See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263277401
Waste Tyre Rubber in Asphalt Pavement
Modification.
Article in Material Research Innovations · April 2014
Impact Factor: 0.83 · DOI: 10.1179/1432891714Z.000000000922
CITATIONS
READS
2
60
2 authors, including:
Nuha Mashaan
University of Malaya
33 PUBLICATIONS 76 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Available from: Nuha Mashaan
Retrieved on: 16 May 2016
YOUR ARTICLE
Please review the proof* of your article carefully, checking for any final typographical errors or
minor necessary updates. Please address and answer in full any queries which the copyeditor
may have raised on the Author Query sheet accompanying your proofs.
Please make clear any necessary corrections, within 3 working days, using one of the following
methods:
Use Adobe's Comments and/or Editing Tools to indicate changes directly onto
the PDF and return via email. Please request guidelines if required.
Email the necessary corrections as a list citing the page and line number
where a correction needs to be made, how the text currently appears, and
what it should be changed to.
Use the BSI proof marks to indicate changes on a paper printout of the PDF
and email, fax or post the pages (contact details below).
Production Editor, MRI
Maney Publishing, 1 Carlton House Terrace, London, SW1Y 5AF, UK
Tel.: +44 (0) 20 7451 7369
Fax: +44 (0) 20 7451 7307
mri@maneypublishing.com
VIEWING YOUR ARTICLE’S PRODUCTION STATUS AND PLACING ORDERS USING
MANEYTRACK
http://maneytrack.maney.co.uk
Approximately three weeks ago, you will have received an email detailing your log-in details for
Maney Publishing’s web-based production tracking system, ManeyTrack. Via ManeyTrack you
can:
-
View the production status of your article at any time.
-
Place orders for, offprints or to make your article open access.
Please log in using the web address, above. If you have misplaced your log-in details please
check your spam/junk folder. If you are still unable to find them please click on the above url and
click on ‘Forgot Password’ and follow instructions. If you require further technical assistance,
please contact the Administrator: ManeyTrackAdmin@maneypublishing.com
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This journal is hosted online at www.maneyonline.com/mri
OFFPRINTS: You will receive a complimentary PDF eprint of your final article. If you wish to
purchase traditional hardcopy offprints please log in to ManeyTrack to view prices and to place
your order – see details for ManeyTrack above.
GET FOUND, GET READ, GET CITED
As part of our commitment to making the content we publish as visible as possible, Maney
offers its authors use of the Kudos service which is designed to help you increase article
readership and citations by enabling you to explain, enrich and share your articles.
Corresponding authors will receive a registration email regarding the service once the article
is published. To find out more visit www.growkudos.com.
FEEDBACK
Tell us about your publishing experience at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/stm_authorsurvey
*Please note this PDF file may not be offered for commercial sale or for any systematic
external distribution by a third party.
Kind regards,
Production Editor
Waste tyre rubber in asphalt pavement
modification
Nuha Salim Mashaan* and Mohamed Rehan Karim
Currently, a serious problem that leads to environmental pollution is the abundance and increase of
waste tyres from vehicles. The major approach to solve this issue is to recycle waste tyre rubber
including its use as crumb rubber modifier in asphalt pavement. This study aims to investigate
the effect of crumb rubber modifier on engineering properties of rubberised asphalt. The
physical and rheological properties of rubberised asphalt binder that include different
percentages of crumb rubber modifier (0, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20%) were determined and assessed
using various laboratory tests. Results showed that 16% crumb rubber modifier at 180°C
blending temperature have a significant effect on modified binder engineering properties. Also,
the study promotes the recycle of waste tyre rubber in an environment friendly manner.
Keywords: Waste tyre rubber, Bitumen, Rubberised bitumen, Physical properties, Rheology, Environmental impact
Introduction
Scrap tyres lead to serious disposal problems. However,
the use of scrap tyres in asphalt pavements in the form
of fillers/additives could minimise the environmental pollution and maximise natural resource conservation. There
are two major approaches: first to resolve the wastage of
rubber and disposal of scrap tyres which are to reuse
waste rubber, second to reclaim raw resource of rubber.
Crumb rubber is made by shredding scrap tyre into a particular material free of fibre and steel. There are two techniques to produce crumb rubber: ambient grinding and
the cryogenic process.1 Ambient grinding process can be
divided into two methods: granulation and cracker
mills. Ambient describes the temperature when the
waste tyres rubber as its size is reduced. The material is
loaded inside the crack mill or granulator at ambient
temperature. Cryogenic tire grinding consists of freezing
the scrap tire rubber using liquid nitrogen until it
becomes brittle, and then cracking the frozen rubber
into smaller particles with a hammer mill. Cryogenic
grinding is a cleaner, slightly faster operation resulting
in production of fine mesh size. The high cost of this
process is a disadvantage due to the added cost of
liquid nitrogen.
Malaysia’s production of scrap tyres is about 10 million
pieces per annum and unfortunately they are being disposed in an environmentally unfriendly manner.2 A
bitumen 80/100 penetration grade is commonly used in
Malaysia and due to high traffic loading and hot
weather conditions, pavement distresses appear quite
early in the service life of the asphalt pavement. Thus,
Center for Transportation Research, Faculty of Engineering, University of
Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
*Corresponding author, email nuhaasim@siswa.um.edu.my
© W. S. Maney & Son Ltd 2014
DOI 10.1179/1432891714Z.000000000922
the use of crumb rubber in bitumen modification is considered as a sustainable technology which would transform the conventional asphalt into a new asphalt
mixture highly resistant to rutting and fatigue deformations. Since the 1960s, the use of rubberised bitumen
binder in road materials applications has gained
increased interest in the paving industry. Hence, the
task of current asphalt researchers and engineers is to
look for different kinds of modified bitumen with rheological properties that would directly affect and improve the
asphalt pavement performance.
Currently, researches on applications of rubberised
bitumen binders have reported many advantages. These
advantages include improved bitumen resistance to
rutting due to high viscosity, softening point, improved
bitumen resistance to surface-initiated cracks and
reduction of fatigue cracking, reduction of temperature
susceptibility and improved durability as well as
reduction in road pavement maintenance costs.3–6 The
properties of rubberised bitumen binders at a wide
range of temperatures are highly dependent on the chemistry of the bitumen binder, the crumb rubber content,
size and texture of rubber particle and the blending
conditions.3–7
The viscous-elastic properties of bitumen are determined by the differing percentages between asphaltenes
and maltenes fraction. According to the microstructure
and the colloidal system of bitumen, asphaltenes are diffused into an oily matrix of maltenes, and encased by a
shell of resins whereby its thickness varies with the temperature that is being tested.8,9 Thus, the mechanical properties and microstructure of bitumen are dependent on
bitumen composition, blending temperatures and on the
degree of aromatisation of the maltenes and the concentration of asphaltenes.9
Previous research has shown that the major mechanism
of the bitumen–rubber interaction is the swelling of the
Materials Research Innovations
2014
VOL
18
SUPPL
6
S6-1
Mashaan and Karim
Waste tyre rubber in asphalt pavement modification
1 Continuous blend asphalt rubber produced at laboratory10
rubber particles because of the absorption of the light
fractions oil into the rubber particles and stiffening of
the residual binder.5,6 Also, the improved property of rubberised bitumen is likely to depend on interaction between
crumb rubber and bitumen binder. Crumb rubber particles swell when mixed with the bitumen binder to
form a viscous gel; leading to an increase in the viscosity
of the rubberised bitumen binder.3
The aim of this research was to determine the effects of
incorporating crumb rubber modifier (CRM) on the
engineering properties of modified bitumen binder. The
physical and rheological properties of bitumen binders
that is modified using various percentages of CRM
were determined and assessed with laboratory tests.
Experimental programme
Materials
The bitumen binder used in this study was 80/100 penetration grade, obtained from Shell supplier located in
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. In this study, fine crumb
rubber size # 30 (0·6 mm) was selected in order to
reduce segregation.
Sample preparation
Rubberised bitumen binder was prepared by mixing
bitumen 80/100 penetration grade with CRM (0, 4, 8,
12, 16 and 20% by binder weight) passing the 30-mesh
sieve. The propeller mixer is used to mix the bitumen
and the crumb rubber at two different blending temperatures of 160 and 180°C for 90 minutes continuous blending. Binder mixing was conducted at the velocity speed of
350 rev min−1. The fabrication of rubberised bitumen
samples as shown in Fig. 1.
Results and discussion
Penetration test results
Figure 2 illustrates the penetration value versus (CRM)
content and blending temperature. The penetration
value of the CRM-modified binder for different blending
temperatures depends on their relation with crumb rubber
content. It shows a decrease in penetration as the rubber
content increased in the bituminous specimens. It is
appears that the decrease in penetration of CRM modified binder samples compared with unmodified binder
was approximately about 17–80% for 4 and 20% rubber
content, respectively.
The results showed that the CRM rubber content in the
mixture led to lower penetration values, agreeing with
findings of previous studies. These results are due to the
crumb rubber content exhibiting a strong effect on penetration reduction by increasing the stiffness of crumb
rubber modified bitumen binder. This would make the
binder more resistant to high temperature susceptibility,
thus leading to high resistance to permanent deformation
like rutting.11
Additionally, the increase in blending temperature
enhanced the particle size of the rubber and led to the
increase in rubber mass through the interaction and swelling of the rubber into the bitumen during the blending
process, which led to the decrease in the penetration
values of rubberised bitumen samples.
Softening point test results
Figure 3 shows the softening point value versus (CRM)
content and blending temperature. As displayed in
Fig. 5, at 160°C the increase in CRM content led to
high softening point of modified bitumen samples by
about 1–10°C for 4 and 20% rubber content, respectively,
while the softening point showed more increase at the
Binder tests
A series of binder tests were carried out on the modified
binder for purpose of selecting the optimum combination
parameters of mixing temperature and CRM content.
The binder tests include Brookfield viscosity at 135°C
(ASTM D4402), penetration test (ASTM D5-2002) softening point test at 25°C (ASTM D 36) and dynamic shear
rheometer (DSR) at 76°C (ASTMD-4 proposal P246).
This proposal test method focuses on determining the
linear visco-elastic properties of bitumen when tested in
dynamic (oscillatory) shear using parallel plate test geometry. Specification testing of DSR was performed at a
test frequency of 10 rad s−1.
S6-2
Materials Research Innovations
2014
VOL
18
SUPPL
6
2 Illustrates the penetration value versus (CRM) content and
blending temperature
Mashaan and Karim
Waste tyre rubber in asphalt pavement modification
3 Shows the results softening point of rubberised bitumen
5 Complex shear modulus results at 76°C
blending temperature of 180°C by about 2·5 to 15·5°C for
4 and 20% crumb rubber content, respectively. The
increase of rubber content in the mix might be related
to an increase in the asphaltenes/resins ratio which
enhanced the stiffened property and make the modified
binder less susceptible to temperature changes.
Also, the increase in blending temperature led to the
increase in rubber volume through the interaction and
swelling of the rubber into the bitumen during the blending process, thus, leading to the an increase in the softening point values of rubberised bitumen samples.
This increase in softening point was similar with the findings of Bahia and Davis.12 The main factor in the increase
in softening point can be attributed to crumb rubber
content, regardless of type and size. The increase in softening point led to a stiff binder that has the ability to
enhance its recovery after elastic deformation.
Moreover, this increase in softening point might have
resulted from the increase in binder molecular weight
when the crumb rubber interacted with the bitumen
binder.
is highly important to select the temperature at which
the binder would maintain an acceptable viscosity that
enables the bitumen binder to coat the aggregate effectively. This, in turn, would help to ensure better workability of rubberised bitumen, which reduce the permanent
deformations.
The increase in viscosity might be due to the amount of
asphaltenes in the bitumen that enhanced the viscous flow
of the modified bitumen sample during the interaction
process. In general, higher crumb rubber content was
found to lead to an increase in the viscosity at 135°C.3
According to the Asphalt Institute, the specification of
a maximum viscosity at 135°C should not be more than
3 Pas for unaged binder. Thus, the viscosity of 20%
rubber content at different blending temperatures has
exceeded the limit and thus, it is not recommended.14
Dynamic shear test results
Complex shear modulus G* result
Viscosity refers to the fluid property of the bitumen and it
is a gauge of flow-resistance. At the application temperature, viscosity greatly influences the potential of the
resulting paving mixes. The increase in viscosity due to
varied blending temperature and different CRM content
showed significant effect for all modified samples for
mixing time of 90 minutes as shown in Fig. 4.
The increase in viscosity with increased blending temperature and crumb rubber content has been verified by
Bahia and Davies,13 and Lee et al.14 Based on the viscosity results of this study, its increase was accompanied
by the increase in rubber content from 4% to a high
CRM content of 20% by binder weight. Moreover, the
increase in viscosity might be due to CRM content with
higher blending temperature, which would increase the
elasticity and break down the crosslink of rubber; these
aspects would make the modified binder thicker and
more elastic. In addition, during sample preparation it
As displayed in Fig. 5, an increase in CRM content and
blending temperature leads to an increase in the
complex shear modulus G* at 76°C. The results showed
that G* appears to increased as the crumb rubber
content increases. In this study, adding crumb rubber to
the base bitumen increased the complex shear modulus
(G*) over the range of blending temperatures. Given
that the crumb rubber might dissolve and disperse into
the bitumen, the mechanical properties of the modified
binder could be enhanced. Another reason would be
physical chemical properties of both bitumen and
crumb rubber. In general, these properties are affected
during interaction processes because rubber particle
dimensions are reduced, and these are related to breakdown or depolymerisation of rubber particles digested
in asphalt binders.15
Adding crumb rubber increased stiffness, thus yielding
a higher failure temperature. At high blending temperature, the chemical reaction between rubber and bitumen
binder saw to changes in binder properties. As expected,
the rubber particles tend to swell due to the absorption
4 Brookfield viscosity results at 135°C
6 Phase angle results of all samples at 76°C
Brookfield viscosity test results
Materials Research Innovations
2014
VOL
18
SUPPL
6
S6-3
Mashaan and Karim
Waste tyre rubber in asphalt pavement modification
of aromatic oils, leading to the production of viscous
gels.14
Phase angle (delta) result
Figure 6 shows the effect of blending temperature and
rubber content on the phase angle at 76°C. The blending
temperature does affect the properties of rubberised
binder in term of phase angle, and the increase in
crumb rubber content also led to an obvious decrease of
the phase angle of the rubberised binder. Thus, the
primary reduction in the phase angle could be attributed
to the effect of rubber content. Enhancing the rubber
content led to the increase in carbon black reacting with
the natural rubber, which corresponded to the elastic
part of the crumb rubber chemistry. A phase angle (δ) represents the transition from viscous to elastic solid behaviours of bitumen binders. As mentioned in the
literature review, the higher values of phase angles correspond to binders that become more viscous, while with
lower value it tends to be more elastic. In general, this
reflects a trade-off between high and low temperature performances of bitumen binders.9
Conclusions
1
S6-4
Based on this limited study on the utilisation of crumb
rubber modifier in asphalt binders, the following findings
were addressed:
(i) According to laboratory binder tests, it is clear that
rubber crumb content played a major role in influencing significantly the performance and rheological properties of rubberised bitumen binders. It
could enhance the performance properties of
asphalt pavement resistance against deformation
during construction and road services.
(ii) The results of binder tests on rubberised bitumen
showed the increase in Brookfield viscosity, softening point and complex shear modulus, as well as
reduced penetration and phase angle, means using
crumb rubber modifier at 180°C significantly
affect the performance properties of rubberised
bitumen.
(iii) The increase in rubber content by 20% showed a
corresponding increase in Brookfield viscosity
value that is higher than SHRP specification
limits (3 Pas). As such, crumb rubber modifier
content of 20% and above is not suitable as far as
ease of pavement construction is concerned due to
the high viscosity of the rubberised binder.
Materials Research Innovations
2014
VOL
18
SUPPL
6
(iv) The conclusions arrived at from this research will
involve promotion of sustainable technology
through recycle waste material to produce a new
material in an environment friendly manner.
References
1. B. Adhikari, D. De and S. Maiti: ‘Reclamation and recycling of
waste rubber’, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2000, 25, 909–948.
2. M. R. Ibrahim, H. Y. Katman, M. R. Karim and A. Mahrez:
‘Properties of rubberised bitumen mixes prepared with wet and dry
mixing process’, ‘Proc 8th Int. Conf. of Eastern Asia Society for
Transportation Studies’, Indonesia, 2009.
3. C. Thodesen, K. Shatanawi and S. Amerkhanian: ‘Effect of crumb
rubber characteristics on crumb rubber modified (CRM) binder viscosity’, Construction Building Mater., 2009, 23, 295–303.
4. F. M. Nejad, P. Aghajani, A. Modarres and H. Firoozifar:
‘Investigating the properties of crumb rubber modified bitumen
using classic and SHRP testing methods’, Construction Building
Mater., 2012, 26, 481–489.
5. C. C. Wong and W. G. Wong: ‘Effect of crumb rubber modifiers on
high temperature susceptibility of wearing course mixtures’,
Construction Building Mater., 2007, 21, 1741–1745.
6. F. Xiao, P. E. Zhao and S. N. Amirkhanian: ‘Fatigue behavior of
rubberized asphalt concrete mixtures containing warm asphalt additives’, Construction Building Mater., 2009, 23, 3144–3151.
7. J. Shen, S. N. Amirkhanian, F. Xiao and B. Tang: ‘Influence of
surface area and size of crumb rubber on high temperature properties
of crumb rubber and modified binders’, J. Construction Building
Mater., 2009, 23, 304–310.
8. L. H. Lewandowski: ‘Polymer modification of paving asphalt
binders’, Rubber Chem. Technol., 1994, 67, (3), 447–480.
9. F. J. Navarro, P. Partal, M. Garcia-Morales, M. J. Martin-Alfonso,
F. F. Martinez-Boza, C. Gallegos and A. C. Diogo: ‘Bitumen modification with reactive and non-reactive (virgin and recycled) polymers: A comparative analysis’, J. Indus. Eng. Chem., 2009, 15,
458–464.
10. A. P. Paulo and C. P. Jorge: ‘Laboratory optimization of continuous
blend asphalt rubber’, ‘Proc. 3rd European Pavement and Asset
Management EPAM 3’, Coimbra, 2008.
11. P. Kumar, H. C. Mehndiratta and K. L. Singh: ‘Rheological properties of crumb rubber modified bitumen – A lab study’, J. Sci. Indus.
Res., 2009, 68, 812–816.
12. H. U. Bahia and R. Davies: ‘Effect of crumb rubber modifiers
(CRM) on performance-related properties of asphalt binders’,
J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technologists, 1994, 63, 414–449.
13. H. U. Bahia and R. Davies: ‘Factors controlling the effect of crumb
rubber on critical properties of asphalt binders’, J. Assoc. Asphalt
Paving Technologists, 1995, 64, 130–162.
14. S. J. Lee, C. K. Akisetty and S. N. Amirkhanian: ‘The effect of
crumb rubber modifier (CRM) on the performance properties of
rubberized binder in HMA pavements’, Construction Building
Mater., 2008, 22, 1368–1376.
15. S. K. Palit, R. K. Sudhakar and B. B. Pandey: ‘Laboratory evaluation of crumb rubber modified asphalt mixes’, J. Mater. Civil
Eng., 2004, 16, (1), 45–53.
Authors Queries
Journal:
Materials Research Innovations
Paper:
MRI_ICOSEM_103
Article title: Waste tyre rubber in asphalt pavement modification
Dear Author
During the preparation of your manuscript for publication, the questions listed below have arisen.
Please attend to these matters and return this form with your proof. Many thanks for your assistance
Query
Reference
Query
1
Please define ’SHRP’.
Remarks