[go: up one dir, main page]

Gilbert, 2001 - Google Patents

Collective remorse

Gilbert, 2001

Document ID
6261283780685488391
Author
Gilbert M
Publication year

External Links

Snippet

This essay explores the nature of an important collective emotion, namely, collective remorse. Three accounts of collective remorse are presented and evaluated. The first involves an aggregate of group members remorseful over acts of their own associated with …
Continue reading at papers.ssrn.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F17/30861Retrieval from the Internet, e.g. browsers
    • G06F17/30899Browsing optimisation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/20Handling natural language data

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Gilbert Remarks on collective belief
Gilbert Collective remorse
Gilbert Collective belief and scientific change
Drayton Where the real power lies
Gilbert Acting together, joint commitment, and obligation
Gilbert Sociality as a philosophically significant category
Waldron The Dignity of a Human Lifetime
He Why is establishing democracy so difficult in China: The challenge of China’s national identity question
Blaywais The different effect of psychological distances on neglected opportunity costs
von Ungern-Sternberg Constitutional law on religion
Kearney Resilience Excellence Framework: Après nous le deluge!
De Guzman Addressing Improper Waste Disposal in Barangay Cut-cot Pulilan, Bulacan
Grebieniow Peculium Duplicis Iuris. On the Liability of the Slave's Owner in D. 15.1. 19.1-2 (Ulp. 29 ad ed.)(Peculium duplicis iuris. Sulla responsabilità de peculio del dominus in D. 15.1. 19.1-2 (Ulp
Gupta et al. Multiple disease prediction system using machine learning
Walters A Re-Consideration of White’s Energy Relation for Societal Evolution
Reschke A Business Simulation and Knowledge Management System for Complex Adaptive Systems:‘Causalysator’
Krishnan The State of Women in the Dramas of Aringar Anna
Epps Written Testimony of Daniel Epps on “Court Expansion and Other Changes to the Court’s Composition” for The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States
Cao Mitigating Overtreatment: The Role of Patients’ Demands for Unnecessary Care
Gilbert et al. On an Argument for the Impossibility of Prediction in the Social Sciences
Selamet Contemplating Actors in Sustaining Health and Wellbeing during a Hotel Quarantine in Kuwait
Reidy Liberal Democratic Foreign Policy, International Toleration and Reasonable Hope: Rawl’s the Law of Peoples
Edun Examining the Legal Implications of Making a Will Vis a Vis the Appointment of a Next of Kin
Goel Whether the Functions Performed by the Hospital Are Public Functions, on the Basis of Which a Writ of Mandamus Can Lie Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950?
Fronek The development of a psychosocial screening model for human participants with spinal cord injury in experimental research