Botechia et al., 2018 - Google Patents
Investigation of production forecast biases of simulation models in a benchmark caseBotechia et al., 2018
View PDF- Document ID
- 8285433392724054170
- Author
- Botechia V
- da Silva Gaspar A
- Avansi G
- Davolio A
- Schiozer D
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Oil & Gas Sciences and Technology–Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles
External Links
Snippet
Reservoir management decisions are often based on simulation models and probabilistic approaches. Thus, the response of the model must be sufficiently accurate to base sound decisions on and fast enough to be practical for methodologies requiring many simulation …
- 238000004519 manufacturing process 0 title abstract description 44
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
- G01V99/005—Geomodels or geomodelling, not related to particular measurements
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
- G01V2210/60—Analysis
- G01V2210/66—Subsurface modeling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
- G01V2210/60—Analysis
- G01V2210/61—Analysis by combining or comparing a seismic data set with other data
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
- G01V2210/60—Analysis
- G01V2210/62—Physical property of subsurface
- G01V2210/624—Reservoir parameters
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V3/00—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
- G01V3/12—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation operating with electromagnetic waves
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V3/00—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
- G01V3/38—Processing data, e.g. for analysis, for interpretation, for correction
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
- G01N33/26—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups oils; viscous liquids; paints; inks
- G01N33/28—Oils, i.e. hydrocarbon liquids
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V9/00—Prospecting or detecting by methods not provided for in groups G01V1/00 - G01V8/00
- G01V9/02—Determining existence or flow of underground water
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V11/00—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS prospecting or detecting by methods combining techniques covered by two or more of main groups G01V1/00 - G01V9/00
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Hassen et al. | 3D geological modeling of the Kasserine Aquifer System, Central Tunisia: New insights into aquifer-geometry and interconnections for a better assessment of groundwater resources | |
Jiang et al. | A quantitative study on accumulation of age mass around stagnation points in nested flow systems | |
Pedretti et al. | Apparent directional mass‐transfer capacity coefficients in three‐dimensional anisotropic heterogeneous aquifers under radial convergent transport | |
Hamdi | Well-test response in stochastic permeable media | |
Glegola et al. | History Matching Time-Lapse Surface-Gravity and Well-Pressure Data With Ensemble Smoother for Estimating Gas Field Aquifer Support—A 3D Numerical Study | |
Kamali et al. | 3D geostatistical modeling and uncertainty analysis in a carbonate reservoir, SW Iran | |
Abadpour et al. | Integrated geo-modeling and ensemble history matching of complex fractured carbonate and deep offshore turbidite fields, generation of several geologically coherent solutions using ensemble methods | |
Kazemi et al. | Seismic History Matching of Nelson Using Time-Lapse Seismic Data: An Investigation of 4D Signature Normalization | |
AlRassas et al. | Integrated static modeling and dynamic simulation framework for CO 2 storage capacity in Upper Qishn Clastics, S1A reservoir, Yemen | |
US9709697B2 (en) | Method for exploiting a geological reservoir by means of a matched reservoir model consistent with the flow properties | |
Pyrcz et al. | Uncertainty in reservoir modeling | |
Lima et al. | Assisted history-matching for the characterization and recovery optimization of fractured reservoirs using connectivity analysis | |
Al-Mudhafar et al. | Stochastic lithofacies and petrophysical property modeling for fast history matching in heterogeneous clastic reservoir applications | |
Botechia et al. | Investigation of production forecast biases of simulation models in a benchmark case | |
Gazzola et al. | Reducing uncertainty on land subsidence modeling prediction by a sequential data-integration approach. Application to the Arlua off-shore reservoir in Italy | |
Orellana et al. | Influence of variograms in 3D reservoir-modeling outcomes: An example | |
Huseby et al. | Natural and conventional tracers for improving reservoir models using the EnKF approach | |
Lux et al. | Evaluation and optimization of multi-lateral wells using MODFLOW unstructured grids | |
Ostad et al. | Fracture network modeling using petrophysical data, an approach based on geostatistical concepts | |
Hamdi et al. | RTA-Assisted Numerical History-Matching Workflow | |
Dehghani et al. | Application of integrated reservoir studies and techniques to estimate oil volumes and recovery—Tengiz Field, Republic of Kazakhstan | |
Le Ravalec et al. | Integrating data of different types and different supports into reservoir models | |
Fernàndez‐Garcia et al. | Conditional stochastic mapping of transport connectivity | |
Wallace | Use of 3-dimensional dynamic modeling of CO₂ injection for comparison to regional static capacity assessments of Miocene sandstone reservoirs in the Texas State Waters, Gulf of Mexico | |
Sakaki et al. | On the value of lithofacies data for improving groundwater flow model accuracy in a three‐dimensional laboratory‐scale synthetic aquifer |