REVIEW ARTICLE
Paraneoplastic Leukemoid Reaction in Solid Tumors
Subhankar Chakraborty, MD, PhD,* Brent Keenportz, MD,w Suzette Woodward, MD,w
Jay Anderson, MD,z and David Colan, MDz
Abstract: Leukemoid reaction is defined as leucocytosis >50,000/mL.
When it occurs in association with a malignancy, and infection or
leukemia has been ruled out, it is termed as paraneoplastic leukemoid
reaction. A patient presented with fatigue, generalized weakness, and
abdominal distension and was incidentally noted to have a white blood
cell count of 139,000/mL. Leukemia was ruled out by peripheral smear
and flow cytometry. Computed tomography–guided biopsy of thickened omentum revealed poorly differentiated metastatic carcinoma. He
died 3 days after admission with a peak white blood cell count of
180,000/mL. Previous reports and pathophysiology of paraneoplastic
leukemoid reaction are reviewed.
Key Words: leukemoid, paraneoplastic, cytokine, carcinoma, cytokine
(Am J Clin Oncol 2015;38:326–330)
L
eukemoid reaction is defined as a white blood cell count
(WBC) more than 50,000/mL with predominance of neutrophil precursors. Although it can occur in severe infection, it
can also present as a paraneoplastic syndrome in patients with
a variety of cancers. Lung, esophageal, nasopharyngeal and
laryngeal, gastric, cholangiocarcinoma, melanoma, multiple
myeloma, bladder, kidney, prostate, and hepatocellular carcinomas have all been reported to be associated with this condition. The underlying mechanism appears to be the production
of growth factors such as granulocyte macrophage colonystimulating factor (GM-CSF), granulocyte CSF (G-CSF), and
interleukins (IL-3 and IL-6) that are produced by the tumor
cells. We present the case of a 64-year-old man who was
admitted with increasing fatigue, generalized weakness, and
progressive abdominal distension. He was noted to have a
marked leukemoid reaction and subsequently diagnosed with
poorly differentiated carcinoma with peritoneal carcinomatosis. We reviewed the literature to present other reported cases
of leukemoid reaction in association with solid tumors and
discuss potential causative mechanisms.
CASE
A 64-year-old male patient presented to the emergency department complaining of progressive generalized weakness for the last 10
days. He also complained of anorexia, early satiety, generalized
abdominal pain, abdominal distension, dark brown-colored urine,
decreased urinary frequency, and progressive dyspnea on exertion.
While the urinary symptoms had begun about 3 days prior, his other
From the *Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska
Medical Center, Omaha; wDepartment of Pathology, Saint Francis
Medical Center; and zInternal Medical Associates of Grand Island,
Grand Island, NE.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Reprints: Subhankar Chakraborty, MD, PhD, Department of Internal
Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE- 681982055. E-mail: schakra@unmc.edu.
Copyright r 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
ISSN: 0277-3732/15/3803-0326
DOI: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3182a530dd
326 | www.amjclinicaloncology.com
symptoms had been progressively worsening for the last 4 months. He
also reported that he had not had a bowel movement for the last 1
week. He had a 100 pack-year smoking history and was a current
smoker. Examination at the time of admission was significant for
tachycardia (118/min), hypoxia (90% on 2 L/min oxygen), and
tachypnea (22/min). He appeared dehydrated. There was significant
abdominal distension with hypoactive bowel sounds. Multiple skin
lesions suggestive of scabies were noted over the abdominal wall.
Symmetrical lower extremity weakness was noted bilaterally, and
reflexes were brisk. His WBC count was markedly elevated at 139,000/
mL, with 56% segmented neutrophils, 42% band forms, 2% lymphocytes, and no eosinophils or basophils. His hemoglobin level was
15.3 g/dL and platelet count was 246,000/mL. Other significant
abnormal laboratory examinations revealed a sodium level of 132
mEQ/L (normal 136 to 145 mEQl/L), potassium level of 5.2 mEQ/L
(3.5 to 5.1 mEQ/L), creatinine level of 3.55 mg/dL (0.6 to 1.3 mg/dL),
and calcium level of 12.8 mg/dL (8.5 to 10.1 mg/dL). Alkaline phosphatase level was elevated at 436 U/L (50 to 136 U/L) together with
bilirubin (1.4 mg/dL; range, 0.2 to 1.0 mg/dL). Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels, however, were normal.
A computed tomography scan of the chest, abdomen, and the pelvis
without contrast revealed a 1.3-cm spiculated mass in the right upper
lobe adjacent to the trachea suspicious for malignancy (Fig. 1A). In the
abdomen, there was diffuse omental caking suggestive of peritoneal
carcinomatosis (Fig. 1B). There were also ascites and splenomegaly.
An abdominal ultrasound revealed a 6.2-cm hypoechoic mass in the
left lobe of the liver and a 16-cm spleen. Paracentisis revealed a
cloudy, amber-colored fluid with 28,694 red blood cells/mL and 9207
WBCs/mL (91% neutrophils, 8% lymphocytes, and 1% monocytes).
The serum albumin ascites gradient was 0.3. Cultures of the ascites
fluid were negative for any bacterial infection. Hepatitis serology was
negative. Serum parathyroid hormone level was elevated at 154 pg/mL
(12 to 88 pg/mL). However, parathyroid hormone-related protein and
free T4 levels were normal. The thyroid-stimulating hormone level was
mildly elevated (4.34 mU/L; range, 0.36 to 3.74 mU/L). The total 25hydroxy vitamin D level was low at 10.2 ng/mL (24 to 80 ng/mL),
whereas the 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D level was normal. Fractionation
of the alkaline phosphatase isoenzymes revealed that the percentage of
heat-stable isoenzyme was 5%, which was suggestive of a predominantly bone isoenzyme contributing to the increased total enzyme
level. A peripheral smear showed neutrophilia with band forms but no
blasts (Figs. 2A, B). Ascites fluid cytology revealed a few atypical cells
(Figs. 2C–E). Fine-needle biopsy of the omentum revealed poorly
differentiated malignant cells that were positive for cytokeratin (CK) 7
but negative for CK20 or hepatocyte-specific antigen (Figs. 2F–H).
Flow cytometry of the peripheral blood showed a marked increase in
maturing granulocytes with a mild left shift, suggestive of a myeloproliferative disorder. Although initially stable, the patient deteriorated
rapidly about 48 hours later, becoming rapidly hypoxic, tachycardic,
hypotensive, and unresponsive. His leukocyte count peaked at 180,000/
mL, with a platelet count of 260,000/mL, whereas the red blood cell
count remained unchanged. Despite resuscitation attempts, the patient
died on day 3 of hospitalization of cardiorespiratory failure. The family
declined an autopsy.
Because of the small amount of tissue available, we could not
pinpoint the primary tumor in this patient. However, on the basis of the
CK staining pattern, CK7 positive CK20 negative, there were several
candidates for a primary source including lung, mesothelial, pancreatobiliary, gallbladder, small bowel, squamous cell carcinomas, and
thyroid tumors. The patient had elevated calcium levels together with
elevated parathyroid hormone levels, low total vitamin D level, and
American Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume 38, Number 3, June 2015
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
American Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume 38, Number 3, June 2015
FIGURE 1. Noncontrast computed tomography scan of the chest
and the abdomen showing (A) a 1.3-cm spiculated mass in the
right upper lobe adjacent to the trachea (yellow arrow) and (B)
omental caking suggestive of carcinomatosis.
normal parathyroid hormone-related protein levels, suggesting a
coexisting primary hyperparathyroidism and hypovitaminosis D. The
elevated bone alkaline phosphatase levels suggest enhanced bone
turnover from the hyperparathyroidism, whereas the elevated uric acid
levels could be attributed to increased destruction of myeloid precursors and rapid turnover of cancer cells (supported by high lactate
dehydrogenase). Omental caking (Fig. 1B) is a feature of advanced
malignancy. This radiologic sign is caused by infiltration of the
omental fat by malignant cells either from a primary tumor of the
omentum or metastases from the stomach, pancreas, colon, and bladder
cancer and sometimes from malignant melanoma.
DISCUSSION
Paraneoplastic syndromes (PNS) are defined as effects
distant from the site of the primary tumor that are produced by
substances released from tumor cells but not due to direct
tissue invasion by the primary tumor or its metastases. Several
categories of PNS exist including cutaneous, hematologic,
rheumatologic, endocrine, neurologic, and ocular manifestations. A paraneoplastic leukemoid reaction (PLR) is a
hematologic PNS that has been defined in the literature as
leucocytosis >20,000 to 50,000/mL and described in association with different solid tumors. Neutrophils are generally the
Copyright
r
Leukemoid Reaction in Solid Tumors
predominant white cell type in these cases. However, there
have been case reports of PLR wherein the predominant cell
types were eosinophils.1–3 PLR has also been reported in
patients with tumor recurrence, suggesting that it is caused by
tumor-released factors.4 In one case, PLR preceded the diagnosis of colorectal cancer by nearly 4 years and was initially
misdiagnosed as chronic neutrophilic leukemia.5 Most
reviewed studies have reported an association between elevated levels of a particular cytokine and leucocytosis. The
levels of IL-1a, b, IL-3, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IL-6, and TNF-a
have all been reported to be elevated in various solid tumors
and suggested to contribute to an elevated leukocyte count.6
We reviewed the Medline database through PubMed for articles describing leukemoid reaction in association with solid
tumors. Articles in English for which published text was
available were selected for review. Selected cases are summarized in Table 1. From the table, we see that the reported
leukocyte count at presentation has ranged from 11,000 to
110,000/mL. The peak leukocyte count has been reported at
between 48,300 and 215,000/mL. Survival of patients with PLR
ranged from 10 days up to 2 years. As shown in Figure 3, there
was a trend toward negative correlation between the WBC
count at presentation and the peak WBC count with survival in
patients with PLR.
A review of the literature suggests that PLR is a “side
effect” of a paracrine mechanism used by tumor cells to
stimulate their own growth. Tumor cells produce cytokines
(colony-stimulating factors and ILs), which then bind to
receptors on the same cells and stimulate proliferation. Some
of these cytokines are also hematopoietic growth factors and
stimulate myeloid proliferation. Watanabe and colleagues, for
instance, described a case of PLR associated with non–small
cell cancer of the lung, wherein the serum GM-CSF levels
were markedly elevated (77 times higher than normal). Tumor
cells expressed both GM-CSF and its cognate receptor, suggesting that PLR was a “side effect” of paracrine growth.20
Serum GM-CSF levels were also elevated together with
increased expression of GM-CSF and GM-CSF receptor by
non–small cell cancer cells and by eosinophils in another
reported case of PLR.1 In a case of PLR associated with
prostate cancer metastatic to the bone, serum IL-6 and TNF-a
levels were elevated, whereas that of other cytokines was
normal.6 Elevated IL-6 levels (with normal G-CSF and GMCSF) has been reported in PLR associated with pancreatic
cancer12 and hepatocellular carcinoma.4 In one report, urothelial carcinoma cells in a patient with PLR were observed to
express vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), HIF-1a
(hypoxia inducible factor), and G-CSF.23 The VEGF-HIF-1
axis is an important pathway used by cancer cells to evade
apoptosis and might explain the poor prognosis associated with
PLR in a portion of the cases.
Large-scale studies of PLR are few in the literature. In
one single-center study (N = 3770) investigating the incidence
and mortality associated with PLR, Granger and colleagues
reported that the incidence of PLR (defined as WBC count
> 40,000/mL) in solid tumors (n = 758) was 10%. The most
common causes of such high leucocytosis in solid tumor
patients were exogenous growth factors (69%) and infections
(15%). Pneumonia (49%), blood stream infections (27%), and
urinary tract infections (16%) were the most commonly
reported infections associated with PLR. The majority (68%)
of the patients in this study had either a bulky primary tumor or
a metastatic cancer. About 50% of the patients had some
evidence of lung involvement. The WBC count ranged from
53,000 to 115,000/mL, with nearly all (96%) patients having a
2013 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
www.amjclinicaloncology.com |
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
327
Chakraborty et al
American Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume 38, Number 3, June 2015
FIGURE 2. A, A low-power peripheral smear showing numerous neutrophils including immature band forms but no blasts in the
background of erythrocytes. B, A high-power peripheral smear showing immature neutrophils. C, Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the
cell block from ascites fluid showing large atypical cells with hyperchromatic nuclei and irregular borders in a background of neutrophils
and fibrin. D, low and E,F, High-power view of hematoxylin and eosin staining of the Omental mass showing pleomorphic malignant
cells with a hyperchromatic nucleus and irregular borders with an increased nucleus to cytoplasmic ratio. G, Immunohistochemistry of
malignant cells from the omentum showing positivity for pancytokeratin, suggesting a carcinoma. H, Malignant cells staining positive
for cytokeratin 7.
neutrophilic predominance. Interestingly, the majority of the
patients were stable at the time of initial presentation, with
99% being afebrile, 93% normotensive, and 88% with a normal respiratory rate. The short-term and long-term prognosis
of patients with PLR, however, was poor. Nearly 76% patients
died within 3 months of presentation and only 10% were alive
at 1 year. All those who were still alive had received some
form of therapy.26 Cvitkovic et al27 in another study reported
that the incidence of PLR was about 16% in a cohort of 255
patients with undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
328 | www.amjclinicaloncology.com
The distinction between leukemoid reaction and leukemia
is usually achieved by the leukocyte alkaline phosphatase
(LAP) score. A LAP score that is higher than normal generally
favors a benign etiology, whereas a low score should prompt
evaluation for possible chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or
paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. The low lap score in
CML is believed to represent inadequate maturation of granulocytes and is related to low G-CSF levels.6 In our case, we
performed a flow cytometric analysis of the peripheral blood,
which showed normal myeloid precursors, although there was
Copyright
r
2013 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
American Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume 38, Number 3, June 2015
Leukemoid Reaction in Solid Tumors
TABLE 1. Selected Case Reports on Leukemoid Reaction in Solid Tumors
WBC Count at
Presentation (/lL)
Peak WBC
Count (/lL)
Poorly differentiated
carcinoma
Poorly differentiated large
cell carcinoma of lung
Poorly differentiated
squamous cell carcinoma
Non–small cell lung cancer
139,000
180,000
Neutrophilia
Died 3 d after presentation
15,000
155,000
Neutrophilia
Died 7 mo after diagnosis
7
28,000
151,000
Neutrophilia
Died 4 mo after diagnosis
7
71,600
71,600
Neutrophilia
8
Non–small cell lung cancer
52,000
ND
Neutrophilia
Giant cell carcinoma of the
lung
Lung adenocarcinoma
Large cell lung cancer
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Metastatic prostate cancer
Thyroid cancer
11,000
90,000
Neutrophilia
Died before chemotherapy could
be started
Died 4 wk after diagnosis despite
chemoradiation
Died 3.5 mo after presentation
10
21,200
77,400
30,300
99,000
66,800
146,000
120,000
100,000
ND
74,800
103,000
Died 5 mo after diagnosis
Died 2 mo after diagnosis
Died (time not mentioned)
Alive at last follow-up
Alive at 4 mo
ND
11
1
12
13
6
14
52,000
35,000
52,000
ND
Neutrophilia
Eosinophilia
Neutrophilia
Eosinophilia
Neutrophilia
Neutrophil and
eosinophil
Neutrophilia
Neutrophilia
ND
Died 2 y after diagnosis
15
16
90,000
92,900
ND
18,100
215,000
120,000
143,000
48,300
ND
Neutrophilia
ND
Neutrophilia
Died 30 d after axillary dissection
Died 6 wk after presentation
Died 5 wk after presentation
Death 8 wk after admission
17
18
19
20
68,800
147,800
Neutrophilia
Died after 10 d of admission
21
110,000
42,000
ND
121,000
Neutrophilia
Neutrophilia
Died 10 d after admission
Died 4 mo after starting
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Died 10 wk after surgery
4
22
Cancer
Gastric cancer
Adenosquamous carcinoma
of the stomach
Malignant melanoma
Cervical carcinoma
Ovarian cancer
Metastatic large cell
carcinoma
Sarcomatoid hepatocellular
carcinoma
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Urothelial carcinoma
Differential
Count
Urothelial carcinoma of renal
pelvis
Transitional cell carcinoma
39,800
ND
Neutrophilia
32,800
60,000
Neutrophilia
Transitional cell carcinoma
24,700
100,000
Neutrophilia
Renal cell carcinoma
Transitional cell carcinoma
50,000
67,000
ND
95,000
Neutrophilia
Neutrophilia
Outcome
Alive at 9 mo postresection of
tumor and radiation therapy
Died about 11 mo after initial
diagnosis
Died 6 wk after diagnosis
Died 5 wk postsurgery
References
This study
9
23
24
25
9
2
WBC indicates white blood cell.
a left shift indicating rapid myeloproliferation. In patients with
suspected PLR, a LAP score or flow cytometric analysis can be
a good initial test to rule out CML. A peripheral smear is also
recommended as is a rigorous search for an infectious source.
Imaging studies should be undertaken to look for a neoplastic
source based on the clinical scenario.
The management of leukemoid reaction is the treatment
of the underlying tumor. In cases where eosinophils are the
predominant cell type, hydroxyurea has been shown to be
beneficial (in one report, a decreased cell count from 120,000
to < 30,000/mL).1 Complications from leukemoid reaction
chiefly result from increased blood viscosity. Gangrene of the
foot has been described in one report.1 In our patient, the
sudden onset of hypoxia, hypotension, and shortness of breath
led us to believe that he may have died from a massive
pulmonary embolism.
Internists and family physicians are often the first contact
of patients who present with PLR. Hence, it is important to be
aware of this entity and order appropriate tests to identify the
underlying cause. The assistance of a hematologist should be
sought early on. Our knowledge of mechanisms underlying
Copyright
r
PLR is still lacking. In many cases, as in ours, it is due to the
lack of adequate tissue to conduct more thorough testing.
Further, it is evident that in most cases,22 imaging underestimates the tumor burden. Hence, one should always request
an autopsy in patients who die of PLR. This is helpful to better
understand the mechanism underlying PLR including the
evaluation of cytokine levels and cytokine receptor expression
in tumor cells. Whether targeting these cytokines or their
cognate receptors will have an impact on PLR and the overall
outcome remains an open question at this time.
Learning Points From This Case:
Leukocyte counts in excess of 20,000 should always prompt
workup aimed at distinguishing leukemia from a leukemoid
reaction.
Initial tests should include a peripheral smear, a leukocyte
alkaline phosphatase score, or a peripheral blood flow
cytometry looking for blasts, an infectious workup, and
imaging appropriate to the clinical scenario to evaluate for
an underlying malignancy.
2013 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
www.amjclinicaloncology.com |
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
329
American Journal of Clinical Oncology
Chakraborty et al
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
FIGURE 3. The correlation of WBC count at presentation (A) and
the peak WBC count (B) with the reported survival in cases of
paraneoplastic leukemoid reaction (PLR). Source of data is shown
in Table 1. WBC indicates white blood cells.
PLR is recognized as a late manifestation of cancer and
patients often have an extremely poor prognosis.
The treatment of PLR is the treatment of the underlying
condition. Hydroxyurea might be beneficial in those with
eosinophil-predominant PLR.
19.
20.
21.
REFERENCES
1. Lammel V, Stoeckle C, Padberg B, et al. Hypereosinophilia driven
by GM-CSF in large-cell carcinoma of the lung. Lung Cancer.
2012;76:493–495.
2. Miller JI, Sarver RG, Drach GW. Leukemoid reaction: a rare
paraneoplastic syndrome associated with advanced bladder
carcinoma. Urology. 1994;44:444–446.
3. Varindani MK, Pitchumoni CS, Lucariello RJ. Eosinophilic
leukemoid reaction in pulmonary carcinoma. N Y State J Med.
1982;82:347–348.
4. Jain P, Roop RR, Jha A. Hepatocellular carcinoma manifesting as
cavitary lung metastases and leukemoid reaction. J Gastrointestin
Liver Dis. 2008;17:355–356.
5. Ferrer A, Cervantes F, Hernandez-Boluda JC, et al. Leukemoid
reaction preceding the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma by
four years. Haematologica. 1999;84:671–672.
6. Azuma T, Sakai I, Matsumoto T, et al. Leukemoid reaction in
association with bone marrow necrosis due to metastatic prostate
cancer. Intern Med. 2005;44:1093–1096.
7. Shalom G, Sion-Vardy N, Dudnik J, et al. Leukemoid reaction in
lung cancer patients. Isr Med Assoc J. 2010;12:255–256.
8. Ganti AK, Potti A, Mehdi S. Uncommon syndromes and treatment
manifestations of malignancy: case 2. Metastatic non-small-cell
330 | www.amjclinicaloncology.com
18.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
Volume 38, Number 3, June 2015
lung cancer presenting with leukocytosis. J Clin Oncol. 2003;
21:168–170.
Mukhopadhyay S, Mukhopadhyay S, Banki K, et al. Leukemoid
reaction: a diagnostic clue in metastatic carcinoma mimicking
classic Hodgkin lymphoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med.
2004;128:1445–1447.
Dalal PR, Rosenthal R, Sarkar TK. Leukemoid reaction in
pulmonary carcinoma. J Natl Med Assoc. 1980;72:683–686.
Riesenberg H, Muller F, Gorner M. Leukemoid reaction in a
patient with adenocarcinoma of the lung: a case report. J Med
Case Rep. 2012;6:211.
Qureshi KM, Raman AK, Tan D, et al. Leukemoid reaction in
pancreatic cancer: a case report and review of the literature. JOP.
2006;7:631–634.
Ashdhir P, Jain P, Pokharna R, et al. Pancreatic cancer manifesting
as liver metastases and eosinophillic leukemoid reaction: a case
report and review of literature. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;
103:1052–1054.
Amor F, Bernardo M, Fattor B, et al. Sensory neuropathy in
paraneoplastic leucocytosis. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;pii.
Bosoteanu C, Bosoteanu M, Aschie M. Differential diagnosis
issues in a case of gastric carcinoma associated with leukemoid
reaction. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2009;50:701–705.
Endo K, Kohnoe S, Okamura T, et al. Gastric adenosquamous
carcinoma producing granulocyte-colony stimulating factor.
Gastric Cancer. 2005;8:173–177.
Schniewind B, Christgen M, Hauschild A, et al. Paraneoplastic
leukemoid reaction and rapid progression in a patient with
malignant melanoma: establishment of KT293, a novel G-CSFsecreting melanoma cell line. Cancer Biol Ther. 2005;4:23–27.
Nimieri HS, Makoni SN, Madziwa FH, et al. Leukemoid reaction
response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in a patient with
cervical carcinoma. Ann Hematol. 2003;82:316–317.
Chuang SS, Lin CN, Lin YS. Undifferentiated ovarian carcinoma
associated with leukemoid reaction. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi
(Taipei). 2001;64:592–596.
Watanabe M, Ono K, Ozeki Y, et al. Production of granulocytemacrophage colony-stimulating factor in a patient with metastatic
chest wall large cell carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1998;28:
559–562.
Shin HP, Jeon JW, Park JJ, et al. A case of leukemoid reaction in a
patient with sarcomatous hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J
Hepatol. 2011;17:226–228.
Perez FA, Fligner CL, Yu EY. Rapid clinical deterioration and
leukemoid reaction after treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the
bladder: possible effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:e215–e217.
Lin HC, Chai CY, Su YC, et al. Leukemoid reaction resulting from
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor producing urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2007;23:89–92.
Mongha R, Narayan S, Das R, et al. Fever and leukemoid reaction:
a rare paraneoplastic manifestation of bladder carcinoma. Indian J
Cancer. 2008;45:131–132.
Dukes JW, Tierney LM Jr. Paraneoplastic leukemoid reaction as
marker for transitional cell carcinoma recurrence. Urology.
2009;73:928–929.
Granger JM, Kontoyiannis DP. Etiology and outcome of extreme
leukocytosis in 758 nonhematologic cancer patients: a retrospective, single-institution study. Cancer. 2009;115:3919–3923.
Cvitkovic E, Bachouchi M, Boussen H, et al. Leukemoid reaction,
bone marrow invasion, fever of unknown origin, and metastatic
pattern in the natural history of advanced undifferentiated
carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type: a review of 255
consecutive cases. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11:2434–2442.
Copyright
r
2013 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.