[go: up one dir, main page]

Ates et al., 2020 - Google Patents

Fine-tuning of feedback gain control for hover quad copter rotors by stochastic optimization methods

Ates et al., 2020

Document ID
5513820024418859602
Author
Ates A
Alagoz B
Kavuran G
Yeroglu C
Publication year
Publication venue
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Electrical Engineering

External Links

Snippet

Three degree of freedom (3 DOF) Hover Quad Copter (HQC) platforms are implemented for various missions in diverse scales from the micro to macro platforms. As HQC platforms scale down, micro platform requires rather robust and effective control techniques. This …
Continue reading at link.springer.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
    • G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
    • G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
    • G05B13/042—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
    • G05D1/00—Control of position, course or altitude of land, water, air, or space vehicles, e.g. automatic pilot
    • G05D1/08—Control of attitude, i.e. control of roll, pitch, or yaw
    • G05D1/0808—Control of attitude, i.e. control of roll, pitch, or yaw specially adapted for aircraft
    • G05D1/0816—Control of attitude, i.e. control of roll, pitch, or yaw specially adapted for aircraft to ensure stability
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
    • G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
    • G05B13/0205—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric not using a model or a simulator of the controlled system
    • G05B13/024—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric not using a model or a simulator of the controlled system in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
    • G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
    • G05B13/0265—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion
    • G05B13/027—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion using neural networks only
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B11/00—Automatic controllers
    • G05B11/01—Automatic controllers electric
    • G05B11/32—Automatic controllers electric with inputs from more than one sensing element; with outputs to more than one correcting element

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Noordin et al. Adaptive PID controller using sliding mode control approaches for quadrotor UAV attitude and position stabilization
Eskandarpour et al. A constrained error-based MPC for path following of quadrotor with stability analysis
Hua et al. Tracking differentiator and extended state observer-based nonsingular fast terminal sliding mode attitude control for a quadrotor
Glida et al. Optimal model-free backstepping control for a quadrotor helicopter
Alagoz et al. Auto-tuning of PID controller according to fractional-order reference model approximation for DC rotor control
Deng et al. Control parameter design for automatic carrier landing system via pigeon-inspired optimization
Ates et al. Fine-tuning of feedback gain control for hover quad copter rotors by stochastic optimization methods
Hasseni et al. Parameters tuning of a quadrotor PID controllers by using nature-inspired algorithms
Mehndiratta et al. Automated tuning of nonlinear model predictive controller by reinforcement learning
Lu et al. Online optimisation‐based backstepping control design with application to quadrotor
Benkhoud et al. Dynamics modeling and advanced metaheuristics based LQG controller design for a Quad Tilt Wing UAV
Hsu et al. Emotional fuzzy sliding-mode control for unknown nonlinear systems
Abdollahi et al. Simplified fuzzy‐Padé controller for attitude control of quadrotor helicopters
Sahrir et al. PSO–PID controller for quadcopter UAV: index performance comparison
Shen et al. Attitude active disturbance rejection control of the quadrotor and its parameter tuning
Ates et al. Modified monarch butterfly optimization with distribution functions and its application for 3 DOF Hover flight system
Velagić et al. Design of LQR controller for 3D trajectory tracking of octocopter unmanned aerial vehicle
Kouritem et al. A self-adjusting multi-objective control approach for quadrotors
Kumar et al. A comparative analysis of lqr and smc for quanser aero
Yang et al. Fault-tolerant multi-rate sampled-data control for quadrotor UAV
Wang et al. Limit cycle oscillation suppression controller design and stability analysis of the periodically time-varying flapping flight dynamics in hover
Jokar et al. Adaptive fuzzy global fast terminal sliding mode control of an over-actuated flying robot
Zhang et al. Extreme learning machine assisted adaptive control of a quadrotor helicopter
Nguyen et al. Design of synchronization controller for the station-keeping hovering mode of quad-rotor unmanned aerial vehicles
Xu et al. Control of a tilting hexacopter under wind disturbance