Sarantopoulou, 2021 - Google Patents
Biometrics at the gate: An assessment of EU's biometrical bordersSarantopoulou, 2021
View PDF- Document ID
- 2859680733505803525
- Author
- Sarantopoulou A
- Publication year
External Links
Snippet
1.1. Background After the events of 11 September 2001 in New York and Washington DC, the intensity and the centralization of surveillance in western countries increased dramatically 1. In the years to follow, the refugee crisis of 2016 and terrorist attacks in …
- 230000033228 biological regulation 0 abstract description 108
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06K—RECOGNITION OF DATA; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
- G06K9/00—Methods or arrangements for reading or recognising printed or written characters or for recognising patterns, e.g. fingerprints
- G06K9/20—Image acquisition
- G06K9/2018—Identifying/ignoring parts by sensing at different wavelengths
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Ceyhan | Technologization of security: Management of uncertainty and risk in the age of biometrics | |
| Hu | Algorithmic jim crow | |
| Blasi Casagran | Fundamental rights implications of interconnecting migration and policing databases in the EU | |
| Quintel | Connecting personal data of Third Country Nationals: Interoperability of EU databases in the light of the CJEU's case law on data retention | |
| Aldana et al. | Aliens in Our Midst Post-9/11: Legislating Outsiderness within the Borders | |
| Smith et al. | Biometric identification, law and ethics | |
| Palmiotto | When is a decision automated? A taxonomy for a fundamental rights analysis | |
| Jasmontaite-Zaniewicz et al. | Disproportionate surveillance: Technology-assisted and automated decisions in asylum applications in the EU? | |
| Abomhara et al. | Border control and use of biometrics: reasons why the right to privacy can not be absolute | |
| Stenum | The body-border. Governing irregular migration through biometric technology | |
| La Fors-Owczynik | Monitoring migrants or making migrants ‘misfit’? Data protection and human rights perspectives on Dutch identity management practices regarding migrants | |
| Zawadzka | Biometric technology in European Union border management after 2015 | |
| Castelluccia | Impact analysis of facial recognition | |
| Završnik | The European Digital Fortress and Large Biometric EU IT Systems: Border Criminology, Technology, and Human Rights | |
| Sarantopoulou | Biometrics at the gate: An assessment of EU’s biometrical borders | |
| Yaninsky-Ravid et al. | The Tripartite Model of Facial Recognition: Bridging the Gap Between Privacy, Public Safety, Technology and the Fourth and First Amendments | |
| De Hert | Biometrics and the challenge to human rights in Europe. Need for regulation and regulatory distinctions | |
| Duić et al. | Interoperability between the EU information systems–from an idea to the realisation | |
| Jeandesboz | European Union information systems for border and migration enforcement: trajectories, programmatics, and uses | |
| Krasmann et al. | ‘My fingerprint on Osama’s cup.’On objectivity and the role of the fictive regarding the acceptance of a biometric technology | |
| Andronikou et al. | Biometric profiling: Opportunities and risks | |
| Wilcox | Gendered bodies in securitized migration regimes | |
| Šarf | Automating freedom, security and justice: Interoperability of AFSJ databases as a move towards the indiscriminate mass surveillance of third-country nationals | |
| Hendow et al. | Using technology to draw borders: fundamental rights for the Smart Borders initiative | |
| Amoroso | Intelligent borders: Exploring the suitability of artificial intelligence systems in refugee status determination under international law |