'),o.close()}("https://assets.zendesk.com/embeddable_framework/main.js","jmir.zendesk.com");/*]]>*/

Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Mar 5, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 12, 2021 - Jun 12, 2021
Date Accepted: Jul 5, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessing Professionals’ Adoption Readiness for eMental Health: Development and Validation of the eMental Health Adoption Readiness Scale

Feijt M, de Kort Y, Westerink J, Bierbooms J, Bongers I, IJsselsteijn W

Assessing Professionals’ Adoption Readiness for eMental Health: Development and Validation of the eMental Health Adoption Readiness Scale

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(9):e28518

DOI: 10.2196/28518

PMID: 34533469

PMCID: 8486999

Assessing Professionals' Adoption Readiness for eMental Health: Development and Validation of the eMental Health Adoption Readiness (eMHAR) Scale

  • Milou Feijt; 
  • Yvonne de Kort; 
  • Joyce Westerink; 
  • Joyce Bierbooms; 
  • Inge Bongers; 
  • Wijnand IJsselsteijn

ABSTRACT

Background:

Over the last decades, significant advances have been made in the development of digital tools and applications for mental healthcare. Yet, despite growing evidence for their effectiveness, their acceptance and use in clinical practice remain low. To gain further insights in the process of eMental Health adoption and to facilitate future research on this topic, a validated and easy-to-use instrument to assess professionals' readiness to adopt eMental Health is necessary.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to develop and validate an instrument for assessing mental healthcare professionals' adoption readiness for eMental Health.

Methods:

Item generation was guided by literature and input from mental healthcare professionals and experts in survey development. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted on an initial set of 29 items completed by a sample of mental healthcare professionals (N = 432), after which the scale was reduced to 15 items in an iterative process. The factor structure thus obtained was subsequently tested with a confirmatory factor analysis with a second sample of mental healthcare professionals (N = 363). Internal consistency, convergent validity and predictive validity of the eMHAR Scale were assessed.

Results:

Exploratory factor analyses resulted in a three-factor solution with 15 items. The factors were analyzed and labeled as ‘perceived benefits and applicability of EMH’, ‘EMH proactive innovation’, and ‘EMH self-efficacy’. These factors were confirmed through a confirmatory factor analysis. The total scale and subscales showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.73-0.88) and acceptable convergent and predictive relations to related constructs.

Conclusions:

The constructed eMHAR Scale showed a conceptually interpretable three-factor structure with satisfactory characteristics and relationships with relevant concepts. Its ease of use allows for a quick acquisition of data that can contribute to understanding and facilitating the process of adoption of eMental Health by clinical professionals.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Feijt M, de Kort Y, Westerink J, Bierbooms J, Bongers I, IJsselsteijn W

Assessing Professionals’ Adoption Readiness for eMental Health: Development and Validation of the eMental Health Adoption Readiness Scale

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(9):e28518

DOI: 10.2196/28518

PMID: 34533469

PMCID: 8486999

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time. Copyright

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.