ORIGINAL REPORTS
Left-handed Surgeons: Are They Left Out?
Prasad S. Adusumilli, MD,* Christian Kell, MD,† Jae-Hyung Chang, MD,* Scott Tuorto,‡ and
I. Michael Leitman, MD*
*Department of Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York; †Department of Neurology,
Universitaetsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; and ‡Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering
Cancer Center, New York, New York
BACKGROUND: Left-handedness has been considered a
simple inconvenience by some or something as convoluted as
“the sinister,” the Latin word for the left, by others. One in ten
medical personnel is left-handed. The perceptions of lefthanded surgeons regarding their laterality related inconveniences are unknown.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the perceptions of left-handed
surgeons and the way it has affected their surgical training and
career.
DESIGN AND SETTING: Web-based survey of left-handed
surgeons.
PARTICIPANTS: Left-handed surgeons in 2 boroughs of
New York City, Manhattan and Brooklyn.
METHODS: Distribution and completion of the survey.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Career-oriented concerns of
left-handed surgeons.
RESULTS: Three percent of left-handed surgeons received lat-
erality related mentoring during medical school. Ten percent of
the programs mentored left-handed surgical residents, and 13%
of the programs provided left-handed instruments during surgical residency. Laparoscopy and laparoscopic instruments did
not eliminate the problems associated with instrument handling to left-handed surgeons. Ten percent of the left-handed
surgeons expressed concerns when asked whether they would be
comfortable being treated by another left-handed surgeon when
they are the patients themselves.
CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals the perceptions of left-
handed surgeons in adapting to a right-handed world. Early
laterality related mentoring in medical school and during surgical residency with provision of left-handed instruments might
reduce the inconveniences of left-handed surgeons learning.
(Curr Surg 61:587-591. © 2004 by the Association of Program
Directors in Surgery.)
KEY WORDS: laterality, dominance cerebral, education, lapa-
roscopy
INTRODUCTION
Eleven percent of Americans (20% of men and 8% of women)
are left-handed.1 Studies reflect similar percentages of lefthanders among medical personnel.2 Left-handedness has been
considered a simple inconvenience by some, whereas some lefthanded surgeons feel that they are “the last unorganized minority.”1 Although left-handers are considered to be more intellectual,3 musical,4,5 and artistic4,5, studies have documented that
left-handed people are more prone to unintentional injuries,6,7
head trauma,8 motor vehicle accidents,9 and increased sports
injuries.10 Left-handed industrial workers are 5 times more
prone to finger amputations than right-handed workers.11 Surgical professions demand higher cognitive skills, good ergonomics, and coordination. Despite this, there is complete paucity of literature for left-handed surgeons. An online literature
search reveals only 5 articles related to “left-handed surgeons.”12-16 No textbook narrates advice for left-handers.
There is persistent right hemispheric activation in converted
left-handers, despite decades of right-handed writing.17
Schueneman and Pickleman15 have shown that although lefthanded surgical residents are more proficient on a neuropsychological test of tactile-spatial abilities, they tend to be more cautious, more reactive to stress, and have lesser operating skills.
In the current study, we surveyed the perceptions of lefthanded surgeons regarding their laterality related adjustment
difficulties.
METHODS
Correspondence: Inquiries to Prasad S. Adusumilli, MD, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, 430 East 67th Street, RRL 417D, Box 516, New York, NY 10021; fax: (212)
717-3053; e-mail: adusumip@mskcc.org
Presented at the Society of Critical Care Congress 2002, San Diego, California.
A web-based survey was conducted (www.geocities.com/
lefthandsurgeon). This survey consisted of demographic information, childhood experiences, lateral predominance in performing motor tasks, career expectations, mentoring
CURRENT SURGERY • © 2004 by the Association of Program Directors in Surgery
Published by Elsevier Inc.
0149-7944/04/$30.00
doi:10.1016/j.cursur.2004.05.022
587
experiences, and training support during residency. Openended questions were included seeking the opinions of lefthanded surgeons regarding specific surgical procedures and
their advice for the younger generation of left-handed surgeons.
Contact information for left-handed surgeons was obtained
from colleagues, as no such database is available. Survey forms
were mailed (surface mail and e-mail) with greetings on the
occasion of “International Left-handers Day” (August 13th).
The survey participants were from 2 boroughs of New York
City, Manhattan and Brooklyn. The responses were collected
anonymously and the results were tabulated. Incomplete responses were excluded in the final analysis.
RESULTS
Demographics: Eighty percent of the survey participants responded (n ⫽ 68). One in 5 respondents is a female. The
median age of the survey respondents was 45 years (range, 27 to
60). Two thirds of the surgeons are practicing general surgery,
whereas others are in surgical specialties. These surgeons are in
practice for a median of 12 years (mean 15 years and mode 12
years), whereas 13 of them are still in training.
Lateral predominance: Sixty-nine percent of the responding
surgeons are only left-handed, whereas 31% perceive themselves as ambidextrous. Left-handed surgeons preferentially use
their left-hand for writing a report (90%), shaving (92%),
throwing a ball (80%), and handling instruments in the operating room (70%), but they use their right hand (68%) for
handling a computer mouse. One in 3 left-handed surgeons
were forced to change laterality during childhood by their parents, teachers, and peer pressure, although most of the respondents felt that left-handedness was an advantage in team sports
(ball-oriented games).
Medical school and surgical residency experiences: The experiences of the respondents while entering into medical school
and surgical residency were documented in Table 1. The majority of the respondents surgical training programs “did not
care” about their laterality (n ⫽ 60). Others were advised “to
switch laterality” (n ⫽ 4), were “reassured and offered help” (n
⫽ 3), or were “asked to quit” (n ⫽ 1). Only one in 10 respondents were offered laterality related mentoring by the surgical
training programs. One in 2 left-handed surgeons voluntarily
sought advice from a senior left-handed surgeon during their
training period. While assisting the faculty in the operating
room during their training, 30 respondents said that none of
the faculty was annoyed by their left-handedness, whereas 38
said that some of the faculty was annoyed. Although half of the
respondents were aware that left-handed instruments were
available to them, only 13% of the respondents were provided
with left-handed instruments by their training programs. Three
surgeons considered leaving surgery at some point in their career, and 1 surgeon considered changing specialty (cardiothoracic surgery) because of laterality related frustrations.
Laterality preferences in performing an invasive procedure:
Twelve percent of the surgeons preferred to stand on the right
588
side of the bed while inserting a urinary catheter, 53% on the
left and 35% had no preference. For central venous cannulation, the preferred approaches for left-handed surgeons were
left subclavian (38%), right subclavian (33%), right internal
jugular (20%), and left internal jugular (4%). The vessel of
choice for arterial cannulation was the left radial artery (59%)
and for peripheral venous cannulation and phlebotomy was the
left forearm (78%). Twelve percent of the surgeons change the
monitor and room setup while performing an endoscopic procedure, whereas the rest perform the procedure the way it is
originally arranged.
Operating room experiences: One third of the surgeons have
their laterality preference documented on the surgeons’ preference card in the operating room. When asked whether they had
to remind the scrub nurse or technician about their left-handedness during 10 consecutive operative procedures, 27% of the
left-handed surgeons said that they never had to remind the
operating room staff, 45% of the respondents had to remind
their laterality 1 to 5 times, whereas 27% had to remind the
operating room staff more than 6 times. Sixty-one percent of
the surgeons use their right foot to activate a bovie pedal,
whereas the rest use their left foot. Twenty-eight percent felt
that they are more prone to needle stick injury and other occupational hazards in the operating room because of their laterality compared with their right-handed colleagues. Contrary to
popular belief, the introduction of laparoscopy and laparoscopic instruments did not eliminate laterality related discomfort to the left-handed surgeons. Among the respondents, 31
respondents felt that laparoscopy and laparoscopic instruments
did not eliminate any discomfort associated with laterality,
whereas 10 respondents felt that laparoscopy eliminated the
problems associated with surgical instruments completely.
Among the rest of the respondents, 15 felt that 75% of the
problems are eliminated by these instruments, 9 felt that 50%
of the problems are eliminated, and 3 felt that 25% of the
problems are eliminated.
Career experiences: During their surgical career, 59 (87%) of
the responding surgeons felt that they were never at a disadvantage compared with their right-handed colleagues during hiring
or promotion because of their laterality. Four surgeons felt that
they were at a disadvantage once during their career, 1 surgeon
felt at a disadvantage 3 times, and 5 surgeons felt at a disadvantage several times during their career. Twenty-five percent of
the surgeons said that their patients never noticed their laterality, 15% said patients noticed up to 3 times, and 60% said
patients noticed several times during their career. Ninety-four
percent of the responding left-handed surgeons said that their
patients never expressed concern regarding the operating surgeon’s laterality, whereas 6% reported patient concerns 1 to 3
times. Ten percent of the responding left-handed surgeons expressed concerns when asked whether they would be comfortable being treated by another left-handed surgeon when they
are patients themselves.
CURRENT SURGERY • Volume 61/Number 6 • November/December 2004
TABLE 1. Career-related Perceptions of Left-handed Surgeons in Percentage (n ⫽ 68). Numbers Are Represented in Percentage.
Perceptions of Left-handed Surgeons
Yes
No
1. Did you encounter practical difficulties in medical school because of your
laterality?
2. Were you offered mentoring for your left-handedness in the medical
school?
3. Did you anticipate laterality related problems prior to entering into the
surgical profession?
4. Did you communicate with a left-hand surgeon prior to entering into the
surgical profession?
5. Were you discouraged or cautioned by your peers, surgical seniors or
family in choosing surgery as a career because of your left-handedness?
6. During surgical residency interviews, did any of your referees mention your
laterality in their reference letter?
7. During surgical residency interviews, were you asked about your laterality?
8. During surgical residency interviews, did you mention your laterality?
9. During surgical residency, did your program mentor you for your hand
preference?
10. During surgical residency, did you voluntarily approach another left-hand
surgeon for advice?
11. During surgical residency, were you aware of any left-handed instruments?
12. Did your program offer any left-handed instruments?
15
85
3
97
24
76
10
84*
13
87
0
84⫹
4
3
10
96
97
90
49
40**
50
13
50
87
⫹ Do not know 16%.
*No left-handed surgeon available 6%.
**No left-handed surgeon available 11%.
DISCUSSION
The present study illustrates the perceptions of left-handed surgeons in adapting to a right-handed world. Although it may be
easier to mentor the surgical skills to a right-handed trainee,
there are no studies or teaching material available to teach lefthanded surgical residents. One in 4 left-handed surgeons in our
study was anxious entering into the surgical profession. Laterality-related guidance was reported to be minimal in medical
school. The first practical exposure a medical student has in the
operating room is handling the scissor, clamp, needle holder,
and tying a knot. It is only conceivable that unpleasant initial
tasks and difficulties during medical school surgical rotation
might be deterring left-handed medical students from choosing
a surgical career, although no data are available to correlate this.
Intrinsically, tools and instruments are built with a distinct
advantage for either the right or left-handed individual. Among
survey respondents, only 13% (9 respondents) were provided
left-handed instruments by their surgical training programs.
Having basic sets of left-handed instruments (scissors, clamps,
and needle holders) available in the teaching hospitals for medical students and surgical residents may minimize the inconveniences associated with learning.
Nearly half of the left-handed surgeons surveyed were anxious about their laterality related difficulties and sought advice
during surgical residency, but only 1 in 10 programs mentored
for laterality predominance. A previously published study by
Schueneman and Picklemann15 has shown that although lefthanded residents are more proficient on a difficult neuropsychological test of tactile-spatial abilities integrating tactile and
kinematic information, they tend to be more cautious, more
reactive to stress, and have lesser operating skills compared with
their right-handed colleagues. Authors caution that there might
be a bias in their study by the senior attending surgeons in
evaluating the performances of left-handed surgical residents
because of the inconvenience associated with assisting them.
Nevertheless, there is a lack of laterality related mentoring for
left-handed surgical residents as is shown in our study, which
might be another contributing factor in the perceivable difference between right- and left-handed surgical residents. Lefthanded surgeons preferred an approach that might be different
than a right-handed surgeon in performing an invasive procedure as revealed in the present study. Mentoring by a righthanded surgeon or a senior surgical resident will only leave the
left-handed residents to teach themselves a procedure. Perhaps
the situation might be different if there is an understanding that
an ergonomically different approach might be more convenient
and safe for a left-handed learner. Provision of a left-handed
mentor and other environmental modifications could be used
to minimize the recurring difficulties for left-handed learners.
It is interesting to note that laterality preference of the lefthanded surgeon is noted only 35% of the time on the operating
room preference card. Simple documentation of the surgeon’s
laterality preference might eliminate the interpersonal conflicts
and inconveniences between surgeons and the operating room
staff and promote a congenial operating room environment.
Studies in other professions have shown that only 45% of the
left-handers are left-footed and 57% of the left-handers are
left-eyed.18 The observation in our study that 61% of lefthanded surgeons prefer their right foot to use the bovie pedal is
consistent with that. This observation might be of significance
while developing modern ergonomic robots and other minimally invasive consoles.
CURRENT SURGERY • Volume 61/Number 6 • November/December 2004
589
Left-handed surgeons felt that the following surgical procedures are difficult to learn standing on the right side of the
operating table: open cholecystectomy, pelvic surgeries, right
hemicolectomy, and procedures around the gastro-esophageal
junction. Left-handed surgical residents should be given a
chance to stand on the left side of the operating table, which is
“right” for them to learn. Left-handed surgeons also felt considerable difficulty in handling the following instruments: long
vascular needle holders (difficult to keep the tip moving while
disengaging the ratchet), heavy hemostatic clamps, righthanded scissors, and a wheat Lander. Modern stapling devices
and endovascular instruments have significantly eliminated
problems for left-handed surgeons. The popular belief that
laparoscopy and minimally invasive surgical instruments have
completely eliminated difficulties for the left-handed surgeons
does not hold true for the respondents in this study. Laparoscopic surgery involves more static posture of the neck and
trunk with more frequent awkward movements of the upper
extremities than open surgery.19 A study by Emam et al,20
which compares ergonomic needle drivers to the conventional
finger loop instruments has shown that with ergonomic needle
drivers, a different pattern of joint movements along with a
reduction in muscle power exerted during endoscopic suturing
results in an absence of muscle fatigue. Therefore, it is important to note the observation in our study regarding laparoscopic
instruments to facilitate designing and developing left-handed
instruments during the current era of laparoscopic and minimally invasive surgery.
We were surprised to learn that 1 in 10 left-handed surgeons
have perceivable difficulty in being treated by another lefthanded surgeon. Unfortunately, our survey did not have the
provision to inquire into the reasons for this perception.
A simple website, a chapter in surgical textbooks, or a pocket
manual outlining the guidelines in performing invasive and
surgical procedures specifically for left-handed surgeons that
lists the available left-handed instruments might be of benefit
for future left-handed medical students and surgical residents.
Our study has several limitations. The sample group may
not be representative of all left-handed surgeons, but no such
database is available. There might be a source of bias in the
study as the questionnaire is specifically designed to elicit the
perceptions of left-handed surgeons only. But the responses
received are fairly consistent with the maturity of the responding surgeons. We purposefully eliminated a righthanded surgeon’s control arm, as our aim is not to elicit
performance differences among right- and left-handed surgeons but to simply seek perceptions of left-handed surgeons. Future studies with a larger number of participants
and appropriate psychometric evaluation of the survey may
help to reduce the above limitations.
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
1. Rohrich RJ. Left-handedness in plastic surgery: asset or
liability? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:845-846.
2. Henderson NJ, Stephens CD, Gale D. Left-handedness in
dental undergraduates and orthodontic specialists. Br
Dent J. 1996;181:285-288.
3. Annett M, Manning M. Arithmetic and laterality. Neuro-
psychologia. 1990;28:61-69.
4. Schachter SC, Ransil BJ. Handedness distributions in
nine professional groups. Percept Mot Skills. 1996;82(1):
51-63.
5. Gotestam KO. Left-handedness among students of archi-
tecture and music. Percept Mot Skills. 1993;70:13231327.
6. Graham CJ, Dick R, Rickert VI, Glenn R. Left-handedness
as a risk factor for unintentional injuries in children. Pediatrics. 1993;92:823-826.
7. Graham CJ, Cleveland E. Left-handedness as an injury
risk factor in adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 1995;16(1):5052.
8. MacNiven E. Increased prevalence of left-handedness in
victims of head trauma. Brain Inj. 1994;8:457-462.
9. Coren S. Left-handedness and accident-related injury risk.
Am J Public Health. 1989;79:1040-1041.
10. Bhairo NH, Nijsten MW, Van Dalen KC, Ten Duis HJ.
Hand injuries in volleyball. Int J Sports Med. 1992;13:
351-354.
11. Taras JS, Behrman MJ, Degnan GG. Left-hand domi-
nance and hand trauma. J Hand Surg. 1995;20:10431046.
12. Corbu D, Pento V, Iordache N, Dragomirescu C. Lapa-
roscopic cholecystectomy in the hands of the left-handed
surgeon. A technical note. Chirurgia (Bucur). 1998;93(1):
49.
13. Pouw L, Tulloh B. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the
left-handed surgeon. Br J Surg. 1995;82(1):138.
14. Bernstein G. Needle holders—an instrument especially
for the left-hand surgeon. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1988;
14:505-506.
15. Schueneman AL, Pickleman J, Freeark RJ. Age, gender,
The present study demonstrates the specific areas of improvement that are worthwhile to attempt to create a more positive
590
learning atmosphere for left-handed surgeons. By implementing these simple measures, inconveniences in training lefthanded surgical trainees may be minimized.
lateral dominance and prediction of operative skill among
general surgery residents. Surgery. 1985;98:506-515.
CURRENT SURGERY • Volume 61/Number 6 • November/December 2004
16. Freeman MJ, Singh J, Chell P, Barber K. Modular pha-
19. Nguyen NT, Ho HS, Smith WD, et al. An ergonomic
koemulsification training adapted for a left-handed
trainee. Eye. 2004;18(1):35-37.
evaluation of surgeons’ axial skeletal and upper extremity
movements during laparoscopic and open surgery. Am J
Surg. 2001;182:720-724.
17. Siebner HR, Limmer C, Peinemann A, et al. Long-term
consequences of switching handedness: a positron emission tomography study on handwriting in ‘converted’ lefthanders. J Neurosci. 2002;22:2816-2825.
20. Emam TA, Frank TG, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Influence
18. Augustyn C, Peters M. On the relation between footedness
and handedness. Percept Mot Skills. 1986;63:1115-1118.
CURRENT SURGERY • Volume 61/Number 6 • November/December 2004
of handle design on the surgeon’s upper limb movements,
muscle recruitment, and fatigue during endoscopic suturing. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:667-672.
591