Liu et al., 2024 - Google Patents
Coral: A blockchain protocol for handling transactions with deadline constraintsLiu et al., 2024
- Document ID
- 9597495370746915497
- Author
- Liu Y
- Jia L
- Wang X
- Huang H
- Zhao Q
- Li Z
- Sun Y
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Computer Networks
External Links
Snippet
Transactions with deadline constraints are prevalent in blockchain-based scenarios like auctions, elections, and supply chain management, where only transactions completed within an exact deadline are valid. This paper introduces effective throughput as a …
- 235000014653 Carica parviflora 0 title abstract description 110
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/38—Payment protocols; Details thereof
- G06Q20/40—Authorisation, e.g. identification of payer or payee, verification of customer or shop credentials; Review and approval of payers, e.g. check credit lines or negative lists
- G06Q20/401—Transaction verification
- G06Q20/4016—Transaction verification involving fraud or risk level assessment in transaction processing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/60—Protecting data
- G06F21/64—Protecting data integrity, e.g. using checksums, certificates or signatures
- G06F21/645—Protecting data integrity, e.g. using checksums, certificates or signatures using a third party
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/04—Exchange, e.g. stocks, commodities, derivatives or currency exchange
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/38—Payment protocols; Details thereof
- G06Q20/382—Payment protocols; Details thereof insuring higher security of transaction
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Kaur et al. | MBCP: Performance analysis of large scale mainstream blockchain consensus protocols | |
Yun et al. | DQN-based optimization framework for secure sharded blockchain systems | |
Fan et al. | Cloud/edge computing resource allocation and pricing for mobile blockchain: An iterative greedy and search approach | |
US12093247B2 (en) | Blockchain system and method | |
Oliveira et al. | Towards a performance evaluation of private blockchain frameworks using a realistic workload | |
Huang et al. | Resource allocation and consensus on edge blockchain in pervasive edge computing environments | |
Ferrer-Gomila et al. | A fair contract signing protocol with blockchain support | |
Andrade et al. | Discouraging free riding in a peer-to-peer cpu-sharing grid | |
Ciampi et al. | Fairmm: A fast and frontrunning-resistant crypto market-maker | |
CN112449705A (en) | Metastable byzantine protocol | |
Yuan et al. | CoopEdge+: Enabling decentralized, secure and cooperative multi-access edge computing based on blockchain | |
US11625260B2 (en) | Method for enhancing throughput in blockchain network | |
US11423016B2 (en) | Method for scaling computation in blockchain by delaying transaction execution | |
Al-Bassam et al. | Airtnt: Fair exchange payment for outsourced secure enclave computations | |
Shi et al. | Worm computing: A blockchain-based resource sharing and cybersecurity framework | |
Du et al. | Biecs: A blockchain-based intelligent edge cooperation system for latency-sensitive services | |
Shamieh et al. | Transaction throughput provisioning technique for blockchain-based industrial IoT networks | |
Zhang et al. | EB-BFT: An elastic batched BFT consensus protocol in blockchain | |
Liu et al. | Coral: A blockchain protocol for handling transactions with deadline constraints | |
Ning et al. | On the exploitation of blockchain for distributed file storage | |
Batool et al. | Block-RACS: Towards reputation-aware client selection and monetization mechanism for federated learning | |
Liao et al. | Rt-dag: A dag-based blockchain supporting real-time transactions | |
Jia et al. | Themis: An equal, unpredictable, and scalable consensus for consortium blockchain | |
Raikwar et al. | Fairness Notions in DAG-Based DLTs | |
Riehl et al. | Transaction pricing for maximizing throughput in a sharded blockchain ledger |