Lu et al., 2020 - Google Patents
Improved estimation and forecasting through residual-based model error quantificationLu et al., 2020
- Document ID
- 7383669200899880038
- Author
- Lu M
- Chen Y
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- SPE Journal
External Links
Snippet
Owing to the complex nature of hydrocarbon reservoirs, the numerical model constructed by geoscientists is always a simplified version of reality: for example, it might lack resolution from discretization and lack accuracy in modeling some physical processes. This flaw in the …
- 238000011002 quantification 0 title description 7
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
- G01N33/26—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups oils; viscous liquids; paints; inks
- G01N33/28—Oils, i.e. hydrocarbon liquids
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
- G01V99/005—Geomodels or geomodelling, not related to particular measurements
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
- G01V1/30—Analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
- G01V2210/60—Analysis
- G01V2210/62—Physical property of subsurface
- G01V2210/624—Reservoir parameters
- G01V2210/6248—Pore pressure
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V3/00—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
- G01V3/38—Processing data, e.g. for analysis, for interpretation, for correction
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
- G01V2210/60—Analysis
- G01V2210/66—Subsurface modeling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
- G01V2210/60—Analysis
- G01V2210/61—Analysis by combining or comparing a seismic data set with other data
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V11/00—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS prospecting or detecting by methods combining techniques covered by two or more of main groups G01V1/00 - G01V9/00
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/10—Complex mathematical operations
- G06F17/18—Complex mathematical operations for evaluating statistical data, e.g. average values, frequency distributions, probability functions, regression analysis
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP3563030B1 (en) | Method and system for regression and classification in subsurface models to support decision making for hydrocarbon operations | |
| Grana et al. | Quantitative log interpretation and uncertainty propagation of petrophysical properties and facies classification from rock-physics modeling and formation evaluation analysis | |
| Scheidt et al. | Prediction-focused subsurface modeling: investigating the need for accuracy in flow-based inverse modeling | |
| US12488486B2 (en) | Method for estimating fluid saturation of a rock | |
| Ma et al. | Practical implementation of knowledge-based approaches for steam-assisted gravity drainage production analysis | |
| Chen et al. | Global-search distributed-gauss-newton optimization method and its integration with the randomized-maximum-likelihood method for uncertainty quantification of reservoir performance | |
| Dutta et al. | Value of information analysis for subsurface energy resources applications | |
| CN116840906A (en) | Uncertainty evaluation method for reservoir physical property parameter prediction | |
| Lu et al. | Improved estimation and forecasting through residual-based model error quantification | |
| Hussain et al. | Advanced AI approach for enhanced predictive modeling in reservoir characterization within complex geological environments | |
| Pyrcz et al. | Uncertainty in reservoir modeling | |
| Feng et al. | Simultaneous prediction of porosity, saturation, and lithofacies from seismic data via multitask deep learning | |
| Neto et al. | 3D seismic data assimilation to reduce uncertainties in reservoir simulation considering model errors | |
| WO2020142257A1 (en) | Method and system for evaluating variability in subsurface models to support decision making for hydrocarbon operations | |
| Qian et al. | A rock physics driven Bayesian inversion for TOC in the Fuling shale gas reservoir | |
| Cominelli et al. | Benchmark study of ensemble Kalman filter methodology: History matching and uncertainty quantification for a deep-water oil reservoir | |
| Sureshjani et al. | Estimating reservoir permeability distribution from analysis of pressure/rate transient data: A regional approach | |
| Lawal et al. | Uncertainty-aware reservoir permeability prediction using gaussian processes regression and nmr measurements | |
| Bosch et al. | Reservoir uncertainty description via petrophysical inversion of seismic data | |
| Morales et al. | Automatic well-log baseline correction via deep learning for rapid screening of potential CO2 storage sites | |
| Alabbad et al. | Machine learning model evaluation: A case study for core guided petrophysical analysis | |
| Barros et al. | Quantifying efficiency of field-wide geophysical surveys for verifying CO2 plume conformance during storage operations | |
| Wu et al. | Effective parametrization for reliable reservoir performance predictions | |
| Pafeng et al. | Joint rock physics inversion of elastic and electric attributes for rock and fluid properties–a real data example | |
| Park et al. | Deep learning-assisted THM-integrated InSAR modeling for CO2 storage characterization and surface deformation forecasting |