The paper gives an analysis of possession manifestations in Teleut and Chulym-Turkic by means of ... more The paper gives an analysis of possession manifestations in Teleut and Chulym-Turkic by means of noun constructions. Possessive relations in the focus languages form a functional-semantic field, with a grammar core composed of the third-type ezafe constructions as well as combinations of possessive pronouns and nouns marked with possessive affixes. This marking is discourse-featured and optional in case of the 1st and 2nd person possessor, but inalienable possession is manifested by the regular head marking of the personal pronominal possessive constructions. Also non-ezafe and non-possessive usage of the 3rd person possessive affix is featured, which is presumably affected by its article-like function. On the periphery of the possessiveness functional-semantic field there are adyective affixes *-lɨɣ and *-ɣɨ, which imply the possession of an obyect, quality or a feature, or manifest the idea of their accumulation and concentration.
This study encourages a multidisciplinary research to identify parallels in the group belonging a... more This study encourages a multidisciplinary research to identify parallels in the group belonging and chronology of South Siberian Turkic (Chulym Turkic and Bachat Teleut) and Yakut. There is solid evidence that the ancestors of modern Yakuts and their language originate from the Central Asian steppe Proto-Turkic community of the 1 st century BC. South Siberian Turkic varieties have not been studied as thoroughly, but they are expected to have traces of some non-Turkic language substratum. The analysis of the Teleut gene pool has revealed two different components of the Turkic and non-Turkic nature, which gives reason to consider non-Turkic elements in Teleut as aboriginal. The gene pool study of the Chulym Turks is expected to contribute to the issue of language history and Chulym Turkic lexicon which is etymologically vague from the Turkic viewpoint.
The article is devoted to the language situation in the dwelling points of the Teleut, an autocht... more The article is devoted to the language situation in the dwelling points of the Teleut, an autochthonous minority Turkic variety of South Siberia. The fieldtrip data collected in 2013-2014 enable to generally conclude about the preservation rate of Teleut in different age groups and basic spheres of its use. A large impact of the predominant Russian language on Teleut is detected resulting in the big amount of lexical borrowings, which have replaced the original lexicon, and the syntactical distortion of the Teleut speech. Asymmetrical Russian-Teleut bilingualism with the prevalence of Russian is claimed the main reason of this phenomenon.
The article characterizes the current state of the Teleut language, which belongs to the minority... more The article characterizes the current state of the Teleut language, which belongs to the minority Turkic languages of Siberia. An analysis of the position of the Teleut language in existing classifications of Turkic languages is given. Fieldtrip linguistic data on Teleut collected by the authors in 2013–2014 allow to make certain conclusions about the extent of language preservation within different age groups as well as the main language use spheres. There is a significant influence of the Russian language expressing in a large number of loanwords displacing native Turkic words. Also the syntactic rules of Teleut are often being neglected as a result of Russian language impact. “The Teleut language” at the moment is a conditional term for the language of the indigenous Turkic population of Belovo district in Kemerovo region, South Siberia, Russia. In common Turkic languages classifications it is often referred to as a southern dialect of the Altai language. However, there are prerequisites to consider it as a separate language. Despite the genetic links Teleut language has with other Southern Altai dialects, forming together a national literary Altai language, Teleut has a clearly defined geographical location, which does not border on the Altai language area. It is also spoken by a separate and united ethnolinguistic community and has a separate writing and orthography, different from Altai literary language, which is of course still disputable since there are no stable literary rules for modern written Teleut. This allows us to consider the existence of a linguistic cluster comprising Altai and Teleut languages. However this thesis requires more empirical Teleut fieldtrip material with the subsequent analysis of all levels of the language system.
The article dwells on the problems of ethnolinguistic interpretation of the Shor
folklore onomas... more The article dwells on the problems of ethnolinguistic interpretation of the Shor folklore onomasticon. The ethnolinguistic approach to the proper name interpretation is widely accepted in modern onomastic studies. As in the folklore of any other indigenous people, the Shor folklore proper names do not only denote the character, but also carry a lot of hidden information revealing traditional beliefs and culture of the Shor people. Folklore proper names classification is determined by two main principles, which are genre affiliation (myths and legends) and characteristics of object denotation (anthroponyms, toponyms and other classes of proper names). There are few accidental folklore proper names, most proper names are unique in their own way and have their own origin, both linguistic and cultural.
http://ling.tspu.edu.ru/en/archive.html?year=2017&issue=3
LINGUISTICS
Annaj E. K. METAPHORICAL ... more http://ling.tspu.edu.ru/en/archive.html?year=2017&issue=3 LINGUISTICS
Annaj E. K. METAPHORICAL EXPRESSIVES IN TUVAN IN CONTRAST WITH RUSSIAN.
Akhmatova M. A. FUNCTIONAL-SEMANTIC POTENTIAL OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS IN KARACHAY-BALKAR NART EPIC.
Gotovtseva L. M., Nikolaeva T. N., Prokopieva A. K. BASIC BINARY CONCEPTS AS FRAGMENTS OF THE LANGUAGE PICTURE OF THE YAKUTS’ WORLD.
Milovanova M. V., Terentyeva E. V. LEXICAL HYBRIDIZATION TRENDS OF ORAL COMMUNICATION IN POLYLINGUAL SPACE OF MODERN RUSSIA.
Sagaydachnaya A. A. CATEGORY OF NUMBER IN UDIHE.
ANTHROPOLOGY
Borgoiakova T. G. A person and his social space in the khakass language consciousness.
Grinko I. A. NARRATIVES IN THE MUSEUM SPACE: NEW PRACTICES.
Zaytseva T. I. STYLISTIC FEATURES OF GENDER DISCOURSE IN THE CONTEMPORARY DOMESTIC MEDIEVAL STUDIES (FOLLOWING THE HEADLINES OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS).
Tuchkova N. A., Korobejnikova I. A. GUESTHOOD AND HOSPITALITY ACCORDING TO THE SELKUP FOLKLORE AND ETHNOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS.
Yusha Z. M. FOLKLORE AND ETHNOGRAPHIC TRADITIONS OF TUVINIANS OF CHINA (BASED ON 2016 FIELDWORK).
The paper gives an analysis of possession manifestations in Teleut and Chulym-Turkic by means of ... more The paper gives an analysis of possession manifestations in Teleut and Chulym-Turkic by means of noun constructions. Possessive relations in the focus languages form a functional-semantic field, with a grammar core composed of the third-type ezafe constructions as well as combinations of possessive pronouns and nouns marked with possessive affixes. This marking is discourse-featured and optional in case of the 1st and 2nd person possessor, but inalienable possession is manifested by the regular head marking of the personal pronominal possessive constructions. Also non-ezafe and non-possessive usage of the 3rd person possessive affix is featured, which is presumably affected by its article-like function. On the periphery of the possessiveness functional-semantic field there are adyective affixes *-lɨɣ and *-ɣɨ, which imply the possession of an obyect, quality or a feature, or manifest the idea of their accumulation and concentration.
This study encourages a multidisciplinary research to identify parallels in the group belonging a... more This study encourages a multidisciplinary research to identify parallels in the group belonging and chronology of South Siberian Turkic (Chulym Turkic and Bachat Teleut) and Yakut. There is solid evidence that the ancestors of modern Yakuts and their language originate from the Central Asian steppe Proto-Turkic community of the 1 st century BC. South Siberian Turkic varieties have not been studied as thoroughly, but they are expected to have traces of some non-Turkic language substratum. The analysis of the Teleut gene pool has revealed two different components of the Turkic and non-Turkic nature, which gives reason to consider non-Turkic elements in Teleut as aboriginal. The gene pool study of the Chulym Turks is expected to contribute to the issue of language history and Chulym Turkic lexicon which is etymologically vague from the Turkic viewpoint.
The article is devoted to the language situation in the dwelling points of the Teleut, an autocht... more The article is devoted to the language situation in the dwelling points of the Teleut, an autochthonous minority Turkic variety of South Siberia. The fieldtrip data collected in 2013-2014 enable to generally conclude about the preservation rate of Teleut in different age groups and basic spheres of its use. A large impact of the predominant Russian language on Teleut is detected resulting in the big amount of lexical borrowings, which have replaced the original lexicon, and the syntactical distortion of the Teleut speech. Asymmetrical Russian-Teleut bilingualism with the prevalence of Russian is claimed the main reason of this phenomenon.
The article characterizes the current state of the Teleut language, which belongs to the minority... more The article characterizes the current state of the Teleut language, which belongs to the minority Turkic languages of Siberia. An analysis of the position of the Teleut language in existing classifications of Turkic languages is given. Fieldtrip linguistic data on Teleut collected by the authors in 2013–2014 allow to make certain conclusions about the extent of language preservation within different age groups as well as the main language use spheres. There is a significant influence of the Russian language expressing in a large number of loanwords displacing native Turkic words. Also the syntactic rules of Teleut are often being neglected as a result of Russian language impact. “The Teleut language” at the moment is a conditional term for the language of the indigenous Turkic population of Belovo district in Kemerovo region, South Siberia, Russia. In common Turkic languages classifications it is often referred to as a southern dialect of the Altai language. However, there are prerequisites to consider it as a separate language. Despite the genetic links Teleut language has with other Southern Altai dialects, forming together a national literary Altai language, Teleut has a clearly defined geographical location, which does not border on the Altai language area. It is also spoken by a separate and united ethnolinguistic community and has a separate writing and orthography, different from Altai literary language, which is of course still disputable since there are no stable literary rules for modern written Teleut. This allows us to consider the existence of a linguistic cluster comprising Altai and Teleut languages. However this thesis requires more empirical Teleut fieldtrip material with the subsequent analysis of all levels of the language system.
The article dwells on the problems of ethnolinguistic interpretation of the Shor
folklore onomas... more The article dwells on the problems of ethnolinguistic interpretation of the Shor folklore onomasticon. The ethnolinguistic approach to the proper name interpretation is widely accepted in modern onomastic studies. As in the folklore of any other indigenous people, the Shor folklore proper names do not only denote the character, but also carry a lot of hidden information revealing traditional beliefs and culture of the Shor people. Folklore proper names classification is determined by two main principles, which are genre affiliation (myths and legends) and characteristics of object denotation (anthroponyms, toponyms and other classes of proper names). There are few accidental folklore proper names, most proper names are unique in their own way and have their own origin, both linguistic and cultural.
http://ling.tspu.edu.ru/en/archive.html?year=2017&issue=3
LINGUISTICS
Annaj E. K. METAPHORICAL ... more http://ling.tspu.edu.ru/en/archive.html?year=2017&issue=3 LINGUISTICS
Annaj E. K. METAPHORICAL EXPRESSIVES IN TUVAN IN CONTRAST WITH RUSSIAN.
Akhmatova M. A. FUNCTIONAL-SEMANTIC POTENTIAL OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS IN KARACHAY-BALKAR NART EPIC.
Gotovtseva L. M., Nikolaeva T. N., Prokopieva A. K. BASIC BINARY CONCEPTS AS FRAGMENTS OF THE LANGUAGE PICTURE OF THE YAKUTS’ WORLD.
Milovanova M. V., Terentyeva E. V. LEXICAL HYBRIDIZATION TRENDS OF ORAL COMMUNICATION IN POLYLINGUAL SPACE OF MODERN RUSSIA.
Sagaydachnaya A. A. CATEGORY OF NUMBER IN UDIHE.
ANTHROPOLOGY
Borgoiakova T. G. A person and his social space in the khakass language consciousness.
Grinko I. A. NARRATIVES IN THE MUSEUM SPACE: NEW PRACTICES.
Zaytseva T. I. STYLISTIC FEATURES OF GENDER DISCOURSE IN THE CONTEMPORARY DOMESTIC MEDIEVAL STUDIES (FOLLOWING THE HEADLINES OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS).
Tuchkova N. A., Korobejnikova I. A. GUESTHOOD AND HOSPITALITY ACCORDING TO THE SELKUP FOLKLORE AND ETHNOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS.
Yusha Z. M. FOLKLORE AND ETHNOGRAPHIC TRADITIONS OF TUVINIANS OF CHINA (BASED ON 2016 FIELDWORK).
Uploads
Papers
constructions. Possessive relations in the focus languages form a functional-semantic field, with a grammar core
composed of the third-type ezafe constructions as well as combinations of possessive pronouns and nouns marked
with possessive affixes. This marking is discourse-featured and optional in case of the 1st and 2nd person possessor,
but inalienable possession is manifested by the regular head marking of the personal pronominal possessive
constructions. Also non-ezafe and non-possessive usage of the 3rd person possessive affix is featured, which is
presumably affected by its article-like function.
On the periphery of the possessiveness functional-semantic field there are adyective affixes *-lɨɣ and *-ɣɨ, which
imply the possession of an obyect, quality or a feature, or manifest the idea of their accumulation and concentration.
of Siberia. An analysis of the position of the Teleut language in existing classifications of Turkic languages is given.
Fieldtrip linguistic data on Teleut collected by the authors in 2013–2014 allow to make certain conclusions about the
extent of language preservation within different age groups as well as the main language use spheres. There is a
significant influence of the Russian language expressing in a large number of loanwords displacing native Turkic
words. Also the syntactic rules of Teleut are often being neglected as a result of Russian language impact.
“The Teleut language” at the moment is a conditional term for the language of the indigenous Turkic population of
Belovo district in Kemerovo region, South Siberia, Russia. In common Turkic languages classifications it is often
referred to as a southern dialect of the Altai language. However, there are prerequisites to consider it as a separate
language. Despite the genetic links Teleut language has with other Southern Altai dialects, forming together a national
literary Altai language, Teleut has a clearly defined geographical location, which does not border on the Altai language
area. It is also spoken by a separate and united ethnolinguistic community and has a separate writing and orthography,
different from Altai literary language, which is of course still disputable since there are no stable literary rules for
modern written Teleut. This allows us to consider the existence of a linguistic cluster comprising Altai and Teleut
languages. However this thesis requires more empirical Teleut fieldtrip material with the subsequent analysis of all
levels of the language system.
folklore onomasticon. The ethnolinguistic approach to the proper name interpretation is widely
accepted in modern onomastic studies. As in the folklore of any other indigenous people, the
Shor folklore proper names do not only denote the character, but also carry a lot of hidden
information revealing traditional beliefs and culture of the Shor people. Folklore proper names
classification is determined by two main principles, which are genre affiliation (myths and
legends) and characteristics of object denotation (anthroponyms, toponyms and other classes of
proper names). There are few accidental folklore proper names, most proper names are unique
in their own way and have their own origin, both linguistic and cultural.
Journal Editorship
LINGUISTICS
Annaj E. K. METAPHORICAL EXPRESSIVES IN TUVAN IN CONTRAST WITH RUSSIAN.
Akhmatova M. A. FUNCTIONAL-SEMANTIC POTENTIAL OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS IN KARACHAY-BALKAR NART EPIC.
Gotovtseva L. M., Nikolaeva T. N., Prokopieva A. K. BASIC BINARY CONCEPTS AS FRAGMENTS OF THE LANGUAGE PICTURE OF THE YAKUTS’ WORLD.
Milovanova M. V., Terentyeva E. V. LEXICAL HYBRIDIZATION TRENDS OF ORAL COMMUNICATION IN POLYLINGUAL SPACE OF MODERN RUSSIA.
Sagaydachnaya A. A. CATEGORY OF NUMBER IN UDIHE.
ANTHROPOLOGY
Borgoiakova T. G. A person and his social space in the khakass language consciousness.
Grinko I. A. NARRATIVES IN THE MUSEUM SPACE: NEW PRACTICES.
Zaytseva T. I. STYLISTIC FEATURES OF GENDER DISCOURSE IN THE CONTEMPORARY DOMESTIC MEDIEVAL STUDIES (FOLLOWING THE HEADLINES OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS).
Tuchkova N. A., Korobejnikova I. A. GUESTHOOD AND HOSPITALITY ACCORDING TO THE SELKUP FOLKLORE AND ETHNOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS.
Yusha Z. M. FOLKLORE AND ETHNOGRAPHIC TRADITIONS OF TUVINIANS OF CHINA (BASED ON 2016 FIELDWORK).
constructions. Possessive relations in the focus languages form a functional-semantic field, with a grammar core
composed of the third-type ezafe constructions as well as combinations of possessive pronouns and nouns marked
with possessive affixes. This marking is discourse-featured and optional in case of the 1st and 2nd person possessor,
but inalienable possession is manifested by the regular head marking of the personal pronominal possessive
constructions. Also non-ezafe and non-possessive usage of the 3rd person possessive affix is featured, which is
presumably affected by its article-like function.
On the periphery of the possessiveness functional-semantic field there are adyective affixes *-lɨɣ and *-ɣɨ, which
imply the possession of an obyect, quality or a feature, or manifest the idea of their accumulation and concentration.
of Siberia. An analysis of the position of the Teleut language in existing classifications of Turkic languages is given.
Fieldtrip linguistic data on Teleut collected by the authors in 2013–2014 allow to make certain conclusions about the
extent of language preservation within different age groups as well as the main language use spheres. There is a
significant influence of the Russian language expressing in a large number of loanwords displacing native Turkic
words. Also the syntactic rules of Teleut are often being neglected as a result of Russian language impact.
“The Teleut language” at the moment is a conditional term for the language of the indigenous Turkic population of
Belovo district in Kemerovo region, South Siberia, Russia. In common Turkic languages classifications it is often
referred to as a southern dialect of the Altai language. However, there are prerequisites to consider it as a separate
language. Despite the genetic links Teleut language has with other Southern Altai dialects, forming together a national
literary Altai language, Teleut has a clearly defined geographical location, which does not border on the Altai language
area. It is also spoken by a separate and united ethnolinguistic community and has a separate writing and orthography,
different from Altai literary language, which is of course still disputable since there are no stable literary rules for
modern written Teleut. This allows us to consider the existence of a linguistic cluster comprising Altai and Teleut
languages. However this thesis requires more empirical Teleut fieldtrip material with the subsequent analysis of all
levels of the language system.
folklore onomasticon. The ethnolinguistic approach to the proper name interpretation is widely
accepted in modern onomastic studies. As in the folklore of any other indigenous people, the
Shor folklore proper names do not only denote the character, but also carry a lot of hidden
information revealing traditional beliefs and culture of the Shor people. Folklore proper names
classification is determined by two main principles, which are genre affiliation (myths and
legends) and characteristics of object denotation (anthroponyms, toponyms and other classes of
proper names). There are few accidental folklore proper names, most proper names are unique
in their own way and have their own origin, both linguistic and cultural.
LINGUISTICS
Annaj E. K. METAPHORICAL EXPRESSIVES IN TUVAN IN CONTRAST WITH RUSSIAN.
Akhmatova M. A. FUNCTIONAL-SEMANTIC POTENTIAL OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS IN KARACHAY-BALKAR NART EPIC.
Gotovtseva L. M., Nikolaeva T. N., Prokopieva A. K. BASIC BINARY CONCEPTS AS FRAGMENTS OF THE LANGUAGE PICTURE OF THE YAKUTS’ WORLD.
Milovanova M. V., Terentyeva E. V. LEXICAL HYBRIDIZATION TRENDS OF ORAL COMMUNICATION IN POLYLINGUAL SPACE OF MODERN RUSSIA.
Sagaydachnaya A. A. CATEGORY OF NUMBER IN UDIHE.
ANTHROPOLOGY
Borgoiakova T. G. A person and his social space in the khakass language consciousness.
Grinko I. A. NARRATIVES IN THE MUSEUM SPACE: NEW PRACTICES.
Zaytseva T. I. STYLISTIC FEATURES OF GENDER DISCOURSE IN THE CONTEMPORARY DOMESTIC MEDIEVAL STUDIES (FOLLOWING THE HEADLINES OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS).
Tuchkova N. A., Korobejnikova I. A. GUESTHOOD AND HOSPITALITY ACCORDING TO THE SELKUP FOLKLORE AND ETHNOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS.
Yusha Z. M. FOLKLORE AND ETHNOGRAPHIC TRADITIONS OF TUVINIANS OF CHINA (BASED ON 2016 FIELDWORK).