E53A Adding missed properties on IncrementalExecutionResultImpl.Builder.from by Juliano-Prado · Pull Request #3593 · graphql-java/graphql-java · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Adding missed properties on IncrementalExecutionResultImpl.Builder.from#3593

Merged
bbakerman merged 3 commits intographql-java:masterfrom
Juliano-Prado:Adding-properties-on-IncrementalExecutionResultImpl-build-from
Jun 1, 2024
Merged

Adding missed properties on IncrementalExecutionResultImpl.Builder.from#3593
bbakerman merged 3 commits intographql-java:masterfrom
Juliano-Prado:Adding-properties-on-IncrementalExecutionResultImpl-build-from

Conversation

@Juliano-Prado
Copy link
Contributor

Adding two missed properties on IncrementalExecutionResultImpl.Builder.from

super.from(incrementalExecutionResult);
this.hasNext = incrementalExecutionResult.hasNext();
this.incremental = incrementalExecutionResult.getIncremental();
this.incrementalItemPublisher = incrementalExecutionResult.g 6880 etIncrementalItemPublisher();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps you were already in the progress of doing it. Could you please add a test for this?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Test please

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've added the tests, check out: src/test/groovy/graphql/incremental/IncrementalExecutionResultTest.groovy

…Test.groovy

Co-authored-by: dondonz <13839920+dondonz@users.noreply.github.com>
@bbakerman bbakerman added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 1, 2024
Merged via the queue into graphql-java:master with commit 481854e Jun 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

0