Fran Martin
Current project website: www.mobileselves.org
Fran Martin is Reader in Cultural Studies at the University of Melbourne and an Australian Research Council Future Fellow. Her best known research focuses on television, film, literature, Internet culture and other forms of cultural production in the contemporary transnational Chinese cultural sphere, with a specialization in cultures of gender and queer sexuality. She recently co-authored, with Tania Lewis and Wanning Sun, Telemodernities: Television and Transforming Lives in Asia (Duke U.P., 2016). Her other book publications include Backward Glances: Contemporary Chinese Cultures and the Female Homoerotic Imaginary (Duke U.P., 2010); Lifestyle Media in Asia: Consumption, Aspiration and Identity (co-edited with T. Lewis, Routledge, 2016); Mobile Cultures: New Media in Queer Asia (co-edited with C. Berry and A. Yue, Duke U.P., 2003); Situating Sexualities: Queer Representation in Taiwanese Fiction, Film and Public Culture (Hong Kong U.P., 2003); Angelwings: Contemporary Queer Fiction from Taiwan (Hawaii U.P., 2003); AsiaPacifiQueer: Rethinking Genders and Sexualities (co-edited with P. Jackson, M. McLelland and A. Yue, Illinois U.P., 2008); and Embodied Modernities: Corporeality, Representation and Chinese Cultures (co-edited with LN Heinrich, Hawaii U.P., 2006).
ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1265-9577
Fran Martin is Reader in Cultural Studies at the University of Melbourne and an Australian Research Council Future Fellow. Her best known research focuses on television, film, literature, Internet culture and other forms of cultural production in the contemporary transnational Chinese cultural sphere, with a specialization in cultures of gender and queer sexuality. She recently co-authored, with Tania Lewis and Wanning Sun, Telemodernities: Television and Transforming Lives in Asia (Duke U.P., 2016). Her other book publications include Backward Glances: Contemporary Chinese Cultures and the Female Homoerotic Imaginary (Duke U.P., 2010); Lifestyle Media in Asia: Consumption, Aspiration and Identity (co-edited with T. Lewis, Routledge, 2016); Mobile Cultures: New Media in Queer Asia (co-edited with C. Berry and A. Yue, Duke U.P., 2003); Situating Sexualities: Queer Representation in Taiwanese Fiction, Film and Public Culture (Hong Kong U.P., 2003); Angelwings: Contemporary Queer Fiction from Taiwan (Hawaii U.P., 2003); AsiaPacifiQueer: Rethinking Genders and Sexualities (co-edited with P. Jackson, M. McLelland and A. Yue, Illinois U.P., 2008); and Embodied Modernities: Corporeality, Representation and Chinese Cultures (co-edited with LN Heinrich, Hawaii U.P., 2006).
ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1265-9577
less
Uploads
Caitlin H Douglass , Can Qin, Fran Martin, Yinzong Xiao, Carol El-Hayek and Megan SC Lim.
Few studies investigate sexual health among Chinese international students in Australia. We recruited domestic (n ¼ 623) and Chinese international (n ¼ 500) students for separate online surveys on sexual behaviours and knowledge. Samples were compared using Chi square, Fisher's exact and equality of medians tests. Domestic students were more likely than international students to have ever touched a partner's genitals (81% vs. 53%, p < 0.01), had oral sex (76% vs. 44%, p < 0.01), vaginal intercourse (67% vs. 41%, p < 0.01) and anal intercourse (31% vs. 6%, p < 0.01). Domestic students were younger when they first touched a partner's genitals (16 vs. 18 years, p < 0.01), had oral sex (17 vs. 18 years, p < 0.01) and vaginal intercourse (17 vs. 18 years, p < 0.01). Domestic students were less likely than Chinese international students to report only one lifetime partner for touching genitals (22% vs. 50%, p < 0.01), oral sex (25% vs. 55%, p < 0.01), vaginal intercourse (30% vs. 58%, p < 0.01) and anal intercourse (54% vs. 88%, p < 0.01). Domestic students were more likely than Chinese international students to use the oral contraceptive pill (48% vs. 16%, p < 0.01) and long-acting reversible contraceptives (19% vs. 1%, p < 0.01). Domestic students scored higher than international students on a contraception and chlamydia quiz (4/5 vs. 2/5, p < 0.01). Domestic and Chinese international students differed in sexual behaviours and knowledge highlighting the need for relevant sexual health promotion for both groups.
Caitlin H Douglass , Can Qin, Fran Martin, Yinzong Xiao, Carol El-Hayek and Megan SC Lim.
Few studies investigate sexual health among Chinese international students in Australia. We recruited domestic (n ¼ 623) and Chinese international (n ¼ 500) students for separate online surveys on sexual behaviours and knowledge. Samples were compared using Chi square, Fisher's exact and equality of medians tests. Domestic students were more likely than international students to have ever touched a partner's genitals (81% vs. 53%, p < 0.01), had oral sex (76% vs. 44%, p < 0.01), vaginal intercourse (67% vs. 41%, p < 0.01) and anal intercourse (31% vs. 6%, p < 0.01). Domestic students were younger when they first touched a partner's genitals (16 vs. 18 years, p < 0.01), had oral sex (17 vs. 18 years, p < 0.01) and vaginal intercourse (17 vs. 18 years, p < 0.01). Domestic students were less likely than Chinese international students to report only one lifetime partner for touching genitals (22% vs. 50%, p < 0.01), oral sex (25% vs. 55%, p < 0.01), vaginal intercourse (30% vs. 58%, p < 0.01) and anal intercourse (54% vs. 88%, p < 0.01). Domestic students were more likely than Chinese international students to use the oral contraceptive pill (48% vs. 16%, p < 0.01) and long-acting reversible contraceptives (19% vs. 1%, p < 0.01). Domestic students scored higher than international students on a contraception and chlamydia quiz (4/5 vs. 2/5, p < 0.01). Domestic and Chinese international students differed in sexual behaviours and knowledge highlighting the need for relevant sexual health promotion for both groups.
Table of Contents
1. Chua Beng Huat—Foreword: Rethinking Consumption in Economic Recessionary East Asia
2. Fran Martin and Tania Lewis—Lifestyle Media in Asia: Consumption, Aspiration and Identity
3. Sun Jung— Neoliberal Capitalism and Media Representation in Korean Television Series: Subversion and Sustainability
4. Wu Jing— Family, Aesthetic Authority and Class Identity in the Shadow of Neo-liberal Modernity: The Cultural Politics of Exchanging Space
5. Wanning Sun—Mediatization of Yangsheng: The Political and Cultural Economy of Health Education through Media in China
6. Yue Gao— The Pink Ribbon Campaign in Chinese Fashion Magazines: Celebrity, Luxury Life-Styles and Consumerism
7. Fang-chih Irene Yang— Empresses In The Palace and The Project of “Neoliberalization through China” in Taiwan
8. Youna Kim—Media and Cultural Cosmopolitanism: Asian Women in Transnational Flows
9. Fran Martin— Differential (Im)mobilities: Imaginative Transnationalism in Taiwanese Women’s Travel TV
10. Larissa Hjorth, Heather Horst, Sarah Pink, Baohua Zhou, Fumitoshi Kato, Genevieve Bell, Kana Ohashi, Chris Malmo, and Miao Xiao—Locating the Mobile: Intergenerational Locative Media in Tokyo, Shanghai and Melbourne
11. Tania Lewis—Dishing Up Diversity? Class, Aspirationalism and Indian Food Television
12. Bart Barendregt and Chris Hudson— Islam´s Got Talent: Television, Performance and the Islamic Public Sphere in Malaysia