Joanna Stroud
University College London, Digital Education, Department Member
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Division of education, Department MemberLondon School of Economics and Political Science, Centre for Learning Technology, Department Memberadd
- Education, Technology for Learning and Teaching, E-learning, Educational Technology, Online Learning, Instructional Design, and 16 moreDistance Education, Assessment, Instructional Technology, Distance Learning, Assessment in Higher Education, Pedagogy, Virtual Learning, Blended Learning, Learning Disabilities, Digital Literacy, Student Engagement, Asynchronous online forums in education, Clickers, Feedback (Education), Audio (Education), and Mature students in Higher Educationedit
- Learning technologist and academic developer with experience spanning teaching and research intensive contexts.edit
In recent years, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have been an emergent mode of educational delivery. The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine has launched three MOOCs in the past year, with nearly 40,000 students enrolled... more
In recent years, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have been an emergent mode of educational delivery. The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine has launched three MOOCs in the past year, with nearly 40,000 students enrolled worldwide. These courses have driven awareness of open educational practices within the School, culminating in the launch of our Open Study at LSHTM platform, housing open access courses and OER both independent of and related to our MOOC provision. This growing culture of openness is in line with our broader strategic aims of promoting better health and equity through high quality, flexible, and global study opportunities.
MOOCs produce a vast amount of learner data, thus affording significant opportunities for educational research (Breslow, et al., 2013, p.13), and with much of this conducted around online pedagogies and learning design. While it is clear that universities are now increasingly able to reach a worldwide audience and extend access to research, education and training of the highest quality, there remains a lack of robust data and analysis around the effectiveness of and motivations for flexible, self-directed learning.
Simple exploration of our MOOC analytics indicates that professional learners are strongly represented in each course cohort. Milligan and Littlejohn suggest (2014, p.1) that while the open context of such courses can broadly reduce barriers to learning, this same open, flexible online format can also be useful to professional learners, enabling individuals to tailor their learning needs to their corresponding work demands. This presentation will report upon our findings regarding learner perspectives of the value and impact of MOOCs in terms of professional development. Based on data gathered in surveys and focus groups, it will highlight some of the reasons why working learners might participate in open courses, the importance of certifying or accrediting learning in this context, and how online learning can be attuned to workplace study.
References
Breslow, L., Pritchard, D.E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G.S., Ho, A.D., & Seaton, D.T. (2013) Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, vol. 8, pp.13-25.
Milligan, C., and Littlejohn, A. (2014) Supporting Professional Learning In A Massive Open Online Course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol.15(5).
MOOCs produce a vast amount of learner data, thus affording significant opportunities for educational research (Breslow, et al., 2013, p.13), and with much of this conducted around online pedagogies and learning design. While it is clear that universities are now increasingly able to reach a worldwide audience and extend access to research, education and training of the highest quality, there remains a lack of robust data and analysis around the effectiveness of and motivations for flexible, self-directed learning.
Simple exploration of our MOOC analytics indicates that professional learners are strongly represented in each course cohort. Milligan and Littlejohn suggest (2014, p.1) that while the open context of such courses can broadly reduce barriers to learning, this same open, flexible online format can also be useful to professional learners, enabling individuals to tailor their learning needs to their corresponding work demands. This presentation will report upon our findings regarding learner perspectives of the value and impact of MOOCs in terms of professional development. Based on data gathered in surveys and focus groups, it will highlight some of the reasons why working learners might participate in open courses, the importance of certifying or accrediting learning in this context, and how online learning can be attuned to workplace study.
References
Breslow, L., Pritchard, D.E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G.S., Ho, A.D., & Seaton, D.T. (2013) Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, vol. 8, pp.13-25.
Milligan, C., and Littlejohn, A. (2014) Supporting Professional Learning In A Massive Open Online Course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol.15(5).
Research Interests:
Research Interests: E-learning, Assessment, Audio (Education), Feedback (Education), Learning Technology, and 7 moreAssessment in Higher Education, Technology Enhanced Learning, Media-Enhanced Feedback, Screencast Feedback, 360 Feedback assessment, Formative Assessment and Feedback, and Screencasting and video production
When open online courses first appeared within the broader educational landscape there was much discussion surrounding their potential to widen access to higher education internationally and notably among 'developing' communities.... more
When open online courses first appeared within the broader educational landscape there was much discussion surrounding their potential to widen access to higher education internationally and notably among 'developing' communities. However, as the course format has matured it has become clear that the issue is far more complex than simple availability, requiring more considered analysis to better understand problems and develop the kinds of learning design approaches that could offer both technical and cultural inclusivity. This qualitative study looked to explore these issues, conducting semi-structured interviews with educational professionals who were not only engaged in open online course development but had produced courses that had attracted a significant proportion of their learners from low-resource settings. Inductive thematic analysis of the data revealed that while it is thought that the key traits of the format could offer flexibility and rich educational experiences to learners in these settings, educators face many difficulties in catering to diverse and often unknown audiences. There are nevertheless a range of attitudes and pedagogic stances that could be adopted to address, if not entirely solve, issues of cross-cultural relevance within courses. Based on these findings it is recommended that those who wish to develop courses that are both accessible and offer positive learning experiences for global learners should adopt a reflexive stance within the design process. This involves active acknowledgement of the benefits and drawbacks of the format, but furthermore requires the learning designer to engage with the principles of openness from technical, cultural, and pedagogic perspectives.