george gaiko
Greetings! My name is George, I am 29 and I graduated from the Faculty of Philosophy twice! In the first specialty, I am a "specialist philosopher." Do not be surprised, I received my first education in the old Russian educational system. Second education - Master in Philosophy of Arts.
As it is not difficult to guess, I am engaged in metaphysics and philosophy of art. Albert Camus, Socrates, Kazemir Malevich, Graham Harman + Quentin Meillassoux and Eastern philosophy had the greatest influence on me. More precisely, now I am engaged in Object Oriented Ontology and the history of visual arts.
I hope you will be interested to read my work. I do not promise that their number will grow rapidly, but in the near future I plan to write an article on the philosophy of Albert Camus.
Supervisors: Alina Boyko (advisor and co-author) and Sergey Terechov (supervisor)
Phone: +79606479117
Address: Russian Federation, Orel
As it is not difficult to guess, I am engaged in metaphysics and philosophy of art. Albert Camus, Socrates, Kazemir Malevich, Graham Harman + Quentin Meillassoux and Eastern philosophy had the greatest influence on me. More precisely, now I am engaged in Object Oriented Ontology and the history of visual arts.
I hope you will be interested to read my work. I do not promise that their number will grow rapidly, but in the near future I plan to write an article on the philosophy of Albert Camus.
Supervisors: Alina Boyko (advisor and co-author) and Sergey Terechov (supervisor)
Phone: +79606479117
Address: Russian Federation, Orel
less
Uploads
The authors consider Harman’s concept to be one of the main achievements of modern philosophy.
This concept makes it possible to overcome the problem of objectivity as such and to gain access to the
object uncorrelated by the subject of knowledge. Using the presented scheme of the object, the authors
postulate the absence of the subject and subject-object relations based on correlations. Thus, the problem
of objectivity is solved in a radical way. However, Harman’s object-oriented ontology does not explain
how the relations between uncorrelated objects occur. It is essential to find the way to describe the mechanism
of interaction between objects in which the object remains real, i.e. uncorrelated, and at the same
time sensual, accessible for perception and interaction. That is why the authors turn to Jacques Derrida’s
concept of deconstruction. Its application to the analysis of relations between objects in Graham Harman’s
object-oriented ontology allows the authors to deabsolutize correlationism as the only possible way
of relations between objects, and at the same time to preserve it as a way of interaction between objects.
The nature of the relations between objects can be logically explained by the philosophy of Albert Camus,
through combining his method of cognition with the principle of deconstruction. Using this method,
the authors come to a conclusion that correlations necessarily arise when objects interact, which allows
them to manifest themselves as accessible. However, the existence of objects by themselves takes place
without correlations. They are a condition for the appearance of a sensory object, but they are not possible
with the existence of real objects on their own. The method proposed shows that the relations of objects
represent an inextricable duality of the sensual and the real object, which is manifested in their knowableunknowable
nature. Studying the nature of interaction between objects in Graham Harman’s objectoriented
ontology with the help of this method allows better understanding of the problem of objectivity
as such. This issue requires further, more extensive, study and discussion.
description of the object as such. But ООО is not without flaw. The most obvious is the absence of a description of the relationship of the real and sensual object. To solve these problem is to learn to read the map.
We believe that the theory of knowledge (that we find in Camus`s philosophy) and ontology have one object of research, but different subject of research. And we find our method in the theory of knowledge, because we believe that it can study the relationship between objects. We study and use this method of studying and understanding relationship RO-SO. With it, we describe the interaction between two type of objects.
The authors consider Harman’s concept to be one of the main achievements of modern philosophy.
This concept makes it possible to overcome the problem of objectivity as such and to gain access to the
object uncorrelated by the subject of knowledge. Using the presented scheme of the object, the authors
postulate the absence of the subject and subject-object relations based on correlations. Thus, the problem
of objectivity is solved in a radical way. However, Harman’s object-oriented ontology does not explain
how the relations between uncorrelated objects occur. It is essential to find the way to describe the mechanism
of interaction between objects in which the object remains real, i.e. uncorrelated, and at the same
time sensual, accessible for perception and interaction. That is why the authors turn to Jacques Derrida’s
concept of deconstruction. Its application to the analysis of relations between objects in Graham Harman’s
object-oriented ontology allows the authors to deabsolutize correlationism as the only possible way
of relations between objects, and at the same time to preserve it as a way of interaction between objects.
The nature of the relations between objects can be logically explained by the philosophy of Albert Camus,
through combining his method of cognition with the principle of deconstruction. Using this method,
the authors come to a conclusion that correlations necessarily arise when objects interact, which allows
them to manifest themselves as accessible. However, the existence of objects by themselves takes place
without correlations. They are a condition for the appearance of a sensory object, but they are not possible
with the existence of real objects on their own. The method proposed shows that the relations of objects
represent an inextricable duality of the sensual and the real object, which is manifested in their knowableunknowable
nature. Studying the nature of interaction between objects in Graham Harman’s objectoriented
ontology with the help of this method allows better understanding of the problem of objectivity
as such. This issue requires further, more extensive, study and discussion.
description of the object as such. But ООО is not without flaw. The most obvious is the absence of a description of the relationship of the real and sensual object. To solve these problem is to learn to read the map.
We believe that the theory of knowledge (that we find in Camus`s philosophy) and ontology have one object of research, but different subject of research. And we find our method in the theory of knowledge, because we believe that it can study the relationship between objects. We study and use this method of studying and understanding relationship RO-SO. With it, we describe the interaction between two type of objects.