Proceedings
PRO 78
Historic Mortars and
RILEM TC 203-RHM Final Workshop
HMC2010
Proceedings of the
2nd Conference and of the
Final Workshop of RILEM TC 203-RHM
Edited by J. Válek, C. Groot, J. J. Hughes
RILEM Publications S.A.R.L.
Published by RILEM Publications s.a.r.l.
157 rue des Blains F-92220 Bagneux - France
Tel : + 33 1 45 36 10 20 Fax : + 33 1 45 36 63 20
http://www.rilem.net
E-mail: dg@rilem.net
2009 RILEM – Tous droits réservés. e-ISBN: 978-2-35158-112-4
Publisher's note: this book has been produced from pdf files provided by the
individual contributors. In the absence of some of the original source files, limited
editorial adjustments and corrections were possible. The publisher makes no
representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy of the information
contained in this book and cannot accept any legal responsibility or liability for any
errors or omissions that may be made.
All titles published by RILEM Publications are under copyright protection; said
copyrights being the property of their respective holders. All Rights reserved.
No part of any book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means,
graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or by
any information storage or retrieval system, without the permission in writing from the
publisher.
RILEM, The International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction
Materials, Systems and Structures, is a non profit-making, non-governmental technical
association whose vocation is to contribute to progress in the construction sciences,
techniques and industries, essentially by means of the communication it fosters
between research and practice. RILEM's activity therefore aims at developing the
knowledge of properties of materials and performance of structures, at defining the
means for their assessment in laboratory and service conditions and at unifying
measurement and testing methods used with this objective.
RILEM was founded in 1947, and has a membership of over 900 in some 70 countries.
It forms an institutional framework for co-operation by experts to:
• optimise and harmonise test methods for measuring properties and performance of
building and civil engineering materials and structures under laboratory and service
environments,
• prepare technical recommendations for testing methods,
• prepare state-of-the-art reports to identify further research needs,
• collaborate with national or international associations in realising these objectives.
RILEM members include the leading building research and testing laboratories around
the world, industrial research, manufacturing and contracting interests, as well as a
significant number of individual members from industry and universities. RILEM's
focus is on construction materials and their use in building and civil engineering
structures, covering all phases of the building process from manufacture to use and
recycling of materials.
RILEM meets these objectives through the work of its technical committees.
Symposia, workshops and seminars are organised to facilitate the exchange of
information and dissemination of knowledge. RILEM's primary output consists of
technical recommendations. RILEM also publishes the journal Materials and
Structures which provides a further avenue for reporting the work of its committees.
Many other publications, in the form of reports, monographs, symposia and workshop
proceedings are produced.
Theme III
Conservation and restoration issues
case studies, values, authenticity and
compatibility of mortars, restoration and
conservation techniques
1
2nd Historic Mortars Conference HMC2010 and RILEM TC 203-RHM Final Workshop
22-24 September 2010, Prague, Czech Republic
III.30
Overview of the 100 Mortars Project
at the Archaeological Site of Herculaneum
Alessandra De Vita1, Paola Pesaresi1 and Valentina Puglisi1
1
Herculaneum Conservation Project, Italy, a.devita@herculaneum.org,
p.pesaresi@herculaneum.org, v.puglisi@herculaneum.org
Abstract The Herculaneum Conservation Project is a public-private initiative to
conserve and enhance the Roman city of Herculaneum, Italy. Emphasis is placed
on simplifying and reducing costs of archaeological site management by
reinstating site infrastructure, promoting rolling programmes of maintenance, and
research and trials to improve conservation methods. After preliminary research in
the site archives, the 100 Mortars Project is now underway and aims to study the
wide range of mortars present in the archaeological site – both original Roman
mortars and those used in twentieth-century restoration campaigns. More than one
hundred mortars have been sampled for analysis so far and it is hoped that in a few
years almost a complete range of ancient and modern mortars from Herculaneum
will be available. This will not only increase knowledge about the site but will
also contribute to the conservation of Herculaneum and other open-air
archaeological sites, thanks to the development of works strategies that consider
quality, cost and time parameters when working with each type of mortar
identified. This paper reviews the results obtained so far.
1
Introduction
The Herculaneum Conservation Project (HCP) is a Packard Humanities
Institute project, in partnership with the Soprintendenza Speciale per i Beni
Archeologici di Napoli e Pompei (SANP; the heritage authority) and the British
School at Rome, which has been active in Herculaneum since 2001. The
partnership was formalized by a sponsorship contract through which the private
partner can undertake works in the archaeological site of Herculaneum under its
own management and at its own expense with a multidisciplinary team working in
very close partnership with colleagues from the public authority [1, 2].
The 100 Mortars initiative was launched by the HCP team in order to carry out
an extensive sampling campaign across the site of both original and restoration
833
2nd Historic Mortars Conference HMC2010 and RILEM TC 203-RHM Final Workshop
22-24 September 2010, Prague, Czech Republic
mortars. Mortars from Herculaneum have never been systematically sampled and
consequently there is little knowledge about the quality and the behaviour of the
ancient mortars and those used during the nineteenth- and twentieth-century
excavation and restoration campaigns. This research is providing important data
on the different mortar typologies present (see below), their state of conservation
and the composition of the modern restoration mortars used at Herculaneum in the
nineteenth- and twentieth- century excavation/restoration onwards.
The primary focus of the initiative is on wall mortars (mortars in wall cores and
joint mortars); however, research is being extended to include mortars related to
decorative features (plastered surfaces and their preparatory layers, bedding
mortars for mosaics and mortar pavements).
The result of this sampling campaign will be of great importance in providing
additional data on the building techniques used in the Roman town, but also in
understanding the effect of the AD 79 eruption on the ancient mortars and their
condition after 80 years (and in some case of more than a century) of exposure to
the elements as the result of archaeological excavation. As HCP is a project
focused on advancing conservation methodologies and techniques, this research is
also considered as the first step in a broader study which aims to understand how
to manage the conservation of mortars in open-air conditions and how to conserve
them where cement-based mortars were applied during modern restoration works.
These results will also inform the rolling programme of maintenance that is being
launched at Herculaneum, and could also be useful for other sites in the Vesuvian
and Naples area.
2
Understanding mortars to consolidate Herculaneum’s walls
Since 2007 the HCP team has carried out extensive mapping of Herculaneum’s
walls, aimed at identifying structural problems and intrinsic characteristics that
could affect its survival. Since 2005 a campaign focused on structural
consolidation has been one of HCP’s main activities and the mapping, along with
other studies on materials and construction techniques, has provided support for
programming works [3, 4].
In Herculaneum the nature of the site’s burial means that wall structures often
survive at a significant height (32% of the walls in the archaeological site are
higher than 3 m) and the buildings may have more than two floors still in place
(unlike Pompeii). However, these heights are not properly supported by thick
consistent walls (more than 50% of the walls are no wider than 50 cm). These
structures are similar in height to those found in modern towns, but are as fragile
as archaeological ruins. In addition, violent site formation processes and
progressive decay have caused many walls to be in conditions at the limit of
resistance to failure: bowing and leaning, erosion of lower portions, etc. are
common phenomena.
834
2nd Historic Mortars Conference HMC2010 and RILEM TC 203-RHM Final Workshop
22-24 September 2010, Prague, Czech Republic
The characteristics of the mortars that sealed the joints are crucial in cases of
rising damp, a very common condition at Herculaneum. Erosion is also a
characteristic of half-excavated structures, in areas close to the edge of site, as
ground water coming from the modern town above is continual. In reality the
decay by erosion in Herculaneum surprisingly affects the tuff blocks that make up
the wall facing more than the mortar holding them together. This demonstrates the
strong resistance of the ancient mortars used in Herculaneum (indeed, there is
wide evidence for use of pozzolana in mortars at Herculaneum and Pompeii).
3
Ancient and modern wall mortars in Herculaneum
The composition and quality of the original construction mortars used in
Herculaneum’s walls do not only have archaeological value, but are also
fundamental for understanding the structural capacity of the wall itself. In the case
of Herculaneum, the masonry fabric has been exposed to violent natural events
and slow decay processes: the archaeological site which we deal with today is the
result of the AD 62 earthquake and AD 79 eruption, as well as the trauma of
excavation, extensive restoration inventions (including reconstructions with a
variety of modern and often incompatible materials) and gradual decay due to
exposure to the elements since excavation.
Today understanding the structural capacity of an archaeological wall is of
great importance in order to better carry out its restoration, and is even more so
when, as in the case of Herculaneum, it is in a seismic area.
The decision to core sample the walls was made so as to gain the most
information with the least invasive option possible: the core drill can extract
bedding mortar from the wall facing and core filling.
3.1
Rubble core masonry walls at Herculaneum
The most widespread typology of masonry in the Roman world – and therefore
at Herculaneum – are faced walls with a rubble core where the external facings
functioned as formwork into which the core mixture was poured. Roman
constructions vary considerably according to geographical location, construction
period, wall thickness and decay suffered [5]. In Herculaneum the external facings
are usually made up of geometrically arranged tuff blocks and sometimes are
brick-faced walls. Instead the reconstruction of wall facings during and after
excavation were carried out using an alternative arrangement of tuff blocks, which
was used as a visual language for distinguishing original from restored sections.
Before the 100 Mortars sampling campaign began, knowledge of the wall cores
was limited and came from direct observation of the few unconsolidated wall
crests. On the basis of this data, the core seems to be made up of large quantities
of mortar containing tuff and/or brick fragments. The wall cores reconstructed
835
2nd Historic Mortars Conference HMC2010 and RILEM TC 203-RHM Final Workshop
22-24 September 2010, Prague, Czech Republic
after the nineteenth- and twentieth-century excavations are instead distinguished
by the use of lapilli as an aggregate, a clear sign that the restoration work was
carried out in the modern period (as lapilli were a product of the AD 79 eruption).
4
Methodology
As the 100 Mortars project is not a global sampling campaign but one for a
limited number of samples, choosing areas to sample was crucial for obtaining
comparable results. This is a summary of the strategy adopted:
• Building typology (public/private, bath building, house, etc.);
• Architectural typology (pilaster, colonnade, elevations, etc.);
• Construction technique (opus reticulatum, incertum, vittatum, mixtum,
craticium) [5];
• Restoration techniques (1800s, 1927-1939, Second World War period, post-war
period, after 1961).
These categories were agreed with the HCP archaeologists [6] using research
that had already been acquired on the Roman period and the post-excavation
restoration techniques (using the excavation diaries and photographs held in the
heritage authority’s archive). The main objective is to create a database of
comparable information on various levels, so as to obtain results that connect the
conservation risk to construction typology, construction period or restoration
characteristic. In this way, using HCP’s GIS database as a tool it is possible to
establish works priorities using data gathered from decay mapping crossreferenced with the 100 Mortars results.
For the internal samples a diamond-tipped core drill was used with a diameter
of 2 cm, while pieces of the joint mortars were often easier to extract using a small
hammer and chisel. The bored hole was also investigated using an endoscope. The
location of the samples is recorded on a geo-referenced map and all the relevant
data are entered into HCP’s GIS database (Fig. 1) [7].
836
2nd Historic Mortars Conference HMC2010 and RILEM TC 203-RHM Final Workshop
22-24 September 2010, Prague, Czech Republic
Fig. 1 Examples of HCP mapping of walls using the GIS data base (Image: Paola
Pesaresi/Ascanio D’Andrea/HCP)
During the first sampling campaign on wall cores, 44 core samples were taken,
of which only 4 remained intact during extraction (Fig. 2). This is already a result
in itself, as it can be deduced that the decohesion of the core’s component material
is tied to the presence of clayey material mixed with lime. This clay component
has been preliminarily identified as volcanic material (a mixture of pumice) dating
to 3800 years ago (the so-called Avellino pumice) which is widely present in the
geology of the Herculaneum area. The characteristic of disaggregating in water
was also true for samples taken from the walls that had been entirely reconstructed
during the 1800s restorations and those carried out by Amedeo Maiuri (19271961), probably because they used material from the eruption of AD 79 in the
mix.
All samples were taken with the aim of creating thin sections to be examined
under an optical microscope in order to evaluate:
•
•
•
•
the ratio between binder and aggregate;
the petrographic components of the aggregates;
the presence of salts;
the microscopic decay conditions.
Further investigation is planned in order to characterise the various types of
mortar including X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Thermogravimetric Analyses
(TGA/DTA).
837
2nd Historic Mortars Conference HMC2010 and RILEM TC 203-RHM Final Workshop
22-24 September 2010, Prague, Czech Republic
Fig. 2 One of the most complete cores taken from a Herculaneum wall. A: stone; B: stone
fragments mixed with mortar; C: mortar with clayish appearance; D: stone. (Image: Alessandra
De Vita/HCP)
5
Sampling decorated wall plasters and restoration mortars
Outdoor and indoor decorative plasters at Herculaneum are composed of
different kinds of aggregate with varied granulometry. The use of local materials
such as pyroclastic sands or sand taken from the two rivers which ran alongside
Herculaneum was common. In many cases a mixture of inert sands was used,
though a single aggregate is found in some cases. The lower areas of outdoor
plasters were usually made with the addition of ground brick dust to give the
mortars hydraulic properties and longer durability.
After a careful examination of the weathered areas around site, twenty samples
of decorative plasters were taken from lacunae in the painted layer. Pre-selection
was also carried out using macro-photography (Figs. 3-4).
Large quantities of cement were used during the excavation and restoration
campaign led by Amedeo Maiuri from 1927 to 1962 [8]. Apart from the cement
used to surround fresco fragments, Maiuri used to fill in gaps with a mortar on
which an outline of the decoration was sketched. Restoration mortars will also be
sampled and examined. The period in which these interventions were carried out
can be identified by consulting the heritage authority’s archives.
6
Sampling floor mortars
Herculaneum has various types of mortar floors including cocciopesto (ground
terracotta fragments mixed with mortar, often with tesserae or polychrome marble
fragments inserted as decoration), mosaics; opus sectile (marble pieces bedded in
mortar and arranged in geometric patterns).
838
2nd Historic Mortars Conference HMC2010 and RILEM TC 203-RHM Final Workshop
22-24 September 2010, Prague, Czech Republic
Most of these floors have been restored in the past and so the selection of
original mortars was determined by a team including an archaeologist and a
conservator. Forty-one samples of mortars used in these types of floors have been
taken from lacunae.
Fig. 3 Detail of plaster in the peristyle of the House of Argos where the primary aggregate can be
seen. Scale marker: units of 1 cm. (Image: Alessandra De Vita/HCP)
Fig. 4 Detail of plaster from the facade of the House of the Genius showing brick fragments and
black volcanic sand grains (the latter are indicated with arrows). (Image: Alessandra De
Vita/HCP)
839
2nd Historic Mortars Conference HMC2010 and RILEM TC 203-RHM Final Workshop
22-24 September 2010, Prague, Czech Republic
7
Preliminary results
Although we are still waiting for the results of the scientific analyses on the
samples taken from this first campaign at Herculaneum, it is already possible to
say that the sampling methodology and 100 Mortars Project aims are a significant
step forward both for our understanding of ancient Herculaneum and for
improving conservation techniques and methodologies.
After several years of activities focused on the ancient city’s structures and
decorative features, thanks to a continual campaign of emergency interventions
and maintenance, the HCP team has entered into a new phase where it is handing
over information, conservation approaches and methodologies to SANP. Through
research, experimentation and pilot projects, but in particular through a long
process of co-programming (where the public partner and the private partners
commission consultancy and works in unison), the HCP team is attempting to
launch a long-term conservation programme for the entire archaeological site
sustainable with the resources of the public partner alone. Maintenance campaigns
are being organised by typology, both on structures and decorative features. These
are accompanied by interventions that focus on specific problems and also by
more complete conservation projects. In this context, the 100 Mortars project will
constitute a particularly important contribution as an attempt to identify the best
techniques for the maintenance and conservation of construction mortars and those
for floors and wall plasters.
8
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all HCP colleagues for their support of this
research project, and in particular Domenico Camardo who provided insight and
advice on archaeological issues; Rossella Di Lauro who assisted with the
investigations within walls; Giorgio Torraca for input on the research objectives
and diagnostic investigations; Stefano Volta for technical assistance for sampling.
In addition, the contribution of SANP colleagues, such as that of Maria Paola
Guidobaldi and Giuseppe Zolfo, continues to be vital in ensuring the relevance of
our work for benefiting long-term management of the site.
9
References
1. Thompson J (2007) Conservation and management challenges in a public/private partnership
for a large archaeological site (Herculaneum, Italy). Conservation and Management of
Archaeological Sites 8:191-204
2. Guidobaldi MP (2006) L’Herculaneum Conservation Project. Un programma di
conservazione per salvare la città antica. Ocnus 14: 135-142
840
2nd Historic Mortars Conference HMC2010 and RILEM TC 203-RHM Final Workshop
22-24 September 2010, Prague, Czech Republic
3. Pesaresi P, Martelli Castaldi M (2007) Conservation measures for an archaeological site at
risk (Herculaneum, Italy): from emergency to maintenance. Conservation and Management
of Archaeological Sites 8: 215-236
4. Pesaresi P (2009) Gestire l’emergenza. La manutenzione delle strutture archeologiche.
In:Coralini, A. (ed.) Vesuviana. Archeologie a confronto. Antequem, Bologna
5. Adam JP (1994) Roman Building: Materials and Techniques. B.T. Batsford Ltd
6. Camardo D (2007 Archaeology and conservation at Herculaneum: from the Maiuri campaign
to the Herculaneum Conservation Project. Conservation and Management of Archaeological
Sites 8:205-214
7. Thompson J, D’Andrea A (2009) Gestione di un progetto interdisciplinare in un sito
archeologica complesso. In:Coralini, A. (ed.) Vesuviana. Archeologie a confronto.
Antequem, Bologna
8. Maiuri A (1958) Ercolano. I nuovi scavi (1927-1958). Istituto Poligrafico dello Stato, Rome
841
2nd Conference on Historic M ortars and
RILEM TC 203-RHM Final W orkshop
HM C2010
Proceedings of the 2nd RILEM Conference
Edited by J. Válek, C. Groot, J. J. Hughes
RILEM Proceedings PRO 78
e-ISBN: 978-2-35158-112-4
2010 Edition
An objective of the 2nd Historic Mortars Conference is to bring together
scientists, technicians and professionals involved in research and studies
of historic mortars to present and discuss advances in this topic. The main
theme of the conference is the conservation of historic buildings and works
of art, i.e. studying mortars with respect to repair. This is a unifying field
where a truly interdisciplinary collaboration is needed and where
contributions of archaeologist, architects, civil and structural engineers,
geologists, material scientists, chemists, conservation scientists and art
restorers interested in mortars should have their place. The special focus of
the conference will be on the application of research and technical
knowledge to conservation practice and vice versa in its reflection on such
recommendations.
RILEM Publications S.a.r.l.
157 rue des Blains
F-92220 Bagneux - FRANCE
Tel: + 33 1 45 36 10 20 Fax: + 33 1 45 36 63 20
E-mail : dg@rilem.net