Sacchi et al., 2021 - Google Patents
Deep reinforcement learning of robotic prosthesis for gait symmetry in trans-femoral amputated patientsSacchi et al., 2021
View PDF- Document ID
- 9414937555698142673
- Author
- Sacchi N
- Incremona G
- Ferrara A
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- 2021 29th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED)
External Links
Snippet
This work proposes a novel control methodology to achieve gait symmetry in trans-femoral amputated patients with prostheses. The proposed approach allows to overcome the limits of classical model-based control strategies by introducing a Deep Reinforcement Learning …
- 230000005021 gait 0 title abstract description 24
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N3/00—Computer systems based on biological models
- G06N3/02—Computer systems based on biological models using neural network models
- G06N3/08—Learning methods
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/0265—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion
- G05B13/027—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion using neural networks only
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N3/00—Computer systems based on biological models
- G06N3/02—Computer systems based on biological models using neural network models
- G06N3/04—Architectures, e.g. interconnection topology
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, E.G. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/50—Prostheses not implantable in the body
- A61F2/68—Operating or control means
- A61F2/70—Operating or control means electrical
- A61F2002/704—Operating or control means electrical computer-controlled, e.g. robotic control
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, E.G. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/50—Prostheses not implantable in the body
- A61F2/54—Artificial arms or hands or parts thereof
- A61F2/58—Elbows; Wrists; Other joints; Hands
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Li et al. | Toward expedited impedance tuning of a robotic prosthesis for personalized gait assistance by reinforcement learning control | |
Wen et al. | A new powered lower limb prosthesis control framework based on adaptive dynamic programming | |
Aghasadeghi et al. | Learning impedance controller parameters for lower-limb prostheses | |
Huang et al. | Optimisation of reference gait trajectory of a lower limb exoskeleton | |
Rose et al. | End-to-end deep reinforcement learning for exoskeleton control | |
Castillo et al. | Reinforcement learning meets hybrid zero dynamics: A case study for rabbit | |
Sacchi et al. | Deep reinforcement learning of robotic prosthesis for gait symmetry in trans-femoral amputated patients | |
Rai et al. | Mode-free control of prosthetic lower limbs | |
Singh et al. | Learning bipedal walking on planned footsteps for humanoid robots | |
Zhao et al. | Quadratic programming and impedance control for transfemoral prosthesis | |
Liu et al. | A new robotic knee impedance control parameter optimization method facilitated by inverse reinforcement learning | |
Wu et al. | Human-robotic prosthesis as collaborating agents for symmetrical walking | |
Huang et al. | Adaptive Gait Planning with Dynamic Movement Primitives for Walking Assistance Lower Exoskeleton in Uphill Slopes. | |
Horn et al. | Nonholonomic virtual constraints for control of powered prostheses across walking speeds | |
Clark et al. | Learning ergonomic control in human–robot symbiotic walking | |
Ma et al. | Robotic leg prosthesis: A survey from dynamic model to adaptive control for gait coordination | |
Zhao et al. | A hybrid systems and optimization-based control approach to realizing multi-contact locomotion on transfemoral prostheses | |
Rose et al. | Designing a Biped Robot's Gait using Reinforcement Learning's-Actor Critic Method | |
Marjaninejad et al. | Model-free control of movement in a tendon-driven limb via a modified genetic algorithm | |
Kalani et al. | Application of DQN learning for delayed output feedback control of a gait-assist hip exoskeleton | |
Rai et al. | Continuous and unified modeling of joint kinematics for multiple activities | |
Clark et al. | Learning predictive models for ergonomic control of prosthetic devices | |
Eslamy et al. | Motion planning for active prosthetic knees | |
Apostolopoulos et al. | Energy efficient and robust balancing with motion primitive switching | |
Zhang et al. | Flat-Upstairs Gait Switching of Lower Limb Prosthesis via Gaussian Process and Improved Kalman Filter |