Scheber et al., 2013 - Google Patents
Conventional prompt global strike: a fresh perspectiveScheber et al., 2013
- Document ID
- 7120444973906194176
- Author
- Scheber T
- Guthe K
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Comparative Strategy
External Links
Snippet
Conventional prompt global strike (CPGS) is the proposed capability to deliver a precision nonnuclear weapon against a target anywhere in the world in less than an hour. Despite years of study and debate, the need for a better understanding of the issues related to this …
- 230000018109 developmental process 0 abstract description 12
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B12/00—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
- F42B12/02—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
- F42B12/36—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect for dispensing materials; for producing chemical or physical reaction; for signalling; for transmitting information
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B12/00—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
- F42B12/02—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
- F42B12/04—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of armour-piercing type
- F42B12/06—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of armour-piercing type with hard or heavy core; Kinetic energy penetrators
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B12/00—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
- F42B12/02—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
- F42B12/20—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type
- F42B12/22—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type with fragmentation-hull construction
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H11/00—Defence installations; Defence devices
- F41H11/02—Anti-aircraft or anti-guided missile or anti-torpedo defence installations or systems
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| O’Hanlon | Forecasting change in military technology, 2020-2040 | |
| Korda et al. | US ballistic missile defenses, 2019 | |
| Lambeth | Air operations in Israel's war against Hezbollah: learning from Lebanon and getting it right in Gaza | |
| Riqiang | China's anxiety about US missile defence: A solution | |
| Gordon et al. | The Army's role in overcoming anti-access and area denial challenges | |
| Steinberg | Weapons in space: The need to protect space assets | |
| Chapman | Global defense procurement and the F-35 joint strike fighter | |
| O’Hanlon | A Retrospective on the so-called revolution in military affairs, 2000-2020 | |
| Jackson | Evaluating novel threats to the homeland: unmanned aerial vehicles and cruise missiles | |
| Jones et al. | Combined arms warfare and unmanned aircraft systems: A new era of strategic competition | |
| Rogers | Arctic drones–A new security dilemma | |
| Bartles | Russian threat perception and the ballistic missile defense system | |
| Scheber et al. | Conventional prompt global strike: a fresh perspective | |
| Lambakis | A guide for thinking about space deterrence and China | |
| Sugden | Speed Kills: Analyzing the deployment of conventional ballistic missiles | |
| Cordesman | Gulf and Iran's Capability for Asymmetric Warfare | |
| Kleinschmidt et al. | Scanning the horizon: Drones and counter-narcotics in latin america | |
| Forden | China and Space War | |
| Ellison et al. | Without precedent: global emerging trends in nuclear and hypersonic weapons | |
| Mistry | South Asia's Missile Expansion | |
| Fayet et al. | Deep precision strikes: a new tool for strategic competition | |
| Grego | Do technology advances allow missile defences to make up ground? | |
| Cummings | Crisis Stability, Ooda Loops, and Hypersonic Weapons | |
| Kueter et al. | The Cruise Missile Challenge: Designing a defense against asymmetric threats | |
| Lewis et al. | How US strategic antimissile defense could be made to work |