[go: up one dir, main page]

Bland et al., 1999 - Google Patents

Measuring agreement in method comparison studies

Bland et al., 1999

Document ID
9170876077025012096
Author
Bland J
Altman D
Publication year
Publication venue
Statistical methods in medical research

External Links

Snippet

Agreement between two methods of clinical measurement can be quantified using the differences between observations made using the two methods on the same subjects. The 95% limits of agreement, estimated by mean difference 1.96 standard deviation of the …
Continue reading at journals.sagepub.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
    • G01N33/48Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/68Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving proteins, peptides or amino acids
    • G01N33/6803General methods of protein analysis not limited to specific proteins or families of proteins
    • G01N33/6827Total protein determination, e.g. albumin in urine
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/30Monitoring
    • G06F11/34Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment
    • G06F11/3409Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment for performance assessment
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/05Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radiowaves
    • A61B5/053Measuring electrical impedance or conductance of a portion of the body
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/48Other medical applications
    • A61B5/4869Determining body composition
    • A61B5/4872Body fat
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/04Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric signals of the body of parts thereof
    • A61B5/0402Electrocardiography, i.e. ECG
    • A61B5/0452Detecting specific parameters of the electrocardiograph cycle
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/02Detecting, measuring or recording pulse, heart rate, blood pressure or blood flow; Combined pulse/heart-rate/blood pressure determination; Evaluating a cardiovascular condition not otherwise provided for, e.g. using combinations of techniques provided for in this group with electrocardiography or electroauscultation; Heart catheters for measuring blood pressure
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Bland et al. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies
Bunting et al. A practical guide to assess the reproducibility of echocardiographic measurements
Bland et al. Comparing two methods of clinical measurement: a personal history
Müller et al. A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients
Martin et al. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement
Altman et al. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies
Bland et al. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement
Gallagher et al. Small organs with a high metabolic rate explain lower resting energy expenditure in African American than in white adults
Shoukri et al. Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: review and new results
Marques-Pinto et al. Nurses’ intention to leave the organization: a mediation study of professional burnout and engagement
Willett An overview of issues related to the correction of non‐differential exposure measurement error in epidemiologic studies
Liu et al. Can overnight urine replace 24-hour urine collection to asses salt intake?
Kwong et al. Imprecision of urinary iothalamate clearance as a gold-standard measure of GFR decreases the diagnostic accuracy of kidney function estimating equations
Van Den Boomen et al. Native T1 reference values for nonischemic cardiomyopathies and populations with increased cardiovascular risk: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Weinsaft et al. Left ventricular papillary muscles and trabeculae are significant determinants of cardiac MRI volumetric measurements: effects on clinical standards in patients with advanced systolic dysfunction
Hambye et al. Variability of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes with quantitative gated SPECT: influence of algorithm, pixel size and reconstruction parameters in small and normal-sized hearts
Chiarelli et al. Sources of systematic bias in hypercapnia-calibrated functional MRI estimation of oxygen metabolism
CN101501479A (en) Salivary analysis
Robison et al. Noninvasive hematocrit assessment for cardiovascular magnetic resonance extracellular volume quantification using a point-of-care device and synthetic derivation
CN111739647B (en) Suicide risk prediction method and related device for bipolar disorder based on magnetic resonance imaging
Kowalski et al. Design evaluation for a population pharmacokinetic study using clinical trial simulations: a case study
Kammerlander et al. Extracellular volume quantification by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging without hematocrit sampling: ready for prime time?
Taher et al. A novel Sigma metric encompasses global multi-site performance of 18 assays on the Abbott Alinity system
CN109102888A (en) A kind of human health methods of marking
Tirrell et al. Analysis of hierarchical biomechanical data structures using mixed-effects models