Open Access Library Journal
2017, Volume 4, e3593
ISSN Online: 2333-9721
ISSN Print: 2333-9705
3D Matrix Ring with a “Common” Multiplication
Orgest Zaka
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Technical Science, University of Vlora “Ismail QEMALI”, Vlora, Albania
How to cite this paper: Zaka, O. (2017) 3D
Matrix Ring with a “Common” Multiplication. Open Access Library Journal, 4:
e3593.
https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1103593
Received: April 11, 2017
Accepted: May 12, 2017
Published: May 15, 2017
Copyright © 2017 by author and Open
Access Library Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution International
License (CC BY 4.0).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Open Access
Abstract
In this article, starting from geometrical considerations, he was born with the
idea of 3D matrices, which have developed in this article. A problem here was
the definition of multiplication, which we have given in analogy with the usual
2D matrices. The goal here is 3D matrices to be a generalization of 2D matrices. Work initially we started with 3 × 3 × 3 matrix, and then we extended
to m × n × p matrices. In this article, we give the meaning of 3D matrices.
We also defined two actions in this set. As a result, in this article, we have
reached to present 3-dimensional unitary ring matrices with elements from a
field F.
Subject Areas
Algebra, Applied Statistical Mathematics, Geometry
Keywords
Linear Algebra, Matrices, Ring Theory
1. Introduction
Based on the meaning of the addition and the multiplication of 2D matrices
[1]-[6], this article stretches this sense, the idea, the addition and the multiplication of 3D matrices. Starting from geometrical considerations, concretely taking
into account the cube, he was born with the idea of 3D matrices, which have developed in this article. A problem here was the definition of multiplication, for
which we have acted pages, analogously acted as the columns, which we have
given in analogy with the usual 2D matrices [6] [9]. The goal here is 3D matrices
to be a generalization of 2D matrices. We proved that this set of two actions together in forming the “unitary ring” [7] [8] [10] [11]. In literature and in various
mathematical forums, we noticed an interest in the 3D matrices, but on the
other hand are missing results associated with them; this was a sufficient reason
to explore. We introduced the meaning of the scalar multiplication, and finally
DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1103593
May 15, 2017
O. Zaka
we have shown that we have an F-module connected to this ring 3D matrices or
vector spaces [8] [10]. As indications for this paper were simply geometric imaginations. Everything presented in this article are my results.
2. Addition of 3 × 3 × 3, 3-D Matrices over Field F, and the
Addition Abelian Group of Their 3-D Matrices
Imagining a parallelepiped, with born idea of 3D matrices, which are define as
follows
Definition 2.1 3-dimensional 3 × 3 × 3 matrice will call, a matrix which has:
three horizontal layers (analogous to three rows), three vertical page (analogue
with three columns in the usual matrices) and three vertical layers two of which
are hidden.
{
}
3×3×3 ( F ) = ( aijk ) | aijk ∈ F and i = 1, 2, 3; j = 1, 2, 3; k = 1, 2, 3
The set of these matrices the write how:
Definition 2.2 The addition of two matrices A3×3×3 , B3×3×3 ∈ 3×3×3 ( F ) we
The appearance of these matrices will be as in Figure 1.
{
}
C3×3×3 = ( cijk ) | cijk = aijk + bijk , ∀i, j , k ∈ {1, 2, 3}
will call the matrix:
The appearance of the addition of 3 × 3 × 3, 3D matrices, will be as in Figure 2,
{( a ) | a
= {( b ) | b
}
∈ F for i = 1, 2, 3; j = 1, 2, 3; k = 1, 2, 3}
where matrices A and B have the following appearance,
A3×3×3 =
ijk
ijk
B3×3×3
ijk
ijk
∈ F for i = 1, 2, 3; j = 1, 2, 3; k = 1, 2, 3
113
123
122
112
132
213
111
223
121
222
232
313
323
221
312
311
333
231
322
321
233
131
212
211
133
332
331
Figure 1. 3-D Matrice.
OALib Journal
2/11
O. Zaka
113
112
123
122
223
222
232
313
311
323
221
333
A = ( aijk )i =1,2,3
321
123
122
223
222
232
313
322
B = ( bijk )i =1,2,3
311
321
i =1,2,3
k =1,2,3
333
231
312
331
323
221
332
233
131
212
211
133
132
213
121
111
231
322
312
+
233
131
212
211
112
132
213
121
111
113
133
332
331
i =1,2,3
k =1,2,3
Figure 2. The addition of 3 × 3 × 3, 3D matrices.
Definition 2.3 Zero matrix 3 × 3, 3D we will called the matrix that has all its
elements zero.
=
O3×3×3
) |i
{( 0=
F ijk
a )|i
{(=
}
1,=
2, 3; j 1,=
2, 3; k 1, 2, 3
Definition 2.4. The opposite matric of anmatrice
=
A3×3×3
ijk
}
1,=
2, 3; j 1,=
2, 3; k 1, 2, 3
{
}
− A3×3×3 =
1, 2, 3; j =
1, 2, 3; k =
1, 2, 3
( −aijk ) | i =
will, called matrix
(
)
(where − aijk is a opposite element of element aijk ∈ F , so aijk + −aijk =0 F
and
( F , +, ⋅ )
{( a + ( −a ))=| i 1, 2, 3;=j 1, 2, 3;=k
3; j 1, 2,
=
3; k 1,=
2, 3}
) | i 1, 2,=
{( 0=
is field [8] [10] [11]), which satisfies the condition
A3×3×3 + ( − A3×3×=
3)
=
ijk
ijk
}
1, 2, 3
O3×3×3
Theorem 2.1 ( 3×3×3 ( F ) , + ) is a beliangrup.
Proof: Truly from the definition 2.2, of addition the 3-Dmatrices, we see that
addition is the sustainable in 3×3×3 ( F ) , because
ijk
aijk ∈ F , bijk ∈ F ⇒ cijk = aijk + bijk ∈ F , ∀i, j , k ∈ {1, 2, 3}
∀A =( aijk ) , B =( bijk ) , C =( cijk ) ∈ 3×3×3 ( F ) ⇒ ( A + B ) + C =A + ( B + C )
1) Associative property,
( A + B ) + C = ( aijk ) + ( bijk ) + ( cijk ) = ( aijk + bijk ) + ( cijk ) = ( ( aijk + bijk ) + cijk )
truly
(
)
= ( aijk + bijk + cijk ) = aijk + ( bijk + cijk ) = ( aijk ) + ( bijk + cijk ) = A + ( B + C )
OALib Journal
3/11
( )
( )
O. Zaka
( )
( )
2) ∀A = aijk ∈ 3×3×3 ( F ) , ∃O = 0ijk / A + O = O + A = A.
truly, ∀A = aijk ∈ 3×3×3 ( F ) , ∃O = 0ijk / A + O = O + A = A.
{( a ) + ( 0)
A +=
O
{
3) ∀A =
)|i
{( a=
=
ijk
}
| i 1, 2, 3;=
=
j 1, 2, 3;=
k 1, 2, 3
}
= ( aijk + 0 ) | i =1, 2, 3; j =1, 2, 3; k =1, 2, 3
ijk
}
ijk
1, 2,
3; j 1, 2,
3; k 1,=
2, 3 A
=
=
( a ) ∈ ( F ) , ∃ − A = ( −a ) ∈ ( F ) / A + ( − A ) =
ijk
3×3×3
ijk
3×3×3
{( a + ( −a ))=| i 1, 2, 3;=j 1, 2, 3;=k
3; j 1, 2,
=
3; k 1,=
2, 3}
) | i 1, 2,=
{( 0=
ijk
}
truly, from Definition 2.4, we have
A + ( −=
A)
=
ijk
O.
1, 2, 3
ijk
O
ijk
∀A = ( aijk ) , B = ( bijk ) ∈ 3×3×3 ( F ) , A + B = B + A.
4) Addition is commutative.
truly
A + B = ( aijk ) + ( bijk ) = ( aijk + bijk )
( ,+ ) is abelian
=
(b
ijk
+ aijk ) = ( bijk ) + ( aijk ) = B + A
3. Addition of m × n × p , 3-D Matrices over Any Field F and
the Addition Abelian Group of Their 3-D Matrices
Definition 3.1 3-dimensionalmxnxp matrix will call, a matrix which has: mhorizontal layers (analogous to m-rows), n-vertical page (analogue with n-columns in the usualmatrices) and p-vertical layers (p − 1 of which are hidden).
{
}
m×n× p ( F ) =
1, m; j 1, n; k =
1, p
( aijk ) | aijk ∈ F -field and i ==
The set of these matrixes the write how:
Definition 3.2 The addition of two matrices A, B ∈ m×n× p ( F ) we will call
the matrix:
C m×n× p=
{( c ) | c =
ijk
}
aijk + bijk , ∀=
i 1, m; =
j 1, n; k= 1, p
ijk
The appearance of the addition of mxnxp, 3D matrices will be as in Figure 3,
)|i
{( a =
)|i
{(b =
where matrices A and B have the following appearance,
Am=
×n× p
Bm=
×n× p
ijk
ijk
}
1, p}
1, =
m; j 1,=
n; k 1, p
1, =
m; j 1,=
n; k
Definition 3.3 3-D, Zero matrix m × n × p , we will called the matrix that has
all its elements zero.
=
O Om=
×n× p
)|i
{( a =
| i
{( 0) =
ijk
Definition 3.4 The opposite matric of anmatrice
Am×=
n× p
ijk
}
1, =
m; j 1,=
n; k 1, p
}
1, m=
; j 1, n=
; k 1, p ∈ m×n× p ( F )
will, called matrix
OALib Journal
4/11
O. Zaka
11p
112
22p
213
2n2
222
m1p
211
m2p
mnp
+
m22
A = ( aijk )i =1,m
m21
1n2
122
22p
213
2n2
222
212
m1p
mn2
m22
m12
mn1
m2p
mn2
B = ( bijk )i =1,m
m11
mn1
m21
i =1, n
k =1, p
mnp
231
2n1
221
211
2np
131
1n1
121
111
231
2n1
221
m12
m11
2np
1np
12p
112
131
1n1
212
11p
1n2
122
121
111
1np
12p
i =1, n
k =1, p
Figure 3. The addition of mxnxp, 3D matrices.
{
}
− Am×n× p =
1, m; j =
1, n; k =
1, p ∈ m×n× p ( F )
( −aijk ) | i =
(
)
(where − aijk is a opposite element of element aijk ∈ F , so aijk + −aijk =0 F
and ( F , +, ⋅) is field), which satisfies the condition
{( a + ( −a ))=| i
; j
{( 0) =| i 1, m=
Am×n× p + ( − Am×n×=
p)
ijk
=
ijk
}
1, m=
; j 1, n=
; k 1, p
}
n; k 1,=
p O
1, =
Theorem 3.1 ( m×n× p ( F ) , + ) is abeliangrup.
Proof: Truly from the definition 3.2, of additions the 3-D matrices, we see that
addition is the sustainable in m×n× p ( F ) , because
ijk
aijk ∈ F , bijk ∈ F ⇒ cijk= aijk + bijk ∈ F , ∀=
i 1, m; =
j 1, n; k= 1, p
∀A =( aijk ) , B =( bijk ) , C =( cijk ) ∈ m×n× p ( F ) ⇒ ( A + B ) + C =A + ( B + C )
1) Associative property,
( A + B ) + C = ( aijk ) + ( bijk ) + ( cijk ) = ( aijk + bijk ) + ( cijk ) = ( ( aijk + bijk ) + cijk )
truly
(
)
= ( aijk + bijk + cijk ) = aijk + ( bijk + cijk ) = ( aijk ) + ( bijk + cijk ) = A + ( B + C )
( )
( )
2) ∀A = aijk ∈ m×n× p ( F ) , ∃O = 0ijk ∈ m×n× p ( F ) / A + O = O + A = A.
∀A = ( aijk ) ∈ m×n× p ( F ) , ∃O = ( 0ijk ) ∈ m×n× p ( F ) / A + O = O + A = A.
truly,
A+O
=
{( a ) + ( 0)
{
=
OALib Journal
)|i
{( a =
ijk
ijk
ijk
}
|=
i 1, m; =
j 1, n; =
k 1, p
}
=( aijk + 0 F ) | i =
1, m; j =
1, n; k =
1, p
ijk
}
1, m=
; j 1, =
n; k 1,=
p
A
5/11
3) ∀A =
(a ) ∈
ijk
m×n× p
( −a ) ∈
(F ),∃ − A =
=
m×n× p
( F ) / A + ( − A) =
; j 1, n=
;k
{( a + ( −a ))=| i 1, m=
n; k 1,=
p}
; j 1, =
{( 0 ) =| i 1, m=
ijk
truly, from Definition 2.4, we have
A + ( −=
A)
O. Zaka
ijk
ijk
F ijk
}
O.
1, p
O
∀A = ( aijk ) , B = ( bijk ) ∈ m×n× p ( F ) / A + B = B + A.
4) Addition is commutative.
truly
A + B = ( aijk ) + ( bijk ) = ( aijk + bijk )
( F ,+ ) is abelian
=
(b
ijk
+ aijk ) = ( bijk ) + ( aijk ) = B + A
4. The “Common” Multiplication of 3 × 3 × 3 , 3-D Matrices
with Elements Froman Field F
Definition 4.1: The multiplication of two matrices A, B ∈ 3×3×3 ( F ) we will
call the matrix C = A ⊗ B ∈ 3×3×3 ( F ) calculated as follows:
a113
3-vertical layer a213
a313
a
112
∀ 2-vertical layer a212
a312
a111
1-vertical layer a211
a
311
a123
a223
a323
a122
a222
a322
a121
a221
a321
a133
b113 b123 b133
a233 3-vertical layer b213 b223 b233
a333
b313 b323 b333
b
b
b
a132
112 122 132
a232 , 2-vertical layer b212 b222 b232 ∈ 3×3×3 ( F )
b312 b322 b332
a332
a131
b111 b121 b131
a231 1-vertical layer b211 b221 b231
b
a331
311 b321 b331
The appearance of the multiplication of 3 × 3 × 3, 3D matrices will be as in
Figure 4.
c113 c123 c133
( 3-vertical layer ) c213 c223 c233
c313 c323 c333
c
c
c
112 122 132
=
C (=
2-vertical layer ) c212 c222 c232
c
312 c322 c332
c
c
c
111 121 131
(1-vertical layer ) c211 c221 c231
c
311 c321 c331
a113
a213
a313
a
112
a212
a
312
a111
a
211
a311
a123
a223
a323
a122
a222
a322
a121
a221
a321
a133 b113 b123
a233 b213 b223
a333 b313 b323
a132 b112 b122
a232 ⊗ b212 b222
a332 b312 b322
a131 b111 b121
a231 b211 b221
a331 b311 b321
b133
b233
b333
b132
b232
b332
b131
b231
b331
where, the first vertical page is:
OALib Journal
6/11
O. Zaka
113
112
213
111
212
313
211
312
311
113
112
123
122
223
222
232
313
311
323
221
333
231
322
312
233
131
212
211
112
132
213
121
111
A = ( aijk )i =1,2,3
321
113
133
⊗
122
222
311
233
232
313
323
221
333
231
322
312
i =1,2,3
k =1,2,3
223
131
212
211
133
132
213
121
111
332
331
123
B = ( bijk )i =1,2,3
321
332
331
i =1,2,3
k =1,2,3
Figure 4. The multiplication of 3 × 3 × 3, 3D matrices.
c111 = a111 ⋅ b111 + a121 ⋅ b211 + a131 ⋅ b311 ;
c112 = a112 ⋅ b112 + a122 ⋅ b211 + a132 ⋅ b312 ;
c113 = a113 ⋅ b113 + a123 ⋅ b213 + a133 ⋅ b313 ;
c211 = a211 ⋅ b111 + a221 ⋅ b211 + a231 ⋅ b311 ;
c212 = a212 ⋅ b112 + a222 ⋅ b211 + a232 ⋅ b312 ;
c213 = a213 ⋅ b113 + a223 ⋅ b213 + a233 ⋅ b313 ;
c311 = a311 ⋅ b111 + a321 ⋅ b211 + a331 ⋅ b311 ;
c312 = a312 ⋅ b112 + a322 ⋅ b211 + a332 ⋅ b312 ;
c313 = a313 ⋅ b113 + a323 ⋅ b213 + a333 ⋅ b313 ;
the second vertical page is:
c121 = a111 ⋅ b121 + a121 ⋅ b221 + a131 ⋅ b321 ;
c122 = a112 ⋅ b122 + a122 ⋅ b222 + a132 ⋅ b322 ;
c123 = a113 ⋅ b123 + a123 ⋅ b223 + a133 ⋅ b323 ;
OALib Journal
7/11
O. Zaka
c221 = a211 ⋅ b121 + a221 ⋅ b221 + a231 ⋅ b321 ;
c222 = a212 ⋅ b122 + a222 ⋅ b222 + a232 ⋅ b322 ;
c223 = a213 ⋅ b123 + a223 ⋅ b223 + a233 ⋅ b323 ;
c321 = a311 ⋅ b121 + a321 ⋅ b221 + a331 ⋅ b321 ;
c322 = a312 ⋅ b122 + a322 ⋅ b222 + a332 ⋅ b322 ;
c323 = a313 ⋅ b123 + a323 ⋅ b223 + a333 ⋅ b323 ;
and third vertical page is:
c131 = a111 ⋅ b131 + a121 ⋅ b231 + a131 ⋅ b331 ;
c132 = a112 ⋅ b132 + a122 ⋅ b232 + a132 ⋅ b332 ;
c133 = a113 ⋅ b133 + a123 ⋅ b233 + a133 ⋅ b333 ;
c231 = a211 ⋅ b121 + a221 ⋅ b221 + a231 ⋅ b321 ;
c232 = a212 ⋅ b122 + a222 ⋅ b222 + a232 ⋅ b322 ;
c233 = a213 ⋅ b123 + a223 ⋅ b223 + a233 ⋅ b323 ;
c331 = a311 ⋅ b121 + a321 ⋅ b221 + a331 ⋅ b321 ;
c332 = a312 ⋅ b122 + a322 ⋅ b222 + a332 ⋅ b322 ;
c333 = a313 ⋅ b123 + a323 ⋅ b223 + a333 ⋅ b323 ;
It is reduce the above notes through matrix blocks
C3 A3 B3 A3 × B3
C 2 = A2 ⊗ B2 = A2 × B2
C A B A ×B
1
1 1 1 1
where
a111 a121 a131
=
A1 =
a211 a221 a231 ; A2
a
311 a321 a331
b111 b121 b131
B1 = =
b211 b221 b231 ; B2
b
311 b321 b331
a112 a122 a132
a113 a123 a133
a212 a222 a232 ; A3 a213 a223 a233 ;
=
a
a
312 a322 a332
313 a323 a333
b112 b122 b132
b113 b123 b133
b212 b222 b232 ; B3 b213 b223 b233 ;
=
b
b
312 b322 b332
313 b323 b333
C3 A3 B3 A3 × B3
C 2 = A2 ⊗ B2 = A2 × B2
C A B A ×B
1
1 1 1 1
and
c111 c121 c131
C1 =
=
c211 c221 c231 ; C 2
c
311 c321 c331
c112 c122 c132
c212 c222 c232 ; C3
=
c
312 c322 c332
c113
c213
c
313
C1 =×
A1 B1 ; C 2 =×
A2 B2 ; C3 =×
A3 B3
c123
c223
c323
c133
c233
c333
Remark 4.1 Two dimensional matrices can think like matrix with size
m × n ×1
Easy seen from the definition 1, above it that, if =
aij 2 0,=
aij 3 0 and
=
bij 2 0,=
bij 3 0, ∀i, j ∈ (1, 2, 3) we get, the usual 3 × 3-matrix multiplication,
then will take only the first vertical layer is (or, in the language of matrix blocks
OALib Journal
8/11
O. Zaka
would say that: A2 = 0 ; A3 = 0 ; B2 = 0 ; B3 = 0 ):
a111 ⋅ b111 + a121 ⋅ b211 + a131 ⋅ b311
a211 ⋅ b111 + a221 ⋅ b211 + a231 ⋅ b311
a ⋅b + a ⋅b + a ⋅b
311
321
211
331
311 111
a111 ⋅ b121 + a121 ⋅ b221 + a131 ⋅ b321
a211 ⋅ b121 + a221 ⋅ b221 + a231 ⋅ b321
a311 ⋅ b121 + a321 ⋅ b221 + a331 ⋅ b321
a111 ⋅ b131 + a121 ⋅ b231 + a131 ⋅ b331
a211 ⋅ b121 + a221 ⋅ b221 + a231 ⋅ b321
a311 ⋅ b121 + a321 ⋅ b221 + a331 ⋅ b321
Definition 4.2. The3-D,unit matrix, associated with the “common” multiplication, must be:
I 3×3×3
1
0
0
1
= 0
0
1
0
0
0 0
1 0
third vertical layer
0 1
0 0
1 0 the second vertical layer
0 1
0 0
1 0 the first vertical layer
0 1
or, in the language of matrix blocks:
I 3×3×3
I 3×3
= I 3×3
I
3×3
Easy distinguish that, ∀A ∈ 3×3×3 ( F ) / A ⊗ I 3×3×3 =A.
Theorem 4.1 ( 3×3×3 ( F ) , ⊗ ) is a unitary semi-Group with regard to this
ordinary multiplication
Proof: 1) associative property. ∀A, B, C ∈ 3×3×3 ( F )
A3 B3 C3 A3 × B3 C3 ( A3 × B3 ) × C3
A2 ⊗ B2 ⊗ C 2 = A2 × B2 ⊗ C 2 = ( A2 × B2 ) × C2
A1 B1 C1 A1 × B1 C1 ( A1 × B1 ) × C1
A3 × ( B3 × C3 )
C2 )
A2 × ( B2 ×=
A ×(B ×C )
1
1
1
( 3×3 ( F ),×) is a semigroup
=
A3 B3 C3
A2 ⊗ B2 ⊗ C 2 .
A B C
1 1 1
2) ∃I 3×3×3 ∈ 3×3×3 ( F ) / ∀A ∈ 3×3×3 ( F ) ⇒ A × I 3×3×3 =A.
A3 I 3×3 A3 × I 3×3 ( ( F ),×) is a unitary semigroup A3
3×3
=
A2 × I 3×3
A2 ⊗ I 3×3 =
A2
A1 I 3×3 A1 × I 3×3
A1
Theorem 4.2 ( 3×3×3 ( F ) , +, ⊗ ) is a unitary Ring.
Proof: 1) From Theorem 2.1. ( 3×3×3 ( F ) , + ) is abeliangrup.
2) From Theorem 4.1. ( 3×3×3 ( F ) , ⊗ ) is a unitary semi-Group, and consequently also, ( 3×3×3 ( F ) , ⊗ ) is a unitary semi-Group
3) ∀A, B, C ∈ 3×3×3 ( F ) ,
a) A ⊗ ( B + C ) = A ⊗ B + A ⊗ C . b) ( A + B ) ⊗ C = A ⊗ C + B ⊗ C .
OALib Journal
9/11
O. Zaka
truly
A3 B3 C3
A ⊗ ( B + C )= A2 ⊗ B2 + C 2 =
A B C
1 1 1
A3 B3 + C3
A2 ⊗ B2 + C 2 =
A B +C
1
1 1
A3 × ( B3 + C3 )
A2 × ( B2 + C 2 )
A ×(B + C )
1
1
1
A3 × B3 + A3 × C3 A3 × B3 A3 × C3
=
A2 × B2 + A2 × C 2 = A2 × B2 + A2 × C 2
A1 × B1 + A1 × C1 A1 × B1 A1 × C1
A3 B3 A3 C3
= A2 ⊗ B2 + A2 ⊗ C 2 = A ⊗ B + A ⊗ C .
A B A C
1 1 1 1
( 3×3 ( F ),+ ,×) is a unitary Ring
In a similar manner proved the point (b).
5. Multiplication of a 3-D, 3 × 3 × 3 -Matrix by a Scalar
Definition 5.1 The multiplication of matrix A ∈ 3×3×3 ( F ) with scalar
λ ∈ F , is matrix=
C λ A ∈ 3×3×3 ( F ) :
a113 a123 a133
a213 a223 a233
a313 a323 a333
a
a122 a132
112
=
C λ=
a212 a222 a232
a
312 a322 a332
a111 a121 a131
a
a221 a231
211
a311 a321 a331
λ ⋅ a113
λ ⋅ a213
λ ⋅ a313
λ ⋅a
112
λ ⋅ a212
λ ⋅a
312
λ ⋅ a111
λ ⋅a
211
λ
a
⋅
311
λ ⋅ a123 λ ⋅ a133
λ ⋅ a223 λ ⋅ a233
λ ⋅ a323 λ ⋅ a333
λ ⋅ a122
λ ⋅ a222
λ ⋅ a322
λ ⋅ a121
λ ⋅ a221
λ ⋅ a321
λ ⋅ a132
λ ⋅ a232
λ ⋅ a332
λ ⋅ a131
λ ⋅ a231
λ ⋅ a331
: F × 3×3×3 ( F ) → 3×3×3 ( F )
So
( λ , A) λ A
Theorem 5.1 ( 3×3×3 ( F ) , +, F ) is a vector space
Proof. is evident because, ( 3×3 ( F ) , +, F ) it is the vector space, see [6] [8]
Definition 5.2 The multiplication of matrix A ∈ m×n× p ( F ) with scalar
λ ∈ F , is matrix=
C λ A ∈ m×n× p ( F ) :
[9] [10].
wherein each element of the matrix is multiplied (by multiplication of the field
F) with the element λ ∈ F . Well, so we have
: F × m×n× p ( F ) → m×n× p ( F )
( F ) , +, F ) is a vector space
Proof. Is evident because, ( m×n ( F ) , +, F ) it is the vector space, see [6] [8]
Theorem 5.2
(
( λ , A) λ A
m×n× p
[9] [10]
OALib Journal
10/11
O. Zaka
6. Conclusion
In this article, based on geometric considerations, and mostly considering the
cube, we managed to develop the idea of the 3D matrix doing so a generalization
of the 2D matrices, step by step. Furthermore, we gave a unitary ring with the
elements of a field F. Initially we gave the ring 3 × 3 × 3 , 3D matrices and then
generalized this concept for m × n × p , 3D matrices. At the end of this article,
we present the scalar multiplication with the 3D matrices and we show that the
set of 3 × 3 × 3 , 3D matrix, forms a vector space over the field F.
References
[1]
Artin, M. (1991) Algebra. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
[2]
Bretscher, O. (2005) Linear Algebra with Applications. 3rd Edition, Prentice Hall,
Upper Saddle River.
[3]
Connell, E.H. (2004) Elements of Abstract and Linear Algebra.
[4]
Schneide, H. and Barker, G.P. (1973) Matrices and Linear Algebra (Dover Books on
Mathematics). 2nd Revised Edition.
[5]
Lang, S. (1987) Linear Algebra. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York.
[6]
Nering, E.D. (1970) Linear Algebra and Matrix Theory. 2nd Edition, Wiley, New
York.
[7]
Zaka, O. and Filipi, K. (2016) The Transform of a Line of Desargues Affine Plane in
an Additive Group of Its Points. International Journal of Current Research, 8,
34983-34990.
[8]
Zaka, O. (2013) Abstract Algebra II. Vllamasi, Tirana.
[9]
Zaka, O. (2013) Linear Algebra I. Vllamasi, Tirana.
[10] Zaka, O. (2013) Linear Algebra II. Vllamasi, Tirana.
[11] Zaka, O. and Filipi, K. (2016) One Construction of an Affine Plane over a Corps.
Journal of Advances in Mathematics, 12.
Submit or recommend next manuscript to OALib Journal and we will provide best service for you:
Publication frequency: Monthly
9 subject areas of science, technology and medicine
Fair and rigorous peer-review system
Fast publication process
Article promotion in various social networking sites (LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter,
etc.)
Maximum dissemination of your research work
Submit Your Paper Online: Click Here to Submit
Or Contact service@oalib.com
OALib Journal
11/11