Pietruski et al., 2015 - Google Patents
Image-guided bone resection as a prospective alternative to cutting templates—a preliminary studyPietruski et al., 2015
- Document ID
- 5424792770760742097
- Author
- Pietruski P
- Majak M
- Światek-Najwer E
- Popek M
- Jaworowski J
- Zuk M
- Nowakowski F
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
External Links
Snippet
Objective To evaluate the accuracy of craniomaxillofacial resections performed with an image-guided surgical sagittal saw. Material and methods Twenty-four craniomaxillofacial resections were performed using an image-guided sagittal saw. Surgical outcomes were …
- 238000002271 resection 0 title abstract description 70
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/80—Cortical plates, i.e. bone plates; Instruments for holding or positioning cortical plates, or for compressing bones attached to cortical plates
- A61B17/8085—Cortical plates, i.e. bone plates; Instruments for holding or positioning cortical plates, or for compressing bones attached to cortical plates with pliable or malleable elements or having a mesh-like structure, e.g. small strips for craniofacial surgery
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/16—Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans
- A61B17/17—Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires
- A61B17/1739—Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires specially adapted for particular parts of the body
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/34—Trocars; Puncturing needles
- A61B17/3403—Needle locating or guiding means
- A61B2017/3405—Needle locating or guiding means using mechanical guide means
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Azarmehr et al. | Surgical navigation: a systematic review of indications, treatments, and outcomes in oral and maxillofacial surgery | |
| Pietruski et al. | Image-guided bone resection as a prospective alternative to cutting templates—a preliminary study | |
| Mazzoni et al. | Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing cutting guides and customized titanium plates are useful in upper maxilla waferless repositioning | |
| Wong et al. | Patient-specific instrument can achieve same accuracy with less resection time than navigation assistance in periacetabular pelvic tumor surgery: a cadaveric study | |
| Yu et al. | Three-dimensional accuracy of virtual planning and surgical navigation for mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap | |
| Huang et al. | Improved accuracy of 3D-printed navigational template during complicated tibial plateau fracture surgery | |
| Mazzoni et al. | Simulation-guided navigation: a new approach to improve intraoperative three-dimensional reproducibility during orthognathic surgery | |
| Pietruski et al. | Supporting mandibular resection with intraoperative navigation utilizing augmented reality technology–a proof of concept study | |
| Markiewicz et al. | The use of 3D imaging tools in facial plastic surgery | |
| Pietruski et al. | Accuracy of experimental mandibular osteotomy using the image-guided sagittal saw | |
| Sallent et al. | How 3D patient-specific instruments improve accuracy of pelvic bone tumour resection in a cadaveric study | |
| Anand et al. | Role of navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a surgeon’s perspectives | |
| Pietruski et al. | Supporting fibula free flap harvest with augmented reality: a proof‐of‐concept study | |
| Bouchard et al. | Osteomark: a surgical navigation system for oral and maxillofacial surgery | |
| Portnoy et al. | Three-dimensional technologies in presurgical planning of bone surgeries: current evidence and future perspectives | |
| Yu et al. | A revised approach for mandibular reconstruction with the vascularized iliac crest flap using virtual surgical planning and surgical navigation | |
| Pietruski et al. | Navigation-guided fibula free flap for mandibular reconstruction: A proof of concept study | |
| Zhu et al. | Registration strategy using occlusal splint based on augmented reality for mandibular angle oblique split osteotomy | |
| US20210059691A1 (en) | Surgical cutting guides designed for anatomical landmarks | |
| US20190105058A1 (en) | Cutting template and a method of manufacturing the same | |
| Scolozzi | Applications of 3D orbital computer-assisted surgery (CAS) | |
| Kaduk et al. | Surgical navigation in reconstruction | |
| Amundson et al. | Three-dimensional computer-assisted surgical planning, manufacturing, intraoperative navigation, and computed tomography in maxillofacial trauma | |
| Shao et al. | Robot‐assisted augmented reality surgical navigation based on optical tracking for mandibular reconstruction surgery | |
| Xia et al. | A new paradigm for complex midface reconstruction: a reversed approach |