User talk:Microchip08/Archive/5
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please see above conversation, can you help? Thanks - tholly --Talk-- 10:23, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Simple News Issue Two
Issue 2 - 13th December 2008 37,332 editors, 41,432 articles, 109,917 pages. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Announcements | ♥ | Administrators | ||||||
| ||||||||
|
[Subscribe] [Dates] [Discussion] [The Team] |
|
--GoblinBot1 (talk) 17:22, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Nations' cup
Hello Microchip08/Archive. I'm very sorry but the nations cup will have to be postponed until further notice as our judges have concerns about the rules and organization of it. However the Editors cup will go ahead as planned. Thanks, Yotcmdr Sign up for the wikicup =talk= 19:35, 15 December 2008 (UTC) |
Merry Christmas!
Microchip08, I hope that you have a very Merry Christmas 2008, and that Santa brings you everything you want :P. If you are going away anywhere, have a great time, and whatever else you do I really hope you enjoy it!
BG7even 21:56, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Wikicup has started
The Wikicup has started! Good luck! |
Yotbot (talk) 01:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikicup Notice
Hello Microchip08/Archive. We have come to a conclusion after dicussing the way points should be counted. You must make a page were you keep record of your edits. It should look like this and it should be called user:Microchip08/Archive/Wikicup Edit Count. It will be checked by our judges to make sure there is no cheating. If we find that there was a very large margin of error, you will be disqualified. Remember, any edit which does not figure on this page will not be counted in your final score. Thank you for your attention. |
Yotbot (talk) 23:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
WikiCup Points
Hello Microchip08/Archive. You may stop updating your wikicup edit count (unless told otherwise by a judge) as it will be done by a judge from now on. Thank you, Yotbot (talk) 21:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC) |
Simple News Issue Three
Issue 3 - 19th January 2009 42,058 editors, 53,245 articles, 124,392 pages. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Announcements | ♥ | Administrators | ||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
[Subscribe] [Dates] [Discussion] [The Team] |
|
--GoblinBot3 (talk) 20:44, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Nudity
You commented at the voting discussion for Wikipedia:Proposed_very_good_articles#Nudity_2. Another user has expressed concerns that there are some sourcing issues with the article that need to be addressed before this is passed as a very good article. Would you mind reviewing the discussion at the vote page and adding your input (or help to find sources, if you can)? Thank you, Either way (talk) 22:02, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
RfA Thankspam
GoblinBot3 (talk) 11:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
My RfA
Thank you for participating in my recent request for adminship, which passed with a total of 21/5. I will try to the best of my abilities to maintain the trust of the community, and I will carefully consider the opposes to learn how to further improve. Cheers, Juliancolton (talk) 14:08, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
But it doesn't update on Thursdays, and I already read it yesterday
Since I'm a RC stalker and all. ;) EVula // talk // 21:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Omai. MC8 (talk) 21:53, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Freddy, Battleman, etc.
Go here for more information. He's a persistent troublemaker who likes to insert his unsupported edits about boxing, the poisoning of Stalin and Alexander the Great, and other things. He's been banned numerous times here.
I know he's the banned user for a few reasons: he's been harassing me for two years and so I'm familiar with his style, he makes the same edits here and over at English Wiki, his horrible spelling and grammar, his labeling of any attempts to clean up his work as "vandalism", etc. If you want to explore this user's troubled history, I'll be free to help you do so.
Plus, as I mentioned in my Olympic Auditorium edit, he wants to use other wikis to prove his point. They aren't reliable sources. So even if he wasn't banned his edit is unsupported.MKil (talk) 16:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)MKil
- Hello, boxrec THE BOXING ENCYCLOPEDIA IS THE MECCA OF BOXING, yet, mkil wants to prove how great he is, it is virtually impossible to argue with him nor is it possible, he has been banned before. http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.php/Olympic_Auditorium
- Also, stalin, if you go under history, you will read link from ny times on warfarin poisoning, evidence was provided, mkil deleted khrushchev and stalin's burial, in 1961 stalin was moved from Lenin's mausuleum behind Kremlin's wall (destalinization). Alexander great, poisoned with strychnine in wine, is another theory, all these things are given and they are readily available all over internet, these theories have been around for centuries, yet Mkil WILL NEVER, NEVER read source or listen to a reason!
- http://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikita_Khrushchev&diff=1336477&oldid=1336258 why revert facts? It's called khrushchev's thaw http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=khrushchev+moved+stalin%27s+body+in+1961&aq=f&oq=
- Unfortunately being logical with mkil is an absolute impossibility. The principles that guide reasoning within a given field or situation he will never comprehand. Always puts blame on others! — Preceding unsigned comment added by errorswhat (talk • contribs)
- The above speaks for itself. Please review the edits made by Freddy and his sockpuppets as well as the anonymous IPs on the Stalin, Khruschev, and other pages. His style is, to put it kindly, unique and easy identified. He's been banned her and yet returns again and again to make edits, call me psycho, say I'm part of the mafia, etc.MKil (talk) 17:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)MKil
- Being banned has nothing to do with this conversation, mkil did not refute given facts about oympiic stadium capacity, he is simply shifting the blame on others, and if i made some spelling mistakes, my keyboard has problems. Yes, please review freddy's edits and fine contributions made to John Paul II, creation of many articles, yet that is not the point, the point is evidence was given on the above articles yet mr. king of vandals mkil kept on reverting, it's clear he has personal vandetta against some people, no matter how right you are, he will revert things and shift the blame on other insane subjects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by errorswhat (talk • contribs)
- Well, i have to go to work (unlike mkil), if you want to unblock freddy who should not have been banned in first place ok, if not ok as well, if you want to revert mkil's olympic version, be my guest, i tried to fix things, i appreciate your neutrality, it's never been around on wikipedias!
Mkil has administratorship help, so also proves nothing is fair here! But what goes up, crashes down hard, last laugh is mine!
Unblock
Thanx for your neutrality, but lowlife administrator blocked my ip's, i am writing from work, will only reply to you via method i told you. You can unblock me, in return you get a lot back, my knowledge is deep. I cant write from work, just got promoted to manager. I am not allowed, but mkil problem is 3 years old, mkil is a very cold individual.. love your neighbour, I tried, he will even demand proof people need to breath oxygen to live, go figure. Check jp2 page, it was nominated for excellence, improved by Fredy, example how others should look like, mkil's talk page, check marciano decision, i was right yet again! If u want good edits, fine, if not, fine, showd wikipedia's ignorance! Im not wasting time with hypocrites!
- I'd rather not use email for things such as this, as other editors can clarify points if I make a mistake. I'm confused: is there anything you wish me to do? MC8 (talk) 19:34, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- Sure, i cant type here and have no intention replying when I have free time, just for this, as explained why, just get in touch directly, some things are private. The things we need to correct we can discuss over here. You have to understand my frustration with some people here who are totally cold n indifferent!
- Conspiracy section ? Cool, for every article of a politician!
- Well... removing info on Stalin's burial is barbarism, 1961 date it was moved it's not conspiracy, well known fact thats everywhere!
http://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikita_Khrushchev&diff=1337697&oldid=1337695 all correct no need to revert!
- Once you get suspended (AND I WAS NOT SUSPENDED FOR CONTENT BUT FOR PRIVATE DISPUTE WITH CERTAIN PATHETIC ADMINISTRATOR) it's a given form unfortunately on wikipedia, edits get reverted no matter how good, but this way wikipedia is only hurting itself, well, i will look for your reply (here & as explained) by friday!
- I am not an administrator (yet!), so I cannot unblock you. If you would like to help Wikipedia get better, please have a look at this page. MC8 (talk) 08:19, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Unfortunately way too many people have special agendas,created their own stupid rules, well u know what to do, some of the users, like below are in agreement with others so they look bad, therefore they get more votes and overvote the ones they hate, but everything has its limits and ends... Some create policies, evil people will find ways1, as they will neever admit to mistakees!
Rollback
Hi, MC, I have responded to your concern on WP:ANI, however I'd suggest that we continue the discussion here or on my talk page if you want to so as to not clutter up ANI. Take care, and let me know if you need any further explanation :-) fr33kman t - c 19:55, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Simple News Issue Three
Issue 4 - 2th March 2009 50,066 editors, 55,989 articles, 130,886 pages. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Announcements | ♥ | Administrators | ||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
[Subscribe] [Dates] [Discussion] [The Team] |
|
--GoblinBot3 (talk) 22:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Simple News Issue Five
Issue 5 - 16th March 2009 52,806 editors, 56,607 articles, 133,001 pages. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Announcements | ♥ | Administrators | ||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
[Subscribe] [Archives] [Discussion] [The Team] |
|
--GoblinBot3 (talk) 12:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Request for global JavaScript and user_talk pages (Synchbot)
Hello Microchip08. You now have global JavaScript as you requested (see discussion and edit log). However, I'm no longer running the bot for user description or talk pages, unless you first create an account on all Wikimedia wikis where the bot will run (see the instructions on that page). Let me know if you're interested in doing that. —Pathoschild 09:16:03, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Oh noes
Congratulations: You have been given a Barnstar! |
Meetare Shappy Cunkelfratz! 21:33, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Simple News Issue 6
Issue 6 - 28th April 2009 60,218 editors, 58,333 articles, 138,873 pages. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Announcements | ♥ | Administrators | ||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
[Subscribe] [Archives] [Discussion] [The Team] |
|
GoblinBot3 (talk) 18:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Mass QD tagging
Please cease your QD tagging immediately. There has been no clear consensus on AN regarding CM16 yet. Until then, all of his user pages should stay. Thanks. Chenzw Talk 12:21, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
RE: C:QD
Yeah, but I find it easier to write that :P GARDEN 21:19, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
A pun?
User:Razorflame has given you some cookies! Now enjoy them! |
A pun? Giving a chocolate chip cookie to Chippy? :D Anyways, cheers, Razorflame 16:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
your RfD
Read the en.wp article. It explains why that article is notable (I just wanted to point it out). Griffinofwales (talk) 18:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
List of diplomatic missions in Russia
What is bad about my article? Oxana879 (talk) 19:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Sig
<3 — This signed comment was added by Kennedy (talk • changes). (I ♥ MC8) 10:26, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Aleksa Lukic
Good idea, thanks! fr33kman talk 21:32, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Bambifan problem
Hi. I'm trying to help both this site and EN with a long-term problem user. I have no desire to rehab him over here and I'll move the conversation (and this user) back over to EN the moment he answers. I simply have no other way to communicate with this user. Thanks for understanding. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:42, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Simple News Issue 7
Issue 7 - 8th June 2009 67,135 editors, 59,528 articles, 143,118 pages. | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Announcements | ♥ | Administrators | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
[Subscribe] [Archives] [Discussion] [The Team] |
|
GoblinBot3 (talk) 11:29, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Simple News Issue 8
Issue 8 - 22th June 2009 69,053 editors, 59,757 articles, 144,395 pages. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Announcements | ♥ | Administrators | ||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
[Subscribe] [Issues] [Discussion] [The Team] |
|