Conference Presentations by Getulio Yuzo Okuma
Background/Purpose: Studies have shown a clear difference among minority and economically disadva... more Background/Purpose: Studies have shown a clear difference among minority and economically disadvantaged patients. Less is known about marginalized populations in Brazil, a country that possesses a two-tiered healthcare system, based on socioeconomic status. We sought to explore differences in quality of life (QOL) and distress among patients receiving care within these systems.
Methods: 270 patients were assessed for distress (DT), anxiety/depression (HADS) and QOL (FACT-G). Half of them was recruited at a private institution (PRI) and the other at a public institution (PUB) (each group: n=135; 68.9% breast and 31.1% gynecological cancers). We calculated descriptive statistics and examined QOL and distress using T-test and ANOVA.
Results: We found ethnic differences between PUB (50.4% white, 32.6% mulato and 14.1% black) and PRI patients (82.9% white), and income disparities (PUB patients report almost a third less monthly income than PRI patients). PUB patients were mostly late-stage diagnosed 70.4% compared to PRI counterpart 42.2% (p<.001). In general PUB patients reported higher rates of distress and anxiety/depression (p<.03); and poorer QoL outcomes (p<.01).
Conclusions: This preliminary study is one of the first to investigate inequities in cancer outcomes among patients in Brazilian healthcare settings. Analyses revealed notable differences between groups across demographic characteristics, while individuals of lower socioeconomic status reported significantly poorer psychosocial outcomes. These results suggest a complex interaction between ethnicity, access to care and cancer outcomes, and warrants further research to better understand and address these inequities. Further discussion of the role of psycho-oncology research and clinical practice in reducing disparate outcomes among Brazilian cancer patients is warranted.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Papers by Getulio Yuzo Okuma
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa
Resumo Estudo prospectivo e transversal, para determinar a prevalência de prejuízo cognitivo deco... more Resumo Estudo prospectivo e transversal, para determinar a prevalência de prejuízo cognitivo decorrente da quimioterapia e explorar fatores preditores e mediadores em sobreviventes de câncer de mama. Utilizou-se o Termômetro de Distress, Escala de Ansiedade e Depressão, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General e Cognitive Function. As sobreviventes (N = 62) reportaram uma alta prevalência de distress (46,8%) e de ansiedade (24,2%), com baixos escores nas subescalas déficit cognitivo e habilidades cognitivas percebidos. O funcionamento cognitivo esteve associado à idade (β = 1,42; p = 0,002), atuação profissional (β = -23,12; p = 0,004), depressão (β = -5,43; p = 0,001) e qualidade de vida (β = 1,24; p = 0,001). Prejuízo cognitivo deve ser considerado no serviço de Psico-Oncologia.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Brazilian Journal of Oncology, 2017
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Estudos de Psicologia, 2017
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2017
31 Background: Studies have shown a clear difference among minority and economically disadvantage... more 31 Background: Studies have shown a clear difference among minority and economically disadvantaged patients. Less is known about marginalized populations in Brazil, a country that possesses a two-tiered healthcare system, based on socioeconomic status. We sought to explore differences in quality of life (QOL) and distress among patients receiving care within these systems. Methods: 270 patients were assessed for distress (DT), anxiety/depression (HADS) and QOL (FACT-G). Half of them was recruited at a private institution (PRI) and the other at a public institution (PUB) (each group: n=135; 68.9% breast and 31.1% gynecological cancers). We calculated descriptive statistics and examined QOL and distress using T-test and ANOVA. Results: We found ethnic differences between PUB (50.4% white, 32.6% mulato and 14.1% black) and PRI patients (82.9% white), and income disparities (PUB patients report almost a third less monthly income than PRI patients). PUB patients were mostly late-stage di...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Revista Psicologia e Saúde, 2021
O presente estudo teve o objetivo de avaliar a relação entre o distress, a qualidade de vida e a ... more O presente estudo teve o objetivo de avaliar a relação entre o distress, a qualidade de vida e a prática espiritual e religiosa (ER) em pacientes recém-diagnosticados com câncer, na primeira linha de tratamento quimioterápico. Trata-se de um estudo transversal, que avaliou 100 pacientes quanto ao distress (Termômetro de Distress), qualidade de vida (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – General) e espiritualidade (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Spiritual Well-Being Scale e Escala de Religiosidade da Universidade de Duke). Os resultados sugerem que a prática ER é uma importante estratégia no enfrentamento do diagnóstico e tratamento do câncer, estando associada significativamente a um menor nível de distress, melhor qualidade de vida e melhor bem-estar espiritual.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
PsycTESTS Dataset, 2019
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Conference Presentations by Getulio Yuzo Okuma
Methods: 270 patients were assessed for distress (DT), anxiety/depression (HADS) and QOL (FACT-G). Half of them was recruited at a private institution (PRI) and the other at a public institution (PUB) (each group: n=135; 68.9% breast and 31.1% gynecological cancers). We calculated descriptive statistics and examined QOL and distress using T-test and ANOVA.
Results: We found ethnic differences between PUB (50.4% white, 32.6% mulato and 14.1% black) and PRI patients (82.9% white), and income disparities (PUB patients report almost a third less monthly income than PRI patients). PUB patients were mostly late-stage diagnosed 70.4% compared to PRI counterpart 42.2% (p<.001). In general PUB patients reported higher rates of distress and anxiety/depression (p<.03); and poorer QoL outcomes (p<.01).
Conclusions: This preliminary study is one of the first to investigate inequities in cancer outcomes among patients in Brazilian healthcare settings. Analyses revealed notable differences between groups across demographic characteristics, while individuals of lower socioeconomic status reported significantly poorer psychosocial outcomes. These results suggest a complex interaction between ethnicity, access to care and cancer outcomes, and warrants further research to better understand and address these inequities. Further discussion of the role of psycho-oncology research and clinical practice in reducing disparate outcomes among Brazilian cancer patients is warranted.
Papers by Getulio Yuzo Okuma
Methods: 270 patients were assessed for distress (DT), anxiety/depression (HADS) and QOL (FACT-G). Half of them was recruited at a private institution (PRI) and the other at a public institution (PUB) (each group: n=135; 68.9% breast and 31.1% gynecological cancers). We calculated descriptive statistics and examined QOL and distress using T-test and ANOVA.
Results: We found ethnic differences between PUB (50.4% white, 32.6% mulato and 14.1% black) and PRI patients (82.9% white), and income disparities (PUB patients report almost a third less monthly income than PRI patients). PUB patients were mostly late-stage diagnosed 70.4% compared to PRI counterpart 42.2% (p<.001). In general PUB patients reported higher rates of distress and anxiety/depression (p<.03); and poorer QoL outcomes (p<.01).
Conclusions: This preliminary study is one of the first to investigate inequities in cancer outcomes among patients in Brazilian healthcare settings. Analyses revealed notable differences between groups across demographic characteristics, while individuals of lower socioeconomic status reported significantly poorer psychosocial outcomes. These results suggest a complex interaction between ethnicity, access to care and cancer outcomes, and warrants further research to better understand and address these inequities. Further discussion of the role of psycho-oncology research and clinical practice in reducing disparate outcomes among Brazilian cancer patients is warranted.