Christianity Was Exposed By Abelard Reuchlin
(Roman Piso, 06-15-2017)
Summary. Because of Reuchlin's work, we now know a number of things that we had not known
before. One, is that what was being written in antiquity, was being tightly controlled by royalty. In fact,
the best description for it would be an 'oligarchy'. This changes the very context in which we should be
studying the subject. It means that not only are we examining just who the New Testament authors
were, but also those who were writing the histories of the time.
Another thing is that Abelard Reuchlin not only passed along Inner-Circle knowledge that he was told,
but he expounded upon it so that it could be more clearly understood by those who otherwise would
not. He put forth a viable means in which to examine the texts of the time which includes those who
were the witnesses to the creation of Christianity, those Jews who were writing the Talmud.
In addition, he caused others, like me, to examine this further and allowed us to realize just how
valuable it is in our studies to look much closer at the involvement of the Jews in trying to prevent the
rise of those who would go on to create and promote Christianity. For, the Jews of the time, saw it
(Christianity) for what it was truly was, an effort or tactic used by their enemies, as a part of the war
that they had been fighting. And therefore, a fraud which needed to be exposed as such.
The cause of the Pharisees and Scribes was for basic human rights, the end of slavery, and the
foundation of a new fair democratic government. And, instead of teaching irrational and superstitious
religion, they were trying to wean people off of that and replace it with sound, rational, practical,
ethical reasoning.
While Christianity, by contrast, was created to do the opposite of that. And that is because some greedy
Roman rulers whose lives of luxury would be drastically changed, if the Pharisees and Scribes
accomplished their goals for the people. Of course, to get people to believe in Christianity, the creators
of Christianity had to make it appear to be something 'good', in much the same way that trappers set
traps for dumb animals. Which, is exactly how those ancient royal rulers (the less than 1% of the time)
saw non-royals, as nothing more than their own chattel which was there for no other reason than their
own use for whatever purposes that they saw fit. Thus, Christianity was created as a means for them to
better secure, control and manipulate the people, that they saw as their own sheep or chattel.
This paper highlights the course that Abelard Reuchlin had taken in order to reach the conclusions that
he was able to in order to advance our understanding of what the world was really like during the time
in which the New Testament was being written and just who had motive to do so. And, his work also
reminds us that we must consider all of the evidence of the time (that means the Jewish texts, the Jews
of the time, and the Jewish war that was involved in the creation of Christianity).
Reuchlin's work underscores our need to better understand what we study in the correct context in
order to find out just who was actually writing at the time, and why. It is because of Abelard Reuchlin's
work (and that of others, or course), that my own work was made more complete. I urge everyone to
read and learn from the work that Reuchlin had devoted his life to in order that future generations could
have that extremely important information.
==
For those who do not know it, Abelard Reuchlin wrote a work titled 'The True Authorship of the New
Testament'. In that work, he, for the very first time ever, gave the true names the authors of the New
Testament books. He was certain of it. And so are those who have went on to research the subject in the
way that he did. [I] But, just how was he able to do it when so many others had failed?
Perhaps the most impressive thing to me is that though he had made the discoveries that he did, he did
not seek to use it in order to manipulate people (like others who used the knowledge to bilk believers).
Nor did he keep that information to himself. Instead, he realized how important it was to share the
information. And so, he presented it in a very scholarly and condensed way, and offered it to the public
at next to his cost (plus postage) to produce it in a form that could be sent directly to people by snailmail. He first offered this information to the public in 1979, by offering it in various publications. [II]
Though Reuchlin was not seeking fame or fortune from his discoveries, he did receive an amount of
recognition by a community of intelligent people who could appreciate his work and efforts. Though
many of those who knew of and appreciated his work were those who are sometimes termed "ordinary
people," he was, indeed, celebrated to some extent by a few Inner-Circle members. Ironically, it
appeared that among those who expressed the most appreciation for his work were ex-Catholics.
As you may have guessed, if you did not know it already, Abelard Reuchlin has since passed away. But
his work lives on, and he is remembered quite fondly by those who knew and loved both him and his
work. He was a very special individual, with great talents. He literally lived his life in service to
Humanity. And, he continued to try to give more information about the subject that he knew so well,
virtually until the end of his life. So, what I will try to give you here is what I know about just how he
had managed to find out what he did. [III]
Abelard Reuchlin grew up a practicing Jew, and therefore, knew Hebrew, Aramaic and Yiddish. He had
a great sense of humor and was very creative. He would often make up songs and jokes, particularly on
the subject of those who had created Christianity. And, I had the great honor and pleasure of his having
had shared those with me. I particularly enjoyed when he would sing one of his songs to me or tell me
one of his original jokes about the Pisos. [IV]
He (Reuchlin), knew that one day, once what he had discovered (or uncovered) becomes known to
everyone, it would mean the end of what so many Jews in the First and Second Centuries (and later)
had died trying to prevent (i.e., Christianity). And, that it will be a time of great celebration, of
"liberation" for Humanity from the yoke of they knew to be a huge lie and fraud. He looked forward to
a time when the world would one day know about the war that was fought on behalf of Humanity by
the Jews, in a very long, and yet virtually unknown war. [V]
As I had said above, Reuchlin knew Hebrew, Aramaic, and Yiddish. And, as many of the Jews from his
generation, he knew some German as well. However, he also knew Latin and Greek. So, he was able to
read primary source documents (ancient texts) in their original language. When he and I had worked
together on various items regarding this subject matter, we would consult each other and share our
work and information with each other. I asked him a lot of questions, and thus, learned quite a lot from
him. With his knowledge of these languages, he was able to research what most people could not. [VI]
What both he and I knew to begin with is that there are those out there who know the truth about
Christianity, but who have kept that information to themselves. They are those whom we call 'InnerCircle' members. Reuchlin did not just stumble across what he needed to know in order to find out what
he did. He had an Inner-Circle member confide in him with information that lifted the veil from his
eyes, and, which gave him a push in the right direction. And that information was that Romans had
created Christianity (and, pointed him towards the Pisos). Thus, he was able to build himself a
foundation of knowledge in which to work from, from the work of those who had previously
investigated the Roman creation of Christianity. [VII]
He investigated the work of those who had already reached the conclusion of a Roman authorship for
the New Testament texts. He examined the work of Professor Bruno Bauer of the University of Berlin,
who wrote several books regarding the origins of the gospels, including 'Chrestus Und Die Kaiseren'
(1877, Berlin). [VIII]
One of the strongest connections to a Roman link to the gospels found by Bauer is that of a link
between the Christian ideology and "philosophy" represented in the gospels and that of Roman
Stoicism; particularly, that of the Roman Rhetorician, Seneca. He found that the ideological concepts
presented in Seneca's literary work virtually mirrored that which is found in the gospels. Since Seneca
wrote slightly earlier than the gospels were written in their finished form (the earliest being 'Mark' circa
70 CE), it may be better stated that it is the gospels which reflect the ideology presented by Seneca.
[IX]
When scholars critical of Christianity began to investigate as Professor Bauer did, they began to finally
better date the New Testament texts to the time in which they are actually written, and/or when they
were first completed in their finished form. Also, Professor Bauer was one of the first to discover that
the gospel of Mark was the first or earliest of the synoptic gospels. [X]
Thus, with the work of Professor Bauer, Reuchlin would understand how Bauer was able to uncover
the things that he had uncovered. Another researcher whose work Reuchlin examined was James
Ballantine Hannay, of Oxford. Hannay had helped to prepare and develop the 'Encyclopedia Biblica',
which was published by Oxford University, circa 1900-1910. This encyclopedia exposed the true
"bawdy" nature of various religions, including Christianity, by giving the true meaning of the words
used by the authors of religious texts. [XI]
So, Reuchlin had the work of both Bauer and Hannay to work from. And, Hannay, like Bauer, also
found many Roman connections to the gospels and other New Testament texts. Now, there were these
two exceptional scholars, and both agreed upon a Roman authorship for the New Testament. But
neither was able to identify the actual authors of the New Testament texts beyond a connection to
Seneca, Roman stoicism and bawdy Roman language used within the New Testament (i.e. inside jokes,
and therefore, evidence of non-holy authorship). [XII]
Abelard Reuchlin knew just who the scholars were during the time in which he began his studies. That
is, just who were known as being the most knowledgeable regarding the Roman Empire during the time
in which Christianity was created. And so, he consulted their work. Among these, was Sir Ronald
Syme. Syme wrote books, but he was mainly known within academia for his research papers, which
were generally published within academic journals and periodicals (JRS, etc.). [XIII]
Another thing that I should say is that Reuchlin was already familiar with the "classics". That is, he had
built himself a library containing books of classical (ancient) texts, particularly, those which were made
available by Harvard University (the Loeb Classical Library editions). Those books were published so
that they gave both the original language of the texts as well as a direct translation for each page.
Meaning, that these books were published specifically for scholars and researchers, so as to give easy
access to what may be termed (in most cases), primary source documents in the original language. And,
as stated before, Reuchlin was able to read those texts in their original language. [XIV]
Remember I said that Reuchlin had been told some information that would help him? He had expressed
an interest in finding out the truth about Christianity and often spoke to Rabbis about the subject.
Today, there are a few Rabbis who are Inner-Circle members (they know the subject, at least to some
extent). In earlier times, there were several Rabbis who were Inner-Circle (up until about the 1500s).
Many of those were either killed or died off without spreading their knowledge (Crusades, Inquisitions,
etc.). Reuchlin actively sought out others to help answer some of his questions. He discovered that
there were certain quotes and lines in literature which Inner-Circle authors would know and use, which
had apparent special meanings. Some were by Shakespeare, and some were by other I.C. authors. [XV]
He knew this too, that there were Inner-Circle Jews during the First and Second Centuries, and beyond.
Thus, he had the Talmud and other Jewish commentaries to consult. And, the Jews of the time in which
Christianity was created, were witnesses to its creation. So, it made sense that they would try to let
others know what they knew, and the way in which to do that was to put that information in the
Talmud. This was one of the main reasons for hatred towards the Jews down through the centuries.
Since they had censorship imposed upon them, they were not allowed to write about what they knew in
any obvious fashion. Which is why they had to do the best that they could in such circumstances. [XVI]
I once asked Reuchlin, "when was it that you first discovered that the Piso family were the authors of
the New Testament?" He told me that he began to examine the Pisos as the authors in 1973. He then
examined the Pisos and their relatives, mainly from articles by Professor Syme, before 1973. But he
then had to focus upon finding which of them were the authors of which NT book. And, it took him
from that time, until 1979 to put the information that he had discovered into a form which he could
make available to the public. He said that Professor Syme was an Inner-Circle member, but that Syme
did not dare write about what he knew publicly (as it would ruin his career). [XVII]
Though Reuchlin now had a great deal of information in which to work with (including the Talmud, for
comments from Jews who were witnesses to the creation of Christianity), he was only one person and
sought the help and information of others as well. He realized that in order to do the work that he did,
that it had consumed a substantial portion of his life in the process. But to him, it was a duty that he
knew he had to do. You see, both he and I realized that there were thousands of people who had gave
their lives in order to try to prevent Christianity from becoming a reality. And virtually no one knew
that, or who these people were. To us, it was important to let the world know this. [XVIII]
Reuchlin had become aware of a book that would greatly help him in his examination of the Talmud.
That book, which he shared with me, is 'Jewish Expressions On Jesus' (An Anthology, KTAV
Publishing House Inc., New York, 1977). It had been published at various times (even before 1977). It
is this book, that gives so many instances of individuals connected to Christianity being mentioned in
the Talmud. And, most importantly, as Reuchlin had discovered, the authors who were Inner-Circle,
were using and being referred to through the use of alternate names (aliases or pen names). [XIX]
Because a) Reuchlin had observed the use of alias names being used to hide or disguise the true names
and identities of those involved in the creation of Christianity in the other ancient texts of the time - he
b) readily understood the same thing being used in the Talmud. And c), he saw it as verification of what
he had already found. [XX]
Piecing everything he found together, he realized that certain individuals and families were involved in
not only the creation of Christianity, but also in all other material being written for publication within
the Roman Empire. Even the Jews were restricted on what they were able to write while residing under
the rule of others. It was the Pisos and their royal cousins (including the Flavians) who were ruling the
Roman Empire after having gotten rid of Nero and others (e.g., Galba, Otho and Vitellius). But while
the Pisos enjoyed life with Vespasian and Titus ruling, that ended (for a while) when Domitian became
emperor. They eventually had him (Domitian) assassinated, and installed Nerva. From then on, they
were virtually in control of the Roman Empire once again. [XXI]
Some people ask, how can I be sure that what he has said is true? I usually inform them of the use of
aliases and pen names used by both the authors and those whom they were writing about (because, all
of them were royalty and wanted their identities concealed during their own lifetime). I tell them what
had convinced me of what Reuchlin was saying about the authors not being who they said they were,
and that is in giving an example that they can check on themselves. Perhaps the easiest is that of
Tacitus as Neratius Priscus. See my papers on the subject. [XXII]
So, why hasn't Reuchlin's work been accepted by some people? [a] The subject matter when studied as
it should be is complex and quite involved; many people do not have the time and/or inclination, or
even ability, to do it right. [b] It contradicts the belief of some people. Thus, they reject it for that
reason and that reason only. [c] Some people do not like certain aspects of Reuchlin's work; such as his
use of the word/term 'code' and/or the fact that he used number systems (alpha-numerics). But, then
many people do not realize that ancient languages were alpha-numeric. That is, letters had numeric
value and were used as such routinely in ancient times.
[d] Academia was never established to get at the truth. And that still is not its purpose, though some
may like to think so. If that were the case, biased or religious people would not be allowed to be a part
of it, as objectivity is necessary to get at the truth. The truth is that current academia is about generating
money for those making money from it. [e] Academia, in terms of areas such as history and religion,
teach assumptions as the basis for students to build upon (see my Six Major Assumptions of Academia,
found in my book 'Piso Christ'). [f] Those who are a part of academia and who have earned degrees,
teach, etc., in the areas of history and/or religion see no gain for themselves if what they were taught is
incorrect. Their degrees would virtually be worthless. Their degrees would become something akin to a
certification of gullibility. And, they would be embarrassed by the reality of the situation.
[g] And still others, would not accept his work for whatever personal reasons of their own (laziness,
etc.). [h] Some think that Reuchlin did not give enough information so as to allow the to get up to
speed, or attain the level of knowledge that Reuchlin himself, did. That is, even though he told what he
had found, he didn't provide enough information so as to allow most readers of his material to get to
that level as well. Remember, he had to learn several languages and devote a large portion of his life to
this. You, if you want to understand this as he did, must also do your work as he did. Not everyone is
suited to be a scholar of this level. That is the simple reality that must be faced.
One thing is certain. Reuchlin's work is extremely important and remains an essential source of
information for anyone researching the origins of Christianity. In my informed opinion, Abelard
Reuchlin did indeed expose Christianity. And, the work done by him and others will be added to and
become known to more and more people as time goes on. As Reuchlin used to say to me, "keep up the
good work, and be well." Abelard Reuchlin passed away in the first half of 2015.
==
[I] In 'The True Authorship of the New Testament', Reuchlin also gives the dates in which the New
Testament texts were written along with their authors. He also gives the history of the time which
parallels the time in which those books were written.
[II] He saw his work as a service to Humanity. He knew that eventually everyone would know what he
discovered, and that they would know that it was his work that directly aided in exposing the truth and
true nature of both the creation of Christianity, but also of the history of the time as well. He had hoped
to have been around to see it. Unfortunately, despite having worked very hard to get the work out to
people, he passed away before being able to see that happen. He had did interviews with radio stations
(talk shows), made videos, and placed ads in magazines like 'The Humanist', 'The Progressive', 'The
Nation' and 'The Atlantic'.
[III] He wrote several other works after having written 'The True Authorship'. 'Inner-Circle' members
are those who in one way or another, knew the truth about the creation of Christianity. Some were born
into families who passed the knowledge on within their family, but kept that knowledge from everyone
else. Others, learned about it from others who had figured it out or had been told of it. There are, and
have been, many 'Inner-Circle' authors. Most have only hinted at what they knew.
[IV] Reuchlin knew several languages and would help me with Hebrew, Aramaic and some Yiddish.
One such poem/song which he wrote and would sing was called 'The Night Before Piso'.
[V] Most historians still do not realize that it was one long war. They still think of the Jews of the time
in the generic sense and instead of seeing the larger picture as an actual war, they only see intermittent
"revolts." And this is because so many scholars today have tunnel-vision, and basically either ignore
the Jews of the time (their Talmud and role in history), or they do not go far enough in learning about
them and their sects. They tend to read on a superficial level (simply reading and believing in virtually
the same way as Christian believers believe the New Testament, instead of working to find out just who
the authors actually were before believing them), and focus nearly entirely upon the Roman authors
who were lying bold-faced to them.
[VI] We found it essential to know many ancient languages in order to obtain an accurate overview of
ancient history and religion. And, to be informed of the research of others in more modern times, it is
necessary to know languages other than English also. Many of those who are known of as scholars
today, know perhaps Latin and some Greek, in addition to their own native language and maybe
another modern language. That is not at all what is required to reach the level of scholarship which
Reuchlin and a few others have attained. They must be able to read for themselves all primary sources
in the original languages in those times. And that includes the records of the Jews and others.
[VII] I, and others were told by Reuchlin who that individual was. However, I do not remember who
that I.C. member was. I did actually write it down, but many of my notes were destroyed. So, I don't
know if I will ever be able to find that information. Those who had investigated the Roman creation of
Christianity prior to Abelard Reuchlin were Prof. Bruno Bauer, and James Ballantyne Hannay, among
others.
[VIII] 'Chrestus Und Die Kaiseren' by Prof. Bruno Bauer, 1877, Berlin. It was translated into other
languages, including English. Originally written in 'Old German'. I had written a translation of it years
ago, but it appears that it was destroyed along with other of my notes, papers and manuscripts. Bauer
also wrote several other books on related subjects.
[IX] He recognized and identified Seneca's and the Roman stoicism (philosophy) as a main element
within the gospels. Which is something not derived from those living in or around Judea, but patently,
Roman. In fact, there are instances within the NT texts that nearly mirror Seneca's statements verbatim.
If not always by exact word, then certainly, by meaning. He also noticed a correlation between the
various writers of the time and the NT texts, including Tacitus, Suetonius' 'The Twelve Caesars'
biographies of the first 12 Roman Emperors, Pliny The Younger and others. He even consulted the
Talmud to some degree. See my paper, 'Seneca, Christianity, And The Caesars'.
Seneca, Christianity, And The Caesars
http://www.academia.edu/33161068/Seneca_Christianity_And_The_Caesars
[X] H.J. Holtzmann (Heinrich Julius), established that Mark was the earliest gospel, and the existence
of the 'Q' ("Quella") document.
[XI] The 'Encyclopedia Biblica' appears to have been suppressed and has become a rare publication. A
copy of it may still exist at Oxford University.
[XII] It is truly amazing just what Prof. Bruno Bauer had discovered. He even understood that there
was a "closed environment" in place, not only at the time in which the NT was being written, but also
that it was still in effect during his time. And, though James Ballantyne Hannay ('The Rise, Decline
And Fall Of The Roman Religion', published posthumously in 1925) did not get everything correct, he
did have a great knowledge of the words that were being used in religion - and particularly, in Christian
texts. He even illustrates their origin and gives his sources. Also, see my book, 'Piso Christ' for
examples of what the bawdy Roman authors actually wrote into the New Testament texts.
Piso Christ: What Is The Book About?
http://pisoproject.wordpress.com/piso-christ-what-is-the-book-about/
Piso Christ: The Roman Piso Family Created Christianity.
https://www.amazon.com/Piso-Christ-Book-Classical-Scholarship/dp/142692996X
[XIII] Reuchlin cites various papers in 'The True Authorship of the New Testament', and says that "The
biographical index at the end of Pliny's letters is very helpful in interrelating, and hence deciphering,
the various names and identities." Syme's work helps as well. Regarding those mentioned by Pliny
(Pliny The Younger), see Syme's 'People In Pliny', JRS. And the Flavian connection is virtually
deduced for us in 'Some Flavian Connections', Gavin Townend, Journal of Roman Studies, LI. 54, 62,
1961.
[XIV] Reuchlin's ability to read and study in several languages helped immensely; as well as the
carefully selected library that he had built for himself. To build a set covering the classics of the 1st and
2nd Centuries alone, in the Loeb Classical Library edition series would be quite costly. But, one can
read them at many local college or university libraries. It is not likely that you would find them at
regular public libraries.
[XV] This, to me at least, is one of the best explanations for there having been an "oral tradition". That
is, Rabbis and Inner-Circle Jews could pass along knowledge that they could not write down (as they
were forbidden to do so under penalty of death by those who were ruling over them). They could read
and explain what they read and what it actually meant, so that Inner-Circle Jews could keep that
information alive, even though they could not write it down in commentaries, etc. The 'Inner-Circle' are
those who know the true context of ancient history and the truth about the creation of Christianity.
Mainly, they are either the descendants of those who created Christianity or descendants of the Jews
who fought against it. In general, those of the oligarchy (both now and then) are those referred to as
'Inner-Circle'.
The Oligarchy (or 1%) uses organized religion to dumb-down the masses, so that they are easier to
control and manipulate. Napoleon: "Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.
Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich." We need to enact new laws that protect US
from the 1%. Did you know that most (if not all) of those who comprise the Oligarchy or 1% today are
direct descendants of Pope Alexander VI? And are, of course, of royal blood.
Wealth Inequity Because Of The Oligarchy
http://billmoyers.com/story/now-just-five-men-almost-much-wealth-half-worlds-population/
Understanding The Oligarchy
http://www.academia.edu/32492893/Understanding_The_Oligarchy.pdf
Understanding The Oligarchy
http://pisoproject.wordpress.com/understanding-the-oligarchy/
Oligarchy And Ancient Genealogies
http://www.academia.edu/28345792/Oligarchy_And_Ancient_Genealogies
Napoleon Bonaparte & The Holy Roman Empire
http://www.academia.edu/10994708/Napoleon_Bonaparte_and_The_Holy_Roman_Empire
The Audacity Of King James (Part I)
http://www.academia.edu/18868444/TheAudacityOfKingJames_Part_I_
Pope Alexander VI (Rodrigo Borgia), leader of the notorious Borgia papal crime family (Pope from
1492-1503). The likeness of 'Jesus' that most Christian believers have thought to be that of Christ since
the early 1500s was actually that of Cesare Borgia (born 1475, died 1507), Pope Alexander VI's son.
Pope Alexander VI (his ancestors & descendants)
http://www.academia.edu/11025420/Pope_Alexander_VI_Ancestors_and_Descendants_
[XVI] See my paper, 'The Medieval Censorship Of The Talmud', in Academia(dot)Edu.
The Medieval Censorship Of The Talmud
http://www.academia.edu/32028899/The_Medieval_Censorship_Of_The_Talmud
[XVII] From what I know about Inner-Circle members and Syme's work, and because his works helps
other I.C. members, I'd have to agree with Reuchlin. He knew a great deal about the Pisos, and their
royal relatives. He saw and understood many of the same things that Reuchlin and I have observed in
the texts of that time.
Sir Ronald Syme & Abelard Reuchlin (Rome & Christianity)
http://www.academia.edu/10821629/Sir_Ronald_Syme_And_Abelard_Reuchlin_Rome_and_Christiani
ty_
[XVIII] This is why it is important to understand that a long, all-out war had been going on, and not
simply a few Jewish 'revolts'. The main of the war lasted from about 135 BCE until the Diaspora of 135
CE.
[XIX] Careful reading of the Talmud allows us to better understand the part played by individual
Jewish leaders in the war that led up to the Diaspora in 135 CE. Of course, all of the names of all of the
Jews who died in that long war will never be known. But many of the names of the Jewish leaders of
the time who died fighting in that war have been preserved.
[XX] The Jewish leadership were in charge of what went into the Talmud. However, they were writing
while living under the rule of royals who imposed censorship upon them. So, in order to say things in
the Talmud which would eventually help us to find out the truth about Christianity, they had to do so by
using alternative names or nicknames for some of the individuals that they were trying to describe.
Arrius Calpurnius Piso (aka the NT Jesus) In The Talmud
http://www.academia.edu/10920856/Arrius_Calpurnius_Piso_Aka_The_NT_Jesus_In_The_Talmud
Pliny The Younger (aka the NT Paul) In The Talmud
http://www.academia.edu/10734718/Pliny_The_Younger_In_The_Talmud
[XXI] The descendants and royal relatives of the Pisos and Flavians became the rulers of the Roman
Empire, once Domitian was assassinated. Thus, establishing a new oligarchy tracing its ancestry back
to common ancestry.
Arrius Piso And The Emperor Domitian
http://www.academia.edu/31378006/Arrius_Piso_And_The_Emperor_Domitian
The True Context Of Ancient History & The Gordian Emperors
http://www.academia.edu/s/cc567b0350/the-true-context-of-ancient-history-and-the-gordian-emperors
All Roman Emperors From Antoninus Pius On Were Descended From Piso Family Of Rome
http://www.academia.edu/s/d5464e4996/all-roman-emperors-from-antoninus-pius-onodt
[XXII] See my papers, 'Discovering Tacitus As Neratius Priscus' and 'The Descent Of Emperor Tacitus
From Historian Tacitus', and others posted in Academia(dot)Edu.
Discovering Tacitus As Neratius Priscus
http://www.academia.edu/10784164/Discovering_Tacitus_As_Neratius_Priscus
Descent Of Emperor Tacitus From Historian Tacitus
http://www.academia.edu/11003483/Descent_Of_Emperor_Tacitus_From_Historian_Tacitus
The New Classical Scholarship: The New Forensic Study Of History
http://www.academia.edu/31990534/The_NCS_The_New_Forensic_Study_Of_History
Regarding Joseph Atwill's Titus
http://www.academia.edu/30896788/Regarding_Joseph_Atwills_Titus.pdf
A Few Words About The Royal Language
http://www.academia.edu/30347785/A_Few_Words_About_The_Royal_Language
[NOTE: If for some reason a link does not work, you should be able to find the paper you are looking
for at either of these links:
The Roman Piso Papers
http://independent.academia.edu/RomanPiso/Papers
The Piso Project (on Wordpress)
http://pisoproject.wordpress.com
Also, if a link does not work, try to copy & paste the URL into your browser and hit 'Enter'. Or simply
to a search engine search using the paper title.
==
Title in other languages:
[Albanian: 'Krishtërimi u ekspozua nga Abelard Reuchlin']
[Arabian: ']'تعرضت المسيحية من قبل أبيلرد ريوشلين
[Armenian: 'Քրիստոնեությունը բացահայտվեց Աբելարդ Ռեչլինի կողմից']
[Bosnian: 'Hrišćanstvo je izložio Abelard Reuchlin']
[Chinese (Traditional): '基督教被Abelard Reuchlin 暴露']
[Croatian: 'Kršćanstvo je izložio Abelard Reuchlin']
[Czech: 'Křesťanství odhalil Abelard Reuchlin']
[Danish: 'Kristendommen blev udsat af Abelard Reuchlin']
[Dutch: 'Het christendom werd blootgesteld door Abelard Reuchlin']
[Esperanto: 'Kristanismo estis elmontrita Per Abelard Reuchlin']
[Estonian: 'Abelard Reuchlinit tabas kristlus']
[Filipino: 'Ang Kristiyanismo ay Naipahayag Ni Abelard Reuchlin']
[Finnish: 'Abelard Reuchlin esitteli kristinuskon']
[French: 'Le christianisme a été exposé par Abelard Reuchlin']
[German: 'Das Christentum wurde von Abaelard Reuchlin ausgesetzt']
[Greek: 'Ο Χριστιανισμός εκτέθηκε από τον Abelard Reuchlin']
[Hebrew: ' הנצרות נחשפה על ידיAbelard Reuchlin']
[Hungarian: 'A kereszténységet Abelard Reuchlin vette fel']
[Italian: 'Il cristianesimo è stato esposto da Abelard Reuchlin']
[Japanese: 'キリスト教は Abelard Reuchlin によって公開されました']
[Latin: 'Christianismus manifestabatur subito per Reuchlin']
[Latvian: 'Kristietība tika atklāta Abelard Reuchlin']
[Lithuanian: 'Abelardas Reuchlinas apstojo krikščionybę']
[Norwegian: 'Kristendommen ble utsatt av Abelard Reuchlin']
[Persian: ']'مسيحيت توسط آبراهه راولز بازنشسته شد
[Polish: 'Chrześcijaństwo zostało wystawione przez Abelarda Reuchlina']
[Portuguese: 'O cristianismo foi exposto por Abelard Reuchlin']
[Romanian: 'Creștinismul a fost expus de Abelard Reuchlin']
[Russian: 'Христианство было открыто Абеляром Рейхлином']
[Serbian: 'Хришћанство је изложио Абелард Реуцхлин']
[Sindhi: ' عيسائيت ابيلرReuchlin ]'کی طرف سے پيش کيا گيا تھا
[Slovak: 'Kresťanstvo bolo vystavené Abelardom Reuchlinom']
[Slovenian: 'Krščanstvo je pokazal Abelard Reuchlin']
[Spanish: 'El cristianismo fue expuesto por Abelard Reuchlin']
[Swahili: 'Ukristo ulionyeshwa na Abelard Reuchlin']
[Swedish: 'Kristendomen var utsatt av Abelard Reuchlin']
[Turkish: 'Hristiyanlık, Abelard Reuchlin tarafından açığa vuruldu']
[Ukrainian: 'Християнство було розкрито Абеляром Реухліном']
[Urdu: ']'عيسائيت ابيلر راچينن کی طرف سے عائد کيا گيا تھا
[Zulu: 'UbuKristu Buchazwa Ngu-Abelard Reuchlin']
==
Attention (Scholars & Researchers):
We must work to change academia. Virtually all ancient history scholars have been wrong, because a)
as I have explained in my book 'Piso Christ', all of their work is based upon 6 major assumptions, and
b) as a result of these assumptions, they view ancient history in the wrong context. And, this is a cycle.
They were taught to study the subject incorrectly, and they continue to "teach" others to be wrong. This
must stop. Spread this information and help better educate as many people as you can, particularly,
those within academia. Please share this information.
Attention Classics & Ancient History 'Scholars': Richard Carrier, Marcus Borg, Robert M. Price, Bart
Ehrmann, Robert Eisenman, Werner Eck, Anthony Birley. Particularly, Werner Eck, as I have talked to
him a number of times at the urging of Abelard Reuchlin and have sent him my material to study.
Attention New Testament/Biblical 'Scholars': Elaine Pagels, John Dominic Crossan, Jonathan Reed,
Ched Myers, Bernard Brandon Scott, N.T. Wright, Stanley Hauerwas, Amy-Jill Levine, Taylor Weaver,
Richard Hays, David Horrell, Bruce J. Malina, Craig Evans, Craig Keener, Raymond Brown, James D.
G. Dunn, Dale Martin, Stanley Stowers, John Barclay, Philip Esler, Garrett Fagan.
Note: I have personally talked to several of these individuals, as well as friends of theirs who have tried
to get through to them about this work. Religious people particularly, strongly reject anything that
contradicts their beliefs. Which is why it has been so slow to make any real change within academia,
because so many of those who currently comprise it are either religious or biased in some way.
Many problems still exist within Academia. We need to bring Academia into the 21st Century.
Essential Changes To Academia Now Required (Objectivity Is Essential)
http://www.academia.edu/10632376/Essential_Changes_To_Academia_Now_Required_For_A_Qualit
y_Education
The New Classical Scholarship: The New Forensic Study Of History
http://www.academia.edu/31990534/The_NCS_The_New_Forensic_Study_Of_History
A Few Words About The Royal Language (A Language Within Language)
http://www.academia.edu/30347785/A_Few_Words_About_The_Royal_Language
The True Context Of Ancient History & The Gordian Emperors
http://www.academia.edu/s/cc567b0350/the-true-context-of-ancient-history-and-the-gordian-emperors
Ancient Alias Names List (2017)
http://www.academia.edu/s/a339f0df02/ancient-alias-names-list-2017
How & Why Ancient Royalty Created Facades & Illusions
[The Effective Creation of an Alternate Version of Reality]
http://www.academia.edu/15285175/Ancient_Royal_Facades_and_Illusions
Related Papers can be found here:
The Roman Piso Papers
http://independent.academia.edu/RomanPiso/Papers
==
Key Words & Terms)
Roman coins, denominations, coinage, province, Augustus, Claudius, Nero, Vitellius, Domitian, Trajan,
Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, Marcus Aurelius, Septimius Severus, Severus Alexander, Elagabalus, Gordian
III, Philip I 'The Arab', Claudius II 'Gothicus', denari, denarii, denarius, coins, coin, ancient coins,
numismatic, celator, ancient mints, silver, gold, copper, aureus, drachm, didrachm, tetradrachm, follis,
antoninianus, antoninianii, potin, billon, error, restrike, restrikes, silver wash, silvered, limes, AE, AE3,
AR, AV, miliarense, siliqua, centenionalis, argenteus, dupondius, quadrans, cistophorus, sestertius,
quinarius, as, As, Semis, triens, sextans, unica, quadrigatus, moneyer, victoriatus, solidus, scripulum.
History, Ancient History, Rome, Ancient Rome, Roman Empire, Roman Emperors, Popes, Papal
History, Christianity, History of Christianity, Origin of Christianity, Emperor, Emperors, Roman
Catholic History, Holy Roman Empire, Arrius Calpurnius Piso, Roman Piso Family, Ancient Alias
Names, Ancient Pen Names, Gordian Emperors, Emperor Antoninus Pius, Arius Antoninus, Marcus
Aurelius, Oligarchy, Royal Supremacy, Royal Language, Aliases, Genealogy, Ancient Genealogy,
Ancient Genealogies, Historia, Historia Augusta, Flavius Josephus, Pliny The Younger, Suetonius,
Tacitus, Plutarch, Hero of Alexandria, Apollonius of Tyana, Philostratus 'The Athenian', Philostratus
'The Younger', Herodian, Emperor Constantine, Vespasian, Titus, Domitian, Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian,
Lucius Verus, Commodus, Pertinax, Pescennius Niger, Didius Julianus, Clodius Albinus, Septimius
Severus, Severus Alexander, Maximinus, Maximus, Probus, Clodius II, Constantius, Constantius
Chlorus, Eusebius, Pope Eusebius, Church Father, Early Christianity, Roman Creation of Christianity,
Nero, 666, Julius Calpurnius Piso, Julius Piso I, First 10 Popes, Justin Martyr, St. John 'The Divine',
The Revelation, gospels, The Gospel of Thomas, Gnostic, Gnostic Gospels, Apocryphal, texts, holy,
sacred, free, info, sample, paper, papers, research, research paper, Heron, Herod, Agrippa, Philo, Logos,
Talmud, Pharisee, pharisees, sect, Cornelius, Theodosius I, Arcadius, Honorius, Byzantine, Byzantium,
Constantinople, ancient literature, forensic history, censorship, Medieval, medieval censorship,
Inquisition, Crusade, crusades, Church, Church History, comparative, religion, religious, organized
religion, Abelard Reuchlin, Professor, Bruno Bauer, James Ballantyne Hannay, Marcus, Antonius,
Cleopatra, Julius, Caesar, Caesars, Antonius Primus, Cestius Gallus, Nero, Vitellius, Otho, Licinianus,
Frugi, Piso, Julius Servianus, Julius Severus, Julius Constantius I, Galba, New, New Testament, Bible,
gospels, epistles, Panegyricus, Timothy, Justinian The Jurist, Proculus Calpurnius Piso, Silanus Piso,
Herodes Atticus, ben Pantera, Scribes, genealogy, genealogies, royal, royal line, royal blood,
historiography, philosophy, history of, historical Jesus, Dark Ages, Secular Humanism, Atheism,
Atheist, Atheists, Historical Anthropology, Anthropology, Anthropology of Religion, Imperial, Imperial
Rome, Roma, Classics, Classical Antiquity, Religion as psychological warfare.
Anthropology, genealogical charts, genealogy, archaeology, Origins of Christianity, Holy, Holy Roman
Empire, Imperial Rome, Roman Empire, popes, emperor, emperors, King James, Bible, biblical,
classics, classical history, historic, Pliny The Elder, Seneca, Aria, Arria, Arria The Younger, Arria The
Elder, Arius, Arrius, Fadilla, Arria Fadilla, Arria Antonina, Antonius, Marcus Antonius, Antonius
Primus, of Alexandria, of Tyana, of Rome, of Athens, Gnostics, gospel, Gospel of, Thomas, Mary,
Magdalan, magi, three, three days, three wise men, rooster, hen, cock, crow, crew, Alexander, Sabina,
Gaius Calpurnius Piso, Constantine, Julius Constantius, Constantius Chlorus, Emperor, emperors,
Flavia, Flavian, Flavians, Titus, Domitian, Vespasian, Nerva, Augustus, Julius Caesar, Caesar, Tiberius,
Gneius Calpurnius Piso, Gaius, Caligula, Claudius, Nero, Galba, Otho, Vitellius, Trajan, Hadrian,
Antoninus Pius, Marcus Aurelius, Commodus, Pertinax, Didius Julianus, Clodius Albinus, Septimius
Severus, Severus Alexander, Pupienus, Claudius Gothicus, Probus, Gallienus, Tacitus, Florian,
Florianus, Balbinus, Postumus, Philip I, Philip II, Pacatian, Jotapian, Aquilia Severa, Annia, Annia
Faustina, Julia Soaemias, Julia Maesa, Diadumenian, Elagabalus, Julia Domna, Caracalla, Lucius
Verus, Lucilla, Geta, Titiana, Manlia Scantilla, Didia Clara, Pescennius Niger, St. Peter, Saint, Saint
Peter, Linus.