The Low Countries

19 6 Low Countries Daniel Curtis, Jessica Dijkman, Thijs Lambrecht and Eric Vanhaute Episodes of dearth and famine can be discerned in documents from the Low Countries from as early as the late Carolingian period. As with other parts of Europe at this time, though, we rely ultimately on the perception and opinion of contemporary chroniclers, making it dificult to say anything quantiiable or comparative. For example, one seventeenth-century humanist writer compiled a number of medieval chronicles detailing twere zeit (‘hard times’) in Frisia from as early as 851, and then intermittently disrupting the eleventh century in 1006, 1051, 1062 and 1069 (Sax 1986 [1636]: 145). Medieval chroniclers further noted serious periods of dearth in the twelfth century; one in 1146–47 connected with carestia (‘dearth’) and a ‘darkening of the skies’, suggestive of abnormal climatic conditions, while another in 1191 apparently was noted for its wide geographical impact (De Ram 1861: II, bk. 14, no. 2; Kuys 1983: nos. 220, 251). Chronicles from ecclesiastical institutions are our main evidence for harvest failures and dearth in the thirteenth century too: abbot Menko of the monastery of Wittewierum remarked in Groningen in 1250 that city oficials had imported grain from unknown ‘other lands’ to compensate for scarcity (Jansen and Janse 1991: 380–1). Quantiiable data appear from the fourteenth century onwards in the Low Countries, and then with increasing frequency in the transition into the early modern period. However, it is clear that research into the interaction between food availability and mortality in the late medieval and early modern period is still a task fraught with source limitations and methodological dificulties. Moreover, the region of the Low Countries, roughly comprising the modern countries of the Netherlands and Belgium (and Luxembourg), underwent profound political transformations. Up to the sixteenth century the region was referred to as the Burgundian Netherlands or the Seventeen Provinces. After the political secession of the autonomous Dutch Republic in 1581 in the north, the Southern Netherlands remained under the political control of the Spanish and Austrian courts. The north and the south were temporarily reunited 119 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 120 Curtis, Dijkman, Lambrecht and Vanhaute between 1815 and 1830 as the United Kingdom of the Netherlands, to be divided thereafter in two autonomous countries. Data on prices are available from the fourteenth century, though in greater amounts for the south than the north. From the ifteenth century onwards, however, both the north and the south are well served with excellent price series for different grains and other agricultural products. More problems exist with the reconstruction of mortality rates. The northern Low Countries have notoriously scarce sources for reconstructing demographic trends in the medieval period, especially for the countryside (exceptions are De Boer 1978; Van Schaïk 1987), though the situation is slightly better with regard to the south (see the survey in Thoen 1995). Nonetheless, while some towns have burial records starting in the second half of the sixteenth century, for many villages the systematic registration of burials only really begins in the early stages of the seventeenth century. Signiicant time series for mortalities for the countryside, therefore, can be done only from the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Before the period of systematic burial registration, historians are forced to use indirect measures for rising mortalities, such as numbers of probate inventories recorded by city and village magistrates and the revenues from post-mortem taxes raised by lords (Thoen 1988). As with other parts of Europe, one methodological dificulty is distinguishing between mortality rises caused by subsistence crises and poor access to food, and mortality rises caused by diseases such as plague and dysentery. Given that plague outbreaks repeatedly occurred from 1349 to 1670, often in the same places again (Noordegraaf and Valk 1988; Rommes 1990), it is inevitable to have some overlapping plague years and harvest failures. These problems are further exacerbated by the fact that it is now well known that medieval and early modern populations did not necessarily die directly from starvation, but from diseases and illnesses caused by the knock-on effects of sustained exposure to poor nutrition. 1 The Great Famine, 1315–17 The irst abundant wealth of information we have on severe famine in the Low Countries comes from the period 1315–17 (or even 1315–22) with the ‘Great Famine’ – labelled ‘great’ on account of its longevity and scale (Jordan 1996: 7). Partially, at least, this was connected to the terrible and prolonged abnormal weather conditions in the North Sea area, including large amounts of rain and wind. Although, as with earlier episodes of famine, we are reliant on contemporary commentary, we also have quantiiable information in the reporting of prices and the fates and fortunes Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 12 Low Countries 121 of ecclesiastical institutions – particularly from the south. Scholarly tradition has tended to suggest that the southern Low Countries were particularly hard hit by the early fourteenth-century famine, with the scale of human suffering at some of the highest levels seen across Europe (Jordan 1996). In contrast, an impression has also been created that the north got off ‘relatively lightly’ from the terrible crisis period, though probably this is to some extent a function of the relative inequality in the distribution of quantiiable sources. Indeed, the premier book and synthesis on the subject, by Jordan (1996), cites barely any material from the area roughly comprising the present-day Netherlands. Demographic evidence for the famine is patchy in both north and south. It has been calculated that just under 10 per cent of farms were abandoned after the famine hit in the easternmost region of Twente in Overijssel (Slicher van Bath 1970: 97), while in rural coastal Flanders it has been said that settlements lost anything from 10 to 30 per cent of their populations on the basis of archaeological evidence for shrinkage and desertion (Verhaege 1984: 152–6). In such extreme weather conditions, however, depopulation of coastal regions was probably as much related to the effects of looding as it was to harvest failure (Soens 2009). It is possible that there were regional variations in the demographic impact of the 1315–17 famine, but the evidence is so fragmentary and unevenly distributed that no real patterns can be conirmed. Larger population contractions seem to have occurred in the cities and towns of the southernmost parts of the Low Countries, such as the 10 per cent decline cited for Ypres (Carpentier 1962: 1076), compared to Flemish cities further north such as Bruges, with a igure of less than 5 per cent cited (Blockmans et al. 1980: 56). Going even further north, Utrecht was said to have had ‘no noticeable population decline’, though this is only from contemporary observations (Struick 1981). Yet the fragmentary and anecdotal information pieced together from other views of contemporaries at least instructs us not to underestimate the demographic impact of the 1315–17 harvest failures in the northern Low Countries. In some references wage labourers were employed to pick up the corpses of the dead from the public highways for mass burial (Curschmann 1900), while chroniclers from Egmond Abbey frequently testiied to the paupers and beggars left roaming country lanes without food (Aberth 2013: 24). Certainly, the 1315–17 famine enhanced the likelihood of the spread of life-threatening contagious diseases: see the high numbers of deaths in conditions of close contact in the conined monastery of Rijnsburg near Leiden during the period (Ladan 2012: 19). Information for the northern Low Countries on agricultural prices is quite rare for the period around the Great Famine; time series for Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 122 Curtis, Dijkman, Lambrecht and Vanhaute grain are not available until the late fourteenth century (Dijkman 2011: 288). One chronicle from 1316 did mention that prices for wheat, rye and barley had more than doubled in parts of the central Dutch river area of Gelderland (Meister 1901: 51), while further along the Rhine a ‘Great Death’ was mentioned for the region of Xanten in the same year (Weiler 1935: no. 462). More references can be found for the southern Low Countries at this time, though still not enough for full time series. Prices in 1315 and 1316 were recorded everywhere as highly volatile – particularly in Antwerp and Liege (Prims 1933: 140; Van Werveke 1959: 10; Nicholas 1992: 207). In Louvain prices for grain tripled between November 1315 and the summer of 1316 (though caution needs to be heeded with comparing prices for different times of the year) (Lucas 1930: 353–4). Some prices cited by chroniclers, such as 17-fold increases, were probably exaggerations, particularly from clerics looking to secure special dispensations for their ecclesiastical institutions; many monasteries found the years 1315 to 1317 to be a period of severe crisis, culminating in the alienation of landed estates. Evidence recently compiled from Saint John’s Hospital in Bruges shows how, in the years after 1317, the relative expenditure on grains (in relation to dairy products, meat and beverages) was suddenly reduced (Dehaeck 2004), while the actual cost per hectolitre of grain increased substantially by a factor of around 2.5 (Thoen and Soens 2010: ig. 4, 495). And, while price rises may not have been on the scale suggested by contemporary commentators, scarcity was such that some urban governments resorted to long-distance imports of grain, often from the Mediterranean (Van Werveke 1959: 469, 474, 485). It must be noted too that incessantly poor weather conditions in the late 1310s leading to harvest failures in the Low Countries also had repercussions other than for the cultivation of grains. Wet soils led to murrains and sheep plagues, hitting pastoral economies. Accounts from the southerly rural regions of Luxembourg provide good evidence for declining locks and herds across this period, while elsewhere the rise in prices for grains was matched by equivalent increases in other products such as salt – a necessary component of dairy production (Jordan 1996: 63). Overall, based on the compilation of fragmentary source material for the Great Famine of 1315–17 in the Low Countries, it seems that the southern areas were harshly aflicted, while the paucity of sources means that it is impossible to come to a strong conclusion on the fortunes of the north. Probably there were regional divergences in its severity, impact and consequences; after all, the medieval Low Countries are known to have exhibited very sharp differences between regions close together on the basis of agricultural organisation, tenure, socio-political freedoms Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 123 Low Countries 123 and population density (Van Bavel 2010). The fragmentary and anecdotal nature of the evidence remains the biggest obstacle to teasing out regional differences. One thing that may be signiicant, nonetheless, is that, while the 1315–17 harvest failures in other places, such as central and south-east England and northern France, occurred simultaneously with conditions of widespread rural impoverishment as a result of the extreme fragmentation of peasant landholdings and strong pressures on increasingly restricted common resources (Fossier 1968; Schoield 1997; Bailey 1998), in many regions of the Low Countries, such as Holland and Groningen, these ‘Malthusian ceilings’ had not been reached, courtesy of late paths towards land occupation and colonisation (Curtis and Campopiano 2014). That, at least, may point to a more favourable demographic, socio-political and institutional context for some regions of the Low Countries to escape the worst of the 1315–17 crisis (see the favourable situation presented in Van Bavel and Van Zanden [2004]), though it is certainly a matter needing further systematic research. 2 The Northern Low Countries, Fifteenth to Nineteenth Centuries Existing literature suggests that the northern Low Countries managed to escape from hunger from the late sixteenth century due to the central position of Amsterdam in the European grain trade, ensuring a steady supply of cheap wheat and rye (Faber 1976; Noordegraaf 1980; 1985b). In this section, this claim is scrutinised in an analysis of a range of price series from various parts of the northern Low Countries. Admittedly, grain prices in themselves are not the best indicator of famines, but an analysis of high grain price peaks provides a starting point: it renders a list of years in which famine risk was high. Other indicators can then narrow this list down further. An analysis of grain price spikes between the early ifteenth century and the middle of the nineteenth in 11 towns across the northern Low Countries shows the years during which this staple food was unusually expensive. Rye was the most common bread grain in the northern Low Countries from the ifteenth century onwards. Its prices usually show more and sharper spikes than wheat prices, as in times of dearth demand shifted to the cheaper grains. Table 6.1 lists the episodes in which rye prices in any of the towns under investigation were at least double the ‘normal’ rate. An assessment of the impact of grain price peaks must take into account the development of purchasing power in the long run. As in other parts of Europe, real wages in the northern Low Countries rose in Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 Table 6.1 Years of high rye prices in 11 towns in the northern Low Countries: price increase as a percentage of the ‘normal’ price West and middle East South Kampen Arnhem Nijmegen Maastricht Breda Roermond Welfare ratio 59% 110% 1.03 1438–39 142% 192% 1.25 1457 118% 83% 1.77 1482–83 256% 12% 0.98 1491–92 154% 306% 1.16 1517 44% 138% 1.25 1522 126% 124% 1556–57 116% 168% 1565–66 67% 99% 1572–73 122% 122% 1586–87 19% 30% Amsterdam Leiden Utrecht Groningen 1427 1622–23 71% 1626 28% North Coevorden 127% 29% 1.11 301% 127% 0.66 54% 75% 0.91 116% 139% 0.79 83% 121% 1.23 59% 94% 98% 65% 122% 25% 28% 16% 24% 171% 53% 109% 74% 24% 87% 82% 58% 124% 121% 1.23 68% 1.16 61% 26% 0.88 74% 105% 1.02 155% 117% 119% 1.00 83% 142% 1.19 1.24 1.03 1630 81% 58% 66% 1649–51 77% 101% 66% 92% 1661–62 95% 126% 114% 157% 211% 1675–76 91% 110% 60% 78% 110% 71% 72% 94% 182% 1692–94 1698–99 85% 101% 63% 103% 78% 88% 94% 141% 137% 83% 168% 92% 134% 128% 164% 109% 104% 110% 119% 130% 154% 1709–10 141% 158% 198% 228% 170% 181% 143% 121% 194% 145% 1.12 1724 –5% –23% 34% 61% 45% 58% 49% 15% 74% 102% 1.56 1740–41 73% 83% 76% 78% 114% 113% 140% 110% 134% 158% 121% 1.16 1.15 1771 68% 50% 63% 87% 100% 96% 93% 89% 90% 71% 1795 103% 104% 84% 63% 85% 97% 113% 264% 183% 110% 0.98 1800 66% 63% 120% 86% 82% 74% 91% 26% 100% 8% 1.12 66% 49% 56% 49% 62% 94% 129% 83% 131% 0.87 67% 71% 85% 81% 103% 0.84 1816–17 1855 86% Notes: The ‘normal’ price level is deined as the average price in the ninth to second years before the crisis, leaving out the highest and the lowest values. Increases of more than 100 per cent above the normal level are printed in bold. For episodes of dearth covering more than one year, the igures in the table are the prices in the most expensive year for each town. The welfare ratios are those of the year in which the ratio was lowest. Sources: Posthumus (1964: I, 573–6) for Amsterdam; Posthumus (1964: II, tab. 233) for Leiden; Posthumus (1964, II, tabs. 21a, 152–3) for Utrecht; Tijms (2000: tab. 6) for Groningen; Tijms (1977: II, 28–32) for Coevorden; Tijms (1977: I, 313–14) for Kampen; Tijms (1977: I, 136–44) for Arnhem; Tijms (1977: II, 313–24) for Nijmegen; Tijms (1977: II, 37–40, 47–9, 55–9) for Maastricht; Tijms (1977: I, 164–9) for Breda; and Tijms (1989: 112– 63) for Roermond. Welfare ratios were constructed from R. Allen, dataile ‘Labourers’, available at www.nufield.ox.ac.uk/People/sites/Allen/SitePages/ Biography.aspx (corrected for the years 1544–95) and J. L. van Zanden, dataile ‘Reconstruction of national accounts of Holland, 1348–1514’, available at www.cgeh.nl/reconstruction-national-accounts-holland-1500-1800-0. 126 Curtis, Dijkman, Lambrecht and Vanhaute the ifteenth century but declined sharply in the sixteenth century, due to rapidly rising price levels. In contrast to most other parts of Europe (the southern Low Countries and England excepted), this was followed around 1580 by a recovery owing to the catching up of nominal wages, which continued in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. After 1750 a gradual decline of real wages set in, which lasted until the middle of the nineteenth century (Allen 2001; Van Zanden 2009). These long-term trends determined how close to the edge the most vulnerable groups in society lived. A method that allows for comparisons with other European countries is provided by the welfare ratios introduced by Allen: wages expressed as the number of family ‘subsistence baskets’ the daily wage of an unskilled urban construction labourer would buy. In addition to price peaks, Table 6.1 gives the welfare ratios during these peaks for the northern Low Countries. The highest price peaks, with increases of 250 per cent or more over the normal level, are found in the late ifteenth century (1482–83 and 1491– 92) and the middle of the sixteenth century (1556–57). Spikes were not quite as high between the late sixteenth and late eighteenth centuries, but they were by no means absent. The years 1661–62, 1698–99, 1709–10 and to a lesser extent also 1740–41 stand out as years of widespread and signiicant price increases. At least in the south of the country, the price spike of 1795 was as extreme as those of the sixteenth century. This was a year marked by bad weather but it was also the year of the French occupation of the northern Low Countries: wartime destruction and disruption of trade were probably at least partly to blame for rising prices. The year 1816–17 witnessed another, more moderate rye price spike, which appears to have been the last one of signiicance. Although between 1845 and 1847 rye prices rose, they did not double, while in 1855 the only town where this happened – but only just – was Roermond. Analysis of the welfare ratios partly conirms these indings, but also provides an additional perspective. It suggests that, from a long-term perspective, the worst episodes of dearth were those in the third quarter of the sixteenth century. At this point in time standards of living were so low that even a relatively modest price rise, let alone one as sharp as in 1556–57, could cause serious trouble. In the ifteenth century, and again in the seventeenth and early eighteenth, wages were higher, so price surges, even if they were as impressive as in 1482–83 or in 1709–10, were less likely to push people over the edge. Only at the end of the eighteenth and in the early nineteenth century did welfare ratios of unskilled labourers repeatedly drop below the level required to feed and house a family again, even though they did not return to sixteenthcentury levels. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 127 Low Countries 127 Regional differences within the northern Low Countries were considerable. In general, in the towns in the west and middle, and also in the northern town of Groningen, price peaks appear to have become less prominent and less frequent after the ifteenth century. The most notable exception is the year 1709–10, when prices all over the Dutch Republic, including the west and middle, rose dramatically. At the opposite end of the scale were the towns in the south – Maastricht, Roermond and Breda – where high price peaks remained a fact of life throughout the early modern period. Coevorden, in the north-east, and the eastern towns of Kampen, Arnhem and Nijmegen took an ‘in between’ position. One likely explanation for these regional differences is location. Inland towns faced higher transport costs than towns in coastal regions, and especially in years of dearth they may have had dificulty ensuring the steady supply of grain. Price analysis provides a starting point, but by no means gives conclusive evidence for the occurrence of famines. Ideally, mortality igures are needed to measure the impact of the shock. For the medieval period and most of the sixteenth century no mortality rates are available. However, contextual evidence suggests that the three highest ifteenth-century price peaks, those of 1437–38, 1482–83 and 1491–92, must all be assessed as serious crises. The years 1437 and 1438 were marked by famines in many parts of northern and western Europe (Jörg 2008). The sources speak of food riots, starvation and disease. Government reactions betray alarm and despair. For the irst time, as far as we know, towns did not just issue restrictions on the export of grains or on the quantities to be bought and sold at the local market but also started buying and storing grain themselves. They also organised inspections of private grain supplies (Unger 1916: 464–5; Van Schaïk 1978: 225–7, 236–7). The crisis of 1437–39, moreover, witnessed the irst serious interventions of the ‘national’ authorities in food provisioning. In Holland, the Burgundian government attempted to maximise prices and even tried to put the entire grain trade in the hands of a small number of grain merchants. (Dijkman 2011: 297–8). The crises of 1482–83 and 1491–92 bear similar characteristics. In 1483 a chronicler reported that many died for want of food. The Enqueste of 1494, a report on the inancial and economic state of the towns in Holland, frequently refers to extreme impoverishment, up to the point at which people sold their land in order to buy food (Noordegraaf 1985b: 30, 33). Dearth policies irst introduced in 1437– 38 were reapplied on a larger scale than before (Van Schaïk 1978: 247). For the sixteenth century it seems safe to conclude that, because of the decline of real wages, all price spikes in the irst three quarters of the century gave rise to serious trouble. By the late sixteenth century Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 128 Curtis, Dijkman, Lambrecht and Vanhaute export prohibitions, urban grain storage, grain inspections and other measures to combat dearth had become standard procedures in virtually every town (Unger 1916: 473–9). The years 1556 and 1557 were the worst. Towns desperately tried to acquire grain supplies but frequently failed to do so. Merchants from the southern Low Countries who had bought grain in Amsterdam were no longer allowed to ship it home; some grain shipments already on their way to the south were arrested. People in Delft were reportedly eating the refuse of the town’s breweries (Friis 1953: 202–6). Although there were also widespread problems in the years 1565 and 1566, marking the beginning of the Dutch Revolt (Kuttner 1949: esp. 228), and in 1572 and 1573, when sieges, the stationing of troops and pillaging in the countryside wrought havoc (e.g. Nijmegen: Offermans 1972: 122), the situation was probably not as catastrophic as it had been in 1556–57 (Friis 1953: 210–3). The earliest mortality igures we have – fragmentary burial series from the second half of the sixteenth century – lend some support to this impression. The number of burials in the main churches of Gouda and Alkmaar, for instance, peaked in 1557, but for the ‘hunger year’ 1565–66 no significant increase can be discerned (Goudriaan and Ibelings 2002: 43–5). Problems in the 1580s and 1590s appear to have been mainly local in nature. Reports of food riots, raised mortality and starvation for 1586 and 1587, for instance, are all from the south and east of the country, where ighting and plundering caused destruction and disturbance of trade (Noordegraaf 1985a: 74–7). The possibility of a relation between mortality peaks in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries and food shortages has been the subject of some discussion. Faber’s claim that the late eighteenth century witnessed a return of hunger-related mortality (Faber 1976) has been contested by a series of authors, who, in their studies of living standards in a single town or region, were unable to establish irm connections between mortality rates and high food prices (Mentink and Van der Woude 1965; ’t Hart 1983; Noordam 1986). When information from various towns and regions is combined, however, a somewhat different picture emerges. The best sources for this purpose are studies for towns or regions in the west and middle of the Dutch Republic in the early modern period: Rotterdam, Amsterdam, Alkmaar, Edam and Utrecht. For each dearth episode rendered by the grain price analysis average mortality per year has been calculated. Table 6.2 summarises the results, expressing the average number of burials during the crisis years as a percentage of the ‘normal’ level. Up until the early eighteenth century price spikes appear to have left but few marks on mortality igures. Only in the years 1649 to 1651 was Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 129 Low Countries 129 the number of burials above normal in more than one town at the same time, but even then the increase was modest. Signs that the tide was turning became increasingly clear through the eighteenth century. In Rotterdam and Amsterdam all years of high prices from 1740 onwards were marked by raised mortality, though never by more than 50 per cent. The same is true for Utrecht in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. In the middle of the nineteenth century the potato crisis left its mark in the form of substantially raised mortality igures in four of the ive towns under examination. Drawing irm conclusions based on such limited data is dificult. Even within the western part of the country there were probably regional differences, for in the small towns in North Holland (Alkmaar and Edam) nothing of note appears before 1780, when the early modern burial series unfortunately stop. In addition, some years of high prices in the eighteenth century were marked by epidemics, creating confusion over the actual causes of raised mortality. Some of these epidemics apparently bore no relation to food shortages, but at least for 1771 and 1795 the spread of infection due to malnutrition has been suggested as one of the causes of raised mortality (Gerritsma 1981: 386–7; Jansen and De Meere 1982: 197–8). Finally, information on mortality in the north, east and south of the Dutch Republic is even scarcer than for the west and middle. For the time being, the only conclusion that can safely be drawn is that there is no reason to believe that the impact of price peaks on mortality in the east of the Dutch Republic was substantially greater than in the west. In short, the notion that the Dutch Republic was not at all affected by hunger-related death appears to be not quite true – at least, not for the eighteenth century. By combining mortality data from various locations the beginnings of a pattern can be shown. It suggests that conditions worsened in the course of the eighteenth century and conirms Faber’s suspicion that at the end of that century, and the beginning of the next, hunger did take a death toll. In a way, the northern Low Countries’ last brush with hunger-induced mortality is an outlier to what has been discussed previously, because, in contrast to the harvest failures of previous centuries, the crisis of 1845– 50 was connected to the failure of a different crop – the potato. By 1845 the Netherlands, like other northern European countries (see the chapters on Germany and Ireland in this book), was heavily reliant on potato cultivation. As a consequence, the potato blight immediately led to an increase of poverty and to raised mortality igures. In 1847 – the worst year – mortality in the Netherlands as a whole was 32 per cent above normal, but in the coastal clay regions igures were higher: in the province of Groningen, for instance, excess mortality was 43 per cent and in Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 130 Curtis, Dijkman, Lambrecht and Vanhaute Table 6.2 Years of high prices (as deined in Table 6.1) combined with excess mortality as a percentage above the normal level Rotterdam 1649–51 1661–62 1675–76 1692–94 1698–99 1709–10 1740 1771 1795 1800 1817 1845–47* 1855 23% –4% 5% –3% 12% 8% 6% 5% 24% 25% 25% 15% 9% Amsterdam Utrecht Alkmaar Edam (19th century: Edam-Volendam) –6% –15% –11% –2% –49% 38% –46% –8% –15% –5% 96% –25% 49% 26% 7% 4% 10% 21% 1% 16% 37% 51% 26% 48% 24% 20% 50% 13% Notes: The ‘normal’ level has been calculated from the annual data in the same way as for grain prices: as the average number of burials in the ninth to second years before the crisis, excluding the highest and the lowest values. * The years of the potato famine are not included in Table 6.1, but have been added here because these years were clearly marked by raised mortality. Sources: Early modern period: Mentink and Van der Woude (1965: 124–9) for Rotterdam; Diederiks (1982: 16) for Amsterdam; Van der Woude (1972: 635–9) for Alkmaar and Edam: and Rommes (1991: 119–20) and ’t Hart (1983: 242–3) for Utrecht. All igures for 1845–47 and 1855 are derived from the Hofstee dataset (up until 1850) and the Historischecologische databank (HED) assembled by H. Knippenberg (after 1850). We thank the Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demograisch Instituut (NIDI) for providing us with these data. North Holland it even reached 51 per cent (Paping and Tassenaar 2007: 176). The mortality igures in Table 6.2 for Amsterdam, Utrecht, Edam and, in particular, Alkmaar conirm this impression. Of course, it is inevitable that societies more dependent on the production of the potato felt the sting of its failure more than those with diversiied agricultural portfolios. More signiicant were the extreme disparities between rich and poor. In Groningen, for instance, the mass of (quasi-)proletarianised wage labourers was hit much harder than the ‘gentleman farmers’ of the coastal polders (Curtis 2014). The potato was, irst and foremost, a subsistence foodstuff for auto-consumption, grown by labourers cultivating microplots intensively (Roessingh 1976); it was not a particularly marketable product. The reality of the potato disease was then crushing Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 13 Low Countries 131 for these labourers, who were forced to purchase other food products at prices that were invariably outstripping wages (given their nominal decline) (Paping 2004). Changes and malfunctions in the distribution of poor relief exacerbated the situation – leading to a failure of ‘collective insurance’ (Paping 1995: 289–90). As stated earlier, grain price increases in the mid-nineteenth century were not extreme. The severity of the crisis was instead down to the fact that a much larger proportion of the rural population of the northern Low Countries was now exposed to the vicissitudes of the market. It seems, then, that in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries the northern Low Countries were, overall, more susceptible to famine than some southern European countries (see the introduction to this book, Chapter 1, for a general discussion). The fact remains, however, that before the potato crisis signiicant hunger-related excess mortality had been absent: Table 6.2 suggests that, until then, it had not exceeded the 50 per cent level. Which factors allowed the northern Low Countries to escape from severe famine from as early as the late sixteenth century (a truly remarkable achievement if seen in the broader European perspective, as shown by several of the contributions to this book)? Was the central role of Amsterdam in the international grain trade indeed the decisive factor? It is certainly true that the northern Low Countries, from an early stage onwards, depended on grain imports. Since at least the early ifteenth century the most populous western part of the northern Low Countries, Holland, was unable to feed its population due to subsidence of the region’s extensive peat soils. Agriculture had shifted to dairy farming, the products of which were marketed in the nearby towns and also in Flanders, the German Rhineland and England. Moreover, in addition to farm work, the inhabitants of the countryside usually engaged in various nonagrarian activities, such as peat digging, shipping and the construction of dykes and canals. At the same time, urbanisation increased rapidly: as early as 1500 45 per cent of the inhabitants of Holland lived in towns (Van Bavel and Van Zanden 2004). This transformation was accompanied by the increasing importation of bread grains. Until the last quarter of the ifteenth century these grains mainly came from the Seine region in France and, to a lesser extent, the eastern parts of the Low Countries and the adjacent German lands. The role of Baltic grains grew during the two food crises of the late ifteenth century under the inluence of disturbed political relations with France. It gained further importance in the second quarter of the sixteenth century, when proit margins on the French grain trade diminished. The shift of the grain trade to the north stimulated the development of Amsterdam as an important grain trade centre, at irst mainly for the Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 132 Curtis, Dijkman, Lambrecht and Vanhaute northern Low Countries, but from the 1530s or 1540s onwards increasingly also for other parts of Europe (Van Tielhof 1995). The crisis of the 1590s also consolidated and extended trade connections with the Mediterranean (Noordegraaf 1985a: 78; Alfani 2013a: 71–2). From the late sixteenth century until at least the middle of the seventeenth century the Amsterdam staple market supplied much of Europe with Baltic grains. The east and south of the Dutch Republic were never as dependent on grain imports as the west, but the easy availability of import grains did keep them from developing their own sizeable market-oriented grain production (De Vries and Van der Woude 1997: 207). When, between 1650 and 1730, new regions of production emerged and consumption patterns changed, Baltic grain exports declined and Amsterdam lost its dominant position in the European grain trade. Only in times of dearth, as in 1740, did Amsterdam temporarily resume its earlier role as Europe’s grain staple. The city at irst continued to supply markets within the Dutch Republic with grain, but this too changed when in the course of the eighteenth century internal grain production grew and the traditional dependence of the country on grain imports decreased (De Vries and Van der Woude 1997: 414–19). The rise of the Baltic grain trade in the course of the sixteenth century is in keeping with the decrease of grain price spikes after the middle of that century. It is also in keeping with the inding that the second half of the sixteenth century certainly knew great hardship and dearth, but probably no large-scale famines after 1556–57. Likewise, the decline of the Baltic grain trade in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries heralds the return of hunger-related mortality. The fact that, in the eighteenth century, all years of high prices were marked by raised mortality in Amsterdam, Rotterdam and Utrecht supports the impression that, instead of an abrupt transition, this was a gradual process. In both the seventeenth and the eighteenth centuries, however, grain prices in the northern Low Countries on the whole do not seem to have been lower or more stable than in other parts of Europe. This does not necessarily imply that Amsterdam’s international grain trade had no effect on price levels and price luctuations. It may also be taken as a sign that this trade beneited towns all over western and southern Europe – or, at least, towns with easy access to sea routes – as much as the northern Low Countries themselves. However, it does follow that the absence of famines from the northern Low Countries at a time when other areas of Europe still struggled with them cannot be explained from the grain trade alone; other factors must also have contributed. One of these factors has already been discussed: the development of purchasing power. This was affected by grain prices, but also by prices of other products Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 13 Low Countries 133 and, more importantly, by nominal wage levels. Earlier we saw that low wages in the sixteenth century increased the impact of even moderate price peaks. Recurring price spikes in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries were not as damaging, simply because wage levels were much higher than they had been, and also much higher than they were in most other parts of Europe. Wage levels also go a long way in explaining the recurrence of hunger-related mortality in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, even if the situation was not as bleak as 200 years earlier. A second explanatory factor can be found in the presence of a welldeveloped system of formal poor relief. Charity in the Dutch Republic was decentralised, organised by local communities and local churches (Heerma van Voss and Van Leeuwen 2012). For the purpose of relief during food crises, the most important institutions were the public poor tables and the diaconates of the churches, which provided ‘outdoor relief’: assistance through the distribution of bread, other basic necessities such as cloth, and frequently also small amounts of cash. These institutions could be found everywhere: not just in the towns but also in many villages. Recent research has shown that, between the middle of the sixteenth century and the middle of the eighteenth, the percentage of gross domestic product spent on relief in the republic as a whole may have tripled; around 1760 it suficed to cover the needs of almost a tenth of the population. In the late eighteenth century a decline set in; by 1820 spending on relief had fallen to late medieval levels (Van Bavel and Rijpma 2016). The disappearance of famines from the northern Low Countries from the middle of the sixteenth century coincided with the rise in social spending, and the return of hunger-related mortality with its decline. This does not provide conclusive proof that the two are connected; this requires more detailed research, especially on the way in which the poor tables reacted to rising food prices. It does suggest, however, that other factors than simply the Amsterdam grain trade contributed to the disappearance of severe famines from the northern Low Countries. 3 The Southern Low Countries, Fifteenth to Nineteenth Centuries Famine history in the southern Low Countries from the late ifteenth to the late eighteenth centuries shows a clear link between food crises and warfare. Periods of high food prices and high mortality coincided in many cases with periods of intense warfare. During the early modern period many European political conlicts were settled military in the territory Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 134 Curtis, Dijkman, Lambrecht and Vanhaute of the southern Low Countries. This had important consequences that might account for the somewhat higher occurrence of famine compared to the northern Netherlands. Although the southern Low Countries have been characterised by advanced agriculture with relatively high yield ratios since the Middle Ages, domestic production was frequently insuficient to feed the rising population. From the late Middle Ages onwards grain was imported from neighbouring regions (for example, northern France) and the Baltic states. It has been estimated that domestic production of grain in the southern Low Countries covered only three-quarters of the needs in the 1560s (Van der Wee 1966: 284). It was only in the middle of the eighteenth century that the southern Low Countries became (temporarily) independent from foreign grain imports (Vandenbroeke 1975). High levels of urbanisation and heavy reliance on imports made this region particularly vulnerable to famine during periods of warfare. Military movements disrupted both interregional and international trade. Wars also made it more costly and risky to trade foodstuffs. From the early sixteenth century onwards urban and rural magistrates started collecting information on the availability of grain during years of high prices in order to organise redistribution and international sales. When the threat of a food shortage was real, central, regional and local governments organised censuses to take stock of the available foodstuffs. These censuses informed the government in a detailed manner how much food was available, which regions had surpluses and how much grain had to be imported (Wyffels 1985: 113–20; Scholliers 1960: 57–8). However, regional differences in grain prices during the early modern period suggest that the redistribution of food during periods of harvest failure or shortfall coinciding with warfare encountered many dificulties. Next to the disruption of trade, the wars placed additional burdens on the population and the communities in terms of food availability. Villages and cities were forced to supply food, fodder, horses and carts to passing armies in addition to paying wartime taxes. Armies literally lived off the land and consumed much of the food stock (Gutmann 1980: chs. 2–3). Probably, fewer famines might have occurred if the reduction in food availability had not coincided with war, though we can only speculate about that. From this perspective, the resilience of the economic structures of the southern Low Countries communities and their ability to cope with food shortages remain somewhat obscured. This region had without doubt the institutions to cope with famine, but they could never fully function during periods of warfare. War disrupted their operation, thereby turning food shortages into real famines. As emphasised before, the link between high food prices, famine and excess mortality is very dificult to establish and is often non-existent. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 135 Low Countries 135 Table 6.3 Years of high rye prices in four towns in the southern Low Countries: price increase as a percentage of the ‘normal’ price years Rye Ghent 1408 1437–38 1456 1481–82 1491–92 1502 1521 1531–32 1556–67 1584–86 1595 1608 1661 1675 1709 1740 1795 1802 1817 115% 107% 203% 278% 141% 131% 106% 123% 219% 115% 111% 106% 110% Wheat Bruges Antwerp 100% 168% 105% 138% 93% 50% 113% 104% 172% 131% 110% 170% 93% 160% 394% 102% Brussels 86% 96% 147% 117% Bruges 71% 152% 78% 118% 101% 81% 58% 39% 148% 66% 32% 31% 218% 120% 111% Notes: See Table 6.1 for deinition of ‘normal’ price years. Sources: Chiely www.sfu.ca/~djacks/index.html; Jacks (2004); www.iisg.nl/hpw for Bruges in the fourteenth and ifteenth centuries; and Tits-Dieuaide (1975: 273–5) for Brussels in the ifteenth century. In the ifteenth century the early 1480s stand out as a famine-stricken period. Between 1480 and 1483 harvests failed as a result of climatic conditions, exacerbated by civil war in Flanders between 1483 and 1492. On the Bruges market grain prices more than doubled between 1480 and 1482. In many Flemish regions there was a peak in the number of deaths, measured by the number of post-mortem taxes. In the region of Bruges the number of recorded post-mortem inventories more than doubled in 1483 compared to the preceding years (Dombrecht 2014: 82). A similar parallel between prices and the registration of mortmain receipts shows up in data for other Flemish regions. The rise in grain prices in 1482–83 coincides with a rise in the number of recorded deaths. The relationship between prices in 1490–92 and mortality is less clear. It seems that mortality in these regions preceded the rise in grain prices. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 136 Curtis, Dijkman, Lambrecht and Vanhaute Table 6.4 Wheat prices on the market of Bruges and registered number of deceased owing mortmain rights in the chatellenies of Oudburg and Courtray, 1480–94 Year Wheat price (gr. Flemish per hoet) 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 72 84 140 156 59 50 72 91 90 88 104 160 103 79 48 Mortmain receipts in chatellenie of Oudburg 19 69 21 80 42 59 26 24 366 76 Mortmain receipts in chatellenie of Courtray 14 2 33 27 18 26 6 31 16 5 4 12 11 8 Sources: Verhulst (1965: 35) for wheat prices; Boudia (2000) for mortmain rights: 174 (Oudburg), 207 (Courtray). Research for the sixteenth century has identiied 1521–22, 1556–57 and 1585–86 as years of exceptional dearth in Antwerp (Scholliers 1960: 12). A comparison with indirect data on mortality from the registration of post-mortem inventories shows no upsurge of deaths in 1520–21, contrary to the crisis years 1556 and 1557. In 1557 and 1558 the aldermen of the village of Pamele recorded two and a half and four times more postmortem inventories than in the years before, suggesting a positive relationship between prices and mortality during the grain crisis of 1556–57 (Thoen 1988: II, 1142–5). The effects of the dearth years of 1585–86 on mortality are more dificult to gauge, as this period was characterised by massive emigration as a result of the Eighty Years War. Between 1660 and 1750 food shortages were a recurrent feature in the southern Netherlands. Most harvest failures were triggered by climatic factors, in combination with the almost endemic warfare that characterised the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. These decades were especially harsh, but only in 1709 did grain prices more than double. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 137 Low Countries 137 The frequency of famines increased in the seventeenth century, especially after 1650. The seventeenth century has been characterised by historians as a century of catastrophic mortality. The research by Bruneel on mortality in the duchy of Brabant indicates periods of food shortages and rising mortality rates in 1625–26, 1648–51, 1661–62, 1674–76 and 1692–94. Years of high prices also included 1630–31, 1639–40, 1696– 98 and 1708–09, but without signiicant impact on mortality. Bruneel has advanced the hypothesis that the latter selection of years of dearth did not result in catastrophic mortality because the weakest elements of the population had already perished in earlier years of scarcity and famine (Bruneel 1977: 577–98). The chronology of Bruneel its with other research on the relationship between high food prices and mortality. For example, in the western part of Flanders excess mortality as a result of food prices occurred in 1651–52, 1661–62, 1692–93 and 1708–09 (Dalle 1963: 165–76). Other regions experienced crisis mortality too during these periods, though the relationship with food prices has not been researched systematically (Ruwet 1954: 451–76). With the exceptions of 1693–94, 1698 and 1709, few of these harvest crises have been studied in detail. These harvest failures can be related to catastrophic climate conditions, in particular heavy rainfall (the 1690s) and a cold winter (1709). The famine of 1693–94 occurred in the middle of the War of the League of Augsburg (1689–97). The regions bordering France suffered most from these military campaigns. The famine of 1698 was triggered by the end of the military activities in the southern Low Countries. Emigration caused labour shortages and much of the land remained uncultivated. The combination with heavy rainfalls resulted in a harvest crisis and subsequent excess mortality (De Visscher 1978). The dearth in 1709 was instigated by a cold winter in a period when the southern Low Countries were engaged in the War of the Spanish Succession (1702–13). In the years preceding 1709 the cities and villages had been the victim of massive requisitions. These requisitions not only reduced the food stock but also deprived the rural population of their farm stocks and working capital (Van Osta 1969). The complex relation between food prices and mortality in the seventeenth and early eighteenth century is illustrated in Figure 6.1. There seems to be hardly any direct relation between grain prices and mortality, though we must keep in mind that these data cover only a very small region. High prices in 1652 had no effect on mortality. High wheat prices in 1693 were followed by a sharp rise in deaths in 1694, but a similar spike in food prices in 1709–10 resulted in a mortality peak only in 1711, when prices had normalised again. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 Curtis, Dijkman, Lambrecht and Vanhaute 300 1,400 250 1,200 1,000 200 800 150 600 100 400 50 200 0 1639 0 1649 1659 1669 Deaths 1679 1689 1699 1709 Market price of 1 hoet ( = 170 litres) of wheat Annual number of burials 138 Wheat prices Figure 6.1 Mortality and wheat prices in the region of Bruges, 1639–1715 Notes: Mortality estimated as annual numbers of burials in four parishes north and south of Bruges. Wheat prices as recorded on the market of Bruges. Sources: Brusselle (1997: II, 1–2, 6–7, 11–12) (parishes of Jabbeke, Stalhille and Varsenare) and Mus (1984: 166–8) (parish of Aarsele) for burials, and Verhulst (1965) for wheat prices. After 1750 large-scale food shortages became increasingly rare. Traditionally this has been seen as the result of both substantial rises in agricultural production and more eficient government action on and monitoring of food supplies. We are able to compare village-based data for the province of West Flanders, a region with high mortality risks. Only 1740 (a 30 per cent increase), 1741 (75 per cent up), 1794 (85 per cent up) and 1847 (42 per cent up) stand out in this respect.1 1740–41 is sometimes viewed as the last great food and mortality crisis of ancien régime Europe (Vanhaute and Lambrecht 2011). Low harvests in 1739 and the exceptionally long winter of 1739–40 (le long hiver) severely reduced per capita food supply (Vandenbroeke 1975: 76–236). When stocks were exhausted in late April/early May and the prospects of an 1 Surplus mortality, based on data from the province of West Flanders: rises in crude mortality rates, compared to the three-year average prior to the crisis. For the eighteenth century, the data come from 23 villages; for the nineteenth, they are from the total province. Sources: Sentrie (2007) and LOKSTAT, the historical database for local statistics of Ghent University (www.lokstat.ugent.be). Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 139 Low Countries 139 early and abundant harvest had dwindled, prices started to rise. Probably incited by panic as well as a severe distortion of supply and demand, 1740 prices peaked at 25 to 30 per cent above the already high levels of 1739. From 1736 to 1740 the purchasing power of labourers declined by about 60 per cent. The demographic effects of the crisis of 1740 are less straightforward. Reconstructing mortality igures, 1740 does not stand out. Mortality was particularly high in 1741, when food prices started to drop. According to contemporary observations, increased mortality during this period was the result of typhus, typhoid fever and ‘relapsing fevers’. The late eighteenth century marked a short return to the ancien régime pattern when, in 1794–95, a combination of war and harvest failure resulted in high mortality rates. During the irst half of the nineteenth century the southern Netherlands experienced food shortages in 1816– 17 and in 1845–47. This was the last food crisis with a clear impact on mortality rates. The direct cause of the mid-nineteenth-century subsistence crisis was the failure of potato harvests in the years 1845 to 1850 (Vanhaute 2007). The potato blight destroyed 87 per cent of 1845 harvests, and in Flanders, the epicentre of the potato disease, losses amounted to 95 per cent of the crop. Over the following years harvests were also poor, because fewer potato seedlings were planted and yields remained low. Between 1846 and 1850 barely a third of the ‘normal’ potato harvest was gathered in Flanders. The food situation became very precarious in late 1846 and the irst half of 1847 due to poor bread grain harvests. Bad weather conditions in 1846 caused the rye harvest (by far the most important bread grain) to decrease by more than a half, though the losses for wheat and maslin were smaller (each 10 per cent). Calculated in grain equivalents, the combined loss of bread grain and potato harvests in 1846 was 66 per cent. As a result, there were only 125 litres of grain equivalents (bread grains and potatoes) available per head, compared to 375 litres in previous years. Because all harvests were affected (half the bean and pea harvests were lost too), the threat of famine loomed in 1846–47. Prices peaked in the spring of 1847, after the partial failure of grain harvests. Potatoes were sold at 3.5 times the 1844 level. Rye cost 2.4 times as much as in 1844 and wheat cost twice as much. Rice was three times as expensive while peas and beans were 1.8 times as expensive as in 1844. A crisis in the rural lax industry coincided with the subsistence crisis of 1845–47. Compared to the reference years of 1841 to 1845, Belgium recorded in 1847 a surplus mortality of some 23,000 (a 30 per cent increase), adding up in the three-year period 1846 to 1848 to 44,000 (15 per cent up). The number of births decreased by 47,000 during the same years (–12 per cent), and there were 17 per Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006 140 Curtis, Dijkman, Lambrecht and Vanhaute cent fewer marriages. High mortality in 1846–47 was limited to the geographical area of Inner Flanders, with excess mortality of 40 per cent and averages of up to 47 to 53 per thousand in 1847. Most deaths were a consequence of nutrition-related diseases such as dysentery and typhus. 1740 and 1845–47 were the last severe food crises in the southern Low Countries, but they did not turn into sharp famines (very little is known about the food crisis of 1794–95 due to the complete disruption of public authorities and public records). The main explanation is that the peasant economy and village society maintained suficient resilience to absorb the main shocks of these crises. However, the way this happened shifted greatly between 1750 and 1850, due to structural changes in the rural economy. Until the early nineteenth century severe cracks in the food system were mostly met by internal and often informal village relations. Village externalities became much more prominent in the nineteenth century. In the 1840s – contrary to the infamous Irish example – a severe Flemish famine could be avoided because of the survival of the small but mixed and productive peasant farms, and because of the swift and sometimes anticipatory actions of the local and supra-local institutions. The elites resorted to the institutional initiatives of aid, employment and repression more than ever before, backed by an active state apparatus, in both a legal and a inancial sense. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universiteit Leiden / LUMC, on 04 Dec 2017 at 16:44:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316841235.006