Papers by Daniele Dibello
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
This article aims to examine the stability of Venice’s constitutional and political system during... more This article aims to examine the stability of Venice’s constitutional and political system during the late Middle Ages, by considering the question from a new perspective. The analysis of the documents relative to Marino Falier’s conspiracy (1355), has elucidated three factors of political, economic, and cultural nature that helped overcome the subsequent impasse: the immediate reaction of the institutions, the attention to the economic framework, the good management of the image and the memory of the episode. These three factors were ever-present, and are also evident in the other two serious political crises that occurred during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, although with a different intensity and quality.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
This short essay reconsiders one of the most famous and at the same time dramatic events in the p... more This short essay reconsiders one of the most famous and at the same time dramatic events in the political and institutional history of the Republic of Venice: the Francesco Foscari’s deposition from the dogado in 1457. The episode is now reread and analysed according to features, limits and potentialities of the two institutions involved in that moment, the doge and the Council of Ten, without disdaining severely the inability or disability of the head of State as a cause of trouble for the Venetian State.
Some deliberations of the Council of Ten, which are here edited in appendix, have also provided an opportunity to meditate on the peculiar relationship between ‘fact’ and ‘law’ in Venice, by getting ideas from and justifying the failure to update of the promissione ducale following the constitutional exception made by the Ten against the doge Foscari.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Book Papers by Daniele Dibello
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Book Reviews by Daniele Dibello
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Papers by Daniele Dibello
Some deliberations of the Council of Ten, which are here edited in appendix, have also provided an opportunity to meditate on the peculiar relationship between ‘fact’ and ‘law’ in Venice, by getting ideas from and justifying the failure to update of the promissione ducale following the constitutional exception made by the Ten against the doge Foscari.
Book Papers by Daniele Dibello
Book Reviews by Daniele Dibello
Some deliberations of the Council of Ten, which are here edited in appendix, have also provided an opportunity to meditate on the peculiar relationship between ‘fact’ and ‘law’ in Venice, by getting ideas from and justifying the failure to update of the promissione ducale following the constitutional exception made by the Ten against the doge Foscari.
In chiosa, una lettura della questione, ormai canonizzata, secondo l’opera inedita di Tommaso Diplovataccio (1522), al cui interno il giurista raccolse i documenti comprovanti la libertà veneziana, compresi quelli redatti nell’arco di tempo preso in esame.
Scientific coordinator: Daniele Dibello (Universiteit Gent)
Contact: daniele.dibello@ugent.be
www.veneziastoria.it
www.facebook.com/DepStoVenezie
www.youtube.com/channel/