Luypaert et al., 2011 - Google Patents
Validity of perfusion parameters obtained using the modified Tofts model: a simulation studyLuypaert et al., 2011
- Document ID
- 5753669333429344278
- Author
- Luypaert R
- Sourbron S
- De Mey J
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Magnetic resonance in medicine
External Links
Snippet
The two‐compartment Tofts model (2CTM) has had widespread use in research and clinical practice. It assumes there is no broadening associated with the bolus transit through the capillary bed of the tissue under study. This assumption is often violated, with consequences …
- 238000004088 simulation 0 title description 7
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R33/00—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
- G01R33/20—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables involving magnetic resonance
- G01R33/44—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables involving magnetic resonance using nuclear magnetic resonance [NMR]
- G01R33/48—NMR imaging systems
- G01R33/54—Signal processing systems, e.g. using pulse sequences, Generation or control of pulse sequences ; Operator Console
- G01R33/56—Image enhancement or correction, e.g. subtraction or averaging techniques, e.g. improvement of signal-to-noise ratio and resolution
- G01R33/5601—Image enhancement or correction, e.g. subtraction or averaging techniques, e.g. improvement of signal-to-noise ratio and resolution involving use of a contrast agent for contrast manipulation, e.g. a paramagnetic, super-paramagnetic, ferromagnetic or hyperpolarised contrast agent
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
- G06F19/3437—Medical simulation or modelling, e.g. simulating the evolution of medical disorders
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/32—Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Luypaert et al. | Validity of perfusion parameters obtained using the modified Tofts model: a simulation study | |
| Sourbron et al. | Tracer kinetic modelling in MRI: estimating perfusion and capillary permeability | |
| Heye et al. | Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Part I. Perfusion characteristics in the female pelvis by using multiple computer-aided diagnosis perfusion analysis solutions | |
| Henriksen et al. | High-grade glioma treatment response monitoring biomarkers: a position statement on the evidence supporting the use of advanced MRI techniques in the clinic, and the latest bench-to-bedside developments. Part 1: perfusion and diffusion techniques | |
| Keenan et al. | Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging phantoms: a review and the need for a system phantom | |
| Akisik et al. | Pancreatic cancer: utility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in assessment of antiangiogenic therapy | |
| Mangla et al. | Changes in relative cerebral blood volume 1 month after radiation-temozolomide therapy can help predict overall survival in patients with glioblastoma | |
| Murase | Efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters using T1‐weighted dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging | |
| Chapiro et al. | Radiologic-pathologic analysis of contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with HCC after TACE: diagnostic accuracy of 3D quantitative image analysis | |
| Sahani et al. | Imaging the liver | |
| Hirschler et al. | Advanced MR techniques for preoperative glioma characterization: Part 1 | |
| Thoeny et al. | Effect of vascular targeting agent in rat tumor model: dynamic contrast-enhanced versus diffusion-weighted MR imaging | |
| Ahn et al. | Added value of gadoxetic acid–enhanced hepatobiliary phase MR imaging in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma | |
| Agnello et al. | High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of benign hepatocellular lesions: quantitative and qualitative analysis | |
| Donaldson et al. | A comparison of tracer kinetic models for T1‐weighted dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI: Application in carcinoma of the cervix | |
| Sourbron et al. | Quantification of cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and blood–brain‐barrier leakage with DCE‐MRI | |
| Padhani et al. | Multiparametric imaging of tumor response to therapy | |
| Sourbron et al. | On the scope and interpretation of the Tofts models for DCE‐MRI | |
| Wibmer et al. | Liver failure after major liver resection: risk assessment by using preoperative gadoxetic acid–enhanced 3-T MR imaging | |
| Nilsson et al. | Assessment of hepatic extraction fraction and input relative blood flow using dynamic hepatocyte‐specific contrast‐enhanced MRI | |
| Halappa et al. | Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with local-regional therapy: quantitative volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient maps for assessment of tumor response | |
| Bonekamp et al. | Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: MR imaging after intraarterial therapy. Part II. Response stratification using volumetric functional criteria after intraarterial therapy | |
| Lopata et al. | On the identifiability of pharmacokinetic parameters in dynamic contrast‐enhanced imaging | |
| Marzi et al. | Assessment of diffusion parameters by intravoxel incoherent motion MRI in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma | |
| Abrol et al. | Radiomic phenotyping in brain cancer to unravel hidden information in medical images |