollino G, Manconi A, Guzzetti F, Culshaw M,
Bobrowsky P, Luino F (eds) Engineering geology for society and
territory, vol 5. Springer International Publishing Switzerland,
pp 759–762
Brandolini P, Faccini F, Pescetto C (2008) I paesaggi terrazzati d’Italia.
I terrazzamenti della Liguria: un bene culturale e del paesaggio a
rischio. L’Universo 88(2):204–221
Brandolini P, Cevasco A, Firpo M, Robbiano A, Sacchini A (2012)
Geo-hydrological risk management for civil protection purposes in
the urban area of Genoa (Liguria, NW Italy). Nat Hazards Earth
Syst Sci 12(4):943–959
244
planning through probabilistic modelling. Landslides 12(1):101–
114
Galve JP, Cevasco A, Brandolini P, Piacentini D, Azañón JM, Notti D,
Soldati M (2016) Cost-based analysis of mitigation measures for
shallow-landslide risk reduction strategies. Eng Geol 213:142–157
Giammarino S, Giglia G, Capponi G, Crispini L, Piazza M (2002) Carta
geologica della Liguria. Scala 1:200000. LAC, Firenze
Stanchi S, Freppaz M, Agnelli A, Reinsch T, Zanini E (2012)
Properties, best management practices and conservation of terraced
soils in Southern Europe (from Mediterranean areas to the Alps): a
review. Quatern Int 265:90–100
Terranova R (1984) Aspetti geomorfologici e geologico-ambientali
delle Cinque Terre: rapporti con le opere umane (Liguria orientale).
Studi e Ricerche di Geografia 7:39–90
Terranova R (2005) L’abbandono dei versanti montani terrazzati e i
dissesti geomorfologici: una grave perdita di valori ambientali di
P. Brandolini
grande pregio. In: Terranova R, Brandolini P, Firpo M (eds) La
valorizzazione turistica dello spazio fisico come via alla salvaguardia ambientale. Studi regionali e monografici. Patron, Bologna,
36:129–143
Terranova R, Brandolini P, Spotorno M, Rota M, Montanari C,
Galassi D, Nicchia P, Leale S, Bruzzo R, Renzi L, Seronello G,
Dagorne A, Bally E, Castex JM, Reynes-Trias A, Alomar-Canyelles
G, Ferrer-García I, Rodriguez-Gomila R, Grimalt-Gelabert M,
Mus-Amezquita M (2002) Patrimoni de marjades a la Mediterrania
Occidental. Una proposta de catalogaciò. Commissiò Europea DGX,
Programa Raphael, Palma Di Mallorca, Fodesma, 243 pp
Terranova R, Zanzucchi G, Bernini M, Brandolini P, Campobasso S,
Faccini F, Zanzucchi F (2006) Geologia, geomorfologia e vini del
Parco Nazionale delle Cinque Terre (Liguria, Italia). Boll Soc Geol
It, Vol Spec 6:115–128
Tuscany Hills and Valleys: Uplift, Exhumation,
Valley Downcutting and Relict Landforms
21
Mauro Coltorti, Pier Lorenzo Fantozzi, and Pierluigi Pieruccini
Abstract
The Tuscany physical landscape is the result of processes of selective erosion initiated by
regional uplift. The overall geomorphological setting is characterized by “highlands” or
mountain ridges alternated with “lowlands” or basins filled with Mio-Pliocene continental
and marine sediments. A planation surface was shaped over bedrock, including Pliocene
marine terrains, and is widely preserved on top of the mountain ridges. As a result of uplift,
the sedimentary infillings of the Pliocene synform basins were affected by river incision.
Gully and badland erosion dominate the clayey terrains while cuestas, mesas and stepped
slopes are found in sandstones and conglomerate terrains. Large karstic depressions are also
found. In the past, these hosted palaeo-springs that alimented travertine and calcareous tufa
deposition which spread out to occupy large valley sectors.
Keywords
Planation surface
21.1
Tectonic depressions
Introduction
The Tuscany landscape is characterized by NNW–SSE
trending mountain ridges, where the bedrock crops out,
alternating with wide valleys mostly modelled on “soft”
unconsolidated
or
scarcely
consolidated
Mio-Plio-Pleistocene marine and continental sediments. This
landscape is typically found to the west of the highest parts
of the Apennine ridge, between the Arno-Chiana valleys and
the Tyrrhenian Sea (Fig. 21.1).
The classic model of long-term landscape evolution in the
northern Apennines was based on the chronology and facies
of the Mio-Plio-Pleistocene sedimentary basins (Elter et al.
1975). Following this model the compressional tectonic
phase, which generated the thrust-fold sheets, shifted to the
western margin of the Adriatic basin at the end of the
Miocene while in Tuscany the extensional tectonics generated a series of horst and grabens that hosted continental and
M. Coltorti (&) P.L. Fantozzi P. Pieruccini
Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell’Ambiente,
Università di Siena, Via di Laterina 8, 53100 Siena, Italy
e-mail: mauro.coltorti@unisi.it
Uplift
Exhumation
Tuscany
marine sedimentation (Martini and Sagri 1993; Pascucci
et al. 2006). Recent research has changed this model and
provides a new perspective to the geomorphological setting
and evolution of this sector (Coltorti and Pieruccini 1997;
Brogi 2011; Finetti et al. 2001).
21.2
Geographical and Geological Setting
To the west of the Arno-Chiana valley, the landscape is
characterized by gentle relief with mean elevation of the
ridges less than 700 m a.s.l. that contrast with the Apennine
ridge to the east where the elevation reaches 1200–1400 m.
The steep slopes that mark the separation of these two sectors
are associated with NW–SE trending fault system that bounds
to the east the Florence basin, the Upper Valdarno and
Valdichiana basins (Fig. 21.1). The continuity of these
basins, filled with Plio-Pleistocene marine and continental
sediments, are interrupted along their length by NE–SW
trending thresholds due to the rise of the harder pre-Pliocene
bedrock. To the west, these basins are bordered by the Outer
Tuscany Ridge, also known as Cetona-Rapolano-Chianti-Mt.
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_21
245
246
Fig. 21.1 Sketch map of the Tuscany hills and valleys landscape.
Mountain Ridges: Apuane Alps (APA); Pisani Mts. (PIS); Mt. Albano
ridge (ALB); Chianti ridge (CHI); Cetona ridge (CET); Livornesi Mts.
(LIM); Montagnola Senese (MOS); Uccellina Mts. (UCC). Reliefs: Mt.
Amiata (AM); Poggio del Comune (PC). Basins: Versilia basin (VVB);
Casino basin (CAB); Lower Valdarno basin (LVB); Florence basin
(FIB); Upper Valdarno basin (UVB); Valdichiana basin (VCB);
Valdelsa basin (VEB); Siena-Radicofani basin (SRB); Volterra basin
(VOB); Radicondoli-Chiusdino basin (RCB); Middle Ombrone basin
M. Coltorti et al.
(MOB); Albegna basin (ABB); Val di Fine—Val di Cecina basin (VFB);
Sassa basin (SSB); Serrazzano basin (SEB); Piombino basin (PIB);
Grosseto basin (GRB). Localities: Campiglia Marittima (Cm); Radicofani (Ra); Chianciano Terme (Ch); Sarteano (Sa); Cetona (Ce); Pienza
(Pz); San Casciano Val di Pesa (Sc); Bagni San Filippo (Bs); Bagno
Vignone (Bv); Rapolano (Rp); Rosia (Ro); Massa Marittima (Mm);
Saturnia (St); Castelnuovo dei Sabbioni (Cs); Roccatederighi (Rt);
Roccastrada (Rs); Volterra (Vo); Accesa Lake (Al); Lucciola Bella (Lb);
Camposodo/Leonina (Le); Gavorrano (Ga), Pitigliano (Pi)
21
Tuscany Hills and Valleys: Uplift, Exhumation, Valley …
Albano ridge. To the west, the ridge bounds the
Mio-Plio-Pleistocene Valdelsa, Lower Valdarno, Casino and
Siena-Radicofani basins. Further to the west, the latter basins
are bounded by the Inner Tuscany Ridge that is a complex
system of NW–SE trending ridges extending to the coast. The
ridges can be continuous over long distances (Montagnola
Senese—Poggio del Comune, Colline Metallifere) or shorter
(Livornesi Mts., Campiglia Marittima, Uccellina Mts.) and
interrupted by Mio-Plio-Pleistocene basins (Volterra,
Radicondoli-Chiusdino, Val di Fine—Val di Cecina), Sassa,
Serrazzano, Middle Ombrone, Piombino and Grosseto).
Bedrock (Figs. 21.1 and 21.2) is made of a series of
tectono-sedimentary units containing metamorphic and
sedimentary Palaeozoic to Miocene rock (i.e. limestones,
sandstones, marbles, marly limestones, marls, etc.) tectonically transported for hundreds of kilometres from west to
east along low-angle fault planes. During the tectonic
transport they were severely thinned (reduced succession)
and locally deformed to generate a chaotic melange (allochthonous units, Carmignani et al. 2001) (Figs. 21.1 and
21.2). The oldest units, made of Palaeozoic-Oligocene
metamorphic complexes, crop out discontinuously between
the Uccellina Mts. and the Montagnola Senese to the south,
and in the Pisani Mts. and Apuane Alps to the north. The
Palaeozoic basement is overlain by the metamorphic
Mesozoic-Tertiary
Tuscany
Units
(Fig. 21.2).
Non-metamorphic Tuscany Units are tectonically superimposed on the metamorphic complex and, in turn, covered by
the so-called “Allochtonous” Ligurian Complex, also made
of Mesozoic-Tertiary sedimentary units that include ocean
floor basalts and ophiolites (Fig. 21.2). The first evidence of
emerged land is shallow marine and continental sediments
late Miocene in age (autochtonous units, Fig. 21.2, i.e.
Casino and Volterra basins). The variation in thickness of
these deposits suggests the presence of an articulated
topography and the occurrence of unconformities. In fact,
these sediments are unconformably overlain by
Early-Middle Pliocene and Early Pleistocene marine sediments made of clays, sands and gravels of neritic to coastal
environments. Unconformities are associated with
transgressive-regressive cycles. Progressive unconformities
separate major cycles affected by syn-sedimentary folding
(Coltorti and Pieruccini 1997; Pascucci et al. 2006; Coltorti
et al. 2007; Brogi 2011). The sedimentary sequences are
preserved in the basins and rarely on the ridges that usually
record only the last erosional phase. Therefore, Pliocene and,
to a greater extent, Miocene palaeogeography is not consistent with the present day geomorphological setting.
Geotechnical analysis carried out in the Siena-Radicofani
basin on the degree of consolidation of the Pliocene marine
clays revealed that almost 2000 m of sediments were
removed after their deposition (Disperati and Liotta 1998).
Therefore, the tectonic style once associated with horst and
247
Fig. 21.2 Stratigraphic scheme of the tectono-sedimentary units
cropping out in Tuscany. Legend VO volcanic; QMC Quaternary
marine and continental deposits; PMC Pliocene marine and continental
deposits; MMC Late Miocene marine and continental deposits; LC
Ligurian Complex; NMTU non-metamorphic Tuscan Units; MTU
metamorphic Tuscan Units; PB Palaeozoic Basement; (1) main
sedimentary unconformity; (2) main tectonic unconformity (modified
after Coltorti et al. 2012)
graben delimited by high-angle extensional faults (Elter et al.
1975; Martini and Sagri 1993; Pascucci et al. 2006) is now
associated with synform (Coltorti and Pieruccini 1997),
perched, piggy back or bowl-shaped basins (Finetti et al.
2001; Brogi 2011). Finetti et al. (2001) claimed that the
deformation occurred in a compressional regime whereas
according to Coltorti and Pieruccini (1997) and Brogi (2011)
the basins were formed due to surface deformation related to
the activity at depth of east dipping low-angle normal faults.
The only important system of high-angle normal faults is the
one bounding to the east the Florence-Valdarno-Valdichiana
basins, activated during the Early Pleistocene. Minor and
rare high-angle normal faults have been described but they
do not have lateral continuity.
21.3
Landforms and Landscapes
Coastal Pliocene sediments are locally preserved on top of
the mountain ridges and within sedimentary basins. At
depth, inside the basins, sediments testify to a slightly deeper
248
depositional environment. On top of the ridges, these sediments have locally a very limited thickness and most probably in the past they covered a larger area. Marine conditions
characterized the area until the Middle Pliocene. No faults
displace the planation surface along the margins of the
basins, clearly indicating that the depressions are the result
of selective erosion (Coltorti et al. 2012). After the emersion
of the area, the hydrographic network easily deepened
through the basins due to the presence of the erodible
Mio-Plio-Pleistocene sediments (Fig. 21.3). Only the Florence—Upper Valdarno—Valdichiana basins are fault-angle
M. Coltorti et al.
valleys and the river flows parallel to the normal fault system
located to the west of the Tosco-Emilian Apennine ridge. In
the Florence basin, the Arno River abruptly changes direction to the WSW cutting the Mt. Albano ridge and flowing
straight to the sea. The Chiana River runs for a short distance
parallel to the same fault system, but it mostly crosses
slantwise the Valdichiana basin before joining the Tiber
River. Also the upper valley of the Ombrone River deepens
in correspondence with the softer terrains of the
Siena-Radicofani basin before turning abruptly to SW to cut
the Inner Tuscany Ridges down to the coast. All the major
Fig. 21.3 Topographic cross sections across central-southern Tuscany showing the main basins and ridges. Location of profiles in Fig. 21.1. In
Sections 1–3 the master, west dipping normal fault bounding to the west the Tosco-Emilian Apennines, is shown
21
Tuscany Hills and Valleys: Uplift, Exhumation, Valley …
249
Fig. 21.4 The western border of the Valdarno at the contact with the Chianti Mts. The main escarpment is found in the upper part of the slope
while a series of long and deep trenches characterize the middle part (photo M. Coltorti)
rivers deepen within the Mio-Pliocene sediments. However,
some anomalies in the river pathways are recognizable
across the area. In fact, in the inner western reaches many
rivers (i.e. Merse River) flow to the east and make a long
turn before going west towards the Tyrrhenian Sea.
21.3.1
The Apennine Western Foothill: The
Upper Valdarno, Valdichiana
and Florence Basins
The eastern side of the Upper Valdarno and the Florence
basin is characterized by spectacular triangular and trapezoidal facets associated with the main fault system. The
displacement of this fault is 500–600 m, inferred from the
elevation of the planation surface preserved on both blocks.
Coalescent alluvial fans, mainly deposited during the cold
phases of the Middle and Late Pleistocene, seal the footslope. The alluvial fans grade to alluvial terraces that are up to
110 m high above the river bed (Coltorti et al. 2007). These
sediments unconformably overlie Early Pleistocene alluvial
sands and gravels associated with the cooling phases of the
Early Pleistocene (ca. 2.5–2.2 Ma) and Middle or Early
Pliocene deposits with lignites (Brogi et al. 2013). Along the
western side of the valley, an unconformity tilted up to 60°
eastward marks the contact with bedrock. The
re-exhumation of this unconformity generates flatirons but
no faults have been recognized.
In the rest of the Upper Valdarno basin, the deep incision
generated steep slopes in gravels and gentle slopes in silts
and clays. Runoff processes generated a typical badland
landscape (locally “Balze” or “Motte”) and earth pyramids.
Gravitational movements, mainly mud, earth and debris
flows, are frequent although larger slides are found at the
contact between the Pliocene clays and gravels.
Deep-seated gravitational slope deformations (DGSDs)
more than 6 km in length (Fig. 21.4) have been recognized
along the western slope (Coltorti et al. 2009). However,
despite a series of trenches that characterize the base of the
main scarp, the front has not collapsed. This was attributed
to stream erosion that drained the landslide body. However,
large landslides were activated from these DGSDs and one
of them led to the abandonment of the historical village of
Castelnuovo dei Sabbioni, to the east of the Chianti Ridge.
The Upper Valdarno is connected with the Florence basin
to the north by narrow valleys that at higher elevation dissect
the remnants of large concave valley modelled in bedrock.
To the south the connection with the Chiana valley is
marked by the occurrence of fluvial terraces. On the contrary, in both Florence and Valdichiana basins alluvial terraces are almost absent and very restricted in size. The
Valdichiana basin was probably overfilled during the Late
Pleistocene and not affected by headward erosion. It was a
swampy area and a series of reclamation works was carried
out since the sixteenth century and definitively reclaimed
after the nineteenth century with artificial channels and
sedimentary traps. Valdichiana is characterized by intensively cultivated gentle hills modelled on Pliocene marine
and coastal clays and sands. Along the western slopes
(Cetona ridge), these sediments are tilted eastward to generate typical cuestas whereas in the central part of the basin,
mostly undeformed, mesas and step-like slopes dominate
(Boscato et al. 2008). Again along the western slope (Chianciano Terme, Sarteano, Cetona, etc.) thermal and normal
springs formed travertines and calcareous tufa systems of
ponds preserved in the form of flat terraces (palaeo-ponds)
alternating with steep escarpments in correspondence with
palaeo-water falls. Karstic processes locally generated caves
containing Pre- and Proto-historic artefacts and bones (i.e.
Cetona). The Florence basin has also been overfilled and
250
M. Coltorti et al.
Fig. 21.5 The late Middle Pliocene planation surface (dashed line) along the Eastern Tuscany Ridge to the north of Mt. Cetona (photo M.
Coltorti)
apparently only slightly dissected during the Holocene. Flat
alluvial fans are found at the foot of the eastern slope. The
Arno River cuts deep gorges in the areas between basins, but
it enlarges its valley in the Pliocene sediments and generates
a large alluvial plain where the thalweg is confined within
artificial levees in order to mitigate the hazards and risks.
However, these structures did not prevent Florence to be
devastated by the 1966 flood.
21.3.2
The Outer Tuscany Ridge: From Mt.
Cetona to Mt. Albano
Planation surface remnants are one of the typical landscape of
the Outer Tuscany Ridge where they cut coastal Pliocene
sands and gravels as well as the bedrock up to ca. 730 m a.s.l
(i.e. north of Cetona ridge; Fig. 21.5) (Coltorti and Pieruccini
2000; Boscato et al. 2008; Coltorti et al. 2012). It is possible
that in some places two planation surfaces merge in a single
one or that, after removal of the sedimentary cover, only the
older one is preserved. Mt. Cetona (1148 m), the highest peak
of the ridge, was an island emerging from the coastal sediments during the Middle Pliocene (Boscato et al. 2008). To
the north the planation surface lowers down up to the Chianti
Mts. where it is entirely modelled over bedrock. This variation of the mean elevation of the planation surface indicates
post-Pliocene deformation during uplift. The planation surface was dissected by V-shaped valleys and gorges but it is
well preserved on more resistant limestone terrains while is
almost obliterated on sandstones and marls of the Chianti Mts.
21.3.3
The Siena-Radicofani and Valdelsa
Basins
The famous hilly Tuscany landscape is mostly modelled on
marine and coastal Pliocene sediments where clays and
sands dominate the lower part of the succession and sands
and gravels are present in the upper part. The southern part
of the Siena-Radicofani basin, dominated by clay outcrops,
is the Val d’Orcia UNESCO World Heritage Site. The
landscape is characterized by gently undulating arable
slopes. The most striking features are the badlands, made of
“calanchi” (Fig. 21.6) and “biancane” (Fig. 21.7), both
landforms generated by runoff processes and gravitational
movements. The calanchi mainly develop as consequence of
gully erosion, sometimes on slopes with coarser grained
sediments on top of clays. The biancane are dome-shaped
features usually less than 20 m high modelled on clays.
Their formation has been related to the retreat of the crest of
the gullies, and to the accelerated erosion along reticulated
systems of fracture (Alexander 1982; Del Monte 2017). The
whitish colour is due to salt precipitation, especially during
the summer season. The formation of this landscape is
related to soil erosion induced by deforestation and overgrazing since pre-historical times. After the Second World
War, the abandonment of agriculture and farming induced
progressive stabilization of the slopes. The extensive
mechanization led to the flattening of most of the rugged
topography although today, due to their geotouristic value,
some of these badlands are protected.
In the southern part of the basin, an Early Pleistocene
residual volcanic neck (896 m), emplaced between 1.3 and
0.9 Ma, crops out at Radicofani. In this sector, along the
eastern side of the basin, at the contact with the Cetona
ridge, there is a long escarpment that has been associated
with a Pliocene extensional fault, probably the best example
in the region. Mussel borings have been found along the
escarpment (Disperati and Liotta 1998) suggesting its Pliocene activity that, however, did not extend through the
Quaternary. The escarpment, and therefore the supposed
fault is ca. 6 km long. To the north and to the south of the
escarpment, Pliocene clays rest unconformably over the
pre-Pliocene rocks. Moreover, the basin filling is characterized by progressive unconformities and it is possible that
what has been considered a Pliocene fault escarpment might
21
Tuscany Hills and Valleys: Uplift, Exhumation, Valley …
251
Fig. 21.6 Badland morphology (calanchi) to the south east of the Siena Basin (Monte Oliveto Maggiore) (photo P. Pieruccini)
Fig. 21.7 Badland morphology (biancane) to the south of Siena (Torre a Castello) is dominated by selective erosion of fractured clays and slope
wash processes (photo P. Pieruccini)
represent the scar of a giant Pliocene gravitational movement. A modern analogue of this feature can be observed on
the western side of the same basin where, along the eastern
flank of the Amiata volcano, a DGSD more than 6 km long
has been described (Coltorti et al. 2010).
To the north of Radicofani, the Pliocene clays at the base
of the succession are buried under marine sands and conglomerates generating step-like slopes and bevelled cuestas
on which lie many historical villages and towns including
Siena and Pienza (Fig. 21.8).
252
M. Coltorti et al.
Fig. 21.8 Bevelled cuesta at Pienza, modelled over Middle Pliocene sandstones. The Eastern Tuscany ridge is in the background (photo
P. Pieruccini)
The Valdelsa basin to the north is separated from the
Siena-Radicofani basin by a low threshold modelled on
continental Miocene sediments. During the Pliocene, the two
basins were continuous as indicated by similar stratigraphy
and facies. The threshold is located in correspondence of a
periclinal deformation of the synform basins since no
transverse faults can be identified. To the north, on the
eastern side of the Valdelsa basin (San Casciano Val di Pesa)
the sediments belonging to a Plio-Pleistocene palaeo-Arno
fan delta are interfingered with marine deposits of the Lower
Valdarno basin. This interlayering gives rise to mesas and
step-like slopes, dominated by large planar or rotational
slides.
Travertines and calcareous tufa of late Pleistocene and
Holocene age are found along the margins of the basins.
Active hydrothermal springs are present at Bagni San
Filippo, Bagno Vignone and Rapolano. To the north of
Siena along the southern sector of the Valdelsa basin calcareous tufa and travertines form flat surfaces several kilometres wide at different elevations. Travertine ridges along
the sides of these basins have been used to infer the presence
of active faults (Brogi et al. 2014), although other geological
and geomorphological evidence of faulting are missing.
Holocene and Late Pleistocene fluvial terrace staircases
have been recognized elsewhere and are usually better preserved close to the confluences. Middle Pleistocene terraces
are less preserved.
21.3.4
The Inner Tuscany Ridge and Related
Basins
The Inner Tuscany Ridge is wider and more complex than
the Outer Tuscany Ridge because it includes shorter minor
ridges and basins almost parallel to each other. The relief is
deeply incised by the rivers, although remnants of the planation surface are well preserved everywhere. Higher relief
exceeding 1000 m is found in the southern sector, to the
south of Mt. Amiata, where the planation surface is recognizable only as peaks of equal heights. Mt. Amiata (1738 m)
is a shield volcano that experienced activity between 300
and 190 ka with lava flows that filled valleys in an already
dissected landscape. To the south of Mt. Amiata the mean
elevation drops along an alignment that is transversal to the
ridge. This is the Pitigliano area, in the northern flank of the
Bolsena volcano, located to the southwest in the Latium
Region, that was active during the Middle and the very early
Late Pleistocene with a series of ignimbrites, the latter of
which dates to the Last Interglacial. To the northwest of Mt.
Amiata, along the ridge there are very limited remnants of
other effusive lavas at Roccatederighi and Roccastrada, to
the east of Siena. In this sector, the mean elevation decreases
and remnants of the planation surface are better preserved
such as those around the Montagnola Senese, where thick
deposits of calcareous tectonic breccias overlie metamorphic
rocks. Slightly to the north, on the ridge Pliocene coastal
biocalcarenites and conglomerates crop out again unconformably lying on bedrock before it dips under the
Mio-Pliocene sediments of the Lower Valdarno basin.
On bedrock made by severely deformed terrains the
downcutting of the valleys activated widespread rock slides
and rock flows, locally affecting also small towns. The continuity of the ridge is interrupted by a series of basins sometimes interconnected such as the Radicondoli-Chiusdino and
Versilia, that split in the eastern long and wide Volterra basin,
and a western Val di Fine—Val di Cecina basin filled with
Mio-Pliocene continental deposits. The connection of the two
latter basins is suggested by the remnant of Pliocene terrains
21
Tuscany Hills and Valleys: Uplift, Exhumation, Valley …
253
Fig. 21.9 Stepped morphology at Montespertoli: the steeper slopes are modelled in Early Pleistocene sands while the gentle slopes truncate
interlayered clays. Rotational slides and rock flows also affect the slopes (photo M. Coltorti)
in the small Sassa and Serrazzano basins (Riforgiato et al.
2005). To the southwest Mio-Pliocene terrains are preserved
in the Grosseto basin, close to the coastline and in the Middle
Ombrone and Albegna basins slightly to the east. An abrupt
contact with the pre-Miocene bedrock usually corresponds to
tilted unconformities although we cannot exclude the presence of palaeo-valleys filled with continental deposits.
The morphology of the basins is strongly influenced by the
intensity of the river downcutting. Large valleys are found in
the larger basins especially where clay formations crop out.
These basins are the site of intense gully erosion, badland
formation with widespread earth and mud flows, as well as
large rock flows and rock slides on the consolidated terrains.
In correspondence with alternations of sands/sandstones and
clay/marls in Miocene and Plio-Pleistocene terrains step-like
slopes (Fig. 21.9), mesas and sometimes cuestas were
formed. One of the best examples is the famous Volterra
“balze” (cliff) modelled on sandstones overlying clays deeply
affected by badland formation.
In limestones, karstic processes have led to the origin of
wide depressions aligned NW–SE along the eastern side of
the Montagnola Senese ridge but also to the west near the
town of Massa Marittima. These depressions originally
hosted springs and were later filled with palustrine and fluvial sediments and incorporated within the drainage network. A contemporary example is the Accesa Lake, to the
southwest of Massa Marittima (Fig. 21.1), hosting a Late
Pleistocene–Holocene record of climatic and vegetation
changes including human impact (Magny et al. 2007).
Locally thick deposits of travertines and calcareous tufa
originated from these old springs, whilst locally they are still
forming today (i.e. Saturnia). Calcareous tufa almost on top
of the local relief (i.e. Massa Marittima) suggests that karstic
springs were an important component of landscape evolution
since the beginning of the uplift. To the southwest of Rosia,
marine Pliocene sands fill a doline indicating that locally
these features have been inherited from Pliocene karstic
processes.
21.4
Conclusions
The landforms of western Tuscany reflect an interaction
between regional uplift and valley downcutting. A planation
surface interpreted as a plain of marine erosion was modelled over the entire sector and was later uplifted. The planated coastal sediments allow to establish a mean uplift rate
of ca. 0.2 mm/year (ca. 700 m in ca. 3.5 Ma). The uplift
was not perfectly uniform and mild deformations have been
observed. The uplifted area is bordered to the east by an
important fault system (Florence basin—Valdarno—Val di
Chiana), the footwall of which was even more uplifted.
However, to the west of this alignment, there are no horst
and grabens but synform basins alternating with antiform
ridges that were generated by large-scale Pliocene tectonic
deformation. A buried palaeo-landscape dominated by
254
karstic and fluvial landforms has been recognized in places.
Extensional tectonics did not play a role in the evolution of
the present day landscape that is mainly the result of river
downcutting and gravitational processes that were more
intense in softer Mio-Plio-Pleistocene sediments. Along the
western side of Mt. Cetona erosion re-exhumed what has
been considered one of the few high-angle extensional
Pliocene faults. To the north and south of this 6 km long
fault-generated escarpment an onlap of Pliocene sediments
has been observed. We suggest that this evidence could be
associated with large-scale Pliocene gravitational
phenomena.
Exhumation processes almost erased the evidence of the
planation surface across the top of the Pliocene deposits
inside the basins although it is still locally recognizable. It is
very well preserved on top of the ridges, especially on the
more conservative limestone terrains, and it represents one
of the largest relict landscapes in the Italian peninsula.
During the deepening phase of the drainage network the
most photographed and famous features of the Tuscany
landscape such as the cuestas, mesas and badlands on clay
and marly terrains were modelled.
The area hosts many National Parks and Protected areas
where several geomorphological features can be observed
and a large number of geosites has been identified. The
above-mentioned “calanchi” and “biancane” are well
exposed in the protected areas of Lucciola Bella and
Camposodo/Leonina in the Orcia Valley. From these areas,
it is also possible to have splendid views of Radicofani
volcanic neck, Mt. Amiata volcano as well as the planation
surface that affected the Inner and Outer Tuscan Ridge.
A nice location where to walk across the almost unspoiled
valleys and gorges that cut the Inner Tuscany Ridge is the
Upper Merse Natural Reserve. The Natural Park of Mt.
Amiata allows to visit across more or less dissected lava
flows and DGSDs that have been recognized along its
eastern flank. To the west of the Accesa Lake, in the Natural
Park of Gavorrano, is one of the best preserved karst spring
in the region.
Acknowledgements We thank Marta Della Seta and the Editors for
the critical review of the manuscript and the useful suggestions to
improve the text.
References
Alexander D (1982) Difference between “calanchi” and “biancane”
badlands in Italy. In: Bryan RB, Yair A (eds) Badland geomorphology and piping. GeoBooks, Norwich, pp 71–87
M. Coltorti et al.
Boscato P, Coltorti M, Reggiani P (2008) Pliocene Anancus arvernensis (Croizet & Jobert, 1828) remains from Cetona (Siena):
stratigraphy, chronology and paleoenvironment. Boll Soc Geol It
127(1):151–162
Brogi A (2011) Bowl-shaped basin related to low-angle detachment
during continental extension: the case of the controversial Neogene
Siena Basin (central Italy, Northern Apennines). Tectonophysics
499:54–76
Brogi A, Fidolini F, Liotta D (2013) Tectonic and sedimentary
evolution of the Upper Valdarno Basin: new insights from the
lacustrine S. Barbara Basin. Ital J Geosci 132(1):81–97
Brogi A, Capezzuoli E, Martini I, Picozzi M, Sandrelli F (2014) Late
Quaternary tectonics in the inner Northern Apennines (Siena Basin,
southern Tuscany, Italy) and their seismotectonic implication.
J Geodyn 76:25–45
Carmignani L, Decandia F, Disperati L, Fantozzi PL, Kligfield R,
Lazzarotto A, Liotta D, Meccheri M (2001) Inner Northern
Apennines. In: Vai GB, Martini IP (eds) Anatomy of an Orogen:
the Apennines and adjacent Mediterranean Basins. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 197–213
Coltorti M, Pieruccini P (1997) Middle-upper Pliocene ‘compression’
and Middle Pleistocene ‘extension’ in the east-Tiber basin: from
‘synform’ to ‘extensional’ basin in the Tyrrhenian side of the
northern Apennines (central Italy). Il Quaternario 10(2):521–528
Coltorti M, Pieruccini P (2000) A Late Lower Pliocene planation
surface across the Italian Peninsula: a key tool in neotectonics
studies. J Geodyn 29:323–328
Coltorti M, Ravani S, Verrazzani F (2007) The growth of the Chianti
Ridge: progressive unconformities and depositional sequences in
the S. Barbara Basin (Upper Valdarno, Italy). Il. Quaternario 20(1–
2):67–84
Coltorti M, Ravani S, Cornamusini G, Ielpi A, Verrazzani F (2009) A
sagging along the eastern Chianti Mts., Italy. Geomorphology
112:15–26
Coltorti M, Brogi A, Fabbrini L, Firuzabadi D, Pieranni L (2010) The
sagging deep-seated gravitational movements on the eastern side of
Mt. Amiata (Tuscany, Italy). Nat Hazards 59:191–208
Coltorti M, Firuzabadi D, Pieruccini P (2012) Geomorphological map
and land units at 1:200,000 scale of the Siena Province (Southern
Tuscany, Italy). J Maps, Spec Issue:536–551
Del Monte M (2017) The typical badlands landscapes between the
Tyrrhenian Sea and the Tiber River. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M
(eds) Landscapes and Landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham,
pp 281–291
Disperati L, Liotta D (1998) Estimating uplift of clay-filled extensional
basins through the porosity-depth curve: the case of the Radicofani
Basin (Italy). Ann Tectonicae 12:162–176
Elter P, Giglia G, Tongiorgi M, Trevisan L (1975) Tensional and
compressional areas in the recent (Tortonian to present) evolution of
the Northern Apennines. B Geofis Teor Appl 65:3–18
Finetti IR, Boccaletti M, Bonini M, Del Ben A, Geletti R, Pipan M,
Sani F (2001) Crustal section based on CROP seismic data across
the North Tyrrhenian-Northern Apennines-Adriatic Sea. Tectonophysics 343:135–163
Magny M, De Bealieu JL, Drescheer-Schneider R, Vanniere B,
Walter-Simonnet AV, Miras Y, Millet L, Bossuet G, Peyron O,
Brugiapaglia E, Leroux A (2007) Holocene climate changes in the
central Mediterranean as recorded by lake-level fluctuations at Lake
Accesa (Tuscany, Italy). Quat Sci Rev 26(13–14):1736–1758
Martini IP, Sagri M (1993) Tectono sedimentary characteristics of Late
Miocene-Quaternary extensional basin of Northern Apennines,
Italy. Earth Sci Rev 34:197–233
21
Tuscany Hills and Valleys: Uplift, Exhumation, Valley …
Pascucci V, Costantini A, Martini IP, Dringoli R (2006)
Tectono-sedimentary analysis of a complex, extensional, Neogene
basin formed on thrust-faulted, Northern Apennines hinterland:
Radicofani Basin, Italy. Sed Geol 183:71–97
255
Riforgiato F, Mazzei R, Salvatorini G, Sandrelli F (2005)
Chronostratigraphic revision of some Pliocene basins in Tuscany
at the Zanclean/Piacenzian boundary. Boll Soc Geol It, Vol Spec
3:7–13
Landscapes and Landforms of the Duchy
of Urbino in Italian Renaissance Paintings
22
Olivia Nesci and Rosetta Borchia
Abstract
The territory of the Duchy of Urbino (Adriatic Central Italy) is characterized by the
presence of a natural heritage that is associated with attractive vistas and exclusive
scientific, historical, archaeological and architectural assets. The great Renaissance artists
who used to travel across these areas were aware of this. Among them, Piero della
Francesca, Raphael and Leonardo were particularly fascinated by these landscapes and
reproduced them in their most celebrated works of art. Both the Dyptic of the Dukes by
Piero della Francesca and Gioconda by Leonardo bear the land of the Duchy in their
background. Alluvial plains, lakes and landslides are the geomorphic features that can be
best recognized in those landscapes.
Keywords
Cultural geomorphology
22.1
Introduction
Until recently, the landscape backgrounds of Italian paintings from the Renaissance have been generally assumed to
be vivid but generalized creations of the painters’ imagination, although some art historians have guessed that they
were representative of a number of locations. Our work
demonstrates that for several Renaissance painters these
landscapes were actually realistic portrayals of vistas of the
past. Previously, no one superimposed those panoramas on
O. Nesci (&)
Dipartimento di Scienze Pure e Applicate, Università di Urbino
“Carlo Bo”, Via Cà Le Suore 3, 61029 Urbino, PU, Italy
e-mail: olivia.nesci@uniurb.it
R. Borchia
Montefeltro Vedute Rinascimentali, Loc. Maciolla 47, 61029
Urbino, PU, Italy
Renaissance art
Duchy of Urbino
Montefeltro
the present-day landscapes. Recent studies (Borchia and
Nesci 2012a, b) have documented that the landscapes seen in
the backgrounds of the most famous paintings of the Italian
Renaissance, e.g. the Diptych of the Dukes of Urbino by
Piero della Francesca and La Gioconda by Leonardo da
Vinci, are real and belonged to the territories of the former
Duchy of Urbino (Central Italy, Fig. 22.1). As these artists
can be regarded as real “photographers” of the landscapes
they saw, and because their paintings are the sole testament
to the past morphology of these territories, this kind of
research is relevant to both art historians and geologists.
A careful examination of the painted landscape backgrounds
of the Renaissance is of great importance to the study of the
changes that occur in a territory.
Our focus is on an area formerly known as the Duchy of
Urbino, which historically includes parts of the Marche,
Romagna, Tuscany and Umbria regions (Fig. 22.1). These
territories consist of a remarkable variety of landscapes and
are fascinating because of both its intrinsic beauty and
breathtaking geomorphodiversity (sensu Panizza 2009).
Indeed, we are not surprised that these scenes kindled the
sensitivities of the artists who once travelled across this land,
especially during the Renaissance.
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_22
257
258
O. Nesci and R. Borchia
Fig. 22.1 Location map of the Adriatic Central Italy. The black dashed line indicates the extension of the ancient Dukedom of Urbino. The white
dashed line refers to the present regional boundaries
22.2
Geological and Geomorphological
Setting
The geological and geomorphological setting of this section
of the Apennines has left a unique mark on the landscape
due to the variability of its rocks and geological structures.
The geological record indicates environments from deep
marine to continental. The Umbrian-Marchean succession is
an uninterrupted series of strata recording a nearly continuous time interval from the Late Triassic to the Pleistocene
(Passeri 1994). The territory began to resemble its modern
geomorphological structure during the second half of the
Miocene (about 13 to 5 million years ago) when the
Apennine ridge took shape and the entire area began to
emerge (Mayer et al. 2003). The uplift and emergence of the
region took place with a shift from the southwest to the
northeast, in the direction of the Adriatic Sea, through an
intense corrugation of the earth’s crust characterized by the
formation of a broad fold and thrust belt. Tectonic deformation was more intense in the inland areas, where it caused
greater uplift and, as a consequence, a more accentuated
relief of the valleys, as well as the moulding of mountain
landscapes that are at times rugged and bare (Fig. 22.2a).
A gentler deformation, less abrupt rise in the eastern valleys
and along the coast, and less resistant rocks have contributed
to the origin of a soft hilly landscape up to the sea, save for
small local ridges (Mayer et al. 2003).
Most of the western territory (upper valleys of the
Metauro, Foglia and Marecchia rivers) shows a monotonous
sequence of marly-arenaceous strata dating back to the
Miocene (Passeri 1994) that forms a landscape characterized
by cuestas, hogbacks and flatirons. The Umbria-Marche
Apennines are bounded to the north by the Valmarecchia
Sheet, which is embedded in lower Pliocene clays, thus
22
Landscapes and Landforms of the Duchy of Urbino in Italian …
259
Fig. 22.2 The most representative geomorphological landscapes in the study area. The Mt. Catria–Mt. Nerone anticline ridge (a), Sassi Simone
and Simoncello (b), Upper Pleistocene terraced alluvial plain of the Metauro River valley (c)
dating the Sheet emplacement. The Sheet is formed by
Ligurian Units overlain by Epi-Ligurian ones (Perrone et al.
2014). The sharp lithological and erodibility contrast
between the Ligurian substrate, which is mostly clayey, and
the more rigid Epi-Ligurian “rafts” has contributed to the
formation of a unique landscape in the Apennines. The
present vista of Montefeltro is the result of this geological
and geomorphic evolution that lasted for about 12 million
years. Larger relief zones that experienced both great climatic and tectonic forces shattered into smaller pieces, and
landslides reduced their relief. Only a few vestiges of the
primary morphology are left in the form of blocks, spires and
260
O. Nesci and R. Borchia
towers that can be seen here and there among the clay
slopes. The shape of several single cliffs depends on the
orientation of the strata, as can be observed in the Sassi
Simone and Simoncello Natural Park (Fig. 22.2b). The
present geomorphic arrangement, that is the existence of
broad fluvial valleys sloping gently down from the Apennine
watershed to the Adriatic Sea, was initiated quite recently,
about 700,000 years ago, during the Middle Pleistocene,
when the area experienced the effects of global climate
changes (Guerra and Nesci 1999). The landscape was thus
moulded by erosion and accumulation processes, as glacial
periods alternated with subtropical climates. In particular,
erosion at higher elevations and the accumulation of debris
on the valley floors peaked during the cold ages, when the
physical process of rock degradation was more intense and
the rocks themselves were covered with scarce or no vegetation. It was during these periods that broad alluvial plains
took shape, which now occur in strips alongside riverbeds;
these are alluvial terraces and a record of the power of
widespread fluvial sedimentation (Fig. 22.2c).
Warm and cold periods also followed on from one
another in the Holocene, although they were not as long and
intense as the previous Pleistocene events. Nevertheless,
they have also left a mark on the landscape, slopes and
fluvial plains in the form of remarkable geomorphological
features and processes such as erosive escarpments, fluvial
floods, major landslides and badlands (Nesci et al. 2012).
The Little Ice Age (LIA) began in the 1500s, and was
marked in the northern hemisphere by colder temperatures
and abundant heavy rainfall, which lasted through most of
the nineteenth century (Mann 2002). In the Northern
Apennines, and in particular in the Romagna-Marche region,
there were many phases of climatic deterioration and consequent hydrogeological instability. It is difficult to establish
to what extent human beings might have been responsible
for the changes in the landscape in comparison with climatic
effects. Since Roman times there has been clear evidence
that riverbeds were modified, diverted and dammed to produce water reservoirs and mechanical energy, as well as to
create fords and for agricultural purposes. Deforestation
itself may have been partly caused by human factors as,
especially during the cold periods, it was common practice
to regularly cut down trees for firewood (Surian et al. 2009).
22.3
Landscapes and Landforms in Paintings
The project “The Invisible Landscape: The Real Landscapes
of Piero della Francesca” was born in October 2007 with the
recognition of the landscape as a backdrop to the portrait of
Federico da Montefeltro in the famous Diptych of the Dukes
of Urbino by Piero della Francesca (Borchia and Nesci
2012a). The methodology used for the detection and
reconstruction of landscapes is the image analysis process
that works on both the picture and the present landscape.
Thanks to software graphics, it was possible to accurately
investigate every aspect of the area, enabling differences in
colour and morphology and the focus of the details of the
paintings to be brought out. As a result, landforms and
topographic profiles that in some cases even overlap have
been identified, highlighting any subsequent changes over
the centuries.
Digital elevation models were used to visualize landforms
from various altitudes and angles. The geomorphological
analysis was useful for understanding the evolution of the
landscape and explaining the present-day absence of particular elements that were present in the painting (e.g. lakes,
landslides). Slope and river erosion processes were considered, because they may have significantly altered the landscape, particularly extreme formative events which often led
to sudden changes (Persi et al. 1993).
22.3.1
The Diptych of the Dukes of Urbino
The dual portrait of the Dukes of Urbino (Piero della
Francesca, Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence, Italy) which was
painted in oil (47 33 cm) in about 1465, is regarded as an
absolute masterpiece of Piero’s maturity in the Court of
Urbino. The diptych is painted on both the front and back:
on the front, Duchess Battista Sforza (Fig. 22.3a) and Duke
Federico da Montefeltro (Fig. 22.3b) are portrayed in
half-length and seen in profile, one opposite the other,
whereas on the back the two characters are sitting on triumphal chariots and seem to be moving towards one
another.
There is general agreement among scholars that geographical regions, but not precise locations, can be recognized in the backgrounds of Piero’s paintings. These vistas
have been identified as being anything from a generic view
of the domains of Federico da Montefeltro to the Metauro
valley, while other authors have recognized different locations (Brizzi 1991 and references therein).
The first morphological element that we recognized in the
diptych was the small hill located in the background of the
painting in which Federico da Montefeltro is portrayed
(Fig. 22.4). This is Mt. Fronzoso, a small pyramid-shaped
hill marking the boundaries of the Metauro alluvial plain
between Urbania and Sant’Angelo in Vado (Fig. 22.1). In
today’s landscape, the elements with the same patterns as in
the painting correspond to the woody mantle, the growth of
which is favoured by the presence of a calcareous-marly
22
Landscapes and Landforms of the Duchy of Urbino in Italian …
261
Fig. 22.3 Piero della Francesca (1415/20–1492): Portrait of the Dukes of Urbino. Florence, Uffizi Gallery. © 2015. Photo Scala, Florence—
concession Italian Ministry of Heritage and Culture
Fig. 22.4 The Diptych of the Dukes. Comparison of the landscape behind the profile of the Duke (a) with the present landscape of the middle
valley of the Metauro River (b). The lake is no longer present, but is included to aid understanding. On the right, the detail of Mt. Fronzoso
substrate, and the meadows where we can find more marly
rock units that do not enable arboreal plants to take root,
respectively (Fig. 22.4). The granular texture and dark colours on the side next to the river are quite different from the
light hues of the opposite slope. All of the details of the
painting have been recognized (cf. Borchia and Nesci
2012a). The only apparently incongruous natural element in
the landscape in the Duke’s portrait is the wide meandering
river that flows into a broad lake basin that is clearly visible
in the foreground. However, the lake has been replaced by a
broad alluvial plain. The paleolake formed because of a weir
that the Duke himself ordered to be built at the Riscatto
Bridge near Urbania (Fig. 22.5a). Some reliable reconstructions of the historical built-up area of Urbania have
been found, in which the traces of the weir can be observed
(Fig. 22.5b). Local folklore has widely confirmed the
262
O. Nesci and R. Borchia
Fig. 22.5 The town of Urbania with the Riscatto Bridge in a drawing
by Mingucci (1626) (a). In detail (b), the groove present in the bridge
arches, indicative of the presence of a structure that closed the bridge, is
highlighted. The current bridge and the Ducal Palace behind it (c). ©
[2015] Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana
existence of this hydraulic device that allowed the Duke to
come by boat to his game reserve known as “Il Barco”.
Relying on morphostratigraphy and topography, we have
tried to prove the possible existence of a kind of river-lake
by means of a detailed geomorphological survey and a
thorough examination of the stratigraphy resulting from
drilling (Borchia and Nesci 2012a). This allowed us to be
certain that the location of the lake, even if it was not directly
surveyed due to the lack of surface water, might be reasonably compatible with the heights of the countryside from
500 years ago. Due to the LIA, the entire area underwent
intense colluviation originating from both the slopes and
widespread sedimentation in the minor watercourses.
Disastrous floods, which are widely described in many
historical papers (Persi et al. 1993), may have compelled the
Duke’s engineers to open the weir to prevent a dangerous
overflow. Coinciding with this, the river recovered its erosive power and formed the remarkable incision of the river
channel that is still visible today. Curiously, 40 years later,
the same landscape was depicted in a painting by Raphael
(Small Cowper Madonna, National Gallery of Art of
Washington). The pictorial technique in this work is, of
course, different, and yet we are able to recognize the same
details, such as the lake basin, the convent and Mt. Fronzoso
(Borchia and Nesci 2012a).
The landscape in the background of the pictures with the
Dukes on their triumphal chariots (Fig. 22.6a) has its actual
counterpart in the large plain where the Metauro River flows
22
Landscapes and Landforms of the Duchy of Urbino in Italian …
263
Fig. 22.6 The Triumphs of the Diptych of the Dukes (a). The broad plain of River Metauro identified as the background of the painting (b).
Comparison of the hills of San Lorenzo and Farneta (c) and San Pietro (d) with the landscapes on the painting
(Fig. 22.6b). This is a broad valley with a lake at its centre
where we can see some sailing boats and a small island.
Piero della Francesca reproduced both the outlines and the
details with great accuracy in his Triumphs to such an extent
that it is quite easy to detect almost all of the elements of the
landscape. The valley in the Triumphs is the wide plain
crossed by the Metauro River between Urbania and Fermignano (Fig. 22.1). The hill in the foreground (Fig. 22.6c)
corresponds to San Lorenzo, whereas the third hill is the
Farneta, which is slightly visible behind the Duchess. The
hill on the left, behind the Duke’s chariot is San Pietro
(Fig. 22.6d). There is also an element in the Triumphs that
we can no longer identify, namely the lake in the middle and
the small island within it. It is, however, much easier to
understand and explain how the lake formed in this section
of the plain. The slopes along this part of the valley are
remarkably lower than those of the former valley, while the
valley floor itself reveals the old morphology in some of its
parts. A digital model of the ground highlights the hollow
areas as well as the disclosed stretch, which is the dry land at
the centre of the lake (see Fig. 23 in Borchia and Nesci
2012a). On the left side, the lake depression is buried
beneath the conspicuous colluviation that occurred due to
cooling climate of the next century.
Another landscape, seen in the background of the portrait
of Battista Sforza (Fig. 22.7), is located in the middle of
264
O. Nesci and R. Borchia
Fig. 22.7 Comparison of the mid Marecchia River valley (a) with the backdrop of the portrait of Battista Sforza (b). Particulars of relief located
under the chin of the Duchess (c) and the comparison with the Rocca di Maioletto (d)
22
Landscapes and Landforms of the Duchy of Urbino in Italian …
Valmarecchia, and the rugged hill is the cliff of Maioletto
with the vestiges of the homonymous castle. The viewpoint
from which Piero della Francesca painted the entire territory
is located on the cliff of Pietracuta (Fig. 22.1); the perspective is a bird’s-eye view, which is a very useful pictorial
tool with which to take in the complete landscape
(Fig. 22.7a). This kind of viewpoint flattens the scenery, but
many landforms are still easily recognizable. The small
asymmetric hill that is visible under the chin of Duchess
Battista Sforza appears to be modified. The cliff of Maioletto
has been devastated by several landslides since ancient
times, the most ruinous of which occurred on 29th May 1700
and forced the locals to abandon once and for all the castle of
Maioletto that had been built at the top of the cliff. The ruins
of the ancient walls, along with some fragments of brick, are
still witnessing the existence of this thriving medieval castle.
It seems that this major landslide may have been due to
severe climate conditions, since it took place between 1690
and 1700 during the acme of the LIA. Long and extremely
cold winters were followed by rainy middle seasons and
very short summers with frequent downpours. On 28th May
1700 a violent deluge hit Maiolo, and it rained non-stop for
40 h (cf. Persi et al. 1993). On the night of the 29th, while it
was still raining, a large rock fall moved down the valley,
causing a portion of the developed area to crumble away
(Nesci et al. 2005). It is significant that Piero della Francesca
did not paint the badlands; indeed, there are no patterns
demonstrating these peculiar forms of erosion. This can be
explained by the fact that badland morphogenesis is often
associated with intense rainfall events, and changes in land
use occurred later, around the second half of the nineteenth
century (cf. Torri et al. 2000). Piero della Francesca thus
lived when the badlands had probably not yet developed.
22.3.2
La Gioconda
La Gioconda (Leonardo da Vinci, Louvre, Paris, France) is
the most famous painting in the world and is also known as
the Mona Lisa. We could not ignore a landscape that was so
similar, and suggest that the background vistas of the
painting encompass the entire Duchy of Urbino seen from
the heights of Valmarecchia (Borchia and Nesci 2012b). In
order to allow complete visibility, the landscape was represented from a bird’s-eye view and from a considerable
altitude of more than 1000 m. The portrait of the Gioconda
interrupts, but does not conceal, any part of the landscape.
The details of the landscape in the painting have an exact
spatial location and therefore a precise counterpart in the
actual physical landscape (Fig. 22.8).
265
Fig. 22.8 Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519): La Gioconda, 1503-6.
Paris, Louvre. Oil on poplar board, cm 77 53. © 2015 Photo Scala,
Florence
It is important to be familiar with two key expressions to
fully understand the complexity of Leonardo’s landscape: an
aerial bifocal perspective and compression (cf. Borchia and
Nesci 2012b). These methods of mapping are accurate rules
that Leonardo himself documented and published in his
“Treatise on Painting”, which is also known as the “Urbino
Code”. The first detected landscape is at the bottom right of
the woman in the picture (Fig. 22.9). The comparison of the
painted cliff with the real landscape is immediate and easily
recognizable and both natural and human elements have
been identified within this part of the landscape. The only
aspect that can no longer be found is the famous bridge with
at least four arches that rest on large boulders (Fig. 22.9a).
This part of the valley is, at its narrowest point, an ideal spot
to build a bridge or a road, and is characterized by the
presence of a floodplain with large calcareous boulders
which rolled down from the overlying periglacial pediment.
266
O. Nesci and R. Borchia
Fig. 22.9 The landscape identified in the high Valmarecchia (a) compared with the right side of La Gioconda (b). The dashed white lines help us
to understand the accuracy of the profiles
Beyond the visual correspondences, further evidence comes
from a study of the ancient roads conducted by Sacco
(2012), which has shown that a road crossed the river at that
point. There are many historical documents suggesting the
presence of numerous bridges over the Marecchia River that
were later destroyed by floods (Persi et al. 1993). The rugged
relief that appears in the background of the painting has been
recognized as Mt. Aquilone (Fig. 22.9a). Leonardo painted a
large lake, lapping the reliefs. The presence of lakes and
ponds has been known about since historical times (Gambi
1948), and the place names indicate the presence of water
everywhere. The morphology of the site, however, does not
exclude the presence, in the past, of a natural reservoir of
larger dimensions, which is unfortunately not chronologically identified. At the base of the relief, there is actually a
great depression that was probably created by major gravitational deformations that have produced counter-slopes
upon which water run-off and the numerous sources could
collect. These processes may have formed the great lake that
Leonardo painted at the base of Mt. Aquilone. The subsequent mobilization of landslides could have drained the lake
and determined its final infilling, leaving only a few small
depressions. The recognition of some locations in the
painting was helped by some of Leonardo’s drawings. In one
drawing (Fig. 22.10) he emphasized both the flatirons that
are typical landforms in a landscape with stratified rocks,
such as the Umbrian-Marchean Ridge, and the allochthonous
Valmarecchia Sheet.
We recognized other landscapes thanks to numerous old
prints (Fig. 22.11). The two cliffs, named Sassi Simone and
Simoncello (Figs. 22.2 and 22.11a), are part of a popular
resort in Montefeltro, and now belong to a famous nature
reserve that is also an important geological site in the Marche
region. There are plenty of maps and drawings of this area
because Cosimo de’ Medici founded a new town on the flat top
of Sasso Simone, which he named Town of the Sun. This
survived for only a century, and was abandoned because of
harsh conditions during the LIA (Allegretti 1992). We see a
remarkable resemblance between the sets of fractures in the
crest of Sasso Simoncello shown in Fig. 22.11b, c.
In parallel with our research, an Italian historian, Zapperi
(2010), has demonstrated that the painting does not represent
Lisa Gherardini, the wife of Francesco del Giocondo, a
merchant of Florence. Instead, it would depict Pacifica
22
Landscapes and Landforms of the Duchy of Urbino in Italian …
267
Fig. 22.10 Mt. Aquilone present
landscape (a) compared with
Leonardo’s drawing
(b) (Mountain Range RL 12414.
Windsor, Royal Borough
Museum Collection. © 2015.
DeAgostini Picture Library/Scala,
Firenze)
Brandani from Urbino, who was the lover of Giuliano de’
Medici and the mother of his only male child. This supports
the hypothesis that the landscape has a close relationship
with the portrait in the foreground (Perrig 1980).
22.4
Geomorphology and Geoheritage
The landscapes that form the backdrop to Renaissance
paintings are real places that identify with the characters
portrayed in the foreground. Aromatico (2012), in his interesting essay on the Flagellation by Piero della Francesca,
argues that painters could not always express their creativity,
especially in portraiture where they were submissive to the
will of their clients, who often decided what to include in a
painting. Piero had Duke Federico da Montefeltro as a client,
and he designed the work that the artist produced as a good
“labourer”. Taken together, the three landscapes of the Diptych constitute the entire territory of the Duchy of Urbino
(Fig. 22.1). In this way, the Duke wanted to immortalize his
domain and good governance. In the case of the Gioconda, the
landscapes would be the homeland of Pacifica Brandani and
her son Ippolito, combined with the Tuscan territories of her
lover, Giuliano de’ Medici, the boy’s father (Zapperi 2010). It
is fascinating that the historical memory of our land can be
better understood through a new visual approach to the most
famous Renaissance works of art. Indeed, many art scholars
have followed this kind of research for over 500 years, but it is
now possible to approach the problem using modern scientific
methods that can undoubtedly support and enrich traditional
investigations. The Duchy of Urbino area, which is world
famous for its natural landscapes of great beauty and charm
268
O. Nesci and R. Borchia
and its particular geological evolution, not only becomes a
new horizon of knowledge as “landscape art”, but an unexpected cultural resource to share, transmit and promote. The
goal is to create an open-air museum with viewpoints that will
lead the visitor through the extraordinary experience of being
part of a work of art.
Acknowledgements We are grateful to Prof. Larry Mayer for his
critical review of the manuscript and his insights and suggestions.
References
Fig. 22.11 Ideographic drawing of Sasso Simoncello in the late
sixteenth century, Carpegna, municipal archives (a). Detail of Sasso
Simoncello (b) compared with that of the Gioconda (c). The white
dashed lines show similar morphological features
Aromatico A (2012) La Flagellazione, il romanzo, i codici, il mistero.
Petruzzi Ed, Città di Castello, 351 pp
Allegretti G (1992) La città del Sasso. I Sassi, Quaderno 1, Pedrosi Ed,
Villa Verucchio, 61 pp
Borchia R, Nesci O (2012a) The invisible landscape. A fascinating hunt
for the real landscapes of Piero della Francesca among Montefeltro
Hills. Il Lavoro Editoriale Ed, Ancona, 86 pp
Borchia R, Nesci O (2012b) Codice P. Atlante illustrato del reale
paesaggio della Gioconda. Mondadori Electa, Milano, 144 pp
Brizzi A (1991) Alla ricerca di Piero. Guide artistiche Mondadori
Electa, Milano, 125 pp
Gambi L (1948) I laghi di frana dell’Appennino Romagnolo. Boll Soc
Geogr It 1:10–54
Guerra C, Nesci O (1999) Glacis Pleistocenici nel Montefeltro
(Appennino Marchigiano-Romagnolo). In: Orombelli G (ed) Studi
Geografici e Geologici in onore di Severino Belloni. Glauco Brigati
Editore, Genova, pp 419–428
Mann ME (2002) Little ice age. In: Mac Cracken MC, Perry JS
(eds) The earth system: physical and chemical dimensions of global
environmental change, vol 1. Encyclopedia of global environmental
change. Wiley, Chichester, pp 504–509
Mayer L, Menichetti M, Nesci O, Savelli D (2003) Morphotectonic
approach to the drainage analysis in the North Marche Region in
Central Italy. Quatern Int 101:157–167
Nesci O, Savelli D, Diligenti A, Marinangeli D (2005) Geomorphological sites in the Northern Marche (Italy). Examples from
autochthon anticline ridges and from Val Marecchia allochthon. Il
Quaternario, Ital J Quat Sci 18(1):79–91
Nesci O, Savelli D, Troiani F (2012) Types and development of stream
terraces in the Marche Apennines (Central Italy): a review and some
remarks on recent appraisals. Géomorphologie 2:215–238
Panizza M (2009) The geomorphodiversity of the Dolomites (Italy): a
key of geoheritage assessment. Geoheritage 1:33–42
Passeri L (ed) (1994) Appennino umbro-marchigiano. Guide Geologiche
Regionali 7. Società Geologica Italiana. BE-MA, Milano, 301 pp
Persi P, Veggiani A, Lombardi FV, Battistelli M, Renzi G, Allegretti G (1993)
Le frane nella storia della Valmarecchia. Le Penne Ed, Pesaro, 110 pp
Perrig A (1980) Leonardo: Die Anatomie der Erde. Jahrbuch der
Hamburger Kunstsammlungen 25:51–80
Perrone V, Terrotta S, Marsaglia K, Distaso A, Tiberi V (2014) The
Oligocene ophiolite-derived breccias and sandstones of the Val Marecchia Nappe: Insights for paleogeography and evolution of Northern
Apennines (Italy). Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 394:128–143
Sacco D (2012) Archeologia dei paesaggi nella Gioconda. Analisi di un
attraversamento. In: Borchia R, Nesci O (eds) Codice P. Atlante
illustrato del reale paesaggio della Gioconda. Mondadori Electa,
Milano, pp 134–141
Surian N, Rinaldi M, Pellegrini L, Audisio C, Maraga F, Teruggi LB,
Turitto O, Ziliani L (2009) Channel adjustments in Italian rivers:
evolutionary trends, causes and management implications. In:
22
Landscapes and Landforms of the Duchy of Urbino in Italian …
James LA, Rathburn SL, Whittecar GR (eds) Management and
restoration of fluvial systems with broad historical changes and
human impacts. Geol Soc Am Spec Paper 451:83–95
Torri D, Calzolari C, Rodolfi G (2000) Badlands in changing
environments: an introduction. In: Torri D, Poesen J, Calzolari C,
269
Rodolfi G (eds) Badlands in changing environments. Catena Spec
Issue 40(2):119–125
Zapperi R (2010) Abschied von Mona Lisa Das berühmteste
Gemälde der Welt wird enträtselt. C.H.Beck Verlag, München,
159 pp
Rocky Cliffs Joining Velvet Beaches: The
Northern Marche Coast
23
Daniele Savelli, Francesco Troiani, Paolo Cavitolo, and Olivia Nesci
Abstract
The northern Marche coastal area epitomizes many of the elements forming the rich natural,
historical and cultural tissue of the Adriatic seaside of central Italy. The natural heritage,
partly protected in natural reserves, also amalgamates with tourist facilities that exploit
several renowned beach resorts. The northern Marche coastal area, consisting of a coastal
plain interposed between two rocky shore sectors, forms a peculiar blend of different
geomorphological units with distinctive landforms. The coastal plain joins landwards fossil
cliffs and includes the major river mouths. The rapidly recessing rocky shores develop
structural landforms, sea-stacks and benches. Both active and relict cliff retreat induces
extensive landsliding in the whole sea-facing hillslopes.
Keywords
Coastal geomorphology
23.1
Rocky cliffs
Introduction
The central Adriatic Sea joins the forehills of the Apennines
along a roughly rectilinear coast (Fig. 23.1) where rocky
cliffs alternate with famed beaches. This side of the Apennines is internationally acknowledged for its remarkable
geological heritage embracing several classical localities
where, since the nineteenth century, influential geological
and geomorphological researches have been accomplished.
Here, in long celebrated sceneries of gentle hills and valley
flats joining crags and stunning gorges, praised by poets and
Renaissance painters, the physical landscape merges with an
extraordinary heritage of Roman vestiges, ancient towns,
castles and abbeys. Thus, besides being a renowned place for
summer tourism, the coastal area is also a major historical
and cultural attraction. It is also well known as an eminent
D. Savelli P. Cavitolo O. Nesci
Dipartimento di Scienze Pure e Applicate, Università di Urbino
“Carlo Bo”, Via Cà le Suore 3, 61029 Urbino, PU, Italy
F. Troiani (&)
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Sapienza Università di Roma,
Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
e-mail: francesco.troiani@uniroma1.it
Beaches
Northern Marche
place for nature-based tourism in the development of which
the local geological-geomorphological heritage plays a pivotal role. Furthermore, accessible geo-paleontological sites
on the sea-cliffs complement peculiar costal landforms,
making this area a must for Earth scientists and scholars
(Passeri 1995; Ciarapica and Passeri 2001).
23.2
Geographical Setting
The northern Marche coast (Fig. 23.1) strikes NW–SE for
about 100 km, between the seaside towns of Gabicce
(NW) and Sirolo (SE). The whole coastal area belongs to the
Marche Region, provinces of Pesaro-Urbino and Ancona.
The coastal zone as a whole displays rounded hills declining
towards the northeast. Except for Mt. Conero (572 m a.s.l.),
summit elevations do not exceed 200 m close to the coastline and 500 m a little more inland. The coast consists of
about 60 km of sandy-gravel beaches which at both ends
join rocky shores that then extend roughly 15 km to the
northwest (Mt. San Bartolo sector) and 25 km to the
southeast (Mt. Conero sector). The first sector culminates
with Mt. San Bartolo (221 m) and follows an overall
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_23
271
272
D. Savelli et al.
Fig. 23.1 Location map and geological sketch of the northern Marche coastal area. The grey bands SB and MC designate the Mt. San Bartolo and
Mt. Conero rocky shore sectors respectively, both described in the text
rectilinear coastal trend. Conversely, the latter sector, where
the highest cliffs (up to 300 m) of the Italian Adriatic coast
occur, is a promontory protruding seaward for 3.5 km and
culminating with Mt. Conero. The major northern Marche
rivers cross-cut the coastal stripe directly flowing into the
Adriatic Sea (Fig. 23.1).
Along the coast many seaside resorts, renowned for the
fine sands of their beaches, have been repeatedly awarded
for water quality and for the safeguarding of marine environments. Almost the whole coast is accessible by motor
roads or by footpaths, with the exceptions of the steepest
sectors of the cliff areas, accessible only by sailing.
The climate of the coastal zone is warm-temperate of the
Mediterranean type. Mean annual precipitation averages
780–790 mm and mean annual temperature ranges between
14 and 15 °C. Summers are hot and relatively dry, whilst a
pronounced variability mainly depending on the Atlantic
cyclogenesis characterizes winters.
Since the westerly winds are hindered by the Apennines,
the dominant storms are from the NNE (Bora, speeds
sometimes >100 km/h) and from the SE (Scirocco). The
southwesterly winds (Maestrale) are also effective, able to
generate winter storms, particularly in the Mt. San Bartolo
sector, where the effects of winds from the N (Tramontana)
and from the NE (Grecale) also increase. As a result, the
prevailing yearly direction of wave motion is from the N, NE
and SE.
23.3
Geological and Geomorphological
Setting
The Marche Apennines form part of the northern Apennines orogenic belt, an east- to northeast-vergent fold and
thrust belt joining to the northeast with the Adriatic Sea—
Po Plain, this latter being the present-day remnant of the
foredeep (Coward et al. 1999). The Marche Apennines
display an overall arc-shape with a marked north-eastward
convexity that culminates in latitudinal alignment with the
Mt. Conero. The central-northern Adriatic Sea is an
23
Rocky Cliffs Joining Velvet Beaches: The Northern Marche Coast
epicontinental sea with depths not exceeding 70 m. Owing
to its physiography, this sector of the Adriatic basin
experienced repeated emersions in the late Quaternary,
driven by glacial stages, becoming a prolongation of the Po
Plain (Trincardi et al. 1994)—the largest alluvial plain in
Italy—to which the northern Marche rivers extended. At
first, the sea-level fall forced the rivers to entrench in the
mid-Adriatic shelf, but in subsequent pleniglacials the
formerly incised valleys were subject to aggradation (Nesci
et al. 2012). The post-glacial sea-level rise brought the
Holocene shoreline to break into the Apennines foothills
(Lambeck et al. 2004). As a result, the modern coastline at
the regional scale displays an overall north-eastward convex shape, that is roughly parallel to the external margin of
the oroclinal bending of the belt.
The northern Marche coastal zone, covered by this
chapter, consists of relatively soft Plio-Pleistocene pelitic
and arenitic marine deposits overlying Upper Miocene
marly, siliciclastic and evaporitic formations and, at Mt.
Conero, Cretaceous-Paleogene resistant stratified calcareous
and marly calcareous units (Fig. 23.1). The onshore undergoes tectonic uplift with long-term rates gradually decreasing from the 0.3 to 0.5 mm/a over the last 1 Ma of the inner
273
sectors (D’Agostino et al. 2001) to the 0.01–0.15 mm/a
extrapolated on the coastal area (Antonioli et al. 2009;
Calderoni et al. 2010).
Both geology and the position of trunk-valleys exert a
key control on the evolution and physiography of the coastal
area. In the rocky shore sectors, active and relict cliffs break
through coastal relief, which usually match thrusted anticlines cored by relatively resistant rocks (Fig. 23.1). In both
sectors, excellent outcrops along the shore expose stratigraphic sections, markers and boundaries, and highlight the
tectonic structure. Conversely, an up to 1.2 km-wide depositional plain fringes the whole central part of the coastal
area (Figs. 23.1 and 23.2), joining seaward sandy-gravel
beaches. The plain as a whole has undergone a rather
complex morphoevolution, with both local and generalized
advancement and retreat episodes starting at least in late
mid-Pleistocene times. Nevertheless, the most part of the
plain formed after the Holocene maximum marine ingression
(Nesci et al. 2012). Quite different is the situation of the
rocky shores, rapidly retreating during the highstand stages,
with rates that, for the Mt. San Bartolo sector, have been
estimated as high as 300–1000 m in the last 6000 years
(Colantoni et al. 2004).
Fig. 23.2 Three-dimensional view of the central sector of the coastal area. A relict, strongly remoulded cliff (a) joins the plain; the recent
development of the coastal plain is exemplified by historical maps, such as that of Fano (b), redrawn after De Cuppis (1866)
274
23.4
D. Savelli et al.
Landforms
The proximity to the foothills, the variability of rock types
and the presence of river mouths bring into light a wide
range of active and relict landforms of scientific interest and,
in many cases, with an intrinsic scenic beauty. Besides
common landforms produced by wave action, peculiar
geomorphological features can also be observed, such as
landslides (some of which of historical importance) and
structural landforms.
Taking into account the physiographic domains along the
northern Marche coastal area, this section describes representative landforms and key evolutionary mechanisms.
23.4.1
Coastal Plain
23.4.1.1 Beaches
The sandy-gravel beaches (Fig. 23.3) achieved their present
position in the nineteenth century, following the accretion of
the plain which, in the previous four centuries, moved the
beaches more and more seaward (Fig. 23.2b). In the last
century, the advance has been replaced by a renewed tendency to erosional recession, peaking in the 1960s–1970s
and primarily attributed to anthropic actions within the
drainage basins and along the shore zone. Human intervention in the first case brought about an overall reduction in
river bedload supply, whilst in the latter case caused modifications of the longshore redistribution of sediments (Coltorti 1997; Colantoni et al. 2004).
At present, beach sand and gravel form a 15–20 m-thick
depositional body extending seaward to water depths not
Fig. 23.3 Gravel-sandy beach northwest of the Esino River mouth
exceeding 7 m, consisting primarily of river bedload redistributed longshore by wave-generated currents. Due to the
prevailing north-westward direction of the longshore drift,
beaches located close to the river mouths and slightly to the
north of them are usually gravel-dominated. A well-known
example is the Sassonia Beach at Fano. Moving away from
the river mouths, the grain size decreases and sandy beaches
predominate: examples are the celebrated “velvet beaches”
of Senigallia and the beaches between Fano and Pesaro.
In the last decades, in order to prevent beach recession,
breakwaters began to be placed systematically (see
Fig. 23.3) and artificial nourishment of several beaches was
also implemented (Colantoni et al. 2004). At the same time,
most of the landward beach ridges have become occupied by
railroad and roads, buildings and tourist facilities. Human
modification of the coastal area strongly involved the
backshore sectors too, where land reclamation brought about
the disappearance of distinctive landforms such as coastal
bars, ponds bounded by coastal dunes, littoral swamps and
salt marshes (Senigallia). Thus, at present, such landforms
are completely vanished, staying only as historical evidence
in archives and maps of the seventeenth–nineteeth centuries
(see Fig. 23.2b), without major geomorphological signatures
in the field.
23.4.1.2 River Mouths and Retreated Cliffs
The major river mouths consist of narrow estuary-type
outlets closed by mobile spit-bars (Fig. 23.4) which are
destroyed and rebuilt seasonally, if heavy storms and/or
floods impact the shore. Given the shallowness of their
outlets, the gravel-bedded Metauro, Cesano and Esino river
mouths were never used as harbours. Thus, although
23
Rocky Cliffs Joining Velvet Beaches: The Northern Marche Coast
275
Fig. 23.4 The Metauro River mouth (December 2005)
modified by human action, they underwent minor interventions. Conversely, the relatively poor in gravel, hence deeper
Foglia and Misa outlets have played since long the role of
ports and have been transformed into artificial inlets.
From Fano to Falconara, the coastal plain connects on the
landward side with rectilinear, strongly remoulded scarps
carved out in the Plio-Pleistocene soft sedimentary formations, which form the seaward hillslopes (Fig. 23.2a). The
scarps reveal poly-phase evolution by wave undercutting at
the hilly footslopes, effective during highstand stages, most
likely since the middle Pleistocene (Nesci et al. 2012).
Conversely, both to the southeast and to the northwest the
plain narrows to a less than 50 m-thin ribbon fringing the
relict cliff of Mt. Ardizio, abandoned in very recent times,
and
the
Ancona-Falconara
sea-facing
hillslopes,
respectively.
What at a first glance is a simple, regular depositional flat
joining the modern beach to the hillslopes, is actually a
series of low scarps, flexures and gravel ridges, which stress
the complex evolution of the plain over the latest Quaternary
times. Notably, the upper Pleistocene-early Holocene fluvial
plains terminate 300–500 m inland, against 1–8 m-high
retreated cliffs (Fig. 23.1), which strike parallel to the
modern coastline. The cliffs are sharp and well developed
close to the Metauro and Cesano river mouths, whereas in
the Foglia and Misa valleys they are smoothed and partly
concealed by urbanization. According to the exhaustive
evolution model proposed by Nesci et al. (2012), these
scarps were carved out by wave erosion of coastal-fans
formed in the uppermost Pleistocene—early Holocene and
today preserved only in their apex sectors.
About at the mid-Holocene these retreated cliffs achieved
a position that, apart from lesser shoreline fluctuations, was
maintained up to the Roman times. Such appraisal, substantiated by archaeological evidence of fluvial harbours and
other remains, is the reason why this scarp is often referred
to as the best evidence of the shoreline in Roman times
(Elmi et al. 2001). After Roman times—early Middle Ages,
alternating episodes of advance and recession to the “Roman
position” of the shoreline took place, until an ultimate sedimentary regressive tendency was established from the fifteenth–sixteenth century up to the end of the nineteenth
century (Fig. 23.2b), roughly coinciding with the Little Ice
Age. This latter advance resulted in the construction of the
entire 300–500 m-wide sector of the coastal plain facing the
wave-cut scarps, thus originating the present coastal
plain-beach system (Figs. 23.2 and 23.3). It is towards the
end of this phase that the arenaceous cliff of Mt. Ardizio was
deactivated, thus allowing the construction of the railroad
which, sealing definitively the cliff seaward, impeded any
further reactivation.
23.4.2
Rocky Shores
23.4.2.1 Controls on Marine Erosion
The Mt. San Bartolo and Mt. Conero sectors consist of
smooth relief that becomes abruptly steeper seaward as the
gentle land surfaces plunge down in retreating cliffs undermined by rapid foreshore erosion (Fig. 23.5). The evolution
models proposed by Bird (2004) in his comprehensive
overview, and by Colantoni et al. (2004) in the local frame
of the Mt. San Bartolo rocky shore, describe well what may
be observed in both sectors. Specifically, the cliff faces
consist of well-stratified, at places seaward dipping, highly
fissured calcareous, marly and arenaceous rocks. Erosional
contrasts of different lithologies, bedding and rock mass
fracturing, besides promoting the development of structural
landforms (Fig. 23.6), facilitate both marine and subaerial
erosion, favouring bedrock instability. The base of the cliffs
276
D. Savelli et al.
Fig. 23.5 Panoramic views of the active cliffs of Mt. Conero (a) and Mt. San Bartolo (b)
joins rocky benches and narrow, discontinuous gravel beaches (see Figs. 23.6 and 23.7). Debris storage at the foot of
the cliffs, consisting of local landslide accumulations and
sediment bars (Colantoni et al. 2004), temporarily protect the
cliffs from basal erosion. The removal by wave erosion of
such natural defences resumes undercutting, thus restarting
cliff retreat. With some localized exceptions (Fig. 23.8),
nearly the entire cliff undergoes erosional recession at present. The exceptions consist of effectively protected sectors
that can be noticed both on straight reaches (e.g. close to
Gabicce) and within coves (e.g. Mezzavalle). Here beaches
can reach dimensions broad enough to allow only the largest
waves to break against the footslope, thus preserving the cliff
behind from the “ordinary” storm-wave action and favouring
its vegetation and decline by subaerial processes. Notably, in
such poly-phase evolution frame, the combination of cliff
recession with subaerial remoulding of the sea-facing slopes
produces the erosional truncation of gullies and landslide
hollows. The result is the formation of characteristic triangular and trapezoidal facets, which are outstandingly
developed in the Mt. San Bartolo sector (Fig. 23.7), where a
net of subparallel, closely spaced gullies truncated by foreshore erosion hang above the shore (Colantoni et al. 2004).
23.4.2.2 Cliffs and Adjacent Benches
The ongoing shoreline recession is everywhere marked by a
quite continuous, locally overhanging bare scarp varying in
height from 1 m up to a few tens of metres. Constrained by
fault-fracture systems and/or by resistant layers, morphoselection generates headlands and spurs, sometimes projecting
offshore into small, but intriguing sea-stacks, the most outstanding example of which are found at Mt. Conero
(Fig. 23.6a, b). Namely, the partial removal of a marly intercalation within hard calcareous rocks originated a characteristic headland (Il Pirolo) at the southern end of one of the best
coves at the foot of Mt. Conero. At the opposite end of the
same cove, another headland stands facing two celebrated
sea-stacks (Le Due Sorelle) isolated from the cliff by the
complete removal of the previously mentioned marly intercalation. Similarly, a few kilometres to the north, the sea-stack
of La Vela stands (Fig. 23.6b), which displays notches
coherent with the present-day sea level and tide excursion.
23
Rocky Cliffs Joining Velvet Beaches: The Northern Marche Coast
277
Fig. 23.6 Exposed bedding surfaces, rocky spurs and sea stacks
highlight lithological and structural controls on the Mt. Conero rocky
shore. a The two sea-stacks of Le Due Sorelle are apparent in the
foreground, the Pirolo spur rises behind; b La Vela sea stack; c a thick
calcarenitic horizon originates the Scoglio del Trave natural jetty,
closing to the north-west the Mezzavalle cove
Cliff recession left behind a wave-cut platform carved out
in bedrock and extending seaward by about 300 m. The
shore platform is rather flat, with minor roughness due to the
edges of resistant rocks and/or to residual boulders. However, wide sectors are blanketed by sandy patches, cobbles
and blocks. Offshore the calcareous cliff of Mt. Conero large
amounts of landslide-derived residual boulders are also
found, allowing the primary extension of runouts to be
traced on the bench as far as 80–100 m offshore, up to 8–
10 m of water depth (e.g. close to Portonovo). Conversely,
on bare rock platform, characteristic series of bedrock strata
edges can usually be observed. Notably, at the northern end
of the Mezzavalle bay the so-called Scoglio del Trave surfaces from the rocky bench (Fig. 23.6c). This outstanding
278
D. Savelli et al.
Fig. 23.7 Cliff retreat results in the truncation of regularly spaced gullies and the origin of erosional triangular and trapezoidal facets at Mt. San
Bartolo
Fig. 23.8 a An earth flow at Mt. San Bartolo. b The toe of the Portonovo landslide at Mt. Conero and, on its margins (c), the two small lakes
dammed by spit bars
23
Rocky Cliffs Joining Velvet Beaches: The Northern Marche Coast
morphostructure is shaped on a 14 m-thick calcarenitic layer
(the Trave guide-horizon, upper Messinian) and for fairly
less than 1 km, 450 m of which emerged, projects from the
cliff as a natural jetty.
23.4.2.3 Beaches on the Rocky Shores
Gravel beaches are well developed in both rocky shore
sectors, even though the best examples come from Mt.
Conero. Here the Mezzavalle beach (Fig. 23.6c), ending to
the north against the Scoglio del Trave, stands as the by far
best gravel beach of the whole area. The beach, supplied by
calcareous materials from the anticline daylighting a few
kilometres to the southwest, lies within a 2.7 km-wide cove,
that enlarged and hollowed out favoured by a concomitance
of lithological (marl and clay in contact with limestone) and
structural factors. To the south, the Mezzavalle beach merges into the Portonovo beach. The latter is somehow peculiar
for its origin and position, since it has developed at the toe of
a large landslide. The loose calcareous material of the
landslide body was reworked to form a beach where several
residual boulders occur. The landslide overran the previous
shoreline forming two small coves at the toe margin. The
subsequent damming of the coves by spit-bars generated two
small brackish coastal lakes, the so-called Lago Profondo
and Lago Grande (Fig. 23.8b, c). As for the Mt. San Bartolo
rocky shore sector, intriguing for the peculiarity of its cobbles is the gravel beach at the toe of the northwestern part of
the cliff. Here a part of the cobbles consists of rounded,
cemented diagenetic nodules of weird shapes—locally called
cogoli—directly derived from sandstone daylighting on the
cliff face (Colantoni et al. 2004).
23.4.3
Landslides
Landslides affect a large part of the northern Marche coastal
area, often as a response to deep-seated gravitational slope
deformation (Aringoli et al. 2010). At the inland margin of
the coastal plain (Figs. 23.1 and 23.2), landslides set all
along the inactive cliff faces carved out of soft
Plio-Pleistocene deposits. Here they have substantially
remoulded the scarps, leading to the origin of a continuous
fringe of slid materials at the footslopes, often smoothed and
concealed by colluvium (see Fig. 23.2a). However, landslides assume their greatest geomorphological emphasis in
the rocky shore sectors or at their margins, where they exert
controls on both shoreline configuration and processes, and
contribute to the origin of outstanding landforms (Fig. 23.8).
Footslope undermining by wave action, coupled with
slope weakening factors as bedrock stratification, rock mass
fracturing and weathering, brought about a wide range of
mass movements on the sea-facing slopes. As a rule, in both
279
hard and soft terrains, seaward-dipping layering and/or
fault/fracture surfaces facilitate sliding. At the core of the
Mt. Conero calcareous anticline, a distinctive cliff-face
configuration is found where the depletion of its steeply
inclined forelimb produced, primarily by rock sliding, a
seaward slope largely matching exhumed bedding planes
(Fig. 23.6a). On the other hand, otherwise dipping discontinuities within the rock masses, besides favouring sliding,
usually account for rock falls and topples. The development
of earth flows (Fig. 23.8a) and debris flows is rather ubiquitous, depending on the local availability of both fine and/or
coarse loose materials. A good correlation of rock slides and
earth/debris flows with rain and snow melting was assessed
in the Mt. San Bartolo sector by analysing historical records
(Colantoni et al. 2004). In the Mt. Conero sector, an
important triggering factor is the seismicity of the area. In
such regard, meaningful are the several rock falls occurred
along the cliff during the M 2.9 earthquake of 8th August
2013 and the M 4.4 event of 22nd August 2013, which have
had large coverage by mass-media.
At the northern margin of the Mt. Conero rocky shore, the
so called Ancona landslide is of great importance for the
damages to the town (Crescenti et al. 2005). It is a large
rotational slide displacing Plio-Pleistocene pelites undercut
by wave erosion. From the geomorphological standpoint,
however, the most intriguing failure is the aforementioned
landslide of Portonovo (Fig. 23.8b, c), that hollowed out part
of a former amphitheatre-shaped cliff face. A large mass of
stratified and highly fissured limestone slumped down from
maximum heights of about 400 m and avalanched into the
sea with a more than 600 m-long blocky runout (Fig. 23.8b).
This failure is usually regarded as a poorly defined
“pre-historical” event perhaps following the maximum
Holocene marine ingression. However, in the same area,
several minor failures, at least in part reactivating subordinate sectors of the major landslide, have been reported.
These include, for example, a failure following an earthquake in 558 AD, or a landslide that in 1320 AD destroyed a
Benedictine monastery located close to the still preserved,
famed Romanic church of Portonovo.
23.5
Conclusions
The northern Marche coast is a unique place, where a hinterland with a plenty of classical geological localities perfectly blended with an extraordinary historical and cultural
heritage joins famed beaches and eye-catching cliffs. In a
relatively small space, the northern Marche seaside embraces
several landforms characteristic of wider sectors of the
Italian Adriatic coast, ranging from coastal plains joining
sandy beaches to steep rocky shores carved out from both
280
calcareous and terrigenous sedimentary formations. Outstanding landforms of high educational and scientific
importance, often blended with inherent aesthetic values,
occur in the whole area. The necessity to preserve such
environmental, historical and cultural qualities led the
authorities to establish two regional natural parks in the
coastal area, namely the Parco Naturale del Monte San
Bartolo (operating since 1997) and the Parco del Conero
(operating since 1991). Although overshadowed by late
Holocene deposits and landforms, the coastal plain reflects a
long-lasting evolution with an ultimate important advance
following the Holocene maximum marine ingression. The
advance of the coastal plain contrasts with the rapid recession of the two cliff sectors matching the coastal relief of Mt.
San Bartolo and Mt. Conero, where headlands and coves,
sea-stacks and natural jetties are part of an intricate and
appealing blend of marine and structural landforms. The
rapid foreshore erosion, undermining the cliffs, favours
bedrock instability to such an extent that mass movements
become the dominant processes in the evolution of wide
sectors of the cliff faces.
References
Antonioli F, Ferranti L, Fontana A, Amorosi A, Bondesan A,
Braitenberg C, Dutton A, Fontolan G, Furlani S, Lambeck K,
Mastronuzzi G, Monaco C, Spada G, Stocchi P (2009) Holocene
relative sea-level changes and vertical movements along the Italian
and Istrian coastlines. Quatern Int 206:102–133
Aringoli D, Gentili B, Materazzi M, Pambianchi G (2010) Mass
movements in Adriatic central Italy: activation and evolutive control
factors. In: Werner ED, Friedman WP (eds) Landslides: causes,
types and effects. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 1–71
D. Savelli et al.
Bird E (2004) Cliff, coastal. In: Goudie AS (ed) Encyclopedia of
geomorphology. Routledge, London, pp 159–162
Calderoni G, Della Seta M, Fredi P, Lupia Palmieri E, Nesci O,
Savelli D, Troiani F (2010) Late Quaternary geomorphological
evolution of the Adriatic coast reach encompassing the Metauro,
Cesano and Misa river mouths (northern Marche, Italy). GeoActa,
Spec Publ 3:109–124
Ciarapica G, Passeri L (2001) 34 escursioni a piedi, Appennino
Umbro-Marchigiano. Guide geologiche regionali 7(2). BE-MA,
Milano, 269 pp
Colantoni P, Mencucci D, Nesci O (2004) Coastal processes and cliff
recession between Gabicce and Pesaro (northern Adriatic Sea): a
case history. Geomorphology 62:257–268
Coltorti M (1997) Human impact in the Holocene fluvial and coastal
evolution of the Marche region, central Italy. Catena 30:311–335
Coward MP, De Donatis M, Mazzoli S, Paltrinieri W, Wezel FC (1999)
Frontal part of the northern Apennines fold and thrust belt in the
Romagna-Marche area (Italy): shallow and deep structural styles.
Tectonics 18:559–574
Crescenti U, Calista M, Mangifesta M, Sciarra N (2005) The Ancona
landslide of December 1982. Giornale di Geologia Applicata 1:53–62
D’Agostino N, Jackson JA, Dramis F, Funiciello R (2001) Interactions
between mantle upwelling, drainage evolution and active normal
faulting: an example from the central Apennines (Italy). Geophys J
Int 147:475–497
De Cuppis P (1866) Sulla fisica generale del bacino di Fano.
Supplementi della Rivista delle Marche ed Umbria 5:699–717
Elmi C, Colantoni P, Gabbianelli G, Nesci O (2001) Holocene
shorelines along the central Adriatic coast (Italy). GeoActa 1:27–36
Lambeck K, Antonioli F, Purcell A, Silenzi S (2004) Sea-level change
along the Italian coast for the past 10,000 year. Quatern Sci Rev
23:1567–1598
Nesci O, Savelli D, Troiani F (2012) Types and development of stream
terraces in the Marche Apennines (central Italy): a review and
remarks on recent appraisals. Géomorphologie 2:215–238
Passeri L (1995) 15 itinerari, Appennino Umbro-Marchigiano. Guide
geologiche regionali 7. BE-MA, Milano, 301 pp
Trincardi F, Correggiari A, Roveri M (1994) Late-quaternary transgressive erosion and deposition in a modern epicontinental shelf—
the Adriatic semienclosed basin. Geo-Mar Lett 14:41–51
The Typical Badlands Landscapes Between
the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Tiber River
24
Maurizio Del Monte
Abstract
A mixture of special geomorphological conditions and extraordinary cultural interests is
collected in the country between the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Tiber River. In the Holocene
severe erosion processes shaped Plio-Pleistocene marine claystones, highly uplifted during
the Quaternary, producing spectacular badlands landscapes with calanchi and biancane
landforms. Calanchi show a resistant caprock, driving a parallel-retreating evolution of
rugged steep slopes; biancane are rounded landforms, related to clayey outcrops in
low-relief areas. Badlands have been greatly modified by anthropogenic activity: most of
biancane and some calanchi were smoothed in the twentieth century, mainly to the
widening of sowable land. For these reasons, a very peculiar badlands landscape is
recognizable today.
Keywords
Badlands
Calanchi
Biancane
Volcanic caprock
Central Italy
Ogni valle è fatta dal suo fiume e tal proporzione è da valle a valle, quale è da fiume a fiume
Each valley is shaped by its river, and the same proportion existing between a valley and another is found
between their rivers
Leonardo da Vinci
24.1
Introduction
Some clayey terrains present in many parts of Italy are
affected by accelerated erosion processes, producing badlands landforms known as calanchi and biancane. Badlands
landscapes are frequently considered to be typical of dryland
areas. Semi-arid badlands are present throughout the
Mediterranean region, the better-known examples being
located in various parts of Spain and southern Italy. Nevertheless, they also occur in wetter areas, as in central Italy,
where high topographic gradients, bedrock weakness and
high intensity rainstorms coexist.
M. Del Monte (&)
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Sapienza Università di Roma,
Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
e-mail: maurizio.delmonte@uniroma1.it
Central Italy has an unbelievably wide variety of landscapes in relation to its extension. Between the Tyrrhenian
Sea to the west and the Adriatic Sea to the east, there are
about 200 km, along which the traveller crosses coastal,
hilly and high mountain landscapes. The structure of the
Apennine chain consists mainly of ridges of carbonate rocks
of Mesozoic age, elongated in the NW–SE (Apennine)
direction and increasing in elevation from the Tyrrhenian to
the Adriatic sector, where tectonics raised the highest summits to almost 3000 m a.s.l., with thrusts, faults and crustal
deformation still in progress (Fig. 24.1). The great complexity of the geometric relationships between the various
formations is derived from the geological history of the
Apennines. The orogenic wave has spread from west to east;
during the Miocene, it has mainly focused on the Tyrrhenian
sector, that in the Pliocene was then subjected to crustal
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_24
281
282
M. Del Monte
thinning and horst and graben construction. For the same
reason, on the Tyrrhenian coast belt, between the Pliocene
and Quaternary endogenous activity formed several volcanic
complexes, some of which are still active. The recent geological evolution is therefore responsible for the uplift of the
Plio-Pleistocene marine deposits to several hundred metres
above sea level. During this period, on the Tyrrhenian side
of central Italy geodynamic processes have caused differential uplift, volcanic eruptions and the origin of horst ridges. The variety of outcropping lithotypes and the tectonic
processes have influenced the development of structural
landforms. The major ones are represented by morphostructural ridges bounded by NW–SE trending fault
scarps, dipping towards the graben depressions (Fig. 24.1).
Minor morphotectonic features (e.g. straight channels, saddles and straight ridges) are aligned along the other structural
patterns. In the areas in which the main morphostructures are
located and/or where harder rocks crop out, landforms are
more rugged and valleys are deeper. However, the landscapes between the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Tiber River are
mostly characterized by hilly landscapes, with elevations
rarely higher than 1000 m, as a result of the widespread
outcrops of soft sediments. The Plio-Pleistocene clayey
lithotypes recently uplifted are now modelled by very strong
exogenous processes and in some areas give rise to characteristic landscapes, with dramatic and very widespread
erosion landforms: calanchi and biancane.
Fig. 24.1 Geological sketch of the study area. 1 Plio-Quaternary
undifferentiated marine and continental deposits (and subordinate
Messinian evaporites); 2 Pleistocene basic to intermediate volcanic
rocks; 3 Plio-Pleistocene (and subordinate Miocene) acid volcanic
rocks; 4 Ligurian and sub-Ligurian nappes sedimentary and
metamorphic units (Trias to Lower Cretaceous); 5 Tuscan nappe
sedimentary and metamorphic units (Paleozoic to Miocene); 6 UmbriaMarche sedimentary sequence (Trias to Tortonian); 7 Normal faults; 8
Overthrusts and reverse faults; 9 Other faults; 10 Axis of anticline; 11
Axis of syncline; 12 Main fluvial basin boundary
24.2
Geographical and Geological Setting
Several areas in northern Latium and southern Tuscany,
between Siena and Rome, have been modelled by fast
erosion processes and include typical badlands landforms.
24
The Typical Badlands Landscapes Between the Tyrrhenian Sea …
A smooth hilly landscape marks the northern portion of the
area, where biancane slopes are frequent, although often
reshaped due to local crop-growing activities. The biancane
landforms are small clay domes up to approximately 15–
20 m high, mostly bare of vegetation on steeper
south-facing slopes, where sheet and rill erosion is very
strong. Biancane are often located near the footslope or at
the summits, and their existence is always associated with
gentle slopes.
Moving towards the south, the landscape becomes much
rougher, and the typical landforms on clayey slopes are
represented by calanchi, that is systems of rills and gullies
separated by sharp and steep ridges (from “calans” Latin for
“dropping” or “downhill”). They occur particularly in places
where horst structures and/or volcanic caprocks are present
and slope steepness increases. These areas are concentrated
in the eastern and northwestern parts of the Ombrone and
Tiber fluvial basins, respectively (Fig. 24.1). Calanchi are
sometimes bevelled by human activities; overall, the
calanchi slopes are less reworked than those in the biancane
zones.
The geological history has contributed to widespread
outcrops of lithological units prone to denudation
(Fig. 24.1). The building phase of the Apennine orogenic
wedge (Oligocene to Tortonian) led to the formation of the
major horst-and-graben morphostructures in the study areas.
These are mainly NW–SE oriented and composed of sedimentary sequences (Umbria-Marche sequence, Tuscan
Nappe, Ligurian and Subligurian Nappe) overthrust towards
the NE (Fig. 24.1). The nappes include some metamorphic
units (Paleozoic to Trias). The orogenic wedge began collapsing in the Late Miocene. Extensional tectonics, affecting
the Tyrrhenian margin of the Italian peninsula, activated
several NW–SE striking normal faults, which define the
system of horst and graben cut by SW–NE transfer faults
(Liotta 1991). A marine transgression led to the deposition
of a Plio-Pleistocene sequence of clay, sands and conglomerates within the major depressions. Moving inland, the
extensional basins are filled with lacustrine to
fluvio-lacustrine continental deposits.
During the Quaternary, the Plio-Pleistocene marine
deposits were uplifted by several hundred metres. This
strong uplift is related to pluton emplacement and widespread volcanic activity along the Tyrrhenian margin
(Acocella and Rossetti 2002), evidenced by the distribution
of several volcanic complexes (Fig. 24.1). Quaternary uplift
has been particularly strong along a NW–SE elongated zone,
which extends from the Colline Metallifere Area towards the
Latium volcanoes (Mts. Vulsini, Mt. Vico, Mts. Sabatini),
going through Mt. Amiata, Radicofani and Mt. Cetona,
where marine deposits crop out at 800 m.
283
Therefore, the altitude of Plio-Pleistocene marine deposits
reaches several hundred of metres above the present sea
level; together with the high value of relief amplitude, this
underpins a very fast geomorphological evolution in this
sector of central Italy.
24.3
Landforms and Landscapes
Fluvial erosion, together with slope denudation, contributes
significantly to the morphogenesis of the Tyrrhenian side of
central Italy. Many slopes are rapidly evolving and rivers
carry high volumes of suspended sediment load.
Mass movements contribute to slope denudation along
with water erosion. Apart from some rock falls, slides often
occur on steep slopes. However, the influence of gravity is
also evident on gentler slopes, where mudflows, soil creep
and shallow soil flow are widespread. Due to these prevailing morphogenetic processes, gently undulated slopes
typify the regional landscape.
Human impact has significantly affected the landscape of
the area for a long time (Amici et al. 2017). Deforestation,
grazing and farming are among the most important triggers
for accelerated water erosion, tillage erosion and gravitational movements on slopes. Moreover, the effects of farming may become stronger if land-use changes determine
cropland abandonment. Water erosion is pervasive on many
slopes, due to extensive clayey outcrops, human activities,
current climatic conditions and rapid uplift. Sheet erosion is
responsible for exposure of roots and colluvium deposition
at the footslope. As the slope gradient increases slightly, rill
and gully erosion prevail, contributing significantly to badlands development and soil degradation. Ephemeral gullies
are often recognizable in croplands and grow rapidly as a
consequence of concentrated rainfall. Water erosion on
natural slopes leads to typical badlands with calanchi and
biancane. These landforms, in the belt between the
Tyrrhenian Sea and the Tiber River, are similar to the badlands of the United States or many other areas, but have their
own distinct characteristics.
A calanchi slope may seem a reduced model (by one
thousand or ten thousand times) of a fluvial system. Thus, on
the whole, they appear as “concave” landforms. As described by Alexander (1980), calanchi are systems of rills and
gullies, connected in thick small networks evolving headwards and separated by sharp and steep divides (Fig. 24.2).
In central Italy, some calanchi show knife-edged features,
shaped as a system of narrow but deep cuts separated by thin
and articulated ridges (Fig. 24.2), as to reproduce a drainage
network in miniature. On the slopes, the effects of both
strong runoff processes and subsurface erosion processes
284
M. Del Monte
Fig. 24.2 Calanchi on a
southward facing slope
(Tyrrhenian Sector, Tiber River
basin, Latium). A volcanic
caprock is recognizable on some
slope tops
(tunnelling or piping) can be observed. Many other badlands
are made of larger incisions, with a trough-floored aspect,
separated by smaller convex ridges, sometimes overgrown
and characterized by less intense surface runoff phenomena.
The important role of wash denudation in the area is
mainly due to local structural conditions. Calanchi morphology is associated with clayey outcrops, alternating with
sandy and gravel levels, and frequently with counter-dip
slopes, that allow the development of steeper slopes. This
type of slope evolution is even more related to the presence
of a volcanic caprock, especially in northern Latium, or a
more or less cemented sand and conglomerate caprock. If a
caprock is absent, slope steepness decreases quickly and the
parallel-retreating evolution stops, as described in Scheidegger’s evolutive model (1961; Figs. 24.3 and 24.4).
In the Tyrrhenian sector, aspect does not seem to greatly
influence the distribution of badlands, but important morphological and vegetational differences can be observed on slopes
with different aspect. Wash processes shape the south-facing
slopes into very thin and sharp ridges, “blade” crests
(Fig. 24.5). At the bottom of these slopes, in parallel-retreating
evolution, small pediments can be observed, as already
described by Schumm (1962). The north-facing slopes are
much more overgrown and characterized by frequent mass
movements that give a trough-floored aspect to the incisions,
especially during winter.
In other areas of central Italy, like those located in the
Adriatic sector, the presence of calanchi is even more closely linked to south-facing slopes, where higher insulation
restrains vegetation growth; however, in this sector the
south-facing slopes are almost always inclined opposite to
the dip, which helps to hold a higher slope.
Fig. 24.3 Scheidegger’s slope evolution starting from T = 0 (initial
time): 1 clayey slope with caprock; 2 clayey slope without caprock
24
The Typical Badlands Landscapes Between the Tyrrhenian Sea …
285
Biancane are typical dome-shaped features a few metres
in height and usually found in groups (Torri et al. 1994) to
form a “convex” morphology on the whole. These rounded
landforms can reach 20 metres in height without a vegetation
cover on the steeper south-facing slopes, which are characterised by intense slope wash (Fig. 24.6). The term “biancana” (from “bianco” Italian for “white”) probably comes
from the presence of a thenardite (Na2SO4) crust on their
surfaces, due to precipitation from capillary waters.
Micro-pediments usually develop at the foot of the biancane
retreating slopes (Fig. 24.6). They show thin layers of
materials transported by runoff, deposited on low angle
surfaces and often affected by mud-cracking.
The biancane are closely related to areas with low relief.
In southern Tuscany, they are found either on the flat tops of
ridges, and in the valley floors, next to the lower part of
convex slopes (Fig. 24.4). Along the valley bottoms, biancane may be residual “inselbergs” related to slope retract.
Those present on low-relief summit surfaces cannot be
interpreted in the same way; they are due to runoff effects in
interfluve areas, where steepness is low and gully erosion is
still in the initial stage.
Italian badlands have, often, more vegetation if compared to badlands in other areas of the world (Figs. 24.2,
24.5 and 24.6). Their existence is linked to a series of
Fig. 24.5 A watershed between two small basins in the badlands of
northern Latium. The knife ridge has been used for centuries as a
passage to cross the Calanchi Valley. A few decades ago it has become
too narrow and unsafe, and the trail has been abandoned. Note, on the
top (red frame), the remnants wooden boards of the old path hanging
on the verge of falling
Fig. 24.4 Distribution of calanchi and biancane on a typical slope of
the upper Orcia River Valley (southern Tuscany)
286
M. Del Monte
Fig. 24.6 Group of biancane (Orcia Valley, southern Tuscany). At the foot of the southern slopes, evolving by parallel retreat, some
micropediment are growing
favourable factors, dependent on the geological, geomorphological and climatic conditions. The climate of central
Italy, especially that of the piedmont and coastal areas, is
a basic influencing factor for badlands development. Hot
and dry summer followed by a rainy autumn, with heavy
rains on several consecutive days, enhances runoff action.
During winter, the soil does not dry in depth, and spring
rains (although less intense than the autumn ones) often
cause an increase of mass movements rather than of runoff
intensity.
Both calanchi and biancane result from the same geomorphic processes and are influenced by some common
factors. Impermeable bedrock (clay or marly clay) is a
necessary condition to produce strong runoff, where weathering can increase susceptibility to erosion. Thus, aspect
generally plays an important role in badlands evolution by
conditioning the vegetation cover distribution. However,
calanchi and biancane have significant morphological differences (Ciccacci et al. 2003).
Moretti and Rodolfi (2000) outlined several environmental components that interact in the development of the
calanchi landscape. Other factors being equal (e.g. aspect,
lithological and climatic conditions), slope steepness
strongly influences the erosive power of runoff in rills and
gullies. In general, calanchi are more frequent on scarp
slopes and their growth is favoured by sandy, gravel, conglomeratic or volcanic caprocks at the summit, helping to
maintain slope steepness (Fig. 24.3).
Noticeable slope steepness favours diffuse mudflows,
which strongly contribute to the removal of considerable
volumes of sediment (and deposition, generally at the gully
bottom), while caprocks are often subject to rock falls at the
steep summits of calanchi slopes. Since calanchi on
north-facing slopes are generally less developed and more
vegetated, the runoff power is less effective, but may make
earth sliding more likely (Fig. 24.7).
Deep piping is widespread at many calanchi sites, especially in northern Latium where calanchi are more extensive.
24
The Typical Badlands Landscapes Between the Tyrrhenian Sea …
287
Fig. 24.7 Calanchi Valley, with
distinctive asymmetry of relief
and vegetation cover (Tyrrhenian
sector, Tiber River basin, NW of
Rome). The north is on the left
According to Romero-Díaz et al. (2007), this process is
favoured by land-use changes (i.e. cropland abandonment)
and by steep hydraulic gradients. In particular, hydraulic
gradients increase at the intersections between sub-horizontal
bedding and vertical fractures. Deep pipes probably contribute
significantly to denudation and evolve rapidly due to collapse.
Ephemeral gullies develop on cultivated or grazing lands,
where they create very important paths of sediment movement. On slopes, several small earth pillars are present (with
vegetation cover, stones or fossil gastropod shells on the
top), whereas other minor landforms are caused by piping
processes. Some very high pillars are residual landforms,
resulting from demolition of sharp ridges due to falls
(Fig. 24.8). On the footslopes, parallel retreat leads to the
development of landforms similar to small pediments, as it
has already been suggested in previous studies (Schumm
1962; Torri et al. 1994).
Summarizing, in central Italy rill erosion on biancane is
more significant on south-facing steeper slopes, while the
north-facing ones are gentler and generally exhibit a thin,
continuous vegetation cover. The N-S biancane profile is
typically asymmetric (Ciccacci et al. 2003), with the uncovered slopes showing weathered “popcorn surfaces”. According to Farifteh and Soeters (2006), biancane are likely to
develop on originally gentle slopes, while calanchi development is probably favoured by initial slope steepness, due to
strong fluvial deepening in response to the lowering of sea
level or to regional uplift. Moreover, as outlined by Torri and
Bryan (1997) and confirmed by Farifteh and Soeters (2006),
Fig. 24.8 High pillar in the Calanchi Valley (Tiber River basin,
northern Latium)
288
M. Del Monte
structural factors, such as intersecting fracture patterns,
probably control biancane formation and evolution.
In addition to runoff, piping and gravitational movements
act together in shaping biancane slopes, but with some
differences with respect to calanchi slopes: (a) unlike
calanchi slopes (where deep piping is more frequent),
biancane are widely affected by shallow micro-piping,
developing at the boundary between the weathered layer
(“popcorn surface”) and the undisturbed bedrock; (b) biancane are less affected by gravitational movements (mainly
mudflows along major rills and gullies) compared to more
unstable calanchi slopes.
24.4
Geomorphological Evolution
of Calanchi and Biancane Landscapes
Results of hillslope-scale monitoring and many field surveys
showed the relationship between denudation rates and
morphoevolution of the two badlands types. X-ray diffraction analyses performed on samples from the marine Pliocene and Pleistocene sediments of ODP Hole 653A in the
Tyrrhenian Sea indicated an acceleration of the
uplift/emergence of the areas here described at about 1.6 Ma
BP (Della Seta et al. 2009). It is likely that, as a consequence, the landscape has been strongly dissected by fluvial
deepening. In particular, as a result of the coupled effect of
uplift and shifting from relatively dry to humid climatic
conditions in the Early Pleistocene, valley deepening was
favoured. Alternating cold/dry and hot/humid climatic phases during the Pleistocene probably determined the discontinuous preponderance of areal denudation or fluvial
deepening, respectively.
During the Holocene, under conditions of general
post-glacial warming, short-term climatic oscillations
occurred in the mid-European region, as deduced, e.g. from
lake-level fluctuations (Magny 2004). Recent works outlined
the strong relationships among climate, fire, vegetation, and
land-use and attested to the paramount importance of fire in
Mediterranean ecosystems (Drescher-Schneider et al. 2007;
Vannière et al. 2008). As evidenced by these authors,
humans started to affect fire regimes since the Neolithic
(8000 cal years BP), but during the Bronze Age (4000–
3800 cal years BP) a significant increase in using fire as a
tool determined considerable changes in fire regime. In
addition, human impact increased noticeably since the
Roman Age through deforestation, leading to considerable
environmental modifications (Buccolini et al. 2007); as a
result of human-induced rhexistasy, steep valley slopes and
gentler interfluves, together with footslopes, have become
the ideal sites for calanchi and biancane development,
respectively.
After deforestation, grazing and farming have become
important factors responsible for accelerated water erosion,
tillage erosion and gravitational mass movements. Torri et al.
(1999) put forward a hypothesis and provided evidences of
progressive deterioration of the soil and land condition
between 1840 and 1870, which increasingly transformed
arable lands into pasture, and eventually, badlands. More
recently, land-use changes due to cropland abandonment have
amplified the power of water erosion on slopes.
The hypothesized formation and evolution of calanchi
and biancane in the area between Tyrrhenian Sea and Tiber
River is substantially in agreement with the model developed
by Farifteh and Soeters (2006) for calanchi and biancane in
Aliano (southern Italy), although some differences exist. On
the Tyrrhenian side of central Italy the development of
calanchi and biancane is strictly connected to the original
slope steepness, which is one of the major factors influencing their distribution (Della Seta et al. 2007). Moreover, the
occurrence of biancane, even at the summit of calanchi
slopes, allows one to exclude the possibility that they could
represent just residual products of calanchi, as proposed by
some authors. Observations on present embryonic biancane
confirm the leading role played by reticular systems of joints
in the dissection of original, gently dipping surfaces (Torri
and Bryan 1997; Farifteh and Soeters 2006).
Biancane initially grow as small bare symmetrical domes,
whose north-facing slopes start to undergo shading as their
heights increase. On the 20 years monitored biancane (Vergari et al. 2013), vegetation cover is likely to have developed
on these shaded, thus moister, north-facing slopes, rather than
representing a remnant cap, as stated in the evolutionary
model by Farifteh and Soeters (2006), since it wraps the
north-facing slopes of the evolved biancane from top to
bottom. From this perspective, the evolution of biancane
leads to a progressive increase of the aspect-induced asymmetry typical of evolved biancane. Moreover, strong retreat
of south-facing bare slopes leads to the formation and rapid
widening of micro-pediments at their foot (Fig. 24.6).
Therefore, the evolution of many biancane sites in the
Tyrrhenian side of central Italy can be summarized as to
occur in four main stages (Fig. 24.9). Initially, severe runoff
processes affect a gentle slope on fractured clay, cut by
intersecting systems of joints. This may take place in
response to abandonment of agricultural activities, increase
of fluvial deepening, and climatic changes (like those at the
end of the Little Ice Age). Many rills and some gullies
develop along the joints (Fig. 24.9a). Then, rill and gully
networks grow, while under the surface tunnelling processes
24
The Typical Badlands Landscapes Between the Tyrrhenian Sea …
289
Fig. 24.9 Biancane
morphoevolution. a A gentle
slope on fractured clay cut by
intersecting systems of joints is
undergoing severe runoff
processes. b Development of
embryonic symmetrical biancane.
c Biancane hight increases up to
15–20 m. Vegetation on shaded
north-facing slopes covers them
and prevents further erosion. The
south-facing hillsides continue to
increase its own slope, then
evolve by parallel retreat.
Biancane become asymmetric.
d Fast erosion lowers the small
domes and leads to the widening
of micro-pediments
form a pipe network. Selective rill erosion shapes embryonic
symmetrical biancane (Fig. 24.9b). When the biancane
height increases, vegetation on shaded north-facing slopes
covers them and controls the progress of erosion. Thus, the
power of rill erosion decreases on north-facing slopes and
biancane evolve asymmetrically; hereafter, the south-facing
slopes evolve by parallel retreat and some micro-pediments
appear at its foot (Fig. 24.9c). Finally, the south-facing slope
parallel-retreating preserves the asymmetry of biancane, but
fast erosion lowers the small domes and leads to the
widening of micro-pediments (Fig. 24.9d).
Regarding calanchi evolution, their slopes probably
evolve by substantial parallel retreat as long as caprock is
present, according to the Scheidegger’s model (Fig. 24.3).
Some outliers with volcanic caprocks hold ancient villages
(i.e. Orvieto, Civita di Bagnoregio) and picture suggestive
landscapes (Fig. 24.10). When caprock remnants finally
disappear, parallel retreat ceases and slope steepness rapidly
decreases, unless the fluvial systems are rejuvenated. This
evolution is accompanied by changes in denudation rates, as
a function of the increasing mudsliding from the rill and
gully heads.
290
M. Del Monte
Fig. 24.10 An outlier with volcanic caprock. On the top, the ancient settlement of Civita di Bagnoregio lies (Calanchi Valley, Tiber River basin,
northern Latium)
24.5
Conclusions
In the Mediterranean region, soil erosion or, more broadly,
severe slope denudation, is one of the most important
environmental problems, both for its noticeable impact on
human activities and for its consequences in natural environments. In the western sector of central Italy, geomorphic
processes produce typical water erosion landforms, such as
calanchi and biancane. These landscapes are very sensitive
to land use changes that have occurred in recent times: from
natural slopes affected by badlands, the trend has been firstly
towards low-impact croplands, then to over-exploitation
during the last 50 years, and finally to cropland abandonment. The present modifications are mainly due to an
increasing contribution of mass movements to the erosional
processes, previously driven mainly by surface running
waters.
Anyway, slopes have very degraded soils or bare unstable
surfaces, rapidly evolving due to strong wet-dry seasonal
contrasts and widespread outcrops of erodible bedrock.
However, these strong erosion processes have also created
spectacular and rugged landscapes, alongside the cultural
landscapes shaped by people over many centuries. Nowadays, the badlands landscapes in central Italy represent an
additional resource for the territory, and not just “Bad
Lands”. Tourists visiting the monuments and cultural
landscapes between Rome and Siena are also increasingly
attracted by the natural aspects of the landscape, especially
the most picturesque ones: calanchi and biancane
landforms.
References
Acocella V, Rossetti F (2002) The role of extensional tectonics at
different crustal levels on granite ascent and emplacement: an
example from Tuscany (Italy). Tectonophysics 354:71–83
Alexander DE (1980) I calanchi, accelerated erosion in Italy. Geography 65(2):95–100
Amici V, Maccherini S, Santi E, Torri D, Vergari F, Del Monte M
(2017) Long-term patterns of change in a vanishing cultural
landscape: a GIS-based assessment. Ecol Inform 37:38–51
Buccolini M, Gentili B, Materazzi M, Aringoli D, Pambianchi G,
Piacentini T (2007) Human impact and slope dynamics evolutionary
trends in the monoclinal relief of Adriatic area of central Italy.
Catena 71:96–109
Ciccacci S, Del Monte M, Marini R (2003) Denudational processes and
recent morphological change in a sample area of the Orcia River
Upper Basin (Southern Tuscany). Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 26:97–109
Della Seta M, Del Monte M, Fredi P, Lupia Palmieri E (2007) Direct
and indirect evaluation of denudation rates in Central Italy. Catena
71:21–30
Della Seta M, Del Monte M, Fredi P, Lupia Palmieri E (2009) Space–
time variability of denudation rates at the catchment and hillslope
scales on the Tyrrhenian side of Central Italy. Geomorphology 107
(3–4):161–177
24
The Typical Badlands Landscapes Between the Tyrrhenian Sea …
Drescher-Schneider R, de Beaulieu JL, Magny M, Walter-Simonnet
AV, Bossuet G, Millet L, Brugiapaglia E, Drescher A (2007)
Vegetation history, climate and human impact over the last
15,000 years at Lago dell’Accesa (Tuscany, Central Italy). Veg
Hist Archaeobotany 16:279–299
Farifteh J, Soeters R (2006) Origin of calanchi and biancane in East
Aliano, southern Italy. Geomorphology 77:142–152
Liotta D (1991) The Arbia-Val Marecchia line, northern Apennines.
Eclogae Geol Helv 84:413–430
Magny M (2004) Holocene climate variability as reflected by
mid-European lake-level fluctuations and its probable impact on
prehistoric human settlements. Quatern Int 113:65–79
Moretti S, Rodolfi G (2000) A typical “calanchi” landscape on the
Eastern Apennine margin (Atri, Central Italy): geomorphological
features and evolution. Catena 40:217–228
Romero-Díaz A, Marin Sanleandro P, Sanchez Soriano A, Belmonte
Serrato F, Faulkner H (2007) The causes of piping in a set of abandoned
agricultural terraces in southeast Spain. Catena 69:282–293
291
Scheidegger AE (1961) Mathematical models of slope development.
Geol Soc Am Bull 72:37–50
Schumm SA (1962) Erosion on miniature pediments in Badlands
National Monument, South Dakota. Geol Soc Am Bull 73:719–724
Torri D, Bryan RB (1997) Micropiping processes and biancane
evolution in Southeast Tuscany, Italy. Geomorphology 20:219–235
Torri D, Colica A, Rockwell D (1994) Preliminary study of the erosion
mechanisms in a biancana badland (Tuscany, Italy). Catena 23:281–294
Torri D, Regüés D, Pellegrini S, Bazzoffi P (1999) Within-storm soil
surface dynamics and erosive effects of rainstorms. Catena 38:131–150
Vannière B, Colombaroli D, Chapron E, Leroux A, Tinner W,
Magny M (2008) Climate versus human-driven fire regimes in
Mediterranean landscapes: the Holocene record of Lago dell’Accesa
(Tuscany, Italy). Quatern Sci Rev 27:1181–1196
Vergari F, Della Seta M, Del Monte M, Barbieri M (2013) Badlands
denudation “hot spots”: The role of parent material properties on
geomorphic processes in 20-years monitored sites of Southern
Tuscany (Italy). Catena 106:31–41
The Tuff Cities: A ‘Living Landscape’
at the Border of Volcanoes in Central Italy
25
Claudio Margottini, Laura Melelli, and Daniele Spizzichino
Abstract
This chapter describes a unique landscape produced by the action of endogenous and
exogenous factors at the border of the Vulsini Volcanic District between Latium, Umbria
and Tuscany regions in central Italy. This area comprises a narrow strip corresponding to
the transition between the pyroclastic coherent caprock (volcanic plateau) and the lower
Pliocene soft clays. Several morphological features such as mesas, buttes, cliffs, pinnacles
and towers represent the remnants of the original volcanic plateau, modelled by continuous
mass movements and, since ancient times, hosting human settlements. The mutual
relationship between the natural environment and the human presence is the mixing for a
unique “Cultural Landscape”. The sites are still affected by geomorphological processes
and many efforts are now in progress to maintain and preserve the historical villages on the
top of the cliff.
Keywords
Butte
25.1
Mesa
Plateau
Introduction
There are places where the interplay between endogenous
factors and morphogenetic agents builds up enchanting
landscapes, suspended in a delicate position between being
an environmental resource and a natural hazard. In this
context, human settlements may be an enhancement of such
beauty or become the main reason for its destruction. The
“tuff cities” (from the Italian word “tufo”, an igneous rock of
explosive volcanic eruption) lay on the border between
Umbria, Latium and Tuscany and represent an excellent
proof of such unstable equilibrium. Past geodynamic and
volcanic events together with modelling by more recent
exogenous processes have produced spectacular, wide table
C. Margottini (&) D. Spizzichino
Geological Survey of Italy, ISPRA, Via Vitaliano Brancati 60,
00144 Rome, Italy
e-mail: claudio.margottini@isprambiente.it
L. Melelli
Dipartimento di Fisica e Geologia, Università di Perugia, Via A.
Pascoli s.n.c., 06125 Perugia, Italy
Vulsini Volcanic District
Central Italy
landforms, like plateaus and smaller mesas and buttes,
characteristic throughout the whole area. These landforms
became favourite and comfortable sites for human settlements and, in time, for secure and defensible historic towns.
These ancient and often precious urban centres are
nowadays affected by natural hazards such as landslides that
threaten their survival due to strong geomorphological
activity. The resulting scenery, where human modifications
contrast with and overlap the natural landforms, acquires the
value of a “cultural landscape”. Because of the human
action, the exact understanding of the original landscape
formation and of its further evolution is fundamental for any
scientific and management approach.
25.2
Geographical and Geological Setting
Moving between Latium, Umbria and Tuscany, in the
northern and eastern portion of the Vulsini Volcanic District,
a morphological unit is present characterized by an abrupt
passage among flat top areas, steep slopes and carved river
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_25
293
294
valley at the bottom (Fredi and Ciccacci 2017) covering
roughly 480 km2 (Fig. 25.1).
The area described in this chapter is a semicircle, from
northwest and going to east, with the centre corresponding to
the Bolsena Lake. Close to the lake, widespread flat areas are
present where altitudes decrease gently moving away from
the centre. Here the monotony of the top surface suddenly
changes, the rivers deeply engrave the substrate, exposing
the underlying rocks and deposits and revealing new and
fascinating landscapes.
The drainage network shows a centrifugal pattern, starting from the Bolsena Lake and feeding three main rivers. On
the western limit the Fiora River, flowing from north to
south, is present while to the north the Paglia River, from
WNW to ESE, receives the right bank tributaries from the
central-eastern sector of the study area. Moreover, along the
eastern part the Tiber River, the main collector, flows from
north to south after a sudden curve elbow at the confluence
with the Paglia River. The highest elevation values are
C. Margottini et al.
recorded in the central part of the study area, at Torre Alfina
(600 m a.s.l.), Benano (488 m), Sugano (436 m) and
Acquapendente (420 m) villages. Altitudes decrease towards
the eastern sector where the towns of Civitella d’Agliano
(262 m) and Castiglione in Teverina (228 m) are present.
All the aforementioned locations define the edge of the top
surface, and highlight a morphological layer slightly tilted to
the east. The least elevated terrain can be found along the
fluvial valleys (Tiber River valley, 57 m).
The geological setting is characterized by two lithological
complexes and deposits, corresponding to different paleoenvironments. At the bottom of the sedimentary sequence
sea clays are present, covered by a volcanic complex
(stratified pyroclastites, ignimbrites and lavas to a lesser
extent). Landslide deposits are superimposed on both complexes. In order to delimit the zone where the transition
between the volcanic tuffs and the clays produces such a
typical landscape, a proper area has been identified. The
definition of such an area considers the surrounding of the
Fig. 25.1 Location map and geological sketch of the Vulsini area. 1 Geographical distribution of flat top areas, steep slopes and carved river
valley described in this chapter; 2 debris and colluvial deposits; 3 volcanic caprock; 4 sea clays
25
The Tuff Cities: A ‘Living Landscape’ at the Border …
stratigraphic limit between volcanic caprock and clays
(Fig. 25.1).
The present geological configuration is the result of the
geodynamic events that involved the central Apennines. In
the Upper Miocene (7.2–5.3 Ma) a regional uplift occurred,
followed by an extensional phase in the Lower Pliocene
(5.3–3.6 Ma). Due to these events the topographic arrangement was articulated in horsts and grabens with Apenninic
direction (NW–SE). The large basins of Paglia-Tiber to the
east and Siena-Radicofani to the west constitute the morphological evidence of the vertical displacements involving
the whole area (Bertini et al. 1971, Fig. 25.2). In this tectonic phase several transgression and regression cycles have
left a large amount of sediments, both continental and
marine. During this event a large amount of marine clays has
been deposited.
In the Middle and Upper Pliocene (3.6 Ma) due to the
uplift, the rise of a ridge and the resulting sea regression
occurred. The uplift rate reached the maximum values in the
Middle Pleistocene (1.8–0.8 Ma) and was followed by a
tectonic collapse. In consequence, several normal faults
originated in the area and voluminous volcanic activity
occurred. The residual inner basin infill, with brackish sediments and fluvial or fluvial lacustrine depositional
295
environments, evolved first in the area corresponding to the
present Tuscany and afterwards in the Tyrrhenian coast of
Latium (De Rita et al. 1983). In the Late Pleistocene (0.8–
0.1 Ma) the volcanic cycle ended and a continental conglomeratic sequence developed (De Rita 2004). The eruptions occurred at over one hundred distinct centres, mostly
located around or within the volcano-tectonic depressions of
Bolsena and Latera. The arrangement of these centres forms
a polycentric volcanic complex. Consequently, the Vulsini
volcanic complex does not have a conical shape, but is
characterized by gentle slopes with calderas and numerous
minor volcanic forms such as craters and cones. The Vulsini
Volcanic District developed in a time interval of approximately 450,000 years (Nappi et al. 1995), starting from
about 600,000 and terminating some 100,000 years ago, and
covers an area of approximately 2300 km2 (Fig. 25.2). In
this time interval, in different eruptive centres in the area
periods of eruptive activity alternated with periods of quiescence. The volcanism associated with the high volatile
content of the magma was mainly explosive, with paroxysmal activity. As a consequence, large pyroclastic deposits
were produced and volcano-tectonic subsidence occurred,
with associated formation of large calderas. The evolution of
volcanism can be summarized into five periods of activity
producing many volcanic complexes, partially overlapping
(Fig. 25.2, Vezzoli et al. 1987).
25.3
Fig. 25.2 Volcanic complexes of the Vulsini area (modified after
Vezzoli et al. 1987): 1 Paleo-Bolsena (600–450 ka); 2 Bolsena (490–
320 ka); 3 Montefiascone (300–200 ka); 4 South Vulsini (400–
100 ka); 5 Latera (380–100 ka); 6 border of the main eruptive centre;
7 minor eruptive centre; 8 graben; 9 horst
Landforms: The Interaction Between
Geological Structure and Exogenous
Morphogenetic Processes
Geological and structural setting are the main causes of
morphological configuration of the area. The presence of
hard and fractured volcanic plateau rocks on the plastic clay
basement is the main predisposing factor triggering erosion,
transport and sedimentation phenomena. In addition, the
tectonic events have activated the necessary relief energy to
allow geomorphic agents to shape the topographic surface.
The action of tectonic forces and the attempt of geomorphic
agents to rebalance their effects are resumed in Fig. 25.3.
After the marine regression, in early Pleistocene normal
faults have displaced and uplifted the sea clays along the
eastern edge of the area. The fault scarp created a natural
barrier to the volcanic products coming from southwest
(Fig. 25.3a). When the geomorphic agents, in particular
fluvial processes, started to shape the topographic surfaces,
tectonic discontinuities played a major role influencing the
development of the drainage pattern. As an example, the
tracing of the paleo-Paglia River identifies a natural drainage
line at the base of the fault scarp (Fig. 25.3b). The strong
contrast of competence and erodibility between clays and
massive tuffs has encouraged the erosion of the former and
296
C. Margottini et al.
Fig. 25.3 Evolution of the entire area with reference to Paglia River drainage pattern: 1 alluvial deposits; 2 talus; 3 tuff caprock; 4 clays; 5 initial
top of the volcanic caprock; 6 fault scarp; 7 fault plane; 8 paleo-Paglia River track (modified after Cattuto et al. 1994)
gradual deepening of the valley eastward. Progressively
eroded at the base, the plateau reached the state of imbalance
along the whole margins. Starting from this situation and
because of the subsequent erosive action, especially by the
right side river network, fragmentation of volcanic caprock
started (Fig. 25.3c; Gregori and Melelli 2012). Where rivers
are characterized by strong erosive capacity (mainly in the
upper portion of the drainage basins), the demolition of the
plateau is so exasperated that the volcanic cover is left in the
form of completely isolated portions of different sizes such
as mesas, buttes, cliffs, spires and towers (Figs. 25.3d and
25.4).
Nowadays landslides affect the volcanic caprock while
slope processes, including mass wasting, runoff and fluvial
ones model the underlying clays (Garbin et al. 2013).
The caprock is affected by cracks, in many cases open,
due both to the cooling process of the volcanic products and
to tectonic stresses. The result is the presence of different
sets of discontinuities, isolating wedges of the pyroclastic
sequence (tuffs and lavas). The weathering processes such as
thermoclasty and frost shattering enlarge the fissures, whilst
water presence increases the interstitial pressure both along
the discontinuities and at the base of the volcanic cliffs.
Tensile stresses develop evolving in shear and rotational
landslides, in particular at the clays upper stratigraphic limit.
The weight of the tuffs and volcanic wedges together with
water infiltration are the main causes of decay of the
geotechnical characteristics of the clayey basement. The
consequent deformation of clays is the main reason for the
subsidence of the upper strata of fractured rocks. As a consequence, along the edge of the plateaus, and even more on
the isolated reliefs like mesas and buttes, falls and topples
affect the borders of the volcanic sequence. The most evident
consequence is progressive retrogression of the frontal
slopes. Accumulation zones overlay the foot slope becoming
debris and colluvial deposits.
In addition the Pliocene clays are subject to geomorphological processes where gravity and runoff play a fundamental role in slope adjustment. The weathering causes
the decay of the geotechnical characteristics in particular
between 0.5 and 1 m of depth. The absence of a vegetation
cover (or even the presence of shrubs) makes the runoff more
effective. Sheet, rill and gully erosion are widespread and
contribute to the origin of badlands (Fig. 25.5).
Along the south-facing slopes badlands show their
highest expression (Vergari et al. 2013; Del Monte 2017).
Mudslides and mudflows are the most widespread landslide
types. Moreover, the presence of volcanic caprock in some
areas assures slope parallel retreat where both the slope
angle remains high and the runoff continues in time. On the
contrary, where the hard caprock on the top was dismantled,
the entire hillside gradually diminishes in slope angle. Then
the slope acquires a “convex–concave” geometric configuration and evolves with a “slope decline” model. It is
therefore evident that the processes acting on the cliffs and
on the underlying clays are not independent but closely
linked (Ciccacci et al. 2003).
The drainage river network plays a fundamental role in
the morphological evolution. Rivers are far from their
equilibrium profiles since they are still attempting to rebalance the effects of tectonic forces. As a consequence, incision and headward stream erosion are ongoing, deepening
and extending valley sides occur, while the basal clays are
undercut and removed, leading to undermining at the bottom
25
The Tuff Cities: A ‘Living Landscape’ at the Border …
297
Fig. 25.4 The “mesa” of the town of Orvieto, Umbria (after Ficola and Coletti 2011)
of the slopes. The steepness increases and slope stability
decreases, favouring landslides affecting both the basal clays
and the volcanic caprock.
Even if these conditions are the basis of widespread
natural hazards, the resulting landscape is unique in terms of
cultural and aesthetic values. The consequence is that the
main reason of instability of these areas is at the same time
the decisive factor contributing to their attractiveness. The
slope profiles, where highest cliffs rest on gentle hills
“scratched” by badlands are particularly suggestive since the
skyline calls to mind the picture of ships floating on a
choppy sea. To promote and enhance this uniqueness the
only possibility is to preserve these areas and their value.
25.4
A Unique Cultural Landscape Around
the Tuff Cities
Isolation guaranteed by the cliffs was in the past the main
reason to develop human settlements on the top of the mesas
and along the border of the plateaus. Moreover, the fertility
of the volcanic soils (Santi et al. 2003) encouraged
agricultural exploitation. The volcanic cliffs, easy to dug but
sufficiently stable, were utilised since prehistoric times as
refuges and later and still nowadays as storage or shelter for
farm equipment. Over the centuries, this volcanic rock has
allowed ancient populations (e.g. Etruscan, Romans and
mediaeval) to exploit the territory by building necropolises,
roads, workplaces, animal recoveries and cemeteries
(Fig. 25.6).
In many cases a wide network of wells and tunnels cross
the underground portion of the cliffs. These systems are
nowadays still in use and sometimes even further excavation
is taking place. Moreover, volcanic rocks offered the pozzolana, a main component of cement for buildings. In the
least elevated areas clay deposits guaranteed huge amount of
materials for handicraft production.
At the same time, the landscape was shaped, altered and
sometimes protected by human presence. In some cases
deforestation and inappropriate agricultural techniques have
accelerated gravitational and fluvial processes. Likewise, an
erroneous control of drainage network was the triggering
factor for mass movements and soil loss. Nevertheless,
human presence has sometimes slowed the paroxysmal
298
C. Margottini et al.
Fig. 25.5 Panoramic view of typical badland landscape
Fig. 25.6 Sepulchral monument
types in Sovana: a dado (cubic),
semi-dado and false dado tombs;
b temple-style tomb; c the “Tomb
of the Siren”, so called because it
is decorated with sculptures in
high relief depicting a mermaid
with two people (drawings a and
b are modified after Nappi et al.
2004)
evolution. Landslide consolidation and reinforcement of the
slopes as well as limiting river erosion are the most commonly executed actions.
The problem of historic urban settlement and heritage
conservation, in geomorphologically hazardous areas, like
the tuff cities, is generally ruled by two different approaches:
25
The Tuff Cities: A ‘Living Landscape’ at the Border …
299
Fig. 25.7 The town of Civita di
Bagnoregio (Latium) laying on a
mesa
(i) a cultural heritage-driven approach, mainly focused on
the preservation and conservation of the built heritage,
where the main concerns and expertise are in archaeology, architecture or art conservation;
(ii) an engineering/geology-driven approach that exclusively takes into account stabilization and reinforcement of the physical landscape and structures.
Usually one approach is used without regard to the other,
so that some aspects of the problem are underestimated or
not even considered.
The town of Civita di Bagnoregio (Fig. 25.7), located on
the eastern side of the area, is an excellent case where people
have tried for centuries to hinder natural degradation of the
cliff (Bandis et al. 2000). The town, of Etruscan or Villanovian origins (seventh century BC), experienced great
expansion from the Roman Age to the late Middle Age, when
the quarters Ponte and Carcere, now disappeared, where
added to the original urban nucleus. Topographical and
cadastral maps, dating back to the beginning of the eighteenth
century as well as other historical maps and documents, have
proved the progressive shortening of the cliff due to landslides that have caused, in different times, the disappearance
of portions of the town. Many historical accounts recording
landslides and stabilisation works, since 1373 AD, have been
collected and analysed in order to reconstruct in detail the
evolution of the urban setting and cliffs.
As a general remark, in the area described in this chapter,
where the human settlements are present at least from the
Bronze Age, a unique cultural landscape running from Pitigliano, Sovana, Sorano, Proceno, Acquapendente, Torre
Alfina, Lubriano, Civita di Bagnoregio, Orvieto, Porano,
Viceno, Benano, Sugano, Rocca Ripesena, Castiglione in
Teverina, Celleno, Civitella d’Agliano and Roccalvecce is
well recognisable (Fig. 25.8).
The link between landscape, landforms and human
presence is so important in this area, to justify the term of
Anthropogenic mesas for the majority of tufa plateaus. Due
to this fact the area offers a unique opportunity to be a sort of
guide for similar situations, becoming a Cultural Landscape
where the natural background and the human presence are
strictly related one to each other.
25.5
Conclusions
Many historical villages around the Vulsini Volcanic District
in central Italy are located on high land with a flat top and
surrounded by steep, cliff-like sides. This morphological
contrast is a characteristic feature at the border of the volcanic plateau. The reason for such typical landform assemblage resides in the coexistence of rigid pyroclastic rock
overlying plastic clays, with different competency and
erodibility contrasts, affected by the combined action of
endogenous and exogenous forces in space and time. The
outer boundary of the area is at the base of the slope, bordered by the drainage network of three main rivers: Fiora,
Paglia and Tiber.
300
C. Margottini et al.
Fig. 25.8 The Vulsini area on a 3D model. Volcanic caprock is outlined in purple and sea clays in yellow. The panoramas of the most
representative human settlements located in this cultural landscape are also included
The volcanic caprock is geomorphologically unstable,
due to erosion at the toe of the hillsides, caused by fluvial
action. Slope erosion affecting clays and fluvial processes,
often characterized by headwater erosion, induce the caprock
fragmentation and instability conditions, in particular along
the edges. Several portions of different size, named mesas,
buttes, cliffs, pinnacles, and towers, represent the remnants
of the original volcanic plateau.
Nowadays gravitational activity is the main morphogenetic process that shapes the plateau, with rock slides and
falls. On the top areas humans have found a favourable
location for the development of settlements, since ancient
times. In fact, this peculiar landscape formed an excellent
natural defence against external aggression. The easy
retrieval of building materials and the high fecundity of the
land, due to the volcanic bedrock and temperate climate,
have represented further benefits despite geodynamic
unstable equilibrium of the area. People have been able to
take advantage of the strategic positions offered by these
headlands, creating towns of great historical, cultural and
architectural values. However, their extreme fragility, due to
the unrelenting action of exogenous agents and instability
conditions, have represented a constraint to the development
of settlements in modern period and nowadays they represent a wonderful historical urban landscape (Margottini and
Spizzichino 2014), mainly demonstrating typical Middle
Age villages.
Unfortunately, geomorphological processes are clearly
still active and this is the cause of an uncertain future for the
survival of these cultural landscapes. Increasing awareness is
essential, in order to combine tourism exploitation with the
rising of attention from policy makers and stakeholders
within the social, economic and cultural conditions. The
proposed candidature of the city of Orvieto and, in the near
future, of Civita di Bagnoregio to include in the UNESCO
World Heritage List is a great step in this direction, as is the
proposal to create a national geopark in the whole area
described in this chapter.
25
The Tuff Cities: A ‘Living Landscape’ at the Border …
References
Bandis S, Colombini V, Delmonaco G, Margottini C (2000) New
typology of low environmental impact consolidation for rockfall
prone cliffs through interventions from the underground. In:
Bromhead E, Dixon N, Ibsen M-L (eds) Landslides in research,
theory and practice. Thomas Telford Publishing, London, pp 107–
112
Bertini M, D’Amico C, Deriu M, Girotti O, Tagliavini S, Vernia L
(1971) Note illustrative della Carta Geologica d’Italia alla Scala
1:100.000—Foglio 137 Viterbo. Nuova Tecnica Grafica, Roma,
109 pp
Cattuto C, Cencetti C, Gregori L (1994) Itinerario n. 7 (da Orvieto a
Spoleto). Prima parte: da Orvieto a Todi (Sosta 7.3 – Panorama
sulla valle del F. Paglia). In: Passeri L (ed) Appennino Umbro‐
Marchigiano. Guide Geologiche Regionali, Società Geologica
Italiana, BE-MA, Milano, pp 172–173
Ciccacci S, Del Monte M, Marini R (2003) Denudational processes and
recent morphological change in a sample area of the Orcia River
Upper Basin (Southern Tuscany). Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 26:97–109
Del Monte M (2017) The typical badlands landscapes between the
Tyrrhenian Sea and the Tiber River. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M
(eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham,
pp 281–291
De Rita D (2004) Caldere e crateri. In: Italia. Atlante dei Tipi
Geografici. Istituto Geografico Militare, Firenze, pp 347–349
De Rita D, Funiciello R, Rossi U, Sposato A (1983) Structure and
evolution of the Sacrofano-Baccano caldera, Sabatini volcanic
complex, Rome. J Volcanol Geoth Res 17(1):219–236
Ficola P, Coletti M (2011) Umbria from above. Quattroemme Ed.,
Perugia, 334 pp
Fredi P, Ciccacci S (2017) A route of fire in central Italy: the Latium
Ancient Volcanoes. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes
and landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 303–315
301
Garbin F, Margottini C, Brancaleoni R, Sonnessa A (2013) Softening
and swelling mechanism affecting south slope of Civita di
Bagnoregio (Central Italy). In: Bilotta E, Flora A, Lirer S,
Viggiani C (eds) Geotechnical engineering for the preservation of
monuments and historic sites. Taylor & Francis Group, London,
pp 395–402
Gregori L, Melelli L (2012) Di fuoco e di acqua: forme e paesaggi delle
“Città del Tufo”. In: Peccerillo A (ed) L’ignimbrite di
Orvieto-Bagnoregio, Edizioni Nuova Phromos, Città di Castello,
pp 113–134
Margottini C, Spizzichino D (2014) How geology shapes human
settlements. In: Bandarin F, van Oers R (eds) Reconnecting the city.
The historic urban landscape approach and the future of urban
heritage. Wiley, Chichester, pp 47–84
Nappi G, Renzulli A, Santi P, Gillot PY (1995) Geological evolution
and geochronology of the Vulsini Volcanic District (central Italy).
Boll Soc Geol It 114:599–613
Nappi G, Valentini L, Mattioli M (2004) Ignimbritic deposits in central
Italy: pyroclastic products of the Quaternary age and Etruscan
footpaths. In: Guerrieri L, Rischia I, Serva L (eds) Field trip
guidebooks, 32nd IGC Florence 20–28 August 2004. Mem Descr
Carta Geol d’It 63(3), pp 1–34 (P09)
Santi P, Antonelli F, Renzulli A, Pensabene P (2003) Leucite phonolite
millstones from the Orvieto production centre: new data and
insights into the Roman trade. Periodico di Mineralogia 73:57–69
Vergari F, Della Seta M, Del Monte M, Barbieri M (2013) Badlands
denudation “hot spots”: the role of parent material properties on
geomorphic processes in 20-years monitored sites of Southern
Tuscany (Italy). Catena 106:31–41
Vezzoli L, Conticelli S, Innocenti F, Landi P, Manetti P, Palladino DM,
Trigila R (1987) Stratigraphy of the Latera volcanic complex:
proposal for a new nomenclature. Periodico di Mineralogia 56:89–
110
A Route of Fire in Central Italy: The Latium
Ancient Volcanoes
26
Paola Fredi and Sirio Ciccacci
Abstract
In the western portion of Latium (Central Italy) a series of ancient, generally evident
volcanic edifices and numerous lakes hosted in depressions is present. They are directly or
indirectly tied to severe volcanism which occurred between 2 and 0.08 Ma ago. From a
geomorphological point of view, it is possible to identify different volcanic landscapes,
whose appearance mainly depends on the magma chemistry. The landscape of the
Tuscan-Latium Magmatic Province, which was fed by silicic magmas, is typified by
numerous lava domes, rising up from a generally flat ignimbritic plateaux. The landscape of
the alkaline potassic volcanism shows strong differences that are tied to the existence or not
of well-identified central volcanic edifices. In the first case the landscape is dominated by
the presence of outstanding volcanic relief; in the second one many different minor
emission centres are scattered over large flat areas, mainly built up by pyroclastic flows.
Keywords
Volcanic landforms
26.1
Extinct Pleistocene volcanism
Introduction
The landscape of Latium is extremely diverse as a consequence of its complex and lively geological history, its
varied outcropping rocks and various, often intense, exogenous processes. Mountains, hills, gorges, and wide fluvial
valleys follow one another from the inner zone of the
Apennine chain as far as the plains of the Tyrrhenian coastal
zone. The most distinguishing feature of the western portion
of Latium, close to the Tyrrhenian coast, is without doubt the
presence of a series of ancient, generally evident volcanic
edifices and numerous lakes that are hosted in depressions
and are directly or indirectly tied to past severe volcanism. In
fact, the volcanic landscape is such a distinctive characteristic of Latium that it makes this region unique in Central
Italy.
P. Fredi S. Ciccacci (&)
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Sapienza Università di Roma,
Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
e-mail: sirio.ciccacci@uniroma1.it
Latium
Latium volcanism belongs to the Tuscan-Latium Magmatic Province, which developed, starting from the end of
the Pliocene, in a structurally depressed belt that is parallel to
the Tyrrhenian coast and is bordered in the east by the
highest sector of the Apennines.
Even if some authors think that some of these ancient
volcanoes are not completely extinct, there are no eyewitnesses reports of their eruptions. However, Latium volcanoes and their products have strongly influenced the lifestyle
of ancient inhabitants, who were probably unaware of living
in volcanic areas. Many volcanic products have an important
role also in modern life. For example, obsidian that was
produced by the volcanic eruptions of the Ponziane Islands
is suitable to create sharp tools, which favoured the development of prehistoric settlements in these islands. Many
Etruscan necropolises were carved into volcanic “tufa”,
produced by Monti Sabatini volcanism. This rock, actually
the deposit of pyroclastic flows, is easy to cut but is characterised by high strength. These same “tufa” are commonly
used as building stones even today, and quarries are
important man-made landforms in these areas. The Ancient
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_26
303
304
P. Fredi and S. Ciccacci
Romans used lavas from the Colli Albani volcano to pave
their roads. Small lava blocks that resemble truncated,
square-based pyramids and locally called “sanpietrini” were
used during the reign of Pope Benedetto XII to pave San
Pietro square, and they still represent the traditional pavement of many streets and squares in the centre of Rome.
The archaeological site of Tusculum, in the Colli Albani
volcanic area, is of particular interest both from a volcanological and historical point of view. At this site, the
“Sperone” stone crops out; it is a deposit of welded scoriae
that were emitted by low lava fountains ejecting from radial
and tangential fractures, which are related to the collapse of
the caldera that characterises this volcanic relief. This stone
was used by the Romans to build houses in the antique town
Tusculum, but it constitutes also the load-bearing structure of
the Colosseum.
In the second half of the fifteenth century, the discovery
of a large quantity of alum, which is a mineral used at that
time to paint clothes and tan hides, changed the Tolfa volcanic area into an industrial district that was among the most
important ones in Europe.
When volcanic activity ceased, slow pedogenetic processes affected the volcanic rocks and led to the formation of
very fertile soils, which are rich in minerals crucial for
agriculture. The cultivation of vineyards, already practised
by the Ancient Romans, is still an important resource for the
economics of the Vulsini and Colli Albani volcanic areas.
Although it is likely that nobody watched the dramatic
eruptions of Latium volcanoes, there are many witnesses to
their late, mainly hydrothermal activity, which is easily
recognisable even today. Close to Viterbo, a town in
northern Latium, the thermal baths of Bullicame, which were
very famous among the Ancient Romans, and the springs of
Polla di S. Sisto, are still frequented. Again, the “Caldara di
Manziana”, which is one of the most important geosites of
Latium, is a depression from which large quantities of gas
escape, testifying to the hydrothermal activity of the late
stage of Monti Sabatini volcanic activity. These are only a
few among the many examples, but they all demonstrate the
significance of Latium volcanism for the past and present
human activities.
26.2
Geographical and Geological Settings
To understand the origin and evolution of the volcanoes in
Central Italy, and specifically in Latium region, it is necessary to go back in time to approximately 5 million years ago.
At that time, the western sector of the Apennine chain,
which had almost completely emerged, began to thin and
sink, as a consequence of the horst and graben tectonics that
was associated with the birth of the Tyrrhenian Sea. During
this tectonic phase, a striking, mainly NW–SE-oriented fault
system led to the formation of deep depressions that were
successively flooded by marine ingression. Approximately
from 4 to 3 million years ago, these large fractures allowed a
huge quantity of crustal, chiefly acid magma to ascend along
a large number of conduits that fed the volcanism of Latium.
This impressive phenomenon followed a straight southward
route; it started in Toscana (Mt. Amiata) and then moved to
Latium, where Mt. Cimino, Tolfa and Cerite-Manziate lavas
(from 4 to 2 Ma ago) and successively lavas from Monti
Ceriti and Ponziane Islands (from 1.5 to 0.9 Ma ago) were
progressively emplaced.
During the last one million years the fault activity
renewed and a transversal fault system (NE–SW oriented)
developed. During this magmatic phase, which is called the
alkaline potassic phase, magmas generated in the upper
mantle rose up to the surface through the newly formed
fractures, causing a spectacular sequence of volcanic events
that lasted until very recent times.
This new, high potassium content volcanism concentrated
in four areas. From north to south, these areas correspond to
the following four volcanic districts: Monti Vulsini District,
Cimino-Vico District, Monti Sabatini District and Colli
Albani District (Fig. 26.1). Probably due to complex tectonic
arrangement of the mainly carbonate basement, the rising
magma often concentrated in small and isolated chambers
that fed numerous emission centres that were scattered over
large areas. Locally, in contrast, the activity concentrated at
certain places, building central volcanic edifices. Referring to
the four alkali potassic volcanic districts, the scattered or
central volcanic activity alternates from north to south: the
Vulsini and Sabatini District had mainly scattered activity,
while in the Cimino-Vico District and Colli Albani District,
the locally concentrated volcanic activity gave rise to central
volcanic edifices (Peccerillo 2005).
26.3
Landforms and Landscapes
The volcanic districts of Latium show peculiar characteristics if compared with other volcanic areas of Italy. The
emplacement of lava flows, fall deposits and, chiefly, huge
pyroclastic flows tied to the explosive volcanic activity
produced wide plateaux, gently dipping outward from the
central areas where the main volcanic centres were located.
From a geomorphological point of view, it is possible to
identify different volcanic landscapes, which mainly depend
on the magma chemistry: the landscape of the
Tuscan-Latium Magmatic Province, which is fed by silicic
magmas, and the landscape of the alkaline potassic volcanism, whose diversity is related to the presence or absence of
well identified central volcanic edifices.
Although the acid, viscous magmas of the Tuscan-Latium
Magmatic Province had likely built volcanic landforms, the
26
A Route of Fire in Central Italy: The Latium Ancient Volcanoes
305
Fig. 26.1 Geographical setting of Latium (Google Earth © 2015—Image Landsat) and geological sketch of the tectonic arrangement in which
volcanism developed (modified after Caputo et al. 1993)
306
P. Fredi and S. Ciccacci
products of the more recent, alkaline potassic volcanism are
much more common and surely dominate most of the
Latium territory. It is the latter that can be reasonably considered to be the main maker of the volcanic landforms of
Latium.
26.3.1
The Volcanic Landscape
of the Tuscan-Latium Magmatic
Province
The volcanic districts of Latium nourished by silicic magmas
are represented by the Cimino Volcano and the
Tolfetano-Cerite Volcanic System, whose activity was
markedly explosive. Their landscape is dominated by large
ignimbritic plateaux, interspersed by dome-shaped lava
landforms with steep slopes (typically lava domes) that often
attain high elevations above sea level.
At present, more than 50 subconical hills are preserved in
the area of the Cimino Volcano. They originated from the
accumulation of lavas of rhyolitic to trachydacitic composition; Mt. Cimino (1053 m a.s.l.) stands out among them
(Borghetti et al. 1981; Fig. 26.2). The lava domes (approximately 20) prevail in the Tolfetano-Cerite Volcanic System.
They are slightly elevated, with Mt. Santo being the highest
(430 m). They show different morphological characteristics,
which mainly depend on the varying content of silica; the
higher this content, the steeper and higher are volcanic
constructions (De Rita et al. 1994).
26.3.2
The Volcanic Landscape of the Alkaline
Potassic Districts
The morphology of the areas affected by this type of volcanism varies greatly, and the variety of landforms strictly
depends on the predominance of central or scattered volcanic
activity. In the first case, the landscape is dominated by low
relief surfaces, which are mainly due to the emplacement of
pyroclastic flows that have obliterated any pre-existing
morphology. These generally flat areas are interrupted by the
presence of easily recognisable central volcanic edifices,
truncated at their summits by caldera depressions, inside of
which secondary and more recent cones have originated. In
the second case, the emission centres are largely spread over
a wider area, and easily discernible volcanic edifices are
lacking.
The landscape of the areas where central volcanic activity
occurred (the Vico Volcano and the Colli Albani Volcano)
shows easily discernible central volcanic edifices. They were
typical stratovolcanoes and are truncated at their summits by
large depressions due to caldera collapses. Smaller and
steeper cones rose up in a later phase from the caldera
bottom.
26.3.2.1 Vico Volcano
The Vico Volcano history (Mattias and Ventriglia 1970;
Buonasorte et al. 1990) is schematically shown in
Fig. 26.3a. The present landscape is dominated by the Vico
Volcano caldera, inside which the more recent 325 m-high
lava cone of Mt. Venere developed (Fig. 26.3b). The caldera
depression has a very irregular shape, which roughly
resembles a horseshoe. The depression-specific profile is
derived by the coalescence of at least four circular landforms; each of these landforms is tied to one of the main
ignimbritic eruptions, which were responsible for the caldera
collapse.
The largest part of this depression is now occupied by the
Vico Lake (Fig. 26.4), a volcanic lake in Italy at the highest
altitude (510 m), which can be considered to be the most
outstanding feature of the Vico Volcano area. Historical data
indicate that the lake was larger in the past and Mt. Venere,
now completely emerged, was previously an island. In fact,
the water level of the lake was artificially lowered by
approximately 20 m in the Etruscan era. The ancient population dug an underground tunnel in the pyroclastic flows
Fig. 26.2 View of Mt. Cimino Volcano, the highest relief among the Latium volcanic areas
26
A Route of Fire in Central Italy: The Latium Ancient Volcanoes
307
Fig. 26.3 Top satellite image of Vico Volcano (Google Earth—Image
© 2015 DigitalGlobe). a Volcanological and morphological evolution
of the Vico Volcano. 1 0.8–0.4 Ma ago; explosive activity produced
fall deposits and pyroclastic flows; 2 0.35–0.2 Ma ago; mainly effusive
activity: the central volcanic edifice was built up; 3 0.2–0.15 Ma ago;
Plinian eruptions produced pyroclastic flows; collapse of the volcano
summit and the formation of the Vico Caldera; 4 140–95 ka ago; a lake
originated inside the caldera; phreatomagmatic activity produced the
“final tuffs”. At the end, lava flows formed the Mt. Venere cone.
b Panoramic view of the Vico Caldera and its lake
that drained the lake waters from the lake’s southwestern end
beyond the caldera walls, towards the Treia River (a Tiber
tributary). Their aim was to control the water level fluctuations and to gain dry land suitable for agriculture. Successively, the eminent Farnese family restored the Etruscan
tunnel in the sixteenth century, and the water level was
lowered by approximately three more metres. These human
interventions had an important role in the morphological
evolution of the caldera bottom, where wide swampy areas
—rich in organic matter—developed on the blackish and
greyish lacustrine clays. Some of these areas—especially
those on the northern and eastern sides—were completely
dried out and used to grow almond trees, an agriculture
practice that continues to characterise this area.
308
P. Fredi and S. Ciccacci
Fig. 26.4 The Vico Lake viewed from the south shore. The Mt. Venere cone is on the right; on the left is the Mt. Fogliano relief
Nevertheless, swampy areas are still preserved at places
along the waterside.
The caldera rim attains the maximum altitude at Mt.
Fogliano (965 m). The inward slopes are very steep as a
consequence of the collapse; they are drained by centripetal
short and ephemeral watercourses that directly join the lake
The outward slopes result from the emplacement of pyroclastic flows, fall deposits and subordinate lava flows and
represent the lower reaches of the higher ancient volcano,
before the caldera collapse. In contrast to the caldera inner
slopes, they are gently dipping and deeply cut by a general
centrifugal drainage network. In fact, the present morphogenetic processes are mainly associated with channelled
surface waters.
26.3.2.2 Colli Albani Volcano
Although the Colli Albani Volcano (also called Latium
Volcano or simply Castelli Romani; Fig. 26.5) and its
products are spread over a much larger area (1600 km2) than
the Vico Volcano (850 km2), the two volcanic areas show
geomorphological similarities.
As in the case of the Vico Volcano, also the Colli Albani
Volcano landscape is dominated by a gently sloping volcanic relief that is truncated by the summit caldera, inside
which a younger cone is present. This relief, called
Tuscolano-Artemisio, is the remnant of an old stratovolcano
that was active from 0.6 to 0.3 Ma ago, when the caldera
collapse occurred. The caldera depression is circular in shape
and stretches over an arc of 230°, having a diameter that
ranges from 10 to 12 km, and a maximum altitude of
approximately 900 m. The younger and smaller volcanic
Faete Edifice, which was active from 0.3 to 0.2 Ma ago,
rises from the flat caldera bottom (“atrio”) to 949 m at Mt.
Cavo. This younger edifice has a summit called Campi di
Annibale. The Tuscolano-Artemisio circular relief is interrupted at its western reach by the eccentrical craters of
Albano, Nemi and Valle Ariccia, which originated during
the final hydromagmatic phase from 200 to 20 ka. At present, the Albano and Nemi craters are the sites of pleasant
small lakes (Caputo et al. 1995; De Rita et al. 1995; Karner
et al. 2001; Fig. 26.6).
The denudational processes that are presently acting in
the Colli Albani area are mainly due to running water and
subordinately to gravity. Sheet, rill and gully erosion are
typically found on the highest and steepest parts of the
volcano slopes and where less resistant lithologies crop out.
The differential action of weathering and slope wash is
responsible for the origins of the scarps, which are especially
evident along the inward-facing slopes of the main crater
depressions. Here, massive and lithified pyroclastic flow
deposits are interbedded with the less resistant pyroclastic
fall products and hydromagmatic deposits. Trough-floored,
flat floored and V-shaped valleys derive from the dominant
action of the channelled surface waters. The trough-floored
valleys owe their origin to the combined action of fluvial
incision and slope processes (Ciccacci et al. 1986).
26.3.2.3
Monti Vulsini and Monti Sabatini
Volcanoes
The landscape of the Monti Vulsini and Monti Sabatini
volcanic districts lacks a clearly defined central activity and
is much flatter than the landscapes discussed so far. Among
the main notable features are the presence in the central
sectors of wide volcano-tectonic depressions, which host
Lake Bolsena (Monti Vulsini) and Lake Bracciano (Monti
Sabatini), and the scattering of many emission centres over
very large areas.
The Monti Vulsini Volcanic District extends for
approximately 2200 km2 (Fig. 26.7) and is characterised by
the presence of the large Bolsena Lake in its central part
(Fig. 26.8a). The most evident volcanic landforms are the
Montefiascone caldera and the Latera caldera (Buonasorte
et al. 1991) to the west and southeast of the Lake Bolsena
depression, respectively. The eastern and northern edges of
26
A Route of Fire in Central Italy: The Latium Ancient Volcanoes
309
Fig. 26.5 Top satellite images of Colli Albani Volcano (Google Earth—Image © 2015 DigitalGlobe). Bottom schematic evolution of the Colli
Albani Volcano: 1 Tuscolano-Artemisio period (0.6–0.3 Ma ago); 2 Faete period (0.3–0.2 Ma ago); 3 hydromagmatic period (0.2–0.02 Ma ago)
the lake depression clearly show the presence of steep
slopes, which are N–S and NW–SE oriented and are the
surface expressions of faults that are responsible for the
origin of the tectonic-volcanic depression.
The Latera caldera is the result of a collapse that occurred
approximately 60 ka ago at the summit of a former large
stratovolcano, which was built between 0.3 and 0.1 Ma ago.
The caldera rim has a typical elliptical shape and is broken
westward in effect of more recent volcanic events, which
produced numerous scoria cones and the huge lava plateau
of Selva del Lamone. This plateau resulted from the fissure
eruption of numerous lava flows between 170 and 50 ka ago
that extended southwestward for approximately 8.5 km. The
morphological evolution of this sector of the Vulsini volcanic area was deeply influenced by the emplacement of the
lava flows that caused the inversion of the relief. In fact, they
are likely to have filled a former valley, thereby producing a
new divide and forcing the stream to develop a new valley
along the previous divide. To the north of Latera caldera, a
gently northward dipping surface is present. It is made of
pyroclastic flows that erupted from the ancient Latera stratovolcano and is affected by efficient incision by streams
forming a centrifugal drainage network. This area is also
important from an archaeological point of view. In fact, it is
310
P. Fredi and S. Ciccacci
Fig. 26.6 Lake of Nemi, viewed from Mt. Cavo. The lake occupies the southern part of two coalescent craters, typically 8-shaped, which
originated about 180 ka ago
the site of the famous “Tagliate etrusche” (Etruscan cuts,
Fig. 26.8b): very deep and narrow roads dug in the pyroclastic flows by the Etruscans approximately 2500 years
ago, probably to reach their necropolis or, according to
another interpretation, to canalise surface running water. In
fact, the man-made landforms are here as important as the
natural landforms.
The Montefiascone caldera, on the southeastern margin of
Bolsena Lake, is the result of the collapse of the homonymous former volcano that erupted the pyroclastic flows of
the Vulsino southwestern plateau between 0.3 and 0.1 Ma
ago (Nappi and Marini 1988). This smaller circular caldera
(Fig. 26.7) is bordered by very steep and well-preserved
slopes. The town of Montefiascone, which is famous for its
esteemed wine (known as “Est Est Est” since the Middle
Ages), is built on one of the scoria cones located around the
Montefiascone caldera.
The superimposition of different pyroclastic flows that
erupted from the oldest and now erased stratovolcano of the
complex (Bolsena Volcano) has given rise to the roughly
horizontal plateau of the eastern Monti Vulsini sector, gently
sloping eastward, where it is bordered by the scarp due to the
Tiber River’s deepening. The plateau is affected by vigorous
stream erosion that reached the underlying Plio-Pleistocene
clays. In the more distal portion, the plateau is so strongly
dissected that tabular hills, similar to mesas or buttes, are
common. The caprock is made of pyroclastic products, while
the lower slope sections are shaped in the Plio-Pleistocene
shales. The very different resistance to erosion of these
lithologies has favoured the development of wonderful
landscapes, which are the sites of charming towns such as
Civita di Bagnoregio and Orvieto.
The landscape of the Monti Sabatini Volcanic District
(1700 km2) resembles that of Monti Vulsini. Additionally, a
lake depression (Lake Bracciano) dominates in the central
sector (Biasini et al. 1993; Fig. 26.9).
The most evident volcanic landforms are in the eastern
sector, where the Sacrofano-Baccano Volcanic Complex has
developed (Ciccacci et al. 1986). The wider and older
Sacrofano caldera originated approximately 0.36 Ma ago at
the expense of a former volcano; its western margin was
successively interrupted by the more recent collapse of the
Baccano caldera. The northern slopes of the two calderas are
the headwaters of Treia River, which drains countercurrently
with respect to Tiber River before joining it close to Civita
Castellana town. The middle Treia valley is strongly incised
in the low relief pyroclastic plateau. Splendid landscape
views occur in the area. The Mt. Gelato waterfall
(Fig. 26.10a) or the residual tuff cliffs where the Etruscan
town of Narci and the mediaeval town of Calcata
(Fig. 26.10b) were built are suggestive examples.
The central sector of the Monti Sabatini is dominated by
Lake Bracciano (Fig. 26.10c). It is also rich of circular or
sub-circular secondary depressions produced during the late
hydromagmatic phases of the volcanism (maars; Sottili et al.
2011) and located mainly on the eastern and northeastern
edge of the lake. Among them, the most important are the
Monterosi and Martignano craters, hosting small lakes, the
Stracciacappa crater, which was once the site of a shallow
sheet of water and is now completely and artificially dried
out, and the Trevignano crater, which is actually an inlet of
Bracciano Lake. The landscape of the sector to the north of
Bracciano Lake is interrupted by numerous scoria and lava
cones; the cone of Mt. Rocca Romana, which overlooks the
lake, is the highest relief (612 m) of the Monti Sabatini
volcanic district.
26.3.3
The Ponziane Islands
The Ponziane Islands archipelago is composed of five main
volcanic islands. The northwestern islands of Ponza
26
A Route of Fire in Central Italy: The Latium Ancient Volcanoes
311
Fig. 26.7 Satellite image of the Vulsini Volcanic District (Google Earth Image © 2015 DigitalGlobe) and related morphological sketch (modified
after Buonasorte et al. 1991)
312
P. Fredi and S. Ciccacci
Fig. 26.8 a The lake of Bolsena
and Montefiascone caldera
viewed from Montefiascone
town. b Tagliata Etrusca in the
pyroclastic flows of the Latera
Volcanic Complex; Pitigliano is
neighbouring
(Fig. 26.11a), Palmarola and Zannone are an emerged portion of the Tyrrhenian Platform and were marked by an
ancient (approximately 1.5–1.1 Ma old) acid and mainly
underwater volcanic activity, which produced rhyolitic
lavas. The southeastern islands of Ventotene and Santo
Stefano are characterised by an alcalino-potassic chemistry
(0.7 Ma old). Ventotene extends for approximately 3 km
and attains maximum altitude of 139 m; it is an emerged
portion of the Ventotene central volcano, which rises for
900 m from the bottom of the Gulf of Gaeta. The smaller
island of Santo Stefano (Fig. 26.11b) is the summit, which
emerged as a part of a secondary cone of the same volcano.
26.4
Scientific and Cultural Value
of the Latium Volcanoes
The volcanic landscape of Latium has specific peculiarities
that derive from the activity of both endogenous and
exogenous processes, which make this region unique in the
Italian context. Volcanic events are responsible for the primary general imprint. Volcanic cones, calderas,
volcano-tectonic depressions, craters, volcanic lakes and
gently outward sloping pyroclastic plateaux erased the former landscape and prepared a very specific scenario for the
subsequent action of erosional and depositional processes,
which are mainly related to the action of running surface
water. The entire volcanic district was affected by marked
fluvial downcutting in response to an increased volume of
relief. As a consequence, narrow and deep valleys were
formed. Their cross sections often show step-like profiles,
which derive from differential erosion of the pyroclastic
flows, lava flows and fall deposits, each having specific
strength and different resistance to surface processes.
Furthermore, the general radial centrifugal pattern of the
drainage networks is often disturbed by the presence of
fractures and faults that affected the volcanic cover in very
recent times and the morphological evolution as well.
Taking these considerations into account, it is easy to
understand why the volcanic areas of Latium have a precious
scientific and aesthetic value. In fact, many interesting places
have been chosen to be Regional or Provincial Parks or
Reserves: the Regional Natural Reserves of Selva del
Lamone, Lago di Vico and Monterano; and the Regional
26
A Route of Fire in Central Italy: The Latium Ancient Volcanoes
313
Fig. 26.9 Satellite image (Google Earth Image © 2015 DigitalGlobe) of the Monti Sabatini Volcanic District and related geomorphological
sketch (modified after Caputo et al. 1993)
314
P. Fredi and S. Ciccacci
Fig. 26.10 a Mt. Gelato waterfall, along the Treia River. b The beautiful and suggestive town of Calcata in the Treia valley. This town was built
on the “Red tuff with black scoriae” that was erupted from the Vico Volcano (180 ka ago). c View of lake Bracciano from the Odescalchi castle
Natural Parks of Bracciano-Martignano, Appia Antica and
Castelli Romani are only selected examples from the
approximately thirty parks and reserves of the provinces of
Rome and Viterbo.
Furthermore, the beauties of the natural landscape go
along with the historical and cultural value of the entire
volcanic area of Latium, where the evidence of Etruscan and
Ancient Roman civilisations as well as of the Mediaeval and
Renaissance periods is ample.
Many Etruscan works still survive. The necropolis, which
were carved into the Monti Vulsini, Vico and Monti Sabatini
pyroclastic flows, found at Tarquinia, Vulci, Cerveteri and
Sutri, are wonderful but not isolated examples. Roads, such
as the already cited Etruscan Tagliate of Pitigliano, or
aqueducts, such as the Città di Veio aqueducts, or reclamation works, such as the channel that drains Vico Lake,
hold out against the elapsing time.
The Ancient Roman period is attested to by still
better-preserved evidence. The very Aeterna Urbs was built
close to the Tiber bends and over seven hills topped by the
Monti Sabatini and the Colli Albani pyroclastic flows. Furthermore, there are aqueducts (such as the aqueduct of Via
Appia), roads (such as the Via Appia Antica that runs as far
as the Roma periphery on the Colli di Bove lava flow
erupted by the Colli Albani Volcano), and even ship remnants, such as those found in the 1920s in Nemi Lake and
thought to be Caligula’s ships.
The small towns that date back to the Middle Ages and
attained their maximum magnificence in the Renaissance
periods are also very interesting. Orvieto, for example, with
its wonderful cathedral, was built on the Vulsini volcanic
plateau, while other examples include Capranica, Sutri and
Viterbo in the area of the Cimino and Vico Volcanoes,
Bolsena in the Monti Vulsini district, Calcata, Bracciano and
26
A Route of Fire in Central Italy: The Latium Ancient Volcanoes
315
Fig. 26.11 a Cala dell’Inferno on the Ponza Island. This suggestive
cove is a portion of an ancient volcanic cone that is composed of acid
volcanites and is deeply eroded by wave action. b Santo Stefano Island
is the emerged part of a secondary cone that belongs to the Ventotene
Volcano
Anguillara Sabazia in the Monti Sabatini District, and Castel
Gandolfo, Albano Laziale and Frascati in the Colli Albani
area.
Altogether, the volcanic district of Latium is a harmonious combination of physical, historical and cultural landscapes of worldwide relevance.
Caputo C, Del Monte M, Fredi P, Lupia Palmieri E, Pugliese F (1995)
Geomorphological features. In: Trigila R (ed) The Volcano of the
Alban Hills. Tipografia SGS, Roma, pp 13–32
Ciccacci S, De Rita D, Fredi P (1986) Studio geomorfologico delle
depressioni vulcaniche di Sacrofano e Baccano nei Monti Sabatini
(Latium). Mem Soc Geol It 35:833–845
De Rita D, Bertagnini A, Carboni MG, Ciccacci S, Di Filippo M,
Faccenna C, Fredi P, Funiciello R, Landi P, Sciacca P, Vannucci N,
Zarlenga F (1994) Geological-petrological evolution of the Ceriti
Mountains Area (Latium, Central Italy). Mem Descr Carta Geol d’It
49:291–322
De Rita D, Faccenna C, Funiciello R, Rosa C (1995) Stratigraphy. In:
Trigila R (ed) The Volcano of the Alban Hills. Tipografia SGS,
Roma, pp 31–65
Karner DB, Marra F, Renne PR (2001) The history of the Monti
Sabatini and Alban Hills volcanoes: groundwork for assessing
volcanic-tectonic hazards for Rome. J Volcanol Geoth Res
107:185–219
Mattias PP, Ventriglia V (1970) La regione vulcanica dei Monti
Sabatini e Cimini. Mem Soc Geol It 9:331–384
Nappi G, Marini A (1988) I cicli eruttivi dei Vulsini orientali
nell’ambito della vulcano tettonica del complesso. Mem Soc Geol
It 3:679–687
Peccerillo A (2005) Plio-Quaternary volcanism in Italy. Springer,
Berlin, Heidelberg, 365 pp
Sottili G, Palladino DM, Gaeta M, Masotta M (2011) Origins and
energetics of maar volcanoes: examples from the ultrapotassic
Sabatini Volcanic District (Roman Province, Central Italy). B Volcanol 74(1):163–186
References
Biasini A, Buonasorte G, Ciccacci S, Fredi P, Lupia Palmieri E (1993)
Geomorphological characteristics. In: Di Filippo M (ed) Sabatini
Volcanic Complex. Progetto finalizzato Geodinamica, Quaderni
della ricerca scientifica, Monografie finali, CNR, Roma, 11, pp 81–
94
Borghetti G, Sbrana A, Sollevanti F (1981) Vulcano-tettonica dell’area
dei monti Cimini e rapporti cronologici tra vulcanismo cimino e
vicano. Rend Soc Geol It 4(3):253–254
Buonasorte G, Fiordelisi A, Rossi U (1990) Tectonic structures and
geometric setting of the Monti Vulsini Volcanic Complex. Period
Miner 56:123–136
Buonasorte G, Ciccacci S, De Rita D, Fredi P, Lupia Palmieri E (1991)
Some relation between morphological characteristics and geological
structure in Vulsini Volcanic Complex (Northern Latium, Italy).
Z Geomorphol Supp 82:59–71
Caputo C, Ciccacci S, De Rita D, Fredi P, Lupia Palmieri E, Salvini F
(1993) Drainage pattern and tectonics in some volcanic areas of
Latium (Italy). Geol Romana 29:1−13
Relief, Intermontane Basins and Civilization
in the Umbria-Marche Apennines: Origin
and Life by Geological Consent
27
Marta Della Seta, Laura Melelli, and Gilberto Pambianchi
Abstract
The landscape of the Umbria-Marche Apennines (Central Italy) shows a rhythmic sequence
of “whaleback” anticlinal ridges separated by longitudinal synformal valleys. In this
topographic arrangement, flat-floored tectonic depressions appear which enclose a wide
range of landforms, and witness the continuous balance between tectonic forces,
Quaternary climatic phases and drainage network adjustment. Fault scarps and triangular
facets characterize the bordering slopes where thick talus deposits and landslides highlight
the gravitational component. Karstic landforms as dolines and caves and fluvial features
testify to the action of water. The resulting landscape is, for a visitor, like an incomparable
geological handbook.
Keywords
Drainage network Human settlements
valleys Central Apennines
27.1
Introduction
By picturing a travel itinerary through the main cities of
Central Italy, we could start leaving Rome northward and
running upstream, across the wide and flat alluvial plain of
the Tiber River. Most of this landscape is surrounded by
arcuate mountain ranges, which are the magnificent result of
competing natural forces. Their topographic growth started
tens of millions years ago from the bottom of an ancient
ocean (Tethys). These ranges are presently separated by
longitudinal valleys and cut by transverse gorges that
M. Della Seta
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Sapienza Università di Roma,
Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
L. Melelli (&)
Dipartimento di Fisica e Geologia, Università di Perugia,
Via A. Pascoli s.n.c., 06125 Perugia, Italy
e-mail: laura.melelli@unipg.it
G. Pambianchi
Scuola di Scienze e Tecnologie, Università di Camerino,
Piazza dei Costanti 4, 62032 Camerino, MC, Italy
Intermontane basin
Orthoclinal and diaclinal
allowed the connection between Northern and Central Italy.
In fact, the river network of the Umbria-Marche Apennines
started to set up after the emersion of the ridges from the sea,
but underwent continuous readjustments (Fubelli et al.
2014); in particular, Quaternary tectonics was responsible
for the opening of several depressions bounded by normal
faults (Cavinato and De Celles 1999; Melelli et al. 2014).
The latter are represented by Plio-Pleistocene intermontane
basins, mainly clustered on the Tyrrhenian slope of the
Apennines and interrupting the architecture of the mountain
ranges. These morphostructures evolved due to geomorphological processes and in many cases, their endorheic
drainage was captured by external rivers due to their erosional power and headward erosion. The geomorphological
evolution of the intermontane basins was also strongly
influenced by the Quaternary climatic phases, which have
been responsible for superimposition of the different sets of
erosional and depositional landforms described in this
chapter.
Some of these basins are still the theatre of active seismicity along their border faults (Galadini and Galli 2000), as
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_27
317
318
M. Della Seta et al.
testified by the 1997 Umbria-Marche earthquake that caused
eleven casualties and destroyed or strongly damaged
noticeable examples of the Italian architecture and painting.
The reason for these severe consequences lies in the fact that
since the Iron Age the intermontane basins have been colonized by humans, due to the presence of several favourable
topographic and environmental conditions for their
settlements.
27.2
Geographical and Geological Setting
Observing the pattern of the major rivers of Central Apennines, the different arrangements of watercourses flowing
towards the Tyrrhenian Sea, and those moving into the
Adriatic Sea become evident. The former are organized in
large drainage basins and a rectangular pattern following
NNW–SSE and NE–SW directions is characteristic. The
second set comprises shorter rivers with smaller drainage
basins, a parallel pattern and a direction perpendicular to the
Adriatic coast (Fig. 27.1).
The maximum altitude values increase towards east and
partly fit with the regional watershed (Molin and Fubelli
2005). Here the axis of the Apennines chain assumes the
maximum heights, waning in both opposite directions
towards the coastlines.
This physiographic configuration is inherited from the
geological history of Central Apennines where three major
palaeogeographic domains are recognizable from NW to SE
(Fig. 27.1). The Ligurian units are characterized by pelagic
and turbiditic successions deposited on an oceanic crust. The
adjacent Tuscan and Umbria-Marche Domains are characterized by sedimentary successions with a decreasing percentage of the calcareous component moving upward and a
total thickness of about 1200 m. The Latium-Abruzzo
Domain, in the southeastern portion, represents a carbonate
platform. In the Cretaceous, the opening of the Atlantic
Ocean to the west triggered Miocene to Pliocene orogenesis
of the Apennines, with the first compressive deformation
along a NE–SW direction that progressively migrated eastward. At the same time, a superimposed extensional tectonic
phase accompanied the eastward migration of the thrust front
and was responsible for the opening of the Tyrrhenian Sea
since the Tortonian (Cavinato and De Celles 1999).
The first folds emerged above the sea level between the
Middle and Late Pliocene, and, initially, widespread areal
erosion processes shaped a smoothed and low-relief surface
on the top of the ridges. This surface is presently preserved
in hanging remnants and is known as the “Summit Paleosurface” (Late Pliocene–Early Pleistocene).
Since the Early Pleistocene the reliefs grew up again, thus
triggering the third and last evolutionary step responsible for
the present landscape: the diffuse morphogenesis in a
generalized continental environment. Extensional faults cut
mainly the western slopes of the anticlines, thus contributing
to the origin of several intermontane basins. A sudden and
strong uplift involved the whole Central Apennines with a
maximum rate along the axis of the chain (D’Agostino et al.
2001), producing high slope gradients. The intermontane
tectonic depressions are bounded by high-angle normal
faults. The evolution of the basins in space and time has
followed the migration of the extensional front: the oldest
ones to the west are filled by marine sequences, the eastern
ones, most recent, by continental deposits (Fig. 27.1).
The non-coincidence between the highest peaks and the
regional watershed in the Central Apennines, as described in
Fig. 27.2, is among consequences of this evolution.
In addition, during the Quaternary, climate changes
influenced erosional and depositional activity of rivers and
the shaping of slopes. Four orders of fluvial terraces testify to
these climatic oscillations and are recognizable as relict
alluvial plains, at different heights, up to 200 m above the
present valley floor (Nesci et al. 2012).
27.3
Landscapes and Landforms
The landscape of the Umbria-Marche Apennines has a
strong tectonic fingerprint, since it is a puzzle of compressional mountain ridges and mainly extensional intermontane
basins, mostly connected by a structurally controlled drainage network (Fig. 27.2). The mountain ranges reflect the
“whaleback” anticlinal fold arrangement and are characterized by landforms influenced by lithological contrasts and by
the attitude of rock strata (Fig. 27.3).
These ranges are separated by longitudinal (“orthoclinal”)
valleys and cut by transverse (“diaclinal”) gorges. The
orthoclinal valleys generally developed along the axes of
synclines. The diaclinal streams cut the homoclinal structural
slopes and segment them into triangular remnants of dip
slopes, called “flatirons”.
Apart from synclinal valleys, several intermontane basins
mark the landscape of the Apennines as almost rectangular
flat-floored depressions, bounded by normal faults, generally
NW–SE oriented. They are characterized by similar features,
so, let us start looking at these typical landforms (Fig. 27.3).
The planar, steep slopes bounding the basins correspond
to fault slopes and in some cases preserve an original fault
scarp morphology. Several streams dissect the slopes, isolating triangular or trapezoidal facets (Figs. 27.3 and 27.4)
which are witnesses of the fault scarp. The stream power
along the steep slopes is enough to form spectacular alluvial
fans in the junction with the piedmont zone. The fault slopes
often underwent large gravitational phenomena, such as
deep-seated gravitational slope deformations (DGSDs),
which in some cases evolved to catastrophic rock slope
27
Relief, Intermontane Basins and Civilization in the …
319
Fig. 27.1 Location map of the study area and intermontane basins of
the Central Apennines. Main geological units in Central Apennines: 1
continental Pleistocene–Holocene deposits; 2 continental Villafranchian deposits; 3 Pleistocene volcanic products; 4 Plio–Pleistocene marine sediments; 5 Messinian evaporitic and lacustrine
deposits; 6 Tortonian–Messinian terrigenous deposits; 7 Triassic–
Miocene Latium–Abruzzo sedimentary units; 8 Triassic–Miocene
Umbria–Marche sedimentary units; 9 Miocene Epiligurian units; 10
upper Oligocene terrigenous deposits of the Tuscan units; 11 upper
Cretaceous–Oligocene Tuscan units; 12 upper Cretaceous–Eocene
Ligurian units; 13 Paleozoic–lower Cretaceous metamorphic units; 14
upper Miocene plutonic rocks; 15 major thrust front; 16 thrust fault; 17
normal fault. Major basins: AN Anghiari, CA Casentino, CAS
Castelluccio, COL Colfiorito and Plestini, EL Val d’Elsa, FPP
Firenze–Prato–Pistoia, GT Gualdo Tadino, GU Gubbio, LE Leonessa,
MU Mugello, NOR Norcia, PT Paglia–Tevere, RA Radicofani, RI Rieti,
SI Siena, TA Tavernelle, TI Tiberino, UV Umbria Valley; VA Val
d’Arno, VCN Val di Chiana North, VCS Val di Chiana South, VO
Volterra
failures (Melelli and Taramelli 2010; Bianchi Fasani et al.
2014; Fig. 27.3). Thick talus deposits can be recognized at
the footslopes. In some cases they appear stratified and
cemented, suggesting periglacial origin (e.g. grèze litée), and
are linked with Quaternary cold climatic phases (Coltorti
et al. 1983).
Since several intermontane basins developed on calcareous bedrocks, they are often also shaped by karstic
processes, which leave their fingerprints through the genesis
of dolines, swallow holes and caves. More difficult to be
identified is a peculiar type of landform, which testifies for
the lively morphodynamics of the intermontane basins. It is
represented by remnants of relict surfaces hanging at different elevations within the basins. Each surface is correlated
to an ancient local base level of erosion (e.g. an alluvial
plain), generally embedded in an older one.
320
Fig. 27.2 Morphotectonic evolution of the Central Apennines. Compressive and uplift phases: the relief grows up. The initial watershed
divide (1) migrates westward (2). Extensional phase: the normal fault
systems create the intermontane basins mainly along the western flanks
of the folds. The new base levels at the bottom of the intermontane
M. Della Seta et al.
basins force the rivers, flowing westward, to strong erosional activity
along the drainage divides. The watershed migrates eastward (2 and 3).
Legend: a calcareous bedrock, b river cutting, c fluvial and lacustrine
deposits filling the basins, d debris deposits, e drainage divide
Fig. 27.3 Block diagram with landforms common to intermontane basins (DGSD deep-seated gravitational slope deformation)
27
Relief, Intermontane Basins and Civilization in the …
321
Fig. 27.4 Triangular and trapezoidal facets and alluvial fans along the eastern margin of Gubbio basin (after Ficola and Coletti 2011)
27.4
Geomorphological Evolution
The morphoevolution and the typical landforms resulting
from the interaction between geomorphological processes
and geological/climatic factors are very similar in all intermontane basins of Central Apennines. However, an excellent example where all these landforms find their best
display is the Pian Grande di Castelluccio, or “Great Plain of
Castelluccio” (CAS in Fig. 27.1; Umbria, 1350 m a.s.l.).
Even if the area encompasses geological and geomorphological characteristics similar to the other intermontane
basins, a wide number of peculiarities are shown, too. As a
result, the description of the geomorphological evolution of
the Pian Grande is a unique opportunity to guide the reader
in the landscape of the intermontane basins. The entire range
of landforms is an excellent example of the interaction
among litho-structural factors, morphogenetic forces and
climatic changes.
The Pian Grande is inside the National Park of Sibillini
Mountains, extending on an area of 70,000 ha, across the
Marche region and the southeastern part of the Umbria
region. The basin has a quadrangular shape with a length of
about 5 km along the NE–SW direction and a width of about
2 km. The structure is related to a first extensional tectonic
phase with maximum stretching oriented N 50°–60°,
resulting in normal faults with a NNW–SSE direction. The
rotation towards a N–S, N20°E direction generates a partly
left-side transtensive movement along the same faults
planes, obtaining the present outline. The thickness of the
continental Quaternary deposits is about 400–500 m.
The landscape is magnificent, due to the giant mountains
embracing the basin, with the highest peak of Mt. Vettore,
abruptly joined with the 200 m lower plain (Fig. 27.5).
The top of the reliefs, subject to rise during the compressive tectonic phase, preserve the remnants of the Summit
Paleosurface, while the steep slopes abruptly connect them
to the plain along the normal fault planes.
The western slope of Mt. Vettore was generated by two
normal faults, one at the bottom of the slope, along the
junction with the valley floor, and the second one just below
the crest of the mountain, along the track named “Cordone
del Vettore” (Fig. 27.5). The pathway, to an inexpert eye,
appears as a footpath cutting transversally the slope and
dividing it into two branches in the south direction.
322
M. Della Seta et al.
Fig. 27.5 Pian Grande with Mt.
Vettore in the background (left).
The faults lines (“Cordone del
Vettore”) are recognizable along
the upper part of the slope. In the
foreground the Mergani River
shows the angulated pattern
(photo P. Mulazzani)
However, it is the morphological evidence of an active fault
scarp. Moreover, the sudden increase of local relief due to
the Pleistocene uplift and fault activity is the main reason for
the pattern of the drainage network, cutting the slopes along
the maximum gradient and following the main directions of
tectonic discontinuities. The same process causes mass
movements on the slopes, such as the tectonic–gravitational
collapses in the Pian Grande (Gentili and Pambianchi 1994;
Dramis et al. 1995). One of the main peculiarities of the area
is the endorheic drainage system. As further proof of the fact
the Mergani River, at an altitude of 1257 m, flows inside the
karstic swallow hole, along the southwestern boundary of
the basin (Fig. 27.5). The path of the short river, strongly
angulated, follows the main tectonic directions. The swallow
hole testifies that karstic morphogenesis affects the relief.
For this reasons some authors define the Pian Grande as a
polje. However, all the tectonic-karstic basins of Central
Italy show a common peculiarity: thick deposits on the basin
floor (more than 100 m) related to fluvial and lacustrine
environments. This is the main difference with the polje s.s.
of the Dinaric Alps, where the base of the depression coincides with the calcareous bedrock.
The calcareous bedrock and the karstic morphogenesis
are the processes responsible for different evolutions of some
basins. Where the tectonic activity of fault systems is lower
than the regional uplift, fluvial erosion prevails and the
fluvial-lacustrine deposits are eroded. Main streams generally find a threshold at the boundaries of the basin (Fig. 27.6,
from 1 to 5a). The prevailing calcareous composition of
bedrock triggers karstic morphogenesis and the main fault
planes become preferential pathways for groundwater flow
(Fig. 27.6, from 1 to 5b). The karstic morphogenesis contributes to the shaping of the basins, probably since the early
extensional stage. When the underground drainage system is
not well organized, the marsh-pond conditions have persisted since historical times. On the contrary, in the Pian
Grande morphogenesis is in a more advanced stage, the
emptying is complete and there are only deposits on the
bottom, indicating past fluvial and lacustrine environments.
Climatic changes mark the surface with characteristic
landforms. At the junction between the slopes and the bottom of the basin, wide and stratified debris deposits originated in the cold climatic phases (Coltorti et al. 1983) are
evident, resulting in the area named Piè di Vettore, where
alluvial fans are also present. Glacial landforms occur along
Mt. Vettore and Mt. Rotondo. The main evidence of glacial
erosion is rock walls in a semicircle pattern and thresholds
with counter slope, upstream and downstream steps. The
main activity is dated to the end of Middle Pleistocene. One
of the most suggestive evidence is probably the Pilato’s
Lake, also known as the “lake with the glasses” due to the
two circular and interconnecting basins. Its formation is due
to the dam caused by Upper Pleistocene glacial deposits and
by the overlapped and more recent scree deposits. The lake
is also well known because of the presence of Chirocefalo
Marchesonii, a small endemic crustacean, measuring 9–
12 mm and with the particularity of swimming with the
belly facing up. According to numerous legends about the
origin and name of the lake, it was believed that the corpse
of Pontius Pilate was thrown into the lake, considered also
the Averno Lake or the entrance for the Underworld.
Moving down to Pian Grande from the top of Mt. Vettore
is like reading a book whose pages, placed vertically, tell the
story that, since 300 Ma, involved this part of the Apennines. Knowing this geological evolution is the necessary
condition to understand the genesis of this landscape where
—quoting the French geographer H. Desplanques (1911–
1983)—“the contrasts overlap almost for fun”.
27
Relief, Intermontane Basins and Civilization in the …
323
Fig. 27.6 Different evolutions of continental intermontane basins
according to bedrock lithotypes. From 1 to 5a: without karstic
morphogenesis, from 1 to 5b with the contribution of karstic
morphogenesis. Legend: a lakes and swamps, b fluvial-lacustrine
deposits, c bedrock, d faults, e water flow direction, f karstic sinkhole,
g original level before emptying
27.5
same territories as adverse areas to human settlements since
the Prehistory (Radmilli 1960; Barker 1984).
One meaningful example of this contradictory relationship is the evolution of the landscape in the Umbria Valley
(UV in Fig. 27.1), the southeastern branch of the ancient
Tiberino Lake (Umbria, Fig. 27.7), an intermontane basin
where subsidence prevails. The tectonic origin of the
depression is well evident along the eastern boundary, near
Intermontane Basins and Human
Settlements
Geomorphological and climatic conditions and the natural
resources of this part of the Apennines have strongly influenced human settlement. The low-lying morphology and the
richness in water were the most relevant attracting factors.
However, local flooding conditions have transformed the
324
M. Della Seta et al.
Fig. 27.8 The theatre of the Roman city of Carsulae
Fig. 27.7 Digital Elevation Model (90 90 m) of the Umbria
Valley. The altitude values are divided in contrasting colours in order
to highlight their spatial distribution. The technique emphasizes the
large alluvial fan of Foligno in the northern part of the area and the
coalescent alluvial fans along the eastern margin of the basin
the Umbria-Marche pre-Apennine, located where an abrupt
contact with the bottom of the valley is marked by extensive
alluvial fans. Flooding events and humid climatic periods
characterized the area in alternate phases in space and time.
The present surface drainage, with parallel rivers and
channels flowing northward, is the result of human labour to
reclaim the area.
Since pre-Roman times, a Lacus Umber probably occupied a large portion of the central and northern part of the
valley up to an altitude of 219 m a.s.l. In the Roman Period
(753 BC–476 AD) important and dense human settlement
(city and major roads such as the Via Flaminia) is suggestive
of good environmental conditions. Important roads (“strade
consolari”) were built radially from Rome (“Urbe”)
throughout the Italian peninsula.
In the Umbria-Marche Apennines the most important
ones are the Via Salaria (so called from the Latin “salis”, to
indicate the road to transport salt), more to the south, and the
Via Flaminia to the north. These pathways, crossing the
Apennines and exploiting the natural passage offered by the
intermontane basins, reached the Adriatic Sea from where a
thriving commerce started towards the east.
Along Via Flaminia road (so called because it was built
by Gaius Flaminius, the Roman consul, between 225 and
220 BC), many important towns as Terni, Spoleto, Foligno
were built, some of these at the edges of the main intermontane basins. One of the most important towns was
Carsulae (Fig. 27.8), located to the north of Terni town
(Umbria). It took considerable importance in the age of
Augustus (27 BC–14 AD). According to historical sources
this Roman city decayed rapidly and mysteriously in the
fourth century AD, perhaps due to particularly intense
seismic events. Recent geomorphological research also
showed the presence of very large landslides that might have
contributed to the rapid abandonment of the city (Aringoli
et al. 2009).
At the same time, in the Umbria Valley the lowering of
the lake level led to the rise of the largest alluvial fan of the
valley to the north, which began to act as a watershed inside
the basin. The ancient Lacus Umber was then split into two
pools, smaller in size and depth: Lacus Clitorius (more to the
27
Relief, Intermontane Basins and Civilization in the …
south), alimented mainly by the Clitunno River and a relic
Lacus Umber, or Lacus Pertius more to the north. A climatic
phase characterized by low temperatures and more abundant
rainfall began, ensuring higher flow rates to major waterways. Swampy conditions spread throughout the area.
In the Dark Ages (476–1000 AD), a warm climate
characterized the region, followed in the Late Middle Ages
(1000–1492 AD) by a new warm phase and by an economic
decay that brought the surface water conditions into chaos.
Dante Alighieri (1256–1321 AD) in the Divine Comedy,
referring to the nearby Val di Chiana, mentioned the malarial
conditions that plagued the lowlands (“Qual dolor fora, se
de li spedali di Valdichiana tra ‘l luglio e ‘l settembre e di
Maremma e di Sardigna i mali fossero in una fossa
tutti’nsembre, tal era quivi, e tal puzzo n’usciva qual suol
venir de le marcite membre.”—“What pain would be, if from
the hospitals of Valdichiana, ‘twixt July and September, and
of Maremma and Sardinia all the diseases in one moat were
gathered, such was it here, and such a stench came from it as
from putrescent limbs is wont to issue.” Divine Comedy,
Inferno, poem XXIX). Marshy areas persisted and between
1300 and 1850 AD, in a period partly coinciding with the
Little Ice Age as a result of heavy rains and copious river
discharge, the area went back to natural conditions. In 1400
AD, the zone took the name of Padule (marshy area) as
clearly detectable on historical maps. In the following centuries, inundation events occurred and frequent malaria
epidemics spread again. The solution seemed to be found in
1770, when the Topino River was deflected and its path
shortened, and then, between 1844 and 1857, with further
and final reclamation. These actions testify to the constant
effort to live in these areas in spite of such natural hazards.
From a geomorphological point of view, it is clear that
today one of the most important morphogenetic contributions to these areas is given by human activities and it is
evident that intermontane basins still represent a unique
opportunity for human settlement.
The exploitation of the aquifers with the consequent
problems of subsidence, groundwater pollution due to the
use of pesticides for agricultural practice, and the presence of
industries and infrastructures are irreversibly transforming
considerable portions of the areas, often damaging the
landscape and the natural resources. Knowing the geological
and geomorphological history of these areas could be a
unifying key to connect the intermontane basins of Central
Apennines in an ideal network. The identity of these areas,
as physiographic units with a well-defined geological heritage, is a chance to promote knowledge, economic progress
and scientific improvement.
325
27.6
Conclusions
The intermontane basins of the Umbria-Marche Apennines
are excellent locations to understand the geological history
of this part of Central Italy. The lithological, stratigraphic
and tectonic arrangement of bedrock allows to unravel
geological events responsible for the genesis of the present
landscape. In addition, landforms generated by present and
past morphogenetic processes testify to the morphoevolution
of these spectacular morphostructures.
For this reason, the intermontane basins can be considered “morpho-evolutive geosites” that are areas with natural
peculiarities also readable in a temporal sense. The correct
method to observe the landscape of the basins is therefore to
interpret it through a space-time travel, placing landforms on
the geological timescale and investigating the sequence of
the natural events responsible for the construction of the
present landscape. In this context, the type and the mutual
arrangement of the outcropping lithologies are related to the
time span between the Jurassic and the Pliocene. The tectonic style with folds elongated in the prevalent NW–SE
direction and cut by transtensive and normal fault systems,
testifies to the following extensional tectonic stage and the
contemporary uplift that affected the entire study area. The
signature of the most recent geomorphological evolution is
recognizable in slope geometry and landforms, especially
along the mountain fronts bordering the bottom of the
basins.
Morpho-structural landforms demonstrate that basins are
graben or semigraben, while strong gradients generated by
the activity of master faults help to maintain active morphogenesis. The attempt of slopes and drainage network to
balance the system triggers morphogenetic processes, mainly
fluvial and gravitational. To confirm the above statements,
several intermontane basins include geosites with characteristics of uniqueness and excellence from both scientific
and geotouristic point of view.
In a mostly mountainous morphological context, the flat
areas have always represented privileged sites for human
settlement. The ease of transfer and the fertile nature of the
land represented unique opportunities for ancient populations. Despite this, the evidence of human presence also on
the adjacent slopes provides interesting information about
climate change during the Quaternary. Historical sources
refer to periods of economic and social regression, when
high rainfall, flooding, the origin of swamps and marshes
affected the basins and, at the same time, the resident populations moved along the surrounding slopes. Thus, the intermontane basins record in landforms and in historical
326
events the mutual relationship between humans and environment and the non-always easy balance between these two
components, according to the statement of the American
historian William James Durant (1885–1981) that “Civilization exists by geological consent, subject to change
without notice”.
References
Aringoli D, Farabollini P, Gentili B, Materazzi M, Pambianchi G
(2009) Geomorphological evidences of natural disasters in the
Roman archaeological site of Carsulae (Tiber basin-central Italy).
In: De Dapper M, Vermeulen F, Deprez S, Taelman D (eds) Ol’
Man River: geoarchaeological aspects of rivers and rivers plains.
Academia Press, Ghent, pp 5–20
Barker G (1984) Ambiente e società nella preistoria dell’Italia centrale.
La Nuova Italia Scientifica, Roma, 262 pp
Bianchi Fasani G, Di Luzio E, Esposito C, Evans SG, Scarascia
Mugnozza G (2014) Quaternary, catastrophic rock avalanches in the
Central Apennines (Italy): relationships with inherited tectonic
features, gravity-driven deformations and the geodynamic frame.
Geomorphology 211:22–42
Cavinato GP, De Celles PG (1999) Extensional basins in the
tectonically bimodal central Apennines fold-thrust belt, Italy:
response to corner flow above a subducting slab in retrograde
motion. Geology 27(10):955–958
Coltorti M, Dramis F, Pambianchi G (1983) Stratified slope-waste
deposits in the Esino river basin (Umbria-Marche Apennines,
Central Italy). Polarforschung 53(2):59–66
D’Agostino N, Jackson J, Dramis F, Funicello R (2001) Interaction
between mantle upwelling, drainage evolution and active normal
faulting: an example from the Central Apennines (Italy). Geophys J
Int 147:475–497
M. Della Seta et al.
Dramis F, Farabollini P, Gentili B, Pambianchi G (1995) Neotectonic
and large-scale gravitational phenomena in the Umbria-Marche
Apennines, Italy. In: Slaymaker O (ed) Steepland geomorphology.
Wiley, Chichester, pp 199–217
Ficola P, Coletti M (2011) Umbria from above. Quattroemme Ed.,
Perugia, 334 pp
Fubelli G, Della Seta M, Amato G (2014) Drainage system adjustment
in response to the opening of the Rieti intermontane basin (Central
Italy): geostatistical reconstruction of the PaleoFarfa River alluvial
plain. Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali 25(Supplement
2):167–176
Galadini F, Galli P (2000) Active tectonics in the Central Apennines
(Italy): input data for seismic hazard assessment. Nat Hazards
22:225–270
Gentili B, Pambianchi G (1994) Gravitational morphogenesis of the
Apennine chain in central Italy. In: Oliveira R, Rodrigues LF,
Coelho AG, Cunha AP (eds) Proceedings 7th international IAEG
congress. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1177–1186
Melelli L, Taramelli A (2010) Criteria for the elaboration of susceptibility maps for DGSD phenomena in central Italy. Geografia Fisica
e Dinamica Quaternaria 33(2):179–185
Melelli L, Pucci S, Saccucci L, Mirabella F, Pazzaglia F, Barchi MR
(2014) Morphotectonics of the Upper Tiber Valley (Northern
Apennines, Italy), through quantitative analysis of drainage and
landforms. Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali, 25
(Supplement 2):129–138
Molin P, Fubelli G (2005) Morphometric evidence of the topographic
growth of the Central Apennines. Geografia Fisica e Dinamica
Quaternaria 28:47–61
Nesci O, Savelli D, Troiani F (2012) Types and development of stream
terraces in the Marche Apennines (Central Italy): a review and
remarks on recent appraisals. Géomorphologie 2(2):215–238
Radmilli AM (1960) Considerazioni sul Mesolitico italiano. Annali
dell’Università di Ferrara, Sez 15(1):29–48
28
The Terminillo, Gran Sasso and Majella
Mountains: The ‘Old Guardians’
of the Tyrrhenian and Adriatic Seas
Tommaso Piacentini, Marcello Buccolini, and Enrico Miccadei
Abstract
Terminillo, Gran Sasso and Majella, the highest mountains of the Central Apennines, are
spectacular landmarks showing outstanding geological and geomorphological variability
and complexity. Geological features are related to a Neogene NE-verging thrust belt;
geomorphological features are related to the superimposition over time of structural, slope,
fluvial, glacial and karst landforms. With the support of the words of d’Annunzio, a great
poet from Abruzzo, we can describe these mountains as “old guardians” of the Apennines
from the Tyrrhenian to the Adriatic side of Central Italy. Here, the landscape can be
deciphered by earth scientists and results from an intricate geomorphological history.
Nevertheless, the same landscape can be discovered and comprehended by everyone.
Keywords
Mountain landscapes
Central Apennines
28.1
Glacial landforms
Introduction
“Candide cime, grandi nel cielo forme solenni … Dai culmini virginei che splendono sotto le stelle pie…” (Elettra,
Alle montagne, G. d’Annunzio 1903; Snow white peaks, big
in the sky majestic landforms… With virgin summits shining under the pious stars…). With these words Gabriele
d’Annunzio, a great early twentieth-century poet from
Abruzzo, conveys his perception of the mountains of the
Central Apennines, “old guardians” dominating the landscape of Central Italy, from the Tyrrhenian Sea to the
Adriatic Sea. And with the support of d’Annunzio’s words
(texts from Orlando 2003), we now try to describe the
landscape of the main mountains of Central Italy.
Terminillo, Gran Sasso and Majella, the highest mountains of Latium-Abruzzo area, are spectacular places where
geological and geomorphological environments show
T. Piacentini (&) M. Buccolini E. Miccadei
Dipartimento di Ingegneria e Geologia, Università “G.
d’Annunzio” Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti
Scalo, Italy
e-mail: tpiacentini@unich.it
Karst landforms
Structural landforms
beautiful examples of variability and complexity in a relatively well-connected small area. Due to the spatial coexistence of many well-preserved elements of an intricate
structural and landscape evolution, the complex Mesozoic
and Cenozoic paleogeography finds its expression in this
“field laboratory”. Since the beginning of the 1900s large
and significant rock exposures have allowed earth scientists
to decipher the fabric of the landscape’s geological history.
This is characterized by an ancient (Mesozoic-Cenozoic)
tropical environment with bahamian-like lagoons, coral
atolls and deep seas in the early stages, and by a recent
mountain landscape, with glaciers, large intermontane basins
inhabited by mammoths, passing through a complex alternation of tectonic, slope, karst, fluvial and marine landscapes
in the late (Quaternary) stages. Acknowledging this natural
beauty, since the beginning of the 1900s, a specific protection policy for the safeguarding of this landscape has been
implemented, first and foremost through the creation of a
system of national and regional protected areas (e.g. Park of
Abruzzo, Lazio and Molise; Park of Majella Mountain; Park
of Gran Sasso and Laga Mountains; Protected area of Reatini
mountains; Park of Simbruini mountains; Park of Sirente
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_28
327
328
T. Piacentini et al.
Velino and several local protected areas). Moreover, during
the last few decades geotourism activities have also been
progressively introduced (Miccadei et al. 2011).
28.2
Geographical Setting
The Terminillo, Gran Sasso and Majella mountain groups
are located in Central Italy which, from west to east, is
composed of the wide Tyrrhenian coastal plain, followed by
a volcanic belt and by the western piedmont of the Apennines chain. The chain represents the axial part of Central
Italy. To the east, it is bounded by the Adriatic piedmont
through an abrupt morphological limit, and, further east, by a
very narrow coastal plain backed by steep coastal slopes
(Fig. 28.1a). The Central Apennines are an asymmetric
mountain range, with the highest peaks shifted towards
northeast, characterized by alternating ridges (up to 2900 m
high) and valleys (elevation from *1500 m to <250 m),
longitudinal or transversal to the ridges, and by intermontane
basins (i.e. Fucino Plain, Sulmona basin, L’Aquila basin;
elevation from >1500 m to *250 m) (Fig. 28.1a) (Piacentini and Miccadei 2014). The Gran Sasso ridge (2912 m a.s.
l.; Figure 28.2a) and Majella Mountain (2793 m; Fig. 28.2b)
are the highest peaks of the Central Apennines, but they are
located in their northeastern most side, less than 30 km from
the Adriatic coast, overlooking the gentle piedmont and hilly
area from the steep front of the chain. On the southwest side,
Mt. Terminillo (2217 m; Fig. 28.2c) is surrounded by several minor ridges gently sloping towards the Tyrrhenian
piedmont and the volcanic areas.
28.3
Geological and Geomorphological
Setting
The ridges of the Central Apennines are made of Mesozoic
and Cenozoic limestone and marly-limestone related to different paleogeographic domains, from an ancient tropical
environment with bahamian-like lagoons, carbonate platforms, coral reefs and atolls, through submarine slopes and
scarps, to deep seas and basins (ISPRA Geological Map of
Italy, Sheets 349, 357, 358, 359, 369, 378). The ridges are
elongated in directions ranging from NW–SE to N–S and are
separated by narrow valleys incised in Neogene arenaceous
and pelitic deposits, subparallel or transversal to the ridges,
or by wide intermontane tectonic basins partially filled with
Quaternary continental deposits. The eastern slope of the
chain, corresponding to the main thrusts, abruptly drops
down into the Periadriatic piedmont. To the west, the chain
slope, corresponding to normal faults, is moderately steep
and the landscape is characterized by a broad piedmont hilly
zone with individual low ranges, extinct volcanoes, and
broad tuffaceous plateaus (Fig. 28.1b) (D’Alessandro et al.
2003; Piacentini and Miccadei 2014).
Geologically, the chain is a NW–SE-oriented thrust belt
verging NE, and made of thick pre-orogenic
Triassic-Miocene carbonate platform, slope, ramp and
pelagic facies. The kinematic history of thrusting is recorded
by Miocene-Pliocene synorogenic foredeep sediments,
which were progressively involved in the thrust deformation
as the chain was migrating towards the Adriatic foreland
(Fig. 28.1b; Cosentino et al. 2010).
Since the Late Pliocene the thrust belt has been affected
by extensional tectonics and regional uplift and has been
subject to the geomorphological effects of climate fluctuations (Piacentini and Miccadei 2014). After the emersion of
the area and the first morphogenetic stage induced by
compressional tectonics (Miocene), uplift and extensional
tectonics (Upper Pliocene—Pleistocene) have induced the
rise of the Apennines, strong changes in topography, and the
development of drainage systems, outlining the present
morphostructural setting. The morphogenesis has been
influenced by bedrock features related to a complex paleogeografic pattern (i.e. depositional carbonate architectures,
calcarenites and breccias bodies, large-scale unconformities), by tectonic features, and by Quaternary climate changes, that still today are intrinsic factors for the Central
Apennines’ landscape shaping.
28.4
Landforms of the “Old Guardians”
of the Apennines
“… Nelle rocce di sopra, a picco, non un filo di verde non
un lembo d’ombra: erte, come solcate da arterie d’argento,
terribilmente belle ed ignude incontro al cielo.” (Terra
vergine, G. d’Annunzio 1882: … In the sheer rocks above,
not a bit of green nor a patch of shadow: steep, furrowed by
silver arteries, terribly beautiful and bare towards the sky).
28.4.1
Mount Terminillo
The rugged relief of Mt. Terminillo and surrounding peaks,
commonly considered as a part of the Reatini mountains, is
located about 80 km northeast of Rome. It reaches its
highest elevation (2217 m a.s.l.) on its namesake peak and
consists of several ridges over 2000 m (e.g. I Sassatelli, Mt.
Terminilletto, Mt. Elefante, Mt. di Cambio). Its slopes,
sometimes showing high cliffs, are limited to the north by
the Leonessa intermontane basin and to the east and south by
the Velino River valley which, until the early reclamation works carried out in Roman times (271 BC), bogged
down into the Rieti intermontane basin to the west
(Fig. 28.3).
28
The Terminillo, Gran Sasso and Majella Mountains …
Fig. 28.1 Physiographic scheme (a) and geological sketch (b) of
Central Italy (modified after Piacentini and Miccadei 2014; Cosentino
et al. 2010; shaded relief from SRTM DEM based on data provided by
329
the OpenTopography Facility with support from the National Science
Foundation under NSF Award Numbers 1226353 & 1225810)
330
Fig. 28.2 Panoramic views of: a Mt. Terminillo; b Gran Sasso ridge; c Majella Mountain
Fig. 28.3 Orography of Mt.
Terminillo area (elevation map
from ASTER DEM a product of
METI and NASA)
T. Piacentini et al.
28
The Terminillo, Gran Sasso and Majella Mountains …
Due to regional tectonic processes, this area represents a
junction point between ridges pertaining to two different
ancient Mesozoic paleogeographic domains: the LatiumAbruzzi carbonate bahamian-like platform domain (shallow
sea) and the Umbria-Marche-Sabina pelagic basin domain
(deep sea) (ISPRA Geological Map of Italy, Sheet 357).
The general morphostructural setting is characterized by
anticline and thrust ridges and by fault-line valleys, influenced by the passive role played by structure in the geomorphic evolution. It indeed bears traces of selective erosion
of Meso-Cenozoic calcareous and calcareous-marly
sequences, with thick strata of calcarenites and calcareous
breccias, deposited in a transitional domain between a carbonate platform and pelagic basin areas. Only the western
slope facing the Rieti basin is a fault slope related to the
effects of active extensional tectonics at the boundary of the
basin. The ridges are cleaved, frequently interrupted by
deeply incised valleys, both parallel and transversal to the
general N–S trend of the Massif.
After the thrusting phase and the beginning of mountain
building (Early Pliocene, about 5 million years ago), the
Terminillo landscape was characterized by a smoothed-out
surface with a few prominent peaks. The remains of this
landscape are now preserved in low relief surfaces hanging
at high elevation. Regional uplift, extensional tectonics and
Quaternary climate fluctuations have induced the dissection
of the landscape, the formation of high local relief, steep
slopes and deep valleys, as well as the progressive development of the drainage network and of a large cover of
continental deposits.
In this complex interaction, a wide range of processes has
contributed to the development of different types of landforms: structural, slope, fluvial, karstic, glacial and periglacial, and locally anthropogenic.
The presence of rocks with different erodibility is
responsible for the formation of landforms of selective erosion such as structural scarps and saddles. Olistolites made
of Jurassic massive limestone (Calcare Massiccio, Lower
Lias), embedded into younger marly-limestone pelagic
deposits (Corniola, Middle Lias), and levels and lenses of
calcarenites and calcirudites, embedded into the whole
marly-limestone Terminillo Middle Jurassic—Lower Cretaceous succession, outline distinctive structural scarps
(Fig. 28.4a).
Mt. Terminillo’s summit area shows typical features of a
high mountain landscape (above 1800 m) of the Apennines,
with relict landforms and deposits connected with Pleistocene glacial processes which mainly developed along the
northern and eastern mountain sides (Giraudi 1998a). The
most common and marked landforms are glacial cirques,
with steep walls. The NNW downstream movement of these
glaciers produced distinctive U-shaped valleys (2–5 km
long, Valle della Meta, Vall’Organo and Valle di Capo
331
Scura) and left indelible traces in the landscape such as
erratic boulders, roche mountonnée, lateral, ground, as well
as terminal moraines (up to >20 m high and several tens or
hundreds of metres long) and kettle-holes (Fig. 28.4b), a
proof of a currently extinct Pleistocene glacial activity.
As far as the periglacial processes related to the current
snowfall are concerned, an important role as a morphogenetic factor is played by avalanches. Indeed, a large
number of avalanche tracks is present, especially along the
northeastern Terminillo mountain side. When avalanches cut
unconsolidated sediments (e.g. scree slope deposits), their
erosive action, due to both the snow and debris involved
along its route, is evident and downstream large mixed fans
are present.
Karst landforms (dolines) are present all over the calcareous ridges within flat or gently wavy areas at the ridges’
summit or in the valley bottoms; dolines’ size is usually
about few tens of metres. Karst microlandfroms (karren)
mostly affect the calcareous rocky slopes. Groups of dolines
and doline fields have developed within the ancient glacial
cirques and valleys, particularly in the concave-up plucking
zone of the old glaciers.
Finally, slope processes (i.e. mass movements and scree
production) provide an important contribution to shaping the
landscape in relation to lithological setting, local relief and
climate conditions (freeze-thaw). Due to rock-scarp weathering, the base of the steep slopes of the Terminillo and
surrounding peaks is covered by scree slope deposits and
several talus cones. Often, slope processes affect the scarps
of ancient glacial cirques and cover glacial moraines, giving
the slopes a complex concave–convex morphology
(Fig. 28.4b).
28.4.2
Gran Sasso
“Vanisce il Gran Sasso da lungi, titan soffocato entro il
torpore della fumea sanguigna…” (Versi d’amore—Canto
Nuovo G. d’Annunzio 1882: Vanishes the Gran Sasso from
afar, a titan suffocated within the torpidity of the sanguineous smoke…).
The Gran Sasso ridge rises along the northeastern side of
the Central Apennines, less than 30 km away from the coast.
It is the largest massif of Central Italy, an arch-shaped ridge
pointing towards NE, turning from E–W in the northern part
to N–S in the southern part, incorporating the highest peak
of the whole Apennines (Corno Grande, 2912 m) as well as
other high peaks above 2500 m (from west to east: Pizzo
Intermesoli, 2635 m; Corno Piccolo, 2655 m; Mt. Prena,
2561 m; Mt. Camicia, 2564 m) (Fig. 28.5). The main peaks
are surrounded by steep slopes up to more than 1000 m
high. Towards the north the slopes drop down to the piedmont area, at an elevation lower than 1000 m, while towards
332
Fig. 28.4 Landforms of Mt. Terminillo (2217 m): a Eastern side of
Mt. Terminillo; a large structural scarp is present on rugged massive
calcareous levels; b Northeastern side of Mt. Terminillo; glacial cirques
T. Piacentini et al.
in the upper part of the slope and U-shaped glacial valleys with
moraines (photo F. Chiaretti)
Fig. 28.5 Orography of the
Gran Sasso area (elevation map
from Abruzzo Region DEM;
http://www.regione.abruzzo.it/
xcartografia/)
the south the ridge slopes down to the Campo Imperatore
intermontane basin, higher than 1500 m. Therefore, the
overall shape of the massif is an arched, asymmetric
NE-verging ridge which defines the abrupt boundary
between the Apennines and the Adriatic piedmont.
The Gran Sasso area experienced an intense compressional tectonics and subsequent tectonic uplift. Here, the
oldest rocks of the Central Apennines (bitumen dolomites
overlain by limestone and dolomites), Triassic in age, are
uplifted to more than 2000 m. These rocks were overthrusted during the Neogene on calcareous and marly rocks
pertaining to Cretaceous slope and pelagic basin facies and
on Neogene foredeep arenaceous and pelitic rocks. Then
they have been uplifted and displaced by Quaternary
extensional tectonics along NW–SE to E–W normal faults;
in some cases extensional tectonics has reactivated—and
inverted—previous thrusts and compressive tectonic structures, outlining a very intriguing geological and geomorphological setting (ISPRA Geological Map of Italy, Sheet
349).
The general morphostructural setting is characterized by
thrust ridges, deeply incised by selective erosion of ancient
geological structures due to compressional tectonics, and by
faulted homocline ridges, large fault escarpments and a large
high-elevation tectonic basin (Campo Imperatore, >1500 m;
Fig. 28.6a), resulting from active extensional tectonics and
developing along a complex fault system along the northern
border of the basin and at the base of Mt. Prena and Mt.
Camicia ridge (Fig. 28.7) (Galli et al. 2002).
The landscape of the Gran Sasso area is the result of
various very active geomorphological processes: slope processes deeply affecting all the bare flanks of peaks and
28
The Terminillo, Gran Sasso and Majella Mountains …
Fig. 28.6 Corno Grande (2912 m). a Large glacial valley on the
western side of Campo Imperatore, at the footslope of the Corno
Grande, including the Pietranzoni lake; b Calderone glacier (northern
side of the Corno Grande peak; photo P. Scoppola); c 180° panoramic
view of the Calderone glacial cirque from the terminal moraine (photo
333
F. Ciavattella); d Calderone cirque and terminal moraine; in the
foreground a talus cone developed on the slope below the terminal
moraine (photo F. Ciavattella); e Tectono-karst basins with small karst
lakes on the southern side of Campo Imperatore
334
Fig. 28.7 Gran Sasso ridge (*2500 m) and Campo Imperatore
(*1600 m). Large fault escarpment at the boundary of Campo
Imperatore (southern side of the Mt. Prena ridge); in the lower part
Fig. 28.8 Campo Imperatore area (*1600 m). A small fault scarp
affecting a recent alluvial fan
ridges; fluvial processes that occur at the base of the main
slopes; karst processes affecting the flat and wavy areas
surrounding the main peaks. Moreover, from the highest
elevation down to the Campo Imperatore area,
well-preserved evidence of glacial processes is present,
while in the summit area of Corno Grande, the last glacier of
the Apennines has survived, the Calderone glacier
(Fig. 28.6b, c, d), a very small and almost dead remnant of
the last Pleistocene glacial stage. Ancient and recent tectonic
landforms characterize the whole Gran Sasso area
(Figs. 28.7, 28.8) (Galli et al. 2002; Santo et al. 2014).
The main glacial landforms are large glacial cirques
edging the main north-facing slopes and large U-shaped
glacial valleys (2–6 km long, 1–1.5 km wide) incising the
northern side of the main ridge down to less than 1600 m.
On the southeastern side of Corno Grande, the landscape is
dominated by a glacial amphitheater (some 9 km long ridge
with elevation *2000–2500 m) sloping down into a large
glacial valley (*10 km long and 2.5 km wide) and a system
T. Piacentini et al.
active alluvial fans, fed by erosion of highly jointed and fine grained
cataclasite, cover an ancient moraines system
of moraines (up to >30 m high) covering the western part of
Campo Imperatore and incorporating the small outstanding
Pietranzoni lake (Fig. 28.6a).
The main glacial features, except for the Calderone glacier, which is still present although mostly covered by
debris, are the legacy of the Pleistocene glacial advances,
and particularly that of the Last Glacial Maximum (Late
Pleistocene, *20,000 years ago), which deeply affected all
the Central Apennines (above *1500 m) (Bisci et al. 1999;
Jaurand 1999; D’Orefice et al. 2000). Glacial landforms have
been eroded, covered and reworked by fluvial, slope and
karst processes (Figs. 28.6d, 28.7).
Several active alluvial fans are present at the boundary of
Campo Imperatore along the large fault escarpment on the
southern side of Mt. Prena and Mt. Camicia (eastern part of
the Gran Sasso ridge; Fig. 28.7), fed by erosion of highly
jonted and fine grained cataclastic calcareous rocks. The
recent activity along this fault escarpment is documented by
clear geomorphic evidence, such as several metre-high fault
scarps displacing the depositional top-surface of recent
alluvial fans (Fig. 28.8; Galli et al. 2002).
All around the Gran Sasso ridge, at elevations ranging
between 1500 and 2000 m, karst processes deeply mark the
flat and gently wavy landscape with large doline fields and
WNW–ESE elongated tectono-karst basins of variable size
(from few hundreds of metres long to >3 km long, from few
tens of metres to 1 km wide; Fig. 28.6e) due to the effects of
karst processes on faulted and highly jointed calcareous
bedrock.
28.4.3
Majella Mountain
The Majella Mountain, even more than the Gran Sasso, rises
abruptly from the northeastern piedmont of the Central
Apennines at about 25 km from the coast, and is the easternmost massif—the closest to the coast and the second
28
The Terminillo, Gran Sasso and Majella Mountains …
highest in the Apennines—its main peak being Mt. Amaro
(2793 m) (Fig. 28.9).
The general morphostructural setting is characterized by a
large anticline ridge, faulted in the western side, exhumed
and deeply dissected in the northern and eastern sides.
Due to its location and morphological features, the
Majella Mountain offers different contrasting features: the
eastern side, overlooking the Adriatic Sea is connected with
the hills at its base through a homoclinal slope generally
characterized by spectacular deep valleys with cliffs that
reach 1000 m in height; the western side is a major tectonic
escarpment, generally homogeneous, compact and steep,
facing a large and deep fault-line valley, the so-called
Macchia di Caramanico.
Since the Majella is formed by calcareous rocks, karst
morphology is ubiquitous, and has been active since the first
emersion of the area as an island in the subaerial environment. South of Mt. Amaro, paleo-karst phenomena are
characterized by discontinuous outcrops of bauxite and their
effects are related to peculiar paleoclimatic conditions.
Actually, in the Paleocene—Early Miocene interval, the
Fig. 28.9 Orography of the Majella Mountain area (elevation map
from Abruzzo Region DEM; http://www.regione.abruzzo.it/
xcartografia/)
335
paleoclimate was warm-humid tropical and during the
Middle-Late Miocene it was still warm, though drier. In this
context, superficial karst phenomena were favoured, with
consequent areal erosion and levelling, responsible for the
tabular configuration of the Majella summit (Fig. 28.10a, b).
When the climate became arid (Pliocene), karst phenomena
were no longer favoured, fossilizing previous landforms.
During the Pleistocene, karst processes were reactivated,
controlled by the alternation of glacial and interglacial phases.
The major karst landforms are both on the surface and
underground. In areas with low elevation and low gradient,
separating the above-mentioned tabular areas, surface landforms have developed (karren and dolines). The dolines are
often present in groups and are of different types, mainly
funnel-shaped and flat-bottomed, but also collapse dolines
occur, especially north of Mt. Amaro. The karstification of
the Majella determined the indented profile of its divide, that
is located at altitudes slightly lower than the flat summit and
testifies to the presence of a shallow karst network. It is also
outlined by the development of caves located mainly in the
eastern and northern mountain sides with a prevailing horizontal attitude. Among these, the most spectacular ones are
the Cavallone cave, with a total length of about 850 m and a
vertical development of 20 m, and the Bove, Asino and Nera
caves.
The main valleys dissecting the mountain sides are long
(4–10 km) and deep (up to 800–1000 m) canyons
(Fig. 28.10c, d), the origin of which is related to both karst
phenomena and tectonic evolution. Considering the landscape evolution from the beginning, from the stage of karst
summit levelling, the chain uplift was not continuous, but
followed a succession of intermediate phases. In each of
these phases, the relative sea level lowered to a new base
level and this caused the formation of cliffs and the lowering
of karst level. Consequently, canyons were carved through
both upstream regressive surface erosion and downstream
collapses of underground channel roofs. A subsequent phase
of tectonic activity caused a further partial lowering of the
coastline and the process started again, resulting in the
progressive elongation of the canyons. Within the Majella
canyons, at least three levels of fossil karst caves can be
found at different elevations, testifying to different stages of
erosional deepening. To summarize, it can be argued that,
after a long period characterized by a tropical forest-type
landscape, the “Majella island” rose up and the karstification
did not develop deeply, because of unfavourable climate
conditions and the continual rejuvenation of the karst system. The large canyons result from a combination of climate
and tectonics: the uplift virtually prepares the slopes and
climate induces karst and fluvial deepening.
Finally, the activity of glaciers (which have now totally
disappeared) was also important in the geomorphological
evolution of the Majella and left several relict glacial
336
T. Piacentini et al.
Fig. 28.10 Landforms of the Majella Mountain. a Mt. Amaro
(2793 m), glacial and karst landscape of the summit Majella area;
b Mt. Acquaviva (2737 m), karst surfaces; c Orfento River valley,
Sfischio waterfall, *60 m high; d Orta River valley: an example of the
steep structural rock scarps (up to 50–80 m high, locally >100 m) of
the main canyons incising the Majella Mountain slopes
landforms. Glacial cirques (0.5–1.5 m wide) are generally
emplaced on pre-existing karst surfaces, mainly located on
the northern and eastern mountain sides at elevations higher
than 2000 m and affected by rock glacier development
(Fig. 28.10a) (Dramis and Kotarba 1992; Giraudi 1998b). At
the foot of the glacial cirques, U-shaped glacial valleys (up
to >6 km long) contain terminal moraines generally arranged in two systems (up to >20 m high) and, at lower elevations, moraine deposits are reworked by fluvial activity.
aspetti umani, come solitari fantasmi a guardia della valle, o
ancora si accavallano come dorsi di pecore silenziose… Ad
ogni stagione le pietre della montagna appenninica cambiano colore e sembrano davvero contenere in se un
carattere, una vita, un giudizio pensante” (text of D. Maraini
in Orlando 2003; arranged in a circle and declining, they
look like a coliseum built by Cyclops, corroded by the
centuries and the elements, or they take on a human
appearance, like lonely ghosts, guardians of the valley, or,
again, they pile up as the backs of silent sheep… At every
season the rocks of the Apennines mountains change colour
and really seem to contain in themselves a character, a life, a
thinking judgement).
For this reason, many geological and geomorphological
investigations have been carried out for more than a century.
Research has tried to reveal landscape evolution since the
emersion in the subaerial environment, which definitively
occurred between the Late Miocene and the Early Pliocene,
and relate it to tectonic forcing in combination with
28.5
Conclusions
Exploring the landscape of Terminillo, Gran Sasso and
Majella, the highest peaks of the Central Apennines, and
following Gabriele d’Annunzio’s feelings, the rocks of these
mountains seem to be “disposte in cerchio e digradanti,
danno immagine d’un colosseo construtto per opera
ciclopica, corroso da secoli e da intemperie, o acquistano
28
The Terminillo, Gran Sasso and Majella Mountains …
climate-driven geomorphological processes (glacial, slope,
karst, fluvial).
On the other hand, tourists and visitors have been able to
‘perceive’ the landscape and the natural environment thanks
to a preservation policy based on several National Parks and
reserves. Now the ‘perception’ of geological history and
landscape evolution could contribute to the enhancement of
these areas. Over the last decades, geotourism activities have
been implemented and they should now be developed further
in order to increase the awareness of the general public
towards geological and landscape evolution, but also
towards geological hazards and the related risks.
It should now be clear why Terminillo, Gran Sasso and
Majella are more than spectacular places; why they have
attracted scientists from all over the world to a “field laboratory” of rocks and landscapes, to try and decipher the
landscape evolution; and why everyone can understand and
comprehend the landscape variability and its complex geological and landscape history…
Here… “Il monte ingombra col suo dorso enorme i cieli.
E tu non l’odi respirare?” (La notte apollinea, G.
d’Annunzio 1898; The mount obstructs the sky with its
enormous back. Don’t you hear it breathing?).
Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank the anonymous
reviewer, the Editors of the volume, Mauro Marchetti and Mauro
Soldati and the Editor in Chief Piotr Migon, whose precious suggestions and comments greatly improved the manuscript. We also thank
the Struttura Speciale di Supporto Sistema Informativo Regionale of the
Abruzzo Region for providing the topographic data used in this chapter.
References
Bisci C, Gentili B, Dramis F, Ciccacci S, Kotarba A (1999) The extent
of Pleistocene glaciations in the western part of the Campo
Imperatore (Gran Sasso Massif, Central Italy). Landf Anal 2:37–43
337
Cosentino D, Cipollari P, Marsili P, Scrocca D (2010) Geology of the
central Apennines: a regional review. In: Beltrando M, Peccerillo A,
Mattei M, Conticelli S, Doglioni C (eds) The geology of Italy:
tectonics and life along plate margins. Journal of the Virtual
Explorer vol 36, paper 11, pp 1–37
D’Alessandro L, Miccadei E, Piacentini T (2003) Morphostructural
elements of central-eastern Abruzzi: contributions to the study of
the role of tectonics on the morphogenesis of the Apennine chain.
Quatern Int 101–102:115–124
D’Orefice M, Pecci M, Smiraglia C, Ventura R (2000) Retreat of
Mediterranean glaciers since the Little Ice Age: case study of
Ghiacciaio del Calderone, Central Apennines, Italy. Arct Antarct
Alp Res 32(2):197–201
Dramis F, Kotarba A (1992) Southern limit of relict rock glaciers,
Central Apennines, Italy. Permafr Periglac Processes 3(3):257–260
Galli P, Galadini F, Moro M, Giraudi C (2002) New paleoseismological
data from the Gran Sasso d’Italia area (central Apennines). Geophys
Res Lett 29(7):381–384
Giraudi C (1998a) Il glacialismo tardo-pleistocenico del massiccio del
Terminillo (Lazio—Appennino centrale). Il Quaternario 11(1):121–
125
Giraudi C (1998b) Nuovi dati sul glacialismo della Montagna della
Maiella (Abruzzo, Italia centrale). Il Quaternario 11(2):265–271
Jaurand E (1999) Il glacialismo negli Appennini. Testimonianze
geomorfologiche e riferimenti cronologici e paleoclimatici. Boll
Soc Geogr It 12(4):399–432
Miccadei E, Piacentini T, Esposito G (2011) Geomorphosites and
geotourism in the parks of the Abruzzo region (Central Italy).
Geoheritage 3(3):233–251
Orlando E (2003) Abruzzo… ma io salgo, io salgo… Carsa Ed.,
Pescara, 208 pp
Piacentini T, Miccadei E (2014) The role of drainage systems and
intermontane basins in the Quaternary landscape of the Central
Apennines chain (Italy). In: Aucelli PPC, Della Seta M, Giano SI,
Schiattarella M (eds) Special issue: intermontane basins. Rendiconti
Lincei—Scienze Fisiche e Naturali 25(2):139–150
Santo A, Ascione A, Di Crescenzo G, Miccadei E, Piacentini T,
Valente E (2014) Tectonic-geomorphological map of the middle
Aterno river valley (Abruzzo, Central Italy). J Maps 10(3):365–378
Aeternae Urbis Geomorphologia—
Geomorphology of Rome, Aeterna Urbs
29
Maurizio Del Monte
Abstract
The city of Rome includes a lot of well-known historical and cultural sites, but also peculiar
geomorphological features and very typical natural landscapes. A “man-made layering”,
thick and wide, hides the details of some plano-altimetric variations of the original surface.
Nevertheless, natural features are still recognizable among the usual tourist attractions. The
geomorphology of Rome reflects the paleogeographical conditions before the city
foundation, thus allowing us to recognize the evolutionary stages of the ancient Caput
Mundi (Capital of the World) landscape, starting from several thousand years ago until
today. The geomorphological evolution and the geological and climatic framework have
contributed to the economic and cultural development of the area. The history, urban
planning and geomorphological characteristics of Rome are closely connected.
Keywords
Urban geomorphology
Tiber River
Seven Hills
Rome
“Rome is the capital of the world” (Johann Wolfgang Goethe)
“To live in Rome is a way of losing your life” (Ennio Flaiano)
29.1
Introduction
Rome is one of the most popular tourist destinations all over
the world. Visitors of Rome’s well-known historical and
cultural sites can be often surprised to find a wealth of
natural scenery and landscapes (Fig. 29.1).
Among the reasons for the fame of the Aeterna Urbs are
its environmental and geomorphological features. Some
natural features have been removed by millennia of urbanization; others have been modified, or covered by a wide and
worldwide unique “man-made layering”, but are still recognizable among the classic tourist attractions.
Geological and natural heritage can represent, itself, an
attraction for people (Panizza 2001; Coratza and Giusti
2005; Gregori and Melelli 2005; Reynard 2008). Nevertheless, explanations and interpretations of natural features of
the Roman landscape are not generally available in tourist
guidebooks.
In this chapter a geomorphological overview of the
Roman landscapes is carried out. Then, the geomorphological evolution of the area is described. Finally, it is shown
how the geological and climatic framework influenced the
development of the city, contributing to enhance its historical heritage. The link between nature and culture led to the
synthesis of a great part of the “Cultural Landscape”
(UNESCO 2005) of Rome’s city centre.
M. Del Monte (&)
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Sapienza Università di Roma,
Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
e-mail: maurizio.delmonte@uniroma1.it
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_29
339
340
M. Del Monte
Fig. 29.1 A view of St. Peter’s dome in winter, occasionally in an
unusual snowy scenery. The picture is taken from a garden on the top of
Gianicolo ridge towards north
29.2
Geographical Setting
Rome, the capital of Italy, is located on the Tyrrhenian side
of central Italy, west of the Latium-Abruzzi Apennines
(Fig. 29.2).
Many monuments and several large public parks are
located in the Rome’s historical centre. Features of Rome’s
ancient history are inscribed not only on monuments, but
also on a varied landscape, characterized by hilly relief with
the presence of ancient volcanoes, and the Tiber fluvial
system. The Tiber River separates two very distinct types of
landscape.
On the east side of the Tiber River (left bank) there are
the famous Seven Hills (‘Septimontium’): Quirinale, Viminale, Esquilino, Capitolino (also known as Campidoglio),
Palatino, Celio and Aventino, which hosted the first human
villages approximately 2000 years BC (Del Monte et al.
2013). Fords across the river were located adjacent to each
hill. The Seven Hills were formed by erosion processes of
the Tiber fluvial system, which deepened the volcanic plateau of the Latium Volcano (Colli Albani volcanic complex;
cf. Fredi and Ciccacci 2017). This plateau covers the left
slope of the Tiber River valley, extending from southeast of
Rome to the main course of the Tiber. A series of small
flat-bottomed valleys, which are drained by the tributaries of
the Tiber, separates the Seven Hills; three of them appear
today as isolated domes (Aventino, Capitolino and Palatino),
while the others are small ridges (Fig. 29.3).
On the west side of the Tiber River, the floodplain ends at
the foot of the Monte Mario—Gianicolo ridge. While this
ridge reaches 139 m above sea level and shows an uneven
top, the Seven Hills have altitude of 5060 m a.s.l. and flat
tops. The Vatican Hill is located on the right side of the
Tiber, between Monte Mario and Gianicolo. This area, once
unhealthy, was reclaimed in the first century BC. Its name is
probably of Etruscan origin; since prehistoric times, it was a
place devoted to religious rites.
The evolution of the urban area of Rome was controlled
by the development of the hydrographic network during the
peak sea level lowstand that corresponded to the Last Glacial
Maximum (LGM, 22–18 ka BP), which led to deepening of
the main valley thalwegs. This was followed by a phase of
fluvial deposition and valley-floor gradual aggradation due
to sea level rise (17–5 ka BP) (Bellotti et al. 2007).
The bedrock in the historical centre of Rome consists
mainly of clays and marls with foraminifers (Pliocene—
Early Pleistocene), which were deposited during a period of
extensional tectonics that produced several NW–SE oriented
horsts and grabens (parallel to the Apennines). Three major
marine depositional cycles have been recognized in this
period (Bozzano et al. 2006). The first cycle (Lower Pliocene) included the deposition of blue clays, while
coarser-grained sediments of shallower water facies were
deposited during the second and third cycles (Lower Pleistocene). The bedrock is overlain by up to 800-m-thick epicontinental deposits that are related to slow and progressive
crustal uplift. A series of depositional cycles of fluvial-marsh
and marine-marginal environments began at 0.88 Ma BP
(Bellotti et al. 2007).
Only the later fluvial deposits are located in the historical
centre of Rome. These units are interdigitated with a thick
layer of pyroclastic deposits produced by the Sabatini and
Colli Albani volcanic complexes (Giordano et al. 2006),
ranging in age from 600 to 36 ka BP (Karner et al. 2001).
The volcanic outcrops are widespread throughout Rome and
are represented by stratified tuffs, leucititic lavas, pyroclastic,
and volcaniclastic deposits. Continental sedimentation continued throughout these depositional cycles controlled by
eustatic variations. The stratigraphic relationships between
the volcanic and sedimentary units are complex because the
effects of erosion during the lowstands coincided with neotectonic processes and volcanic activity (Belisario et al.
1999; Ciotoli et al. 2003; Cattuto et al. 2005). The
emplacement of volcanic deposits changed the topography
and the hydrography of the area (Heiken et al. 2005); the
29
Aeternae Urbis Geomorphologia—Geomorphology of Rome, Aeterna Urbs
341
Fig. 29.2 Geographical framework of Rome urban area (source
Google Earth, modified; © 2015 Google. Map data: image Landsat,
image © 2015 Digital Globe). The historical centre is included in the
middle panel (see Fig. 29.3). The city grew rapidly since the end of the
nineteenth century, when it became the Capital of the new Italian state.
In the 1950s and 1960s, the urban area was included within a ring road
(The Great Ring). Today, the urban area is extended from the mouth of
the Tiber up to Tivoli town. Some of the main Roman consular roads
are represented outside the present-day central area of Rome, according
to their current route
main stream of the ancient Tiber (Paleo-tiber) moved
towards the Monte Mario—Gianicolo ridge, close to the
edge of Colli Albani plateau.
During the LGM, at approximately 20 ka BP, the large
drop in sea level (Lamb 1995) induced fast erosion processes. In the city of Rome, the Tiber River and its tributaries
cut into the Plio-Pleistocene bedrock up to 50 m below the
present sea level (Fig. 29.4). The subsequent rising in sea
level caused a depositional phase in which the previously
incised valleys were filled by up to 60 m of alluvial deposits
(Ascani et al. 2008). The rate of deposition over the last
17 ka is related to changes in the rate of sea level rise. In
particular, the post-glacial rise of sea level ended between 7
and 5 ka BP. The development of the marine delta at the
mouth of the Tiber subsequently began, and the coastal
wetlands were filled during the Middle Ages. Over the last
3 ka, human activities everywhere contributed to reshape the
topographic surface. The most recent stratigraphic layer
overlies the flood deposits: it consists of a mixture of alluvium, colluvium and materials from human activity that
have accumulated throughout Roman history. This
man-made layer covers the historical centre and ranges in
thickness from a few metres on hill tops to tens of metres in
the valley bottoms (Del Monte et al. 2013). The landscape of
the historical centre of Rome is the result of these complex
Plio-Quaternary events.
29.3
Landforms and Landscapes
A fluvial landscape characterizes the urban area of Rome.
Three thousand years ago, several tributaries of the Tiber
River flowed across the floodplain and marshy lands at the
base of Capitolino, Palatino and Aventino hills.
On the Tiber’s east side, the “historical” hills have steep
slopes and flat tops (Fig. 29.4). The landscape on the west
side of the Tiber, in contrast, is dominated by the Monte
Mario—Gianicolo ridge, which is higher, more rugged and
subjected to severe mass movements. Nowadays, the Rome
area is still characterized by landforms derived from the
action of surface running waters. Polygenic, structural and
gravitational landforms are also widespread; in addition,
many landforms were created by human activities.
29.3.1 The Tiber Drainage Network and Its
Floodplain
The valleys of the Tiber River and its main tributaries have
flat floors (Fig. 29.4), as a result of the Holocene depositional processes described above. The main floodplain
(Fig. 29.5) extends eastward up to the base of the volcanic
plateau comprising the Seven Hills. On the west side of the
Tiber River, the floodplain ends at the foot of the Monte
342
M. Del Monte
Fig. 29.3 A digital elevation
model of the historical centre of
Rome. The Tiber River flows
southward. The white area
corresponds to the State of the
Vatican City
Mario—Gianicolo ridge. To the west, this ridge is cut by the
Aurelia Valley, describing a counterclockwise curve towards
the alluvial plain of the Tiber, next to the Vatican City
(Fig. 29.3).
The landforms modelled by runoff and channelled water
are recognizable throughout the urban area of Rome
(Fig. 29.2). Most of the hydrographic networks, particularly
the smaller streams, are currently affected by linear erosion.
The major streams (including the Tiber River) show the
effects of linear or lateral erosion, even though they have
been modified for erosion control or drainage management.
Consequently, fluvial erosion is now developing many
scarps along the valley floors and often affects the
embankments too.
The drainage network has peculiar characteristics. The
axis of the main valley of the Tiber is oriented north–south
(Fig. 29.3), which is similar to the orientation of several
other channels, especially on the west side of the main river.
The orientation of the Apennines (NW–SE) is also reflected
in many landforms. To the east of the Tiber, the Murcia
Valley ends with a straight feature that is most likely controlled by the presence of horst and graben structures.
29.3.2 Tiberina Island
A fluvial island is present in the Tiber’s urban stretch: the
Tiberina Island. It is located in the historical heart of Rome,
where the city developed next to the river over 2500 years
ago. Its origin is related to a counter-flow confluence
(Fig. 29.6), causing a large river bar, that grew to become
the only island along the Tiber’s urban stream channel (Del
Monte et al. 2016).
Several suggestive legends described the island’s origin
in the past. One explained the accumulation of mud from the
Tiber on Tarquin the Proud’s crops, which were thrown in
the river when the last king of Rome was expelled. Another
legend told of a snake that was sacred to Aesculapius, the
Pagan god of medicine, which was brought on a boat
from Epidaurus (a Hellenic city) to Rome. The city was
29
Aeternae Urbis Geomorphologia—Geomorphology of Rome, Aeterna Urbs
343
Fig. 29.4 Geological cross section showing some geomorphological characteristics of Rome City centre (see ABC direction in Fig. 29.8d)
Fig. 29.5 The floodplain of the Tiber, between Monte Mario—
Gianicolo ridge and the northern ridge (Pincio) of the volcanic plateau,
which continues to the south (right), including the southernmost Seven
Hills (right, out of the frame; see Fig. 29.3). The Tiber flows from left
(north) to the right (south); its floodplain narrows crossing the
present-day central area of Rome, confined between the Gianicolo
and the opposite Pincio. The picture is taken from the top of Gianicolo
towards northeast, Hadrian’s Mausoleum is in the middle of the image
being affected by a pestilence, and the snake appeared to be a
solution, but it escaped from the ship and took refuge on
the island. This legend influenced all the representations
of Tiberina Island over time; even the island’s perimeter
is made of embankments in the outline of a boat
(Fig. 29.6b).
outcrops include ancient fluvial deposits, which are composed of blue clays of the Middle Pleistocene and pyroclastic materials and tuffs of the Latium Volcano
(Middle-Upper Pleistocene) (see Fig. 29.4).
Circo Massimo is the greatest stadium ever built; it could
hold, depending on the time and the extent of the renovations, between 250,000 and 385,000 spectators (Del Monte
et al. 2013). Today, it is often used for shows because it can
hold such a large number of people (approximately
700,000). In the Roman period it was the place where the
mythical episode of the rape of the Sabines took place,
during the games organized by Romulus in honour of the
god Consus.
The Romans drained the Murcia Valley and other
neighbouring areas (Velabrum) in the sixth century BC, and
the stream flow was directed to the Tiber River by an
29.3.3 Murcia Valley
The ancient Murcia Valley (Fig. 29.6a) is located in front of
the Tiberina Island. The flat-floored valley, approximately
200 m wide, with steep slopes, was the ideal landform for
building a large stadium like the Circo Massimo (Circus
Maximus; Fig. 29.7). The ancient Romans built the Circo
Massimo on Holocene alluvial deposits. The valley slope
344
M. Del Monte
Fig. 29.6 a Nadiral view of the
Tiber stream elbow in front of
Aventino (see Fig. 29.3). The
straight Tiber segment upstream
the Tiberina Island is oriented
NW–SE and is aligned with the
axis of the Murcia Valley. On the
left (west) of the Tiber the
Trastevere quarter lies; on the
right, the Flavian Amphitheatre
(Colosseum) is recognizable
(source Google Earth, modified;
© 2015 Google. Map data image
Landsat, image © 2015 Digital
Globe). b Tiberina Island looks
like a boat. It housed the temple
of the medicine god, on which
Christians built the basilica of San
Bartolomeo; today it hosts one of
the most ancient hospitals in
Rome
underground pipe system through the Cloaca Maxima,
nowadays still operating. It became a trade area (Forum
Boarium; in Latin, boarium = of cattle) and a place of cultural importance. Located between Tiberina Island and
Palatino, the Forum Boarium corresponded to a large,
swampy area, where the legend of Rome’s birth began.
Romulus and Remus, the twin founders of Rome, were
discovered here in a hamper.
In front of Forum Boarium there is the church where the
famous “Bocca della Verità” (Truth Mouth) is located. It is a
representation of a fluvial god that, according to legend, is an
oracle (the Romans actually used it as a trap-door for surface
water drainage). Here there was a swampy area due to the
poor drainage caused by the counter-flow confluence
between the Murcia Valley stream and the Tiber.
29.3.4 West of the Tiber: Monte Mario,
Gianicolo, Trastevere
On the west side of the Tiber, a series of narrow and deep
valleys cuts the western and eastern slopes of Monte Mario
—Gianicolo ridge (Fig. 29.3). On the top, many outcrops of
the Sabatini Volcano (Fig. 29.4) are present. Pyroclastic
deposits (with scoriaceous lava and lava layers), a few
metres thick, erupted between 470,000 and 500,000 years
29
Aeternae Urbis Geomorphologia—Geomorphology of Rome, Aeterna Urbs
345
Fig. 29.7 The Circo Massimo
was a huge stadium built in the
Murcia Valley for chariot races
(sixth to second century BC).
A view upstream of the former
fluvial valley. On the left of the
valley bottom, the southern slope
of Palatino Hill; on the right, the
northern slope of Aventino. In the
middle of the depression, an
isolated tree lying on the so-called
“spina” (spine), a small ridge
around which the chariots turned
ago (Del Monte et al. 2013), alternate with reworked volcaniclastic horizons and marsh deposits. Small
trough-shaped valleys are common and indicate geomorphic
evolution by both surface running waters and gravitational
processes.
Landslides are widespread in this western part of the old
town, and particularly common on the slopes of Monte
Mario ridge. The crowns of the landslides are located at the
edges of substructural surfaces, on the boundaries between
the volcanic and the underlying sedimentary rocks, or along
scarps bordering flat anthropogenic deposits (“terraces”).
Many flows occur in areas of moderate slope gradients, and
sometimes within older landslide deposits.
At the bottom of Monte Mario—Gianicolo ridge and
close to the Tiber (Figs. 29.4 and 29.6a), Trastevere was a
hostile Etruscan area when Rome was founded. Over time,
this swampy area became wealthier, and Roman villas,
temples, buildings, and churches were built. The entire
neighbourhood stands on the Tiber floodplain.
Passing through Trastevere (from the Latin trans tiberim
= beyond the Tiber), we leave behind the flat Tiber alluvial
plain (Fig. 29.4) and walk on hillslope of Gianicolo hill.
Several springs are located at the foot of eastern slope:
therefore, two thousands years ago, a large and deep stadium
was built here for naval battle games (in Latin Naumachia
Augusti).
On the right bank of the Tiber, the lower Pleistocene
sands and gravels occur above the Pliocene clays on the
ridge of Monte Mario—Vaticano—Gianicolo (Fig. 29.4).
These deposits contain an unconfined aquifer supplying
several springs at the contact with the underlying clay. Since
these springs did not provide enough water for the needs of
citizens, in the 1608 AD Pope Paul V ordered to restore the
ancient Traiano aqueduct to supply water from the Bracciano
Lake (north of Rome). The aqueduct is today called the
“Paolo Aqueduct”; the famous “Fontanone del Gianicolo”
(Gianicolo Fountain) celebrates the work. A special viewpoint is located in front of the fountain; a large part of the
city centre and its landforms are visible from this location,
including the Tiber River floodplain and the eastern hills of
Rome (see Fig. 29.3).
29.3.5 East of the Tiber: The Seven Hills
The eastern part of the old town is characterized by a large,
flat structural surface. It was formed by the activity of the
Alban Volcano during the Quaternary, starting at approximately 600 ka BP (Karner et al. 2001). The volcanic
deposits filled many of the old valleys and forced the Tiber’s
riverbed to move westwards (Heiken et al. 2005). This
volcanic plateau was afterwards deeply cut by the Tiber
River and its tributaries; after a depositional phase during the
Holocene, their valleys acquired their current flat floors
(Fig. 29.4). Therefore, the valleys on the east side of the
Tiber are similar to the main valley, except for their smaller
size. While the present flood plain of the Tiber River can
reach 2 km in width (Fig. 29.3), those of its tributaries are a
few tens or a couple of hundred metres wide. All these
valleys show very steep slopes and display outcrops of
346
volcanic rocks interposed with fluvial deposits of the
paleo-Tiber.
It is well known that the Romans built the city starting
from the legendary Seven Hills. The first settlements were
concentrated on the hills closest to the Tiber and to the
Tiberina Island, rising a few tens of metres above the flood
plain. The steep slopes and flat tops made them both easy to
defend and suitable to hold small villages.
Gravity-induced phenomena are less common on the
eastern side of the historical centre than on the western one.
Mass movements mainly occur on the steeper slopes of
fluvial valleys that cut the volcanic plateau, often at the
boundary between the volcanic units and the underlying
fluvial–lacustrine deposits. Several small landslides are
affecting the artificial embankments or reshaped scarps, but
these gravitational deposits are rapidly removed, the
embankments reconstructed and the scarps strengthened.
It must be emphasized that the Capitolino and Palatino
Hills appear to be isolated from the volcanic plateau
described above (Fig. 29.3), but they were once joined to the
ridges of the Quirinale and of Esquilino, respectively. The
ancient Romans dug the depression between the Capitolino
and the Quirinale Hills, in the second century AD, to extend
the area of the Roman Forum. In addition, a hill next to the
Colosseum (Velia Hill), between Palatino and Esquilino,
was erased about one hundred years ago for the construction
of a large avenue (Via dei Fori Imperiali; Fig. 29.8). All
seven historical hills were therefore shaped as ridges by
fluvial erosion processes of the Tiber drainage system in the
Late Pleistocene and the Holocene, and then were partially
reshaped in the most recent part of the Holocene (Fig. 29.8).
Palatino is close to the Tiber and the Circo Massimo
(Fig. 29.7) and reaches a maximum height of 51 m a.s.l. It is
an open museum and one of the oldest sites in Rome. A legend tells that the city began as a small village on this hill
(Roma Quadrata, Squared Rome). The village was surrounded by swamps, from which the Romans could control
the course of the Tiber. As said above, the Circo Massimo
was built on the Murcia Valley’s flat-bottom (Fig. 29.7), at
the foot of the Emperor’s Villa on the Palatino (in Latin,
Palatium = palace). The large and straight valley, enclosed
by hills, was particularly suitable for hosting a stadium;
looking from the Circo Massimo it is easy to imagine its
extension upstream, towards the Terme di Caracalla, and
downstream, where the Valle Murcia stream flowed into the
Tiber (Figs. 29.3, 29.6 and 29.8).
The Capitolino is a very important site of natural and
cultural history and the seat of the current city hall of Rome.
On its southern slope (Rupe Tarpea) the “Tufo Lionato”, a
type of ignimbrite that is particularly representative of
Rome’s geological history, is visible (Fig. 29.9). The outcrops of Rupe Tarpea show evidence of several
M. Del Monte
phreatomagmatic eruptions; moreover, the Tufo Lionato has
a very limited and thin exposure, so this outcrop is very
peculiar. The tuff is composed of yellow pumice, black
scoria, lava and holocrystalline (leucite and pyroxene) lithic
fragments dispersed in the matrix (De Rita and Fabbri 2009).
The name “Lionato” comes from the yellow colour of the
ashy matrix, which resembles hair on a lion’s head.
The Rupe Tarpea is famous in cultural history and is
widely considered to be a symbol of Rome. Several legends
refer to it. Tarpea was the name of the daughter of Tarpeo, a
warrior defending the Capitolino after the kidnapping of the
Sabine women, organized by Romulus. She was in love with
Tito Tazio, the Sabines’ king. When he convinced Tarpea to
open the doors of the Capitolino, allowing the Sabine forces
to enter the fortress, the Romans immediately executed
Tarpea, throwing her from the top of the Capitolino Hill.
Since then, the southern slope of the hill has been called
Rupe Tarpea, and any traitor has been punished in a similar
way. Even today, a well-known proverb keeps alive the
moral teaching of this legend. It refers “Arx tarpeia Capitoli
proxima” (Rupe Tarpea is close to Capitolino), in order to
say that everyone after a great honour may know a terrible
end, or conversely, that one, even being out of favour, may
still rise to great honour.
29.3.6 Man-Made Landforms
Rome has always been affected by a variety of human
activities, since the age of the oldest settlements. The signs
of these activities are superimposed and juxtaposed with
those caused by natural processes.
Rome hosted stable settlements since the Bronze Age and
the ancient town is now an area of extraordinary archaeological interest. Mining activities, which are inactive today,
started from sixth to fifth century BC and produced
numerous caves with straight scarps and step-like slopes.
The more recent changes to the topographic surface are due
to open-pit mining. Wide areas of Monte Mario ridge and of
the northern side of Gianicolo have been heavily modified
by excavation and extraction of clay for brick production.
Surface modifications due to anthropogenic activities have
increased since the end of the nineteenth century. The city’s
population grew rapidly in the 1950s, generating intense
construction activity that led to the development of vast
neighbourhoods.
In addition to buildings constructed on almost all
sub-horizontal surfaces, human activities have produced a
number of flat embankments, stepped slopes and terraces.
Intense erosion processes have acted on the man-made
deposits, causing mud and debris flows, runoff and piping.
Not all the human works have been negative for
29
Aeternae Urbis Geomorphologia—Geomorphology of Rome, Aeterna Urbs
347
Fig. 29.8 Geomorphological evolution of the Rome City centre (the
elevation is referred to the present-day surface). a One of the possible
scenarios of about 4000 years before its foundation. b A few thousand
years later, the Tiber Island was formed next to the confluence with the
Murcia Valley stream. Meanwhile, the hills on the Tiber left hosted
shepherds’ huts. c 1000 years after the founding of Rome, the area was
deeply transformed by man: a depression had been dug, separating the
Capitolino Hill and the Quirinale; numerous wetlands disappeared; the
Murcia Valley was drained by the Cloaca Maxima; different constructions lined the floodplain, including the Wharf of Rome, whose landfill
became Mount Testaccio. d The old town today is completely
urbanized and rich in archaeological sites. The construction of the
Via dei Fori Imperiali erased the Velia hill
geomorphological stability: surely useful for flooding prevention is the construction, in the last century, of the Tiber
embankments (Fig. 29.8).
Several examples of relief inversion evidence how deeply
these human activities have changed the morphology of
Rome. Some artificial hills were created and natural hills
erased; some ridges were smoothed, and many small valleys
were filled up, to promote building of necessary infrastructure. This latter intervention, however, has resulted in particularly unwelcome development. Elimination of the
drainage network of the Tiber tributaries, over the past two
centuries, not relieved by an adequate sewerage system as
348
M. Del Monte
Fig. 29.9 a The southern slope of the Capitolino Hill overlooks the Roman Forum and the Tiber. b The Rupe Tarpea shows products of several
eruptions of Latium Volcano under man-made remains
the ancient Romans used to do, is currently the main cause
of overflowing runoff affecting the historical centre, if heavy
rains occur.
Among the most significant changes made by man are the
excavation of the saddle between the Capitolino and Quirinale and the removal of the Velia hill between the Palatino
and Esquilino ridges (Fig. 29.8). Construction activities
have covered repeatedly the surface of the historical city
centre, producing a continuous layer of materials made up of
the remains of collapsed buildings, rubbish, and the ruins of
ancient temples, mixed with colluvium and alluvium. The
thickness of the filling materials ranges between 0 and 30 m
(Fig. 29.4).
A typical example of artificial hill is Mount Testaccio
(Fig. 29.10), which reaches 48 m a.s.l. (the height of the
nearby Aventino and Palatino hills). On the Tiber alluvial
plain, several other man-made mounds appear today as small
hills (e.g., Montecitorio, see Fig. 29.3). Mount Testaccio
was created by the accumulation of so-called “Cocci”
(shards), which are fragments of broken amphorae of the
ancient Romans (in Latin: “testae”, hence the name of the
hill, with the addition of the Italian suffix -accio, indicating a
negative characteristic). The intense trade activity generated
the material that was used in the landfill of Testaccio
(Fig. 29.10; see detail in the enlargement). As a result, it
represents an anthropogenic hill, composed of broken
amphorae fragments; in other words, it was a Roman
dump. The shards are derived from oil amphorae from the
nearby Emporium fluvial port (Wharf of Rome; Fig. 29.8),
where the annona publica (food commodities for the people)
were stored. Recent studies indicate that the amphorae
fragments were routinely thrown away and accumulated
between the Augustan period and the middle of third century
AD (Del Monte et al. 2013).
An accumulation of this magnitude and height was made
possible by a ramp and two side roads for wagons carrying
the shards and amphorae fragments; these materials were
placed in terraces (Fig. 29.10) contained by walls made of
the same intact amphorae, also filled with shards. The
Romans often covered the accumulation with lime, to prevent the decomposition of organics; the lime added cohesion
and stability to slopes. Over the centuries, the accumulation
became a small mountain, vegetation grew and erosion
occurred on slopes. Nowadays, runoff water effects and
landslides are present on the hill slopes.
The function of Mount Testaccio has changed several times. After construction of the Aurelian walls
(third century AD) (Fig. 29.3), Mount Testaccio was no
longer used as a dumping ground. The connections with the
port changed greatly, and the sub-Aventino plain was
somehow protected from the most destructive Tiber River
floods. Originally a port and commercial district, in the
Middle Ages, the Testaccio area became an area of vineyards. Several caves were dug on the flanks of the hill
and used as wine cellars. “Prati del popolo”, meadows of the
people, which were used for picnics until the nineteenth century, were located on top of the hill and are still
recognizable (Fig. 29.10). Nowadays, Testaccio is protected and the access is granted to researchers and to
guided tours. At the foot of the hill a recreational area for
cultural activities, music schools and nightlife has been
developed.
Finally, it should be remarked that the landscape of Rome
preserves signs of the evolution of three different types of
hills: the legendary Seven Hills and other natural hills, like
the Vatican; several man-made hills, such as Mount Testaccio, the highest one; and disappeared hills, due to
man-made erosion, like the removal of Velia hill.
29
Aeternae Urbis Geomorphologia—Geomorphology of Rome, Aeterna Urbs
349
Fig. 29.10 Mount Testaccio is
the largest artificial hill of Rome,
with a height of 48 m a.s.l. and a
circumference of 1 km (source
Google Earth, modified; © 2015
Google. Map data image
Landsat, image © 2015 Digital
Globe). At the lower right corner,
a detail of the geometrical
arrangement of the shards
29.4
Conclusion
The geomorphological characteristics and the reconstruction
of their variation over time represent just a simplified
example of the deep geomorphological complexity of the
Roman territory. Some connections between area’s history,
urban planning and geomorphological characteristics have
been highlighted.
Moreover, some examples were discussed to show that
the Romans built certain structures in specific places
depending on the geomorphic characteristics of the area.
To conclude, the geomorphology of Rome not only represents a topic of geological interest, but also a typical model
of a landscape evolution that influenced the development of
the ancient Caput Mundi (Capital of the World). Rome was
not founded accidentally on some small hills in front of the
Tiber.
Many natural landforms and landscapes are related to the
foundation and to the history of the city. During the last
three thousand years, several landforms have been remodelled, created or vanished due to human activity and natural
processes. They represent nowadays the morphological
consequences that both man and nature have marked in the
territory of Rome, creating a stately, majestic open-air
museum. For these reasons, the landscape of the Aeterna
Urbs is unique all over the world.
References
Ascani F, Bozzano F, Buccellato A, Del Monte M, Matteucci R,
Vergari F (2008) Evoluzione del paesaggio e antiche vie di
drenaggio nell’area de “Il Castellaccio” (Roma) da indagini
geologiche, geomorfologiche e archeologiche). Geol Romana
41:93–116
Belisario F, Del Monte M, Fredi P, Funiciello R, Lupia Palmieri E,
Salvini F (1999) Azimuthal analysis of stream orientations to define
regional tectonic lines. Z Geomorphol Supp 118:41–63
Bellotti P, Calderoni G, Carboni MG, Di Bella L, Tortora P, Valeri P,
Zernitskaya V (2007) Late Quaternary landscape evolution of the
Tiber River delta plain (Central Italy): new evidence from pollen
data, biostratigraphy and 14C dating. Z Geomorphol 126(4):505–
534
Bozzano F, Martino S, Priori M (2006) Natural and man-induced stress
evolution of slopes: the Monte Mario hill in Rome. Environ Geol 50
(4):505–524
Cattuto C, Gregori L, Melelli L, Taramelli A, Broso D (2005) I conoidi
nell’evoluzione delle conche intermontane umbre. Geogr Fis Dinam
Quat, Suppl 7:89–95
Ciotoli G, Della Seta M, Del Monte M, Fredi P, Lombardi S, Lupia
Palmieri E, Pugliese F (2003) Morphological and geochemical
evidence of neotectonics in the volcanic area of Monti Vulsini
(Latium, Italy). Quatern Int 101–102:103–113
Coratza P, Giusti C (2005) Methodological proposal for the assessment
of the scientific quality of geomorphosite. Il Quaternario 18(1):307–
313
Del Monte M, Fredi P, Pica A, Vergari F (2013) Geosites within Rome
City center (Italy): A mixture of cultural and geomorphological
heritage. Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 36(2):241–257
350
Del Monte M, D’Orefice M, Luberti GM, Marini R, Pica A, Vergari F
(2016) Geomorphological classification of urban landscapes: the
case study of Rome (Italy). J Maps 12(1):178–189
De Rita D, Fabbri M (2009) The Rupe Tarpea: the role of the geology
in one of the most important monuments of Rome. Mem Descr
Carta Geol d’It 87:53–62
Fredi P, Ciccacci S (2017) A route of fire in Central Italy: the Latium
Ancient Volcanoes. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes
and landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 303–315
Giordano G, De Benedetti A, Diana A, Daudioso F, Marasco F,
Miceli M, Mollo S, Cas R, Funiciello R (2006) The Colli Albani
mafic caldera (Roma, Italy): stratigraphy, structure and petrology.
J Volcanol Geoth Res 155:49–80
Gregori L, Melelli L (2005) Geoturism & Geomorphosites: the GIS
solution. Il Quaternario 18(1):285–292
M. Del Monte
Heiken G, Funiciello R, De Rita D (2005) The Seven Hills of Rome.
Princeton University Press, Princeton 264 pp
Karner DB, Marra F, Renne PR (2001) The history of the Monti
Sabatini and Alban Hills volcanoes: groundwork for assessing
volcanic-tectonic hazards for Rome. J Volcanol Geoth Res
107:185–219
Lamb HH (1995) Climate, History, and the Modern World. Routledge,
London 384 pp
Panizza M (2001) Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and examples of
geomorphological survey. Chin Sci Bull 46:4–6
Reynard E (2008) Scientific research and tourist promotion of
geomorphological heritage. Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 31:225–230
UNESCO (2005) Operational guidelines for the implementation of the
world heritage convention. Unesco World Heritage Centre, Paris
151 pp
Granite Landscapes of Sardinia: Long-Term
Evolution of Scenic Landforms
30
Rita T. Melis, Felice Di Gregorio, and Valeria Panizza
Abstract
Sardinia is characterized by spectacular granite landscapes with superimposed scenic
landforms. In the eastern part of the island, the granite reliefs consist of mountain massifs
and plateaux separated by metamorphic reliefs and limestone plateaux. Granite landscapes
show peculiar landforms such as inselbergs, tors and tafoni and diverse erosion microforms.
In the extraordinary landscape of Gallura region, wide flat areas with outcropping rocks,
vast extensions of isolated rock blocks and inselberg-type dome-shaped reliefs show
evidence of a long period of intense weathering. Scenic landforms characterize the
spectacular landscape of Sarrabus region, where differential erosion processes have selected
the numerous dikes which have conditioned the orientation of the reliefs and coastal
landforms. Many archaeological remnants can be found in most granite regions of Sardinia
emphasizing the deep bond between man and the physical environment.
Keywords
Granite
30.1
Weathering
Inselberg
Introduction
Sardinia is the second largest island in the Mediterranean
Sea. Its landscapes are of great geo-diversity and the most
spectacular ones are supported by granite bedrock, formed
during the uplift of the ancient Variscan chain. Scenic
landforms occur in an amazing variety of shapes and settings
and are superimposed on splendid granite landscapes.
Throughout the island, the Sardinian granite landscape is
characterized by rugged mountains cut by deep gorges, vast
R.T. Melis (&) F. Di Gregorio
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Università di
Cagliari, Via Trentino 51, 09127 Cagliari, Italy
e-mail: rtmelis@unica.it
V. Panizza
Dipartimento di Storia, Scienze dell’Uomo e della Formazione,
Università di Sassari, Via Zanfarino 62, 07100 Sassari, Italy
Tor
Tafoni
Sardinia
uplands scattered with block piles, and large hills covered by
Mediterranean scrub. Indented coasts, shaped into promontories, bays and small islands border the ancient granite
masses that rise from the sea. Strange landforms carved in
granite have inspired the people’s imagination.
These spectacular granite landscapes are located almost
continuously in the eastern part of the island, from Capo
Testa to Capo Carbonara (Fig. 30.1). In this part of Sardinia,
granite terrains do not form a high and continuous ridge but
a series of mountain massifs and plateaux separated by areas
underlain by metamorphic rocks and limestone plateaux.
The Limbara massif to the north dominates the Gallura
landscape, while to the south the Sette Fratelli (Seven
Brothers) massif characterizes the Sarrabus landscape.
Similar landforms are present in all granite landscapes of
Sardinia, but local structural and lithological conditions
allow different morphological features to be distinguished
and, as Migoń (2004, p. 30) wrote: “there are granite
landscapes and granite landscapes”.
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_30
351
352
Fig. 30.1 Schematic map of the granite outcrops of Sardinia
R.T. Melis et al.
30
Granite Landscapes of Sardinia: Long-Term Evolution …
30.2
Geographical and Geological Setting
The island of Sardinia is located between 38° 51′ 52″ and
41° 15′ 42″ latitude north. It covers a total area of
23,821 km2 of which some 6000 km2 are built by widespread calc-alkalic granitoids intruded in the polydeformed
and metamorphosed Palaeozoic basement during Variscan
Orogeny, from 350 to 290 Ma BP (Rossi et al. 2009).
During this long period of time, changes occurred in the
geodynamic framework, influencing the structural and
compositional characteristics of various intrusions.
The Sardinian batholith consists of numerous intrusive
bodies of variable size and plutons from granodiorites to
leucogranites with incidental amounts of tonalite and gabbro
(Orsini 1976). Permian hypo-volcanism produced numerous
basic and acid dikes crossing the batholith in various
directions. At the end of the Carboniferous, the uplifting of
the Variscan chain fragmented the granite basement and led
to partial erosion of the granite plutons.
The Oligo-Miocene anticlockwise rotation movement of
the Corso-Sardinian block and the Alpine collision produced
major faulting and tilting in the granite batholith. Its outcrops are mainly found in the Gallura and Barbagia region in
the north and in the Sarrabus region in the south (Fig. 30.1).
Minor outcrops of granitic rocks are present in the
Sulcis-Iglesiente and Arburese districts, in the western portion of the island. In these granite regions, the average altitude is about 300 m a.s.l., with the top peaks of Mt. Limbara
(1362 m) to the north and Mt. Sette Fratelli to the south
(1023 m).
Typically, the climate is Mediterranean with mean annual
precipitation of some 650 mm and mean annual temperature
of about 23 °C. In summer maximum values exceeding 40 °C
can be attained and in the winter minimum values below
0 °C are recorded at high altitudes. Precipitation often
occurs in the form of storms, with very intense but short
duration rainfall events in autumn and winter. Winds are
frequent and very strong throughout the year, particularly the
cold Mistral from the northwest and the hot humid Scirocco
from the south. The most important geomorphological
control is exerted by the geological-structural setting, but
also by the climate, in particular past climate changes.
Typical granite landscapes of Sardinia displaying significant
landform diversity can be found in the Gallura and Sarrabus
areas and these will be described below.
30.3
The Gallura Landscape
The northeastern portion of Sardinia is known as Gallura, a
region famous for its rose-coloured beaches and crystal-clear
sea, where the famous “Costa Smeralda” and Maddalena
Archipelago are found. This area is also known for its
353
extraordinary archaeological heritage, the production of
renowned wines, such as Vermentino, and the presence of
widespread cork oak (Quercus suber) woods.
The landscape is dominated by granitoid rocks, since the
Variscan granite batholith crops out extensively with many
mineralogical-petrographic
variations.
Since
the
mid-nineteenth century, the Gallura landscape has stimulated
studies by historians, geographers and geologists who made
observations and formulated scientific theories still valid to
date and which preceded the more recent geomorphological
investigations.
Thanks to the exceptional landforms, numerous protected
areas of natural or international importance have been
established or are being established. Among these, the Piana
dei Grandi Sassi and Mt. Pulchiana are a Natural Reserve
and Natural Monument, respectively. They are both located
in the municipality of Aggius, in northwestern Gallura. The
average altitude, orientation and shape of major landforms
generally follow regional tectonic features, with prevalent
NE–SW and NNE–SSW alignments, as in the case of the
Piana with its saw-toothed crests, locally known as “serre”,
towards southeast near the village of Aggius, or the
alignments of the relief where the Mt. Pulchiana dome is
found. These are the dominant tectonic orientations, especially in the Gallura landscape, which make up, as already
observed by Pelletier in 1960 (p. 12), “the morphological
personality of the whole region”. The imposing granite rock
masses, cropping out everywhere with their typical petrographic and mineralogical variations and tectonic alignments, give the landscape its characteristic features,
modelled on a small to medium scale by physical and
chemical processes.
Out of the Carboniferous-Permian calk-alkaline association characterizing most of Sardinia’s granite, inequigranular
monzogranites and equigranular leucogranites prevalently
crop out in this area (Carmignani et al. 2001). The former are
found in the whole Piana dei Grandi Sassi whereas the latter
are widespread in the Mt. Pulchiana and in all the surrounding ridges. Apart from their mineral associations, these
granites can be distinguished by the average size of the
phenocrysts and the shades of colour, which is typically
pinkish in the leucogranites. The whole area is located
within a wide belt bounded by two important NE–SW oriented left transcurrent faults, ascribable to Miocene compressive tectonics. Tectonic processes disrupted and
displaced the crystalline basement with the formation of the
major large-scale physiographic structures and corresponding elevations of the batholith: high-standing structures,
wide depressions, horizontal or gently inclined plateaux.
Along the dense joint network, intense modelling of relief
forms took place in geological times and under diverse climate conditions. Also the hydrographic network follows the
main structural alignments almost perfectly.
354
The granite outcrops with their round-shaped or
saw-toothed relief, typical of this region, show sets of regular joints normal to each other. Spectacular forms can be
observed where differential erosion has outlined the Permian
dikes, such as the porphyritic-microgranite dike disrupted by
a fault which characterizes the coastal landscape of Capo
Testa.
There has always been a close link between the granite
landscape and humans, which has remained strong across the
centuries linking many historical, religious, social, etc.,
vicissitudes. In this part of Sardinia, the availability of
resistant building materials, often already available in blocks
isolated by the jointed network, was of great importance to
the local population. Also the spectacularity and impressiveness of the relief have become part of daily life,
socio-economic needs and human imagination, thus producing a constant intrigue between culture and natural
landscape. The first evidence of human presence in Gallura
dates back to the early Neolithic, in the form of remains of
temporary settlements inside wide tafoni. Indeed, these
natural cavities have always been a geographic factor
accompanying man throughout history, serving as shelters,
burial sites or stabling for animals.
Also in recent and even present times, the traditional kind
of scattered-habitat settlement, typical of the region, makes
use of the many natural morphological features offered by
granite to give shelter to farm animals, store tools and create
temporary shelters. Some of these landforms show rather
curious shapes which in popular imagination have conjured
Fig. 30.2 The Palau bear: a
spectacular form resulting from
subaerial weathering which
dominates the coastal landscape
of Gallura and the Maddalena
Archipelago
R.T. Melis et al.
up animal and anthropomorphic figures or even other elements taken from the natural world, such as the Arzachena
Toadstool, inside which remains of artefacts were found
testifying its use as a shelter in a period ranging from 3500
BC up to the Nuragic age. Also along the Gallura coasts
subaerial weathering has created extraordinary forms, among
which the famous Palau Bear, which has been declared a
regional natural monument (Fig. 30.2).
In this region, archaeological sites such as rock ledge
shelters, funerary or cult circles, funerary tafoni and dolmens
are extremely important testimonies. Among these, the
so-called “Tombs of the Giants” are made up of huge vertical granite slabs (Fig. 30.3). There are many other monuments which witness not only the widespread use of granite
rocks in very remote times but also a spiritual relationship
with the landscape which in time has created a kind of social
organization and adaptation to the environment forming the
local identity. The whole of Gallura preserves innumerable
sites which can be included in the category of geomorphosites owing to their scientific and often cultural interest
(cf. Panizza 2001). Some of these, such as the Palau Bear or
Mt. Pulchiana, are protected by specific norms whereas in
other cases the introduction of adequate conservation measures and sustainable tourist fruition would be desirable.
Indeed, the intrinsic value of the landscape of this region lies
in the geohistorical heritage (sensu Panizza and Piacente
2009) of its geological-structures and relief forms as well as
in the richness of its archaeological and cultural heritage and
in the constant functional and cultural links between its
30
Granite Landscapes of Sardinia: Long-Term Evolution …
355
Fig. 30.3 Coddu Vecchiu giant
tomb: sepulchral Nuragic
monument in granite blocks
worked by man (Bronze Age,
1800 years BC to 1300 years BC)
and, in the background, a
vineyard of Vermentino di
Gallura wine
components. Therefore, it is a cultural landscape where the
relief and the geological-structural characteristics are in
constant interrelation with the human element (Panizza and
Piacente 2009) and convey shareable values and messages.
30.3.1
Piana dei Grandi Sassi
The Piana dei Grandi Sassi is a wide flat area scattered with
rock blocks and tors (i.e. free-standing residuals approximately of the size of a small house), surrounded by generally
round-shaped reliefs and cut across by the Riu Turrali stream
from SW to NE. This spectacular plain is located in the inner
part of the wider plateau of Tempio Pausania bordered in the
south by the granitic massif of Mt. Limbara. This inner plain
has average elevations between 425 and 460 m, whereas the
surrounding ridges reach a maximum altitude of 680 m. The
lower slopes are connected to the plain at a sharp angle,
although in some places the contact surface is gentler owing
to the accumulation of residual materials and blocks of
various sizes.
This wide area is lower than the surrounding terrains
which are arranged according to the prevailing tectonic
alignments. Its scenery is spectacular, with wind-bent cork
oak trees and grassy tablelands dominated by Mediterranean
scrub where flocks of sheep often graze. Everywhere there
are chaotically arranged rounded boulders and compact
granite outcrops a few metres high (Fig. 30.4). Deposits of
residual material partially reworked by pedogenesis fill the
plain and the depressions whereas piles of jointed rock
blocks stand out in the landscape. A large amount of
prevalently round-shaped boulders has been formed by the
progressive weathering of the granite blocks and tors.
The boulders are of varying sizes and are scattered
practically everywhere across the plain, giving the landscape
a very unusual appearance which has made this area particularly well known with the name of “Piana dei Grandi
Sassi” (Plain of the Big Blocks). The geological-structural
setting and, in particular, the climate changes occurring in
the Cainozoic and in the past 2 million years favoured the
genesis of numerous landforms now scattered across this
particular plain. The erosion of the weathered materials—
which originated in past hot and humid periods—carried out
by running waters has made the tors and scattered boulders
to emerge from the weathering mantle. Exfoliation and
disintegration processes occurring during the most arid
phases have certainly had an important role in the modelling
of these scenic forms.
Everywhere in the plain, the rocky outcrops and blocks
have been hollowed out, with cavities varying considerably
in width and depth from a few tens of centimetres up to a few
metres. They are tafoni (locally known also as “conchi”)
which result from granular disintegration of microfissured
rock surfaces. This surface weathering is controlled by water
penetration into the rock and minerals and is more marked on
shaded rock faces where mistiness maintains a high humidity
level. The initial phase of the hollowing process can take
place under the surface (cf. Twidale 1982), thanks also to
subsurface micro-percolation conditions of groundwater
inside the granite joint network or underneath the weathering
356
R.T. Melis et al.
Fig. 30.4 Panoramic view over Piana dei Grandi Sassi, with wide extensions of large isolated boulders and rock heaps (tors); in the background
the Serre di Aggius
mantle (cf. Roqué et al. 2013). A more advanced stage of
development of tafoni is observed at the base of the blocks.
In these areas, which are more protected from direct sun
rays, rock disintegration process has been more intense from
Fig. 30.5 The Mt. Pulchiana
inselberg with its typical
dome-shaped profile and the
fantastic tors, chaos of blocks and
tafoni scattered at the base of
steep slopes. In the foreground
one of the tafoni utilized as a
shepherd shelter
the bottom towards the top, thus creating large cavities.
Some of these have been used as shelters or burial sites in
Prehistory and, up to the 1970s, as sheep shelters during transhumance. In other cases, shepherds have
30
Granite Landscapes of Sardinia: Long-Term Evolution …
transformed the largest tafoni into rustic houses or shelters
for their animals by adding walls of small granite blocks
(Fig. 30.5).
Most of the tafoni are no longer active. Active disintegration processes can only be observed in particular conditions of dampness and exposure, and are visible on the
wettest walls, with the formation of easily detachable
weathered material which accumulates on the ground.
30.3.2
Mount Pulchiana
Mt. Pulchiana (673 m), rising just northeast of the Piana dei
Grandi Sassi, is an extraordinary landform characterized by a
357
dome-shaped top and may be defined as an inselberg. It rises
from the surrounding plain surmounting a ruin-like chaotic
landscape rich in tors, rock boulders and tafoni of all sizes
(Fig. 30.4). Here the landscape has been controlled by the
transcurrent tectonics of this region which has defined crests
and reliefs and has conditioned the contrast with the nearby
plain. The evolution of this spectacular dome-shaped landform was controlled by the regional fault system and the
complex set of joints. Mt. Pulchiana is located inside a vast
granite area bounded by NNE–SSW and NE–SW trending
faults. Furthermore, the orthogonal joint system characterizing the rock mass has isolated smaller rock portions, one of
which hosts this outstanding inselberg. The orientation and
spacing of joints have controlled the weathering processes
Fig. 30.6 Geological and geomorphological sketch of the Sarrabus granite landscape. 1 Granodiorites, 2 monzogranites, 3 fayalite biotite granites
(Mt. Sette Fratelli), 4 leucogranites, 5 dikes, 6 faults, 7 plateau, 8 pediment
358
R.T. Melis et al.
and, subsequently, the removal of weathering products carried out by running waters.
In detail, the northwestern slope of Mt. Pulchiana is
steeper than the eastern one because of a fault which has
favoured the fall of large fractured blocks. Thick Mediterranean scrub covers the abundant boulders and debris
accumulated at the foot of the slope. On the other hand, the
northeastern slope of this inselberg, which is characterized
by sheer convex faces of outcropping rock, is affected in its
higher part by mega-exfoliation phenomena due to the
opening of sheeting joints. Along the steep southern face
numerous joints can be observed in the outcropping rock,
which cut across the leucogranites orthogonally. The
mountain is separated from other minor ridges to the south
by a paleo-valley set along a NW–SE trending fault, with the
presence of huge, scattered blocks. The chaotic distribution
of rock fragments and rounded blocks, scattered or piled up
in heaps, characterizes the footslopes all around the inselberg. This view is very striking, owing also to the presence
of many tafoni of various sizes and shapes. Near the top of
Mt. Pulchiana the slopes are steeper and ascent can continue
only by overcoming narrow and steep passages between
rock blocks, within natural cavities and dense thickets of
Mediterranean vegetation.
30.4
The Sarrabus Landscape
The Sarrabus granite massif, located at the southeastern
extremity of Sardinia (Fig. 30.6), is bounded to the west by
the Campidano tectonic trench and to the south and east by
Fig. 30.7 The peaks of Mt. Sette
Fratelli with, in the foreground, a
tor emerging from the remains of
the plateau
the sea. It offers scenic landscapes scattered with spectacular
forms. In Sarrabus, as well as in Gallura, the same spectacular granite landforms are found: plateaux, crests, tors and
tafoni. In this region, however, the granite bedrock has been,
on the whole, more affected by incision. Therefore, deep,
narrow gorges are common and the relief energy is higher.
This gives the Sarrabus landscape a more rugged,
mountain-like and less accessible appearance compared with
the Gallura landscape. The Sarrabus massif is shaped into
different calk-alkaline bodies which were intruded into the
metamorphic basement during Variscan Orogeny and subsequently, in the Cainozoic, were tilted during the east
rotation of Sardinia. Numerous acid and basic NW–SE
trending dikes intersect the granitoid bodies. To the north, a
deep valley separates this massif from the metamorphic
terrain of Gerrei. To the south it descends gradually towards
the Gulf of Cagliari and the Tyrrhenian Sea. Two different
landscapes distinguish this scenic massif. To the west the
landscape is characterized by high, rugged relief dissected
by deep valleys, whereas to the east the landscape, which
was tectonically lowered, becomes gentler, with lower elevations (300 m) and elevations separated by shallower valleys. The contrast between these two landscapes can also be
noted by the different trend of the coast, which is high and
rocky to the southwest, whereas it is much more irregular
with numerous islands, wide bays and rocky promontories to
the south and southeast.
In particular, the western landscape is more open than the
eastern one and displays spectacular sceneries both in mesoand microscale. Tooth-sawed crests, steep rock faces, wild
gorges dug into steep slopes, fluvial valleys enclosed in the
30
Granite Landscapes of Sardinia: Long-Term Evolution …
359
Fig. 30.8 a Bronze Age megalithic structure (Nuraghe) harmoniously blending with the tor blocks; b the joint systems in the granite along the
Rio Cannas canyon; c numerous potholes on the valley floor dug in the granite rock
rock, pinnacles, towers and heaps of rock blocks give the
area captivating appearance. In this impressive and striking
landscape the Sette Fratelli ridge stands out; it is crowned by
rocky crests and bounded by deep winding valleys which are
often set along faults.
This area, which is one of the Sardinian Regional Natural
Parks, is covered by thick Mediterranean scrub and by a
dense forest of holm and cork oaks (Quercus ilex and
Quercus suber). Inside this imposing forest populated by the
Sardinian Red Deer (Cervus elaphus corsicanus), seven
rocky peaks stand out, like still giants watching over this
mysterious landscape, giving origin to the place name of
“Sette Fratelli” (Fig. 30.7). These mountain tops attain different elevations: from 791 m of “Perd’a Asub’e Pari” to
360
1016 m of “Punta Sa Ceraxa”, which to the north joins with
the peaks of “Casteddu de Su Dinau” (915 m) and “Baccu
Malu” (1015 m).
Since very ancient times, their dome-shaped forms and
tors have been the subject of myths and legends lost in the
mists of time. They stand like towers covered by rocks and
appear to be built of a number of loose boulders. These
scenic landforms are carved into well-jointed light greyish
leucogranite with commonly occurring Fe-amphibole and
Fe-biotite minerals, as well as fluorite in accessory amounts
and subordinate fayalite (Secchi and Lorrai 2001).
This resistant granite is divided by normal sets of fractures. The evolution of the seven peaks has been influenced
by the fracture spacing in each set. Intense runoff erosion has
removed weathered material from fractures dissecting the
peaks into large rock towers or tors and crumbling boulders.
Isolated boulders crown these summits forming picturesque
pedestals or rocking stones often of imposing dimensions,
such as Punta Sa Ceraxa peak. This peak, whose name
means Point of the Cherry, is made up of huge isolated
blocks which apparently seem to be in precarious equilibrium, piled as they are one on top of the other. Nevertheless,
boulder piles at the foot of the crests bear witness to mass
wasting in the form of rock block falls.
These scenic landforms are also the result of differential
denudation, accomplished mainly by deep weathering during
a long period of humid tropical climate. Fairly flat summit
surfaces bound the Sette Fratelli relief to the west and south.
They bear witness to the remains of a vast denudation area
Fig. 30.9 Panoramic view of
coast of the Capo Carbonara
promotory: piles of rock blocks
on the beach and, in the
background, the Sarrabus granite
reliefs
R.T. Melis et al.
which developed under warm and humid climate conditions
at the end of Variscan Orogeny and was later shaped during
Oligo-Miocene times. In this period, uplift of the granite
rock masses led to an increase of erosion and considerable
deepening of the valleys. The deep Rio Geremeas valley
separates the two largest flat areas formed in the granodiorites. To NNW there is a very regular 700–800 m high
plateau, on which the round-shaped hills of Mt. Antiogu
(764 m) and Mt. Arrubiu (761 m) stand out as they were
modelled in harder leucogranites. On the opposite side of the
Rio Geremeas valley, the plateau is characterized by a surface slightly inclined to the south, from Mt. Melas (841 m)
to Punta Elena (700 m). On these two plateaux, elongated
depressions bear witness to ancient drainage preceding the
Cainozoic uplift, which, in turn, led to the deepening of the
valleys. Scattered blocks hollowed with tafoni protrude from
dense Mediterranean scrub and characterize the plateau
landscape. This gentle morphology, the presence of deep
soils, wet areas and piles of rock blocks, could have provided the prehistoric peoples of the Nuragic civilization with
favourable conditions for their settlements. Indeed, nestled
among the tor blocks, the remains of Nuraghi—megalithic
edifices dating from the Bronze Age (Depalmas and Melis
2011)—are hardly visible (Fig. 30.8a).
The deep, narrow valley of Rio Cannas surrounds the
Sette Fratelli relief to the north. Striking scenery can be
observed by proceeding along the winding canyon meandering in the rose-coloured leucogranites, monzogranites and
granodiorites. In the bare walls of the Rio Cannas canyon
30
Granite Landscapes of Sardinia: Long-Term Evolution …
Fig. 30.10 Images of sea floor along the Villasimius coast: a granite
block piles on the sea floor on the Capo Carbonara coast; b habitat for
large groupers (Serranidae) and gilt-head breams (Sparus aurata)
between granite blocks on the shoal of “Santa Caterina”; c a granite
361
block coloured by the Yellow Cluster Anemones (Parazoanthus
axinellae) and by the red Gorgonaceae on the Capo Carbonara sea
floor (courtesy Area Marina Protetta Capo Carbonara—Comune di
Villasimius)
362
various joint systems can be identified, which separate the
outcropping granite units into irregular prismatic blocks
(Fig. 30.8b). Fields of porphyry, but also quartz, pegmatite
and lamprophyre dikes dissect the granite and arrange the
surrounding ridges in the form of crests and inaccessible
precipices. In the valley floor fluvial erosion has cut across
some rock bars and dug numerous potholes in the riverbed
(Fig. 30.8c).
To the south, the Sarrabus granite massif slopes down
towards the coast, whereas to the east it is affected by a
series of fault scarps. This area is mainly characterized by
flat surfaces which almost completely isolate the low ridges
to which they are abruptly connected. These flattish areas,
identified by Pelletier (1960) as pediments, bear witness to
long-term landscape evolution and its advanced stage. On
the surface of the pediments the monzogranite and granodiorite bedrock is covered by weathering deposits affected
by pedogenesis. It crops out in some parts or is covered by a
thin layer of debris and sand. Small residual inselbergs,
partly covered by prairie or thick Mediterranean scrub,
emerge from the plain.
To the south, in the territory of Villasimius, differential
erosion processes have isolated numerous acidic dikes that
dissect the granodiorites outcrops. In fact, the crests and
parallel valleys are all oriented according to the NW–SE
arrangement of the dikes. This marked orientation is found
also in the relief of the triangular promontory of Capo
Carbonara, linked to the coast by sand bars in which the
splendid
Notteri
lagoon
nestles.
Various
porphyritic-microgranite dikes give the tip of the promontory a particular shape, modelled also by marine erosion
(Fig. 30.9). In this sector, the narrow top of the rocky relief
suddenly slopes down towards its extremity by means of a
fault scarp. The sheer slopes are made up of granite bedrock
and scattered blocks. There are also unusual tafoni in the
landscape dotted by bushes of Mediterranean scrub. Along
the coast, wave-modelled rocks can be seen whereas beneath
the crystal-clear waters of the sea fascinating sceneries are
revealed by the granite rocks forming pinnacles
(Fig. 30.10a), buttresses and depressions, often coloured by
the yellow of zoanthid coral or Yellow Cluster Anemones
(Parazoanthus axinellae) or by the red of the Gorgonaceae
(Fig. 30.10c). On the sea floor near Secca of Cala Caterina,
south-west of the promontory, a fantastic submarine display
of rock piles can be admired which makes up the ideal
habitat of peaceful populations of large groupers (Serranidae) and gilt-head breams (Sparus aurata)
(Fig. 30.10b).
Opposite the Capo Carbonara point, at a distance of some
700 m, the small island of Cavoli is found which represents
the continuation of the promontory into the sea. The joints of
the granite bedrock and the dike system have created the
beautiful main inlets and alignment of two small elevations
R.T. Melis et al.
(40 m) which give the place its morphological character.
Deeply jointed rock blocks characterize the tops of the two
ridges which are linked by means of a gentle saddle. Small
heaps of blocks emerge from the bushes and adorn the
morphology of the island whilst thin sand deposits resulting
from weathered granite accumulate in the inner depressions
and rock fractures, favouring the development of soil and
vegetation.
Along the coast of this wind-swept island, granite surfaces usually remain fresh because of the constant washing
effect of the waves. On the other hand, aerosol and high
salinity favour weathering processes on the rock surfaces
which are not exposed to the direct action of the sea and
produce tafoni. These typical subaerial landforms are at
present found also in submerged areas and bear witness to
sea-level fluctuations in the past 20,000 years.
30.5
Conclusions
The spectacular granitic landscapes of Sardinia result from
weathering and long-term denudation occurring under
changing climates from the early Cainozoic to the present.
The Gallura and Sarrabus landscapes, in particular, offer a
range of major and small-scale granite landforms that reflect
local structural and lithological conditions. Wide flat areas
dominated by inselbergs and covered by rock blocks, shaped
in tafoni, characterize the Sardinia northeastern landscape.
The island’s southeastern landscape offers high relief, surrounded by crests and dissected plateaux framed by scattered
tors. The coastal landscape, affected by differential erosion
of dikes, shows various scenic features such as spectacular
archipelagos, splendid lagoons and promontories. Due to
their strong naturalistic interest and their cultural values,
these landforms represent an important geoheritage of the
Italian landscape. Palau Bear and the Mt. Pulchiana landforms are protected by regional laws as natural monuments,
while two protected areas are set up, respectively the
National Park of the La Maddalena Archipelago and the
Protected Marine Area of Capo Carbonara promontory.
References
Carmignani L, Oggiano G, Barca S, Conti P, Salvadori I, Eltrudis A,
Funedda A, Pasci S (2001) Geologia della Sardegna. Note
illustrative della Carta Geologica della Sardegna a scala
1:200.000. Mem Descr Carta Geol d’It 40:1–283
Depalmas A, Melis RT (2011) The nuragic people: their settlements,
economic activities and use of the land. In: Martini PI,
Chesworth W (eds) Landscape and societies. Selected cases.
Springer, The Netherlands, pp 167–185
Migoń P (2004) Structural control in the evolution of granite landscape.
Geographica 1:19–32
30
Granite Landscapes of Sardinia: Long-Term Evolution …
Orsini JB (1976) Les granitoides hercyniens corso-sardes: mise in
evidence de deux associations magmatiques. Bull Soc Geol Fr
18:1203–1206
Panizza M (2001) Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and examples of
geomorphological survey. Chin Sci Bull 46:4–6
Panizza M, Piacente S (2009) Cultural geomorphology and geodiversity. In: Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (eds) Geomorphosites. Pfeil, München, pp 35–48
Pelletier J (1960) Le relief de la Sardaigne. Institut des Études
Rhodaniennes de l’Université de Lyon, Mémoires et Documents
13:1–484
363
Roqué C, Zarroca M, Linares R (2013) Subsurface initiation of tafoni in
granite terrains. Geophysical evidence from NE Spain: geomorphological implications. Geomorphology 196:94–105
Rossi P, Oggiano G, Cocherie A (2009) A restored section of the
“southern Variscan realm” across the Corsica-Sardinia microcontinent. CR Geoscience 341:224–238
Secchi F, Lorrai M (2001) Some geological and environmental aspects
of the Sàrrabus-Gerrei region (SE Sardinia, Italy). Rend Sem Fac Sc
Univ Cagliari 71:187–208
Twidale CR (1982) Granite landforms. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 372 pp
The Coastal Dunes of Sardinia: Landscape
Response to Climate and Sea Level Changes
31
Rita T. Melis, Felice Di Gregorio, and Valeria Panizza
Abstract
The Sardinian coasts are characterized by spectacular aeolian landscapes. These are
concentrated in areas where the morphology of the coast, the age-long wind action on the
wide sandy beaches and the past availability of sand from the continental shelf—during the
low sea level during Pleistocene glacial phases—permitted remarkable volumes of sands to
accumulate and to dominate above other forms of the coastal landscape. In the western
coast of the island, hit by strong northwestern winds, vast dune fields, adorned by the
Mediterranean bush and white flowers of sea, show a spectacular variety of landforms such
as small nebkhas, loose dunes, cobblestone floors and deflation furrows. Lithified fossil
dunes (aeolianites) occur along most Sardinian coasts, providing important information on
past climate and sea level changes. These attractive wind landscapes offer researchers and
visitors many and various opportunities of study, recreation and tourism, in a context
unique due to the high value of the present and past landscapes.
Keywords
Aeolian processes
31.1
Coastal dune
Introduction
The island of Sardinia, located in the centre of the western
Mediterranean Sea (38°51′52′′–41°15′42′′N lat. and 8°8′–9°
50′E long), is exposed to strong winds, especially from the
north and west, which favours transport and accumulation of
aeolian sand along the coast, resulting in widespread deposition. Furthermore, eustatic fluctuations in response to
Quaternary climate changes, when vast portions of the
continental shelf emerged, favoured these processes
(Fig. 31.1). Along the western coast of Sardinia, from the
Asinara Gulf to the north, to the Oristano Gulf in the centre
and the Iglesiente-Sulcis coast to the south, vast extensions
R.T. Melis (&) F. Di Gregorio
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Università di
Cagliari, Via Trentino 51, 09127 Cagliari, Italy
e-mail: rtmelis@unica.it
V. Panizza
Dipartimento di Storia, Scienze dell’Uomo e della Formazione,
Università di Sassari, Via Zanfarino 62, 07100 Sassari, Italy
Aeolianite
Sardinia
of pearly white sand spread inland from the coastline, covering coastal plains and rugged reliefs. Aeolian processes
have created fragile, dynamic landscapes which are very
sensitive to environmental and climate changes. These
ever-changing wild sceneries are characterized by spectacular erosion and accumulation aeolian landforms. Here, one
can observe with fascination an intact and evocative natural
landscape, in which the rhythm of life is still marked by
strong blowing of the wind. Vast dune fields adorned by the
dark green of the Mediterranean bush and, near the sea, by
white flowers of sea daffodils (Pancratium maritimum L.)
and the slender stems of the European marram grass
(Ammophila arenaria) are mainly located along the northern
and western coast, frequently hit by the strong Mistral wind.
The golden dune fields at Pistis, along the centre-western
coast, and the Piscinas (Arburese) dunes, more to the south,
are spectacular dynamic aeolian landscapes combining a
great variety of micro- and macroforms. In Nurra (northwestern coast), in the Sinis peninsula and along the southwestern coast (Porto Paglia) thick reddish dune fossil
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_31
365
366
R.T. Melis et al.
Fig. 31.1 Location of the
Sardinia coastal dune fields: 1
dune fields; 2 approximate
boundary of the continental shelf
that extends to a depth of ca.
−120 m. Elevations are in metres
a.s.l.
sequences crop out, forming the legacy of ancient aeolian
landscapes linked to Pleistocene climate changes. They form
brittle cliffs exposed to the action of waves and winds.
31.2
Geographical Setting
Sardinia is the second largest island (24,090 km2) of the
Mediterranean Sea. It is located 120 km away from the
Italian peninsula and 185 km from the North African coast.
Its coastline stretches for about 1849 km and is prevalently
made up of rocky and jagged coasts alternating with long
sandy beaches, where vast dune fields are found. The latter
can mainly be observed along the western coast, which is
characterized by a wide continental shelf with sandy seafloor, which has allowed the growth of a thick and extended
sea prairie of Mediterranean tapeweed (Posidonia oceanica).
To the contrary, the eastern coast is narrow and the shelf is
incised by deep canyons.
The present-day position of Sardinia is the result of
complex geological history that records some of the greatest
geodynamic events occurring in the last 400 Ma (Variscan,
Thetys and Alpine s.l. evolution). Its geological features are
among the most varied in the world. The island is mainly
known for Palaeozoic metamorphic and igneous successions
and Jurassic–Cretaceous carbonate successions, which
occupy most of its territory (Melis et al. 2017). The coast is
nearly all characterized by prevalently silicoclastic
31
The Coastal Dunes of Sardinia: Landscape Response …
Quaternary deposits linked to marine processes and wind
action following climate and eustatic changes.
Sardinia is characterized by a warm temperate maritime
climate with an average temperature ranging from 7 °C in
winter to about 25 °C in summer. It shows a wet season
(October to April) accounting for 80% of the yearly precipitation (300 mm during 2008), and a dry one (May to
September) (Delitala et al. 2000). The most frequent winds
blow from the northwest and southwest, without appreciable
variations from one year to the other. Data show that 60–
70% of the winds have a speed of less than 10 m/s, although
speeds up to 25 m/s are not rare (ARPA, Servizio Agrometeorologico Regione Sardegna, http://www.sar.sardegna.it/
). Indeed, high wind speeds cause the main morphological
changes in the dune fields and their progradation.
The winds from the western quadrant prevail on the
island for most of the year, except in summer, when a breeze
regime is established. The western coasts are windier than
the eastern coasts. The latter are sheltered from the westerly
winds, thanks to the natural protection offered by a mountain
range stretching in northsouth direction near the eastern
coast.
In these spectacular landscapes dune movements occur,
causing damage to farming and infrastructure. The Buggerru
dunes (Iglesiente) and the large Is Arenas dunes in the Sinis
peninsula were once mobile dunes but in the second half of
the twentieth century they were subject to large-scale
afforestation which has transformed the landscape: where
there used to be a vast sand desert, now is a thick wood of
stone pine (Pinus pinea) and Aleppo pine (Pinus
halepensis).
Cross-bedding cemented dunes (aeolianites), testifying to
the evolution of these landscapes during the Middle/Upper
Pleistocene glacial periods, are present along the Sardinia
coasts, buried underneath younger aeolian deposits, nearly
all recent.
31.3
Wind Landscapes
The coastal dune systems found along the coasts of Sardinia make up striking and particularly dynamic landscapes
in relation to wind frequency and intensity. At the same
time, they are areas which are very sensitive and vulnerable
to natural or man-induced changes. The origin and evolution of these fragile but fascinating aeolian landscapes
located in the rear-beach areas largely depend upon geomorphological features of the beach to which they are connected and also upon sea level fluctuations and sedimentary
balance.
Thus, where the action of wind coming from the sea is
not particularly strong and frequent, dunes have developed
in an arrangement parallel to the beach, as observed along
367
many shores of the island’s eastern coastline. To the contrary, on the northern and western shores, lashed by the
dominant Mistral wind, nearly all aeolian deposits show a
marked longitudinal development, according to the wind
direction and the width of deflation areas.
Within the same dune field, it is possible to observe
mobile areas subject to progressive stabilization as well as
areas subject to erosion with furrows, channels and deflation
hollows. In particular, the dune systems of Pistis and
Piscinas (Arburese) are very spectacular and of great scientific interest.
These “wind landscapes” present considerable variety of
morphological and vegetation aspects which provide
researchers and visitors a high value of diversity from the
landscape, scientific and tourist–recreational viewpoint.
31.3.1
Pistis Dunes
The Pistis dunes are found on the centre-western coast of
Sardinia, south of the Capo Frasca peninsula (Fig. 31.2).
The area occupied by the dune field diverges from a coastal
curvature with a 2 km wide arch and stretches inland up to
an altitude of about 70 m.
Aeolian deposits, varying in thickness from some
decimetres up to some tens of metres, are made up of
middle-fine, whitish-yellowish quartz–feldspar sands.
Owing to their particular ochre or golden colour, which is
more evident when they are wet, these dunes are known as
Sabbie d’oro (Golden Sands). The succession of aeolian
sediments lies on both the Palaeozoic bedrock, made up of
metamorphic rocks (quartzites, sericite sandstones and filladic schists), and on the edge of ancient terraced alluvial
deposits and cemented aeolian deposits from the Pleistocene.
The latter crop out occasionally in the inner areas—where
deflation is more intense—and at the southernmost tip of the
beach.
The Pistis dune field consists mainly of free dunes
(Fig. 31.3a) stretching inland with a NW–SE oriented axis.
The entire dune system constitutes a particularly attractive
landscape, with erosional and accumulation macro- and
microforms present in the southern sector. A detailed
observation from the upper beach towards the hinterland
allows the following erosional features to be identified:
(i) outcrops of aeolianized Palaeozoic bedrock (Fig. 31.4a),
(ii) wide stretches of pebble floors with well-sorted and
rounded quartz grains, (iii) deflation furrows with desert
pavements made up of sharp, tiny fragments of metamorphic rocks (Fig. 31.4b). Depositional landforms are characterized by embryonic dunes or nebkas (Fig. 31.3b), dunes
fixed by shrubs and trees, and free dunes. Spectacular
ripples shape the surfaces of the latter (Arisci et al. 2003)
(Fig. 31.4c).
368
R.T. Melis et al.
Fig. 31.2 Satellite image of the
Pistis (Arburese) dune field
(source Google Earth, modified;
© 2015 Google. Map data: image
Landsat, image © 2015 Digital
Globe)
Notwithstanding evident signs of tourism expansion in
the peripheral northern and southern areas, this landscape
still possesses marked natural integrity and considerable
scenic impact. Also for this reason, the Pistis dunes have
been declared of high natural interest and worthy of conservation measures. Furthermore, this area has now been
registered in the list of Sites of Community Importance
(SCI) of the European Union.
31.3.2
Piscinas Dune Field
The Piscinas dune field originated from the wide beach
between Punta Fenu Struvu to the north, and the northern
root of the Capo Pecora promontory to the south
(Fig. 31.5a). These dunes stretch into the hinterland for more
than 5 km, over a surface of about 20 km2, attaining considerable height of 100 m. Therefore, together with the Pilat
dunes in the French southwestern coast of Landes (Costa and
Suanez 2013), they are among the highest in Europe. This
fascinating landscape is one of the most significant and
interesting dune systems of Sardinia and the Mediterranean
from the natural, educational, scientific and geotourism
standpoint.
The Piscinas aeolian landscape is a vast stretch of
undulated sand gently descending towards the sea and
abruptly interrupted near the coastline by a high erosional
bluff, turning in some points into a proper cliff, developed in
the Pleistocene aeolianites.
Most of this dune field have been fixed by vegetation.
However, the northern sector is characterized by a narrow
and elongated three-belt system of free quartz–feldspar sand,
which makes up the most spectacular and scenic area of the
whole aeolian complex (Fig. 31.5b). This sand results from
the weathering cover of the underlying aeolianites and the
sandy alluvial deposits of Rio Piscinas and Rio Naracauli
watercourses. Deposition was more consistent during last
century owing to the great amount of stream sediments
coming from the tailings dams of the Montevecchio and
Ingurtosu mines which are located in the elevated area
behind the Piscinas field dunes.
These three long belts of aeolian sediments are different
in size, according to the geomorphological features of the
coastal sector where they originated. Their axial
31
The Coastal Dunes of Sardinia: Landscape Response …
369
Fig. 31.3 The Pistis aeolian
landscape: a view of the Pistis
ochre-coloured dune field;
b embryonic dunes (nebkas) fixed
by vegetation (Ammophila
arenaria)
development, starting from the beach is about 400 m in a
WNW–ESE direction for the northern belt, placed north of
Rio Piscinas; ca. 1 km in a NW–SE direction for the central
belt, stretching between Rio Piscinas and Rio Naracauli; ca.
2 km still in a NW–SE direction for the southern belt, the
largest and most striking one, located south of Rio Naracauli
(Fig. 31.5b).
The diverse extent of the front beach influences the
availability of sediments for wind transport towards the inland
from north to south. The different development of the three
belts is influenced by the morphological context of the
surrounding area that controls the actions of the wind. The
more advanced development of the large southern belt is due
to the wider extent of the front beach, thanks to the supply of
sediments from the Rio Piscinas and Rio Naracauli and to the
littoral drift current with a prevalent N-S direction.
The large southern belt, which in its terminal portion
attains the height of 98 m, makes up the most interesting and
striking part of the mobile dune complex. Its total length, of
about 300 m, remains practically constant for a long stretch,
as shown by two lateral parallel crests which border the inner
part where typical and striking erosional and depositional
370
R.T. Melis et al.
Fig. 31.4 The Pistis dune field:
a aeolianized outcrops of the
Palaeozoic bedrock; b desert
pavements; c deflation hollows
with spectacular ripples
landforms can be seen (Fig. 31.6a). Its initial portion, in
proximity to the front–rear beach, is characterized by a wide
area of embryonic dunes (nebka), less than 1 m in height,
with their typical sandy tail on the leeward side (Fig. 31.6b).
In this sector wide deflation surfaces are found with widespread fine or more or less coarse debris resulting from
disintegration of metamorphic basement rocks, subject to
intense aeolian processes (Fig. 31.6c). Proceeding to the
hinterland, the embryonic dunes give way to more complex
and stable dune formations, made up of less evident,
half-stabilized sand accumulations, which in some cases
have been fixed by shrub and arboreal vegetation. Nevertheless, between the dunes numerous deflation furrows are
visible, which testify to the efficacy of transport process.
Further along, the vegetation cover becomes more scanty
with the presence of a mobile dunes, made up of
donkey-back deposits which seem to be an early advancement front, consisting of material accumulated from the
deflation areas. A second dune advancement front can be
observed at the elevation of about 60 m a.s.l. It is made up of
crescent-shaped dunes which border small deflation hollows,
within which interesting aeolianized outcrops of the lithic
bedrock are present (Fig. 31.5a). Finally, the terminal portion of the entire dune belt is characterized by a slightly
undulating and inland–inclined wide accumulation area
which ends abruptly with a cliff. The whitish surface of this
area is modelled by innumerable, constantly changing aeolian ripples.
The diachronic comparison of photographs taken in the
past 50 years shows that this belt is subject to 1 m/year
advancement and is progressively covering a previous
advancement front dating probably from historical times.
The surface of the latter is stabilized by thick Mediterranean
bush, prevalently mastic (Pistacia lentiscus) and Phoenician
juniper (Juniperus phoenicea).
The central belt, comprised between the estuaries of Rio
Piscinas and Rio Naracauli (Fig. 31.5a), has, on the whole, a
structure similar to the previously described one but both its
length and width are smaller. It starts on the wide beach with
a wide field of less than 1 m high, nebka-like embryonic
31
The Coastal Dunes of Sardinia: Landscape Response …
371
Fig. 31.5 Satellite images of the Piscinas aeolian landscape: a satellite
image of the three belts of mobile dunes in the northern sector of the
Piscinas dune field; b satellite image of the Piscinas dune field (source
Google Earth, modified; © 2015 Google. Map data: image Landsat,
image © 2015 Digital Globe)
dunes showing the typical leeward tail. This structure is then
characterized by a vast deflation area stretching inland for a
few hundred metres, in which there are wide stretches of
more or less aeolianized, fine-grained desert pavements.
Less pronounced sand deposits are present on this surface,
colonized by European marram grass (Ammophila arenaria),
Tamarix sp. shrubs and rare arborescent junipers. In the most
inland area, mammillary aeolian deposits rest on the gentle
arenaceous-schist slopes of the Palaeozoic bedrock.
The northern belt, north of Rio Piscinas, is smaller than
the other ones, due to the narrow beach and the presence of
slopes closer to the coast. This belt is characterized by
deflation furrows and small longitudinal dunes oriented
NW–SE.
series in studies about coastal landscape evolution during
periods of sea level and climate changes, for this part of
Mediterranean Sea.
Biogenic dunes, defined as aeolianites by Sayles (1931),
are present along the coasts of Sardinia from Nurra to the
Sulcis region (Fig. 31.7a). These aeolianites are partially
lithified, cemented by carbonates and composed of fine- to
medium-grained, well-sorted sand. The characteristics of
sand grains largely depend on the local environmental setting but the dominant constituents of the aeolianites are
quartz and feldspar, as well as marine carbonate particles.
Above all, during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM),
when the sea level was 120 m lower than the present one,
the western Sardinian coasts were strongly affected by aeolian processes, generating a system of dunes and associated
facies, locally extending several kilometres inland from the
coast. These aeolian deposits alternate with palaeosols and
more or less marked erosional surfaces, associated with
colluvial/alluvial and fluvial deposits (Ulzega and Hearty
1986; Andreucci et al. 2010).
In Nurra (northwestern Sardinia), along the southern
coast and north of the town of Alghero, continental and
marine deposits can be observed with a certain continuity,
witnessing sea level and climate changes occurring in the
last 200,000 years. Along this suggestive coastline, Quaternary sediments unconformably overlie Tertiary volcanic
31.4
The Aeolian Landscapes of the Past
Partially lithified ancient aeolianites are present along most
Sardinian coasts, providing important information on Pleistocene sea level changes. Their lithological composition is
strictly linked to the local environment and lithology and
they present continuous outcrops along many coastal stretches, as is possible to observe in the Sinis Peninsula (central
western Sardinia). These outcrops, in particular, have been
studied and dated, and represent a fundamental reference
372
R.T. Melis et al.
Fig. 31.6 The Piscinas mobile dunes in the large belt of aeolian sediments (a); wide fields of embryonic dunes (nebkas) at the back of the beach
and in proximity of Rio Naracauli, in the foreground (b); deflation hollows with pebble floors in-between sand dunes (c)
rocks and Mesozoic carbonate formations. Continental
deposits are represented by cemented aeolian sediments
(aeolianites) with intercalations of alluvial, slope and
palaeosol deposits. The limited areal extent of last interglacial (Upper Pleistocene) beach sand deposits (Tyrrhenian
Stage, Marine Isotope Substage 5e), points to coastal morphology very similar to the present one, with small pocket
beaches set between the rocky cliffs (Andreucci et al. 2006).
The presence of aeolianites overlying the Upper Pleistocene
beach deposits (Tyrrhenian Stage) shows a retreating sea
level, with great availability of sand from the continental
shelf and a progressively cooling climate (Andreucci et al.
2010). The formation of these dune systems was possible
during the LGM, at ca. 20 ka BP, when the sea level
dropped more than 100 m below the present-day position,
favouring accumulation, on the continental topography, of
great amounts of sand coming from the shelf. The phases of
greatest accumulation took place during the driest periods,
whereas the presence of intensely bioturbated aeolian layers
and reddish palaeosols (Fig. 31.7b) bear witness to more
humid climate phases. In the bioturbated layers, vertebrate
bones and footprints were found, in particular the remains of
Praemegaceros cazioti, an endemic species of deer, which
became extinct in the Middle-Upper Pleistocene. Orientation
of lamination shows prevailing wind from west and
northwest, similar to the present-day wind direction,
although wind intensity was certainly higher (Fig. 31.7c). In
this part of Sardinia, dune fields are found nowadays only in
correspondence with wide bays characterized by sandy
beaches, as in the case of Porto Ferro.
Remarkable evidence of aeolian landscapes resulting
from Pleistocene climate and sea level changes are
31
The Coastal Dunes of Sardinia: Landscape Response …
373
Fig. 31.7 Cemented dunes (aeolianites) cropping out along the cliffs of the southwestern coast of Sardinia (a); bioturbations and palaeosols in the
aeolianites along the Nurra coast (b), laminated texture in the aeolianites near Cave del Cantaro, south of Alghero (c)
observable in the Sinis peninsula, north of the Oristano Gulf.
Thick dune successions are exposed in the form of cliffs
along the northwestern side of Capo Mannu promontory,
where various dune generations can be observed, intercalated with palaeosols in the high cliff overhanging the sea
(Fig. 31.8a). These dunes were deposited during the Pliocene and Lower Pleistocene (Carboni and Lecca 1995). They
are made up of carbonate sandy bodies with a maximum
thickness of 50 m, resulting from the overlapping of four
main dune units which show lateral continuity, while another
three units are discontinuous, since they are separated by
palaeosols, with a lenticular trend and occasional mammal
remains (Bovidae and Suidae) (Abbazzi et al. 2008). Within
the main dune units, which in some cases attain an average
thickness of 6–9 m, at least 19 dune subunits can be
observed (Carboni and Lecca 1995). These striking dunes
were affected by marine erosion during the rising of the sea
level in the Tyrrhenian Stage (Marine Isotope Substage 5e),
as witnessed by the palaeocliff buried underneath the aeolian
sediments of the LGM (MIS 2) (Carboni and Lecca 1995)
(Fig. 31.8b).
Aeolianites ascribed to this latter period (MIS 2) (Lecca
and Carboni 2007) crop out at Capo San Marco and San
Giovanni in the southern portion of the Sinis peninsula.
They were excellent building materials for the construction
of the Punic-Roman town of Tharros (Fig. 31.9a) and also
suitable bedrock for the excavation of necropolises of
pre-historic and historic populations (Fig. 31.9b).
More to the south, along the coast of the Gonnesa Gulf
(Sulcis-Iglesiente), vast complexes of well-cemented, cross
bedding dunes, ascribable to the Middle Pleistocene, have
developed from the coast to the inland (Fig. 31.9c). In these
spectacular aeolianites, the remains of a Sardinian dwarf
elephant (Mammuthus lamarmorae) were found at Morimenta (Palombo et al. 2012). In addition, traces and fossil
tracks attributed to the Praemegaceros cazioti Megaloceros
374
R.T. Melis et al.
Fig. 31.8 Dune succession with
intercalations of palaeosols
exposed in a cliff at Capo Mannu
(Sinis) promontory (a); fossil cliff
in the cemented dune complex of
Capo Mannu, partially buried by
aeolian and slope deposits of the
LGM (MIS 2) (b)
species (Fanelli et al. 2007) are visible in the aeolianites
cropping out along the Porto Paglia sea cliff.
31.5
Conclusions
The spectacular fields of mobile dunes which characterize
the coastal landscapes of Sardinia are the result of age-long
wind action on the wide sandy beaches. Their evolution is
linked to sea level fluctuations and climate changes during
the Quaternary, as witnessed by the underlying thick lithified
dunes. The geomorphological interest in these gentle and
wild dune landscapes and aeolianites, which form long cliffs
along the shores exposed to the actions of sea and wind, is
also enhanced by their relatively easy accessibility. Most of
these fascinating aeolian landscapes, such as the Piscinas
and Pistis dune fields and the aeolianites making up the high
Sinis cliffs, have been enrolled among the sites of
31
The Coastal Dunes of Sardinia: Landscape Response …
375
Fig. 31.9 View of the Punic-Roman town of Tharros (Sinis), built with blocks of aeolian sandstone (a); detail of the Punic necropolis of San
Giovanni (Sinis) dug out in aeolianites (b); aeolianite cross-bedding at Morimenta (Gonnesa, Sulcis) (c)
community importance (SCI) owing to their considerable
natural interest.
References
Abbazzi L, Carboni S, Delfino M, Gallai G, Lecca L, Rook L (2008)
Fossil vertebrates (Mammalia and Reptilia) from Capo Mannu
formation (Late Pliocene, Sardinia, Italy), with description of a new
Testudo (Cheloni, Testudinidae) species. Riv Ital Paleontol Stratigr
114:119–132
Andreucci S, Pascucci V, Clemmensen L (2006) Upper Pleistocene
coastal deposits of West Sardinia: a record of sea level and climate
change. GeoActa 5:79–96
Andreucci S, Clemmensen LB, Murray A, Pascucci V (2010) Middle to
late Pleistocene coastal deposits of Alghero, northwest Sardinia
(Italy): chronology and evolution. Quatern Int 222:3–16
Arisci A, De Waele J, Di Gregorio F, Ferrucci C, Follesa R (2003)
Geoenvironmental analysis in coastal zone management: a case
study in Southwest Sardinia (Italy). J Coastal Res 19(4):963–970
376
Carboni S, Lecca L (1995) Le Pliocene de Capo Mannu (Sardaigne
occidentale): transition marin littoral-continental dunaire. Comptes
rendus de l’Academie des Sciences Paris, série II a 320:1203–1210
Costa S, Suanez S (2013) Géomorphologie des littoraux Français. In:
Mercier D (ed) Géomorphologie de la France. Dunod, Paris, pp 65–
77
Delitala AM, Cesari D, Chessa PA (2000) Precipitation over Sardinia
(Italy) during the 1946–1993 rainy season and associated
large-scale climatic variations. Int J Climatol 20:519–542
Fanelli F, Palombo MR, Pillola GL, Ibba A (2007) Tracks and
trackways of “Praemegaceros” cazioti (Depéret, 1897) (Artiodactyla, Cervidae) in Pleistocene coastal deposits from Sardinia
(Western Mediterranean, Italy). Boll Soc Paleontol Ital 46(1):47–54
Lecca L, Carboni S (2007) The Tyrrhenian section of San Giovanni di
Sinis (Sardinia): stratigraphic record of an irregular single high
stand. Riv Ital Paleontol Stratigr 13(3):509–523
R.T. Melis et al.
Melis RT, Di Gregorio F, Panizza V (2017) Granite landscapes of
Sardinia: long-term evolution of scenic landforms. In: Soldati M,
Marchetti M (eds) Landscape and landforms of Italy. Springer,
Cham, pp 351–363
Palombo MR, Ferretti M, Pillola GL, Chiappini L (2012) A reappraisal
of the dwarfed mammoth Mammuthus lamarmorai (Major, 1883)
from Gonnesa (south-western Sardinia, Italy). Quatern Int 255:158–
170
Sayles RW (1931) Bermuda during the Ice Age. Am Acad Arts Sci
66:381–468
Ulzega A, Hearty PJ (1986) Geomorphology, stratigraphy and
geochronology of Late Quaternary marine deposits in Sardinia.
Z Geomorph Supp 62:119–129
32
The Terrestrial and Submarine Landscape
of the Tremiti Archipelago, Adriatic Sea
Enrico Miccadei, Tommaso Piacentini, and Francesco Mascioli
Abstract
The archipelago of the Tremiti Islands, situated in the centre of the Adriatic Sea, is
considered, nationally and internationally, a very important geological and geomorphological laboratory, rich in Cenozoic stratigraphic, tectonic and, recently, geomorphological
studies. Despite the small size of the islands, the present landscape of the Tremiti Islands
and of the inner continental shelf shows an outstanding wealth of ancient and present
terrestrial and marine landforms. They provide the islands with their intrinsic and
distinctive value and beauty and that can be discovered walking on the islands, sailing
around them or diving into the turquoise to blue sea.
Keywords
Coastal landforms
Adriatic Sea
32.1
Paleodrainage
Introduction
The Tremiti Islands are an archipelago in the central part of
the Adriatic Sea, north of the Gargano Peninsula (Fig. 32.1).
They are a marine protected area included in the Gargano
National Park. The archipelago is made up of the San
Domino, San Nicola, Capraia, Cretaccio and Pianosa
islands, and of the La Vecchia rock.
For a long time, the name of the archipelago was linked
with the Greek hero Diomedes—their ancient name was
indeed Diomede’s Islands (Insulae Diomedeae in Latin and
Diolηdie1 in ancient Greek). The myth has it that the islands
were made by Diomede by throwing into the sea three huge
rocks, taken from Troy, which then arose from the sea as
islands (San Domino, San Nicola and Capraia). According to
E. Miccadei T. Piacentini (&)
Dipartimento di Ingegneria e Geologia, Università
“G. d’Annunzio” Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti
Scalo, Italy
e-mail: tpiacentini@unich.it
F. Mascioli
Coastal Research Station/Forschungsstelle Küste, An der Mühle 5,
26548 Norderney, Germany
Karst landforms
Landslides
Tremiti Islands
another myth Aphrodite, the Goddess of Love, turned Diomede’s companions into diomedeae, rare sea birds nesting
on the limestone coastal cliffs of San Domino.
The name Tremitis appears for the first time in medieval
manuscripts and relates to historical earthquakes and seismic
hazard in the area, since the word tremiti means “tremors”.
The islands and the surrounding underwater landscape are
characterised by landforms originated from marine and
continental geomorphological processes, such as marine
erosion, gravity-induced processes, surficial running water
and karst processes. These landforms, located below and
above the present sea level, preserve the record of a long
Quaternary landscape evolution connected to geomorphological processes driven by the interaction between climate,
tectonics and sea level changes.
In pre-historical and historical times, the location and the
landscape—characterised by steep cliffs and flat summits—
made the archipelago a good place to live and fish and to
emplace military and naval stations. The most ancient
human records are findings of cabin villages on San Domino
dating back to the Neolithic age (eighth–seventh millennium
BC), while on San Nicola pole holes of an Iron Age cabin
and sepulchral graves of Archaic, Classic and Hellenistic age
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_32
377
378
E. Miccadei et al.
Fig. 32.1 Tremiti Islands. a Location map (modified after Tropeano et al. 2013). b Regional geological scheme of the Central Adriatic Sea and
the Gargano area
(sixth–first century BC) have been found. The Roman
presence is documented by a second century BC domus.
Since the first century BC, the islands were used for the
exile, deportation and internment of prisoners. Roman
Emperor Tiberius exiled here his granddaughter Giulia,
guilty of adultery. Much later, political prisoners were
interned here by Benito Mussolini’s Fascist regime.
However, the strongest anthropic impact on the landscape
of the Tremiti Islands, and particularly on the island of San
Nicola, is due to the settlement of Benedictine monks (1016
AD), who built a church and a monastery-fortress (Santa
Maria). The impact on the landscape was both positive, as
the cliffs were protected from erosional processes, and
negative, due to the quarrying of large amounts of rocks in
the island. In the following centuries the protection of the
monumental part of the island was improved with huge digs,
such as the so-called “La Tagliata”—an artificial incision of
a natural bottleneck on the top surface of the island.
Therefore, the Tremiti Archipelago’s islands and submerged landforms provide a fascinating key to improve the
reading and understanding of the landscape and the natural
and human history of the southern Adriatic Sea.
32.2
Geographical and Geological Setting
The Tremiti Islands, the only Adriatic Italian ones, are
located about 20 km off the Italian coast, in northern Apulia,
close to the Gargano Peninsula (Fig. 32.1), and have a
3 km2 surface; they can be reached by ferry from Vieste and
Rodi Garganico in the Gargano area and from Termoli, on
the Molise coast, and by helicopter from Foggia airport.
The islands are aligned in a SW–NE orientation and rise
from a gentle underwater slope characterised by a pronounced asymmetry with a wide NW continental shelf
extension and a smaller SE one. The islands show a tabular
landscape, with summit gentle surfaces between 116 m (San
Domino) and 55 m a.s.l. (Capraia), bounded by very steep or
vertical cliffs (Fig. 32.2).
Geoscientists have carried out studies in the archipelago
since the late 1800s, when Tellini (1890) published a first
paper with a geological map. Then scientists focused mostly
on palaeontology and only few of them on Quaternary
continental deposits and landscape and lithic industries (Pasa
1953; Zorzi 1958).
The archipelago of the Tremiti Islands is composed of a
sequence of limestone marine rocks, with interbedded
dolomites and marls, dating from the Cenozoic (Paleocene—
Middle Pliocene), which constitute the carbonate bedrock of
the archipelago (Selli 1971). Despite their small size, the
islands are characterised by widespread Quaternary continental deposits (Middle Pleistocene—Holocene), indicative
of slope, alluvial fan and aeolian environments. They overlie
marine rocks from the sea level and up to the summit, more
than 100 m a.s.l., have a maximum thickness of about 40 m,
and are well exposed along the cliffs of San Nicola, part of
San Domino (Cala degli Inglesi, Cala Tramontana, Cala
delle Roselle) and north of Capraia. These deposits are made
up of sand and gravel clastic deposits, paleosoils, calcretes,
aeolian sands and loess (Selli 1971; Cresta et al. 1999;
Miccadei et al. 2011a), with Middle Pleistocene mammal
vertebrates in clastic deposits (Pasa 1953) and Holocene
lithic industries in eluvium–colluvium (Zorzi 1958)
(Fig. 32.3).
32
The Terrestrial and Submarine Landscape of the Tremiti …
Fig. 32.2 Panoramic view of the Tremiti Islands from San Domino
Fig. 32.3 Geomorphological scheme of the Tremiti Islands (modified after Miccadei et al. 2011a, 2012)
379
380
The oldest deposits (Middle Pleistocene) consist of
breccias (with intercalated paleosoils) related to slope processes and, in some places, aeolian sands. These lay on an
erosive surface on carbonate bedrock and in some cases fill
pre-existent karst depressions (San Domino, Cala degli
Inglesi, Cala delle Roselle and Capraia, Fig. 32.4). San
Nicola is characterised by a second sequence of clastic
deposits (Br1, Ps1, Cg1), consisting of breccias and paleosoils (Fig. 32.5a). Above the breccia units, subrounded
conglomerate levels (Cg, Cg1, Figs. 32.4 and 32.5a; more
evident in the southern side of San Nicola and in the SE side
of San Domino, Cala delle Roselle area, and including
remains af a fossil rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculusI; Pasa
1953) possibly outline alluvial fans and streams which
developed on the islands during the sea level low stand of
the late Middle Pleistocene. The clastic units are covered by
loess and calcretes (Cr) (dating from the initial part of the
Upper Pleistocene, Miccadei et al. 2011a)—which are
widespread on all the islands (Figs. 32.4 and 32.5b)—consisting of limestones formed by the cementation of soil,
sand, gravel, shells, by calcium carbonate deposited due to
evaporation or the escape of carbon dioxide from vadose
water. The top of the calcretes is characterised by clear
evidence of karst landforms. Scattered on the calcretes,
aeolian sandy deposits (AS) are present (San Domino),
dating back to the Upper Pleistocene (Miccadei et al. 2011a).
The most recent part of the Quaternary continental succession is constituted by soils and eluvial–colluvial deposits
(S, Fig. 32.4) (San Domino, at Cala degli Inglesi, and San
Nicola), dating back to the Early–Middle Holocene on the
base of Neolithic siliceous and ceramic industries (Zorzi
1958).
The carbonate Cenozoic succession is in a general 10–20°
SE-dipping homocline setting. This is regionally coherent
with a limb of a NE–SW anticline, faulted several times
during the various tectonics stages that involved the uplifted
Adriatic-Apulian foreland of the Apennine orogenesis during the Pliocene and Lower Pleistocene (Argnani et al.
1993); this is also possibly related to diapirism of buried salt
sequences (Festa et al. 2014). The main tectonic discontinuities have E–W, WSW–ENE and NE–SW directions
(Fig. 32.3); they are characterised by strike-slip kinematics
(Argnani et al. 1993; Miccadei et al. 2011a) and by strong
seismicity, with earthquakes along E–W to SW–NE tectonic
discontinuities.
The geomorphological features of the islands, as well as
of the inner continental shelf, are characterised by different
types of landforms (i.e. gravity-induced, fluvial, karst,
coastal and marine) which outline a complex long-term
evolution resulting from the superimposition of marine,
costal and subaerial processes over time. Coastal morphology is the result of coastal and subaerial processes, strongly
related to lithologic and tectonic features (Andriani et al.
E. Miccadei et al.
Fig. 32.4 Quaternary continental succession for San Domino (a),
southern San Nicola (b) and Cretaccio (c). Elevations a.s.l. are shown
along the y axis; the coordinates, in the UTM-WG84 system, indicate
the location of typical outcrops (modified after Miccadei et al. 2011a)
2005). Remains of superficial running water and alluvial fan
landforms are scattered on the islands and preserved in
submerged areas. The karst landforms have been known
since the beginning of the 1900s (Pasa 1953; Cresta et al.
1999) and are related to processes contributing to the Quaternary morphogenesis of the islands at least since the
Middle Pleistocene; evidence of karst processes is
32
The Terrestrial and Submarine Landscape of the Tremiti …
381
Fig. 32.5 Cliffs and rocky coasts on Cenozoic limestone, dolomites
and marls rocks and Quaternary continental deposits of the islands
(after Miccadei et al. 2011a). a San Nicola, cliff >30 m high on an
outcrop of breccias (Br), paleosols (Ps) and conglomerates (Cg), on an
erosional surface (ES) over calcareous marine bedrock (CB), rock falls
are scattered at the cliff’s base; in the lower left part a close-up of the
deposits is included; b Cretaccio, cliff on calcrete (Cr) deposits on an
erosional surface (ES) over carbonate bedrock (CB); the calcrete’s age
is 121 ± 21 ka (U/Th dating; Miccadei et al. 2011a); rocks fallen from
the cliff are scattered at the cliff’s base
documented also within the bedrock marine succession since
the Eocene (Cresta et al. 1999). The present-day morphodynamics of the islands is characterised by the complex
interaction of gravitational and marine processes that induce
the instability, retreat and evolution of the marine cliffs
(Cotecchia et al. 1996).
The geomorphological features of the archipelago highlight the relationships between Quaternary tectonics, regional uplift, possibly diapirism (Mastronuzzi and Sansò 2002;
Tropeano et al. 2013; Festa et al. 2014), and eustatic
sea-level changes (Ridente and Trincardi 2002; Parlagreco
et al. 2011); this has led to alternate periods of emersion and
submersion of the area between the islands and the Italian
coast (now at a depth of up to 80 m b.s.l.), driving the
long-term geomorphological evolution (Miccadei et al.
2011a, b, 2012).
islands and the Italian coast. Tectonic features control the
overall islands’ morphology. The most peculiar landforms of
the islands are marine ones; moreover alluvial fans, superficial running water-related landforms and karst landforms
(visible both above and below sea level) are well preserved
and highlight the complex landscape evolution. Other
landforms are gravity-induced ones, affecting all the cliffs
with several rock falls, translational and complex landslides,
and locally lateral spreads, as well as anthropogenic landforms which outline the most recent changes in the landscape of the Tremiti Islands (Andriani et al. 2005; Miccadei
et al. 2011a, b, 2012).
32.3
Landforms
Despite the small size of the islands, the present landscape of
the Tremiti Islands and of the inner continental shelf shows
an outstanding wealth of active, inactive and relict landforms, that give the islands its intrinsic and distinctive value
and beauty. Present and relict landforms of the islands can be
easily observed walking and sailing around them or diving
into the sea. Such landforms are due to different kinds of
continental, coastal and marine geomorphological processes
(Fig. 32.3) that developed in response to the varied geology,
tectonics, climate conditions, and history of alternated periods of emersion and submersion of the area between the
32.3.1
Tectonic Landforms
The elongated SW–NE morphology of the islands and
several of the coastal indentations, bays and inlets—oriented mostly NW–SE, EW and SW–NE and bounded by
straight walls—are clearly related to the orientations of
faults, joints and associated fracturation zones (e.g. Architiello, Cala degli Inglesi and Cala Tramontana area on the
NW sides of San Domino and on the NE and N side of
Capraia; Figs. 32.3 and 32.6a). Locally, the location and
shape of karst features (dolines) are also controlled by
tectonic features (Fig. 32.6b). Submerged tectonic landforms are also present, mostly sub-vertical scarps and
bedrock outcrop alignments, related to the main fault systems, for example in the area between the San Domino and
Capraia or San Nicola islands and in the northern and
southern sectors of San Domino.
382
E. Miccadei et al.
Fig. 32.6 Cliffs and rocky coasts on Cenozoic limestone, dolomites
and marls rocks and tectonic features (after Miccadei et al. 2011a).
a Capraia, Cala Sorrentino, cliff up to 30 m high, with two inlets
characterised by small pocket beaches; the inlets corresponds to NW–
SE-oriented faults affecting the calcareous bedrock (CB) with high
fracturation which induced their development; on the upper part of the
island they correspond to saddles and karstic depressions filled by
calcretes; b San Domino, northeast coast of the island, karst depression
on the calcareous bedrock of the cliff (CB), with calcretes (cr) on top;
the karst landform is controlled by a tectonic discontinuity (black
dashed line), characterised by a vertical fault plane and cataclastic
rocks
32.3.2
controlled by tectonic features and fracturation, but in many
cases the marked circular shape and morphological features
suggest a karst origin.
Below the sea level, the bathymetry allows to outline
three main flat surfaces at 8–10 m b.s.l., at 20–25 m b.s.l.,
and at 50–55 m b.s.l., more evident on the northwestern side
of the archipelago, which are to be explored by expert divers
(Fig. 32.3). They are marine erosion surfaces related to
different past sea levels, lower than the present one. They are
bounded by scarps and sub-vertical slopes, and provide the
inner continental shelf with a step-like morphology. The
most elevated flat surface shows slightly variable edge
depths, between 8 and 10 m b.s.l., with good inner margin
bathymetric correlation, and it is externally bounded by
sharp or irregular-rounded scarps. The flat surface at 20–
25 m b.s.l. (the largest and most continuous one) is covered
by gravelly and sandy marine deposits and by gravelly alluvial fan deposits, with scattered carbonate bedrock outcrops (Miccadei et al. 2011b). The inner margin is defined
by a sub-vertical or steep rocky scarps. Locally, it is characterised by reefs sub-parallel to the bathymetric trend,
morphologically similar to beach-rocks, characterised by a
thick seaweed cover. The deepest surface (50–55 m b.s.l.) is
covered by sand and gravel deposits; it is mostly bounded by
rounded edges and carved by slight incisions and small
valleys, which possibly originated as subaerial drainage
incisions (Miccadei et al. 2011b).
The marine erosion surfaces appear to be rich in small
erosional landforms, circular coastal rock pools, with
Marine Landforms
Almost the entire length of the Tremiti coast consists of a
well indented (except for San Nicola) rocky coast on carbonate rocks and, locally, on Quaternary continental clastic
and calcrete deposits. Much of the coast of San Nicola,
Capraia and Cretaccio and part of the coast of San Domino
are characterised by steep, vertical, >80 m high cliffs
descending precipitously into the sea (Fig. 32.3). In most
cases, they are affected by rock falls, characterised by
marked undercut notches and several caves, and associated
with sea stacks and rocks in front of them (e.g. I Pagliai)
(Figs. 32.7 and 32.8). The morphology and indentation of
coastal cliffs are in most cases controlled by faults and
related fracturation zones; within indentations and coastal
inlets, small pocket beaches bound the cliffs (Fig. 32.6a).
More than 40 caves are either located at the present sea level
(Fig. 32.8) or they are completely submerged (Fig. 32.9a).
About 30 of them are half-submerged (Fig. 32.8b), with
bottoms at a 3–7 m b.s.l. depth, covered by centimetre and
decimetre-size sub-rounded pebbles. Other submerged caves
are located along the main sub-vertical rocky scarps between
the main flat surfaces, at depths of 8–18 m and 25–45 m b.s.
l. (Fig. 32.9a). Most of them have a small entrance and are
mostly <25 m long, without wide halls. In the northwestern
side of Capraia (Cala Caffè), at 25–30 m b.s.l., a large
submerged cave called Il Grottone is present, in which lithic
industries of the Neolithic age were found (Cresta et al.
1999). The pace of marine erosion shaping the caves is
32
The Terrestrial and Submarine Landscape of the Tremiti …
383
Fig. 32.7 San Domino, I Pagliai, cliff and sea stacks affected by rock falls
Fig. 32.8 a San Domino, Cala delle Roselle, cliffs with a small cave,
developed on calcretes (Cr) stratified breccia (Br) with sub-angular
centimetric clasts, laying on carbonate bedrock (CB) (for labels see
Fig. 32.4; after Miccadei et al. 2011a); b San Domino island, cave at
the sea level extending down to 8 m b.s.l. (after Miccadei et al. 2011b)
diameters varying from some decimetres to over one metre,
often open towards deeper areas and connected to drainage
channels and coastal erosion landforms (Fig. 32.9b).
running water are mostly present on the inner continental
shelf areas; both provide important evidence of alternating
terrestrial and marine geomorphological processes due to
sea-level fluctuations since the Middle Pleistocene
(>200,000 years ago). Submerged landforms, related to
subaerial paleodrainage, consist of several gullies arranged in
two main systems. The deepest one is composed of SE–NW
incisions that developed between 35 m and over 60 m b.s.l.
in limestone bedrock, showing sub-vertical side scarps (NW
32.3.3
Paleodrainage-Related Landforms
While alluvial fan conglomerate deposits are present on the
emerged part of the islands, landforms related to superficial
384
E. Miccadei et al.
valley sides in carbonate bedrock, and are partially filled by
gravel to sand deposits, suggesting a possible origin due to
stream or river incision. Alluvial fans with decimetric
sub-angular clasts, usually stabilized and covered by algal
cover, are located on the 20–25 m b.s.l. surface at the outlet
of the shallower incisions. Alluvial fans lie on the inner part
of the surface at 20–25 m b.s.l. Superficial running
water-related incisions also affect the slopes and scarps
between 20–25 m and 50–55 m b.s.l. and those below 50–
55 m b.s.l.
32.3.4
Fig. 32.9 Submerged landforms on the inner continental shelf (numbers indicate depth) (after Miccadei et al. 2011b); a San Domino island,
submerged cave at 10 m b.s.l.; b Metric sub-rounded coastal rockpools,
at 8 m b.s.l.; c Capraia island, paleo drainage incision between the
sea-level and about 20 m b.s.l.
side of San Domino, Cretaccio and San Nicola). The shallowest one shows deep incisions and erosion channels,
extending from the sea level down to about −25 m
(Fig. 32.9c). They are V-shaped and characterised by steep
Karst Landforms
Walking on the islands or sailing around them, the effects of
karst action are clearly evident and the landforms tell about
the history of landscape evolution in the archipelago related
to climate variations. Wide sub-circular depressions (particularly on San Domino and, locally, Capraia), dolines and
solution pans (on Capraia, San Domino and San Nicola) are
well present at heights ranging from 40 m a.s.l. down to the
sea level (Figs. 32.6a, b and 32.9). The surface karst landforms also shape the erosional surface at the top of the calcretes. Significant examples can be found on San Domino, I
Pagliai (Fig. 32.6b) and Cala delle Roselle, where karst
depressions are relict landforms carved in calcretes and filled
by aeolian sand deposits. The underground karst is represented by about 50 caves scattered throughout the archipelago, at heights from 0 to about 50 m a.s.l. Moreover, several
sub-circular coastal indentations (San Domino) are a possible
inheritance of ancient karst (large dolines), later affected and
partially eroded by marine processes (Fig. 32.10).
Terrestrial karst processes on the inner continental shelf
during sea-level low stands are testified by relict karst
landforms present at different bathymetric ranges, affecting
the rocky sea floor on carbonate rocks, in some cases covered by marine deposits. On the southern coast of the
Capraia island dolines are present at 9–15 m b.s.l., partly
filled by gravel deposits; dolines and solution pans are also
located at the sea level and are intensely reshaped by marine
erosion. Between the islands of San Domino and Capraia,
north of San Domino, dolines over 100 m wide, filled by
sandy and gravelly deposits, are present at 25–35 m b.s.l.
(Fig. 32.3). Also, the submerged caves, located between the
sea level and 50 m b.s.l., are in many cases relict karst
landforms, mostly reshaped by marine processes.
32.3.5
Landforms Due to Mass Movement
Gravity-induced landforms are widespread on the Tremiti
Islands. Inactive and relict landforms are outlined by Middle
Pleistocene—Holocene talus slopes and paleolandslides,
32
The Terrestrial and Submarine Landscape of the Tremiti …
385
Fig. 32.10 Capraia, southern coast of the island, partially submerged relict karst landform on calcareous bedrock (CB) covered by calcretes (Cr)
(after Miccadei et al. 2011a)
both on the islands and below sea level (see Sect. 32.2,
Fig. 32.3); active landslides significantly affect the whole
present-day coastline (Figs. 32.5, 32.11 and 32.12). Due to
the lithological setting, bedrock faulting and fracturation,
and continuous marine erosion at the base of the cliffs, most
of the present cliffs are characterised by different types of
mass movements such as lateral spreads, secondary topples,
rock falls and slides. They involve almost the whole coast of
San Nicola and locally the coast of Capraia and San Domino
(Fig. 32.10a, b). In San Nicola, along the summit edges of
the cliffs, tension cracks are present, related to tectonic
fracturation and relaxation along the free face of the steep
slopes; trenches are also locally present along the cliffs’
edge, outlining possible new landslides to occur. This setting
induces rock falls from the top of the cliffs and locally
translational slides and lateral spreads affecting the whole
cliff. The control of tectonic features on landslides is evident
in several locations, such as at La Tagliata, where landslide
development on highly jointed rocks induced a narrowing of
the top surface of the island of San Nicola, which was then
anthropically deepened. At the base of the slopes, rock falls,
translational and complex landslide deposits, made up of
large rock blocks, become a natural defence from marine
erosion. Landslides are mostly controlled by the contrast in
competence, shear strength and stiffness between the Pliocene re-crystallised dolomitic calcarenites and calcisiltites
and the Miocene marly calcilutites and calcisiltites
(Fig. 32.11) (Cotecchia et al. 1996; Andriani et al. 2005).
In the islands of San Domino and Capraia, coastal rock
falls mostly occur in well fractured Paleogene limestones.
Large and frequent rock falls occur, for example, from the up
to 100 m high cliffs of the Architiello area (the highest of the
Tremiti in San Domino) and in the I Pagliai area. They
consist of small- to medium-size block falls due to undercutting at the base of the cliffs, locally, at the notch level.
They are rather instantaneous events related to sea storms,
rainfall or seismic shaking. In some cases they affect caves
and induce a “cave-arch-stack” evolution (Andriani et al.
2005).
Below the sea level, landforms due to mass movement are
also present, well represented in the northwestern sector of
Capraia, such as paleolandslides located between 30 and
40 m b.s.l. and made of decametric calcareous blocks
(Fig. 32.3).
32.3.6
Human Modifications of the Landscape
Anthropogenic landforms affect mostly the channel between
San Domino and San Nicola, the best protected from the
wind and the waves, where ancient and recent ports, settlements and villages have been established. Several human
modifications affect the natural morphology of the channel
such as piers, massive walls, cliff excavations and/or cliff
protections. An ancient Roman dock is present, submerged
at *15 m b.s.l. between Cretaccio and San Nicola. Urban
settlements are present in San Nicola (mostly the inheritance
of the ancient Benedictine settlement, Fig. 32.12a) and in the
upper part of San Domino, where only one small village is
located, showing, so far, a limited impact on the natural
386
E. Miccadei et al.
Fig. 32.11 Gravity-induced landforms: San Nicola, rock fall at the base of the cliff, mostly controlled by the contrast in competence between the
Pliocene dolomitic calcarenites and calcisiltites (Pl) and the Miocene marly calcilutites and calcisiltites (Mi)
Fig. 32.12 Urban settlement and anthropogenic landforms: a San
Nicola, cliff topped by walls of the Santa Maria abbey-fortress; at the
bottom a concrete block cover is set up as an erosion/protection
measure; b San Nicola, La Tagliata, cliff affected by rock falls and
incision on the top of the island between the abbey area and the
northeastern part of the island, erosional feature artificially deepened by
Benedictine monks for a better defence of the Santa Maria
abbey-fortress
landscape of the island. One of the most impressive landforms is La Tagliata (San Nicola, Fig. 32.12b), between the
Benedictine abbey area and the northeastern part of the
island; it is an erosional landform due to landslides controlled by tectonic features, artificially deepened by the
monks to enhance defence of the Santa Maria abbey-fortress.
32.4
Conclusions
Spectacular features of—and intriguing relationships
between—active, inactive and relict landforms have sculpted
the outstanding terrestrial, coastal and submerged landscapes
of the Tremiti Islands, which can be easily walked on, sailed
32
The Terrestrial and Submarine Landscape of the Tremiti …
around and dived into. Additionally, the geomorphological
significance of the Tremiti Archipelago is enhanced by their
considerable ease of access and by their protection within the
Gargano National Park and the Tremiti Island Marine Protected Area.
Such a small archipelago holds an incredible wealth of
landforms, mostly due to marine, slope and karst processes,
but also to superficial running water and alluvial fan deposition; moreover, the overall setting of these landforms is
related to tectonic and lithological control. The outstanding
and intriguing geomorphological setting reflects alternating
stages of marine and variable terrestrial processes related to
Quaternary paleolandscapes different from the present one,
whose evolution is recorded by continental deposits and by
the superimposition of terrestrial and underwater landforms
(Miccadei et al. 2011a, b).
The dramatic changes in landscape and drainage that
occurred in the Tremiti area have been induced, at least since
the Middle Pleistocene, by tectonic activity (and salt diapirism) and the effects of eustatic and hydroisostatic sea-level
changes, while climate fluctuations induced stages of intense
karst processes. This has resulted in alternating wide gentle
hilly terrestrial landscapes, with slope, karst, alluvial fan and
superficial running water-related processes (Tremiti Islands
connected to the Italian coasts during sea-level low stands),
and marine landscapes submerged by sea-level rises (outlining the islands’ morphology during sea-level high stands).
Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank the anonymous
reviewer, the Editors of the volume, M. Marchetti and M. Soldati and
the Editor in Chief P. Migon, whose precious suggestions and comments greatly improved the manuscript. Figures 32.5, 32.6, 32.8a and
32.10 are reprinted from Quaternary International, 233(1), Miccadei E,
Mascioli F, Piacentini T, Quaternary geomorphological evolution of the
Tremiti Islands (Puglia, Italy), 3–15, Copyright 2011, with permission
from Elsevier.
References
Andriani GF, Walsh N, Pagliarulo R (2005) The influence of the
geological setting on the morphogenetic evolution of the Tremiti
387
Archipelago (Apulia, Southeastern Italy). Nat Hazards Earth Syst
Sci 5:29–41
Argnani A, Favali P, Frugoni F, Gasperini M, Ligi M, Marani M,
Mattietti G, Mele G (1993) Foreland deformational pattern in the
Southern Adriatic Sea. Ann Geofis 36:229–247
Cotecchia V, Guerricchio A, Melidoro G (1996) Geologia e processi di
demolizione costiera dell’Isola di S. Nicola. Mem Soc Geol It
51:595–606
Cresta S, Mastronuzzi G, Pampaloni ML, Sansò P (1999) Le Isole
Tremiti. In: Richetti G, Pieri P (eds) Guida Geologica Regionale,
Puglia e Monte Vulture. BE-MA editrice, Milano, pp 108–125
Festa V, Teofilo G, Tropeano M, Sabato L, Spalluto L (2014) New
insights on diapirism in the Adriatic sea: the Tremiti salt structure
(Apulia offshore, Southeastern Italy). Terra Nova 26(3):169–178
Mastronuzzi G, Sansò P (2002) Holocene uplift rates and historical
rapid sea-level changes at the Gargano promontory. Ital J Quat Sci
17(5–6):593–606
Miccadei E, Mascioli F, Piacentini T (2011a) Quaternary geomorphological evolution of the Tremiti Islands (Puglia, Italy). Quatern Int
232:3–15
Miccadei E, Mascioli F, Orrù P, Piacentini T, Puliga G (2011b) Late
Quaternary paleolandscape of submerged inner continental shelf
areas of Tremiti islands archipelago (northern Puglia). Geogr Fis
Dinam Quat 34(2):223–234
Miccadei E, Orrù P, Piacentini T, Mascioli F, Puliga G (2012)
Geomorphological map of Tremiti Islands Archipelago (Puglia,
Southern Adriatic Sea, Italy), scale 1:15,000. J Maps 8(1):74–87
Parlagreco L, Mascioli F, Miccadei E, Antonioli F, Gianolla D,
Devoti S, Leoni G (2011) New data on Holocene relative sea level
along the Abruzzo Coast, central Adriatic, Italy. Quatern Int
232:179–186
Pasa A (1953) Appunti geologici per la paleogeografia delle Puglie.
Memorie Biogeografiche Adriatiche 2:176–185
Ridente D, Trincardi F (2002) Eustatic and tectonic control on
deposition and lateral variability of Quaternary regressive sequences
in the Adriatic basin (Italy). Mar Geol 184:273–293
Selli R (1971) Isole Tremiti e Pianosa. In: Cremonini G, Elmi C, Selli R
(eds) Note illustrative della Carta Geologica d’Italia alla scala
1:100.000 Foglio 156 “S. Marco in Lamis”, Servizio Geologico
d’Italia, Roma: 49–65
Tellini A (1890) Osservazioni geologiche sulle Isole Tremiti e sull’Isola
di Pianosa nell’Adriatico. Bollettino Regio Comitato Geologico
d’Italia 21(11–12):442–514
Tropeano M, Festa V, Teofilo G, Sabato L, Spalluto L (2013)
Stratigraphic constraints about timing of the Tremiti ridge uplift
(offshore Apulia, southern Italy). J Mediterr Earth Sci 5:141–143
Zorzi F (1958) Tremiti. Rivista di Scienze Preistoriche 13:208–209
Vesuvius and Campi Flegrei: Volcanic History,
Landforms and Impact on Settlements
33
Pietro P.C. Aucelli, Ludovico Brancaccio, and Aldo Cinque
Abstract
Vesuvius and Campi Flegrei are among the best known active volcanoes in the world
because of their well-documented activity in historical times (witnessed also in the
archaeological sites) and due to the risk they create in the surrounding densely populated
area. Vesuvius is a composite stratovolcano including an older cone cut by a large caldera
(Mt. Somma, 1131 m) and a younger cone called Vesuvius Gran Cono (1256 m). The
Campi Flegrei are composed by a large caldera (12 km wide) occupied by about 30
younger monogenic edifices, mainly tuff rings and tuff cones, created by explosive
eruptions due to the interaction between trachytic magma and underground water. Very
famous is also the vertical ground deformation (bradyseism) affecting Pozzuoli in the
Campi Flegrei. This phenomenon has been recorded for the last 2000 years by sea level
marks on the columns of the Roman temple Serapeo.
Keywords
Volcanic landforms
33.1
Bradyseism
Introduction
Mt. Vesuvius and Campi Flegrei are located along the
Tyrrhenian coast, at the margin of an area of recent extensional tectonics (Cinque et al. 1997). The fame of these
volcanic areas is due to their location and interactions with
human settlements in an area of continuous inhabitation
since the Bronze Age. The best known example is the
Vesuvius eruption of 79 AD that destroyed and buried the
Roman towns of Pompeii and Herculaneum. Very famous is
P.P.C. Aucelli (&)
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie, Università di Napoli
Parthenope, Centro Direzionale Isola C4, 80143 Naples, Italy
e-mail: pietro.aucelli@uniparthenope.it
L. Brancaccio
Piazza Carità 6, 80134 Naples, Italy
A. Cinque
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, dell’Ambiente e delle
Risorse, Università di Napoli Federico II, Largo S. Marcellino 8,
80138 Naples, Italy
Volcanic risk
Campi Flegrei
Vesuvius
also the bradyseism (see Sect. 33.3.5) affecting Pozzuoli in
the Campi Flegrei.
33.2
Geological Setting and Volcanic History
Mt. Vesuvius, with a height of 1281 m a.s.l. and a basal
radius of 11 km, rises from the wide Piana Campana
(Campania Plain) and is bounded to the SW by the water of
the Naples Gulf (Fig. 33.1). Its magma chamber is located
4–5 km deep in Mesozoic limestones and is covered by
about 2 km of Quaternary sediments. It is classified as a
stratovolcano because the edifice is composed of alternating
strata of lava and pyroclastic deposits, due to effusive and
explosive eruptions, respectively.
Moreover, the edifice reveals composite morphology
which includes: (i) remnants of an older stratovolcano called
Mt. Somma; (ii) a vaguely elliptical summit caldera, whose
rim is higher and therefore still prominent to the N and NE;
(iii) a younger cone called Vesuvius Gran Cono, with a deep
crater on its summit. Due to this composite architecture, the
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_33
389
390
P.P.C. Aucelli et al.
Fig. 33.1 Shadow relief of the Somma-Vesuvio volcano (a), the Campi Flegrei (Phlegrean Fields) (b) and their position in the Piana Campana
(Campania Plain)
33
Vesuvius and Campi Flegrei: Volcanic History, Landforms …
most appropriate name of this volcano is Somma-Vesuvius
(Fig. 33.2).
Prior to the origin of the caldera, the Somma volcano
reached probably 1600–1800 m a.s.l. Presently the highest
point along the caldera rim is 1131 m (Mt. Somma). In the
northwestern sector of the volcanic complex, the younger
cone has not completely filled up the caldera and a residual
depression called Valle dell’Inferno remains between the
caldera wall and the Vesuvius Gran Cono. Conversely, in the
southwestern sector the caldera was completely filled
because the rim was less elevated (from about 800 m to the
E to about 400 m to the SW) and the Vesuvius products
formed the terrace of Piano delle Ginestre (Fig. 33.1a).
The Valle dell’Inferno depression opens up on the
Vesuvius external slope through the so-called Atrio del
Cavallo: a narrow and steep valley dissecting the caldera rim
and descending towards the town of San Sebastiano al
Vesuvio.
Even though Mt. Vesuvius is an active volcano, its
piedmont belt hosts an almost uninterrupted series of towns
totalling over 600,000 inhabitants. Most of the population is
391
concentrated in the SW sector, which is also the most
exposed to potential lava and pyroclastic flows, as the caldera wall is missing on this side. In response to this high
risk, largely due to unplanned and uncontrolled urban
development during the second half of twentieth century,
Vesuvius is now the most monitored volcano in the world
thanks to the activity of Osservatorio Vesuviano, part of the
Italian National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology.
The present edifice of Somma-Vesuvius began to form
around 25 ka ago but an ancestor volcano can be documented with its earliest lavas dating back to about 400 ka
ago (cf. De Vivo et al. 2010).
Throughout time the activity of Somma-Vesuvius has
occurred in cycles, each composed of (a) a very strong
explosive eruption consisting of the so-called ‘Plinian’ and
‘Subplinian’ events, whose strength was increased by water–
magma interactions at depth (phreatomagmatic eruptions);
(b) a period of less intense ‘Strombolian’ and ‘Vulcanian’
eruptions with lava flows emission, jetting off clots of fluid
lava (fountains) and pyroclastic material emissions; (c) period of variable time of repose.
Fig. 33.2 a View of Somma-Vesuvius from Castel Sant’Elmo in Naples (photo M. Di Vito); note the densely populated piedmont. b Scheme of
the composite volcano structure
392
Fig. 33.3 Detail of the crater rim of Vesuvius Gran Cono. a The cone as
it is today; note the deposits of the last eruption of 1944 along the upper
part of the rim (photo M. Di Vito); b The crater during the eruption of 1944
from a photograph taken by an American military aircraft (Liberator—B24,
photo Archivio fotografico dell’Osservatorio Vesuviano). Clearly visible
are the lava fills of the crater and the new small cone above it; c aerial view
of the cone during the 1944 eruption with scoriae flow lobes (photo
Archivio fotografico dell’Osservatorio Vesuviano)
P.P.C. Aucelli et al.
The attribute ‘Plinian’ originates from the name of the
Roman naturalist Plinius the Elder who witnessed and documented the Vesuvius eruption of 79 AD. Therefore, the
modern volcanologists call ‘Plinian’ an explosive eruption,
able to launch a column of gas and pyroclastic material up to
the stratosphere, forming a very tall pine-shaped cloud, the
so-called Plinian cloud feeding both distal fall out and
proximal pyroclastic flows.
The depressurising of the magma chamber, related to the
79 AD eruption, is responsible for the final “reshape” of the
caldera, which had already been formed due to previous
Plinian eruptions. The growth of the Vesuvius cone postdates the 79 AD eruption (Santacroce et al. 2003) and
probably started after the last explosive eruption of Mt.
Somma at 472 AD (Rolandi et al. 2004).
The last eruption of Mt. Vesuvius occurred in March
1944 when the lava appeared within the crater rim and
significant outflows occurred towards south and then north,
reaching and inflicting serious damages to the towns of San
Sebastiano al Vesuvio and of San Giorgio a Cremano. That
eruption ended with an explosion on March 18, 1944, creating the large and deep empty crater which is still visible
today (Fig. 33.3).
Shifting attention to the Campi Flegrei (literally ‘burning
fields’), it should be remarked that this appellative refers to a
large caldera (12 km wide) located immediately north of
Naples and occupied by a number of younger volcanoes.
The pre-caldera volcanic edifice is morphologically well
preserved only in the N–NE sector, where it appears as a
gentle slope in radial descent from the Camaldoli hill
(457 m), as it was disrupted also by some regional faults and
partly drowned by the Tyrrhenian Sea (Fig. 33.1). The
Campi Flegrei area is also densely inhabited. Its largest town
is Pozzuoli (80,000 inhabitants) built above the ruins of the
Roman Puteoli.
The trachytic magma of the Campi Flegrei chamber,
interacting with underground water, produced mainly
explosive eruptions, most of which were characterized by
magma degassing at shallow depth. For this reason, and
also for the frequent migrations of the vents facilitated by
the highly fractured bedrock, volcanic landforms are
remarkably different from those of Somma-Vesuvius. The
landscape of Campi Flegrei consists of about 30 monogenic edifices, mainly tuff rings and tuff cones, never
exceeding 310 m of height and having external slope
rarely exceeding 20°.
The oldest volcanic rocks exposed in the Campi Flegrei
area date back from 60 to 40 ka. Some authors proposed a
correlation between the last phase of this activity and the
emplacement of the Campanian Ignimbrite (CI), an ignimbrite tuff occurring all over the Campania region related to
a huge phreatomagmatic eruption. Most probably the CI
eruption, which emitted about 300 km3 of magma, occurred
33
Vesuvius and Campi Flegrei: Volcanic History, Landforms …
393
Fig. 33.4 a The SW portion of Herculaneum excavation, exposing an
ancient beach area at the bottom (photo E. Cubellis). Note the
down-stepping Sub-urban buildings covering the pre-existing sea cliff
and the smooth modern topography at the horizon. b Reconstruction of
the landscape before the 79 AD eruption
not only through vents in the Campi Flegrei, likely promoting a first phase of calderization (Rosi et al. 1983), but
also through faults located elsewhere in the Campania Plain
graben (De Vivo et al. 2001; Rolandi et al. 2003).
Another important phreatomagmatic eruption (40 km3 of
emitted magma) in the Campi Flegrei was associated with
the Neapolitan Yellow Tuff (NYT) dating to about 15.3 ka
ago (Deino et al. 2004). This eruption was responsible for
the formation of the present caldera. The NYT deposit is
over 100 m thick and forms, among others, the hills on
which the city of Naples was built. After the big eruption of
the NYT, a new phase of explosive activity can be recorded
between 15 and 9.5 ka, with the Gauro, Agnano and
Archiaverno eruptions followed by minor explosive episodes
(Fondi di Baia) between 8.6 and 8.4 ka.
Most of the well preserved crater morphology, however,
can be ascribed to the last eruptive phase that occurred
between 4.2 and 3.7 ka, when the Astroni (4.1–3.8 ka),
Averno (3.7 ka) and Solfatara (4.1–3.8 ka) craters were
formed, among others. The last eruption of Campi Flegrei
occurred in 1538 AD, when the 110 m high scoria cone of
Monte Nuovo was formed in only 1 week. Eruptions are not
the only morphogenetic forces that shaped the Campi Flegrei
landscape throughout time, because very influent were also
vertical ground deformations (bradyseism).
the direction of Salerno, the hill of Castel Sant’Elmo and the
city sea shore (Fig. 33.2).
Within the Vesuvius profile one can identify, from left to
right: (i) Mt. Somma with its dissected external slope and the
cliffed inner one, i.e. the caldera wall, (ii) the Atrio del
Cavallo valley with the 1944 lava flow, (iii) the Vesuvius
Gran Cono and (iv) the inclined terrace of Piano delle
Ginestre. The old Osservatorio Vesuviano is also visible on a
prominence that constitutes another remnant of the caldera
from the Somma volcano times.
Considering that Piano delle Ginestre terrace formed due
to the damming of Vesuvius lava flows by the caldera wall,
we may fully appreciate the remarkable inclination of the
ancient caldera rim to the SW. It was in the early eleventh
century that this side of the caldera circle was filled up. The
progressive growth of the Vesuvius cone also caused that the
lavas emitted in the northern direction converged in the
Valle dell’Inferno depression and left the caldera through the
gap called Atrio del Cavallo.
With regard to landforms due to erosion by running
water, it should be noted that only the external slope of the
ancient Somma volcano is densely and deeply cut by gullies
and valleys. The difference with the scarcely dissected SW
sector is certainly due to the fact that the Somma edifice is
older than the Vesuvius by millennia.
To visit the volcano from Naples, one should drive to
Ercolano and then take the paved road SP19 and SP140
ending in parking area at 1000 m a.s.l. (Fig. 33.1). From
there, a path leading up to the Vesuvius crater rim begins.
After Piano delle Ginestre, the steep road crosses the ropy
surface of the lava flow of 1858 emitted by a fissure at the
base of the Vesuvius cone vent. Further upslope, after
reaching the valley called Atrio del Cavallo, the road
33.3
33.3.1
Landforms
Somma-Vesuvius Volcano
The best view of the Somma-Vesuvius is from the city of
Naples; good observation points being the A3 highway in
394
P.P.C. Aucelli et al.
approaches the 1944 lava flow. Such flow was emitted from
the summit crater towards the north; after sliding down on
the steep flank of the Vesuvius cone, the lava thickened in
the Valle dell’Inferno depression and flowed slowly towards
the Atrio del Cavallo gap. As the lava surface cooled down
and became rigid while the mass beneath was still hot and
moving, the lava flow developed a blocky surface.
Carrying on the ascent to the summit, one comes across
the Colle Umberto and Colle Margherita lava domes formed
in the late nineteenth century; after that, the tall wall of the
caldera becomes visible. The caldera wall exposes alternations of lavas and scoria, crossed by dikes and sills that
appear to be slightly protruding because they are better
crystallized and therefore more resistant to weathering and
erosion.
33.3.2
The Vesuvius Summit Crater
The path going from the parking lot to the volcano summit
runs along the steep flank (up to 42°) of the Vesuvius cone.
It is mostly made of scoria, sometimes welded and compacted, that began forming in the late Roman period or in the
early Middle Ages and underwent several phases of construction and explosive dismantling. Its present shape and
size are mostly due to deposition that occurred after the
sub-Plinian eruption of 1631, when the previous cone lost
about 450 m of its height.
The summit crater has an elliptical shape (480 580 m)
and a depth of about 300 m (Fig. 33.3). It was formed after
the last explosive phase of the 1944 eruption, responsible for
the accumulation of 20 m of scoria and lapilli that can be
seen on the top of the crater rim. Prior to that event, the
crater, left empty after the 1906 eruption, underwent a phase
of aggradation (1913–1944) that completely filled it up
leaving a small, smoking spatter cone in the centre (Ricciardi
2009).
Inside the crater an almost continuous belt of steeply
stratified and unwelded debris at the base of the caldera wall
is noticeable (Fig. 33.3a), related to mass wasting and run
off processes. The main predisposing factors of this debris
production are the cooling cracks affecting the rock and the
tensile joints created by stress release after the emptying of
the crater in 1944 (Fig. 33.3b). The outer slope of the Gran
Cono is also affected by water erosion and mass movements.
The latter include mainly debris avalanches and debris flows
that can even reach the piedmont coastal cities of Torre del
Greco and Torre Annunziata. Some lobes of small-scale
scoriae flows were formed during the last eruption of 1944
and were photographed by American military aircrafts
(Fig. 33.3c).
33.3.3
Herculaneum, Pompeii
and the Surrounding Landscape
Before the 79 AD Eruption
33.3.3.1 Herculaneum
The ruins of Herculaneum (third century BC–79 AD) are
enclosed within a vast area, with only about one-fourth of
the ancient town excavated (Fig. 33.4a). The archaeological
area is located about 0.5 km from the shore, in an almost
planar landscape that is gently inclined (6°–7°) towards the
sea. This topography is largely due to flattening effect
imposed by pyroclastic deposition during the 79 AD eruption, which also produced an advance of the coastline by
several hundred metres. An image of the landscape prior to
the 79 AD eruption can be evinced from the Latin writer
Sisenna (Hist., 53) who described Herculaneum as a walled
town built on a high ground very close to the sea (a coastal
terrace) delimited on the sides by two streams descending
from Mt. Vesuvius (Fig. 33.4b). The coastal cliff bounding
the ancient terrace to the SW remains largely buried under
the 79 AD pyroclastic cover but part of it is still visible in the
so-called Sub-urban sector of the excavation (Fig. 33.4a).
This is a 12–14 m high cliff disguised beneath a building
dating to the time when the Roman city of Herculaneum
expanded beyond the boundaries of its walls (Sub-urban
buildings).
The sands of the ancient beach were also found between 2
and 4 m below the present sea level, as a proof that the area
subsided by about 3 m after the 79 AD eruption. However, a
drilling campaign recently carried out by the Herculaneum
Conservation Project (funded by the Packard Humanities
Institute) revealed that strong subsidence (4–7 m) also
occurred during the first century BC (Cinque et al. 2009).
This subsidence caused local rise of the sea level and it was
necessary to relocate the Herculaneum harbour piers (as it
happened in Pozzuoli during the year 1983) and to protect
the Sub-urban Thermal Bath from the sea by means a robust
and prominent cornice.
Returning to the time of the 79 AD eruption, the fact that
Herculaneum was buried beneath many metres of hot
pyroclastic flow deposits (absent in the fall out sequence
covering Pompeii) suggests that the Vesuvius caldera
depression was more pronounced than today. Therefore,
most of the hot and degassing fragments falling down from
the pyroclastic column (stage of collapse) engulfed it exiting
where the caldera rim was the lowest (nowadays it corresponds to Piano delle Ginestre).
33.3.3.2 Pompeii
More famed than the ruins of Herculaneum are those of
Pompeii, a Roman town situated 10 km to the SE of
33
Vesuvius and Campi Flegrei: Volcanic History, Landforms …
395
Fig. 33.5 Aerial views of the Averno, with Monte Nuovo in
foreground (a), and Solfatara (b) craters (photo R. Scandone).
A number of recent buildings appear on the western part of the
Solfatara crater rim; they are exposed to very high risk since the
phreatomagmatic eruption of this type of volcano could be sudden and
destructive
Vesuvius crater that was buried by air-fall and surge deposits
of AD 79 Plinian eruption.
The eruption lasted 18 h and at Pompeii it produced a
5 m cover made mostly of pumice fall deposits plus thin ash
layers due to surge propagation. The weight of the fall
deposits caused the sudden collapse of roofs of the buildings. Whilst the push of the surges, related to the collapse of
eruption column occurred in the last part of the eruption,
locally broke down those part of walls that were still
emerging from the pumice cover. At that time, Pompeii had
no less than 12,000 inhabitants.
Ancient Pompeii was built on top of a low hill (about
50 m a.s.l.) that was touched by the Sarno River to the south.
The western foot slope of the hill was bordered by coastal
environments (marshes and sand ridges) related to a coastline that was about 1.5 km less advanced than today.
This hilly ground represents the faulted and eroded
remnants of a pre-historical parasitic cone of Mt. Vesuvius
(Cinque and Irollo 2004). Prior to the 79 AD eruption, the
landscape around Pompeii was remarkably different from the
present one. The Sarno River was meandering (now it
appears straight due to reclamation works of the nineteenth
century) and its mouth, with a port inside, was much closer
to the town, because the ancient shoreline was about 1 km
less advanced than the contemporary coastline. The correlative beach sands are buried under the modern plain, proving
post-eruption subsidence of about 4 m. This phenomenon
anyway did not provoke the regression of the shore, because
the volcanoclastic supply balanced the subsidence, actually
causing the progradation of the coast (Cinque et al. 1997).
33.3.4
Three Volcanoes of the Campi Flegrei
Area
Solfatara, Averno and Monte Nuovo are among the most
interesting and best preserved volcanoes of Campi Flegrei;
being easily accessible to visitors are briefly described
below.
Fig. 33.6 The sketch represents the current morphology of the
Pozzuoli coast. The first century BC palaeogeography is indicated by
a cross hatched line; the light grey spot marks the position of Monte
Nuovo (MN)
33.3.4.1 Averno
The tuff ring of Averno (Fig. 33.5a) is a wide volcano
hosting a dark phreatic lake (Averno Lake) which formed
during one of the most recent intra-caldera phreatomagmatic
396
P.P.C. Aucelli et al.
explosive eruptions (3700 years BP). Averno presents an
elliptical crater rim (about 1450 and 1000 m wide) reaching
its maximum elevation of about 100 m a.s.l. along the
southwestern edge; on the SE only a saddle caused by
marine erosion of the volcanic edifice remains.
From an overlook at the Domitiana road running along
the northern edge of the crater rim it is possible to look down
into the roughly circular crater lake measuring 2 km in circumference and 60 m in depth. The Romans thought that a
cave located next to the lake Avernus was the entrance to the
Hades or the underworld of death. The name derives from
the Greek word aoqmo1 (read aornos), meaning “birdless”,
probably referring to the fact that poisonous gases emanating
from the area before Roman times may have kept away the
birds.
In 37 BC, the Roman general Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa
converted the lake into a shipyard for a military naval base
located near the present day Lucrino Lake, to which Averno
was connected by an artificial canal (Fig. 33.6). The large
harbour of the naval base at Lucrino Lake was named Portus
Julius after Julius Caesar.
Flegrei. This small volcano has a diameter of about 1.2 km
at the base and 375 m at the crater rim. The name Monte
Nuovo, meaning ‘New Mountain’, is related to its rapid
construction due to 1538 AD eruption.
This event was characterized by two eruption phases with
contrasting eruptive styles. The first stage of phreatomagmatic activity produced a tuff cone and was followed by a
second, explosive phase that deposited Strombolian-type
tephra on top of the tuff cone (Di Vito et al. 1987).
It was a very short-lived and dramatic event as most of
the cone was formed in only 2 days, between September 29
and 30, 1538. It caused the destruction of the village of
Tripergole and killed 24 people. The event was preceded
some months ahead by ground uplift which was so intense
during the eruption that it caused a sudden retreat of the sea
leaving the fish trapped on the newly emerging seashore
without enough time to swim away. The eruption strongly
modified the coastal physiography of the Pozzuoli Gulf
transforming a sea branch, Averno Bay, into a lake, Averno
Lake (Fig. 33.6).
33.3.4.2 The Solfatara
This volcano (Fig. 33.5b) takes its name from the Latin
word ‘Sulphur’ because the gases it emanates smell like
Sulphur anhydride. It can be easily reached by Domitiana
road going from Naples to Pozzuoli.
The Solfatara is an elliptical tuff cone 180 m high, with
the crater floor located at 90 m a.s.l. The tuff cone is made
mostly of hydrothermally altered breccias, dune-bedded
ashes and lapilli (Rosi and Sbrana 1987); it was formed
between 4.1 and 3.8 ka ago (Di Vito et al. 1999) through a
classical phreatomagmatic explosive eruption and a historical chronicle also reports a phreatic event in the twelfth
century. Currently, the Solfatara is affected by intense diffuse
degassing and fumarolic activity determined by both magmatic and underground waters. These gases are constantly
monitored by the Osservatorio Vesuviano, as the increase of
magmatic component, e.g. carbon dioxide, is supposed to
have a relevant role in triggering the unrest of the volcanic
system that can affect the area. Ground temperature on the
crater floor is 40 °C on average and, in some areas, it can
exceed 100 °C (about 160 °C at Bocca Grande). The water
table forms ephemeral lakes in the central part of the crater
and water gases gurgling in them simulate a boiling effect.
Most of the crater floor is whitish in colour and lacks soil as
well as vegetation cover. In contrast, the inner southern and
western slopes are covered by Mediterranean maquis.
33.3.5
33.3.4.3 Monte Nuovo Crater
Along the road to Baia there is a 110 m high volcanic cone
called Monte Nuovo (Fig. 33.5a); it is the youngest among
30 monogenic volcanic centres identifiable within the Campi
Coastal Change Due to Bradyseismic
Movements
The Campi Flegrei caldera is famous for the bradyseism.
This term was coined by Arturo Issel, an important Italian
geologist of the nineteenth century, to designate vertical
ground movements in volcanic areas; it derives from two
ancient Greek terms meaning ‘slow movement of the landmass’. Such movements are said to be ‘slow’ because they
are not detectable by human eye, ranging from mm to dm
per year. The cause of negative (i.e. rising) and positive (i.e.
descending) bradyseism can be either the intrusion of new
magma and its degassing or fluctuations of hydrothermal
activity, causing expansion and contraction of rocks and
sediments due to variations in pore pressure in relationship
with heat flux variations. In coastal areas, ancient bradyseismic movements are recorded as changes in relative sea
level but in the Campi Flegrei they are also documented
archaeologically. To this regard, two important sites in the
bay of Pozzuoli should be considered: Portus Julius and
Serapeo.
33.3.5.1 Portus Julius
This large port was built in 37 BC to host the military fleet of
Rome and its ruins are today submerged off the beach of
Lucrino (Fig. 33.7a). When the sea is calm and clear, these
ruins can be seen from the top of Monte Nuovo. The Portus
Julius did not have a long life. Soon after its foundation it
became unusable due to the phase of negative bradyseism
that reduced the water depth and in 12 BC the Roman fleet
abandoned it in favour of the nearby port of Miseno. From
33
Vesuvius and Campi Flegrei: Volcanic History, Landforms …
397
33.3.5.2 Serapeo
The so-called Serapeo has helped Earth scientists to unravel
the history of the Phlegrean bradyseisms from Roman times
onwards (Fig. 33.7b). Its ruins are located near the Pozzuoli
port, at the base of the abandoned sea cliff bounding La
Starza marine terrace. This large Roman edifice was built in
the late first century BC and modified in the third century
AD; initially believed to be a temple for the Egyptian god
Serapis, it was actually a market place or macellum. The
Serapeo gained international fame among geologists when
Charles Lyell displayed an engraving of the ruins on the
frontispiece of his famous book “Principles of Geology”
printed in 1830.
The Serapeo consisted of a pillared court with tall marble
columns supporting a roof, three of which are still standing.
Due to bradyseism, the monument has recorded variable
levels of flooding by the sea evidenced by the whitish marks
left on its walls (Fig. 33.7b). In addition, the relative sea
level rises of the Middle Ages are also documented by the
presence of littoral sediments on its floor (now removed) and
holes on the columns caused by a marine mollusc called
Lithodomus lithofagus. These perforations found as high as
7 m a.s.l., along with the 14C dating of some shells, reveal
that this sea level rise happened between the third and fifteenth century AD (Morhange et al. 2006). At that time the
former coastal plain was submerged and the sea returned to
touch the base of the cliff below La Starza terrace. From the
sixteenth century onward, negative bradyseismic movements
prevailed. They were particularly strong in the first years of
the sixteenth century, before the Monte Nuovo eruption.
This is the reason why strong negative bradyseism is now
assumed to be one of the precursor of eruptions.
Fig. 33.7 a Aerial view of Portus Julius submerged ruins (photo M.
Di Vito); b The Serapeo in Pozzuoli (see detail of the column with the
Lithodomus Litofagus holes); c View of the modern Pozzuoli Port (note
the piers located at two different levels, photo M. Di Vito)
the fourth century AD, there has been a period of stronger
bradyseismic movements alternating between positive and
negative, with the prevalence of subsidence. Today the
structures of Portus Julius are located at about 5 m below sea
level (Fig. 33.6).
33.3.5.3 Recent Events
From 1538 to 1969 the coast of Pozzuoli experienced gradual
lowering at a documented mean rate of 14 mm/year from 1822
onwards. During summer 1969 the area of Pozzuoli was
affected again by uplift that reached a maximum of 1.70 m by
December 1971. This uplift was accompanied by moderate
seismicity. Between mid-1972 and the end of 1974, the ground
subsided by 0.22 m while in the following eight years no
significant change was recorded. In 1982, a new intense uplift
phase began, with low seismicity lasting until the end of the
year. By the end of 1984, the maximum uplift was 180 cm.
Combined with the 1.5 m of uplift recorded between 1969 and
1974, this new uplift caused the abandonment and replacement
of the harbour pier in Pozzuoli (Fig. 33.7c). From 1983 to the
end of 1984 the seismicity was very intense (magnitude up to
4), with hypocentres located at shallow depth (4–5 km) in the
northern part of Pozzuoli Bay. This seismicity caused severe
damages to the town and 40,000 inhabitants had to be
398
P.P.C. Aucelli et al.
evacuated. As the chance of an eruption was seriously considered, based on the events of 1538 AD, most of these people
were relocated to a new residential area built outside the caldera
rim (Monteruscello Village). However, since the end of 1984
the ground has generally subsided (with scattered minor uplift
episodes), but now the instruments are recording a new uplift
phase.
The subsidence has never been accompanied by earthquakes, while seismicity did accompany the uplifts. The
geometry of the movements has a circular pattern centred in
Pozzuoli. The null uplift can be verified at a radial distance
of about 10 km from Pozzuoli.
33.4
Conclusions
The volcanic district of Campania is an example of continued interaction between man and volcanoes since the Greek
times (fifth century BC). Such interaction has always been
associated with high risk to the dense population living on
the Vesuvius piedmont and in the Campi Flegrei Caldera, as
the two volcanoes have eruptive histories characterized by
high-energy explosive events. Bradeyseism in the Campi
Flegrei constitutes an additional problem to people. It affects
building and infrastructure safety, and negative bradeyseism
is supposed to be the precursor of an eruption.
References
Cinque A, Irollo G (2004) Il “Vulcano di Pompei”: nuovi dati
geomorfologici e stratigrafici. Il Quaternario 17(1):101–116
Cinque A, Aucelli PPC, Brancaccio L, Mele R, Milia A, Robustelli G,
Romano P, Russo F, Russo M, Santangelo N, Sgambati D (1997)
Volcanism, tectonics and recent geomorphological change in the
bay of Napoli. Suppl Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 3(2):123–141
Cinque A, Irollo G, Camardo D (2009) Antiche attività estrattive e cicli
bradisismici sulla costa della antica Herculaneum: percorsi, esiti e
prospettive di una ricerca geoarcheologica. In: Corallini A
(ed) Vesuviana Archeologie a confronto. Studi e scavi, Università
di Bologna 23:261–276
Deino AL, Orsi G, Piochi M, de Vita S (2004) The age of the
Neapolitan Yellow Tuff caldera-forming eruption (Campi Flegrei
caldera—Italy) assessed by 40Ar/39Ar dating method. J Volcanol
Geotherm Res 133:157–170
De Vivo B, Rolandi G, Gans PB, Calvert A, Bohrson WA, Spera FJ,
Belkin HE (2001) New constraints on the pyroclastic eruptive
history of the Campanian volcanic Plain (Italy). In: De Vivo B,
Rolandi G (eds) Mt Somma Vesuvius and volcanism of the
Campania Plain. Special Issue Mineral Petrol 73:47–65
De Vivo B, Petrosino P, Lima A, Rolandi G, Belkin HE (2010)
Research progress in volcanology in the Neapolitan area, southern
Italy: a review and some alternative views. Miner Petrol 99:1–28
Di Vito MA, Lirer L, Mastrolorenzo G, Rolandi G (1987) The Monte
Nuovo eruption, Campi Flegrei (Italy). Bull Volcanol 49:608–615
Di Vito MA, Isaia R, Orsi G, Southon J, de Vita S, D’Antonio M,
Pappalardo L, Piochi M (1999) Volcanism and deformation since
12,000 years at the Campi Flegrei caldera (Italy). J Volcanol
Geotherm Res 91:221–246
Morhange C, Marriner N, Laborel J, Todesco M, Oberlin C (2006)
Rapid sea level movements and noneruptive crostal deformations in
the Phlegrean Fields caldera, Italy. Geology 34(2):93–96
Ricciardi GP (2009) Diario del Monte Vesuvio. Venti secoli di
immagini e cronache di un vulcano nella città. Edizioni Scientifiche
ed Artistiche, Torre del Greco, 893 pp
Rolandi G, Bellucci F, Heitzler MT, Belkin HE, De Vivo B (2003)
Tectonic controls on the genesis of the Ignimbrites from the
Campanian volcanic Zone, southern Italy. In: De Vivo B, Scandone R (eds) Ignimbrites of the Campanian Plain. Special Issue
Mineral Petrol 79:3–31
Rolandi G, Bellucci F, Cortini M (2004) A new model for the formation
of the Somma Caldera. Mineral Petrol 80:27–44
Rosi M, Sbrana A, Principe C (1983) The Phlegraean Fields: structural
evolution, volcanic history and eruptive mechanisms. J Volcanol
Geotherm Res 17:273–288
Rosi M, Sbrana A (1987) Phlegraean fields, CNR Quaderni de «la
ricerca scientifica» 114(9):1–175
Santacroce R, Rosi M, Cristofolini R, La Volpe L, Orsi G (2003) Italian
active volcanoes. Episodes 26:227–234
34
Sorrento Peninsula and Amalfi Coast:
The Long-Term History of an Enchanting
Promontory
Aldo Cinque
Abstract
The mountain ridge forming the Sorrento Peninsula and the Amalfi Coast is of great physical
beauty and plenty of tourist attractions. Moreover, it has an interesting geomorphological
history that this chapter illustrates in the form of a 7-stops visit tour. The local landscape was
influenced by extensional tectonics that divided the western coastal belt of southern Italy in
horsts and grabens. While creating impressive fault scarps with truncated landscapes
suspended above them, tectonics promoted, among others, cutting of steep canyons and
opening up of ancient karstic conduits. Around the end of Middle Pleistocene the area attained
tectonic stability and the following climatic and eustatic changes are geomorphologically
recorded at stream mouths and in some coastal caves.
Keywords
Limestone geomorphology
Peninsula Amalfi Coast
34.1
Introduction
The area presented in this chapter is a famous tourist destination since the eighteenth century. Sorrento and Amalfi
were major stops along the Grand Tour that brought to Italy
visitors from the European elites who wanted to be
immersed in Classical culture. The beauty of the natural
landscape and the rich artistic and historical heritage contribute to the longstanding appeal of the Amalfi coast.
UNESCO has included the Amalfi Coast among its World
Heritage Sites because of its “great physical beauty and
natural diversity… (and of) towns such as Amalfi and
Ravello with architectural and artistic works of great significance”. However, while a number of existing guidebooks
provide information on the towns and the historical monuments, no source focuses on the surrounding natural context;
A. Cinque (&)
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, dell’Ambiente e delle Risorse
(DISTAR), Università Federico II, Largo S. Marcellino 10, 80138
Naples, Italy
e-mail: aldocinque@hotmail.it
Morphotectonics
Eustasy
Ignimbrite terrace
Sorrento
the goal of the present chapter is to fill this gap and to offer
explanations on the origin and evolution of landforms to
those who are interested in going beyond the aesthetic
appreciation of landscape.
34.2
Geographical and Geological Setting
The area, lying along the west coast of southern Italy, is a
well-defined physiographic unit consisting of a WNW
trending calcareous ridge (Lattari Mts.) abruptly rising
between two large gulfs and coastal plains (Fig. 34.1). The
Amalfi Coast is the south flank of the eastern part of the
ridge, whose peaks are 900 to over 1400 m high. The Sorrento Peninsula is the western part of the same ridge, whose
elevation rarely exceeds 500 m a.s.l.
The area has a climate of the Mediterranean type (mesothermal with summer drought) with average annual temperatures of 21–28 °C at the sea level and 12–14 °C at the
highest peaks. Correspondingly, the annual rainfall varies
from 850 to 1800 mm. Differently from other calcareous
massifs of the Mediterranean zone, the Lattari Mts. are very
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_34
399
400
A. Cinque
Fig. 34.1 Simplified geological map of the Sorrento Peninsula.
Legend 1 Quaternary deposits (mostly continental sediments and
volcanics); 2 Pliocene continental deposits; 3 Miocene marine
sediments (mostly sandstones and shales); 4 Cretaceous to Triassic
marine carbonate rocks (limestones and dolostones); Pf main faults of
Pliocene age; Qf main faults of Quaternary age; s main water courses;
e main summits and their elevation in m a.s.l.; r main roads; p pathways
mentioned in the text (Bomerano—Positano and Scala—Valle delle
Ferriere—Amalfi)
green because they are mantled by pyroclastic material
coming from Mt. Vesuvius and other Neapolitan volcanoes.
The natural vegetation cover (often replaced by cultivations
of lemons, grapes, olives and chestnuts) includes maquis up
to 300–500 m a.s.l. and mixed deciduous forests as well as
birch dominated woodlands above 800–1000 m.
Geologically speaking, the Lattari Mts. belong to the
Southern Apennines; a chain segment that formed in Late
Tertiary—Early Pleistocene times on a SW-dipping subduction zone. As the subducting slab was also subject to roll
back, the chain migrated progressively to the NE while
incorporating new and new thrust sheets at its front.
Simultaneously, the Tyrrhenian Sea basin was forming and
progressively enlarging towards E and SE due to extensional
tectonics, at the rear of the chain. The enlargement of the
back-arc basin was accomplished by tectonically drowning
new and new slices of the chain in the Tyrrhenian Sea. The
last episode of this kind occurred in the Early Pleistocene. In
the Campania Region two wide coastal grabens were created
at that time: the one hosting the Naples Gulf and the Campania Plain and the one hosting the Salerno Gulf and the Sele
River Plain (Fig. 34.1). The Lattari Mts. ridge is the horst
separating those two grabens; a narrow strip of the Apennines that escaped the collapse and underwent additional
uplift (200–350 m) during Lower and Middle Pleistocene
(Caiazzo et al. 2006).
In terms of bedrock lithology, the ridge is made of
shallow marine dolostones and limestones of Late Triassic to
Late Cretaceous age (totalling a thickness of about 4500 m)
followed by transgressive synorogenic sandstones and shales
of Mid-Late Miocene age (preserved only on the Sorrento
Peninsula and up to 500 m thick). Moreover, unconformably
on the bedrock there are Pliocene and Quaternary formations
(Fig. 34.1) most of which are continental and clastic (talus
debris and alluvial fan deposits), but locally of littoral origin
and their present elevations indicate the amount of uplift
which occurred during the Early and Middle Pleistocene.
Finally, there are the pyroclastic materials deriving from
ancient explosive eruptions of Mt. Vesuvius and Campi
Flegrei; they occur both as matrix of the Late Quaternary
clastic formations and as purely volcanic cover on the hill
slopes and terraces (ISPRA 2013).
34
Sorrento Peninsula and Amalfi Coast: The Long-Term History …
34.3
Landforms and Landscapes
This section describes some representative landscapes and
landforms of the area ordered as in an ideal 7-stops visit tour.
It departs from Castellammare di Stabia, crosses counterclockwise the area and reaches finally Salerno.
34.3.1
The Sorrento Terrace
The northern coast of the Sorrento Peninsula—well
observable from the Castellammare-Sorrento road—shows
an alternation of rocky promontories and bays. This depends
largely on the presence of NW trending faults creating an
alternation of structural highs and lows (Fig. 34.1). On the
landward side of the embayments Late Quaternary depositional terraces made of alluvial conglomerates and pyroclastic materials occur. On a couple of such terraces (80–
100 m a.s.l.) rests—for example—the town of Vico
Equense.
Further ahead, where the road turns around the Punta
Scutolo promontory, one comes in sight of the much wider
Sorrento terrace (Fig. 34.2). It consists of an even top surface, inclined to the NW by a few degrees, and a bounding
Fig. 34.2 The ignimbritic terrace of Sorrento. The photo is a view
from Punta Scutolo (red line position of the fault reactivated after the
eruption of the Campanian Ignimbrite). The drawing is a SW–NE
401
sea cliff 40–55 m high. The latter exposes perfectly the
deposit that created the former: a tens of metres thick bank of
greyish welded tuff belonging to the formation named the
Campanian Ignimbrite. Its emplacement occurred around
40,000 years ago upon huge fissural eruptions—emitting
about 300 km3 of materials—from various faults of the
Campania Plain graben (Bellucci et al. 2006).
As to the origins of the cliff below the terrace, we have to
consider that the Gulf of Naples suffered tens of metres of
sudden subsidence soon after the eruption of the Campanian
Ignimbrite, while the Sorrento Peninsula remained stable.
Consequently, a NE trending fault scarp appeared about
1 km north of Sorrento (Cinque et al. 1997; Fig. 34.1). This
straight tectonic scarp may be regarded as the ancestor of the
present coastal cliff, whose curved plan shape and more
retreated position are due to what happened during the
Post-glacial sea-level rise (18,000–6000 years ago) and the
following Holocene High Stand. In fact, the reaches where
the fault scarp exposed the hard Cretaceous limestones (i.e.
off Punta del Capo and Punta Scutolo capes) suffered little
erosional retreat while being submerged. On the contrary, 1–
1.5 km of retreat occurred in the reach between Sorrento and
Meta, where the scarp was made of the ignimbritic tuff and
also the underlying, loose continental sediments were easy to
geological section (not in scale) describing also the post-fault retreat (0,
1, 2, 3) of the terrace margin
402
A. Cinque
be eroded by sea waves. The rate of cliff retreat (initially
close to 10 cm/year) decreased dramatically when the rising
sea level came above the base of the ignimbritic plate (−5 to
−20 m) with the consequence that waves started attacking
directly the tuff—which is resistant enough—instead of
dismantling it (as they were doing before) by removing the
underlying soft sediments and provoking falls of tuff slabs.
While visiting the beautiful Sorrento and other towns
resting on the same terrace, attention should be also devoted
to the gorges that dissect the local tuff.
34.3.2
Views from Colli San Pietro Pass
The Meta-Positano road crosses the Sorrento Peninsula main
divide at Colli San Pietro (317 m a.s.l.) and offers views
revealing the strong asymmetry of the Peninsula itself,
whose southern slope appears much steeper and shorter than
the northern one. This is partly due to the NNW dip of the
bedrock strata, but what matters even more is the difference
in age of the two flanks. In fact, to the north there is a
polycyclic morphology that started evolving in Pliocene
times, when the area had not been yet reduced to a narrow
peninsula; i.e. when the two grabens hosting the gulfs of
Naples and Salerno did not exist yet. During the Pliocene the
landscape was broken by NW trending faults (Fig. 34.1), but
this was followed by a phase of erosion long enough to
sensibly smooth the previous fault scarps. When a new
tectonic phase reduced the area to a narrow and steep flanked
peninsula (Early Pleistocene; Caiazzo et al. 2006), there was
a renewal of both fluvial dissection and landslide activity.
These erosion phenomena reduced the previous, mature
landscape to some isolated remnants on the summits. In the
meantime—at lower elevations—the NW trending faults
opposing hard Cretaceous limestone to soft Miocene shale
had parts of their planes exhumed by differential erosion,
adding steep fault-line scarps to the landscape (e.g. the ones
flanking the Meta-Sorrento depression).
More simple and short is the history of the southern slope
of the Sorrento Peninsula, which is a fault scarp created
anew during the Early Pleistocene. It belongs to the long and
zigzagging fault-zone that borders the Salerno graben to the
north (Fig. 34.1) and shapes the fundamental geometry of
the spectacular Amalfi Coast.
Looking south from Colli San Pietro (or other places
along the road to Positano) one can see a group of three
small islands at about 4 km from the coast (Fig. 34.3). They
are now known as Li Galli, while in Hellenistic and Roman
times they were called Seirenoussai (meaning “Islands of the
Mermaids”) because this was supposed to be the place where
Odisseus met the mythical mermaids. Geologically speaking, Li Galli and other small islands further west are summits
of a limestone block (originally standing hundreds of metres
above the sea level) that subsided when the Salerno graben
formed.
On the road to Positano one can also note how the coastal
fault scarp (originally planar and sub-vertical) has been
reshaped by both linear and areal processes of erosion. As
normal on limestone hill slopes, the cutting of gullies and
ravines was not only mechanical, but also chemical, creating
diffuse karstic furrows, notches and other microforms. In the
interfluvial sectors of the escarpment the typical cross profile
includes (a) an active sea cliff at the base, followed upwards
by (b) a segment about 35° inclined. Where the scarp is not
higher than about 500 m, “b” reaches up to the top, while
scarp sections exceeding that limit, disclose above “b” a
third element, that is (c) a residual cliff (still to be consumed), sometimes made more complex (stepped) due to
alternations of more and less resistant strata. The “b-c”
couple is typical of scarps evolved by “slope replacement”.
It implies that the initial cliff (the fault plane in our case)
migrates gradually backwards and upslope due to repeated
rock falls, leaving below it a gentler element (the “replacing
slope”) having just the inclination required to permit the
downwasting of the falling coarse debris. The above noted
difference between lower and higher reaches of the escarpment at issue tells us that the time elapsed since faulting was
insufficient for the complete slope replacement of cliffs
higher than about 500 m.
Under the present mild climate, the cliffs produce very
little debris and slow karstic degradation prevails on the
whole slope. Instead, most of cliff recession occurred during
the cold periods of Pleistocene when physical rock weathering was stronger. Consequently, thick screes of debris
formed at the base of the scarp, but they are rarely visible
today because they are submerged and eroded by the following sea-level rises (interglacial and post-glacial ones).
34.3.3
The Montepertuso Rock Arch
and the Surrounding Landscape
As the Lattari Mts. ridge is made mostly of carbonate rocks,
its landscape includes also karstic forms. In terms of epikarst,
the most diffuse and pronounced forms are solution trenches,
furrows and pits occurring where the rock has maintained for
long a cover of pyroclastic material speeding up the dissolution process because of its acidic pH and its high
water-retaining capacity. In terms of hypokarst, the tens of
caverns and galleries so far discovered in the area (Del Vecchio and Fiore 2005) are relatively short, the longest one being
the Cave of Scala, a gallery of 280 m. The existence of other
hypogean cavities is locally revealed by large collapse dolines
like the one hosting the Cemetery of Vico Equense and others
nearby. Most of the explored caves were accessed through
openings created by either Quaternary faults or canyons
34
Sorrento Peninsula and Amalfi Coast: The Long-Term History …
403
Fig. 34.3 The steep Quaternary fault scarp forming the southern slope of the Sorrento Peninsula. A portion of the much gentler northern slope
appears in the right upper corner. To the extreme left are the Li Galli islets
incised in response to the same Quaternary tectonics. This
created also some rock arches, such as the one called Finestra
(west periphery of Amalfi) and the one below Furore’s
cemetery, both of them visible from the Amalfi-Agerola road.
The most famous arch in the area (a real landmark) is the
one called Montepertuso (“pierced mountain”), giving name
also to the nearby hilly hamlet. It is visible from the road
connecting Positano to Montepertuso (Fig. 34.4a) and from
inside the hamlet. Visitors willing a closer glance may
ascend through an ancient stairway of 450 steps (Via
Campola) that ends up inside the arch (Fig. 34.4b).
The narrow and cliffed rocky spur that carries the Montepertuso arch belongs to the SW flank of Mt. S. Angelo a
Tre Pizzi; a NW trending fault scarp that goes from Positano
to Praiano and whose vertical throw (1.5 km) was generated
half in the Middle-Late Pliocene and half during the Early
Pleistocene (Amato and Robustelli 2002). The second
movement, which belongs to the opening of the Salerno
Gulf, by adding a very steep basal portion to the scarp,
caused the beginning of a still ongoing phase of fluvial
dissection of the scarp itself. Among the resulting incisions
the longest and deepest one is the wonderful Vallone Porto,
admirable from bridges along both the Positano-Praiano and
the Montepertuso-Nocelle roads.
The shaping of the Montepertuso spur as a cliffed crest
separating two adjacent valley heads can be related to the
above mentioned phase of fluvial dissection and to combined
processes of cliff retreat. During such events, an ancient
karstic system (probably made of galleries and caverns) was
unroofed and a small remnant of it became the present
Montepertuso rock arch.
34.3.4
The Emerald Grotto
After phases of uplift in the Late Tertiary and in the Early
and Middle Pleistocene, the Lattari Mts. attained a final
stability. Consequently, relative sea-level change stopped
being controlled mainly by movements of the landmass and
started being determined only by eustasy (i.e. absolute and
global changes of water level in the oceans due mostly to
cyclic expansions and contractions of glaciers).
The local record of such Late Quaternary eustatic
palaeo-sea levels spans from −120 to +8 m; respectively
corresponding to the coolest moment of the Last Glacial
(about 18,000 years ago) and to the warmest period of the
Last Interglacial (about 130,000 years ago; Riccio et al.
2001).
Eustasy influenced also the evolution of some karstic
caves, as it can be seen, for example, in the beautiful
Emerald Grotto (Grotta dello Smeraldo) near Conca dei
Marini (Fig. 34.5). One can access it either by the special lift
located alongside the coastal road or by a boat service
departing from the Amalfi port.
The Emerald Grotto is a cavern having a trilobite plan of
about 35 by 35 m. Its vaulted roof reaches almost 20 m a.s.l.,
while its floor reaches 11 m below sea level. Four narrow
galleries (two emerged and two submerged) open into the
cavern from the mountain interior (NW). To the south,
another gallery about ten metres long departs from the
cavern and reaches into the plunging sea cliff outside. Its
roof is at −7 m and its section (about 6 m wide and 4 m
high) reveals signs of an enlargement due to ancient wave
erosion. The sunlight penetrating through this submerged
404
A. Cinque
Fig. 34.4 The southwestern flank of Mt. S. Angelo a Tre Pizzi and the perforated rock spur of Montepertuso (arrow on photo a). Image b offers a
close view of the arch from the SE
Fig. 34.5 The Emerald Grotto near Conca dei Marini. Note the half-submerged stalagmitic column to the right and the bluish light arriving
through the submarine entrance tunnel
passage imparts a distinctive emerald colour to both the
water and the cave walls.
The first speleogenetic stages of the Emerald Grotto are
poorly known. Probably the cavern formed during the
Middle Pleistocene upon the enlargement of originally
pressurized karstic galleries. At the beginning of the Last
Interglacial (about 130,000 years ago), when a strong global
warming occurred, the sea level rose enough to reach the
cavern and to flood it up to about 8 m above the present sea
level. The most striking evidence of such marine transgression can be found on the cavern walls which appear perforated up to the height of 8 m by marine molluscs
Lithodomus lithofagus. The holes are particularly evident in
the western part of the cave, were they occur both on the
34
Sorrento Peninsula and Amalfi Coast: The Long-Term History …
substrate rock and on the calcite concretions that predate the
marine transgression (Colantoni 1970).
Aside from minor sea level fluctuations that occurred
during the Last Interglacial, the other major change that
affected the cave is the long period of very low sea level
characterizing the last glacial period (about 70–15 ka ago).
All over that period the Emerald Grotto remained out of sea
water and a second generation of calcite concretions formed
on its roof, walls and pavement. On the cavern walls these
younger calcitic formations can be distinguished from the
older one because they show no Lithodomus perforations
above the present sea level. Two solid and tall stalagmitic
columns reaching well below the present sea level can be
ascribed to the same younger generation of calcitic formations. As we all know, such columns grow upwards from the
floor and cannot form inside a flooded cavern; their present
condition shows the sea-level changes that affected the
Emerald Grotto in the recent geological past. The cave was
partially submerged after the end of the last glaciation and
the onset of the current warm period (Post-glacial) due to a
rise in sea level of about 120 m induced by melting of ice
sheets. The last 10 m of sea-level change, which occurred in
the past 7000 years, are well recorded in the Emerald Grotto.
34.3.5
The Suspended Agerola Basin
Overtaking the last curve of the road from Amalfi to Agerola is
like making a jump in the geological past. In fact, at that point,
one suddenly loses the sight of the steep coastal escarpment
(shaped by Quaternary tectonics and erosion) and gains the
view of the much gentler landscape characterizing the highest
part of the Lattari Mts., which dates back to the Pliocene.
Agerola is composed of four villages resting on terraces
between 600 and 675 m a.s.l. These terraces testify to a stage
of landscape evolution when the Agerola basin had its floor
flattened by alluvial fan deposits discharged by creeks dissecting the flanks (Pliocene fault scarps) of the surrounding
mountains. These fault scarps differ from the younger ones
of the coastal zone by having unbroken, slightly
convex-concave cross-profiles that rarely exceed 30° of
inclination; proving that there was enough time not only to
complete slope replacement, but also to allow some slope
decline after that.
As regards the long-term morphostructural evolution of
the Agerola basin, good evidence is found in the area of
Grotta Biscotto cave, which is along a mule-track called
Sentiero degli Dei (i.e. Gods path). This pathway, renovated
in part during recent times, was created in the early Middle
Ages to connect Agerola with Montepertuso and Positano.
Nowadays it is a great tourist attraction, as it cuts along the
cliffs offering amazing views to the visitors.
405
The path departs from the main square of Bomerano (one
of the villages forming Agerola), passes through a tributary
incision of the Praia Valley and—after 600 m—reaches a
cliffed rocky spur at the base of Mt. Tre Calli where the
Grotta Biscotto cave is located. Here, over a substratum
made of extremely fractured Mesozoic strata, there are thick
continental conglomerates of the Mid-Late Pliocene. They
include two different facies: (a) matrix rich detrital beds
dipping 10–15° to NE and (b) beds of angular debris, generally matrix poor, dipping 30–35° to E. The latter represents
the rock debris that slid and rolled down from Mt. Tre Calli
block soon after its upfaulting with respect to Agerola’s one.
On the other hand, the sub-coeval facies “a” witnesses an
ancient alluvial fan that was fed by a mountain catchment
existing SW of the spot. But in that direction there is now a
descending topography, not a rising one! (Fig. 34.6). This
change of landscape is due to the Early Pleistocene phase of
extensional tectonics, which created and progressively
enlarged the Salerno Gulf graben by throwing down blocks
of the previous relief (Caiazzo et al. 2006).
Of course, the newborn Early Pleistocene fault scarp soon
started being dissected by running water and two of the
resulting ravines (developing on more fractured rocks)
retreated enough to capture the Agerola basin: the Praia and
the Penise valleys (Fig. 34.6).
Grotta Biscotto area offers also a good example of rock
dwelling (houses built in small caves centuries ago) around
which are ancient stairs of artificial terraces that permitted
agriculture on slopes as steep as 100%. In many cases, the
ground contained in the terraces (weathered pyroclastic
material) was not found on the spot, but it had to be collected
around and patiently carried there ladle by ladle. The
retaining walls (locally called macerine) are made of limestone slabs without mortar, so as to ensure a good internal
drainage and minimize the soil pressure against the wall
itself. Of course, because of the lack of mortar, great attention was paid to proper fitting of the stones and to the
maintenance of the walls.
34.3.6
The Canneto River Canyon
(Valle delle Ferriere)
Being formed of pervious carbonate rocks, the Lattari Mts.
have few perennial streams. One of them is the Canneto
River, which debouches on the Amalfi beach (Fig. 34.7). Its
valley is named Valle delle Ferriere after the iron mills that
have been operating there between the fourteenth and the
eighteenth century. However, since the early Middle Ages
the same water course has been used to power also grain
mills, paper mills and factories of other kinds. The ruins of
such early industrial buildings are well worth visiting, also
406
Fig. 34.6 View of Mt. Tre Calli from the southern edge of Bomerano
terrace. Pcg outcrop of Pliocene conglomerates near Grotta Biscotto;
Yellow line Sentiero degli Dei pathway; red line with arrow one of the
A. Cinque
faults that truncate the Pliocene landscape. On the left, a DEM-derived
perspective from the south showing the whole Agerola basin and the
coastal fault scarp below it (eye with rays location of the photographic shot)
Fig. 34.7 View of the Canneto River canyon from Amalfi
because they are immersed in a landscape of remarkable
beauty and great biodiversity. This is especially true for the
upper part of the basin, where a governmental protected area
was created in 1972.
The Canneto canyon is approximately 5.5 km long, 1–1.5
km wide and up to 800 m deep. It is the greatest fluvial
dissection of the whole Amalfi Coast, being surpassed only
by some basins originating from tectonic depressions (e.g.
Agerola basin). The mentioned primacy depends largely on
the fact that here fluvial dissection started both earlier and
from higher elevation than elsewhere in the Lattari Mts.
In fact, the mountains through which the Ferriere canyon
is cut carries remnants of an Early Pliocene erosional landscape (Caiazzo et al. 2000) in the summit position (1000–
34
Sorrento Peninsula and Amalfi Coast: The Long-Term History …
1200 m a.s.l.). This area started being dissected by an
ancestor of the Canneto River in Mid-Pliocene times, when
the area turned into an uplifted block with respect to the
surroundings (e.g. Agerola basin and Scala-Ravello area).
Then—in the Early Pleistocene—the formation of the
Salerno Gulf graben caused a dramatic truncation of the
palaeo-Canneto valley. With this event, the valley portion
that remained suspended above the newborn coastal
escarpment—suffering also additional uplift—entered the
still ongoing period of regressive erosion that has turned it in
a deep canyon.
The easiest way to visit the canyon is to follow the path in
the valley floor that departs from inside Amalfi. However, for a
better view we recommend descending into the canyon from
Scala (about 400 m a.s.l.) and then walking along the valley
floor path to reach Amalfi. In any case, a place to not miss is
Acqualta, a section of the valley floor with beautiful waterfalls,
some of which generated by karstic springs in the cliffed sides
of the canyon. This place is located at 320 m a.s.l. beyond the
gate leading to the protected area. Here the spray released by
the falling water creates a condition of abundant and constant
moisture that allows the presence of a luxuriant vegetation,
including rare plants such as the giant subtropical fern Woodwardia radicans, two species of Pteris and several others.
Downslope of some springs, the wet slope is densely
vegetated by moss and herbs. As they subtract CO2 to the
spring water passing on them, the dissolved calcium bicarbonate precipitates as calcite, so encrusting the vegetation
carpet and forming lobes of calcareous tufa.
407
Where lying on steep slopes—or against cliffs—those
lobes disclose an internal structure that includes curtain-like
and stalactite-like pendants of encrusted vegetation.
Fluvial deposits are rare in the upper-middle reach of the
valley, consisting of few patches of gravels accumulated
upstream of obstacles given by blocky rock fall deposits. On
the contrary, valley floor aggradation is widespread in the
lowermost reach of the canyon, and a recent drilling near the
river mouth has proved that bedrock rests at least 40 m
below the present sea level. This datum combines well with
the submerged mouths of the Praia and Penise valleys,
narrating the downcutting occurred upon the marine
regression of the last glacial periods of the Pleistocene.
34.3.7
The Capo d’Orso Promontory
The portion of Lattari Mts. located east of Maiori exposes
the lower part of the Mesozoic sequence (Triassic strata).
During diagenesis, this part had the calcium ions partly
replaced by magnesium, so that dolomite (CaMgCO3)
instead of the original calcite (CaCO3) became the dominant
mineral and—therefore—the rock type changed from limestone to dolostone.
In general, dolostones are a little less pervious, less soluble and more erodible than limestones, and confirmation of
this can be found by comparing landforms of the mountains
east of Maiori with the ones observable on the limestones
dominating the area around Positano and Agerola.
Fig. 34.8 Capo d’Orso promontory. General view from Amalfi (a) and the group of pinnacles visible from the coastal road while turning around
the promontory end (b)
408
A. Cinque
Following the road going from Maiori to Salerno, we go
across the dolomitic Capo d’Orso promontory (Fig. 34.8)
and observe that here the frequency of erosional valleys and
ravines is clearly higher than in the western part of the
Lattari Mts., because runoff is higher on dolostones and
because this rock type—when exposed to weathering—disintegrates in fine particles easier to be washed away.
Other points of difference are that here—on the dolomitic
part of the ridge—karstic landforms are more rare, sea cliffs
are less precipitous and, finally, fault scarps—being more
dissected by streams—have their original planarity less
preserved than fault scarps in the calcareous part of the
ridge.
Peculiar of Capo d’Orso are also landforms due to “selective erosion”. They are due to the circumstance that the
degree of dolomitization varies from place to place within
the rock mass, so as to make variable the rock resistance to
erosion. Consequently, processes such as backwearing of
slopes and downwearing of crests did not proceed uniformly,
resulting in the formation of spurs alternating with hollows,
or pinnacles and towers alternating with saddles, where fully
and poorly dolomitized rocks occur side by side.
Some of these features can be seen even from a distance
in the outline of Capo d’Orso (Fig. 34.8), while a closer look
at an interesting group of pinnacles of different shape and
degree of evolution is possible from the point where the
coastal road turns around the cape (Fig. 34.8).
Another recommended stop along the coastal road (km
39) is the small monastery of Santa Maria de Olearia, built in
a cavern and displaying interesting features of Byzantine
architecture along with frescos dating to the tenth century.
The cavern opens in a coarse-grained conglomerate
belonging to an uplifted and much dissected alluvial fan of
Middle Pleistocene age.
34.4
Conclusion
The suggested visit tour across the Sorrento Peninsula and
the Amalfi Coast permits to appreciate how much the present
landscape of Southern Apennines is influenced—especially
to the SW—by events of extensional block faulting occurred
in Quaternary times, when the Tyrrhenian Sea basin had its
last pulse of enlargment.
By creating high fault scarps, truncating pre-existing
mature landforms and also triggering deep fluvial dissection,
said tectonic events laid the foundations of the great physical
beauty of the area.
Especially along the Amalfi Coast, this beauty couples
with terrain roughness so often to determine remarkable
settlement limitations. But the latter were brilliantly surmounted during Early Middle Ages, as the occurrence of
widespread terracing works, ruins of factories and sparse
towns rich of monuments demonstrate.
References
Amato A, Robustelli G (2002) The Nocelle conglomerates: a
problematic outcrop highly suspended on the southern slope of
the eastern Sorrento peninsula (Italy). Il Quaternario 15(1):83–96
Bellucci F, Milia A, Rolandi G, Torrente MM (2006) Structural control
on the upper Pleistocene ignimbrite eruptions in the Neapolitan area
(Italy): volcano tectonic faults versus caldere faults. In: De Vivo B
(ed) Volcanism in the Campania Plain: Vesuvius, Campi Flegrei
and Ignimbrites. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 163–180
Caiazzo C, Cinque A, Merola D (2000) Relative chronology and
kinematics of the Appennine and antiapennine faults of the Sorrento
Peninsula. Memorie Società Geologica Italiana 55:165–174
Caiazzo C, Ascione A, Cinque A (2006) Late Tertiary-Quaternary
tectonics of the Southern Apennines (Italy): new evidences from the
Tyrrhenian slope. Tectonophysics 421:23–51
Cinque A, Aucelli PPC, Brancaccio L, Mele R, Milia A, Robustelli G,
Romano P, Russo F, Russo M, Santangelo N, Sgambati D (1997)
Volcanism, tectonics and recent geomorphological change in the
bay of Napoli. Supplementi Geografia Fisica Dinamica Quaternaria
III(2):123–141
Colantoni P (1970) La Grotta dello Smeraldo di Amalfi e la linea di riva
tirreniana. Le grotte d’Italia, Serie 4(2):45–60
Del Vecchio U, Fiore A (2005) I Monti Lattari e l’isola di Capri. In:
Russo N, Del Prete S, Giulivo I, Santo A (eds) Grotte e speleologia
della Campania. Atlante delle cavità naturali. Elio Sellino Editore,
Avellino, pp 337–361
ISPRA (2013) 1:50,000 geologic map of Italy, Sheet 466 Sorrento
(with explanatory notes). http://www.isprambiente.gov.it/Media/
carg/index.html
Riccio A, Riggio F, Romano P (2001) Sea level fluctuations during
Oxygen Isotope Stage 5: new data from fossil shorelines in the
Sorrento Peninsula (Southern Italy). Zeithschrift für Geomorphologie NF 45(1):121–137
The Coastal Landscape of Cilento (Southern
Italy): A Challenge for Protection and Tourism
Valorisation
35
Alessio Valente, Paolo Magliulo, and Filippo Russo
Abstract
A striking coastline, about 100 km long, characterizes the southernmost part of the
Campania region. It is comprised within one of the largest National Parks of Italy, named
“Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni Park”. The coast preserves a great number of
geological and geomorphological features, frequently well integrated with anthropic
structures, which makes it a unique landscape. The morphology of the coastal area of the
Park is characterized by hills sloping down to the sea, where alternate bays with small
beaches and rocky headlands, hosting a large number of Norman-Aragonese watchtowers.
Limestone cliffs display impressive karst landforms, such as caves, which have
undoubtedly favoured human presence since the Middle Paleolithic. In this suggestive
landscape several landforms and deposits permit to reconstruct the Quaternary-aged
sea-level changes.
Keywords
Coastal processes
Cilento
35.1
Geomorphosites
Introduction
Beyond the sandy beaches of the Sele River Plain, with the
background of the ancient temples of the Greek village of
Poseidonia, currently known as Paestum, a large rocky
promontory called Cilento juts out into the sea. In its coastal
portion, it is characterized by the presence of steep cliffs,
reshaped mainly by waves. These cliffs are mostly interrupted, in their spatial continuity, by steep and narrow valleys, in which short and ephemeral streams flow. At the
mouths of these streams, small-sized pebbly beaches are
present. The sculpting of the cliffs is faster where soft and
mechanically weak Tertiary-aged flysch deposits outcrop,
while it is slower where the bedrock consists of Mesozoic
limestones, markedly more resistant to erosion.
A. Valente (&) P. Magliulo F. Russo
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie, Università del Sannio, Via
dei Mulini 59/A, 82100 Benevento, Italy
e-mail: valente@unisannio.it
Prehistoric traces
European Geopark Network
The coastal landscape is here fairly diverse, as the morphogenetic processes, mainly related to the wave action, are
currently different from the past (Baggioni 1975). The evidence of past marine processes are the numerous and
sometimes suggestive landforms that are preserved along the
cliffs. The setting of these landforms also emphasizes the
tectonic movements that disjointed the Cilento area, making
the orographic setting of these places unique and spectacular. However, to reduce the growing threat from mass
tourism and connected economic land speculation, protection and enhancement strategies are needed.
The establishment in 1995 of the National Park of
Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni was aimed to reach
these objectives. The Park includes almost the entire portion
of the Cilento coast including the marine protected areas of
Licosa—Santa Maria di Castellabate to the north, and Porto
Infreschi to the south. Furthermore, the recent inclusion of
the Park as part of the European and Global Network of
Geoparks is a major achievement (Aloia et al. 2012). This
inclusion emphasizes not only the desire to enhance the
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_35
409
410
A. Valente et al.
geological heritage, but also to develop initiatives aimed at
sustainable development of this area.
35.2
Geographical and Geological Setting
The Cilento coastland, about 100 km long, is located in
southwest sector of the Italian peninsula (Fig. 35.1),
between the Salerno and Policastro gulfs, at the eastern
margin of the Tyrrhenian Sea. The coast is always accessible
by roads and footpaths, except for the southernmost stretches, where no roads and no buildings were built up.
The climate is temperate, with mean annual temperatures
of about 17 °C (12.6–20.8 °C) and mean annual rainfall
ranging from 730 mm in the northern sector to 790 mm in
the southern one. The precipitations are concentrated in
spring and late autumn, while long dry periods occur during
summer.
The most important geomorphological controls are the
geological setting, the rather homogenous marine energy and
the precipitation regime, and, in particular, the frequent
Fig. 35.1 Schematic geological
map of Cilento. Legend (1) recent
Quaternary deposits; (2) ancient
Quaternary deposits; (3) Neogene
synorogenic units; (4)
North-Calabrian Unit (Lower
Miocene–Late Cretaceous); (5–6)
Bulgheria and Alburno-Cervati
Units (Lower-Middle Miocene–
Late Triassic) (see the text for
details)
exceptionally intense rainfall events after prolonged periods
of drought. The action of humans, both along the coast and
in the hinterland, may also cause significant changes in the
dynamics of marine and subaerial processes. These define
the rates of erosion, sediment transfer and beach
accumulation.
The Cilento area falls within the Southern Apennines
fold-and-thrust belt, which developed between the Late
Cretaceous and the Pleistocene, as a consequence of the
interaction between the European and the African plates as
well as of the spreading of the Tyrrhenian oceanic basin,
located immediately to west (Patacca and Scandone 2007).
The geological setting (Fig. 35.1) was determined by several
tectonic phases, in which the sedimentary units, deposited
since the Triassic, were progressively involved from west to
east. The westernmost sedimentary unit, as well as the evidence of the Middle Miocene overthrusting of the latter on
the nearest eastern unit, is exposed only in Cilento. A Neogene synorogenic unit was deposited in a basin, which was
formed on the previously deformed units. Nowadays, this
synorogenic unit is the most widespread in Cilento. At last,
35
The Coastal Landscape of Cilento (Southern Italy): A Challenge …
the Quaternary post-orogenic deposits accumulated mainly
during the cold climatic stages, during which the slopes,
scarcely protected by vegetation against erosion and subject
to intense physical degradation phenomena, supplied huge
amounts of detritus that infilled the morphological depressions located below.
More precisely, the westernmost sedimentary successions, named North-Calabrian Unit (Patacca and Scandone
2007; Vitale et al. 2010) (Fig. 35.1, Unit 4), include marly
calcarenites, calcilutites, clays, often siliceous, with sandstones and rare conglomerates, which were deposited in a
pelagic basin between the Late Cretaceous and the Lower
Miocene. The main outcrops of these successions, strongly
deformed and slightly metamorphosed, are located in the
hilly coastal area and on the face of the most of sea cliffs
(Fig. 35.2a).
The North-Calabrian unit overthrusts both the Bulgheria
Unit and the Alburno-Cervati Unit (Patacca and Scandone
2007) (Fig. 35.1, Units 5–6). The latter are made up of
carbonate sediments from Late Triassic to Lower-Middle
Miocene in age, related to sedimentary environments ranging from shallow water, mainly in a back-reef area of a
carbonatic platform, to relatively deep water of a sedimentary basin, whose depth increased with time before it was
tectonically deformed. This deepening affected first the
Bulgheria Unit, currently outcropping in the southern coastal
area of Cilento (Mt. Bulgheria, 1225 m a.s.l.) (Fig. 35.2b),
and then the Alburno-Cervati Unit, which is much more
widespread in the southern Apennines and well exposed
along the highest tracts of terrain in the internal areas of
Cilento (e.g., Mt. Cervati, 1898 m; Mt. Alburni, 1742 m).
In the Neogene synorogenic units, several formations of
Middle to Late Miocene age are grouped (Patacca and
Scandone 2007) (Fig. 35.1, Unit 3). They consist of clays,
sandstones and conglomerates, locally with significant marly
interbeddings. They were mainly arranged in turbiditic
deposits, generally lying unconformably on the previously
mentioned units. These turbidites occurred within a deep sea
fan developed at the base of a submarine slope. The Cilento
Group (Cavuoto et al. 2004) crops out mainly in correspondence of the Stella, Gelbison and Centaurino coastal
reliefs, as well as along the northern cliffs of Cilento
(Fig. 35.2c).
At last, in the Quaternary post-orogenic units, all the
continental and marine sediments deposited after the final
emersion of the area (Late Pliocene—Early Pleistocene) are
comprised (Fig. 35.1, Units 1–2). As regards the coastal
outcrops, these groups are chiefly represented by conglomerates, roughly stratified, outcropping along the western
portion of Mt. Bulgheria (Ascione and Romano 1999), fluvial sediments, both ancient and recent, distributed along the
valleys of the main rivers (i.e. Alento and Bussento), and
ancient aeolian sands and marine deposits (Early to upper
411
Pleistocene in age), related to different sea levels, widespread along the coast of Cilento (Antonioli et al. 1994;
Cinque et al. 1994).
35.3
Coastal Landforms
The coastal landscape of the Cilento is characterized by a
succession of promontories and inlets, the latter generally
small-sized, except at the mouth of the Alento River. Within
the inlets, the deposition of sandy and/or gravelly sediments
frequently occurs, and therefore beaches can form, albeit
restricted and often bounded by steep slopes (Baggioni
1975) (Fig. 35.3). On promontories and on the mountain
slopes reaching the sea, the wave energy increases, and so
these sections of the coastline are generally affected by
erosion (Baggioni 1975). The consequent coastal retreat is
controlled by the interactions between several factors, such
as the outcropping lithology, the morphological profile and
the wave regime. The cliffs, especially when they are more
than 100 m high, become particularly scenic, as is in the
southernmost stretch of the Cilento, to the south of Capo
Palinuro.
The Mesozoic carbonate rocks that are well exposed
along these cliffs offer considerable resistance to erosion
induced by waves. However, the presence of discontinuities
on the wall (e.g. fractures, bedding surfaces, karst cavities)
can accelerate the retreat and facilitate the formation of
minor coastal landforms on the cliff or at the adjacent sea
bottom. Among minor landforms, particularly characteristic
are marine abrasion platforms at the foot of the cliffs and
sea-notches incised at the level of the sea, and even below.
These landforms, which are often associated with the
deposition of sediments, are well preserved along the
southern coast of Capo Palinuro, also at heights different
from those at which they currently form. Therefore, their
analysis represents a powerful tool to understand the
Quaternary-aged sea-level changes.
Many landforms in the Cilento geomorphological landscape can be considered as geomorphosites according to
Panizza (2001). In fact, several landforms, being representative of a process or event, “have acquired a scientific,
cultural/historical, aesthetic and/or social/economic value”.
The integration of each landform with the biological, historical, social and cultural values increases its importance
and makes the Cilento coastland unique (Aloia et al. 2012).
Some of these landforms are also useful to reconstruct
and understand the uplift history, and then the displacements
that affected this stretch of coastline over time. For this
reason, the coastal slopes appear typically segmented from
the highest terrace positioned at 400 m a.s.l. (Borrelli et al.
1988), presumably formed in the Early Pleistocene, to the
successively lower positions at 170/180, 130/140, 100/110,
412
A. Valente et al.
Fig. 35.2 Examples of coastal cliffs. a Punta del Telegrafo, in front of
Velia: outcrop of folded calcilutites and shales (Lower Miocene—
Oligocene); on the top a tower of the coastal defence system of
sixteenth century; b Cala di Monte della Luna, near Marina di
Camerota: outcrop of light grey and black dolomite (upper Triassic);
c cliff supported by flysch deposits (Middle-Upper Miocene) in the
northern Cilento, near Punta Licosa
65/75 m and finally 50 m (Ascione and Romano 1999)
(Fig. 35.4a). The difficulty to correctly date these terraces is
mainly due to the lack of deposits. Downslope to the cliffs,
other landforms shaped more recently by marine erosion
(e.g. platforms and sea-notches), with associated marine and
continental deposits, are present. In particular, at Lido
35
The Coastal Landscape of Cilento (Southern Italy): A Challenge …
413
Fig. 35.3 Coastal stretch to the south of Marina di Camerota
Ficocelle, to the northwest of Palinuro village, a complete
sedimentary sequence of Upper Pleistocene (Tyrrhenian) is
well exposed along a cliff located upslope to a terraced
surface at 2 m a.s.l. The sequence consists of coastal sands
arranged in sets of layers with horizontal and oblique sedimentary structures, typical of a submerged and emerged
beaches, covered by sand dunes (Antonioli et al. 1994)
(Fig. 35.4b).
Locally, the retreat of the cliffs also left remnants on the
adjacent seabed, so the latter looks articulated, with small
terraces, arches and rocks emerging from sea. Among these,
the natural arch of Palinuro is particularly important. It
displays maximum height of 12 m and its width ranges
between 15 and 10 m (Fig. 35.5). It formed during the last
interglacial (about 100 ka BP), due to fracturing and the
following collapse of the Jurassic limestone strata. At that
time, the sea level was about 6–8 m higher than today.
Subsequently, the re-emergence of the arch due to the
sea-level lowering intensified wave action that nowadays
continues to erode it. To prevent or delay the complete
destruction of this spectacular landform, a submerged barrier
was built and an artificial nourishment of the contiguous
beach was carried out.
Another typical characteristic of these coasts is the great
abundance of caves, whose entrances are located just above
the sea level, or entirely below. The genesis of these caves is
related mainly to karst phenomena that affect the limestone
and dolomite in which the caves are shaped. In this chemical
action, the role of the waves cannot be overlooked, as they
enlarge each small cavity. Hence, a myriad of caves of
various dimensions appear along this stretch of the Cilento
coast, such as the Blue Caves near Capo Palinuro, or the
caves of Noglio and Santa Maria, near Marina di Camerota,
just to mention the most beautiful ones (Fig. 35.6). Inside
them, we can admire stalactites, stalagmites and columns,
but we can also observe, below the sea level, a large variety
of plant and animal species growing in a particular environment referred to as “semi-dark caves”. These caves were
inhabited by man since the Paleolithic period, as evidenced
by the artefacts found within them (Benini et al. 1997).
On the high and rocky coasts shaped in the successions of
the Tertiary-aged flysch, which can be observed in the
remaining sections of the Cilento, the erosive action is more
effective than that described above. The rates of retreat are
significantly higher due to the lower mechanical resistance.
Erosional processes are not limited to marine ones, but also
include subaerial processes, acting on the emerged portion of
the coast. The latter, generally less steep and lower than the
carbonate cliffs, is usually covered by debris on which typical Mediterranean vegetation grows.
414
A. Valente et al.
Fig. 35.4 Landforms associated
to paleo-sea levels. a Sketch of
terraced surfaces along the
southern calcareous slope of Mt.
Bulgheria; the highest terrace, at
400 m a.s.l., is not present in this
cross-section (modified after
Antonioli et al. 1994); b detail of
the Tyrrhenian-aged (Marine
Isotopic Stage 5) coastal sands
outcrop at Palinuro village (Lido
Ficocelle)
Landslides, sometimes of considerable size, occur due to
different conditions of permeability between the cover and
the bedrock, in response to significant changes in the amount
of rain during the year, and to the constant action of waves at
the base of the slopes. Among them, rotational slide of the
coast of Pisciotta covers a large area and threatens important
roads and railway infrastructures. The spread of these phenomena makes difficult to preserve coastal landforms on the
cliffs shaped on flysch deposits. However, it is possible to
observe, for example, a hanging marine abrasion platform
dated back to the Middle Pleistocene (Marine Isotopic Stage
7: between 245 and 190 ka), clearly distinguishable at a
height of about 20–25 m a.s.l. in the coastal profile of Licosa
(Cinque et al. 1994) (Fig. 35.7). In the same profile, it is
possible to recognize other, less-evident terraced land
surfaces, which are younger and less elevated than the previously described one, due to rising sea levels reached
during the late Pleistocene (Marine Isotopic Stage 5: 125 ka
and 75 ka BP; Cinque et al. 1994; Ferranti et al. 2006). This
is confirmed by the analysis performed on the major sedimentary successions of dune and marine environment that
are associated with these abrasion landforms. The latter
assume high geomorphological significance, as they can be
followed with reasonable continuity for the entire coast of
Cilento, unlike other coastal stretches of the Tyrrhenian
coast.
As already mentioned, in the inlets of the Cilento coast,
several beaches, mainly made up of sands, are currently
developing. The most important ones are located between
Santa Maria di Castellabate and San Marco di Castellabate,
35
The Coastal Landscape of Cilento (Southern Italy): A Challenge …
Fig. 35.5 Natural arch shaped in Jurassic limestone, to the west of
Capo Palinuro; in the background is the Cefalo beach, more than 3 km
long
Fig. 35.6 Noglio Cave, to the
west of Marina di Camerota; the
entrance is at 5 m a.s.l.
415
to the north of Punta Licosa and, finally, the largest one
occurs at the Alento River mouth. This latter beach is about
8 km wide, is located at the end of a small coastal plain and
can be divided into two sections. In the northernmost one,
several man-made structures have been erected on the
back-dune ridges, while in the southernmost one, the dune
ridges are currently almost in their natural state (Cinque et al.
1995). Along the first section, as well as in other beaches
mentioned above, where erosion has become significant,
some defence structures, such as breakwaters and walls,
were made.
At the southern end of the Cilento coastline, rocky cliffs
protect small bays, not accessible by car, such as Cala
Bianca and Porto Infreschi (Fig. 35.8a), or restricted coves,
such as the Marcellino Valley (Fig. 35.8b). Inside them,
strips of pebble beach were formed. According to the recent
Italian inventory, Cala Bianca, near Porto Infreschi, is considered one of the most beautiful beaches of Italy, with its
shining sediments and transparent shallow seabed. Porto
Infreschi includes a rich geological heritage constituted by a
number of indicators related to ancient sea levels
(sea-notches, marine terraces and fossil deposits). Among
these, the ones formed in the early Late Pleistocene (before
111 ka BP; Esposito et al. 2003) are evident (Fig. 35.8a).
However, in the Marcellino Valley, a coastal gorge more
than 350 m deep, landforms generated in a morphoclimatic
scenario different from the present one are well preserved
(Baggioni 1975; Borrelli et al. 1988) (Fig. 35.8b).
416
A. Valente et al.
Fig. 35.7 Aerial view of the Licosa promontory with the homonymous island. Note the well-preserved Tyrrhenian marine terrace from the foot of
slope to the sea at 8–10 m a.s.l. (courtesy of National Park of Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni)
35.4
The Imprint of Man
The coastal landscape of Cilento, despite the fact that, in
several sections, it remained intact from a naturalistic point
of view, retains traces of the action of man since ancient
times. Earlier, this action was integrated with the territory,
but recently it has brought substantial changes to the landscape, sometimes without any integration with the natural
components and processes. Some of these interventions
(coastal defence works, tourist resorts) have already been
mentioned while describing the coastal landforms, while
others, especially those integrated into the landscape, will be
analysed briefly here, because they are not always recognizable by an observer.
The continental sediments that overlie marine deposits, or
are interbedded with them, contain very significant traces of
ancient human activities. These traces consist of tools for
hunters and remains of settlements or temporary camps
(hearths, pottery, etc.). The oldest formations date back to
the Lower Paleolithic and were found in some locations
around Marina di Camerota. They contain tools related to
lithic industry known as Acheulean, dated back approximately to 500 ka BP. The middle Paleolithic artefacts were
found more extensively in the surroundings of Capo Palinuro and Marina di Camerota. They contain advanced tools of
the Mousterian, a technique that was developed prior to
35 ka BP. In this latter case, the Neanderthal hunters took
shelter from the conditions of the cold climate of the last
glaciation, especially in coastal caves.
One of these caves, named “Grotta della Cala”, located to
the east of the village of Marina di Camerota, close to the
beach, is almost entirely filled with continental sediments
(talus breccias, aeolian and colluvial sands and silts), speleothems, stalagmites and brown soils, that are associated
with a rich and almost continuous archaeological sequence
from the middle Palaeolithic to the Bronze Age (Benini et al.
1997).
Remains of Greek and Roman settlements are mainly
located in low-lying areas along the coast. The site of Velia
(Fig. 35.9), in the coastal plain of the Alento River, is
considered the most important one, being included in the
UNESCO World Heritage List. The ruins are located on the
35
The Coastal Landscape of Cilento (Southern Italy): A Challenge …
Fig. 35.8 Coastal landforms in Cilento: a Porto Infreschi, where the
sea cliff displays various erosional indicators of ancient sea levels
(wave-cut terrace at 4.5 m and sea-notches at 8.0 m and 3.5 m a.s.l.);
417
inside the caves, a Mousterian lithic industry was found. b The beach at
the mouth of Marcellino coastal gorge
Fig. 35.9 Velia: in the
foreground, the ruins of the
archaeological area (southern
quarter); in the background, the
structure of a medieval castle, the
so-called “Angioina Tower” and
several other remains are present
hillside that faces the sea, and include structures among
which the oldest are dated back to the fifth century BC.
These are the theatre, thermal installation, the sanctuary, the
acropolis and the so-called “Porta Rosa” (fourth century
BC), a beautiful stone-vaulted structure. The inhabitants of
Velia were of Phocians origin, i.e. they came from the present western Turkey. Their economy was almost entirely
based on fishing and maritime trade. These activities were
carried out by using a port which nowadays is completely
filled by the alluvial sediments of the Alento River. These
418
A. Valente et al.
sediments, emplaced during huge flood episodes, together
with other ones referred to marine inundations induced by
significant storm surges, were the results of several environmental crises (Ortolani et al. 1991). These crises, which
also occurred at the site of Paestum, not far from Velia, led
to the abandonment of the area due to the unhealthy conditions that had developed. Today, both archaeological sites,
with their wonderful temples, are among the major tourist
and cultural attractions of the Cilento coast. In addition,
Velia, also known with the Greek name of Elea, was the seat
of the pre-Socratic philosophical school founded by Parmenides and Zeno.
Finally, on these headlands one can see the ancient
watchtowers, typically made with a square base. They were
built in the sixteenth century as a system of defence from the
raids of the Saracens, like that of San Marco of Castellabate,
of Caleo at Acciaroli, or near the Punta Telegrafo, close to
Ascea (Fig. 35.2a).
marine and coastal ecosystems, but also indicate the attention of the resident population to conservation, protection
and enhancement of the most vulnerable natural
environments.
These particular actions, aimed at the protection of the
landscape, are threatened by massive tourist exploitation of
the coast, especially during summer. For this reason, several
objectives must be pursued with the contribution of the park
management, the municipality administration and the visitors of the Cilento coastland. In particular, everyone should
raise the awareness of environmental conservation. To this
aim, making the landscape easily “readable” in terms of
landforms and processes, also by means of innovative
media, could greatly help. In this framework, also the scientific community has an important role to communicate the
knowledge about the coast, its landforms, processes and
hazards.
References
35.5
Protection and Valorization
The coastal landscape of Cilento has already shown a
priceless heritage derived from the harmonic integration
between natural environment and man-made settlements. In
order to protect, in particular, the shores of Cilento, as well
as the beautiful inland areas, the National Park of Cilento,
Vallo di Diano and Alburni was established in 1995. It is
unquestionably one of the most important biogeographic
areas in southern Italy. It is also the first national park in the
Mediterranean that has been included in the list of UNESCO
World Heritage in the category of “cultural landscapes” as
one of global significance. It was later included in the network of Biosphere Reserves of UNESCO program “Man
and Biosphere”, whose objective is to maintain a
long-lasting balance between man and his environment
through conservation of biological diversity, promotion of
economic development and preservation of cultural values.
In 2010, it finally became part of the European and Global
Network of Geoparks, being able “to tell”, in a comprehensive manner, the geological evolution of an area through
its significant heritage, well integrated with the historical
sites and cultural traditions.
The aim of safeguarding the territory does not end with
the establishment of the National Park. In fact, two new
marine protected areas have been set up recently: Licosa—
Santa Maria di Castellabate in the north, and Porto Infreschi
Coast to the south. Despite being different in the type of
coast emerged, they both offer an underwater environment
that host a wide variety of organisms.
Along the coast, there are also museums dedicated to the
sea and its attractions (e.g. Acciaroli, Marina di Camerota).
They represent centres of environmental education on
Aloia A, De Vita A, Guida D, Valente A, Troiano A (2012) The
geological heritage of Cilento and Vallo di Diano Geopark as key in
the evolution of the central Mediterranean in the last 200 My. In:
Proceedings of the 10th European Geopark conference, European
Geopark Network, Porsgrum, Norway, pp 32–41
Ascione A, Romano P (1999) Vertical movements on the eastern
margin of the Tyrrhenian extensional basin. New data from Mt.
Bulgheria (Southern Appenines, Italy). Tectonophysics 315:337–
358
Antonioli F, Cinque A, Ferranti L, Romano P (1994) Emerged and
submerged Quaternary marine terraces of Palinuro Cape (southern
Italy). Mem Descr Carta Geol d’It 52:237–260
Baggioni M (1975) Les côtes du Cilento (Italie du Sud). Morphogénèse
littorale actuelle et héritée. Méditerranée 3:35–52
Benini A, Boscato P, Gambassini P (1997) Grotta della Cala (Salerno):
industrie litiche e faune uluzziane ed aurignaziane. Rivista di
Scienze Preistoriche 48:37–96
Borrelli A, Ciampo G, De Falco M, Guida D, Guida M (1988) La
morfogenesi del Monte Bulgheria (Campania) durante il Pleistocene
inferiore e medio. Mem Soc Geol It 41:667–672
Cavuoto G, Martelli L, Nardi G, Valente A (2004) Depositional system
and architecture of Oligo-Miocene turbidite successions in Cilento
(Southern Apennines). GeoActa 3:129–147
Cinque A, Romano P, Rosskopf C, Santangelo N, Santo A (1994)
Morfologie costiere e depositi quaternari tra Agropoli e Ogliastro
Marina (Cilento, Italia meridionale). Il Quaternario 7(1):3–16
Cinque A, Rosskopf C, Barra D, Campaiola L, Paolillo G, Romano M
(1995) Nuovi dati stratigrafici e cronologici sull’evoluzione recente
della Piana del Fiume Alento (Cilento, Campania). Il Quaternario 8
(2):323–338
Esposito C, Filocamo F, Marciano R, Romano P, Santangelo N,
Scarciglia F, Tuccimei P (2003) Late Quaternary shorelines in
Southern Cilento (Mt. Bulgheria): morphostratigraphy and chronology. Il. Quaternario 16(1):3–14
Ferranti L, Antonioli F, Mauz B, Amorosi A, Dai Pra G, Mastronuzzi G,
Monaco C, Orru P, Pappalardo M, Radtke U, Renda P, Romano P,
Sansò P, Verrubi V (2006) Markers of the last interglacial sea level
high stand along the coast of Italy: tectonic implications. Quatern
Int 145–146:30–54
35
The Coastal Landscape of Cilento (Southern Italy): A Challenge …
Ortolani F, Pagliuca S, Toccaceli RM (1991) Osservazioni sull’evoluzione geomorfologica olocenica della piana costiera di Velia
(Cilento, Campania) sulla base di nuovi rinvenimenti archeologici.
Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 14:163–169
Panizza M (2001) Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and examples of
geomorphological survey. Chin Sci Bull 46(1 Suppl):4–5
419
Patacca E, Scandone P (2007) Geology of the Southern Apennines.
Ital J Geosci, Spec Issue 7:75–119
Vitale S, Ciarcia S, Mazzoli S, Iannace A, Torre M (2010) Structural
analysis of the ‘Internal’ Units of Cilento, Italy. New constraints on
the Miocene tectonic evolution of the southern Apennine accretionary wedge. Comptes Rendus Geosciences 342:475–482
The Salento Peninsula (Apulia, Southern Italy):
A Water-Shaped Landscape Without Rivers
36
Giuseppe Mastronuzzi and Paolo Sansò
Abstract
The Salento peninsula is the ‘heel of the boot’ drawn by the perimeter of the Italian
coastline. It is placed to the south of the alignment Brindisi-Taranto cities, between the
Ionian and the Adriatic seas. Its geological structure is made of a thick Mesozoic carbonate
sequence covered by Tertiary and Quaternary deposits. Landscape evolution is the result of
the interaction between tectonics, karst and marine processes controlled by climate and
sea-level changes. The landscape of Salento peninsula is mainly composed of landforms
shaped by the action of waters, both continental and marine ones, notwithstanding it is
known to be currently a region without extended surficial drainage catchments.
Keywords
Coastal landforms
36.1
Karst landforms
Introduction
The Salento Peninsula (southeastern Apulia) (Fig. 36.1)
shows a rather flat landscape marked by low-elevated
Mesozoic carbonatic ridges separated by grabens filled
with Cenozoic sediments. A staircase of marine terraces can
be recognized at different locations along the coastal area,
whereas deep canyons engrave the entire stratigraphic
sequence.
The Salento peninsula landscape hosts a number of
pre-Quaternary subaerial landforms formed during a long
period lasting from the end of Mesozoic to the Oligocene.
A tropical karst landscape developed, mostly represented by
wide and flat-floored dolines, along with an extensive
bauxitic cover. A shorter karst morphogenetic phase occurred at the end of the Lower Pleistocene. Since then,
G. Mastronuzzi (&)
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e Geoambientali, Università di
Bari “Aldo Moro”, Via Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy
e-mail: giuseppeantonio.mastronuzzi@uniba.it
P. Sansò
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche e Ambientali,
Università del Salento, Ecotekne, Via per Monteroni, 73100
Lecce, Italy
Sapping valleys
Salento
Apulia
landscape evolution was driven by the superimposition of
regional tectonic uplift, started in the Middle Pleistocene, on
the eustatic sea-level change.
For its long geomorphological history, Salento’s landscape is only apparently even. In fact, notwithstanding the
high permeability of rocks that prevented the development of
a well-organized hydrographic network, the action of water
in the subsoil promoted the genesis of deep canyons and
numerous caves, some of them exploited by humans from
the Upper Paleolithic to the Neolithic.
36.2
Geographical Setting
The Salento peninsula is the southernmost part of the Apulia
region; it stretches for about 120 km in NW–SE direction
between the Ionian and the Adriatic Sea (Fig. 36.1). Historically, the Salento peninsula is the region placed to the
south of Soglia Messapica, i.e. the line joining Taranto, on
the Ionian coast, to Brindisi, on the Adriatic one. This area
was first populated by Messapians, an ancient people who
lived there since the eighth century BC; they were conquered
by Romans in the second century BC. The Salento peninsula
was under the Byzantine Empire until the arrival of Normans
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_36
421
422
G. Mastronuzzi and P. Sansò
Fig. 36.1 Geographical setting of Salento peninsula. Dashed white
lines pointed out the five main morphological districts which compound
the Salento peninsula landscape. Large black dots main cities; black
and white dots secondary cities; small black dots localities cited in the
text; yellow and black diamonds figures; blacks triangles main relief;
blue hydrographic network
in the eleventh century. At present, the Salento peninsula
comprises the administrations of three main cities, Taranto,
Brindisi and Lecce, with the population of about 1,800,000
people.
It is a low elevated region attaining the maximum altitude
of 195 m a.s.l. on the top of Serra di San Eleuterio morphostructural ridge. From the geological point of view, three
areas can be identified: (1) the Taranto marine terraces
staircase on the Ionian coast; (2) the Brindisi sedimentary
plain along the Adriatic coast; (3) the southernmost area of
Salento peninsula, marked by a number of morphostructural
carbonatic ridges, locally named Serre, elongated in NNW–
SSE direction (Fig. 36.2).
The Salento peninsula has a typical Mediterranean climate characterized by mild winters and dry warm summers.
Mean annual values of rainfall range from about 700–
900 mm along the southeastern coast to 400–500 mm in the
Taranto area. Mean annual temperature values are comprised
between 14 and 17 °C; the highest values are recorded in
August (monthly average 25.5 °C) whereas the lowest ones
typify January (monthly average 9 °C). The low elevated
landscape does not allow any vertical zonation so that the
Mediterranean scrub (Macchia Mediterranea) and Garigue
associations are the most common features. However, trees
of high Macchia with Quercus ilex and Arbutus unedo, still
survive in small areas. Along the coastal areas, high Macchia
comprises mainly Juniperus oxycedrus and Juniperus
phoenicea, Pistacia lentiscus, Myrtus communis and Phillyrea latifolia. Low Macchia with halophic vegetation is
marked mainly by Calicotome infesta, Myrtus communis,
Pistacia lentiscus, Asparagus acutifolius and, in the southern
part of the peninsula, Euphorbia dendrodes, Olea europea
var. sylvestris, Ceratonia siliqua, Myrtus communis and
Pistacia lentiscus also. An interesting assemblage of both
associations marks the thalweg of canyons. Moreover,
Garigue is made of several herbaceous species and small
size arbustive plants such us Cistus sp., Rosmarinus officinalis, Tymus capitatus and Erica arborea.
36
The Salento Peninsula (Apulia, Southern Italy): A Water-Shaped …
423
Fig. 36.2 Schematic geomorphological section of Salento peninsula
from the western to the eastern coast. Legend (a) pre-Neogene units,
(b) Miocene units, (c) Pliocene units, (d) Lower Pleistocene units,
(e) Middle-Upper Pleistocene units, (1) morphostructural ridge, (2)
Paleogene tropical karst surface, (3) denudation surface shaped on
Pliocene units, (4) Lower Pleistocene karst surface, (5) Middle-Upper
Pleistocene sedimentary plain, (6) Marine terraces (modified after
Sansò et al. 2015)
36.3
glacio-eustatic sea-level change produced a sequence of
marine terraces all around the Salento peninsula.
Main
tectonic
phases
occurred
during
the
Eocene-Oligocene, the Middle Pliocene and the Middle
Pleistocene periods, producing a landscape characterized by
horst and graben morphology. The final uplift of the Apulia
foreland started during the Middle Pleistocene, after general
subsidence that took place in the early Pleistocene period.
On the Salento peninsula the uplift rate strongly decreased at
Marine Isotope Substage (MIS) 9.3, about 330 ka BP; since
then, the highest uplift rates have been recorded in the
Taranto area (about 0.25 mm/year) (Ferranti et al. 2006),
whereas they lower to zero in the southernmost part of the
region. Finally, subsidence has affected the peninsula’s coast
during the last four millennia, most likely due to dome-like
deformation of the region.
Geological Setting
The Salento peninsula is the southernmost emerged part of
Adria Plate, the foreland domain of both Apenninic and
Dinaric orogens (Bosellini 2017). It comprises a Variscan
basement covered by a 3–5 km thick Mesozoic carbonate
sequence (the Calcari delle Murge unit), which in turn is
overlain by thin deposits of Tertiary and Quaternary age
(Sansò et al. 2015). The most ancient rocks of this cover
were deposited as a result of transgressions after the final
emersion of the Apulian carbonate platform occurred
between the end of the Cretaceous and the beginning of the
Paleogene. In some locations, bauxitic deposits can be found
between Mesozoic limestones and Paleogene units.
Four sedimentary cycles occurred in the Neogene and
Early Pleistocene. The first cycle comprises the Pietra leccese Formation and the overlying Calcarenite di Andrano
Formation. The Miocene sedimentary cycle was interrupted
by emersion of Salento which prevented the deposition of
evaporites. The total thickness of Miocene formations is
more than 150 m on the eastern side of the peninsula. The
second cycle is represented by breccias and conglomerates
belonging to the Leuca Formation that was deposited during
the Early Pliocene period, reaching maximum thickness of
30 m. The Uggiano la Chiesa Formation (Upper Pliocene)
is the result of the third sedimentary cycle; it is made of
well-stratified and fossiliferous biodetritical limestones and
yellowish calcareous sands showing maximum thickness of
about 80 m. The fourth sedimentary cycle was responsible
for the deposition of the Calcareniti del Salento Formation,
which is basically formed by very fossiliferous biodetritical
carbonatic sediments with Artica islandica Linneo. The
Calcareniti del Salento Formation, formed in the Lower
Pleistocene, reached maximum thickness of about 60 m.
A number of Middle Pleistocene marine deposits can be also
found in the Salento peninsula. Since the end of Middle
Pleistocene, the uplift of the region superimposed on
36.4
Geomorphological Setting
The Salento peninsula comprises five areas marked by a
peculiar assemblage of landforms. The northeastern area,
stretching between Brindisi and Lecce just to the south of the
Soglia Messapica, is characterized by a low-elevated Middle
Pleistocene sedimentary plain gently sloping from west to
east. It is drained by a relict hydrographic network flowing
toward the Adriatic coast (Fig. 36.1, sector 1).
The southeastern area, placed to the east of Lecce—Santa
Maria di Leuca alignment (Fig. 36.1, sector 2), emerged
most likely at the beginning of the Pleistocene period and is
mostly shaped on pre-Quaternary carbonatic rocks. Peculiar
landforms can be observed: the Paleogene tropical karst
surface on the top of morphostructural ridges (Capo
d’Otranto, Serra di Montevergine, Serra di Poggiardo and
Serra di Martignano) and tectonic depressions stretching
from Roca to south. The widest of these depressions host the
Alimini Lakes. The mid-western area, roughly stretching to
424
G. Mastronuzzi and P. Sansò
the west of Lecce—Santa Maria di Leuca alignment,
(Fig. 36.1, sector 3) emerged definitively during the Middle
Pleistocene. It is marked by wide sedimentary plains interposed among NW–SE trending morphostructural carbonatic
ridges, the Serre (Fig. 36.2). The particular stratigraphic
architecture allowed the development of a contact karst,
where a hydrographic network brings surficial waters into a
number of sinkholes.
The Murge Tarantine is a singular landscape marked by a
low-elevated, W–E oriented morphostructural ridge
(Fig. 36.1, sector 4). Its northern limit is constituted by a low
scarp of regional importance that in the surroundings of Oria
village is marked by a long, elevated relict dune belt. At its
foot, the Taranto area (Fig. 36.1, sector 5) is marked by a
well-known sequence of Middle-Upper Pleistocene sedimentary plains and marine terraces (Belluomini et al. 2002).
36.5
Coastal Landscape
All around the Salento peninsula, a low-elevated landscape
made of a number of Pleistocene marine terraces bordered
by differential erosion scarps and relict cliffs can be recognized. Its development has been strictly connected to repeated marine regression–transgression cycles produced by
glacio-eustatic sea-level changes which have occurred since
the Middle Pleistocene and were superimposed on the tectonic uplift of the region. Some of these terraces display a
thin sedimentary cover composed of calcareous sandstones
very rich in fossil remains (panchina), associated in some
places with dune deposits, whereas others are only wave-cut
platforms.
Particularly interesting is the sequence of marine terraces
recognizable along the coast from Taranto to Gallipoli
formed during the Middle-Upper Pleistocene (Fig. 36.3a)
(Belluomini et al. 2002). In fact, the lowest marine terrace is
marked by the occurrence of a rich Senegalensis fauna
marked out by specimens of Persististrombus latus (Gmelin)
(=Strombus bubonius Lamarck) (Fig. 36.3b), that locally
was only deposited during the Oxygen Isotope Substage
(OIS) 5e, corresponding to the Marine Isotope Stage (MIS)
5.5 and ranging from 132 to 116 ka ago (Amorosi et al.
2014). However, Senegalensis fauna deposits are lacking
along the Salento eastern coast, probably due to cold marine
current pattern in the eastern Mediterranean Sea, which
prevented the spreading of this species in the Adriatic Sea.
The present-day coastal landscape shows very different
features (Caldara et al. 1998). The limestone coast extended
from Otranto (Fig. 36.4) to Santa Maria di Leuca and in the
surrounding of Santa Maria al Bagno is characterized by
polycyclic landforms. Its development is due to submergence of high calcareous coastal slopes that occurred several
times during the last 330 ka (Fig. 36.5). These slopes are
marked by typical forms produced by karst and
gravity-driven processes (caves, slope scree etc.) modified
by coastal karst processes (pools, spitzkarren, notches etc.)
(Mastronuzzi et al. 2007b). Along these coastal tracts, karstic
caves open above and below present sea level (Fig. 36.5);
some of them are famous since they have been exploited by
prehistoric communities. The most famous coastal caves are
Grotta Romanelli and Grotta Zinzulusa. The first one is
important for the findings of palaeontological remains and
evidence of Pleistocene sea-level change; the latter has been
partly flooded during the Holocene sea-level rise and is open
to the public.
High cliffs occur where the coastal landscape is shaped in
soft Pliocene or Pleistocene rocks. A narrow beach stretching
between Torre Mattarelle and Torre San Gennaro, to the south
of Brindisi, is bordered landward by a fast retreating cliff cut
in Middle Pleistocene clayey sands. Cliffs, arches and stacks
shaped in the Upper Pliocene calcarenites constitute the
spectacular coastal landscape north of Otranto. Finally, at
Porto Miggiano, cliffs are retreating by rock falls of jointed
Lower Pleistocene calcarenites (Fig. 36.6).
The Holocene submergence of relict river valleys formed
deep inlets as in the case of Brindisi, Otranto and Taranto. In
this last locality, a circular bay (Mar Grande) developed due to
erosion of diffracted waves (Mastronuzzi and Sansò 1998).
Wide platforms gently sloping seaward are widespread
along the Ionian coast of peninsula (Fig. 36.7). In this area,
the roof collapse of tabular caves shaped into the Pleistocene
calcarenitic bedrock, due to mixing of fresh and salt waters,
produced wide depressions, locally named spunnulate. Few
beaches can be found on the eastern side of the Salento
peninsula; the presence of dark heavy minerals of Monte
Vulture volcano reveals that beaches are mainly nourished
by Ofanto river solid load (Fig. 36.8). The volcano cone is,
in fact, entirely within the limits of the drainage basin of this
river which flows in W–E direction from the Southern
Apennines to reach the Apulian Adriatic coastline about
200 km to the northeast of Salento. On the western side of
the peninsula, bioclastic long beaches are fed by bioclasts
deriving from the Posidonia oceanica biocoenosis. Three
Holocene dune generations have been detected along the
coast of Salento peninsula (Mastronuzzi and Sansò 2002a).
The oldest one is cemented and has been referred to the
Mid-Holocene; loose aeolian sands with numerous soil
levels mark the second generation of dunes, dated back to
2500 years BP. The youngest dune belt borders main beaches landward, isolating wetlands with valuable phyto- and
zoological associations. Finally, boulder accumulations
produced by historical tsunamis can be recognized at different localities along the Salento rocky coast (Fig. 36.9)
(Mastronuzzi et al. 2007a).
36
The Salento Peninsula (Apulia, Southern Italy): A Water-Shaped …
Fig. 36.3 In the Taranto area, the marine terrace formed during the
last interglacial period (Marine Isotope Substage 5.5, about 125 ka BP)
is marked by a rich Senegalensis fauna (a). Specimens of P. latus
Fig. 36.4 The eastern coast of
the Salento peninsula, between
Otranto and Santa Maria di
Leuca, formed by the
submergence of a calcareous
coastal slope, extended from
about 100 m a.s.l. down to 50 m
of depth. The Capo d’Otranto
lighthouse is the easternmost
point of Italy (longitude 18°31′
13″, 7 East) and only 70 km far
from Albanian coast
425
collected near Taranto (b). These gastropods colonized the Italian coast
only during the Marine Isotope Substage 5.5 ranging from 132 to
116 ka
426
G. Mastronuzzi and P. Sansò
Fig. 36.5 The impressive coastal landscape of eastern Salento, between Otranto and Santa Maria di Leuca, is due to action of karst, slope and
marine processes (photo M. Caldara)
Fig. 36.6 Retreating cliffs can
be recognized along several tracts
of the Salento peninsula’s coast.
At Porto Miggiano locality, cliffs
are cut into Lower Pleistocene
calcarenites
36
The Salento Peninsula (Apulia, Southern Italy): A Water-Shaped …
Fig. 36.7 Along the Ionian coast of the Salento peninsula the
development of narrow bioclastic beaches produced wide marsh areas
in landward direction. Most of them have been reclaimed during the
427
past century. During medieval times, at Salina Monaci, monks used the
coastal depression to produce marine salt (after Pennetta et al. 2011)
Fig. 36.8 The Holocene sea-level rise resulted in the flooding of dolines along the Adriatic coast of the Salento peninsula as for as in the Cesine
locality (after Pennetta et al. 2011)
428
G. Mastronuzzi and P. Sansò
Fig. 36.9 Megaboulder deposits
have been recognized along
several tracts of the coast of
Salento peninsula. They suggest
the impact of tsunami that struck
several times the coast during the
last one thousand years. At Torre
Sant’Emiliano, two megaboulder
ridges formed because of the
impact of a tsunami generated by
the strong earthquake of 20
February, 1743
36.6
Karst Landscape
The complex geological evolution of Salento peninsula
strongly influenced karst processes so that a very peculiar
karst landscape has developed during three distinct morphogenetic phases.
Small relicts of an ancient karst landscape, mostly compound of wide dolines shaped on Mesozoic limestones, mark
the top surfaces of the main morphostructural highs. This
landscape developed during a long period of continental
conditions that occurred between the end of Mesozoic and
the Oligocene (65–25 million years). During this phase the
bauxitic deposits cropping out at Otranto (Le Orte locality),
at Poggiardo (Li Reali locality) and Montevergine, formed
under humid tropical climatic conditions. Rejuvenation of
this karst landscape due to Pleistocene denudation along
with the particular geological structure of the area produced
a very peculiar karst landform, the Masso della Vecchia,
produced by soil surface lowering because of renewed
sinkhole activity (Fig. 36.10).
A new karst landscape developed at the end of Lower
Pleistocene. It shows a wide assemblage of epigenic and
hypogenic landforms and was buried under Middle Pleistocene non-carbonatic marine sands.
The uplift of the Salento peninsula during the Middle
Pleistocene was associated with intense denudation which
resulted in the progradation of continental shelf for about
15 km. On the newly emerged surfaces an endorheic
hydrographic network developed. It flows from SW to NE in
response to the higher uplift of the southern part of Salento
peninsula and eroded the Middle Pleistocene non-carbonatic
cover in the mid-southern area of Salento, contributing to the
Fig. 36.10 The Masso della Vecchia is a very peculiar karst landform;
its emergence is consequence of the re-activation of near sinkholes
which produced the lowering of the soil surface
re-activation of Lower Pleistocene karst landforms. This
karst landscape is still buried under Middle-Upper Pleistocene marine covers at the northernmost part of Salento
peninsula which has been affected by less intense uplift.
Exhumation of Lower Pleistocene karst landscape has
been accomplished by its local re-activation. The hydrographic network developed on the non-carbonatic cover, in
fact, brings allogenic waters to marginal depressions whose
bottom is studded by a number of cave collapse sinkholes
promoting karst processes (contact karst) (Selleri et al.
2002).
The widest endorheic drainage catchment is that of
Canale dell’Asso, which brings surficial waters from the
36
The Salento Peninsula (Apulia, Southern Italy): A Water-Shaped …
wide area between the Casarano-Galatone and NocigliaGalatina morphostructural ridges towards a wide depression
placed in the surroundings of Nardò. At present it is broken
into smaller basins due to the development of numerous
sinkholes along its talweg.
Collapse dolines are common features in the region. They
have been produced by roof collapse of caves shaped in
Pliocene and Pleistocene calcarenites. The deepest and most
famous are the Vore di Barbarano, two collapse dolines in
Lower Pleistocene calcarenites which show a diameter of
about 20 and 15 m, and a depth of about 35 and 25 m,
respectively.
36.7
Sapping Valleys
The northernmost area of the Salento penisula is marked by
a network of canyons with peculiar features, locally called
gravine or lame. They are short, straight valleys, deeply
entrenched in the Plio-Pleistocene calcareous sandstones and
Mesozoic limestones. Different generations of valleys are
recognizable, each one of them leading to the inner margin
of a marine terrace which represents its base level.
Morphological features and local hydrogeological conditions suggest that sapping processes, i.e. intense chemical
weathering due to groundwater and related mass movements, were responsible for the development of the southern
Apulia valley network. Valleys show, in fact, constant
width, steep heads and walls with occasional rock slides or
Fig. 36.11 Gravina di Riggio
and its human settlement (near
Taranto); the peculiar
hydrogeological features of the
Salento peninsula enhanced the
development of sapping valleys,
locally named gravine or lame
429
slid blocks, aggraded and nearly flat floors, forming abrupt
angles with adjacent slopes (Fig. 36.11).
Moreover, geomorphological analysis showed that:
(1) valley growth is affected by joint pattern; (2) valleys do
not have a surficial watershed; (3) surfaces of the marine
terraces, into which the valleys are extended, show no evidence of surface run off (Mastronuzzi and Sansò 2002b).
Sapping valley development starts with the formation of a
small embayment due to the outcrop of a main fracture zone
or the occurrence of an erosional notch. This ground
depression induces deformation of the shape of water table,
with flow lines concentrating at the edge of the initial
indentation promoting very effective sapping processes.
Subsequently, the valley extends headwards, producing a
progressive increase in flow convergence, in the intensity of
sapping processes and in the related rate of headward erosion. Headward sapping proceeds faster than valley widening because the valley head is the site of the greatest
groundwater flow convergence.
Sapping processes were enhanced during interglacial high
sea-level stands since the local aquifer rests on sea water
intruding from the nearby coastal area, so that each ancient
coastline is marked by its own generation of valleys. However, the longest and deepest valleys formed on the Ionian
side of the Salento peninsula during the Oxygen Isotope
Stage 7, corresponding to about 240 ka. This is most likely
due to fast sea-level rise accompanied by very humid climatic conditions that increased the hydraulic head at springs
and the intensity of sapping processes.
430
36.8
G. Mastronuzzi and P. Sansò
Conclusions
The landscape of Salento peninsula retains landforms
developed during the long geological evolution that has
occurred during the past 65 millions of years. Water has
always been the main actor: tropical surficial waters contributed to deep weathering of Mesozoic bedrock producing
a bauxitic cover, surficial and underground waters enhanced
the modelling of a complex karst landscape, groundwater
promoted sapping processes during the Middle-Upper
Pleistocene and the development of spectacular deep and
narrow canyons. Moreover, during Middle-Upper Pleistocene, relative sea-level change and marine processes
resulted in the development of marine terraces along several
tracts of Salento peninsula coast. Holocene sea-level rise
flooded relict river valleys and caves, whereas at present
waves unrestly shape the Salento peninsula coast, cutting
cliffs and building beaches. During historical times, huge
tsunami waves left on the coast narrow ridges of
megaboulders.
In summary, notwithstanding the present scarcity of
running waters, the Salento peninsula can exibit a complex
and spectacular water-shaped landscape developed during its
long geological history. This valuable geological heritage
has attracted numerous researchers during the last 150 years
and has been the focus of field trips during scientific geological meetings and conferences over the last 30 years
(Sansò et al. 2015). However, the geological heritage is still
completely unexploited by the local tourism industry,
despite the fact that it could significantly improve the tourist
offer of Salento region through realization and promotion of
a network of “geological paths” along the most scenic areas
of the peninsula.
Acknowledgements This chapter collects the results derived in the
frame of the National Research Programme 2011–2013 PRIN
(Response of morphoclimatic system dynamics to global changes and
related geomorphologic hazard) and under the umbrella of the IGCP
Project n. 588 from UNESCO e IUGS.
References
Amorosi A, Antonioli F, Bertini A, Marabini S, Mastronuzzi G,
Montagna P, Negri A, Piva A, Rossi V, Scarponi D, Taviani M,
Vai GB (2014) The Middle-Late Quaternary Fronte Section (Taranto, Italy): an exceptionally preserved marine record of
the Last Interglacial. Global Planet Change 119:23–38
Belluomini G, Caldara M, Casini C, Cerasoli M, Manfra L, Mastronuzzi G, Palmentola G, Sansò P, Tuccimei P, Vesica PL (2002)
The age of Late Pleistocene shorelines and tectonic activity of
Taranto area, Southern Italy. Quatern Sci Rev 21:525–547
Bosellini A (2017) Outline of the Geology of Italy. In: Soldati M,
Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer,
Cham, pp 21–27
Caldara M, Centenaro E, Mastronuzzi G, Sansò P, Sergio A (1998)
Features and present evolution of Apulian Coast (Southern Italy).
J Coast Res SI(26):55–64
Ferranti L, Antonioli F, Mauz B, Amorosi A, Dai Prà G, Mastronuzzi G,
Monaco C, Orrù P, Pappalardo M, Radtke U, Renda P, Romano P,
Sansò P, Verrubbi V (2006) Markers of the last interglacial sea level
high stand along the coast of Italy: tectonic implications. Quatern Int
145–146:30–54
Mastronuzzi G, Sansò P (1998) Morfologia e genesi delle Isole Chéradi
e del Mar Grande (Taranto, Puglia, Italia). Geogr Fis Dinam Quat
21:131–138
Mastronuzzi G, Sansò P (2002a) Holocene coastal dune development
and environmental changes in Apulia (southern Italy). Sed Geol
150:139–152
Mastronuzzi G, Sansò P (2002b) Pleistocene sea level changes, sapping
processes and development of valleys network in Apulia region
(southern Italy). Geomorphology 46:19–34
Mastronuzzi G, Pignatelli C, Sansò P, Selleri G (2007a) Boulder
accumulations produced by the 20th February 1743 tsunami along
the coast of southeastern Salento (Apulia region, Italy). Mar Geol
242:191–205
Mastronuzzi G, Quinif Y, Sansò P, Selleri G (2007b) Middle-Late
Pleistocene polycyclic evolution of a geologically stable coastal
area (southern Apulia, Italy). Geomorphology 86:393–408
Pennetta L, Caldara M, Mastronuzzi G, Sansò P (2011) La costa della
Puglia. In: Ginesu S (ed) La Costa d’Italia. Carlo Delfino Editore,
Sassari, pp 327–352
Sansò P, Margiotta S, Mastronuzzi G, Vitale A (2015) The geological
heritage of Salento Leccese Area (Apulia, southern Italy). Geoheritage 7(1):85–101
Selleri G, Sansò P, Walsh N (2002) The contact karst of Salento region
(Apulia, Southern Italy). In: Gabrovšek F (ed) Evolution of Karst:
from Prekarst to Cessation. Institut za raziskoavnje krania ZRC
Sazu, Zalozba ZRC, pp 275–282
The Landscape of the Aspromonte Massif:
A Geomorphological Open-Air Laboratory
37
Gaetano Robustelli and Marino Sorriso-Valvo
Abstract
The Aspromonte Massif, literally “Wild Mountain”, shows a very rugged and uneven
topography due to a dense alternation of V-shaped valleys and interfluves. Three broad sets
of geomorphic processes are principally responsible for landscape modelling and for
carving the wide variety of landforms occurring in Aspromonte: tectonic uplift, river
dissection and slope processes. These geomorphic processes, combined with weathering
processes and contrasting rock erodibility, make Aspromonte one of the most landslideprone areas in the Mediterranean basin, and the local river network a large in-channel
sediment storage to be conveyed to the sea.
Keywords
Fiumara
37.1
Landslide
Marine terrace
Introduction
The Aspromonte Massif in southernmost Italy shows a very
rugged landscape, characterised by a dense river valley
network alternating with sharp or flat interfluves. Unlike
other massifs of the Calabria Region, Aspromonte has not
been sufficiently appreciated either by the scientific community or by the common people. The main reasons lie in
the hard accessibility of the area from the main cities, the
difficult conditions of mountain path networks, but also in
the high impact of slope instability and flooding upon urban
centres and communications.
Despite this, the Aspromonte Massif provides a wide
range of landscapes and landforms that have long captivated
some geoscientists. Here, we describe the widest range of
G. Robustelli (&)
Dipartimento di Biologia, Ecologia e Scienze della Terra
(DIBEST), Università della Calabria, Via P. Bucci, 87036 Rende,
CS, Italy
e-mail: gaetano.robustelli@unical.it
M. Sorriso-Valvo
Istituto di Ricerca per la Protezione Idrogelogica, Consiglio
Nazionale delle Ricerche (IRPI-CNR), Via C. Cavour 4-6, 87036
Rende, CS, Italy
Aspromonte Massif
Calabria
geomorphological features of the Aspromonte massif, with
the aim of fascinating all readers with this wild and
appealing landscape.
37.2
Geographical Setting
The Aspromonte Massif is located in south Calabria, the tip
of the Italian “boot”, with Sicily to the southeast (Fig. 37.1).
The term Aspromonte can be literally translated as “Wild
Mountain”, and provides an idea of the rugged landscape of
the massif. It is believed that its name comes from the term
asper, meaning rugged in Latin, or from the Greek aspròs,
that is white, the colour of rocks constituting the core of the
massif.
Aspromonte extends southwards from the Limina Pass
(Limina SS 582, Fig. 37.1), and hosts the National Park of
Aspromonte that covers some 650 km2. It rises from sea
level to an average elevation of approximately 1100 m a.s.l.
at the highest plateau, with peaks higher than 1400 m.
Montalto is the highest peak (1956 m) at a distance of only
20 km from the sea. Many of these places offer wonderful
panorama of the coast of Sicily and Calabria.
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_37
431
432
G. Robustelli and M. Sorriso-Valvo
Fig. 37.1 Location of the Aspromonte Massif
Especially on the Ionian side, the massif is strongly dissected
by a dense river network consisting of short, high-gradient
streams, many of them known with the local name of “fiumara”. The fiumara river valleys, along with landslide phenomena, provide its typical rugged landscape (Fig. 37.2).
Because of its geographic position and its mountainous
nature, Aspromonte records a high climatic variability. The
climate is Mediterranean with montane modifications (wetter
summers and colder winters, with more than one month of
snow cover). There is a strong precipitation gradient ranging
from 300 to 1500 mm. However, based on the analysis of
daily and monthly rainfall concentration (Coscarelli and
Caloiero 2012), the eastern side presents a greater seasonality of rainfall distribution, with high-intensity,
short-duration thunderstorms (maximum daily rain up to
125 mm) strongly affecting the total yearly rainfall volume.
Vegetation on Aspromonte is strongly vertically zoned in
response to the precipitation and temperature gradients, but
some plant species are also affected by rainfall distribution
and morphology. Exclusively on the Ionian side the Citrus
Bergamot is commercially grown, which is known for the
essence extracted from its aromatic skin that is abundantly
used in perfumery, as well as to flavour teas and
confectionery.
37.3
Geological Control on Processes
and Landforms
The landscape of the Aspromonte Massif is strongly controlled by lithology and structure, as well as by the intense
uplift that occurred during the Quaternary. This headland
lies in one of the most geodynamically active sectors in the
central Mediterranean area, where complex crustal deformation is ongoing as a result of the Africa–Europe collision
(Billi et al. 2007).
37
The Landscape of the Aspromonte Massif: A Geomorphological …
433
Fig. 37.2 View of the typical rugged landscape of Aspromonte in the upper reach of the Amendolea river valley. Large landslides (arrows)
provide great amount of sediment to the valley floor
The core of the massif and much of the western part is
composed of Palaeozoic metamorphics (slate, phyllite, schist
and gneiss) intruded by granitoids. In Aspromonte three
tectono-metamorphic units are usually recognised (Fig. 37.3),
which are, from bottom to top and from north to south, the
Lower Metapelite Group, the Aspromonte Unit and the Stilo
Unit (Cirrincione et al. 2008). These terrains are strongly
affected by slope instability because of high degree of jointing,
weathering processes, rock mass strength and river dissection.
The uppermost Stilo Unit is unconformably covered by
limestone and dolostone of Jurassic-Cretaceous age, with
disconformities marked by palaeo-karst surfaces.
The pre-Cenozoic basement is overlain by late
Oligocene-Quaternary siliciclastic sediments (>2000 m thick)
deposited in the Ionian forearc basin (Cavazza and Ingersoll
2005). The alternating weak and resistant lithologies underpin
the structurally controlled landforms and provide a background to varying landslide scenarios, well noticeable along
the Ionian side of Aspromonte. Worthy to note is the
Stilo-Capo d’Orlando Formation (Chattian-Burdigalian)
(Fig. 37.3), a 600-m thick unit that, where composed of
coarse-grained terrigenous detritus, shows amazing weathering landforms. This formation passes upward to “Varicoloured
clays”, a clayey melange strongly affected by landsliding.
37.4
Weathering Landforms
Today, Calabria experiences a Mediterranean climate and, as
a result of relief ranging from 0 to 2000 m, mean annual
precipitation higher than 1000 mm and temperatures from
10 to 16 °C. Such climate conditions, together with one of
the highest leaching factor in Europe (Le Pera and
Sorriso-Valvo 2000), caused severe weathering processes.
Deeply weathered rocks are widespread throughout the
region. Weathering products indicate humid temperate to
subtropical environment and a Late Cenozoic to Quaternary
age for the deep weathering (Guzzetta 1974; Le Pera and
Sorriso-Valvo 2000). Although not all the massifs have been
treated in the same detail, the existence of deeply weathered
rock in Aspromonte is well known (Calcaterra and Parise
2010).
The gentle topography of the summit plateaus is dominated by transport-limited erosion, with the development of
great thickness of quartz-rich regoliths. Although very
uncommon, boulders locally occur as a result of spheroidal
weathering and subsequent removal of the sandy-textured
regolith.
Moving away from the highlands, a sharp increase in slope
gradients marks the transition to the weathering-limited
slopes. Here, the rapid dismantling of highly erodible and/or
more weathered material can also accentuate the topographic
relief. As a consequence, the decrease of confining pressure
produces large or small fractures and joints that run parallel to
the surface, encouraging spalling of rock sheets from the main
rock body to give exfoliation domes very apparent in some
rocks of Aspromonte, such as granitoids (Fig. 37.4a) and
conglomerates of the Stilo-Capo d’Orlando Formation
(Fig. 37.4b–d). The Pietra Cappa Dome (Fig. 37.4c), 140 m
high, is the most famous among exfoliation domes clearly
evident in the Valle delle Grandi Pietre (literally Big Stones
Valley), westward of San Luca. Locally the dip of the beds
434
G. Robustelli and M. Sorriso-Valvo
Fig. 37.3 Geological sketch
map of Aspromonte Massif and
location of the main fault
segments of the Siculo–Calabrian
rift zone (in red)
underpins the character of this landform, leading to the
development of hogback.
Tafoni are also present and take the form of hollows or
cavities, with overhanging margins like visors, in vertical or
near-vertical faces especially of the Stilo-Capo d’Orlando
Formation (Fig. 37.4c). Although the origin of tafoni is still
debated, many of those found in Aspromonte may have
developed from early hollows and/or coalescent hollows that
result from falling of cobble to boulder clasts of sandy
matrix-supported conglomerates. Similarly, the numerous
small pits affecting conglomerates of the Stilo-Capo d’Orlando Formation closely resemble honeycomb weathering.
At a small scale, undercutting and selective dismantling
processes locally produce amazing mushroom/pedestal and
bollard-shaped rocks (Fig. 37.4b, d).
37.5
Slope Processes and Landforms
Slope processes and landforms are widespread throughout
the Aspromonte Massif.
Above 1200–1400 m, from the Aspromonte Plateaus to
the top of Montalto, slope wash and rill/gully erosion affect
the unconsolidated soil cover. Human activity (ploughing
and occasional quarrying) interferes with superficial processes essentially through human-induced creeping. The
overall effect is a smooth inselberg-and-piedmont low-relief
system dissected by gullies arranged in a radial pattern.
Moving away from plateaus, dominating slope processes are
mass movement and related erosion.
Sharp increase in slope gradients marks the transition to
the downstream area, where deeply incised valleys originate,
the thickness of regolith strongly decreases and slope
movement becomes the dominant process. Landslides are
widespread and intense, and form all-size scars, scree slopes
and landslide-related fans (Sorriso-Valvo 1988) on both side
of Aspromonte. However, due to outcropping of more
erodible rocks, the Ionian side is more deeply dissected and
affected by deep-seated mass movement. This is also the area
where erosion rate is the highest one, amounting to
0.8 mm/year in the past 1 million years (Ergenzinger 1988).
Greco et al. (2007) and Calcaterra and Parise (2010)
highlighted that factors favouring such morphogenetic attitude to mass movement are the extremely pervasive and
intense tectonic deformation of rocks, especially in gneiss
and schist, as well as rock mass weathering (Fig. 37.5a).
On crystalline bedrock, the most frequent type of mass
movement is complex rock slide evolving to rock avalanche
and debris flow (Greco et al. 2007), resulting from the
ultimate creep collapse concluding the long-term creep
deformation of high, steep slopes. They may reach considerable dimensions (Fig. 37.4a), as the Costantino landslide
of January 1973 (up to 700 m wide and 100 m thick, and
over 21 106 m3 in volume) or the Vallone Colella land-
37
The Landscape of the Aspromonte Massif: A Geomorphological …
435
Fig. 37.4 Weathering landforms. a Mt. Tre Pizzi (literally “Three
Peaks”) shows exfoliation landforms in granite (Aspromonte upland
near Antonimina fault). b The Roccia del Drago (literally “Rock of the
Dragon”) is a 6 m high, pedestal rock carved in conglomerates of the
Stilo-Capo d’Orlando Formation. c The Pietra Cappa Dome is the
highest exfoliation conglomerate dome of the Grandi Pietre valley,
displaying some tafoni (arrows) in its vertical or near-vertical faces.
d Bollard-shaped rocks near Roghudi (Caldaie del Latte, literally “Milk
Boilers”). They develop through the deepening and widening of joints
by weathering, rounding off the tops of the polygonal blocks to form
karst-like landforms in conglomerates
slide of October 1951 (more than 1.5 km wide, with a
maximum local relief exceeding 400 m).
On sedimentary rocks outcropping along the Ionian side
of Aspromonte, landforms depend on the dominance of mass
movement or running-water modelling processes. Where
flysch and clayey melanges significantly crop out, a wide
range of landslides occurs among which earth slides and
flows are the predominant phenomena, and they may reach
very large dimensions. Occasionally, landsliding may cover
more than 90% of slopes carved in the clayey melange.
Alternating weak and resistant lithologies also provide fascinating landslide scenarios (Fig. 37.5b).
On silty marls close to the coast, and onto old landslide
bodies, badlands widely develop, against which the effectiveness of planned mitigation strategies (reforestation, land
use change, minimising rainfall erosivity, etc.) is limited in
time to 7–10 years. On the Tyrrhenian side, slope processes
are less intense so that structural landforms are better
preserved. Between Villa San Giovanni and Palmi, the
Aspromonte extends down to the sea coast with high cliffs
where landslides (rock fall, rock slide, debris slide and debris
flow) are also evident. At the base of such cliffs, where deep
gorges reach the sea, pocket beaches and discontinuous,
narrow coastal plains develop on which some villages are
hosted such as Bagnara Calabra and Scilla.
37.6
Fluvial Processes and Landforms
Fluvial processes and landforms reflect the morphology of
highlands, major slopes and piedmont zones. Relatively
calm streams gently dissect the Aspromonte highland,
apparently at very low erosion rates that, however, rapidly
increase while approaching the abrupt break in slope that
marks the highland edge. Here, streams change dramatically
becoming roaring torrents excavating deep gorges and
436
G. Robustelli and M. Sorriso-Valvo
Fig. 37.5 Landsliding is one of
geomorphic processes mostly
responsible for landscape
modelling in Aspromonte. a The
Costantino landslide occurred
after a 24 h precipitation of about
390 mm in January 1973. The
landslide affected highly
weathered gneisses, and dammed
the Fiumara Buonamico, forming
a wide lake that lasted only a few
hours before breaching occurred.
b Slope movements at Bova
consist of lateral spreading in
welded sandstones accompanied
by toppling, falling or sliding
canyons, with riverbeds excavated in bare rock or lined with
very coarse-grained lag deposits, often moved downstream
by mass transport phenomena.
Fiumara is the typical local name given to river valleys of
Aspromonte, and indicates streams typically of high gradient
and short length, characterised by an ephemeral and torrential
regime. International scientific community acknowledges this
term, which thus can be used in geomorphological literature.
The corresponding catchment areas develop almost entirely in
high relief mountain areas. A braided pattern and gravel-bed
load characterise their middle and lower courses (Fig. 37.6a,
b). Sorriso-Valvo and Terranova (2006) provide a thorough
review of the characteristics of fiumara streams.
In plan view, the related valleys have a very apparent
meander-like trend (Fig. 37.6a), which is believed to result
from the role of some key factors (structural controls, rock
mass weathering grades, lateral stream erosion induced by
landslide and vice versa, etc.), all acting to form meandering
valleys. Based on geological and stratigraphical setting,
other hypotheses such as antecedence, superimposition and
stream persistence may be also considered. Within bedrock
of elevated resistance to erosion, thresholds and narrow
gorges form, upstream of which river aggradation occurs
(Fig. 37.6b). This is also observed upstream of huge landslides or tributary alluvial fans.
Fiumara floodplains are not stabilised by dense vegetation (Fig. 37.6a, b), hence sediment yields are relatively
high. The presence of armour and abundant sediment supply
does not allow even small to moderate flow events to scour
the bed and alter channel morphology. However, when large
37
The Landscape of the Aspromonte Massif: A Geomorphological …
437
Fig. 37.6 Fluvial landforms. a Overview of the middle reach of
Amendolea, the most famous fiumara of Aspromonte. Note the sinuous
trend of river valley, characterised by braided pattern and gravel-bed
load, and the active alluvial fan developed from a left tributary.
b Close-up view of the upper reach of the Fiumara Amendolea which is
up to 300 m wide. The village of Roghudi (arrow) was relocated after
two large floods occurred in December 1972 and January 1973. c The
active alluvial fan developed from left tributary of the Fiumara di
Melito, associated with active landslides (in the background). The fan
toe is affected by severe retreat due to trimming by the main river
rainstorms occur, the resulting sediment yield can be magnitudes higher than one recorded in perennial streams.
The banks of the main channels show coarse alluvial
sandy-gravelly sediments alternating with sand and silt
layers. Channel beds consist of coarse gravel, cobbles and
boulders. The state of aggradation/degradation of alluvial
beds depends on the balance between debris input from the
slopes and transport capacity of streams. Recurrent heavy
rainstorms increase landsliding that results in sudden
aggradation of streambeds. Later, as sediment supply reduces, erosion promotes low-rate streambed degradation.
However, these alternating phases, whose duration is a few
decades, do not modify the general, over-filled aspect of
fiumara riverbeds in the long term. The river beds are
essentially in a cyclical, but stationary state since at least
3 ka BP, based on dating of vegetation remnants
(Sorriso-Valvo and Terranova 2006).
Occasionally, if a very large landslide occurs, an
aggradation cycle may last longer and aggradation may be
more relevant than usual. For instance, the huge Vallone
Colella landslide triggered by October 1951 thunderstorms is responsible for the severe aggradation of the
Fiumara Amendolea riverbed (Fig. 37.6a), which attained
about 10 m in the upper reach, and more than 2 m close to
coastline.
Intramontane-valley fans are also widespread
throughout Aspromonte (Fig. 37.6a, c), and many of them
show evidence of current activity, being usually associated with active landslides (Fig. 37.6c). These confined
fans are not able to prograde over a low-angle surface,
particularly due to trimming by erosion of the main rivers
(Fig. 37.6c). In the past decades, they have experienced
several changes in fan and feeder channel dynamics
between phases of aggradation/progradation and dissection. This is likely to result from continuous sediment
inputs that were progressively stored in the feeder channels until their slopes reach a threshold value due both to
aggradation and fan toe retreat.
438
37.7
G. Robustelli and M. Sorriso-Valvo
Stepped Landscapes
Since the Pliocene, contractional structures have been
superimposed by extensional faults which have fragmented
the Calabria region into structural highs and subsiding
basins, such that today an array of active normal faults runs
southwards from Calabria to the Ionian coast of Sicily
(Tortorici et al. 1995; Catalano et al. 2008).
Since the Early–Middle Pleistocene, Calabria was affected by strong uplift, largely coeval with motion on these
extensional faults. It is worthy to emphasise that above the
fault escarpments produced by the active fault belt crossing
the Calabria, the landscape is dominated by hanging remnants of gentle land surfaces, known as Piani d’Aspromonte
(Aspromonte Plateaus), which form a staircase between 500
and 1350 m, considered to be four stepped marine terrace of
Early Pleistocene age (Miyauchi et al. 1994). More likely,
these land surfaces can be related to the oldest stages of
landscape evolution, which occurred during Late Pliocene–
Early Pleistocene through relief smoothing processes.
Anyway, the long-term uplift that affected the region is
spectacularly documented by flights of marine terraces,
resulting from the interaction between tectonics and eustatic
sea-level changes and well developed along the coasts
(Fig. 37.7). Notably, the high relief rocky coasts of the
Tyrrhenian sector better preserve sequences of stair-like
terraces. This zone is famed because of its beauty, and is
known as the Violet Coast by the nuances of the sea.
Along the 60 km of coastline from Scilla to Mèlito di
Porto Salvo, fourteen marine terraces form a staircase
between the present sea level and 520 m a.s.l. (Dumas et al.
2000). Five of them (10, 170, 290, 400 and 510 m) are
correlated with interglacial stages (MIS) 1, 5.5, 7.5, 9 and 11
respectively, corresponding to peaks of warmer climate on
isotopic curves. The longer term uplift established using
these Middle Pleistocene markers is 1.24 mm/year, but
uplifted Holocene tidal notches and marine deposits indicate
a recent increase of uplift rates up to 2.1 mm/year (Antonioli
et al. 2006).
37.8
Tectonic and Structural Landforms
The imprint of tectonics on geomorphology of the Aspromonte Massif is evident not only in the size, extent, and
location of landforms, but also in the steepness of river
profiles, the features of mountain slopes, and in the pattern
of river network.
Tectonics influences geomorphological processes and
landforms of Aspromonte through the direct action of
faulting and the indirect influence of spatial variability in
rock erodibility and the effects of geological structure.
Notably, the present landscape of the Tyrrhenian side is
strongly related to tectonic activity, whereas structurally
controlled erosional features dominate on the Ionian side. In
addition, the different landscapes are due to the contrasting
influence of bedrock on both sides of Aspromonte.
The most impressive tectonic feature of the region is
represented by the Siculo–Calabrian rift zone (Tortorici et al.
1995), which forms a N-striking normal fault belt about 370
km long that runs more or less continuously along the inner
side of the Calabrian arc, extending through the Strait of
Messina along the Ionian coast of Sicily. Some segments of
the fault systems are still active (Galli and Bosi 2002;
Catalano et al. 2008; Ferranti et al. 2008), making the area a
key point for characterising the seismic hazard of southern
Calabria.
The fault belt is made up of five major segments showing
an overall en-echelon arrangement and formed by
west-facing normal fault segments that strongly articulate the
Aspromonte Massif (Catalano et al. 2008). From the north to
the south it includes the Cittanova, S. Eufemia, Scilla,
Reggio Calabria and Armo faults, which are morphologically well detectable thanks to very evident, steep and
straight fault scarps (Fig. 37.8a). These fault segments
exhibit very sharp rectilinear escarpments, showing well
developed triangular facets separated by wineglass canyons.
They are tens to hundreds of metres high and noticeable
from the A3 Highway, state roads and many panoramic
viewpoints (Fig. 37.8a).
Fig. 37.7 Looking from a distance, the landscape of Aspromonte resembles a flight of steps facing the sea. Overview of the sequence of stair-like
marine terraces from the south of the Villa San Giovanni
37
The Landscape of the Aspromonte Massif: A Geomorphological …
439
Fig. 37.8 Tectonic landforms a overview from the north of the Scilla
fault scarp; the village of Scilla, in the background, is located on the
MIS 5.5 marine terrace. b Close-up view of the isolated cuesta
landform of Gerace. Cliffs are dissected by widened vertical joints,
which form open clefts resulting from lateral spreading phenomena
According to Tortorici et al. (1995) and Galli and Bosi
(2002), the 1783 and the 1894 seismic events are related to
the west-dipping Cittanova, Scilla and S. Eufemia faults,
whereas the offshore branch of the Reggio Calabria fault is
considered to be the seismogenic source of the intense 1908
Messina earthquake (M 7.1).
On the Ionian side, several pieces of evidence highlight the
key role of lithological controls, through which geological
structure receives its topographic expression. Conversely, it is
hard to discern a clear topographic signature of tectonic
landforms because of high rates of erosional processes. Nevertheless, through the indirect influences of spatial variability
in erodibility generated by faulting and juxtaposition of rocks
with variable erosion resistance, the influence of faults on
landscape is easy to detect (fault line scarps).
Because of lithological heterogeneity, a diverse gallery of
homoclinal structures eroded in the late Oligocene-Quaternary
siliciclastic sediments is evident. Notably, the sedimentary
succession forms an overall E-dipping monocline, with tectonic growth structures increasing upward. The ensuing progressive unconformity is morphologically well apparent
between Bianco and Roccella Jonica, through the topographic
expression resulting from differential erosion of strata with
variable erosion resistance. Due to river erosion, landscape is,
therefore, characterised by undulating, along-strike ridges
resulting from changes in dip angle and strata unit thickness
that make the upper surfaces of these landform very sinuous.
At small scale, various structural landforms (hogbacks,
homoclinal ridges and cuestas) develop according to the dip of
the beds (Fig. 37.8b).
top of piedmont hills after the fall of Roman Empire. On the
difficult slopes of Aspromonte, Orthodox Catholic monasteries, or just dormitories, were built in tenth–eleventh centuries, whereas small settlements were built in fifteenth
century by new Greek migrants escaping from Turkish
invaders. Greek colonies are spread in the south part of
Aspromonte (Bova, Condofuri, Gallicianò, Africo, Pentedattilo and so forth), but any witness of Greek origin has
nearly completely disappeared, even though at present an
attempt is being made of rescuing ancient traditions. The
most relevant, still active legacy of Greek tradition is the
popular dance music, the tarantella, that is still danced in
occasion of special recurrences, and in the pilgrimage tradition to the Virgin of Polsi Sanctuary, down in the Fiumara
Buonamico canyon, where the ancient Greek tradition of
ecatombe (100 sacrificial victims, goats and lambs) is yearly
renewed with a feast that reminds Dionysiac rituals.
After the tremendous storms of 1053, 1953 and 1973,
some of the most uncomfortable villages have been moved
to more comfortable, but seldom safer, places. As a consequence, people used to timber logging and goat pasture as a
source of their living, had to transform themselves, without
any technical or economic assistance, into fishermen or else.
The result has been an increment of illegal activity. After a
while, most of these villages have been reclaimed, but in a
quasi-illegal way, so that they are now inhabited (such as
Pentedattilo) but cannot get regular services by the
Municipalities.
Besides rainstorms, earthquakes have also caused villages
abandonment. Earthquakes, in addition to being the
destructive side of tectonics that also should be accounted
for the natural beauty of Aspromonte, are the reason why
very little of the valuable architecture patrimony is still
preserved. In Greek and Roman times (between sixth century BC and sixth century AD), and then the Norman and
Svevian times (between tenth and thirteenth centuries AD)
this territory was one of the most beautiful, peaceful and rich
37.9
Human Settling and Cultural Heritage
In such a difficult land, human settlement has constantly
been a difficult task. New cities and villages since ever have
been settled on the coastal plains by Greek colonies, or on
440
G. Robustelli and M. Sorriso-Valvo
lands of Europe. However, after the eras of French and
Spanish ruling, nothing of that has been left.
37.10
Geomorphological Hazards and Their
Mitigation
In such a rugged area with such an aggressive climate,
geomorphological hazards are the major concern for land
managers. Landsliding of every type, flash floods and
intense erosion are so frequent and widespread that the
economic and social development of this area is hampered.
The rugged morphology makes the building of lifelines and
roads very difficult and expensive. Geomorphic phenomena
are occasionally so violent that infrastructures and settlements may be threatened. The situation can be worse in the
lowlands, where there are more infrastructure and persons
exposed to the danger of geomorphological disasters than in
the high mountain zone. The 1951, 1953 and 1973 storms
caused more than 100 victims and the abandonment of
several mountain villages. However, the situation is much
better in the highlands, where morphology is gentle.
Protecting the territory is quite difficult and expensive and
its maintenance very expensive in respect to construction
costs. Traditional protective measures such as reforestation
is of little use against landslides because of rocky, steep
slopes involved. Erosion by surface water is also difficult to
combat because the high gradient of slopes eases runoff rate
and velocity, so that badland-like landforms develop also on
weathered, crystalline rocks.
In this situation, corrective measures are undertaken only
where extremely necessary. On the other hand, the large rate
of debris budget that reaches the coast, allows for a relatively
steady condition of shorelines, while the effects of a diffused
building and of corrective measures on drainage basins
during the 1950s and 1960s included worrying and diffused
beach erosion that has damaged several marine villages and
lifelines. On the Tyrrhenian side, the narrow coastal plain is
densely inhabited and crossed by the most important railway
and main roads, rather frequently affected by landslide
phenomena, sometimes causing casualties. Here corrective
measures, though expensive, seldom inefficient and of limited duration, are a must and go further than strictly necessary. Sometimes it would be better to let some areas to
evolve wild, limiting intervention where absolutely
necessary.
37.11
Conclusions
The Aspromonte Massif provides a wide range of landscapes
that result from the interaction of tectonic uplift, river dissection, and slope processes, giving Aspromonte its rugged
and uneven topography. At times, landscapes are arranged in
such a beautiful, ever-changing scenario that some landscapes may be considered unique and incomparable geomorphological examples, making Aspromonte potentially
one of the most significant earth science sites in South Italy.
Many of the best examples lie within the national park of
Aspromonte, which provides visitor centres and accompanying explanations of the natural environment.
Notwithstanding its relative access difficulty, it would be
desirable that the geomorphological significance of Aspromonte improves in the future by attracting more and more
scientists and people, which may enhance its importance as a
training ground for research programmes and recreation
activities in a wonderful scenery overhanging the sea.
References
Antonioli F, Ferranti L, Lambeck K, Kershaw S, Verrubbi V, Dai Pra G
(2006) Late Pleistocene to Holocene record of changing uplift rates
in southern Calabria and northeastern Sicily (southern Italy, central
Mediterranean Sea). Tectonophysics 422:23–40
Billi A, Presti D, Faccenna C, Neri N, Orecchio B (2007) Seismotectonics of the Nubia plate compressive margin in the south
Tyrrhenian region, Italy: clues for subduction inception. J Geophys
Res 112(B08302):1–13
Calcaterra D, Parise M (2010) Weathering in the crystalline rocks of
Calabria, Italy, and relationships to landslides. In: Calcaterra D,
Parise M (eds) Weathering as a predisposing factor to slope
movements, vol 23. Geological Society, London, Engineering
Geology Special Publications, pp 105–130
Catalano S, de Guidi G, Monaco C, Tortorici G, Tortorici L (2008)
Active faulting and seismicity along the Siculo–Calabrian rift zone
(southern Italy). Tectonophysics 453:177–192
Cavazza W, Ingersoll RV (2005) Detrital modes of the Ionian forearc
basin fill (Oligocene–Quaternary) reflect the tectonic evolution of
the Calabria-Peloritani terrane (southern Italy). J Sediment Res
75:268–279
Cirrincione R, Ortolano G, Pezzino A, Punturo R (2008) Poly-orogenic
multi-stage metamorphic evolution inferred via P–T pseudosections: an example from Aspromonte Massif basement rocks
(southern Calabria, Italy). Lithos 103(3–4):466–502
Coscarelli R, Caloiero T (2012) Analysis of daily and monthly rainfall
concentration in southern Italy (Calabria region). J Hydrol 416–
417:145–156
Dumas B, Gueremy P, Lhenaff R, Raffy J (2000) Périodicités de temps
long et de temps court, depuis 400 000 ans, dans l’étagement des
terrasses marines en Calabre méridionale (Italie). Géomorphologie:
relief, processus, environnement 1:25–44
Ergenzinger P (1988) Regional erosion: rates and scale problem in the
Buonamico basin, Calabria. Catena Suppl 13:97–107
Ferranti L, Monaco C, Morelli D, Antonioli F, Maschio L (2008)
Holocene activity of the Scilla fault, southern Calabria: insights
from coastal morphological and structural investigations. Tectonophysics 453:74–93
Galli P, Bosi V (2002) Palaeoseismology along the Cittanova fault:
implications for seismotectonics and earthquake recurrence in
Calabria (southern Italy). J Geophys Res 107(B3):1–19
Greco R, Sorriso-Valvo M, Catalano E (2007) Logistic regression
analysis in the evaluation of mass movements susceptibility: the
Aspromonte case study, Calabria, Italy. Eng Geol 89:47–56
37
The Landscape of the Aspromonte Massif: A Geomorphological …
Guzzetta G (1974) Ancient tropical weathering in Calabria. Nature
251:302–303
Le Pera E, Sorriso-Valvo M (2000) Weathering and morphogenesis in a
Mediterranean climate, Calabria, Italy. Geomorphology 34:251–270
Miyauchi T, Dai Pra G, Sylos Labini S (1994) Geochronology of
pleistocene marine terraces and regional tectonics in the Tyrrhenian
coast of south Calabria, Italy. Il Quaternario 7(1):17–34
441
Sorriso-Valvo M (1988) Landslide-related fans in Calabria. Catena
Suppl 13:109–121
Sorriso-Valvo M, Terranova O (2006) The Calabrian fiumara. Z Geomorphol NF 143:105–121
Tortorici L, Monaco C, Tansi C, Cocina O (1995) Recent and active
tectonics in the Calabrian arc (southern Italy). Tectonophysics
243:37–55
Volcanic Landforms and Landscapes
of the Aeolian Islands (Southern Tyrrhenian
Sea, Sicily): Implications for Hazard Evaluation
38
Federico Lucchi, Claudia Romagnoli, and Claudio Antonio Tranne
Abstract
The Aeolian Islands are a Quaternary active volcanic structure in Southern Italy. These
volcanic islands are characterized by an outstanding display of volcanic landforms
(stratocones, lava flows, domes, fissures, dykes, calderas, lateral collapses) derived from
repeated episodes of volcanic activity and volcano-tectonic collapse under the control of
regional tectonic trends. Stromboli and Vulcano are particularly characterized by ongoing
eruptive and gravity-driven instability processes. Geomorphic evolution there plays a
fundamental role on the localization of eruptive vents and conduits and the distribution of
volcanogenic flows, with important insights on volcanic hazard and risk assessment.
Keywords
Volcanic landforms
38.1
Caldera
Introduction
The Aeolian Islands are the most active volcanic structure in
the Mediterranean area, including presently active (Stromboli and Vulcano), dormant (Panarea and Lipari) and extinct
volcanoes (Salina, Filicudi, Alicudi). Well known since
prehistoric times, the Aeolian volcanoes have attracted the
interest of many naturalists, historians, travellers, artists and
scientists, being rightfully assumed as the cradle of the
modern scientific discipline of Volcanology from the study
and description of the world-famous eruption localities of
Stromboli and Vulcano. There is a large variety of volcanic
landforms and spectacular landscapes which enabled the
Aeolian Islands to become one of the UNESCO World
Heritage sites. In this highly dynamic and active environment, landform investigation provides a fundamental contribution to geological mapping and stratigraphic analysis,
and to risk assessment and hazard zonation (Lucchi 2013).
F. Lucchi (&) C. Romagnoli C.A. Tranne
Dipartimento di Scienze Biologiche, Geologiche e Ambientali,
Sezione di Geologia, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di
Bologna, Piazza Porta S. Donato 1, 40126 Bologna, Italy
e-mail: federico.lucchi@unibo.it
Lateral collapse
38.2
Volcanic hazard
Aeolian Islands
Geographical and Geological Setting
The Aeolian Islands are the emergent portions of large
volcanic edifices rising ca. 2000–3000 m above the seafloor.
Together with the surrounding seamounts, they are arranged
in an articulated, arc-shaped structure around the Marsili
basin (Fig. 38.1), in a complex subduction-related geodynamic setting (De Astis et al. 2003). The morphostructural
context and geological evolution of the Aeolian Islands are
directly conditioned by regional fault systems. In particular,
the active or dormant volcanoes are located in the central
(Vulcano and Lipari) and eastern (Stromboli and Panarea)
sectors, to the northeast of the Tindari-Letojanni lithospheric
fault system, developing in an extensional stress regime
related to active subduction. The extinct volcanoes (Alicudi,
Filicudi and Salina) are instead sited in the western (and
central) sector, now dominated by a compressional tectonic
regime.
The Aeolian volcanism has developed entirely during the
Quaternary, starting from ca. 1.3 Ma in the submarine areas
(Beccaluva et al. 1985) and ca. 270–250 ka in the emergent
portions (Fig. 38.2; Lucchi et al. 2013a). The oldest
calc-alkaline mafic products were emplaced on Lipari, Salina
and Filicudi before the marine oxygen isotope stage (MIS)
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_38
443
444
F. Lucchi et al.
Fig. 38.1 Sketch bathymetry of the southern Tyrrhenian Sea and the Aeolian Islands. The main Tindari–Letojanni (TL) fault system is shown.
Depth contour lines in metres below sea level
7.3 (ca. 220 ka). Between 220 and 124 ka, volcanism
occurred on Lipari, Salina, Filicudi and Panarea producing
mafic to intermediate rocks. Lipari, Panarea, Vulcano and
Alicudi were active during MIS 5 (124–81 ka), mostly
erupting high-potassium intermediate rocks. More evolved
silicic rocks appeared since ca. 75–70 ka on Lipari, Salina,
Vulcano, Filicudi and Panarea, also producing a series of
major subplinian eruptions. Shoshonite and leucite-bearing
lavas were emitted during the younger stages of Vulcano.
Stromboli was entirely constructed by calc-alkaline to
shoshonite rocks during the past 85 ka up to the present, and
is characterized by ongoing strombolian activity. Historical
eruptions are recorded on Lipari (AD 776–1230) and Vulcano (AD 1888–90), whereas intense hydrothermal activity
is presently documented on Vulcano (La Fossa cone) and
Panarea (submarine areas).
38.3
Landforms and Landscapes
The Aeolian Islands are characterized by a large variety of
volcanic landforms, both in the emerged and submerged
portions of the volcanic edifices (cf. Lucchi et al. 2013b).
Differently from any other geological setting, the landforms
in volcanic areas may result from a combination of constructive and destructive processes acting simultaneously or
strictly connected (Thouret 1999). The volcanic edifices
generally have a relatively short-lived existence due to the
effects of slope instability and high-energy erosion and
denudation processes, which are particularly intense and
rapid due to high topographic relief, steep-sided slopes and
unstable nature of volcanic products. This is the direct
consequence of the episodic nature of volcanism, which
usually results in a rapid supply of volcanic products during
38
Volcanic Landforms and Landscapes of the Aeolian Islands …
Fig. 38.2 Schematic diagram showing the chronology of eruptive
activity in the Aeolian volcanic islands, as emerges from the available
radiometric ages of volcanic products (vertical bars) and tephrostratigraphy (see Lucchi et al. 2013a, for complete age references). The age of
marine terraces (light blue horizontal bars) is displayed by comparison
with specific peaks of the Late Quaternary sea-level curve of
Waelbroeck et al. (2002)
relatively short-lived constructional stages, separated by
longer periods of quiescence between the eruptions. The
higher degradation rates generally follow closely the eruptions
and may be frequently accompanied by catastrophic landsliding and lateral collapse of the flanks (and summit) of the
edifices. The various volcanic landforms derived from primary
eruptive processes thus can be largely modified and altered by
volcano-tectonic collapses and structural features, and erosional processes in subaerial and marine environments.
38.3.1
Volcanic Landforms
Several volcanic landforms are observed in the Aeolian
Islands, reflecting the diversity of eruption types, composition of magmas and erupted products, monogenic or polygenic evolution, influence of regional tectonic trends and the
role played by volcano-tectonic activity and erosional processes. Selected volcanic landforms are listed in Table 38.1.
445
All the Aeolian Islands are polygenic composite volcanic
edifices resulting from the interplay of successive eruptive
sequences and volcano-tectonic collapses through time
(Fig. 38.3). Alicudi and Stromboli are truncated
cone-shaped stratocones with a central conduit and summit
craters producing radially distributed lavas and pyroclastic
products. Their craters are generally located within a summit
caldera or near the headwall of lateral collapses that interrupted the polygenic growth of the stratocones (see
Sect. 38.3.2). Filicudi, Salina, Lipari and Vulcano are
instead compound or multiple volcanic edifices composed of
several eruptive centres of variable size (superposed in space
and time) interplaying with successive calderas and lateral
collapses.
The main landforms are a number of polygenic stratocones or composite volcanoes, reaching heights of 600–
900 m (Table 38.1). The best-preserved stratocones are
Monte dei Porri and Monte Fossa delle Felci on Salina
(Fig. 38.4a), Monte S. Angelo and Monte Chirica on Lipari,
Fossa Felci and Casa Ficarisi on Filicudi (Fig. 38.4b) and La
Fossa cone on Vulcano (Fig. 38.5a). The stratocones generally have a simple summit crater, although some of them
are characterized by different compound crater rims and/or
eccentric eruptive fissures departing along the main tectonic
trends. Most of these stratocones have a steady-state
geometry with a concave-upward profile, with radial erosional gullies along the flanks relative to the progressive
degradation of the edifices (Fig. 38.4a). These are generally
connected with voluminous detritic deposits at the foot of
the slopes (Fig. 38.4b). Marine terraces and submarine
shelves cut the slopes of the older stratocones (Figs. 38.3
and 38.4b) as the result of the interaction between Late
Quaternary sea-level fluctuations and crustal vertical movements (Lucchi 2009; Romagnoli et al. 2013).
The stratocones are generally juxtaposed to several
monogenic (to polygenic) volcanic landforms represented by
tuff ring/tuff cones, scoria (spatter) and pumice cones or lava
domes (Fig. 38.3; Table 38.1). Selected examples are the
Monte Pilato pumice cone in NE Lipari erupted in the early
Middle Ages (Fig. 38.4c) and the Pollara asymmetric tuff
ring in NW Salina, whereas isolated scoria cones are Monte
Guardia on Filicudi and San Vincenzo on Stromboli. Most
of them are largely dissected by subsequent erosion and
excavation of the unconsolidated pumice or scoria deposits.
A N–S alignment of scoria cones associated to lava flows is
instead recognized along the W coast of Lipari (Timponi
cones) reflecting the control of main regional tectonic trends.
The lava domes have variable dimensions and shape, from
small adventive and plug domes to large endogenous domes
with well-developed flow foliation and rampart structures.
They may be isolated (Monte Montagnola on Filicudi;
Basiluzzo at Panarea; Fig. 38.4d) or grouped together in
clusters or alignments of coeval domes along faults (Monte
446
F. Lucchi et al.
Table 38.1 Morphological and volcanological features of selected volcanic landforms in the Aeolian Islands
Name
Island
Morphology
Height
(m)
Thickness
(m)
Length (m)
Width
(m)
Crater type
(diameter in
m)
Up to
1200
NE–SW
fissure
Age
(ka)
Type of activity
Eruption style
Feature
*2
Effusive
Lava flow field
Lava flows and domes (at increasing viscosity)
San Bartolo
Stromboli
*20
1500
Vulcanello
Vulcano
*30
*500 (subcircular)
Vulcanello
scoria cone
*2
Effusive
Lava flow field
Pietre Cotte
Vulcano
*20
*380
*180
La Fossa
crater
AD
1739
Effusive
Coulee
Rocche Rosse
Lipari
*60
*4000
(plus
submarine)
*1000
M. Pilato
crater
AD
1230
Effusive
Coulee
Monte
Montagnola
Filicudi
*120–
150
*1000 (subcircular)
*64
Effusive
Endogenous dome
(lobate)
Basiluzzo
Panarea
*165
830 400 (elliptical)
*54
Effusive
Endogenous dome
Monte Lentia
Vulcano
*190
Up to 550 500
(subcircular)
27–8
Effusive
Alignment of domes
along caldera rim
M. Guardia–
M. Giardina
Lipari
*100–
170
Up to 1200 1000
(subcircular)
27–24
Effusive
Alignment of domes
along a fissure
Pyroclastic cones (and fissures)
Monte Guardia
Filicudi
*140
300–400 (subcircular)
Simple crater
*190
Explosive
Scoria cone (with lava
flows)
San Vincenzo
Stromboli
70–80
(*15)
*450 (subcircular)
Simple crater
*12.5
Explosive
Scoria cone (with lava
flows)
Nel Cannestrà
Stromboli
(*10)
*500 (elongated)
NE–SW
fissure
*8
Explosive/effusive
Scoria agglomerate
(with lava flows)
Timponi
Lipari
Up to
350
*500–600
(subcircular)
N–S fissure
*267
Explosive
Alignment of scoria
cones (with lava flows)
Pollara
Salina
Up to
*200
*600
(crater-subcircular)
Simple crater
27.5–
15.6
Explosive
Tuff ring (asymmetric)
Monte Pilato
Lipari
*350
*2000 (subcircular)
Composite
crater
(*1000)
AD
776
Explosive
Pumice cone
(*150)
Stratocones and composite volcanoes
Fossa Felci
Filicudi
774
*2200 (subcircular)
Simple crater
(+fissures)
*246–
195
Mixed
Stratocone
Monte Fossa
delle Felci
Salina
960
*3200 (subcircular)
Simple crater
(580)
*160–
121
Mixed
Stratocone
Monte dei
Porri
Salina
859
*2900 (subcircular)
Simple crater
(260)
*70–
57
Mixed
Stratocone (collapsed)
Monte Chirica
Lipari
*602
*1300 (half-diameter)
Simple crater
(370)
*256–
81
Mixed
Stratocone (collapsed)
Monte S.
Angelo
Lipari
593
*3800 (subcircular)
Simple crater
(*500)
*114–
81
Mixed
Composite volcano
(collapsed)
La Fossa
Vulcano
*602
*2000 (subcircular)
Composite
crater (*500)
<5.5
Mixed
Stratocone
Eroded landforms
Canna
Filicudi
71
*50
*29
Effusive
Lava neck (submerged
edifice)
Strombolicchio
Stromboli
49
*140
*204
Effusive
Lava neck (submerged
edifice)
38
Volcanic Landforms and Landscapes of the Aeolian Islands …
447
Fig. 38.3 Morphostructural sketch maps of the Aeolian Islands with
the main volcanic and volcano-tectonic landforms and structural
features. Dykes are not displayed because they are out of scale. Late
Quaternary marine terraces and submarine erosive shelf breaks are also
shown. Numbers on the islands indicate metres above sea level. Depth
contour lines are in metres below sea level
448
F. Lucchi et al.
Fig. 38.4 Selected volcanic landforms in the Aeolian Islands. Numbered points in the figures indicate metres a.s.l. a Monte dei Porri and
Monte Fossa delle Felci stratocones on Salina. b Northern side of the
Fossa Felci and Casa Ficarisi stratocones on Filicudi, with thick detrital
slope cones resulting from epivolcanic processes. c Northern view of
the Rocche Rosse obsidian coulee originated from the rim of the Monte
Pilato pumice cone (Lipari), the flanks of which are deeply cut by
pumice quarries. d Basiluzzo endogenous dome, NE of Panarea.
e Vulcanello lava platform and composite scoria cone in the northern
sector of Vulcano. f Strombolicchio lava neck, NE of Stromboli
(Stromboli in the background)
Giardina—Monte Guardia—San Lazzaro domes on Lipari)
or caldera rims (Monte Lentia domes on Vulcano;
Fig. 38.5a). Panarea and the surrounding islets are particularly assumed as a polygenic, multivent cluster of endogenous and plug domes (partly eroded and destroyed) lacking
of a central vent.
There are some lava flows, both silicic and mafic, that
constitute independent distinctive landforms. The Rocche
Rosse obsidian-rich rhyolite coulee originated from the
Monte Pilato cone in the High Middle Ages is known
worldwide (Fig. 38.4c), whereas other examples of silicic
coulees are well preserved on Lipari (Forgia Vecchia) and
Vulcano (Pietre Cotte; Fig. 38.3). Mafic lava flow fields are
instead recognized on Stromboli (San Bartolo) and Vulcano
(Vulcanello; Fig. 38.4e). Moreover, peculiar features are
represented by welded scoriaceous agglomerates related to
fountain-fed explosive phases of independent fissures
developed along regional tectonic trends on the northeastern
flank of Stromboli (e.g. Nel Cannestrà fissure) or different
caldera rims along the western coast of Vulcano (Fig. 38.3).
Eroded volcanic landforms are the result of erosion and
denudation of the volcanic edifices leading to substantial
inversion of topographic relief (Thouret 1999). They are
mostly represented by volcanic necks and dykes. The Canna
and Strombolicchio necks (Fig. 38.4f), located offshore the
coasts of Filicudi and Stromboli (Fig. 38.3), are the solidified conduits of almost entirely dismantled (and submerged)
stratocones, the original geometry of which is made evident
by sub-rounded, flattish submarine shelves. Dykes are
numerous in the Aeolian archipelago, mostly with a
38
Volcanic Landforms and Landscapes of the Aeolian Islands …
449
Fig. 38.5 Volcano-tectonic collapses and structural features in the
Aeolian Islands. Numbered points in the figures indicate metres a.s.l.
a La Fossa caldera rims on Vulcano, surrounding La Fossa cone. The
rim of the older Il Piano caldera is visible on the right side. b Aerial
view of the summit area of Stromboli with the active craters (NE,
central and SW) aligned in NE–SW direction near the headwall of
Sciara del Fuoco collapse. c NNW–SSE normal faults along the
Tindari-Letojanni structural trend truncate the southern dome-complex
of Lipari producing a steep coastal cliff. The southern part of the Monte
Giardina-Monte Guardia-San Lazzaro dome-alignment is also exposed
subvertical and radial arrangement around the main stratocones, and represent the feeders of the successive eruptive
sequences. Parts of the dykes are aligned along specific
directions reflecting the influence of the main tectonic trends,
whereas several dykes are recognized on Stromboli along the
walls of the Sciara del Fuoco collapse (Tibaldi 2001).
magma reservoirs. They are recognized in most of the
Aeolian Islands (Fig. 38.3), interrupting the construction of
the Alicudi and Stromboli composite volcanoes or truncating
some of the major stratocones on Salina, Lipari and Vulcano. The best examples are the piecemeal La Fossa and Il
Piano calderas on Vulcano (De Astis et al. 2013), formed
between *100 and *13 ka and partly filled by the subsequent eruptive sequences of La Fossa cone (Fig. 38.5a; see
Sect. 38.4.1). Most calderas in the Aeolians (e.g. on Alicudi
and Stromboli) are almost completely filled by more recent
volcanic successions, and are generally made visible by
structural discordances along the flanks of the cones.
Lateral collapses (sector or flank collapses) affect the
summit and flanks of the main stratocones (Monte dei Porri
and Monte Rivi on Salina, Chiumento on Filicudi), as recorded in steep-sided (exceeding 30°), amphi-theatre-shaped
scars delimited by subvertical rims and with volumes of 0.5–
2 km3. These collapses are mostly induced by high topographic relief and steep dipping slopes of the stratocones,
combined with high eruption rates and repeated intrusion of
38.3.2
Volcano-Tectonic Collapses
A substantial part of the morphogenetic activity in volcanic
areas is related to events of catastrophic volcano-tectonic
failure of volcanic edifices, which are represented by calderas or lateral collapses. These collapses produce impressive landforms, and also exert direct control on the
localization of the subsequent eruptive vents, which are
generally sited along the rims or in the centre of the collapse
depressions.
Calderas are subcircular to elliptical (km large) depressions formed by the vertical collapse of the roof of shallow
450
F. Lucchi et al.
dykes. Recurrent lateral failures during the Holocene (Tibaldi
2001; Francalanci et al. 2013) are recorded in the multi-stage
Sciara del Fuoco collapse structure on the summit and NW
flank of Stromboli (Fig. 38.5b; Sect. 38.4.2). As typical in
volcanic islands, the lateral collapses of Stromboli are associated with voluminous debris avalanche deposits with
megablocks, documented at the foot of the submarine volcano
slopes (Bosman et al. 2009).
38.3.3
Structural Features
The structural trends acting in the Aeolian Islands are
directly outlined by normal and strike-slip faults (Fig. 38.3),
although they generally have a low degree of preservation
due to subsequent erosion and covering. Impressive
strike-slip to normal faults with ca. 100 m high subvertical
fault scarps truncate the silicic dome-complex in the southern sector of Lipari (Fig. 38.5c). They are NNW–
SSE-aligned along the Tindari–Letojanni fault system that
dominates the structural setting of the central Aeolian sector.
A series of high-angle normal faults with tens-of-metres
vertical dip slips cut the western side of Panarea along the
NE–SW direction of the main structural trend acting in the
eastern Aeolian sector (Fig. 38.3).
Other structure-related features characteristic of volcanic
areas are the alignments of coeval domes (Fig. 38.5c) or
cones, aligned crater rims or vents (e.g. the active craters of
Stromboli; Fig. 38.5b) or elongated eruptive fissures and
dykes that provide information on the tectonic trends acting
on magma ascent through the crust up to surface.
38.4
Contemporary Activity
Stromboli and Vulcano are characterized by active volcanic
and volcano-tectonic landforms, and recent to ongoing
manifestations of eruptive and hydrothermal activity. There,
volcanic geomorphology can provide a fundamental contribution to risk assessment through (1) geomorphic hazard
zonation, (2) recognition of the more probable areas of future
opening of eruptive vents and fissures and (3) evaluation of
the influence of landforms on the transport and deposition of
the erupted products and volcanogenic flows.
38.4.1
millennia (alternating with Vulcanello) up to the
well-known AD 1888–1890 eruption that gave the name to
the “vulcanian” eruption style. This cone is presently
characterized by an active hydrothermal system with several high-temperature fumaroles around the summit crater.
Different hazard scenarios are related either to the active
geomorphic evolution of the cone or the short-term renewal
of eruptive activity. Volcanic risk is high here because La
Fossa cone is located near to the main inhabited area of
Vulcano Porto, which is crowded by thousands of tourists
during the summer.
La Fossa cone is 391 m high and steep-sided (average
slope angles of 30°), and is constructed by stratified,
coherent to incoherent pyroclastic successions and a few
viscous lava flows. Large portions of the cone are inherently
unstable due to oversteepened slopes and the stratified
internal structure of the cone, with unconsolidated layers
acting as potential sliding planes. The conditions of
gravity-driven instability may be enhanced by shallow
seismicity and ground deformation associated with movements of magma. In 1988 a landslide of ca. 200,000 m3
occurred along the NE flank of La Fossa cone during a
period of volcanic quiescence (Fig. 38.6), sliding into the
sea and producing a small tsunami (Romagnoli et al. 2012).
The entire NE flank of the edifice is in fact in conditions of
poor stability due to ongoing sea-wave undercutting and
cliff-retreat and to active submarine erosion (Fig. 38.6),
which particularly threaten the coastal settlement of Vulcano
Porto (Romagnoli et al. 2012). Other areas of slope instability are sited along the N (Forgia Vecchia) and SE flanks of
the cone (Grotta dei Palizzi; Figs. 38.5a and 38.6) due to
weakening of hydrothermally altered rocks.
A different hazard scenario involves the short-term (tens
to hundreds of years) eruptive reactivation of La Fossa cone
(Dellino et al. 2011). This is expected to occur as a vulcanian
eruption giving rise to pyroclastic density currents accompanied by fallout of ballistic blocks and bread-crust bombs.
Over most of La Fossa history (*5 ka), the currents laterally spreading from the summit crater have been confined by
the steep and subvertical walls of the La Fossa caldera surrounding the cone (Figs. 38.5a and 38.6). Only a few currents during the Grotta dei Palizzi activity (*1.6 ka) were
able to pass over the topographic barrier of the caldera walls
and reached the inhabited area of Il Piano in central Vulcano
(Fig. 38.3), thus being considered the most hazardous
eruptive event on the short-term.
La Fossa Cone and Caldera (Vulcano)
The Holocene history of Vulcano has been mostly characterized by the construction of La Fossa cone (De Astis
et al. 2013), standing out in the centre of La Fossa caldera
in the northern sector of the island (Fig. 38.5a). Recurrent
eruptive phases have occurred there during the past two
38.4.2
Active Craters of Stromboli and Sciara
del Fuoco Collapse
The active craters of Stromboli are located near the headwall
of the Sciara del Fuoco collapse (Figs. 38.5b and 38.7), and
38
Volcanic Landforms and Landscapes of the Aeolian Islands …
451
Fig. 38.6 3D image of the NE flank and submarine slopes of La Fossa
cone, with the 1988 landslide scar and evidence for sea-level
undercutting and submarine erosive channels (modified after Romagnoli et al. 2012). It is shown that the distribution of La Fossa cone
pyroclastic deposits (outer border in red) is conditioned by the La
Fossa caldera rims. Depth contour lines and quoted points are in metres
b.s.l. and a.s.l
are characterized by persistent and mildly explosive activity
typical of the “strombolian” eruption style. This activity has
been continuous starting from the eighth century (Francalanci et al. 2013). The relevant scoriaceous products are
mostly confined within the borders of Sciara del Fuoco and
accumulate in the area around the craters and along the
collapse slope (Fig. 38.7a). Spatter and lithic fragments
related to intermittent, more energetic explosions (paroxysms) can overcome the collapse walls and are deposited
along the flanks of the cone, occasionally reaching the
inhabited areas of Stromboli and Ginostra (Fig. 38.3). The
collapse particularly acts as a topographic trap for episodic
lava flows originated from the summit craters and
vents/fissures opened inside the collapse depression
(Fig. 38.7a). These lava flows go through the steep collapse
scar and frequently reach the sea forming lava deltas that are
rapidly dismantled by marine erosion (Fig. 38.7a; Calvari
et al. 2010). Through the Holocene, the Sciara del Fuoco
collapse area has been episodically filled up to the rim by
lava flows that surmounted its lateral rims and laterally
expanded along the flanks of the cone. The latest lava
overflow of the collapse rims was recorded in the High
Middle Ages (Francalanci et al. 2013).
The progressive rapid accumulation of volcanic products along the steep and unstable slopes of Sciara del
Fuoco (average slope angles of 35–38°) may easily induce
events of lateral failure by overloading and oversteepening
effects, enhanced by the recurrent intrusion of NE-trending
dykes. Five major NW-dipping collapses are recorded
during the Holocene, with the latest one occurred in the
Late Middle Ages (Francalanci et al. 2013). These
large-scale sector collapses are catastrophic events that
mobilize up to few km3 of material, but the related hazard
is not very high as these events show recurrence periods of
some (or more) thousand years. Conversely, medium-scale
landslides (volumes up to some millions of m3) affecting
the Sciara del Fuoco slope are more hazardous as they
occur with higher frequency, i.e. from some hundreds up
to a few tens of years (Casalbore et al. 2011). These events
are able to generate local but severe tsunamis when
occurring in shallow-water, as demonstrated by the recent
2002 tsunamigenic landslide of *25 106 m3 that
affected the subaerial and submerged slopes of Sciara del
Fuoco (Fig. 38.7b; Baldi et al. 2008). This landslide
resulted in a small tsunami with waves up to 10 m high
that struck the Stromboli coasts and the surrounding areas.
Previous small tsunamis were reported in 1879, 1916,
1919, 1930, 1944 and 1954, mostly associated with hot
avalanches or pyroclastic flows entering the sea during
paroxysms (Barberi et al. 1993).
452
F. Lucchi et al.
Fig. 38.7 a View of the Sciara del Fuoco collapse showing the lavas
erupted in 2007 flowing down the steep slopes delimited by the NE
collapse rim and forming a lava delta. The 2002–2003 lava flows and
other products of the recent activity of Stromboli also fill the collapse.
b 3D frontal view of Sciara del Fuoco showing the 2002 landslide area
along the emerged and submerged slopes (modified after Baldi et al.
2008)
38.5
seamounts: implications for geodynamic evolution of the Southern
Tyrrhenian basin. Earth Planet Sci Lett 74:187–208
Bosman A, Chiocci F, Romagnoli C (2009) Morpho-structural setting of
Stromboli volcano revealed by high-resolution bathymetry and
backscatter data of its submarine portions. Bull Volcanol 71:1007–1019
Calvari S, Lodato L, Steffke A, Cristaldi A, Harris AJL, Spampinato L,
Boschi E (2010) The 2007 Stromboli eruption: event chronology
and effusion rates using thermal infrared data. J Geophys Res 115:
B04201
Casalbore D, Romagnoli C, Chiocci FL, Bosman A (2011) Potential
tsunamigenic landslides at Stromboli volcano (Italy): insight from
marine DEM analysis. Geomorphology 126(1–2):42–50
De Astis G, Lucchi F, Dellino P, La Volpe L, Tranne CA, Frezzotti ML,
Peccerillo A (2013) Geology, volcanic history and petrology of
Vulcano (central Aeolian archipelago). In: Lucchi F, Peccerillo A,
Keller J, Tranne CA, Rossi PL (eds) The Aeolian Islands volcanoes.
Geological Society of London Memoirs vol 37, pp 281–348
De Astis G, Ventura G, Vilardo G (2003) Geodynamic significance of the
Aeolian volcanism (Southern Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy) in light of structural,
seismological and geochemical data. Tectonics 22:1040–1057
Dellino P, De Astis G, La Volpe L, Mele D, Sulpizio R (2011)
Quantitative hazard assessment of phreatomagmatic eruptions at
Vulcano (Aeolian Islands–Southern Italy) as obtained by combining
stratigraphy, event statistics and physical modelling. J Volcanol
Geoth Res 201:364–384
Francalanci L, Lucchi F, Keller J, De Astis G, Tranne CA (2013)
Eruptive, volcano-tectonic and magmatic history of the Stromboli
volcano (north-eastern Aeolian archipelago). In: Lucchi F, Peccerillo A, Keller J, Tranne CA, Rossi PL (eds) The Aeolian Islands
volcanoes. Geol Soc London Memoirs vol 37, pp 395–469
Lucchi F (2009) Late-Quaternary terraced marine deposits as tools for
wide-scale correlation of unconformity-bounded units in the volcanic
Aeolian archipelago (southern Italy). Sed Geol 216:158–178
Lucchi F (2013) Stratigraphic methodology for the geological mapping
of volcanic areas: insights from the Aeolian archipelago (Southern
Italy). In: Lucchi F, Peccerillo A, Keller J, Tranne CA, Rossi PL
(eds) The Aeolian Islands volcanoes. Geol Soc London Memoirs
vol 37, pp 37–55
Lucchi F, Keller J, Tranne CA (2013a) Regional stratigraphic
correlations across the Aeolian archipelago (southern Italy). In:
Conclusions
Landform analysis of the Aeolian Islands volcanoes allows for
the recognition of the main volcanic landforms (stratocones,
domes, lava flows, fissures), and their subsequent modification
by erosion processes and volcano-tectonic collapses (caldera,
lateral collapses). Moreover, volcanic geomorphology can give
information on the localization through time of active eruptive
vents, calderas, and lateral collapses under control of the
regional tectonic trends acting in the different sectors of the
archipelago. This provides important information for geological
mapping and reconstruction of the main steps of
island-building and destruction through the interaction between
volcanism, volcano-tectonic events, tectonic activity, and
sea-level fluctuations. Implications for volcanic hazard and risk
assessment are primarily related to the currently active volcanoes of Stromboli and Vulcano, where the volcanic landforms
and collapses play a fundamental role in controlling the
localization of active vents and conduits and the distribution of
volcanogenic flows, and in promoting flank instability.
References
Baldi P, Bosman A, Chiocci FL, Marsella M, Romagnoli C, Sonnessa A
(2008) Integrated subaerial-submarine morphological evolution of
the Sciara del Fuoco after the 2002 landslide. In: Calvari S,
Inguaggiato S, Puglisi G, Ripepe M, Rosi M (eds) The Stromboli
volcano. An integrated study of the 2002–2003 eruption, vol 18.
AGU, Washington, Geophysical Monograph, pp 171–182
Barberi F, Rosi M, Sodi A (1993) Volcanic hazard assessment at Stromboli
based on review of historical data. Acta Vulcanol 3:173–187
Beccaluva L, Gabbianelli G, Lucchini F, Rossi PL, Savelli C (1985)
Petrology and K/Ar ages of volcanics dredged from the Aeolian
38
Volcanic Landforms and Landscapes of the Aeolian Islands …
453
Lucchi F, Peccerillo A, Keller J, Tranne CA, Rossi PL (eds) The
Aeolian Islands volcanoes. Geol Soc London Memoirs vol 37,
pp 55–81
Lucchi F, Peccerillo A, Keller J, Tranne CA, Rossi PL (eds) (2013b)
The Aeolian Islands volcanoes. Geol Soc London Memoirs vol 37,
526 pp
Romagnoli C, Casalbore D, Bortoluzzi G, Bosman A, Chiocci FL,
D’Oriano F, Gamberi F, Ligi M, Marani M (2013)
Bathy-morphological setting of the Aeolian islands. In: Lucchi F,
Peccerillo A, Keller J, Tranne CA, Rossi PL (eds) The Aeolian
Islands volcanoes. Geol Soc London Memoirs vol 37, pp 27–36
Romagnoli C, Casalbore D, Chiocci FL (2012) La Fossa Caldera
breaching and submarine erosion (Vulcano island, Italy). Mar Geol
303–306:87–98
Thouret J-C (1999) Volcanic geomorphology—an overview. Earth-Sci
Rev 47:95–131
Tibaldi A (2001) Multiple sector collapses at Stromboli volcano, Italy:
how they work. B Volcanol 63:112–125
Waelbroeck C, Labeyrie L, Michel E, Duplessy JC, McManus JF,
Lambeck K, Balbon E, Labracherie M (2002) Sea-level and deep
water temperature changes derived from foraminifera isotopic
records. Quat Sci Rev 21:295–305
Geomorphology of the Capo San Vito
Peninsula (NW Sicily): An Example
of Tectonically and Climatically Controlled
Landscape
39
Valerio Agnesi, Christian Conoscenti, Cipriano Di Maggio,
and Edoardo Rotigliano
Abstract
The Capo San Vito peninsula is located along the north-westernmost sector of the Sicilian
coastline. It is characterized by a complex geomorphological setting, where a large variety
of coastal, gravity-induced and karst landforms allow the visitor to easily detect the
interactions between Quaternary tectonics and climate changes as well as morphodynamic
processes responsible for shaping the landscape. Thanks to natural reserves, the peninsula
preserves a typical Mediterranean natural environment, marked by spectacular and
suggestive landforms.
Keywords
Marine terraces
39.1
Landslides
Introduction
The Capo San Vito peninsula stretches northward for near
18 km into the Tyrrhenian Sea from the north-westernmost
Sicilian coastline, with a width narrowing from 20 to 5 km
(Fig. 39.1). Two main carbonatic ridges limit its landscape
from the south and east, leaving space, in the central-western
and northernmost sectors, for nearly level areas. The peninsula is characterized by a complex geomorphological setting
and shows spectacular coastal, gravity-induced and karst
landforms, such as marine terraces limited by high cliffs, large
rafted rock blocks sunk into a clayey substratum, large polje
and dolines. In spite of low density of population, human
activity has locally had a great impact on the landscape due to
intense quarrying. At the same time, the peninsula hosts some
of the most important natural reserves of Sicily.
The great scenic value of the landscape of the Capo San
Vito peninsula is directly linked to the same reasons that
determine its high scientific interest. In fact, relict
well-preserved and active spectacular landforms are the
result of the controlling role that tectonic and climate exerted
on the main morphodynamic processes shaping the
V. Agnesi C. Conoscenti C. Di Maggio E. Rotigliano (&)
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e del Mare, Università di
Palermo, Via Archirafi 22, 90123 Palermo, Italy
e-mail: edoardo.rotigliano@unipa.it
Karst landforms
Sicily
peninsula during the Quaternary. Visitors are thus allowed to
easily read such interactions in the field, through a large set
of landforms and in the framework of a suggestive and
evocative Mediterranean scenario.
39.2
Geographical and Geological Setting
The Capo San Vito peninsula is marked by a S–N oriented
ridge declining from Mt. Sparagio (1110 m a.s.l.) to Mt.
Monaco (532 m). The ridge, which is limited in the south by
the E–W oriented structure of Mt. Sparagio, runs along the
eastern side of the peninsula, whereas coastal plains of
Castelluzzo and San Vito lo Capo occur in the western and
northernmost sectors.
From a geological point of view, the peninsula is part of the
Sicilian fold and thrust belt, structured along the Africa–Europe
plate boundary in the Central Mediterranean, made of several
imbricate units, essentially emplaced during the Miocene. In
the study area, two main tectonic units have been recognized
(Catalano et al. 2011): (1) an imbricate fan composed of
Mesozoic-Paleogene platform carbonates (Panormide units)
overlain by Miocene pelagic deposits; (2) Upper Triassic to
Liassic shelf and Jurassic to Paleogene deep-water carbonate
rocks (Trapanese units), overlain by Miocene pelagic clays and
marls. The Panormide units overthrust the Trapanese units.
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_39
455
456
V. Agnesi et al.
Fig. 39.1 Geographical setting of the Capo San Vito peninsula, main geomorphological features and physiographic units
Finally, Lower Pleistocene neritic bioclastic calcarenites
(Marsala synthem) crop out in the Castelluzzo area.
According to the Köppen classification, the climate is
typical Mediterranean (Csa) with mean annual rainfall of
about 475 mm, concentrated between September and
March–April. The monthly temperature (19 °C on average)
ranges between 12 °C in January and 28 °C in August.
The whole territory of the Capo San Vito peninsula is
part of the Trapani province, and its main municipalities
are Custonaci (5441 inhabitants, 186 m a.s.l.), San Vito lo
Capo (4577 inhabitants, 5 m)—including the hamlets of
Castelluzzo and Macari—and Castellammare del Golfo
(15,116 inhabitants, 24 m), including the village of
Scopello.
39
Geomorphology of the Capo San Vito Peninsula (NW Sicily) …
39.3
Geomorphological Features
On a large scale, the geomorphological setting of the study
area is marked by large tectonic structures/forms, such as
horsts and half-grabens, bounded by fault scarps hundreds of
metres high (Di Maggio et al. 2017). On a smaller scale,
landforms connected to (a) “lateral bevelling” (planation
surfaces and wave-cut platforms), (b) deepening processes
(fluvio-karst canyons, V-shaped valleys and hanging and
isolated abandoned valleys) and (c) enhancement of relief
energy (landforms due to differential erosion or
deep-seated/shallow mass movements) are observed.
Considering geological structure and the consequent
geomorphic landscape, Capo San Vito peninsula can be
partitioned into six physiographic units (Fig. 39.1):
1. Mt. Monaco, Mt. Palatimone and Mt. Sparagio areas,
where karstified planation surfaces at different heights,
karst depressions, abandoned valleys, fluvio-karst canyons, cliffs and structurally controlled slopes are
responsible for a mountainous landscape bordered by
large scarps and frequently hosting small to widespread
flat areas at the summits;
2. Mt. Acci–Pizzo Sella area, whose uneven landscape,
made of non-uniform slopes, is the result of the alternation of gentle denudation slopes and abrupt scarps due to
selective erosion;
3. Scopello–Mt. Ramalloro area, in the south-westernmost
edge of the peninsula, which shows a very rough landscape, mainly shaped by surficial to deep-seated landslides, water erosion processes and selective denudation;
4. Forgia stream valley, which limits the peninsula in the
south, with a hilly landscape developed on marly-clayey
rocks;
5. Flat coastal areas, where successions of marine terraces
produce a homogeneous landscape interrupted by scarp
systems corresponding to abandoned sea cliffs;
6. Mt. Speziale and Mt. Cofano areas, with large summit
planation surfaces, bordered by wide and weathered
structurally controlled scarps and internally cut by
tectonic-karst depressions.
On the whole, the landscape of the Capo San Vito
peninsula merges low (marine terraces) and high (karstified
planation surfaces) flat areas, presently located at different
heights as a result of tectonic and climate changes. The flat
areas are laterally bordered by low to high slopes (abandoned sea cliffs and structurally controlled slopes), while in
the inner zone karst, fluvio-karst or tectonic depressions as
well as landslides and landforms due to selective erosion
interrupt their continuity. Anthropogenic processes are
responsible for very recent and, in some areas, profound
landscape changes, which affected both the coastal (tourism
457
activities) and the inner sectors (quarries). At the same time,
the peninsula hosts two of the most important protected areas
of Sicily (the “Zingaro” and the “Monte Cofano” natural
reserves).
39.4
39.4.1
Coastal Landforms
Marine Terraces
Marine terraces are located in the northern and western areas
of the Capo San Vito peninsula. They are the result of wave
erosion, responsible for long-lasting parallel retreat of the
cliffs and the genesis of platforms at their foot, during the
phases of marine highstand connected to several warm climate phases, in the Middle and Late Pleistocene. Their
emergence above the present sea level is mainly due to the
Quaternary tectonic uplift (Di Maggio et al. 1999; Antonioli
et al. 2002; Bonfiglio et al. 2004). The phases of marine
highstand are indicated by bands of lithodome holes,
wave-cut notches and sea caves partially filled by
marine/continental fossiliferous deposits (Di Maggio et al.
1999). Due to their genesis, this set of well-preserved coastal
features plays a crucial role in the understanding of the
relationships between tectonics, climate changes, and
eustatic fluctuations of Sicily during the Quaternary.
The successions of marine terraces occur in different
settings, depending on the tectonic features of the areas in
which the terraces lie. Where the uplift rate was low, the
successions consist of few large polycyclic wave-cut platforms; where the uplift rate was high, the successions are
characterized by more frequent but smaller platforms (Di
Maggio et al. 1999; Antonioli et al. 2002).
The existence of these well-preserved relict landforms is
linked to the presence of resistant carbonate rocks. In the
plain where the San Vito lo Capo village is located and in the
Piana di Sopra area, the marine terraces are cut in Mesozoic
marine carbonate rocks (Panormide Units), while in the plain
of Castelluzzo they are carved in Lower Pleistocene marine
calcarenite rocks.
The Piana di Sopra area is a tableland delimited by scarps
tens of metres high, located in the northwestern area of the
peninsula (Fig. 39.2). This landscape is the result of marine
erosion, which, controlled by eustatic fluctuations and
Quaternary tectonic uplift, carved several sub-planar surfaces producing seven different levels of marine terraces.
The top flat surface, extended for near 4 km2, is deformed by
a NNE–SSW fault showing a left-lateral displacement. The
phase of marine highstand, which produced this terrace, is
recorded by inactive wave-cut notches and sea caves cut in
the high abandoned cliffs (e.g. Torre Isolidda site). The inner
surfaces of these caves show bands of lithodome holes and
locally are partially filled by deposits bearing marine
458
V. Agnesi et al.
Fig. 39.2 Piana di Sopra area. The uppermost abrasion platform crossed by a fault scarp and bordered by structurally controlled sea cliffs tens of
metres high
invertebrates and occasionally mammals and pulmonate
mollusc remains. The vertebrate fossils can be attributed to
the Elephas falconeri Sicilian Faunal Complex, dated to the
Lower-Middle Pleistocene. Locally, the lower more recent
marine platforms are covered by coastal conglomerates and
calcarenites with a rich warm-temperate fauna, including
Strombus bubonius, or by continental deposits with mammal
assemblages attributed to the Elephas mnaidriensis Sicilian
Faunal Complex, dated to the Upper Pleistocene (Bonfiglio
et al. 2004).
The areas of the San Vito lo Capo and the Castelluzzo
villages (Fig. 39.3) consist of coastal plains bounded by
inland scarps hundreds of metres high. The coastal plains are
old wave-cut platforms; the high scarps are abandoned sea
cliffs, whose development has been mainly controlled by N–
S, NNW–SSE and E–W fault systems (Catalano et al. 2011).
About 0.5 km wide abrasion surfaces follow the present-day
coastline, forming a lateral continuous strip located at altitudes between 0 and 18 m. Rare patches of coastal/marine
deposits with Strombus bubonius or continental breccias
with Elephas mnaidriensis locally overlie the abrasion surfaces (Cottignoli et al. 2002).
The succession of emerged marine terraces from 0 to
about 100 m indicates an uplifted area and the correlation
with coastal and mammal deposits at Piana di Sopra
allowed us to define a morphoevolutive model of the
marine terraces system, starting from the first emersion of
the area (Fig. 39.4). The older terrace orders (I order), cut
into Lower Pleistocene rocks, permit to date the beginning
of the terrace succession to the interglacial phases of the
post-Lower Pleistocene, whilst the younger (VII order) can
be correlated with more recent marine highstands (100–
90 ka ago).
The Capo San Vito peninsula, where successions of
marine terraces are very clearly exposed, constitutes a
highly didactic area for the understanding of the control
on marine processes exerted by Quaternary climatic
changes and neo-tectonic uplift. The presence of fault
scarps and displaced wave-cut platforms or terrace
deposits, in fact, points to the occurrence of tectonic
events. In particular, the faults that produce fault scarps
within the I order, uppermost terrace surface and that
displace the II order terrace and its deposits at Semaforo
site, responsible for the difference in altitude within its sea
caves and inner edge at Piana di Sopra area, are linked to
one or several tectonic events younger than genesis of the
I and II order terraces and older than genesis of the III
order terrace. The difference in altitude within the inner
edges of the marine terraces as far as the VI order
indicates tectonic events up to Eutyrrhenian age
(125,000 years BP) and beyond.
39.4.2
Beaches
The San Vito beach is the only beach along the peninsula
and is located in its northernmost edge. It extends for more
than 2 km and is made of bioclastic sand, mainly composed
39
Geomorphology of the Capo San Vito Peninsula (NW Sicily) …
459
Fig. 39.3 Marine terraces in the Castelluzzo area
by shell fragments (Fig. 39.5). The submerged zone is
covered by a well-developed Posidonia prairie. The San Vito
Cape protects the strand from the prevailing northwestern
(Maestrale) winds, so that the beach drift is E-W oriented,
being controlled by eastern winds (Grecale).
Starting from the 1960s, the morphology of the beach has
been strongly affected by construction of the little harbour of
San Vito lo Capo, whose docks have modified the littoral
drift, and by the huge expansion of the town, which largely
occupied the backshore. Moreover, trawling and summer
touristic sailing are responsible for the partial erosion of the
Posidonia prairie.
Notwithstanding the recent modifications of the natural
landscape, the San Vito beach still preserves its scenic
quality and touristic value, being included among the most
beautiful beaches of Italy.
39.5
Landslides
Landslide types and dimensions at the Capo San Vito
peninsula are strictly related to its geological setting, whilst
Quaternary climate changes and tectonics have controlled
their activity and evolution. In light of the widespread
outcropping of brittle rocks, landslides took place in areas
where these rocks contain mechanical discontinuities (e.g.
lithologic variation, tectonic surfaces and bedding planes) or
where erosion processes have exhumed the underlying
ductile substratum. In particular, spectacular fast shallow
(Macari–Conturrana area) and slow deep-seated (Scopello
and Rocche Bianche area) landslide phenomena affect the
northwestern and the southeastern sectors of the peninsula,
respectively (Fig. 39.1).
39.5.1
The Macari–Conturrana Area
The Pizzo Sella area, due to the presence of high structural
scarps made of carbonate rocks, is characterized by high rock
fall hazard. The last relevant event occurred on 28 February
2001, when a rock fall hit the Macari village, detaching large
blocks, which accumulated in a 470 m long and 90 m wide
area. The detached blocks totally destroyed seven houses and
heavily damaged twenty more. As a consequence of the rock
fall, the civil protection authority ordered the evacuation of
more than 200 people from the small village.
In the north-western sector of Pizzo Sella, the Conturrana landslide represents one of the largest gravity-induced
phenomena of San Vito peninsula, involving an area of
nearly 250,000 m2. The landslide involved translational
slide and rock avalanche, which affected a slope made of
highly tectonized marls overlain by carbonatic rocks,
locally forming a very narrow fold. The triggering mechanism is likely to be connected to a large earthquake that
presumably occurred in the third or fourth century BC
(Nicoletti and Parise 1996). The landslide body, which
rests on the southern sector of the Piana di Sopra terrace, is
1.3 km long and 650 m wide.
A popular tradition of religious origin says that the
landslide was the result of the wrath of God, who was
460
V. Agnesi et al.
Fig. 39.4 Evolutionary model of
the Piana di Sopra area. Note that
the area is constantly being
uplifted, except the relative
subsidence and a local northward
tilting due to the block-faulting
movements (steps a and c). The
current altitude of the inner edges
of each order of marine terrace
(step f) is growing from north to
south, indicating overall uplift
rates higher in the southern area
(about 0.15 m/ka) and gradually
lower in the northern area (about
0.1 m/ka). The black arrows in
step f are proportional to rates of
tectonic uplift: the larger the size,
the higher is the uplift rate
offended by the blasphemous and licentious habits of the
people living in the old Conturrana village, to the point of
causing its total destruction and burial. The only survivors to
the disaster were San Vito, a young mystic who was visiting
preaching the village for, and his nurse Santa Crescenza. But
during the escape, the nurse, transgressing God’s instruction,
turned her view back to the village and, for this, was punished and suddenly petrified. In memory of this old legend,
the San Vito lo Capo inhabitants erected a little votive
chapel, dedicated to Santa Crescenza, located just on the tip
of the landslide, where the devout followers use to leave a
stone for any grace received.
39.5.2
The Scopello and Rocche Bianche
Landslides
The Scopello and Rocche Bianche landslides (Agnesi et al.
2000, 2015; Di Maggio et al. 2014) are located in the
southeastern edge of the Capo San Vito peninsula
39
Geomorphology of the Capo San Vito Peninsula (NW Sicily) …
461
Fig. 39.5 The San Vito lo Capo beach (Mt. Monaco and Pizzo Sella in the background from left to right)
(Fig. 39.1), where an overthrust plane outcrops, separating a
rigid fractured slab made of Mesozoic carbonate rocks from
the underlying ductile substratum, corresponding to Tertiary
marly-clayey terrains.
During the Miocene-Pleistocene tectonic phases, the
general uplift of the area and the related block-faulting
phenomena determined fracturing of the carbonate slab, its
emersion and activation of intense erosion processes. The
following exhumation of the overthrust plane laterally
unlocked the rigid carbonate slab so that deep deformation
phenomena could have been activated (differential settling,
back tilting, block sliding and lateral spreading), leading to
the partitioning of the ancient rigid slab.
From the common crown area of the Portella di Baida
saddle, two diverging “twin landslides” can be observed:
the Scopello and the Rocche Bianche landslides, which
stretch towards the sea coast (NNE) and the Guidaloca
stream (S), respectively. The landslides involved complex
movements, including deep to surficial deformation,
affecting the rigid slab and the ductile substratum,
respectively.
Starting from the same geomorphological setting,
depending on the difference of the local erosion base level
and the type of lateral eroding/unlocking process (coastal
and stream erosion, respectively), the Scopello and the
Rocche Bianche landslides show different evolution stages
and dimensions, with the first being in a much more
advanced stage and involving a much wider area. For this
reason, since the late 1970s to which the first studies are
dated, both scientific and geo-touristic interests almost
exclusively focused on the Scopello landslide.
The activity of the Scopello landslides is presently due to
both deep-seated deformations, still producing the detachment and seaward spreading/sliding of blocks from the
carbonate slab scarps, and shallow to surficial phenomena
involving either the thick debris cover or the exhumed
ductile substratum. Furthermore, the long lasting deformation has displaced offshore a relevant part of the landslide
body. The inner mountain edge of the carbonate slab is
marked by a scarp, several tens of metres high, constituting
the crown sector of the landslide. From the right and left
flanks of scarp, several small to large blocks detached due to
lateral spreading and block sliding movement, converging
towards the central transportation zone. The blocks have
rafted tens to hundreds of metres away from their detachment scarp, with their roots sunk in the underlain ductile
substratum (Fig. 39.6).
In the southeastern side (Fig. 39.7), differential
settling/back tilting and lateral spreading movements, having
NNE direction, affect the carbonate slab, which in this sector
is reduced to a narrow ridge (Pizzo Perania).
In the southern coastal sector of the landslide area, disarticulated rafting blocks are observed, reaching the coastline and producing the typical “Faraglioni” landscape
(variously dimensioned sea stacks; Fig. 39.8). Oceanographic surveys by side-scan sonar and multi-beam soundings attest for an offshore prolongation of the landslide body
up to about 2 km, with a general convex bathymetry and
several isolated blocks variously displaced onto the landslide
debris.
The Scopello landslide constitutes a unique and very
spectacular landscape, where, thanks to the very advanced
462
V. Agnesi et al.
Fig. 39.6 The inner mountain
sector of the Scopello landslide:
blocks of various dimensions are
spreading/sliding toward the
central sector of the landslide area
Fig. 39.7 The right southeastern sector of the Scopello landslide: the carbonate ridge is disarticulated into few large units by differential
settling/back tilting and lateral spreading movements
stage of gravitational phenomena, it is possible to take a
direct look on the Quaternary dismantling of an emerged
Mesozoic carbonate platform. From the edge of the carbonate slab, it is possible for the viewer to get the whole
scene of the phenomena acting on the highest sector of the
area, clearly recognizing the “puzzle” of blocks and earth/
debris flow bodies moving seaward. The small to large
rafting blocks can be easily recognized as well as ideally
connected upward to their detachment scarps, whose
geometry almost perfectly fit the block shapes. Few kilometres downhill, the medieval Scopello small village itself is
located on the top surface of a large disarticulated block.
Downhill, where the blocks have reached the sea, spectacular stacks mark the coastal landscape of the “Faraglioni”
area, which are at the same time one of the main touristic
attraction, attracting a lot of people in summer, and a frequently exploited set for national and international film
makers.
39
Geomorphology of the Capo San Vito Peninsula (NW Sicily) …
463
Fig. 39.8 The sea stacks in the coastal sector (“Faraglioni”) are displaced carbonate blocks emerging from the sea
39.6
Karst Landforms
In a landscape which is largely made of carbonatic rocks, the
large population of epigean (e.g. polje, dolines, canyons,
karren field) or hypogean (caves)—and horizontally—(e.g.
karst planation surfaces, passages) or vertically developed
(e.g. canyons, shafts) karst landforms—allows to recognize
the effects of the base erosion/karst level changes. In particular, a great number of epigean and hypogean karst
landforms can be observed, whose largest example is represented by the Piana di Purgatorio polje, a 2 4 km
sub-elliptical depression. Its origin was also controlled by
tectonics and selective erosion. To the southwest, near
Custonaci, the great (200 300 m) collapse doline of
Contrada Bufara (Fig. 39.9) has long been erroneously
considered by the local people as a meteoritic impact crater.
Among the epigean landforms, fluvio-karst canyons and
karren fields are present along tectonic alignments and over
the summit sub-flat areas, respectively.
Dissolution processes are also responsible for the development of a diffused and structured hypogean karstic system, made of an intricate network of shafts and passages,
among which the 200 m deep well of Abisso del Purgatorio
is one of the most important caves of Sicily.
At the southern foot of Mt. Cofano is located the Grotta
Mangiapane; a horizontal cave, 70 m high, 13 m large and
Fig. 39.9 The Contrada Bufara doline near Custonaci
50 m long, where in the second half of the nineteenth century paleontological and archaeological surveys brought to
light several prehistoric finds (tooth and bones fossils, artefacts in obsidian and flint, rupestrian paintings) dated at
Upper Epigravettian. This cave, of karst origin, has been
opened by marine erosion during the Middle Pleistocene.
Thanks to the large dimensions, some rural houses have
been built in the past into the Grotta Mangiapane cave.
Starting from the last decade, during the Christmas period,
464
V. Agnesi et al.
the cave is used by the local people as a living nativity scene,
whose evocative and natural location attracts a large number
of tourists.
39.7
Human Activities and Protected Areas
On the whole, still nowadays, the distance from towns and
the poor road connectivity have actually preserved the Capo
San Vito peninsula territory from severe effects of high
anthropogenic pressure, which elsewhere has compromised
some coastal areas of Sicily. In fact, human impact, mainly
consisting in the construction of rural country houses or
small buildings, is limited to the surroundings of San Vito
Lo Capo and Scopello. A very different scenario arises if
focusing the analysis on the southernmost sector of the
peninsula (Mt. Sparagio–Mt. Palatimone), where great
marble quarries have substantially modified the calcareous
slopes. At the same time, efforts to preserve the natural
landscape resulted in the establishment of a number of
geosites and two important Natural Reserves.
39.7.1
The Marble Basin of Custonaci
The southern slope of Monte Sparagio, in the Custonaci
territory, has been since the fifteenth century affected by
extraction of Cretaceous platform calcareous rocks commercially named Custonaci marbles. The technical and
ornamental value of these rocks (the main type named
Fig. 39.10 Quarry landscape at the southern slope of Mt. Sparagio
“Perlato di Sicilia”, with an ivory colour hosting dispersed
patches of pure calcite), together with the presence of fault
scarps, which expose large volumes of easily extractable
blocks, have been responsible for the remarkable development of the quarrying activity in the area. Today, more than
200 active sites are recorded, involving an area of 3 km2 and
producing 1.5 million tonnes of rocks per year, employing
near 3000 people with 100 million euros of sales volume.
In light of these data, the Marble Basin of Custonaci is the
second in Europe for importance.
Such an impressive manufacturing activity has obviously
resulted in intense modifications to the landscape, with high
bare quarry fronts set at different heights on the slopes and
great debris/scraps landfills, which result in uneven and
ruiniform morphologies (Fig. 39.10). At the same time, in
light of the great economic importance of the quarries, local
people and the owner himself have been trying since long
time to find a sustainable trade-off.
39.7.2
Protected Areas
Some of the most important protected areas of western Sicily
area located in the Capo San Vito peninsula (Fig. 39.1): the
Reserve of Zingaro and the Reserve of Monte Cofano, which
were established with a regional law in 1981.
The Reserve of Zingaro was the first established natural
protected area in Sicily, as an achievement of a great
mobilization of the Sicilian people, culminated in a great
march on 18 May 1980 for blocking the construction of an
39
Geomorphology of the Capo San Vito Peninsula (NW Sicily) …
465
east-littoral road, which would have connected Scopello to
San Vito Lo Capo, crossing the totally uncontaminated
eastern coastal sector of the peninsula.
The restricted territory of the Reserve of Zingaro extends for
1600 ha, including a coastal cliff sector 7 km long, locally
interrupted by some small sandy or pebbly bays. The reserve is
an example of Mediterranean ecosystem, hosting a great variety
of natural environments set on calcareous substratum. A great
number of vegetable taxa (near 700) is present, some of which
very rare and endemic, in addition to typical Mediterranean
mammals and reptiles and nearly 40 different species of birds.
A well-developed network of natural paths, 30 km long in
total, allows the visitors to enjoy the summit landscape by
trekking, as well as the sea, going to the bays.
The natural Reserve of Monte Cofano protects the calcareous promontory and its surrounding coastal areas. It was
established on 1989 and extends for 537.5 ha. It is of great
importance for the scenic coastal landscape as well as for the
widespread occurrence of karstic epigean (dolines, sinkholes) and hypogean (caves).
Capo San Vito peninsula, highlighting morphogenetic, tectonic and climate events occurred during the Quaternary
period in the central sector of the Mediterranean area.
39.8
Conclusions
The magnificent coastal, gravitational, karst and structural
landforms of the Capo San Vito peninsula reflect an interplay between geomorphological processes, tectonics and
Quaternary climate changes.
Broad wave-cut platforms, high abandoned structurally
controlled sea cliffs, wide landslide scarps, large deformed
rafting blocks, their position between sea and mountains, as
well as weather and colours of Sicily, make the landscape of
the Capo San Vito peninsula spectacular and wonderful. At
the same time, the richness of the remarkable geomorphological features at the Capo San Vito peninsula makes it
suitable both for geo-tourism and teaching. In fact, the
geological and geomorphological situations and constrictions are very clear and easy to read/interpret.
From a scientific point of view, the set of the marine
terraces, caves, wave-cut notches, and tectonic landforms,
allow to reconstruct the geomorphological evolution of the
References
Agnesi V, Di Maggio C, Macaluso T, Rotigliano E (2000) Genesis and
evolution of deep seated gravitational slope deformation phenomena in Western and Central Sicily. Memorie Società Geologica
Italiana 55:363–371
Agnesi V, Rotigliano E, Tammaro U, Cappadonia C, Conoscenti C,
Obrizzo F, Di Maggio C, Luzio D, Pingue F (2015) GPS monitoring
of the Scopello (Sicily, Italy) DSGSD phenomenon: relationships
between surficial and deep-seated morphodynamics. In: Lollino G,
Giordan D, Crosta GB, Corominas J, Azzam R, Wasowski J,
Sciarra N (eds) Engineering geology for society and territory, vol 2.
Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 1321–1325
Antonioli F, Cremona G, Immordino F, Puglisi C, Romagnoli C,
Silenzi S, Valpreda E, Verubbi V (2002) New data on the Holocenic
sea-level rise in NW Sicily (Central Mediterranean Sea). Global
Planet Change 34:121–140
Bonfiglio L, Agnesi V, Masini F, Di Maggio C (2004) Quaternary
eustatic fluctuations and biochronology of vertebrate-bearing
deposits correlated with marine terraces in Sicily. In: Guerrieri L,
Rischia I, Serva L (eds) Field trip guidebooks, 32nd IGC Florence
20–28 August 2004. Memorie Descrittive Carta Geologica d’Italia
63(1-B07): 1–36
Catalano R, Agate M, Basilone L, Di Maggio C, Mancuso M, Sulli A
(2011) 593 Castellammare del Golfo. Carta Geologica d’Italia alla
scala 1:50.000, ISPRA, Servizio Geologico d’Italia, Regione
Siciliana
Cottignoli A, Boschian G, Di Maggio C, Masini F, Petruso D (2002)
Pedostratigraphic notes on the middle-late Pleistocene of Capo San
Vito Peninsula (NW Sicily). Il Quaternario 15(1):121–130
Di Maggio C, Incandela A, Masini F, Petruso D, Renda P (1999)
Oscillazioni eustatiche, biocronologia dei depositi continentali
quaternari e neotettonica nella Sicilia nord-occidentale (Penisola
di San Vito lo Capo - Trapani). Il Quaternario 12(1):25–50
Di Maggio C, Madonia G, Vattano M (2014) Deep-seated gravitational
slope deformations in western Sicily: controlling factors, triggering
mechanisms, and morphoevolutionary models. Geomorphology
208:173–189
Di Maggio C, Madonia G, Vattano M, Agnesi V, Monteleone S (2017)
Geomorphological evolution of western Sicily, Italy. Geol Carpath
68(1):80–93
Nicoletti PG, Parise M (1996) Geomorphology and kinematics of the
Conturrana rockslide-debris flow (NW Sicily). Earth Surf Proc Land
21:875–892
Landforms and Landscapes of Mount Etna
(Sicily): Relationships Between a Volcano, Its
Environment and Human Activity
40
Stefano Branca, David Chester, Emanuela De Beni, and Angus Duncan
Abstract
Mount Etna is the highest relief in Sicily and represents a unique environment because of
its long-established and almost continuous eruptive activity, that has moulded its landforms
and which has produced distinctive landscapes. Over the past 60 ka, both destructive and
constructive geological processes have produced the principal morphological features of
the volcano such as the wide Valle del Bove depression, monogenic scoria cones and
extensive lava flow fields. Relationships between Etna, its environment and human activity
began in the Neolithic Period within the mountain foot region and have developed over
millennia. Even though there has been a rapid rate of resurfacing by lava during historic
times, the impact on human activity has been short-lived, recovery has been rapid and
society has adjusted to the ever present hazard in distinctive ways.
Keywords
Stratovolcano
40.1
Volcanic geomorphology
Introduction
Mount Etna is one of the most famous volcanoes of the
world due to its central location within the Mediterranean
Sea and its almost continuous eruptive activity. Interrelationships between human activity and the volcanic environment have continued since the Neolithic Period. In fact,
the favourable climatological, hydrological and pedological
conditions of the lower flanks of Etna, named mountain foot
region (0–1000 m a.s.l.), together with its strategic position
as the connection between the Tyrrhenian district to the
north and the Hyblean to the south, has allowed the
S. Branca (&) E. De Beni
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Osservatorio
Etneo, Piazza Roma 2, 95125 Catania, Italy
e-mail: stefano.branca@ingv.it
D. Chester
Department of Geography, Liverpool Hope University, Hope
Park, Liverpool, L16 9JD, UK
A. Duncan
Department of Geography and Planning, University of Liverpool,
Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK
Human activity
Etna
development of both civilizing and cultural processes in this
distinctive Mediterranean region. Mount Etna is delimited
by the Simeto and Alcantara valleys which have been the
main routes of communication since the Neolithic
(Fig. 40.1). The oldest Greek colonies in Sicily are Naxos,
founded on the lava promontory of Capo Schisò at the
mouth of the Alcantara River in 734 BC, and the city of
Katane (Catania), founded in 729 BC along the Ionian coast
of Etna. After more than 2700 years about 900,000 people
currently live in the mountain foot region.
The morphological setting of Etna volcano is the result of
a complex geological evolution. It began about 330 ka years
ago in a subaerial environment (Branca et al. 2011a), and
was characterized by several changes in the shallow feeder
system, eruptive style and shape and position of the
numerous eruptive centres that contributed to the growth of
this large composite volcano. In addition, the morphological
features of Etna are influenced by the volcano’s location
within eastern Sicily, where several tectonic lineaments
intersect (Favalli et al. 1999). In this area the interaction
between volcanic and geological processes has led to the
evolution of an extraordinary variety of environments,
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_40
467
468
S. Branca et al.
Fig. 40.1 Location of Mount Etna volcano in eastern Sicily. In the
orthoimage of Etna (modified after Gwinner et al. 2006) the sterile
lands formed by the lava flow fields of the last 400 years are clearly
visible, as are forest regions and the highly urbanized lower eastern and
southern flanks. Inset map a illustrates the major regional tectonic
structures of eastern Sicily (modified after Azzaro et al. 2012)
landforms and landscapes, which are the result of a long and
complex geomorphological evolution. Due to the uniqueness
of its geological, volcanological and geomorphological
characteristics, Mount Etna has been recently added to the
UNESCO World Heritage List, in June 2013.
40.2
Geographical Setting and Land Use
Etna dominates eastern Sicily, being over 3300 m high and
covering an area of ca. 1200 km2. Geographers have
described Sicily as ‘an ugly picture in a frame of gold: the
40
Landforms and Landscapes of Mount Etna (Sicily): Relationships …
dry poverty-stricken core of the island contrasting vividly
with the intensively-cultivated, irrigated coastal periphery’
(King 1973, p. 112). Etna is perhaps the ‘frames’ most
singular region. Despite continuous cropping since the
classical period, agricultural production has been maintained
without significant soil erosion or yield reduction. There is a
diversity of land use (Fig. 40.2), which reflects a delicate
adjustment to both environmental and economic factors
operating at varying heights within different sectors of the
volcano.
Etna’s climate is characterized by an increase in precipitation with height so that the summit area receives over
1200 mm; average annual temperatures are ca. 18 °C at the
coast, but decline rapidly with height and heavy snowfall is
the feature of the mountain’s upper slopes; temperature
Fig. 40.2 Agricultural land use
of the Etna region (modified after
Chester et al. 1985). The
mountain foot region stretches
from sea level to 1000 m, the
regione boscara from 1000 to
2000 m and the regione deserta is
over 2000 m
469
contrasts occur between the warmer northern, northwestern,
western and other sectors of the volcano affected by exposure to the Ionian Sea; and a persistent volcanic plume is
deflected by predominantly westerly winds causing rainfall
enhancement over the eastern and southeastern sectors.
Irrigation exploits groundwater in permeable lavas, which
are fed by winter rainfall and snow melt.
Soil variation on Mount Etna is primarily related to climate, but in many localities fertility reflects the nature, depth
and age of soil-forming materials, local patterns mirroring
the age and morphology of lava flows and the age/depth of
tephra deposited on them. The most productive soils occur
on old flows on the lowest slopes of Etna and are
fine-textured, brown cambisols and luvisols. With the
exception of rock outcrops, the poorest soils of Etna are
470
S. Branca et al.
young and eroded lithosols. Regosols are weakly developed
in loose substrates, particularly on tephra.
Except at high altitude, the indigenous woodland of Etna
has been cleared and the links between climate/
hydrology/soils and land use are very strong, with the
most intensive cropping taking place on the eastern, southeastern, southern and southwestern flanks, often under irrigation and within the mountain foot region (Fig. 40.1).
Land-use intensity also reflects height (i.e. is more intensive
at low levels) and proximity to Catania (population of the
metropolitan area ca. 750,000), the principal port and city of
the region. In recent years land around Catania is becoming
progressively urbanized. On Etna yields within the mountain
foot region were traditionally maintained by a combination
of: (a) inter-cropping of cereals and vegetables, usually sown
in association with tree crops; (b) lava-block terraces on
steep slopes, that were well established by the thirteenth
century and which reduce erosion; (c) wood-mulch which
was widely used both to increase organic matter and reduce
evaporation and (d) animals closely integrated into the
farming system. As well as producing meat and other
products, animals provided manure.
The maintenance of this distinctive agricultural system
required large quantities of labour from farmers’ extended
families, but from the 1970s many terraces ceased to be
cultivated. Abandonment bore witness to a reduction in the
area being intensively cropped, especially towards the upper
altitudinal limit of the mountain foot region. Investment by
the Italian State and the European Economic Communities
(later the European Union) was concentrated on larger units,
mechanization and more modern techniques. On Etna the
mountain foot region retains its agricultural particularity and
the traditional system of intensive irrigated agriculture may
still be recognized (Chester et al. 2011). The agriculture
labour force continues to shrink, service employment to
increase and many municipalities, particularly those near to
Catania, are today’s commuter settlements. Tourism is a
major industry and the region is a location for many second
homes. These developments are boosted by the region’s
designation as both a National Park and a World Heritage
Site.
40.3
Geological Evolution
Submarine eruptions, representing the earliest volcanic
events in the Etna region, occurred about 500 ka ago and
products from this, the Basal Tholeiitic phase, are exposed
along the coast, between the towns of Aci Castello and Aci
Trezza, interlayered within Pleistocene marine sediments.
The oldest subaerial volcanic products in the Etna region
erupted about 330 ka ago within the paleo-valley of the
River Simeto, forming a wide and thin lava plateau
(Fig. 40.3). In this paleo-landscape, explosive phreatomagmatic activity also occurred at eruptive fissures, as recognized at Valcorrente and Motta S. Anastasia, due to the
interaction between magma and groundwater located in the
sediments of the paleo-Simeto alluvial plain (Branca et al.
2011a, b). Following a long hiatus, eruptive activity on Etna
resumed about 220 ka. It became more continuous, developed along the present lower eastern flank and was associated with the Timpe faults system. This phase continued
until about 130 ka. During that time effusive eruptions
generated superimposed lava flows that formed Etna’s earliest volcano structure. It is interpreted as a lava shield
elongated for at least 22 km on a NNW–SSE alignment
(Branca et al. 2011a, b). This lava succession is exposed
discontinuously along the Acireale, Moscarello and Ripa
della Naca fault scarps and a wide portion of the shield is
below sea level (Chiocci et al. 2011). During this phase,
which is named Timpe and is dated for about 129–126 ka
years ago, effusive activity from fissure eruptions occurred
for the first time in the central portion of the present Etna
edifice in the area between Val Calanna and Moscarello.
Starting from about 110 ka, the path of magma ascent
became more localized, an efficient plumbing system
developed and this led to the construction of a central
polygenetic volcanic structure in the area presently occupied
by the Valle del Bove depression (Fig. 40.3). In particular,
the change from fissure to central eruptive style produced the
earliest polygenetic strato-cones: the so-called Tarderia,
Rocche and Trifoglietto volcanoes (Branca et al. 2011a, b).
The Trifoglietto volcano was characterized by steep slopes
and reached a maximum elevation of around 2600 m, and
represented the principal edifice constructed during this
phase. Following the end of Trifoglietto activity, local
shifting of the shallow eruptive feeder system generated
several eruptive centres which not only covered the previous
centres, but also produced a composite strato-cone formed
by the superposition of several small central volcanic
edifices.
The stabilization of the shallow plumbing system in its
present position at about 60 ka allowed the main bulk of
Etna’s edifice to grow and produced the Ellittico volcano.
This eruptive centre developed on the northwest flank of the
Valle del Bove volcanic edifices because of a NNW shift of
about 4 km in the position of the main eruptive axis. The
Ellittico volcano was characterized by explosive and effusive
activity both from summit vents and flank fissures, which
generated steep slopes above a height of 1600–1700 m,
forming the distinctive conical shape of the stratovolcano.
This attained a maximum height of about 3600 m. The
formation of lava flow fields during flank eruptions allowed
for the gradual expansion of Ellittico’s slopes on to the
sedimentary basement, causing a radical modification of the
paleohydrographic setting of the Simeto and Alcantara
40
Landforms and Landscapes of Mount Etna (Sicily): Relationships …
471
Fig. 40.3 Geological sketch map of the Etna volcano (modified after
Branca et al. 2011a). Within the Mongibello volcano two units which
relate to the formation of the Valle del Bove are represented: a the Milo
debris avalanche deposit (yellow dots) and b the Chiancone
debris-alluvial deposit shown by white dots
valleys between about 40 and 30 ka. In this period the
paleo-valley of the River Simeto was invaded by lava flows
which produced several dams within the paleo-watercourse.
At the same time the Alcantara paleo-valley was totally filled
with lava and this caused a northward stream diversion of
the paleo-river bed to its present valley around 30–25 ka
ago. Ellittico volcanic activity ended about 15 ka ago with a
series of Plinian eruptions that caused the collapse of the
summit cone from a height of about 3600 to 2900 m,
forming the Ellittico caldera.
Finally, the eruptive activity of the past 15 ka belongs to
the Mongibello volcano and has produced the present day
morphology of Mount Etna (Fig. 40.3). In particular, lava
flows from summit eruptions almost completely filled the
Ellittico caldera, whereas lava flows generated by flank eruptions expanded the area of Etna. The eruptive fissures of the
Mongibello volcano are spatially clustered indicating the
presence of at least three main zones of weakness, the
so-called NE, S and W rifts and these have been sites of
repeated magma intrusion. Strombolian explosive activity
472
S. Branca et al.
along the eruptive fissures formed single and/or coalescent
monogenic scoria cones and elongated spatter ramparts. At
about 10 ka the morphostructural setting of the Mongibello
volcano was drastically modified as a consequence of sector
collapses that affected the eastern flank of the Etna edifice
(Calvari et al. 2004). According to Guest et al. (1984), a
number of large landslides generated the depression known as
the Valle del Bove, producing the Milo debris avalanche
deposit located at the end of the valley (Fig. 40.3). Subsequent
processes of erosion and further minor collapses widened the
depression and formed a large fan-shaped feature along the
Ionian coast which is called the Chiancone. During the
Holocene several intense explosive events from summit vents
took place and in historical times the largest explosive eruption
of Mongibello volcano occurred in 122 BC (Del Carlo et al.
2004). The 122 BC Plinian event produced a widespread
pyroclastic fall deposit on the southeast flank, causing substantial damage to the ancient Roman city of Catania, the
collapse of the summit cone and the formation of the caldera
called Cratere del Piano. The effusive and explosive activity of
the last 2 ka has completely filled the Cratere del Piano caldera, gradually forming the present summit region of Mount
Etna with its associated craters.
40.4
Geomorphology and Landforms
The earliest volcanic landforms of the Etna region were
formed during the Basal Tholeiitic, Timpe and Valle del
Bove phases, between about 330 and 60 ka, and are almost
totally masked by volcanic products from the Ellittico and
Mongibello phases. The relicts of the oldest subaerial lava
flows form a series of tabular terraced bodies along the left
bank of the Simeto valley, dipping gently SSE, which crop
out discontinuously from an elevation of about 550 to 250 m
between the towns of Adrano and Paternò (Fig. 40.3).
Conversely, the Timpe lava shield morphology is not recognizable since it is totally buried and in part rests offshore,
close to the coast and near to the town of Acireale (Chiocci
et al. 2011). The only preserved landforms of the earlier
strato-cone morphostructures of the Valle del Bove phase
belong to the Tarderia eruptive centre whose southeast flank
is located to the south of the Valle del Bove and which forms
a morphological belt of steeper land stretching from Tarderia
to the town of Zafferana (Fig. 40.4) (Chester et al. 1985;
Branca et al. 2011b).
The main landforms of Etna’s edifice were formed during
the activity of Ellittico and Mongibello volcanoes during the
last 60 ka and were generated through both constructive and
destructive processes (Azzaro et al. 2012). They are represented by steep slopes which form the conical shape of the
Ellittico’s strato-cone along the western and northern flanks
of Etna, above a height of 1600–1700 m, and by the wide
depression of the Valle del Bove—Val Calanna along its
eastern side. The Valle del Bove—Val Calanna is a complex
landform related to large-scale flank failures that have
resulted in a typical horseshoe-shaped depression, about
7 6 km wide, which is characterized by steep-sided
break-away scarps up to 1000 m high (Fig. 40.4). The
summit area of Etna, instead, shows a broadly planar morphology at a height of about 2900 m which is bounded by
the rim of the Ellittico caldera to the north and that of the
Cratere del Piano caldera to the west and south. Conversely a
typical tectonic landform represented by a series of high and
prominent rectilinear morphological scarps, locally named
Timpe, characterizes the lower east flank from Acireale to S.
Alfio (Figs. 40.3 and 40.4) (Azzaro et al. 2012).
Overall, about 85% of the Etna flanks are formed by
monogenic volcanic landforms such as pyroclastic cones and
lava flow fields mainly generated during the eruptive activity
of the past 15 ka (Branca et al. 2011a). More than 300
pyroclastic cones are widely distributed along Etna flanks
above an altitude of about 500 m (Azzaro et al. 2012). These
landforms of basaltic volcanism are related to the explosive
activity which occurred along the fissures of flank eruptions.
The morphological features of the pyroclastic cones can vary
from larger spatter ramparts elongated according to fissure
orientation to single scoria cones of different size and elevation and a series of coalescent scoria cones (Fig. 40.5).
The scoria cones show a conical shape ranging from symmetric to asymmetric and reaching heights up to 200 m.
Sometimes they are characterized by a breached side.
Lava flows are formed by both simple and compound
fields showing different morphological features (Chester
et al. 1985). As a rule, the simple lava fields are characterized by typical aa morphology, with a clinker and rubbly
surface, whereas the compound fields show more complex
morphologies due to the presence of both aa and toothpaste
flow units with slabby surfaces (Guest and Stofan 2005). The
simple lava fields can also be characterized by the presence
of prominent features such as the levées of the flow channels
with lengths ranging from several hundred metres to several
kilometres (Figs. 40.6 and 40.7). Compound lava fields
show several secondary surface textures such as tumuli and
pressure ridges whose dimensions are generally decametres.
The presence of compound lava fields characterized by pahoehoe morphology is rare on Etna. One of its best examples
is the 1614–24 lava field, which covers an area of over
20 km2 on the upper northern flank. This lava flow is
characterized by several different surface textures such as
ropy flows, squeeze-ups, tumuli, and driblet cones of entrail
and toey lava. Sometimes the pahoehoe flow fields show the
presence of large tumuli, having basal diameters ranging
from several hundred metres up to 1 km.
Over time, the original morphology of the lava fields was
gradually modified by pedogenesis (Chester et al. 1985).
40
Landforms and Landscapes of Mount Etna (Sicily): Relationships …
473
Fig. 40.4 a Oblique DEM-derived east view of Etna (modified after
Gwinner et al. 2006) showing some of the principal landforms of the
volcano such as the Valle del Bove; the morphological belt belonging
to the early Tarderia eruptive centre and the rectilinear fault scarps from
Acireale to the Ripa della Naca and b aerial view from the east taken in
November 2006 showing typical landforms of the summit region and of
the Valle del Bove. Large historic scoria cones located on the upper
southern flank show the year of eruption
These processes are more intense in the mountain foot region
where the formation of soil is more rapid, with its thickness
varying from a few tens of centimetres to a few metres.
Historical lava flows (i.e. those erupted over the past
2400 years) show a well-preserved morphology which in
some cases can be covered by a soil which varies according
to the location on the volcano’s slopes. On prehistoric lava
flows, the main morphological features are rarely unchanged, being covered by soil and/or pyroclastic and epiclastic
deposits. Another important factor modifying the original
morphology of the lava fields is intense human activity. This
has affected the mountain foot region since before Roman
times. In fact, the gradual development of agriculture led to
the construction of terraces which have been built using lava
blocks. A typical example is represented by the lava field of
the 1408 eruption, whose intense agricultural exploitation in
the area between Pedara and Trecastagni has masked most of
its original morphological features. Reforestation has also
474
Fig. 40.5 Aerial view of the western flank which is characterized by
eruptive fissures formed by scoria cones and spatter ramparts. In the
foreground, two scoria cones formed during the 1974 eruption (Mts. De
Fig. 40.6 A lava flow channel of the 2004–2005 eruption
S. Branca et al.
Fiore) should be noted. In the background, there are several scoria
cones of prehistoric age
40
Landforms and Landscapes of Mount Etna (Sicily): Relationships …
475
Fig. 40.7 Panoramic view of the
2004–2005 lava flow field located
along the western wall of the
Valle del Bove
contributed to the acceleration of soil development which
can make the state of preservation of historical lavas similar
to those of prehistoric age.
40.5
Interactions with Human Activity
Throughout most of its history the Etna region has been a
traditional self-contained agricultural society and has coped
with eruptions using largely indigenous methods. Although
there are examples of State involvement, such as the provision of troops to maintain law and order, comprehensive
intervention only dates from the 1928 eruption (Chester et al.
2012). Since prehistoric times, the cultivated area of Etna
has been impacted by frequent lava invasions, on occasion
settlements have been totally and partially destroyed and the
population has suffered distress. Major eruptions are known
from the classical period (e.g. 122 BC), and medieval times
(see Tanguy et al. 2012), but from the fifteenth century
records are more comprehensive and show the following.
The village of Pedara and its cultivated lands were destroyed
in 1408; in 1537 Nicolosi was devastated; in 1646–47 a wide
cultivated area on the north flank of the volcano was
reported to have been wiped out; the 1669 eruption—the
largest historical event—destroyed Nicolosi, Malopasso, S.
Pietro Clarenza, Mascalucia, Comporotondo, S. Giovanni
Galermo, Misterbianco, 14 smaller settlements and a part of
Catania and agricultural land and dwellings were destroyed
near to Macchia in 1689 (Fig. 40.1). In 1923, the small
settlements of Cerro and Catena were severely damaged and
in 1928 Mascali was destroyed by lava flows.
In the traditional economy of Etna region, the outskirts of
towns and villages often comprise a corona, a roughly circular rim of particularly productive agriculture. For the
period from the 1669 eruption to 1900, major losses to
coronas occurred in 1651–1654—Bronte; 1792–1793—
Zafferana; 1811–1812—Milo; 1832 and 1843—Bronte;
1852–1853—Zafferana; 1879—Passopisciaro; 1886 and
1892—Nicolosi. We estimate that between 1500 and 1900
ca. 8% of the total land area of the mountain foot region
(Fig. 40.1) was effectively sterilized by lava (Chester et al.
2011).
When disaster strikes it is often assumed that people
panic, but research on disasters in many countries and on
Mount Etna shows this rarely to be the case. Though
apprehension is noted in some documents, the vast majority
of people remained calm, normal day-to-day activities continued and people still farmed their land and pursued their
trades. On Mount Etna serious eruptions often occurred
several times a century and people adapted to them. For
instance, people frequently left their home villages to live
with relatives, this being noted in 1843, 1883 and 1886.
Sometimes farmers and their families were forced to convert
small shelters on family plots into temporary accommodation and community relief committees featured in the process of recovery (e.g. in 1892).
On Etna a notable characteristic of loss-bearing was that,
although cities, towns and villages could be badly impacted
by lava flows, they quickly recovered. Nicolosi was, for
example, devastated by lava in 1537, but seems to have been
fully rebuilt by the time of the 1669 eruption (Chester et al.
1985). Lava flows normally advance slowly and residents
476
S. Branca et al.
Fig. 40.8 The advance of the
1910 lava flow over cultivated
land in an area of the mountain
foot region, in the vicinity of
Nicolosi (photo Archivio
Fotografico Toscano di Prato,
Fondo Gaetano Ponte)
know in advance if and when their village/home are about to
be destroyed and there is evidence that people salvaged all
they could. In 1928 newsreel films show that the removal of
tiles, windows and doors was a well-established practice in
the region and confirms earlier written accounts. Peasant
agriculture involves maximizing family security over profit,
and one feature is that cultivation plots are often owned in
different localities (whether through inheritance and/or as a
deliberate mitigation strategy is unknown), which means that
a single eruption is unlikely to wipe out all of a farmer’s land
(Fig. 40.8). Pastoralism provided a valuable additional
source of income in times of distress.
One distinctive feature of Mount Etna and southern Italy
generally is that many people perceived and continue to see
the divine hand in natural disasters, and eruptions have been
associated with well-developed liturgies of divine appeasement, comprising the procession of sacred relics and saintly
images, and intercessory prayer. One important aspect of this
response is that it has not produced a fatalistic attitude and
inhibited people either from protecting themselves or, more
latterly, from accepting help from authorities and/or
instruction from the State and its agencies.
The Etna region is also exposed to tectonic and
volcano-related earthquakes, the former caused major
localized damage in Catania in 1169 and 1693, whereas the
latter produced major damage and fatalities near Macchia in
association with the 1865 and 1911 eruptions (Chester et al.
2012). Indeed the only time when the region’s resilience was
almost overwhelmed by its vulnerability was during the
second half of the seventeenth century, when in less than
25 years after the 1669 eruption, the 1693 earthquake caused
a decline in agricultural production and much destruction.
Recovery was not complete until well into the eighteenth
century.
Mount Etna remains as one of the world’s most active
volcanoes. There have been a number of major eruptions
over the last 50 years which have had significant impacts on
human activity. Notable eruptions include those of 1971,
1983, 1991–1993, 2001 and 2002–2003 (Fig. 40.9). The
eruption of 1971 acted as a catalyst for modern volcanological research on Mount Etna and study on Etna has
played a major contribution to understanding the factors that
control the morphological evolution of basaltic lava flows. In
addition, since initial interventions during the 1983 eruption,
work on the volcano has played a major part in the development of intervention techniques to divert and limit the
spread of lava flow fields to minimize impact.
40.6
Conclusions
Mount Etna is one of the largest and most active continental
volcanoes in the world and is arguably the dominant landscape feature in Southern Italy. The typical landforms of
Etna volcano have developed during the past 60 ka in a
period in which the main bulk of the stratovolcano structure
was formed. In particular, the main morphological features
have been produced during the Mongibello phase of activity
in the Holocene. During this time interval, the wide
horseshoe-shaped depression of the Valle del Bove formed,
and intense eruptive activity generated numerous simple
flows, compound flow fields and scoria cones on Etna’s
40
Landforms and Landscapes of Mount Etna (Sicily): Relationships …
477
Fig. 40.9 Aerial view of 2002–2003 eruption. In the foreground the
lava flow destroys the pine wood forest of Linguaglossa. In the
background is the upper northeast flank with the summit craters
showing degassing activity and the ash column generated by the 2002–
2003 eruptive vent located in the upper south flank
slopes. Though frequent eruptions have led to a high rate of
resurfacing, the volcanic morphology of the mountain foot
region has been significantly modified by human activity.
This modification results from agricultural development,
quarrying and, in the environs of Catania, urbanization.
During recent historic times and apart from the major 1669
eruption which was followed by the devastating 1693
earthquake, the impact of eruptions on human activity has
been short-lived.
Throughout much of the historic period responses to
eruptions on Etna were local in scale and character. Since the
1928 eruption each successive eruption has, however, seen a
greater State intervention in the process of hazard planning,
particularly through the efforts of the Istituto Nazionale di
Geofisica e Vulcanologia. Whereas this has enhanced overall
disaster resilience, much of the traditional resilience that has
been so typical of pre-industrial times has been reduced
(Chester et al. 2011). Today responses to volcano and
volcano-related emergencies in Italy are the responsibility of
central government, through the Department of Civil
Protection (Dipartimento della Protezione Civile which was
founded in 1982). The Dipartimento della Protezione Civile
can use the expertise and resources of local authorities (comuni) and scientific bodies, such as the Istituto Nazionale di
Geofisica e Vulcanologia in Catania. The volcano is monitored by an array of geophysical techniques, but additionally
proactive planning uses hazard mapping and land-use
zoning.
The Etna region today, particularly on its southern and
eastern flanks and in the vicinity of Catania, is the location of
many second homes and large numbers of people commute
each day to the city. The region as a whole is a tourist destination and much of the historic Sicilian way of life and the
distinctive character of its settlements have largely disappeared,
though some features are still to be found in the more isolated
settlements of western and northwestern sectors.
Acknowledgements We are grateful to the Archivio Fotografico
Toscano di Prato for the permission to publish the photograph of the
Fondo Gaetano Ponte.
478
References
Azzaro R, Branca S, Gwinner K, Coltelli M (2012) The
volcano-tectonic map of Etna volcano, 1:100.000 scale: an
integrated approach based on a morphotectonic analysis from
high-resolution DEM constrained by geologic, active faulting and
seismotectonic data. Ital J Geosci 131(1):153–170
Branca S, Coltelli M, Groppelli G, Lentini F (2011a) Geological map of
Etna volcano, 1:50,000 scale. Ital J Geosci 130(3):265–291
Branca S, Coltelli M, Groppelli G (2011b) Geological evolution of a
complex basaltic stratovolcano: Mount Etna, Italy. Ital J Geosci 130
(3):306–317
Calvari S, Tanner LH, Groppelli G, Norini G (2004) A comprehensive
model for the opening of the Valle del Bove depression and hazard
evaluation for the eastern flank of Etna volcano. In: Bonaccorso A,
Calvari S, Coltelli M, Del Negro C, Falsaperla S (eds) Etna Volcano
Laboratory, AGU (Geophysical monograph) 143:65–75
Chester DK, Duncan AM, Guest JE, Kilburn C (1985) Mount Etna: the
anatomy of a volcano. Chapman and Hall, London, 404 pp
Chester DK, Duncan AM, James PA (2011) Mount Etna, Sicily:
landscape evolution and hazard responses in the pre-industrial era.
In: Martini P, Chesworth W, Panizza M (eds) Landscapes and
societies. Springer, Berlin, pp 235–255
Chester DK, Duncan AM, Sangster H (2012) Human responses to
eruptions of Etna (Sicily) during the late-Pre-Industrial Era and their
implications for present-day disaster planning. J Volcanol Geotherm
Res 225–226:65–80
S. Branca et al.
Chiocci LF, Coltelli M, Bosman A, Cavallaro D (2011) Continental
margin large-scale instability controlling the flank sliding of Etna
Volcano. Earth Planet Sci Lett 89:665–677
Del Carlo P, Vezzoli L, Coltelli M (2004) Last 100 ka Tephrostratigraphic record of Mount Etna. In: Bonaccorso A, Calvari S,
Coltelli M, Del Negro C, Falsaperla S (eds) Etna Volcano
Laboratory AGU (Geophysical monograph) 143:77–89
Favalli M, Innocenti F, Pareschi MT, Pasquaré G, Mazzarini F,
Branca S, Cavarra L, Tibaldi A (1999) The DEM of Mt Etna:
geomorphological and structural implications. Geodin Acta 12
(5):279–290
Guest JE, Stofan ER (2005) The significance of slab-crusted lava flows
for understanding controls on flow emplacement at Mount Etna,
Sicily. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 142:193–208
Guest JE, Chester DK, Duncan AM (1984) The Valle del Bove, Mount
Etna: its origin and relation to the stratigraphy and structure of the
volcano. J Volcanol Geother Res 21:1–23
Gwinner K, Coltelli M, Flohrer J, Jaumann R, Matz KD, Marsella M,
Roatsch T, Scholten F, Trauthan F (2006) The HRSC-AX Mt. Etna
project: high-resolution orthoimages and 1 m DEM at regional scale.
Int Arch Photogrammetry and Remote Sens XXXVI(Part 1):6 pp
King R (1973) Sicily. David and Charles, Newton Abbot, 200 pp
Tanguy JC, Condomines M, Branca S, La Delfa S, Coltelli M (2012)
New archeomagnetic and 226Ra–230Th dating of recent lavas for the
Geological map of Etna volcano. Ital J Geosci 131(2):241–257
Pantelleria Island (Strait of Sicily): Volcanic
History and Geomorphological Landscape
41
Silvio G. Rotolo, Valerio Agnesi, Christian Conoscenti,
and Giovanni Lanzo
Abstract
Pantelleria is a volcanic island located in the Strait of Sicily, 95 km far from the Sicilian
coastline and 67 km from Cape Bon (Tunisia). The volcanological history of the island
begins approximately 324 ka BP and the last eruptive event was a submarine eruption that
occurred on 1891 A.D. Eruptive activity was characterized by seven very intense explosive
events, the latest being the Green Tuff (44 ka). They have all produced ignimbrite sheets
that covered large sectors of the island. The landscape of the island mirrors the variety of
the eruptive styles and their interplay with volcano-tectonics. The most evident
geomorphological features are represented by: (i) the mantle-like distribution of the Green
Tuff ignimbrite; (ii) the arcuate remnants of the two large caldera collapses, and (iii) the
intracalderic scoria cones, lava domes and lava fields. A very dense distribution of dry
walls, built since Roman times, perfectly integrate the volcanic landscape, preventing from
erosion and rock falls.
Keywords
Volcanic island
41.1
Ignimbrites
Introduction
Pantelleria is a volcanic island located in the central portion
of the Strait of Sicily Rift System, a domain of thinned
continental crust with abundant submarine and subaerial
magmatism (Rotolo et al. 2006; Civile et al. 2008). The
NW–SE elongation of Pantelleria, coincident with the main
axis of the Rift, reflects the influence of regional tectonics,
also evident in the distribution of volcano-tectonic features
(eruptive centres and fissures, exhalative areas; Catalano
et al. 2009).
The most prominent morphostructural features of the
island are the remnants of the two nested calderas (Mahood
and Hildreth 1986): the older one is named La Vecchia
caldera and its collapse is dated 140–145 ka (Rotolo et al.
2013); the younger one is named Cinque Denti (or
S.G. Rotolo (&) V. Agnesi C. Conoscenti G. Lanzo
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e del Mare (DiSTeM),
Università di Palermo, Via Archirafi 22, 90123 Palermo, Italy
e-mail: silvio.rotolo@unipa.it
Caldera
Pantelleria
Strait of Sicily
Monastero) caldera and its collapse is associated with the
Green Tuff Plinian eruption (Civetta et al. 1984; Mahood
and Hidreth 1986). Caldera rims are preserved only at places
(Fig. 41.1) being largely eroded or covered by younger
eruptions. The traces of the two calderas are roughly concentric with a maximum offset of 1 km in the south (Serra
Ghirlanda area), while they are apparently coincident in the
north and east sectors of the island.
From the compositional viewpoint, the erupted volcanic
rocks are mostly pantellerites (i.e. peralkaline rhyolites), less
commonly trachytes and subordinately basalts. Although an
ample variety of eruptive products is represented (ignimbrites, pumice falls, lava flows), explosive volcanism
largely dominated the volcanological history of the island.
Finally, it is worth of note the interaction of human
activities with the geological context. Since the Roman age,
the central area of the island which is dominated by poorly
consolidated tephra, was the most fertile and densely cultivated. However, cultivations are diffuse also in very rough
areas, such as lava fields or steep volcano flanks, where dry
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_41
479
480
S.G. Rotolo et al.
Fig. 41.1 Location of Pantelleria and simplified geological map of the
island (modified after Rotolo et al. 2007). 1 Alluvium and fill; 2
Post-Green Tuff basalts; 3 Pre-Green Tuff basalts; 4 Post-Green Tuff
pantelleritic pumice falls and lava flows; 5 Pre-Green Tuff pantellerites;
6 Trachyte lavas; 7 Green Tuff; 8 Faults; 9 Cinque Denti caldera rim;
10 La Vecchia caldera rim; 11 Principal eruptive vents
walls are used to form narrow terraces. The dry walls, mostly
made of pantellerite lava, represent together with the ubiquitous hollow towers (called “Pantelleria gardens” and built
to protect lemon trees from the wind), the typical markers of
the man-made landscape of Pantelleria, perfectly integrated
in the geological scenario.
41.2
Geographical Setting
Pantelleria is rising from a water depth of 2000 m below the
sea level (Agnesi and Federico 1995) and extends for
83 km2 between the latitudes 36°44′03″N and 36°50′20″N
and the longitudes 11°57′13″E and 12°03′30″E, being
41
Pantelleria Island (Strait of Sicily): Volcanic History and Geomorphological Landscape
481
95 km (51 nautical miles) far from the Sicilian coastline and
67 km (36 nautical miles) from Cape Bon (Tunisia)
(Fig. 41.1).
Pantelleria is the fifth Italian island, after Sicily, Sardinia,
Elba and Sant’Antioco. It has the shape of an irregular ellipse
oriented approximately NW–SE, whose length and width are
around 14 and 8 km, respectively. Its perimeter is 51.5 km.
From the morphological viewpoint, two sectors of the
island can be clearly distinguished: a mountainous sector
which occupies the southeast portion of the island and a hilly
sector located in the northwestern zone (Fig. 41.2). The first
one, which is larger, includes the highest peak of the island,
Montagna Grande (836 m a.s.l.), in addition to the mounts of
Mt. Gibele (700 m) and Cùddia (an arabic word standing for
hill) Attalora (560 m). Conversely, the northwestern sector
is characterized by the reliefs of Mt. Gelfiser (394 m) and
Mt. Gelkhamar (247 m).
The northern sector of the area is characterized by a low
and rocky shoreline that is interrupted by numerous bays and
small beaches; on the other hand, the southern coast presents
hard rock cliffs, locally exceeding 200 m of elevation, which
are also fragmented by small bays.
Fig. 41.2 Hillshade map of Pantelleria. 1 Cùddia Bruciata; 2 Punta
Spadillo; 3 Cala Cinque Denti; 4 Mt. Gelkhamar; 5 Cùddia Randazzo; 6
Cùddia Gallo; 7 west of Khamma; 8 Cala Tramontana; 9 Mt. Gelfiser;
10 Cala Levante; 11 Cùddia Mueggen; 12 Cùddia Sciuvechi; 13 Cùddia
Mida; 14 Montagna Grande; 15 Mt. Gibele; 16 Gibile 1; 17 Gibile 2; 18
Cùddia Scauri; 19 Fossa Russo; 20 Cùddia Attalora; 21 Salto La
Vecchia
482
S.G. Rotolo et al.
The position of Pantelleria generates climatic conditions
typical of a transitional environment, with the peculiar
characteristics of both the southern sector of Italy and the
coastal region of North Africa.
The mean annual precipitation measured at the climatic
station of the meteorological service of the Italian Air Force
(191 m), calculated for the period 1971–2000, is 502 mm.
November is the wettest month (mean rainfall 89.0 mm),
whereas July is the driest one (mean rainfall 1.9 mm). Precipitation concentrates in the autumn/winter season, during
which around 80% of total annual rainfall occurs, with
maximum concentration in winter.
The mean annual temperature recorded in the same time
interval is 20.7 °C, whereas the mean monthly temperatures
range between 13.9 (January) and 29.0 °C (August).
41.3
Geological Evolution
The eruptive history of the island can be divided in two
distinct periods: before and after the Green Tuff eruption
(44 ka).
(i) The old period (300 to 44 ka) was dominated by medium to high-energy explosive eruptions, with seven
(including the Green Tuff) very powerful eruptions that
covered large sectors of the island with ignimbrite sheets
(ignimbrite is the rock deriving from emplacement,
cooling and welding of pyroclastic flows). More in
detail, the two oldest ignimbrites were emplaced at 181
and 175 ka (Mahood and Hildreth 1986) in the south
sector of the island, burying some old volcanic centres
(e.g. Cùddia Scauri). A later eruption (dated 140–
145 ka; Rotolo et al. 2013) caused the first caldera
collapse (“La Vecchia” caldera) whose rim is visible in
a superb exposure at Salto La Vecchia. Volcanism
younger then 140 ka partly filled the La Vecchia caldera: one ignimbrite erupted at 125 ka was emplaced in
the NW to NE sectors of the island, while two other
ignimbrites (105 and 85 ka) covered almost all the
island and are well visible in the vertical coastal cliffs
(exceeding 200 m in height) west and south of Scauri
village (Fig. 41.3), or at Salto La Vecchia, where these
ignimbrites lap onto the La Vecchia caldera wall. The
last high-energy eruption was the Green Tuff (age 44 ka,
Fig. 41.3 Cliffs of the southwestern sector of Pantelleria (2.5 km south of Scauri). From bottom to top three pantellerite lava flows, and five piled
ignimbrite units. The ages (ka) of ignimbrites are from Rotolo et al. (2013)
41
Pantelleria Island (Strait of Sicily): Volcanic History and Geomorphological Landscape
Scaillet et al. 2013) to which the second caldera collapse
was related, the “Cinque Denti” caldera (Mahood and
Hildreth 1986) or “Monastero” caldera (Civetta et al.
1984).
The Green Tuff represents the most powerful eruption on
the island (Plinian) (Lanzo et al. 2013) and produced a low
aspect ratio ignimbrite (i.e. height/diameter ratio), impressive in its mantle-like distribution all over the island.
The Green Tuff has a very variable thickness: it thins out
to 1 m in the lee-side of reliefs (with respect to the direction
of the propagation of the pyroclastic flows) and thickens to
20 m in paleovalleys. This behaviour, typical of pyroclastic
flows, results in a general flattening of the pre-existing
topography.
(ii) The young period is related to the restart of activity
after the Green Tuff eruption. Volcanism was much less
explosive and was centred almost exclusively within
the Cinque Denti caldera. The caldera was filled for
around two-thirds with acidic (trachyte to pantellerite)
magmas that formed pumice cones, lava flows and lava
domes.
The first eruption after the Cinque Denti caldera collapse
was the voluminous eruption (3 km3) of trachyte lavas that
now form the Mt. Gibele—Montagna Grande complex (age
35–28 ka, Mahood and Hildreth 1986). As first proposed by
Mahood and Hildreth (1986), Montagna Grande represents a
tilted block that was separated by the Mt. Gibele source vent
by a trapdoor fault running NE–SW. Along the fault-hinges
Fig. 41.4 The Randazzo
volcanic centre (centre-left); note
the pumice ring encircling a
broken dome
483
bordering the Montagna Grande tilted block, pantellerite
magmas found a way to the surface, building a number of
volcanic structures: (i) low-volume lava domes in the
western side (Fossa Russo and the two Mt. Gibile),
(ii) pumice cones and lava domes in the northern sector
(Cùddia Mida, Cùddia Sciuvechi, Cùddia Gelfiser, Cùddia
Gallo, Cùddia Randazzo) and (iii) a shield volcano (Cùddia
Mueggen) in the east side.
Cùddia Gallo is also the youngest eruption of this sector
with an age of 6–8 ka (Rotolo et al. 2007; Speranza et al.
2010; Scaillet et al. 2011). The most recent volcanic event
was the 1891 submarine eruption that occurred 5 km off the
NW coast of the island (Washington 1909) and produced
floating basaltic scoriae, steam columns, but also earthquake
swarms and the uplift of 1–2 m of the northern coast of the
island (Riccò 1892).
41.4
Landscapes, Landforms and Human
Activities
The complex volcano-tectonic history of Pantelleria strongly
controls the island morphological evolution. Two main
morphological sectors are evident on the island and witness
the progressive migration of volcanism from southern to
northern sectors. The present-day landscape is mainly controlled by gravitational and coastal processes and is markedly influenced by increasing human activities. In order to
illustrate the geomorphological variety of the island, we
identify the following morphological elements, representative of the different landscape types.
484
S.G. Rotolo et al.
Fig. 41.5 The Khaggiar lava
field, view from the summit of
Cùddia Randazzo
Fig. 41.6 A view of the southeastern sector of the island (looking
NW). At the centre left Mt. Gibele, whose trachyte lava flowed in the
young caldera plain. On the very background it is visible the summit of
Montagna Grande, the highest relief of the island (836 m). A small
portion of Mueggen pantellerite lava shield volcano is barely visible at
the extreme right of the photo
41
Pantelleria Island (Strait of Sicily): Volcanic History and Geomorphological Landscape
Cùddia Randazzo complex—The Randazzo volcanic
centre (age 7–8 ka BP; Speranza et al. 2010; Scaillet et al.
2011) consists of (Fig. 41.4): (i) a pumice cone of 400–
500 m in diameter; (ii) a later pantellerite lava dome intruded
in the core of the pumice cone. The dome is ruptured with a
V-shape, opened towards NE; (iii) the break-up of the dome
originated the Cuttinar-Khaggiar pantellerite lava field
(Fig. 41.5) that extends up to Punta Spadillo, 2.5 km from
the source vent of Cùddia Randazzo. In the very abrupt
morphology of obsidianaceous pantellerite lavas, it is still
possible to recognize traces of old man-made terraces and a
Roman path that leads to the seaside.
Cùddia Mueggen—Mueggen is a young (age 18 ka,
Scaillet et al. 2011) pantellerite shield volcano located in
the eastern sector of the island, between Montagna Grande
to the west and the La Vecchia caldera rim (at
Khamma-Serra Ghirlanda) to the east (Fig. 41.6). Mueggen
lavas flowed down to the sea, NE of the village of
Khamma, in a narrow lava flow. Shield volcanoes are
usually fed by poorly viscous mafic magmas, able to
expand at 360° and maintaining a low aspect ratio, while
are very uncommon in rhyolite magmas (very viscous).
The exception of Mueggen is due to the relatively fluid
behaviour of some alkali-rich pantellerite magma, with
respect to the “normal” alkali-poor rhyolites.
Fig. 41.7 The intra-caldera Lake Specchio di Venere (looking east)
485
The intra-caldera Lake Specchio di Venere (Fig. 41.7)—
The Lake Specchio di Venere (literally Venus mirror) is a
subcircular endhoreic lake, 450 350 m wide, with a
maximum depth of 13 m (Bocchi et al. 1988) and the water
table just one metre above the present-day sea level. The
north margin of the lake is coincident with the north side of
the young caldera wall, and the substratum of the lake is
composed of the caldera debris and the Green Tuff. The
water of the lake is a result of mixing of meteoric,
hydrothermal and sea water (Aiuppa et al. 2007). The
southwestern shoreline is characterized by several CO2-rich
hydrothermal springs.
The human activity in Pantelleria since the Phoenician
age (fourth–third century BC) has produced a particular
landscape characterized by the presence of dry walls,
man-made terraces and circular towers. The dry walls have a
height generally in the range of 1–2 m (Fig. 41.8a), and can
be found all over the island, although they are rather more
common in sectors close to lava fields, whose rugged morphology required the use of the dry walls to form small
terraces. The latter constitute portions of land surface suitable for agriculture activities, the main of which is viticulture, largely related to the production of the Zibibbo grape
(whose name derives from the Arabic word zabib = raisins).
This grape is used to produce the sweet wine named Passito,
486
S.G. Rotolo et al.
Fig. 41.8 a The characteristic dry walls; b the circular towers,
Pantelleria gardens, built to protect lemon trees from strong winds
which is one of the principal high quality productions of the
island.
The circular towers (Fig. 41.8b), which are locally called
“jardino pantesco” (Pantellerian garden), are built to protect
lemon trees (typically one or two) from strong winds that
blow on the island in any season. They are circular structures
(diameter 5–8 m, height 3–6 m, wall thickness 1 m),
roofless and made of stones. These structures have a single
narrow opening for access at the base. The thick walls retain
moisture, helping to keep a particularly mild microclimate
inside the garden. Unlike lemon trees, caper plants need
windy exposures which particularly occur in the southern
sector of the island.
41.5
Conclusion
During its early lifetime, Pantelleria experienced a series of
ignimbrite-forming eruptions that culminated with a caldera
collapse at 140–145 ka. The magnitude of the eruptions
reached a peak with the Green Tuff (44 ka) eruption, related
also to a second caldera collapse. The volcanism younger
than the Green Tuff was much less explosive in comparison
with the older period and was also punctuated by numerous
pantellerite lava flows.
The complex interplay of tephra distribution and
volcano-tectonic events created a landscape dominated by:
(i) the ubiquitous mantling of the Green Tuff; (ii) the
younger caldera depression and, only at places, the barely
visible traces of the older caldera; (iii) young pumice and
scoria cones, lava fields and lava domes, concentrated
mostly within the young caldera.
The most recent eruption (1891 AD) was submarine,
5 km offshore, while the youngest onshore eruption was a
low-energy Strombolian pumice fallout at Cùddia Gallo with
an age of 6-8 ka. Although the island is rated with a low
probability of unrest, the composition and temperature of
thermal waters and CO2 concentration of some well-known
exhalating areas, are periodically monitored.
Due to the richness of flora, fauna and the uniqueness of
landscapes that still preserve the typical ecosystem of the
Mediterranean shrub, about one-third of the island is protected (Riserva Naturale Orientata Isola di Pantelleria) and
connected through a dense network of footpaths; some of
them are very ancient and scenically cross lava domes or
lava fields. The presence of a Museum of Volcanology at
Punta Spadillo, with illustrated geological itineraries, makes
the Island a perfect site for geotourism, given the superb
quality of exposures, the variety of volcanological scenarios
and the perfect integration of volcanic landscapes with
human activities. The ubiquitous occurrence of dry walls
remodeled the topographic surface preventing erosion and
rock falls. In addition, it increased the availability of areas
for the cultivation of Zibibbo grape, used for the production
of the famous Passito wine.
Acknowledgements Thanks are due to an anonymous reviewer for
very helpful comments and to M. Soldati and M. Marchetti for their
careful editorial handling.
References
Agnesi V, Federico C (1995) Aspetti geografico-fisici e geologici di
Pantelleria e delle isole Pelagie (Canale di Sicilia). Naturalista
Siciliano 19:1–22
Aiuppa A, D’Alessandro W, Gurrieri S, Madonia P, Parello F (2007)
Hydrologic and geochemical survey of the lake “Specchio di Venere”
(Pantelleria island, Southern Italy). Environ Geol 53:903–913
Bocchi G, Gabbianelli G, Lanzafame G, Lucchini F, Rabbi E, Rossi PL
(1988) Relazione sui rilievi eseguiti sul “Lago Specchio di Venere”,
Pantelleria. Bull Italian Natl Gr Volcanol 4:63–73
Catalano S, De Guidi G, Lanzafame G, Monaco C, Tortorici L (2009)
Late Quaternary deformation on the island of Pantelleria: new
constraints for the recent tectonic evolution of the Sicily Channel
Rift (Southern Italy). J Geodyn 48:75–82
41
Pantelleria Island (Strait of Sicily): Volcanic History and Geomorphological Landscape
Civetta L, Cornette Y, Crisci G, Gillot PY, Orsi G, Requejo CS (1984)
Geology, geochronology and chemical evolution of the island of
Pantelleria. Geol Mag 121:541–562
Civile D, Lodolo E, Tortorici L, Lanzafame G, Brancolini G (2008)
Relationships between magmatism and tectonics in a continental
rift: the Pantelleria Island region (Sicily Channel, Italy). Mar Geol
251:32–46
Lanzo G, Landi P, Rotolo SG (2013) Volatiles in pantellerite magmas:
a case study of the Green Tuff Plinian eruption. J Volcanol Geoth
Res 262:153–163
Mahood GA, Hildreth W (1986) Geology of the peralkaline volcano at
Pantelleria, Strait of Sicily. Bull Volcanol 48:143–172
Riccò A (1892) Terremoti, sollevamenti e eruzione sottomarina a
Pantelleria nella seconda metà di ottobre 1891. Bollettino Società
Geografica Italiana 29:1–31
Rotolo SG, Castorina F, Cellura D, Pompilio M (2006) Petrology and
geochemistry of submarine volcanism in the Sicily channel rift.
J Geol 114:355–365
487
Rotolo SG, La Felice S, Mangalaviti A, Landi P (2007) Geology and
petrochemistry of the recent (<25 ka) silicic volcanism at Pantelleria island. Bollettino Società Geologica Italiana 126:191–208
Rotolo SG, Scaillet S, La Felice S, Vita-Scaillet G (2013) A revision of
the structure and stratigraphy of pre-Green Tuff ignimbrites at
Pantelelria (Strait of Sicily). J Volcanol Geoth Res 250:61–74
Scaillet S, Rotolo SG, La Felice S, Vita G (2011) High-resolution
40
Ar/39Ar chronostratigraphy of the post-caldera (<20 ka) volcanic
activity at Pantelleria, Sicily Strait. Earth Planet Sci Lett 309:280–290
Scaillet S, Vita-Scaillet G, Rotolo SG (2013) Millenial-scale phase
relationships between ice-core and Mediterranean marine records:
insights from high-precision 40Ar/39Ar dating of the Green Tuff of
Pantelleria, Sicily Strait. Quatern Sci Rev 78:141–154
Speranza F, Landi P, D’Ajello Caracciolo F, Pignatelli A (2010)
Paleomagnetic dating of the most recent silicic eruptive activity at
Pantelleria (Strait of Sicily). Bull Volcanol 72:847–858
Washington HS (1909) The submarine eruptions of 1831 and 1891 near
Pantelleria. Am J Sci 237:131–150
Part III
Geoheritage
42
Geoheritage in Italy
Maria Cristina Giovagnoli
Abstract
The geoheritage of a country is one of the expressions of its geodiversity and Italy is a rich
country in both of them. Nevertheless, Italy is still far from having a national geoheritage
conservation strategy. In Italy, there is no national protection law about geoheritage which
is protected only indirectly by the Cultural Assets Code and the national Law on Protected
Areas and by only three regional laws strictly connected with geoheritage. In the Italian
Geoparks of the EGN, European Geoparks Network, the geoheritage is protected and
enhanced. Four Italian sites are in the UNESCO World Natural Heritage List, which has the
aim of sharing with the whole world the responsibility of preserving these sites of
outstanding properties.
Keywords
Geodiversity
Heritage Site
42.1
Geoconservation
Introduction
The wide range of the Italian peninsula landscapes and their
uniqueness are strictly connected with its rich geological
variety, with its geodiversity. The geological diversity has
also largely influenced land use and the distribution of
habitats and location of human settlements. However, in the
last years the relevance of the geological component is slow
to be widely accepted by the Italian public opinion, unlike
the growing awareness of the importance of preserving
ecosystems and biodiversity. Geologists and geomorphologists started using the term geodiversity in the 1990s with
slightly different meanings in different parts of the world,
and in general it stands for the natural range of geological
(rocks, minerals, fossils) and geomorphological (landforms,
processes) and soil features of a territory and, according to
Gray (2004), it includes their assemblages, relationships,
properties, interpretations and systems. The geoheritage of a
M.C. Giovagnoli (&)
Istituto Superiore per la Ricerca e la Protezione Ambientale
(ISPRA), Via Vitaliano Brancati 60, 00148 Rome, Italy
e-mail: cristina.giovagnoli@isprambiente.it
Geopark
European Geoparks Network
World
country is one of the expressions of its geodiversity, a term
which implies the complexity and variety of geology and
which is used to describe the variety within abiotic nature,
whereas biodiversity means biological diversity.
Geoheritage includes sites or areas—the geosites, which
have a special role in the reconstruction of the Earth’s history and which show different geological characteristics:
rocks, fossils and minerals recording how life evolved or
how volcanism, sea level changes, erosion and other geomorphological processes have shaped the landscape and are
continuing to shape it today. All the geosites of a territory
represent its geoheritage.
42.2
Geoconservation and Geoheritage
Protection in Italy
In the mid-1990s, a general discussion about geological
heritage started in the Italian scientific community (Panizza
and Piacente 1993; Brancucci et al. 1999) in the wake of a
burgeoning of activities in Europe, but while in most
European countries the interest in geoheritage had been
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_42
491
492
determined by an environmental preservation policy, in Italy
a geoheritage legislation has yet to be formulated.
As a matter of fact, in Italy the Code of Cultural and
Landscape Assets (Law N. 42 of 2004) is the only national
law that regards geological heritage. It deals with both cultural and environmental assets but not with geoconservation.
This law refers to the territory as the result of the interaction
between human and natural factors and states both that
geological peculiarities (geosites) are under protection, if
they are included in the town-and-country planning, and that
some of them must be comprised therein. This is the reason
why, in the last few years, local authorities in Italy have
developed regional inventories of geosites.
Some Italian regions, as a result of this law, have
developed an interest in geoconservation and have issued
regional laws dealing specifically with geological heritage
such as Emilia-Romagna in 2006, and Liguria and Apulia in
2009. In 2012, Sicily also issued a law about geosites but not
directly dedicated to geological heritage and merely concerning the inventory of Sicilian geosites; however it may be
a first step towards a geoheritage conservation project for the
Island.
Another national legislative instrument which provides,
although indirectly, an effective protection of geoheritage is
the Framework Law on Protected Areas N. 394/1991. This
law also takes into account the geological characteristics of a
territory which are listed among features of relevant environmental importance legally required to establish an Italian
Protected Area (national, regional, etc.). The geosites which
are inside a protected area are protected by all the rules
which regulate a park, a reserve, etc.
A specific national law dealing with geoheritage is still
eagerly awaited for, while national activity of inventorying
started at the beginning of the third millennium, with the aim
of getting to know Italian geoheritage.
At the beginning of the 2000s, the Italian Geological
Survey started a project on geoheritage, with the aim of
producing a systematically compiled inventory of the most
valuable sites of geological interest in Italy. The inventory
was intended to be an instrument for gaining understanding
of the Italian geological heritage. Sites were selected on the
basis of information from published resources and data and
only a very small part of them came from adequate research
or site visits undertaken. The entire Italian coverage was
selected from scratch, in a relatively short time (about two
years). The implementation was not based on a
pre-established geological framework but it was approximately based on geological domains such as geomorphology, palaeontology, stratigraphy, mineralogy, etc. Data
collected for each geosite were related to general and geological characterization, illustrations, references and additional characteristics. The results of this first part of the
project were then collected in a database. The second part of
M.C. Giovagnoli
the activity was conducted sharing national and local experience about geosites and modifying the national format for
the geosite collection, taking into account local geological
situations, administrative use and touristic purposes.
Currently, the general characterization of each geosite
includes: (i) geosite identification, (ii) geographical and
administrative identification, (iii) access, (iv) legal protection, vulnerability and risks of degradation.
The geological characterization describes the geosite and
validates its inclusion in the Inventory: (i) scientific interest
(i.e. geological context) and its assessment: palaeontology,
mineralogy, geomorphology, etc., (ii) rare, representative or
illustrative, (iii) related interest: cultural, naturalistic, geotouristic, etc., (iv) scientific relevance: local, regional or
national, (v) geological content: main lithologies,
geochronology, a brief geological description, (vi) illustrations: pictures, excerpts of geological maps, geological
sections, etc., (vii) references: pdf of scientific and informative literature and any other published document about
the site.
As a result of this activity, the Italian Geosites Inventory
is today a geodatabase published on the ISPRA website
(Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research,
which includes the Geological Survey of Italy) and it can be
freely consulted (http://sgi.isprambiente.it/geositiweb/). At
the moment the geodatabase contains data about approximately three thousand geosites and half of them are geomorphological sites. Geosites are important for their
particular geological, scientific features but certainly the
scenic impact of coastal cliffs and foreshore, U-shaped valleys and cirques, clints and grikes, dolines, lakes, canyons,
badlands, etc., lends geosites an impact that cannot be
underestimated.
Inventorying geosites is also a way to disseminate the
knowledge of geoheritage and to bring it closer to the general public. Knowledge is, in fact, the first and perhaps the
best way of preserving geoheritage. The best protection
comes when people have a hand in it, when they feel that a
geosite is something that belongs to them.
42.3
Italian Geoparks
In the last 20 years, the general interest in geoheritage has
grown in Italy and a new approach to the geological study of
an area, taking into account also the social, cultural and
economic life has developed.
This kind of approach has been perfectly put into practice
by the Geoparks of the European Geoparks Network (EGN).
A Geopark, in fact, plays an important role in the economic
development of its territory enhancing the geological heritage of the area through community involvement, aiming at
the economic development of the region.
42
Geoheritage in Italy
The EGN was born on the initiative of four European
regions: Haute Provence (France), Maestrazgo/Teruel (Spain),
Lesvos Island (Greece) and Vulkaneifel (Germany), which
sensed the economic potential of their geoheritage and the
importance of developing projects involving both the naturalistic and the cultural richness of their territories. Their joint
analysis of the characteristics, perspectives and problems of
their respective terrains resulted in the definition of a common
development strategy focused on geological sustainable
development and on geotourism in particular.
Any region that wishes to be part of the EGN, must
complete a strict procedure in order to achieve high quality
standards in Geoparks (UNESCO 2006, 2008) and the
Fig. 42.1 Map of Italian
Geoparks (red circles) and World
Heritage Sites (blue stars)
493
membership is limited to a period of 4 years after which it
can be renewed following a revalidation process.
It should be remembered that a Geopark is not a protected
area according to the legal significance that Italian law
applies to this term. Therefore there are no legal restrictions
applicable to a Geopark in order to protect its geoheritage.
At the end of the 2014, there were 111 Global Geoparks
and their number is constantly changing. Currently there are
nine Geoparks in Italy (Fig. 42.1), Italy being the second
largest group in Europe, after Spain, whereas China is by far
the first one in the world.
The Italian Geoparks (Aloia and Burlando 2013) are also
natural regional parks, protected areas, with the exception of
494
M.C. Giovagnoli
Fig. 42.2 Madonie Geopark,
Sicily: the Carbonara tableland, a
plateau situated on Pizzo
Carbonara at an elevation
between 1500 and 1979 m a.s.l.
(photo P. Li Puma)
the Rocca di Cerere Geopark. The Tuscan Mining Geopark
and the Geological Mining park of Sardinia are also mining
parks.
The Madonie Geopark in northern Sicily (Fig. 42.2) was
the first Italian Geopark, joining the network in 2001. The
Madonie Mountains are a region of extraordinary interest,
both geological and botanical and cultural: rocks from Triassic to Pleistocene age outcrop in the area and are grouped
in units whose relationships are extremely complicated by
tectonics (Catalano and D’Argenio 1982). The geomorphological aspect of the Madonie is the result of the morphogenetic processes acting on different lithologies outcropping
and of the interaction of these processes with the tectonic
and neotectonic evolution of the region, as well as the climatic variations that continued during the Quaternary Period. The karst areas, a large plateau carved by hundred of
sinkholes, 1600 m above sea level, are among the most
impressive landscapes in the Madonie.
The Rocca di Cerere Geopark (Fig. 42.3) is located in the
central zone of Sicily (Lentini et al. 1987). The name has
been chosen because of the ancient consecration of this
territory to the chthonian deities. The area of the Geopark is
characterized by the presence of a gypsum-sulphurous plateau arisen during Messinian salinity crises (between 5.96
and 5.33 Ma ago) due to the drying up of the Mediterranean
Sea with the consequent deposition of evaporites. The
numerous, now closed down mines, with their significant
archaeological industrial settlements, are connected to the
Messinian deposits outcropping in the area.
The Beigua Geopark (Fig. 42.4) is located in Liguria
(northwestern Italy) and covers an area of particular interest
in reconstructing the evolution of the Alpine mountain chain
and its relationship with the Apennines, where extensive
exposures of ophiolites represent a fragment of the original
Jurassic ocean basin (Rovereto 1939). Geomorphological
processes in a periglacial environment have strongly affected
the landscape influencing the origin of a gentle morphology,
with accumulations of large block deposits like block
streams and block fields. Water effects on the Beigua
Geopark landscape are visible both as fluvial landforms, as
in the Valle Gargassa canyon, as well as in the contemporary
coastal settings in the form of cliffs and beaches. Relict
marine terraces and beach deposits are also present.
The Geological Mining Park of Sardinia (Fig. 42.5)
consists of eight different areas, each one identified by its
mineralogical and mining activity and by the historical and
human aspects related to mining (Zoppi 1888). It occupies
one-sixth of the total area of the Sardinia Island and is
characterized by spectacular landscapes and unique geological heritage. In Sardinia the oldest rocks in Italy outcrop,
dated to the Lower Cambrian. In fact, the island was part of
the paleo-European margin until its counterclockwise rotation during Oligocene-Early Miocene. The important processes of metallogenesis and minerogenesis occurred during
millions of years, resulting in the most significant mineral
deposits in Italy, and Sardinia was in the past the first mining
district in Italy. The almost total abandonment of mining at
the end of the twentieth century left an extraordinary
42
Geoheritage in Italy
495
Fig. 42.3 Rocca di Cerere
Geopark, Sicily: Gresti Castle on
Numidian Flysch (Late Oligocene
—Early Miocene) (photo G.
Amato)
Fig. 42.4 Beigua Geopark, Liguria: the Valle Gargassa, a spectacular
canyon which has been shaped in Valle Gargassa conglomeratic
formation (photo M. Saettone)
heritage of mining archaeology to be preserved and transmitted. Combined with the natural and archaeological heritage, this makes this Geopark truly unique.
The Adamello-Brenta Geopark (Fig. 42.6) covers a
key-area in northwestern Trentino, characterized by the
presence of tectonic border between the Austroalpine and the
Southern Alps, and the history of the geological units
outcropping in the area began in the Lower Paleozoic
(Castellarin and Vai 1982). Gorges, alluvial plains, fans,
landslides and detrital strata result from fluvial and
gravity-driven erosional and depositional processes which
occurred after the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). In the
Brenta Dolomites, the carbonatic rocks have been intensively carved by karstic processes which have obliterated or
erased glacial morphologies. Even hypogean karstification is
well developed and caves, cavities and karstic wells make
the Brenta Dolomites a very important karstic aquifer. On
Mount on the other hand, due to the plutonic origin of the
rocks, glacial morphologies dominate.
The Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni Geopark
(Fig. 42.7) located in the south of Campania (southern Italy)
is characterized by very dissected morphology with hilly
landscapes and deeply engraved valleys and a costal sector
with cliffs and limited coastal lowlands (Valente et al. 2017).
The Cilento landscape took shape mainly during the Quaternary and was strongly influenced by both tectonic evolution of the area and climatic changes during this period. On
the Mesozoic carbonate succession, karstic processes have
496
Fig. 42.5 Geological Mining Park of Sardinia: the coastal dune of Piscinas
Fig. 42.6 Adamello Brenta Geopark, Trentino Alto Adige: the geosite of Cima Vagliana (photo G. Alberti)
M.C. Giovagnoli
42
Geoheritage in Italy
497
Fig. 42.7 Cilento and Vallo di
Diano Geopark, Campania:
Calore Gorges near Felitto (photo
A. Aloia)
Fig. 42.8 Tuscan Mining
Geopark, Tuscany: a mining
deposit geosite known as “le
Roste” (photo R. Cinelli)
produced plateaus showing sinkholes and poljes, limited by
slopes and dissected by deep gorges and canyons.
The Tuscan Mining Geopark (Fig. 42.8) in southwestern
Tuscany coincides with the territory of the Colline Metallifere, the most important mining district in the Italian
peninsula (Lazzarotto et al. 2003). Geodiversity of this
region results from the long and complex geological evolution of southern Tuscany, mainly related to the formation
of the Apennine chain. These geological processes were
accompanied by intrusive and effusive magmatic activity
498
M.C. Giovagnoli
which has produced geothermal systems, as well as a
widespread hydrothermal circulation responsible for sulphide mineralization (mainly in the Colline Metallifere district). At present, the Larderello and Mt. Amiata geothermal
fields are active and exploited for production of geothermal
energy, for heating domestic and industrial structures. Several recent surface manifestations of the southern Tuscany
thermal anomaly occur in the Geopark territory, mainly as
gaseous emissions, hydrothermal springs, hydrothermally
altered rocks and travertine deposits, which have influenced
the history, economy and culture of the territory of the
Geopark.
The territory of the Apuane Alps Geopark is situated in
northwestern Tuscany. The Apuan mountains were named
“Alps” due to the presence of high peaks, different from
those of the Northern Apennines (Carmignani and Kligfield
1990). The “Alpine” morphology is more evident on the
coastal side of the region whereas the inland side has similar
characteristics but with a slightly more gentle profile. Apuan
stones, often grouped together under the trade name of
Carrara marbles, have always been famous. Quarrying
activity began in the sixth century BC and continues today.
The complex geological history of the area is responsible for
its high geodiversity: 19 mineral species have been discovered and described here for the first time, most of which are
exclusive to this area.
The youngest Italian Geopark in the EGN to date is the
Sesia—Val Grande Geopark. The name comes from two
alpine valleys which share the same geological heritage and
have decided to join in a single Geopark. The area is located
in northeastern Piedmont (northwestern Italy), where it sits
astride the Canavese segment of the Insubric Line, a
1-km-thick mylonite belt that is a major tectonic boundary of
the Alps (Fountain 1976). Accessible outcrops display the
effects of dramatic geological processes that shaped the
continental crust at a wide range of crustal levels, from
high-grade metamorphism, magmatism, anatexis and ductile
deformation at depths as great as 25–30 km, to the explosive
eruption of a “supervolcano” 282 million years ago.
42.4
The World Heritage List
The main purpose of the UNESCO—Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage is to increase the States’ awareness on issues related to
knowledge and conservation of their own heritage. In particular, the Convention establishes a List that includes the
most important and representative examples of heritage,
either natural or cultural, which are considered to have
values that are essential for the whole of mankind, no matter
where they are located. The concept of “outstanding universal value” is the peculiarity of this List. The sites selected
are the best examples of cultural and natural heritage on a
world basis or specific to certain geographical areas and
within a specific category of properties. The purpose of the
List is to identify properties of outstanding value and to
share with the whole world the responsibility of preserving
them for future generations. Currently there are 49 Italian
sites of outstanding universal value. Four of them (Fig. 42.1)
are natural properties: the Aeolian Islands (since 2000),
Monte San Giorgio (2003, extended in 2010), the Dolomites
(2009) and Mount Etna (2013).
The Aeolian Islands are the emergent portions of large
volcanic edifices rising ca. 2000–3000 m above the seafloor
and are the most active volcanic structure in the Mediterranean area (Lucchi et al. 2017). Stromboli and Vulcano are
presently active, Panarea and Lipari are dormant, whilst
Salina, Filicudi and Alicudi are extinct volcanoes. The
Aeolian Islands volcanism has entirely developed during the
Quaternary, starting from ca. 1.3 Ma in the submarine areas
(Beccaluva et al. 1985) and ca. 270–250 ka in the emergent
portions. All the Aeolian Islands are polygenic composite
volcanic edifices resulting from the interplay of successive
eruptive sequences and volcano-tectonic collapses through
time. Implications for volcanic hazard and risk assessment
are primarily related to the currently active volcanoes of
Stromboli and Vulcano.
The Italian Dolomites have been recognized by UNESCO
as a World Heritage Property in 2009. They are located in
northern Italy, in the southeastern sector of the Alpine chain
but, from the geological view point, they belong to the
Southern Alps and are a segment of the African margin. The
outcropping rocks are mainly of sedimentary origin and were
deposited in a warm tropical sea during the middle Triassic
and in a vast tidal flat during the late Triassic, when the most
famous and spectacular geological formation of the Dolomites, the Dolomia Principale, was formed. During the
middle Triassic the region was characterized by intense
volcanic activity. The superb landscapes of Dolomites are
the result of geomorphological processes which acted during
the Quaternary and particularly since the LGM, on rocks
with very different geomechanical behaviour. Hence, the
variety of landforms which makes the Dolomites a unique
place in the world (Panizza 2009; Soldati 2010).
The latest Italian site on the List was Mount Etna,
inscribed in 2013. Etna is one of the largest continental
volcanoes in the world, characterized by an almost continuous eruptive activity. It dominates eastern Sicily, being
over 3300 m high. Its typical landforms have developed
during the past 60 ka in a period in which the main bulk of
the stratovolcano structure was formed and they were generated through both constructive and destructive processes
(Azzaro et al. 2012). Interrelationships between human
activity and volcanic activity have continued since the
Neolithic. Except for a few hiatuses, volcanic activity has
42
Geoheritage in Italy
never stopped to this day and there have been a number of
major eruptions over the last 50 years which have had significant impacts on human activity. At present it is interesting to observe how the impact on human activity has
always been short-lived, recovery has been rapid, and the
society has showed a strong resilience to disasters.
In 2010 UNESCO approved the extension of Monte San
Giorgio, Switzerland, to include the portion of Monte San
Giorgio located in Italy, on the basis of natural criteria. The
site is listed as: “transboundary property”. The property
encompasses the complete Middle Triassic (240–230 Ma)
outcrop of Monte San Giorgio, one of the most famous
fossil-bearing outcrops and the most important in the world
in terms of marine vertebrates. The fauna is characterized by
an exceptional state of conservation and an extremely high
number of findings which have led to the identification of
about 30 species of marine and terrestrial reptiles, about
eighty species of fish, more than one hundred invertebrate
species, and several plants. Reptiles are the most spectacular,
some specimens being more than six metres long. Sauropterygians, a taxon of aquatic reptiles, is the most represented one in the outcrop while the land-based fauna is more
restricted and includes a complete skeleton of Ticinosuchus
(Krebs 1965), the first to be discovered in the northern
hemisphere. A continuous scientific study of the site has
been carried out in the last 75 years by Zurich, Switzerland,
and Milan, Italy, research teams.
The popularity that derives from being included in the
List certainly brings with it immediate economic effects and
makes local communities aware of the value of the place
where they live. In general, the action of the Convention has
focused attention on issues related to conservation and
protection of the heritage and it has recommended each State
party to the Convention to identify innovative tools for
managing heritage, combining conservation and protection
with sustainable development, which would also aim at
improving the socio-economic situation and the quality of
life of the population. Being on the List is a great opportunity but not a direct instrument for preserving natural heritage and consequently, the geological one too.
42.5
Conclusions
As the EGN Network experience shows very effectively,
geological heritage can become an economic resource. In the
same way, as Geoparks have developed successfully throughout Europe, geotourism and geological focused sustainable
tourism could be a new economic strategy which would offer
an indirect protection to geosites. Enhancement projects,
exploring strategies for attracting tourists and providing them
499
with positive experience, are on the way and in the next years
we will see if projects focused on geoheritage have got off the
ground in Italy. The positive side effects of these activities
should be better awareness of geoheritage and consequently
public cooperation in its protection. Participation in protection
would be the most efficient solution, while awaiting a law
dedicated to the safeguarding of the Italian geoheritage that at
present is still only the subject of debate among experts.
References
Aloia A, Burlando M (eds) (2013) Geoparchi Italiani—Italian Geoparks. Forum Nazionale dei Geoparchi Italiani, Italia, 64 pp
Azzaro R, Branca S, Gwinner K, Coltelli M (2012) The
volcano-tectonic map of Etna volcano, 1:100.000 scale: an
integrated approach based on a morphotectonic analysis from
high-resolution DEM constrained by geologic, active faulting and
seismotectonic data. Ital J Geosci 131(1):153–170
Beccaluva L, Gabbianelli G, Lucchini F, Rossi PL, Savelli C (1985)
Petrology and K/Ar ages of volcanics dredged from the Aeolian
seamounts: implications for geodynamic evolution of the Southern
Tyrrhenian basin. Earth Planet Sci Lett 74:187–208
Brancucci G, Carton A, Pavia G (1999) Scheda inventario geositi.
Geoitalia 4:43–49
Carmignani L, Kligfield R (1990) Crustal extension in northern
Apennines the transition from compression to the extension in the
Alpi Apuane core complex. Tectonics 9(6):1273–1303
Castellarin A, Vai GB (1982) Introduzione alla geologia strutturale del
Sudalpino. In: Castellarin A, Vai GB (eds) Guida alla Geologia del
Sudalpino centro-orientale. Guide Geologiche Regionali, Società
Geologica Italiana, Bologna, pp 1–22
Catalano R, D’Argenio B (1982) Schema geologico della Sicilia. In:
Catalano R, D’Argenio B (eds) Guida alla geologia della Sicilia
occidentale. Guide Geologiche Regionali, Società Geologica Italiana, Palermo, pp 9–41
Fountain DM (1976) The Ivrea-Verbano and Strona-Ceneri Zones,
Northern Italy: a cross section of the continental crust—new
evidence from seismic velocities of rock samples. Tectonophysics
33:145–165
Gray M (2004) Geodiversity. Valuing and conserving abiotic nature.
Wiley, Chichester, 434 pp
Krebs B (1965) Ticinosuchus ferox nov.gen. nov.sp. Einneuer Pseudosuchieraus der Trias des Monte San Giorgio. Neues Jahrbuch für
Geologie und Paläontology 81:1–140
Lazzarotto A, Aldinucci M, Cirilli S, Costantini A, Decandia FA,
Pandeli E, Sandrelli F, Spina A (2003) Stratigraphic correlation of
the Upper Palaeozoic-Triassic successions in Tuscany, Italy: a
review. Bollettino Società Geologica Italiana 1:25–35
Lentini F, Catalano S, Carbone S, Grasso M, Monaco C (1987)
Presentazione della carta geologica della Sicilia centro-orientale.
Bollettino Geofisica Teorica e Applicata 36(141–144):102–125
Lucchi F, Romagnoli C, Tranne CA (2017) Volcanic landforms and
landscapes of the Aeolian Islands (Southern Tyrrhenian Sea, Sicily):
implications for hazard evaluation. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M
(eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy, Springer, Cham, pp 443–453
Panizza M (2009) The geomorphodiversity of the Dolomites (Italy): a
key of geoheritage assessment. Geoheritage 1:33–42
Panizza M, Piacente S (1993) Geomorphological assets evaluation.
Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie NF Suppl Bd 87:13–18
500
Rovereto G (1939) Liguria geologica. Memorie Società Geologica
Italiana 2:1–743
Soldati M (2010) Dolomites: the spectacular landscape of the “Pale
Mountains”. In: Migon P (ed) Geomorphological landscapes of the
world. Springer Science + Business Media BV, Dordrecht, pp 191–199
UNESCO (2006) Guidelines and criteria for national geoparks seeking
UNESCO’s assistance to join the global geoparks network. Internal
Document, Paris, 10 pp
UNESCO (2008) European geoparks, earth heritage protection and
sustainable local development. Published by the Natural History Museum of the Lesvos Petrified Forest on behalf of the
European Geoparks Network, 176 pp
Valente A, Magliulo P, Russo F (2017) The coastal landscape of
Cilento (Southern Italy): a challenge for protection and tourism
valorization. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and
landforms of Italy, Springer, Cham, pp 409–419
M.C. Giovagnoli
Zoppi G (1888) Descrizione geologico-mineraria dell’Iglesiente.
Memorie Descrittive Carta Geologica d’Italia 4:1–154
Websites
http://whc.unesco.org/ World Heritage website
http://www.europeangeoparks.org/ Geoparks. Official Website of the
European Geoparks Network
http://www.geoparchitaliani.it/ Geoparchi Italiani. Sito ufficiale dei
Geoparchi in Italia
http://sgi.isprambiente.it/geositiweb/ The Italian Geosite Website
of ISPRA, Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and
Research
43
Geomorphodiversity in Italy: Examples
from the Dolomites, Northern Apennines
and Vesuvius
Mario Panizza and Sandra Piacente
Abstract
Following the concept of geomorphodiversity (Panizza 2009), the extrinsic and intrinsic
peculiarities of the geomorphology of the Dolomites, Emilia-Romagna Apennines and
Vesuvius volcano are outlined. The Dolomites show an exceptional beauty and unique
landscape. The inclusion in the UNESCO World Heritage List is an important scientific
achievement, owing mainly to their geomorphological importance. The Emilia-Romagna
Apennines, a candidate for enrolment in the European Geopark Network, show a
multifaceted and complex image from the geomorphological point of view. They constitute
an educational example to illustrate geomorphic evolution, gypsum karst phenomena and
morphodynamic peculiarities. The Vesuvius volcano shows geomorphodiversity mainly
referred to the type of eruptions, with some exemplary processes inserted in international
volcanic nomenclature. It makes up an important geoheritage site that can be considered a
field laboratory for volcanic geomorphology research. As for the management of these
mountains, a conceptual path is suggested and illustrated, following the phases of
knowledge, communication, awareness, protection and appraisal.
Keywords
Geomorphodiversity
43.1
Geoheritage
Introduction
Starting from the definition of landscape (European Landscape Convention, Florence 2000), geoheritage (see EU
Manifesto on Earth Heritage and Geodiversity, Strasbourg
2004) and geodiversity (Sharples 1995; Dixon 1996; Gray
2004; Zwolinski 2004; Reynard and Coratza 2007; Erikstad
2013), geomorphodiversity was defined as: “the critical and
specific assessment of the geomorphological features of a
territory, by comparing them in a way both extrinsic and
intrinsic and taking into account the level of their scientific
quality, the scale of investigation and the purpose of the
research” (Panizza 2009).
M. Panizza (&) S. Piacente
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Università di
Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 103, 41125 Modena, Italy
e-mail: mario.panizza@unimore.it
Dolomites
Emilia-Romagna Apennines
Vesuvius
This concept of geomorphodiversity cannot be univariate.
The whole set of geomorphological data of the study territory should be critically assessed, compared with that from
other territories mainly in an extrinsic way and analysed
within the territory itself mainly in an intrinsic way in order
to evaluate geomorphological characteristics and, therefore,
geomorphodiversity of the area. The scale of the investigations should be taken into the right account and the level of
their scientific value assessed. Practically, it is a matter of
carrying out original research, finalized each time towards
well-defined purposes, by avoiding statistical elaborations,
even with mathematical indexes and formulas: in fact this
procedure does not constitute a scientific research, but a
mere statistics, which are only an end in themselves;
see difference between geology (cἡ-kόco1) and geometry
(cἡ-lέsqom).
This concept of geomorphodiversity can be usefully applied
to the description and assessment of geomorphological
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_43
501
502
M. Panizza and S. Piacente
Fig. 43.1 Location of Dolomites (1), Emilia-Romagna Apennines (2) and
Vesuvius volcano (3)
heritage. Three examples of this application in Italy are presented: the first one concerns the Dolomites, the second one
focuses on the Emilia-Romagna Apennines, the third one deals
with the Vesuvius volcano (Fig. 43.1).
43.2
The Dolomites
On June 26 2009 the Dolomites were included in the World
Heritage List because of their exceptional beauty and unique
landscape (criterion vii), as well as in the recognition of their
scientific importance from the geological and geomorphological viewpoint (criterion viii). In particular, with reference
to criterion viii and to geomorphology specifically, it was
stated that
The Dolomites are of international significance for geomorphology, as the classic site for the development of mountains
in dolomite limestone. The area presents a wide range of
landforms related to erosion, tectonics and glaciation. The
quantity and concentration of extremely varied carbonate
formations is extraordinary in a global context, including
peaks, towers, pinnacles and some of the highest vertical rock
walls in the world. Taken together, the combination of
geomorphological and geological values creates a property of
global significance.
(UNESCO, General Assembly, Valencia, Spain, June 2009)
The area is located in the northeastern sector of Italy and
it is a part of the Southern Alps. Out of the Dolomite range,
nine different “systems” were chosen to represent an organic
series of exceptional aesthetic and scientific values. The nine
systems, contained in an area of approximately 142,000
hectares, are integrated and complement one another. In fact,
they constitute a serial property, as they represent a unified
whole, albeit dislocated and complex, both in terms of
geography and landscape and from a geological and geomorphological standpoint (Gianolla et al. 2008).
From an aesthetic point of view these mountains present
exceptional, monumental, original and spectacular features.
It is here that nineteenth century travellers found inspiration
for the “romantic” landscape, and the Dolomites still provide
a fundamental reference point for defining the modern
concept of natural beauty. We should remember the painters
who have been inspired by these mountains for their works:
from Titian to the romantics (Fig. 43.2), from the expressionists to the futurists and onwards to contemporary artists,
in addition to writers, poets, musicians and other artists who
have felt stimulated and called to immortalize the aesthetic
values of this range.
The geological importance of the Dolomites is due to the
extremely detailed and continuous manner in which they
represent a large part of the Mesozoic Era, bearing witness to
a tropical sea which existed here between 260 and 200
million years ago. It is possible to reconstruct the geological
history of this period as if reading from the pages of a
gigantic stone book (Gianolla et al. 2008).
In order to acquire correct geomorphological understanding of these mountains, the concept of geomorphodiversity
has been applied (Panizza 2009) (Fig. 43.3). First of all, they
have monumental, original and spectacular qualities
(Fig. 43.4) which distinguish the Dolomites from all other
mountains in the world (extrinsic geomorphodiversity on a
global scale). Furthermore, in the context of the alpine environment, they offer a particularly varied, complex and
emblematic range of morphological features (extrinsic geomorphodiversity on a regional scale), with structural forms
causally linked with movements of the Earth’s crust both in
the past and at present. On account of their variety and
complexity, these landforms are superimposed on other forms
which offer an almost complete educational and scientific case
study within the Dolomites (intrinsic geomorphodiversity at
regional scale). The contemporary morphology partly reflects
the present-day climate conditions whilst partly it records
processes taking place during recent geological periods (cf.
Soldati 2010). Thus, we can observe vestiges from the
pre-glacial and inter-glacial times right up to the present day,
including, above all, erosional and depositional landforms left
by ancient glaciers (Fig. 43.5). These glaciers occupied the
43
Geomorphodiversity in Italy: Examples from the Dolomites …
503
Fig. 43.2 Landscape in the Dolomites: general view of Catinaccio. Oil painting on canvas by J. Gilbert (1862) after Audisio and
Guglielmotto-Ravet (1982)
Fig. 43.3 Geomorphodiversity
of the Dolomites
valleys of the Dolomites until only a few thousand years ago,
leaving only the highest peaks emerging above the ice surface, and reaching as far as the edge of Po Plain. On a local
scale, another example of intrinsic geomorphodiversity is
offered by a wide range of karst formations, both epigene and
hypogene.
In conclusion, we can assert that the Dolomites represent
a kind of high altitude, open air laboratory of geomorphological heritage of exceptional global value, clearly one
among the most extraordinary and accessible in the world,
and ideal for researching, teaching, understanding and
developing Earth Science theories.
504
M. Panizza and S. Piacente
Fig. 43.4 Croda da Lago (on the left) and Nuvolau (on the right) in the Dolomites (photo H. Kostner). Croda da Lago is made up of Norian
dolomites, Nuvolau is made up of Ladinian-Carnian dolomites: they are both examples of high extrinsic geomorphodiversity on a global scale
43.3
The Emilia-Romagna Apennines
Concerning the Emilia-Romagna Apennines, a dossier is
being prepared to present a part of these mountains as a
candidate to the European Geoparks Network (Gentilini and
Panizza 2012). The area is located in northern Italy, south of
the Po Plain, where it extends in NW–SE direction. The
regional administrative framework is the Emilia-Romagna
Region, but the territory examined covers only a portion of
it, including mostly the Bologna Apennines. It can be considered representative of the Emilia-Romagna Apennines’
geological characteristics.
The importance of the region in geology dates back to the
introduction of the very name of the discipline which
occurred for the first time in 1603 in Bologna by Ulisse
Aldrovandi (Gentilini and Panizza 2012). Before Aldrovandi, Leonardo da Vinci, while crossing the Romagna
Apennines, described the succession of strata he encountered
(Leicester Codex 1506–1510) and drew a synthetic view of
fluvial geomorphological knowledge in the Imola Map
(1503). Later, the Emilia and Romagna geological research
reached international relevance and recognition in stratigraphy and micropaleontology, marine geology, sedimentology
of clastic (the concept of “turbidite” was born in the
Northern Apennines), carbonate and evaporite rocks, tectonics, sedimentation, applied geomorphology, speleology.
On this sound scientific basis, it was possible to establish
and promote different areas as geological heritage. The
physical characteristics of the territory reflect the geological
background of the mountain chain. In particular, they are
strictly controlled by geological-structural factors, such as
the outcrops of the Tuscan Units (Oligo-Miocene arenaceous
Flysch), overlying the mostly clayey Ligurian Formations.
The valleys descending from the mountain crests in certain
places have the shape of dug-in grooves, with bare steep
slopes. Vast areas are characterized by landform homogeneity and correspond to the zone where the so-called
“Argille Scagliose” (historical name) crop out. The prevalence of pelitic formations has favoured erosional processes
along the valley floors and on the slopes, with widespread
mass wasting processes and the development of “calanchi”
(badlands). A lower geomorphological unit corresponds to
the outcrop area of the Plio-Pleistocene sands and silty clays,
showing badland erosional landforms between sandy bluffs.
Along the border between the Bologna and Ravenna provinces the “Vena del Gesso” (literally “Gypsum Vein”)
43
Geomorphodiversity in Italy: Examples from the Dolomites …
505
Fig. 43.5 Late Glacial moraine arc which blocked the Chedùl valley (Upper Badia Valley, Italian Dolomites), leading to the origin of a small,
now extinct lake. Example of intrinsic geomorphodiversity on a regional scale (photo M. Panizza)
crops out, with its spectacular epigene and hypogene gypsum karst morphology.
Also for this area the concept of geomorphodiversity has
been applied (Fig. 43.6). In the case of extrinsic geomorphodiversity, the area of the prospective geopark can be considered
as an exemplary case in the Apennines owing to its typical
geological features. It is in fact an educational example to
illustrate tectonic evolution, stratigraphic and sedimentological
sequences and lithological peculiarities of this chain and to
compare with other mountains in the world. Gypsum karst
phenomena, though, remain the most important and interesting
geological characteristic of this area (Gentilini and Panizza
2012). From the surface viewpoint, individual landforms such
as large sinkholes, blind and closed valleys, lapiez fields and
deep dissolution furrows attract most attention. Among subterranean karst systems, it should be noted that in the province
of Bologna there is one of the most widespread gypsum cave
system in the world (Fig. 43.7).
On the other hand, intrinsic geomorphodiversity is
mainly at regional scale and concerns first of all the
complexity and variety of geomorphological features,
including Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) glacial landforms, fluvial landforms, spectacular badlands, and mud
volcanoes (“salse”), which create a very peculiar morphology (cf. Castaldini and Coratza 2017). A characteristic of the Emilia-Romagna mid-Apennines is given by
the high frequency of mass wasting phenomena in both
time and space. A large part of the slopes is indeed
affected by gravity movements of various types
(Fig. 43.8). This is mainly due to the prevalently clayey
nature of the rocks as well as jointing, tectonic setting and
climate characteristics, with intense precipitation in the
spring and autumn. Finally, human intervention should
not be ignored since various anthropogenic activities in
the past have caused instability situations on extensive
slope surfaces, such as deforestation or slope cuts for
engineering works. Owing to all these characteristics and
processes, the Emilia-Romagna Apennines are to be
considered among the most landslide-prone regions in the
world.
506
M. Panizza and S. Piacente
Fig. 43.6 Geomorphodiversity of the Emilia-Romagna Apennines and
of the Vesuvius volcano
43.4
The Vesuvius Volcano
A third example is given by the Vesuvius volcano, one of the
Italian National Parks, which is about to be also proposed as
a candidate for the European Geoparks Network.
Mt. Somma-Vesuvius (Fig. 43.9) is a composite central
stratovolcano made up of a more ancient structure, which
has been affected by numerous collapses and now constitutes
the caldera rim of Mt. Somma, and a more recent volcanic
cone—Vesuvius—which was formed inside the ancient
caldera. The cone grew and collapsed several times owing to
constructive volcanic activity during the inter-plinian
extrusive phases and destructive activity during plinian and
sub-plinian type explosive eruptions (cf. Luongo 2012;
Aucelli et al. 2017).
The beginning of volcanic activity in this area goes back
to some 400,000 years BP. The first plinian eruption identified in the field is dated for 18,000 years BP and was
named as the Basal Pumice Eruption. It was followed by
other plinian eruptions: the Mercato Eruption (8700 years
BP), the Avellino Eruption (3700 years BP), and the Pompeii Eruption (79 AD). All these volcanic activity phases
were interspersed with many sub-plinian eruptions which
were characterized by the same mechanisms as in plinian
eruptions, but at lower energy levels. Among these, the most
recent ones were the 472 AD Eruption and the 1631 Eruption. The latter initiated a long period of persistent activity
which ended with the 1944 Eruption. At present, the endogenic dynamics of Vesuvius is represented by slow ground
movements, low-energy seismicity and low-intensity
fumarole activity from the bottom of the crater. All these
phenomena are being recorded by the INGV—Vesuvian
Observatory in order to monitor the hazard level of the area
(Lirer et al. 2009; Luongo 2012; Aucelli et al. 2017).
Also for the Vesuvius the concept of geomorphodiversity
has been applied (Fig. 43.6). From the geomorphological
standpoint, extrinsic geomorphodiversity mainly refers to the
type of eruption, with exemplary processes reflected in the
international volcanic nomenclature. For example, morphological features of tephra connected with the plinian eruptions (Fig. 43.10), or surface runoff erosion and typical
forms which developed from the ashes of “Vesuvian”
eruptions. At a regional scale, intrinsic geomorphodiversity
includes the examples of landforms and processes linked to
volcanism, such as slag cones or craters, which have considerable educational value. Of further interest is marine
terraces (Fig. 43.9) and other terraced forms, whose origin is
related to the occurrence of lahars. Also the phenomena of
relief inversion may be observed in the area. They generally
originate through the geomorphic evolution after a lava flow
filled a valley and has progressively emerged in the form of a
terrace or ridge resulting from differential erosion affecting
the surrounding slopes. Other landforms specific to the area
are those typical for pseudo-karst topography,
pseudo-dolines of phreato-magmatic or outgassing origin, or
resulting from minor explosions. Other cases are represented
by the cavities on Mt. Somma, in correspondence with
eruption fractures or joints between two adjacent layers, or
caves and tunnels due to lava flows or, less frequently, gas
bubbles trapped within flows. Typical are the caves found in
the municipalities of Ercolano, Torre del Greco and
Terzigno.
Around Vesuvius there are archaeological parks of the
ancient Vesuvian cities buried by the volcanic ejecta of the
79 AD Eruption. Among these are the excavations at Pompeii, Herculaneum, Oplontis and Stabiae. From the summit
of the northern rim of Vesuvius crater, a magnificent
panorama of the Gulf of Naples and the surrounding islands,
as far as the Pontine Islands, can be admired.
43
Geomorphodiversity in Italy: Examples from the Dolomites …
507
Fig. 43.7 The Tanaccia cave (Emilia-Romagna Apennines), one of the largest epigenetic gypsum caves in the “Vena del Gesso”, Ravenna
province (photo P. Lucci). It is an example of high extrinsic geomorphodiversity on a regional scale
Fig. 43.8 The Morsiano earth flow, made up of the clayey Helmintoyd Flysch and “Argille Scagliose” (Auctt) formations, in the Emilia-Romagna
Apennines (photo G. Bertolini). It is an example of intrinsic geomorphodiversity on a regional scale
508
M. Panizza and S. Piacente
Fig. 43.9 The Mt.
Somma-Vesuvius (photo U.
Leone). It comprises the caldera
rim (Mt. Somma, on the left) and
a more recent volcanic cone
(Vesuvius, on the right), which
was formed inside the caldera. In
the foreground the Tyrrhenian
coast showing marine terrace
formed by the tephra of the
Pompeii eruption of 79 AD: near
Herculaneum the progression of
the coastline towards the sea was
about 400 m
43.5
Landscape Management
The values of the landscapes of the Dolomites, EmiliaRomagna Apennines and Vesuvius reside in their geodiversity,
biodiversity, geomorphodiversity, scenic qualities and cultural
heritage. All these values should be considered as inter-related
and inter-dependent elements within a holistic conception,
including also social components and strategies (Erikstad
2013). These are not fixed or immutable values but rather
dynamic ones, in agreement with the evolution of the society
itself (Panizza and Piacente 2014). A holistic approach that
integrates these different values is essential since landscape
character is the result of the action and interaction of both
natural and human factors. Therefore, the knowledge of the
landscape is achieved by searching for all the causes that have
contributed in space and time to its formation. All the landscape
features should be analysed from various standpoints related to
different cultural and disciplinary backgrounds in order to build
an integrated and holistic understanding of the landscape. This
type of integrated approach has also been advocated elsewhere
(Henriques et al. 2011; Prosser et al. 2011; Gordon et al. 2012).
Therefore, the landscape is increasingly becoming a basis for
research and for our awareness facing global change (Hijort
and Luoto 2010).
In order to carry out a thorough territorial analysis, it is
therefore of paramount importance to first choose the goals of
investigations and, consequently, the most appropriate conceptual and methodological path for management purposes.
As for the management of the mountain areas described in
this chapter, a conceptual path is suggested and illustrated,
following the phases of knowledge, communication, awareness,
protection and appraisal.
Knowledge should be based on a detailed analysis of the
specific aspects of the Dolomites, of the Emilia-Romagna
Apennines and of the Vesuvius. Such knowledge should be
articulated into: (i) a strictly scientific interdisciplinary
research; (ii) an accurate interpretation, within an integrated
holistic-type synthesis. Subsequently, analytical–descriptive
approaches are to be followed by systemic-developmental
ones, which envisage the landscape as a set of interacting
elements, closely connected to socio-cultural development.
Communication must be comprehensible in order to
enrich knowledge, and based on scientific rigour. Specific
communication skills are needed, together with a clear cultural and social aim. The two main aspects of communication should be popularization (by means of meetings,
folders, articles, books) and education and training (school
and lifelong learning).
43
Geomorphodiversity in Italy: Examples from the Dolomites …
509
network of all the physical, biological and cultural elements
of the territory.
References
Fig. 43.10 Pyroclastic flow deposits on the slope above Herculaneum,
laid down during a phase of 79 AD plinian eruption of Vesuvius (after
Lirer et al. 2009). They are examples of extrinsic geomorphodiversity
on a global scale
Awareness: any landscape can become common heritage
and therefore a cultural asset in all its values only if communication leads to shared awareness; not only would this
allow participation but would also support territorial management choices. It is obvious that, besides the above quoted
specific characteristics, the strategies for involving and
awakening public opinion could result also from the perceptions and expectations of diverse territorial realities, taking
into account previous local experiences. A project thus conceived would involve the experience and responsibility of
administrators, operators and beneficiaries at different levels.
As for protection and appraisal, the idea is “not planning in
order to protect and protecting in order to manage” but “planning
in order to disseminate knowledge and develop awareness in
order to appraise and self protect” (Panizza and Piacente 2014).
Management: not a top-down planning (passive
approach) but a bottom-up planning (active approach) with
community involvement. Therefore, this sort of management
must be linked to an “open network”, intended as a cultural
Aucelli PPC, Brancaccio L, Cinque A (2017) Vesuvius and Campi
Flegrei: volcanic history, landforms and impact on settlements. In:
Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy.
Springer, Cham, pp 389–398
Audisio A, Guglielmotto-Ravet B (1982) Alpi e Prealpi nell’iconografia dell’800. Priuli & Verlucca, Ivrea, 479 pp
Castaldini D, Coratza P (2017) Mud volcanoes in the Emilia-Romagna
Apennines: small landforms of outstanding scenic and scientific
value. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms
of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 225–234
Dixon G (1996) Geoconservation: an international rewiev and strategy
for Tasmania. Occasional Paper 35, Parks & Wildlife Service,
Hobart, Tasmania, 101 pp
Erikstad L (2013) Geoheritage and geodiversity management—the
questions for tomorrow. Proc Geologists’ Assoc 124:713–719
Gray M (2004) Geodiversity, valuing and conserving abiotic nature.
Wiley, Chichester, 434 pp
Gentilini S, Panizza M (eds) (2012) Application Dossier of the Emilia
Romagna Apennine for membership in the European and Global
Geoparks Network under the auspices of UNESCO. GAL Appennino Bolognese, Bologna, 46 pp
Gianolla P, Micheletti C, Panizza M, Viola F (eds) (2008) Nomination
of the Dolomites for inscription on the World Natural Heritage List
UNESCO—Nomination document. Provincia di Belluno, Provincia
Autonoma di Bolzano—Bozen, Provincia di Pordenone, Provincia
Autonoma di Trento, Provincia di Udine, 363 pp
Gordon JE, Barron HF, Hansom JD, Thomas MF (2012) Engaging with
geodiversity—Why it matters. Proc Geologists’ Assoc 123:1–6
Henriques MH, Peña dos Reis R, Brilha J, Mota T (2011) Geoconservation as an emerging geoscience. Geoheritage 3:117–128
Hjort J, Luoto M (2010) Geodiversity of high latitude landscapes in
northern Finland. Geomorphology 115:109–116
Lirer L, Petrosino P, Munno R, Grimaldi M (2009) Vesuvius through
history and science. Electa, Napoli, 243 pp
Luongo G (2012) Vesuvio. In: Panizza M, Coratza P (eds) Il “Viaggio
in Italia” di J.W. Goethe e il paesaggio della geologia. ISPRA,
Roma, pp 77–79
Panizza M (2009) The geomorphodiversity of the Dolomites (Italy): a
key of geoheritage assessment. Geoheritage 1:33–42
Panizza M, Piacente S (2014) Geomorfologia culturale. Pitagora
Editrice, Bologna. New Edition, 356 pp
Prosser CD, Bridgland DR, Brown EJ, Larwood JG (2011) Geoconservation for science and society: challenges and opportunities.
Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 122:337–342
Reynard E, Coratza P (2007) Geomorphosites and Geodiversity: a new
domain of research. Geographica Helvetica 62:138–139
Sharples C (1995) Geoconservation in forest management-principles
and procedures. Tasforest 7:37–50
Soldati M (2010) Dolomites: the spectacular landscape of the “Pale
Mountains”. In: Migon P (ed) Geomorphological landscapes of the
world. Springer, pp 191–199
Zwolinsky Z (2004) Geodiversity. In: Goudie AS (ed) Encyclopedia of
geomorphology, vol 1. Routledge, London, pp 417–418
Goethe’s Italian Journey and the Geological
Landscape
44
Paola Coratza and Mario Panizza
Abstract
Over 220 years ago Johann Wolfgang von Goethe undertook a nearly two-years long and
fascinating journey to Italy, a destination dreamed for a long time by the great German
writer. During his journey from Alps to Sicily Goethe reflected on landscape, geology and
morphology of “Il Bel Paese”, sometimes providing detailed descriptions and acute
observations concerning the great and enduring laws by which the earth and all within it are
governed. In the present chapter an attempt is made to reproduce Goethe’s ante litteram
geotourism itinerary through Italy, which is considered one of the most attractive tourist
destination worldwide thanks to its rich cultural and natural heritage and the outstanding
aesthetic qualities of its complex landscape.
Keywords
Italian landscape
44.1
Geology
Introduction
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (28 August 1749—22 March
1832)—considered the greatest German literary figure of the
modern era—in 1786 set out on a fascinating journey to
Italy: a journey to a distant, warm and sunny land, a dream
longed for a long time. Goethe’s journey across Italy lasted
nearly two years, from September 3 1786 to June 18 1788:
exactly one year, nine months and fifteen days. Most of this
time was spent in Rome, where he first stayed for four
months and later on for nearly ten months. During his stay in
Italy, he wrote many letters to a number of friends in Germany, which he later used, enriched with afterthoughts and
reminiscences, as the basis for his famous book “Italian
Journey” (original title: Italienische Reise) published in
1816–17.
The present chapter refers to the journey of the great
writer as an example of perception and description of an
“integrated” landscape, taking into account its natural and
P. Coratza (&) M. Panizza
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Università di
Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 103, 41125 Modena, Italy
e-mail: paola.coratza@unimore.it
Goethe
human components (geology, biology, climate, history,
architecture, literature, etc.). From the Brenner Pass to
Sicily, Goethe reflected on landscape, contrasting morphologies, the genesis of territories, providing detailed
descriptions useful for reconstructing land use conditions of
the late eighteenth century (Fig. 44.1). The “Italian Journey”
is a kaleidoscope of images, documents, notes, impressions
and ideas of life lived in pleasant situations or problematic
ones. Goethe was an observer, with the eye of a geologist
and landscape painter, as he himself stated, and therefore he
had a 360° view of the Italian landscape (Panizza and Coratza 2012).
44.2
Goethe in Italy
In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the Grand Tour of
Italy—in search of art, culture and the roots of western
civilization—became an almost compulsory step, a sort of
rite of passage, in the education of European upper-class
young men, who were expected to acquire experiences that
would complete their traditional and classical education.
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_44
511
512
P. Coratza and M. Panizza
Fig. 44.1 Goethe’s journey
across Italy
Travelling in the eighteenth century was dangerous, since
highwaymen could attack on any road. Furthermore, coaches
could easily break down due to poor state of the roads. As
regards travelling in another country, very few people could
speak a foreign language. Journeys were slow and long. In a
week, no more than 500–600 km could be travelled and only
very rich people could afford the expenses of such long
journeys.
In 1786, Goethe was already the acknowledged leader of
the Sturm und Drang literary movement, when he set out on
his journey to Italy to fulfil his personal and artistic quest
and to find relief from his responsibilities and the agonies of
unrequited love. The journey was a kind of escape, prepared
in secret, since his work as minister at Weimar had stifled his
creativity. On September 3 1786, at three in the morning,
Goethe slipped away from the Bohemian spa of Carlsbad
and travelled by post coach to the Brenner Pass and down
through South Tyrol to Verona, without saying goodbye to
anybody (Fig. 44.1). The urgency of his first journal entry
shows his desire to leave without notice: “I slipped out of
Carlsbad at three in the morning; otherwise, I would not
have been allowed to leave. Perhaps my friends, who had so
kindly celebrated my birthday on 28 August, had thereby
acquired the right to detain me, but I could wait no longer”
(Goethe 1786–1788: 23).
Goethe made this journey in Italy mainly to discover
himself as an artist: “My purpose in making this wonderful
journey is not to delude myself but to discover myself in the
objects I see” (Goethe 1786–1788: 57), “Now my attention is
fixed on the architect, the sculptor and the painter and in
them too, I shall learn to find myself” (Goethe 1786–1788:
155). He travelled through Italy with the desire to see with
his own eyes art and architecture that he had only read and
heard about before, especially from his father. He described
the draw of travelling as “an irresistible need” (Goethe
1786–1788: 128). In 1788, he returned from his famous
travels in Italy profoundly transformed as a man, humanist
and scientist. What Goethe was looking for in our country
44
Goethe’s Italian Journey and the Geological Landscape
was not so much the Italy of Michelangelo, Leonardo and
the great Renaissance and Baroque paintings. He was
searching for Greek and Roman antiquities, and when he
saw a real Roman monument for the first time in Verona—
the Arena—he was overjoyed.
The “Italian Journey” is a journal full of fascinating
observations on geology and botany, climate, art and history, and the character of local people he encountered.
Goethe brought back home about one thousand sketches
and drawings and also started to write and became creative
again. Within the field of geology and mineralogy, he
showed a keen interest in rocks. His studies and remarks
led him to take the side of the Neptunists, who were convinced of the importance of water in the slow process of
formation of all kinds of rocks, against the Plutonists, who,
on the contrary, favoured the igneous origin of many rock
types.
Fig. 44.2 a Brenner Pass in an
original drawing by J.W. Goethe
(1786); b Brenner Pass nowadays
(photo Sönke Kraft aka Arnulf zu
Linden, Wikimedia Commons
under CC BY-SA 3.0)
513
44.3
Walking in Goethe’s Footsteps: From
Brenner to Sicily
On September 3 1786, Goethe travelled as rapidly as he could
by coach to the Brenner Pass and down through South Tyrol to
Verona, Vicenza, and Venice (Fig. 44.1). On September 8
1786, he stopped in Brenner at the “Post Hotel”. Goethe
described “the limestone Alps through which I have been
travelling so far are grey in colour and have beautiful irregular
shapes, even though the rock is divided into level strata and
ridges. But since folded strata also occur and the rock does not
weather equally in all places, the cliff and peaks assume
bizarre shapes” (Goethe 1786–1788: 33). Goethe could not see
the Dolomites directly, as he had come from the valleys of the
Adige and Isarco rivers and travelled mostly at night. However,
he referred to the morphology and differential erosion of
“limestone” and to the high mountains of Tyrol (Fig. 44.2).
514
P. Coratza and M. Panizza
Fig. 44.3 a Drawing of the
castle of Malcesine (1786) by
J.W. Goethe; b Malcesine
nowadays (photo degreezero
2000, Wikimedia Commons
under CC BY-SA 2.0)
Continuing his journey towards Rome, Goethe was fascinated by the scenery around Lake Garda: “I could have
already been in Verona this evening, but I was close to a
magnificent product of nature, a splendid spectacle, Lake
Garda. I did not want to miss it, and I was repaid for my
detour” (Goethe 1786–1788: 41). He described the unique
natural landscape of this lake, the open spaces and the
majesty of the mountains surrounding it (Fig. 44.3). They
fascinated him as he followed the road across the moraine
hills which border the lake in its southern part. He described
the moraine amphitheatre of Lake Garda, a very complex
structure resulting from several glacial advances including
those of the Last Glacial Maximum (Baroni 2017), as a
“gigantic dam of gravel” whose origin is related to glacial
and fluvio-glacial morphogenetic processes. It is important
to realize that in Goethe’s time the theory of glaciation had
not yet been developed and therefore the correct explanation
of the genesis of these landforms was unavailable to him. He
described this area as a land of plenty, “a new country”, in
which “the people lead the careless life of a fool’s paradise”, living in homes where “the doors have no locks” and
“the windows are closed with oil paper instead of glass”
(Goethe 1786–1788: 42). What he enjoyed most of all was
fruits. For the first time he mentioned lemons, figs and pears
that he loved (Fig. 44.4).
In his diary unexpected attention is given to the agricultural landscape, and in particular to vineyards. Sometimes
Goethe showed particular interest in the growing of crops,
44
Goethe’s Italian Journey and the Geological Landscape
Fig. 44.4 The lemon house of Castel: remnants of the florid past of
lemon cultivation in Limone (Garda Lake) (photo Wikimedia Commons under CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain)
the characteristics of the soil and farming practices, providing detailed descriptions useful for understanding and
reconstructing the agricultural landscape of the late eighteenth century. Proceeding from Verona to Vicenza, the
journey took place from the wide valley of the Adige River
to the hills of volcanic origin of the Berici Mountains,
passing by the calcareous hills of the Lessinean Mountains.
These are landforms characterised by various lithological
sequences which are explicitly mentioned by Goethe. The
country traversed was defined as “a vast plain… across
which we drove on a wide, straight and well-kept road
through fertile fields. There trees are planted in long rows
upon which the vines are trained to their tops. Their gently
swaying tendrils hang down under the weight of the grapes,
which ripen early here. This is what a festoon ought to look
like” (Goethe 1786–1788: 63).
On September 28, he arrived in Venice (Fig. 44.5), where
he saw the sea for the first time in his life and gazed across
the lagoon from the top of the St. Mark’s bell-tower. The
view of the vast expanse of water beyond the Lido and the
view of the Alps to the north and east was an extraordinary
experience: “The lagoons are covered at high tide, and when
I turned my eyes in the direction of the Lido, a narrow strip
of land which shuts in the lagoons, I saw the sea for the first
time” (Goethe 1786–1788: 79). During his two-week stay in
Venice much emphasis was given to the architecture and
particularly on how it stands as a human construct in relationship to the water of the lagoon. The Lagoon of Venice—
the largest in Italy with an area of about 550 km2—is
influenced by the tides of the Adriatic Sea and constitutes the
unique result of natural and anthropogenic changes which
have occurred since its formation, about 6000 years
BP. From a geomorphological standpoint, the lagoon is
characterised by a complex system of mud-flats, salt
515
marshes, shallows and brackish ponds, together with a network of channels and tidal creeks, formed by “the interaction of tides and earth”. The Lagoon of Venice has
undergone continuous modifications mainly due to mean
sea-level changes, and in more recent times, to human
activities, that directly and indirectly induce the complex
morphodynamic changes occurring in the lagoon (Bondesan
2017). Goethe gave a very exhaustive description of this
landscape: “The lagoon is a creation of nature. The interaction of tides and earth, following a gradual fall in level of
the primeval ocean, formed an extensive tract of swampland
at the extreme end of the Adriatic, which was covered at
high tide but partly exposed at low” (Goethe 1786–1788:
97). In Venice and its lagoon nature and history are intimately linked: “Human skill took over the highest portions
of ground and thus Venice came into being as a cluster of
hundreds of islands surrounded by hundreds of other
islands” (Goethe 1786–1788: 97). The detailed description
given by Goethe is useful for understanding the complex
environmental system of the lagoon: its integration into the
wider system of high-Adriatic lagoons, the presence of
human activities on the original environmental matrix, the
connection with the sea through the beaches, the action of
the tide and the system of internal channels, the ongoing
process of landfill and therefore, the hydrological connections with the mainland, human intervention and the problems of maintenance (Bondesan and Rossetto 2012). “All
that intelligence and hard work created in times past,
intelligence and hard work have now to preserve” (Goethe
1786–1788: 97).
Goethe’s interest in rocks is also evident in the description
that he gave of the badlands of Paderno, in the Bologna
Apennines, which he visited on horseback on 20 October.
Goethe dedicated a few passages of his diary to the description of rocks and landscapes that he encountered along his
path. The most beautiful lithological description concerns the
rock complex on which the Paderno badlands were formed.
He compared the Argille Scagliose (scaly clayshales
—“schist” in Goethe’s definition) to “… finely laminated
schists… that glitter like bituminous coal”, pinpointing their
main features. He did not even miss their typical jointing and
the contrasting appearance of intact clayshales compared with
weathered clayshales. Obviously he must have picked up a
sample and crushed it into fine fragments, noticing that the
rock does not lose its typical scaly texture. By quoting “…
conchoidal surface…”, he probably observed the rock concave–convex scaly surfaces, whereas when he described it as
“… spotted with white particles and sometimes with yellow…” he referred very likely to salt and limonite efflorescence (the latter derived from the weathering of pyrite), which
is frequently observed on the surface of these clayshales
(Cazzoli 2012). Goethe also referred to the morphology of
these places: “The hill where the spar is found is not far from
516
P. Coratza and M. Panizza
Fig. 44.5 a Lagoon of Venice in an original drawing by J.W. Goethe (1786); b Aerial view of the old town island of Venice and its surrounding
lagoons. Canal Grande in the centre of the photo (photo Wikimedia Commons under CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain)
44
Goethe’s Italian Journey and the Geological Landscape
a brick kiln and a stream formed by the conjunction of a
number of brooks…” (Goethe 1786–1788: 114). This is
indeed the situation found on the valley floor of the Torriane
and Strione streams, which collect water from many ditches
and rivulets and make up the typically patterned hydrography
of the badlands of the northern Apennines. There are very
evocative short passages, which in their extreme synthesis
convey a clear view of the badland environment, the visible
erosion of the autumn rains on the slopes (Goethe’s visit took
place in October) and their instability, due both to falls which
affect the sub-vertical faces of the badlands and mud flows
which spread about as far as the valley floors: “By ascending
along the gorges of the brittle and decaying mountain,
washed up by the latest rain… in various points of recently
formed landslide bodies…” (Goethe 1786–1788: 114).
Although the Paderno badlands, unlike other areas of Emilia
(Canossa, Monteveglio, Passo dell’Abbadessa etc.), do not
show on the whole spectacular morphological features, they
are articulated into different small basins with rugged and
twisted morphology which makes the landscape unique.
Thanks to the roads running along their margins, these
landforms are visible from several panoramic points, with
striking perspectives from the valley floor to the mountain
crests and vice versa (Cazzoli 2012). The final part of
Goethe’s description was dedicated to “… the so-called
Bolognese heavy spar…”, which is the main goal of his
investigations in Paderno. In fact, this mineral was already
known to the German writer when he was 22 years old, as
Fig. 44.6 Goethe in the Roman
Campagna, the famous painting
by his friend and painter J.H.
Tischbein, his housemate in
Rome
517
demonstrated by the account given in his famous “best-seller”
The Sorrows of Young Werther. The description of the samples he examined is extremely clear, with some remarks on
the possible origin of these minerals: “… One can see at once
that they are not alluvial detritus, but to determine whether
their formation was simultaneous with that of the schist, or a
result of the tumefaction or decomposition of the latter, would
require a more careful examination” (Goethe 1786–1788:
114–115).
The journey continued south through “a strange network
of criss-crossing mountain ridges”, the Apennines: “a
curious part of the world”. Although Goethe described with
great care the landscapes he came across, it is surprising that
he paid little attention to places which have always been
consecrated to religious and secular history, such as Florence, Perugia, Assisi and Spoleto, but the writer’s mind is
diverted by his eagerness to arrive in Rome, “my heart’s
desire”. “Across the mountains of Tyrol I fled rather than
travelled. Vicenza, Padua and Venice I saw thoroughly,
Ferrara, Cento, Bologna casually, and Florence hardly at
all. My desire to reach Rome quickly was growing stronger
every minute until nothing could have induced me to make
more stops, so that I spent only three hours there. Now I
have arrived, I have calmed down and feel as if I had found
a peace that will last for my whole life. Because, if I may say
so, as soon as one sees with one’s own eyes the whole which
one had hitherto only known in fragments and chaotically, a
new life begins” (Goethe 1786–1788: 128).
518
Goethe first stayed for four months and later for nearly
ten months in Rome, which he described as “the First City of
the World”. He called on 1 November, when he arrived in
Rome, “the birthday of my new life”. Once he arrived in
Rome, he felt immediately at home and behaved as if he had
always lived in the city (Fig. 44.6). Goethe was an
extraordinary observer and examined the landscape with
extreme sensitivity. He was probably the first scholar to
guess at the overlapping of Rome’s “historical strata”, that
is, that the city’s millenary history had an intrinsic relationship with the landscape, the morphology and lithological
nature of Roman territory (Fig. 44.7). “Here is an entity
which has suffered so many drastic changes in the course of
two thousand years… and this makes it difficult for one to
follow the evolution of the city, to grasp not only how
Modern Rome follows on Ancient, but also how, within both,
one epoch follows upon another” (Goethe 1786–1788: 133).
The morphology and the particular geological features which
characterise it have had a decisive role in the history of
Fig. 44.7 a Imaginary Italian
landscape in the moonlight with
the Pyramid of Caius Cestius
(Rome) in the foreground and a
Roman aqueduct in the
background (original drawing J.
W. Goethe 1788); b Pyramid of
Caius Cestius in Rome (photo
Jimmy P. Renzi, Wikimedia
Commons under CC BY-SA 3.0)
P. Coratza and M. Panizza
Rome (Del Monte 2017). The proximity to a large river
which allowed easy access to the sea, the surrounding hills
which favoured defence, the availability of practically
inexhaustible territorial resources—in particularly excellent
and plentiful building stones—and, even more important,
abundant fresh and clean water from the Apennines slopes
determined the fortune of this city destined to become over
the millennia Republican and Imperial Rome, the city of the
Popes and, finally, the capital of unified Italy (De Rita 2012).
In spring of 1787, after four months in Rome, Goethe
decided to move on to Naples, as his father had done before.
He arrived in Naples with his friend Johann Heinrich Wilhelm Tischbein on 25 February, and spent two months there
(Fig. 44.8). The road passed “between and over volcanic
hills,” and “Vesuvius was on our left all the time, emitting
copious clouds of smoke” as they made their way to the city.
He climbed Vesuvius—“a peak of hell which towers up in
the middle of paradise”—three times. In the description of
the excursions, Goethe showed an extraordinary ability in
44
Goethe’s Italian Journey and the Geological Landscape
519
Fig. 44.8 The Bay of Naples
with a view of Mt. Vesuvius in a
drawing by C.H. Kniep, Goethe’s
friend and travel companion in
Naples and in Sicily (Hildesheim
1755—Napoli 1825)
understanding volcanic processes and described them with
great effect, penetrating the complexity of the phenomenon
despite the lack of physical knowledge compared with our
studies today (Luongo 2012). As a student in Freiburg,
Goethe had attended lectures by Abraham Gottlob Werner,
the leading German figure in geology, and convicted Neptunist. Because of his education, Goethe could not have been
convinced about the centrality of volcanoes in earth formation, as he stated that volcanoes were “the superficial result
of localized combustion, having no geological significance.”
Notwithstanding this position, he was taken with the
romance of Vesuvius and the description of his ascents
reveals how Goethe was mesmerised by the phenomenon of
its eruption: “The Terrible beside the Beautiful, the Beautiful
beside the Terrible, cancel one another out and produce a
feeling of indifference,” and “The Neapolitan would certainly be a different creature if he did not feel himself
wedged between God and the Devil” (Goethe 1786–1788:
215). The final ascent, on 20 March, is filled with details and
the German scientist described the canals formed as the lava
flowed down the mountain slopes, with the molten material
stiffening, “while the dross floating on the surface is thrown
down equally to the right and left. By this means a dam is
gradually raised, on which the glowing river flows along as
calmly as a mill stream. We walked beside the dam, which
was raised to a considerable height, the dross regularly
rolling down its sides as far as our feet. We could see the
glowing stream from below through several holes in the
canal, and from above as it flowed on down” (Goethe 1786–
1788: 214). Mt. Somma-Vesuvius is an active composite
central stratovolcano made up of a more ancient apparatus,
the caldera of Mt. Somma, that contains the younger cone of
Mt. Vesuvius, which has remained in a dormant state since
1944 (Aucelli et al. 2017). Goethe during his ascent, may
have seen spectacular flow features like breaks in the slope
due to lava overflowing artificial walls, cracks or fractures,
folds, lava blocks, ridges, lava levees, channelled flows, flow
lobes and toe-like flows.
From Naples Goethe ventured into the deep south of
Italy, and in March he set sail to Sicily—with the painter
Christoph Heinrich Kniep—where he arrived after a
four-day journey and spent a month and a half on the island
(Fig. 44.9). In his journey across Sicily, which took place in
April, Goethe was overwhelmed by the extraordinary variety
of the landscape, turning from barren plains and hills to
luxuriant spots. The view of the Monte Pellegrino promontory and the harmonious landscape between sea, sky and
coast, when he was still on his boat in the harbour, is enriched by the striking scenery offered by vegetation, such as
the “mulberry trees in their freshest green, evergreen oleanders, hedges of lemon trees etc.” (Goethe 1786–1788:
228) which made him define this island as a blessed land. “I
had completely recovered and was able to enjoy everything
thoroughly… The delicate contours of Monte Pellegrino to
the right were in full sunshine, and a shore with bays,
headlands and promontories stretched far away to the left ”.
The geomorphological features of the area around the Gulf
of Palermo are characterised by coastal plains, isolated ridges and mountain groups. The plain of Palermo is a vast flat
surface linked to sub-vertical cliffs through thick debris
520
P. Coratza and M. Panizza
Fig. 44.9 a Sicilian landscape in
an original drawing by J.W.
Goethe (1786); b Panoramic view
of Monte Pellegrino observable
from the famous seaside resort of
Mondello (photo Wikimedia
Commons under CC0 1.0
Universal Public Domain)
cones. Typically, this geomorphological arrangement is
controlled by the vertical tectonic movements of the last 4
million years, which has formed an alternation of horst and
graben, the latter filled up with the prevalently calcarenite
Pleistocene deposits (Nicchitta and Messina 2012).
Goethe much appreciated geological, climatic and
gastronomic characteristics of Sicily, stating that “To have
seen Italy without having seen Sicily is not to have seen
Italy at all, for Sicily is the clue to everything” (Goethe
1786–1788: 246). He also considered the Sicilian food
exquisite: “The vegetables are delicious… The oil and the
wine are also good, but would be even better if prepared
with greater care” (Goethe 1786–1788: 247).
44
Goethe’s Italian Journey and the Geological Landscape
44.4
Final Remarks
The roots of the modern tourism can be traced back to the
seventeenth and eighteenth centuries when the Grand
Tour became an institutional practice among aristocrats
and literati, primarily, but not exclusively, for education
and pleasure. Although the interest in the ancient classical
world and its rediscovery in the forms of the Renaissance
was the main motivation for the Grand Tour, also the
natural environment with its sublime and picturesque
scenery has been an “object of desire” for many tourists
and especially for Goethe. In this perspective, even
though the term “geotourism” came into common usage
from the mid-1990s onwards (Hose 1995) in order to
define a sustainable geologically based tourism, the
Goethe’s journey is an excellent example of early geotourism, related to landscape and its geological features.
Goethe was not only a great writer, but also a scientist
and a geomorphologist ante litteram. His diary contains
examples of landscape-scale analysis, where an appreciation of interactions between landscape compartments,
sense of place, appreciation of diversity and difference,
and associated insights into human relationships are
highlighted. Goethe’s Italian journey as revisited in this
paper aims at stimulating interest in the “geological”
component of the environment in which we live or travel
by means of an “integrated” approach.
521
References
Aucelli PPC, Brancaccio L, Cinque A (2017) Vesuvius and Campi
Flegrei: volcanic history, landforms and impact on settlements. In:
Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy.
Springer, Cham, pp 389–398
Baroni C (2017) Lake Garda: an outstanding archive of Quaternary
geomorphological evolution. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 169–179
Bondesan A (2017) Geomorphological processes and landscape
evolution of the Lagoon of Venice. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M
(eds) Landscapes and Landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham,
pp 181–191
Bondesan A, Rossetto T (2012) La Laguna di Venezia. In: Panizza M
and Coratza P (eds) Il “Viaggio in Italia” di J.W. Goethe e il
paesaggio della geologia. ISPRA, Roma, pp 22–24
Cazzoli MA (2012) Calanchi di Padero. In: Panizza M and Coratza P
(eds) Il “Viaggio in Italia” di J.W. Goethe e il paesaggio della
geologia. ISPRA, Roma, pp 28–30
De Rita D (2012) La città di Roma, passato e presente. In: Panizza M
and Coratza P (eds) Il “Viaggio in Italia” di J.W. Goethe e il
paesaggio della geologia. ISPRA, Roma, pp 58–59
Del Monte M (2017) Aeternae Urbis geomorphologia—geomorphology of Rome, Aeterna Urbs. In: Soldati M, Marchetti M (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer, Cham, pp 339–350
Goethe JW (1786–1788) Italian journey. Translation Auden WH,
Mayer E (1962), Penguin Books, London, 508 pp
Hose TA (1995) Selling the story of Britain’s stone. Environ
Interpretation 10(2):16–17
Luongo G (2012) Vesuvio. In: Panizza M and Coratza P (eds) Il
“Viaggio in Italia” di J.W. Goethe e il paesaggio della geologia.
ISPRA, Roma, pp 77–79
Nicchitta D, Messina A (2012) Il Monte Pellegrino. In: Panizza M and
Coratza P (eds) Il “Viaggio in Italia” di J.W. Goethe e il paesaggio
della geologia. ISPRA, Roma, pp 92–93
Panizza M, Coratza P (2012) (eds) Il “Viaggio in Italia” di J.W. Goethe
e il paesaggio della geologia. ISPRA, Roma, 112 pp
Wine Landscapes of Italy
45
Vincenzo Amato and Mario Valletta
Abstract
The grapevine is present in Italy from the Alpine areas to the Mediterranean islands,
according to geological, geographical, soil and climate features. The variety of wine
landscapes of Italy is mainly due to the high degree of geodiversity of the Italian territories
and second due to the complex relationships between landforms and human activities.
Since it is impossible to outline all the wine landscapes of Italy in a single chapter of a
book, we have chosen to describe only some best-quality wines and the connected typical
landscapes, such as the well-known Chianti, and some smaller and unique terroirs
connected with regional specific landscapes, such as those of Adriatic piedmont and hilly
areas (Abruzzo Region), of southern Apennine inner valleys (Campania Region) and of
mountains and volcanoes (Sicily Region).
Keywords
Italian terroir
45.1
Vineyard
Introduction
Italy is one of the major worldwide producers of wines, not
only in terms of quantity (more than 80 million hl) but also
in terms of high quality and large variety. The main Italian
quality wines are defined with different level of labels
according to their area of production and in the respect of
defined quality standards, as Controlled and Guaranteed
Denomination of Origin (DOCG) and Controlled Denomination of Origin (DOC). Within these two levels, the wines
are grouped in 92 “macro-areas”, according to geological,
soil, geographical and climatic features (Pollini et al. 2014)
(Fig. 45.1). Moreover, many other wines are anyhow true
“excellences”. The grapevines are cultivated in a variety of
environments, from high mountains to coastal areas, from
V. Amato (&)
Dipartimento di Bioscienze e Territorio, Università del Molise,
Contrada Fonte Lappone, 86090 Pesche (IS), Italy
e-mail: vincenzo.amato@unimol.it
M. Valletta
Istituto Euro-Mediterraneo di Scienze e Tecnologia, Via Michele
Miraglia 20, 90139 Palermo, Italy
Soils
Geodiversity
hills to alluvial plains, from dry to marshy areas, with bedrock that range from granites to limestones, from conglomerates to schists and from volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks
to marls and clays (Table 45.1). The wine production area is
a very important variable influencing consumers’ judgment,
since it reflects the origin, quality and traceability of the
wine. The landscape represents an important component of
the wine origin and it summarizes several factors and attributes of the wine quality (e.g. climate and soil for grape
quality, the local history for grape production traditions).
The latter is the result of a combination of geology, geomorphology, pedology, climate, agrarian features which
characterize the terroirs that make each wine so unique
(Biancotti et al. 2003). A vineyard is one of the elements
composing a landscape often becoming a revaluing and
distinctive feature for those who study and appreciate the
land and its scenery. In this way, the wine landscapes and the
related terroirs are among the major elements supporting
high quality of wine and have to be taken into account from
the production to the choice, tasting and evaluation of a
wine, both from the producers and oenologists and from the
consumers and experts’ point of view.
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_45
523
524
V. Amato and M. Valletta
Fig. 45.1 Map of the main
Italian areas of wine production
(green areas) (original drawing
by E.A.C. Costantini and R.
Lorenzetti) and selected wine
landscapes of Italy illustrated in
this chapter (orange areas)
From the outstanding variety of the Italian terroirs and
related high-quality wines (Biancotti et al. 2003; Cita et al.
2004; Colacicchi and Parotto 2006), some areas of Tuscany, Abruzzo, Campania and Sicily have been selected
and described in this chapter. These areas may be considered as representative of the main wine landscapes of Italy.
In addition, they present historical and cultural components
as additional values to the wine landscapes. The Chianti
district (Tuscany), representative of the Tyrrhenian Apennines hilly areas, is the most popular Italian wine production area in the world. The Adriatic coastal and hilly areas,
represented by the Abruzzo Region, are one of the Italian
areas of greater production of wine. The inner valleys of
the Southern Apennines, represented by the Campania
Region, having been affected by repeated and recent sedimentation of volcanic products, are the terroirs of the best
high-quality wines of Southern Italy. The Island of Sicily,
with alternating high mountains, hilly, coastal and volcanic
landforms, is a special area where the wine landscapes are
also widespread up to high altitudes. For these selected
areas, in a journey through the Italian peninsula, the
complex multifaceted relationships between landscape and
terroirs (rocks, soils, geomorphology, climate, exposure)
and grapevines are outlined, showing the main factors and
elements composing the landscapes of wine. Several
high-quality wines of the four selected areas are not
described in the following paragraphs, but they are briefly
synthesized in Table 45.2.
45
Wine Landscapes of Italy
525
Table 45.1 Selected Italian wines and their relationships with geology and landscape features
Region
Terroir
Wine
Geology
Landscape and
landforms
Piedmont
Monferrrato, Langhe,
Asti and Alba
Nebbiolo, Barolo, Barbaresco, Barbera, Grignolino,
Dolcetto, Brachetto, Moscato
Sandstones, marls,
clays, sands,
calcarenites
Hills and
hillslopes
Piedmont
Canavese, Ivrea,
Maggiore Lake
Erbaluce di Caluso
Glacial deposits
Intramoraine lake
and gentle slopes
Val d’Aosta
Aosta valley
Petit Rouge, Red and White of the la Thouille
Metamorphites,
glacial deposits
Valley flanks
Lombardy
Valtelllina
Sassella, Inferno
Glacial deposits
Stone wall
terracing of
mountain slopes
Lombardy
Oltrepò Pavese
Bonarda, Riesling
Clays, sands,
conglomerates
Hills and
hillslopes
Lombardy
Franciacorta, Garda
Terre di Franciacorta, Groppello, Lugana
Moraines
Gentle slopes
Trentino
Adige and Isarco
valley, Rotaliana
plain, Venosta valley
Schiava, Müller-Thurgau, Riesling, Sylvaner,
Sauvignon, Lagrein, Moscato giallo, Nosiola,
Traminer, Gewürztraminer, Blauburgunder
Ignimbrites,
limestones, fluvial
and glacial deposits
Well-exposed
slopes and flat
alluvial plains
Veneto
Soave, Valpolicella
Soave, Amarone, Recioto, Valpolicella
Marls, limestones,
basalts, alluvial
deposits
Hills and
hillslopes
bordering alluvial
plains
Veneto
Marca Trevigiana
Prosecco di Conegliano, Valdobbiaddene
Alluvial deposits
Alluvial plains
Veneto
Gambellara, Breganze
Bardolino, Bianco di Custoza, Cartizze, Durello,
Gambellara, Raboso
Marls and alluvial
deposits
Hills and
hillslopes
Friuli
Grave, Iudrio and
Isonzo rivers
Picolit, Terrano, Collio, Ribolla gialla, Pinot bianco
and grigio, Verduzzo, Tocai friulano, Refosco
Marls, red residual
soils, sandstones
Alluvial plains and
hillslopes
Liguria
Cinqueterre
Rossese, Pigato, Sciacchetrà
Marls, siltites,
limestones
Terraces of coastal
steep slopes
EmiliaRomagna
Colli Piacentini
Dolcetto, Barbera, Bonarda
Clays, sands,
alluvial deposits
Alluvial plains and
hillslopes
EmiliaRomagna
Romagna
Sangiovese, Albana, Trebbiano
Clays, sands and
alluvial deposits
Alluvial plains,
coasts, hillslopes
and hills
Emilia-Romagna
Parma, Reggio Emilia
and Modena
Lambrusco
Clays, sands and
alluvial deposits
Hills and
hillslopes, alluvial
plains
Umbria
Central sector
Sagrantino di Montefalco, Rubesco di Torgiano
Clays, sands,
conglomerates,
marls
Alluvial plains,
hillslopes and hills
Umbria
Orvieto
Classic Orvieto
Tuffs, ignimbrites
Intermontane
basins and gentle
slopes
Marche
Mt. Conero
Rosso Conero
Pelitic and
pelitic-carbonatic
deposits
Gentle and steep
coastal slopes
Marche
Adriatic coast
Kurni, Verdicchio di Jesi, Verdicchio di Matelica
Sandstone and
pelites
Coastal and valley
slopes
Molise
Biferno and Trigno
rivers
Pentro di Isernia, Biferno
Clays, sandstones
Hills and
hillslopes
Molise
Adriatic coast
Tintilia
Pelites
Coastal and gentle
slopes
Latium
Bolsena Lake and
Latera basin
Aleatico, Est!Est!Est! di Montefiascone
Volcanic rocks
Gentle slopes and
hills
(continued)
526
V. Amato and M. Valletta
Table 45.1 (continued)
Region
Terroir
Wine
Geology
Landscape and
landforms
Latium
Cesanese
Cesanese Comune, Cesanese d’Affile
Marls, sandstones
and volcanic rocks
Gentle slopes and
hills
Latium
Castelli Romani
Montefiascone, Frascati, Marino, Aleatico
Volcanic rocks
Gentle slopes and
volcanic hills
Basilicata
Monte Vulture
Aglianico del Vulture
Tuffs, sandstones
Gentle slopes
Apulia
Murge
Castel del Monte, Locorotondo, Gioia del Colle,
Gravina, Martina Franca
Red residual soils
Plateaux and
gentle slopes
Apulia
Salento
Primitivo di Manduria, Salice salentino, Copertino
Clays and sands
Gentle coastal
slopes
Apulia
Tavoliere
San Severo, Rosso di Cerignola, Cacc’ e mitt’ di
Lucera
Clays
Plains
Calabria
Ionian coast
Cirò, Gaglioppo, Greco, Nerello
Pelites, sandstones,
sands,
conglomerates
Terraces of coastal
slopes and valley
flanks
Calabria
Aspromonte
Bivongi
Metamorphites,
alluvial deposits,
sandstones
Steep and gentle
slopes, hills and
alluvial plains
Sardinia
Nuoro
Cannonau
Granites, basalts,
metamorphites
Gentle and steep
slopes and hills
Sardinia
Campidano
Nuragus di Cagliari
Pelites
Hillslopes and
plains
Sardinia
Gallura
Vermentino di Gallura
Granites
Gentle slopes and
hills
Sardinia
NW coast
Malvasia di Bosa
Riolitic ignimbrites,
pyroclastic deposits
Gentle and steep
slopes and hills
45.2
The Chianti Hills: A Worldwide Famous
Wine Landscape
The Chianti hills are one of the most well-known Italian
examples of a territory whose name corresponds to a
high-quality food: the Chianti wine. The Chianti Classico
area is the historic core of the Chianti hills in Tuscany,
which are intimately connected to a specific appellation of
origin, the Chianti Classico DOCG. This connection gives
paramount evidence to the linkage between landscape and
wine lying under the “terroir” concept (Van Leeuwen and
Seguin 2006; Goulet and Morlat 2011; Vaudour et al. 2015).
The Chianti Classico highlights a secular awareness and a
general acknowledgment of a “taste of land”, which is also a
cultural heritage (Costantini and Barbetti 2008). The beautiful Chianti landscape can boast a harmonious blend of
features shaped by farmers, castles and villages with traditional rural architecture and medieval heritage (Fig. 45.2).
The Chianti Classico DOCG area extends to almost
72,000 ha and presents vineyards located at altitudes not
exceeding 700 m a.s.l. The grape variety is typically Sangiovese, for a minimum of 80% of grapes, with the possible
addition of other black berries of the area, not more than a
20%. Notwithstanding the linkage between the Chianti territory and the Chianti wine, the DOC area encompasses
lands showing some common traits but also many local
specificities, which give reason for the presence of many
terroirs and wines with different qualities and styles (Priori
et al. 2014).
The Chianti landscape can be described by nine landscape units, which enclose environmentally homogeneous
areas at the reference scale of 1:250,000 (Fig. 45.3).
Actually, the morphology of Chianti is quite variable,
passing from the high and low mountains and hills to the
east, where the vineyards are placed on the Chianti Classico Ridge up to 500–600 m a.s.l. (landscape 1), to the
more gentle hills of Val di Pesa or Val d’Elsa to the west
(landscapes 4 and 5). Average annual rainfall spans
between 650 and 950 mm, with a gradient from the
northeast to the southwest. The average annual temperature
is 13–14 °C, with cold winters and hot summers and
maximum temperatures often above 35 °C. The daily
fluctuations are quite pronounced, especially at higher
elevations. The different mesoclimatic conditions have a
pronounced effect on wine acidity, anthocyanins and sugar
content (Costantini et al. 2006).
45
Wine Landscapes of Italy
527
Table 45.2 - Selected wines of the Tuscany, Abruzzo Campania and Sicily regions, and their relationships with geology and landscape features
Region
Terroir
Wine
Geology
Landscape
Tuscany
Montalcino hills
Brunello
Pelites, sands, sandstones,
calcareous turbidites
Hillslopes and hills
Tuscany
D’Orcia and di
Chiana valleys
Vino Nobile di Montepulciano
Clays and sands
Alluvial plains and
hillslopes
Tuscany
Senesi hills
Morellino, Solaia
Arenaceous turbidites,
pelites, sands
Hills and hillslopes
Tuscany
Vulsini volcanoes
Bianco di Pitigliano
Tuffs
Gentle slopes and
volcanic hills
Abruzzo
NE sectors of
Abruzzo-Molise
Apennines
Pecorino, Passerina,
Cabernet, Chardonnay, Merlot, Pinot Noir, Riesling
Clays, sands,
conglomerates, marls,
sandstones, limestones
Gentle slopes, hills,
coastal and valley
slopes
Campania
NW sector of
Campanian Plain
Falerno del Massico
Limestones, tuffs,
pyroclastites
Gentle slopes and
coastal plains
Campania
Ischia Island,
Phlegrean Fields
Per’ e’ palumm’, Biancolella
Vulcanites
Gentle and steep
slopes
Sicily
Palermo and
Trapani provinces
Alcamo, Marsala
Sandstones, marls,
limestones
Hills, gentle and
steep slopes
Sicily
Pantelleria Island
Moscato o Zibibbo di Pantelleria
Basalts, pumices
Gentle coastal slopes
Sicily
SE coastal sector
Cerasuolo, Contessa Entellina, Monreale, Conte di
Salaparuta, Moscato di Noto, Nero d’Avola, Syrah,
Inzolia
Limestones, red residual
soils, sands
Hills and gentle
hillslopes
Fig. 45.2 An example of the
landscape of the Chianti Classico
area, sculptured by man
throughout the centuries and
millennia
Landscape 1 (NE Chianti area) geologically corresponds to
the central part of the Chianti anticline, that is tectonically
overlain by the Ligurian Unit, made up of Cretaceous to
Eocene shales, limestones and marls. Sandstones of the
Macigno del Chianti formation are also present south of
Castellina in Chianti, in the upper valley of Arbia River
(landscape 3). In these units the viticulture develops on sandy
soils with locally high degree of stoniness. They have low
528
V. Amato and M. Valletta
Landscape 5 includes low and medium hills of the Val di
Pesa area, on mostly calcareous conglomerate and gravel,
with sand and clayey sand. Here the soils are well drained
and easily penetrated by roots. Good fertility may lead to an
excessive plant vigour and depress wine quality. Landscape
8 belongs to the Siena Basin and landscape 9 to the Val
d’Elsa area where marine conglomerates and sandstones of
Early–Middle Pliocene are exposed (Coltorti et al. 2009).
The sandy lithology determines well-drained soils, poor in
skeleton, easily penetrable by plant roots. As a whole, the
low-lying areas consist of soils formed upon alluvial materials with a deep rooting potential, dating from the Quaternary. Further uphill, on the Pliocene and Miocene marine
sediments, the soils are mainly clayey and calcareous, but
they are often rather thin due to severe water erosion. Chianti
wine quality here is very much affected by climatic conditions of the year, since soils are not able to mitigate the
excess or lack of available water.
Finally, the Chianti landscape and their soil features are
the key for the wine quality. On the whole, the richness of
the skeleton is the main functional soil characteristic in the
Chianti region, since it regulates soil fertility and drainage of
rainwater. Skeleton also induces a high root deepening,
which favours slow and steady supply of water and nutrients
to the plant, and an optimal ripening process of grapes.
These soils are particularly suited to tree crops in general and
wine in particular. The main Chianti grape varieties such as
Sangiovese, which exert a low genetic control on their
phenology, reach in stony soils of the Chianti hills very
high-quality levels (Costantini et al. 2006).
Fig. 45.3 Landscape unit map of the Chianti Classico area. 1 Low
mountain and high hills with medium and high gradient on sandstone
(Macigno del Chianti Formation); 2 Low mountain and high hills with
medium and high gradient on limestone and marly limestone, sandstone
and shale (Montemorello Formation); 3 High hills with medium
gradient on sandstone (Macigno del Chianti Formation) and slope of
the Flysch of the Chianti Formation; 4 High hills with medium gradient
on predominantly marly clay and shale; 5 Low and medium hills with
medium gradient on mostly calcareous conglomerates and gravels, with
sand and clayey sandy; 6 Low and medium hills with medium gradient
on sandstone; 7 Low and medium hills with medium gradient on marly
clay and shale; 8 Low and medium hills with medium gradient on
marine sand sediments; 9 Low and medium hills with medium gradient
on marine clay sediments
water availability for plants, which can be an important limiting
factor for grape production, but also a determinant of wine
finesse. A thrust fault line marks the boundary between landscape 1 and landscapes 2, 4 and 7 (i.e. Greve in Chianti, Radda
in Chianti, Castellina in Chianti) where the Ligurian Units
outcrop. Soils have good fertility and moderate water holding
capacity. The amount of the skeleton is also here the dominant
functional character. The high limestone content can limit
excessive vegetation, and be beneficial for the grape quality,
concentrating the juices inside berries.
45.3
The Wine Landscapes of the Adriatic
Piedmont and Hilly Areas: Examples
from Abruzzo
Moving toward the east and crossing the Apennines chain,
the Adriatic piedmont and hilly areas slope down to the
Adriatic coast, in a wide belt from the northern to the
southern part of Italy, and are characterized by the widespread presence of vineyards placed from the coast up to
800 m a.s.l. “Blonde” golden hills separate the mountain
range (to the west), from the Adriatic Sea (to the east). Here,
in regions where vineyard cultivation and wine making has
been well established for centuries, the Abruzzo hilly areas
have been recently growing as “hills of wine” merged with
large olive groves.
The Abruzzo piedmont and coastal hilly sector is an
approximately 30 km wide, SW–NE trending belt between
the coast and Apennines (Fig. 45.4), ranging from 100 to
1000 m a.s.l., with gentle slopes and wide alluvial plains.
Climate is humid subtropical with an annual precipitation
range between 600 and 800 mm (sub-coastal regime) and
45
Wine Landscapes of Italy
529
Fig. 45.4 Simplified lithological
map of Abruzzo and main wine
zones. 1 Gravel, sand and clay of
Quaternary deposits; 2 Clay, sand
and conglomerate of
Pliocene-Pleistocene marine
sequence; 3 Arenaceous and
pelitic rocks of Neogene turbiditic
sequences; 4 Calcareous and
marly rocks of
Mesozoic-Cenozoic marine
carbonate platform, slope and
pelagic sequences; 5
Clayey-marly-calcareous rocks of
Mesozoic-Cenozoic Molise
pelagic sequence; 6
Montepulciano d’Abruzzo and
Trebbiano d’Abruzzo wine zones;
7 Controguerra and
Montepulciano “Colline
teramane” wine zones
average temperatures ranging between 8 and 10 °C in January and more than 25 °C in July and hence suitable for
vineyards, although occasionally affected by spring frost due
to northeastern winds.
The hilly landscape is the result of fluvial and
gravity-induced geomorphological processes, which have
affected marine sedimentary rocks (Pliocene-Pleistocene
clays, sandstones and conglomerates; D’Alessandro et al.
2003) and have contributed to the formation of Quaternary
continental sedimentary deposits (slope debris and colluvial
deposits, fluvial sand, gravel and silt, beach sands)
(Fig. 45.4). These recent terrains are covered by loose
clayey, silty and sandy soils, rich in clay minerals, locally
with a gravel skeleton. Soils are from permeable to moderately impermeable with skeleton content from high to low,
with moderate water retention and good workability. They
are particularly suited to tree crops, in general, and wine in
particular (Fig. 45.5), being rich in clay minerals. Here, the
vineyards found a favourable climate, landscape and lithological conditions, except for the alluvial and coastal plains,
due to high humidity and possible water stagnancy.
A large terroir includes the Abruzzo hills and the Sulmona intermontane basin and produces well-known wine
varieties, the Montepulciano d’Abruzzo (red grape) and the
Trebbiano d’Abruzzo (white grape). These varieties were
first developed in the higher part of the Pescara River valley,
on pelitic-arenaceous terrains, and in the Sulmona intermontane basin (known since the times of the Roman poet
Ovidio as being fertile and ideal for the cultivation of wheat
and grapes), on lacustrine and alluvial deposits of a Pleistocene lake (Colacicchi and Parotto 2006). Later, they found
suitable conditions for their development in the whole hilly
landscape. Today, crops are installed on alive supports and
mostly on artificial supports. The high-quality vineyards are
grown at elevations between 150 and 500 m a.s.l. (up to
600 m for south-facing slopes), on hills with variable slope
(mainly gentle and moderate, 10–20°, or on planar hilltops)
and aspect (mainly south) (Figs. 45.5 and 45.6). The Rittochino vineyard arrangement is the most common (wine
rows perpendicular to the slope) and induces a good soil
drainage but increases soil erosion. Due to high sun radiation
and low air humidity, the “awning” system is also common
530
Fig. 45.5 a Expanses of vineyards in Central Abruzzo, with vine rows
on clay slopes bordering the main rivers; b Vineyards cover clay slopes
in central-southern Abruzzo, characterized by sandy and conglomerate
V. Amato and M. Valletta
tops and top scarps, providing a heterogeneous and well-drained soil on
the clay bedrock
Fig. 45.6 Piedmont-hilly area of northern Abruzzo characterized by coloured gentle hills, with vineyards, merged with olive groves, along the
slopes of fluvial valleys (a) and on coastal slopes (b)
(a vertical trunk with the fruiting canes originating a continuous coverage).
The quality of bedrock (moderately loose and rich in clay
minerals) and soil (incoherent, heterogeneous, poorly sorted
and well draining), together with appropriate solar irradiation, climate conditions and morphology define Abruzzo’s
Montepulciano terroir and result in the main features of the
wine: from moderate to high alcoholic rate, an inviting
intense ruby red colour, with an unmistakable aroma of red
fruits, flowers and spices, and a dry and mellow flavour.
According to historical documents, the Montepulciano has
been present in the region since the mid eighteenth century
and it has progressively become the ‘true ambassador’ of
Abruzzo’s wines (it represents over 80% of the total quality
wines of this area). From the same landscape and the same
grapes, but with a particular winemaking technique, a
cherry-red colour rosé wine is produced, the Cerasuolo wine.
From the same landscape and terroir of Abruzzo’s Montepulciano, but from white grapes, Abruzzo’s Trebbiano wine,
the second DOC of this area, is produced (Fig. 45.4). However,
Trebbiano vineyards prefer the hilly areas closer to the seaside,
characterized by higher temperatures and humidity, which
provide the wine with its straw yellow colour and its
organoleptic properties; this wine is very much appreciated for
its pleasant flowery and fruity bouquet, its freshness, and its dry
and harmonic flavour. A third DOC wine, typical of a small
area in the northernmost hills of Abruzzo, at the border with the
Marche Region, is the Controguerra wine (Fig. 45.4). It
includes excellent types of white and red wines obtained from
indigenous local grape varieties, expressing the age-old tie with
45
Wine Landscapes of Italy
the landscape (Pecorino, Passerina), together with international
grape varieties (Cabernet, Chardonnay, Merlot, Pinot Noir,
Riesling).
45.4
The High-Quality Wine Landscapes
of the Campania Region
Moving south and crossing back the Apennines chain, the
landscape of the Campania Region can be briefly summarized in two main geomorphological districts: the first,
characterized by the mountains and hills of the Apennines
chain and by wide and narrow fluvial valleys; the second,
located in the western part, characterized by alternating
high-rocky coasts, alluvial coastal plains and volcanic
landscapes (Fig. 45.7). The vineyards are widespread in all
geomorphological and lithological contexts, especially in the
hilly, piedmont and alluvial-plain sectors of the Apennine
chain. Among the latter, the Sannio and the Irpinia vineyards
are the best examples of high-quality and high-amount wine
production, particularly the territory between the Calore and
Fig. 45.7 Simplified
geo-lithological map of the
Campania Region showing the
three high-quality wine selected
areas (Castelvenere, Tufo and
Taurasi). 1 Alluvial, coastal,
palustrine-lacustrine and slope
deposits (Quaternary); 2
Volcanoclastic deposits
(Quaternary); 3 Basinal units
(Meso-Cenozoic); 4 Limestones,
dolomites and marls of carbonate
platform units (Meso-Cenozoic)
531
Sabato river alluvial plains. Only here in the whole region,
there are wines (Taurasi, Greco di Tufo, Fiano di Avellino
and Aglianico del Taburno) classified as DOCG appellation.
Wines of best quality are produced mostly in three little
village territories: Castelvenere, Tufo and Taurasi.
The village of Castelvenere, situated in the
southern-eastern flanks of the Matese Mts. (Fig. 45.7), was
founded in the Middle Ages on the volcanic deposits of the
Tufo Grigio Campano Formation (Late Pleistocene, 39 ka
BP, De Vivo et al. 2001). Over 80% of the territory is
occupied by vineyards, which are widespread in all the
geological and geomorphological contexts. A key role for
high-quality wines is played by low topographic gradients of
vineyard surfaces that allow for the development of mature
soil profiles and runoff or stagnation of shallow and deep
waters and permit a good exposure to the sun’s rays. The
vineyards producing high-quality wines are generally located on slopes with gradients ranging 10–20°, with preferential SW and SE aspect. Among the native or semi-native
grapes, the most common is the Falanghina del Sannio, an
ancient white grape variety. In particular, the Falanghina
532
V. Amato and M. Valletta
vineyards, well adapting to the stagnant water, prefer planar
or sub-planar surfaces, such as the alluvial terraces of the
Calore River, the lacustrine-palustrine terraces and the erosional surfaces located at the top of the hills (Fig. 45.8a, b).
The village of Tufo is the spearhead of the winegrowing
production zone of Sabato River valley. The main lithologies
outcropping in the valley flanks and in the hills, which reach
600 m a.s.l. at maximum, are constituted by
Miocene-Pliocene sandstone, conglomerate and clay with
intercalations of gypsum and sulphur layers. Here, in the last
twenty years, relevant works of terracing have been done for
vineyard cultivations, converting the slope profiles into long
sequences of terraces. The vineyards are widespread over all
lithologies, although gentle slopes on sandstone and
Fig. 45.8 The main wine landscapes of Castelvenere (a and b), Tufo
(c and d) and Taurasi (e and f) villages. a Falanghina vineyards on Tufo
Grigio Campano Fm. terrace; b Falanghina vineyards on Calore River
valley flanks; c Greco vineyards on alluvial terrace; d Greco vineyards
on sandstones with gypsum-sulphur layers; e Alberata Taurasina
vineyards; f Aglianico vineyards on erosional glacis truncating
Miocene sandstone
45
Wine Landscapes of Italy
silty-clay deposits—especially those with SW–SE aspects—
and alluvial or tuff terraces, generally characterized by
well-drained soils, very rich in volcanic and fluvial assemblages, are preferred (Fig. 45.8c, d). High-quality wines are
produced in the vineyards cultivated close to the
gypsum-sulphur layers of the Miocene-Pliocene succession.
In fact, the great amount of sulphur in the soils and rocks
inhibits the formation of harmful pathologies and reduce the
annual numbers of chemical and phytosanitary treatments.
This peculiarity of the Tufo territory has been the driving
force to the development of the Greco grape since the
Greek-Roman period.
The Taurasi village is located in the central sector of the
valley of the Calore River (Fig. 45.7). Taurasi wine is the
first wine of the region that achieved the title of DOCG, with
the appellation “red wine obtained mainly by the Aglianico
vineyards and secondly by other black grapes that cannot
exceed the 15%”. The production guidelines indicate that
cultivation must follow traditional techniques and must
prefer hilly landscapes with good exposure to the sun’s rays,
while the vineyards within the alluvial plains and over the
planar and sub-planar surfaces are not recommended, being
characterized by high humidity and not sufficiently sunny.
High-quality wines are produced on soils improved both by
polygenic clasts derived by fluvio-aggradational processes
and high amount of volcaniclastic and clayey fraction
(Fig. 45.8e, f). The combination of geological factors
enhances both the vegetative activity of the wines and the
winegrapes, promoting lignification processes and
organoleptic characters of the wine, giving an intensity of
aromas, good structure and balance. The widespread and
specialized presence of vineyards over the last millennia in
the Taurasi village area gave rise to the development of a
typical vineyard farming system, known as “Alberata
Taurasina” or “Antico sistema taurasino”, dating back to the
Etruscan school (3.0–2.5 ka BP) (Fig. 45.8e). Today, the
landscape of vineyards made of Alberata has almost disappeared because the modern viticulture prefers the less
laborious espalier vineyards.
45.5
The Wine Landscapes of Sicily: The
Examples of Mount Etna
and the Madonie Mountains
The journey through the wine landscapes, passing the
Messina Strait, ends in Sicily which, according to Cita et al.
(2004), is “a puzzle of different lithospheric pieces in motion
relative to each other” resulting in a mosaic of different
landscapes. Mountainous chains, developing along the
northern coast, include Saccense, Imerese and Panormide
complexes, Madonie Mts. and Peloritan-Calabrian arc
(Fig. 45.9). The southeastern sector belongs to undeformed
533
foreland. A wide deformed area, including marine deposits
of Quaternary-Neogene age and Messinian evaporites,
occupies an area comprehended between the two sectors.
Mt. Etna characterizes the eastern coast of the island. With
this geodiversity of Sicily, a great number of wine landscapes is associated, from high mountains over the 1000 m
a.s.l to the coastal landscapes, including gentle or steep
slopes, hills, alluvial plains, flat areas of plateaux, etc. Some
of them are peculiar, particularly in terms of connection
between landscape and geological features, such as the Mt.
Etna, with special cultivars widespread up to over 1000 m a.
s.l., and the Madonie Mts., representative of Tyrrhenian
coastal and mountain areas which bear traces of the whole
geological history of the island.
45.5.1
Mount Etna
Mt. Etna, one of the most active volcanoes of the world—the
largest active in Europe—is the highest mountain of Italian
islands (3323 m a.s.l.). It is a complex stratovolcano, composed of overlapping various volcanic structures active
during different periods (Branca et al. 2011; Branca et al.
2017). Its products overlap partially allochthonous Cretaceous to Pleistocene rocks (Fig. 45.9). The fertile soils
developed on volcanic products and the propitious climate,
with different climatic–environmental zones according to
altitude and distance from coast, contribute to the
high-quality wines. Vineyards are placed mostly along the
northern and eastern slopes and reach an altitude of over
1000 m a.s.l. (northern slope, Alcantara River valley). One
of the most important areas for the grape-growing extends
from the village of Randazzo (to the west) to Passo Pisciaro
(to the east). This area is delimitated, at the northern side, by
river terraces, especially suitable for grape-growing, formed
on barrages produced by lava flows. Where the slopes are
steeper, dry-stone walls contain earth platforms where
vineyards are planted (Fig. 45.10). The Etna DOC region
covers over 1828 ha in the Catania area on the eastern slopes
of the volcano. The most produced wines are red, together
with a typical white wine (Etna Bianco and Etna Bianco
Superiore) made from two very ancient autochthonous cultivars: Carricante and Catarratto comune. The vineyards
grow on volcanic terrains of Na-alkaline-basaltic composition, generally light due to the presence of ash and lapilli.
The Carricante cultivar is native of Sicily: the name means
abundant, constant yield. This wine has a particular flavour
of Marsala, and is used as base for production of many
vermouths. Etna Rosso or Rosato is a very popular red wine
produced on the slopes of Mt. Etna from the autochthonous
Nerello Mascalese and Nerello Mantellato variety. Etna’s
Minnella Bianca is a very rare white wine, typical and
exclusive of Mt. Etna. It is produced in extremely small
534
Fig. 45.9 Simplified geological map of Sicily showing the two
high-quality wine selected areas: Mt. Etna and Madonie Mts. 1
Alluvial, coastal and slope deposits (Quaternary); 2 Sandstones and
siltstones (Cenozoic); 3 Limestones (Meso-Cenozoic); 4 Metamorphic
V. Amato and M. Valletta
rocks (Mesozoic); 5 Sandy clays and arenaceous rocks (Cenozoic); 6
Clays (Cenozoic); 7 Volcanic rocks and sediments (Quaternary)
(modified after Fierotti et al. 1988)
Fig. 45.10 Mt. Etna vineyards: in the areas of Passo Pisciaro (a) and on artificial terraces (b)
45
Wine Landscapes of Italy
535
Fig. 45.11 An overview of the Madonie Mts. vineyards: a gentle slopes underlain by pelitic and pelitic-arenaceous sediments; b gentle slopes
underlain by the Numidian Flysch
quantities and is named from a cultivar characterized by long
bunches and oblong (rather than round) grapes with thick
skins.
45.5.2
Madonie Mountains
The wine production area in the Madonie mountains is
resulting only from little cultivations mainly of red wines
with a high alcoholic strength. These are located on the
northern slopes of the Madonie Mts., in an area in the
northern part of EGN/GGN Madonie Geopark, the first
Italian Geopark. Geologically, the massif consist of carbonatic, carbonatic-marly and silico-clastic sediments of the
Mesozoic-Cenozoic age (Imerese, Panormide and Sicilide
tectonic units), in addition to Numidian Flysch (Fig. 45.9).
The Trubi Formation, mainly consisting of terrigenous and
carbonatic-marly deposits, rests unconformably on pelitic
sediments of the Sicilidi tectonic unit. Great part of the
vineyards, and consequently the wine landscape, are on
gentle to steep slopes of hills made of pelitic and
pelitic-arenaceous sediments (Fig. 45.11a). Some small
vineyards are on red residual soils generated by karstic
processes on the carbonatic rocks and on quartz-arenitic
deposits, generally affected by intense and concentrated
weathering. The best high-quality wines are produced in the
Castelbuono village territory and extend especially in the
foothill and hilly areas toward the Tyrrhenian Sea. The best
wines are produced on the soils genetically connected to
Numidian Flysch, since they have a medium mixture
(sandy-silty clays) with a siliceous skeleton (Fig. 45.11b).
Vineyards extend especially in the areas with northern aspect
and elevation from 200 to 500 m a.s.l. The red, white and
rosé wines result from the union of native grapes varieties, as
Grillo or Nero d’Avola, and international ones, as Cabernet
Sauvignon, Merlot, Sauvignon Blanc and Chardonnay.
Biological and biodynamic wines are Montenero and Litra
(red wines) and Sensinverso (white wine).
Acknowledgements The chapter has benefited from multiple contributions by the following Authors. Section 1: Mario Valletta, Patrizia
Sibi, Vincenzo Amato. Section 2: Edoardo A.C. Costantini, Romina
Lorenzetti, Pierluigi Bucelli. Section 3: Enrico Miccadei, Vania Mancinelli, Tommaso Piacentini. Section 4: Vincenzo Amato, Francesca
Filocamo, Mario Valletta, Cinzia Verrillo. Section 5: Vincenzo Amato,
Mario Valletta. Section 5.1: Pietro Carveni. Section 5.2: Alessandro
Torre, Fabio Luciano Torre. English revision: Gabriella Pesci.
References
Biancotti A, Panbianchi G, Pioletti AM (2003) Spaces, environments
and landscapes of terroirs. BEM sas, Milano, 166 pp
Branca S, Coltelli M, Groppelli G, Lentini F (2011) Geological map of
Etna volcano, 1:50,000 scale. It J Geosc 130:265–291
Branca S, Chester D, De Beni E, Duncan A (2017) Landforms and
landscapes of Mount Etna (Sicily): relationships between a volcano,
its environment and human activity. In: Soldati M.,
Marchetti M. (eds) Landscapes and landforms of Italy. Springer,
Cham, pp 467–478
Cita MB, Chiesa S, Colacicchi R, Crisci GM, Massiotta P, Parotto M
(2004) Italian wines and geology. BE-MA editrice, Milano, 148 pp
Colacicchi R, Parotto M (2006) Geologia dei vini italiani. Italia
centrale, BE-MA editrice, Milano, 175 pp
Coltorti M, Ravani S, Cornamusini G, Ielpi A, Verrazzan F (2009) A
sagging along the eastern Chianti Mts., Italy. Geomorphology
112:15–26
Costantini EAC, Barbetti R (2008) Environmental and visual impact
analysis of viticulture and olive tree cultivation in the Province of
Siena (Italy). Europ J Agronomy 28:412–426
Costantini EAC, Barbetti R, Bucelli P, L’Abate G, Lelli L, Pellegrini S,
Storchi P (2006) Land peculiarities of the vine cultivation areas in
the Province of Siena (Italy), with indications concerning the
viticultural and oenological results of Sangiovese wine. It J Geosc
6:147–159
D’Alessandro L, Miccadei E, Piacentini T (2003) Morphostructural
elements of central-eastern Abruzzi: contributions to the study of
the role of tectonics on the morphogenesis of the Apennine chain.
Quatern Int 101–102:115–124
536
De Vivo B, Rolandi G, Gans PB, Calvert A, Bohrson WA, Spera FJ,
Belkin HE (2001) New constraints on the pyroclastic eruptive
history of the Campanian volcanic Plain (Italy). Mineral Petrol
73:47–65
Fierotti G, Dazzi C, Raimondi S (1988) Carta dei suoli della Sicilia.
Università di Palermo, Regione Siciliana
Goulet E, Morlat R (2011) The use of surveys among wine growers in
vineyards of the middle-Loire Valley (France), in relation to terroir
studies. Land Use Policy 28:770–782
Pollini L, Bucelli P, Calò A, Costantini E, L’Abate G, Lisanti MT,
Lorenzetti R, Malorgio G, Moio L, Pomarici E, Storchi P, Tomasi D
V. Amato and M. Valletta
(2014) Atlante dei territori del vino italiano. Pacini Editore, Firenze,
864 pp
Priori S, Barbetti R, L’Abate G, Bucelli P, Storchi P, Costantini EAC
(2014) Natural terroir units, Siena province, Tuscany. J Maps 10
(3):466–477
Van Leeuwen C, Seguin G (2006) The concept of terroir in viticulture.
J Wine Res 17:1–10
Vaudour E, Costantini E, Jones GV, Mocali S (2015) An overview of
the recent approaches to terroir functional modelling, footprinting
and zoning. SOIL 1:287–312
Index
A
Abruzzo, 2, 18, 31, 33, 54, 55, 70, 71, 226, 318, 319, 327, 332, 335,
523, 524, 527–530
Adamello, 2, 43, 101–104, 106, 107, 109–111, 171, 175, 176, 495, 496
Adda, 90, 92, 96–98
Adige River (River Adige), 45, 103, 115, 116, 124, 157, 184, 187, 197,
515
Aeolian Islands, 2, 19, 60, 61, 64, 443, 444, 447, 449, 450, 452, 498
Alluvial fan, 49, 50, 182, 194, 216, 242, 249, 250, 318, 321, 322, 324,
334, 378, 380, 382, 384, 387, 400, 405, 408, 436, 437
Alta Badia, 2, 123–129, 131, 132
Alto Adige, 16, 30, 496
Amalfi, 2, 57, 399, 400, 402, 403, 405–407
Apulia, 10, 14, 21, 25, 26, 31, 33, 34, 378, 421, 423, 429, 492, 526
Arête, 45, 106, 108, 175
Arno, 52, 68, 245, 248, 250, 252
Aspromonte, 2, 51, 59, 431–438, 440
B
Badlands, 2, 53, 56, 58, 64, 141, 226, 230, 231, 250, 254, 260, 265,
281, 282, 284–286, 288, 290, 296, 435, 492, 504, 505, 515, 517
Basilicata, 31, 33, 59, 63, 69
Beach, 51, 58, 61, 63, 64, 67–71, 116, 158, 160, 166, 177, 178, 184,
187, 188, 199, 240, 271–276, 279, 353, 360, 366, 367, 369, 371,
372, 382, 393–396, 405, 409, 413–417, 424, 430, 435, 440, 458,
461, 481, 494, 515, 529
Berici, 50, 515
Biancane, 53, 250, 251, 254, 281–283, 285–290
Bianco (Mont Blanc/Monte Bianco/Mt. Bianco), 43, 44, 77, 78, 80, 82,
84, 85, 157, 285, 439, 533
Bolsena, 252, 294, 295, 308, 310, 312, 314
Bradyseism, 393, 396, 397
Braided (Braided river/Braided pattern/Braided morphology), 50, 70,
157–159, 161, 194, 436, 437
Brenta, 46, 48, 71, 101–106, 108–111, 157, 175, 181, 183, 184, 187,
188, 495, 496
Bronze Age, 14, 178, 195, 288, 299, 346, 355, 359, 360, 389, 416
C
Calabria, 12, 24, 31, 33, 34, 51, 57, 59, 69, 70, 431, 433, 438
Calanchi, 61, 226, 250, 251, 254, 281–284, 286–290
Caldera, 60, 61, 225, 227, 230, 295, 304, 306–308, 310, 312, 389, 391,
393–396, 398, 443, 445, 448–450, 452, 471, 472, 479, 480,
482–486, 506, 508, 519
Campania, 14, 17, 31, 57, 58, 60, 61, 63, 68, 69, 389, 390, 393, 398,
400, 409, 495, 497, 524, 527, 531
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
M. Soldati and M. Marchetti (eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy,
World Geomorphological Landscapes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2
Campi Flegrei, 2, 10, 21, 27, 57, 60, 62, 389, 390, 392, 393, 395, 396,
398, 400
Cave, 26, 64, 98, 149, 152–154, 335, 373, 382–385, 396, 402, 404,
405, 415, 428, 463, 505, 507
Central Alps, 43, 46, 91, 101, 108
Central Apennines, 54–57, 226, 295, 318–321, 325, 327, 328, 332,
334, 336
Centuriation, 14, 15
Cervino, 43
Chianti, 245, 246, 249, 250, 523, 524, 526–528
Cilento, 2, 58, 68, 69, 409–413, 416–418, 495, 497
Cinque Terre, 2, 37, 68, 235–240, 242, 243
Climatic Optimum, 12, 15
Coastal cliff, 377, 382, 394, 401, 412, 449, 465, 482, 492
Coastal dunes, 2, 274, 366, 367, 496
Como Lake (Lake Como), 2, 33, 49, 78, 89–91, 96–98
Costa Smeralda, 65, 353
Crater, 60, 61, 132, 226, 295, 308, 310, 312, 389, 392–396, 445, 449,
450, 463, 472, 477, 506
Crypto-depression, 169, 171, 172, 176
Cuesta, 172, 173, 245, 249, 251–254, 258, 439
Cultural heritage, 17, 19, 242, 279, 299, 354, 439, 508, 526
D
Debris flow, 84, 85, 87, 94, 140, 239, 240, 242, 249, 279, 346, 394,
434, 462
Deep-seated gravitational slope deformation, 82, 172, 249, 279, 318,
320. See also DGSD
Delta, 12, 49, 51, 67–70, 137, 158, 166, 176, 181–183, 185–187,
193–199, 201, 202, 252, 341, 451
DGSD, 249, 251, 254, 320. See also Deep-seated gravitational slope
deformation
Differential erosion, 124, 128, 153, 172, 312, 351, 354, 362, 402, 424,
439, 457, 506, 513. See also Selective erosion
Dinosaur footprint, 26, 115, 116, 122
Doline, 26, 98, 110, 147, 150–156, 174, 253, 319, 331, 334, 335, 381,
384, 402, 421, 427, 428, 455, 463, 465, 492, 506
Dolomites, 2, 10, 19, 44, 92, 101, 103, 106, 111, 123, 126, 127, 132,
136, 144, 149, 158, 332, 378, 381, 382, 495, 498, 502–505, 508,
513, 531
E
Earth flow, 63, 132, 209, 215, 217, 278, 279, 507
Earth pyramid, 95, 96, 249
Earth slide, 131, 132, 215, 217, 435
Eastern Alps, 40, 113, 115, 137, 143, 158
537
538
Emilia-Romagna, 2, 12, 14, 15, 17, 31, 35, 48, 70, 196, 197, 202, 212,
215, 217, 219, 223, 226–228, 232, 233, 492, 502, 504–508
Etna, 2, 19, 21, 26, 33, 36, 39, 60, 61, 64, 65, 467–473, 475–477, 498,
533, 534
Etruria, 14
Euganei, 50
F
First World War, 16, 126, 130, 132, 155
Fiumara/Fiumare, 59, 64, 70, 432, 436, 437, 439
Flatiron, 172, 173, 249, 258, 266, 318
Flood, 12, 14, 31, 37, 61, 83, 84, 87, 93, 154, 158, 164, 184, 186, 190,
194, 237, 242, 243, 250, 341, 345, 404, 418
Florence, 33, 245–247, 249, 253, 260, 261, 265, 266, 501, 517
Friulian Plain, 32, 157–160, 162, 181
Friuli Venezia Giulia, 2, 16, 30, 34, 70, 138, 147–149, 151, 156, 158,
167
G
Garda Lake (Lake Garda), 2, 23, 49, 102, 114, 116, 169–173, 175–178,
514, 515
Gargano, 25, 59, 70, 377, 378, 387
Geodiversity, 2, 40, 491, 498, 501, 508, 523, 533
Geoheritage, 2, 133, 267, 491–493, 499, 501
Geomorphodiversity, 2, 133, 257, 501–509
Geopark, 19, 101, 108, 110, 300, 409, 418, 491–497, 501, 504, 506,
535
Geosite, 18, 84, 89, 108, 111, 155, 254, 304, 325, 464, 491, 492, 496,
497, 499
Geotourism, 111, 233, 328, 337, 486, 493, 499, 511, 521
Giudicarie, 102, 103, 114, 115, 121, 172
Glacial cirque, 82, 103, 107, 108, 130, 331–334, 336
Glacial trough, 45, 107
Glaciation, 12, 49, 50, 77, 81, 108, 128, 158, 162, 172, 174, 405, 416,
502, 514
Glacier, 2, 8, 12, 13, 39, 42, 44–47, 49, 53, 54, 56, 71, 77–86, 89,
91–95, 98, 101, 106–108, 110, 113, 114, 121, 123, 128, 130,
132, 137, 143, 150, 162, 169, 170, 172, 174–176, 194, 200, 327,
331, 333–335, 403, 502
Gorge, 39, 53, 55, 56, 58, 59, 64, 135–137, 141, 143, 152, 154, 158,
161, 177, 203, 207, 209, 250, 254, 271, 303, 317, 318, 351, 358,
415, 417, 435, 495, 497, 517
Gran Paradiso, 18, 43, 46, 78, 84
Gran Sasso, 25, 51, 55, 56, 327, 330–332, 334, 336, 337
Gravina/Gravine, 59, 429
Grike, 110, 149–153, 156, 492
Gully, 14, 64, 221, 226, 245, 250, 253, 283, 285, 288, 296, 308, 434
H
Hazard, 61, 77, 87, 89, 95, 215, 219, 223, 233, 242, 250, 293, 297, 325,
337, 377, 438, 440, 443, 450–452, 459, 477, 498, 506
I
Inselberg, 285, 351, 356–358, 362, 434
Insubric Line, 21, 23, 40, 45, 46, 78, 89, 91, 95, 103, 172, 498
Intermontane basin, 2, 51–55, 57, 317–319, 321, 323, 325, 327, 328,
332, 529
Ischia, 60, 62, 64, 69
K
Karren, 98, 110, 147, 150–154, 156, 331, 335, 463
Index
Karst, 2, 26, 46, 48, 53, 55, 57–59, 64, 67, 69, 98, 101, 108, 110, 111,
117, 118, 120, 147–156, 327, 331, 333–337, 377, 380–382, 384,
385, 387, 409, 411, 413, 421, 423, 424, 426, 428, 430, 433, 435,
455, 457, 463, 465, 501, 503, 505
Kettle, 92, 93, 331
L
Lagoon channel, 183, 185, 186
Landslide, 2, 52, 60, 82, 85, 93, 94, 113–121, 125, 129, 131, 132,
135–144, 152, 172, 203, 207, 210, 215–223, 226, 231, 235–243,
249, 257, 259, 260, 265, 266, 274, 276, 277, 279, 293, 296, 299,
317, 345, 346, 348, 381, 385, 402, 431, 433–437, 440, 450, 451,
457, 459–462, 472, 495, 517
Late Glacial (Lateglacial), 92, 106, 108, 114, 118, 121, 123, 128–130,
132, 163–165, 176, 505
Last Glacial Maximum, 23, 47, 91, 105, 128, 130, 136, 157, 164, 167,
174, 183, 194, 217, 334, 340, 371, 495, 505, 514
Latium, 2, 14, 17, 31, 54, 60, 63, 68, 69, 252, 282–287, 290, 293, 295,
299, 303–306, 312, 314, 315, 318, 319, 327, 331, 340, 343, 525,
526
Lava flow, 60, 63, 65, 252, 254, 304, 307–309, 314, 391, 393, 443,
445, 450–452, 467–477, 479, 483, 485, 486, 506, 533
Lavini di Marco, 113–117, 121
LGM, 12, 13, 48, 53, 56, 67–69, 71, 91, 95, 98, 106, 128–130, 137,
140, 158, 162–165, 174–176, 184, 341, 372, 498. See also Last
Glacial Maximum
LIA, 78, 82, 84, 87, 92, 93, 106, 108, 109, 262, 265, 266. See also
Little Ice Age
Liguria, 10, 17, 31–33, 37, 40, 51, 52, 67, 68, 204, 226, 235–238, 492,
494, 495
Little Ice Age, 12, 44, 78, 82, 92, 93, 106, 109, 223, 260, 275, 288,
325. See also LIA
Lombardy, 16–18, 24, 30, 43, 46, 50, 89, 90, 102, 103, 110, 171, 174,
212
M
Maggiore Lake (Lake Maggiore), 33, 46, 97
Maiella (Majella), 25, 55, 56, 327, 328, 330, 334, 335, 337
Marche, 2, 32, 35, 54–56, 70, 226, 233, 257, 258, 260, 266, 271–274,
279, 282, 283, 317–319, 321, 324, 325, 331, 530
Marine Isotope Stage, 372, 423–425. See also MIS
Marine terrace, 60, 61, 67, 69, 70, 237, 397, 415, 416, 421–424,
429–431, 438, 445, 455, 457–460, 465, 494, 506, 508
Marocca/Marocche, 113, 117–121, 172
Meander, 50, 152, 154, 158, 161, 162, 186, 203, 204, 209, 211, 212,
436
Mesa, 53, 63, 245, 249, 252–254, 293, 296, 297, 299, 300, 310
Messina Strait, 10, 26, 69, 533
MIS, 174, 175, 373, 438, 443. See also Marine Isotope Stage
Molise, 12, 31, 327, 378, 529
Monte San Giorgio, 19, 498, 499
Monviso, 44, 78, 81, 82
Moraine, 44, 46, 47, 49, 50, 77, 80–85, 87, 89, 92, 93, 98, 106, 109,
114, 129, 130, 137, 141, 158, 169, 174, 175, 331–334, 336, 514
Moraine amphitheatre, 12, 45, 49, 77–79, 81, 82, 91, 98, 162, 169, 171,
174–177, 514
Mud flat, 185, 186
Mud volcano, 2, 39, 225–233, 505
N
Naples, 15, 57, 61, 62, 389, 391–393, 400–402, 506, 518, 519
National Park, 18, 91, 92, 235, 237, 242, 243, 254, 321, 337, 362, 377,
387, 409, 416, 418, 431, 440, 470, 506
Index
Natural Park, 110, 133, 254, 260, 280, 314
Natural reserve, 18, 95, 229–231, 233, 254, 271, 312, 455, 457, 464,
465
Neolithic, 7, 13, 19, 169, 177, 288, 354, 377, 380, 382, 421, 467, 498
Northern Apennines, 14, 23, 25, 38, 49, 52, 53, 55, 70, 206, 212, 215,
216, 226, 233, 245, 260, 272, 498, 504, 517
O
Ortles-Cevedale, 43–45, 92, 102, 175, 176
P
Palaeolithic (Paleolithic), 12, 169, 174, 409, 413, 416, 421
Pantelleria, 479–483, 485, 486
Piave, 46, 48, 71, 135–137, 141, 143, 181, 182, 184, 187
Piemonte, 77–79, 81, 83, 84, 87, 204
Planation surface, 52, 245, 248–250, 252–254, 457, 463
Plateau, 10, 19, 25, 33, 44, 65, 102, 106, 110, 124, 126, 128, 129, 132,
147, 149–154, 156, 171, 225, 293, 295, 296, 300, 309, 310, 340,
341, 343, 346, 357, 360, 431, 470, 494
Po Delta, 2, 14, 48, 51, 70, 182, 194–199
Polje, 57, 151, 152, 154, 156, 322, 455, 463, 497
Pompeii, 389, 394, 506, 508
Po Plain, 8, 11, 12, 14, 21, 23, 24, 29, 30, 32, 33, 35, 45, 46, 49, 77, 78,
81, 97, 113, 169, 171, 174–176, 194, 204, 216, 226, 231, 272,
503
Po River, 12, 23, 102, 184, 193, 202, 203
Protalus rampart, 92, 130
R
Relief inversion, 205, 347
Renaissance, 2, 15, 197, 257, 267, 271, 314, 513, 521
Risk, 84, 85, 87, 89, 94, 138, 144, 167, 215, 219, 221, 223, 235, 236,
241, 242, 391, 395, 398, 443, 450, 498
Roches moutonnée, 81, 103, 108, 150
Rock avalanche, 84, 94, 113, 115, 117, 140, 172, 434, 459
Rock fall, 63, 81, 85, 87, 96, 113, 115, 119, 120, 132, 136–139, 172,
178, 238, 240, 265, 279, 283, 286, 381–383, 385, 386, 402, 407,
424, 435, 459, 479, 486
Rock glacier, 44, 46, 91, 92, 94, 108, 131, 336
Rock slide, 81, 113, 117, 131, 132, 141, 238, 252, 279, 300, 429, 434,
435
Rome, 2, 14, 16, 64, 282, 287, 290, 304, 314, 317, 324, 328, 339–349,
396, 511, 514, 517, 518
Rosa (Monte Rosa, Mt. Rosa), 33, 43, 77, 78, 84–86
S
Salento, 2, 421–430
Salse, 1, 226, 230, 232, 505
Salt marsh, 181, 183, 185, 186, 190, 274, 515
Sapping valley, 429
Sarca, 113, 116–119, 172
Sardinia, 2, 8, 10, 12, 16, 17, 21, 26, 31, 33, 36, 63–67, 325, 351–353,
358, 362, 365–367, 371, 374, 494, 496
Sea-level change, 12, 51, 67, 365, 371, 372, 377, 381, 387, 403, 405,
409, 411, 421, 423, 424, 430, 438, 491, 515
Sea-stack, 271, 276, 277, 280, 382, 383, 461, 463
539
Second World War, 1, 16, 17, 135, 156, 250
Selective erosion, 53, 57, 64, 101, 104, 205, 207, 208, 245, 248, 251,
331, 332, 408, 457, 463. See also Differential erosion
Sicily, 8, 10, 12, 14–16, 21, 26, 31, 33, 34, 51, 57, 59, 60, 64, 71, 226,
233, 431, 438, 443, 455, 457, 463–465, 467, 468, 479, 481, 492,
494, 498, 511, 519, 520, 524, 527, 533, 534
Sinkhole, 19, 152–154, 156, 323, 424, 428, 465, 494, 497, 505
Sorrento peninsula, 2, 399–403
Southern Apennines, 24, 25, 32, 57, 58, 400, 408, 410, 411
Stratocone (Strato-cone), 443, 445, 448, 449, 452
Stratovolcano, 61, 63, 306, 308–310, 389, 470, 476, 498, 506, 519, 533
Stromboli, 21, 27, 60, 443–445, 448–452, 498
T
Tafoni, 66, 206, 351, 354–358, 360, 362, 434, 435
Tagliamento, 2, 46–48, 71, 152, 157–167
Terminillo, 328, 330–332, 336, 337
Terraced slope, 235–237, 240–243
Terroir, 237, 523, 524, 526, 529, 530
Tethys, 7, 10, 46, 127, 226, 317
Tiber, 14, 248, 281–284, 287, 288, 290, 294, 295, 299, 307, 310, 314,
317, 340–349
Tidal creek, 185, 186, 515
Tor, 358–360
Trasimeno, 55
Trebbia, 203, 204, 207–209, 211, 212, 215
Tremiti, 2, 64, 377–379, 381, 382, 384–387
Trentino, 2, 16, 102, 110, 113, 116, 121, 495, 496
Triangular facet, 210, 317, 438
Tuscany, 2, 10, 14, 16, 25, 31, 34, 37, 51, 53, 60, 63, 68, 245–248, 250,
252–254, 257, 282, 285, 286, 293, 295, 497, 498, 524, 526, 527
U
Umbria, 2, 31, 54, 55, 231, 257, 258, 282, 283, 293, 317–319, 321,
323–325, 331
Urbino, 2, 257, 258, 260, 261, 265, 267, 271
V
Vajont landslide, 135–141, 143
Valle d’Aosta, 2, 12, 44, 45, 77–79, 81, 82, 87
Val Pola landslide, 94, 95
Valtellina, 2, 21, 33, 45, 89–92, 94–96, 98
Vatican City, 8, 342
Venetian Plain, 29, 32, 196
Veneto, 16, 17, 30, 47–49, 70, 124, 136, 151, 158, 182
Venice Lagoon (Lagoon of Venice), 2, 48, 71, 181–188, 190, 196, 197,
199, 515, 516
Vesuvius, 2, 21, 27, 389, 391–395, 398, 400, 501, 502, 506, 508, 509
Volcanic caprock, 283, 284, 286, 289, 290, 294–297, 300
Vulcano, 21, 27, 61, 443–445, 448–450, 452, 498
W
Western Alps, 23, 35, 40, 44, 47, 77–79, 81, 83, 84, 87
World Heritage, 19, 46, 58, 111, 123, 136, 144, 156, 235, 242, 250,
300, 399, 416, 418, 443, 468, 470, 493, 498, 501, 502