Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2016, Georgetown Center for Contemporary Arab Studies
Article in magazine issue on the Arab Spring, by Georgetown University's Center for Contemporary Arab Affairs, 2016.
Orbis
Is the New Middle East Stuck in Its Sectarian Past? The Unspoken Dimension of the “Arab Spring”2013 •
The serial collapse of regimes in wake of the Arab Spring was followed by aftershocks of ubiquitous sectarianism. How can we account for its upsurge? On the one end of the debate, we find a “primordial” penchant to ascribe sectarian conflict to ostensibly inextricable, sociological roots. On the other end, we find a desire to pin the blame for sectarianism on external, (neo)colonial actors pursuing an all too familiar “divide and rule” strategy. What is the historical evidence supporting each of these two narratives? Is sectarianism (ta¯ ’ifı¯ya) really the product of external interventionism or inborn instincts? Or is it, as is more commonly claimed, indicative of a continuing malaise in authoritarian Arab states seeking to leverage tribal and religious communalisms? What policies have been devised by states, both within and outside of the region, to instrumentalize or contain the spread of sectarianism and what preemptive strategies can be pursued in the future to stem this extremely costly contagion? Tracing the trajectory of sectarian discourse from its ostensible origins down to the present day, this chapter weigh the indigenous and extraneous factors which have shaped the morphology of sectarianism. The article makes the case that only a nuanced analysis blending considerations of past and present confessional ideologies and class interests, as well as political instrumentalization of sectarian identity by both external and internal actors, may allow us to better comprehend the vigor of communalism in the present day.
The Middle East Journal
The New Sectarianism: The Arab Uprisings and the Rebirth of the Shi'a-Sunni Divide by Geneive Abdo (review)2017 •
The Brookings Institution is a private non-profit organization. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. Brookings recognizes that the value it provides to any supporter is in its absolute commitment to quality, independence and impact. Activities supported by its donors reflect this commitment and the analysis and recommendations are not determined by any donation. of the research topic from the beginning, nearly two years ago, and gave initial backing to the project. Jean-Francois Seznec offered very useful feedback on Bahrain. This monograph benefited from skilled and insight-ful researchers. reza h. Akbari, the author's gifted and perceptive research associate, ...
The unfolding uprisings across the Arab world have been viewed through a regional prism. Political scientists particularly were predisposed to view the "Arab Spring" as a long overdue culmination of pent-up popular frustrations with corrupt and autocratic regimes. Such an exclusive focus on the democracy deficit long besetting political systems in the Arab world however begs the question of the particular historical moment of the outburst of 2011 and as such may not capture the full scope of the underlying dynamic. While political repression by praetorian states served as a crucial catalyst for massive street demonstrations, it is increasingly apparent that the parabolic rise of commodity prices may have kindled a politically and demographically charged situation. In its first segment, this chapter thus attempts to draw the links between monetary and fiscal policies in the United States and Europe, the ensuing contagion of global inflation and its role in destabilizing certain Arab States, while leaving others largely insulated from the wave of revolt. I argue that the likelihood of a revolution in any given Arab state must be weighed against a multiplicity of local and global factors, chief of which is the exposure of a critical mass of a vulnerable segment in a given society to price increases in essential commodities. While gulf rentier states – with the exception of a particularly bifurcated Bahrain – thusfar were able to stave off major street protests with direct and indirect subsidies, even seasoned autocrats such as Mubarak in Egypt or Ben Ali in Tunisia – bereft of rentier revenue - were unable to withstand the popular pressures. Finally, the chapter examines to what degree the socio-economic imbalances which fomented the revolutions have aggravated religious sectarianism in pluralistic Arab states such as Lebanon and Syria, thereby undermining the uprisings’ declared drive for civil rights, political accountability and social justice.
This article examines the current sectarianization of the Middle East. It begins with a conceptualization of sectarianism, distinguishes kinds of sectarianism and examines the factors that determine which versions of sectarianism dominate at a particular time. It surveys the preconditions of sectarianization—unequal modernization, instrumentalization of identity in regime power-building practices; the initial precipitant of sectarianization, the US invasion of Iraq; and the impact of the Arab uprisings, in which sectarianism was instrumentalized by regimes and oppositions. Instrumentalized sectarianism reached the grassroots and was transmuted into militant sectarianism by the security dilemma, competitive interference in failed states and trans-state diffusion of sectarian discourses. The consequences of sectarianization include its challenge to state formation and its tendency to empower authoritarianism. Civil war has unleashed militant sectarianism leading to exclusivist practices among both regimes and opposition. The regional power struggle has taken the form of sectarian bi-polarization between Sunni and Shia camps. Sectarianization can only be reversed by an end to the current civil wars in Syria, Iraq and Yemen and the regional power struggles that keep them going.
Government and Opposition
Understanding the Arab Spring: One Region, Several Puzzles, and Many Explanations2015 •
This comprehensive review essay ties together the latest scholarly interventions from the study of the Arab Spring. It finds that beyond a mass of descriptive generalizations, the best works on the uprisings focus upon three questions. First, how did the Arab Spring begin – that is, what were the causative origins of popular mobilization in these non-democratic states? Second, how did national insurrections that varied in length and escalation become a truly regional wave of contention, spreading so quickly across borders? Third, why did regime trajectories and outcomes vary so widely, from revolutionary insurrections to leadership survival to civil war?
South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education
Learning style awareness and academic performance of studentsD.Bird (ed.), Agriculture and Industry in South-Eastern Roman Britain (Oxford, Oxbow Books)
The Development of Iron Production in the Roman Weald2017 •
Sosyal Bilimler Ne İşe Yarar?
"Ben Buraya Edebiyatı Övmeye Değil, Gömmeye Geldim!: Akademik Bir Beşeri Bilim Alanı Olarak Edebiyatın Vazgeçilmezliği Üzerine Bir Savunu"2015 •
Journal of Balkans and Middle Eastern Studies 10 (3): 293-307.
EU Enlargement in the Western Balkans: Strategies of Borrowing and Inventing2008 •
Erytheia. Revista de Estudios Bizantrinos y Neogriegos
ERYTHEIA 44: discussions and reviews2018 •
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Evaluation of health status and its predictor among university staff in Nigeria2018 •