Furian et al., 2013 - Google Patents
Spinal posture and pelvic position in three hundred forty-five elementary school children: a rasterstereographic pilot studyFurian et al., 2013
View HTML- Document ID
- 9257842025226329767
- Author
- Furian T
- Rapp W
- Eckert S
- Wild M
- Betsch M
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Orthopedic Reviews
External Links
Snippet
Children's posture has been of growing concern due to observations that it seems to be impaired compared to previous generations. So far there is no reference data for spinal posture and pelvic position in healthy children available. Purpose of this pilot study was to …
- 230000001045 lordotic 0 abstract description 9
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1121—Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement
- A61B5/1122—Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement of movement trajectories
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
- A61B5/4528—Joints
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/107—Measuring physical dimensions, e.g. size of the entire body or parts thereof
- A61B5/1075—Measuring physical dimensions, e.g. size of the entire body or parts thereof for measuring dimensions by non-invasive methods, e.g. for determining thickness of tissue layer
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/48—Other medical applications
- A61B5/4869—Determining body composition
- A61B5/4872—Body fat
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
- A61B5/4538—Evaluating a particular part of the muscoloskeletal system or a particular medical condition
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/48—Diagnostic techniques
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/05—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radiowaves
- A61B5/053—Measuring electrical impedance or conductance of a portion of the body
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/50—Clinical applications
- A61B6/505—Clinical applications involving diagnosis of bone
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Furian et al. | Spinal posture and pelvic position in three hundred forty-five elementary school children: a rasterstereographic pilot study | |
Stolinski et al. | Two-dimensional digital photography for child body posture evaluation: standardized technique, reliable parameters and normative data for age 7-10 years | |
Knott et al. | The use of the T1 sagittal angle in predicting overall sagittal balance of the spine | |
Betsch et al. | Determination of the amount of leg length inequality that alters spinal posture in healthy subjects using rasterstereography | |
Pazos et al. | Reliability of trunk shape measurements based on 3-D surface reconstructions | |
Ferreira et al. | Quantitative assessment of postural alignment in young adults based on photographs of anterior, posterior, and lateral views | |
Maurer et al. | Assessment of glenoid inclination on routine clinical radiographs and computed tomography examinations of the shoulder | |
Anderst et al. | Three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics in the healthy young adult cervical spine during dynamic functional loading | |
Mohokum et al. | The validity of rasterstereography: a systematic review | |
de Oliveira et al. | Validity and reproducibility of the measurements obtained using the flexicurve instrument to evaluate the angles of thoracic and lumbar curvatures of the spine in the sagittal plane | |
Betsch et al. | The effect of simulating leg length inequality on spinal posture and pelvic position: a dynamic rasterstereographic analysis | |
Aroeira et al. | Non-invasive methods of computer vision in the posture evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis | |
Vidal et al. | Reliability of cervical lordosis and global sagittal spinal balance measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis | |
Schülein et al. | Rasterstereographic evaluation of interobserver and intraobserver reliability in postsurgical adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients | |
D'Amico et al. | Normative 3D opto-electronic stereo-photogrammetric posture and spine morphology data in young healthy adult population | |
Thelen et al. | Normative 3D acetabular orientation measurements by the low-dose EOS imaging system in 102 asymptomatic subjects in standing position: analyses by side, gender, pelvic incidence and reproducibility | |
Applebaum et al. | Evaluating the role of surface topography in the surveillance of scoliosis | |
Tabard-Fougère et al. | Radiation-free measurement tools to evaluate sagittal parameters in AIS patients: a reliability and validity study | |
Russell et al. | Measurement of lumbar Lordosis: a comparison of 2 alternatives to the cobb angle | |
Wild et al. | Does age affect the response of pelvis and spine to simulated leg length discrepancies? A rasterstereographic pilot study | |
Chaise et al. | Validation, repeatability and reproducibility of a noninvasive instrument for measuring thoracic and lumbar curvature of the spine in the sagittal plane | |
Rousseau et al. | Assessment of the axial rotation of the pelvis with the EOS® imaging system: intra-and inter-observer reproducibility and accuracy study | |
Wawrose et al. | In vivo changes in adjacent segment kinematics after lumbar decompression and fusion | |
Kandasamy et al. | Posture and back shape measurement tools: a narrative literature review | |
Crawford et al. | The effect of interspinous implant surgery on back surface shape and radiographic lumbar curvature |