Skip to main content
Sean Patrick  O'Rourke
  • 122 Gailor Hall
    Stamler Center for Letters
    Sewanee: The University of the South
    Box 1385
    735 University Avenue
    Sewanee,  TN 37383
  • 8649089946
Rhetoric, Race, Religion, and the Charleston Shootings: Was Blind but Now I See is a collection focusing on the Charleston shootings written by leading scholars in the field who consider the rhetoric surrounding the shootings. This book... more
Rhetoric, Race, Religion, and the Charleston Shootings: Was Blind but Now I See is a collection focusing on the Charleston shootings written by leading scholars in the field who consider the rhetoric surrounding the shootings. This book offers an appraisal of the discourses – speeches, editorials, social media posts, visual images, prayers, songs, silence, demonstrations, and protests – that constituted, contested, and reconstituted the shootings in American civic life and cultural memory. It answers recent calls for local and regional studies and opens new fields of inquiry in the rhetoric, sociology, and history of mass killings, gun violence, and race relations—and it does so while forging new connections between and among on-going scholarly conversations about rhetoric, race, and religion. Contributors argue that Charleston was different from other mass shootings in America, and that this difference was made manifest through what was spoken and unspoken in its rhetorical aftermath. Scholars of race, religion, rhetoric, communication, and sociology will find this book particularly useful.
The calls for academics to engage the public have grown, motivated by concerns for civic health and for maintaining public and political support for higher education and academic research. Whatever its value to the public sphere, there is... more
The calls for academics to engage the public have grown, motivated by concerns for civic health and for maintaining public and political support for higher education and academic research. Whatever its value to the public sphere, there is still considerable uncertainty about whether and how public engagement counts–is it valued by colleagues and institutions in promotion and tenure decisions? We sought to provide evidence to assess the value of public engagement with experimental and observational methods set in a survey of faculty from seven liberal arts colleges. We find that public engagement is valued and engaged by these faculty, with variation observed by institution, mode of public engagement, and college division (arts faculty the most supportive and science faculty the least). We recommend institutions communicate clearly how they value public engagement; until that point, academics should tread carefully as they seek public audiences and partnerships.
Research Interests:
Sean Patrick O'Rourke: Introduction: On Saturday, November 20, 1993, five historians of rhetoric presented papers on the question, "What is the most significant passage on rhetoric in the works of Francis Bacon?" The American Society for... more
Sean Patrick O'Rourke: Introduction: On Saturday, November 20, 1993, five historians of rhetoric presented papers on the question, "What is the most significant passage on rhetoric in the works of Francis Bacon?" The American Society for the History of Rhetoric ...
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:

And 16 more

This speech, delivered at the invitation of Furman University's Mere Christianity Forum and rooted in Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials series, argues that Christians and others should pursue a "republic of heaven."
Research Interests:
Speech given at the dedication of the Learning Commons in the Jessie du Pont Library, Sewanee: The University of the South. Argues that wisdom and eloquence are at the heart of liberal education in the 21st century.
Research Interests:
This essay celebrates Young Scholars in Writing’s first ten years by considering the journal’s Comment and Response section. It locates the activity of commenting on and responding to peer scholarship at the heart of traditional education... more
This essay celebrates Young Scholars in Writing’s first ten years by considering the journal’s Comment and Response section. It locates the activity of commenting on and responding to peer scholarship at the heart of traditional education in rhetoric, argues for an approach that emphasizes controversia, the more or less Ciceronian notion of considering both or all sides of a question, details the comment and response assignment at Furman University, and considers several benefits of commenting on and responding to peer scholarship.
The calls for academics to engage the public have grown, motivated by concerns for civic health and for maintaining public and political support for higher education and academic research. Whatever its value to the public sphere, there is... more
The calls for academics to engage the public have grown, motivated by concerns for civic health and for maintaining public and political support for higher education and academic research. Whatever its value to the public sphere, there is still considerable uncertainty about whether and how public engagement counts–is it valued by colleagues and institutions in promotion and tenure decisions? We sought to provide evidence to assess the value of public engagement with experimental and observational methods set in a survey of faculty from seven liberal arts colleges. We find that public engagement is valued and engaged by these faculty, with variation observed by institution, mode of public engagement, and college division (arts faculty the most supportive and science faculty the least). We recommend institutions communicate clearly how they value public engagement; until that point, academics should tread carefully as they seek public audiences and partnerships.
This essay considers questions about civility raised in the discourse responding to the January 2011 shootings in Tucson, Arizona. Focusing on two sites of discord—the debate in the media and President Obama’s address at the memorial... more
This essay considers questions about civility raised in the discourse responding to the January 2011 shootings in Tucson, Arizona. Focusing on two sites of discord—the debate in the media and President Obama’s address at the memorial service for the victims—our analysis identifies two conceptions of civility and their corresponding assumptions about democracy and community, provides a critique of both conceptions, and offers a conceptual framework for rhetorical critics studying civility.
Theproblemof textual circulation at the heart of this forumhas a rich and complicated genealogy. Issues of textual provenance, authenticity, transcription, translation, and accuracy, so central to the inquiries of the Renaissance... more
Theproblemof textual circulation at the heart of this forumhas a rich and complicated genealogy. Issues of textual provenance, authenticity, transcription, translation, and accuracy, so central to the inquiries of the Renaissance humanists, have quite recently given way to questions raised by postmodern culture’s media-saturated environments: textual fragmentation, distribution, consumption, and redistribution by and in multicultural and frequently transnational publics and counterpublics, in nonsynchronous, nonlinear, nonpunctual interchanges. Few studies, however, have considered the circulation of photographic texts or the question examined in this essay: howmight the strategic circulation of some photographic texts and the noncirculation of others serve to buttress a status quo buckling under the assaulting forces of change? How might circulation and noncirculation serve the rhetoric of those seeking to control or stifle that change? Working from the assumption that the civil rights movement was a fundamentally rhetorical activity, this short essay considers the rhetoric of visual argument in the photographs published (and not published) by the