[go: up one dir, main page]

Liu et al., 2022 - Google Patents

Fluid-structure interaction analysis on the influence of the aortic valve stent leaflet structure in hemodynamics

Liu et al., 2022

View HTML
Document ID
6555987111169750146
Author
Liu X
Zhang W
Ye P
Luo Q
Chang Z
Publication year
Publication venue
Frontiers in physiology

External Links

Snippet

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a minimally invasive surgical treatment for heart valve disease. At present, personalized TAVR valves are not available for some patients. This study adopts the fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model of the research object …
Continue reading at www.frontiersin.org (HTML) (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, E.G. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/24—Heart valves ; Vascular valves, e.g. venous valves; Heart implants, e.g. passive devices for improving the function of the native valve or the heart muscle; Transmyocardial revascularisation [TMR] devices
    • A61F2/2412—Heart valves ; Vascular valves, e.g. venous valves; Heart implants, e.g. passive devices for improving the function of the native valve or the heart muscle; Transmyocardial revascularisation [TMR] devices with soft flexible valve members, e.g. tissue valves shaped like natural valves
    • A61F2/2418—Scaffolds therefor, e.g. support stents
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
    • G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
    • G06F17/5018—Computer-aided design using simulation using finite difference methods or finite element methods
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
    • G06F19/3437—Medical simulation or modelling, e.g. simulating the evolution of medical disorders
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, E.G. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/04—Hollow or tubular parts of organs, e.g. bladders, tracheae, bronchi or bile ducts
    • A61F2/06—Blood vessels
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, E.G. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/82—Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/86—Stents in a form characterised by the wire-like elements; Stents in the form characterised by a net-like or mesh-like structure
    • A61F2/90—Stents in a form characterised by the wire-like elements; Stents in the form characterised by a net-like or mesh-like structure characterised by a net-like or mesh-like structure

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Spühler et al. 3D fluid-structure interaction simulation of aortic valves using a unified continuum ALE FEM model
Xu et al. A framework for designing patient‐specific bioprosthetic heart valves using immersogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis
Sotiropoulos et al. Fluid mechanics of heart valves and their replacements
Frauenfelder et al. Computational Fluid Dynamics: Hemodynamic Changes in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm After Stent-Graft Implantation: T. Frauenfelder et al.
Liu et al. Fluid-structure interaction analysis on the influence of the aortic valve stent leaflet structure in hemodynamics
Borazjani et al. High-resolution fluid–structure interaction simulations of flow through a bi-leaflet mechanical heart valve in an anatomic aorta
Tango et al. Validation and extension of a fluid–structure interaction model of the healthy aortic valve
Lam et al. A computational study on the biomechanical factors related to stent-graft models in the thoracic aorta
Lavon et al. Fluid–structure interaction models of bicuspid aortic valves: the effects of nonfused cusp angles
Kagadis et al. Computational representation and hemodynamic characterization of in vivo acquired severe stenotic renal artery geometries using turbulence modeling
Wald et al. A numerical study of the hemodynamic effect of the aortic valve on coronary flow
Sundström et al. Effects of Normal Variation in the Rotational Position of the Aortic Root on Hemodynamics and Tissue Biomechanics of the Thoracic Aorta: Sundström et al.
Yan et al. A fluid–structure interaction study of different bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes throughout the cardiac cycle
Roy et al. A literature review of the numerical analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with endovascular stent grafts
Peng et al. The study on the impact of AAA wall motion on the hemodynamics based on 4D CT image data
Wei et al. Impact of stent malapposition on intracoronary flow dynamics: An optical coherence tomography-based patient-specific study
Caiazzo et al. Blood flow simulations for the design of stented valve reducer in enlarged ventricular outflow tracts
Mirza et al. Importance of non-newtonian computational fluid modeling on severely calcified aortic valve geometries—insights from quasi-steady state simulations
Asadi et al. The effects of implantation orientation of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve in an anatomic left ventricle-aorta configuration
Farokhi et al. Investigation the effect of geometry and position of polymeric heart valves on hemodynamic with fluid-structure interaction numerical method
Mohammadi et al. The Apex bileaflet mechanical heart valve
Mohammadi et al. Review of numerical methods for simulation of the aortic root: present and future directions
Costa et al. Computational fluid–structure analysis of the impact of leaflet thickness and protrusion height on the flutter phenomenon in aortic valve bioprostheses
Ma et al. Hemodynamic study of the effect of the geometric height of leaflets on the performance of the aortic valve under aortic valve reconstruction
Annerel et al. Influence of valve size, orientation and downstream geometry of an aortic BMHV on leaflet motion and clinically used valve performance parameters