Ho studiato presso l’Università di Bologna, laureandomi in Filosofia nel 2016 con una tesi in Storia della Filosofia Moderna, intitolata "Crisi e accelerazione della storia: Genesi e sviluppo della modernità nel pensiero di Reinhart Koselleck" sotto la direzione del Prof. Alberto Burgio e del Dott. Gennaro Imbriano e in Scienze Filosofiche (LM) nel 2019 con una tesi in Storia della Filosofia, intitolata "Gli usi di Gramsci in Argentina: Dal marxismo critico di Pasado y Presente al post-marxismo di Ernesto Laclau", sotto la direzione del Prof. Alberto Burgio, dal Prof. Francesco Cerrato e dal Prof. José Luis Villacañas Berlanga (Universidad Complutense di Madrid). Nel 2018 ho svolto un periodo di studio presso l’Universidad Complutense di Madrid.
Dal 2019 ho svolto un Dottorando in Scienze Giuridiche (curriculum storico-filosofico giuridico) presso l’Università di Salerno, sotto la direzione del Prof. Geminello Preterossi, dove ho scritto una tesi dal titolo "Un decisionismo impuro. Ernesto Laclau e la tradizione politico-giuridica moderna". Ho conseguito il titolo di Dottore di Ricerca nel 2024, e sono attualmente borsista di ricerca presso l'Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici di Napoli dove lavoro sul concetto di sovranità nel rapporto fra populismo e costituzionalismo. Ho scritto articoli e recensioni in italiano e spagnolo su riviste scientifiche italiane e internazionali, quali Democrazia e Diritto (Franco Angeli), Scenari (Mimesis), B@belonline (Roma Tre-press), MicroMega, Nuova Informazione Bibliografica (Il Mulino), Filosofia Politica (Il Mulino), Meta: Research in Hermeneutics Phenomenology and Practical Philosophy (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Press, Iasi, Romania), Dissonância: Revista de Teoria Crítica (Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brasil), Lo Sguardo - Rivista di Filosofia, Pólemos. Ho curato nel 2019 una sezione monografica della rivista Scenari (Mimesis) insieme a Stefano Marino e Rolando Vitali intitolata “Populismo, femminismo e popular culture”, nel 2021 ho tradotto e curato "L'altro volto del peronismo" di Ernesto Sabato (Rogas, Roma) e nel 2023 ho tradotto e curato (con Elena Albanese) "Per un femminismo populista: Verso l'immaginazione politica del futuro" di Luciana Cadahia (Rogas, Roma).
I miei interessi di ricerca riguardano soprattutto la filosofia politica moderna e contemporanea e la filosofia della storia, con particolare riferimento alla teologia politica, al marxismo e alla teoria del populismo in relazione con il pensiero giuridico (per ora).
Dal 2019 ho svolto un Dottorando in Scienze Giuridiche (curriculum storico-filosofico giuridico) presso l’Università di Salerno, sotto la direzione del Prof. Geminello Preterossi, dove ho scritto una tesi dal titolo "Un decisionismo impuro. Ernesto Laclau e la tradizione politico-giuridica moderna". Ho conseguito il titolo di Dottore di Ricerca nel 2024, e sono attualmente borsista di ricerca presso l'Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici di Napoli dove lavoro sul concetto di sovranità nel rapporto fra populismo e costituzionalismo. Ho scritto articoli e recensioni in italiano e spagnolo su riviste scientifiche italiane e internazionali, quali Democrazia e Diritto (Franco Angeli), Scenari (Mimesis), B@belonline (Roma Tre-press), MicroMega, Nuova Informazione Bibliografica (Il Mulino), Filosofia Politica (Il Mulino), Meta: Research in Hermeneutics Phenomenology and Practical Philosophy (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Press, Iasi, Romania), Dissonância: Revista de Teoria Crítica (Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brasil), Lo Sguardo - Rivista di Filosofia, Pólemos. Ho curato nel 2019 una sezione monografica della rivista Scenari (Mimesis) insieme a Stefano Marino e Rolando Vitali intitolata “Populismo, femminismo e popular culture”, nel 2021 ho tradotto e curato "L'altro volto del peronismo" di Ernesto Sabato (Rogas, Roma) e nel 2023 ho tradotto e curato (con Elena Albanese) "Per un femminismo populista: Verso l'immaginazione politica del futuro" di Luciana Cadahia (Rogas, Roma).
I miei interessi di ricerca riguardano soprattutto la filosofia politica moderna e contemporanea e la filosofia della storia, con particolare riferimento alla teologia politica, al marxismo e alla teoria del populismo in relazione con il pensiero giuridico (per ora).
less
InterestsView All (17)
Uploads
The present contribution investigates the work of the 19th-century Spanish philosopher Juan Donoso Cortés, one of the main proponents of European counter-revolutionary thought. Referring to the genealogy of modern politics traced by Carlo Galli, Donoso's thought is interpreted through the order/disorder dyad, understood as the basis of his entire conception. It is in fact possible to see how the question of immanent disorder and the need for a transcendent order define, through theological and anthropological formulations, Donoso's philosophy of history, politics and right. As a consequence, he theorizes the necessity of a dictatorship as a response to the fundamental event at the origin of the rupture of the divine cosmic order: the revolution. Donoso"s philosophy is therefore configured, in the path of counter-revolutionary philosophy, as the transition to a secularized theory of reaction to the emergence of political and social conflict in the modern world.
Este artículo trata de comprender como en la teoría crítica del valor desarrollada por el filósofo alemán Robert Kurz (1943-2012) se plantea el vínculo entre la temporalidad abstracta del capitalismo-el tiempo de la producción-y la forma histórica y concreta de desarrollo de la modernización capitalista con su ideología: la filosofía de la historia progresista. El trabajo parte de la definición del problema de la temporalidad en el contexto de la crítica categorial de Kurz, así como de la influencia que sobre este tema ha tenido Moishe Postone (1942-2018), y continúa exponiendo el modo en que, según estos autores, se constituye una dialéctica entre tiempo abstracto y tiempo concreto en el desarrollo del capitalismo. En la segunda parte se indagan los fundamentos filosóficos que han impedido a la teoría marxista comprender este proceso, permaneciendo vinculada a una ideología de la modernización (de origen ilustrado y hegeliano) que-según Kurz-no es otra cosa que una proyección real de la metafísica concreta del desarrollo del capitalismo. En conclusión, se plantean algunas críticas a los límites de la idea de acción trasformadora resultante de la crítica categorial del
marxismo propuesta por Kurz.
Palabras clave
Temporalidad, Capitalismo, Modernización, Tiempo abstracto, Progreso
______________________
Abstract (eng)
This article deals with the relationship between the abstract temporality
of capitalism (the time of production) and the historical-concrete way of
development of capitalist modernization and its ideology (the progressive
philosophy of history), as established in the theory of the critique of value
developed by the German philosopher Robert Kurz (1943-2012). In the first
part of my contribution I start by defining the problem of temporality in
the context of Kurz’s categorical critique, also highlighting the influence
that Moishe Postone (1942-2018) had in it. Then I explain how, according
to these authors, a dialectic between abstract and concrete time in the
process of capitalistic development is constituted. In the second part I
investigate then the philosophical foundations that have prevented
Marxist theory from understanding this process remaining linked to an
ideology of modernization (with illuministic and Hegelian origins) that –
according to Kurz – is nothing more than a real projection of the concrete
metaphysics of the development of capitalism. In conclusion, some
critiques are raised to the limits of the idea of transformative action
resulting from the categorical critique of Marxism proposed by Kurz.
Keywords
Temporality, Capitalism, Modernization, Abstract Time, Progress
of sensus communis in the philosophy of Giambattista Vico and the
interpretation of it provided by Hans-Georg Gadamer in the context of his
project of a philosophical hermeneutics. Gadamer’s rehabilitation of the
concept of commonsense, derived from an early work of Vico entitled De
nostri temporis studiorum ratione ratione, is functional to his criticism of the
methodological model of knowledge that the humanities (or, in German, the
Geisteswissenschaften) have borrowed from the natural sciences, to which
Gadamer opposes the rhetorical-linguistic experience that one can make in a
real community. Comparing these two philosophers will lead me then to
analyze the interpretations of Gadamer’s hermeneutical appropriation of Vico
that various scholars have provided, mostly to criticize Gadamer by arguing
that his treatment of Vico’s concept of commonsense eventually falls prey to
some kind of relativism. This topic also implies a critical analysis of the two
authors’ overall philosophies, in particular with regard to the difference
between Vico’s project of developing a science of human history grounded on
universal transcendental structures in his Scienza nuova and Gadamer’s
concept of extra-methodical truth and experience that forms the basis of his
philosophical hermeneutics in Wahrheit und Methode.
The present contribution investigates the work of the 19th-century Spanish philosopher Juan Donoso Cortés, one of the main proponents of European counter-revolutionary thought. Referring to the genealogy of modern politics traced by Carlo Galli, Donoso's thought is interpreted through the order/disorder dyad, understood as the basis of his entire conception. It is in fact possible to see how the question of immanent disorder and the need for a transcendent order define, through theological and anthropological formulations, Donoso's philosophy of history, politics and right. As a consequence, he theorizes the necessity of a dictatorship as a response to the fundamental event at the origin of the rupture of the divine cosmic order: the revolution. Donoso"s philosophy is therefore configured, in the path of counter-revolutionary philosophy, as the transition to a secularized theory of reaction to the emergence of political and social conflict in the modern world.
Este artículo trata de comprender como en la teoría crítica del valor desarrollada por el filósofo alemán Robert Kurz (1943-2012) se plantea el vínculo entre la temporalidad abstracta del capitalismo-el tiempo de la producción-y la forma histórica y concreta de desarrollo de la modernización capitalista con su ideología: la filosofía de la historia progresista. El trabajo parte de la definición del problema de la temporalidad en el contexto de la crítica categorial de Kurz, así como de la influencia que sobre este tema ha tenido Moishe Postone (1942-2018), y continúa exponiendo el modo en que, según estos autores, se constituye una dialéctica entre tiempo abstracto y tiempo concreto en el desarrollo del capitalismo. En la segunda parte se indagan los fundamentos filosóficos que han impedido a la teoría marxista comprender este proceso, permaneciendo vinculada a una ideología de la modernización (de origen ilustrado y hegeliano) que-según Kurz-no es otra cosa que una proyección real de la metafísica concreta del desarrollo del capitalismo. En conclusión, se plantean algunas críticas a los límites de la idea de acción trasformadora resultante de la crítica categorial del
marxismo propuesta por Kurz.
Palabras clave
Temporalidad, Capitalismo, Modernización, Tiempo abstracto, Progreso
______________________
Abstract (eng)
This article deals with the relationship between the abstract temporality
of capitalism (the time of production) and the historical-concrete way of
development of capitalist modernization and its ideology (the progressive
philosophy of history), as established in the theory of the critique of value
developed by the German philosopher Robert Kurz (1943-2012). In the first
part of my contribution I start by defining the problem of temporality in
the context of Kurz’s categorical critique, also highlighting the influence
that Moishe Postone (1942-2018) had in it. Then I explain how, according
to these authors, a dialectic between abstract and concrete time in the
process of capitalistic development is constituted. In the second part I
investigate then the philosophical foundations that have prevented
Marxist theory from understanding this process remaining linked to an
ideology of modernization (with illuministic and Hegelian origins) that –
according to Kurz – is nothing more than a real projection of the concrete
metaphysics of the development of capitalism. In conclusion, some
critiques are raised to the limits of the idea of transformative action
resulting from the categorical critique of Marxism proposed by Kurz.
Keywords
Temporality, Capitalism, Modernization, Abstract Time, Progress
of sensus communis in the philosophy of Giambattista Vico and the
interpretation of it provided by Hans-Georg Gadamer in the context of his
project of a philosophical hermeneutics. Gadamer’s rehabilitation of the
concept of commonsense, derived from an early work of Vico entitled De
nostri temporis studiorum ratione ratione, is functional to his criticism of the
methodological model of knowledge that the humanities (or, in German, the
Geisteswissenschaften) have borrowed from the natural sciences, to which
Gadamer opposes the rhetorical-linguistic experience that one can make in a
real community. Comparing these two philosophers will lead me then to
analyze the interpretations of Gadamer’s hermeneutical appropriation of Vico
that various scholars have provided, mostly to criticize Gadamer by arguing
that his treatment of Vico’s concept of commonsense eventually falls prey to
some kind of relativism. This topic also implies a critical analysis of the two
authors’ overall philosophies, in particular with regard to the difference
between Vico’s project of developing a science of human history grounded on
universal transcendental structures in his Scienza nuova and Gadamer’s
concept of extra-methodical truth and experience that forms the basis of his
philosophical hermeneutics in Wahrheit und Methode.