[go: up one dir, main page]

Academia.eduAcademia.edu
Meeting with Education and Juvenile Justice Representatives California Endowment Conference Center Oakland, CA May 23-24, 2012 Elements of the pipeline • Suspension & Expulsion • Since 1973, suspension increased for all students • BW disparity increased from 2X to 3.5X • School SROs • 1997: 9446 vs. 2009: 17,000 • School-based arrests • PA - 1999-2006 4,563 to 12, 918 • Ticketing • Texas: Doubled between 2006 & 2009 Who is at risk? • • • • • Students of color Males* Low SES LGBT Students with disabilities The School-to-Prison Pipeline: Pathways from Schools to Juvenile Justice School Climate Zero Tolerance Approaches Dropout Engagement / Lost educ. opportunity Juvenile Justice/Delin quency School Climate • Schools w/ harsh discipline policies, higher OSS rates ≈ perceived less safe (Steinberg, et al., 2011) • Student-teacher trust and shared teacher expectations ≈ lower suspensions (Kirk, 2009) • Schools with lowest levels of support & academic expectations ≈ highest rates of suspension, largest BW suspension gap (Gregory, et al., 2011) School engagement/lost educational opportunity • Connectedness lower in schools that expel more for minor infractions or 1st occurrence (McNeely, et al., 2002) • Attendance worsened with increased police presence (Brady, et al., 2007) • For African American males, more suspensions predicted: • Lower academic achievement in 8th grade • Lower school engagement in 10th grade (Davis & Jordan, 1994). Dropout • Suspension increased likelihood of dropout 77.5%; • Stronger predictor then SES or GPA (Suh and Suh, 2007) • Suspended/expelled students 5 times as likely to drop out (CSG, 2011) • African American males 2x more likely to drop out for disciplinary reasons (Stearns & Glennie, 2006) Juvenile delinquency/JJ involvement • OSS increases risk of antisocial behavior • Controlling for individual & family risk factors (Hemphill, et al., 2006) • Racial disparities in OSS predict similar disparities in court referrals (Nicholson-Crotty, et al., 2009). • Controlling for delinquent behavior & demographics • Suspended/expelled students greater likelihood of contact with juv justice (CSG, 2011) • No disciplinary violations -> 2.4 % • Repeat involvement (2-5) -> 14.7 % The School-to-Prison Pipeline: Pathways from Schools to Juvenile Justice School Climate Zero Tolerance Approaches Dropout Engagement / Lost educ. opportunity Juvenile Justice/Delin quency