Due to their role and purpose professionally and societally, teachers can potentially impact their students indefinitely within the educative process during one or more education phases (pre-primary, primary, secondary, and tertiary). The...
moreDue to their role and purpose professionally and societally, teachers can potentially impact their students indefinitely within the educative process during one or more education phases (pre-primary, primary, secondary, and tertiary). The quality and depth of education impacts society at large, and education is optimal where it is holistic and purposeful. Educational processes “involve and shape the student and teacher in their depths” (Mayes, 2017: 26). The lack of this type of practice among educators impacts the purpose of education, which is to prepare and equip students in the best possible way for their future, post graduate life and subsequent career.
Within Clifford Mayes’s archetypal pedagogy, archetypes are typically fundamental modes of human experience and reflection upon these modes supports teachers professionally and personally in the instrumental role they play within systems of education. Through the practice of archetypal reflectivity (AR), educators are able to better understand and explore their purpose, teaching practice and underlying factors that affect it.
This interpretivist study explored AR among HE educators in the form of in-depth interviews followed by content analysis. Findings indicate that experienced educators sought to shape students positively, their teaching methods had changed significantly from when they first began teaching and the profession of teaching overlaps personally and professionally. Consequently, the practice of AR among educators was found to be valuable due to the rich insights gained from experienced educators in areas of self-knowledge, content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge.