FAST
FASHION
Edited by Bibiana Obler
and Phyllis Rosenzweig
With essays by Kirsty Robertson
and Thuy Linh Nguyen Tu
SLOW
ART
Contents
Contents
2 Foreword
Anne Collins Goodyear and
John Wetenhall
6 Introduction
Bibiana Obler and
Phyllis Rosenzweig
Essays
18 The Art of Warehousing
Thuy Linh Nguyen Tu
26 The Afterlife of Clothing
Kirsty Robertson
Catalogue
38 Julia Brown
Live feed; printer-error
identification station and
operator at an Italian luxurysilk textile factory; Or, before
“Leaving the Factory,” the
meditative disposition’s
instinct for privacy, 2010
40 Martin de Thurah
Stories, 2017
42 Carole Frances Lung
Frau Fiber vs. the Circular
Knitting Machine, 2015
44 Cat Mazza
Electroknit Dymaxion, 2019
48 Senga Nengudi
The Threader, 2007
50 Planet Money Makes a T-Shirt,
2013
52 Martha Rosler
Martha Rosler Reads “Vogue,”
1982
54 Hito Steyerl
Lovely Andrea, 2007
56 Sweatshop—Deadly Fashion,
2014
58 Rosemarie Trockel
Yvonne, 1997
60 Wang Bing
15 Hours (Shi Wu Xiao Shi), 2017
64 Suggestions for Further Reading
66 Suggestions for Further Viewing
67 Author Biographies
Introduction
Bibiana Obler and
Phyllis Rosenzweig
6/7
Fast Fashion / Slow Art, both as exhibition
and catalogue, aims to catalyze broadranging conversations about issues related
to the global production and distribution
of textiles. What are the merits of the
local and tailor-made versus the mass
production of fast fashion? Is it possible
to protect workers’ rights and ensure
safe working conditions while keeping
up with consumer demands? How
does technology affect the experience
and conditions of labor? What skills
do the mass production of textiles
require? Can design and technology offer
sustainable solutions to the environmental
effects of fast fashion? What role do
art and popular culture have in raising
consumer consciousness?
labor activists, conscientious
consumers, corporate lobbyists, and others have been studying and
discussing textile production and distribution for decades. It was the
cotton mills, after all, that sparked the Industrial Revolution. Fast Fashion /
Slow Art focuses on the particularities of garment industries’ operations
in this age of fast fashion. The quantity of production, the environmental
effects of the global movement of raw and manufactured goods, the implications—so far mostly negative—of new technologies (such as fabrics
that combine synthetic and organic materials), and the scale of waste
have produced a crisis qualitatively different from that which spurred
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels to formulate The Communist Manifesto.
Labor conditions continue to constitute violence against workers—now
especially women—but the combination of technological “innovations”
with the speed and scale of moving goods, and the complicated trade
politics between nations, have created new challenges.
It is beyond the scope of this exhibition and catalogue to provide a
comprehensive analysis of fast fashion in the twenty-first century. Rather,
the works by artists and filmmakers in this show—through metaphor,
poetic sensibility, irony, protest, and humor—ask us to slow down and
consider the complexities of various issues surrounding the garment
industry and its embeddedness in everyday lives.
“Fast fashion” refers to a mode of production, distribution, and
marketing that creates and feeds an appetite for the frequent consumption
and discarding of clothing. Supplying inexpensive, yet stylish, garments
became a leading business model in the 1990s: by restocking stores with
new and incredibly cheap options, sometimes as often as twice a week,
ARTISTS, FILMMAKERS, ECONOMISTS,
1
Fig. 1. Martha Rosler,
Martha Rosler Reads
“Vogue,” 1982, video, color,
sound, 25:22 minutes.
Courtesy Electronic Arts
Intermix (EAI), New York.
8/9
2
clothing companies encouraged constant and binge consumption. The
system relies on poor-quality, high-speed manufacture and low wages, as
well as highly networked connectivity that allows for last-minute design
decisions communicated to factories scattered across the globe.1 “Fast
fashion” is just the latest incarnation of the pleasures and ills associated
with garment production. Already it shows signs of yielding to a slowly
increasing desire, on the part of consumers, for well-made garments that
have at least some claim to sustainability and being “woke.”
The videos in Fast Fashion / Slow Art coincide with the rise—and
perhaps incipient waning—of fast fashion. They address this stage
in the history of the garment industry in diverse ways, but they all
play with the documentary form, injecting it with performance and
fiction, the better to get at the truth of their subjects. In “The Painter
of Modern Life,” Charles Baudelaire defined modernity with fashion
in mind: the eponymous artist “makes it his business to extract from
fashion whatever element it may contain of poetry within history, to
distil the eternal from the transitory.”2 Likewise these videos represent
the beauty and ugliness of the millennial moment—how this period’s
struggles are distinctive, but also belong to the ever-lengthening history
of modernity.
Martha Rosler’s now classic Martha Rosler Reads “Vogue” (fig. 1)
introduces many of the themes in the show: the divide between the
privilege associated with fashion and the adverse conditions of sweatshop
laborers; murky relations between fashion and art patronage; and the
call for viewers to realize their own complicity. Rosler dedicates most of
her twenty-five-minute video to a deadpan feminist critique focused on
Vogue magazine. In a short musical interlude to the tune of Blondie’s “Die
Young Stay Pretty,” she presents footage from a sweatshop, presumably in
New York’s Chinatown, accompanied by statistics on garment production:
“Over 40% of clothes sold in the US are made in the Third World. Most
of the rest are made in Third World enclaves in NYC, Miami, Chicago,
and L.A.” At that time, in 1982, the US garment industry was still in a
relatively early stage of its seismic shift away from primarily US-based
production. In 1965, less than 5 percent of clothing sold in the United
States was made abroad. Recent statistics indicate that the opposite is
now the case—about 97 percent is made abroad—although the tide may
be slowly reversing.3
Many of the videos in the exhibition not only take up issues broached
by Rosler but also relate to her tactics. In Lovely Andrea (fig. 2), Hito
Steyerl combines footage from multiple sources and inserts herself into
Fig. 2. Hito Steyerl,
Lovely Andrea, 2007,
single-channel video,
color, sound in English,
Japanese, and German
with English subtitles,
30 minutes. Courtesy of
the artist and Andrew
Kreps Gallery, New York.
Image CC 4.0 Steyerl.
Fig. 3. Julia Brown,
Live feed; printer-error
identification station and
operator at an Italian
luxury-silk textile factory;
Or, before “Leaving the
Factory,” the meditative
disposition’s instinct for
privacy, 2010, HD color
video, sound, 2:49
minute loop. Courtesy
of the artist.
Fig. 4. Carole Frances
Lung, Frau Fiber and Bob
standing in front of a
ring spinner at Echoview
Fiber Mill, Weaverville,
North Carolina, taken
on-site during filming
of Frau Fiber vs. The
Ring Spinner, 2016,
photograph. Courtesy
of ILGWU archive.
Fig. 5. Carole Frances
Lung, Frau Fiber vs.
Stoll, 2016, video. Filmed
at StrickChic, Apolda,
Germany. Courtesy of
ILGWU archive.
Fig. 6. Institute 4 Labor
Generosity Workers &
Uniforms (Frau Fiber’s
headquarters and experimental factory, 322 Elm
Avenue, Long Beach,
California) on the anniversary of the Triangle
Shirtwaist Factory fire,
March 25, 2016. Courtesy
of ILGWU archive.
Fig. 7. Frau Fiber at
the Institute 4 Labor
Generosity Workers &
Uniforms in the annual
production of 146
commemorative blouses
honoring those who died
in the Triangle Shirtwaist
Factory fire, March
25, 2016. Courtesy of
ILGWU archive.
10 / 11
the narrative to offer a feminist critique—in this case, of the industry of
bondage pornography. Steyerl, even more than Rosler, unsettles distinctions between documentary and fiction. Her focus provides a lens for a
broad-ranging interrogation of what constitutes freedom and bondage,
including the drone of sweatshop labor (this time to the tune of Donna
Summer’s 1983 “She Works Hard for the Money”).
The pace of Rosler’s and Steyerl’s videos is deliberate, making
certain demands on a viewer’s attention span, but interspersed with
dance music and varied visual evidence. Julia Brown’s Live feed; printererror identification station and operator at an Italian luxury-silk textile
factory; Or, before “Leaving the Factory,” the meditative disposition’s instinct
for privacy (fig. 3) asks the viewer to stand just behind a worker and experience her labor, which appears in an unending loop. The screen glows
with scrolling silk as the woman checks for machine-made mistakes.
Brown foregrounds beauty and drudgery, and buries, for a researcher
to uncover, a critique of the entanglement of the garment industry with
art patronage.
Carole Frances Lung (Frau Fiber’s archivist and biographer) and
Wang Bing take slowness to even more extreme lengths in their durational
videos. Lung’s four-and-a-half-hour Frau Fiber vs. the Circular Knitting
Machine is the first in a series of real-time films in which her avatar
competes by hand against means of industrial production. In addition
to taking on a sock factory, Frau Fiber has faced off with a ring spinner
(fig. 4) and a flatbed knitting machine (fig. 5). Of the artists in Fast
Fashion / Slow Art, Lung is the most wholly concentrated on garment
industry critique and activism. Her studio and headquarters, the Institute
4 Labor Generosity Workers & Uniforms (ilgwu), pays homage to the
International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union, which Rosler also thanks
in the credits of her video. In addition to starring in time-based media,
Frau Fiber conducts workshops and performances that draw heavily on
historical research. The anniversary of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory
fire, wherein 146 garment workers died in 1911, is the occasion for an
annual event (figs. 6–7).
In Frau Fiber vs. the Circular Knitting Machine, Lung approaches
her activism with deadpan humor. Wang, by contrast, is a filmmaker who is refashioning cinema verité for the twenty-first century.
3
4
6
5
7
8
15 Hours (Shi Wu Xiao Shi) (fig. 8), his longest film to date, records a
day in the life of a garment-processing facility in Huzhou, China—the
length of the film determined by the length of the work day.4 Wang’s
“cinema of labor,” as Elena Pollacchi has described his oeuvre, relies on
vast footage made possible (on his limited budget) by digital technology.
His films are notable for how intimately they convey people’s everyday
lives and the effects of China’s rapid economic growth.5 Although their
work is stylistically different, both Wang and Rosler deploy documentary footage to explore the particular challenges people face in their
own time. Martha Rosler Reads “Vogue” comments, for example, on the
problem of contracting (the scandal regarding where Nancy Reagan’s
high-fashion clothes were actually made). Wang’s attention to garment
workers—in 15 Hours and also in another film, Bitter Money (2016),
which begins by tracking the journey of two teenage cousins from
Fig. 8. Wang Bing,
15 Hours (Shi Wu Xiao
Shi), 2017, 16:9 film,
color, sound in Chinese
Mandarin and dialect
with English subtitles;
in two parts, 7 hours,
55 minutes each. Edition
of 6 + 2 AP, courtesy
of the artist and Galerie
Chantal Crousel, Paris.
Fig. 9. Rosemarie
Trockel, installation
view of Yvonne (1997,
video) at the Galerie
für Zeitgenössische
Kunst Leipzig. © 2018
Artists Rights Society
(ARS), New York / VG
Bild-Kunst, Bonn;
courtesy of GfZK Leipzig.
9
12 / 13
10
rural China to Huzhou—provides a granular view of the widespread
phenomenon of migrant labor in contemporary China.
The videos by Rosemarie Trockel, Cat Mazza, Senga Nengudi,
and Martin de Thurah share concerns with the films discussed above,
including an interest in the performative and for relations between
hand-making and industrial production. However, they take a different
tack. Trockel’s Yvonne features friends of all ages cavorting in the artist’s
eccentric woolen creations. The only other work in the show from the
twentieth century, like Rosler’s video, Yvonne conjures a nexus of ideas
that plays out in myriad ways in the twenty-first. Sometimes exhibited
as part of an installation that includes photogravures of video stills and
a suitcase containing items worn in the video (fig. 9), Yvonne asks to be
understood in the context of Trockel’s career. Famously, for example, she
interrogated the privileged status of painting by having corporate logos
and other impersonal motifs converted into patterns for machines to
knit—and exhibiting these in lieu of oils on canvas. Highly personalized
adornments were handmade for Yvonne’s cast. Together, the various
modes of production suggest an investigation of the relationship between
handicraft, the work of art, and late capitalist technologies.
As an artist who consistently works with textiles, often with an
activist agenda, Mazza is closest to Lung in her overall practice. Perhaps
most famously, she organized makers from around the world to contribute
to her Nike Blanket Petition, which appealed to the corporation for fair
labor conditions with crocheted squares in lieu of signatures (fig. 10). Her
scrutiny of the intersection between technology and textiles, however,
puts her into a direct lineage with Trockel. For Fast Fashion / Slow Art,
Fig. 10. Cat Mazza, Nike
Blanket Petition, 2003–8,
crochet and knit,
natural and synthetic
yarns, and web media,
15 × 5 1⁄2 feet. Image
courtesy of the artist.
Fig. 11. Martin de Thurah,
Stories, 2017, video,
black-and-white, sound,
2:04 minutes. Courtesy
of the artist and Epoch
Films, New York.
Fig. 12. T-shirts produced
by National Public
Radio’s Planet Money
Makes a T-Shirt, 2013.
Collection of Pietra Rivoli,
photo by Blaine Dunn.
Fig. 13. Aftenposten,
Sweatshop—Deadly
Fashion, 2014, fiveepisode web series.
Courtesy Aftenposten,
photography by
Pål Karlsen.
14 / 15
Mazza has conceived a video installation, Electroknit Dymaxion, that will
combine grid-based designs drawn from multiple sources, including the
Textile Museum’s collection (Plates 10–11). After converting motifs into
knitting patterns with the help of an open-source program she developed
in 2004 with the help of programmer Eric St. Onge, Mazza will have her
knitting machines use the patterns to create “paintings,” some of which
she will animate and project onto a polyhedron inspired by Buckminster
Fuller’s Dymaxion map. If Trockel targets the elitism and sexism of the
art world through outsourcing and hand-making, Mazza aims to connect
communities through an open-source web application that generates
patterns for hand-making.
Nengudi’s The Threader (Plate 12), like Yvonne, glories in the physical
relationship between skein and human body. As a portrait of one of the
last highly skilled textile workers employed in a New York City factory,
Nengudi’s film alludes to the dwindling number of such jobs in the
United States. The Scalamandré factory, founded in 1929 in Queens,
New York, supplies luxury decorative textiles to the White House, among
others. In 2004, for the sake of cutting costs, it moved most of its production to a technologically up-to-date facility in North Carolina. Only a
few artisans remained, in rented quarters, including Amir Baig, the star
of The Threader. While the film is elegiac in mood, Nengudi’s focus is
on the beauty of such work and the way labor can be akin to dance.6
In Martin de Thurah’s short, staged film, Stories (fig. 11), a girl walks
through Berlin peeling white T-shirts off her body like some variation
of a clown car, discarding them with insouciance. The impression of a
camera simply recording without judgment creates a surreal dissonance
between real and unreal. That the T-shirt is both indispensable and utterly
disposable in this dreamlike sequence speaks pointedly to a theme of so
much of the work in Fast Fashion / Slow Art: the invisibility of the human
cost of producing fast fashion.
A final cluster of videos includes more mainstream fare. National
Public Radio (npr)’s Planet Money Makes a T-Shirt, an interactive website
combining text with video, documents the process entailed in making
a T-shirt, from growing cotton in Texas to sewing in Bangladesh to
transporting the shirts back to npr listeners (fig. 12). Sweatshop—Deadly
Fashion (fig. 13), a reality show produced by Aftenposten, Norway’s largest
11
12
13
newspaper, took three young fashion bloggers to Cambodia to see what
working conditions are like there, turning two of them into activists.
In both of these, the imagined viewer is unambiguously the (relatively
well-off) consumer and the goal is consciousness-raising. Also worth
noting in this context is comedian John Oliver’s meticulously researched
2015 segment on fast fashion for Last Week Tonight, which hilariously
and incisively exposes the human price of dirt-cheap fashion and how
previous exposés have made no difference.7
Whereas most of the videos focus on production, the two guest
essays in this catalogue address what happens after clothing is made:
Thuy Linh Nguyen Tu analyzes the labor of distribution, and Kirsty
Robertson the environmental impact of discarded textiles. Tu and
Robertson point to new directions in scholarship, and in their sensitivity
to the cultural connotations of their studies, offer their own play on the
documentary form.
The work by these artists, filmmakers, and scholars cannot solve all
the intractable problems plaguing the textile industry. But they can be
sites to address these issues creatively and from new angles. When we
(read: consumers) think of mass production, we sometimes forget that
there are still people—often with specialized skills—involved. Conversely,
when we (read: conscientious consumers) call for local consumption over
global, we may not take into account the complex calculus required to
evaluate the political and environmental pros and cons. Taken together,
the works of Fast Fashion / Slow Art ask viewers to pay attention to the
people and issues concerned in the fabrics—quite literally—of our lives.
16 / 17
1 For a helpful overview, see Elizabeth
Cline, Overdressed: The Shockingly
High Cost of Cheap Fashion (New York:
Penguin, 2012).
2 Charles Baudelaire, “The Painter of
Modern Life” (1863), in The Painter
of Modern Life and Other Essays, trans.
Jonathan Mayne (New York: Da Kapo
Press, 1964), 12.
3 Cline, Overdressed, 41; Harry Moser
and Sandy Montalbano, “Why Made-inUSA Fashion Is Turning Heads,” Industry
Week, January 18, 2018, https://www.
industryweek.com/economy/why-madeusa-fashion-turning-heads.
4 Britta Bürger, “Der radikale Blick
des Wang Bing,” Deutschlandfunk
Kultur, July 15, 2017, https://www.
deutschlandfunkkultur.de/independentfilm-in-china-der-radikale-blick-deswang-bing.2168.de.html?dram:article_
id=391151.
5 Elena Pollacchi, “Wang Bing’s Cinema:
Shared Spaces of Labor,” WorkingUSA:
The Journal of Labor and Society 17, no. 1
(March 2014): 31–43.
6 Julie V. Iovine, “A Song of the
Loom Is Silenced,” New York Times,
March 25, 2004.
7 “Fashion: Last Week Tonight with
John Oliver (HBO),” April 26, 2015,
https://youtu.be/VdLf4fihP78.
Author Biographies
Suggestions for Further Viewing
Zelnik, Frederic, dir. The Weavers.
Austria: Zelnik-Film, 1927.
Arnold, Jack, dir. With These Hands.
New York: Promotional Films, 1950.
Mackendrick, Alexander, dir. The Man in
the White Suit. UK: Ealing Studios, 1951.
Gordon, Michael, dir. Pillow Talk. USA:
Arwin Productions, 1959.
Patwardhan, Anand, dir. Occupation:
Mill Worker. Brooklyn, NY: First Run/
Icarus Films, 1996.
Peled, Micha X, dir. China Blue. Toronto:
Teddy Bear Films, 2005.
De la Torre, Sergio, and Vicky Funari,
dirs. Maquilapolis. Netherlands:
Independent Television Service, 2006.
Carracedo, Almudena, dir. Made in L.A.
San Francisco: Independent Television
Service, 2007.
Majid, Hannan, and Richard York,
dirs. The Machinists. UK: Rainbow
Collective, 2010.
Martin, Uwe H., dir. White Gold: Texas
Blues. Denmark: Bombay Flying
Club, 2011.
Gupta, Meghna, dir. Unravel. London:
Soul Rebel Films, 2012.
66 / 67
Morgan, Andrew, dir. The True Cost.
USA: Life Is My Movie Entertainment
Company, 2015.
Akers, Ben, dir. Alex James: Slowing
Down Fast Fashion. UK: Journeyman
Pictures, 2016.
Jain, Rahul, dir. Machines. USA: Kino
Lorber, 2016.
Wang Bing, dir. Bitter Money. New York:
Icarus Films, 2016.
McIlvride, David, and Roger Williams,
dirs. RiverBlue. Los Angeles: Paddle
Productions, 2017.
Bibiana Obler is associate professor
of art history at the George Washington
University. Her book Intimate
Collaborations: Kandinsky and Münter,
Arp and Taeuber (2014) investigates the
role of artist couples in the emergence
of abstract art. She is working on a
second book, Anti-Craft, on relations
between craft and art in the late
twentieth century.
Kirsty Robertson is associate professor
of contemporary art and museum
studies at Western University in London,
Ontario. She has published widely
on activism, visual culture, museums,
and textiles and is a founding member
of the Synthetic Collective, a group of
artists, scientists, and cultural
researchers working on plastic pollution
in the Great Lakes region.
Phyllis Rosenzweig is curator emerita
at the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture
Garden. While at the Hirshhorn,
she organized many exhibitions of
contemporary artists including Byron
Kim, Sherrie Levine, Glenn Ligon,
and Kiki Smith. More recently, she
curated exhibitions at G Fine Art and
American University Art Museum,
both in Washington, DC, as well as
BronxArtSpace in New York City.
Thuy Linh Nguyen Tu is associate
professor of social and cultural analysis
at New York University. She is the
author of The Beautiful Generation: Asian
Americans and the Cultural Economy
of Fashion (2010) and Consuming Skin:
Experiments in Race and Beauty Across
the Pacific (forthcoming). Her writing has
also appeared in American Quarterly,
Women’s Studies Quarterly, and n+1,
among other publications.
Text and photography © 2019
Bowdoin College
Book © 2019 Scala Arts
Publishers, Inc.
This research was supported
by a Craft Research Fund grant
from the Center for Craft.
Published on the occasion
of the exhibition Fast Fashion /
Slow Art, organized by the
Bowdoin College Museum
of Art, Brunswick, Maine in
cooperation with the Corcoran
School of the Arts and Design
at the George Washington
University and the George
Washington University Museum /
Textile Museum, Washington,
DC. On view in the historic
Flagg building of the Corcoran
School of the Arts and Design,
Washington, DC, August 8–
December 15, 2019; the
Bowdoin College Museum
of Art, Brunswick, Maine,
January 30–August 2, 2020.
First published in 2019 by
Scala Arts Publishers, Inc.
c/o CohnReznick LLP
1301 Avenue of the Americas
10th floor
New York, NY 10019
www.scalapublishers.com
Scala – New York – London
Distributed outside Bowdoin College
in the book trade by
ACC Art Books
6 West 18th Street
Suite 4B
New York, NY 10011
ISBN 978-1-78551-223-0
Cataloguing-in-Publication Data is
available from the Library of Congress.
Edited by Magda Nakassis
Designed by Antonio Alcalá and
Ricky Altizer of Studio A
Printed in China
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
All rights reserved. No part of this
book may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system or transmitted in
any form or by any means, electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording
or otherwise, without the written
permission of Bowdoin College and
Scala Arts Publishers, Inc.
Every effort has been made to
acknowledge correct copyright of
images where applicable. Any errors
or omissions are unintentional and
should be notified to the Publisher,
who will arrange for corrections to
appear in any reprints.
Front cover:
(top) Still from Planet Money Makes
a T-Shirt, 2013, interactive website
© 2013 National Public Radio, Inc.
Photo credit: David Gilkey/NPR (see
pages 50–51).
(bottom) Still from Rosemarie Trockel,
Yvonne, 1997, video, black-and-white
and color, sound, 14 minutes. Galerie
für Zeitgenössische Kunst Leipzig.
© 2018 Artists Rights Society (ARS),
New York / VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn;
courtesy of GfZK Leipzig (see pages
58–59).
Frontispiece:
Cat Mazza, work in progress for
Fast Fashion / Slow Art video
installation (image altered), 2018.
Photograph courtesy of the artist
(see pages 44–47).
Page 2: Detail (altered) from page 51.
Page 6: Detail (altered) from page 12.
Page 18: Detail (altered) from page 19.
Page 26: Detail (altered) from page 33.
Page 36: Detail (altered) from page 11.
Page 62: Detail (altered) from page 57.