[go: up one dir, main page]

Chen et al., 2014 - Google Patents

Assessment of volumetric noise and resolution performance for linear and nonlinear CT reconstruction methods

Chen et al., 2014

View HTML
Document ID
8152192667152984177
Author
Chen B
Christianson O
Wilson J
Samei E
Publication year
Publication venue
Medical physics

External Links

Snippet

Purpose: For nonlinear iterative image reconstructions (IR), the computed tomography (CT) noise and resolution properties can depend on the specific imaging conditions, such as lesion contrast and image noise level. Therefore, it is imperative to develop a reliable …
Continue reading at www.osti.gov (HTML) (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T11/00—2D [Two Dimensional] image generation
    • G06T11/003—Reconstruction from projections, e.g. tomography
    • G06T11/005—Specific pre-processing for tomographic reconstruction, e.g. calibration, source positioning, rebinning, scatter correction, retrospective gating
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
    • G06T2207/30004—Biomedical image processing
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/02—Devices for diagnosis sequentially in different planes; Stereoscopic radiation diagnosis
    • A61B6/03—Computerised tomographs
    • A61B6/032—Transmission computed tomography [CT]
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00—Image analysis
    • G06T7/0002—Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
    • G06T7/0012—Biomedical image inspection
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/10—Image acquisition modality
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N23/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation not covered by G01N21/00 or G01N22/00, e.g. X-rays or neutrons
    • G01N23/02—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation not covered by G01N21/00 or G01N22/00, e.g. X-rays or neutrons by transmitting the radiation through the material
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T5/00—Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit-mapped to bit-mapped creating a similar image
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2211/00—Image generation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/48—Diagnostic techniques
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/58—Testing, adjusting or calibrating devices for radiation diagnosis
    • A61B6/582—Calibration

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Chen et al. Assessment of volumetric noise and resolution performance for linear and nonlinear CT reconstruction methods
Friedman et al. A simple approach to measure computed tomography (CT) modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise‐power spectrum (NPS) using the American College of Radiology (ACR) accreditation phantom
Li et al. Statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in clinical CT systems. Part II. Experimental assessment of spatial resolution performance
Richard et al. Towards task‐based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms
Samei et al. Assessment of the dose reduction potential of a model‐based iterative reconstruction algorithm using a task‐based performance metrology
Hu et al. Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach
Evans et al. Noise‐resolution tradeoffs in x‐ray CT imaging: a comparison of penalized alternating minimization and filtered backprojection algorithms
Sanders et al. Patient‐specific quantification of image quality: an automated method for measuring spatial resolution in clinical CT images
Li et al. Adaptive nonlocal means filtering based on local noise level for CT denoising
Won Kim et al. Realistic simulation of reduced‐dose CT with noise modeling and sinogram synthesis using DICOM CT images
Gang et al. Anatomical background and generalized detectability in tomosynthesis and cone‐beam CT
Yu et al. measuring contrast‐and noise‐dependent spatial resolution of an iterative reconstruction method in CT using ensemble averaging
Chen et al. Volumetric quantification of lung nodules in CT with iterative reconstruction (ASiR and MBIR)
Chen et al. Evaluating iterative reconstruction performance in computed tomography
Baek et al. The noise power spectrum in CT with direct fan beam reconstruction
Wu et al. Evaluation of scatter effects on image quality for breast tomosynthesis
Hu et al. The effect of angular dose distribution on the detection of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis
Takenaga et al. Modulation transfer function measurement of CT images by use of a circular edge method with a logistic curve-fitting technique
Ohkubo et al. Image filtering as an alternative to the application of a different reconstruction kernel in CT imaging: feasibility study in lung cancer screening
Cruz‐Bastida et al. Hi‐Res scan mode in clinical MDCT systems: experimental assessment of spatial resolution performance
Sieren et al. Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE) versus weighted filtered back projection (WFBP) effects on quantitative measure in the COPDGene 2 test object
Söderman et al. Image quality dependency on system configuration and tube voltage in chest tomosynthesis—a visual grading study using an anthropomorphic chest phantom
Sanchez et al. Task‐based optimization of dedicated breast CT via Hotelling observer metrics
Li et al. Correlation between human observer performance and model observer performance in differential phase contrast CT
Hahn et al. A comparison of linear interpolation models for iterative CT reconstruction