- University College London, Institute of Archaeology, AlumnusUniversity of Cambridge, Archaeology, Alumnusadd
- Archaeological Method & Theory, Commercial/ Contract Archaeology, Archaeology of Identity, Archaeology of burials, European Bronze Age, Archaeology, and 13 morePrehistoric Archaeology, Statistical Methods in Archaeology, Field Archaeology, Bronze Age Europe (Archaeology), Bronze Age (Archaeology), Early Bronze Age (Archaeology), Middle Bronze Age, Late Bronze Age, Bronze Age Archaeology, Fortified Settlements (Archaeology), Fortifications, Bronze age fortification in Europa, and Bronze Age Hungaryedit
- Post-doctoral researcher ("Transformation and crisis in prehistoric and archaic societies") at the Graduate School "H... morePost-doctoral researcher ("Transformation and crisis in prehistoric and archaic societies") at the Graduate School "Human Development in Landscapes"/the Johanna-Mestorf-Academy.
Previously Lecturer for Prehistory at the Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte, CAU Kiel.
PhD project, dealing with identity in LBA cremation cemeteries in C. and S. Germany was carried out as part of the EC Marie Curie FP7 "Forging Identities" Project.
Alumna of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London (graduated 2008).
Alumna of the Department of Archaeology and Jesus College, University of Cambridge (matriculated 2003).edit - Professor Johannes Mülleredit
A Kiskunsági homokhát, a Pesti hordalékkúp-síkság, illetve a Pilis—Alpári homokhát találkozásánál az ócsai Turjánvidék szomszédságában található Kakucs—Turján mögött lelőhely a Kárpát-medence középső bronzkorában (ca. 2000/1900–1500/1450... more
A Kiskunsági homokhát, a Pesti hordalékkúp-síkság, illetve a Pilis—Alpári homokhát találkozásánál az ócsai Turjánvidék szomszédságában található Kakucs—Turján mögött lelőhely a Kárpát-medence középső bronzkorában (ca. 2000/1900–1500/1450 cal BC) a Vatya-kultúra népességének egyik jellegzetes települése volt. A területen több talajtani módszer együttes alkalmazásával lehetőség nyílt arra, hogy feltérképezzük a bronzkori település talajtani, sekélyföldtani viszonyait, illetve a régészeti lelőhely fejlődéstörténetének, tafonómiájának egyes részleteit rekonstruáljuk. A talajtani térképező fúrások eszközének segítségével a fedő talajképződmény alatt meghatároztuk az antropogén hatásra fejlődött és módosult talajok, valamint üledékek vertikális és horizontális kiterjedését. Ennek keretében nem csak a hármas tagolású lelőhely kerítőárkainak betöltését, hanem az épületobjektumok által megjelenített megtelepedési és pusztulási rétegeket is vizsgáltuk. A pusztulási rétegként meghatározott K1 ...
Research Interests:
In Kneisel, J., Kirleis, W., Dal Corso, M., Taylor, N. and Tiedtke, V. (eds.) 2012. Collapse or Continuity? Environment and Development of Bronze Age Human Landscapes. Proceedings of the International Workshop... more
In Kneisel, J., Kirleis, W., Dal Corso, M., Taylor, N. and Tiedtke, V. (eds.) 2012. Collapse or Continuity? Environment and Development of Bronze Age Human Landscapes. Proceedings of the International Workshop "Socio-Environmental Dynamics over the Last 12,000 Years: The Creation of Landscapes II (14th - 18th March 2011)" in Kiel. Universitätsforschungen zur Prähistorischen Archäologie Band 205. Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
In Kneisel, J., Kirleis, W., Dal Corso, M. and Taylor, N. (eds.) Forthcoming. Setting the Bronze Age Table: Production, subsistence, diet and their implications for European Landscapes. Proceedings of the International Workshop... more
In Kneisel, J., Kirleis, W., Dal Corso, M. and Taylor, N. (eds.) Forthcoming. Setting the Bronze Age Table: Production, subsistence, diet and their implications for European Landscapes. Proceedings of the International Workshop "Socio-Environmental Dynamics over the Last 12,000 Years: The Creation of Landscapes III (15th - 18th April 2013)" in Kiel. Universitätsforschungen zur Prähistorischen Archäologie. Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH.
Research Interests:
In Suchowska-Ducke et al. (eds.) Forthcoming. Forging Identities. The Mobility of Culture in Bronze Age Europe. Report from a Marie Curie Project 2009-2012 with concluding conference at Aarhus University, Moesgaard 2012. BAR... more
In Suchowska-Ducke et al. (eds.) Forthcoming. Forging Identities. The Mobility of Culture in Bronze Age Europe. Report from a Marie Curie Project 2009-2012 with concluding conference at Aarhus University, Moesgaard 2012. BAR International Series. Oxford: Archaeopress
Research Interests:
In Ginn, V.G., Enlander, R.A. and Crozier, R. (eds.) 2014. Exploring Prehistoric Identity in Northwest Europe: our construct or theirs? Oxford: Oxbow. pp. 175-185
Research Interests:
In Kneisel, J., Kirleis, W., Dal Corso, M., Taylor, N. and Tiedtke, V. (eds.) 2012. Collapse or Continuity? Environment and Development of Bronze Age Human Landscapes. Proceedings of the International Workshop "Socio-Environmental... more
In Kneisel, J., Kirleis, W., Dal Corso, M., Taylor, N. and Tiedtke, V. (eds.) 2012. Collapse or Continuity? Environment and Development of Bronze Age Human Landscapes. Proceedings of the International Workshop "Socio-Environmental Dynamics over the Last 12,000 Years: The Creation of Landscapes II (14th - 18th March 2011)" in Kiel. Universitätsforschungen zur Prähistorischen Archäologie Band 205. Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH.
Research Interests:
One of the most common criticisms levelled at archaeologists studying identity through burial remains is that our conclusions are actually based on our own concepts of identity; that we approach mortuary evidence as a mirror for past... more
One of the most common criticisms levelled at archaeologists studying identity through burial remains is that our conclusions are actually based on our own concepts of identity; that we approach mortuary evidence as a mirror for past identities but end up actually reflecting our modern perceptions and understandings of how people categorise and identify each other in death. Usually we focus on whether this is an insurmountable issue, and if we can escape the conceptual bonds of our personal contexts. However, I would like to turn this issue on its head. I believe that our inextricable entanglement in our own modern understandings of death and identity has the potential to offer us greater insights into these aspects of the past, if we only approach them in a different way.
Recent research into emotion, understandings of the body, and processes of identification and categorisation in various social disciplines (including archaeology) suggest a need to marry a recognition that prehistoric worldviews likely varied greatly from our own with an understanding that discarding all aspects of our own experience and modern understanding may be leading us to create one-dimensional narratives about past identities. We need not break and discard our mirrors; we should instead remember that despite being distorted images, reflections can still be useful.
Recent research into emotion, understandings of the body, and processes of identification and categorisation in various social disciplines (including archaeology) suggest a need to marry a recognition that prehistoric worldviews likely varied greatly from our own with an understanding that discarding all aspects of our own experience and modern understanding may be leading us to create one-dimensional narratives about past identities. We need not break and discard our mirrors; we should instead remember that despite being distorted images, reflections can still be useful.
Identity and mobility are two very important topics in current Bronze Age research, since this period marks a dramatic increase in long-distance connections. In contrast with many of the large-scale research projects into these phenomena,... more
Identity and mobility are two very important topics in current Bronze Age research, since this period marks a dramatic increase in long-distance connections. In contrast with many of the large-scale research projects into these phenomena, this volume brings the search for identities back down to a local level; focusing on how identities were constructed within individual cemeteries, and what role mobility might have played for burial form and content. Using diverse social theories and drawing upon natural scientific methods, an approach is developed for investigating identities within cremation cemeteries; an often overlooked data source. Through the application of this approach to two case study sites (Vollmarshausen, near Kassel and Künzing, in Lower Bavaria), new insights could be gained into Late Bronze Age identities, their construction and negotiation, and the social structures within which they played out.
Identität und Mobilität sind zentrale Themen in der Erforschung der Bronzezeit, da in dieser Periode überregionale Netzwerke deutlich zunahmen. Im Gegensatz zu vielen großräumig angelegten Forschungsprojekte, die sich diesen Phänomene ebenfalls widmen, werden in dem vorliegenden Band Identitäten auf lokale Ebene untersucht; wobei der Fokus darauf liegt, wie Identitäten innerhalb einzelnen Gräberfelder konstruiert waren und welche Rolle Mobilität bei der Auswahl der Bestattungsform und Grabbeigaben gespielt haben könnte. Brandbestattungen als Datenquelle werden meist wenig Beachtung gezollt, daher wurde hier ein Ansatz spezifisch für Brandgräberfelder, mithilfe diverse soziale Theorien und naturwissenschaftliche Methoden, entwickelt. Die Ergebnisse aus der Anwendung dieses Ansatzes auf zwei Fallstudien (Vollmarshausen (Hessen) und Künzing (Niederbayern)) ermöglichen neue Einblicke in spätbronzezeitliche Identitäten, wie sie konstruiert und innerhalb der Gesellschaft etabliert wurden, sowie das soziale Umfeld in denen sie relevant waren.
Identität und Mobilität sind zentrale Themen in der Erforschung der Bronzezeit, da in dieser Periode überregionale Netzwerke deutlich zunahmen. Im Gegensatz zu vielen großräumig angelegten Forschungsprojekte, die sich diesen Phänomene ebenfalls widmen, werden in dem vorliegenden Band Identitäten auf lokale Ebene untersucht; wobei der Fokus darauf liegt, wie Identitäten innerhalb einzelnen Gräberfelder konstruiert waren und welche Rolle Mobilität bei der Auswahl der Bestattungsform und Grabbeigaben gespielt haben könnte. Brandbestattungen als Datenquelle werden meist wenig Beachtung gezollt, daher wurde hier ein Ansatz spezifisch für Brandgräberfelder, mithilfe diverse soziale Theorien und naturwissenschaftliche Methoden, entwickelt. Die Ergebnisse aus der Anwendung dieses Ansatzes auf zwei Fallstudien (Vollmarshausen (Hessen) und Künzing (Niederbayern)) ermöglichen neue Einblicke in spätbronzezeitliche Identitäten, wie sie konstruiert und innerhalb der Gesellschaft etabliert wurden, sowie das soziale Umfeld in denen sie relevant waren.