Aldo Pisano
I'm Aldo and I'm trying to understand what's going on in the new digital world. I'd like giving contribution to research starting from my research fields: Ethics and AI, Narrative Ethics, Didactics of Philosophy. I had my bachelor's degree in Philosophy in 2018 and I worked on my thesis in Aix-Marseille University with Carlo Rovelli.
I'm a Phd Student in Learning Sciences and Digital Technologies (Università della Calabria, Italy) and I work with Prof.ssa Ines Crispini, Full professor of Ethics. I also work as a teacher in High Schools.
Supervisors: Professoressa Ines Crispini
I'm a Phd Student in Learning Sciences and Digital Technologies (Università della Calabria, Italy) and I work with Prof.ssa Ines Crispini, Full professor of Ethics. I also work as a teacher in High Schools.
Supervisors: Professoressa Ines Crispini
less
InterestsView All (35)
Uploads
Papers
key issues: responsibility and potential limits to human autonomy. The design of autonomous weapons should prioritize transparency and autonomy in decision-making, especially in morally challenging situations. The automation bias highlights the risks of relying on AI as infallible due to its mathematical programming. This bias undermines human deliberation and violates ethical theories at both the metaethical and normative levels. Starting from the hci model, an ethics by design for AI is necessary, providing support while allowing users to maintain responsibility. Trusting autonomous weapons requires ensuring that autonomy does not compromise human decision-making, preserving the value of ethical choices’ complexity and avoiding the reduction of ethics to mathematical generalizations. Users should have the freedom to disregard AI advice and act according to the situation, thereby assuming responsibility.
Aim of this paper is to analyze the rule of speech and action as performative acts in Hannah Arendt's ethical and political theory, moving from The Human conditon and from the difference between "private" and "public" space as considered in Arednt's philosophy. The first one (private) is linked to a natural disposition of individual who acts in that way called "work" for his/her own subsistence, the second one (public) is linked to the creation of that artificial human space called society where "actions"-in an ethical and political sense-take place. Specifically, the most relevant theme is that "actions" and "speeches" are not mere "acts" or "words", but they become morally relevant only when the subject assumes a conscious responsability about what she/he acts or says. This happens only when the person "thinks" which means that he begins an "interior dialogue" in an individual space. In the internal perspective, this self-reflection allows conscience's development, while in the external one it becomes public through verbalization in the form of judgment.
Book Reviews
Conference Presentations
key issues: responsibility and potential limits to human autonomy. The design of autonomous weapons should prioritize transparency and autonomy in decision-making, especially in morally challenging situations. The automation bias highlights the risks of relying on AI as infallible due to its mathematical programming. This bias undermines human deliberation and violates ethical theories at both the metaethical and normative levels. Starting from the hci model, an ethics by design for AI is necessary, providing support while allowing users to maintain responsibility. Trusting autonomous weapons requires ensuring that autonomy does not compromise human decision-making, preserving the value of ethical choices’ complexity and avoiding the reduction of ethics to mathematical generalizations. Users should have the freedom to disregard AI advice and act according to the situation, thereby assuming responsibility.
Aim of this paper is to analyze the rule of speech and action as performative acts in Hannah Arendt's ethical and political theory, moving from The Human conditon and from the difference between "private" and "public" space as considered in Arednt's philosophy. The first one (private) is linked to a natural disposition of individual who acts in that way called "work" for his/her own subsistence, the second one (public) is linked to the creation of that artificial human space called society where "actions"-in an ethical and political sense-take place. Specifically, the most relevant theme is that "actions" and "speeches" are not mere "acts" or "words", but they become morally relevant only when the subject assumes a conscious responsability about what she/he acts or says. This happens only when the person "thinks" which means that he begins an "interior dialogue" in an individual space. In the internal perspective, this self-reflection allows conscience's development, while in the external one it becomes public through verbalization in the form of judgment.
The proposal focuses on epistemological and anthropological development in Carlo Rovelli's work.